Activities of Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary speeches (494)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Permitted health claims made on foods (B8-0842/2016) FR
High common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (A8-0211/2016 - Andreas Schwab) FR
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano) FR
European Border and Coast Guard (A8-0200/2016 - Artis Pabriks) FR
Preparation of the post-electoral revision of the MFF 2014-2020: Parliament's input ahead of the Commission's proposal (A8-0224/2016 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas) FR
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (TAXE 2) (A8-0223/2016 - Jeppe Kofod, Michael Theurer) FR
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme 2017 (RC-B8-0885/2016, B8-0885/2016, B8-0886/2016, B8-0892/2016, B8-0893/2016, B8-0894/2016, B8-0895/2016, B8-0896/2016) FR
Japan's decision to resume whaling in the 2015-2016 season (B8-0853/2016, B8-0853/2016, B8-0855/2016, B8-0862/2016, B8-0863/2016) FR
EU-Peru Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0197/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
Emission limits for non-road mobile machinery (A8-0276/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini) FR
Refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market (A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei) FR
Social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility (A8-0217/2016 - Eleonora Forenza) FR
A forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment (A8-0220/2016 - Tiziana Beghin) FR
The fight against trafficking in human beings in the EU's external relations (A8-0205/2016 - Barbara Lochbihler) FR
EU-Monaco agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0206/2016 - Andreas Schwab) FR
Appointments to the Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion FR
Massacres in eastern Congo (RC-B8-0801/2016, B8-0801/2016, B8-0802/2016, B8-0804/2016, B8-0805/2016, B8-0807/2016, B8-0808/2016, B8-0809/2016) FR
Renewable energy progress report (A8-0196/2016 - Paloma López Bermejo) FR
Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (A8-0199/2016 - Markus Pieper) FR
Competitiveness of the European rail supply industry (B8-0677/2016) FR
Setting up of a Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion, its powers, numerical strength and term of office (B8-0745/2016) FR
Follow-up to the resolution of Parliament of 11 February 2015 on the US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0580/2016, B8-0584/2016) FR
Space capabilities for European security and defence (A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski) FR
Endocrine disruptors: state of play following the Court judgment of 16 December 2015 (RC-B8-0733/2016, B8-0733/2016, B8-0734/2016, B8-0735/2016, B8-0736/2016, B8-0737/2016, B8-0738/2016) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of GMO maize Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x GA21 (B8-0732/2016) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: placing on the market of a genetically modified carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line SHD-27531-4) (B8-0731/2016) FR
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (A8-0154/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld) FR
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (judicial cooperation in criminal matters) (A8-0198/2016 - Martina Anderson) FR
Peace Support Operations - EU engagement with the UN and the African Union (A8-0158/2016 - Geoffrey Van Orden) FR
Unfair trading practices in the food supply chain (A8-0173/2016 - Edward Czesak) FR
Virtual currencies (A8-0168/2016 - Jakob von Weizsäcker) FR
Delivering a new deal for energy consumers (A8-0161/2016 - Theresa Griffin) FR
Poverty: a gender perspective (A8-0153/2016 - Maria Arena) FR
Non-tariff barriers in the Single Market (A8-0160/2016 - Daniel Dalton) FR
The Single Market strategy (A8-0171/2016 - Lara Comi) FR
Traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restaurants and retail (B8-0581/2016) FR
Follow-up and state of play of the Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (B8-0583/2016, B8-0587/2016) FR
Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for certain foods (B8-0545/2016) FR
Framework Agreement on parental leave (A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena) FR
Preventing and combating trafficking in human beings (A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder) FR
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (A8-0164/2016 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra) FR
Acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy (B8-0562/2016) FR
New territorial development tools in cohesion policy 2014-2020 (A8-0032/2016 - Ruža Tomašić) FR
Cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU (A8-0074/2016 - Iliana Iotova) FR
European Investment Bank annual report 2014 (A8-0050/2016 - Georgi Pirinski) FR
Attacks on hospitals and schools as violations of international humanitarian law (B8-0488/2016, B8-0488/2016, B8-0489/2016, B8-0490/2016, B8-0491/2016, B8-0492/2016, B8-0493/2016) FR
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0101/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0123/2016 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen) FR
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Court of Auditors (A8-0107/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate (B8-0439/2016) FR
Zika virus outbreak (B8-0449/2016) FR
Situation in Poland (B8-0461/2016, B8-0463/2016, B8-0464/2016, B8-0465/2016) FR
Towards improved single market regulation (A8-0278/2015 - Anneleen Van Bossuyt) FR
Learning EU at school (A8-0021/2016 - Damian Drăghici) FR
Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in vocational education and training (A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall) FR
The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (A8-0027/2016 - Sylvie Goulard) FR
Towards a thriving data-driven economy (B8-0308/2016) FR
EU-San Marino agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (C8-0370/2015) FR
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0031/2016 - Sofia Ribeiro) FR
Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (A8-0017/2016 - Catherine Stihler) FR
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2014 (A8-0020/2016 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz) FR
Introduction of compatible systems for the registration of pet animals across Member States (RC-B8-0251/2016, B8-0251/2016, B8-0252/2016, B8-0253/2016, B8-0254/2016, B8-0256/2016) FR
The role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) (B8-0171/2016) FR
Systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS (RC-B8-0149/2016, B8-0149/2016, B8-0154/2016, B8-0156/2016, B8-0157/2016, B8-0159/2016, B8-0161/2016, B8-0162/2016) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean FG72 (B8-0133/2016) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 (B8-0134/2016) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 89788 (B8-0135/2016) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106 on emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (B8-0040/2016) FR
New Strategy for gender equality and women's rights post-2015 (B8-0148/2016, B8-0150/2016, B8-0163/2016, B8-0164/2016) FR
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on heavy metals (A8-0002/2016 - Giovanni La Via) FR
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants (A8-0001/2016 - Giovanni La Via) FR
Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement (A8-0008/2016 - Nathalie Griesbeck) FR
Mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy (A8-0003/2016 - Mark Demesmaeker) FR
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (A8-0372/2015 - Ulrike Lunacek) FR
Appointment of the members of the Committee of Inquiry on emission measurements in the automotive sector FR
Mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) (RC-B8-0043/2016, B8-0043/2016, B8-0045/2016, B8-0051/2016, B8-0057/2016, B8-0058/2016, B8-0059/2016, B8-0060/2016) FR
EU priorities for the UNHRC sessions in 2016 (RC-B8-0050/2016, B8-0050/2016, B8-0052/2016, B8-0056/2016, B8-0063/2016, B8-0064/2016, B8-0065/2016, B8-0066/2016) FR
Personal protective equipment (A8-0148/2015 - Vicky Ford) FR
Colombian peace process (RC-B8-0041/2016, B8-0041/2016, B8-0042/2016, B8-0053/2016, B8-0054/2016, B8-0055/2016, B8-0061/2016, B8-0062/2016) FR
Annual report on EU Competition Policy (A8-0368/2015 - Werner Langen) FR
The role of intercultural dialogue, cultural diversity and education in promoting EU fundamental values (A8-0373/2015 - Julie Ward) FR
External factors that represent hurdles to European female entrepreneurship (A8-0369/2015 - Barbara Matera) FR
Skills policies for fighting youth unemployment (A8-0366/2015 - Marek Plura) FR
Towards a Digital Single Market Act (A8-0371/2015 - Kaja Kallas, Evelyne Gebhardt) FR
Setting up a Committee of Inquiry on emission measurements in the automotive sector, its powers, numerical strength and term of office (B8-1424/2015) FR
Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (B8-1347/2015) FR
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0344/2015 - Cristian Dan Preda) FR
Protection of Virunga national park in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (B8-1346/2015) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603xT25 FR
EU-China relations (A8-0350/2015 - Bas Belder) FR
Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: Challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance (A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom) FR
Situation in Hungary: follow-up to the European Parliament Resolution of 10 June 2015 (B8-1349/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1358/2015, B8-1359/2015, B8-1360/2015, B8-1361/2015) FR
Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (A8-0330/2015 - Peter Eriksson) FR
Implementation of the European Progress Microfinance Facility (A8-0331/2015 - Sven Schulze) FR
EU-Liechtenstein agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0334/2015 - Sander Loones) FR
Special report of the European Ombudsman in own-initiative inquiry concerning Frontex (A8-0343/2015 - Roberta Metsola, Ska Keller) FR
Sustainable urban mobility (A8-0319/2015 - Karima Delli) FR
The state of play of the Doha Development Agenda in view of the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-1230/2015) FR
A new animal welfare strategy for 2016-2020 (B8-1278/2015, B8-1278/2015, B8-1279/2015, B8-1280/2015, B8-1281/2015, B8-1282/2015, B8-1283/2015) FR
Education for children in emergency situations and protracted crises (B8-1240/2015) FR
Towards simplification and performance orientation in cohesion policy for 2014-2020 (B8-1231/2015) FR
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for immediate budgetary measures to address the refugee crisis (A8-0336/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes) FR
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: granting an authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexhyl) phthalate (DEHP) (B8-1228/2015) FR
Prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (A8-0316/2015 - Rachida Dati) FR
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on child poverty (A8-0310/2015 - Inês Cristina Zuber) FR
Cohesion policy and marginalised communities (A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke) FR
The role of the EU within the UN (A8-0308/2015 - Paavo Väyrynen) FR
Reform of the electoral law of the EU (A8-0286/2015 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Jo Leinen) FR
Future aviation package (B8-1146/2015, B8-1147/2015, B8-1148/2015, B8-1149/2015, B8-1150/2015, B8-1151/2015, B8-1152/2015) FR
New challenges and concepts for the promotion of tourism in Europe (A8-0258/2015 - Isabella De Monte) FR
Use of genetically modified food and feed (A8-0305/2015 - Giovanni La Via) FR
Novel foods (A8-0046/2014 - James Nicholson) FR
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (A8-0249/2015 - Julie Girling) FR
European Citizens' Initiative (A8-0284/2015 - György Schöpflin) FR
EU-Switzerland agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0271/2015 - Jeppe Kofod) FR
Package travel and linked travel arrangements (A8-0297/2015 - Birgit Collin-Langen) FR
European single market for electronic communications (A8-0300/2015 - Pilar del Castillo Vera) FR
Discharge 2013: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0282/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0269/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
Emission measurements in the automotive sector (B8-1075/2015, B8-1075/2015, B8-1076/2015, B8-1077/2015, B8-1078/2015, B8-1079/2015, B8-1080/2015) FR
Draft amending budget No 7/2015: Managing the refugee crisis: immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration (A8-0289/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR
Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (A8-0275/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux) FR
Renewal of the EU Plan of action on Gender equality and Women's empowerment in development (B8-0988/2015) FR
Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (A8-0213/2015 - Anna Záborská) FR
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Tunisia in Union programmes (A8-0254/2015 - Pier Antonio Panzeri) FR
European small claims procedure and European order for payment procedure (A8-0140/2015 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg) FR
Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air (A8-0160/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb) FR
Caseins and caseinates intended for human consumption (A8-0042/2015 - Giovanni La Via) FR
ILO Forced Labour Convention: judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0226/2015 - Helga Stevens) FR
Possible extension of geographical indication protection of the EU to non-agricultural products (A8-0259/2015 - Virginie Rozière) FR
Role of local authorities in developing countries in development cooperation (A8-0232/2015 - Eleni Theocharous) FR
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme 2016 (B8-0656/2015, B8-0659/2015, B8-0660/2015, B8-0661/2015, B8-0662/2015, B8-0663/2015, B8-0664/2015) FR
Migration and refugees in Europe (RC-B8-0832/2015, B8-0832/2015, B8-0833/2015, B8-0834/2015, B8-0835/2015, B8-0837/2015, B8-0838/2015, B8-0842/2015) FR
Cloning of animals kept and reproduced for farming purposes (A8-0216/2015 - Giulia Moi, Renate Sommer) FR
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU (2013-2014) (A8-0230/2015 - Laura Ferrara) FR
Promoting youth entrepreneurship through education and training (A8-0239/2015 - Michaela Šojdrová) FR
Follow up to the European citizens' initiative Right2Water (A8-0228/2015 - Lynn Boylan) FR
Tax avoidance and tax evasion as challenges in developing countries (A8-0184/2015 - Elly Schlein) FR
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (A8-0215/2015 - Sirpa Pietikäinen) FR
European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0139/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Udo Bullmann) FR
Strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia (A8-0171/2015 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu) FR
Recent revelations of high-level corruption cases in FIFA (RC-B8-0548/2015, B8-0548/2015, B8-0549/2015, B8-0550/2015, B8-0571/2015, B8-0572/2015, B8-0573/2015, B8-0574/2015) FR
Conclusion of the Doha amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0167/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini) FR
EU-Iceland agreement on Iceland participation in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0166/2015 - Giovanni La Via) FR
State of EU-Russia relations (A8-0162/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) FR
European energy security strategy (A8-0164/2015 - Algirdas Saudargas) FR
Situation in Hungary (RC-B8-0532/2015, B8-0532/2015, B8-0533/2015, B8-0534/2015, B8-0535/2015, B8-0536/2015, B8-0537/2015) FR
Intellectual property rights: an EU action plan (A8-0169/2015 - Pavel Svoboda) FR
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0054/2015 - Arnaud Danjean) FR
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (B8-0460/2015) FR
Outbreak of Xylella fastidiosa affecting olive trees (B8-0450/2015, B8-0451/2015, B8-0451/2015, B8-0452/2015, B8-0456/2015, B8-0457/2015, B8-0458/2015) FR
Request for consultation of the Committee of the Regions on "Possible evolutions and adjustments of the current institutional set up of the European Union" FR
Financing for development (A8-0143/2015 - Pedro Silva Pereira) FR
Green growth opportunities for SMEs (A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer) FR
Persecution of the Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabaab (B8-0369/2015, RC-B8-0382/2015, B8-0382/2015, B8-0383/2015, B8-0385/2015, B8-0386/2015, B8-0387/2015, B8-0388/2015) FR
Destruction of cultural sites perpetrated by ISIS/Da'esh (B8-0375/2015, B8-0375/2015, B8-0389/2015, B8-0390/2015, B8-0391/2015, B8-0393/2015, B8-0403/2015, B8-0405/2015) FR
Expo Milano 2015: Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life (B8-0360/2015) FR
Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters with Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0017/2015 - Andrzej Duda) FR
Deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system (A8-0053/2015 - Olga Sehnalová) FR
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (A8-0025/2015 - Nils Torvalds) FR
Reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (A8-0130/2015 - Margrete Auken) FR
Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport (A8-0122/2015 - José Inácio Faria) FR
A new EU Forest Strategy (A8-0126/2015 - Elisabeth Köstinger) FR
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/017 FR/Mory-Ducros (A8-0124/2015 - Jean-Paul Denanot) FR
Macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0056/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) FR
Annual Tax report (A8-0040/2015 - Eva Kaili) FR
Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament (A8-0039/2015 - Elmar Brok) FR
Relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism (RC-B8-0215/2008, B8-0215/2015, B8-0216/2015, B8-0221/2015, B8-0222/2015, B8-0223/2015, B8-0224/2015, B8-0225/2015) FR
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0236/2015, B8-0236/2015, B8-0237/2015, B8-0238/2015, B8-0243/2015, B8-0244/2015, B8-0245/2015, B8-0246/2015) FR
Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (A8-0018/2015 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz) FR
Fight against child sexual abuse on the Internet (RC-B8-0217/2015, B8-0217/2015, B8-0218/2015, B8-0219/2015, B8-0220/2015, B8-0226/2015, B8-0227/2015) FR
Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (A8-0032/2015 - Jörg Leichtfried) FR
Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions (A8-0022/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain) FR
Humanitarian crisis in Iraq and Syria, in particular in the IS context (RC-B8-0136/2015, B8-0136/2015, B8-0137/2015, B8-0138/2015, B8-0139/2015, B8-0140/2015, B8-0141/2015, B8-0142/2015) FR
Accession of Morocco to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0005/2015 - Heidi Hautala) FR
Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (A8-0001/2015 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR
US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0098/2015, RC-B8-0123/2015, B8-0123/2015, B8-0133/2015) FR
Anti-terrorism measures (B8-0100/2015, RC-B8-0122/2015, B8-0122/2015, B8-0124/2015, B8-0125/2015, B8-0126/2015, B8-0127/2015, B8-0132/2015) FR
Renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum (RC-B8-0099/2015, B8-0099/2015, B8-0121/2015, B8-0130/2015, B8-0131/2015) FR
Country of origin labelling for meat ingredients in processed food (B8-0097/2015) FR
The work of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (A8-0012/2015 - Charles Goerens) FR
Ombudsman's annual report 2013 (A8-0058/2014 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR
Situation in Ukraine (RC-B8-0008/2015, B8-0008/2015, B8-0018/2015, B8-0020/2015, B8-0021/2015, B8-0025/2015, B8-0027/2015, B8-0029/2015) FR
Freedom of expression in Turkey: Recent arrests of journalists, media executives and systematic pressure against media (RC-B8-0036/2015, B8-0036/2015, B8-0040/2015, B8-0041/2015, B8-0042/2015, B8-0043/2015, B8-0044/2015, B8-0045/2015) FR
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EC and Tunisia, to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU (A8-0049/2014 - Elmar Brok) FR
Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs (A8-0038/2014 - Frédérique Ries) FR
Steel sector in the EU: protecting workers and industries (RC-B8-0352/2014, B8-0351/2014, B8-0352/2014, B8-0353/2014, B8-0354/2014, B8-0355/2014, B8-0356/2014) FR
Scientific examination of questions relating to food (A8-0059/2014 - Giovanni La Via) FR
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) (A8-0036/2014 - Pilar Ayuso) FR
Commission’s impact assessment guidelines (RC-B8-0311/2014, B8-0311/2014, B8-0312/2014, B8-0313/2014, B8-0314/2014, B8-0315/2014, B8-0316/2014) FR
Digital single market (RC-B8-0286/2014, B8-0286/2014, B8-0287/2014, B8-0288/2014) FR
2014 UN Climate Change Conference - COP 20 in Lima, Peru (1-12 December 2014) (B8-0251/2014) FR
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/008 FI/STX Rauma (A8-0043/2014 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/005 FR/GAD (A8-0044/2014 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki) FR
The EU and the global development framework after 2015 (A8-0037/2014 - Davor Ivo Stier) FR
2012 discharge: European Council and Council (A8-0010/2014 - Tamás Deutsch) FR
Draft amending budget No 2/2014 - surplus resulting from the implementation of the budget year 2013 (A8-0018/2014 - Gérard Deprez) FR
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015 - all sections (A8-0014/2014 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Monika Hohlmeier) FR
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/004 ES/Comunidad Valenciana metal (A8-0013/2014 - Patricija Šulin) FR
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/006 FR/PSA (A8-0016/2014 - Isabelle Thomas) FR
Shipments of waste (A7-0069/2014 - Bart Staes)
Russian pressure on Eastern Partnership countries and in particular destabilisation of eastern Ukraine (B7-0431/2014, B7-0435/2014, RCB7-0436/2014, B7-0436/2014, B7-0437/2014, B7-0441/2014, B7-0444/2014)
Consumer product safety (A7-0355/2013 - Christel Schaldemose)
Payment accounts (A7-0398/2013 - Jürgen Klute)
Employment and social aspects of the role and operations of the Troika (A7-0135/2014 - Alejandro Cercas)
High common level of network and information security (A7-0103/2014 - Andreas Schwab)
Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (A7-0277/2013 - Andrea Zanoni)
Common European sales law (A7-0301/2013 - Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Luigi Berlinguer)
Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (A7-0276/2013 - Linda McAvan)
Situation in Ukraine (RCB7-0219/2014, B7-0219/2014, B7-0220/2014, B7-0221/2014, B7-0222/2014, B7-0223/2014, B7-0224/2014)
Private copying levies (A7-0114/2014 - Françoise Castex)
Common system of value added tax (A7-0090/2014 - Ivo Strejček)
Deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system (A7-0106/2014 - Olga Sehnalová)
Accessibility of public sector bodies' websites (A7-0460/2013 - Jorgo Chatzimarkakis)
Freezing and confiscation of proceeds of crime (A7-0178/2013 - Monica Luisa Macovei)
Implementation of Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (short presentation)
Award of concession contracts (A7-0030/2013 - Philippe Juvin)
Public procurement (A7-0007/2013 - Marc Tarabella)
Access of goods and services to public procurement markets (A7-0454/2013 - Daniel Caspary)
Consumer programme 2014-2020 (debate)
Consumer programme 2014-2020 (debate)
Eco-innovation - jobs and growth through environmental policy (A7-0333/2013 - Karin Kadenbach)
Payment accounts (A7-0398/2013 - Jürgen Klute)
Union action for the 'European Capitals of Culture' for the years 2020 to 2033 (A7-0226/2013 - Marco Scurria)
Milk production in mountain areas, disadvantaged areas and outermost regions (A7-0383/2013 - Herbert Dorfmann)
European retail action plan for the benefit of all actors (A7-0374/2013 - Cornelis de Jong)
EU space industrial policy (A7-0338/2013 - Angelika Niebler)
Cloud computing (A7-0353/2013 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
North-East Atlantic: deep-sea stocks and fishing in international waters (A7-0395/2013 - Kriton Arsenis)
Civil protection mechanism (A7-0003/2013 - Elisabetta Gardini)
CARS 2020: towards a strong, competitive and sustainable European car industry (A7-0391/2013 - Franck Proust)
Volunteering and voluntary activity in Europe (A7-0348/2013 - Marco Scurria)
Competitiveness of enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (2014 - 2020) (A7-0420/2012 - Jürgen Creutzmann)
Programme for the environment and climate action (LIFE) (A7-0294/2012 - Jutta Haug)
Action programme for customs (A7-0026/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre)
Erasmus for all programme (A7-0405/2012 - Doris Pack)
Creative Europe programme (A7-0011/2013 - Silvia Costa)
Europe for Citizens programme (A7-0424/2012 - Hannu Takkula)
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (A7-0282/2013 - Alain Cadec)
Organised crime, corruption, and money laundering (A7-0307/2013 - Salvatore Iacolino)
Suspension of the SWIFT agreement as a result of NSA surveillance (B7-0467/2013, RCB7-0468/2013, B7-0468/2013, B7-0471/2013, B7-0472/2013, B7-0481/2013)
Europski fond za pomorstvo i ribarstvo (A7-0282/2013 - Alain Cadec) HR
Organizirani kriminal, korupcija i pranje novca (A7-0307/2013 - Salvatore Iacolino) HR
Suspenzija sporazuma SWIFT zbog nadzora Agencije za nacionalnu sigurnost (B7-0467/2013, RCB7-0468/2013, B7-0468/2013, B7-0471/2013, B7-0472/2013, B7-0481/2013) HR
Rethinking education (A7-0314/2013 - Katarína Neveďalová)
Portable batteries and accumulators containing cadmium (A7-0131/2013 - Vladko Todorov Panayotov)
Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (A7-0277/2013 - Andrea Zanoni)
Recreational craft and personal watercraft (A7-0213/2012 - Malcolm Harbour)
EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement (B7-0436/2013, B7-0439/2013)
Technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations (B7-0440/2013)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardy - Italy (A7-0294/2013 - Salvador Garriga Polledo)
Private international law and employment (A7-0291/2013 - Evelyn Regner)
Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (A7-0276/2013 - Linda McAvan)
EU cybersecurity strategy: an open, safe and secure cyberspace (B7-0386/2013)
European cultural and creative sectors as sources of economic growth and jobs (A7-0248/2013 - Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid)
Measures for the recovery of European eel stocks (A7-0242/2013 - Isabella Lövin)
Implementation of the EU youth strategy 2010-2012 (A7-0238/2013 - Georgios Papanikolaou)
Internal market for services (A7-0273/2013 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)
Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and right to communicate upon arrest (A7-0228/2013 - Elena Oana Antonescu)
Making the internal energy market work (A7-0262/2013 - Jerzy Buzek)
Practical arrangements for the holding of the European elections in 2014 (A7-0219/2013 - Andrew Duff)
Completing the digital single market (B7-0331/2013)
Connected TV (A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert)
Serious cross-border threats to health (A7-0337/2012 - Gilles Pargneaux)
Recent floods in Europe (RCB7-0319/2013, B7-0319/2013, B7-0320/2013, B7-0321/2013, B7-0322/2013, B7-0323/2013, B7-0324/2013)
Priority substances in the field of water policy (A7-0397/2012 - Richard Seeber)
2013 review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS (A7-0147/2013 - Elmar Brok, Roberto Gualtieri)
Health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (A7-0009/2013 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier)
Animal health requirements governing trade in dogs, cats and ferrets (A7-0366/2012 - Horst Schnellhardt)
EU trade and investment agreement negotiations with the US (B7-0187/2013, B7-0195/2013)
Labour conditions and health and safety standards following the recent factory fires and building collapse in Bangladesh (RCB7-0223/2013, B7-0223/2013, B7-0224/2013, B7-0225/2013, B7-0230/2013, B7-0231/2013, B7-0232/2013)
Amendment of the EC-Ukraine Agreement on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (A7-0059/2013 - Claude Moraes)
European statistics on demography (A7-0050/2013 - Csaba Sógor)
Technical and control measures in the Skagerrak (A7-0051/2013 - Werner Kuhn)
Definition, description, presentation, labelling and protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks
Protection of public health from endocrine disrupters (A7-0027/2013 - Åsa Westlund)
Nuclear threats and human rights in North Korea (B7-0132/2013, B7-0134/2013, B7-0135/2013, B7-0136/2013, B7-0137/2013, B7-0138/2013)
Online consumer dispute resolution - Alternative consumer dispute resolution (debate)
Online consumer dispute resolution (A7-0236/2012 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)
Alternative consumer dispute resolution (A7-0280/2012 - Louis Grech)
Radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption (A7-0033/2013 - Michèle Rivasi)
Transparency of measures regulating the prices of medicinal products for human use (A7-0015/2013 - Antonyia Parvanova)
Sound level of motor vehicles (A7-0435/2012 - Miroslav Ouzký)
Conservation of fishery resources (A7-0342/2012 - Pat the Cope Gallagher)
EU-Iraq partnership and cooperation agreement (A7-0411/2012 - Mario Mauro)
Regulation on mandatory marking of origin for certain products imported from third countries (B7-0013/2013, B7-0013/2013, B7-0014/2013, B7-0015/2013, B7-0016/2013)
Youth guarantee (B7-0007/2013)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Consumer rights (debate)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked funds in Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 concerning the European Fund of Regional Development and the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development - Delivering a single market to consumers and citizens - Long-term sustainability of public finances for a recovering economy - Contribution of the Cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU 2020 objectives (debate)
Explanations of vote (continuation)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Internal Market Scoreboard - Consumer protection - SOLVIT (debate)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Reports (2)
REPORT on the implementation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC PDF (178 KB) DOC (94 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a consumer programme 2014-2020 PDF (473 KB) DOC (688 KB)
Shadow reports (13)
REPORT on unfair trading practices in the food supply chain PDF (350 KB) DOC (143 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on personal protective equipment PDF (1 MB) DOC (912 KB)
REPORT on misleading advertisement practices PDF (170 KB) DOC (83 KB)
REPORT on a new agenda for European Consumer Policy PDF (226 KB) DOC (146 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR) PDF (690 KB) DOC (1 MB)
REPORT on the 20 main concerns of European citizens and business with the functioning of the Single Market PDF (391 KB) DOC (241 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes (Regulation on consumer ODR) PDF (529 KB) DOC (847 KB)
REPORT on a new strategy for consumer policy PDF (240 KB) DOC (173 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws PDF (173 KB) DOC (201 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer rights PDF (1 MB) DOC (1 MB)
REPORT Report on the impact of advertising on consumer behaviour PDF (220 KB) DOC (138 KB)
REPORT Report on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens PDF (229 KB) DOC (143 KB)
REPORT Report on consumer protection PDF (219 KB) DOC (126 KB)
Opinions (1)
OPINION on alternative dispute resolution in civil, commercial and family matters
Shadow opinions (7)
OPINION on an aviation strategy for Europe
OPINION on new challenges and concepts for the promotion of tourism in Europe
OPINION on the possible extension of European Union geographical indication protection to non-agricultural products
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights and Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 on air carrier liability in respect of the carriage of passengers and their baggage by air
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law
OPINION on improving access to justice: legal aid in cross-border civil and commercial disputes
OPINION on how to avoid food wastage: strategies for a more efficient food chain in the EU
Institutional motions (195)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on China, notably the situation of religious and ethnic minorities PDF (153 KB) DOC (62 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cameroon PDF (153 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Brunei PDF (152 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on China, notably the situation of religious and ethnic minorities PDF (153 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cameroon PDF (159 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Brunei PDF (147 KB) DOC (51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Kazakhstan PDF (154 KB) DOC (62 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the case of human rights defenders PDF (150 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights in Guatemala PDF (161 KB) DOC (58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Human Rights Situation in Kazakhstan PDF (151 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights in Guatemala PDF (153 KB) DOC (54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the case of human rights defenders PDF (163 KB) DOC (55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on women’s rights defenders in Saudi Arabia PDF (160 KB) DOC (63 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe PDF (159 KB) DOC (55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chechnya and the case of Oyub Titiev PDF (152 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on women's rights defenders in Saudi Arabia PDF (166 KB) DOC (56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe PDF (146 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chechnya and the case of Oyub Titiev PDF (166 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Azerbaijan, notably the case of Mehman Huseynov PDF (155 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan PDF (153 KB) DOC (60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Azerbaijan, notably the case of Mehman Huseynov PDF (154 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan PDF (146 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania PDF (281 KB) DOC (51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt, notably the situation of human rights defenders PDF (303 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the case of Nasrin Sotoudeh PDF (282 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt, notably the situation of human rights defenders PDF (178 KB) DOC (58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania PDF (174 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the case of Nasrin Sotoudeh PDF (170 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Bangladesh PDF (293 KB) DOC (60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cuba PDF (286 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Vietnam, notably the situation of political prisoners PDF (286 KB) DOC (59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cuba PDF (361 KB) DOC (55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Bangladesh PDF (152 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Vietnam, notably the situation of political prisoners PDF (276 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul PDF (288 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Sea of Azov PDF (148 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (152 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (279 KB) DOC (57 KB)
PDF (270 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Sea of Azov PDF (144 KB) DOC (47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass arbitrary detention of Uyghurs and Kazakhs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region PDF (151 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the UAE, notably the situation of human rights defender Ahmed Mansoor PDF (147 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deterioration of media freedom in Belarus, notably the case of Charter 97 PDF (155 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (158 KB) DOC (59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the case of journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo PDF (153 KB) DOC (60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia, notably the case of Kem Sokha PDF (158 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Uganda, arrest of parliamentarians from the opposition PDF (148 KB) DOC (56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the case of journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo PDF (288 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Uganda, arrest of parliamentarians from the opposition PDF (271 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia, notably the case of Kem Sokha PDF (170 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi PDF (162 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (161 KB) DOC (64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Moldova following the invalidation of the mayoral elections in Chișinău PDF (151 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the migration crisis and humanitarian situation in Venezuela and at its terrestrial borders with Colombia and Brazil PDF (288 KB) DOC (58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi PDF (306 KB) DOC (54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Moldova following the invalidation of the mayoral elections in Chisinau PDF (267 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (375 KB) DOC (56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the migration crisis and humanitarian situation in Venezuela and at its borders PDF (279 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of Rohingya refugees, in particular the plight of children PDF (291 KB) DOC (59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, notably the case of Ukrainian political prisoner Oleg Sentsov PDF (161 KB) DOC (49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Bahrain, notably the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (292 KB) DOC (59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgian occupied territories 10 years after the Russian invasion PDF (282 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation of Rohingyas refugees, in particular the plight of children PDF (286 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, notably the case of Ukrainian political prisoner Oleg Sentsov PDF (271 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Bahrain, notably the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (299 KB) DOC (54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgian occupied territories 10 years after the Russian invasion PDF (261 KB) DOC (48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan, notably the situation of Noura Hussein Hammad PDF (156 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation on women’s rights defenders in Saudi Arabia PDF (162 KB) DOC (61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of imprisoned EU-Iranian dual nationals in Iran PDF (159 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan, notably the situation of Noura Hussein Hammad PDF (265 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of women's rights defenders in Saudi Arabia PDF (293 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of imprisoned EU-Iranian dual nationals in Iran PDF (294 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (166 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mercy killings in Uganda PDF (156 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest of human rights defenders in Sudan, notably the case of Sakharov Prize Laureate Salih Mahmoud Osman PDF (165 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (265 KB) DOC (49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mercy killings in Uganda PDF (296 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest of human rights defenders in Sudan, notably the case of Sakharov Prize laureate Salih Mahmoud Osman PDF (283 KB) DOC (50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on executions in Egypt PDF (292 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on child slavery in Haiti PDF (154 KB) DOC (55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, the case of Oyub Titiev and the Human Rights Centre Memorial PDF (285 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Child slavery in Haiti PDF (153 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, the case of Oyub Titiev and the Human Rights Centre Memorial PDF (165 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (161 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria PDF (285 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of the human rights activists Wu Gan, Xie Yang, Lee Ming-che and Tashi Wangchuk, and the Tibetan monk Choekyi PDF (290 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on El Salvador: the cases of women prosecuted for miscarriage PDF (374 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: notably the dissolution of CNRP Party PDF (283 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa PDF (280 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan PDF (401 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on El Salvador: the cases of women prosecuted for miscarriage PDF (157 KB) DOC (55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: notably the dissolution of CNRP Party PDF (163 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Vietnam: freedom of expression PDF (145 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan PDF (160 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Madagascar PDF (291 KB) DOC (59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Sudan, notably the case of Mohamed Zine al-Abidine PDF (155 KB) DOC (50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on terrorist attacks in Somalia PDF (162 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Madagascar PDF (160 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Freedom of Expression in Sudan, notably the case of Mohamed Zine El Abidine PDF (153 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Terrorist attacks in Somalia PDF (153 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (287 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of Crimean Tatar leaders Akhtem Chiygoz, Ilmi Umerov and the journalist Mykola Semena PDF (284 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of persons with albinism in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (287 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The Situation in the Maldives PDF (158 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of Crimean Tatar leaders Akhtem Chiygoz and Ilmi Umerov and journalist Mykola Semena PDF (161 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation of people with albinism in Malawi and other African countries PDF (150 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, in particular the situation of Rohingyas PDF (153 KB) DOC (55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Laos, notably the cases of Somphone Phimmasone, Lod Thammavong and Soukane Chaithad PDF (148 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Gabon: repression of the opposition PDF (162 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia, notably the case of Kem Sokha PDF (151 KB) DOC (57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar including the situation of Rohingyas PDF (162 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Gabon: repression of the opposition PDF (148 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Laos: notably the cases of Somphone Phimmasone, Lod Thammavong and Soukane Chaithad PDF (145 KB) DOC (49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: notably the case of Mr Kem Sokha PDF (158 KB) DOC (51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Indonesia PDF (157 KB) DOC (51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, notably the situation of human rights defenders and the death penalty PDF (278 KB) DOC (50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Yemen PDF (162 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The Human Rights Situation in Indonesia PDF (285 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, notably the situation of human rights defenders and the death penalty PDF (145 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ethiopia, notably the case of Dr Merera Gudina PDF (163 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zambia, particularly the case of Hakainde Hichilema PDF (153 KB) DOC (55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan PDF (164 KB) DOC (56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ethiopia notably the case of Dr Merera Gudina PDF (183 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zambia, particularly the case of Hakainde Hichilema PDF (150 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan PDF (176 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, in particular the situation of the Rohingya PDF (164 KB) DOC (86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain PDF (157 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of people with albinism in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (162 KB) DOC (86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tajikistan: situation of prisoners of conscience PDF (164 KB) DOC (86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Vietnam PDF (167 KB) DOC (91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia PDF (161 KB) DOC (87 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The Gambia PDF (163 KB) DOC (88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Crimean Tatars PDF (158 KB) DOC (83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the follow-up to and review of the 2030 Agenda PDF (285 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria PDF (167 KB) DOC (91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Honduras: situation of human rights defenders PDF (162 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the attack in Lahore PDF (159 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (164 KB) DOC (88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt, notably the case of Giulio Regeni PDF (168 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Kazakhstan PDF (168 KB) DOC (88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of the missing book publishers in Hong Kong PDF (157 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain: the case of Mohammed Ramadan PDF (149 KB) DOC (82 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars PDF (155 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Estonian and UK seamen under detention in India PDF (148 KB) DOC (72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on North Korea PDF (159 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ethiopia PDF (166 KB) DOC (91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Malaysia PDF (157 KB) DOC (79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (285 KB) DOC (84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ibrahim Halawa, potentially facing the death penalty PDF (287 KB) DOC (83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ibrahim Halawa, potentially facing the death penalty PDF (268 KB) DOC (70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Cambodia PDF (281 KB) DOC (78 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, in particular the killings in the province of Zabul PDF (286 KB) DOC (79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Bangladesh PDF (292 KB) DOC (85 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION situation in Cambodia PDF (147 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, in particular the killings in the province of Zabul PDF (157 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the freedom of expression in Bangladesh PDF (167 KB) DOC (74 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ali Mohammed al-Nimr PDF (159 KB) DOC (80 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ali Mohammed al-Nimr PDF (141 KB) DOC (68 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain, in particular the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (155 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia’s draft laws on NGOs and trade unions PDF (153 KB) DOC (79 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain, in particular the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (153 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia, draft laws on NGOs and trade unions PDF (166 KB) DOC (69 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nepal following the earthquakes PDF (178 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria: situation in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish PDF (191 KB) DOC (87 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Paraguay: legal aspects related to child pregnancy PDF (157 KB) DOC (82 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nepal after the earthquakes PDF (135 KB) DOC (65 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Paraguay: the legal aspects related to the child pregnancy PDF (150 KB) DOC (71 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria, the situation in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish PDF (146 KB) DOC (73 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (139 KB) DOC (67 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nigeria PDF (154 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the second anniversary of the Rana Plaza building collapse and progress of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact PDF (166 KB) DOC (91 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (121 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent atrocities in Northern Nigeria PDF (131 KB) DOC (63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the killing of students in Kenya by terror group al-Shabaab PDF (131 KB) DOC (60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the second anniversary of the Rana Plaza building collapse and the state of play of the Sustainability Compact PDF (128 KB) DOC (56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania, notably the issue of land grabbing PDF (145 KB) DOC (71 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (151 KB) DOC (76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks and abductions by Da’esh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians PDF (150 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania, notably the issue of land grabbing PDF (134 KB) DOC (60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (140 KB) DOC (68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks and abductions by Daesh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians PDF (131 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi: the case of Bob Rugurika PDF (138 KB) DOC (74 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Mr Raif Badawi, Saudi Arabia PDF (141 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi: the case of Bob Rugurika PDF (141 KB) DOC (56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Saudi Arabia, the case of Mr Raif Badawi PDF (129 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Kyrgyzstan, homosexual propaganda bill PDF (141 KB) DOC (65 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, in particular the case of Alexei Navalny PDF (142 KB) DOC (72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, in particular the case of Alexey Navalny PDF (131 KB) DOC (61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights in Uzbekistan PDF (137 KB) DOC (68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the dissappearance of 43 teaching students in Mexico PDF (131 KB) DOC (60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s response to the Ebola outbreak PDF (141 KB) DOC (69 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (121 KB) DOC (54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iraq and Syria, and the ISIS offensive, including the persecution of minorities PDF (136 KB) DOC (72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s response to the Ebola outbreak PDF (131 KB) DOC (58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Iraq PDF (130 KB) DOC (62 KB)
Oral questions (8)
Investigation in the wake of the Dieselgate 2.0 scandal PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
The EU Youth Guarantee Programme PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Taxation of ports PDF (105 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Call for a limitation of abusive fees charged for cross-border intra-EU phone calls and SMSs in the upcoming review of the telecoms framework PDF (106 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Cooperation agreement with Philip Morris International (PMI) PDF (195 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Access to energy in Africa PDF (193 KB) DOC (19 KB)
According to Europol at least 10 000 refugee children are missing PDF (196 KB) DOC (25 KB)
According to Europol at least 10 000 refugee children are missing PDF (196 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Written explanations (276)
Listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, as regards the UK's withdrawal from the EU (A8-0047/2019 - Sergei Stanishev) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte qui n’entrera en vigueur qu’au lendemain du retrait du Royaume-Uni de l’Union européenne. Une exception sera créée pour les citoyens britanniques entrant dans le territoire de l’UE: pour un séjour de 90 jours maximum sur une période de 180 jours, ils ne devront pas faire de demande de visa. Cela vise principalement les voyages d’affaires ou à des fins touristiques ou familiales et ne donne bien sûr pas le droit de travailler dans l’UE. Il faut bien préciser que ce texte s’appliquera sur la base du principe de réciprocité, c’est-à-dire à condition que les ressortissants de l’UE bénéficient de la même exemption pour de courts séjours sur le territoire du Royaume-Uni lorsque celui-ci deviendra un État tiers. Dans l’éventualité où le Royaume-Uni devait réintroduire une obligation de visa, la voie empruntée par l’Union pourrait être modifiée.
Common rules for the internal market for natural gas (A8-0143/2018 - Jerzy Buzek) FR
Actuellement, l’UE importe plus de 70 % de sa consommation totale de gaz naturel de Norvège, de Russie et d’Algérie, principalement via des gazoducs. J’ai soutenu la révision de cette directive car les règles modifiées permettront de créer un marché du gaz européen plus concurrentiel. La propriété des gazoducs pénétrant le territoire de l’Union européenne pourra désormais être distinguée par rapport au service de fourniture du gaz. Ainsi, l’accessibilité aux gazoducs en provenance d’États tiers sera garantie à d’autres opérateurs, comme c’est déjà le cas pour les gazoducs européens. Les consommateurs bénéficieront d’une concurrence accrue et donc de prix moins élevés. Cette révision clarifie également le cadre juridique concernant tout futur projet de gazoduc avec des pays tiers, notamment avec le Royaume-Uni lorsque le pays deviendra un pays tiers. Concernant les gazoducs existants (en fonction avant l’entrée en vigueur de cette directive), un État membre pourra opter pour une dérogation pendant un an suite à l’entrée en vigueur de la directive, pour autant que cela reste compatible avec les principes de concurrence.
Pan-European Personal Pension Product (A8-0278/2018 - Sophia in 't Veld) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du produit paneuropéen d'épargne-retraite individuelle (PEPP). Le PEPP a pour objectif d’apporter des solutions aux personnes qui actuellement n’ont pas accès à des prestations suffisantes et de renforcer l’éventail de choix de produits de retraite proposé aux Européens. En particulier, les citoyens mobiles pourront bénéficier de son service de portabilité, garanti comme un droit des épargnants, qui permet de continuer à contribuer à un PEPP déjà souscrit auprès d’un fournisseur lors d’un changement d’État membre. Il est toutefois important de rappeler que le PEPP n’est pas destiné à remplacer les régimes de retraite nationaux existants, puisqu’il s’agit d’un produit supplémentaire et strictement complémentaire. Par ailleurs, je me félicite que la réglementation du PEPP tienne compte des facteurs environnementaux, sociaux et de gouvernance. Ainsi, l’épargne devra être investie conformément aux objectifs décrits dans l’accord de Paris, aux objectifs de développement durable et aux principes des Nations unies relatifs aux entreprises et aux droits de l’homme.
Work-life balance for parents and carers (A8-0270/2018 - David Casa) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la directive relative à l’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée des parents et aidants qui vise à mieux répartir les responsabilités familiales, à renforcer le rôle du père et à favoriser l’intégration des femmes sur le marché du travail. Ce texte prévoit la création d’un congé de paternité de 10 jours au niveau européen, l’amélioration des conditions du congé parental et la création d’un congé d’aidant de 5 jours par an pour fournir des soins à un proche. Même si je regrette que nous n’ayons pas pu être plus ambitieux, notamment en ce qui concerne la rémunération du congé paternité, seulement fixée au niveau du congé maladie national, il faut saluer les effets positifs pour les familles dans les États membres les moins avancés sur le plan social. Il est grand temps de réduire efficacement les inégalités de genre. Il est nécessaire de rappeler que le taux d’emploi des femmes est 11,5 % moins élevé que celui des hommes dans l’Union et que 31 % des femmes qui n’ont pas d’emploi sont dans cette situation à cause de responsabilités liées à des proches dans le besoin.
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (A8-0461/2018 - Verónica Lope Fontagné) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport du Fonds social européen plus (FSE+) qui, avec un budget proposé à 106 milliards d’euros, est un programme ambitieux qui permettra de promouvoir efficacement l’emploi et l’inclusion sociale. Je me félicite tout particulièrement de la volonté de donner la priorité au soutien aux groupes défavorisés et aux plus démunis ainsi qu’à l’inclusion sociale et la lutte contre la privation matérielle. Ce fonds concrétise le socle européen des droits sociaux. Par ailleurs, j’accueille avec satisfaction l’allègement des formalités administratives. Grâce à la diminution de la bureaucratie, le fonds devrait gagner en flexibilité et permettre un accès facilité au financement. Cela permettra d’optimiser l’utilisation des financements européens et de fournir un soutien mieux ciblé en réponse aux défis sociaux et en matière d’emploi auxquels font face les citoyens.
Quality of water intended for human consumption (A8-0288/2018 - Michel Dantin) FR
Selon les études menées par la Commission européenne, la réduction de la consommation d'eau en bouteille pourrait aider les ménages européens à économiser plus de 600 millions d'euros par an. Les bouteilles en plastique étant l’un des articles en plastique à usage unique que l’on retrouve le plus fréquemment sur les plages européennes, la diminution de leur consommation contribuerait grandement à réduire les déchets marins. Afin d’inciter les citoyens à consommer l’eau du robinet, il faut faire un effort sur la qualité de l’eau desservie. Le texte que j’ai soutenu propose de réduire les doses maximales de certains polluants tels que le plomb (de moitié), les bactéries dangereuses, et introduit de nouveaux plafonds pour plusieurs substances polluantes présentes dans l’eau potable. Le texte a pour deuxième objectif d’introduire le principe d’un accès à l’eau pour tous dans l’UE. Les États membres sont appelés à améliorer l’accès à l’eau dans les villes et les espaces publics, en installant des fontaines gratuites là où c’est techniquement réalisable.
Establishing the Creative Europe programme (2021 to 2027) (A8-0156/2019 - Silvia Costa) FR
Europe Créative est le Programme européen consacré à soutenir l’industrie de la création et de la culture. Ce secteur est l’un des grands employeurs de l’Union européenne. Il emploie 3,3 % de la population active européenne et est un moteur de croissance économique important. Pourtant, ce Programme reste un des moins bien financés de l’UE, c’est pour cette raison que j’ai voté en faveur du doublement de son budget. À travers ses trois volets, Europe créative aura pour objectifs de promouvoir l’expression et la création artistique, de renforcer la dimension transfrontière, la circulation et la visibilité des opérateurs culturels et de leurs œuvres. Il aura également pour priorité, plus particulièrement dans le secteur de l’audiovisuel, de favoriser le développement de talents et de compétences, l’utilisation des technologies numériques pour stimuler l’innovation des œuvres européennes et d’améliorer la circulation internationale, en particulier la distribution en salles, des œuvres audiovisuelles.
'Erasmus': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport (A8-0111/2019 - Milan Zver) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la poursuite du programme Erasmus+ pour la période 2021-2027. Erasmus+ est l’un des programmes européens qui rencontrent le plus de succès, il était donc important que son financement soit triplé afin de répondre aux attentes qu’il crée chez les citoyens européens. Un accent particulier a été mis sur l’inclusivité du Programme. Il est demandé à la Commission européenne et aux agences nationales Erasmus+ d’élaborer un cadre de mesures inclusives et de développer des stratégies nationales à cet égard. Ces mesures pourront inclure l’adaptation des financements aux besoins des participants, notamment le soutien financier à la mobilité, l’ajustement des enveloppes mensuelles de bourse et une révision régulière du coût de la vie. De plus, le nouveau Programme permettra la mise en œuvre de partenariats d’excellence composés de réseaux d’universités européennes et des centres de formation d’excellence. Ces initiatives permettront de dépasser les modèles de coopération existants actuellement dans l’enseignement. Enfin, l’initiative lancée par le Parlement, DiscoverEU, est intégrée dans Erasmus+. Les jeunes européens âgés entre 18 et 20 ans, en particulier ceux ayant moins d’opportunités, auront l’occasion de voyager en Europe en participant à des activités éducatives avec une forte composante d’apprentissage.
Recent developments on the Dieselgate scandal (B8-0222/2019, RC-B8-0223/2019, B8-0223/2019, B8-0224/2019) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative aux développements récents du scandale du «dieselgate», qui regrette que la Commission n’ait pas présenté au Parlement de rapport complet sur les conclusions et les recommandations de la commission EMIS. La situation est pourtant dramatique et la question de l’empreinte que laisseront les véhicules diesel très polluants, qui continueront à avoir un effet néfaste sur la qualité de l’air pendant de nombreuses années, n’est que trop peu abordée. Les États membres devraient prendre en urgence les mesures nécessaires pour retirer du marché les véhicules très polluants afin de renouveler la flotte de véhicules en circulation. Pour le moment, les campagnes de rappel des États membres ne concernent qu’un nombre trop limité de véhicules. Pour y remédier, la Commission devrait publier des lignes directrices, détaillant la façon dont les véhicules concernés par le rappel devraient être mis en conformité avec les réglementations européennes pertinentes. Il incombe à la Commission d’impliquer suffisamment les États membres sur ces questions.
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli) FR
Il est aujourd’hui impératif d’agir dans le domaine du transport, seul secteur de l'UE n’ayant pas enregistré de baisse significative de ses émissions de gaz à effet de serre depuis 1990. Le transport routier est particulièrement coupable : il génère la majorité des émissions de gaz à effet de serre (72,9 % en 2016) et est responsable d'environ 20 % des émissions totales de gaz à effet de serre dans l'UE. J’ai soutenu le rapport portant sur les normes de performance en matière d’émissions pour les voitures et les camionnettes, qui représente une étape supplémentaire pour la transition écologique. J’accueille avec satisfaction les objectifs de réduction des émissions de CO2 qui est fixé à 37,5 % pour les voitures neuves et à 31 % pour les camionnettes neuves d'ici 2030, des chiffres plus ambitieux que ceux proposés initialement par la Commission. Toutefois, il faut garder à l’esprit qu’à terme, c’est l’impact du cycle de vie complet des voitures qui devra être évalué.
Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (A8-0317/2018 - Frédérique Ries) FR
Alors que 25 millions de tonnes de déchets en plastique sont produites chaque année dans l’Union européenne, dont un quart seulement est recyclé, il est urgent d’agir contre la production excessive de plastique. J’ai voté en faveur du rapport portant sur la réduction de l’incidence sur l’environnement de certains produits en plastique qui interdit définitivement plusieurs produits à usage unique comme les assiettes, couverts ou encore pailles en plastique. Les produits concernés par cette nouvelle législation représentant 70 % de l’ensemble des déchets marins qui menacent la faune marine. Une autre avancée majeure est le renforcement de l’application du principe « pollueur-payeur » grâce à l’introduction de la responsabilité élargie du producteur (REP) notamment pour les producteurs de matériel de pêche, qui devront prendre en charge les coûts de la collecte des mégots et des filets abandonnés en mer. Il s’agit là de mesures qui vont dans le bon sens.
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (A8-0382/2018 - Laura Agea) FR
Dans l’objectif de mettre en œuvre le socle européen des droits sociaux et notamment son dixième principe qui prévoit que les travailleurs ont droit à un environnement de travail sain, sûr et adapté, j’ai voté en faveur du rapport portant sur la protection des travailleurs contre les risques liés à l’exposition à des agents cancérigènes ou mutagènes au travail. Cette nouvelle modification ajoute des valeurs limites d’expositions pour cinq substances supplémentaires, protégeant ainsi de manière efficace les travailleurs qui y sont exposés. Ces avancées devraient permettre d’améliorer les conditions de travail d'un million de travailleurs dans l'Union et de prévenir plus de 22 000 cas de maladies liées au travail. Plus spécifiquement, cela protégera les travailleurs des secteurs verriers, électroniques, chimiques, de la construction, du textile, du bois et des matières plastiques. Il est d’une grande importance que le processus de révision de cette directive sur les agents cancérigènes et mutagènes au travail se poursuive à l’avenir, dans l’intérêt des travailleurs européens.
Representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers (A8-0447/2018 - Geoffroy Didier) FR
Lancée en 2018 par la Commission, la directive relative à l’action représentative fait partie des nouvelles initiatives en faveur des consommateurs européens visant à leur garantir une protection renforcée. À l’heure actuelle, seuls 19 États membres offrent une voie de recours juridique collective. Ces procédures peuvent être néanmoins très longues et coûteuses, notamment si les victimes commencent par intenter leur action individuellement. De plus, les récents scandales de masse ayant eu des conséquences transfrontalières (Dieselgate, Ryanair) ont mis en évidence les lacunes de certains systèmes. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ces nouvelles règles permettant des actions de groupe dans différents secteurs tels que la protection des données, les services financiers, les voyages et le tourisme, l’énergie, les télécommunications, l’environnement ou encore la santé : les consommateurs ayant subi un préjudice pourront ainsi se regrouper pour dénoncer une pratique illégale et obtenir une indemnisation.
Discontinuing seasonal changes of time (A8-0169/2019 - Marita Ulvskog) FR
Les dispositions relatives à l’heure d’été ont fait l’objet d’un vif débat public et près de 4,6 millions de citoyens ont participé à la consultation publique organisée par la Commission à ce sujet, un record. J’ai soutenu la fin du changement d’heure saisonnier en 2021, comme souhaité par la majorité des citoyens européens. En effet, 85% des répondants recommandaient de mettre un terme à cette pratique qui compte plus d’effets néfastes que positifs, notamment pour la santé humaine. Il me semble toutefois essentiel que les pays de l’UE et la Commission se coordonnent pour garantir que l’application de l’heure d’été dans certains pays et de l’heure d’hiver dans d’autres ne perturbe pas le fonctionnement du marché intérieur. Afin d’éviter des éventuelles perturbations, la Commission pourra soumettre une proposition visant à reporter la date d’application de la directive de 12 mois maximum si nécessaire.
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss) FR
Les sociétés diffusant des contenus sur internet étaient pour le moment insuffisamment incitées à signer des accords de licence avec les titulaires de droits de ces contenus car elles n’étaient pas responsables du contenu que leurs utilisateurs mettaient en ligne. L’obligation de supprimer des contenus portant atteinte au droit d’auteur s’appliquait le plus souvent lorsqu'un titulaire de droits leur en faisait la demande, ce qui ne leur garantissait pas toujours un revenu équitable. Le but de la directive, en faveur de laquelle j’ai voté, est donc de responsabiliser ces entreprises en garantissant les droits des créateurs (musiciens, interprètes, scénaristes, éditeurs et journalistes) dans la sphère numérique en obligeant les entreprises diffusant leurs contenus à passer des accords de rémunération équitables et ainsi obtenir une juste contrepartie pour l’exploitation de leurs œuvres. Cela faisait longtemps qu’un rééquilibrage entre le secteur de la culture et les sociétés diffusant des contenus sur internet était attendu et nécessaire. Une avancée majeure supplémentaire concerne le secteur journalistique par la création d'un droit voisin: nous avons créé pour les éditeurs de presse, la possibilité de négocier aux noms des journalistes des accords avec les agrégateurs de nouvelles qui ne payaient pas l’exploitation de ces données.
Framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union (A8-0198/2018 - Franck Proust) FR
Ces vingt dernières années, la structure et la provenance des investissements directs étrangers (IDE) ont radicalement changé, avec plus d’IDE en provenance d’économies émergentes. Les investissements chinois ont été multipliés par six, ceux du Brésil par dix et ceux de la Russie ont presque doublé, avec pour cible, récemment, des secteurs dans la haute technologie et souvent des entreprises détenues par l’État ou ayant un lien avec les gouvernements. Actuellement, plus ou moins la moitié des États membres disposent d’un mécanisme de filtrage, mais ces derniers diffèrent grandement en termes de champ d’application et de conception. L’Union avait donc tout intérêt à intervenir: le règlement que j’ai soutenu vise à protéger les infrastructures critiques et stratégiques dans des domaines tels que l’énergie, le transport, les télécommunications, les données, l’espace et la finance. Des technologies précises comme les semi-conducteurs, l’intelligence artificielle et la robotique sont également inclues. Il s’agit donc du tout premier système européen qui soutient le filtrage des IDE par les États membres, pour des motifs de sécurité et d’ordre public.
EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (resolution) (A8-0048/2019 - David Martin) FR
Singapour est de loin le plus grand partenaire de l’UE dans la région d’Asie du Sud-Est, représentant près d’un tiers des échanges en matière de biens et services, et près de deux tiers des investissements entre les deux régions. Plus de 10 000 entreprises européennes ont leur siège régional à Singapour. L’accord de libre-échange entre l’Union et Singapour est donc une étape majeure pour la coopération entre l’UE et cette région. J’ai voté en sa faveur car il supprimera progressivement d’ici 5 années quasiment tous les tarifs douaniers entre les deux parties. Il permettra le libre-échange de services, protègera les produits européens uniques en reconnaissant plus de 190 indications d’origine, et ouvrira les marchés publics singapouriens aux entreprises européennes, notamment dans le secteur du rail.Ce tout premier accord commercial bilatéral entre l’UE et un membre de l’Association des nations de l’Asie du Sud-Est (ANASE) pourra servir de tremplin pour de futurs accords commerciaux entre les deux régions, à une époque où l’UE ne peut plus compter sur les États-Unis comme partenaire commercial privilégié. L’accord inclut également des droits renforcés pour les travailleurs et insiste pour une meilleure protection environnementale.
2018 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0467/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda) FR
La Bosnie-Herzégovine a demandé à rejoindre l’Union européenne le 15 février 2016 mais, depuis deux ans, le pays a considérablement réduit ses efforts de réforme. J’ai soutenu le rapport 2018 concernant ce pays, qui souligne qu’aucun progrès substantiel n’a été accompli, hormis dans quelques rares domaines comme le développement rural ou l’énergie. Le ralentissement visible dans l’adoption des réformes n’est pas de nature à favoriser l’adhésion de la Bosnie-Herzégovine à l’Union. Des réformes constitutionnelles sont nécessaires afin de transformer le pays en un État pleinement inclusif et fondé sur l’état de droit. Par ailleurs, la corruption généralisée persiste et la volonté déclarée de lutter contre cette dernière n’est pour le moment pas suivie de faits. La résolution regrette également le manque de progrès en matière de liberté d’expression et d’indépendance des médias et constate que le pays n’est encore qu’à un stade précoce de la mise en place d’une économie de marché viable. Ces éléments justifient la nécessité de mettre en pause le processus d’élargissement.
EU-Morocco Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (A8-0027/2019 - Alain Cadec) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du nouvel accord relatif à la gouvernance juridique, environnementale, économique et sociale des activités des navires de pêche de l’UE au Maroc et au Sahara occidental. L’accord vise à promouvoir une pêche durable en autorisant les navires de l’UE à pêcher uniquement les volumes admissibles mentionnés dans la Convention de l’ONU sur le droit de la mer. En outre, l’accord permet à l’UE et au Maroc de coopérer davantage dans la promotion d’une politique de pêche durable et soutient les efforts du Maroc en matière de développement du secteur de la pêche et de l’économie bleue. La valeur totale annuelle des possibilités de pêche est estimée à 153,6 millions d’euros: 48,1 millions pour la première année, 50,4 pour la deuxième et 55,1 pour les deux dernières. Une centaine de navires européens provenant principalement d’Espagne, du Portugal et de France vont pouvoir pêcher dans les eaux marocaines. L’impact économique de l’accord sera très positif pour le Maroc, en particulier les régions du sud. Il s’agit donc d’un accord « gagnant-gagnant ».
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A8-0180/2018 - Elisabetta Gardini) FR
Le mécanisme de protection civile de l'UE repose actuellement sur un système volontaire, dans le cadre duquel l'UE coordonne les contributions volontaires des États participants à un pays qui a demandé une assistance. Ces dernières années, les conditions climatiques extrêmes dans plusieurs États membres simultanément ont mis à rude épreuve le mécanisme d’entraide. Pour le moment, l'UE ne dispose pas d'une capacité de réserve pour aider les États membres débordés. J’ai donc voté en faveur de cette législation dont l’objectif est d’aider les États membres à répondre mieux et plus vite aux catastrophes naturelles ou d’origine humaine, en partageant les moyens de protection civile plus efficacement. L’amélioration majeure est la création d’une réserve de ressources (RescEU) composées d’avions de lutte contre les incendies de forêt, de pompes à grande capacité, d’hôpitaux de campagne et d’équipes médicales d'urgence, pour une utilisation dans toutes sortes d'urgences. RescEU interviendra lorsque les ressources déployées par les États membres ne seront pas suffisantes pour répondre à une catastrophe.
Minimum requirements for water reuse (A8-0044/2019 - Simona Bonafè) FR
Les ressources d’eau de l'UE sont de plus en plus sous pression, cela peut entraîner des pénuries et une détérioration de sa qualité. Le changement climatique, l’imprévisibilité du climat et la sécheresse mettent à rude épreuve les ressources en eau douce nécessaire au développement urbain et agricole. Selon la Commission européenne, la fréquence et l'intensité des sécheresses ainsi que leur impact environnemental et économique ont considérablement augmenté au cours des trente dernières années. La réutilisation plus large des eaux usées traitées pourrait limiter l'extraction des eaux souterraines et des plans d'eau. C’est pour cette raison que j’ai soutenu la nouvelle réglementation définissant les normes minimales de qualité pour les eaux recyclées destinées à l’irrigation agricole, elle prévoit des obligations pour les opérateurs de production, de distribution et de stockage, ainsi que des mesures de gestion des risques. Les eaux récupérées seront utilisées pour irriguer les cultures vivrières, alimentaires transformées et non vivrières. La Commission devra évaluer dans un délai de 5 années si ces eaux peuvent servir à d’autres usages. Évoluer vers une économie circulaire dans notre manière de consommer l’eau est l’objectif, cela nous permettrait de faire des économies d’échelle importantes mais également de limiter l’extraction des eaux souterraines.
Annual report 2017 on the protection of the European Union’s financial interests- fight against fraud (A8-0003/2019 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport annuel 2017 sur la protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne, qui note avec satisfaction que le nombre total des irrégularités frauduleuses et non frauduleuses signalées en 2017 a baissé de 20 % par rapport à 2016. La bonne gestion des dépenses publiques et la protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union doivent rester des éléments essentiels, afin de renforcer la confiance des citoyens en veillant à ce que leur argent soit utilisé correctement et efficacement. C’est pourquoi, malgré les résultats positifs annoncés, il est préoccupant de constater que le coût des affaires de fraude à la TVA intracommunautaire s’élève à environ 50 milliards d’euros par an. En particulier, la fraude de type «carrousel» devrait être combattue fermement, via une coopération renforcée entre les États membres et un échange d’informations pertinentes pour faire face à la gravité de la situation actuelle.
Implementation and functioning of the .eu top level domain name (A8-0394/2018 - Fredrick Federley) FR
Le nom de domaine .eu est le 8ème plus grand code internet dans le monde avec plus de 3.8 millions d’enregistrements en 2017. En améliorant l’identité européenne en ligne et en encourageant les activités transfrontières en ligne, ce nom de domaine peut se révéler un atout pour le développement du marché unique numérique. Cependant, le cadre légal attenant devait être mis à jour pour répondre à un environnement et un marché en ligne en évolution. C’est l’objectif poursuivi par ce texte : les principes généraux d’enregistrement de noms de domaine (critères d’éligibilité, conditions d’enregistrement et de révocations) ont été actualisés, les juridictions compétentes et le droit applicable ont été précisés. La réforme a également permis d’instaurer une garantie de conformité au principe d’état de droit qui permettra au registre .eu de fonctionner dans l’intérêt du public et dans le strict respect des règles de transparence, d’équité et de responsabilité.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 (B8-0076/2019) FR
J’ai soutenu l’objection à la décision visant à autoriser la mise sur le marché de produits contenant ou dérivant de coton génétiquement modifié GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 comme je le fais de manière régulière pour les demandes d’autorisation d’OGM. Premièrement, parce que la procédure actuelle de mise sur le marché d’OGM me semble insatisfaisante : les autorisations sont adoptées sans le soutien d’une majorité qualifiée des États membres et la procédure ne prévoit pas de pouvoirs étendus au Parlement européen en la matière. Ensuite, je suis sensible à l’inquiétude de l’opinion publique face à la production et la commercialisation sur le marché européen de produits OGM. De plus, le respect du principe de précaution est de mise dans ce domaine. En effet, les évaluations de risque pour la santé humaine et animale sont insuffisantes : les altérations génétiques proposées pour ce coton modifié créent un risque de résistance antibiotique qui n’a pas été déterminé entièrement sûr pour l’être humain et l’environnement.
Situation in Venezuela (B8-0082/2019, B8-0083/2019, B8-0084/2019, B8-0085/2019, B8-0086/2019, B8-0087/2019) FR
L’Union européenne a déjà appelé de ses vœux le rétablissement de la démocratie et de l’état de droit au Venezuela à plusieurs reprises. Alors que des protestations et des manifestations massives ont eu lieu ces derniers jours dans le pays, j’ai soutenu la résolution qui reconnaît Juan Guaidó comme président par intérim légitime. Mme Mogherini, haute représentante de l’Union pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité ainsi que les États membres devraient adopter la même position jusqu’à la tenue de nouvelles élections présidentielles libres. L’Assemblée nationale du Venezuela est à ce jour le seul organe démocratique véritablement légitime du pays, elle doit être pleinement soutenue par l’Union européenne et ses pouvoirs doivent être rétablis et respectés. Toute tentative de résolution de la crise par le recours à la violence doit être rejetée. Par ailleurs, face à la répression brutale qui a fait des dizaines de morts et aux violations graves des droits de l’homme, une enquête indépendante et complète devrait être menée, comme demandé par le Secrétaire général de l’ONU.
Annual report on competition policy (A8-0474/2018 - Michel Reimon) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport annuel sur la politique de concurrence qui félicite la Commission de ses efforts visant à garantir l'application effective de la réglementation européenne dans l'Union, au bénéfice des consommateurs. Par ailleurs, la Commission devrait accroître son soutien aux PME pour leur permettre de faire respecter leurs droits face aux pratiques déloyales et lutter contre l’utilisation injustifiée des barrières tarifaires et des subventions sur le marché mondial. Une politique de concurrence efficace est nécessaire pour que le commerce puisse profiter aux travailleurs, aux consommateurs et aux entreprises. Cela doit rester une priorité européenne. Par ailleurs, la réglementation actuelle de l’UE n’est pas adaptée pour lutter efficacement contre la double non-imposition et pour mettre un terme à la course vers le bas en matière d’imposition des sociétés. La Commission devrait tourner ses efforts en ce sens dans le futur.
Protection of the Union's budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States (A8-0469/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Petri Sarvamaa) FR
Le respect de l'état de droit et des valeurs européennes est le principe fondamental sur lequel nous avons bâti le projet européen. S’il s’avère qu’un gouvernement ne respecte pas ou plus ces valeurs, l’UE doit être dotée d’un mécanisme permettant d’envoyer un message signifiant à l’État membre en question qu’il s’est écarté du droit chemin. C’est dans cet esprit que j’ai voté en faveur d’un nouvel outil donnant la possibilité aux institutions européennes de suspendre les financements européens en cas de défaillance généralisée du principe d’état de droit. La Commission, accompagnée d’un groupe d’experts, constatant cette défaillance généralisée pourrait lancer la procédure. Le Conseil et le Parlement y seraient associés, renforçant ainsi la responsabilité démocratique des décisions. De surcroit, la proposition législative votée au Parlement européen inclue des mesures de sauvegarde pour les bénéficiaires finaux. En effet, l’État faisant l’objet de la procédure devrait poursuivre la mise en œuvre des fonds européens concernés et effectuer les paiements destinés aux bénéficiaires finaux, tels que les chercheurs ou les organisations de la société civile. La Commission devrait aider les bénéficiaires et s’assurer qu'ils reçoivent les montants dus. Une fois les défaillances éliminées, le montant bloqué sera de nouveau alloué selon la même procédure.
Establishing the Rights and Values programme (A8-0468/2018 - Bodil Valero) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de l’établissement du programme « Droits et valeurs » car il est encore aujourd’hui nécessaire de faire davantage pour promouvoir la démocratie, l'État de droit et les droits fondamentaux dans toute l'Union. Pour la période 2021-2027, le budget proposé à 1,8 milliards d’euros permettra de soutenir les organisations de la société civile aux niveaux local, régional, national et transnational dans cette optique. Les fonds investis permettront - via des campagnes de sensibilisation, des initiatives visant à réfléchir sur les racines des régimes totalitaires et à commémorer leurs victimes -, de promouvoir l'égalité et la non-discrimination, d’encourager l'engagement et la participation des citoyens au processus démocratique et de combattre la violence. Il est important que ce programme soit par ailleurs un outil permettant de soutenir les projets de jumelage de villes, les défenseurs des droits de l'homme et les lanceurs d’alerte, les mesures de lutte contre le discours de haine et la protection des victimes de violence.
EU-Morocco Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0478/2018 - Marietje Schaake) FR
Le but de ce nouvel accord commercial était de permettre au territoire du Sahara occidental de bénéficier des mêmes préférences tarifaires que le Maroc. La Cour de Justice de l’UE, jugeant que la souveraineté du Maroc ne s’applique pas au territoire du Sahara occidental, considère que pour étendre l’accord à ce territoire, l’UE doit respecter plusieurs conditions : obtenir le consentement du peuple sahraoui et s’assurer que les préférences tarifaires bénéficient au peuple de ce territoire. La Commission a rempli ces conditions en consultant un grand nombre d’organisations représentatives du peuple sahraoui et en négociant avec le Maroc un mécanisme de traçabilité permettant de définir l’origine des produits exportés depuis ce territoire. Le mécanisme garantira ainsi que les bénéfices liés à la baisse des tarifs aillent directement à la population locale et soient mesurables. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce nouveau traité international, car le Maroc est un allié de l’Union dans diverses matières stratégiques (migration, terrorisme, commerce) et l’accord respecte les prérequis imposés par la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne.
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) (A8-0445/2018 - Maria Arena) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du Fonds européen pour la transition (FET), qui permettra de venir en aide aux travailleurs européens licenciés en raison de modifications majeures de la structure du commerce mondial. Ce fonds permet un accompagnement face aux défis de la mondialisation et de la transition numérique et écologique. La Commission pourra mobiliser le FET et financer un ensemble de mesures destinées à favoriser la réinsertion des travailleurs licenciés sur le marché du travail : formation, recyclage des compétences, aide à la recherche d’emploi et à la reconversion, démarrage ou reprise d’activité entrepreneuriale, etc. En mettant l’accent sur des mesures actives du marché du travail, le FET permettra une réintégration rapide des travailleurs dans des emplois stables. Je me félicite en particulier de l’accent mis sur le soutien à l’esprit entrepreneurial et à la création d’entreprise, des facteurs essentiels pour la vitalité de nos économies. Véritable expression de la solidarité de l’Union avec les travailleurs qui ont perdu leur emploi, le FET encouragera une croissance plus inclusive et une amélioration des politiques en matière d’emploi et sur le plan social, en ligne avec les principes du socle européen des droits sociaux.
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (A8-0461/2018 - Verónica Lope Fontagné) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur le Fonds social européen plus (FSE+) pour la période 2021-2027, un programme ambitieux et qui consacre en priorité le soutien aux groupes défavorisés et aux plus démunis. Selon le texte voté, les États membres devraient en effet allouer au moins 27 % de leurs ressources relevant de la gestion partagée à l’inclusion sociale et au moins 3 % à l’insertion sociale des plus défavorisés et à la lutte contre la privation matérielle. Avec un budget de plus de 106 milliards, ce fonds est le principal instrument financier de l’Union pour promouvoir l’emploi et l’inclusion sociale. Par ailleurs, le texte répond au besoin de simplification du programme, avec la fusion de différents fonds au sein du FSE+ et l’allègement des formalités administratives. Le FSE+ gagne en pertinence, en simplicité et en flexibilité. Grâce à cela, les bénéficiaires jouiront ainsi d’un accès facilité aux financements. En outre, il était important que le FSE+ devienne l’outil européen qui incarne la concrétisation du socle européen des droits sociaux et que ses priorités soient plus étroitement liées au Semestre européen, afin d’assurer la cohérence des politiques européennes.
Specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) (A8-0470/2018 - Pascal Arimont) FR
La coopération territoriale en Europe a incontestablement contribué à l’intégration européenne. Au cours des dernières années, elle a été essentielle pour façonner l’Union de demain, une Union où les citoyens européens apprennent à se connaître et coopèrent pour faire face aux défis communs. J’ai donc voté pour pérenniser, sur la période 2021-2027, le programme Interreg permettant de financer des projets bénéficiant à la coopération entre les régions européennes. L’augmentation du budget, la réduction de la charge administrative pour les demandeurs et les autorités administratives, le taux de cofinancement des projets jusqu’à 80% sont des éléments à accueillir avec enthousiasme. En outre, les projets Interreg devraient également contribuer de plus en plus à l’émergence de solutions aux problèmes majeurs que sont le changement climatique et le manque de produits innovants en Europe.
Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides (A8-0475/2018 - Norbert Lins, Bart Staes) FR
La commission spéciale Pesticides a été instituée conséquemment à la controverse née du renouvellement du glyphosate et des préoccupations concernant la procédure européenne d’autorisation de nouvelles substances. La commission spéciale a mis en évidence plusieurs failles dans la procédure et formulé plusieurs recommandations pour qu’elle soit modifiée à l’avenir: par exemple que les citoyens aient accès aux études utilisées dans la procédure d’autorisation d’un pesticide, y compris toutes les données et informations relatives aux demandes. Elle propose aussi qu’au cours de la procédure, toutes les études réglementaires menées soient enregistrées dans un registre public et qu’une «période de commentaires» soit prévue durant laquelle les parties prenantes pourraient fournir des données supplémentaires pour s’assurer que toutes les informations pertinentes aient été prises en compte. Il est également demandé que la Commission prenne des mesures pour protéger les groupes vulnérables et mettre fin à l’épandage de pesticides sur de longues distances à proximité d’écoles, de crèches, de terrains de jeux, d’hôpitaux, de maternités ou d’établissements de soins. Partageant ces inquiétudes et ces préconisations, j’ai voté en faveur du rapport.
Establishing the InvestEU Programme (A8-0482/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes, Roberto Gualtieri) FR
J’ai voté en faveur d’InvestEU, nouveau programme de l'UE visant à soutenir l'investissement et l'accès aux financements entre 2021 et 2027. Successeur du « plan Juncker », ce programme pour l'emploi, la croissance et l'investissement a pour objectif de devenir une rampe de lancement pour des investissements qui auraient autrement été difficiles à réaliser. Je salue l’augmentation du montant de la garantie à hauteur de 40,8 milliards d'euros, qui devrait permettre de mobiliser 698 milliards d'euros d'investissements. L’augmentation du taux d'emploi dans l'UE est un objectif clairement énoncé dans le programme, mais ce dernier devra également servir à la réalisation des objectifs de l'accord de Paris sur le climat. Au moins 40% de l'enveloppe financière globale du programme InvestEU devrait notamment être utilisée pour participer à l’atteinte des objectifs climatiques
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017 (A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras) FR
La situation des droits fondamentaux dans l’UE n’est pas réjouissante. Ces derniers sont en particuliers menacés dans plusieurs pays. J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative à la situation des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne en 2017 qui appelle les institutions européennes à évaluer effectivement le respect de l’État de droit par les États membres et à dénoncer les restrictions en termes de liberté d’expression ainsi que les violations des droits fondamentaux des migrants et des demandeurs d’asiles dans certains pays de l’Union. Les mesures prises dans certains pays de l'UE pour affaiblir la séparation des pouvoirs et l'indépendance du pouvoir judiciaire sont inacceptables. Une évaluation impartiale et régulière de l'évolution de l'État de droit, fondée sur des critères objectifs dans tous les États membres, est aujourd’hui nécessaire. De plus, les restrictions croissantes à la liberté d'expression et de réunion dans l'UE sont extrêmement préoccupantes, tout comme les menaces et pressions auxquelles font face les journalistes. L’Union doit agir avec plus de force pour améliorer cette situation.
Autonomous driving in European transport (A8-0425/2018 - Wim van de Camp) FR
Plusieurs pays du monde s'orientent rapidement vers la mise sur le marché de dispositifs innovants permettant une mobilité à la fois connectée et automatisée. L'UE doit réagir beaucoup plus rapidement à l'évolution du secteur pour éviter de se retrouver dépendante de la technologie développée par d’autres puissances. Les premiers travaux de la Commission sur le sujet sont un pas dans la bonne direction, mais des efforts importants doivent encore être faits pour garantir un financement suffisant du secteur et l'existence de règles appropriées de sécurité et de responsabilité. La Commission et les pays de l'UE sont également invités à continuer à jouer un rôle de premier plan dans l'harmonisation technique internationale des véhicules automatisés dans le cadre de la Commission économique pour l'Europe des Nations unies (CEE-ONU) et de la Convention de Vienne. Enfin, le rapport estime que la recherche devrait également se concentrer sur les effets à long terme du transport autonome, sur des questions telles que l'adaptation des consommateurs, l'acceptation par la société, les réactions physiologiques, les réactions physiques et la réduction des accidents. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte.
EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (A8-0366/2018 - Pedro Silva Pereira) FR
J’ai soutenu la conclusion de l’accord pour un partenariat économique entre l’Union européenne et le Japon qui permettra de lever les barrières au commerce pour que les entreprises européennes puissent exporter plus facilement vers le Japon. Il s’agit de l’accord le plus ambitieux signé par l’Union, il couvrira 600 millions de consommateurs. On compte parmi les secteurs qui en bénéficieraient: les vins, les spiritueux, les produits laitiers, les secteurs du cuir et du textile ou encore les opérateurs ferroviaires. Par ailleurs, l’accord donne une part importante aux questions sociales et environnementales. En effet, des objectifs contraignants sont fixés pour la promotion des standards élevés en matière de droit du travail, de protection des consommateurs et d’écologie. Les deux parties s’engagent également pour le respect de l’Accord de Paris. Ces engagements, associés aux avantages économiques et commerciaux attendus me permettent d’apporter mon plein soutien à cet accord qui va aider à promouvoir des normes élevées et à renforcer le développement durable dans la politique commerciale.
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on Terrorism (A8-0374/2018 - Monika Hohlmeier, Helga Stevens) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution sur les observations de la commission spéciale sur le terrorisme qui formule des recommandations aux États membres pour lutter contre la radicalisation, améliorer l’interopérabilité des données et soutenir les victimes. Elle souligne l’importance du respect plein et entier des droits fondamentaux et notamment de la protection des données tout en exprimant une préoccupation justifiée quant aux lacunes en termes d’échange des données entre les agences et entre les États membres et les autorités de l’Union européenne. Plusieurs recommandations mériteraient une grande attention de la part des États et pourraient les aider à lutter plus efficacement contre le terrorisme. Je pense notamment à la création d’une liste de surveillance européenne des prédicateurs radicaux, à des mesures de lutte contre la radicalisation (par exemple des programmes dans les prisons ou dans l’éducation) ou encore à une surveillance accrue à l’encontre des combattants de retour en Europe ayant pu être identifiés.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0392/2018 - David McAllister) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport annuel sur la mise en œuvre de la politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC), qui souligne qu’il est temps pour l’Union européenne de prendre son destin en main et qu’elle devrait assumer son rôle en tant que puissance politique et économique à part entière, souveraine dans les relations internationales. Pour cela, un renforcement de son autonomie stratégique et de son intégration sont nécessaires pour permettre une véritable politique européenne. Aucun État membre de l’Union n’est capable à lui seul de relever efficacement les défis mondiaux de notre temps. À ce titre, je regrette que, trop souvent, les États membres défendent en priorité leurs intérêts nationaux sans se préoccuper des conséquences éventuelles en Europe, ce qui nuit à l’unité, à la cohérence et à l’efficacité de l’Union et à sa crédibilité en tant qu’acteur mondial. La possibilité de passer au vote à la majorité qualifiée dans certains domaines de la PESC (qui sont pour l’heure soumis à l’unanimité) ainsi que la mise en place d’un Conseil de sécurité de l’Union me semblent être des mesures qui permettraient de rendre le processus décisionnel de la PESC plus efficace.
Establishing the European Defence Fund (A8-0412/2018 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte car il vise à créer un fonds européen de la défense pour la période 2021-2027, qui a pour objectifs la coopération entre les États membres dans le domaine de l’innovation militaire et la réalisation d’économies dans la production de technologies de pointe dans le domaine de la défense. Il s’inscrirait dans une démarche de recherche de liberté et d’autonomie stratégique de la part de l’Union européenne face à d’autres acteurs internationaux. Ce fonds aura donc pour effet de soutenir des projets de recherche collaboratifs très efficaces qui pourraient améliorer sensiblement les performances des capacités européennes futures tout en tenant compte des priorités en matière de capacités de défense arrêtées d'un commun accord entre les États membres dans le cadre de la politique étrangère et de sécurité commune.
EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (A8-0369/2018 - Michael Gahler) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative à la mise en œuvre de l’accord d’association de l’Union européenne avec l’Ukraine qui reconnaît les efforts de réforme du pays et les progrès réalisés dans plusieurs domaines comme l’énergie, la santé, les retraites, l’éducation, l’administration publique et la décentralisation, ainsi qu’en matière de défense et de sécurité, de système bancaire et de stabilisation macro-économique. L’Ukraine devrait toutefois faire de la lutte contre la corruption une priorité absolue et traiter les problèmes liés au pouvoir oligarchique.Par ailleurs, dans le contexte politique actuel, il était important de condamner fermement l’agression russe contre l’Ukraine le 25 novembre dernier dans le détroit de Kertch, et d’exiger la libération immédiate et sans condition de tous les navires et marins ukrainiens. L'UE et les États membres devraient introduire des sanctions ciblées à l'encontre de la Russie si les soldats ukrainiens ne sont pas relâchés et en cas de nouvelle escalade militaire. Cette tension politique souligne un peu plus les problèmes posés par la construction du gazoduc Nord Stream 2, véritable projet politique, qui menace la sécurité énergétique européenne et devrait être abandonné.
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (A8-0142/2018 - Claude Rolin) FR
J’ai soutenu la révision de la directive permettant de lutter contre l’exposition des travailleurs à des agents cancérigènes ou mutagènes. Alors que le cancer est la première cause de mortalité d’origine professionnelle en Europe, ce texte, d’apparence technique, représente une réelle avancée pour l’amélioration de la vie de millions de travailleurs en Europe. La révision ajoute huit nouvelles substances qui feront désormais l’objet d’un contrôle strict dans le milieu professionnel. Je me félicite tout particulièrement de l’ajout d’une valeur limite d’exposition pour les gaz d’échappement des moteurs diesel, véritable victoire du Parlement et enjeu sanitaire de premier plan. Plus de 20 millions de travailleurs sont exposés à des agents cancérigènes, dont plus de 12 millions aux seules émanations de diesel, notamment dans l’industrie. Ces avancées étaient donc nécessaires et attendues.
Transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain (A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer) FR
Suite à l’initiative citoyenne européenne sur le glyphosate, notamment les inquiétudes – fondées – exprimées au sujet de la transparence des études scientifiques utilisées pour l’évaluation des pesticides, les règles de travail et de transparence de l’Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments (EFSA) devaient être modifiées. Les règles actualisées visent à améliorer la transparence dans l’évaluation des risques et à garantir la fiabilité, l’objectivité et l’indépendance des études utilisées par l’EFSA pour autoriser un produit à être mis sur le marché. De plus, un registre européen commun des études commandées devrait être créé afin de dissuader les entreprises en attente d’une autorisation de dissimuler des études défavorables. S’il existe un doute sur les preuves fournies par une entreprise, l’agence devrait également consulter des tiers afin d’identifier si d’autres données ou études scientifiques pertinentes existent. Pour ces raisons, j’ai donc soutenu l’adoption de ce texte.
Humanitarian Visas (A8-0423/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) FR
Malgré de nombreuses annonces et requêtes relatives à des voies d’accès sûres et légales vers l’Europe pour les demandeurs d’asile, l’UE ne dispose pas d’un cadre harmonisé concernant les procédures d’entrée protégée. En conséquence, 90 % des personnes ayant bénéficié d’une protection internationale auraient atteint le territoire de l’UE par des moyens irréguliers. C’est dans ce cadre qu’une proposition législative de la Commission est demandée, mettant en place un visa humanitaire européen donnant accès au territoire de l’UE (uniquement à l’État membre délivrant le visa) dans le seul but de déposer une demande de protection internationale. J’ai voté en faveur de cette proposition législative car elle pourrait faire baisser le nombre de décès en Méditerranée et sur les routes migratoires vers l’UE, et elle permettrait de lutter contre les passeurs. Elle permettrait de mieux gérer les arrivées, l’accueil et le traitement des demandes d’asile, ce qui bénéficiera également au budget des États membres.
New European Agenda for Culture (A8-0388/2018 - Giorgos Grammatikakis) FR
L’Union européenne a pour ambition de proposer un cadre dans lequel ses citoyens disposent d’un vaste choix de possibilités sur le plan du développement culturel et social tout en créant les opportunités de croissance économique pour le secteur culturel et de la création. Le développement de ce secteur favorise l’émergence de société cohésives, inclusives et plus justes. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce nouvel agenda européen pour la culture car il insiste sur plusieurs points essentiels afin de créer cet environnement propice à l’épanouissement personnel tels que la promotion d’une rémunération juste et de conditions de travail décentes, la modernisation des systèmes de sécurité sociale, la transparence et la responsabilité des plateformes envers les artistes, ou encore la facilitation de la mobilité des artistes.Enfin, j’apprécie également que la Commission soit invitée à présenter des plans d’action en faveur du patrimoine culturel européen aussi bien tangible qu’intangible.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/003 EL/Attica publishing (A8-0377/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR
La région de l’Attique, en Grèce, a récemment dû faire face à 550 licenciements survenus dans 3 entreprises du secteur de l’édition. Ces licenciements, liés à la crise financière et économique mondiale mais aussi à la rapide évolution numérique risquent d’avoir un effet négatif important sur l’économie locale d’une région déjà en proie à des difficultés de redéploiement en raison de la rareté de l’emploi, de l’absence de formation professionnelle correspondant aux besoins du marché du travail ainsi que du grand nombre de demandeurs d’emploi de longue durée. Pour en limiter les effets négatifs, j’ai voté pour la mobilisation du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation à hauteur de 2,3 millions d’euros à destination des travailleurs licenciés. Cette aide financière, qui ne pourra se substituer aux actions relevant de la responsabilité des entreprises, permettra de financer des actions en faveur des travailleurs, telles que l’aide à la recherche d’emploi, la formation professionnelle, la reconversion en fonction des besoins du marché du travail, l’aide à la création d’entreprise ou encore la fourniture d’allocations de formations et d’incitations à l’embauche.
Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders (A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon) FR
L’espace Schengen est l’une des grandes réussites de l’Union européenne : il permet le passage d’un État membre à un autre sans devoir faire l’objet de contrôle aux frontières. Des exceptions, pouvant donner lieu à des contrôles temporaires, existent mais leur manque de clarté a pu favoriser des interprétations divergentes entre certains États membres. Dès lors, nous signalons que ces contrôles temporaires aux frontières ne devraient être utilisés que dans des circonstances exceptionnelles et en dernier ressort. La période initiale de contrôle est réduite à deux mois au lieu de six et les contrôles qui durent plus longtemps ne pourront être reconduits au-delà d’un an. De plus, toute prolongation au-delà de six mois nécessitera que la Commission établisse si cette prolongation est conforme aux exigences légales et devra obtenir l’autorisation du Conseil des ministres de l’UE. La liberté de circulation est une des libertés fondatrices de l’Union, elle ne peut être malmenée sans motif valide. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur de cette révision.
The Cum Ex Scandal: financial crime and the loopholes in the current legal framework (B8-0518/2018, B8-0519/2018, B8-0520/2018, B8-0521/2018, B8-0525/2018, RC-B8-0551/2018, B8-0551/2018, B8-0552/2018) FR
La fraude fiscale CumEx, découverte en 2012, dont on pensait au départ qu'elle n'avait touché que l'Allemagne, est maintenant estimée à 55 milliards d’euros et touche 11 pays de l’UE. La fraude impliquait des pratiques consistant à faciliter l'achat et la revente d'actions appartenant à des investisseurs étrangers le jour du paiement du dividende : la rapidité avec laquelle ces transactions étaient effectuées et le manque de communication entre autorités a favorisé l’émergence de demandes frauduleuses de remboursement d'impôt de la part d'étrangers à qui on remboursait un impôt impayé, et ce, parfois à plusieurs reprises. Par conséquent, nous demandons que l’Autorité européenne des marchés financiers et des valeurs mobilières et l’Autorité bancaire européenne mènent une enquête sur les systèmes à la base de cette fraude afin d'évaluer les menaces potentielles pour les marchés financiers, d'identifier les acteurs impliqués dans ces systèmes, d'évaluer les infractions au droit national ou européen et d'évaluer les mesures prises par les autorités nationales de surveillance. L'enquête devrait également identifier les défaillances dans la coordination entre les États membres qui ont permis à ces fraudes de se poursuivre, et de présenter des recommandations de réforme et d'action.
Role of the German Youth Welfare Office (Jugendamt) in cross-border family disputes (B8-0546/2018) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution concernant le rôle des services allemands de l’aide sociale à l’enfance (Jugendamt) dans les litiges familiaux transfrontaliers qui, tout en soulignant l’importance du principe de subsidiarité sur ce sujet, s’inquiète du grand nombre de pétitions signées par des parents non allemands s’estimant victimes de discriminations en ce qui concerne la garde de l’enfant. Afin d’éclaircir cette situation, la Commission devrait en particulier évaluer si les juridictions allemandes ont dûment respecté les dispositions du règlement Bruxelles II bis (relatif à la compétence, la reconnaissance et l'exécution des décisions en matière matrimoniale et en matière de responsabilité parentale). Si nécessaire, l’Union devrait rappeler à l'Allemagne ses engagements en faveur de la protection des intérêts supérieurs de l'enfant, ainsi que l’importance de la coopération entre les juridictions des différents États membres. Il est essentiel de garantir la mise en place de pratiques équitables et la protection des droits des enfants des couples binationaux. Par ailleurs, afin d’aider leurs ressortissants confrontés à des problèmes liés à des litiges familiaux transfrontaliers, les États membres devraient mettre en place des mesures pour améliorer l’assistance et le conseil juridique.
Defence of academic freedom in the EU's external action (A8-0403/2018 - Wajid Khan) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution concernant la défense de la liberté académique dans l’action extérieure de l’Union qui recommande au Conseil et à la Commission de s’engager plus fortement en ce sens. L’UE devrait dénoncer publiquement les attaques portées contre la liberté d’enseignement lorsqu’elles ont lieu et rappeler qu’il est de la responsabilité des États de garantir cette liberté, de protéger les établissements d’enseignement supérieur et d’apporter un soutien aux universitaires et aux étudiants contre de telles attaques. Ces atteintes doivent être condamnées publiquement et l’Union devrait aborder la question de la liberté académique dans les différents types de dialogues politiques. Il est aujourd’hui opportun d’intensifier les efforts diplomatiques avec les pays partenaires en ce qui concerne des incidents de ce type que l’on ne peut plus ignorer et d’encourager les pays partenaires à mettre en place un cadre pour la liberté académique.
Transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union (A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon) FR
Les avancées sociales prévues par cette révision garantissent de nouveaux droits concrets pour les travailleurs européens, permettant d’améliorer la prévisibilité et la sécurité des conditions de travail, en particulier en ce qui concerne les nouvelles formes d'emploi «atypiques» apparus ces dernières années. La révision étend le champ d'application de la directive à des formes d'emploi qui en sont aujourd'hui souvent exclues et établit des droits minimaux qui s’appliquent à tous les travailleurs tels que le droit à recevoir les formations obligatoires gratuitement, la limitation des clauses d’exclusivité, ou encore l’obligation pour les employeurs d’informer les travailleurs ayant un planning de travail variable des périodes durant lesquelles ils peuvent être appelés à travailler. Il est impératif de conclure rapidement les discussions afin d’aboutir à l’adoption d’un texte favorable aux travailleurs européens et à la mise en œuvre effective du socle européen des droits sociaux. Pour cette raison, j’ai voté en faveur du mandat pour les trilogues.
Rail passengers' rights and obligations (A8-0340/2018 - Bogusław Liberadzki) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette refonte législative car elle comporte une réelle avancée pour les utilisateurs du rail. Ceux-ci vont bénéficier de nouveaux droits. Il sera par exemple désormais possible pour les voyageurs d’emmener leur vélo à bord des trains à grande vitesse, longue distance, transfrontaliers et locaux. Ou encore, l’assistance aux personnes à mobilité réduite devra être gratuite et, dans les plus grandes gares, il ne sera plus nécessaire de prévenir à l’avance pour obtenir de l’aide. Les usagers auront dorénavant droit à de meilleures indemnisations en cas de retard important. En effet, les indemnisations pour les retards supérieurs à une heure passent de 25% à 50% du prix du billet. Et aussi, Les voyageurs pourraient recevoir 75% du prix du billet pour un retard d’une heure et demie et 100% du prix du billet pour un retard supérieur à deux heures. Cette indemnisation s’ajoutant au droit à la poursuite du voyage ou au réacheminement.
Lyme disease (Borreliosis) (B8-0514/2018) FR
L'étendue réelle de la borréliose de Lyme dans l'UE est inconnue en raison du manque de statistiques sur cette maladie et de la très grande variété de définitions et de méthodes de détection, de diagnostic et de traitement. De nombreux patients ne sont pas diagnostiqués rapidement et n'ont dès lors pas accès à un traitement approprié en raison des difficultés de détection des symptômes et de l'absence de tests appropriés. Il est dès lors demandé à la Commission d’élaborer des plans de lutte contre la maladie au niveau européen, en fonction de la gravité de cette épidémie. La mise en place d'un réseau européen incluant les parties prenantes concernées est encouragée. En outre, les États membres touchés par la maladie devraient fournir des rapports obligatoires sur la prévention et la lutte contre les tiques afin d'endiguer la propagation de la bactérie Borrelia. Les personnes atteintes par cette maladie se sentent trop seules et peu protégées, l’Union européenne peut donner une impulsion pour faire avancer les choses, j’ai donc voté en faveur de la résolution.
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0335/2018 - Sabine Lösing) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur l’exportation d’armes qui rappelle avec force aux États membres leur engagement pris en 2008 dans le but de contrôler les exportations de technologie et d’équipements militaires. Selon cet engagement, les États sont tenus d’évaluer au cas par cas les demandes d’autorisation d’exportation qui leur sont adressées en fonction de huit critères qu’ils doivent appliquer lorsqu’ils prennent une décision de licence d’exportation d’armes. Ces règles communes ont notamment pour but d’empêcher la fourniture d’armes à des pays impliqués dans de graves violations du droit humanitaire et d’éviter que les armes européennes ne soient utilisées contre les forces armées européennes. Je déplore l’application non systématique de ces critères qui sont pourtant essentiels pour le respect des valeurs de l’Union. L’ambition d’accroître la compétitivité du secteur ne saurait compromettre l’application de ces critères repris dans une position commune dans le cadre de la PESC.
European Electronic Communications Code (A8-0318/2017 - Pilar del Castillo Vera) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette nouvelle législation car elle met en place des éléments positifs. Le code des communications européen permettra d’offrir aux citoyens une connectivité à haut débit tout en donnant la prévisibilité nécessaire aux opérateurs de télécommunications pour développer les investissements nécessaires dans ce secteur. Les nouvelles règles auront également pour effet de plafonner les appels et les SMS d’un État membre à un autre, respectivement à 19 centimes par minute et à 6 centimes par envoi à compter du 15 mai 2019. De plus, les utilisateurs de messageries en ligne telles que Skype ou Whatsapp bénéficieront d’une meilleure protection, notamment en termes de cryptage. Enfin, un dispositif d’urgence devra être mis en place en cas de catastrophe majeure, les citoyens concernés étant alors avertis par SMS ou via une application mobile.
Need for a comprehensive Democracy, Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights mechanism (B8-0523/2018, B8-0524/2018) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution qui déplore que la Commission n’ait pas encore présenté une proposition pour un mécanisme approfondi de l’Union pour la protection de la démocratie, de l’état de droit et des droits fondamentaux. Le respect des valeurs de l’Union, que nous défendons, devrait être évalué chaque année dans l’ensemble des États membres. Ainsi, un rapport annuel fondé sur des preuves permettrait d’évaluer le respect, par tous les États membres de l’Union, des valeurs inscrites dans les traités et de formuler des recommandations par pays, comme cela est déjà le cas pour les politiques économiques. Le besoin d’un tel mécanisme se fait aujourd’hui sentir comme nous le prouvent les situations politiques de plusieurs États membres. Par ailleurs, le Conseil devrait lui aussi s’engager en faveur du renforcement de la démocratie, de l’état de droit et des droits fondamentaux et en particulier assumer pleinement son rôle dans les procédures en cours.
Implementation of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement (A8-0320/2018 - Andrejs Mamikins) FR
Cette résolution fait le point sur la mise en œuvre de l’accord d’association de l’UE avec la Géorgie. L’Union est désormais le principal partenaire commercial de la Géorgie et la principale source d’investissements étrangers directs. Les autorités géorgiennes sont invitées à continuer d’assurer la stabilité, la poursuite des réformes démocratiques et l’amélioration de la situation économique et sociale des Géorgiens, qui sont touchés par la pauvreté, le chômage et l’émigration économique. Les droits de l’homme, le droit du travail, l’indépendance de la justice, le haut niveau de corruption, ainsi que la protection de l’environnement demeurent des sujets d’inquiétude. Il faut néanmoins saluer la nature concurrentielle des élections présidentielles qui ont eu lieu et l’absence de violence durant celles-ci.J’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution car elle va dans la bonne direction en gardant à l’esprit les défis à affronter.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Latvia (A8-0357/2018 - Inese Vaidere) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la mobilisation du Fonds de solidarité de l’Union européenne pour venir en aide à la Lettonie suite aux intenses inondations subies par le pays. La Lettonie a en effet subi il y a un an une longue période de précipitations intenses qui ont saturé le sol et entraîné des inondations dans tout le pays, en particulier dans la région de Latgale et les territoires environnants. Les inondations ont détruit les cultures et causé des dégâts considérables pour les cours d’eau, les systèmes de drainage, les installations de traitement des eaux usées ainsi que les infrastructures routières et ferroviaires. L’aide de 17,7 millions d’euros fournie par l’Union aura pour but de réparer les dégâts et de soutenir la région de Latgale. L’argent sera en particulier destiné à la restauration des infrastructures essentielles, à rembourser le coût des mesures d'urgence et à couvrir les coûts d'une partie des opérations de nettoyage.
EU development assistance in the field of education (A8-0327/2018 - Vincent Peillon) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution sur l’aide européenne au développement dans le domaine de l’éducation qui doit être au cœur nos politiques de développement. L’Union et les États membres devraient consacrer au minimum 10% de leur aide publique au développement à l’éducation d’ici à 2024, et 15% en 2030. En effet, l’éducation nécessite un investissement massif venant de l’aide internationale tout comme des pays en développement eux-mêmes. De plus, au moins 40% de l’aide à l’éducation de l’Union et des États membres devrait être dirigée vers les pays les moins avancés. La qualité de l’éducation est au centre de plusieurs enjeux : la maîtrise des apprentissages de base est un prérequis pour l’insertion dans la vie professionnelle, l’éducation des filles est un levier déterminant pour les sociétés, elle l’est aussi pour l’émancipation des groupes vulnérables ou encore l’intégration des personnes handicapées ou des migrants. Pour toutes ces raisons, je déplore qu’à l’heure actuelle l’aide à l’éducation ne soit pas davantage une priorité des bailleurs internationaux, cette situation doit évoluer.
The rule of law in Romania (B8-0522/2018) FR
L’État roumain est en train d’emprunter un chemin préoccupant. La nouvelle législation sur le statut des juges et des procureurs, l’organisation judiciaire et le Conseil supérieur de la magistrature pourrait, selon les avis du Groupe d’États contre la corruption du Conseil de l’Europe et de la Commission de Venise, avoir des conséquences sur l’indépendance de la justice, sur son efficacité et sa qualité. Le rôle du service de renseignement roumain et sa possible ingérence dans les activités de la justice roumaine sont des plus inquiétants, laissant entrevoir une violation du principe de la séparation des pouvoirs. La résolution suggère d’ailleurs un renforcement du contrôle sur ces services. L’intervention violente et disproportionnée de la police roumaine suite aux manifestations qui ont eu lieu à Bucarest l’été dernier est à condamner dans un État respectant les valeurs démocratiques. Enfin, la résolution invite la Commission à reprendre son contrôle annuel anti-corruption dans tous les États membres de l’UE et propose un système composé d’indicateurs stricts afin de mesurer le niveau de corruption, véritable fléau en Roumanie. Pour toutes ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution.
Manufacture, placing on the market and use of medicated feed (A8-0075/2016 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution relative aux médicaments vétérinaires car il était devenu essentiel de disposer d’un marché unique des médicaments vétérinaires et de régir l'autorisation, la fabrication, la mise sur le marché, la distribution et l'utilisation des médicaments vétérinaires. La mise en place d’un cadre réglementaire spécifique adapté aux caractéristiques du secteur vétérinaire permettra en outre d’améliorer l’accès aux médicaments et leur disponibilité, de réduire les charges administratives, de stimuler l’innovation et la compétitivité du secteur et de lutter contre la résistance aux antibiotiques chez les animaux. Ce dernier point est primordial, les médicaments vétérinaires ne doivent en aucun cas servir à améliorer la performance ou à compenser le non-respect de bonnes pratiques d’élevage. En particulier, l’utilisation métaphylactique (par exemple pour traiter un groupe d’animaux dont l’un présente des signes d’infection) devrait être un dernier recours et n’être possible qu’après diagnostic et prescription des antimicrobiens par un vétérinaire. Par ailleurs, la Commission devrait pouvoir sélectionner les antimicrobiens qui devront être uniquement réservés aux traitements humains. Enfin, il est essentiel que les denrées alimentaires importées respectent les normes de l’UE et que les antibiotiques ne soient pas utilisés pour favoriser la croissance des animaux.
Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy) FR
Le Parlement européen a adopté un nouveau cadre légal portant sur la mise en place des taxes routières. Ce nouveau cadre vise à contribuer à la réalisation des objectifs de réductions des émissions de l’UE pour le secteur des transports et à rendre les redevances routières plus équitables. À partir de 2023 pour les véhicules utilitaires lourds et les camionnettes de transport de marchandises et à partir de 2027 pour les véhicules utilitaires légers, la tarification routière imposée par les États membres devrait se baser sur la distance afin de garantir que les véhicules soient taxés en fonction de leur utilisation réelle des routes et de la pollution qu’ils génèrent. Il s’agira d’une application du principe du pollueur payeur et de l’utilisateur payeur. Pour encourager l'utilisation de véhicules respectueux de l'environnement, les pays de l'UE devraient fixer des taux de tarification routière différents en fonction des émissions de CO2. Ce texte, que j’ai soutenu, est un pas supplémentaire pour que la politique européenne de transport lutte mieux contre les émissions de C02 et la pollution générée par le secteur du transport routier européen.
Promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles (A8-0321/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb) FR
Cette révision législative s’inscrit dans le prolongement de la stratégie européenne pour une mobilité à faible taux d’émissions visant à remplir les engagements pris par l’UE lors de la COP21 tenue à Paris en 2015. En effet, la directive en vigueur actuellement n’a pas atteint les objectifs escomptés dans ce secteur (champ d’application trop restreint, imprécision ou extrême complexité des dispositions relatives à l’achat des véhicules). Il en découle que, pour le moment, les organismes publics n’ont acheté que de faibles volumes de véhicules propres. C’est pourquoi, le texte pour lequel j’ai voté met en place des objectifs minimaux différents d’un État membre à l’autre en matière de marchés publics. Cela constitue un moyen efficace d’atteindre l’objectif consistant à dynamiser la pénétration de véhicules propres sur le marché. De plus, il est précisé que la mise en place de ces objectifs pour les véhicules utilitaires légers et lourds nécessitera des ressources financières supplémentaires, dont l’Union devra tenir compte dans son futur cadre pluriannuel.
Rise of neo-fascist violence in Europe (RC-B8-0481/2018, B8-0481/2018, B8-0482/2018, B8-0483/2018, B8-0486/2018, B8-0488/2018) FR
Alarmé par la banalisation du racisme et de la xénophobie qui vont de pair avec les idéologies fascistes et nazis, j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution. Il y est dénoncé le manque d’action sérieuse à l’égard de ces groupes néofascistes et néonazis, ce qui a permis leur recrudescence en Europe. L’impunité dont ils jouissent dans certains États membres est l’une des raisons qui expliquent la montée des actions violentes à l’encontre de la société tout entière ou ciblant des minorités spécifiques. Il est proposé que les États membres devraient mettre en place des « programmes de sortie » pour aider les individus à quitter ces groupuscules. Dans cette perspective, l’éducation et la sensibilisation des jeunes à l’histoire sont des outils majeurs pour lutter contre ce phénomène.
2018 UN Climate Change Conference in Katowice, Poland (COP24) (B8-0477/2018) FR
Pour que l’Union garde un cap ambitieux dans la lutte contre le changement climatique, j’ai soutenu une résolution relative à la COP24 qui appelle l’Union européenne à intensifier ses mesures climatiques. Il est regrettable que les engagements actuels pris par la Convention-cadre des Nations unies sur les changements climatiques (CCNUCC) pourraient seulement limiter le réchauffement climatique à une augmentation de la température d’environ 3,2 degrés, encore bien loin des 2 degrés demandés lors de l’Accord de Paris. Pourtant, une augmentation limitée à 2 degrés serait déjà irréversible pour la planète, seul un objectif de 1,5 degré permettrait d’éviter les dégâts les plus importants. Par ailleurs, l’Union européenne devrait se fixer des objectifs plus élevés en matière de réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES). Ainsi, l’objectif de 45 % de réduction des émissions de GES européennes dans l’ensemble de l’économie d’ici à 2030 devrait être rehaussé à 55 %. Le budget de l’Union devrait être cohérent avec ces priorités climatiques. Ainsi, je soutiens l’intégration du climat et des énergies au cœur de nos préoccupations budgétaires. La part des dépenses liées au climat devrait augmenter de 20 à 30 % dès que possible.
14th meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP14) (B8-0478/2018) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution sur la 14e réunion de la convention sur la diversité biologique (COP 24) car il est prioritaire que la diversité biologique soit un axe horizontal de nos politiques européennes. Il est en effet inquiétant de remarquer que les objectifs d’Aichi pour la biodiversité à l’horizon 2020 ne seront pas remplis si l’on considère la trajectoire de perte de biodiversité dans laquelle nous nous trouvons aujourd’hui. La conservation et le rétablissement de la biodiversité sous-tendent la réalisation de la plupart des Objectifs de développement durable et sont essentiels pour la protection de l’environnement, la sécurité alimentaire, l’atténuation du changement climatique, la santé et la réduction des risques de catastrophes. À cet égard, la Commission les États membres devraient s’engager à faire des efforts supplémentaires et immédiats. Il est crucial de s’attaquer aux principales causes de la perte de biodiversité et de sa dégradation par une approche stratégique à long terme comprenant notamment l’identification et la conservation des zones protégées, la limitation de la perte de biodiversité et des répercussions négatives sur les territoires et communautés autochtones ainsi que le rétablissement des écosystèmes en dehors des zones protégées.
The use of Facebook users’ data by Cambridge Analytica and the impact on data protection (B8-0480/2018) FR
Suite au scandale Facebook-Cambridge Analytica, société soupçonnée d’avoir collecté illégalement des données sur Facebook et fait pencher le référendum en faveur du Brexit notamment, j’ai soutenu une résolution demandant un audit complet de Facebook afin d’évaluer la sécurité des données circulant sur le réseau social. Avec cette affaire, le réseau social n'a pas seulement violé la confiance des utilisateurs européens, mais aussi le droit de l'UE, Facebook devrait donc modifier ses pratiques afin de se mettre en conformité avec la législation européenne sur la protection des données et assurer plus de transparence. Il est urgent de mettre en place des mesures supplémentaires pour protéger nos démocraties et prévenir toute tentative de manipulation électorale future. L’interdiction du profilage à des fins électorales est une priorité. De plus, les publicités politiques payées devraient pouvoir être identifiées facilement et l’identification des faux comptes devrait être plus rapide afin de lutter contre la propagation volontaire des fake news.
General budget of the European Union for 2019 - all sections (A8-0313/2018 - Daniele Viotti, Paul Rübig) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du budget annuel de 2019: un budget largement tourné vers l’avenir. Pour atteindre un niveau de croissance et d’emploi plus élevé, il soutient la recherche, l’innovation et l’investissement par un rétablissement des lignes budgétaires du programme Horizon 2020. Il demande beaucoup plus d’efforts en faveur de la jeunesse qui est le futur de l’Europe, les crédits en faveur d’Erasmus+ sont donc augmentés. Un autre axe d’orientation est la lutte contre le réchauffement climatique. Afin que le sujet soit pris au sérieux, 100 millions d’euros supplémentaires y seront consacrés. L’Union européenne ne pouvant plus fermer les yeux sur la dérive autocratique de M. Erdogan, les crédits en faveur de la préadhesion de la Turquie ont quant à eux été diminués. Enfin, la création d’un fonds de solidarité en faveur des victimes des attentats terroristes en Europe est demandée.
Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (A8-0317/2018 - Frédérique Ries) FR
L’état de pollution de nos océans, en grande partie causé par des produits plastiques, est dramatique. Bien que la responsabilité de ce problème ne peut être endossée uniquement par l’Union européenne, nous prenons conscience peu à peu de l’effet de nos actions sur l’environnement. À cet égard, le Parlement européen a largement adopté un texte interdisant à partir de 2021, la mise sur le marché des produits plastiques à usage unique qui représentent plus de 70% des déchets marins et pour lesquels des alternatives existent (assiettes, couverts, cotons-tiges, pailles, ...). D’autres objectifs de réduction ont été entérinés, tels que la réduction de 50% d’ici 2025 et de 80% d’ici 2030 des déchets issus des filtres à cigarette. Cette législation ambitieuse, pour laquelle j’ai voté, est une étape qui va dans la bonne direction et place l’Union européenne à la pointe de la lutte contre la pollution marine.
The role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed (A8-0293/2018 - Renate Weber) FR
Depuis 30 ans, la participation financière des salariés (PFS) s’est beaucoup développée en Europe et notamment en France, mais de grands écarts existent entre les États membres. En 2018, environ dix millions de salariés européens sont actionnaires, et vingt pays de l’Union européenne disposent, sous une forme ou sous une autre, d’une réglementation d’incitation à la PFS. J’ai soutenu ce rapport qui invite la Commission à émettre des recommandations afin d’encourager les États membres et les entreprises, notamment les PME, à offrir des régimes de PFS. La demande de participation financière des salariés s’accroît dans l’Union européenne et cette participation a prouvé son utilité. Un ensemble bien défini d’orientations européennes simples et générales devrait permettre de garantir des conditions de concurrence équitables ainsi que la diffusion de ses avantages dans l’ensemble de l’Europe. Pour parvenir à cela, l’accent doit être mis sur le potentiel de ces régimes pour les travailleurs et leurs employeurs du point de vue de la croissance et de la protection sociale. Des mesures en faveur de la PFS pourraient être prises à l’échelle de l’Union: campagnes de sensibilisation, éducation financière des citoyens, transparence et information accrues, davantage d’incitations ainsi qu’une réflexion sur les obstacles transnationaux.
Public procurement strategy package (A8-0229/2018 - Carlos Coelho) FR
J’ai voté pour ce rapport car il souligne les leviers à activer pour mieux moderniser les marchés publics en Europe. Il faut reconnaître que le cadre législatif de l’Union relatif aux marchés publics de 2014 n’avait jusqu’à présent pas porté pleinement ses fruits. Nous pointons d’abord l’importance d’une bonne application du cadre législatif par l’ensemble des États membres. Nous insistons ensuite sur la numérisation des procédures, déjà expressément prévue dans la stratégie de 2014. Enfin, nous appelons à une plus grande accessibilité des marchés publics, notamment par la création d’un guide et d’un code déontologique destinés aux acteurs intervenant dans les procédures de passation. Rappelons pour conclure l’importance d’une meilleure intégration des PME dans les procédures d’appel d’offres par la division du marché en lots ou encore la favorisation des passations conjointes, y compris transfrontières.
EU Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) (A8-0320/2017 - Axel Voss) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution qui permettra à l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) de bénéficier de nouvelles règles plus efficaces et opérationnelles, notamment grâce à un nouveau modèle de gouvernance. Il est tout à fait nécessaire d’avoir des outils européens et modernes en ce qui concerne la coopération judiciaire et la lutte contre la criminalité transfrontalière. Il était notamment important d’établir clairement la répartition des compétences entre le Parquet européen et Eurojust en ce qui concerne les activités criminelles portant atteinte aux intérêts financiers de l’Union. Eurojust devrait en particulier assurer la coordination des enquêtes et des poursuites menées par les États membres, coopérer avec le Parquet européen pour les matières relatives à sa compétence, soutenir les centres d’expertise spécialisée développés par Europol et appuyer l’action des États membres aux fins de la prévention et de la répression des formes graves de criminalité. Eurojust est aujourd’hui une agence essentielle pour relever nos défis européens communs en matière de lutte contre la criminalité et le terrorisme.
Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders (A8-0001/2018 - Nathalie Griesbeck) FR
Les dispositions mises en place par le texte que nous venons d’approuver devraient permettre aux États membres de se communiquer mutuellement, de façon plus rapide et plus simple, les décisions de gel d’avoirs ou de confiscations de biens d’origine criminelle. Plus précisément, ces nouvelles mesures introduisent l’utilisation de certificats et de formulaires standards pour faciliter les échanges et instituent des obligations de délais entre États membres pour appliquer les décisions d’exécution.En outre, les victimes sont pourvues de droits plus étendus, elles seront les premières indemnisées lors de la distribution des biens confisqués. J’ai voté en faveur de ces nouveaux outils qui permettent de lutter concrètement contre les organisations criminelles qui tirent profit des libertés fondatrices de l’UE en favorisant la collaboration judiciaire entre les ordres judiciaires européens.
Free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (A8-0201/2018 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt) FR
Ce nouveau règlement européen interdira les règles nationales exigeant que les données à caractère non personnel soient stockées et traitées dans un État membre donné. Les données en question sont très variées: il peut s’agir d’ensembles de données agrégées utilisées pour l’analyse des mégadonnées, de données sur l’agriculture ou encore de données sur les besoins d’entretien des machines industrielles. Les restrictions sur la localisation des données ne pourront être permises que si elles sont justifiées par des raisons de sécurité publique, comme définies dans les traités et conformément à l’interprétation de la Cour européenne de justice.Le cas où un ensemble de données est composé à la fois de données à caractère personnel et non personnel a aussi été prévu, le règlement s’appliquant alors uniquement à la partie à caractère non personnel. Lorsque ces données à caractère personnel et non personnel sont inextricablement liées, l’application des règles de l’Union sur la protection des données (GDPR) sera d’application.Ainsi, les deux règlements s’appliquent de manière complémentaire. J’ai donc voté pour ce texte qui devrait offrir des conditions de concurrence équitables aux entreprises européennes et leur permettra d’être compétitives au niveau international.
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0444/2018, B8-0444/2018, B8-0445/2018, B8-0446/2018, B8-0447/2018, B8-0448/2018, B8-0449/2018, B8-0450/2018) FR
La situation politique et humanitaire actuelle au Yémen est dramatique: 22 millions de Yéménites sont dans un besoin urgent d’aide humanitaire ou de protection, 8 millions de personnes sont menacées de famine et le conflit a déjà fait plusieurs milliers de morts et provoqué un effondrement de l’économie.J’ai soutenu la résolution qui condamne les violences causées sur les civils par les différentes parties du conflit et exhorte toutes les parties au conflit à mettre immédiatement un terme aux hostilités. Désormais, seule une solution politique négociée entre tous peut rétablir la paix et préserver l’unité, l’indépendance et l’intégrité territoriale du Yémen. Un accès humanitaire complet aux zones de conflit doit être établi d’urgence afin d’aider les populations qui en ont besoin.De plus, compte tenu du non-respect des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire au Yémen, tous les États membres devraient s’abstenir de vendre des armes et tout autre équipement militaire à l’Arabie saoudite, aux Émirats arabes unis ainsi qu’au gouvernement yéménite.
Harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the VAT system (A8-0280/2018 - Jeppe Kofod) FR
Selon différentes études, les pays de l’Union européenne perdent jusqu’à 50 milliards d’euros chaque année en raison de la fraude transfrontalière à la TVA. Ce nouveau texte fait partie d’un vaste train de mesures présenté par la Commission européenne visant à réformer le système de TVA et à améliorer la clarté transfrontalière. J’ai voté en faveur de l’action générale de la Commission qui a pour objectif de faciliter les échanges commerciaux au sein du marché unique (pour les PME en particulier) et à réduire la fraude à la TVA. De plus, je suis également en faveur des mesures plus spécifiques proposant d’établir un système communiquant de façon automatique les changements de règles liées à la TVA entre les États membres, un portail d'informations multilingue permettant tant aux particuliers qu’aux entreprises d'obtenir rapidement des données précises sur les taux de TVA au sein des pays de l’UE, ainsi que le statut d’assujetti certifié permettant d’accéder à plusieurs procédures simplifiées pour la déclaration et le paiement de la TVA transfrontière.
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli) FR
J’ai soutenu cette résolution qui vise en particulier à ce que les émissions de CO2 des nouvelles voitures et camionnettes soient réduites de 20 % d’ici à 2025 et de 40 % d’ici à 2030. Même si je défendais une réduction allant jusqu'à 50%, l’objectif obtenu est plus écologique et ambitieux que ce qui avait été proposé initialement par la Commission européenne. Ces mesures étaient particulièrement attendues et devraient permettre de mieux responsabiliser le secteur des transports, dont les émissions de gaz à effet de serre sont toujours en augmentation. Il est de plus indispensable que cette décarbonisation s’accélère afin de respecter les engagements pris dans le cadre de l’Accord de Paris et de préserver plus efficacement la santé humaine et l’environnement. J’ai souhaité encourager la mise en vente du plus grand nombre de véhicules à émissions faibles ou nulles sur le marché avec la mise en place d’un système de bonus / malus pour les constructeurs.
EU Agenda for Rural, Mountainous and Remote Areas (B8-0399/2018) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur la prise en compte des besoins spécifiques des zones rurales, montagneuses et isolées, qui souligne que ces zones devraient être renforcées, en prenant en compte leurs besoins spécifiques, afin d’assurer un développement territorial équilibré en Europe. Ces zones sont en effet confrontées à des défis spécifiques et en particulier l’exode rural, notamment des jeunes. Pour faire face à ce phénomène, le programme rural européen englobant les zones rurales devrait être ambitieux pour parvenir à stimuler le développement socio-économique, la croissance et la diversification de l’économie. Il devrait stimuler l’interconnexion avec les zones urbaines afin de favoriser la cohésion et d’éviter le risque de fragmentation territoriale mais aussi prendre en compte la protection de la nature et les enjeux environnementaux. Le programme rural devrait être accompagné d’un cadre stratégique visant à atteindre les objectifs en matière de villages intelligents, d’accès aux services publics, de transition numérique, de formation et d’innovation. Toutes ces mesures devraient permettre d’apporter une vitalité nouvelle dans les régions isolées.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/001 NL/Financial service activities (A8-0294/2018 - Ivana Maletić) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la mobilisation du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation, suite à une demande présentée par les Pays-Bas, afin d’apporter une aide à 1324 travailleurs licenciés du secteur des services financiers qui ont subi les conséquences de la mondialisation. L’Union réagit en solidarité et apporte une contribution financière de 1,2 millions d’euros afin d’éviter que les licenciements n’aient un effet négatif sur l’économie locale de régions qui connaissent déjà des taux de chômage élevés. Les Pays-Bas concentreront leurs actions sur les groupes vulnérables pour les aider à changer de profession, de secteur ou de région, y compris en proposant des formations pour de nouveaux secteurs professionnels plus porteurs tels que les transports, les services informatiques et les professions techniques. Pour accompagner les travailleurs dans leur réinsertion, différentes mesures comme l’aide à la recherche d’emploi, la valorisation de l’entrepreneuriat, l’aide au reclassement externe et l’aide à la création d’entreprise seront également mise en œuvre.
Provision of audiovisual media services (A8-0192/2017 - Sabine Verheyen, Petra Kammerevert) FR
L’évolution du marché et des pratiques dans le secteur audiovisuel rendait urgente la mise à jour de cette directive. J’ai voté en faveur du texte, principalement pour trois raisons. Premièrement, nous renforçons les règles de protection des publics, et en particulier du public mineur. Deuxièmement, nous avons souhaité soutenir la diversité culturelle et la création européenne en obligeant les services de médias à la demande (par exemple, Netflix) à proposer 30 % d’œuvres européennes dans leurs catalogues et à leur donner une bonne visibilité. Troisièmement, les plateformes de partage de vidéo sont intégrées dans le champ d’application de la directive, ce qui représente un premier pas vers une mise à niveau de leurs obligations par rapport à celles des fournisseurs de services de média audiovisuel traditionnels. En conséquence, Youtube mais aussi les services de média sociaux, et c’est important, devront mieux lutter contre les contenus haineux, violents, incitant au terrorisme ou ceux portant atteinte au développement du jeune public. Il est grand temps de davantage responsabiliser les plateformes.
A European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy (A8-0262/2018 - Mark Demesmaeker) FR
Les conséquences du plastique sur l’environnement sont désormais une préoccupation collective. La production globale annuelle de plastique atteignait 322 millions de tonnes en 2015 et devrait doubler au cours des 20 prochaines années. Dans ce contexte, le Parlement a adopté à une très large majorité une nouvelle stratégie sur les matières plastiques dans une économie circulaire. J’ai voté favorablement cette résolution car son intention générale va dans la bonne direction. Qui plus est, plusieurs propositions me semblent judicieuses : les incitations à collecter les déchets marins par les pêcheurs, la mise en place de nouvelles normes et définitions pour la biodégradabilité et la compostabilité des plastiques, et enfin l’interdiction des microplastiques dans les cosmétiques et les détergents d’ici 2020.
A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (A8-0257/2018 - Karin Kadenbach) FR
Dans l’Union, la résistance antimicrobienne, causée par l’utilisation excessive et non justifiée des antibiotiques, est responsable d’environ 25 000 décès et de 1,5 milliard d’euros de dépenses de santé supplémentaires chaque année. J’ai soutenu la résolution relative au plan d’action européen fondé sur le principe «Une seule santé», car il est urgent d’enrayer cette tendance. L’utilisation prudente et modérée des antimicrobiens est essentielle pour limiter l’émergence de la résistance antimicrobienne dans la santé humaine, mais aussi dans l’élevage animal et l’aquaculture. Étant donné les disparités entre les pays de l’Union, la Commission et les États membres devraient limiter la vente d’antibiotiques par les professionnels et supprimer toute incitation à leur prescription. Il conviendrait par ailleurs de mener des actions efficaces à l’encontre des ventes d’antibiotiques illégales et sans prescription dans l’Union. Enfin, puisque le manque de connaissances demeure un facteur-clé de ce problème, des étiquettes expliquant l’utilisation des antibiotiques permettraient également aux consommateurs de faire des choix éclairés. À ce titre, la Commission devrait créer un système unique d’étiquetage.
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová) FR
À l’issue d’études et d’enquêtes, il est apparu que plusieurs produits de marque et d’emballage identiques vendus sur le marché intérieur différaient dans leur composition et leurs ingrédients au détriment de certains consommateurs en fonction de leur emplacement géographique. Ces pratiques commerciales ont pu être observées dans le secteur de la vente de produits alimentaires mais également de détergents, de cosmétiques, d’articles de toilette et de produits destinés aux bébés. J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte car il est intolérable que les consommateurs du marché intérieur soient traités de manière différente en fonction de leur lieu de résidence. De plus, je suis convaincu que l’inclusion de ce genre de pratiques commerciales dans la liste « noire » des pratiques déloyales prohibées sur le marché intérieur enverrait un signal clair qui permettrait d’éviter ce phénomène de doubles standards portant atteinte à la confiance qu’ont les consommateurs dans le marché intérieur.
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss) FR
Après de longues années de travail et de débats, le Parlement européen a adopté la réforme sur le droit d’auteur. J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte qui remet à jour la législation existante, inadaptée aux nouvelles exigences de l’ère numérique. L’objectif de cette refonte est d’apporter des avantages tangibles aux citoyens de l'Union, aux chercheurs, aux éducateurs, aux écrivains, aux artistes, à la presse et aux institutions du patrimoine culturel. L’adoption de cette position remet la création au centre de la chaîne de valeur et favorise la redistribution des richesses qui sont jusqu’à présent encore, en grande partie accaparées par les géants du numérique. C’est une étape cruciale qui a été franchie : l’adoption de ce texte à une large majorité donne un mandat clair aux négociateurs du Parlement et va leur permettre d’aborder les tractations avec le Conseil sur des bases solides.
Countering money laundering by criminal law (A8-0405/2017 - Ignazio Corrao) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution visant à lutter contre le blanchiment de capitaux, qui a pour objet d’ériger en infraction pénale tout acte de blanchiment de capitaux lorsque celui-ci est commis intentionnellement et en sachant que les biens provenaient d’une activité criminelle. Les États membres devraient faire en sorte que cette pratique soit passible d’une peine d’emprisonnement maximale d’au moins quatre ans. Cet établissement de sanctions minimales à l'échelle européenne contribuera à prévenir le blanchiment d’argent dans toute l’Union.Par ailleurs, les nouvelles règles sur les mouvement d’argent liquide, qui incluent désormais l’or et les cartes électroniques prépayées anonymes, permettront aux autorités d’enregistrer des informations sur les mouvements d’argent liquide suspects en-dessous du seuil actuel de 10 000 euros et de saisir de façon temporaire l’argent liquide si elles soupçonnent une activité criminelle. Grace à ces améliorations, l’Union est désormais mieux armée pour combattre efficacement le blanchiment de capitaux et les actions illégales qu’il finance.
The situation in Hungary (A8-0250/2018 - Judith Sargentini) FR
Face aux dérives du pouvoir incarné par le premier ministre Viktor Orbán en Hongrie, j’ai soutenu la résolution prévoyant le déclenchement de l’article 7 du traité sur l’Union européenne. Il revient maintenant aux États membres, après avoir entendu le point de vue des autorités hongroises, de prendre leurs responsabilités et d’établir, conformément au Traité, si la Hongrie a violé les valeurs fondatrices de l’UE. La situation dans le pays et notamment le fonctionnement du système constitutionnel, l’indépendance de la justice, la liberté d’expression ou encore les droits fondamentaux des migrants, des demandeurs d’asile et des réfugiés sont en cause. Nous sommes encore dans la phase préventive de cette procédure, enclenchée pour la première fois par le Parlement, qui permet un dialogue avec le pays concerné et vise à éviter de possibles sanctions. Toutefois, l’existence d’un risque clair de violation grave par la Hongrie des valeurs sur lesquelles l’Union est fondée ne peut être ignorée.
State of EU-US relations (A8-0251/2018 - Elmar Brok) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur l’état des relations entre l’Union européenne et les États-Unis qui déplore la décision des États-Unis d’initier une guerre commerciale qui porte préjudice aux deux parties. En effet, l’incertitude causée par la décision récente des États-Unis d’imposer des tarifs douaniers sur l’acier et l’aluminium et la politique unilatérale «America first» portée par le Président Trump vont à l’encontre du partenariat entre nos deux régions et met à mal la confiance mutuelle. De plus, la décision américaine de se retirer de plusieurs accords internationaux clés et en particulier de l’accord de Paris sur le climat, en dépit des enjeux écologiques que nous connaissons, est plus que regrettable. Toutefois, je reconnais que malgré ces tensions, les États-Unis doivent demeurer un partenaire privilégié. Notre relation mériterait d’être renforcée, notamment en ce qui concerne la cybersécurité, la lutte contre le terrorisme ou les politiques énergétiques.
Pathways for the reintegration of workers recovering from injury and illness into quality employment (A8-0208/2018 - Jana Žitňanská) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur les solutions visant à aider les travailleurs à retrouver un travail de qualité après une blessure ou une maladie. Dans ce domaine, une culture de la prévention est importante et il est notamment essentiel d’assurer aux travailleurs un accès suffisant aux soins de santé afin de détecter une maladie le plus tôt possible. Il convient également d’élaborer un programme de suivi des travailleurs exposés à des risques psychosociaux, tels que le stress, la dépression et le burn-out, dans le but de formuler des recommandations et des lignes directrices pour lutter contre ce type de risques. Par ailleurs, pour faciliter le retour au travail, la Commission devrait prendre des mesures pour contrer les effets négatifs de l’absence prolongée du travail. Elle devrait également élaborer des lignes directrices sur les bonnes pratiques ainsi qu’un encadrement et des conseils à l’intention des employeurs sur la manière d’élaborer et de mettre en œuvre des plans de réinsertion efficaces.
European Solidarity Corps (A8-0060/2018 - Helga Trüpel) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette initiative portée depuis 2 ans par la Commission Juncker. Le Corps européen de solidarité va offrir à environ 100 000 jeunes âgés de 18 à 30 ans la possibilité de participer à des projets de solidarité dans toute l’Europe. La jeunesse pourra ainsi acquérir de précieuses expériences pour des périodes allant jusqu’à un an, tout en apportant sa contribution à la société par des actions de volontariat, des stages ou des emplois dans son pays de provenance ou dans un autre pays européen. Les compétences acquises par ces jeunes seront certifiées et leur permettront de faire valoir ensuite leurs qualités sur le marché du travail. Les entités proposant des activités devront bénéficier d’un label de qualité et pourront par exemple couvrir des projets de solidarité liés à l'éducation, la santé, la protection de l'environnement, la prévention des catastrophes, la fourniture de denrées alimentaires, l'accueil et l'intégration de migrants et demandeurs d'asile. L’accent a été particulièrement mis sur l’inclusivité du programme, pour faire en sorte qu’il soit le plus largement accessible.
Language equality in the digital age (A8-0228/2018 - Jill Evans) FR
Le développement d’internet et des outils numériques a provoqué un «fossé numérique» entre les langues largement répandues et les autres, moins employées dans cet environnement. Ce phénomène est en cours d’expansion et certaines de ces langues minoritaires sont déjà en état d’extinction numérique. Nous savons que le multilinguisme est un des points forts de l’Union européenne mais comme nous pouvons l’observer dans ce cas, il recèle également des défis. C’est dans la perspective de trouver des réponses aux besoins d’une Europe multilingue que j’ai voté pour ce texte: nous devons empêcher à certaines langues d’être minorisées dans le secteur numérique en investissant en Recherche et Développement dans le domaine des technologies linguistiques, ou encore dans le développement d'applications innovatrices par exemple (traitement du langage naturel, analyse de textes, les technologies vocales ou l’exploration de données).
European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) (A8-0322/2017 - Kinga Gál) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte car il permettra la mise en place d’un nouveau système d’information et d’autorisation concernant les voyages. Plus précisément, il s’intéressera aux ressortissants de pays tiers exemptés de l’obligation de visa voulant entrer sur le territoire de l’Union européenne. Les ressortissants de plus de 60 pays devront préalablement remplir un formulaire électronique dans lequel ils fourniront des données personnelles (notamment le nom, le lieu et la date de naissance, le sexe et la nationalité), les informations liées à leur document de voyage (validité, pays de délivrance), ainsi que le pays européen dans lequel ils ont prévu leur première entrée. Le voyageur devra également informer les autorités de toute condamnation pour des infractions pénales graves (terrorisme, exploitation sexuelle d’enfants, trafic d’êtres humains ou de drogues, meurtre et viol), de séjours dans des zones de guerre ou de conflit et d’une éventuelle décision administrative leur demandant de quitter le territoire. Le tout dans une période couvrant les dix dernières années. La grande majorité des demandeurs recevra l’autorisation quasi instantanément mais ce système permettra d’identifier ceux qui présentent un risque en termes de sécurité, de migration irrégulière ou d’épidémie.
The migration crisis and humanitarian situation in Venezuela and at its borders (RC-B8-0315/2018, B8-0315/2018, B8-0316/2018, B8-0317/2018, B8-0318/2018, B8-0319/2018, B8-0320/2018, B8-0321/2018) FR
Alors que certains accusent les travailleurs humanitaires et les ONG d’agir en dehors du cadre légal en apportant leur aide aux migrants, j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution demandant des lignes directrices destinées aux États membres pour empêcher que l’aide humanitaire ne soit érigée en infraction pénale. L’Union devrait en effet s’assurer que l’aide aux migrants apportée par des citoyens pour des raisons humanitaires ne fasse pas l’objet de sanctions inappropriées. À cette fin, la Commission devrait préciser quels types d’aide aux migrants ne devraient pas être criminalisés et adopter des orientations précises afin de garantir que la loi soit appliquée de façon plus claire et plus uniforme. Cela est essentiel puisqu’à l’heure actuelle peu d’États membres ont transposé l’exception relative à l’aide humanitaire prévue par la législation européenne dans leur législation nationale concernant les sanctions pénales pour toute personne facilitant l’entrée, le transit et le séjour irréguliers de migrants.
Guidelines for Member States to prevent humanitarian assistance being criminalised (B8-0314/2018) FR
Alors que certains accusent les travailleurs humanitaires et les ONG d’agir en dehors du cadre légal en apportant leur aide aux migrants, j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution demandant des lignes directrices destinées aux États membres pour empêcher que l’aide humanitaire ne soit érigée en infraction pénale. L’Union devrait en effet s’assurer que l’aide aux migrants apportée par des citoyens pour des raisons humanitaires ne fasse pas l’objet de sanctions inappropriées. À cette fin, la Commission devrait préciser quels types d’aide aux migrants ne devraient pas être criminalisés et adopter des orientations précises afin de garantir que la loi soit appliquée de façon plus claire et plus uniforme. Cela est essentiel puisqu’à l’heure actuelle peu d’États membres ont transposé l’exception relative à l’aide humanitaire prévue par la législation européenne dans leur législation nationale concernant les sanctions pénales pour toute personne facilitant l’entrée, le transit et le séjour irréguliers de migrants.
The adverse effects of the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act on EU citizens (B8-0306/2018) FR
La FATCA est une loi américaine avec des effets extraterritoriaux importants. Elle vise à empêcher l’évasion fiscale par des Américains et, à cette fin, elle exige des institutions financières étrangères qu’elles recherchent des « personnes américaines » par un certain nombre d'indices d’américanité. Les personnes en question doivent ensuite prouver qu’elles ne sont pas américaines. Cette loi afflige de nombreux citoyens européens puisque les personnes répondant aux exigences américaines voient leurs comptes d’épargne gelés et se trouvent privées d’accès aux services bancaires, les institutions financières rechignant à produire les coûteux rapports que leur impose cette loi. J’ai donc voté pour cette résolution invitant la Commission et le Conseil à présenter une approche commune de l’Union à la FATCA et d’ouvrir des négociations avec les États-Unis en vue d’un accord afin de garantir la pleine réciprocité de l’échange d’informations, de faire respecter les principes fondamentaux du droit de l’Union, y compris la directive sur les comptes de paiement, et de permettre aux «Américains accidentels» de se défaire de leur citoyenneté américaine non souhaitée gratuitement, sans enregistrement de leurs données et sans sanctions.
Statute for social and solidarity-based enterprises (A8-0231/2018 - Jiří Maštálka) FR
L’économie sociale et solidaire revêt une grande importance au sein de l’Union ; elle représente quelque deux millions d’entreprises qui emploient plus de 14,5 millions de salariés et sont précieuses pour la cohésion sociale et la croissance économique. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution demandant à la Commission de créer, au niveau de l’Union, un «label européen de l’économie sociale» qui puisse être octroyé aux entreprises qui respectent les obligations légales qui définissent le statut d’entreprise de l’économie sociale et solidaire. Un tel label permettrait de mettre en lumière les caractéristiques spécifiques de ces entreprises et leurs effets sociaux, d’améliorer leur visibilité, d’encourager l’investissement et de faciliter l’accès au financement. Ce label devrait être facultatif pour les entreprises, mais être reconnu par tous les États membres afin de favoriser leur développement et leur activité au sein de l’Union.
EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) (A8-0224/2018 - Tokia Saïfi) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution relative à la conclusion d’un accord de partenariat et de coopération entre l’Union et la République d’Iraq, qui est un instrument essentiel pour réaffirmer la volonté de l’Union européenne de nouer un partenariat solide avec ce pays. Il est important de rappeler aux États membres et à l’Union la nécessité d’accompagner l’Iraq dans sa transition vers la démocratie et dans le processus de reconstruction et de maintenir l’aide humanitaire qu’ils fournissent actuellement pour aider et protéger tous les irakiens touchés par les conflits. Une aide financière supplémentaire d’urgence est nécessaire pour la reconstruction des infrastructures prioritaires et la restauration des services essentiels. L’Union devrait par ailleurs intensifier sa coopération pour faciliter la stabilisation et la sécurité des zones récemment libérées. Au travers du dialogue politique, l’Union pourrait œuvrer avec les autorités irakiennes afin de promouvoir le respect des droits de l’homme, le renforcement des institutions démocratiques, une bonne gouvernance et un système judiciaire efficace.
Negotiations on the EU-Azerbaijan Comprehensive Agreement (A8-0185/2018 - Norica Nicolai) FR
L’Azerbaïdjan fait partie des États membres du partenariat oriental mis en place par l’Union fondé sur l’approfondissement des relations, sur l’observation du droit international et des valeurs communes fondamentales telles que la démocratie, l’état de droit, la bonne gouvernance et le respect des droits humains. À cet égard, j’ai voté en faveur de cette recommandation car elle exprime les exigences du Parlement européen pour les négociations futures relatives à un accord global avec l’Azerbaïdjan. L’assemblée appelle à veiller, avant l’achèvement des négociations, à ce que l’Azerbaïdjan libère ses prisonniers politiques et ses prisonniers d’opinion, à soutenir la réforme de la justice visant à garantir son impartialité et son indépendance vis-à-vis du pouvoir exécutif, à veiller à ce que le futur accord soit ambitieux et porteur d’avantages tangibles pour les deux parties, non seulement pour les grandes entreprises, mais aussi pour les citoyens de l’Union et de l’Azerbaïdjan. Il est également rappelé aux autorités azerbaïdjanaises qu’aucun accord global ne sera ratifié avec un pays qui ne respecte pas les valeurs et droits fondamentaux de l’Union.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/009 FR/Air France (A8-0210/2018 - Alain Lamassoure) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative à la mobilisation du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation suite à la demande concernant les travailleurs de l’entreprise Air France. L’Union réagit en solidarité et mobilise 9,9 millions d’euros pour apporter son soutien suite aux 1 858 licenciements survenus en Île-de-France et en Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur. Face au recul de la part de marché de l’Union dans le secteur des transports aériens, il est capital de soutenir les travailleurs des compagnies aériennes européennes lorsqu’ils sont durement touchés. Pour éviter que ces licenciements n’aient des répercussions négatives importantes sur l’économie locale, l’Union financera plusieurs types d’actions à destination des anciens employés d’Air France: services de conseil et orientation professionnelle, formation professionnelle, aide pour la reprise ou la création d’une entreprise et allocation de recherche d’emploi.
European Defence Industrial Development Programme (A8-0037/2018 - Françoise Grossetête) FR
J’ai voté pour l’instauration du premier programme européen de développement industriel dans le domaine de la défense, qui sera doté d’un budget de 500 millions d’euros pour 2019-2020. Ce programme contribuera à financer le développement de nouveaux produits et de technologies améliorées dans le but de rendre l’Union plus indépendante, ce qui permettra de gérer les dépenses budgétaires de façon plus efficace. Selon une étude, le coût de la non-Europe dans ce domaine dérivant des doubles emplois, de la surcapacité et des entraves imposées aux acquisitions militaires, s’élève à 26,4 milliards d'euros perdus chaque année. L’Union européenne cofinancera des projets mis en œuvre par des consortiums d'au moins trois entreprises publiques ou privées établies dans au moins trois États membres de l'UE. Ce programme peut être considéré comme le projet pilote du prochain Fonds européen de la défense. Avec une proposition de budget de 13 milliards d’euros sur une période de 7 ans, ce fonds visera à rendre l’UE plus indépendante dans le domaine de la défense, grâce à la coopération, tout en encourageant une utilisation plus efficace de l’argent des contribuables.
Climate diplomacy (A8-0221/2018 - Arne Lietz, Jo Leinen) FR
Les graves effets du changement climatique sont ressentis dans le monde entier et doivent par conséquent constituer une priorité stratégique dans les relations diplomatiques internationales. Dans cette perspective, j’ai soutenu cette résolution pour que l’Union intensifie ses efforts en matière de diplomatie climatique, défende l’action pour le climat et réaffirme son engagement politique de manière constante. J’ai en revanche voté contre la demande de simples discussions au sein des Nations Unies afin de trouver une réponse aux mouvements de populations en raison du changement climatique. À l’avenir, les flux migratoires trouvant leur cause dans le climat seront aussi pressants que ceux liés à la politique aujourd’hui. Je pense qu’en ce domaine, en tant que leader mondial, nous devons aller plus loin et œuvrer à l’élaboration d’une définition universellement acceptée du réfugié climatique afin que notre futur soit marqué par moins d’incertitude que ne l’est notre présent.
Structural and financial barriers in the access to culture (A8-0169/2018 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski) FR
La culture a un rôle vital à jouer dans nos sociétés modernes. Un secteur culturel actif et accessible est un indice d’une société démocratique et ouverte à tous. Cependant, la culture reste encore trop souvent perçue comme confinée à un cercle d’initiés. J’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution, qui demande aux États membres de consacrer une part appropriée de leurs budgets pour soutenir le secteur et de mettre en œuvre des mesures afin de garantir l’accès et la participation des citoyens à la culture. Les États membres pourraient par exemple cibler des publics spécifiques : étudiants, familles nombreuses ou personnes âgées. Il serait également opportun de renforcer l’intérêt et la compréhension de la culture par l’intégration de l’éducation culturelle et artistique dans les programmes scolaires mais aussi en reconnaissant l’éducation non-formelle et informelle dans ce secteur. Enfin, l’outil numérique peut se révéler utile pour parer à plusieurs obstacles empêchant l’accessibilité à la culture comme les situations géographiques défavorables, le handicap ou la langue. Il faudra donc développer son maniement dès le plus jeune âge.
Georgian occupied territories ten years after the Russian invasion (RC-B8-0275/2018, B8-0275/2018, B8-0276/2018, B8-0277/2018, B8-0278/2018, B8-0279/2018, B8-0285/2018) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution concernant les territoires géorgiens qui demeurent occupés par la Russie dix ans après l’invasion du pays. Il s’agit ici de réaffirmer un soutien à la souveraineté et à l’intégrité territoriale de la Géorgie. Au lieu de mettre en œuvre l’accord de cessez-le-feu du 12 août 2008, la Russie renforce continuellement sa présence militaire dans ces régions. La Russie devrait mettre un terme à son occupation des territoires géorgiens d'Abkhazie et d'Ossétie du Sud (région de Tskhinvali), et respecter l’inviolabilité des frontières internationalement reconnues de la Géorgie. La Russie devrait également revenir sur sa décision de reconnaître la prétendue indépendance des régions occupées illégalement.Enfin, en tant que force d’occupation, la Russie doit respecter les obligations qui lui incombent et mettre un terme aux violations des droits de l’homme, aux restrictions à la liberté de circulation et de séjour, à la discrimination fondée sur l’appartenance ethnique, ainsi qu’aux violations du droit à la propriété et à l’accès à l’enseignement en langue maternelle dans les territoires occupés. L’UE doit continuer à agir afin de contribuer à une résolution pacifique du conflit.
Negotiations for a new EU-ACP Partnership Agreement (B8-0274/2018) FR
Alors que le traité fondateur du partenariat entre l’Union européenne et les pays du groupe des États d’Afrique, des Caraïbes et du Pacifique (ACP) expire en février 2020, j’ai soutenu la résolution concernant le futur accord de partenariat UE-ACP qui accueille favorablement l’architecture générale pour la future coopération proposée par la Commission. L’élément central de cet accord est à juste titre la lutte contre la pauvreté, qui reste un défi dans de nombreux pays. De manière générale, la réalisation des 17 objectifs de développement durable élaborés par l’ONU doit être considérée comme une priorité de nos relations. Je regrette toutefois l’absence de dispositions spécifiques pour garantir une dimension durable pour l’agriculture, alors que nous connaissons les défis auxquels les agriculteurs sont confrontés dans les pays ACP en raison du changement climatique. Enfin, il me semble important de souligner que la dimension parlementaire du partenariat ACP-UE devrait être renforcée.
Further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0183/2018 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR
L'aide macrofinancière de l'UE est un instrument d'urgence exceptionnel pour qu’un pays voisin de l’Union puisse faire face à de graves difficultés financières. J’ai approuvé la proposition de la Commission de verser cette aide à l’Ukraine en vue de couvrir une partie de ses besoins financiers. L’Ukraine devra cependant donner des gages de respect des mécanismes démocratiques, notamment au regard du pluralisme parlementaire, l'État de droit et les droits de l'homme. Rappelons par ailleurs que le prêt est subordonné aux progrès réalisés dans la lutte contre la corruption sur la base de l’institution d’un tribunal spécialisé, conformément aux recommandations de la commission de Venise du Conseil de l'Europe. La Commission européenne et le Service européen pour l'action extérieure sont chargés de vérifier que ces conditions préalables soient respectées. Si tel n’était pas le cas, les versements seraient suspendus ou annulés temporairement.
Negotiations on the modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0158/2018 - Charles Tannock) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette recommandation, qui met l’accent sur les aspects qu’il serait bon d’approfondir dans les relations entre l’Union européenne et le Chili. Les lignes que nous devrions suivre afin de renforcer ce partenariat se basent sur les principes démocratiques que nous partageons, la lutte contre le changement climatique, l’égalité homme-femme, la bonne gouvernance et le respect des droits fondamentaux. Plus précisément, notre assemblée sera attentive aux défis entrepris par le Chili dans plusieurs domaines tels que le respect du droit et de l’équité dans les procédures judiciaires, le combat contre la pauvreté et les inégalités en vue de la réalisation des objectifs de développements durables, l’amélioration des normes et programmes éducatifs et l’éradication du travail forcé et du travail des enfants.
EU-NATO relations (A8-0188/2018 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu) FR
Nous sommes aujourd’hui bien conscients que les seules réponses nationales au terrorisme et à l’insécurité sont insuffisantes. J’ai soutenu la résolution sur les relations UE-OTAN qui rappelle que nos deux organisations partagent des intérêts stratégiques communs en matière de protection des citoyens contre toute menace. Il est nécessaire d’établir un partenariat plus approfondi car aucune des deux organisations ne dispose d’un éventail suffisamment complet d’outils pour relever les nouveaux défis liés à la sécurité, qui sont de moins en moins conventionnels et de plus en plus hybrides.Il me semble notamment essentiel de collaborer plus étroitement en matière de prévention, d’analyse et d’alerte précoce afin de pourvoir lutter contre les menaces éventuelles par des actions communes. Nos relations devraient ainsi se concentrer sur des éléments clés, tels que la communication stratégique, la connaissance de la situation, le partage d’informations classées ainsi que la suppression d’obstacles à la circulation rapide du personnel et des ressources militaires au sein de l’UE.
Cyber defence (A8-0189/2018 - Urmas Paet) FR
Depuis quelques années, les attaques informatiques constituent une menace importante pour la sécurité et la stabilité de l’Union et de ses État membres. Ces derniers sont confrontés à un risque sans précédent prenant la forme de cyberattaques politiques d’État ainsi que de cybercriminalité et de terrorisme. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution portant sur la cyberdéfense qui appelle à un développement des capacités de cyberdéfense et de cyberdissuasion au sein de l’Union. Il me semble nécessaire d’œuvrer rapidement à l’élaboration des solutions concrètes pour surmonter les obstacles politiques, législatifs et organisationnels restants qui s’opposent à la coopération en matière de cyberdéfense.A l’heure actuelle, la fragmentation des stratégies et des capacités de défense européennes conduit à la vulnérabilité aux cyberattaques. En conséquence, les États membres devraient renforcer leur capacité à travailler ensemble. La coopération et les échanges réguliers et renforcés entre les acteurs publics concernés aux niveaux européen et national sont essentiels. Je me félicite à ce titre du lancement de deux cyberprojets européens, une plateforme d’échange d’informations sur les cyberincidents et la mise en place d’équipes d’intervention rapide en cas d’incident informatique.
Common rules in the field of civil aviation and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (A8-0364/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution établissant des règles communes dans le domaine de l’aviation civile qui vise à moderniser les règles de sécurité aérienne et en particulier à garantir un usage sécurisé des drones qui deviennent de plus en plus courants. Selon les estimations, la technologie des drones civils pourrait même représenter environ 10% du marché de l'aviation de l'UE d’ici les dix prochaines années (soit environ 15 milliards d'euros par an) et pourrait créer quelque 150 000 emplois dans l'UE d'ici 2050. À l’heure actuelle, la majorité des drones sont couverts par des règles nationales divergentes, ce qui peut entraver le développement du marché. L’accord conclu avec le Conseil établi des principes clés, valables dans toute l’UE, qui permettront de garantir un niveau commun de sécurité. Ainsi, conformément aux nouvelles dispositions, en fonction du risque lié, par exemple, au poids du drone ou à la zone d'opération, le drone aurait besoin de fonctionnalités supplémentaires, comme un outil d’atterrissage automatisé. Par ailleurs, la Commission devrait élaborer des règles plus détaillées, telles que les limites d’altitude et de distance maximales pour les vols de drones, et quelles opérations et drones devraient être certifiés en fonction du risque qu'ils présentent.
Modernisation of education in the EU (A8-0173/2018 - Krystyna Łybacka) FR
L’éducation que nous recevons nous permet de nous développer et de comprendre le monde qui nous entoure. En cela, elle est probablement le bien le plus précieux que nous offre les États modernes. Cependant, le système éducatif ne peut pas rester figé et lui aussi doit évoluer avec son environnement. J’ai voté pour ce texte car il a pour objectif de tracer les lignes directrices pour la modernisation du système éducatif européen. Cela implique tout d’abord une approche globale de la politique éducative, en intégrant et laissant participer les acteurs concernés. La numérisation et le potentiel des nouvelles technologies de l’information et de la communication doivent être mieux exploités en vue d’offrir de nouvelles opportunités éducatives. Les États membres sont appelés à rendre plus attractif le rôle des enseignants mais également, à les aider, en renforçant leurs compétences numériques, à intégrer de nouvelles idées dans leur méthode d’enseignement. Enfin, l’enseignement supérieur est un des atouts majeurs de l’Union, il est nécessaire d’améliorer son inclusivité, la mobilité dans les parcours académiques et la reconnaissance transfrontalière des qualifications et des diplômes universitaires.
Towards a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector (A8-0186/2018 - Carlos Iturgaiz) FR
Le secteur de l’aquaculture en Europe représente environ 20 % de la production de poisson, il est composé principalement de PME ou de microentreprises dans les régions côtières ou rurales. Malgré une production mondiale croissante, la production européenne a chuté ces dernières années. J’ai voté pour cette résolution car elle insiste sur le développement et la diversification du secteur en améliorant la compétitivité de ses produits, tout en préservant le fonctionnement durable des écosystèmes marins et la sécurité de la production alimentaire. Ces objectifs pourront être atteints, notamment, en assurant un financement public adéquat dans le secteur, au niveau de l’Union et au niveau national, qui encourage la recherche et le développement et permette d’améliorer le fonctionnement des procédures administratives d’octroi de licences à tous les niveaux de pouvoirs.
Odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework (A8-0155/2018 - Ismail Ertug) FR
La modification illégale du compteur kilométrique d’un véhicule est devenue une pratique courante au niveau européen. On estime même que 30 à 50 % de véhicules impliqués dans les ventes transfrontalières ont été soumis à ce type de manipulation.Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur du rapport sur la manipulation du compteur kilométrique des véhicules à moteur car il conviendrait de rapidement mieux lutter contre cette fraude, qui porte préjudice aux consommateurs européens, représente à l’échelle européenne entre 5,6 et 9,6 milliards d’euros de dommages et a des conséquences négatives directes sur la sécurité routière.La Commission devrait rapidement proposer une nouvelle législation, afin notamment de permettre aux données relatives au kilométrage des véhicules d’occasion d’être plus facilement accessibles au-delà des frontières nationales.Par ailleurs, il devrait être obligatoire d’enregistrer les relevés kilométriques à chaque contrôle technique, chaque opération d’inspection ainsi que lors d’autres visites chez le garagiste. Il est urgent que l’Union se dote d’un cadre réglementaire cohérent et efficace dans ce domaine.
Situation in Nicaragua (RC-B8-0244/2018, B8-0244/2018, B8-0248/2018, B8-0249/2018, B8-0250/2018, B8-0251/2018, B8-0252/2018, B8-0253/2018) FR
Alors que la démocratie et l’état de droit sont en déclin dans le pays et que la corruption touche massivement les proches du président Ortega, j’ai soutenu la résolution concernant la situation au Nicaragua. La répression perpétrée par les autorités nicaraguayennes contre les manifestants opposés à la réforme de la sécurité sociale et qui demandent la tenue de nouvelles élections est inacceptable et a coûté la vie à au moins 84 personnes depuis la mi-avril. Cette répression, exercée brutalement, au mépris des règles des principes de nécessité et proportionnalité établis par le droit international doit être condamnée. Par ailleurs, alors que le président Ortega a été réélu trois fois de suite, en contradiction totale avec la Constitution qui interdit les réélections consécutives, une réforme électorale aboutissant à des élections équitables, transparentes et crédibles doit être préconisée. Une enquête internationale indépendante devrait également être diligentée pour poursuivre les responsables de la répression et des morts. Par ailleurs, je déplore le harcèlement que subissent les journalistes et la fermeture arbitraire des médias couvrant les manifestations. Enfin, il faut souligner l'urgente nécessité de lutter contre la corruption rampante au sein des cercles politiques du Nicaragua, un des plus grands défis du pays.
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (A8-0162/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR
Le contexte économique de ces dernières années a eu des conséquences négatives pour les citoyens européens. Les jeunes Européens ont sans doute été les premières victimes de cette période et se sentent inquiets pour leur avenir. L’Union européenne a développé une stratégie en faveur de la jeunesse: malgré le succès de certaines initiatives relatives à cette politique, cette stratégie reste à être améliorée et renforcée. C’est dans cette optique que j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution qui demande de la rendre plus participative, en impliquant les jeunes dans son élaboration. La Commission est invitée à mieux coordonner toutes ses initiatives en faveur de l’insertion des jeunes sur le marché du travail, notamment Erasmus+ et le Corps européen de solidarité, et à les relier systématiquement à la stratégie globale. Enfin, il est important que les actions liées à cette stratégie (dont les États membres ont la compétence) soient correctement promues, soutenues et financées sur le long terme afin que des résultats concrets soient obtenus.
Implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries) FR
L’écoconception est définie comme l’intégration des caractéristiques environnementales dans la conception d’un produit en vue d’améliorer la performance environnementale du produit tout au long de son cycle de vie. C’est durant la phase de fabrication que 80% des nuisances environnementales sont réalisées. Cette politique européenne a généré une réelle plus-value : l’économie d’énergie primaire par an serait supérieure à la consommation d’énergie primaire annuelle d’un État membre comme l’Italie et correspond à une réduction d’émissions de CO2 de 320 millions de tonnes par an. Malgré ces aspects positifs, l’écoconception souffre de quelques retards dans sa mise en œuvre. Le texte demande à la Commission de remédier à cet état en fixant des échéances et des étapes plus claires pour la finalisation des mesures d’exécution. L’autre grand défi est l’amélioration de la surveillance du marché pour que cette politique ne finisse pas par pénaliser les acteurs industriels qui respectent les règles. En effet, il est estimé que 10 à 25% des produits soumis à la directive ne sont pas conformes aux exigences, ce qui n’est pas acceptable. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté pour cette résolution.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (A8-0175/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant la mobilisation du Fonds de solidarité de l’Union européenne pour venir en aide aux régions de France, Grèce, Espagne et Portugal touchées par des catastrophes naturelles en 2017. Le montant alloué par le fonds s’élèvera à 104,2 millions d’euros d’aide, dont 49 iront à la France, à la suite du passage des ouragans Irma et Maria ayant dévasté notamment la Guadeloupe et Saint-Martin. Dans le cas actuel, le Fonds est utilisé pour soutenir les efforts de reconstruction et couvrir une partie des coûts des services d'urgence, des hébergements temporaires, des opérations de nettoyage et de protection du patrimoine culturel, afin d'alléger la charge financière supportée par les autorités nationales.
The future of food and farming (A8-0178/2018 - Herbert Dorfmann) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution sur l’avenir de l’alimentation et de l’agriculture car elle propose un cadre ambitieux afin de rendre l’agriculture innovante et de préconiser la poursuite d’une double performance économique et environnementale. Il est nécessaire via cette politique de garantir aux citoyens européens un approvisionnement sûr en aliments de qualité à des prix abordables. Par ailleurs, il me semble essentiel de revitaliser les zones rurales et d’apporter un soutien accru aux jeunes et aux nouveaux agriculteurs. Enfin, il me semble important de souligner que la réduction de la bureaucratie pour les mesures de verdissement permettrait d’optimiser l’obtention de résultats dans ce domaine et de favoriser une agriculture durable, qui reste la priorité de notre siècle en matière agricole.
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (A8-0160/2018 - Carlos Coelho) FR
L’espace Schengen, aujourd’hui, est un accord abolissant les contrôles aux frontières intérieures entre 26 États et représentant 400 millions d’habitants. Le rapport commence par condamner la réintroduction de frontières internes entre certains États membres en raison des lacunes dans le système d’asile et ensuite met en avant plusieurs mesures à prendre dans le cadre du système Schengen pour améliorer son fonctionnement. Notamment, prévoir une réponse permanente, solide et efficace dans les opérations de recherche et de sauvetage en mer afin de prévenir les pertes de vies humaines, garantir des procédures de retour rapides et efficaces respectant pleinement les droits fondamentaux, assurer des conditions de vie adéquates pour tous les demandeurs d'asile, en particulier pour les mineurs non accompagnés, ainsi que pour les femmes en situation de vulnérabilité ou encore mettre en œuvre une décision de retour prise par un autre État membre. Pour ces motifs, j’ai voté pour cette résolution.
Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Angelika Mlinar) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur les normes minimales concernant les droits, le soutien et la protection des victimes de la criminalité, dont l’évaluation souligne certaines lacunes existantes au sein de l’Union. La fourniture de services appropriés aux victimes en fonction de leurs besoins reste en effet un défi. Des difficultés existent en particulier car les victimes n’ont souvent pas conscience de leurs droits et sont parfois traitées différemment d’un pays à l’autre. Par ailleurs, la disponibilité des structures de soutien aux victimes n’est pas uniforme dans l’Union et au sein même d’un État membre. Je déplore à ce titre les difficultés auxquelles se heurtent parfois les victimes qui tentent d’accéder aux services de soutien alors que la garantie d’un accès égal pour toutes les victimes à ces services est fondamentale.
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (A8-0319/2017 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Agnes Jongerius) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de l'accord obtenu concernant le détachement de travailleurs au sein de l'Union, qui conclut avec succès de longs mois de négociations. Je me félicite des avancées obtenues concernant la protection des droits des travailleurs et la lutte contre le dumping social en Europe. Ce vote entérine le principe phare d’une rémunération identique pour un même travail effectué au même endroit, puisque toutes les règles du pays d'accueil en matière de rémunération devront désormais s'appliquer aux travailleurs détachés. De plus, les frais de déplacement, de pension et d'hébergement devront être payés par l'employeur et non déduits des salaires des travailleurs. La révision de la directive permettra par ailleurs de mieux lutter contre les cas de détachement frauduleux, par exemple par une société dite "boîte aux lettres", en assurant une meilleure coopération entre les autorités nationales. Ces améliorations permettront d’évoluer vers une Europe plus sociale, assurant des conditions de travail équitables et une concurrence plus saine entre les entreprises.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström) FR
De nombreuses espèces aquatiques sont encore surpêchées ou pêchées jusqu'à la limite de soutenabilité dans les pays hors Union. L’Union européenne ne peut pas facilement imposer sa vision à ces pays mais peut les pousser à respecter des normes de pêche plus respectueuses pour les ressources marines. C’est pour cette raison que j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution : il y est demandé à la Commission d’assurer que les produits de la pêche et de l'aquaculture importés respectent les normes de conservation, de gestion et d'hygiène de l'UE en appliquant plus efficacement les mesures de contrôle. Les commerçants voulant exporter des produits dans l’Union se verraient obligés de respecter les contraintes du marché intérieur. De plus, l'extension des mesures de contrôle favorisera une concurrence plus saine et évitera un marché discriminatoire qui pourrait nuire au secteur de la pêche dans l'UE.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0148/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la mobilisation du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation, qui viendra en aide aux salariés de l’usine Caterpillar dans la province belge du Hainaut. Cet instrument budgétaire permet à l’Union de réagir pour aider les travailleurs qui subissent les conséquences de la mondialisation et des modifications majeures de la structure du commerce mondial. Les 4,6 millions d’euros débloqués permettront aux 2 287 travailleurs licenciés de Caterpillar de bénéficier d’un accompagnement dans leur réinsertion sur le marché du travail, notamment grâce à une aide individuelle à la recherche d’emploi, à des formations et des reconversions, et à la promotion de l’entrepreneuriat. De plus, ce fonds permettra d’atténuer les conséquences socio-économiques pour la région de Charleroi, puisque ces licenciements ont eu un effet négatif important sur l’économie locale.
A global ban on animal testing for cosmetics (B8-0217/2018) FR
L’Union européenne dans ses traités s’est engagée à promouvoir le bien-être animal tout en protégeant la santé humaine et l’environnement. Dans l’Union, depuis 2013, la mise sur le marché de produits cosmétiques testés sur des animaux est interdite et cela n’a pas empêché l'industrie cosmétique européenne de prospérer et de représenter environ deux millions d'emplois. Malheureusement, cette réalité est loin d’être le cas partout au niveau mondial. Il faut que l’Union européenne fasse avancer les choses dans ce domaine. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu la résolution exhortant l’Union européenne, à travers son réseau diplomatique, à lancer une action à l’échelle mondiale visant à faire interdire l’expérimentation animale dans les cosmétiques d’ici 2023. L’objectif serait pour nous de rallier le plus grand nombre d’États à cette cause dans le cadre d’une convention internationale.
Media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (A8-0144/2018 - Barbara Spinelli) FR
Le pluralisme et plus généralement la liberté d’information sont un maillon essentiel de notre société. Bien que mis à mal en diverses occasions dernièrement, ils restent des éléments vitaux pour le bon fonctionnement de notre système démocratique. Il est impératif que nous luttions contre les dérives mettant en péril ces principes fondamentaux. J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte, dans lequel nous demandons notamment de créer un mécanisme indépendant de surveillance des risques à l’encontre du pluralisme et de la liberté des médias dans l’Union ainsi qu’un organisme réglementaire indépendant et impartial, en coopération avec les associations de journalistes, afin de les protéger de toute violence et des menaces. Enfin, nous évoquons le délicat sujet des «fake news» contre lequel il faut lutter âprement, tout en évitant que cela soit prétexte à discréditer ou criminaliser des voix critiques.
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0056/2017 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport relatif à la prévention de l’utilisation du système financier qui prévoit une réglementation plus stricte des monnaies virtuelles, comme le Bitcoin, afin d'éviter qu'elles ne soient utilisées à des fins de blanchiment d'argent et de financement du terrorisme. L’objectif de cette législation est de mettre fin aux possibilités d’anonymat dont profitent souvent les criminels. D’une part, les plateformes de change de devises virtuelles et les fournisseurs de portefeuilles de stockage devront, tout comme les banques, appliquer des mesures de vigilance à l'égard de la clientèle, notamment des exigences en matière de vérification de la clientèle. D’autre part, les nouvelles mesures concernent aussi les risques liés aux cartes prépayées puisque leur surveillance sera renforcée, notamment grâce à la réduction du seuil d'identification des détenteurs de cartes prépayées de 250€ actuellement à 150. L’Union est ainsi dotée d’instruments plus adéquats et stricts pour faire face aux fraudes et aux sorties illégales de capitaux.
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur la surveillance du marché des véhicules à moteur. Ce texte est une réponse européenne forte au scandale du « Dieselgate », scandale qui avait notamment mis en lumière des défaillances dans les tests, des conflits d'intérêt potentiels entre constructeurs, services techniques et agences d'homologation, et des lacunes dans la surveillance de ce marché dans son ensemble. Il faut donc accueillir favorablement l'adoption de ces règles, qui permettront d’éviter les tromperies en matière d'émissions, d'accroître la transparence des informations communiquées par les constructeurs, et d'instaurer une surveillance accrue du système d’homologation des véhicules. Je souligne en particulier l'intérêt du nouveau régime de tests qui sera établi pour les voitures en circulation afin de veiller à ce que les voitures respectent les limites d’émission tout au long de leur durée de vie et les nouvelles dispositions prévues pour les centres de tests qui feront l’objet d’audits réguliers et indépendants. Un regret toutefois : l'absence d'accord sur la mise en place d'une Agence européenne, que nous avions soutenue depuis le début dans ce dossier. Dans l'ensemble, nul doute que cet ensemble de règles sera bénéfique pour la santé des consommateurs et pour l’environnement.
Organic production and labelling of organic products (A8-0311/2015 - Martin Häusling) FR
Une nouvelle législation européenne sur la production biologique et l'étiquetage de ces produits a été adoptée. J’ai soutenu le texte car il va permettre la stimulation de la production biologique et garantir la circulation de produits biologiques de qualité. Des contrôles stricts basés sur les risques tout au long de la chaîne d’approvisionnement sont prévus, ces contrôles seront réalisés sur place et concerneront tous les opérateurs, au moins une fois par an. De plus, la règle d’équivalence, selon laquelle un produit importé d’un pays tiers doit respecter une réglementation bio similaire mais pas identique sera progressivement supprimée. Ces produits importés devront dorénavant respecter les normes européennes (souvent plus strictes) pour pénétrer et être distribués sur le marché unique. Par ailleurs, les agriculteurs et autres opérateurs de la chaîne d’approvisionnement seront contraints d’appliquer un ensemble de nouvelles mesures pour éviter la contamination. Si une contamination advient et se révèle délibérée ou si l’opérateur n’applique pas les mesures de précaution, le produit perdra son statut de produit biologique. Enfin, à condition que les deux activités soient encadrées et réellement séparées, les exploitations mixtes seront autorisées. Cette mesure est bienvenue car elle encouragera la conversion vers la production bio.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0140/2018 - Miroslavs Mitrofanovs) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative aux lignes directrices pour les politiques de l’emploi des États membres qui, dans le cadre du Semestre européen, rappelle plusieurs priorités politiques. Elle souligne notamment l’importance de promouvoir des marchés du travail inclusifs, capables de s’adapter à la réalité et aux évolutions économiques, sociales, technologiques et environnementales. Par ailleurs, la reprise économique que connaît l’Union soutient les évolutions positives sur les marchés du travail, mais n’efface pas les difficultés et les fortes disparités en matière de résultats économiques et sociaux entre les États membres et à l’intérieur de ceux-ci. De plus, la croissance économique n’entraîne pas automatiquement une baisse du chômage. Le principal défi à relever est donc d’amener l’Union vers une croissance intelligente, durable et inclusive qui s’accompagne de la création d’emplois durables. Il importe que le Conseil tienne pleinement compte de cette position, car cela requiert une action coordonnée et ambitieuse, tant à l’échelon de l’Union qu’à l’échelon national.
Protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová (B8-0186/2018) FR
J’ai voté pour cette résolution qui condamne fermement le meurtre du journaliste d’investigation slovaque Ján Kuciak et de sa fiancée Martina Kušnírová. Les autorités slovaques sont appelées à utiliser toutes les ressources nécessaires pour garantir et mener à bien une enquête approfondie et indépendante sur le double meurtre, de préférence conjointement avec Europol, afin de traduire les auteurs de ce crime en justice: il est inimaginable que de tels meurtres se produisent impunément dans l’Union européenne. De manière plus générale, ce sont tous les journalistes d’investigation qui doivent être protégés de toute forme d’intimidation, d’inculpations pour diffamation ou d’attaques visant à les faire taire. Ces derniers font encore trop souvent l’objet d’actions en justice dont le seul objectif est de les censurer. Il en va du pluralisme des médias et de la liberté de la presse, valeurs fondamentales pour nos sociétés démocratiques.
Vaccine hesitancy and drop in vaccination rates in Europe (B8-0188/2018, B8-0195/2018) FR
La chute du taux de vaccination en Europe liée à la réticence à la vaccination est un problème de santé publique inquiétant. J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative à la baisse des taux de vaccination en Europe qui rappelle que le manque de confiance de l’opinion publique en cette matière est un défi majeur. Il est nécessaire de restaurer cette confiance grâce à plus de transparence pour les citoyens, notamment en matière de production et d’évaluation des vaccins, de financement de programmes de recherche indépendants et de renseignement sur les potentiels effets secondaires des vaccins. Par ailleurs, un dialogue scientifique et factuel devrait être ouvert avec la société civile afin de combattre les informations non fiables, trompeuses et non scientifiques relatives à la vaccination. Cela est nécessaire pour assurer une protection adéquate du public contre les maladies évitables par la vaccination, et empêcher le phénomène de réapparition de maladies que nous pensions avoir éradiquées, telles que la polio, la diphtérie, la rougeole ou les oreillons.
Implementation of the Bologna Process – state of play and follow-up (B8-0190/2018) FR
L’éducation, et plus précisément l’enseignement supérieur, est un pilier essentiel de notre société, ayant pour rôle le développement personnel des compétences et de l’engagement civique de la jeunesse, il renforce l’employabilité et permet une plus grande compréhension interculturelle. Le processus de Bologne est une initiative intergouvernementale dont une conférence se tiendra prochainement à Paris et qui, par un dialogue ouvert et constructif, contribue à la réalisation d’un espace européen de l’enseignement supérieur (EEES). J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte car il invite les pays participants à accroître leur engagement politique pour atteindre cet objectif. Il demande également que la future conférence soit l’occasion de se livrer à une évaluation critique visant à recenser les obstacles à la mise en œuvre des engagements pris, à soutenir les pays ayant pris du retard dans cette mise œuvre et à définir les objectifs au-delà de 2020.
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (A8-0131/2018 - Helga Stevens) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution de la Convention pour la prévention du terrorisme. Cette Convention aura pour effet d’accroître l’efficacité des instruments internationaux existants en matière de lutte contre le terrorisme et intensifiera les efforts des Parties de deux manières : en qualifiant d’infractions pénales certains actes pouvant conduire à la commission d’infractions terroristes comme la provocation publique, le recrutement et l’entraînement et en renforçant la coopération pour la prévention, tant au niveau national (politiques nationales de prévention), qu’au niveau international par la modification des accords d’extradition et d’entraide judiciaire en vigueur. La Convention intègre également une disposition relative à la protection et à l’indemnisation des victimes du terrorisme ainsi qu’un processus de consultation des Parties pour assurer une mise en œuvre et un suivi effectifs de ces mesures.
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport relatif aux emballages et déchets d’emballages car, bien que la gestion des déchets se soit améliorée ces dernières années, de très grandes variations existent d’un État membre à l’autre et de nombreux progrès sont encore à faire. Ainsi, dans le cadre de l’économie circulaire, des objectifs clairs sont fixés : d’ici 2025, au moins 55% des déchets municipaux (produits par les ménages et les entreprises) devront être recyclés, contre 44% aujourd’hui. L’objectif passera à 60% d’ici 2030 et à 65% d’ici 2035. Par ailleurs, 65% des déchets d’emballage devront être recyclés d’ici 2025 et 70% d’ici 2030. Ces objectifs ambitieux devront permettre l’optimisation de la gestion des déchets, ce qui bénéficiera à l’environnement, au climat, à la santé humaine et à l’économie.
Progress on UN Global compacts for safe, orderly and regular migration and on refugees (B8-0184/2018) FR
Dans un monde interdépendant, les défis liés à la mobilité humaine doivent être traités à l’échelon permettant d’atteindre les résultats les plus efficaces, c’est-à-dire la communauté internationale dans son ensemble. Dans cette perspective, j’ai accueilli avec enthousiasme cette résolution soutenant les objectifs de la déclaration de New York pour les réfugiés et les migrants et le processus qui en découle en vue d’élaborer un régime de gouvernance global. Ce cadre viserait à renforcer la coordination dans le domaine de la migration internationale et à mettre en place des approches durables centrées sur les individus, soulignant l’importance de protéger les droits des réfugiés et des migrants. L’Union européenne a un rôle moteur dans cette démarche, c’est pour cette raison qu’elle et tous les États membres doivent s’engager dans ce processus afin d’assurer un partage équitable des responsabilités pour l’accueil et l’aide aux réfugiés.
EU-Comoros fisheries partnership agreement: denunciation (A8-0058/2018 - João Ferreira) FR
Depuis 2006, les relations avec les Comores sont régies par un accord de partenariat dans le secteur de la pêche. En échange de licences d’exploitation des ressources halieutiques par des navires européens (espagnols, portugais et français), l’Union européenne offrait une contrepartie financière destinée en partie à l’appui sectoriel. Cependant, la mise en œuvre de l’accord (l’exercice des licences de pêche) n’a pas vraiment abouti à cause principalement de la piraterie et de l’implication des Comores dans des opérations qui violent le règlement relatif à la pêche illicite, non déclarée et non réglementée (INN). C’est ainsi qu’en 2015, l’Union européenne a signalé aux Comores qu’elle examinait l’opportunité de les inscrire parmi les pays non coopérants, chose faite en 2017. Dès lors, la Commission et le Conseil ont proposé de dénoncer l’accord. Tenant compte de l’inaction des autorités compétentes, j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution dénonçant l’accord.
Europass: framework for skills and qualifications (A8-0244/2017 - Thomas Mann, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov) FR
Il y a quelques années déjà, nous avions établi un cadre pour répondre aux besoins de modernisation des outils et services européens en matière d’aptitudes, de compétences et de certifications. C'était la naissance de «portfolio Europass». Après une décennie d’utilisation, cet outil méritait de bénéficier d’une rénovation. J’ai soutenu l’accord en première lecture dont l’objectif est de favoriser la transparence, la compréhension et la reconnaissance des compétences acquises non seulement dans des contextes formels, mais aussi non formels et informels. Par ailleurs, les services Europass seront mieux adaptés aux souhaits et aux attentes de ceux à qui il est destiné: les apprenants, les demandeurs d’emploi, les employeurs, les établissements d’enseignement et de formation, les partenaires sociaux et les autorités nationales compétentes. Au vu de ces motifs, j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte.
Situation in Syria (RC-B8-0139/2018, B8-0139/2018, B8-0141/2018, B8-0142/2018, B8-0143/2018, B8-0144/2018, B8-0146/2018, B8-0150/2018) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution concernant la situation en Syrie qui condamne une nouvelle fois les atrocités et les violations généralisées des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire commises durant le conflit, en particulier par les forces du régime de Bachar el-Assad, avec le soutien de ses alliés, la Russie et l’Iran. Alors qu’au moins 400 000 personnes ont été tuées au cours des 7 années de conflit, que des millions de personnes ont été déplacées, et que des civils n’ont pas accès à l’alimentation, à l’eau et aux soins de santé, les violences se poursuivent toujours dans la Ghouta orientale, en dépit de la résolution adoptée par le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Cette résolution qui appelle à un cessez-le-feu de 30 jours sans délai devrait être respectée intégralement et de toute urgence par les différentes parties. La spirale de violence doit prendre fin et un tribunal international pour les crimes de guerre en Syrie devrait être mis en place. Il ne pourra y avoir de résolution efficace du conflit ni de paix durable en Syrie sans que soient établies les responsabilités pour les crimes commis.
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (B8-0134/2018, B8-0135/2018) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution sur le Brexit dans laquelle nous exposons le futur cadre des relations entre l’UE et le Royaume-Uni suite à la sortie de ce dernier de l’Union européenne. Un accord d’association pourrait se révéler un cadre adéquat pour ces futures relations: il se baserait sur quatre piliers. Les relations commerciales et économiques, la sécurité intérieure, la coopération dans le domaine des affaires étrangères et de la défense et enfin la coopération thématique, par exemple en matière de projets transfrontaliers de recherche et d’innovation. Ce cadre devrait être accompagné de plusieurs éléments sur lesquels il n’est pas possible de transiger. Par exemple, le respect de l'intégrité du marché intérieur, de l'union douanière et des quatre libertés, sans qu’une approche « à la carte » soit permise. Le processus de prise de décisions indépendant et l'ordre juridique de l'UE devraient également être préservés. Enfin, la gouvernance de ce cadre devrait être dotée d’un mécanisme de résolution des différends robuste.
Objection to Commission delegated regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 as regards the Union list of projects of common interest (B8-0136/2018) FR
J’ai soutenu l’objection visant à rejeter la 3e liste de l’Union de Projets d’Intérêt Commun, car cette dernière ne s’inscrit pas suffisamment dans la logique de lutte contre le changement climatique. Je déplore que la majorité de mes collègues n’ait pas fait le même choix, car dans cette liste de programmes qui a pour objet d’aider l’Union à atteindre ses objectifs énergétiques, le nombre important de projets dans le secteur gazier est problématique. Le soutien à de nouvelles infrastructures pour les combustibles fossiles fragilise voire entrave l’exécution des engagements contractés lors de la COP21 à Paris. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté pour l’objection.
Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski) FR
Le système actuel de ressources propres de l’Union européenne est complexe et pose des problèmes. J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant ce système pour la période post 2020, qui demande une simplification et plus de transparence. Ce rapport réclame notamment l'instauration de nouvelles et véritables ressources propres destinées à remplacer en partie les contributions fondées sur le revenu national brut, ce qui permettrait des économies dans les budgets des États membres. Une taxe sur les transactions financières (TTF) à l'échelon européen, l’imposition des sociétés du secteur numérique ou encore la fiscalité environnementale devraient pouvoir permettre à l’Union d’avoir les ressources nécessaires afin de poursuivre efficacement son action politique. Il faut toutefois rappeler que les nouvelles ressources propres n'ont pas pour but d'augmenter la pression fiscale globale pesant sur le contribuable européen, qui ne devra pas être affecté.
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0052/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman) FR
Le processus annuel du Semestre européen constitue un indicateur important pour les États membres dans le cadre de l’élaboration de leurs politiques économiques et sociales nationales. J'ai soutenu le rapport relatif au Semestre qui souligne que l’examen annuel pour 2018 montre des signes positifs de relance économique pour l'Union, notamment en termes de croissance et de baisse des taux de chômage.Toutefois, dans une optique de développement économique durable et de convergence sociale, le texte ne manque pas de rappeler l'importance d'établir des réformes nationales socialement et économiquement équilibrées, afin de tirer avantage du potentiel des PME et de l'économie sociale pour la croissance et la création d'emplois. Les États doivent également agir pour renforcer leurs mesures de lutte contre la pauvreté et les inégalités.Enfin, il faut souligner que, pour la catégorie des jeunes, le chômage demeure à des niveaux inacceptables. Il s'agit d'un défi majeur, à relever d'urgence.
Cross-border parcel delivery services (A8-0315/2017 - Lucy Anderson) FR
Dans le cadre de la stratégie pour le marché unique numérique, le secteur de la livraison de colis sera soumis à de nouvelles règles. J’ai voté en faveur car elles consistent à imposer aux fournisseurs de services de livraison de colis la communication de leurs tarifs pour une liste prédéfinie des services. La Commission européenne publiera les prix sur un site internet dédié, afin de permettre aux consommateurs et aux entreprises de comparer plus facilement les tarifs nationaux et transfrontaliers entre États membres et entre fournisseurs et ainsi d’opter pour la meilleure option. En conséquence, les écarts injustifiés entre les tarifs devraient diminuer et la confiance des consommateurs dans les achats et le transport transfrontalier s’en verra accrue. De plus, les opérateurs devront fournir une série d’informations afin qu’un monitoring et une évaluation de l’évolution du système soient menés pour éviter les défaillances du marché.
Lagging regions in the EU (A8-0046/2018 - Michela Giuffrida) FR
Il existe encore dans l’Union européenne des régions à faible croissance nécessitant un soutien continu afin qu’elles comblent leur retard. Malgré les contraintes budgétaires, j’ai voté pour ce texte visant à fournir des mesures stratégiques et dynamiser la population et l’économie de ces régions. Concrètement, il est demandé que les régions de niveau NUTS III qui présentent un retard en matière de développement soient mieux définies, de stimuler l’éducation et la formation afin de réduire le chômage et d’aider les jeunes à rester dans ces régions, de garantir aux entreprises un accès facile au crédit, de soutenir et améliorer la gestion des institutions régionales et d’encourager les activités productives et commerciales, notamment le tourisme durable, l’économie circulaire et l’agriculture. La politique de cohésion européenne reste vitale pour ces régions et les aider à se développer est une priorité.
The role of EU regions and cities in implementing the COP 21 Paris Agreement on climate change (A8-0045/2018 - Ángela Vallina) FR
L’Union doit conserver un rôle de leader dans la lutte contre le changement climatique et s’assurer d’avoir des objectifs ambitieux et les moyens de les atteindre. Dans cette optique, j’ai soutenu le rapport sur le rôle des régions et des villes dans la mise en œuvre de l’accord de Paris sur le changement climatique. Celui-ci souligne que les villes doivent jouer un rôle décisif dans ce combat et que l’atténuation du changement climatique devrait être considérée comme une priorité importante dans les politiques de cohésion de l’Union. Les collectivités territoriales sont en effet responsables de la mise en œuvre de la plupart des mesures d’atténuation du changement climatique et d’adaptation à ce dernier. Il est donc nécessaire de prendre des mesures fortes concernant la planification urbaine, la mobilité, les transports publics et les infrastructures ou encore la performance énergétique des bâtiments. Pour cela, les gouvernements devraient aider les villes et les régions à respecter les engagements internationaux et favoriser le développement d’actions à l’échelon local et régional.
Definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks and protection of geographical indications thereof (A8-0021/2018 - Pilar Ayuso) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport concernant le secteur des boissons spiritueuses, qui rappelle que l’Union doit conserver un haut niveau d’exigence, notamment en matière de protection et d’information des consommateurs et de qualité des produits. L’Union doit être en mesure de préserver la réputation que les boissons européennes se sont taillée dans l'Union et sur le marché mondial, notamment par la prise en considération des méthodes traditionnelles de production. Afin d’assurer une approche uniforme, il convient d’établir des critères clairs en ce qui concerne la définition, la présentation et l’étiquetage de ces boissons. Par ailleurs, la protection des indications géographiques doit rester un élément caractéristique essentiel, dans les cas où une qualité, réputation ou méthode traditionnelle de production de la boisson spiritueuse peut être attribuée essentiellement à cette origine géographique. Ainsi, les consommateurs seront préservés des pratiques de nature à les induire en erreur et une concurrence loyale sera assurée.
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel) FR
Les États membres éprouvent de plus en plus de difficultés à protéger leur base d’imposition de l’érosion car les structures de planification fiscale complexes sont devenues particulièrement sophistiquées. Pour répondre à ce problème, j’ai soutenu le principe d’un échange automatique et obligatoire d’informations en rapport avec les dispositifs transfrontaliers, qui facilitera la lutte contre les régimes fiscaux agressifs. Il faut encadrer les activités des intermédiaires fiscaux et les soumettre à l’obligation de rendre des comptes. Ainsi, les opérateurs qui conçoivent ou promeuvent des plans fiscaux agressifs devraient fournir des informations détaillées sur leurs régimes dans un répertoire central. Il s’agit d’une réponse aux scandales fiscaux récents qui permettra aux autorités fiscales nationales des États membres de disposer des informations nécessaires pour réagir rapidement contre les pratiques fiscales dommageables et les stratégies d’évitement face à l’impôt. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of genetically modified maize 59122 (DAS-59122-7) (B8-0122/2018) FR
J’ai soutenu l’objection à la décision visant à renouveler l’autorisation de mise sur le marché de produits à destination humaine et animale contenant du maïs génétiquement modifié 59122 (DAS-59122-7) comme je le fais de manière régulière pour toutes les demandes concernant les OGM. Premièrement, parce que la procédure actuelle de mise sur le marché d’OGM me semble insatisfaisante: cette autorisation a été adoptée sans le soutien d’une majorité qualifiée des États membres et elle ne prévoit pas de pouvoirs étendus au Parlement européen en la matière. Ensuite, plusieurs éléments m’interpellent: l’inquiétude de l’opinion publique face à la production et la commercialisation de produits OGM sur le marché européen et face au respect du principe de précaution du fait de l’insuffisance des évaluations des risques pour la santé humaine et animale.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/006 ES/Galicia apparel (A8-0033/2018 - Esteban González Pons) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de l’octroi d’une aide de 720 000 euros en soutien aux anciens employés de cinq entreprises de l'industrie de l'habillement de la région de la Galice en Espagne. Cette contribution financière issue du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation (FEAD), qui a pour but d’apporter une aide aux travailleurs subissant les conséquences de la mondialisation, servira à accompagner les travailleurs dans leur réinsertion sur le marché du travail. Le secteur de l’habillement en Europe a particulièrement souffert de l'augmentation des importations de textiles et de vêtements et la région de la Galice souffre actuellement d’un taux de chômage élevé. L’Union réagit en solidarité et se mobilise pour apporter son soutien et protéger les travailleurs.
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (A8-0025/2018 - Frank Engel) FR
L’Union européenne s’est construite sur la base de valeurs communes, notamment le respect des droits fondamentaux et des libertés individuelles. L’évolution du projet européen est accompagnée depuis des décennies d’un raffermissement des garanties légales et judiciaires dont disposent les citoyens pour faire valoir leurs droits. Le présent rapport s’attache particulièrement, sans néanmoins laisser pour compte d’autres problématiques, à réaffirmer toute l’importance du droit d’asile et du principe d’état de droit. Les individus dont l’intégrité physique est menacée par des circonstances qui les contraignent à fuir leur pays d’origine ont le droit de compter sur les États européens pour les accueillir. En outre, les dérives populistes et les tendances autoritaires qui réapparaissent dans les États membres doivent être condamnées sans réserve. Il en va de la survie de notre communauté. Pour ces motifs, j’ai voté pour ce rapport.
Prospects and challenges for the EU apiculture sector (A8-0014/2018 - Norbert Erdős) FR
Au vu de l’importance du secteur apicole, des abeilles pour l’écosystème et de la nécessité de soutenir les professionnels qui sont quotidiennement témoins de la détérioration de la situation, j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution. Nous avons besoin d’une stratégie à grande échelle et long terme pour diminuer la mortalité des abeilles ! Le désastre n’est pas seulement écologique, il se répercute également sur l’économie du secteur. Dans cette optique, le texte appelle à une augmentation de 50 % du budget des programmes apicoles nationaux et à introduire un nouveau régime de soutien aux apiculteurs dans la politique agricole commune post-2020. De plus, les contrôles et la traçabilité du miel importé devraient être renforcés et harmonisés afin de respecter les exigences européennes en la matière. Et enfin, les prochaines négociations commerciales avec les pays tiers devront tenir compte du statut « sensible » des produits apicoles.
Monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0010/2018 - Damiano Zoffoli) FR
J'ai soutenu le rapport concernant la surveillance des données relatives aux émissions de CO2 et à la consommation de carburant des véhicules utilitaires lourds neufs (autobus, camions et autocars). L'établissement d'un cadre technique permettant de déterminer de manière précise les émissions de CO2 de ces véhicules est un engagement supplémentaire pour répondre aux objectifs de l'Accord de Paris. La publication de ces informations permettra de renforcer la transparence écologique liée aux activités de transport. Ainsi, tous les utilisateurs de véhicules pourront prendre des décisions d’achat éclairées et les constructeurs automobiles pourront comparer les performances de leurs véhicules avec celles d’autres marques, ce qui devrait inciter la conception de véhicules plus efficaces sur le plan énergétique. Ces informations précieuses offriront en outre à l'Union une base solide pour l’élaboration de politiques visant à encourager la commercialisation de véhicules plus économes sur le plan énergétique.
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0078/2018, B8-0078/2018, B8-0080/2018, B8-0081/2018, B8-0083/2018, B8-0087/2018, B8-0094/2018) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution relative à la situation au Venezuela, car il est essentiel de rappeler que l’Union ne reconnaît pas la décision prise par l’Assemblée nationale constituante, illégitime, de convoquer des élections présidentielles anticipées d’ici à la fin du mois d’avril 2018. De nombreux candidats potentiels ne pourront pas se présenter à ces élections parce qu’ils sont en exil, frappés de sanctions administratives, emprisonnés ou assignés à résidence. Par ailleurs, le Conseil devrait prendre une position forte et étendre les sanctions appliquées contre sept personnalités vénézuéliennes aux principaux responsables de l’aggravation de la crise politique. L’Union devrait également affirmer sa solidarité et son soutien plein et entier à la population du Venezuela, et œuvrer à la mise en place d’un plan pour un accès en urgence de l’aide humanitaire au pays.
Summer-time arrangements (B8-0070/2018, B8-0071/2018) FR
Selon moi, l’Union aurait dû mettre fin immédiatement au système d’heure d’été, qui ne produit en réalité que des gains énergétiques marginaux, en plus de causer des problèmes de santé publique, de sécurité routière et d'avoir un impact négatif sur les élevages. Une majorité de mes collègues dans l’assemblée a cependant décidé de commencer par une étude pour évaluer davantage les effets de ce changement d’horaire et d'éventuellement envisager, sur base des résultats, de mettre fin au système. C'est un début et cela reste mieux que le statu quo, en espérant que l’évaluation apportera la clarté nécessaire pour trancher définitivement cette question.
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0007/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution relative à la composition du Parlement européen, qui, face aux conséquences du Brexit et au départ des députés britanniques, devrait permettre d’établir une représentation plus équilibrée pour la prochaine mandature. Les sièges libérés par le Royaume-Uni lors de son retrait de l’Union faciliteront l’adoption d’un nouveau système de répartition des sièges au Parlement. Je me félicite que la nouvelle répartition proposée, tout en diminuant le nombre total de membres du Parlement, soutienne l’octroi de cinq sièges supplémentaires à la France, dans le respect de la proportionnalité dégressive. Je regrette cependant que la majorité de mes collègues ait voté contre l’établissement de listes transnationales pour les prochaines élections européennes. Cette proposition, que je soutiens depuis plusieurs années, permettrait de renforcer la citoyenneté européenne et aurait favorisé le débat politique européen.
Objection to a delegated act: Adding Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago and Tunisia to the list of high-risk third countries (B8-0074/2018) FR
L'inscription de la Tunisie sur la liste des pays considérés comme étant exposés au blanchiment de capitaux et au financement du terrorisme est un mauvais signal envoyé à notre partenaire tunisien et j’aurais souhaité qu’elle soit rejetée. La Tunisie déploie actuellement des efforts importants pour se conformer aux exigences de l'Union et renforcer son système financier contre les activités criminelles, tout cela à un moment où l’expérience démocratique tunisienne est confrontée à des défis majeurs.Par ailleurs, le vote extrêmement serré a mis en exergue la sensibilité de cette question et l'urgence pour l'Union de mettre en place son propre système d'évaluation afin de ne plus se contenter de suivre la liste du Groupe d'action financière (GAFI). Je déplore donc que l'acte délégué ait porté non pas sur un, mais trois pays (la Tunisie, le Sri Lanka et Trinité-et-Tobago), et demande qu’à l’avenir, la Commission rédige des actes délégués distincts, en ajoutant ou en retirant un pays à la fois.
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018) FR
A l’heure actuelle, il y a encore 500 000 femmes victimes de mutilations génitales vivant dans l’UE, c’est beaucoup trop. Il est extrêmement urgent que la Commission et les États membres travaillent en synergie pour mettre fin à cette pratique culturelle d’un autre âge et contraire à nos principes les plus fondamentaux. Cette coopération doit prendre effet entre autres dans les secteurs de la santé, du travail social, de l’éducation et de la justice. De plus, il serait bon que les États membres qui n’ont pas encore ratifié la Convention d’Istanbul sur la prévention et la lutte contre la violence à l’égard des femmes le fassent sans délai, afin que les engagements de l’UE soient conformes aux normes internationales promouvant une approche intégrée. Sur ce sujet, la tolérance zéro est de mise, j’ai donc pleinement appuyé cette résolution.
EU-Brazil Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0004/2018 - Angelo Ciocca) FR
J’ai voté pour l’approbation du renouvellement de l’accord de coopération scientifique et technologique entre l’UE et la République fédérative du Brésil pour plusieurs raisons. Le Brésil reste à la pointe de la recherche dans le domaine de l’agriculture, ainsi qu’en ce qui concerne les maladies infectieuses et tropicales. Il est également un acteur de rang mondial en matière de technologies de l’information et de la communication, des nanotechnologies et de l’énergie. En outre, Union européenne et Brésil ont un intérêt mutuel pour le développement des énergies renouvelables, notamment ce qu’on appelle les biocarburants avancés de deuxième génération. Pour finir, le potentiel du Brésil en tant que partenaire dans le domaine de la recherche et de l’innovation continuant d’augmenter, il m’a semblé impératif de considérer ce pays comme un partenaire stratégique pour l’Union dans cette région du monde.
Geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment (A8-0172/2017 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein) FR
Alors que la part des Européens qui achètent en ligne est en augmentation constante, environ deux tiers des sites n’autorisent pas les consommateurs à acheter leurs produits depuis un autre pays de l’UE. Afin de supprimer ces obstacles au commerce en ligne transfrontalier, j'ai soutenu le rapport concernant le géoblocage. Il s'agit d'une avancée pour les consommateurs de l'Union, qui ne connaîtront plus les blocages et discriminations actuels, puisque les commerçants devront traiter les consommateurs transfrontaliers de la même façon que les acheteurs locaux, en leur proposant les mêmes prix. Chacun pourra dorénavant choisir sur quel site il souhaite acheter des biens ou des services, sans être bloqué ou automatiquement redirigé vers un autre site en raison de sa nationalité, de son lieu de résidence ou même de sa localisation temporaire. Cette étape est importante pour la mise en place d’un marché intérieur numérique effectif.
Accelerating clean energy innovation (A8-0005/2018 - Jerzy Buzek) FR
Dans l’économie moderne, l’énergie tient une place essentielle. J’ai donc voté pour cette résolution qui met en place trois axes pour maintenir le statut de l’UE en tant que leader mondial dans le domaine de l’innovation énergétique. Pour ce faire, les citoyens européens doivent être plus participatifs et davantage se tourner vers l’innovation et l’utilisation d’outils numériques pour produire et consommer une énergie plus durable et plus propre. De plus, il faut que le prochain budget consacré à la recherche et au développement augmente globalement d'au moins 120 milliards d'euros, avec une hausse significative du financement de projets énergétiques à faibles émissions et le soutien d'initiatives impliquant les villes et les administrations locales. Enfin, l'UE devrait étudier les moyens d'aider les pays en développement et émergents dans leur transition énergétique et élaborer une stratégie d'exportation de technologies et de solutions énergétiques.
Marrakesh Treaty: facilitating the access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired, or otherwise print disabled (A8-0400/2017 - Max Andersson) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution visant à approuver la décision du Conseil de conclure le traité international de Marrakech. Il s’agit là d’une nouvelle étape décisive dans la mise en œuvre intégrale de cet important acte législatif sur le droit d’auteur. En effet, sa dimension culturelle et ses objectifs sociaux sont indéniables. Il vise principalement à établir un ensemble de limitations et d’exceptions obligatoires du droit d’auteur en faveur des aveugles, des déficients visuels et des personnes ayant d’autres difficultés de lecture des textes imprimés. Son ambition est de faciliter pour ces personnes l’accès à des textes imprimés et à des œuvres dans des formats accessibles, tout en protégeant les titulaires de ces droits.
Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, and international child abduction (A8-0388/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) FR
Une Union où les citoyens circulent librement a eu pour effet indirect une augmentation du taux de divorces internationaux en son sein. Afin de répondre au mieux aux problèmes pouvant découler des procédures de divorce impliquant des ressortissants de plusieurs États membres comme par exemple les enlèvements internationaux ou la garde de l’enfant, l’Union européenne s’est dotée d’une meilleure législation en ce qui concerne ces litiges. J’ai voté pour cette législation pour faire en sorte que les droits des enfants soient renforcés tout au long de la procédure de règlement des différends entre les couples en instance de divorce. Dorénavant l'enfant, accompagné d’un expert spécialement formé à cet effet, aura le droit d'exprimer une opinion par le biais d’une procédure claire et avec moins de pression. En outre, les cas d’enlèvements d’enfants devront être examinés par des juges de la famille expérimentés, afin de garantir que la priorité soit accordée à l'intérêt supérieur de l'enfant.
Implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative in the Member States (A8-0406/2017 - Romana Tomc) FR
L'emploi des jeunes doit être une priorité politique de l'Union européenne. Pour cette raison, je porte une attention particulière à l'initiative pour l'emploi des jeunes (IEJ), et au programme qu'elle finance, la garantie pour la jeunesse. Grâce à ses financements, l'initiative a déjà aidé 1,4 million de jeunes à trouver un emploi, un stage ou une formation. J'ai apporté mon soutien à cet outil en votant en faveur du rapport sur la mise en œuvre de l’initiative pour l’emploi des jeunes dans les États membres.Le rapport souligne les réalisations de l'IEJ et rappelle qu’il est essentiel de lui garantir un financement d’au moins 700 millions d’euros sur la période 2018-2020, mais porte également un regard critique sur le programme et les possibilités d'améliorer sa mise en œuvre. Il est notamment essentiel que les financements de l’Union européenne ne remplacent pas les financements nationaux, mais les complètent. Par ailleurs, les États membres doivent poursuivre leurs efforts pour améliorer le ciblage des NEET, les jeunes qui ne travaillent pas et ne suivent pas d’études ni de formation. Ces jeunes, et en particulier les plus inactifs et difficiles à réintégrer, qui sont les plus exposés à l’exclusion, devraient pouvoir bénéficier de services personnalisés.
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (A8-0401/2017 - Nicola Danti) FR
J'ai soutenu le rapport concernant la réglementation et le besoin de réforme des services professionnels, qui souligne que les professions réglementées jouent un rôle fondamental dans l’économie européenne. Une haute qualité des services professionnels et un environnement réglementaire efficace sont d'une importance capitale pour le maintien du modèle économique et social de l’Union. Je me félicite pour cette raison des orientations données aux États membres dans le cadre de l’exercice d’évaluation mutuelle. Par ailleurs, il me semble prioritaire de répondre aux défis d'innovation posés par la numérisation du secteur des services professionnels. Il est urgent d'engager la réflexion, en gardant à l'esprit les incidences et les risques pour les consommateurs. Ainsi, la réglementation des services professionnels devrait être révisée régulièrement afin de tenir compte de l’innovation technique et de la numérisation.
Control of exports, transfer, brokering, technical assistance and transit of dual-use items (A8-0390/2017 - Klaus Buchner) FR
J'ai soutenu le rapport instituant un régime de l’Union de contrôle des exportations, des transferts, du courtage, de l’assistance technique et du transit en ce qui concerne les biens à double usage, dans l'optique d'y inclure la dimension des droits de l'homme, qui permettra un contrôle plus complet des exportations européennes. Cette disposition est essentielle, pour que l'Union traite la question sensible du commerce des biens à double usage avec le plus de prudence possible, et s'assure que les technologies et les biens conçus pour une utilisation civile en Europe ne puissent être utilisés de façon abusive une fois exportés. Les technologies de cyber-surveillance doivent notamment être considérées avec une grande vigilance, afin que les régimes autoritaires ne puissent pas les utiliser dans le but d’espionner leur population, en piratant les ordinateurs ou en interceptant les téléphones portables.
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López) FR
L'Union européenne doit rester un leader mondial en matière d’utilisation de l’énergie produite à partir de sources renouvelables, qui constitue un élément essentiel pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre, dans l'optique de respecter les engagements pris au titre de l’accord de Paris de 2015 sur le changement climatique. Pour cette raison, j'ai voté en faveur du rapport concernant la promotion de l’utilisation de l’énergie produite à partir de sources renouvelables, qui établit un objectif contraignant au niveau de l’Union, d’au moins 35 % d’énergie produite à partir de sources renouvelables dans la consommation finale d’énergie en 2030. Ce niveau sera atteint grâce à un effort collectif de tous les États membres, puisque des niveaux nationaux contraignants seront établis, en tenant compte des spécificités et du potentiel de chaque État. L'Union doit adopter une stratégie ambitieuse afin de réduire ses émissions bien plus fortement et rapidement qu’elle ne l’avait prévu, et passer à un système énergétique hautement performant et reposant sur les énergies renouvelables au plus tard en 2050.
Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Claude Turmes) FR
Le règlement sur la gouvernance de l’Union énergétique est une législation-cadre promouvant un système de gouvernance solide afin de respecter les engagements pris dans le cadre de l’accord de Paris. Il couvre plusieurs dimensions de l’Union énergétique et coordonne les objectifs visés dans les législations individuelles sur les énergies renouvelables, l’efficacité énergétique ou encore le marché intérieur de l’énergie. J’ai voté en faveur de cette politique car elle permettra de développer une véritable indépendance énergétique, de créer des emplois et de sécuriser les investissements, tout en restant dans les clous de l’accord de Paris afin de limiter l’augmentation de la température à 1,5 °C au-dessus des niveaux pré-industriels.
Implementation of EU macro-regional strategies (A8-0389/2017 - Andrea Cozzolino) FR
Les stratégies macro-régionales (SMR) sont un instrument de promotion de la coopération territoriale européenne et visent à rassembler les régions d’États membres et de pays tiers confrontées à des défis communs. Si les SMR varient pour ce qui est des pays ou des domaines concernés, elles partagent néanmoins toutes un même objectif: veiller à coordonner une approche par rapport à un ou plusieurs problèmes qui gagneraient en efficacité à être affrontés ensemble. Il existe à l’heure actuelle quatre régions s’étant dotées d’une telle stratégie: la stratégie pour la mer Baltique, la stratégie pour la région du Danube, la stratégie pour la région de l’Adriatique et de la mer Ionienne et la stratégie pour la région alpine. Au vu de la précieuse contribution à la coopération transfrontalière et intersectorielle que les SMR apportent en renforçant la connectivité et le transfert de connaissances, et en consolidant les relations économiques entre pays et régions, je voté pour ce rapport.
Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures (A8-0381/2017 - Gabriel Mato) FR
J’ai soutenu l'interdiction de la pêche électrique, comme une majorité de mes collègues. C’est une victoire importante dans l'optique d'établir au sein de l'Union des pratiques de pêche soutenables et respectueuses des écosystèmes marins. Il n'est pas imaginable que l'Union reste le seul endroit au monde à autoriser cette pratique destructrice, qui cause des dégâts irréversibles sur les ressources, notamment juvéniles.Je regrette cependant, qu'au-delà de l'interdiction de la pêche électrique, le reste du rapport ne soit pas à la hauteur des exigences que l'Union doit se fixer. En effet, le texte adopté manque d’ambition: il ne permettra pas de garantir la santé des océans à long terme et constitue une véritable occasion manquée, faute d'établir des standards et objectifs communs et obligatoires, notamment concernant la capture d’espèces marines inférieures aux tailles minimales de référence. Pour cette raison, j'ai voté contre le rapport car l'Union ne doit pas revoir ses ambitions environnementales à la baisse.
International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (A8-0399/2017 - José Inácio Faria) FR
La préservation des océans, des ressources marines et côtières sont indéniablement nécessaires au bien-être des personnes et de l’environnement de manière générale. Les océans et ces ressources sont pourtant particulièrement vulnérables à la surpêche, à la dégradation, à la pollution et au changement climatique. Dans ce contexte, les objectifs de développement durable ont été adoptés au niveau des Nations unies parmi lesquels figurent la conservation et l’exploitation durable des océans. De cette manière, nous démontrons que la diversité biologique des écosystèmes marins et côtiers et le caractère durable de leur exploitation sont essentiels au niveau mondial. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport qui demande à la Commission d’améliorer la gouvernance mondiale en établissant des partenariats océaniques avec les principaux acteurs et qui nous rapprochent de nos objectifs.
A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility (A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout) FR
La mobilité est essentielle. L’Union s’emploie à mettre en place des transports sûrs, efficaces et accessibles, en cherchant à atteindre une connectivité mondiale. Néanmoins, les transports ont une part importante de responsabilité dans l’émission de gaz à effet de serre, aussi l'Europe doit-elle mettre en place dès aujourd'hui une stratégie axée sur une mobilité à faibles émissions. C’est dans cette optique que j’ai voté en faveur du rapport sur la stratégie européenne pour une mobilité à faible taux d’émissions. Nous y soulignons notamment la nécessité d’instaurer des systèmes de transports intelligents, coopératifs et interopérables et des véhicules efficaces tendant vers des émissions nulles.Je me suis opposé à la partie du texte prônant une généralisation des méga-trucks car selon moi, ils ne peuvent constituer la solution pour répondre aux défis environnementaux auxquels nous devons faire face. Enfin, nous rappelons l'importance que les autorités encouragent les citoyens à adopter des comportements positifs, comme la mobilité intermodale.
Objection to an implementing act: use of phosphoric acid – phosphates – di – tri – and polyphosphates (E 338-452) in frozen vertical meat spits (B8-0666/2017) FR
J’ai soutenu l’objection visant à interdire l’utilisation d’additifs phosphatés dans la viande en broche surgelée (ou kebab) au vu des inquiétudes qui existent concernant les conséquences des phosphates utilisés comme additifs alimentaires sur la santé. Alors qu’ils sont de plus en plus utilisés pour conserver la saveur et retenir l’eau dans la viande de kebab, une étude allemande a souligné le lien potentiel entre les phosphates et les maladies cardiovasculaires. Pour cette raison, j’estime que l’utilisation d’additifs phosphatés devrait être interdite dans la viande de kebab, comme elle l’est déjà pour les viandes fraîches et transformées. Je regrette que l’objection n’ait pas obtenu suffisamment de votes pour être adoptée et j’espère que l’étude de l’Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments concernant la sécurité des additifs qui est attendue pour la fin d’année 2018 permettra d’apporter des preuves scientifiques suffisantes pour permettre une interdiction totale. D’ici là, les alternatives existantes devraient être favorisées.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister) FR
Le rapport annuel sur la politique étrangère et de sécurité commune, que j’ai soutenu, souligne que nous devons faire plus pour répondre aux enjeux internationaux actuels qui pourraient menacer la sécurité de l'Union, et nous montrer à la hauteur des attentes des citoyens: la prolifération des armes de destruction massive, le terrorisme, les conflits dans le voisinage oriental et méridional, les guerres par procuration, les guerres hybrides, la guerre de l’information, etc. L'Union peut se positionner pour répondre à ces défis à condition d'avoir une réponse diplomatique européenne forte et une réaction plus rapide face aux crises. Il me semble donc nécessaire de faire un grand pas en avant pour donner corps à cette politique commune que nous appelons de nos voeux depuis si longtemps, d'accélérer le processus de prise de décision au Conseil et de rappeler aux États membres l'importance de concrétiser l’ambition d’une défense européenne commune et autonome. De son côté, la Commission devrait évaluer la possibilité de mettre en place une direction générale de la défense qui mènerait les actions de l’Union pour soutenir, coordonner ou compléter les actions des États membres.
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2016 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0365/2017 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl) FR
Il est préoccupant d’observer les retours en arrière dans de nombreux pays du monde dans les domaines de la démocratie, des droits de l’homme et de l’état de droit. J’ai soutenu le rapport annuel 2016 sur les droits de l’homme et la démocratie dans le monde et sur la politique de l’Union européenne en la matière qui souligne que l’Union doit intensifier ses efforts dans la lutte contre les persécutions et les privations de liberté multiples. Il est primordial que l’Union et ses États membres appliquent activement le principe d’intégration des droits de l’homme et de la démocratie dans l’ensemble de leurs politiques. Il est également nécessaire de souligner l’extrême vulnérabilité des migrants et des réfugiés face à l’exploitation, au trafic de migrants et à la traite des êtres humains. L’Union devrait agir pour protéger les migrants et traiter de manière effective la question des violations des droits de l’homme auxquelles ils sont confrontés. Des dispositifs de réinstallation et de réunification des familles et des couloirs humanitaires devraient être établis afin d’améliorer leur sort.
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0374/2017 - Linnéa Engström) FR
Je suis en faveur de l’accord sur le nouveau régime législatif relatif à la gestion durable des flottes de pêche externes, car ce nouveau cadre réglementaire instaure des mesures rigoureuses, transparentes et harmonisées pour la délivrance et la gestion des autorisations de pêche aux navires européens pêchant en dehors des eaux communautaires et aux navires étrangers opérant dans les eaux de l’Union. L’ancien règlement se devait d’être adapté aux exigences consacrées par la nouvelle politique commune de la pêche dont les objectifs sont l’accroissement de la transparence, l’amélioration de la gouvernance et le perfectionnement des contrôles et de l’application des règles.
Extension of the duration of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0198/2017 - Udo Bullmann, José Manuel Fernandes) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la prolongation de la durée d’existence du Fonds européen pour les investissements stratégiques (FEIS) jusqu’en 2020. Le FEIS est un succès pour l’UE, il a contribué à la reprise économique depuis 2015 en comblant les lacunes du marché et les écarts d’investissement. Cette prolongation permettra d’atteindre un objectif d’investissements de 500 milliards d’euros pour promouvoir et financer des projets innovants. Je salue l’introduction d’améliorations techniques concernant ce fonds et notamment le renforcement de la plateforme européenne de conseil en investissement, avec une présence locale accrue qui permettra d’encourager les projets régionaux, locaux et les petits projets. Cette amélioration permettra de rendre le FEIS plus accessible aux régions européennes, favorisera la croissance, la compétitivité et contribuera à créer de nouveaux emplois pour les Européens.
Rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes (A8-0378/2017 - Tiemo Wölken) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution donnant le feu vert à l’ouverture des négociations avec le Conseil sur les règles d’accès aux programmes de télévision et de radio en ligne. Ces nouvelles règles ont pour objectif de répondre à la demande croissante de contenus de la part des consommateurs européens. Le principe de territorialité a été préservé pour une large part afin de fournir une protection optimale au secteur de la création culturelle en Europe et favoriser son développement. Nous nous sommes engagés à préserver la diversité culturelle, et nous nous y employons. Nous souhaitons garantir un accès à des contenus de qualité pour les consommateurs, et nous sommes convaincus que le texte ainsi voté y contribuera. L’Union européenne ne peut se permettre de perdre sa position de choix dans ce domaine.
EU-USA Air Transport Agreement (A8-0376/2017 - Theresa Griffin) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de l’approbation de l’accord de transport aérien entre l’Union européenne et les États-Unis d’Amérique afin que cet accord puisse être conclu de manière définitive. Son objectif était l’établissement d’un «espace aérien sans frontières» entre les parties. Il était donc question de créer un marché unique des transports aériens où les transporteurs européens et ceux des États-Unis seraient en mesure de fournir des services aériens sans aucune restriction, et qui intégrerait le marché intérieur des deux parties. Ces questions restant extrêmement sensibles sur le plan politique aux États-Unis, il a été décidé de les mettre en place en plusieurs étapes. En 2010, la deuxième étape des négociations a abouti à l’accord appliqué de manière provisoire jusqu’à ce jour. Cet accord est perçu comme une réalisation majeure fournissant de nouvelles possibilités d’accès au marché et renforçant le cadre de coopération dans les domaines réglementaires de sûreté, de sécurité et d’environnement.
EU Citizenship Report 2017: Strengthening Citizens' Rights in a Union of Democratic Change (A8-0385/2017 - Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea) FR
25 ans après l’entrée en vigueur du traité de Maastricht consacrant la citoyenneté européenne, il était temps de passer en revue les domaines dans lesquels des défis devaient encore être relevés en cette matière. C’est ce que ce rapport s’emploie à faire en examinant minutieusement les actions proposées par la Commission. Il convient d’améliorer les droits liés à la citoyenneté européenne et de faire en sorte que les citoyens puissent, de manière effective, les apprécier dans leur vie quotidienne. En ce sens, il faut renforcer les valeurs européennes communes: l’égalité et la non-discrimination, la participation des citoyens à la vie démocratique de l’Union, ainsi que mettre à disposition des citoyens un espace public européen de sécurité, de paix et de prospérité durable leur permettant d’exprimer des préoccupations et des idées quant à l’évolution de l’Union. Pour ces motifs, j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport.
Towards a digital trade strategy (A8-0384/2017 - Marietje Schaake) FR
Les évolutions technologiques actuelles, l’accès à l’internet et la numérisation de l’économie stimulent la croissance et permettent tout à la fois aux entreprises d’ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives pour leur développement et aux citoyens d'avoir accès à de nouveaux biens et services innovants.J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant la future stratégie pour le commerce numérique car j’estime que les enjeux du numérique devraient figurer en meilleure place dans la politique de l’Union en matière commerciale. Une telle stratégie de l’Union devrait s’appuyer sur l’objectif de garantir un accès au marché pour les biens et services numériques dans les pays tiers et garantir que les règles commerciales produisent des avantages concrets pour les consommateurs. Cette stratégie devrait permettre de favoriser la croissance des PME et des jeunes entreprises, et pas uniquement celle des multinationales.Par ailleurs, les citoyens et consommateurs européens devraient bénéficier de cette stratégie, via la réduction de la fracture numérique notamment. De plus en plus de particuliers, qui vendent et achètent en ligne, peuvent être confrontés à de lourdes procédures douanières, que nous devrions simplifier.
Accession of Chile, Iceland and Bahamas to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0364/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR
De nos jours, il arrive encore que l’on soit confronté à ce qu’on appelle un enlèvement international d’enfant. Cela se présente le plus souvent lorsqu’un couple se sépare, et que le père ou la mère originaire d’un autre pays tente d’obtenir la garde des enfants, dans un contexte d’absence de coopération entre États en cette matière. La convention de La Haye sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants a pour objet de remédier à ce genre de situation. Cette convention étant entrée en vigueur au Chili, en Islande et dans les Bahamas, il était nécessaire que la Roumanie, unique État à ne pas avoir encore accepté l’adhésion de ces pays à la convention, dépose une déclaration d’acceptation au niveau du Conseil qui rende la convention applicable. J’ai voté en faveur du rapport au motif qu’il autorise la Roumanie à accepter l’adhésion de ces États à la convention.
Instrument contributing to stability and peace (A8-0261/2017 - Arnaud Danjean) FR
L’instrument contribuant à la stabilité et à la paix (IcSP) a vocation à appuyer les initiatives en matière de sécurité et les actions de consolidation de la paix dans les pays partenaires. J’ai voté en faveur du rapport le concernant car je soutiens le renforcement du fonds avec une nouvelle allocation de 100 millions d’euros. Par ailleurs, il était selon moi nécessaire de rappeler que l’instrument est à destination des activités militaires uniquement dans des circonstances exceptionnelles et ne peut être destiné à financer des dépenses militaires récurrentes, l'achat d'armes et de munitions, ni des formations destinées à contribuer spécifiquement à la capacité de combat des forces armées. L’aide de l’Union, dans le cadre de cet instrument, ne devrait pas être utilisée pour financer le renforcement des capacités des acteurs militaires à des fins autres que des activités liées au développement et des activités liées à la sécurité pour le développement.
Ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy (A8-0302/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark) FR
Nous votons ici sur ce texte qui concerne les établissements financiers d’importance systémique mondiale, c’est-à-dire ceux dont la faillite causerait un risque qui menacerait le système financier dans sa globalité. J’ai voté pour, car ce texte vise à ce que ces établissements financiers disposent d’une capacité d’absorption des pertes et de recapitalisation suffisante afin de garantir que leurs fonctions critiques puissent se poursuivre sans que les finances publiques ou la stabilité financière ne soient mises en péril. Il s’agit donc de ne pas répéter les erreurs passées. Cette réforme prendrait la forme d’une nouvelle catégorie d’actifs constituée de titres de créance de rang supérieur «non privilégiés» qui ne seraient utilisés à des fins de renflouement interne qu’après les autres instruments de fonds propres, mais avant les autres créances de rang supérieur. Il reviendrait donc aux actionnaires et investisseurs de ce type de titres d’assumer les pertes et non plus au contribuable.
Implementation of the European Disability Strategy (A8-0339/2017 - Helga Stevens) FR
Aujourd’hui, près d’une personne sur six dans l’Union vit avec une forme de handicap. Ce sont 80 millions de citoyens pour lesquels nous devons assurer une égalité de traitement, une vie indépendante et la possibilité de jouer un rôle dans la société. J’ai soutenu le rapport sur la mise en œuvre de la stratégie européenne en faveur des personnes handicapées car j’estime que l’UE et ses États membres doivent renforcer leurs efforts. Dans le cadre de la stratégie européenne 2020-2030 en faveur des personnes handicapées - qui devra être ambitieuse et transparaître dans toutes les législations de l’UE et dans le processus du Semestre européen -, il faudra également porter attention à la mise en place de formations pour le personnel éducatif pour soutenir les personnes avec des besoins plus complexes et la nécessité de porter une attention particulière aux femmes et aux jeunes filles handicapées, qui souffrent souvent d’une double discrimination.
The EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development (A8-0334/2017 - Maurice Ponga) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur la stratégie UE-Afrique pour souligner l’importance de donner un nouvel élan à notre coopération. Ce «nouvel élan pour le partenariat Afrique-UE » devrait permettre d’approfondir nos relations en les orientant sur la prospérité et la stabilité des deux continents et en reflétant leur évolution sur les plans social, environnemental, économique et politique. Il me semble important d’établir un dialogue franc afin de pouvoir promouvoir la bonne gouvernance, la démocratie, l’état de droit, les droits de l’homme et la lutte contre la corruption. De plus l’UE doit poursuivre ses investissements et devrait fournir une aide plus substantielle en faveur de l’agriculture durable, des petits agriculteurs, des systèmes d’éducation nationaux et de la lutte contre le changement climatique. Il est aussi essentiel de rappeler aux États membres l’importance de respecter l’engagement pris de consacrer 0,7 % de leur PIB à l’aide publique au développement.
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2016 (A8-0328/2017 - Marlene Mizzi) FR
J’ai voté en faveur d’une résolution sur le rapport 2016 du Médiateur européen. La médiation joue un rôle essentiel dans nos sociétés, la mise en place d’un Médiateur européen est un aspect positif: il permet aux citoyens et aux entreprises de trouver un interlocuteur ouvert à recueillir les plaintes liées à diverses problématiques (cas de mauvaise administration de la part des institutions et agences de l’UE) auxquelles ils sont confrontés. Ce texte nous fournit des informations précieuses et détaillées sur le travail effectué et les résultats obtenus. Le Médiateur a reçu un total de 1 880 plaintes. Il est intéressant de noter qu’il y a eu une réduction du nombre d’enquêtes portant sur les institutions de l’UE. Enfin, le rapport estime qu’il est important de continuer à répondre et à réagir aux commentaires critiques du Médiateur et à améliorer le taux de suivi de ses recommandations.
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (A8-0340/2017 - Javi López) FR
Alors que l’un des objectifs de la stratégie Europe 2020 est de réduire d’au moins 20 millions le nombre de personnes touchées ou menacées de pauvreté ou d’exclusion sociale, ce taux se stabilise au niveau de 23,7 %, avec des chiffres qui demeurent particulièrement élevés dans certains États membres. Le rapport sur la lutte contre les inégalités comme moyen d’action pour stimuler la création d’emplois et la croissance, que j’ai soutenu, propose de s’appuyer sur les politiques européennes de cohésion et d’investissement et sur la coordination des politiques sociales pour s’attaquer à cette question. Il invite la Commission à encourager une réforme des politiques fiscales des États afin que les budgets alloués à la santé, au logement, aux affaires sociales, à l’emploi et à l’éducation soient suffisants. Le rapport rappelle également qu'il convient d’améliorer la qualité des emplois dans l’Union, notamment en termes de sécurité de l’emploi ainsi que de santé et de sécurité au travail, en vue de réduire les inégalités entre les travailleurs.
Rule of law in Malta (B8-0596/2017, B8-0597/2017) FR
Le récent assassinat de la journaliste d’investigation Daphne Caruana Galizia a renforcé mes craintes à propos des problèmes auxquels l’État maltais est confronté depuis plusieurs années: atteintes à l’état de droit, à la liberté des médias et à l’indépendance de la police et de l’appareil judiciaire. J’ai donc voté en faveur de la résolution demandant qu’une enquête indépendante internationale soit menée sur la mort de madame Galizia, qu’un dialogue régulier soit noué avec le gouvernement maltais dans le but de veiller au respect des valeurs chères à l’Union et que la lutte contre la fraude fiscal devienne effectivement un objectif prioritaire du gouvernement. Sur ce dernier point, il me semble déplorable que la police maltaise n’enquête pas sur les allégations graves de corruption et de non-respect des obligations en matière de surveillance bancaire et de blanchiment de capitaux, tout particulièrement l’absence d’investigation suite aux révélations des Panama papers.
Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (B8-0589/2017) FR
Je me félicite du plan d’action pour le milieu naturel, la population et l’économie et ait voté en sa faveur puisqu’il constitue un pas dans la bonne direction. Aujourd’hui, alors qu’en Europe près d’un quart des espèces sauvages sont menacées d’extinction et que la plupart des écosystèmes sont dégradés, il est nécessaire de rappeler aux États membres l’importance d’appliquer pleinement les politiques adoptées en vue de mieux protéger la biodiversité, les ressources naturelles et la santé publique. Les objectifs de la stratégie de l’Union européenne en faveur de la biodiversité à l’horizon 2020 et de la convention sur la diversité biologique ne sauraient être atteints sans efforts supplémentaires et substantiels. Des mesures sont notamment nécessaires pour obtenir des progrès dans la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre, de la pollution atmosphérique ainsi que dans l’amélioration de l’efficacité énergétique. La Commission et les États membres doivent accorder une grande priorité politique à ces questions.
The situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (B8-0594/2017, B8-0595/2017) FR
Les valeurs communes de l’Union semblent aujourd’hui menacées en Pologne, notamment au regard de la séparation des pouvoirs, de l’indépendance du système judiciaire et des droits fondamentaux. J’ai soutenu la résolution concernant la situation de l’état de droit et de la démocratie en Pologne car j’estime qu’il est d’une grande importance de faire évoluer la situation. Il est particulièrement inquiétant de voir en Pologne l’évolution législative qui se déroule actuellement sans véritable contrôle constitutionnel puisqu’aucune solution de compromis n’a été trouvée au problème du bon fonctionnement du Tribunal constitutionnel. Pour ces raisons et pour empêcher une violation grave de l’état de droit, la procédure de l’article 7 de l’Union devrait être lancée.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/004 IT/Almaviva (A8-0346/2017 - Daniele Viotti) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de l’octroi d’une aide de 3 347 370 euros à destination de personnes anciennement employées par l’entreprise italienne d’innovation technologique Almaviva. Touchée de plein fouet par la crise économique, une pression importante s’est faite sentir sur le prix des services de marketing et d’assistance aux acheteurs de biens et de services, ce qui a entraîné une baisse du chiffre d’affaire et de la rentabilité de la société en question. La multinationale a enregistré une baisse des recettes entre 2011 et 2016 atteignant 45 %. Cette aide, issue du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation, est dédiée aux travailleurs des secteurs les plus touchés par les aspects négatifs de la mondialisation. Elle sera destinée à cofinancer des mesures d’accompagnement à la recherche d’emploi, de formation, d’aide et de contribution à l’entrepreneuriat pour les 1640 travailleurs licenciés.
Cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (A8-0077/2017 - Olga Sehnalová) FR
Au sein de l’Union, les différences entre les systèmes nationaux de protection des consommateurs sont problématiques et peuvent provoquer des failles. On estime en effet que 37 % des boutiques et des sites de réservation en ligne ne respectaient pas les législations européennes relatives aux consommateurs en 2014. Pour lutter contre cela, j’ai soutenu le rapport sur la coopération entre les autorités nationales chargées de veiller à l’application de la législation en matière de protection des consommateurs dans le but de mettre en place des règles européennes contre les escroqueries et de pouvoir arrêter plus rapidement les opérateurs commerciaux malhonnêtes. En élargissant les pouvoirs des autorités nationales chargées de faire appliquer la loi, il sera plus simple de détecter et de stopper les violations en ligne des législations. De plus, une meilleure coordination des actions permettra de lutter plus efficacement contre les infractions transfrontalières dans l’UE. J’estime par ailleurs qu’il est particulièrement important d’impliquer davantage les associations de consommateurs, qui jouent un rôle réel en signalant des infractions présumées.
Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change (A8-0329/2017 - Iratxe García Pérez) FR
Le changement démographique (vieillissement de la population, chute de la natalité) exerce des pressions économiques, sociales, budgétaires et environnementales importantes sur les gouvernements et les autorités régionales et locales des États membres. Pour lutter contre ce phénomène, il nous faut agir par une action coordonnée à tous les niveaux de pouvoir au travers d’une stratégie d’adaptation des instruments de l’Union (EFSI, les Fonds ESI, FEDER et notamment le Fonds de cohésion). Pour ces motifs, j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport car il invite les États membres à renforcer ces fonds, notamment le Fonds européen de développement régional, en ciblant mieux les investissements disponibles, et le Fonds de cohésion en l’intégrant aux futures stratégies destinées à remédier au changement démographique.
Action plan on retail financial services (A8-0326/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson) FR
Le milieu financier, comme on peut s’en douter, n’est pas resté en retrait par rapport à la révolution numérique, l’évolution du marché financier va de pair avec les changements de comportement des consommateurs. Il est nécessaire d’avoir pour objectifs la suppression des obstacles transfrontaliers et le renforcement de la concurrence au bénéfice des consommateurs, tout en protégeant ces consommateurs. Sur ce dernier point, j’émets une série de critiques vis-à-vis de préoccupations non affrontées par la Commission: la conversion des devises liée au paiement sur le marché numérique, les frais facturés sur les transactions en devise, les risques liés à la vente en ligne à distance, le blocage géographique injustifié empêchant d’avoir accès à des services plus avantageux et le manque de reconnaissance mutuelle et l’interopérabilité des techniques d’identification numérique. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté pour le rapport.
Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive (A8-0297/2017 - Laura Ferrara) FR
En 2004, une directive européenne pour la prévention et la réparation des dommages environnementaux basée sur le principe du pollueur-payeur est entrée en vigueur. Le présent rapport vise à analyser l’application de sa mise en œuvre. J’ai voté en faveur du rapport pour deux raisons. Premièrement, il met en avant les problèmes rencontrés dans la réalité tels qu’un système de responsabilité objective limité par une liste de cas restreinte, une transposition inégale et fragmentée dans les États membres et l’absence de dispositions spécifiques lorsqu’il n’est pas possible de retrouver l’entité responsable des dommages ou lorsque l’entité est insolvable. Deuxièmement, il incite aussi la Commission à reformuler une proposition visant à prendre en compte l’évolution rapide des facteurs de pollution ou encore l’introduction de normes aidant les exploitants et les compagnies d’assurance afin d’accroître la diffusion d’un système d’assurance pour les différents dommages environnementaux.
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with Australia (A8-0311/2017 - Daniel Caspary) FR
L’Union européenne est sur le point de lancer de nouvelles négociations concernant des accords commerciaux avec l’Australie. Le but de cet accord est d’accroître les échanges de biens et de services, les flux commerciaux et les investissements. Le mandat octroyé à la Commission comprend les éléments suivants : la mise en place de solides garde-fous pour ce qui a trait à l’agriculture, la création d’opportunités commerciales pour les PME, l’obtention de nouvelles opportunités en termes de contrats avec les autorités publiques pour les entreprises européennes et un haut niveau de protection pour les consommateurs de l’UE.
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens (A8-0064/2017 - Marita Ulvskog) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant la protection des travailleurs contre les risques liés à l’exposition à des agents cancérigènes ou mutagènes au travail qui vise à établir des règles plus strictes, au bénéfice de la santé des travailleurs européens. Ces nouvelles règles ambitieuses introduisent des seuils limites pour 11 substances cancérigènes supplémentaires, ajoutées à la liste actuelle. De plus, les valeurs limites d’exposition professionnelle, c’est-à-dire la quantité maximale de substances dangereuses à laquelle les travailleurs peuvent être exposés, ont été réduites. L’objectif est d’apporter des protections supplémentaires à des travailleurs qui sont particulièrement exposés, notamment dans les domaines de la construction, de la chimie, de l’industrie du bois et du textile. La Commission devra par ailleurs évaluer la possibilité d’inclure dans la liste des substances dangereuses les substances reprotoxiques, ayant un impact sur les fonctions sexuelles et la fertilité, d’ici le premier trimestre 2019.
Fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism (A8-0294/2017 - Soraya Post) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant l’intégration des Roms dans l’Union et la lutte contre l’antitsiganisme car malgré les efforts déployés, on perçoit au quotidien, dans l’ensemble de l’Europe, un rejet de cette communauté à plusieurs niveaux de la société. Il s’agit bien d’une forme de racisme. Les Roms subissent quotidiennement discriminations, dénigrement, parfois de la violence et se retrouvent dans une situation de grande exclusion sociale. Pour faire face à cela, il est primordial d’éduquer et d’informer le grand public, afin de balayer les préjugés. À cet égard, il revient aux États membres d’assumer pleinement leurs responsabilités et de lancer des campagnes d’information et de sensibilisation à long terme. La Commission comme les États membres devraient mettre en place des commissions de vérité et de réconciliation afin de lutter contre les stéréotypes et de garantir aux Roms leurs droits fondamentaux. Les principes d'égalité et de non-discrimination entérinés dans les traités doivent s’appliquer, il est choquant de savoir que 80% des Roms vivent sous le seuil de pauvreté de leur pays au sein de l’Union.
EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (A8-0303/2017 - Dominique Riquet) FR
En 2005, le Conseil des ministres «Transports» avait fixé un programme d’action pour développer les relations aériennes de la Communauté et définissant les trois piliers sur lesquels la politique européenne est fondée dans ce domaine. Il s’agit de la sécurité juridique des accords bilatéraux existant, le développement de l’espace aérien européen commun par l’intégration des règles européennes par les pays voisins et l’établissement d’un ensemble de nouveaux accords aériens globaux fixant deux objectifs : l’ouverture des marchés et un processus de convergence réglementaire garantissant un cadre satisfaisant en termes de concurrence. C’est dans ce contexte que j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte car il vise à permettre l’ouverture des marchés et comprend aussi un rapprochement général des législations entre les deux parties autour notamment des éléments clés de la réglementation européenne dans le domaine de l’aviation (sécurité, concurrence, contrôle aérien et protection du consommateur).
Authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion (A8-0304/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR
Depuis les années 30, Le rhum traditionnel des régions françaises ultrapériphériques fait l’objet d’un régime d’accise spécial qui relève d’une stratégie d’aide fiscale à long terme. Lorsque le marché intérieur a été créé et les des accises en Europe harmonisées, ce régime spécial a été prorogé avec l’accord de l’Union européenne. Afin d’assurer la compétitivité de la filière canne-sucre-rhum dans ces régions, les quantités pouvant bénéficier d’une fiscalité particulière sont ajustées. Cependant, en 2016, la production de rhum dans les régions françaises ultrapériphériques a dépassé le quota pouvant bénéficier d’un traitement fiscal particulier. J’ai donc voté en faveur de la proposition de la Commission visant à adapter le quota annuel pouvant bénéficier de cette fiscalité de manière à ce que ce secteur ne soit pas impacté négativement.
Control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes cost-effectiveness (A8-0296/2017 - Derek Vaughan) FR
Avec plus de 4 millions de jeunes de 15 à 24 ans au chômage dans l’Union européenne, la lutte contre le chômage des jeunes est une priorité politique. En effet, encore aujourd’hui, l’accès aux services publics de l’emploi reste insuffisant pour les jeunes chômeurs les plus vulnérables. J’ai voté en faveur du rapport sur le contrôle des dépenses et le suivi de la garantie pour la jeunesse car celui-ci souligne la nécessité de garantir un engagement à long terme et une programmation ambitieuse, afin que tous les jeunes qui n’ont pas d’emploi, ne sont pas scolarisés ou ne suivent pas de formation (NEET) aient pleinement accès aux programmes. Cette garantie, pour obtenir des résultats concrets, devra se poursuivre à long terme. La Commission et les États membres devront veiller à ce qu’un financement suffisant soit disponible dans le but d’assurer l’intégration des jeunes NEET. Il me semble important, à ce titre, que les fonds publics disponibles pour les politiques actives du marché du travail au niveau de l’Union et des États membres soient augmentés.
Renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0567/2017) FR
Je me suis opposé à la proposition de la Commission de renouveler l’autorisation du glyphosate au sein de l’Union européenne pour les dix prochaines années. En vertu du principe de précaution et pour répondre à une grande préoccupation des citoyens européens, il convient d’interdire cette substance dès que possible. Le délai de 5 ans que j’ai soutenu est une phase de sortie raisonnable et encadrée. Ces années doivent être celles de la fin de l’usage du glyphosate et de l’obtention de solutions alternatives pour l’agriculture, comme l’agriculture à bas niveau d’intrants. Cette évolution est aujourd’hui une nécessité. Il ne faut pas oublier que le Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (CIRC), agence de l’Organisation mondiale de la santé, a classé en mars 2015 le glyphosate cancérogène probable pour l’homme. De plus, le scandale des «Monsanto papers» doit nous alerter sur cet herbicide qui est le plus utilisé au monde et qui voit peser sur lui de forte présomption de nocivité pour la santé humaine, animale et environnementale.
Authorisation of genetically modified oilseed rapes MON 88302 x Ms8 x Rf3 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0569/2017) FR
En votant en faveur de l’objection, je me suis une nouvelle fois opposée à la mise sur le marché de l’Union de denrées alimentaires génétiquement modifiées. Il est essentiel de rappeler que les denrées alimentaires ne doivent pas avoir d’effets négatifs sur la santé humaine, la santé animale ou l’environnement. Or, concernant le colza OGM, de nombreuses critiques ont été formulées par des États membres durant la période de consultation, notamment concernant le manque de connaissances et de conclusions fiables au sujet des effets sur la reproduction et sur le développement. Par ailleurs, sur un plan plus général, il ne me semble pas que la généralisation des OGM soit une solution soutenable pour l’agriculture dans le futur.
Legitimate measures to protect whistle-blowers acting in the public interest (A8-0295/2017 - Virginie Rozière) FR
Ces dernières années, nous avons été témoins d’une succession de scandales dans des secteurs aussi variés que la santé publique, l’environnement, la fraude et la corruption ou l’évasion fiscale. Ces évènements ont mis en lumière le rôle crucial que peuvent avoir les lanceurs d’alerte dans notre société, d’où la nécessité de leur offrir une protection adéquate. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution, dans laquelle nous posons un cadre qui pourra servir de base à cette protection. Je voudrais en particulier souligner ici quelques éléments importants dans ce contexte. D’abord, l’importance d’une définition précise de ce qu’est un lanceur d’alerte. Nous avons prévu qu’en plus des signalements de faits contraire à la loi, les atteintes à l’intérêt général soient aussi couvertes; ensuite, nous devions reconnaître l’existence de cas qui nécessitent de s’adresser directement à la presse; enfin, nous attendons les actions de la Commission rapidement.
Enhanced cooperation: European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0290/2017 - Barbara Matera) FR
J’ai soutenu la création d’un Parquet européen pour lutter contre la fraude, qui permettra de poursuivre à l’échelon européen les auteurs d’infractions portant atteinte aux intérêts financiers de l’UE et les cas les plus graves de fraudes à la TVA. Ce parquet sera compétent pour mener de sa propre initiative des enquêtes et des investigations en toute indépendance. Il s’agit d’une étape cruciale dans la défense des intérêts financiers de l’Union et des citoyens car à titre d'exemple, les fraudes à la TVA coûteraient en moyenne 50 milliards d'euros par an au contribuable européen. Vingt États membres, dont la France, ont choisi de travailler en coopération renforcée dans ce domaine afin d’apporter des changements significatifs dans la façon dont l’Union défend ses intérêts financiers. Toutefois, je regrette que ce Parquet européen ne soit pas compétent pour la grande criminalité transfrontalière, les crimes transnationaux et les affaires transnationales de terrorisme. Nous nous battrons pour que ce soit le cas à l’avenir.
Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation (A8-0279/2017 - Javier Couso Permuy) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte qui vise à instituer la Fondation Union européenne-Amérique latine-Caraïbes (Fondation UE-ALC). Cette Fondation va permettre d’approfondir le partenariat birégional entre l’Union européenne et la Communauté d’États latino-américains et Caraïbes (CELAC). Cela se fera par l’encouragement d’études sur des thèmes communs aux deux régions, la promotion de débats sur des stratégies destinées à réaliser des objectifs communs et le développement de nouvelles opportunités de mise en réseau de la société civile et des acteurs sociaux. Vu les aspects historiques, culturels et humains caractéristiques des relations entre l’Europe et la région d’Amérique latine et des Caraïbes, il était temps que le dialogue avec ce partenaire stratégique soit enrichi de manière à relever de manière efficace les défis mondiaux auxquels ces régions sont confrontées.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Greece (A8-0287/2017 - Claude Moraes) FR
J’ai approuvé le projet du Conseil relatif à l’approfondissement de la coopération transfrontalière, notamment en vue de lutter contre le terrorisme et la criminalité transfrontalière. En l’occurrence, ce projet vise à reconnaître la réalisation par la Grèce des conditions et de la procédure précédant l’autorisation de réception et de transmission de données à caractère personnel. La Grèce échangera dorénavant les données dactyloscopiques des migrants arrivant sur ses côtes de manière automatisée avec les autres États membres de l’Union européenne. Cela représente un pas de plus vers une coopération accrue entre les États membres pour ce qui concerne la lutte contre le terrorisme et le crime organisé.
Objection to an implementing measure: scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties (B8-0542/2017) FR
J’ai voté pour l’objection du Parlement européen aux critères d’identification des perturbateurs endocriniens proposés par la Commission européenne. Cette décision s’est basée sur plusieurs éléments.Premièrement, conformément à l’avis du service juridique du Parlement, il apparaissait clairement que la proposition de la Commission outrepassait le mandat qui lui avait été confié sur base de la procédure législative ordinaire. Elle mettait en place une exception contraire à l’esprit de l’acte législatif de base.Deuxièmement, les critères proposés par la Commission avaient un niveau d’exigence tel qu’ils rendaient difficile l’établissement de la preuve à leur encontre.Troisièmement, ces critères ne répondaient pas aux attentes de certains scientifiques spécialisés. En effet, plusieurs associations d’experts ont émis des préoccupations quant à l’identification de certains perturbateurs causant actuellement des dommages aux êtres humains avec ces critères. En connaissant le rapport de l’OMS qualifiant les perturbateurs endocriniens de "menace mondiale" et sur base du principe de précaution, il aurait été difficile d’accepter ces critères. La résolution adoptée demande que de nouveaux critères d’identification soient proposés par la Commission dans les plus brefs délais.
2017 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany (COP23) (B8-0534/2017) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution relative à la COP23, organisée à Bonn, en Allemagne, qui appelle la Commission et les États membres à revoir à la hausse leurs objectifs et instruments politiques en matière de lutte contre le changement climatique. Malgré la décision de M. Trump, président des États-Unis, de se retirer de l’accord de Paris, des engagements européens et internationaux concrets doivent nous permettre de mener une politique ambitieuse et de conserver l’objectif du maintien d’une hausse des températures bien en-deçà des 2°C. Ces engagements concrets concernent notamment la fourniture de sources supplémentaires de financement pour la lutte contre le changement climatique, y compris en introduisant une taxe sur les transactions financières ainsi que l’ajustement de la taxe carbone aux frontières en ce qui concerne les produits provenant de pays qui ne respectent pas leurs engagements pris aux termes de l’accord de Paris.
State of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (B8-0538/2017, B8-0539/2017) FR
Les négociations de sortie du Royaume Uni subissent encore des retards. J’estime que les progrès réalisés sont insuffisants pour lancer les négociations concernant les futures relations entre l’Union et le Royaume Uni. Les clarifications de Theresa May dans son discours de Florence ont été appréciées mais il est dorénavant temps qu’elles soient transposées en propositions concrètes permettant aux négociations de passer aux étapes suivantes. Certaines questions majeures nécessitent que des progrès soient réalisés, notamment celles relatives aux droits des citoyens britanniques et européens, aux obligations financières du Royaume Uni envers l’Union européenne et à la frontière entre la République d’Irlande et l’Irlande du Nord. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté pour la résolution.
Addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries (A8-0283/2017 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant les organisations de la société civile dans les pays en développement. Il est préoccupant que, particulièrement dans les pays en proie à des conflits, le rétrécissement de l’espace qui lui est dévolu se fasse par des moyens complexes liés par exemple à la législation, aux restrictions au niveau du financement, à des contraintes administratives excessives, par la criminalisation et la stigmatisation de représentants de la société civile, la censure ou encore la détention arbitraire.L’Union devrait donc veiller à ce que ses financements soient bien utilisés, notamment pour aider les militants de la société civile menacés. Par ailleurs, la désignation de points de contact pour les droits de l’homme et la société civile dans les délégations de l’Union me semble être une avancée positive et devrait permettre d’améliorer la coopération avec la société civile locale.
The fight against cybercrime (A8-0272/2017 - Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi) FR
Les entreprises européennes sont de plus en plus confrontées à des problèmes de cyber sécurité et de nombreux incidents passent inaperçus. J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant la lutte contre la cybercriminalité car l’Union doit permettre à nos entreprises de lutter contre ces attaques malveillantes. Afin qu’elles ne soient pas vulnérables contre des attaques sophistiquées, la Commission et les États membres devraient, de manière préventive, lancer des campagnes de sensibilisation et d’information. Par ailleurs, étant donné la nature transfrontalière de la cybercriminalité, il est nécessaire de renforcer l’échange d’informations entre les autorités policières et judiciaires et les experts en cybercriminalité. À ce titre, une priorité doit être d’intensifier les échanges d’informations par l’intermédiaire d’Eurojust, d’Europol et de l’ENISA et de leur donner des ressources appropriées. Il est crucial de consacrer des fonds suffisants à la recherche en sécurité informatique.
EU political relations with ASEAN (A8-0243/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer) FR
La résolution adoptée vise à brosser un aperçu large des relations que l’Union européenne entretient avec l’Association des Nations de l’Asie du Sud-Est (ANASE). Après 40 années d’échanges entre ces deux organisations, l’UE souhaite faire progresser ces relations en les fondant sur des mesures concrètes, des résultats tangibles et une coopération plus puissante. L’ANASE deviendrait un partenaire stratégique permettant à l’UE de jouer un rôle plus important dans la mise en œuvre d’objectifs communs dans la région indopacifique. La résolution met l’accent sur les relations commerciales entre les deux partenaires et la nécessité du multilatéralisme mais évoque aussi les questions plus sensibles de militarisation de la mer de Chine méridionale, les principes de responsabilité sociale des entreprises, l’égalité entre les hommes et les femmes, les droits fondamentaux et des minorités, ainsi que les problèmes environnementaux. Estimant le texte équilibré, j’ai voté pour la résolution.
The future of the Erasmus+ programme (B8-0495/2017) FR
Après trois années d’activité, il était temps de se pencher sur le futur du Programme européen le plus populaire au travers d’une résolution qui sonnait comme un bilan. Il faut se féliciter des succès du Programme en terme d’incidence positive pour plus de 9 000 000 de participants aussi bien en Europe qu’en dehors de ses frontières, de collaboration stratégique entre les établissements ainsi qu’en termes de développement d’aptitudes essentielles pour l’épanouissement personnel, social et professionnel. Néanmoins, il était important d’également insister sur les améliorations encore possibles : le renforcement des liens entre les établissements d’enseignement et de formation et le monde professionnel, la difficulté de trouver un stage à l’étranger pour les apprentis en formation, les principes d’ouverture, d’accessibilité et d’inclusivité. Dans ce sens, il est nécessaire qu’une augmentation du budget d’Erasmus+ s’inscrive dans une stratégie politique plus vaste avec pour objectif que tous les jeunes puissent y participer. Aussi, ai-je voté pour la résolution.
A new skills agenda for Europe (A8-0276/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Momchil Nekov) FR
Vu l’évolution rapide de l’environnement sociétal et économique qui nous entoure, il est vital pour la jeune et moins jeune génération de se procurer un bagage de compétences permettant de faire face aux défis de notre ère. C’est à travers une stratégie ambitieuse et globale visant à mettre à disposition des citoyens des compétences essentielles à l’apprentissage tout au long de la vie, défini comme une combinaison de connaissances, de compétences et d’attitudes indispensables au développement et à la réalisation personnels, à la citoyenneté active et à l’employabilité, que nous nous dirigeons avec ce rapport.L’accent est mis sur des aspects de l’éducation qui peuvent renforcer l’esprit d’entreprise et la créativité, l’analyse critique, la prise de décision et la participation à la vie sociale. Le rapport se concentre également sur des compétences transversales telles que la technologie, l’éducation numérique et aux médias. Enfin, il insiste sur la nécessité de mettre en lumière les avantages de la formation duale, consistant en une formation par alternance dans un établissement d’enseignement et une entreprise. Pour toutes ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur du rapport.
Subjecting acryloylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0284/2017 - Brice Hortefeux) FR
Dans le cadre de la procédure de consultation, le Parlement a été appelé à s’exprimer sur la décision d’exécution du Conseil soumettant une nouvelle substance (l’acryloylfentanyl) à des mesures de contrôle. Le rapport d’évaluation des risques rédigé conjointement par l’Observatoire européen des drogues et des toxicomanies (OEDT) et Europol publié le 17 novembre 2016 conclut que cette substance, fabriquée essentiellement en Chine, est un psychoactif dont la structure est analogue à une substance déjà contrôlée dans l’Union. Trois États membres ont déjà signalé que 47 décès et 20 intoxications aiguës seraient liés à l’acryloylfentanyl. Les mesures proposées permettront d’éviter des obstacles à la coopération policière et judiciaire transfrontalière et d’endiguer les risques sanitaires et sociaux liés à la substance. Compte tenu de ces éléments, j’ai voté en faveur de la décision d’exécution du Conseil.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0280/2017 - Giovanni La Via) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant la mobilisation du Fonds de solidarité de l’Union européenne pour venir en aide à l’Italie. Ce fonds, créé en 2002, permet à l’Union de venir en aide à un État membre ou à un pays en voie d’adhésion lorsqu’il doit faire face à une catastrophe naturelle aux conséquences graves. Un financement d’1,2 milliard d’euros servira donc à aider plusieurs régions italiennes qui ont été touchées par une série de tremblements de terre entre le 24 août 2016 et le 18 janvier 2017. Cette mobilisation du FSUE est la plus forte de son existence et s’ajoute à un montant de 30 millions d’euros qui avait déjà été versé dans le cadre de la mobilisation du FSUE en 2016. Ce fonds additionnel permettra de financer des logements temporaires et de réparer le réseau routier et bénéficiera directement aux citoyens les plus touchés par le sinistre.
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant le Système d'échange de quotas d'émission de l'Union européenne (SEQE de l'UE) afin de maintenir l'actuelle restriction du champ d'application pour les activités aériennes et de préparer la mise en œuvre d’un mécanisme de marché mondial à partir de 2021. En effet, nous avons trouvé dans ce vote un juste équilibre entre la nécessaire préservation de la compétitivité du secteur aérien européen et les objectifs environnementaux liés au réchauffement climatique. Après décembre 2020, un dispositif mondial pour compenser les émissions de CO2 du transport aérien devrait être introduit : c’est à ce moment que nous devrions réévaluer l’opportunité de prolonger la dérogation du secteur ou non. Par ailleurs, il me semble judicieux de prévoir que les États membres de l’UE devraient utiliser les recettes générées par la mise aux enchères des quotas d’émission pour financer des politiques en matière de lutte contre le changement climatique.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean DAS- 68416-4 (B8-0498/2017) FR
En votant en faveur de l’objection, je me suis opposé au processus d’autorisation d’entrée sur le marché de produits contenant ce soja génétiquement modifié et ce pour plusieurs raisons. Premièrement, de nombreuses critiques ont été formulées par certains États membres durant la période de consultation concernant le manque de données en matière d’évaluation des risques, ce qui ne permettait pas d’exclure de manière univoque les effets négatifs sur la santé animale et humaine. Deuxièmement, aucune majorité qualifiée n’a été trouvée au Conseil concernant cette décision et la procédure ne prévoit pas de pouvoirs étendus pour le Parlement en la matière, rendant le processus non démocratique. Troisièmement, certaines recherches indépendantes manifestent des inquiétudes quant aux risques présentés par une substance active présente dans ce soja pour le développement de l’embryon, les anomalies congénitales et la perturbation endocrinienne. Conformément au principe de précaution, il serait hasardeux, il me semble, d’autoriser ce produit ou ses dérivés. Quatrièmement, il nous faut revenir à un usage soutenable des herbicides. Contrairement à ce que l’on a pu penser un temps, les OGM se sont dans la pratique inscrits dans une cercle vicieux, menant à une utilisation croissante d’herbicides et par la suite à une résistance accrue à ces substances.
EU political relations with Latin America (A8-0268/2017 - Javi López) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport concernant les relations politiques entre l’Union européenne et l’Amérique latine, qui souligne l’importance des relations entre nos deux continents et s’inquiète de la situation politique au Venezuela. Le partenariat birégional entre l’Union et l’Amérique latine repose sur des principes communs, tels que la démocratie, les droits de l’homme, la paix et la solidarité, l’état de droit et l’indépendance du pouvoir judiciaire. Il est essentiel d’élargir la coopération politique et économique avec ces pays et de nouer avec eux des liens solides. Toutefois, l’instabilité politique et sociale actuelle au Venezuela est extrêmement préoccupante. Le gouvernement vénézuélien se doit de garantir la séparation et l’indépendance des pouvoirs et rétablir pleinement l’autorité constitutionnelle de l’Assemblée nationale. Il doit également veiller à la libération immédiate de tous les prisonniers politiques et présenter un calendrier en vue de la tenue d’élections libres et transparentes. J’ai soutenu ce rapport afin de condamner les élections du 30 juillet 2017 en vue de la formation d’une assemblée constituante, cette dernière manque de légitimité et est une violation du principe de la séparation des pouvoirs.
Academic further and distance education as part of the European lifelong learning strategy (A8-0252/2017 - Milan Zver) FR
Dans notre société, nous savons combien l’éducation et la formation sont essentielles. L’amélioration des connaissances et des compétences est un objectif que nous nous devons de poursuivre en Europe, dans un monde en constante évolution. Il faut également adapter les outils à notre disposition car un accès limité aux possibilités de formation peut réduire la compétitivité des personnes sur le marché du travail et leur causer des difficultés dans leur vie privée. De manière complémentaire aux systèmes traditionnels, d’autres voies d’accès à l’enseignement doivent être mises en place, et c’est dans cette optique que le rapport s’inscrit. Le texte rappelle que la formation continue et à distance permet de mieux faire face aux défis modernes en favorisant l’éducation de personnes en difficulté, en réduisant les coûts des formations et en adaptant l’enseignement aux spécificités des personnes. Pour ces motifs, j’ai décidé de voter pour ce rapport.
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (A8-0181/2017 - Carlos Zorrinho) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport relatif à la promotion de la connectivité internet dans les communautés locales afin de soutenir l’initiative Wifi4EU qui permettra le développement d’une société numérique européenne plus inclusive. Les fonds permettront de financer des connexions wifi dans des centres de vie publique dans plus de 6 000 communautés au sein de l’UE. Ce projet bénéficiera fortement aux zones rurales et favorisera le développement d’un accès universel à internet, via une connexion gratuite, facile d’accès et sécurisée. De plus, je suis fortement attaché aux garanties pour la préservation des données à caractère personnel et des mesures de protection des utilisateurs accompagneront cette initiative afin de s’assurer que la publicité commerciale ou l’utilisation des données à caractère personnel n’auront pas lieu.
Whale hunting in Norway (B8-0499/2017) FR
Malgré le moratoire sur toutes les formes de chasse à la baleine à des fins commerciales instauré par la Commission baleinière internationale (CBI) en 1982, la Norvège a poursuivi ses activités de chasse et repris ses activités de chasse commerciale en 1993. De plus, elle subventionne l’industrie de la baleine et encourage la consommation et l’utilisation de produits résultant de la chasse. J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant la chasse à la baleine en Norvège pour condamner la persistance de ces pratiques. Je déplore que la Norvège ne soit toujours pas revenue sur sa décision, en dépit des réactions diplomatiques et de protestations internationales de grande ampleur. Les exportations de chair de baleine en provenance de Norvège sont en augmentation depuis plusieurs années, il est inacceptable qu’elles puissent transiter par les ports européens. La Commission devrait mettre en place une interdiction exceptionnelle afin que cela ne soit plus le cas et devrait par ailleurs être en mesure de fournir des informations précises relatives aux expéditions de chair de baleine qui ont transité par des ports européens.
European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and establishing the EFSD Guarantee and the EFSD Guarantee Fund (A8-0170/2017 - Eduard Kukan, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution relative au Fonds européen pour le développement durable qui met en place un instrument innovant afin de lutter contre la pauvreté et de favoriser un développement durable dans les pays partenaires de l’Union les moins développés. Grâce à ce mécanisme, nous serons en mesure de lever 44 millions d’euros destinés à des investissements. Ce fonds contribuera en priorité à l’éradication de la pauvreté et au développement économique et social, en mettant particulièrement l’accent sur la création durable d’emplois décents, notamment en faveur des jeunes, des femmes et des personnes exposées à l’exclusion. Par ailleurs, nous fournirons des financements en faveur des micro-entreprises et des petites et moyennes entreprises, afin de favoriser le développement d’un secteur privé local stable et viable à long terme. Nous permettrons ainsi l’amélioration du climat d'investissement tout en incluant des valeurs européennes telles que le respect des droits de l’homme, sociaux, professionnels et environnementaux.
Cross-border exchange of accessible format copies of certain works and other protected subject-matter for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled (A8-0102/2017 - Max Andersson) FR
La ratification du traité de Marrakech visant à faciliter l’accès des aveugles, des personnes avec déficiences visuelles et des personnes ayant d’autres difficultés de lecture des textes imprimés, nécessite la transposition dans un texte législatif de l’UE des obligations auxquelles nous avons décidé de nous soumettre. C’est dorénavant chose faite : le présent texte fait en sorte que les exemplaires en format accessible de livres imprimés, livres électroniques, revues, journaux, magazines et autres écrits et textes imprimés réalisés dans les États membres, aussi bien sous une forme sonore que numérique ou analogique, puissent être plus facilement distribués, communiqués ou mis à la disposition des personnes bénéficiaires ou des entités autorisées. Ceci devrait grandement améliorer l’accès à des livres étrangers dans un format accessible, comme le braille, les livres audio ou encore les impressions « grands caractères », et par là-même contribuer à rendre notre société plus inclusive, raison pour laquelle j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte.
EU action for sustainability (A8-0239/2017 - Seb Dance) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur l’action de l’Union pour la durabilité. Les propositions avancées sont intéressantes et se basent sur les objectifs de développement durable des Nations unies. Parmi celles-ci, nous retenons entre autres la promotion du bien-être des citoyens, de la prospérité générale, de l’accès à des soins de santé plus équitables ainsi que de la lutte contre le changement climatique et la préservation de l’environnement.Nous souhaitons ancrer les objectifs de développement durable dans une feuille de route de l’Union européenne afin qu’ils deviennent un élément central de nos politiques à venir. L’intérêt de ce rapport réside dans l’ambition de ne pas s’enfermer dans un programme vertical – où les initiatives et propositions seraient envoyées par les institutions européennes vers le reste de la société – mais de créer une plateforme interactive faisant coopérer acteurs aux niveaux national, régional et local, entreprises privées, associations et autres acteurs de la société civile pour aboutir à un processus inclusif faisant participer tous les acteurs concernés.
Building an ambitious EU industrial strategy as a strategic priority for growth, employment and innovation in Europe (RC-B8-0440/2017, B8-0439/2017, B8-0440/2017, B8-0445/2017, B8-0446/2017, B8-0447/2017, B8-0448/2017, B8-0449/2017) FR
L’industrie européenne représente plus de 50 millions d’emplois et est un chef de file mondial dans de nombreux secteurs. Cependant, sa contribution au PIB de l’Union est passée de 19 % à moins de 15,5 % au cours des 20 dernières années. J’ai donc apporté mon soutien à cette résolution, qui appelle la Commission à présenter dans les prochains mois une stratégie et un plan d’action européen en faveur d’une politique industrielle cohérente et complète afin de réindustrialiser le continent. Il est en effet primordial de renforcer notre base industrielle et de mener une politique d’innovation ambitieuse pour préserver la compétitivité de l’industrie européenne et permettre aux PME, pilier de notre industrie, de surmonter les difficultés liées aux évolutions de l’économie mondiale. Il est temps de reconnaître l’importance de la modernisation de la base industrielle en Europe et son rôle fondamental en tant que moteur de la croissance durable et de l’emploi.
European standards for the 21st century (A8-0213/2017 - Marlene Mizzi) FR
Dans ce rapport sur les normes européennes pour le XXIe siècle nous définissons les contours de ce que doit être la stratégie à venir en matière de normalisation : la création d’un véritable système européen de normalisation. Nous le savons, les normes représentent un outil essentiel au bon fonctionnement du marché unique, en permettant de stimuler la croissance, la compétitivité européennes et les innovations ainsi qu’en renforçant les entreprises, les travailleurs et la protection des consommateurs. Parmi les défis du XXIe siècle, il est clair que l’évolution rapide des TIC doit être traitée en priorité, en particulier la 5G, l’informatique en nuage, l’internet des objets, les technologies des données et la cybersécurité. Un autre élément à souligner est l’importance de la promotion des normes européennes et du système européen de normalisation sur la scène internationale et du partage de nos normes - voire de leur valorisation - dans d’autres régions du monde. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport.
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR
À la suite de l’annexion illicite de la péninsule de Crimée par la Russie, l’Union européenne a accentué son soutien à l’Ukraine. C’est dans cet esprit de situation économique difficile et d’efforts de réforme entrepris par l’Ukraine que l’Union vise à instaurer des mesures commerciales autonomes temporaires sur des produits agricoles et industriels en faveur de l’Ukraine. Pour que l’accord soit équilibré, nous l’avons assorti de deux mécanismes d’encadrement. Premièrement, le droit au bénéfice des mesures commerciales autonomes sera subordonné au respect par l’Ukraine de toutes les conditions figurant dans l’accord d'association, dont font partie par exemple le respect des droit de l’Homme et de l’état de droit ou la lutte contre la corruption et la criminalité organisée et ce, afin d’éviter toute fraude. Deuxièmement, lorsqu’un produit originaire d’Ukraine sera importé dans des conditions telles que des difficultés graves puissent être, ou risquent d’être, causées à des producteurs de produits similaires ou directement concurrents dans l’Union, une analyse de la Commission peut mener les droits du tarif douanier commun à être rétablis pour ces produits. Étant donné notre devoir de solidarité envers le peuple ukrainien et les protections mises place rendant le règlement équilibré, j’ai voté en sa faveur.
A longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies (A8-0214/2017 - Pascal Durand) FR
C’est avec enthousiasme que j’ai voté pour ce rapport qui s’attaque à trois problématiques majeures de notre modèle économique basé sur la consommation: le manque de robustesse et de réparabilité des produits, la longévité des produits et le manque d’informations pour les consommateurs. Ces problématiques touchent principalement le consommateur mais leur résolution permettra accessoirement de redonner de l’air au secteur de la réparation, en difficulté ces dernières années en Europe. Il est urgent d’adopter des critères de résistance minimums couvrant la robustesse, la réparabilité et l’évolutivité des produits dès leur conception. Nous devons par ailleurs encourager l’utilisation de techniques de construction et de matériaux qui rendent plus facile et moins onéreuse la réparation ainsi que la disponibilité des pièces détachées et leur qualité. Enfin, il faut interdire les solutions techniques ou les logiciels empêchant la réparation en dehors des circuits agréés. Pour conclure, rappelons ici l’urgence de se mettre d’accord sur une définition commune de l’obsolescence programmée en Europe.
Addressing human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide (A8-0222/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda) FR
Les crimes de guerre et les crimes contre l’humanité ont malheureusement marqué plusieurs civilisations au cours des siècles, notamment l’Europe, et restent plus que cruellement d’actualité. D’une part, parce qu’ils se produisent encore dans certaines régions du monde; souvent parce que les victimes et leurs descendants souhaitent obtenir une reconnaissance des atrocités qu’elles ont vécues. Le texte rappelle que l’Union a l’obligation morale d’agir contre ces crimes au nom des valeurs qu’elle exporte à travers le monde, parmi lesquelles le respect des droits de l’homme, l’état de droit et la démocratie. Il appelle également l’Union à être préventive et réactive au travers de ses missions afin de détecter les signes annonciateurs des crimes de guerre ou contre l’humanité. Enfin, il réitère le soutien de l’Union à la Cour pénale internationale et la nécessité de traduire en justice les personnes à tenir responsables de crimes de guerre ou de crime contre l’humanité. Ce dernier point est très important car il insiste sur la responsabilité des acteurs non étatiques, Daech étant particulièrement ciblée pour toutes les atrocités commises en Irak et en Syrie avec la volonté claire d’éliminer certaines minorités de la région. Pour ces raisons, j’ai décidé de voter en faveur de ce rapport.
Working conditions and precarious employment (A8-0224/2017 - Neoklis Sylikiotis) FR
Les formes atypiques d’emploi sont en augmentation au sein de l’Union. J’ai soutenu la résolution sur les conditions de travail et l’emploi précaire car il est nécessaire, aujourd’hui, d’évaluer si certaines de ces formes d’emploi présentent des risques plus importants de précarité et d’instabilité. Il en est ainsi par exemple dans le cas du travail à temps partiel involontaire, des contrats à durée déterminée ou encore des contrats «zéro heure». Le risque de précarité dépend également d’autres facteurs tels qu’une rémunération insuffisante ou une faible protection sociale. Nous invitons donc la Commission à prendre des mesures à l’égard du travail précaire, qui concerne les travailleurs les plus vulnérables, afin de garantir que tous les types de contrats de travail proposent des conditions de travail décentes. Par ailleurs, nous rappelons que, conformément à la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union, tout travailleur a le droit de bénéficier d’une limitation de la durée maximale du temps de travail, de temps de repos journalier et hebdomadaire et de congés payés annuels.
Implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0200/2017 - José Manuel Fernandes, Udo Bullmann) FR
Le Fonds européen pour les investissements stratégiques (FEIS) existe désormais depuis un an et demi. Bien qu’il soit encore trop tôt pour tirer un bilan approfondi, nous avons souhaité faire une première évaluation de sa mise en œuvre et faire quelques mises en garde. Il faut rappeler l’urgence de combler le retard d’investissement en créant un climat propice aux investissements dans des domaines stratégiques afin de relancer la croissance, de lutter contre le chômage, d’encourager le développement d’une industrie forte, durable et compétitive et d’atteindre les objectifs stratégiques de l’Union à long terme. Par ailleurs, nous rappelons qu’à l’avenir il faudra garantir une distribution géographique plus équilibrée ainsi qu’un soutien accru pour les investissements innovants plus risqués, tout en veillant à ce que les bénéficiaires finaux soient conscients du soutien du FEIS. En ces termes, j’ai voté pour la résolution.
European agenda for the collaborative economy (A8-0195/2017 - Nicola Danti) FR
L’économie collaborative connaît un véritable boum depuis quelques années. Cependant, le développement de ce secteur de l’économie n’a pas été nécessairement bien accueilli par tous. Les acteurs de l’économie traditionnelle se sont particulièrement manifestés en dénonçant une concurrence déloyale et la condamnation certaine de leurs entreprises. Nous nous souvenons particulièrement de la grève des taxis qu’ont connue plusieurs pays en riposte à la montée en puissance des services de transport alternatifs. L’Union européenne doit se pencher davantage sur l’économie collaborative afin de garantir une concurrence équitable, les droits des travailleurs et le respect des obligations fiscales. J’ai décidé de voter en faveur de ce rapport afin qu’une stratégie claire pour ce secteur soit adoptée.
Online platforms and the Digital Single Market (A8-0204/2017 - Henna Virkkunen, Philippe Juvin) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur les plateformes en ligne dans le marché unique numérique. Il est temps de mettre à jour la législation pour l’adapter à l’ère numérique actuelle. Internet s’est considérablement développé durant la dernière décennie et les plateformes qui en font partie doivent être responsabilisées dans leur activité, tout en soutenant leur valeur ajoutée. Nous appelons les plateformes à adopter certaines mesures telles que le respect de l’anonymat des données à caractère personnel des utilisateurs ou encore des conditions générales d’utilisation claires, complètes et facilement accessibles. Par ailleurs, nous adressons des recommandations à la Commission pour qu’elle clarifie les règles relatives à la responsabilité et avance dans la lutte contre la publication de faux contenus.
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0407/2017, B8-0407/2017, B8-0408/2017, B8-0409/2017, B8-0410/2017, B8-0411/2017, B8-0412/2017, B8-0413/2017) FR
La situation politique et humanitaire actuelle du Yémen est dramatique, 82% de la population est en besoin d’aide humanitaire et 2,1 millions de personnes souffrent de malnutrition dont 1,3 million d’enfants qui souffrent de malnutrition aiguë sévère. J’ai soutenu cette résolution qui rappelle que les frappes aériennes de la coalition menée par l’Arabie Saoudite et le blocus naval qu’elle a imposé au Yémen ont provoqué la mort de milliers de personnes et participé à la déstabilisation du pays. Cela a exacerbé la situation déjà critique du Yémen. Pour cette raison nous demandons à la Haute Représentante de l'Union pour les Affaires étrangères et la Politique de sécurité d’imposer un embargo européen sur les armes à l’Arabie Saoudite, compte tenu de la gravité des accusations qui pèsent sur elle, notamment au regard de la violation des droits humanitaires au Yémen. L’Arabie Saoudite, mais aussi l’Iran, ont un rôle clé à jouer dans la résolution de cette crise régionale et pour le rétablissement de la paix et de l’indépendance et l’intégrité territoriale du Yémen.
Objection to Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 as regards the control measures relating to the cultivation of hemp and certain provisions on payments (B8-0395/2017) FR
J’ai voté contre l’objection car je souhaite apporter mon soutien à la proposition de la Commission européenne visant à interdire l’utilisation de pesticides dans les surfaces d'intérêt écologique (SIE). Ces SIE ont été créées lors de la dernière réforme de la PAC comme l'un des trois critères du verdissement, qui justifie 30 % des aides directes du premier pilier (paiements verts). Or, l'expérience a montré que l'utilisation majeure de pesticides sur ces espaces a anéanti les efforts de protection. Puisque leur objectif est précisément de sauvegarder et d’améliorer la biodiversité sur les exploitations, les SIE doivent être préservées de l’usage massif de pesticides afin de développer la biodiversité dans l’espace agricole. Je souhaite par ailleurs soutenir l’agriculture écologique et durable, pour préserver la santé des citoyens européens et notre environnement. La PAC doit encourager cette dynamique et non entraîner la destruction de l'environnement, l’élimination de la vie sauvage ou l’aggravation des dérèglements climatiques. Il revient au Parlement de favoriser la mise en place d’une PAC plus verte.
The need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap (A8-0197/2017 - Constance Le Grip) FR
Comment se fait-il qu’en 2017 et au sein des pays de l’Union européenne, un écart s’élevant à hauteur de 38,3 % persiste entre les pensions perçues par les hommes et celles perçues par les femmes? L’Union européenne travaille depuis plusieurs décennies à la promotion de l’égalité des genres et malgré tout, un fossé sépare encore hommes et femmes sur certains points. Parmi ceux-ci, la proportion de femmes travaillant à temps partiel est largement plus élevée que celles des hommes, 32% contre... seulement 8 %, un salaire horaire plus bas ou encore un nombre d’années d’emploi moins élevé pour cause d’obligations familiales. La situation des femmes est globalement fragilisée sur le marché de l’emploi.Dans la liste des actions à impérativement prendre, il faut continuer à lutter contre la discrimination et les stéréotypes ainsi qu’optimiser l’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et personnelle. J’ai donc apporté mon soutien à ce rapport pour que l’UE continue à combattre ces inégalités.
2016 Report on Kosovo (A8-0062/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek) FR
Je me suis opposé à la résolution concernant le Kosovo. J’estime en effet que la situation actuelle du pays n’est pas suffisamment équilibrée pour que nous puissions envisager un élargissement de l’Union à ce pays. Il est essentiel de noter que le processus d’intégration requiert un engagement à long terme. Or, le Kosovo est caractérisé par la polarisation persistante et extrême de son paysage politique. De plus, le pays est toujours marqué par l’absence de progrès dans le domaine de la protection de la liberté d’expression et de la liberté des médias. Les menaces et agressions directes à l’encontre des journalistes sont inacceptables et il faut mettre un terme à l’impunité des auteurs de violences. Par ailleurs, le pays ne lutte pas suffisamment contre la corruption systémique et la criminalité organisée. Le Kosovo reste un lieu de stockage et de transit connu pour les drogues dures et même pour la traite d’êtres humains et le trafic de femmes et d’enfants. Les raisons de s’alarmer sont nombreuses et il revient au Kosovo de fournir davantage d’efforts avant que les discussions concernant l’adhésion ne puissent aller plus loin.
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano) FR
C’est avec grande satisfaction que j’ai voté en faveur de la refonte du système d’étiquetage de l’efficacité énergétique. Ce nouvel instrument permettra de fournir aux consommateurs des informations plus claires et lisibles concernant la consommation énergétique de leurs appareils ménagers. Les consommateurs pourront choisir des produits plus efficaces afin de réduire leur consommation et leurs factures d'énergie, tandis que les fabricants seront encouragés à innover et à investir dans des produits plus économes en énergie. Cette initiative s’inscrit également dans une démarche environnementale pour l’Union, qui souhaite améliorer son efficacité énergétique d’au moins 27 % d’ici à 2030, limiter les émissions de CO2 et réduire la dépendance énergétique vis-à-vis de certains fournisseurs. En ce sens, les nouvelles règles mises en place par ce texte législatif devraient permettre de réaliser des économies supplémentaires d’énergie équivalant à 200 térawattheures par an, soit la consommation annuelle de l’Estonie, de la Lettonie et de la Lituanie réunies.
European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (A8-0061/2017 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà) FR
L’initiative des capitales européennes de la culture vise à sauvegarder et à promouvoir la richesse et la diversité des cultures en Europe, et à mettre en valeur les traits communs qu’elles partagent, tout en renforçant chez les citoyens le sentiment d’appartenance à un espace culturel commun et en encourageant ainsi la compréhension mutuelle et le dialogue interculturel. Cette nouvelle décision vise également à reconnaître la contribution de la culture au développement à long terme des villes afin d’encourager une croissance intelligente, durable et inclusive. De plus, il est décidé qu’en vue de renforcer les liens culturels entre les pays de l’Association européenne de libre-échange qui sont parties à l’accord sur l’espace économique européen et l’Union, l’initiative devrait également être ouverte aux villes de ces pays, conformément audit accord. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution.
Rates of value added tax applied to books, newspapers and periodicals (A8-0189/2017 - Tom Vandenkendelaere) FR
Jusqu’à présent, la directive TVA en vigueur empêchait les services fournis par voie électronique tels que les livres électroniques et les journaux en ligne d’être soumis à un taux TVA inférieur à 15% alors que les États membres avaient l’opportunité d’appliquer un taux réduit de TVA aux publications imprimées, certains États membres avaient même obtenu des dérogations les autorisant à appliquer des taux super-réduits ou nuls sur ces dernières. Le développement de l’économie numérique tend progressivement à ne plus justifier cette divergence de traitement entre les publications électroniques et imprimées. Pour cette raison, la Commission a proposé de modifier la directive TVA afin de donner la possibilité aux États membres d’appliquer des taux de TVA uniformes. C’est avec satisfaction que j’ai accueilli cette proposition attendue de longue date et voté en faveur du texte.
Protection of vulnerable adults (A8-0152/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron) FR
L’absence de cadre juridique uniforme relatif aux «adultes vulnérables» dans l’Union crée potentiellement des difficultés touchant la protection de leur personne et de leurs biens. La résolution vise à combler ce vide juridique de manière à ce que ces personnes puissent jouir pleinement de la liberté de circulation et protéger leur patrimoine de manière adéquate. Premièrement, une définition de ce qu’on entend par «adultes vulnérables» est donnée. Ensuite, l’objectif n’étant pas d’harmoniser totalement les mesures de protection existant dans chaque État membre mais bien d’offrir un cadre de protection européen, il est proposé de mettre en place un ensemble de règles facilitant la reconnaissance et l’exécution de décisions adoptées dans d’autres États membres les concernant. Dans cette optique, j’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution.
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR
L’Ukraine traverse une crise terrible depuis plusieurs années et l’Union européenne est son premier partenaire commercial. L’accord assurant des préférences commerciales temporaires à l’Ukraine est une étape importante dans nos relations avec ce pays. Cependant, nous avons prévu quelques exceptions, telles que les tomates et le blé. Par ailleurs, il est demandé à l’Ukraine de continuer à lutter contre la corruption. Enfin, il est prévu que les représentants des industries européennes puissent commander des études afin de s’assurer que cet accord ne nuise pas aux producteurs de l’UE. J’ai décidé de voter en sa faveur car ce texte me paraît équilibré en assurant, d’une part, un développement des relations commerciales avec l’Ukraine et, d’autre part, la protection de certains produits sensibles pour les producteurs européens. Cet accord est donc une main tendue à l’Ukraine, assortie de règles à respecter dans le cadre de ce partenariat.
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (B8-0384/2017) FR
L’agence des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne a été créée par l’Union en 2007; son siège se trouve à Vienne. Le but poursuivi par l’Agence est de fournir aux institutions européennes ainsi qu’aux États membres des conseils et des avis clairs, objectifs et indépendants concernant les droits fondamentaux. Grâce à une coopération renforcée avec ses partenaires, l’Agence soutient et oriente par ses travaux chaque État membre dans les efforts spécifiques qu’il déploie dans le domaine des droits fondamentaux et de leur protection. Le cadre pluriannuel couvrant la période de 2018 à 2022 s’articulera autour de huit thématiques primordiales pour la protection des droits fondamentaux, telles que la lutte contre les discriminations (selon la race ou le genre, par exemple), la société de l’information et le respect de la vie privée, ou encore l’accès à la justice pour tous. J’ai donc voté en faveur du cadre pluriannuel soutenant cette importante Agence.
Resilience as a strategic priority of the EU external action (B8-0381/2017) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution relative à la résilience en tant que priorité stratégique de l'action extérieure de l'Union qui rappelle aux États membres la nécessité de respecter leurs engagements en matière d’aide publique au développement.Le concept de résilience correspond à la capacité d’une personne, d’un ménage, d’une communauté, d’un pays ou d’une région à se préparer à des crises et des chocs, à y résister, à s’y adapter et à récupérer rapidement par la suite. Nous affirmons donc que le renforcement de cette résilience est un processus de long terme dont la promotion nécessite des ressources suffisantes, conformément à l’importance qu’elle revêt en tant qu’une des priorités stratégiques de l’Union.Par ailleurs, une réflexion stratégique, avant le prochain cadre financier pluriannuel, devrait être menée afin de souligner la manière dont l’Union pourrait mieux utiliser les instruments actuels de financement, en cohérence avec les bonnes pratiques d’aide au développement.
High-level UN Conference to support the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14 (UN Ocean Conference) (B8-0382/2017) FR
Le rapide déclin de la richesse marine nous alerte sur l’urgence d’agir pour donner l’impulsion nécessaire à la protection de nos océans. Malgré les engagements internationaux pris en 2002 lors du sommet mondial sur le développement durable de Johannesburg, 31,4 % des ressources halieutiques mondiales continuent d'être surexploitées. Pour ces raisons, j’ai soutenu la résolution relative à la conférence des Nations unies sur l’océan qui réaffirme l’engagement du Parlement en faveur d’une pêche durable et souligne la nécessité d'agir au niveau mondial pour réduire les répercussions dommageables des activités humaines sur les océans. Cette résolution rappelle la démarche de précaution qui doit être appliquée, afin de reconstituer les stocks halieutiques exploités et de les maintenir à des niveaux suffisants. À l’heure où plus de 40 % des océans sont fortement touchés par les activités humaines et la pollution, où au moins 30 % des stocks mondiaux de poissons sont surexploités et où nous savons que ce n’est pas moins de 20 % du récif corallien mondial qui est d’ores et déjà perdu, il est temps de réagir.
Future perspectives for technical assistance in cohesion policy (A8-0180/2017 - Ruža Tomašić) FR
J’ai voté pour ce rapport car il concerne un outil précieux pour l’appui de la planification et la mise en œuvre des fonds de l’Union européenne: l’assistance technique. Ce mécanisme permet de renforcer les institutions et la capacité administrative des États membres. Nous insistions sur la nécessité d’adopter une démarche stratégique, transparente et coordonnée en matière d’information sur le mécanisme. La Commission européenne est invitée à soutenir les États membres rencontrant des ennuis en appliquant la politique de cohésion et à veiller à la coordination des mesures d’assistance technique financées entre autres par les fonds ESI. De plus, le rapport insiste sur la difficulté que l’assistance technique rencontre dans certains États membres pour atteindre les niveaux local et régional.
Cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market (A8-0378/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada) FR
Le règlement sur la portabilité transfrontière des services de contenus en ligne aura des répercussions très positives pour les consommateurs. Il donnera la possibilité aux abonnés à un service de contenus en ligne d’accéder à ce service lorsqu’ils sont temporairement en déplacement dans un autre État membre. La portabilité transfrontière des services de contenu en ligne ne portera pas atteinte à la territorialité et n’affectera pas les règles du droit d’auteur dans les autres États membres. Elle permettra en revanche d’améliorer le fonctionnement du marché intérieur en favorisant la circulation des services et des personnes. Pour ces raisons, j’ai voté en faveur de la résolution.
Implementation of the Council's LGBTI Guidelines, particularly in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in Chechnya, Russia (B8-0349/2017, B8-0349/2017, B8-0350/2017, B8-0351/2017, B8-0353/2017, B8-0355/2017, B8-0356/2017) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution portant sur la protection des personnes LGBTI, notamment en ce qui concerne la persécution des hommes (perçus comme) homosexuels en Tchétchénie. Les autorités tchétchènes doivent mettre un terme à la persécution des homosexuels et une enquête indépendante devrait être menée de façon urgente. Il reviendrait à l’UE de soutenir la mise en place d’une telle enquête afin de traduire les auteurs de ces crimes en justice et de mettre un terme à l’impunité. Comme le soulignent les lignes directrices du Conseil relatives aux personnes LGBTI, nous nous devons d’adopter une approche proactive en ce qui concerne la promotion des droits des personnes LGBTI, notamment pour la lutte contre les «violences phobiques» à leur égard et le soutien des défenseurs des droits fondamentaux. Je souhaite par ailleurs rappeler l’existence de normes universelles des droits de l’homme, d’égalité et de non-discrimination, y compris pour les personnes LGBTI et exprimer ma profonde inquiétude face aux informations faisant état de tortures et de détentions arbitraires d’hommes perçus comme homosexuels en Tchétchénie.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems (A8-0196/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR
L’Union a mis en place des instruments, dont le Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation (FEM), pour apporter une aide aux travailleurs subissant les conséquences de la mondialisation et les modifications de la structure du commerce international. J’ai voté en faveur de l’utilisation de ce fonds afin de soutenir les salariés de l’entreprise Nokia, en Finlande, et de les accompagner dans leur réinsertion sur le marché du travail.Le secteur des TIC est un domaine clé pour l’économie finlandaise, mais il est hautement sensible aux mutations du marché mondial et à la concurrence internationale. Pour ces raisons, l’Union devra apporter son soutien à la Finlande dans ses mesures d'accompagnement individualisé, de formation ou encore de prime à l'embauche, qui permettront aux travailleurs licenciés de retrouver un emploi. L’aide adoptée pour être mobilisée au titre du FEM s’élève à 2,6 millions d’euros en crédits d’engagement et de paiement, pour aider les 821 anciens travailleurs.
EU eGovernment action plan 2016-2020 (A8-0178/2017 - Sabine Verheyen) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur le plan d’action européen pour l’administration en ligne car, comme le souligne le rapport, le « développement de l’administration en ligne est un élément essentiel du marché numérique ». Il était donc primordial d’appuyer ce rapport afin de renforcer nos efforts dans l’unification du marché numérique européen. La conversion des administrations publiques aux services en ligne permettrait de faciliter l’utilisation des services publics numériques pour les citoyens et les entreprises. L’intérêt résiderait également dans la possible personnalisation de ces services. Ce rapport traite enfin du développement du réseau 5G et de l’importance d’assurer une couverture équitable à tous les citoyens européens, particulièrement dans les zones rurales qui ont tendance à être laissées pour compte.
Annual report 2015 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0159/2017 - Julia Pitera) FR
La défense des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne est un élément fondamental, nous devons lutter contre les fraudes et les irrégularités affectant l’exécution du budget européen. C’est pour cette raison que j’ai soutenu la résolution concernant la protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne et la Lutte contre la fraude. Je suis extrêmement préoccupé par l’importance des irrégularités frauduleuses signalées en 2015, dont les montants ont augmenté de 18 %, passant de 538 millions d’EUR en 2014 à 637,6 millions d’EUR en 2015. Cela concerne notamment le commerce de produits de contrebande, dont le tabac, qui représente à lui seul une perte de 10 milliards d’EUR sur les recettes publiques. La priorité est de lutter contre ces pratiques afin de renforcer la confiance des citoyens et de garantir que leur argent soit utilisé correctement.
Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety (A8-0175/2017 - Biljana Borzan) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport proposant des mesures susceptibles de réduire le gaspillage alimentaire à hauteur de 50% d’ici à 2030. Dans l’UE, ce gaspillage représente près de 88 millions de tonnes, soit 173 kg par habitant et par an. La production et l’élimination de ces déchets alimentaires génèrent l’émission de 170 millions de tonnes de CO2. Pour arriver à cette diminution de moitié, le rapport propose notamment de lever les restrictions sur les dons alimentaires et d’informer plus clairement les consommateurs (étiquettes « à consommer avant le » et « à consommer de préférence avant le »).Nous insistons par ailleurs sur le fait que les produits alimentaires dans les pays développés sont généralement gaspillés dans les derniers maillons de la chaîne alimentaire, plus précisément au niveau de la distribution et de la consommation. Nous soulignons également l’intérêt de réformer la législation actuelle de l’UE afin de faciliter les dons alimentaires.
Minamata Convention on Mercury (A8-0067/2017 - Stefan Eck) FR
Le mercure, qui peut avoir des conséquences extrêmement néfastes sur la santé, est l’une des substances les plus polluantes au monde. Des études scientifiques établissent la toxicité aiguë du mercure, l’exposition à cette substance peut provoquer des effets toxiques sur les systèmes nerveux, digestif et immunitaire ainsi que sur les poumons, les reins, la peau et les yeux. La convention de Minamata et le nouveau règlement sur le mercure constituent des contributions majeures en vue de protéger les citoyens de cette pollution dans le monde et dans l’Union européenne. Après l’adoption du règlement le 14 mars dernier, l’heure est venue pour notre assemblée de ratifier la convention au nom de l’Union et ainsi, j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte.
Hybrid mismatches with third countries (A8-0134/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson) FR
La lutte contre l’évasion fiscale au sein de l’Union est une priorité. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu la résolution concernant les dispositifs hybrides faisant intervenir des pays tiers.Les règles relatives aux transferts hybrides et aux dispositifs hybrides importés devraient être harmonisées et coordonnées autant que possible entre les États membres. Cela permettrait l’amélioration de la résilience du marché intérieur dans son ensemble, grâce à la suppression des situations d’asymétries entre les États, afin notamment, d’éviter les cas de double crédit d’impôt.Nous devons empêcher les pratiques inacceptables de certaines multinationales qui tirent avantage du décalage entre les règles fiscales des États membres de l’UE et des pays tiers afin de se soustraire à l’impôt. Des pénalités devraient être prévues pour ceux qui exploitent des dispositifs hybrides. Ces mesures, alors que des faiblesses sont mises à jour dans les économies nationales de marché actuelles, sont nécessaires pour freiner les possibilités de pratiques d’érosion de la base d’imposition et de transfert de bénéfices.
Structural Reform Support Programme for 2017-2020 (A8-0374/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl) FR
Le Programme d’appui à la réforme structurelle pour 2017-2020 permettra de soutenir les États membres qui entreprennent des réformes structurelles, l’objectif étant de pousser à moderniser leur économie et à améliorer leur croissance à long terme. Cela sera possible notamment via une assistance technique visant leurs capacités institutionnelles et administratives afin de créer un cadre économique robuste. Cette aide aura des implications dans de nombreux domaines politiques en particulier, la gestion des finances publiques, le marché du travail, l’éducation et les formations et l’agriculture mais également dans un domaine qui est devenu de première importance comme la migration. Pour toutes ces raisons, j’ai soutenu ce rapport.
European Year of Cultural Heritage (A8-0340/2016 - Mircea Diaconu) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport relatif à l’année européenne du patrimoine culturel. L’objectif principal de cette initiative européenne est de mettre en valeur le très riche patrimoine culturel européen qui a joué un rôle important dans l’histoire et l’identité des pays de l’Union européenne, particulièrement dans le cas de la France. Cette année européenne du patrimoine culturel se déroulera tout au long de l’année 2018 et se manifestera au travers d’événements, d’activités éducatives et culturelles afin de faire prendre conscience au public européen de la richesse de son patrimoine culturel. Le patrimoine culturel européen mérite également qu’on mette en lumière les défis permanents de sa sauvegarde.Le secteur culturel européen emploie directement environ 300 000 personnes et crée indirectement 7,8 millions d’emplois, et mérite d’être soutenu.
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions (A8-0138/2017 - Ulrike Rodust) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de l’amendement soutenant le financement du renouvellement de la flotte de pêche des régions ultrapériphériques de l’UE dont les territoires d’Outre-mer français.Certaines de ces régions ont besoin d’investissement et font face à une situation sociale et économique instable, avec notamment un chômage des jeunes plus élevé qu’en métropole.D’un point de vue écologique, le renouvellement de la flotte de pêche obsolète se justifie. La modernisation des flottes de pêche n’a pas pu être suffisamment effectuée et de ce fait, la surconsommation de carburant encourage les pêcheurs à naviguer près des côtes. La ressource au large est pillée par la pêche illicite, non déclarée et non réglementée, représentant une menace pour la biodiversité locale.Rappelons que ce renouvellement devra rester dans le cadre de la capacité autorisée en se limitant au remplacement d’un ancien bateau par un nouveau et assurer la durabilité de la pêche.
European Solidarity Corps (B8-0238/2017) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution portant sur le corps européen de solidarité, qui demande à la Commission d’inclure dans sa future proposition législative une description claire des dispositions budgétaires. J’estime en effet que le financement de ce programme de solidarité ne doit pas avoir d’impact négatif sur les programmes existants destinés aux jeunes, tels Erasmus + ou la garantie pour la jeunesse.Pour que le corps européen de solidarité soit une réussite, la Commission devra également l’intégrer dans une stratégie plus vaste visant à créer un environnement propice au volontariat en Europe, tout en veillant à ne pas perturber le fonctionnement d’instruments qui ont fait leurs preuves tels que le service volontaire européen.Par ailleurs, il incombe à la Commission et aux États membres de veiller à ce que les jeunes issus de milieux défavorisés ou ayant des besoins spécifiques aient pleinement accès au corps européen de solidarité.
Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (RC-B8-0237/2017, B8-0237/2017, B8-0241/2017, B8-0242/2017, B8-0243/2017) FR
J’ai soutenu la résolution concernant les négociations avec le Royaume-Uni après la notification de son intention de se retirer de l’UE. Il s’agit en effet d’une proposition qui devrait permettre de parvenir à un accord équilibré entre l’Union européenne et le Royaume-Uni, dans l’intérêt des personnes vivant au sein des deux entités. La priorité selon moi est de protéger l’intérêt et le traitement équitable des citoyens de l'Union européenne des 27 et les 3 millions de ressortissants des États membres résidant au Royaume-Uni. Le texte adopté garantira la transparence du processus de négociations et permettra de bâtir entre l’UE et le Royaume-Uni une relation étroite et équilibrée en termes de droits et d’obligations. Il précise par ailleurs que le Royaume-Uni continuera à jouir des droits qui sont les siens en qualité d’État membre de l’Union européenne jusqu’à l’entrée en vigueur de l’accord de retrait. À ce titre, il devra honorer ses engagements pris ultérieurement, y compris les engagements financiers au titre du budget européen.
Genetically modified maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 (B8-0236/2017) FR
J’ai soutenu l’objection du Parlement concernant le maïs OGM, qui demande à la Commission de retirer son projet de décision d’exécution. De très nombreuses objections ont été formulées par plusieurs États membres, qui ont notamment pointé du doigt les informations manquantes ainsi que les études et essais mal exécutés sur la question. On ne peut approuver des variétés pour lesquelles des informations insuffisantes ont été fournies concernant la sécurité, qui n’ont pas été testées ou qui n’ont même pas encore été créées. Il faut également souligner que les utilisations prévues par la Commission incluaient la création d’une tolérance aux herbicides contenant du glufosinate d’ammonium – élément toxique pour la reproduction – et du glyphosate – élément qui divise actuellement la communauté scientifique. De surcroît, les nouvelles demandes d’autorisation d’OGM excèdent les pouvoirs d’exécution de la Commission européenne, qui trouve dorénavant le Parlement européen systématiquement sur sa route en matière d’autorisation d’OGM.
Palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (A8-0066/2017 - Kateřina Konečná) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport concernant l’huile de palme et la déforestation des forêts tropicales humides. L’UE doit s’opposer à la production non durable d’huile de palme, qui a pour conséquence la déforestation et la dégradation d’habitats. La Commission devra également mettre en place un système de certification unique, afin d’accroître la traçabilité de l’huile de palme et de garantir que seule l’huile de palme produite de manière durable puisse entrer sur le marché de l’Union. Ce sont des mesures nécessaires afin de combattre la pression croissante que subissent les forêts tropicales, puisque 40 % de la déforestation mondiale est imputable à des plantations en monoculture de palmiers à huile, en particulier en Asie du Sud-Est. Ces monocultures entraînent d’énormes incendies, l'assèchement des rivières, l'érosion des sols, la pollution des cours d'eau mais aussi des conflits fonciers, le travail forcé, le travail d’enfants et l’irrespect des droits fondamentaux des communautés locales.
Draft recommendation following the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (B8-0177/2017) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de la commission mise en place suite au scandale des émissions dans le secteur de l'automobile. Je soutiens la nécessité de prévenir les conflits d'intérêts entre les régulateurs nationaux et les constructeurs automobiles lors de la mise sur le marché d'un nouveau véhicule. Il est également essentiel d’améliorer les tests et contrôles environnementaux et d’inciter les États membres à se lancer pleinement dans une stratégie de mobilité à faibles émissions. Toutefois, je regrette le rejet de la proposition de créer une agence européenne indépendante de surveillance, qui aurait été garante d’un contrôle efficient et d’une application plus rigoureuse des règles relatives aux émissions des véhicules dans l’Union. Pour ma part, c’est une proposition que j’ai soutenue. Le Parlement manque ici une occasion et il s’agissait d’ailleurs d’une des grandes recommandations du rapport parlementaire présenté en février par Kathleen Van Brempt.
An integrated EU policy for the Arctic (A8-0032/2017 - Urmas Paet, Sirpa Pietikäinen) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport portant sur une politique intégrée de l’Union européenne pour l’Arctique, qui concerne trois domaines prioritaires : le changement climatique, le développement durable et la coopération internationale. L’Union doit s’affirmer en tant que leader et prendre des mesures afin de protéger l'écosystème vulnérable de l'Arctique. Elle devra promouvoir, à l’échelle internationale, des normes réglementaires strictes de précaution dans les domaines de la protection de l’environnement et de la sécurité pour l’exploration, la prospection et la production pétrolière. Il est nécessaire d’agir en vue de décourager l’exploitation et l’utilisation des combustibles fossiles, qui accélèrent la fragilisation des eaux. C’est pourquoi je soutien la demande faite aux États membres d’interdire les subventions accordées dans le domaine des combustibles fossiles. En outre, la région revêt une importance croissante en raison de l’ouverture de nouvelles voies maritimes, mais tout développement de la pêche commerciale en Arctique doit être réalisé de manière pleinement compatible avec la nature spécifique de la région. Il ne faut pas oublier que les changements climatiques se révèlent plus sévères et violents en Arctique que sur le reste du globe, puisque la région se réchauffe environ deux fois plus vite que la moyenne mondiale.
Food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products (A8-0022/2017 - Karin Kadenbach) FR
Les récents scandales de fraude alimentaire ont mis en lumière la nécessité de renforcer l’efficacité des contrôles sur les denrées alimentaires. Il est en effet primordial de garantir des aliments sains et sûrs pour les consommateurs européens afin de restaurer leur confiance dans la totalité de la chaîne alimentaire. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu cette résolution visant à garantir une approche harmonisée des contrôles officiels et s’assurer du respect des règles de l’Union en la matière.La législation prévoit un système de contrôle global, intégré et plus efficace des règles sur les denrées alimentaires et les aliments pour animaux, des exigences vétérinaires et phytosanitaires, et des règles régissant la production biologique et les indications géographiques protégées. Les inspections seront réalisées de manière régulière et inopinée, suivant une approche fondée sur le risque, et les sanctions en cas de violation intentionnelle des règles seront plus strictes et harmonisées à l’échelle européenne.
Mercury (A8-0313/2016 - Stefan Eck) FR
Le mercure est une substance toxique qui peut être présente notamment dans le poisson et les fruits de mer, les écosystèmes et la faune sauvage. Certaines lacunes réglementaires existent en la matière et doivent être corrigées afin de garantir une mise en adéquation complète de la législation de l’Union avec la convention de Minamata des Nations unies.J’ai dès lors soutenu la résolution ayant pour objectif de combler ces lacunes afin de garantir un niveau élevé de protection de la santé humaine et animale et de l’environnement. Nous appelons notamment à interdire l’importation de mercure, de composés de mercure et de mélanges ainsi que l’exportation, l’importation et la fabrication dans l’UE de produits contenant du mercure ajouté.Nous demandons également l’élimination progressive de l’utilisation du mercure dans les amalgames dentaires, l’interdiction de son utilisation dans l'exploitation minière artisanale et à petite échelle, l’élimination des déchets de mercure ainsi que l’évaluation de son utilisation dans la fabrication de vaccins en vue de parvenir à une interdiction totale.
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè) FR
Il existe actuellement de fortes disparités entre les États membres en matière de traitement des déchets. En moyenne, moins de la moitié des déchets municipaux sont recyclés ou compostés dans l’Union européenne, alors que plus d’un tiers sont toujours mis en décharge.À l’heure où le réchauffement climatique devient criant et où les matières premières s’épuisent, la transition vers une économie circulaire est indispensable si nous voulons préserver notre environnement et assurer une adéquation entre nos activités humaines et l’avenir de notre planète.J’ai apporté mon soutien aux quatre propositions sur les déchets dans lesquelles nous réintroduisons des objectifs ambitieux de gestion des déchets. Nous demandons qu’au moins 70 % en poids des déchets municipaux soient recyclés ou préparés en vue du réemploi et que la proportion de déchets municipaux mis en décharge soit limitée à 5 % d’ici à 2030. Nous proposons également un objectif de 80 % pour les matériaux d’emballage. Enfin, nous appelons à réduire de moitié le gaspillage alimentaire et les déchets marins d’ici à 2030 dans l’Union.
Minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits (A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur les normes minimales relatives à la protection des lapins d’élevage afin d’encourager la Commission à établir une feuille de route dans ce domaine. De tels standards existent pour la protection des poules pondeuses, des veaux, des cochons et des poulets. Il est essentiel de mettre fin à l’absence de ce type de cadre concernant l’élevage cunicole au sein du marché unique, en faisant référence à l’expérience acquise et aux connaissances scientifiques. C’est pourquoi je suis favorable à une proposition législative équilibrée concernant la protection des lapins d’élevage d’autant plus que les consommateurs sont de plus en plus soucieux des conditions d’élevage et du bien-être animal et souhaitent se voir proposer une viande de lapin abordable et de qualité. La Commission devra prendre en compte la santé et le bien-être animal, la situation des éleveurs, les incidences sur l’environnement et la protection des consommateurs dans sa proposition législative.
Options for improving access to medicines (A8-0040/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz) FR
Outre une augmentation du prix des nouveaux médicaments ces dernières décennies, on constate des inégalités croissantes entre États membres en matière de vente et d’accessibilité des médicaments innovants.Des mesures doivent être prises à l’échelle nationale et européenne afin de garantir le droit des patients à un accès universel, abordable, effectif, sûr et rapide aux thérapies essentielles et innovantes, ainsi que d’assurer de futurs investissements dans l’innovation pharmaceutique. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu ce rapport déterminant les options de l’Union européenne pour améliorer l’accès aux médicaments et continuer d’assurer la viabilité de nos systèmes de santé dans l’Union.
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme (A8-0030/2017 - Silvia Costa) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur la mise en œuvre du programme "Europe créative", le programme-cadre européen visant à soutenir les secteurs de la culture, de l’audiovisuel et de la création.Ses principaux objectifs sont de soutenir la capacité de ces secteurs à opérer à l‘échelle transnationale et internationale, de favoriser la circulation transnationale des œuvres et des acteurs culturels et créatifs, d’atteindre des publics nouveaux et élargis et enfin de renforcer la capacité financière des PME et des microentreprises actives dans ces secteurs.Cependant, le manque de moyens financiers reste un obstacle important pour les candidats potentiels, c’est pourquoi nous demandons d’augmenter le budget du programme afin que celui-ci soit à la hauteur des attentes des citoyens européens. Nous appelons également la Commission à améliorer la gestion du programme, à renforcer sa dimension interculturelle ainsi qu’à améliorer son articulation avec les différents programmes de l’Union tels qu’Erasmus + ou Horizon 2020.
Implementation of the Europe for Citizens programme (A8-0017/2017 - María Teresa Giménez Barbat) FR
J’ai apporté mon soutien au rapport sur la mise en œuvre du programme «L’Europe pour les citoyens», un programme visant à améliorer la connaissance et la compréhension de l'Union européenne par les citoyens, à renforcer le sens de la citoyenneté européenne et à rapprocher les citoyens de l'Union.Le contexte actuel caractérisé par une remise en question de l’existence du projet européen montre l’importance et la nécessité de promouvoir le sentiment d’une identité européenne partagée, de réfléchir aux causes de la perte de crédibilité de l’Union européenne, d’encourager la participation civique et de lancer un débat approfondi sur les valeurs européennes.Le budget étant actuellement insuffisant pour atteindre les objectifs du programme, nous demandons d’envisager une enveloppe financière totale de 500 millions d’euros environ au titre du prochain cadre pluriannuel. Nous appelons également, entre autres, la Commission à rassembler toutes les informations utiles concernant le programme sur un portail de communication unique, les pays participants qui ne l'ont pas encore fait à désigner un point de contact national et à permettre au Parlement de participer à l’adoption du programme en qualité de colégislateur dans le cadre de la procédure législative ordinaire, sur un pied d’égalité avec le Conseil.
EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (A8-0009/2017 - Artis Pabriks) FR
Je suis favorable à la libération des échanges, mais pas n’importe laquelle; celle qui est équilibrée, maîtrisée et qui apporte à toutes les parties en présence de réels avantages et le moins d'inconvénients possible. Le premier des effets positifs doit être un enrichissement réciproque, un bénéfice net en termes de croissance et d’emplois. Or de l’aveu même de la Commission européenne, l’effet du CETA ne dépasserait pas 0,018 % en emplois européens nouveaux sur une période d’exécution de 6 à 10 ans.Parmi les dangers liés au CETA, on ne peut ignorer l'impact non négligeable sur les PME, la déstabilisation de filières agricoles dont celles des viandes bovines et porcines, l’affaiblissement du principe de précaution ou encore l’impact sur les indications géographiques d’origine qui protègent les produits alimentaires de nos terroirs.Enfin, la Commission européenne projette de mettre en place «provisoirement» le CETA dès sa ratification par l’Assemblée de Strasbourg, avant même la consultation des autres assemblées, en ne suspendant que la très contestée mesure sur le recours à l’arbitrage dans les conflits entre investisseurs privés et États nationaux.Procéder ainsi n’est pas selon moi faire avancer l’Europe. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté contre le CETA.
European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2017 (A8-0037/2017 - Yana Toom) FR
Chaque année, le Parlement européen livre ses orientations et recommandations sur le Semestre européen. Aussi, le présent rapport s’intéresse pour sa part à l’emploi et aux aspects sociaux dans le cadre de l’examen annuel de la croissance 2017. Les chiffres disponibles attestent d’un recul global du chômage dans l’Union européenne depuis le deuxième semestre de 2013, recul qui demeure cependant lent et disparate selon les États membres. Dès lors, engager de nouvelles actions de politiques publiques ainsi que de nouvelles réformes, dans le cadre du Semestre européen, concourra à l’établissement d'une croissance durable. Dans le présent rapport, nous énumérons, en ce sens, une série de propositions à l’adresse des États membres et de la Commission, propositions qui me semblent dans l’ensemble pertinentes. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de celui-ci.
Biological low risk pesticides (B8-0140/2017) FR
L’utilisation de produits phytopharmaceutiques classiques présente des risques potentiels sur la santé humaine, sur les animaux et sur l’environnement. Il est possible de trouver des traces de résidus de pesticides dans le sol, l’eau ainsi que des traces dépassant le niveau maximal autorisé dans certains produits agricoles. J’ai apporté mon soutien à la résolution sur les pesticides à faible risque d’origine biologique car je pense que ceux-ci pourraient constituer une alternative viable et contribuer à une agriculture plus durable.Aujourd’hui, seules sept substances actives classées comme étant "à faible risque" ont à ce jour été approuvées pour une utilisation dans l’UE. Améliorer leur disponibilité dans l’Union permettrait aux agriculteurs de disposer de davantage d’instruments pour protéger leurs cultures et aux consommateurs de disposer de denrées alimentaires sûres à la fois abordables et produites de façon compatible avec le développement durable. C’est pourquoi nous appelons la Commission à présenter avant la fin de l’année 2018 une proposition législative afin d’accélérer la procédure d’évaluation, d’autorisation et d’enregistrement des pesticides à faible risque d’origine biologique.
An integrated approach to Sport Policy: good governance, accessibility and integrity (A8-0381/2016 - Hannu Takkula) FR
Le présent texte porte sur la nécessité de disposer au niveau européen d'une approche intégrée en matière de politique des sports. À cette fin, il vise à établir des propositions concrètes qui devront être prises en compte dans le programme de travail sur le sport qui sera présenté prochainement par la Commission européenne. Outre un rappel des bienfaits que prodigue la pratique du sport, notamment en termes sociaux, éducatifs ou de santé, ce rapport aborde des propositions qui me sont apparues comme pertinentes afin d’améliorer la gouvernance, l’accessibilité et l’intégrité dans les pratiques sportives d’ici 2018. J’entends par exemple l’amélioration de la transparence, la lutte contre le dopage, la lutte contre les matchs truqués, la lutte contre la violence, le hooliganisme et les discriminations, la protection des mineurs. Pour ces diverses propositions qui me semblent pertinentes, j’ai apporté mon soutien à ce texte.
Cross-border aspects of adoptions (A8-0370/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) FR
J’ai apporté mon soutien à la résolution appelant particulièrement la Commission à la création d’un certificat d’adoption européen permettant la reconnaissance automatique par les États membres des certificats d’adoption d’enfants émis dans un autre État membre. Ce texte vise à réduire les difficultés administratives rencontrées par les ressortissants d’un État membre ayant adopté un enfant dans leur pays de résidence et qui déménagent par la suite dans un autre État membre.Cette résolution doit compléter les règles déjà existantes en matière d’adoptions internationales conformément à la Convention de La Haye du 29 mai 1993 en s’appliquant aux adoptions nationales validées dans un État membre. Cet état de fait allait ainsi à l’encontre du principe de liberté de circulation au sein de l’espace européen et de l’aspiration à un cadre juridique stable dans la famille pour l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant, dans le respect de l’ordre public de l’État membre qui applique la reconnaissance. Il est important enfin que les États membres poussent à un renforcement de la coopération entre les autorités juridiques en matière d’adoption.
Implementation of Erasmus + (A8-0389/2016 - Milan Zver) FR
J’ai soutenu le rapport sur la mise en œuvre du programme Erasmus +. Ce programme de financement de l’Union européenne consacré à l’éducation, à la jeunesse et au sport, est devenu de par son succès une initiative phare de l’Union. Celui-ci permettra à plus de 4 millions d’Européens d’étudier, de se former et de faire du volontariat dans un autre pays entre 2014 et 2020.Je suis convaincu qu’un programme fort tel qu’Erasmus + pourra contribuer à faire rebondir le projet européen actuellement en pleine crise existentielle. C’est pour cela que nous devons redoubler d’efforts afin de l’améliorer davantage: diminuer les obstacles bureaucratiques, améliorer la visibilité des différents programmes sectoriels et y associer le nouveau nom «Erasmus +», renforcer la dimension d’enseignement scolaire, rendre le programme plus accessible aux organisations de petite taille ou encore inclure la mobilité à des fins éducatives dans tout programme d’enseignement supérieur ou professionnel afin d’améliorer la qualité de l’enseignement et de la formation professionnelle.Enfin, je me réjouis de l’augmentation budgétaire de près de 300 millions d’euros en 2017 et appelle à ce que le niveau de budget actuel soit garanti pour la prochaine génération de programmes.
Major interpellations (1)
VP/HR - Recent state-terror activities by Iran in the EU PDF (53 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Written questions (43)
Implementation of recommendations on animal welfare PDF (100 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Execution of three Kurdish prisoners in Iran PDF (6 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - The situation of Dr Ahmad Reza Djalali PDF (194 KB) DOC (17 KB)
The situation of Dr Ahmad Reza Djalali PDF (194 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Introduction of the GSP+ system in Pakistan PDF (194 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Follow-up on the Council's conclusions on Myanmar of 26 February 2018 and its decision 2018/655 PDF (199 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Compliance with Directive 2008/50/EC PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Marketing standards for poultry meat PDF (196 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Implementation of sanctions against Russia PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Microplastics in tap water PDF (18 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Future of EU assistance to Tunisia PDF (99 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Glyphosate PDF (98 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) PDF (99 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Vine varieties resistant to cryptogamic diseases PDF (102 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Derogation from the rules concerning the marketing of plant protection products PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Effectiveness of the partial ban on three neonicotinoids PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Recognition of psychomotor therapy qualifications in the Union PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Traineeship mobility in Europe PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Approval and surveillance of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Union promotion of web authoring tools which meet web accessibility requirements PDF (100 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Census of those living in the camps around Tindouf PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
European maritime spatial planning as part of the IMP PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Chemical warfare agents (CWA) in the Baltic Sea PDF (100 KB) DOC (28 KB)
Situation of children in Europe PDF (102 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Protection of video game users, in particular minors PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Substances with endocrine-disrupting properties - follow-up to the judgment against the Commission PDF (100 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Comprehensive strategy on missing and unaccompanied children PDF (194 KB) DOC (26 KB)
Unfair commercial practices PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Impact of climate change on the European wine sector PDF (102 KB) DOC (23 KB)
EU-wide inquiry into vehicle emissions tests PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Food safety concerns regarding Canadian horsemeat imports PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The fight against the disappearance of bees in the European Union PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Effective entry into force of the European unitary patent PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Combatting vine wood diseases PDF (102 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Delay in the approval of the new corporate venture scheme PDF (6 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Figures for road safety in the European Union in 2014 PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Aid to the refugee camps around Tindouf PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Mileage fraud in the European Union PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt PDF (99 KB) DOC (28 KB)
VP/HR - Political prisoners and polarisation in Venezuela PDF (96 KB) DOC (25 KB)
New building materials and fire safety in Europe PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Recognition of geographic indications on the internet - negotiations with Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) PDF (197 KB) DOC (26 KB)
Extension of motorway concession contracts by France and European competition law PDF (5 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Written declarations (2)
Amendments (1501)
Amendment 46 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the 2018 European Year of Cultural Heritage represents an opportunity to increase awareness of the unique strength and diversity of EU's cultural heritage and the vital role it plays in our societies and economies, in creating a sense of belonging, in promoting active citizenship and in defining our fundamental values and identity; Notes that the EC placed the protection and promotion of cultural heritage as one of the three strategic objectives and recommends that the work carried out within the EYCH 2018 be taken into consideration for the drafting of future policies and programmes.
Amendment 52 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to present an Action Plan for Cultural Heritage and emphasises the need to focus on both tangible and intangible aspects of Europe’s heritage, that will contribute to the long-term legacy of the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018. Emphasises the need for the Action Plan to focus on both tangible and intangible heritage, to address all the issues discussed within the 10 European initiatives and to bring forward the recommendations issued during the EYCH 2018. Moreover, agrees with the EC proposal to ask Member States to prepare complementary Action Plans at national level;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the EC to set up a single EU portal dedicated to cultural heritage, bringing together information from all the EU programmes funding cultural heritage and structured into three main sections - funding opportunities for cultural heritage; a database with examples of best practices and excellence from the field of cultural heritage and relevant references; and news and links concerning cultural heritage-related policy developments, actions and events;
Amendment 70 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the creation of an online directory of European films and the launch of the first EU Film Week and encourages the Commission and the Member States, in collaboration with the creative industries, to boost the visibility of European cinema in Europe and across the world, in particular by developing a European platform providing access to licensed EU films, while remunerating artists and right- holders fairly and respecting the principle of territoriality;
Amendment 128 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Underlines that, despite the EU added value of cultural investment, Creative Europe represents 0.15 % of the overall EU budget, of which only 31 % is earmarked for culture; welcomesnotes that the policy areas of the new Creative Europe programme will be expanded; welcomes, therefore, the new MFF proposal and the proposed increase in funding as a good first step and calls for a doubling of the budget allocated to the new Creative Europe programme;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that the popularity of Creative Europe, combined with its underfunding and administrative complexity, led to a mere 16.2 % success rate; points out that this acts as a dissuasive factor and prevents many CCS actors from applying;
Amendment 144 #
2018/2091(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines the crossover impact of culture and calls on the Commission and the Member States to report on how much funding is allocated to culture across all funding programmes and ensure that it amounts to at least 1 % of the next MFF; invites the EU regions to designate culture, cultural heritage and CCSs as a priority in the structural funds;
Amendment 129 #
2018/2090(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to make good use ofpromote Union financial support among the wider public and educational institutions and to make good use of it to make access to digital learning content, tools and solutions a reality for all;
Amendment 148 #
2018/2090(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for a shift towards more non- the-jobformal and informal learning and insists on the need to have the right education and training frameworks in place, and to ensure that vocational education systems are properly resourced; believes that opportunities for re-skilling and upskilling are essential, with relevant digital skills components mainstreamed in workplace training programmes;
Amendment 174 #
2018/2090(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the introduction of the PISA ICT module across Member States to ensure that they are aiming for the same level of digital skills and to pinpoint any problems quickly; encourages Member States to share lessons and best practices, in particular in the area of educational innovation;
Amendment 6 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the 2019 budget should contribute towards achieving the Europe 2020 targets in the social and employment area and the successful implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, particularly when it comes to combating youth and long-term unemployment, rising inequalities, social exclusion and poverty, in particular child poverty; highlights the need for continued support for the inclusion of migrants; stresses, in this regard, that the 2019 budget cannot be understood outside the context of the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework (MFF);
Amendment 132 #
2018/2034(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that adequate skills can be acquired and the skills mismatch tackled by improving the quality and accessibility of education and training, including targeted quality training, in particular in digital and entrepreneurial areas, and reinforcing upskilling and reskilling measures, which require appropriate support, including funding at EU, national and regional level; points to the need to increase the relevance of vocational training to the labour market;
Amendment 22 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The solidarity activities offered to young people should be of high quality, in the sense that they should respond to unmet societal needs, contribute to strengthening communities, offer young people the opportunity to acquire valuable knowledge and competences, be financially accessible to young people, with particular effort being made to promote the participation of young people with fewer opportunities and be implemented in safe and healthy conditions.
Amendment 28 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) These activities should be to the benefit of communities while also fostering the individual’s personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, which may take the form of volunteering, traineeships and jobs, projects or networking activities, developed in relation to different areas, such as education and training, social inclusion, employment, gender equality, entrepreneurship – in particular social entrepreneurship – ,citizenship and democratic participation, environment and nature protection, climate action, disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery, agriculture and rural development, provision of food and non- food items, health and wellbeing, creativity and culture, heritage protection, physical education and sport, social assistance and welfare, youth assistance, reception and integration of third-country nationals, territorial cooperation and cohesion, and cooperation across borders. Such solidarity activities should include a solid learning and training dimension through relevant activities that can be offered to participants before, during and after the solidarity activity.
Amendment 71 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) These activities should be to the benefit of communities while also fostering the individual’s personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, which may take the form of volunteering, traineeships and jobs, projects or networking activities, developed in relation to different areas, such as education and training, social inclusion, employment, gender equality, entrepreneurship – in particular social entrepreneurship – ,citizenship and democratic participation, environment and nature protection, climate action, disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery, agriculture and rural development, provision of food and non- food items, health and wellbeing, creativity and culture, heritage protection, physical education and sport, social assistance and welfare, youth assistance, reception and integration of third-country nationals, territorial cooperation and cohesion, and cooperation across borders. Such solidarity activities should include a solid learning and training dimension through relevant activities that can be offered to participants before, during and after the solidarity activity.
Amendment 82 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Young people’s spirit of initiative is an important asset for society and for the labour market. The European Solidarity Corps contributes to fostering this aspect by offering young people the opportunity to devise and implement their own projects aimed at addressing specific challenges to the benefit of their local communities. These projects are an opportunity to try out ideadevelop innovative solutions to common challenges and support young people to be themselves drivers of solidarity actions. They also serve as a springboard for further engagement in solidarity activities and are a first step towards encouraging European Solidarity Corps participants to engage in self-employment or setting upcontinue to be active citizens either as volunteers, trainees or as employees in associations, non-governmental organisations or other bodies active in the solidarity, non-profit and youth sectors.
Amendment 88 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Particular attention should be given to ensuring the quality of the activities and other opportunities offered under the European Solidarity Corps, in particular by offering adequate online or offline training, language support, insurance, administrative and post-activity support to participants as well as the validation of the knowledge, skills and competences acquired through their European Solidarity Corps experience. Security and safety of the volunteers remain of paramount importance and volunteers should not be deployed to operations conducted in the theatre of international and non- international armed conflicts. Those support measures should be developed and provided in collaboration with youth organisations and other non-profit and civil society organisations in order to tap into their expertise on the field.
Amendment 91 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) ‘quality label’ means the certification attributed to a participating organisation willing to provide solidarity activities under the European Solidarity Corps, in the role of a host and/or in a support function and which attests that the organisation is able to provide high- quality solidarity activities in line with the principles and objectives of the European Solidarity Corps;
Amendment 131 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) where the health and safety of participants can be assured.
Amendment 141 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The European Solidarity Corps shall be open to the participation of public or private entities and international organisations, provided that they have received a European Solidarity Corps quality label to attest that the organisation is able to guarantee the quality of its activities in line with the principles and objectives of the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 149 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. As a result of the assessment the entity may be attributed the European Solidarity Corps quality label. The obtained label shall be re-assessed periodically and may be revoked. Any entity wishing to substantially changes its activities must inform the competent implementing body so that it can be re- assessed.
Amendment 182 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12a) ‘European Solidarity Corps Portal’ means an interactive web-based tool, in all official languages of the Union, managed under the responsibility of the Commission, that provides relevant online services to support the quality implementation of the European Solidarity Corps, complementing activities of participating organisations, including providing information about the European Solidarity Corps, registering participants, searching for participants, advertising and searching for solidarity activities, searching for potential project partners, supporting contact making and offers for solidarity activities, training, communication and networking activities, informing and notifying about opportunities, providing a feedback mechanism regarding the quality of solidarity activities as well as other relevant developments related to the European Solidarity Corps;
Amendment 184 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘humanitarian aid activity’ means an activity supporting humanitarian aid operations in third countries intended to provide needs-based emergency assistance aimed at preserving life, preventing and alleviating human suffering, and maintaining human dignity in the face of man-made crises or natural disasters, including assistance, relief and protection operations in humanitarian crises or their immediate aftermath, supporting measures to ensure access to people in need and to facilitate the free flow of assistance, as well as actions aimed at reinforcing disaster preparedness and disaster risk reduction, linking relief, rehabilitation and development, and contributing towards strengthening resilience and capacity to cope with, and recover from crises; in compliance with the humanitarian aid principles referred to in Article 10(2), as well as the ‘do no harm principle’1a. _________________ 1a Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in Disaster Relief; General Assembly Resolution 45/182; UNHCR, Emergency Handbook; OCHA on Humanitarian Principles; UNICEF’s Humanitarian Principles, July 2003
Amendment 191 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Programme is to promote solidarity as a value, mainly through volunteering; to enhance the engagement of young people and organisations in accessible and high- quality solidarity activities as a means to contribute to strengthening cohesion, solidarity and, democracy and citizenship in the Union and abroad, addressing societal and humanitarian challenges on the ground, with particular effort to promote social inclusion. The participation in the Programme should result in a generation of young people more likely to engage in solidarity activities through their entire lives.
Amendment 198 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The specific objective of the Programme is to provide young people, including those with fewer opportunities, with easily accessible opportunities for engagement in solidarity activities effecting positive societal challenges in Europe and abroad while improving and properly validating their competences for personal, educational, social, cultural, civic and professional development; as well as facilitating their active citizenship, employability and transition into the labour market.
Amendment 204 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
(b) to ensure that the solidarity activities that are offered to participants are of high quality, properly validated and respect the principles of the European Solidarity Corps referred to in Article 16(2);
Amendment 221 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) measures aimed at ensuring the quality of volunteering, traineeships or jobs, including trainingargeted training particularly for those placements involving vulnerable groups, language support, complementary insurance, support before or after the solidarity activity as well as the further use of Youthpass that identifies and documents the competences acquired during the solidarity activities for participants, and capacity building and, administrative support for participating organisations;
Amendment 234 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Actions implemented under the strand ‘Participation of young people in solidarity activities addressing societal challenges’ shall in particular contribute to strengthening cohesion, solidarity, citizenship and democracy in the Union and abroad, while also responding to societal challenges with particular effort to promote social inclusion.
Amendment 252 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The actions under this Chapter shall be carried out in compliance with the humanitarian aid principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence, as well as the ‘do no harm principle’.
Amendment 254 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Volunteering in support of humanitarian aid operations as referred to in Article 4.1, point (a) shall include an adequate learning and training componentphase before the placement, shall comply with the humanitarian aid principles referred to in Article 10(2), including the ‘do no harm principle’, shall not substitute traineeships or jobs and shall be based on a written volunteering agreement.
Amendment 270 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The European Solidarity Corps shall be open to the participation of public or private entities and international organisations, provided that they have received a European Solidarity Corps quality label to attest that the organisation is able to offer high-quality solidarity activities in line with the principles and objectives of the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 282 #
2018/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. As a result of the assessment the entity may be attributed the European Solidarity Corps quality label. The obtained label shall be re-assessed periodically and may be revoked. Any entity wishing to substantially change its activities must inform the competent implementing body so that it can be re- assessed.
Amendment 38 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Those rights and values must continue to be promoted and enforced and shared among the citizens and peoples and be at the heart of the EU project. Therefore, a new Justice, Rights and Values Fund, comprising the Rights and Values and the Justice programmes shall be created in the EU budget. At a time where European societies are confronted with extremism, radicalism and division, prejudice and anti-democratic ideologies, by means of new and more dangerous ways, using ‘fake news’ and cyber-attacks, spreading hate and mistrust against our open and inclusive societies, it is more important than ever to promote, strengthen and defend justice, rights and EU values:, EU values and the rule of law, which is inseparable from democracy itself, and a condition for its effectiveness. To promote and support human rights, respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, and the rule of law. This will have profound and direct implications for political, social, cultural and economic life in the EU. As part of the new Fund, the Justice Programme will continue to support the further development of Union area of justice and cross-border cooperation. The Rights and Values Programme will bring together the 2014-2020 Programme Rights, Equality and Citizenship established by Regulation (EU) No 1381/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council8 and the Europe for Citizens programme established by Council Regulation (EU) No 390/20149 , (hereafter 'the predecessor Programmes'). __________________ 8 Regulation (EU) No 1381/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 62) 9 Council Regulation (EU) No 390/2014 of 14 April 2014 establishing the ‘Europe for Citizens’ programme for the period 2014- 2020 (OJ L 115, 17.4.2014, p.3)
Amendment 44 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Justice, Rights and Values Fund and its two underlying funding programmes will focus primarily on people and entities, which contribute to makesupport, disseminate and protect our common values, rights and rich diversity, keeping them alive and vibrant. The ultimate objective is to nurture and sustain rights- based, equal, inclusive and democratic society. That includes defending a vibrant civil society, encouraging people's democratic, civic and social participation and fostering the rich diversity of European society, based on our common values, history and memory. Article 11 of the Treaty of the European Union further specifies that the institutions shall, by appropriate means, give citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action.
Amendment 48 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Rights and Values programme (the 'Programme') should allow developing synergies to tackle the challenges that are common to the dissemination, promotion and protection of values and to reach a critical dimension to have concrete results in the field. That should be achieved by building on the positive experience of the predecessor Programmes and also developing new innovative measures. This will enable to fully exploit the potential of synergies, to more effectively support the policy areas covered and to increase their potential to reach people. To be effective, the Programme should take into account the specific nature of the different policies, their different target groups and their particular needs through tailor-made approaches.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to bring the European Union closer to its citizens, a variety of actions and coordinated efforts are necessary. Bringing together citizens in town-twinning projects or networks of towns and supporting civil society organisations in the areas covered by the programme will contribute to increase citizens' engagement in society and ultimately their involvement in the democratic life of the Union. At the same time supporting activities promoting mutual understanding, diversity, dialogue and respect for others fosters a sense of belongingsocial integration and a European identity, based on a shared understanding of European values, culture, history and heritage. The promotion of a greater sense of belonging to the Union and of Union values is particularly important amongst citizens of the EU outermost regions due to their remoteness and distance from continental Europe.
Amendment 71 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Non-discrimination is a fundamental principle of the Union. Article 19 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides for action to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. Non- discrimination is also enshrined in Article 21 of the Charter. The specific features of the diverse forms of discrimination should be taken into account and appropriate action should be developed in parallel to prevent and combat discrimination on one or more grounds. The Programme should support actions to prevent and combat discrimination, racism, xenophobia, anti- semitism, anti-muslim hatred and other forms of intolerance, as misogyny, homophobia and ageism. In that context, particular attention should also be devoted to preventing and combating all forms of violence, hatred, segregation and stigmatisation, as well as combating bullying (including cyber-bullying), harassment and intolerant treatment. The Programme should be implemented in a mutually reinforcing manner with other Union activities that have the same objectives, in particular with those referred to in the Commission Communication of 5 April 2011 entitled ‘An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 202010 ’ and in the Council Recommendation of 09 December 2013 on effective Roma integration measures in the Member States11 . __________________ 10 COM(2011)173. 11 OJ C 378, 24.12.2013, p. 1.
Amendment 74 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In accordance with Union acts on equal treatment, Member States set up independent bodies for the promotion of equal treatment, commonly known as "equality bodies", in order to combat discrimination based on race and ethnic origin as well as gender. However, many Member States have gone beyond these requirements and ensured that equality bodies can also deal with discrimination based on the other grounds such as age, sexual orientation, religion and belief, disability or other grounds. Equality bodies play a key role in promoting equality and ensuring effective application of equal treatment legislation by providing in particular an independent assistance to victims of discrimination, conducting independent surveys concerning discrimination, publishing independent reports and making recommendations on any issue relating to discrimination in their country. It is essential that the work of all those relevant equality bodies is coordinated at Union level in this respect. EQUINET was created in 2007. Its members are the national bodies for the promotion of equal treatment as established by Council Directives 2000/43/EC15 and 2004/113/EC16 , and by Directives 2006/54/EC17 and 2010/41/EU18 of the European Parliament and of the Council. EQUINET is in an exceptional situation, being the only entity which ensures coordination of activities between equality bodies. This coordination activity by EQUINET is key for the good implementation of Union anti- discrimination law in Member States and should be supported by the Programme. __________________ 15 Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p. 22). 16 Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (OJ L 373, 21.12.2004, p. 37). 17 Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 23). 18 Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC (OJ L 180, 15.7.2010, p. 1).
Amendment 79 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) A high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, the pursuit of a high level of education and training are objectives to be incorporated by the EU when defining its policies and activities. The Programme should aim for equal opportunities among European citizens and to promote the objectives enshrined in article 9 TFEU, including exploring synergies and complementarities between those objectives.
Amendment 88 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing and combating inequalities and discrimination on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or, belief or opinion, disability, age or sexual orientation, and supporting comprehensive policies to promote gender equality and anti- discrimination and their mainstreaming as well as policies to combat racism and all forms of intolerance, including online;
Amendment 95 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) increasing citizens’ understanding of the Union, its shared values, history, cultural heritage and diversity;
Amendment 130 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Member States should pay particular attention to disadvantaged beneficiaries, including disabled people, young and older unemployed persons, people with a low level of qualifications, and those at risk of poverty, when designing the coordinated package of active labour market policy measures, given that those groups experience particular problems in re- entering the labour market. Notwithstanding, the principles of gender equality and of non- discrimination, which are among the Union’s core values and are enshrined in the European Pillar of Social Rights, should be respected and promoted when implementing the EGF.
Amendment 138 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) In compliance with the principle of sound financial management, financial contributions from the EGF should not replacebe intended to replace either national support programmes for workers or actions that are the responsibility of the companies making the redundancies, but should, where possible, complement support measures which are available for beneficiaries within the Union funds or other Union policies or programmes.
Amendment 140 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Special provisions should be included for information and communication activities on EGF cases and outcomes. The Commission should, in particular, promote the dissemination of existing best practice, raise the profile of the EGF, raise awareness of the EGF’s eligibility criteria and applications procedures, and do more to raise awareness of the EGF among EU citizens and workers.
Amendment 146 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) The Member States should conduct effective communication activities in order to promote financial contributions from the EGF, emphasise that funding has come from the EU and raise the profile of activities financed by the EU under the EGF.
Amendment 150 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) Considering the fact that the digital transformation of the economy requires a certain level of digital competence of the workforce, the dissemination of skills required in the digital age should be a mandatory horizontal element of anypromoted as one of the elements comprising the coordinated package of personalised services offered.
Amendment 154 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
The EGF shall contribute to a better distribution of the benefits of globalisation and technological advance by helping displaced workers adapt to structural change. As such, the EGF shall contribute to the implementation of the principles defined under the European Pillar of Social Rights and enhance social and economic cohesion among regions and Member State, foster smart, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, and promote the creation of sustainable jobs.
Amendment 239 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) a brief description of the events that led to the displacement of workers and a reasoned analysis of the link between the planned redundancies and major structural changes in world trade patterns;
Amendment 256 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member States should conduct effective communication activities and shall acknowledge the origin and ensure the visibility of the Union funding by providing coherent, effective and targeted information to multiple audiences, including targeted information to beneficiaries, local and regional authorities, social partners, the media and the public.
Amendment 258 #
2018/0202(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall promote the dissemination of existing best practice in the area of communication, and implement information and communication activities on EGF cases and outcomes based on its experience, with the aim of improving the effectiveness of the EGFraising the profile of the EGF, raising awareness of the EGF’s eligibility criteria and applications procedures, improving the EGF’s effectiveness and ensuring that Union citizens and workers know about the EGF.
Amendment 91 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) As regards grants provided to beneficiaries, Member States should increasingly make use of simplified cost options. The threshold linked to the obligatory use of simplified cost options should be linked to the total costs of the operation in order to ensure the same treatment of all operations below the threshold, regardless of whether the support is public or private. Member States should consult the monitoring committee as regards preparing simplified cost options.
Amendment 183 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 9
Article 15 – paragraph 9
9. The scope and level of the suspension of commitments or payments to be imposed shall be proportionate, shall respect the equality of treatment between Member States and shall take into account the economic and social circumstances of the Member State concerned, in particular the level of unemployment, the level of poverty or social exclusion of the Member State concerned in relation to the Union average and the impact of the suspension on the economy of the Member State concernedsocial scoreboard indicators. The impact of suspensions on programmes of critical importance to address adverse economic or social conditions shall be a specific factor to be taken into account.
Amendment 202 #
2018/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i – point i (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i – point i (new)
(i) measures relating to simplified cost options.
Amendment 234 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) In its Conclusions of the 14 of December 2017, the European Council called on Member States, the Council and the Commission to take forward a number of initiatives to elevate European cooperation in education and training to a new level, including by encouraging the emergence by 2024 of 'European Universities', consisting in bottom-up, excellence-driven networks of universities across the Union. intended to increase the attractiveness of higher education institutions in the Union and to improve cooperation between research, innovation and education. The Programme should support these European Universities and their development.
Amendment 380 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) ‘people with fewer opportunities’ means people facing obstacles that prevent them from having effective access to opportunities under the Programme for economic, social, cultural, geographical or health reasons, a migrant background or for reasons such as special learning needs, disabilityies and educational difficulties;
Amendment 445 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) partnerships for excellence, in particular European universities, Centres of vocational excellence and joint master degrees;the principal objective of which is to increase the attractiveness of higher-education establishments in the European Union by encouraging research, innovation and education, centres of vocational excellence and joint master degrees; partnerships for excellence shall involve at least one Member State.
Amendment 107 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Culture, cultural heritage and, cultural diversity and media pluralism are of great value to European society from a cultural, environmental, social and economic point of view and should be promoted and supported. The Rome Declaration of 25 March 2017 as well as the European Council in December 2017 stated that education and culture are key to building inclusive and cohesive societies for all, and to sustaining European competitiveness.
Amendment 139 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) To be effective, the Programme should take into account the specific nature of the different sectors, their different target groups and their particular needs through tailor-made approaches within a strand dedicated to the audiovisual sector, a strand dedicated to the other cultural and creative sectors and a cross-sectoral strand. In this respect, the programme should take into account the specific situation of the outermost regions (ORs) and overseas countries and territories (OCTs) which contribute to the enrichment of the European cultural diversity and its international influence. Exchanges and cooperation between people and organizations from ORs and OCTs and third countries, especially their neighbours, should be encouraged.
Amendment 260 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) 'cultural and creative sectors' means all sectors whose activities are based on cultural values or artistic and other individual or collective creative expressions. The activities may include the development, the creation, the production, the dissemination and the preservation of goods and services which embody cultural, artistic or other creative expressions, as well as related functions such as education or management. They will have a potential to generate innovation and jobs in particular from intellectual property. The sectors include inter alia architecture, archives, libraries and museums, artistic crafts, audiovisual (including film, television, video games and multimedia), tangible and intangible cultural heritage, design (including fashion design), festivals, music, literature, performing arts, books and publishing, journalism and press, radio, and visual arts;
Amendment 262 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) 'the Seal of Excellence' is the high- quality label awarded to projects submitted to Creative Europe, with the beneficiaries' consent, which are deemed to deserve funding but do not receive it due to budget limits. It recognises the value of the proposal and supports the search for alternative funding, within EU programmes.
Amendment 286 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) promoting the quality, competitiveness, independence and scalability of the European audiovisual industry;
Amendment 298 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) To promote the mobility of artists and professionals of the cultural and creative sectors
Amendment 362 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to promote European audiovisual works including audiovisual heritage and support audience development across Europe and beyond.
Amendment 384 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to set up and support programme desks tothe establishment of programme desks in participating countries with the aim of promote,ing the Programme in their country and tose countries, to assist the cultural and creative sectors in relation to the programme and provide basic information on other relevant support opportunities available under EU funded programmes and stimulateing cross-border cooperation within the cultural and creative sectors.
Amendment 489 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) Translation, whatever the media, to strengthen the circulation of European works in a digital and multilingual environment.
Amendment 505 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) Support to other sectors: targeted actions in favour of the development of the creative aspects of all sectors of artistic creation, including the design and fashion sectors and cultural tourism as well as to their promotion and representation outside the European Union.
Amendment 534 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point j
Annex I – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) European festivals' network(s) screening a significant proportion of non- national European works;, and their networking activities with other festivals, where appropriate
Amendment 582 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – table – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – table – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(1a) The number of projects developed by organisations managed by women
Amendment 583 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point 1 a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) Proportion of women acting as directors, writers or producers in MEDIA supported projects
Amendment 584 #
2018/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) Number, budget and geographical origins of co-productions developed and created with the support of the Programme
Amendment 106 #
2018/0106(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Such channels shall safeguard the anonymity of whistleblowers, as well as their personal data.
Amendment 123 #
2018/0106(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) safeguard the anonymity of whistleblowers, as well as their personal data.
Amendment 127 #
2018/0106(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. These channels shall safeguard the anonymity of whistleblowers, as well as their personal data.
Amendment 55 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas good occupational safety and health practices are crucial for a productive and motivated workforce, which helps companies remain competitive and innovative and helps to maintain valuable skills and work experience, reduce staff turnover and prevent exclusion; whereas SMEs have particular needs in this regard, demanding support measures in order to attain their OSH objectives; whereas, on the other hand, good OSH practices are crucial for SMEs to stay in the market and keep ensuring employment;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the improved health and reintegration of workers increases the overall wellbeing of society, has economic benefits to Member States, employees and employers and helps to retain; whereas to retain and to reintegrate older workers is key to secure skills that would otherwise be lost;
Amendment 67 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas older workers, despite being more subjected to chronic illness, also are proved to have a lower degree of exposure to physical risks and greater working time autonomy;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Proclamation on the European Pillar of Social Rights on 17 November in Gothenburg,
Amendment 32 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the employment rate in the EU is increasing and has reached 235.4 million people in jobs in the second quarter of 2017, which constitutes an employment rate of 72.3 %, meaning that the EU is on track to reach the 75 % employment rate target specified in the Europe 2020 strategy; whereas very substantial differences persists in many Member States and employment rates have still some way to go to recover from the crisis and notably also to attain the Europe 2020 national targets;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2260(INI)
4a. Notes that our education systems should be updated in accordance with the challenges of our society, such as those produced by globalisation and technological progress; highlights, in this regard, the importance of fostering ICT and media literacy, entrepreneurial education and the lifelong learning programmes to tackle poverty, social exclusion and unemployment in line with the targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 37 #
2017/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Emphasises the importance of the learning of foreign languages to enhance students’ and workers’ mobility and in order to achieve the Barcelona European Council’s objective of “mother tongue + two";
Amendment 39 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU unemployment rate is at its lowest level in nine years and stands at 7.5 %18.9 million people are still without a job despite that the EU unemployment rate and the euro area unemployment is at its lowest level in nine years and eight years and stands at 7.5 % and 8.9% respectively;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the accompaniment of the long-term unemployed is essential, since otherwise this situation will begin to affect their self-confidence, wellbeing and future development, putting them at risk of poverty and social exclusion and undermining the sustainability of social security systems, as well as the European social model;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its call for the assessment of the need and feasibility of creation ofng a Child Guarantee and for proper and swift implementation of the Youth Guarantee, including through improvedadequate funding allocation and better monitoring and communication;.
Amendment 114 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Interinstitutional Proclamation on the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) and believes its 20 key principles regarding equal opportunities and access to the labour market, fair working conditions and social protection and inclusion should serve as a point of reference when implementing the European Semester policy coordination cycle; Highlights that the EPSR is a first step through consolidation of a common approach to the protection and development of social rights across the EU, which should be reflected in measures pursued by Member States; Reiterates the call on the Commission to continue to complement this with further measures on deepening the economic and monetary union;
Amendment 146 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need to implement effective labour market policies in order to reduce long-term unemployment; Member States should further help those out of work by providing affordable, accessible and quality services support for job search, training and requalification, while protecting those unable to participate;
Amendment 169 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts in investing in high-quality education and training in order to guarantee that the skills acquired will match labour market demand and to reduce the number of young people who leave school early; underlines, in this respect, the growing demand for digital and other transferable skills and insists that the development of these skills is urgent and particularly necessary; stresses the importance of initiatives to support the long-term mobility of students and young graduates from education and vocational training, which will make it possible to develop a skilled and mobile labour force in sectors with potential;
Amendment 178 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that Member States and the Commission should maximize efforts to ensure equal opportunity and access to education and training to ensure social inclusion and better economic outcomes; Calls on the Commission and Member States to upgrade vocational training and strengthen work-based learning, including quality apprenticeships; Recalls that recognition of skills acquired outside formal education and training and support for adults should also be made easier;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that the integration of long-term unemployed individuals through individually tailored measures is a key factor for fighting poverty and social exclusion and contributing to the sustainability of national social security systems; highlights, in this context, the importance of skills and competences acquired in non-formal and informal learning environments;
Amendment 184 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take all the necessary measures to improve the services and legislation that are important for a proper work-life balance and for gender equality; calls for the development of accessible, quality and affordable childcare and early education services, and for the creation of favourable conditions for parents and carers by allowing for advantageous family leave take-up and flexible working arrangements which tap into the potential of new technologies; underlines, in this respect, the potential of public-private partnerships;
Amendment 197 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the potential of SMEs, as well as health and social services and social enterprises, in job creation and the economy as a whole; considers it vital to support entrepreneurship and to improve the business environment by removing administrative burdens, improving access to finance and supporting the development of tax models and simplified tax compliance procedures favouring SMEs, entrepreneurs, micro-entities and start-ups;
Amendment 212 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers demographic decline, which affects EU regions to different extents, to be among the serious obstacles hindering EU growth; calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce measures designed to address this challenge; underlines the fact that demographic decline requires a holistic approach, which should include the adaptation of the necessary infrastructure, and the enhancement of public services and flexible working arrangements; Insists that innovation forms of work should go hand in hand with adequate job security and accessible social protection;
Amendment 217 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on Member States and the Commission to promote lifelong learning, especially for older workers, to adapt their skills and facilitate their employability;
Amendment 222 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to pursue the policy of active ageing, the social inclusion of elderly people and solidarity between generations; Recalls that more cost- effective health systems and long-term care that ensure timely access to affordable preventive and curative healthcare of good quality are also fundamental for productivity;
Amendment 234 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up efforts for further inclusion of people with disabilities into the labour market by removing legislative barriers and creating incentives for their employment; Recalls that an adapted work environment for people with disabilities as well as targeted financial support to help them participate fully in the labour market and in the society as a whole are essential;
Amendment 237 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Encourages the Member States to implement the necessary measures for the social inclusion of refugees as well as people of ethnic minority or immigrant origin;
Amendment 242 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Welcomes new initiatives proposed by the Commission such as the launching of a public consultation on a European Labour Authority, as well as a European Social Security Number; calls, therefore, on the Member states to provide labour inspectorates with adequate resources, and also to improve cross-border cooperation between inspection services and the electronic exchange of information and data, in order to improve the efficiency of the controls intended to combat and prevent social fraud and undeclared work and reduce administrative burden;
Amendment 246 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Calls for stronger commitment to combat poverty and rising inequality, and, where needed, for greater investment in social infrastructure and support for those hit hardest to address inequalities correctly notably through social protection systems that provide adequate and well-target income support but also through the design of national tax and benefits systems;
Amendment 248 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Highlights that in the period 2014 to 2016, real wage growth lagged behind productivity growth despite improvements in the labour market; Recalls that growth in real wages, as a result of increased productivity, is crucial to tackle inequalities;
Amendment 41 #
2017/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas a gender perspective must be included in decision-making on youth policies which takes into account the specific challenges and circumstances faced by young women and girls in particular;, men , girls and boys in the education and labour market.
Amendment 59 #
2017/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 109 #
2017/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Is highly concerned at the persistent high rates of youth unemployment throughout the EU; recalls that quality job creation and employment should be guaranteed and remain key commitments towards young people; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote structural reforms of the labour market, fair working conditions and remuneration; stresses the importance of defining social rights for new forms of employment and ensuring social dialogue;
Amendment 124 #
2017/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the fact that YEI measures have provided support for more than 1.6 million young people26 ; emphasises the need to improve the quality of offers under the Youth Guarantee by performing gap assessments and market analyses prior to setting up schemes; improve the monitoring and performing system and to ensure that YEI funds are being used as supplement to national fund and not as a replacement; _________________ 26 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDo c.do?pubRef=- //EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2017- 0406+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN
Amendment 111 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Acknowledges the reality of individual differences in cognitive abilities and personality traits that interact with social and environmental factors for influencing educational outcomes; highlights, in this context, that education is more efficient, equalitarian and fair when these differences are taken into account;
Amendment 117 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights the potential of newdigital technologies and distance learning to improve the quality of education by meeting learners’ needs, increasing flexibility in learning and teaching, and creating new forms of cooperation;
Amendment 126 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that increased efforts are needed to shift the educational paradigm to bebalance both a teacher and content centered approach - together with a more learner- and understanding- centered one, thus combining learning methods adapted to traditional and online learning models, and strengthening the personalisation of the educational process and increasing retention rates;
Amendment 138 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights that educational systems should promote interdisciplinary approaches, cooperation and team work aimed at equipping pupils and students with knowledge and skills, as well as with professional, transversal, social and civic competences;
Amendment 141 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses the need to give an expanded role to sport and outdoor activities in educational curricula at all levels with enhanced possibilities for developing cooperation between education establishments and local sports organisations;
Amendment 155 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Supports the Council conclusions of 14 December 2017 calling for enhanced student mobility and participation in education and cultural activities, including through a ‘European Student Card’, that should facilitate recognition of university credits obtained in other Member States;
Amendment 205 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Stresses the need to enhance the learning of languages with a view to speak two languages in addition to the mother tongue and to promote in secondary schools the teaching of at least two subjects in a non-native language;
Amendment 221 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises, within the context of creating a European Educational Area, the importance of supporting, cooperation between university establishments and building on, the potential of all European universities;
Amendment 226 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Underlines the need to address skill mismatches and skill shortages in certain occupational fields which could lead to skills polarisation in the labour market and weaker social cohesion; calls, therefore, on the Commission and on the Member States to take action in order to promote the interaction between educational institutions and business, research sector and other relevant social partners;
Amendment 390 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Recommends the implementation of athe ‘wWhole sSchool aApproach’ to increase social inclusion, accessibility and quality in education, as well as to address the problem of early school leaving, which has long-term negative effects on social development and economic grow thin Europe;
Amendment 399 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34 a. Calls on the European Commission and on the Member States to develop a pilot scheme to support the exchanges of secondary students to spend at least half of an academic year in another Member State;
Amendment 400 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 b (new)
Paragraph 34 b (new)
34 b. Recommends the Member States to integrate learning about the EU into the high school curricula, to enable students learn about the functioning of the Union, its history and the value of European citizenship;
Amendment 419 #
2017/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36 a. Encourages Red Cross trainings in schools for students, teachers and staff to contribute to learning essential first aid skills and be able to act in case of emergency;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to better support Member States’ efforts to remove legal and organisational barriers and ensure equal access for people with disabilities to inclusive education and training, including VET and adult learning, culture, tourism and sport; emphasises the importance to ensure the availability, accessibility and affordability of individualised support services for people with disabilities;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States, to set targets for education and training participation, poverty reduction and employment for people with disabilities and people with special needs and to closely monitor and evaluate their situation in local, regional, national and at EU level;
Amendment 30 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it essential to improve information for people with disabilities regarding mobility opportunities, to provide them with the necessary guidance and assistance and to give special attention and address to the difficulties they encounter;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Highlights that preparing teachers and trainers to work with children with disabilities and providing them with adequate support is essential; encourages Member States to design inclusive education training and continuous professional development for teachers and trainers, with inputs from diverse stakeholders, particularly organisations representing people with disabilities and professionals with disabilities;
Amendment 60 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes with concern that refugees and asylum seekers with disabilities face multiple challenges such as lack of accessibility to assistance, lack of access to education, insufficient access to assistive technology which could make communication and integration easier;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States and in cooperation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to promote and protect the rights of persons with disabilities among the refugees and asylum seekers; encourages Member States to exchange good practises on innovative and successful programs for refugees with disabilities, particularly in the areas of inclusive and special needs education, vocational training and skills development;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Highlights that in order to better assess the implementation and the outcomes of the European disability strategy, better data collection, statistics and monitoring are needed;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that better synergy is needed between the European Disability Strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals, with particular regard to education and training, which should be reinforced;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2069(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Highlights that the Europe for Citizens programme promotes a better understanding of citizens' rights and duties in the EU;recommends therefore that the next generation of the programme should be adopted with a legal base enabling the Parliament to be involved as a co-legislator on equal footing with the Council, and to be equipped with more human and financial resources to increase the number of projects supported;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2069(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that continuous efforts are needed to increase EU citizens’ awareness of their rights and to ensure that those rights are uniformly enforced across the entire EU, highlighting the opportunities brought about by belonging to the EU; underlines the role of educational institutions in raising awareness among young people of their EU rights and in endorsing active citizenship; calls on the Commission, in this context, to provide a common framework for learning about the EU at school; shares the Commission’s view, moreover, that promoting awareness of EU citizenship rights requires cooperation at European, national, regional and local levels;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2069(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Values the importance of culture and art, art and science as integral aspects of active EU citizenship; stresses their role in strengthening citizens’ shared sense of belonging to the Union and stimulating intercultural dialogue;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2069(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to enhance citizens’ political engagement in the democratic life of the EU; encourages the promotion of democratic participation by intensifying citizens’ dialogue, enhancing citizens’ understanding of the role of EU legislation in their daily lives, and underlining their active and passive right to vote in local and European elections wherever they live within the EU;
Amendment 29 #
2017/2069(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Supports the revision of the European Citizens Initiative (ECI), with a view to improving its accessibility and ease of use; highlights the need to enhance the functioning and public awareness of the ECI in order to reach its full potential to foster citizen participation and democratic debate;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that growth is the key to more jobssustainable growth and investment are the key to job creation and increased prosperity and that it is necessary to direct the structural funds more effectively towards promoting growth;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the 2018 budget must play a key role in enhancing the Union’'s contribution to growth and jobssustainable growth, jobs and social inclusion, especially in combatingthe areas of youth unemployment and inequality;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that youth unemployment rates remain verunacceptably high in the Union1a and that the situation of unemployed young people, especially NEETS (not in education, employment, or training), is particularly worrying; emphasises that, in order to address this issue, it is of the utmost importance to ensure the properadequate and timely funding of the Youth Guarantee schemes through the European Youth Initiative and the European Social Fund;Youth Employment Initiative and the European Social Fund; in this regard, highlights the importance of continuing the YEI up to the end of the current MFF; also notes the Court of Auditors statement that it is not possible to address the whole NEET population with the resources available from the EU budget alone1b; _________________ 1aIn March 2017, the youth unemployment rate was 17.2% in the EU28 and 19.4% in the euro area, compared with 19.1% and 21.3% respectively in March 2016 - Eurostat, 2nd May 2017: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/29 95521/8002525/3-02052017-AP- EN.pdf/94b69232-83a9-4011-8c85- 1d4311215619 1bSpecial report No 5/2017: Youth unemployment – have EU policies made a difference?, p. 8
Amendment 18 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes it is essential that the Youth Employment Initiative continues to be adequately funded and stresses in the context of the Multiannual Financial Framework mid-term review that the Council must adopt the agreed increase of EUR 500 million;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of sufficient funding and good budgetary management of the programmes within the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework that aim to address unemployment, poverty and social exclusion, such as the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the different axes of the Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD); insists, therefore, that for 2018 these programmes’' resources should at least be maintained at the levels of the previous EU budget; notes that payment amounts for this year's budget were limited as the structural funds have not been absorbed as quickly as expected and stresses that adequate payment appropriations be provided for in budget 2018;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the EU budget should also support vocational training and professional qualification measures; highlights, in this respect, that proper funding for the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) is paramountensure the adequate financial and human resourcing of EUROFOUND, CEDEFOP, ETF and EU-OSHA in order to allow them to fulfil their respective remits and ensure the best possible results in support of EU legislative and policy objectives;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises are a major source of employment in the Union andthe backbone of Europe's economy, representing 99% of all businesses in the EU; notes that one of the main problems in setting up and maintaining such enterprises and keeping them going is that of obtaining finance; underlines that the 2018 budget should support measures promoting entrepreneurship in those enterprises, including social entrepreneurship and, innovative social enterprises and self-employment; stresses, in this respect, that the budget 2018 should in particular facilitate access to micro- credits available through the microfinance and social entrepreneurship axis of the Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) programme;
Amendment 38 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges that financial support be provided for programmes creating jobs for those with multiple disadvantages onfrom EU funds reaches as many targeted beneficiaries as possible in particular for those furthest from the labour market, such as the long-term unemployed, people with disabilities and people from minority backgrounds;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates that pilot projects and preparatory actions are very valuable tools to initiate new activities and policies in the fields of employment and social inclusion; stresses that several ideas of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs have been implemented successfully in the past as pilot projects/preparatory actions; is of the opinion, therefore, that that committee will make further use of those instruments in 2018; encourages the full use of the margins available under each heading; calls for Parliament to be given regular, detailed updates on the various stages in the implementation of pilot projects and preparatory actions by the Commission.
Amendment 32 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas, having peaked at 24 % in 2013, the youth unemployment rate in the EU-28 has steadily dropped, reaching below 17 % in 2017, but remains unacceptably high in a number of countries, including Greece (45.5%), Spain (39.2%) and Italy (35.4%);
Amendment 90 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the significant divergence in economic performance in terms of both economic and employment growth across the EU-28; urges the Member States that continue to lag behinconcerned to implement the necessary structural reforms in order to catch up with other EU economies; and notes that it is sound economic policies, which are ultimately a Member State responsibility, that create jobs;
Amendment 97 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the YEI aims to complement national funding and not to replace it and is concerned about the conclusions of the Court’s report highlighting the risk that the appropriations earmarked for this initiative are not leading to a net increase in funding available and are simply being used for expenditure previously financed from national budgets; stresses that the YEI budget cannot and was never meant to shoulder on its own the ambition of offering all young people a good-quality offer within a period of four months of becoming unemployed or leaving formal education;
Amendment 107 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for the YEI to be a driver for policy reform in particular and, for better coordination in the fields of employment and education, especially in those Member States experiencing high rates of youth unemployment, with a view to ensuring that those and for the introduction by Member States introduceof integrated, comprehensive and long-term approaches to tackling youth unemployment which enhance the employability of young people and lead to sustainable employment, as opposed to having a range of fragmented (existing) policies, which often target NEETs who are relatively easy to integrate anyway;
Amendment 123 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to set up better outreach strategies for NEETs so that the young people concerned can be targeted more effectively;
Amendment 193 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for a discussion about the future status of the YEI which does not question its continuation but addresses the question of transforming it from a crisis instrument into a more permanent, main EU financing instrument for tackling youth unemployment, and which establishes a co- financing requirement in order to underline the primary responsibility of the Member States;
Amendment 208 #
2017/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for a future discussion about the quality of offers under the YEI and YG and about the positive impact of extending the eligible age bracket under the YEI to 25- 29;
Amendment 15 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Suggests that Regulation (EU) 211/2011 might create a conflict of interest, becauseRecalls the competencies of the Commission with regards to Regulation (EU) 211/2011, and in particular that the Commission is acting both as an expert and as an advisory body, whilst at the same time assessing the registration criteria and the follow-up procedures; calls therefore for efforts to resolve such conflict of interests, as it might jeopardisethe Commission to remain cognizant of these roles while ensuring the democratic nature of the ECI;
Amendment 21 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 26 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RecommendEncourages lowering the minimum age for eligibility to support a citizen’s initiative proposal to 16 years, in order to encourage youth participation;
Amendment 30 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises that organisers of citizen’s committees are often not completely ready when registering an ECI; stresses that there should be a gap of a few months between the registration and the start of the process of collecting statements of support from signatories;believes therefore that the citizens’ committee be allowed to decide on the start of the collection time, within a specified margin of approximately three months; expresses the view that this adjustment will make the process of gathering support easier, by ensuring that it begins when the committee is fully prepared.
Amendment 32 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends taking into consideration the difficultiesgnises that the ECI has a nature of Europe- wide campaigning caused by linguistic and cultural barriers,and offers opportunities to find common European interests and values across cultures, while taking into consideration distance and the significant delays due to the various national procedures in the registration of an OCS (Online Collection System);
Amendment 35 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 41 #
2017/2024(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the requirement for personal data to be simplified in order to facilitate support for an ECI, for example by dispensing with the ID or Passport number requirementsuch as using digital technologies, as the current approach leads to delays.
Amendment 11 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the importance of inclusive and quality education and training, research and lifelong learning opportunities in addressing economic, social and environmental challenges and preparing a sustainable future; notwelcomes, in this regard, the EU’s intention to integrate the SDGs, and especially SDG 4 of the 2030 Development Agenda, in the European policy framework;
Amendment 15 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that education and training are key to moving society toward sustainability; highlights that sustainability education develops skills, knowledge and values that promote behaviour in support of a sustainable future; encourages, therefore, Member States to strengthen their efforts to implement education for sustainability through all levels and all forms of education and training;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is deeply concerned about the differences in the performance of education systems in Member States, as shown by the latest PISA reports and about the fact that between 2010 and 2014 investment in education and training fell by 2.5 % in the EU as a whole; stresses that properly resourced public education systemsand training systems, accessible to all, are essential for equality and social inclusion and for meeting the targets set by SDG 4;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines the need for more inclusive approach in financing the education and training policies and therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to mobilise and use all available instruments in order to secure smart investments in innovative teaching, training and learning aimed to improve the quality and relevance of skills and strengthen the performance of education and training systems;
Amendment 23 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recommends that in the context of education, training and lifelong learning for inclusion and sustainability, a genuine revision of EU and Member States’ education and emppolicies is necessary in order to raise awareness of sustainable develoypment policies is necessaryand to ensure that learning enables people to make responsible decisions and builds capacity for future-oriented thinking; highlights that education and training and skills policies should not only be adjusted to labour market demands but should also promote personal and societal development in a holistic manner;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to enhance coordination and to enable and optimise synergies between ESIF and other Union programmes in order to improve and modernise the quality of education and training systems in Member States; stresses that populations in rural areas and remote regions shall have equal access to equitable quality education and training and lifelong learning opportunities;
Amendment 32 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes thatWelcomes the achievements of the Youth Guarantee scheme and Youth Employment Initiative have hitherto failsince their launch in 2013; notes, however, that further actions are needed to address the persistent problem of high levels of youth unemployment; calls for their revision in order to promote the creation of new high- quality jobs and decent social protection for young peopletherefore on the Commission to revise, accelerate and broaden the Youth Guarantee's and YEI sustainable implementation in order to overcome the existing problems as difficulties in engaging with vulnerable groups and to better outreach to non- registered NEETs and low skilled youth.
Amendment 6 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. Whereas the EU 2020 strategy establishes the EU's target of 75 % of men and women in employment by 2020 and, in particular, to close the gender gap in employment; whereas coordinated efforts will be required to facilitate women's labour-market participation.
Amendment 15 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
A c. Whereas although women account for almost 60% of graduates in the EU they remain under-represented in science, mathematics, IT, engineering and related careers; highlights, as a result, inequality in occupations is taking new forms and, despite the investment in education, young women are still twice as likely as young men to be economically inactive;
Amendment 37 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to promote the well-beingequality of women, by tackling the pay and pension gaps and combating atypical and insecure forms of work and employment, such as temporary co, which currently stand at 16 % and 40 % respectively; highlights the importance of the attractiveness of new forms of work by providing adequate flexibility that can promote higher employment racts or involuntary part-time worktes among women;
Amendment 50 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights that the causes and consequences of the gender pension gap need to be addressed, as this is an obstacle to the economic independence of women in old age, when they face a higher risk of poverty than men.
Amendment 61 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to eliminate occupatithe horizontal segregationand vertical gender segregation of the labour market by addressing discriminatory social behaviours and stereotypes and promoting the equal participation of women and men in the labour market, education, training and all forms of care;
Amendment 65 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States, to promote and support female entrepreneurship initiatives as it can provide women the knowledge they need to found or co-found their own businesses based on their innovative ideas. In this regard, it is crucial to provide information on access to training, to support women entrepreneurs in accessing alternative sources of funding, business networking opportunities as well as advising on the start-up, management and growth of their businesses in the early phases.
Amendment 86 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for measures to guaranteensure the economic and social dignity of feminised work, such as domestic work;
Amendment 89 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses also the importance to pay attention to the specific needs of groups facing particular barriers to entry to the labour market such as women in rural areas as well as women with disabilities and migrant women.
Amendment 101 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to enforcestrengthen the implementation of existing laws and workplace policies thato prohibit discriminationtect women from discrimination, particularly, in the recruitment, retention and promotion of women in employment in both the public and private sectors;
Amendment 123 #
2017/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to strengthen and enforce the full exercise of the right of collective bargaining in the private and public sectors; in this regard, social partners have high potential to support gender equality on the labour market by actively raising the issue of equal pay during collective bargaining;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Council conclusions on the role of early childhood education and primary education in fostering creativity, innovation and digital competence (2015/C 172/05),
Amendment 7 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 20 May 2014 on effective teacher education,
Amendment 8 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
Citation 5 c (new)
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 20 May 2014 on quality assurance supporting education and training,
Amendment 17 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 8 September 2015 on promoting youth entrepreneurship through education and training,
Amendment 49 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas often individuals possess skills, which are not identified, exploited or properly rewarded; whereas skills acquired outside formal settings, through work experience, volunteering, civic engagement or other relevant experiences are not necessarily recorded in a qualification or documented and therefore are being undervalued;
Amendment 54 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
F b. whereas cultural and creative industries contribute to social well-being, innovation, employment and stimulate EU´s economic development while employing more than 12 million people in the EU, which is 7.5% of all persons employed in the total economy and contribute to the economy with 5.3% of the total EU GVA and further 4% of nominal EU GDP generated by the high- end industries 1a; _________________ 1aBoosting the competitiveness of cultural and creative industries for growth and jobs, 2015
Amendment 56 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Recital F c (new)
F c. whereas the current arrivals of migrants and refugees to the European Union require the establishment of more sustained approach and validation practices directed towards third country nationals in order to facilitate their integration and make a better use of their skills and qualifications;
Amendment 75 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas access to learningeducation and training opportunities must be a right for everyone at every stage of life so that they can acquire transversal skills such as, numeracy, digital and media literacy, critical thinking, social skills, foreign language proficiency and relevant life skills;
Amendment 81 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas, nowadays, our education and training systems are facing a significant challenge as a result of the digital transformation, which is impacting teaching and learning processes; whereas an effective digital skills provision is essential to ensure the workforce is prepared for the current and future technological changes;
Amendment 98 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
L a. whereas in order to ensure smart, sustainable and inclusive economic growth and jobs for young people, there is a strong need for more Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) proficiency in the European Union;
Amendment 99 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L b (new)
Recital L b (new)
L b. whereas the demand for STEM professionals and associate professionals is expected to grow by around 8% between now and 2025, much higher than the average 3% growth forecast for all occupations; Whereas the employment in STEM-related sectors is also expected to rise by around 6.5% between now and 2025 2a; _________________ 2a Cedefop, Rising STEMs Database, March 2014
Amendment 121 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the focus on the need to upgrade the European education and training systems in line with the fast changing economic and societal environment; notes that, while skills needs are dynamic, the main focus of the skills package is to enhance the adaptability of individual and address the immediate needs of the labour market; highlights in this respect the importance of a pan- European skills needs forecasting tool and lifelong learning with a view to adapting to new situations in the labour market;
Amendment 129 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines that creativity and innovation are becoming driving factors in the European Union´s economy and should be mainstreamed in the national and European policy strategies;
Amendment 132 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to include leadership, social intelligence, management, entrepreneurial and financial education, business start-up adviceforeign languages proficiency, negotiation, business start-up advice, coding, new media literacy and communication technologies in their education programmes, and to prioritise the further development of those capabilities also in vocational training and education (VET) programmes, including enhancingtogether with the enhancement of the European craftsmanship;
Amendment 153 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Underlines that culture, creativity and arts significantly contribute to personal development, employment and growth across the European Union, carrying innovation, stimulating cohesion, strengthening intercultural relations, mutual understanding and preserving European identity, culture and values; Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their support for CCIs in order to unleash and fully explore their potential;
Amendment 169 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Insists that education isand training are not only a key factors in enhancing employability, but also in combating social exclusion and therefore believes that investing in skills and competences is crucial to tackling the high unemployment rate, especially among NEETs; recalls that a genuine estimation of future skills needs is paramount in this respect;
Amendment 184 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Insists on the need for immediate action to reverse the unacceptable situation of 70 million Europeans lacking basic skillsNotes with concern the unacceptable situation of 70 million Europeans lacking basic skills; welcomes therefore the establishment of the Upskilling Pathways and insists on its swift implementation and monitoring; calls furthermore on the Commission and Member States to encourage and support flexible re-skilling and up-skilling programmes, tailored to the individual needs of each Member State, for both unemployed individuals and those who are employed;
Amendment 251 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Insists on the importance of validating non-formal and informal learning to reach out and empower learners; recognises that this is particularly evident for disadvantaged groups, such as refugees and low-skilled adults who are in need of priority access to validation arrangements;
Amendment 258 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recognises that the lack of comparability and coherence between the validation approaches of EU countries, especially for VET, represents an additional barrier;
Amendment 292 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Insists on the need to incorporate new technologies in the teaching and learning process in order to equip people with the right set of skills, competences and knowledgeand to ensure the development of the full range of digital skills that individuals and companies across the country need in an increasingly digital economy; furthermore, stresses the need for more collaborative, coordinated and targeted approach for the development and implementation of digital skills´ strategies;
Amendment 309 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to urge Member States to draw up comprehensive national strategies for digital skills; points out however that in order for these strategies to be effective, there is a need for systematic teacher training programmes and strong pedagogical leadership from teachers at all levels of education;
Amendment 333 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Reiterates that knowledge and skills related to science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM), especially in combination with creativity, are crucial in responding to the economic challenges we are facing and that developments in these fields underpin advances in scientific research across all disciplines and drive innovation and job creation across various sectors of EU´s economy;
Amendment 337 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23 b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage and better support the interaction between education and training institutions, national authorities, businesses and other relevant stakeholders in order to identify and exchange views on how STEM and ICT skills shortages can be tackled in a structural way with long-term impact;
Amendment 341 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 c (new)
Paragraph 23 c (new)
23 c. Encourages Members States to establish, swiftly implement and regularly update national STEM strategy, fitting to each Member State's specific needs, applying bottom-up approach with triple helix cooperation;
Amendment 383 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses the need to increase the attractiveness of VET by making sure that young people and their families have access to information and guidance on VET options;
Amendment 399 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that the upskilling of all teachers would be theis a prerequisite for the deliveryimplementation of the New Skills Agenda and that further efforts and analyses have to be made ion attracting talents to this profession, underlines that enhancing innovative teaching and learning practices and facilitate mobility and exchange of best practices could be one step forward this goal;
Amendment 419 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue to make VETvocational education and training more visible and to enhance its attractiveness; calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to set further targets to encourage work- based learning in VET programmes;
Amendment 429 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue to focus on offering opportunities to its citizens, of all ages, to develop their digital skills, in particularwhile fostering the digital transformation of the economy and re- shaping the way people learn, work and do business, and takes; in this regard, calls on the Member States to take note of the Commission’s intention to focus on the positive aspects of this transformation via the EU e-skills strategy;
Amendment 438 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Calls foron the Member States to include early entrepreneurship education to beas part of the curriculum in the Member States in order to develop an individual entrepreneurial mind-set in their citizens as a key competence which supports personal development, active citizenship, social inclusion and employability;
Amendment 478 #
2017/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Calls on the Commission and Member States to make funding available in order to bridge the existing technological gap between educational and training institutions which are well equipped and those which are not and to support teachers´ and trainers´ up-skilling in technology in order to keep pace with today's increasingly digital world, as part of the national strategies for digital skills;
Amendment 421 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall include as a minimum:
Amendment 591 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 1(b) and 2(a) may, where appropriate, be given in the form of a reference to the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing those particular points.deleted
Amendment 116 #
2017/0305(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 2
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 2
Member States should foster equal opportunities in education and raise overall education levels, particularly for the least qualified. They should ensure quality learning outcomes, reinforce basic skills, foster the development of entrepreneurial skills, reduce the number of young people leaving school early, enhance the labour- market relevance of tertiary degrees, improve skills monitoring and forecasting, and increase adult participation in continuing education and training. Member States should take account of the specific circumstances of disabled people and come up with measures that are tailored to their needs in order to foster their development and employability. Member States should strengthen work-based learning in their vocational education and training systems, including through quality and effective apprenticeships, make skills more visible and comparable and increase opportunities for recognising and validating skills and competences acquired outside formal education and training. They should upgrade and increase the supply and take-up of flexible continuing vocational training. Member States should also support low skilled adults to maintain or develop their long term employability by boosting access to and take up of quality learning opportunities, through the establishment of Upskilling Pathways, including a skills assessment, a matching offer of education and training and the validation and recognition of the skills acquired.
Amendment 37 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 c (new)
Recital 1 c (new)
(1c) According to EIOPA, only 67 million people, or 27% of the total EU population between 25-59 years old, are currently voluntarily subscribed to financial products with a long-term pension objective and that this is concentrated in only a few Member States.
Amendment 39 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 e (new)
Recital 1 e (new)
(1e) Portability of the PEPP will increase its attractiveness as a product particularly to young people and help to further facilitate citizens’ right to live and work across the Union.
Amendment 42 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Personal pensions are important in linking long-term savers with long-term investment opportunities. A larger, European market for personal pensions will support the supply of funds for institutional investors and investment into the real economy which could help increase job creation across the EU.
Amendment 47 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Currently, the functioning of the internal market for personal pensions is impeded by the high degree of fragmentation between national markets and the limited degree of portability of personal pension products. This can result in difficulties for individuals to make use of their basic freedoms. For instance, they may be prevented from searching for or taking up a job in or retiring into another Member State. In addition, the possibility for providers to use the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services is hampered by the lack of standardisation of existing personal pension products.
Amendment 61 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In its Communication Mid-Term Review of the Capital Markets Union Action Plan32 , the Commission announced "a legislative proposal on a pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) by end June 2017. This will lay the foundations for a safer, more cost-efficient and transparent market in affordable and voluntary personal pension savings that can be managed on a pan-European scale. It will address the demographical challenge and pension gap, meet the needs of people wishing to enhance the adequacy of their retirement savings, address the demographical challenge, complement the existing pension products and schemes in particular under the first and second pillar, and support the cost-efficiency of personal pensions by offering good opportunities for long-term investment of pension savings". __________________ 32 COM(2017) 292 final, p. 6. COM(2017) 292 final, p. 6.
Amendment 97 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) In order to facilitate provisions to open national compartments in all Member States, PEPP providers should be able to enter partnerships with other PEPP providers.
Amendment 105 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) In order to ensure optimal product transparency, PEPP manufacturproviders should draw up the PEPP key information document for the PEPPs that they manufacture before the product can be distributed to PEPP savers. They should also be responsible for the accuracy of the PEPP key information document. The PEPP key information document should replace and adapt the key information document for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products under Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council33 which would not have to be provided for PEPPs. __________________ 33 Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs), OJ L 352, 9.12.2014, p. 1.
Amendment 113 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) PEPP providers should draw up a Pension Benefit Statement addressed to PEPP savers, in order to present them with key personal and generic data about the PEPP scheme and to ensure continuous information on it. The Pension Benefit Statement should be clear, updated, simple and comprehensive and should contain relevant and appropriate information to facilitate the understanding of pension entitlements over time and across schemes and serve labour mobility.
Amendment 132 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) In view of the long-term retirement objective of the PEPP, the investment options grantoffered to the PEPP savers should be framclearly outlined, covering the elements which will allow investors to make an informed investment decision, including the number of investment options they can choose from. After the initial choice made upon the subscription of a PEPP, the PEPP saver should have the possibility to modify this choice at reasonable intervals (every five years), so that sufficient stability is offered to providers for their long-term investment strategy whilst at the same time investor protection is ensured.
Amendment 143 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) In order to find better conditions for their investments, thus also stimulating the competition among PEPP providers, PEPP savers should have the right to switch providers during the accumulation and the decumulation phases, through a clear, quick and safe, safe and transparent procedure.
Amendment 154 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) Full transparency on costs and fees related to the investment in a PEPP should be guaranteed. A level-playing field between providers would be established, whilst ensuring consumer protection. Comparative information wouldshall be available between different products, thus incentivising competitive pricing.
Amendment 155 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
Recital 56
(56) Although the ongoing supervision of PEPP providers is to be exercised by the respective competent national authorities, EIOPA should coordinate the supervision with regards to PEPPs, in order to guarantee the consistent application of a unified supervisory methodology, contributing in this way to the pane- European nature of the pension product.
Amendment 163 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
Recital 69
(69) Following the launch of the PEPP, Member States are strongly encouraged to take into consideration Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/… and to extend the benefits of the tax advantages they grant to national PPPs also to the PEPP.
Amendment 205 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
(24) "default investment option" means an investment strategy where the PEPP saver recoups at least the capital invested and which is either selected by the PEPP saver or applied when the PEPP saver has not provided instructions on how to invest the funds accumulating in his PEPP account;
Amendment 215 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
(28a) "biometric risks" mean risks linked to longevity, disability and death.
Amendment 217 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 b (new)
(28b) "compartment partnership" means cooperation between PEPP providers to offer compartments in different Member States as regards the portability service as referred to in Article 12.
Amendment 283 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The portability service allows PEPP savers to continue contributing to the PEPP which they have already contracted with its provider, while changing their domicile by moving to another Member State. The Commission should examine waiving the fee for changing providers as an incentive. In any case, costs shall be reasonable and communicated always at time of the contract.
Amendment 290 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. When proposing a PEPP, the PEPP provider or PEPP distributor shall provide potential PEPP savers with information on which national compartments are immediately available and either from the PEPP provider or from a registered partner.
Amendment 300 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
PEPP providers may enter a compartment partnership with other PEPP providers in order to facilitate provisions to open compartments in all Member States.
Amendment 306 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of the PEPP saver, the PEPP provider shall propose to the PEPP saver to arrange for transfer of accumulated assets between different compartments of the individual PEPP account, so that all assets could be consolidated in one compartment. Costs associated with this transfer must have been stipulated at the time the contract was concluded.
Amendment 315 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) identification of the registered partner if any;
Amendment 319 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
All documents and information under this Chapter shall be provided to PEPP customers electronically, provided that the PEPP customer is enabled to store such information in a way accessible for future reference and for a period of time adequate for the purposes of the information and that the tool allows the unchanged reproduction of the information stored. Upon request, PEPP providers and distributors shall provide free of charge those documents and information also on another durable medium. and in an accessible format to PEPP savers with a visual or hearing impairment as well as an easy to read version for PEPP savers with low or no financial literacy.
Amendment 329 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point iv
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point iv
(iv) general information on the portability service, including information on the compartments and registered partners if any;
Amendment 385 #
Amendment 392 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. PEPP providers shall draw up a concise, clear and comprehensible personalised document containing key information for each PEPP saver taking into consideration the specific nature of national pension systems and of relevant national social, labour and tax law (“PEPP Benefit Statement”). The title of the document shall contain the words “PEPP Benefit Statement”.
Amendment 398 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The PEPP Benefit Statement shall be provided free of charge, annually and include, at least, the following key information for PEPP savers:
Amendment 401 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) personal details of the PEPP saver, name of the PEPP providand contact information of the PEPP provider, identification of the scheme of the PEPP saver, information on pension benefit projections, information on accrued entitlements or accumulated capital, contributions paid by the PEPP saver or any third party and information on the funding level of the PEPP scheme, for which Article 39, paragraphs 1(a), (b), (d), (e), (f) and (h) of Directive 2016/2341/EU shall be applied, where the “member” means the PEPP saver, the “IORP” means the PEPP provider, the “pension scheme” means the PEPP scheme and “the sponsoring undertaking” means any third party for the purposes of this Regulation;
Amendment 453 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 1
PEPP providers may offer PEPPs with an option ensuring the coveragshall include a guarantee ofn the risk of biometric risks. For the purpose of this Regulation, “biometric risks” mean risks linked to longevity, disability and deathcapital invested for death and permanent disability of the PEPP saver during the accumulation phase.
Amendment 464 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 46 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Within twofive working days from receipt of the authorisation referred to in paragraph 2, the receiving PEPP provider shall request the transferring PEPP provider to carry out the following tasks, if provided for in the PEPP saver’s authorisation:
Amendment 487 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. PEPP providers mayshall make available to PEPP savers one or more of the following forms of out-payments:
Amendment 59 #
2017/0123(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In view of their potential to considerably affect the road haulage market, as well as the social protection of workers, serious infringements of Union rules on the posting of workers, cabotage and the law applicable to contractual obligations should be added to the items relevant to the assessment of good repute.
Amendment 68 #
2017/0123(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) UIn order to avoid distortions of competition and take account of the development of international transport activities of undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or with combinations of vehicles not exceeding that limit should have a minimum level of financial standing, to ensure that they have the means to carry out operations on a stable and long- lasting basis. However, since the operations concerned are generally of a limited size, the corresponding requirements should be less demanding than, they should be subject to requirements similar to those applicable to operators using vehicles or combinations of vehicles above that limit.
Amendment 92 #
2017/0123(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) To this end, and in order to facilitate checks and to, eliminate uncertainty and take into account the fact that cabotage is not an ordinary form of haulage operation, the limitation on the number of cabotage operations subsequent to an international carriage should be abolished, while the number of days available for such operations should be reducmaintained.
Amendment 99 #
2017/0123(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) Further digitalisation of enforcement tools is a prerequisite for the proper functioning of the internal market, reducing unnecessary administrative burden and carrying out effective and efficient enforcement of the rules in the road sector;
Amendment 109 #
2017/0123(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 1
Article 1
Amendment 154 #
2017/0123(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
(xiia) cabotage;
Amendment 40 #
2017/0122(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) There are differences among Member States in the interpretation and implementation of the weekly rest requirements as regards the place where the weekly rest should be taken. In order to ensure good working conditions and the safety of drivers, it is therefore appropriate to clarify that requirement to ensure that drivers are provided with adequate accommodation for their regular and reduced weekly rest periods if they are taken away from home.
Amendment 47 #
2017/0122(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) In order to safeguard working conditions of the drivers at places of loading and unloading, owners and operators of such facilities should provide the driver with the access to hygienic facilities.
Amendment 125 #
2017/0122(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8
Article 8 – paragraph 8
(ba) Paragraph 8 is replaced by the following: ‘8. Where a driver chooses to do this, daily rest periods and reduced weekly rest periods away from base may be taken in a vehicle, as long as it has suitable sleeping facilities for each driver and the vehicle is stationary.’;
Amendment 132 #
2017/0122(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – introductory part
8a. The reduced and regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest shall not be taken in a vehicle. They shall be taken in a suitable accommodation, with adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities;.
Amendment 153 #
2017/0122(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 c (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 8 c (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is inserted: “8c. Member States shall issue an annual report to the Commission on the availability of suitable rest facilities for drivers and secured parking facilities on their national territory, from the date of entry into force of this Regulation. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a common standard for Member States reporting.”
Amendment 59 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure the effective and proportionate implementation of Directive 96/71/EC in the road transport sector, it is necessary to establish sector-specific rules reflecting the particularity of the highly mobile workforce in the road transport sector and providing a balance between the social protection of drivers and the freedom to provide cross-border services for operators as well as the need to ensure that inter-company competition in the sector is fair. The provisions on posting of workers in Directive 96/71/EC, and on the enforcement of those provisions in Directive 2014/67/EU, apply to the road transport sector unless this Directive provides otherwise.
Amendment 79 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Such balanced criteria should be based on a concept of a sufficient link ofthe simple, readily understood concept of the link between a driver with aand the territory of a host Member State. Therefore, a time thresholdis link should be establcharacterished, beyond which the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State shall apply in case of y at least one commercial loading or unloading operation taking place in the host Member State. Furthermore, in order to eliminaternational transport operations. This time threshold should not apply to cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/200918 and 1073/200919 since the entire transport operation is taking place in a host Member State. As a consequence any uncertainty or complications for the Member States and for companies, and to avoid any disparity between workers, the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State should be apply to cabotageied to international transport and cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/200918 and 1073/200919 irrespective of the frequency and duration of the operations carried out by a driver. __________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72). 19 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p.88)
Amendment 88 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure effective and efficient enforcement of the sector-specific rules on posting of workers and to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens for non-resident operators sector, specific administrative and control requirements should be established in the road transport sector, taking full advantage of control tools such as the digital tachograph. Control tools should be strengthened, and specifically the smart tachograph should be introduced across the board as soon as possible, in order significantly to improve the monitoring of compliance with the rules on posting of drivers for international transport and cabotage operations.
Amendment 170 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road transport sector employed by undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that Directive, when performing international carriage or cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 where the period of posting to their territory to perform these operations is shorter than or equal to 3 days during a period of one calendar month.
Amendment 183 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 210 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Amendment 361 #
2017/0121(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, by […] [The time limit for transposition will be as short as possible and, generally, will not exceed two years] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive in the same time frame as that set out under Article 2 of the legislative act amending Directive 96/71/EC. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 42 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Young people should be provided with easily accessible opportunities to engage in solidarity activities, which cwould enable them in the first place to express their commitment to the benefit of communities while acquiring useful experience, skills and competences for their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, therebywhich would improvinge their employability. Those activities would also support the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers.
Amendment 49 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The solidarity activities offered to all young people should be of high quality, in the sense that they should respond to unmet societal needs, contribute to strengthening communities, offer young people the opportunity to acquire valuable knowledge and competences, be financially accessible to young people, in particular efforts must be made to ensure participation of young persons with disabilities and disadvantages and be implemented in safe and healthy conditions.
Amendment 56 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The European Solidarity Corps would provide a single entry point for solidarity activities throughout the Union. Consistency and complementarity of that framework should be ensured with other relevant Union policies and programmes. The European Solidarity Corps should build on the strengths and synergies of existing programmes, notably the European Voluntary Service. It should also complement the efforts made by Member States to support young people and ease their school-to-work transition under the Youth Guarantee19 by providing them with additional opportunities to make a start on the labour market in the form of traineeships or jobs in solidarity-related areas within their respective Member State or across borders. Complementarity with existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities under the European Solidarity Corps, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, EURES and the Eurodesk network, the European Youth Forum (YEJ), the European Volunteer Centre (CEV) and other relevant civil society organisations including the social partners should also be ensured. Furthermore, complementarity between existing related schemes, in particular national solidarity schemes and mobility schemes for young people, and the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured, building on good practices where appropriate. __________________ 19 Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee (2013/C 120/01).
Amendment 65 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The European Solidarity Corps should open up new opportunities for young people to carry out volunteering, traineeship or job placements in solidarity- related areas as well as to devise and develop solidarity projects based on their own initiative. Those opportunities should help respond to unmet societal needs and contribute to strengthening communities while also contribute to enhancing their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development. The European Solidarity Corps should also support networking activities for European Solidarity Corps participants and organisations as well as measures to ensure the quality of the supported activities and to enhance the validation of their learning outcomes.
Amendment 71 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Voluntary activities constitute a rich experience in a non-formal and informal learning context which enhances young people's personal, socio-educational and professional development, active citizenship and employability. Voluntary activities should not have an adverse effect on potential or existing paid employment, nor should they be seen as a substitute for it. Solidarity placements in the form of volunteering under this Regulation should be offered by public authorities or by participating organisations in the not for profit sector or those involved in collaboration with a not for profit entity. In order to ensure continuity with respect to the volunteering activities that are supported at Union level, the volunteering activities under the European Voluntary Service that fall within the geographical scope of the European Solidarity Corps should be supported by the latter in the form of cross-border volunteering placements. The other volunteering activities under the European Voluntary Service that do not fall under the geographical scope of the European Solidarity Corps should continue to be supported under the Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport20 . With respect to the interpretation of related legislation at Union level, both the cross-border volunteering placements under the European Solidarity Corps and the volunteering activities that continue to be supported under Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 should be considered equivalent to those carried out under the European Voluntary Service. __________________ 20 Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 50.
Amendment 77 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Traineeships and jobs in solidarity- related areas can offer additionalhelp to build social , economic and civic cohesion while offering opportunities for young people to make a start on the labour market while contributing to addressing key societal challenges. This can help foster the employability and productivity of young people while easing their transition from education to employment, which is key to enhancing their chances on the labour market. The traineeship placements offered under the European Solidarity Corps should be remunerated by the participating organisation and follow the quality principles outlined in the Council Recommendation on establishing a Quality Framework for Traineeships of 10 March 201421 . The traineeships and jobs offered should constitute a stepping stone for young people to enter the labour market and should therefore be accompanied by adequate post-placement support. The traineeship and job placements should be facilitated by relevant labour market actors, in particular public and private employment services, social partners and Chambers of Commerce. As participating organisations, they should be able to apply for funding via the competent implementing structure of the European Solidarity Corps in view of intermediating between the young participants and employers offering traineeship and job placements in solidarity sectors. Traineeships and jobs in solidarity related areas must be entirely separate from any volunteering activities. __________________ 21 Council Recommendation of 10 March 2014 on a Quality Framework for Traineeships, OJ C 88, 27.3.2014, p. 1.
Amendment 86 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Young people’s spirit of initiative is an important asset for society and for the labour market. The European Solidarity Corps should contribute to fostering this aspect by offering young people the opportunity to devise and implement their own projects aimed at addressing specific challenges to the benefit of their local communities. Those projects should be an opportunity to try out ideas in a sustainable way and support young people to be themselves drivers of solidarity actions. They could also serve as a springboard for further engagement in solidarity activities and could be a first step towards encouraging European Solidarity Corps participants to engage in self- employment or setting up associations, NGOs or other bodies active in the solidarity, non-profit and youth sectors.
Amendment 89 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Young people and organisations participating in the European Solidarity Corps should feel that they belong to a community of individuals and entities committed to enhancing solidarity across Europe. At the same time, participating organisations need support to strengthen their capacities to offer good quality placements to an increasing number of participants. The European Solidarity Corps should support networking activities aimed at strengthening the capacity of young people and participating organisations’ engagement in this community, at fostering a European Solidarity Corps spirit, as well as at encouraging the exchange of useful practices and experience. Those activities should also contribute to raising awareness about the European Solidarity Corps among public and private actors as well as to collect feedback from participants and participating organisations on the implementation of the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 112 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) A European Solidarity Corps Portal should continuously be developed in order to ensure easy access to the European Solidarity Corps and to provide a one-stop shop for both interested individuals and organisations as regards, inter alia, registration, identification and matching of profiles and opportunities, networking and virtual exchanges, online training, language and pre and post-placement support as well as other useful functionalities, which may arise in the future.
Amendment 130 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Any entity willing to participate in the European Solidarity Corps, whether funded by the European Solidarity Corps budget, by another Union programme or by a different funding source, should first receive a quality label provided that the appropriate conditions are fulfilled. The process that leads to the attribution of a quality label should be carried out on a continuous basis by the implementing structures of the European Solidarity Corps. The attributed quality label should be reassessed periodically and could be revoked if, in the context of the checks to be performed, the conditions that led to its attribution were found to be no longer fulfilled.
Amendment 138 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) This Regulation should apply from 1 JanuaryMarch 2018. In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Regulation, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 144 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) “solidarity activity” means an activity aimed at addressing unmet societal needs to the benefit of a community while also fostering the individual’s personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, which may take the form of placements, projects or networking activities, developed in relation to different areas, such as education and training, employment, social inclusion, gender equality, entrepreneurship, in particular social entrepreneurship, citizenship and democratic participation, environment and nature protection, climate action, disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery, agriculture and rural development, provision of food and non-food items, health and wellbeing, creativity and culture, physical education and sport, social assistance and welfare, youth assistance, reception and integration of third-country nationals, territorial cooperation and cohesion;
Amendment 156 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) “participating organisation” means any public or private entity that has already been attributed the European Solidarity Corps quality label, and which offers a placement to a participant in the European Solidarity Corps or implements other activities in the framework of the European Solidarity Corps;
Amendment 186 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) “quality label” means the certification attributed to a public or private entity or an international organisation wishing to become a participating organisation and willing to provide placements under the European Solidarity Corps following a procedure aimed at ensuring compliance with the principles and requirements of the European Solidarity Corps Charter;
Amendment 190 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) “European Solidarity Corps Charter” means the document that sets out the respective rights and responsibilities that all the entities willing to join the European Solidarity Corps must agree to adhere to in advance and comply with at all times in order to obtain and keep the quality label;
Amendment 232 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. An application from an eligible entity to become a European Solidarity Corps participating organisation shall be assessed by the competent implementing body of the European Solidarity Corps in order to ascertain that its activities adhere to the requirements of the European Solidarity Corps. Any entity which substantially changes its activities must inform the competent implementing body so that it can be assessed again.
Amendment 241 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) the number of organisations holding the quality label whose solidarity activities have received funding under the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 60 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Work-life balance remains however a considerable challenge for many parents and workers with caring responsibilities, with a negative impact on female employment. A major factor contributing to the underrepresentation of women in the labour market is the difficulty of balancing work and family obligationresponsibilities. When they have children, women tend to work less hours in paid employment and spend more time fulfilling unpaid care responsibilities. Having an ill or dependent relative has also been shown to have a negative impact on female employment, leading some women to drop out of the labour market entirely.
Amendment 80 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Member States and, where appropriate, the European Union, should take measures under the European Pact for Gender Equality (2011-2020) and its provisions on the promotion of a better work-life balance to improve the supply of adequate, affordable, high-quality childcare services for children under the mandatory school age in line with the objectives set at the European Council in Barcelona in March 2002. Commission Recommendation 2013/112/EU[21] “Investing in children: breaking the cycle of disadvantage” also stresses the need to improve access to sufficient resources and to achieve the Barcelona objectives on childcare facilities for young children. At the same time, work-life balance and gender equality need to be complemented by investment in quality long-term care and diversification of services in this area.
Amendment 174 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to provide greater opportunities to remain in the work force for men and women carrying ofor an elderly family member and/or other relatives in need of care, workers with a seriously ill or dependant relative should have the right to take time off from work in the form of carers' leave to take care of that relative. To prevent abuse of that right, proof of the serious illness or dependency may be required prior to granting of the leave.
Amendment 197 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Member States should give special attention to single parents who face particular challenges in terms of work-life balance and need specific support. This Directive should allow for separate provisions regarding leave and flexible working arrangements for single parents.
Amendment 212 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to encourage working parents and carers to remain in the work force, those workers should be able to adapt their working schedules to their personal needs and preferences. Working parents and carers should therefore be able to requesthave the right to request, based on discussions with the employer, flexible working arrangements, meaning the possibility for workers to adjust their working patterns, including through the use of remote working arrangements, flexible working schedules, or a reduction in working hours, for caring purposes. In order to address the needs of workers and employers, it should be possible for Member States to limit the duration of flexible working arrangements, including a reduction in working hours. While working part-time has been shown to be useful in allowing some women to remain in the labour market after having children, long periods of reduced working hours may lead to lower social security contributions translating into reduced or non-existing pension entitlements. The ultimate decision as to whether or not to accept a worker’s request for flexible working arrangements should lie with the employer, Specific circumstances underlying the need for flexible working arrangements can change. Workers should therefore not only have the right to return to their original working patterns at the end of a given agreed period, but should also be able to request to do so at any time where a change in the underlying circumstances so requires.
Amendment 302 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) “parental leave” means paid leave from work on the grounds of the birth or adoption of a child to take care of that child;
Amendment 335 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) “relative” means a worker’s son, daughter, adopted child, mother, father, spouseadoptive parents, spouse and his or her children or partner in civil partnership and his or her children, where such partnerships are envisaged by national law;
Amendment 359 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) “flexible working arrangements” means the possibility for workers after discussions with their employer to adjust their working patterns, including through the use of remote working arrangements, flexible working schedules, or a reduction in working hours.
Amendment 361 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) "single parent" means a person who is neither married nor in a partnership as recognised by national law and who has sole parental responsibility for a child.
Amendment 424 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Single parents shall have access to at least the same level of rights and protection ensured to parents under this Directive and may benefit from specific provisions, in accordance with national law, considering their specific situation.
Amendment 480 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have the right to carers' leave of at least five working days per year, per worker. Such right may be subject to appropriate substantiation of the medical condition of the worker's relativ, dependency or the loss of autonomy of the worker's relative. The information on the medical condition, dependency or situation of loss of autonomy should be kept confidential and be shared only with a restricted number of involved services to safeguard the right to data protection of both the worker and the person in need of care.
Amendment 559 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Employers shall consider and respond to requests for flexible working arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, taking into account the needs of both employers and workers. Employers shall justify any refusal of such a request in writing.
Amendment 594 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States together with the social partners shall take the necessary measures to prohibit less favourable treatment of workers on the ground that they have applied for, or have taken, leave referred to in Article 4, 5, 6 or 6,7 or on the ground that they have exercised their right to flexible working arrangements referred to in Article 9.
Amendment 643 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
This Directive shall not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection already afforded to workers within Member States.
Amendment 644 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 b (new)
This Directive shall not affect Member States' prerogative to apply or to introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to workers or to encourage or permit the application of collective agreements more favourable to workers.
Amendment 645 #
2017/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 c (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 c (new)
This Directive is without prejudice to any other rights conferred on workers by other legal acts of the Union.
Amendment 3 #
2016/2304(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. NHighlights that Cohesion policy proved to be one the most important public tools in promoting growth and jobs and reducing regional disparities; notes with concern that in 2015 only 34 % of Europeans said that they had heard about projects co-financed by the EU to improve the area in which they live and that this proportion has remained unchanged since June 20101 ; therefore, there is an urgent need to improve communication strategies to citizens, considering the low awareness of the positive effects cohesion policies have in quality of life and economic growth, which is even more important in times of challenge by populism and spread negativity about the European project; __________________ 1 Flash Eurobarometer 423: Citizens’ awareness and perceptions of EU regional policy.
Amendment 22 #
2016/2304(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with the managing authorities, to monitor regularly that all legal provisions as regards information and communication are being implemented thoroughly in order to ensure transparency and the widespread dissemination of information about the achievements of the Funds, and paying special attention to groups of beneficiaries in vulnerable positions;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2304(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) by communicating the European added value of the projects, particularly in terms of job creation and social integration; in this context, draws attention to the growing importance of social media as the main source of information among many citizens, and also the dissemination of anti-European propaganda on the internet; recommends the more intense use of social media to communicate the successes of cohesion policies and the opportunities related to their use;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2304(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to reduce the administrative burden on authorities and beneficiaries, without affecting necessary controls and audits, with a view to ensuring a better absorption rate, in particular for SMEs, which have created around 85 % of new jobs within the Union in the past five years, and micro- businesses and companies in remote rural areas in order to foster their capacity to create employment and add economic value;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2304(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the Commission to analyse the real impact of investing EU funds during the previous programming period and to draw specific conclusions regarding the positive and negative experiences as a starting-point for adding value to the investment process;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2304(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Stresses that there is a particular need at EU and at Members States level to improve simplification for beneficiaries with more precise targeting to meet their needs. In this regard, the social partners and stakeholders could contribute to the identification of both good and bad practices and help in introducing simplification option in their Member States;
Amendment 198 #
2016/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Stresses that despite the fact that more creative content is being consumed today than ever before, on services such as user-uploaded content platforms and content aggregation services, the creative sectors have not seen a comparable increase in revenues from this increase in consumption; stress that one of the main reasons for that is being referred to as a transfer of value that has emerged due to the lack of clarity regarding the status of these online services under copyright and e-commerce law; stress that an unfair market has been created, threatening the development of the Digital Single Market and its main players: the cultural and creative industries;
Amendment 212 #
2016/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Highlights that liability exemptions can only apply to genuinely neutral and passive online providers, and not to services that play an active role in distributing, promoting and monetising content at the expense of creators;
Amendment 221 #
2016/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Considers that digital platforms are means of providing wider access to cultural and creative works and offer great opportunities for cultural and creative industries to develop new business models; highlights that consideration is to be made of how this process can function with more legal certainty and respect for right holders; underlines the importance of transparency and of ensuring a fair level playing field; considers in this regard that protection of right holders within the copyright and intellectual property framework is necessary in order to ensure recognition of values and stimulation of innovation, creativity, investment and production of content;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas increases in inequality are linked with declining labour shares of national wealth and shrinking trade union density;
Amendment 51 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the fact of having a job is no longer a guarantee of protection against poverty, and whereas decent working conditions are essential if levels of inequality are to be reduced;
Amendment 90 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Affirms that growing inequalities thare aten the future of the European project odds with the EU's principles and values, erode its legitimacy and damage trust in ithe EU as an engine of social progress;
Amendment 135 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to extend the scope of the European Semester and the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) by adding new binding indicators to estimate individual imbalances in inequalitiesindicators which make it possible to estimate inequalities more effectively as a way to link economic coordination with employment and social performance;
Amendment 162 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 189 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to raise the funding level of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) for the period 2017-2020 to least EUR 21 billion, including young people under 3025; calls on the Commission to ensure better implementation of the Youth Guarantee, taking into account the latest findings of the European Court of Auditors’ report on use of the YEI;
Amendment 213 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its concern about the increasing number of atypical work contracts and forms of non-standard employment, which are sometimes linked with precarious working conditions, lower wages, exploitation and poorer social security contributions, and rising inequality;
Amendment 232 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to present a proposal for a Framework Directive on decent working conditions for all forms of employment, ensuring for every worker a core set of enforceable rights, eliminating discrimination based on contractual status, ensuring a minimum number of working hours and facilitating decent working times and the right to negotiate schedules;
Amendment 234 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 236 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Is convinced that applying the principle of the same pay for the same work done in the same place will help to reduce inequalities between workers;
Amendment 237 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Expresses its concern regarding the negative effects of increasing automation due to the delay in adapting legislation, which threatens to exert downward pressure on social protection systems and wages, especially affecting low and medium-skilled workermphasises the changes brought about by increasing automation, and, in that connection, deplores the delay in adapting legislation; stresses that increasing automation offers new employment opportunities, and calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to exploit these changes as a means of combating unemployment; emphasises, in that connection, the importance of keeping social protection and wages at adequate levels;
Amendment 263 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a European UMember States gradually to harmonise their unemployment Iinsurance schemes, complementing current national benefit systems; considers that such an automatic stabiliser can play an important role in reducing inequality between countries and in neutralising the consequences arising from the absorption of asymmetric shocks;
Amendment 279 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 288 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission and the Members States to strengthen workers’ rights and foster the collective bargaining power of employees through structural reforms of labour markets, widening collective bargaining coverage, and promoting unionisation;
Amendment 303 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. HighlightsTakes the view that, in manysome countries, welfare and social protection systems have been severely underminaffected by austerity measures with huge consequencerepercussions in terms of income inequalities;
Amendment 310 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Member States to reform their welfare systems (education, health, pensions and transfers) in order to achieve more effective redistribution and promote andfairer redistribution of wealth, taking into account the new social risks and vulnerable groups that have arisen from the social and economic challenges confronting society;
Amendment 322 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to put forward a European legal framework in line with the related ILO recommendation to guarantee every European citizen a social protection floor with universal access to healthcare, basic income security whose level is set by each Member State and access to the goods and services defined as necessary at national level;
Amendment 337 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that international trade has beenis an engine for growth in many countries, but also can be perceived as a source of inequalities; calls on the Commission and the Member State to promote fairer international trade agreements that respect European labour market regulations, while protecting quality employment and workers’ rights and ensuring intra-European and national mechanisms for the compensation of workers and sectors negatively affectedwhich must be safeguarded and promoted by means of fair international trade agreements;
Amendment 348 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Considers that the current inequality of opportunities for children and young people has damaging consequences for their wellbeing and ‘wellbecoming’ as individuals, thereby contributing to the estrangement of European youth and workers, especially those on the wrong side of the opportunity gap;
Amendment 353 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Stresses that education has a key role to play in reducing inequalities, and, in that connection, calls on the Member States to step up their efforts and earmark sufficient investment in order to guarantee equal opportunities;
Amendment 361 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Stresses, further, that many cultural and sporting activities are powerful tools for cohesion and social integration, and points out that these activities can improve the employment prospects of the least-favoured members of society by teaching them soft skills;
Amendment 384 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. ConsidersDeplores the fact that, despite existing legislation enshrining the principle of equal pay for work of equal value by male and female workers, there is still a gender pay gap and an even greater gender pension gap; calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the gender gap challenge in pay and pensions;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2242(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that effective mechanisms to discuss and resolve difficulties experienced when implementing YG schemes are needed, together with a strong commitment by the Member States to setting realistic, achievable targets in order to implement the scope of the YG in full, including partnership-building, ensuring an effective outreach, enabling skills enhancement and putting in place proper evaluation structures;
Amendment 8 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
Amendment 48 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas cultural relations are fundamental drivers of social cohesion and sustainable economic and human development, while playing a crucial role in strengthening civil society capacities, reinforcing democratisation processes and in conflict prevention, resolution and resilience;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas mobility of researchers, studentacademics and staffudents to and from third countries and alumni networks of former participants in EU programmes17 are a key part of the EU’s international cultural relations; __________________ 17 For instance, Erasmus and Horizon 2020.
Amendment 107 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the mutual advantages of working together: the EU is an arena in which all Member States join forces to play a stronger role in the field of international cultural relations; suggests that each Member State’s rotating presidency could launch joint actions together with the EU, such as exhibitions and co-productions, particularly for smaller states or those with no cultural representations abroad;
Amendment 116 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls the importance of cooperation among the Member States with respect to cultural heritage in terms of research, preservation and management and the fight against trafficking, art looting and destruction, including through regionally dedicated funds and assistance; and trans-border police cooperation;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends that international cultural relations be embedded in the cultural and creative sectors (CCS), thus reinforcing and promoting the role of professionals, including through regional creative hubs and cluster, clusters and cultural networks;
Amendment 181 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to appoint a ‘focal point’ in each EU delegation to liaise with Member States’ national cultural institutes, representatives and local civil society, actors and authorities in a collaborative approach aimed at identifying priority areas, needs and methods of cooperation, and to provide an adequate budget and training;
Amendment 248 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Recognises the need for an in-depth knowledge of the fieldcultural scene of each country, local actors and civil society, in order to improve these actors’ access to programmes and funding and to ensure that the multiplying effect of their participation in EU programmes and initiatives is exploited; recommends consulting local actors with a view to co- designing programmes; calls for the development and the follow up of innovative collaborative approaches relying on tools and networks already in place (grants, sub-grants)22 , and for them to be followed up, taking gender balance into account; __________________ 22 For example, the EU-funded programme MEDCULTURE, which is working on developing and improving cultural policies and practices related to the cultural sector. The participative approach involves civil society actors, ministries and private and public institutions working in the field of culture, as well as other related sectors.
Amendment 284 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Recommends to include policies to prevent and respond to the destruction and looting of cultural heritage in times of conflict into the EU's agenda for conflict prevention and peace building;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas under Article 67(2) TFEU the European Union is competent to deal with matters relating to the European common asylum policy;
Amendment 21 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas whistleblowers play an important role in reporting unlawful or improper conduct which undermines the public interest; whereas whistleblowers are persons who draw the attention of their employers, public and private administrative authorities, judicial authorities and third parties to such unlawful or improper conduct which they have discovered in the performance of their duties and which they have an obligation to disclose on the grounds that the conduct in question is prejudicial to the public interest;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas a number of publicised whistleblowing cases have shown that whistleblowing brings serious wrongdoing in the private and public sectors to the attention of the public and of political authorities; whereas suchome of these wrongdoings have therefore been subject to corrective measures;
Amendment 34 #
2016/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas corruption is one of the mosta serious problems facing around the world today, as it can hamper a state’s ability to deliver inclusive economic growth in various fields;
Amendment 34 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas whistleblowing has proved useful in a number of areas, such as public health, taxation, the environment, consumer protection, and combating corruption and upholding social rightsbreaches of labour law;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas investigative journalism and the independent press remain vulnerable in the context of the disclosure of sensitive information, and whereas members of these professions must enjoy the same protection as the whistleblowers they protect in the name of the confidentiality of their sources;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for action to change the public perception of whistle-blowers by highlighting their positive role as an early warning mechanism to prevent abuses and corruption and to enable public scrutiny of state actionbring to light wrongdoing by companies or governments;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the protection of whistleblowers is not guaranteed in a number of Member Statesa number of Member States do not have laws which offer whistleblowers appropriate protection, while many others have introduced advanced programmes to protect them; whereas the result of that is fragmented protection of whistleblowers in Europe, which makes it difficult for them to find out their rights and how to whistleblow, and creates legal insecurity in cross-border scenarios;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for measures to protect workers who detect and report wrongdoings in the field of unemployment;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the Commission has not proposed suitable legislative measures to protect whistleblowers in the EU effectively, in particular in cases involving a Member State;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas any third-country national recognised as a whistleblower by the European Union or one of its Member States must be entitled to all the relevant protection measures if, whether in the course of his or her duties or otherwise, he or she has come into the possession of and disclosed information about illegal conduct or acts of espionage, committed either by a third country or by a domestic or multinational company, which are prejudicial to a State, a nation or Union citizens and jeopardise, without their knowledge, the integrity of a government, national security or collective or individual freedoms;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the dangers of excluding whistle-blowing workers from career progression and of retaliation by colleagues at their workplace, in addition to that of losing their jobs, and the dampening effect this has on those who may come across wrongdoing;
Amendment 68 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission, after assessing the options available, to present a horizontal legislative proposal, which should ideally be horizontal, with a view to effectively protecting whistleblowers in the EU before the end of this yearas soon as possible; stresses that there are at present a number of possibilities for legal bases enabling the EU to take action on the matter; calls on the Commission to consider all those possibilities with the aim of proposing a coherent and effective mechanism;
Amendment 83 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes ‘whistleblower’ to mean anybody who reports on or reveals information on an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which undermines the public interest,, a serious threat or instance of damage which undermines the public interest and which has come to his or her attention in the context of his or her working relationship, be it in the public or private sector, of a contractual relationship, or of his or her trade union or association activities;
Amendment 87 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Takes the view that the definition of whistleblower should reassert the principles of ethical conduct, good faith, disinterest and freedom;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that thought should be given to taking legislative action at EU level in order to afford whistle-blowers the necessary legal certainty and protection throughout the Union; calls accordingly on the Commission to continue to look for an appropriate legal basis;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that a breach of the public interest includes, but is not limited to, acts of corruption, conflicts of interest, unlawful use of public funds, threats to the environment, health, public safety, national security and privacy and personal data protection, tax avoidance, attacks on workers’ rights and other social rightsbreaches of labour law and attacks on human rights;
Amendment 96 #
2016/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. RStresses the importance of establishing a clear definition of ‘whistle- blower’ that includes the stipulation that there must be no ulterior motive behind disclosures; recalls that in the event of false accusations, those responsible should be held accountable.
Amendment 103 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the role of whistleblowers in revealing serious attacks on the public interest has proved its significance on many occasions over a number of years and that whistleblowing must be recognised as a mechanism which has a vital role to play in preventing unlawful acts; stresses, further, that whistleblowers have proved to be a crucial resource for investigative journalism and for an independent press;
Amendment 107 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that whistleblowers are proving to be a crucial resource for investigative journalism and for an independent press; emphasises that for this reason members of these professions are vulnerable in the context of the disclosure of sensitive information and must therefore enjoy the same protection as the whistleblowers they protect in the name of the confidentiality of their sources;
Amendment 111 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 114 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Emphasises that protecting whistleblowers is essential if instances of serious wrongdoing are to be brought to the attention of the authorities and the general public; emphasises, further, that the role of whistleblowers must be recognised and the relevant rules harmonised at European level, in order to deter reprisals against them;
Amendment 121 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that one of the barriers to whistleblowers’ activities is the absence of clearly identified means of reportingprotection, which may deter potential whistle-blowers from reporting what they know; stresses that the absence of clearly identified means of reporting causes a number of whistleblowers to remain silent; expresses its concern about the retaliation and pressures which whistleblowers face when they address the guilty person or party in their organisation;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that the credibility and validity of a report must be able to be assessed in part on the way in which it was made; believes that it is necessary to establish a coherent systemTakes the view that a coherent, credible and reliable system should be introduced which enables reports to be delivered both inside and outside the organisation; emphasises that public disclosure should be envisaged only as a last resort;
Amendment 129 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to study a tiered system enablingof procedures to facilitate whistleblowing inside and outside the organisation; stresses that, to do so, clear procedures should be established; believes that employers should be encouraged to introduce internal reporting procedures and that one person should be responsible for collecting reports in each organisation; considers that employee representatives should be involved in the assignment of that role;
Amendment 143 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that reporting outside the organisation without first going through an internal step is not grounds to invalidate a report, file a lawsuit or refuse to give protection, provided that the whistleblower can provide proof of the risk that he or she is running and acted in good faith and disinterestedly;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its concerns about the risks run by whistleblowers at their place of work, in particular the risks of direct or indirect retaliation by the employer and by those working for or acting on behalf of the employer; stresses that retaliation usually takes the form of suspending, slowing down or stopping career progression or even dismissal, along with psychological harassment; stresses that retaliation is a barrier to whistleblowers’ activities; believes that it is necessary to introduce protective measures against destabilising practices; takes the view that retaliation should be penalised and sanctioned effectively; stresses that, once somebody is recognised as a whistleblower, the measures taken against him or her should be brought to an endshould be taken to protect him or her;
Amendment 157 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Takes the view that protection should also be provided if a whistleblower draws attention to conduct involving a Member State;
Amendment 158 #
2016/2224(INI)
13b. Notes that investigative journalists and members of the independent press pursue a solitary profession in the course of which they face many kinds of pressure; emphasises, therefore, that it is essential that they should be protected against all attempts at intimidation;
Amendment 162 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses its concern aboutCondemns the practice of gagging orders, which involve filing or threatening to file lawsuits against the whistleblower not in an effort to have him or her convictedsecure justice, but in an effort to bring about self-censorship or financial, mental or psychological exhaustion;
Amendment 163 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses, however, that a clear distinction must be drawn between the professional confidentiality obligations which employees and public servants have and the need to disclose or bear witness in good faith to instances of wrongdoing likely to undermine the public interest. Any person who makes a report which they know to be false or which is malicious must be liable to disciplinary measures or even prosecution;
Amendment 177 #
2016/2224(INI)
16. Believes that the option to report confidentially or anonymously would encourage whistleblowers to share information which they would not share otherwise; stresses, in that regard, that clearly regulated means of reporting anonymously or confidentially should be introduced, at least at the first stage of the reporting procedure;
Amendment 183 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that nobody should lose the benefit of protection on the sole grounds that he or she has misjudged the facts or that the perceived threat to the public interest did not materialise, provided that, at the time of reporting, he or she had reasonable grounds to believe them to be trueacted in good faith and disinterestedly;
Amendment 187 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the role that public authorities, non-governmental organisations and trade unions play in supporting and helping whistleblowers in their dealings within their organisation;
Amendment 199 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the Member States, with a view to making these measures effective, to consider the advisability of setting up national compensation funds;
Amendment 206 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the Commission to introduce the principle of granting an EU passport to any third-country national who, whether in the course of their duties or not, has disclosed information about illegal conduct or acts of espionage, committed either by a third country or a domestic or multinational company which are prejudicial to a State, a nation or Union citizens and jeopardise, without their knowledge, the integrity of a government, national security or collective or individual freedoms;
Amendment 208 #
2016/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Emphasises that, in addition to all the protection measures afforded to whistleblowers in general, these whistleblowers in particular must be guaranteed proper reception arrangements, accommodation and safety in a Member State which does not have an extradition agreement with the country which committed the acts in question. In cases where the European Union has an extradition agreement with the third country involved, calls on the Commission, pursuant to Article 67(2) TFEU on European asylum policy, to use its powers to take all the measures required to protect these whistleblowers, who are particular vulnerable to severe reprisals in the country whose illegal or fraudulent practices they brought to public attention;
Amendment 9 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas education systems are struggling toshould respond to the profound and complex changes that our societies and economies are undergoing, including technological innovation, while at the same time focus on quality, personal development and social inclusion;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas every person, at every stage of their life should have lifelong learning opportunities to acquire the knowledge and skills they need for both their personal development and professional progress; whereas the European Lifelong learning strategy should be reinforced;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas further efforts need to be made in order to enhance the synergies between education and employment, both by facilitating entry into the labour market and by enabling individuals to constantly update their skills or to learn new skills throughout their careers;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
B b. whereas academic further and distance education have a significant contribution to individuals´ personal development and to the formation of human capital and should become an integral part of the European Lifelong learning strategy;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas distance education and academic further education are important tools in providing flexible, personalized education opportunities for all without any discrimination byased on country, region, class, age or gender;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas distance education refers to a method of teaching which offers flexibility in learning through the use of emerging technologies, not as a replacement to on-campus education, but offering an alternative for the learners who are unable to participate in on-campus education;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas adaptation to accelerating economic and technological change is a major challenge for an ageing workforce and that responding to this challenge will be one of the keys to ensure the longterm competitiveness of the European Union´s economy;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
F b. whereas academic further and distance education play an increasingly important role in facilitating the adaptation of workers to economic and technological change throughout their professional life;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas academic distance education provides for flexible study formats that help people attain a better work-life balance and enhances mobility;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas digitalization enables flexibility and interactivity of the educational process and it is a key factor for the further development of academic further and distance education;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas academic further and distance education are rapidly expanding sectors with significant potential in terms of economic growth and job creation;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that many schooleducational and training institutions are struggling to respond to the profound and complex changes that our societies and economies are undergoing; stresses that new, flexible and accessible forms of lifelong learning, suitable for individuals of all ages, can successfully address some of those challenges such as social exclusion, early school leaving and skills mismatches;
Amendment 85 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that academic institutions must prepare students for uncerknowledge-based societies and constaintyly changing economies and provide them with tools such as entrepreneurial andmindset and transversal skills, such as adaptability skills, in order to explore their own pathways and reach their full potential;
Amendment 99 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Acknowledges the need to focus on bridge-building between schoolenhance close cooperation between educational and training institutions, local communities and the economy;
Amendment 109 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the importance of Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020 for enhancing lifelong learning, and the need for; calls therefore on the Member States to unlock the fullfully explore the potential of those programmes;
Amendment 121 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Stresses that to remain competitive, and to give low- and high- skilled workers alike the best chance of success, businesses together with the educational and training institutions need to offer training and career-focused education throughout people's working lives;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises the particular importance of quality teaching for the outcomes of education; stresses furthermore the need for continuous up- skilling of the teaching staff and the importance of developing new models of teaching and learning as part of the innovation process and gradual digitization of education;
Amendment 147 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Acknowledges that further and distance education creates development opportunities for universities to broaden their field of competences and diversify their revenues programs they offer;
Amendment 155 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recognises the need to keep up with rapid technological change, in particular for distance education, and that the importance of ICT cannot be overstressedusing ICT in distance learning as a vehicle through which major educational and developmental challenges could be tackled in an optimal and cost-effective manner;
Amendment 161 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Notes with regret that the lack of ICT literacy is a major issue today among both educators and learners; reiterates the importance of technological proficiency in order to be able to harness the potential of distance learning and facilitate the implementation of new teaching and learning methods;
Amendment 164 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Highlights the fact that only one quarter of schoolchildren in Europe are taught by digitally confident teachers, which is a major obstacle preventing the flourishing of new methods of teaching; calls therefore on schoolthe Member States to provide stronger support for teachers and school leadeand up-skilling opportunities for teachers, trainers and tutors;
Amendment 172 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Acknowledges the costsimportance of quality education and tailor-made learning; highlights that distance education can provide a learner-centred, high quality education at a lower cost;
Amendment 177 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Insists that costs must not act as a barrier to enrolment and participation in education; encourages therefore the Commission and Member States to better support and promote distance learning as a quality, affordable, flexible and personalized educational option;
Amendment 181 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recognises the continued importance of blended learning, in particular in the context of VET; stresses that the combination of high quality digital technologies and face-to-face learning opportunities result in greater student achievements and therefore encourages the Commission and Member States to better support and promote blended learning;
Amendment 211 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on Member States to ensure a holistic approach to education and to provide students with authenticdiverse learning opportunities that develop their aspirations and the skills needed to survive in aprosper in a constantly changing global economy;
Amendment 225 #
2016/2142(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Highlights the importance of specialised teacher training for distance learningdigital and distance learning training for teachers;
Amendment 2 #
2016/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates the importance of a well- functioning and integrated Single Market to the recovery of the European economy after the financial crisis; supports, and its contribution to sustainable, future- oriented growth; calls, therefore, for the inclusion of Country-Specific Recommendations (CSRs) which go beyond narrow fiscal and macroeconomic targets and allow for a more balanced policy mix with the potential to help sustain a socially balanced recovery; welcomestablish sustainable growth that fosters economic, social and environmental progress, progress that will, inter alia, foster support for and recognition of the benefits of the internal market among EU citizens; encourages thise repositioning, as well a of CSRs along these lines; welcomes the streamlined structure of CSRs;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that several CSRs focus on skills and labour markets; stresses that the right skills and good initial and lifelong training are key to ensuring productivity and output growth; calls on the Commission and the Member States to pursue, and adopt and step up digital and lifelong learning programmes as a matter of urgency; stresses, moreover, the need to enable and encourage both students and apprentices to take an apprenticeship, traineeship or study trip abroad as part of their training.
Amendment 1 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the inclusion of a specific section on consumers in the Commission’s Aviation Strategy; notes that for consumers booking travel many of the applicable rights are still based on horizontal consumer protection legislation; considers, therefore, that the ‘Fitness Check’ on the consumer acquis should take that into account the impact on this sector;
Amendment 3 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Strongly encourages the Commission in seeking to support research and innovation in the aviation sector through public-private partnerships, the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Structural and Investment Funds and the European Fund for Strategic Investments; stresses the need to give priority to a European investment strategy based on a concerted rather than fragmented approach;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Regrets the fragmentation of European Union airspace, the cost of which is put at EUR 5 billion by the Commission and which, in particular, results in delays for passengers;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Points to the importance of protecting and enforcing, both online and offline, the rights of travel-booking and travelling consumers, including persons with a disability and persons with reduced mobility, as regards accessibility and assistance;
Amendment 24 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the importance of ensuring that travel websites and applications respect EU law, as in 2015 travel and holiday accommodation bookings accounted for 52 % of all purchases made online;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Reiterates its commitment to high air and airport safety and security standards, which are vital for consumer confidence and for the sector's competitiveness; points up in this connection how important it is, at a time of strong air traffic growth, that those standards should limit passenger inconvenience, in particular as regards waiting times and delays, while ensuring a high level of safety and security and compliance with fundamental rights;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses the need to ensure high standards as regards public health requirements for residents near airports (in particular noise and air quality standards) and points up the importance of making rapid progress on adopting demanding international noise standards;
Amendment 45 #
2016/2062(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Welcomes the Commission's decision to make use of interpretative guidelines on Regulation No 261/2004 on air passenger rights in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights so as to improve application thereof; stresses the importance, at the same time, of rapidly adopting the revised regulation;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Agrees with the Commission that the lack of cross-border financial services is a major concern and may harm the interests of consumers and businesses, as well as undermine the functioning of the single market; supports all efforts to find new ways to re-launch the single market for retail financial services in practice;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Underlines the continued lack of cross-border sales of individual third party liability vehicle insurance is especially concerning; notes this lack of competition has led to some EU citizens paying rates that are hundreds of times higher than others for the same vehicle model; while understanding that risk and costs are factors in prices, notes that these factors are not sufficient to explain such price fragmentation across Europe; asks the Commission to adopt an sector specific action plan on the European market for individual motor vehicle insurances, including recommendations as to EU wide rules on guarantee funds, guidelines on the use of 'bonus-malus' data when a EU citizen moves to another Member State and other possible actions needed to create a true single market for vehicle insurance;
Amendment 22 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. CWelcomes the benefits brought to consumers by the digital transformation of financial services and the raise of non- traditional fintech companies which have started to change the way retailers and consumers interact; calls on the Commission to ensure that digitalisation brings better market access for all businesses on an equal footing, especially for SMEs and fintechs, and greater consumer choice, bringing down price differences of financial services within the EU;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to fully transpose and implement the MCD, PAD, IDD MiFID II directives as soon as possible, especially in relations to their consumer information requirements and protection measures;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses the roles played by the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) in ensuring the protection of the consumers of financial products; asks the Commission to ensure they have the independency and tools needed to carry out their missions and regrets the budget reductions which have led to the limiting of their working programmes;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the importance of availability of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and online dispute resolution (ODR), especially cross-border, as efficient redress is key to the single market and consumer trust; recommends that the Fin- NET programme be incorporated into the ADR and ODR structures in order to increase its efficiency and the work towards consolidating such services into 'one-stop-shops' for consumers;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Asks the Member States to ensure that digital communications and sales related to retail financial services are available in forms accessible to persons with disabilities, including via websites and downloadable file formats; supports the full inclusion of all retail financial services within the scope of the Directive on the accessibility requirements for products and services (the "European Accessibility Act");
Amendment 64 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Asks the Commission to work with retailers, consumer organisations and other relevant stakeholders towards the creation of an independent pan-European comparison website for the most sold financial services products;
Amendment 70 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Welcomes the work towards greater transparency in the pricing of rental car services, including the sale of ancillary insurances and other fees; stresses that all fees or charges, either required or optional, connected to the rental a vehicle should be visible to the consumer on the rental company or comparison website in a clear and highlighted manner; reminds the Commission of the need to enforce the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and welcomes the recent adoption of new implementing guidelines in light of technological change;
Amendment 73 #
2016/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 e (new)
Paragraph 9 e (new)
9e. Recalls the work done relating to the credit rating agencies regulation; asks the Commission to review the impact of such legislation in relations to products sold to retail consumers;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2010(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to monitor the evolving postal sector, including the growth of e-commerce and e-substitutionparcel delivery, and to respond where necessary to ensure the sustainability of the USO;
Amendment 31 #
2016/2010(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to take full account of the occurrence, and further risk, of downgrading of job security and terms and conditions for workers in the postaldelivery sector, and to make specific provision to mitigate and avoid this in any proposed new legislation;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2010(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that, while the situation varies from one Member State to another, geographical coverage and accessibility to universal services for parcel deliveries in the EU can be improved, especially for vulnerable consumers and those in remote areas;
Amendment 176 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 20
Recital 20
4a. Recital 20 is replaced by the following: “(20) In the field of sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits, insured persons, as well as the members of their families, living or staying in a Member State other than the competent Member State, should be afforded protection. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)” Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 179 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Long-term care benefits for insured persons and members of their families needshould, in principle, continue to be coordinated according to specific rules which, in principle, follow the rules applicable to sickness benefits,the rules applicable to sickness benefits, taking the specific nature of long-term care benefits into account and in line with the case law of the Court of Justice. It is also necessary to provide for specific provisions in case of overlapping of long-term care benefits in kind and in cash.
Amendment 205 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point c
Article 1 – point c
Amendment 209 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
Amendment 213 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
(b) In Point (i)(1)(ii) after the term “, point (ii) is replaced by the following: (ii) with regard to benefits in kind pursuant to Title III, Chapter 1 on sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” the term “and Chapter 1a on long-term care benefits” is inserted., any person defined or recognised as a member of the family or designated as a member of the household by the legislation of the Member State in which he/she resides;
Amendment 214 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point va – point i
Article 1 – point va – point i
Amendment 301 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Title III – Chapter 1 – title
Title III – Chapter 1 – title
Amendment 304 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 19
Article 19
14b. Article 19 is replaced by the following; “Article 19 Stay outside the competent Member State 1. Unless otherwise provided for by paragraph 2, an insured person and the members of his/her family staying in a Member State other than the competent Member State shall be entitled to the benefits in kind which become necessary on either medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care during their stay, taking into account the nature of the benefits and the expected length of the stay. These benefits shall be provided on behalf of the competent institution by the institution of the place of stay, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation it applies, as though the persons concerned were insured under the said legislation. 2. The Administrative Commission shall establish a list of benefits in kind which, in order to be provided during a stay in another Member State, require for practical reasons a prior agreement between the person concerned and the institution providing the care. (http://www.at4am.ep.parl.union.eu/at4am/ameditor.html?documentID=20512&locale=en#)benefit.” Or. en
Amendment 317 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
14c. In Article 28(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “1. A frontier worker who has retired because of old-age or invalidity is entitled in the event of sickness or the need for long-term care to continue to receive benefits in kind in the Member State where he/she last pursued his/her activity as an employed or self-employed person, in so far as this is a continuation of treatment for sickness or of provision of long-term care which began in that Member State. ‘Continuation of treatment’ in the case of sickness means the continued investigation, diagnosis and treatment of an illness for its entire duration. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)‘Continuation of provision of long-term care’ means the continued granting of long-term care benefits in kind where entitlement to such benefits was established prior to retirement.” Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 322 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 30
Article 30
14d. Article 30 is replaced by the following: “Article 30 Contributions by pensioners 1. The institution of a Member State which is responsible under the legislation it applies for making deductions in respect of contributions for sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits, may request and recover such deductions, calculated in accordance with the legislation it applies, only to the extent that the cost of the benefits pursuant to Articles 23 to 26 is to be borne by an institution of the said Member State. 2. Where, in the cases referred to in Article 25, the acquisition of sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits is subject to the payment of contributions or similar payments under the legislation of a Member State in which the pensioner concerned resides, these contributions shall not be payable by virtue of such residence. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)” Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 330 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33 a (new)
15a. the following Article is inserted: “Article 33a Long-term care benefits 1. The Administrative Commission shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria contained in point (vb) of Article 1, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may coordinate long-term care benefits in accordance with another Chapter in Title III, provided that the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable to the beneficiaries as it would be if the benefit were coordinated as a long-term care benefit under this Chapter and the benefit and the specific conditions to which the benefit is subject are listed in Annex XII. 3. Article 34 (1) and (3) shall also apply to benefits listed in Annex XII.”
Amendment 333 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Amendment 336 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, which have to be treated as sickness benefits and are therefore6a. In Article 34, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, provided by the Member State competent for cash benefits under Articles 21 or 29, is, at the same time and under this Chapter, entitled to claim benefits in kind intended for the same purpose from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of these benefits in kind under Article 35, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: if the person concerned claims and receives the benefit in kind, the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the amount of the benefit in kind which is or could be claimed from the institution of the first Member State required to reimburse the cost. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)” Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 340 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Amendment 345 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Chapter 1 a
Chapter 1 a
Amendment 583 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. If that institution determines that the legislation of another Member State applies, it shall do so provisionally and shall without delay inform the institution of the Member State which it considers to be competent of this provisional decision. The decision shall become definitive within two months after the institution designated by the competent authorities of the Member State concerned has been informed of it, unless the latter institution informs the first institution and, the persons and the employer concerned that it cannot yet accept the provisional determination or that it takes a different view on this.
Amendment 585 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 5
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. The competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is determined to be applicable either provisionally or definitively shall without delay inform the person concerned and/or his or her employer.
Amendment 604 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Title III – Chapter 1– title
Title III – Chapter 1– title
Sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits, and long-term care benefits.
Amendment 606 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 23 – second sentence
Article 23 – second sentence
Amendment 609 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 23
Article 23
14a. Article 23 is replaced by the following; "Article 23 Regime applicable in the event of the existence of more than one regime in the Member State of residence or stay If the legislation of the Member State of residence or stay comprises more than one scheme of sickness, long-term care, maternity and paternity insurance for more than one category of insured persons, the provisions applicable under Articles 17, 19(1), 20, 22, 24 and 26 of the basic Regulation shall be those of the legislation on the general scheme for employed persons. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)" Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 613 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Amendment 614 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
15a. In Article 25, paragraph 1is replaced by the following: 1. For the purposes of the application of Article 19 of the basic Regulation, the insured person shall present to the health care or long-term care provider in the Member State of stay a document issued by the competent institution indicating his entitlement to benefits in kind. If the insured person does not have such a document, the institution of the place of stay, upon request or if otherwise necessary, shall contact the competent institution in order to obtain one. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 617 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 3
Article 25 – paragraph 3
15b. In Article 25, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: “3. The benefits in kind referred to in Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation shall refer to the benefits in kind which are provided in the Member State of stay, in accordance with its legislation, and which become necessary on medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care with a view to preventing an insured person from being forced to return, before the end of the planned duration of stay, to the competent Member State to obtain the necessary treatment. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML) or long-term care.” Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 624 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Amendment 628 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – title
Article 31 – title
Amendment 629 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Amendment 630 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Article 31 – paragraph 2
(e) In paragraph (2), the term "Article 34(2)" is replaced by "Article 353a (21)".
Amendment 631 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
17a. In Article 32, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. When a person or a group of persons are exempted upon request from compulsory sickness or long-term care insurance and such persons are thus not covered by a sickness or long-term care insurance scheme to which the basic Regulation applies, the institution of another Member State shall not, solely because of this exemption, become responsible for bearing the costs of benefits in kind or in cash provided to such persons or to a member of their family under Title III, Chapter I, of the basic Regulation. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)" Or. en (http://eur-
Amendment 633 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Amendment 647 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Title VI – Chapter I – title
Title VI – Chapter I – title
Amendment 691 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7
Annex I – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Annex XII – title
Annex XII – title
LONG-TERM CARE BENEFITS IN CASH PROVIDED IN DEROGATION FROM ARTICLE 353A(1) OF CHAPTER 1A
Amendment 692 #
2016/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7
Annex I – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Annex XII – subheading
Annex XII – subheading
Amendment 25 #
2016/0359(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The objective of this Directive is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by removeing obstacles to the exercise of fundamental freedoms, such as the free movement of capital and freedom of establishment, which result from differences between national laws and procedures on preventive restructuring, insolvency and second chance. This Directive aims at removing such obstacles by ensuring that viable enterprises in financial difficulties have access to effective national preventive restructuring frameworks which enable them to continue operating; that honest over indebted entrepreneurs have a second chance after a full discharge of debt after a reasonable period of time; and that the effectiveness of restructuring, insolvency and discharge procedures is improved, in particular with a view to shortening their length.
Amendment 43 #
2016/0359(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In many Member States it takes more than three years for bankrupt, but honest entrepreneurs to discharge their debts and make a fresh start. Inefficient second chance frameworks result in entrepreneurs having to relocate in other jurisdictions in order to benefit from a fresh start in a reasonable period of time, at considerable additional costs to both their creditors and the debtors themselves. Long disqualification orders which often accompany a procedure leading to discharge create obstacles to the freedom to take up and pursue a self-employed,pursue entrepreneurial activity.
Amendment 49 #
2016/0359(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) All these differences translate into additional costs for investors when assessing the risks of debtors entering financial difficulties in one or more Member States and the costs of restructuring companies having establishments, creditors or assets in other Member States, such as is most clearly the case of restructuring international groups of companies. Many investors mention uncertainty about insolvency rules or the risk of lengthy or complex insolvency procedures in another country as a main reason for not investing or not entering into a business relationship with a counterpart outside their own country. This uncertainty therefore acts as a disincentive which obstructs the freedom of establishment of undertakings and harms the proper functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 52 #
2016/0359(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Those differences lead to uneven conditions for access to credit and to uneven recovery rates in the Member States. A higher degree of harmonisation in the field of restructuring, insolvency and second chance is thus indispensable for a well-functioning single market in general and for a working Capital Markets Union in particular, as well as for the viability of economic operations and therefore for the preservation and creation of jobs.
Amendment 114 #
2016/0359(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Throughout the preventive restructuring procedures, workers should enjoy full labour law protection. In particular, this Directive is without prejudice to workers' rights guaranteed by Council Directive 98/59/EC68, Council Directive 2001/23/EC69, Directive 2002/14EC of the European Parliament and of the Council70, Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council71 and Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council72. The obligations concerning the information and consultation of workers under national law implementing the above-mentioned Directives remain fully intact. This includes obligations to inform and consult workers' representatives on the decision to have recourse to a preventive restructuring framework in accordance with Directive 2002/14/EC. Given the need to ensure an appropriate level of protection of workers, Member States should in principle exempt workers' outstanding claims, as defined in Directive 2008/94/EC, from any stay of enforcement irrespective of the question whether these claims arise before or after the stay is granted. Such a stay should be permissible only for the amounts and for the period that the payment of such claims is effectively guaranteed by other means under national law. Where Member States extend the cover of the guarantee of payment of workers' outstanding claims established by Directive 2008/94/EC to preventive restructuring procedures set up by this Directive, the exemption of workers' claims from the stay of enforcement is no longer justified to the extent covered by that guarantee. Where under national law there are limitations to the liability of guarantee institutions, either in terms of the length of the guarantee or the amount paid to workers, workers should be able to enforce their claims for any shortfall against the employer even during the stay of enforcement period. __________________ 68 Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies, OJ L 225, 12.08.1998, p. 16. 69 Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, OJ L 82, 22.03.2001, p. 16. 70 Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community, OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29. 71 Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, OJ L 283, 28.10.2008, p. 36. 72 Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and community-scale groups of undertakings for the purpose of informing and consulting employees, OJ L 122, 16.5.2009, p. 28.
Amendment 83 #
2016/0304(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 establishes European Employment Services (EURES), a network of employment services and a mechanism for an automated matching of people to jobs through the EURES common IT platform. To enable the exchange and the matching of job vacancies with candidates, this mechanism needs a common and multilingual list of skills, competences and occupations. By developing ESCO the Commission isaims at providing a multilingual classification system of occupations, skills and competences and qualifications that is suited to this purpose. _________________ 31 OJ L 107, 22.4.2016, p. 1. OJ L 107, 22.4.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 108 #
2016/0304(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Union tools and services for skills and qualifications should adapt to changing practices and advances in technology to ensure they remain relevant and of value to users. This should be achieved by, among other things, creating more synergy between related tools and services, including those developed by third parties, to offer a more comprehensive and effective service and by enhancing exchange of best practices among the Member States.
Amendment 213 #
2016/0304(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Europass shall support cooperation on the development, use and dissemination of open standards, comprising metadata schemata and semantic assets, to facilitate more effective exchange of information on skills and qualifications at EU level and by Member States and third parties. The multilingual classification system ESCO (European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations) referred to in article 6 shallmay be used to support this work.
Amendment 347 #
2016/0304(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) support cooperation at national level among public and private stakeholders on skills related issues in economic sectors;
Amendment 529 #
2016/0288(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 92 a (new)
Article 92 a (new)
Article 92a Intra-Union calls 1. Providers of publicly available number based interpersonal communication services shall not apply tariffs to intra-Union fixed and mobile communications services terminating in another Member State which are higher from tariffs for services terminating in the same Member State, unless it is justified by the difference in mobile termination rates. 2. Where providers of publicly available number based interpersonal communication services apply different tariffs to intra-Union fixed and mobile communications services terminating in another Member State than to services terminating in the same Member State, the surcharge shall not be higher than the difference between mobile termination rate of the Member State where the call is terminating and mobile termination rate of the Member State where call is originating.
Amendment 75 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) This Regulation determines that certain online transmissions by broadcasting organisations are subject only to the national laws of the Member States of establishment of those organisations. However, these provisions affect neither the rights provided under Directive 2001/29/EC nor the rights acquisition on a contractual basis for such online transmissions. Therefore, through the principles of territoriality and contractual freedom it will be possible to continue limiting the exploitation of the rights affected by the principle of country of origin laid down in this Regulation, especially as far as certain technical means of transmission or certain language versions are concerned, provided that any such limitations of the exploitation of those rights are in compliance with Union law.
Amendment 88 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Operators of retransmission services offered on satellite, digital terrestrial, closed circuit IP-based, mobile and similar networks, provide services which are equivalent to those provided by operators of cable retransmission services when they retransmit simultaneously, in an unaltered and unabridged manner, for reception by the public, an initial transmission from another Member State of television or radio programmes, where this initial transmission is by wire or over the air, including by satellite but excluding online transmissions, and intended for reception by the public. They should therefore be within the scope of this Regulation and benefit from the mechanism introducing mandatory collective management of rights. RIP-based retransmission services which are offereoffered both on closed-circuit networks and on the open internet should be exincluded fromin the scope of this Regulation as those services have different characteristics. They are not linked to any particular infrastructure and their ability to ensure a controlled environment is limited when compared for example to cable orlong as they are provided to a defined number of users (e.g. subscribers, registered users) and comparable to closed circuit IP-based networks.
Amendment 100 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Copyright and related rights involve in some cases the application of numerous territorially-defined national rights belonging to different right holders. In some cases, the exercise of such rights involves different entities. A database should be developed by the Commission and Member States in cooperation with collective management organisations in order to facilitate the identification of rightholders to enhance the ability of broadcasting organisations and retransmission operators to conclude licensing agreements.
Amendment 145 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) “retransmission” means any simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged retransmission, other than cable retransmission as defined in Directive 93/83/EEC and other than retransmission provided over an internet access service as defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 , intended for reception by the public of an initial transmission from another Member State, by wire or over the air, including that by satellite but excludingand online transmission, of television or radio programmes intended for the reception by the public, provided that such retransmission is. Such retransmission must be equivalent to retransmissions by operators of cable retransmission services and must be made by a party other than the broadcasting organisation which made the initial transmission or under whose control and responsibility such transmission was made. _________________ 19Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union, OJ L 310, 26.11.2015, p. 1.
Amendment 167 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) Paragraph 1 shall not undermine the principle of territorial exploitation of rights or contractual freedom in copyright law, and shall be without prejudice to the rights set out in Directive 2001/29/EC.
Amendment 186 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(5a) The Commission and Member States in cooperation with collective management organisations shall develop a database providing information relating to copyright and related rights of works, including concerning the holder of the right, the type of use of the right, its territorial scope and its duration.
Amendment 98 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Search engines embrace a wide variety of services whose aim is in principle to enable the public to access resources disseminated over the Internet. However, the nature of the acts performed by these entities varies greatly from service to service. While text search engines supply a clickable hypertext link whose basic aim is to lead users to the reference online service, most search engines specialising in images directly display the works referenced in the search results, autonomously in relation to the online service from which they are derived. As the images can then be consulted in their original format and in high quality, these search engines therefore in terms of their functionalities more closely resemble image banks. Exploitation of graphic, plastic or photographic works therefore requires authorisation by the rightholders under Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC. In view of the very large number of images reproduced or communicated to the public by these search engines, it is desirable to leave it to the discretion of Member States to apply balanced solutions, with provision for equitable compensation.
Amendment 99 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) In accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, in Member States where commercial use of the freedom of panorama is not authorised, reproductions and representations by natural persons of works of architecture and sculptures permanently located in public places must always require the prior authorisation of the authors, their rightholders or collecting societies. Paragraph 37 of Parliament's resolution of 9 July 2015 on the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC states that this field could benefit from more common rules, while remarking that differences may be justified to allow Member States to legislate according to their specific cultural and economic interests.
Amendment 101 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 b (new)
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) The right of communication to the public and the right of making available to the public defined in Article 3 of the Directive, which implements the principles and rules laid down in Article 8 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty, to which the Union is a party, play a vital role in the information society. Union law should guarantee its effect and effectiveness in order to afford a high level of protection to rightholders.
Amendment 117 #
2016/0280(COD)
(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new exception should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnershipIn order to preserve the capacity of rightholders to develop licences on the market and to receive payment, the exception should apply only to text and data mining conducted for non- commercial purposes.
Amendment 121 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large amounts of information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. In certain instances, text and data mining may involve acts protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database right, notably the reproduction of works or other subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents from a database. Where there is no exception or limitation which applies, an authorisation to undertake such acts would be required from rightholders. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright andor legally accessible, for which in such instances no authorisation would be required.
Amendment 149 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In the context of public-private partnerships, a private organisation should intervene only if it represents a structure with a non-commercial purpose and if it has legitimate access to the content.
Amendment 152 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use of the works or other subject-matter or extracts under the exception or limitation should be only in the context of teaching and learning activities carried out under the responsibility of educational establishments, including during examinations, and be limited to what is necessary for the purpose of such activities. Thus, for example, the exception should be limited to the use of brief extracts for intellectual works, except in the case of plays and poems. The exception or limitation should cover both uses through digital means in the classroom and online uses through the educational establishment's secure electronic network, the access to which should be protected, notably by authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.
Amendment 162 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject-matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism wshould, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for not, on the other hand, apply to materials which are primarily intended for the educational market, for which it should be possible to arrange licences. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject-matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.
Amendment 205 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject-matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism wshould, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for not apply to materials which are primarily intended for the educational market, for which it should be possible to arrange licences. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject-matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.
Amendment 213 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) An act of preservation may require a reproduction of a work or other subject- matter in the collection of a cultural heritage institution and consequently the authorisation of the relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage institutions are engaged in the preservation of their collections for future generations. Digital technologies offer new ways to preserve the heritage contained in those collections but they also create new challenges. In view of these new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the current legal framework by providing a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction in order to allow those acts of preservation for these cultural heritage institutions.
Amendment 227 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) For the purposes of this Directive, works and other subject-matter should be considered to be permanently in the collection of a cultural heritage institution when copies of these protected works or other subject-matter are owned or permanently held by the cultural heritage institution, for example as a result of a transfer of ownership or licence agreementsf the work or other subject-matter or licence agreements, thereby enabling the file to be stored on the institution's server.
Amendment 234 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Where content generated or made available by a user involves the short and proportionate use of a quotation or of an extract of a protected work or other subject-matter for a legitimate purpose, such use should be protected by the exception provided in this Directive. This exception should only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with normal exploitation of the work or other subject-matter concerned and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder. For the purpose of assessing such prejudice, the degree of originality of the content concerned, the length/extent of the quotation or extract used, the professional nature of the content concerned or the degree of economic harm must be examined, where relevant, while not precluding the legitimate enjoyment of the exception. This exception should be without prejudice to the moral rights of the authors of the work or other subject- matter.
Amendment 235 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Technological developments have given rise to information society services enabling their users to upload content and make it available in diverse forms and for various purposes, including to illustrate an idea, criticism, parody or pastiche. Such content may include short extracts of pre-existing protected works or other subject-matter that these users might have altered, combined or otherwise transformed.
Amendment 238 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 b (new)
Recital 21 b (new)
(21 b) Despite some overlapping with existing exceptions or limitations, any content that is uploaded or made available by a user that reasonably includes extracts of protected works or other subject-matter is not covered by Article 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC. A situation of this type creates legal uncertainty for both users and rightholders. It is therefore necessary to provide a new specific exception to permit the legitimate uses of extracts of pre-existing protected works or other subject-matter within content that is uploaded or made available by users.
Amendment 239 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 b (new)
Recital 21 b (new)
(21 b) Information society service providers cannot claim to be covered by the exception provided for in this directive, for the use of quotations or extracts from protected works or other subject-matter in content that is uploaded or made available by users, to relieve them of their responsibility or reduce the scope of their obligations according to the provisions of Article 13 of this directive.
Amendment 255 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Member States should, within the framework provided for in this Directive, have flexibility in choosing the specific type of mechanism allowing for licencesto be used for out-of- commerce works to extend to the rights of rightholders that are not represented by the collective management organisation, in accordance to their legal traditions, practices or circumstances. Such mechanisms can include extended collective licensing and presumptions of representation. This directive should not anticipate any specific solutions developed in Member States to handle the mass digitisation of out-of-commerce works.
Amendment 261 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 1
Recital 38 – paragraph 1
Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities andinstallations and thus performing an act of communication to the public and/or making available to the public, as well as an act of reproduction, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders who so request, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . In the interests of ensuring legal certainty for users of services, these agreements should cover the liability of the latter when they are not acting professionally for acts falling under Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC that they perform. _________________ 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).
Amendment 274 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 2
Recital 38 – paragraph 2
In respect of this Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-mattercontent provided by the service or promoting themat content, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.
Amendment 278 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 3
Recital 38 – paragraph 3
In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject-matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/ECno request for a licensing agreement is addressed to the information society service providers who play an active role or when the information society service providers which are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC store and offer to the public a significant quantity of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users.
Amendment 284 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of press publicationress agencies and publishers are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publicationThis is largely due to the fact that some news aggregators use press agencies' and publishers' content without purchasing a licence and without making suitable payment for the work provided. News aggregators are responsible for the content that they make publicly available. In the absence of recognition of press agencies and publishers as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment isare often complex and inefficient.
Amendment 292 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to largesignificant amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.
Amendment 297 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39 a (new)
Recital 39 a (new)
Amendment 299 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39 b (new)
Recital 39 b (new)
(39b) It should be recalled that, both in general and in the light of the references to Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC made in this directive, a work and/or other subject-matter is communicated to the public and/or made available to the public when a natural or legal person affords access to it to persons outside their normal family circle or most immediate associates. For this purpose it makes no difference that the latter can gain access to the works and/or other subject-matter at the same place or in different places and at the same time or at different times.
Amendment 300 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) The organisational and financial contribution of press agencies and publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital and analogue uses.
Amendment 318 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking whichen such acts do not constitute communication to the public.
Amendment 320 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long duration, offering few possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there should be a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the relevant revenues and the benefits derived from the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the performance, including in light of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The assessment of the situation should take account of the specific circumstances of each case as well as of the specificities and practices of the different content sectors. Where the parties do not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, the author or performer should be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent authority.
Amendment 331 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications and press agencies under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. TheyArticles 2 and 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC and Articles 3 and 9 of Directive 2006/115/EC, insofar as the use of press publications is concerned. Short extracts of copyrighted press publications constitute reproduction given their economic value. Their unauthorised use should therefore be prohibited unless they are being used in a private and non- commercial context. These rights should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive. The protection afforded to press agencies and publishers by this Directive should include any content generated automatically by news aggregators.
Amendment 338 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 a (new)
Recital 34 a (new)
(34 a) When extracts are re-used by an aggregator, it should be possible for the press agency or publisher to decide for specific reasons to award the aggregator a licence free of charge.
Amendment 347 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) The protection granted to publishers of press publications and press agencies under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications and press agencies should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications or press agencies, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.
Amendment 353 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have lawful access for thenon-commercial purposes of scientific research.
Amendment 354 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Press agencies and publishers, including those of press publications, books orand scientific publications, often operate on the basis of the transfer of authors' rights by means of contractual agreements or statutory provisions. In this context, publishers make an investment with a view to the exploitation of the works contained in their publications and may in some instances be deprived of revenues where such works are used under exceptions or limitations such as the ones for private copying and reprography. In a number of Member States compensation for uses under those exceptions is shared between authors and publishers. In order to take account of this situation and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, Member States should be allowed to determine that, when an author has transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher or press agency or otherwise contributes with his works to a publication and there are systems in place to compensate for the harm caused by an exception or limitation, publishers and press agencies are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.
Amendment 358 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36 a (new)
Recital 36 a (new)
(36 a) The obligation to acquire licences should also apply to news aggregators.
Amendment 370 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37 a (new)
Recital 37 a (new)
(37 a) Despite the fact that more creative content is being consumed today than ever before, on services such as user- uploaded content platforms and content aggregation services, yielding significant profits, the creative sectors have not seen a comparable increase in revenues from this increase in consumption. The value of cultural and creative works has been diverted away from the authors, artists, producers and others rights holders, generating an unsustainable "value gap". This transfer of value, due to the lack of clarity regarding the status of these online services under copyright and e-commerce law, undermines the efficiency of the online market, distorts competition and drives down the overall value of cultural content online. It also limits consumer choice for new and innovative legitimate services in the European Digital Single Market and puts at risk cultural and creative industries that create significant jobs and growth for EU economy, as underlined by the European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2016 on a "coherent EU policy for cultural and creative industries (2016/2072(INI))"
Amendment 373 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- matter, or of extracts thereof, with the exception of content intended chiefly for the educational market and the market in musical scores, for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:
Amendment 375 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37 a (new)
Recital 37 a (new)
(37 a) It should be clearly noted that the mechanism providing exemption from liability does not apply to services that play an active role in uploading copyrighted works or subject-matter. Accordingly, UUC services undertaking acts of communication to the public through their essential intervention in the act of communication to the public initiated by uploaders are not covered by Directive 2000/31/EC where copyright is concerned, and are therefore subject to the provisions of Directive 2001/29/EC in the same way as providers of online content services.
Amendment 376 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37 b (new)
Recital 37 b (new)
(37 b) Digital platforms are means of providing wider access to cultural and creative works and offer great opportunities for cultural and creative industries to develop new business models; consideration is to be made of how this process can function with more legal certainty and fairness and respect for right holders; importance of transparency and of ensuring a level playing field is necessary; in this regard, protection of right holders within the copyright and intellectual property framework is necessary in order to ensure recognition of values and stimulation of innovation, creativity, investment, to guarantee the success of a Digital Single Market, offering all diverse and quality cultural and creative works.
Amendment 379 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37 c (new)
Recital 37 c (new)
(37 c) This is why liability exemptions can only apply to genuinely neutral and passive online service providers, and not to services that play an active role in distributing, promoting and monetising content at the expense of creators.
Amendment 384 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 1
Recital 38 – paragraph 1
Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 reproduction as well as an act of communication to the public, including the act of making content available, the process of which began with the uploading by their users of the copyrighted works and subject-matter, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders who so request, covering rights of reproduction and communication to the public, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34. In respect of the liability exemption provided for in Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising copyrighted uploaded content for the purpose of selection, categorisation or aggregation, or by promoting or recommending them, irrespective of the means used to that end. Where a service provider plays an active role it cannot be exempt from liability as provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. Unless they are acting in a professional capacity, the liability of service users for copyrighted acts is covered by the licensing contracts concluded by the rightholders with the service providers. _________________ 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).
Amendment 396 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States may provide that the exception adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject- matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the market.
Amendment 432 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 a (new)
Recital 38 a (new)
(38 a) In order to ensure the correct functioning of any licensing agreement, or to prevent unauthorised access to copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by the users, information society service providers storing and disseminating this content and providing public access to it must take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the protection of these copyrighted works and other subject- matter, for example by implementing effective technologies.
Amendment 433 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 b (new)
Recital 38 b (new)
(38 b) This obligation is also incumbent upon those information society service providers that can claim the liability exemption provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC when they store or provide public access to a significant amount of copyrighted works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users. A service provider not taking appropriate action or not responding effectively to requests made by rightholders to enter into licensing agreements will not be able to claim the protection provided by Article 14 (1) of Directive 2000/31/EC.
Amendment 435 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – title
Article 7 – title
Use of out-of-commerce works by cultural heritage institutions
Amendment 439 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders shouldmust provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services shouldmust be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement. In cases when the measures and technologies established on the basis of this Directive affect the uploading of content that is covered by an exception or authorisation, service suppliers must be required to set up complaint and redress mechanisms for the benefit of the users whose content has been affected by these measures. Such mechanisms must maintain a balance between the need to ensure that content covered by exceptions to copyright or authorisations is not unduly affected by the measures, and the need to ensure that complaint and redress mechanisms do not unreasonably prejudice the effectiveness of the measures. To achieve this aim, the complaint and redress mechanisms must allow rightholders to receive adequate information to assess complaints and respond to them. The complaint and redress mechanisms must also allow a suitable period of time for rightholders to respond to complaints.
Amendment 440 #
2016/0280(COD)
1. Member States shall provide that when a collective management organisa, in agreement with rightholders, users and cultural heritage institutions, on behalf of its members, concludes a non-exclusive licence for non-commercial purposes with a cultural heritage institutiona legal mechanism whereby non-exclusive licences may be granted for the digitisation, distribution, communication to the public or making available of out-of- commerce works or other subject-matter permanently in the collections of the institution, such a non-exclusive licence may be extended or presumed to apply to rightholders of the same category as those covered by the licence who are not represented by the collective management organisationsuch institutions, provided that:
Amendment 444 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 450 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This legal mechanism may take the form of an extended collective licence or a presumption when a collective management organisation is, on the basis of mandates from rightholders, broadly representative of rightholders in the category of protected works or other subject-matter and of the rights which are the subject of the licence;
Amendment 454 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39 a (new)
Recital 39 a (new)
(39 a) The technical measures established should make it possible, at the request of and in association with the rightholders, to recognise given target content. Their aim is not to impose a general obligation to check and run data searches on the content, and do not require the use of the personal data of the end user. These measures are therefore fully compatible with Article 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Amendment 455 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
A work or other subject-matter shall be deemed to be out of commerce when the whole work or other subject-matter, in all its translations, versions and manifestations, is not available to the public through customary channels of commerce and cannot be reasonably expected to become so.
Amendment 456 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39 b (new)
Recital 39 b (new)
(39 b) Member States should ensure that an intermediate mechanism exists enabling service providers and rightholders to find an amicable solution to any dispute arising from the terms of their cooperation agreements. To that end, Member States should appoint an impartial body with all the relevant competence and experience to assist the parties in the resolution of their dispute.
Amendment 457 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39 c (new)
Recital 39 c (new)
(3 c) It should be recalled that, both in general and in the light of the references to Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC made in this directive, a copyrighted work and/or other subject-matter is communicated to the public and/or made available to the public when a natural or legal person affords access to it to persons outside their close and personal circle, defined as being their family or most immediate associates. For this purpose it makes no difference whether the latter can gain access to the copyrighted works and/or other subject-matter at the same place or in different places, and at the same time or at different times.
Amendment 459 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the economic value of their rights which are harmonised under Union law. This is especially the case where such rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. As authors and performers tend to be in a weaker contractual position when they grant licences or transfer their rights, they need information to assess the continued economic value of their rights, compared to the remuneration received for their licence or transfer, but they often face a lack of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of adequate information by their contractual counterparts or their successors in title is important for the transparency and balance in the system that governs the remuneration of authors and performers. The obligation to provide information must be transmitted with the rights and must therefore accompany the work however it is used and irrespective of who is using it or the location.
Amendment 466 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States shall ensure that the licences referred to in paragraph 1 are sought from a collective management organisation that is representative forin the Member State where:
Amendment 466 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) When implementing transparency obligations, the specificities of different content sectors and of the rights of the authors and performers in each sector should be considered. Member States should consult all relevant stakeholders as that should help determine sector-specific requirementwill ensure that the representative organisations of all relevant stakeholders determine sector-specific requirements and establish standardised procedures and formats for presenting the information in each sector, promoting automated processing making use of digital technologies and international identifiers of works. Collective bargaining should be considered as an option to reach an agreement between the relevant stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable the adaptation of current reporting practices to the transparency obligations, a transitional period should be provided for. The transparency obligations do not need to apply to agreements concluded with collective management organisations as those are already subject to transparency obligations under Directive 2014/26/EU.
Amendment 476 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long duration, offering few possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there should by could institute a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the relevant revenues and the benefits derived from the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the performance, including in light of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The assIt is essment of the situation should take account of the specific circumstances of each case as well as of the specificities and practices of the different content sectorsial that the contractual position of authors and performers be strengthened so that they can enjoy fair, non-assignable remuneration and so as to avoid power imbalances between the parties. Such a provision would apply only to the parties directly linked contractually. Where the parties do not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, the author or performer should be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent authority or to terminate his or her contract.
Amendment 514 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – title
Article 13 – title
Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works andor other subject-matter uploaded by their users
Amendment 516 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts ofprotected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their protected conclude fair and balanced agreements with all rightholders governing such content at the request of those rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. Under the terms of the agreements with rightholders, these service providers shall take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject- matter. These agreements should cover the liability of users of information society service providers when these users are not acting professionally for acts falling under Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/31/EC that they perform. When information society service providers (i) play an active part but are not required to conclude a licence agreement by the holders of rights to works or other subject- matter or to prevent the availability on their services ofstored by them and to which they provide public access, or (ii) are eligible for the liability exemption provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, but store and provide to the public access to a large number of protected works or other subject-matter, these service providers shall take measures to prevent protected works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through thein cooperation with the service providers from being made available by their services. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter. Rightholders shall provide information society service providers with all relevant and necessary details to ensure the functioning of measures taken by the service providers pursuant to this article.
Amendment 526 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2a (5) ‘lawful access’ means access to content obtained in accordance with the applicable legislation;
Amendment 527 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 b (new)
Article 2 b (new)
Article 2b (6) ‘automated image referencing service’ means any online service which reproduces or makes available to the public for indexing and referencing purposes graphic or art works or photographic works collected by automated means via a third-party online service;
Amendment 528 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1. Any complaint filed under the mechanism shall be processed by the relevant rightholder within a reasonable period of time. The rightholder shall give evidence for the rights being upheld.
Amendment 532 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments. In cooperation with the Member States, the Commission shall encourage the exchange of best practices across the Union regarding the results of any cooperation established pursuant to implementation of paragraph 1 of this Article.
Amendment 535 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry out, with the rightholders’ consent, text and data mining of works or other subject- matter to which they have lawful access for thenon-commercial purposes of scientific research.
Amendment 563 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Copies of content accessible for text and data mining (TDM) must be kept in a secure way. They may not be stored or preserved in any form beyond the end of the TDM project. Any copy preserved or stored for more than six months after the end of the project shall be considered an unlawful copy.
Amendment 566 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 a (new)
Article 14 a (new)
Article 14a Fair remuneration Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive fair remuneration for each mode of exploitation of their protected works and other subject-matter. There must be separate remuneration for each application of the right of communication to the public within the meaning of Directive 2001/29 and for each act of reproduction of the content of authors and performers.
Amendment 574 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- matter or extract thereof, except for contents that are primarily intended to the educational and musical scores markets, for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:
Amendment 575 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.
Amendment 588 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff, and lasts for the time required to illustrate the lesson;
Amendment 598 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) is confined to short extracts of written, printed or digital work, to works of which few copies were published or to individual articles from newspapers or periodicals which cannot be accessed individually and separately by those entitled to access them, and is accompanied by the indication of the source, including the author's name, unless this turns out to be impossible.
Amendment 601 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The exception provided for paragraph 1 must allow the lesson to accessed by digital means both in the country in which the establishment providing it is situated and in that where the student is located;
Amendment 620 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States availing themselves of the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments.
Amendment 640 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Member States may provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. Article 5 Preservation of cultural heritage Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, designated as such by their Member States to make copies of any works or other subject-matter that are permanently in their collections, in any format or medium, on condition that it is not feasible to acquire copies of them, for the sole purpose of the preservation of such works or other subject-matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation.
Amendment 648 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Works permanently in a collection are those works which are the property of the cultural heritage institution, and not works held under licence and accessible via a third-party server.
Amendment 653 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Automated image-referencing services may also fall within the scope of this exception for the purpose of the preservation of such works or subject- matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation.
Amendment 658 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Use of extracts from pre-existing works and other subject-matter in content uploaded or made available by users (1) Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, point (a) of Article 5 and Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, and point (a) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC in order to allow for the use of extracts from pre- existing works and other subject-matter in content uploaded or made available by users, other than in the course of their work, for purposes such as criticism, review, illustration, caricature, parody or pastiche, provided that the extracts: (a) relate to works or other subject-matter that have been lawfully made available to the public; (b) are accompanied by the indication of the source, including the author’s name, unless this turns out to be impossible; and (c) are used in accordance with fair practice and in a manner that does not extend beyond the specific purpose for which they are being used. (2) Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in this Article shall be unenforceable. (3) This exception shall be without prejudice to the provisions of Article 13 of this Directive.
Amendment 672 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Accessing content covered by an exception provided for in this Directive shall not confer on users any entitlement to use it pursuant to another exception. 2. Article 5(5) and the first, third, fourth and fifth subparagraphs of Article 6(4) of Directive 2001/29/EC shall apply to the exceptions and the limitation provided for under this Title.
Amendment 723 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that where parties wishing to conclude an agreement for the purpose of making available audiovisual works on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties relating to the licensing of rights, they may rely on the assistance of an impartial body with relevant experience. That body shall provide assistance with negotiation and help reach agreements. This paragraph shall not apply to the licensing of copyrighted works and subject matter by the organisations referred to in Articles 3(a) et 2(3) of Directive 2014/26/EC.
Amendment 729 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10a Member States shall require producers and the transferees of the rights to make every effort to ensure continuous exploitation of European audiovisual works, for example by making such works available to the public on video-on- demand platforms. Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure compliance with the provisions of paragraph 1, for example by encouraging the conclusion of professional agreements between organisations representing authors, on the one hand, and producers and other stakeholders, on the other, as well as video-on-demand platforms, so as to ensure the continuous exploitation of audiovisual works.
Amendment 730 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 b (new)
Article 10 b (new)
Article 10b These provisions shall be without prejudice to the application of the rules relating to media chronology, the freedom of a producer or distributor to accord exclusive rights to the exploitation of the audiovisual works in question and the freedom of a broadcaster or on-demand video platform to acquire and distribute or make available on demand the works of its choice, in line with its editorial freedom and responsibility.
Amendment 737 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – title
Article 11 – title
Protection of press publications concerning digital uses
Amendment 753 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications and press agencies with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.
Amendment 775 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1News aggregators shall use press agencies' and publishers' content and shall be responsible for the content that they make publicly available.
Amendment 776 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Publishers and news agencies must also be safeguarded, by licensing arrangements for example, when it comes to the mass exploitation of their content, particularly with regard to content aggregators or rightholders.
Amendment 794 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Member States may provide for an exception or limitation to the rights referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC so that works can be made available to the public by means of automated image referencing, provided that rightholders are compensated fairly.
Amendment 805 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – title
Article 13 – title
Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and otheworks or subject-matter uploaded by their users
Amendment 808 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. IWhere information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts ofoffer or make accessible to the public copyrighted works or subject- matter made available by their users, they shall conclude with rightholders so requesting licensing agreements for rights of reproduction and communication with public, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC . Under the terms of the licensing agreements, these service providers shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the proper functioning of agreements licensing the use of their works or other subject-matter. An information society service provider who fails to put in place technical measures quickly and efficiently to respond to requests from rightholders under this Article shall not benefit from the protection provided for in Article 14 (1) of Directive 2000/31/EC. Unless they are acting in a professional capacity, the liability of service users for copyright acts is covered by the licensing contracts concluded with the service providers. Information society service providers playing an active part but not required by rightholders to conclude a licensing agreement for works or other subject- matter uploaded by their usersstored by them and to which they provide public access shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers. Information society service providers eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC that nevertheless store and make available to the public a significant quantity of copyrighted works or other subject-matter shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the proper functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter. Rightholders, for their part, shall provide information society service providers with the necessary details to ensure the proper functioning of measures taken by the service providers.
Amendment 840 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. 2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1, for example regarding content uploaded by users and withdrawn by service providers for no valid reason. The rightholders concerned must deal with the complaint within a reasonable period and provide adequate justification for the rights claimed by them.
Amendment 849 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regarding disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1, for example as regards the application of a possible exception or authorisation for use for the content concerned, such mechanisms may not unduly detract from the effectiveness of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 860 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments. The Commission shall encourage the exchange of best practices across the European Union.
Amendment 873 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13a Member States shall provide that disputes between successors in title and information society services regarding the application of Article 13(1) may be subject to an alternative dispute resolution system. Member States shall establish or designate an impartial body with the necessary expertise, with the aim of helping the parties to settle their disputes under this system. The Member States shall inform the Commission of the establishment of this body no later than (date mentioned in Article 21(1)).
Amendment 876 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Chapter 4 a (new)
Chapter 4 a (new)
CHAPTER 2a PROTECTION OF AUDIOVISUAL AUTHORS FOR THE MAKING AVAILABLE OF THEIR WORKS Article -14 1. Member States shall provide that when an audiovisual author or performer has transferred his/her making available to the public right to a producer, that author or performer shall retain the right to obtain equitable remuneration that is proportionate to the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work, provided that these measures are not included in the initial contract. 2. That right to equitable and proportional remuneration shall be non-transferable and may not be waived.
Amendment 933 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low or unexpected compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances, provided that these measures are not included in the initial contract. Member States may provide that this right expires if it is not exercised within a reasonable period from the act of exploitation in question.
Amendment 992 #
2016/0280(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Directive 2001/29/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point g a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point g a (new)
2a. In Article 12(4) the following point is added: "(ga) to add publishers and press agencies to the list of beneficiaries of related rights listed in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC as regards the reproduction right."
Amendment 68 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) With a view to enforcing the provisions of this Directive and thereby guaranteeing effective protection of workers, coordination between the Member State labour inspectorates and EU cooperation on combating posting- related fraud should be stepped up.
Amendment 80 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whether the Posting of Workers Directive still strikeshas struck the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers without affecting free business competition.
Amendment 82 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Part of the problems arising from the implementation of Directives 96/71/EC and 2017/67/EU stem from overt abuse or illegal cross-border activity. The posting of workers through ‘mailbox companies’ or bogus temporary postings are evidence of this. Protectionist demands by certain Member States cannot met by restricting freedom to provide services but by stepping controls on the cross-border movement of workers to prevent fraudulent practices in this connection.
Amendment 86 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 b (new)
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) By Decision (EU) 2016/344, the Union established a European Platform to enhance cooperation in tackling undeclared work, including cross-border aspects; both this decision and Parliament's resolution of 14 January 2014 on effective labour inspections as a strategy to improve working conditions in Europe should lead the Commission to consider the possibility of creating a European Labour Inspectorate consisting of a body of European inspectors specialized in cross-border mobility to provide technical support for national inspectors in the implementation of European legislation on the movement of workers.
Amendment 91 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The principle of equal treatment and the prohibition of any discrimination based on nationality are enshrined in EU law since the founding Treaties. The principle of equal pay has been implemented through secondary law not only between women and men, but also between employees with fix term contracts and comparable permanent workers, between part-time and full-time workers or between temporary agency workers and comparable workers of the user undertaking. In any case, there is no reason for proper use of the posting of workers to involve any infringement of this principle.
Amendment 153 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Because of the highly mobile nature of work in international road transport, the implementation of the posting of workers directive raises particular legal questions and difficulties (especially where the link with the concerned Member State is insufficient). It would be most suited for these challenges to be addressed through sector-specific legislation together with other EU initiatives aimed at improving the functioning of the internal road transport marketwhich should be clarified through sector-specific legislation.
Amendment 192 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) It is within Member States' competence to set rules on remuneration in accordance with their law and practice. However, national rules on remuneration applied to posted workers must be justified by the need to protect posted workers and must not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services. The European Union must exercise strict oversight to forestall any disproportionate use of these restrictions by certain Member States.
Amendment 456 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a
1a. If undertakings established in the territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration, , the Member State may, on a non–discriminatory and proportionate basis, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory. The European Union shall exercise strict oversight to forestall any disproportionate use of these restrictions by certain Member States.
Amendment 504 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
(2a) Article 4(2) is amended as follows: Member States shall make provision for cooperation between the public authorities which, in accordance with national legislation, are responsible for monitoring the terms and conditions of employment referred to in Article 3. Such cooperation shall in particular consist in replying to reasoned requests from those authorities for information on the transnational hiring- out of workers, including manifest abuses or possible cases of unlawful transnational activities. That cooperation may be carried out through the European Platform created to enhance cooperation in tackling undeclared work, since cross- border aspects form part of its remit.
Amendment 506 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 507 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(2a) In Article 4(2), the following new subparagraph 2a is added: Where the liaison office or competent national authority in the country from which the worker is posted is unable to provide the information sought by the labour administration in the host country, the administration in the country from which the worker is posted shall seek that information from the administration or body able to provide it.
Amendment 21 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the deepening of the European internal market remains a key economic issue, especially in the context of the development of new technologies, where a market with critical mass is needed to promote the emergence of innovative and competitive players on the global scene;
Amendment 62 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the fact that the strategy is complementary to efforts made in other areas; believes that, by building on the initiatives already being taken, the strategy has good potential to help ensure economic prosperity, improve the wellbeing of Europeans by practical measures and make Europe attractive for investments and more resistant to global competition;
Amendment 121 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 167 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 175 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Commission’s announced initiative on the European agenda for the collaborative economy, and its intention to look at that economy in order to assess what needs to be done to accompany its growth and its major contribution to the economic system; stresses the need to clarify the regulatory uncertainty surrounding the application of the rules in this sector, both as regards consumer rights, health and safety standards and competition, taxation, social security and employment;
Amendment 200 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Draws attention to the important role of standards for innovation and progress in the single market; believes that timely action needs to be taken to develop high EU standards for quality, interoperability and safety in furtherance of EU industrial policy, and that those standards should also be promoted at international level; calls on the Commission to support and reinforce European standards, including by exploiting the opportunities offered by the ongoing negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP);
Amendment 227 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for measures to facilitate access to the patent system in Europe for all micro-enterprises and SMEs that wish to use the European patent with unitary effect in innovating their products and processes, including by cutting fees and providing translation assistance;
Amendment 237 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to present a proposallegislative proposal for the establishment of a single European system for the protection of geographical indications for non-agricultural products in the EU;
Amendment 357 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that unjustified discrimination against consumers and entrepreneurs on the basis of nationality or place of residence that is not based on any objective and verifiable criteria, in both online and offline environments, is not acceptable within the single market;
Amendment 371 #
2015/2354(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission to submit, as a matter of priority, a legislative proposal to address geo-blocking and other unjustified forms of discrimination by market operators; calls on the Commission to lay down effective criteria for assessing the unjustified character of geo-blocking;
Amendment 25 #
2015/2323(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for further measures raise consumers’ awareness of their rights in respect of changing suppliers and contracts and to make switching between providers easier and faster, including a shortened switching period, the abolition of transfer fees and penalties and effective data portability, in order to prevent the lock-in of consumers;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2323(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to take further action to improve the frequency of energy bills and their clarity and transparency as regards types of energy sources, consumption and price structure; calls for EU guidelines on price comparison tools, e.g. on transparency and reliability, and for access for all consumers to at least one price comparison tooleasily accessible and understandable price comparison tool covering suppliers, contract types, prices and types and proportions of energy sources used for energy services;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2323(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges authorities combating unfair trade practices and those processing complaints in the energy sector to cooperate more closely with their counterparts in other Member States in ensuring respect for consumer rights; welcomes the Commission’s intention to consider incorporating laws specifically concerning energy into the Annex to the Regulation on Consumer Protection Cooperation;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU faces diverse challenges, at both global and domestic levelthe level of both its internal market and its economy, such as sluggishweak growth, high levels of unemployment and intense international competition;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas a robust, efficient and inclusive Single Market, with enhanced governance, is a crucial instrument to boostimprove growth, employment, investment and competitiveness and thuso preserve the confidence of the business sector and consumers;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the Single Market (SM) is the backbone of Member States’ economies; highlights the economic benefits of the SM, such as product and market integration, economies of scale, stronger competition, and a level playing field for 500 million citizens across the 28 Member States, providing greater choice and, in particular, greater choice of high-quality products and services at lower prices for consumers;
Amendment 79 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the importance of an all inclusive, transparent and non- discriminatory approach towards all EU Member States – Eurozone and non- Eurozone –process leading to relevant and necessary reforms through the European Semester;
Amendment 80 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that pressing economic and social issues continue to hampere need to carry out appropriate and fair economic and social reforms, in order to improve productivity and the competitiveness of the European economy;
Amendment 100 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that the public sector and public procurement are critical drivers of both Member State andRecalls the role that public procurement can play for business, growth, job creation and competitiveness (representing more than 19 % of EU GDP expenditure) and job creation;
Amendment 124 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Highlights that bettere importance of fostering the conditions necessary for the emergence of start-ups and, SMEs could result in more active innovation and job creationand innovative companies capable of generating sustainable growth and creating jobs; recalls, however, that remaining red tape barriers impede prospects for SME growth domestically and internationally;
Amendment 129 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights that the intensity of tangible and intangible capital accumulation in the EU has been lower post-financial crisis when compared to competitors; believes that revitalising investment is of the utmost importance in order to restore productivity and long-term growth in the EU; emphasises that the lag in public spending is especially pronounced in the area of information and communication technologies (ICT); demands that investment be focused on financing the real economy and that sustained measures continue to be taken to achieve that goal;
Amendment 132 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for an immediate abolition of unjustified territorial restrictions known as geo-blocking and for full implementation of Article 20 of the Services Directive, thus ending unjustified price discrimination;
Amendment 137 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises that the notion of the modern economy is rapidly changing owing to digital and technological advances, more intense international competition and changes in consumerthe behavioural patterns of economic agents and consumers;
Amendment 158 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Highlights that the EU, with its sizeable SM and strong tradition in manufacturing state-of-the-art products, could be the perfect breeding ground for innovative companies, but that this would require a modern industrial policy and better integrated infrastructure which puts technology adoption and an innovation- friendly ecosystem at the forefront; calls for any future digital framework proposed to be user-friendly and workableinclusive and accessible, guaranteeing all consumers a high level of protection;
Amendment 163 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Commission to take a strategic approach to enforcement and use all available evidencedata and instruments at its disposal, including rigorous notification of Member State legislation (ex-ante and ex- post), the ‘single market test’, proportionality, benchmarking, best practices, peer pressure, alternative arbitration systems, existing Court of Justice of the European Union rulings and infringement procedures;
Amendment 179 #
2015/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Urges national market surveillance authorities to cooperate more closely and to exchange information and best practices to effectively tackle the high number of illegal and non-compliant products incurring high costs for complying businesses, as well as high risk for consumers, particularly the most vulnerable; calls for the immediate adoption of the Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package by the Council of the European Union;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD), ratified by the EU on 23 December 2010 (2010/48/EC),
Amendment 41 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the use of the internet and mobile communications has changed the way users communicate, invent, consume and share; whereas this has not only expanded the market place, facilitating access by small companies to a customer base of 500 million customers and the development by entrepreneurs of, but also changed the market , promoting the development by entrepreneurs of new industrial models, new actors and new ideas;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas all Union policies and legislation in the area of the Digital Single Market should allow new opportunities for users and businesses to emerge, especially within today’s service society, while taking a holistic approach that considers the digital skills gap which will need to be filled quickly and their social dimension as they inevitably involve structural changes;
Amendment 112 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas Europe must become one of the leaders of the fourth industrial revolution; whereas, in this respect, the emergence of major European champions in the digital field, the transition to the digital economy of European companies, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, and entrepreneurship must be supported, and whereas an ambitious and tailored long-term investment policy, particularly as regards intangible infrastructure, should be implemented;
Amendment 118 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas a high level of consumer protection and satisfaction necessarily entails choice, quality, flexibility, information and trust in a secure online environment;
Amendment 125 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas a high level of consumer protection and satisfaction necessarily entails choice, flexibility, information and trust in a secure and accessible online environment;
Amendment 167 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Communication on ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’; believes that the horizontal approach taken needs to be strengthened in its implementation as the digital sector affects every dimension of society and, the economy, culture and administration;
Amendment 227 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that users’ trust in digital services is vital to innovation and growth in the digital economy and that reinforcing that trust should be at the basis of both public policy and business models; notes that for users this will depend in particular on a high level of consumer protection, better understanding of consumer rights and how to exercise them and effective remedies being available to them, and for businesses it will depend in particular on smart, strong and up-to-date laws which allow them to do business in a constantly changing environment;
Amendment 257 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the urgent need for the Commission and Member States to promote a more dynamic economy for innovation to flourish and for companies to scale up, through the development of e- government, a modernised regulatory framework fit for the emergence and scale- up of innovative businesses, and a long term investment strategy in infrastructure, skills, research and innovation, in particular by making use of the European Fund for Strategic Investments;
Amendment 278 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes that the future Digital Single Market must be inclusive to all EU citizens, and calls the Commission and Member States on strengthening efforts to ensure an appropriate level of accessibility that can enable the participation of disadvantaged groups, including persons with disabilities;
Amendment 303 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned aboutNotes the different national approaches taken to regulating the internet and the sharing economy; and urges the Commission to take actioninitiatives to preserve the integrity of the single market and the internet as an open and global platform for communication and innovation platform while preserving European economic and cultural diversity;
Amendment 420 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that a full harmonisation of the legal framework governing online sales irrespective of whether they are cross- border or domestic sales, while maintaining the coherence ofbetween online and offline rules regarding legal remedies, constitutes the most practical and proportionate approach;
Amendment 436 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. CoInsiders that there is a risksts that the Commission’s future proposals entailshould avoid the risk of a growing disparity between the applicable legal standards for offline and online purchases;
Amendment 446 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets the imprecision ofAwaits the Commission’s proposals regarding a legislative measure for a more comprehensive online sales law that covers digital content products as well as tangible goods;
Amendment 453 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 465 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Requests an ‘Active Consumers’ strategy to assess in particular whether consumer switching is facilitated in the online world, and whether action is needed to make this more accessible and consumer switching easier, in order to boost competition in online markets;
Amendment 516 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that accessible, efficient and high-quality delivery services which are attractively priced and can be monitored are an essential prerequisite for thriving cross-border e-commerce; Stresses that accessible, affordable, efficient and high- quality delivery services are an essential prerequisite for thriving cross-border e- commerce; supports the proposed measures to improve price transparency, interoperability and regulatory oversight that should target both the smooth functioning of cross-border parcel delivery markets and compliance with relevant social and labour rights, allowing enough flexibility for the delivery market to evolve and adapt to technological innovations; and the needs of e-consumers;
Amendment 564 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that ambitious actions are needed to improve access to legal digital content, in particular by endinggoods and services sold online, including by increasing the effectiveness of the provisions of the Directive on Consumer Rights, guaranteeing that delivery costs for goods are in proportion to the real cost of transport, and ending unjustified geo- blocking practices and unfair price discrimination based on geographical location or nationality;
Amendment 602 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Supports in particular the Commission’s planned scrutiny of the practical enforcement of Article 20(2) of the Services Directive in order to analyse possible patterns of discrimination against consumers based on their nationality or country of residence; calls on the Commission to identify and definestresses the value of better coordination between the contact points designated by the Member States and of reinforcing joint action by the Commission and national authorities in targeted sectors in order better to verify the application of the above-mentioned article; calls on the Commission to identify and clarify concise case groups of justified discrimination under Article 20(2) of the Services Directive in order to outlaw unjustified discriminatory behaviour by private entities and in order to provide interpretative assistance to authorities responsible for applying Article 20(2) in practice; calls on the Commission to make concerted efforts to add the provision of Article 20(2) to the Annex of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 in order to utilise the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network’s investigation and enforcement powers;
Amendment 659 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Emphasises that incentivising private investments in fast and ultra-fast communication networks is a requirement for any digital progress, with competition remaining the main driver of infrastructure investments, innovation, affordable prices and choices for consumers, including those with special needs; considers that little evidence exists, in the still fragmented European telecommunications market, of a link between consolidation of operators and increased investment in networks;
Amendment 719 #
2015/2147(INI)
20. Stresses that since the development of over-the-top services has increased demand and competition to the benefit of consumers, modernisation of the telecommunication framework should not necessarily lead to more regulatory burdens, but should drive innovation and fair competitionensure fair and non-discriminatory competition between all operators providing the same service;
Amendment 815 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Urges the Commission to develop an innovation-friendly policy that fosters competition between, and innovation in, online platforms; considers that the priorities should be transparency, facilitation of switching between platforms or online services, access to platforms, fair rules to be followed by all operators, and identifying and addressing barriers to the emergence and scale-up of platforms;
Amendment 867 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Appreciates the Commission’s initiative to analyse the role and responsibility of platforms in the Digital Economy, including methods of combating illegal online content or use of the data collected, as part of the upcoming Internal Market Strategy;
Amendment 890 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Encourages the Commission to analyse the need to protect consumers in the sharing economy and, wheby assessing where initiatives are appropriate and if necessary, to come forward with proposals to ensure thean adequacyte level of the consumer-related legislation framework protection in the digital sphere, including in cases of possible abuses, and where ex- post remedies, and not ex-ante regulation, are sufficient or more effective;
Amendment 938 #
2015/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Underlines the need for the measures foreseen in General Data Protection Regulation to be fully implement1 a and to ensure consumers and clients are notified of cyber-breaches without delay and what, if any, personal or professional data has been accessed; believes that companies should take appropriate actions to protect against any use of leaked data after a security breach for a set period of time; __________________ 1a Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) Art 31 - Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Art 32 - Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 23 #
2015/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that the overhaul of competition policy is needed partly in order to meet the challenges posed by the digital single market, a sector which is changing rapidly, hence the importance of overcoming the current fragmentation along national lines and doing away with barriers to access to the market, while guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regards it as essential to guarantee fair terms of competition on the digital market and to combat the abuse of dominant positions; considers it important, in particular, to make the on-line research and advertising market more open and transparent and to improve competitive conditions there, and regards it as vital to guarantee an open and neutral net;
Amendment 50 #
2015/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers it essential for the Commission to continue to promote better convergence and cooperation between national competition authorities in the European Union;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the fight against the sexual abuse of children needs a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary approach; insists, for that reason, that measures such as awareness raising, preventive campaigns, training and education are just as essential in the fight against these crimes as assistance to victims, including the parents and guardians of the victim, investigation of crimes and prosecution of offenders;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls on the Commission and on the Member States to prioritize the prevention of child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation and to strengthen their cooperation with educational and training institutions, sexual abuse helpdesks, international and non-governmental organizations, civil society organizations and private industries in order to establish effective and innovative prevention policies, including developing teaching and trading materials concerning this matter;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages all Member States who still have not fully implemented Article 23 of the Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography to adopt preventive measures concerning the regularsystematic training of officials likely to come into contact with children, as for instance aimed at enabling them to identify and deal with child victims and potential child victims of sexual abuse or exploitation;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the prevention measures should cover technology related aspects in particular, with a view to ensuring a safer internet and digital literacy; encourages therefore Member States to consider incorporating sexual abuse prevention in their educational curriculum, as for instance teaching children, from very early age, to be aware of online safety, spotting the signs of inappropriate behaviour, and how to report it;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Highlights that given the rapidly changing nature of cybercrime and the pace at which technology evolves, there is a need for constantly adaptive approach to research and development of mechanisms and advanced techniques, including software development, which allow the early detection, blocking and removal of illegal content such as child sexual abuse content online; calls therefore on the Member States to strengthen their actions and constantly adapt their child sexual abuse prevention plans and policies to combat online child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography and calls on the Commission to support their efforts;
Amendment 64 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Stresses that regularly collecting data and distributing factual information about the current levels and methods of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children as well as providing children, parents and individuals working with children with the appropriate knowledge and tools is essential to reduce and prevent this threat;
Amendment 90 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that about half of the Member States have chosen to apply – besides measures aimed at the prompt removal of web pages containing child sexual abuse material in accordance with Article 25 (1) – measures which are optional under Article 25 (2) of the Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography - to block access to websites containing or disseminating child pornography;
Amendment 94 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Notes with concern the results of the Internet Watch Foundation´s (IWF) annual report, released at the beginning of April 2017, according to which internet domains based in Europe now host 60% of the webpages that feature images of child sexual abuse, accounting 19 percentage point increase from 2015, and that there is sharp increase of sexual abuse URLs is some Member States; calls on the Member States to strengthen their cooperation, exchange of information and share good practises in order to reduce the availability of child sexual abuse online;
Amendment 101 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Member States to accelerate, in cooperation with the iconternent iandustry service providers, the notice and take- down procedures. of child sexual abuse and exploitation content, including child pornography; calls on the Commission to facilitate and enhance the exchange of best practices in that field and calls furthermore on the Member States to strengthen their cooperation in order to effectively address this issues;
Amendment 110 #
2015/2129(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Encourages Member States, which have not yet done so, to establish assistance services, including online services, to provide support, information and training on how to recognise the signs of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation and how to respond when they see troubling behaviour that is not yet abusive;
Amendment 42 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Agrees with the Commission on the need to take a holistic yet ambitious approach to public procurementand ambitious approach to public procurement; recalls the urgent need to improve substantially conditions for granting EU undertakings access to public procurement in third countries; welcomes the publication by the Commission of its amended Proposal for a regulation on the access of third- country goods and services to the Union’s internal market in public procurement and procedures supporting negotiations on access of Union goods and services to the public procurement markets of third countries (COM(2016)0034);
Amendment 63 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the TiSA and TTIP negotiations, calls for them to be completed swiftly, and; states that the content thereof is more important than keeping to a timetable; underlines the need to ensure greater market access for European service providers;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. having regard to the size and strategic importance of the food supply chain for the European Union; whereas the sector employs over 47 million people in the EU, and whereas the total value of the EU market for products connected with the retail food trade is estimated at EUR 1.05 billion; whereas 99.1% of undertakings in the food and drink sector are SMEs and microenterprises;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the food trade has an increasingly significant cross-border dimension and is of particular importance for the functioning of the internal market; whereas cross-border trade between the EU Member States accounts for 20% of the EU’s total food and drink production; whereas 70% of all Member States’ food exports are to other Member States;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas European competition law should permit consumers to benefit from a wide range of quality products at competitive prices, while ensuring that undertakings have an incentive to invest and innovate by giving them a fair chance to promote the advantages of their products without being unduly forced out of the market by UTPs;
Amendment 133 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that UTPs imposed by parties in a stronger bargaining position clearly have a negative impact; stresses that UTPs can hamper investment and product innovation, thus impairing the quality, variety and innovative character of products supplied to consumers;
Amendment 163 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges, nonetheless, that voluntary and self-regulatory schemes are not enoughmay prove insufficient to put an end to UTPs once and for all, owing to the lack of effective enforcement mechanisms; with that in mind, awaits the results of the Commission’s assessment to see what lessons can be learnt from it;
Amendment 196 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Reaffirms that free and fair competition, freedom to contract and proper enforcement of the relevant legislation, making it possible to protect all economic actors of all sizes operating within the food supply chain, are of key importance in ensuring the proper functioning of the food supply chain;
Amendment 200 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Points out that taking advantage of a stronger bargaining position to impose UTPs is a violation of the principle of freedom to contract, as the stronger party has more say in the shape that the business relationship is to take and can unilaterally impose terms that disproportionately serve its own financial interests, and the weaker party often has no option other than to agree to those terms; believes that steps need to be taken to build mutual trust between supply chain partners, on the basis of the principles of freedom to contract, equivalence of benefits and freedom to take advantage of those benefits;
Amendment 210 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission to submit specific proposals for EU legislation banning UTPs in the food supply chain that willIntends to carry out an in-depth examination of the Commission’s evaluation of existing national rules seeking to combat and ban UTPs in the food supply chain and learn the necessary lessons, particularly with a view to assessing whether European legislation is an appropriate tool to combat UTPs, enable markets to operate as they should and fair and transparent relations to be maintained between food producers, suppliers and distributors;
Amendment 233 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Suggests that work should begin on EU rules on the establishment or recognition of nationalRecommends that the Member States establish public agencies with responsibility for enforcing laws to combat unfair practices in the food supply chain and ensuring that they have the means to carry out their tasks; takes the view that public agencies of this kind should be empowered to open and conduct investigations on their own initiative andor on the basis of informal information and complaints dealt with on a confidential basis (thus overcoming the fear factor), as well as to impose penalties; also stresses that these national authorities should be encouraged to coordinate among themselves and share relevant information, particularly on good practice, and expertise concerning new types of UTPs;
Amendment 244 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Believes strongly that a single, clear, precise and binding definition of UTPs should be drawn up, so as to allow effective rules to be laid down with a view to combating such practices;
Amendment 251 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for due account to be taken, win then drafting of any rules in this area, of the specific features of each market and the legal requirements obtaining on it, the different situations and approaches in individual Member States, the degree of consolidation or fragmentation of individual markets, and other significant factors; takes the view that suchany regulatory efforts in this area should ensure that there is relatively broad discretion to tailor the measures to be taken to the specific features of each market and should be based on the general principle of improving enforcement by involving the relevant public agencies;
Amendment 264 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to assess the voluntary and self-regulatory schemes put in place to date (particularly as regards the number and proportion of the problem cases between different actors in the food supply chain resolved by this route) and the effectiveness of the regulatory action taken at national and EU level; expects to be notified of the results of this assessment; calls for an assessment of the likely impact of the various types of EU regulatory action that have been proposed, with due account being taken of all the possible implications for the various stakeholders and for consumer welfare;
Amendment 273 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on unfair business-to- business trading practises in the food supply chain (COM (2016) 32),
Amendment 288 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas unfair trading practices (UTPs) are a problem attested to by all entities in the food supply chain and by many national competition authorities; whereas the Commission's report of 29 January 2016 on unfair business-to-business trading practices in the food supply chain confirms that those practices can occur at every stage of the food supply chain; whereas the Commission and Parliament have repeatedly drawn attention to the problem of UTPs;
Amendment 304 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the report by the Commission on unfair business-to- business trading practices in the food supply chain, as well as the long-expected accompanying study on the monitoring of the implementation of principles of good practices in vertical relationship in the food supply chain;
Amendment 352 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges, nonetheless, that voluntary and self-regulatory schemes are not enough to put an end to UTPs once and for all, owing to the lack of effective enforcement mechanisms; require independent and effective enforcement mechanisms, as well as appropriate and impartial governance structures, in order to put an end to UTPs once and for all;
Amendment 354 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Urges the Commission to follow-up its recommendations from its report of 29 January 2016 on unfair business-to- business trading practices in the food supply chain, to increase the credibility and effectiveness of the Supply Chain Initiative (SCI) by requiring the relevant stakeholders to: a. improve awareness of the SCI, especially among SMEs, b. ensure the impartiality of the SCI's governance structure, c. allow alleged victims of UTPs to complain confidentially, and d. grant investigatory and sanctioning power to independent bodies;
Amendment 369 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. UrgeSupports the Commission to submit specific proposals for EU legislation banning UTPs in the food supply chain that will enable markets to oper's efforts in assessing the effectiveness and credibility of available mechanisms for the enforcement of rules against UTPs in Member States; agrees with the Commission thate as they should and fair and transparent relations to be maintained between food producers, suppliers and distributort this stage, there is no added value of a specific harmonized regulatory approach at EU level, given the fact that the large majority of Member States have introduced regulatory measures and public enforcement mechanisms;
Amendment 388 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for due account to be taken, when drafting rules in this area,Notes that, in adopting measures to counter unfair trading practices within the food supply chain, due account must be taken of the specific features of each market and the legal requirements obtaining on it, the different situations and approaches in individual Member States, the degree of consolidation or fragmentation of individual markets, and other significant factors; takes the view that such regulatory efforts shouldit is necessary to ensure that there is relatively broad discretion to tailor the measures to be taken to the specific features of each market and should be based on the general principle of improving enforcement by involving the relevant public agencies and/or competent national bodies and platforms;
Amendment 391 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to assesscontinue to assess closely the effectiveness of the voluntary and self-regulatory schemes put in place to date and the effectivenessand of the regulatory action taken at national and EU level; calls for an assessment of the likely impact of the various types of EU regulatory action that have been proposed, with due account being taken of all the possible implications for the various stakeholders and for consumer welfarelevel to combat unfair trading practices; expects the results of the review to be communicated before 2019, focusing in particular on the creation of national platforms and follow-up to the recommendations made in the report of 29 January 2016 (COM (2016) 32) by the various stakeholders, particularly the SCIs;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the lack of a unitary system for the protection of geographical indications relating to non-agricultural products creates an inadequate and highly fragmented situation in Europe, arising from the fact that some Member States offer no specific protection and others have different national and local, sectoral or transversal rules, which have distorting effects, which hamper the harmonious development of the common market, as well as homogeneous protection and effective competition on equal terms, which prevent consumers from receiving accurate, truthful and comparable information and which are an obstacle to consumer protection;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is strongly convinced that extending protection of geographical indications to non-agricultural products could have many and varied positive effects for citizens, consumers, producers and the whole European economic and social fabric, as well as positive effects on trade relations which the EU maintains or is negotiating with third countries;
Amendment 37 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
- protect consumers more effectively and help them to make better informed choices about buying products, increasing transparency, furnishing more information about quality and origin, origin and production conditions and ensuring traceability;
Amendment 48 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 2
Paragraph 6 – indent 2
- help effectively to combat counterfeiting, fraudulent use of the name of a geographical origin and other unfair practices which mislead the final consumer and cause harm, most of all, to micro and medium-sized enterprises whichenterprises and SMEs which legitimately produce the vast majority of the products that could potentially receive protection and which currently do not have the legal or financial means to defend their interests;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 4
Paragraph 6 – indent 4
- promote the development of new, skilled employment with links to local areas, with particular reference to rural areas, depressed areas and to the poorest regions, imparting a fresh impetus to vocational and craft training closely connected to the development of localities and production areas;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 4
Paragraph 6 – indent 4
- promote the maintenance of infrastructure and the development of new, skilled employment with links to local areas, with particular reference to depressed areas and to the poorest regions, imparting a fresh impetus to vocational and craft training closely connected to the development of localities and production areas;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that this new protection scheme is not intended to replace existing instruments, and that the key word should be compatibility of new geographical indications with effective existing rights and systems;
Amendment 72 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that this system must be accompanied by the creation of a single European register, that it should be characterised by a cross-cutting approach in order to maximise its economic and social impact, and that it should making it possible to significantly enhance the existing link between products and their area of origin, in order tomprove transparency, increase the credibility and authenticity of a product and guarantee its origin and traceability;
Amendment 81 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Proposes that producer groups, their associations, chambers of commerce and local authorities should be authorised to apply for registration of a GI for non- agricultural products;
Amendment 28 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The technological development leading to a proliferation of portable devices such as tablets and smartphones increasingly facilitates the use of online content services by providing access to them regardless of the consumers’ location. There is a rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to content and innovative online services not only in their home country but also when they are temporarily present. Access to online content services should therefore be made easier for subscribers temporarily present in a Member State of the Union other than their Member State of residence. The concept of ‘temporary presence’ should be tailored to the objective of this Regulation, namely to provide cross-border portability of online content services to subscribers residing temporarily in another EU Member State of the Unionwho return regularly to their Member State of residence.
Amendment 42 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Consumers increasingly enter into contractual arrangements with service providers for the provision of online content services. However, consumers that are temporarily present in another Member State of the Union often cannot access and use the online content services that they have acquired the right to use in their home countryMember State of residence.
Amendment 49 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Therefore, increasingly, online content services are marketed in a package in which content which is not protected by copyright and/or related rights is not separable from content which is protected by copyright and/or related rights without substantially lessening the value of the service provided to consumers. This is especially the case with premium content such as sporting or other events of significant interest to consumers. In order to enable service providers to deliver to consumers, when the latter are temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence, full access to their online content services, it is indispensable that this Regulation also covers such content used by online content services and therefore that it applies to audiovisual media services within the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU as well as to transmissions of broadcasting organisations in their entirety.
Amendment 52 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The acquisition of a licence for the relevant rights is not always possible, notably when rights in content are licensed on an exclusive basis. In order to ensure the territorial exclusivity, online service providers often undertake, in their licence contracts with right holders, including broadcasting organisations or events organisers, to prevent their subscribers from accessing and using their service outside the territory for which the service provider holds the licence. These contractual restrictions imposed on service providers require providers to take measures such as disallowing access to their services from IP addresses located outside the territory concerned. Therefore, one of the obstacles to the cross-border portability of online content serviWithout violating the principle of territoriality, this Regulation should meet the demand for portability acces is to be found in the contracts concluded between the online service providers and their subscribers, which in turn reflect the territorial restriction clauses included in contracts concluded between those service providers and right holdersonline content services for any subscriber temporarily present in a Member State other than his or her Member State of residence.
Amendment 54 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Therefore, the objective of this Regulation is to adapt the legal framework in order to ensure that the licensing of rights no longer presents barriers to cross-border portability of online content services in the Union andconcerning copyright and related rights with a view to bringing about a common approach to the provision of online content services to subscribers temporarily present in a Member State other than their Member State of residence. The concept of cross-border portability should be clearly distinguished from that theof cross- border portability can be ensuredaccess, which does not lie within the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 143 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
Article 1
This Regulation introduces a common approach in the Union to ensuring that subscribers to online content services in the Union,ir Member State of residence can access and use these services when temporarily present in another Member State, can access and use these servisubject to effective prior verification of their Member State of residences.
Amendment 161 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) “Member State of residence” means the Member State where the subscriber is habitually residingand actually residing and to which he or she returns regularly;
Amendment 167 #
2015/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) “Temporarily present in a Member State” means a presence of a subscriber in a Member State other than the Member State of residence on a non-permanent basis;
Amendment 284 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) The shift to a circular economy should be in keeping with the pillars of sustainable development, and should therefore mirror its social benefits. The social and solidarity-based economy, which is traditionally connected with waste management and helps create jobs for the unemployed and socially marginalised, should be reinforced by the Member States.
Amendment 291 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 b (new)
Recital 14 b (new)
(14b) The role of actors in the social and solidarity-based economy, such as associations and social enterprises, in re- use and preparation for re-use, should be recognised and consolidated. Member States should take the necessary steps to promote the role of the actors in the social and solidarity-based economy in this field including, where relevant, through the appropriate economic instruments, social clauses as a criterion in the award of public contracts and ease of access to waste collection points, or any other economic or regulatory incentive.
Amendment 450 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 16
Article 3 – point 16
16. "preparing for re-use" means any checking, cleaning or repairing recovery operations, by which waste, products or components of products that have been collected by a recognised preparation for re-use operator or deposit-refund scheme are prepared so that they can become waste are prepared for re-used without any other pre-processing;
Amendment 614 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point - a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point - a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
(-a) in paragraph 1, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following: Such measures may include an acceptance of returned products and of the waste that remains after those products have been used, as well as the subsequent management of the waste and financial responsibility for such activities. These measures may include the obligation to provide publicly available – and particularly re-user available – information as to the extent to which the product is re- usable and recyclable. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that re-use operators have access to instruction manuals, spare parts, technical information and any other equipment, tools or software needed to prepare an item for re-use, taking due consideration of intellectual property rights.
Amendment 800 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8a – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. When a product is covered by an extended producer responsibility scheme, Member States shall ensure that treatment of the ultimate waste generated during re- use and preparation for re-use activities relating to that product is covered by the extended producer responsibility fee.
Amendment 1026 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) by 2025, the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste shall be increased to a minimum of 60% by weight, with a minimum of 2% of municipal waste prepared for re-use;
Amendment 1036 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) by 2030, the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste shall be increased to a minimum of 65% by weight., with a minimum of 5% of municipal waste prepared for re-use;
Amendment 157 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Bodies concerned with the cultural and historical aspects of weapons and recognised as such by the Member State in whose territory they are established and holding in their possession firearms classified in category A acquired before the date of entry into force of this Directive should be able to keep those firearms in their possession subject to authorisation by the Member State concerned and, provided that those firearmall the safety conditions have been deactivatedmet.
Amendment 236 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) To avoid that markings are easily erased and to clarCommon Union rules on marking should be introduced which ensure that markings cannot be removed, specify on which components the marking should be affixed, common Union rules on marking should be introduced and state what information should be included in the marking in order to ensure genuine traceability.
Amendment 244 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Firearms may be used for far more than 20 years. In order to ensure their traceability, records of them should be kept for an indeterminate period of time until destruction is certified by the competent authorities.
Amendment 266 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Selling arrangements of firearms and, their components and ammunition by means of distance communication may pose a serious threat to security as they are more difficult to control than the conventional selling methods, especially as regards the on line verification of the legality of authorisations. It is therefore appropriate to limit the selling of firearms and componentsammunition by means of distance communication, notably internet, to dealers and brokers.
Amendment 294 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) In order to improve the functioning of the information exchange between Member States, the Commission should assess the necessary elements of a European system to support such exchange of information contained in the computerised data-filing systems in place in Member States. The Commission's assessment may be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal taking into account existing instruments regarding exchange of information.
Amendment 298 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) In order to ensure appropriate exchange of information between the Member States on authorisations granted and on refusals, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of adopting an act to enable the Member States to create such aan automated European system ofor exchange ofing information electronically on authorisations granted and on refusals. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 368 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 1i
Article 1 – paragraph 1i
1i. For the purposes of this Directive, “deactivated firearms” shall mean firearms that have been modified with the purpose of rendering them permanently unfit for use by deactivation, ensuring that all essential parts of the firearm have been rendered permanently inoperable and incapampossible tof removale, replacement or a modificationy that would permit the firearm to be reactivated in any way, in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 of 15 December 2015 establishing common guidelines on deactivation standards and techniques for ensuring that deactivated firearms are rendered irreversibly inoperable1a. _________________ 1a OJ L 333, 19.12.2015, p. 62.
Amendment 432 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that any firearm or paressential component placed on the market has been irremovably marked and registered in compliance with this Directive.
Amendment 463 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The marking shall be affixed irremovably to the receiver of the firearm but also to the other essential components of the firearm as defined in Article 1(1b).
Amendment 527 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) are not likely to be a danger to themselves or others, to public order or to public safety; having been convicted of a violent intentional crime shall be considered as indicativevidence of such danger.
Amendment 557 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall provide for standard medical tests for issuing or renewing authorisations as referred to in paragraph 1, for the acquisition and possession of firearms, and shall withdraw authorisations if any of the conditions on the basis of which it was granted isthe acquisition or possession was allowed are no longer met.
Amendment 615 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Member States may authorise bodies concerned with the cultural and historical aspects of weapons and recognised as such by the Member State in whose territory they are established to keep in their possession firearms classified in category A acquired before [the date of entry into force of this Directive] provided they have been deactivated in accordance with the provisions that implement Article 10(b)A, provided that all safety conditions are met.
Amendment 693 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Member States shall make arrangements for the deactivation of firearms and of all essential parts thereof to be verified by a competent authority in order to ensure that the modifications made to a firearm and to all essential parts thereof render it irreversibly inoperable. Member States shall, in the context of this verification, provide for the issuance of a certificate or record attesting to the deactivation of the firearm orand the apposition of a clearly visible mark to that effect on the firearm.
Amendment 714 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9
Article 1 – point 9
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. The competent authorities of the Member States shall exchange information on the authorisations grantedelectronically, via an automated European system, on the authorisations granted, and on the refusals to grant authorisations, for the transfers of firearms to another Member State as well as information with regard to authorisations and refusals to grant authorisations as defined in Article 7.
Amendment 737 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 12
Article 1 – point 12
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
The Commission shall, by [date], assess the necessary elements of a European system for the exchange of information contained in the computerised data-filing systems referred to in Article 4(4) between the Member States. The Commission's assessment shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal taking into account existing instruments regarding exchange of information.
Amendment 18 #
2014/2256(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that copyright and related rights play an important role, as they protect and stimulate both the development and marketing of new products and services and the creation and exploitation of their creative content, thereby contributing to improved competitiveness, employment and innovation across several industry sectors in the EU; stresses that the EU has strong creative potential and rich cultural diversity that must be protected on the internal market and at international level by a clear and precise legal framework;
Amendment 27 #
2014/2256(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the need to ensure appropriate remuneration and to protect the rights of all categories of right holders in a better way; recalls that while the cultural and creative industries (CCI) employ more than seven million people and contribute 4.5% of EU GDP annually, and that even though the services, technologies and options permitting the general public to access creative works grow every day, the earnings of right holders in the CCI sector keep decreasing; stresses the need to raise consumer awareness of the consequences of infringement of copyright and related rights;
Amendment 34 #
2014/2256(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fact that Member States’ provisions on copyright and related rights vary considerably, and that the exclusivity which copyright grants its owner is, in principle, limited to the territorial boundaries of the Member State where the right has been granted, which leads to market fragmentation across the EU; recalls that this fragmentation is also the result of consumer preferences and market adaptation to them;
Amendment 6 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the importance of the tourism sector for the EU and its internal market, and stresses its potential as a driver of socio-economic growth and job creation; urges the EU to develop a more integrated approach to tourism, taking account of tourism when designing all its policies, particularly the digital agenda;
Amendment 14 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the EU should be ready to tap the potential of third countries with a large population and an emerging middle class, particularly the BRIC countries, where the number of outbound tourists is rising; points out the need for initiatives aimed at promoting tourism and for more flexibility in tourist visa arrangementincreasing the visibility of European tourism destinations;
Amendment 24 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission’s Digital Tourism Platform and its objectives of boosting the innovation capacity of tourism-related SMEs for the purpose of activating the tourism sector and of generating suggestionproposals for how to adapt and shape policies aimed at further developtourism policy and tools ing the tourism sectordigital age;
Amendment 35 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Member States and the Commission to simplify administrative procedures and taxation systems, taking into account specific challenges to SMEs in the tourism sector, to facilitate compliance in light of the rise of the sharing economy, and to ensure that the regulatory framework fosters innovation;
Amendment 42 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recommends the creation of an EU online application containing European travel maps,Urges the Commission to explore the possibility of creating online tools which could help to promote Europe as a tourist destination, and to improve the amount and quality of information available to consumers of tourism services both before and after departure;
Amendment 49 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need to have a more coordinated approach among Member States in tourism-related policy areas, such as innovation, transport, taxation, service quality and the visa regime, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity; recalls the importance of quality as a major component of consumers’ level of satisfaction, and calls on the sector’s professionals to continue improving the quality of the tourism services offered;
Amendment 70 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes the development of numerous cooperative practices and of the sharing economy in the tourism sector, and acknowledges the regulatory challenge that this development could represent because of its rapidity, its multiform nature and its variable market impact, as well as in relation to the rights of consumers, particularly vulnerable consumers;
Amendment 77 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the providers of tourism services should provide consumers with accurate information andensure that the information given to consumers regarding such services is accurate and comprehensible, and that consumers are not mislead or misinform them.ed;
Amendment 91 #
2014/2241(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to meet in full its commitments to oversee the effectiveness of consumer rights as regards tourism services in the EU, and recalls the importance of this approach in identifying shortcomings and discerning suggested improvements;
Amendment 34 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is convinced, however, that TTIP should not only cut down barriers but also aim at promoting European high levels of consumer protection; observes that in most sectors EU and US standards and regulatory environmentsaccording to the TFUE (Treaty on the functioning of the EU), the EU shall ensure this high level; considers, therefore, that approximating our regulations represents a unique chance to establish high-quality standards and laws for consumers which will be the de facto international standards; stresses that such approximation must preserve the level of protection of existing standards and not preclude adopting future high standards;
Amendment 138 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the setting-up of an ambitious and effective cooperation mechanism aimed at creating common standards where possible in existing procedures, and at establishing a dialogue between regulators on technical procedures to ensure that there is no unintended divergence in future standards in key sectors covered by TTIP; believes that EU- US common standards should be promoted in all international forums;
Amendment 172 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Supports the establishment of a mandatory structural dialogue and cooperation between regulators, in complete respect of regulatory autonomy, in particular in the engineering sector, comprising electrical and mechanical machinery, appliances and equipmentlimited to the sectors covered by TTIP and in complete respect of regulatory autonomy; welcomes an improved regulatory cooperation; stresses that this should involve early warning mechanisms and exchanges at the time of preparation of regulations; believes that regulatory divergences are the central non-tariff barrier (NTB) to trade, and that regulators should explore ways to promote compatibility, such as mutual recognition, harmonisation or alignment of requirements in the engineering sector, comprising electrical and mechanical machinery, appliances and equipment, and that regulators should explore ways to promote compatibility;
Amendment 279 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) to attempt to make the negotiations lead to a convergence of standards, based on norms of demanding quality and safety, since the European model, with its high quality standards, is not negotiable;
Amendment 300 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to consider that this agreement will be ‘win-win’ only if the European Union gives itself the means for greater integration, which involves completion of the Single Market and strengthening of its economic, budgetary, fiscal and political governance;
Amendment 495 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
(xi) to ensure that account is taken of the discrepancies in the openness of public procurement markets on both sides of the Atlantic and the huge interest on the part of European companies in obtaining access to public contracts in the US both at federal and state level, for example for construction services, traffic infrastructure and goods and services while respecting sustainability criteria for procurement on both sides, inter alia the new EU procurement and concession package entering into force in 2016; to invite the European Union to introduce a ‘European Business Act’, modelled on the ‘American Business Act’ and supporting the economic development of SMEs and European industry;
Amendment 806 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv a (new)
(xva) to ensure that the agreement guarantees a high level of protection for European Geographical Indications for consumer products and for food, wines and spirits, enabling the producers’ know- how to be preserved;
Amendment 14 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. Whereas the countries worst hit by the current outbreak of Ebola in West Africa were countries with particularly under resourced, under staffed and vulnerable health systems.
Amendment 66 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. Whereas the impact of the Ebola crisis exceeds its mortality rates affecting the prosperity of their whole economies. In 2015 alone according to the World Bank, the impact on GDP of the three most affected countries will be 2 billion dollars, as a direct consequence of the crisis.
Amendment 68 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. Whereas the impact of the death rates in affected countries are further worsened by struggling health systems which are unable to provide basic services like immunisation, childcare and maternal health services.
Amendment 78 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Requires the Member States and the Commission to coordinate and strengthen medical research and the production of efficient medicines and vaccines against Ebola, and to advance the necessary clinical trials for existing candidate treatments; with other public and private stakeholders including WHO, against Ebola and other emerging diseases that are otherwise neglected by the commercial sector.
Amendment 82 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the European Commission's mobilisation of €24.4 million in 2014 and €114 million in 2015 from Horizon 2020 to fund research projects that combat Ebola through the development of vaccines, rapid diagnostics tests, and clinical trials to test existing and new Ebola compound treatments.
Amendment 84 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Salutes that in January 2015 the first trial of a potential drug to treat Ebola started at a Medecins Sans Frontieres centre in Liberia. Vaccines trials, which would normally take decades, are now being fast-tracked in Ebola-affected countries on a timescale of weeks and months.
Amendment 101 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recognises the suspicion that the first human to contract Ebola became infected directly or indirectly through contact with a wild animal carrying the virus, most likely an infected bat. Urges Members States to follow FAO’s recommendations of enforcing strict legal restrictions on the trade, hunting and capture of bush meat, which poses a threat to human health and biodiversity.
Amendment 139 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the conclusions of the 10- 11 December 2014 ‘High level meeting on building resilient systems for health in Ebola-affected countries’, in which the governments of the affected countries reiterated their commitment to lead the work on building resilient health systems through national plans that will be used as the basis on which all international actors and partners can define roles and responsibilities.
Amendment 140 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses the importance of the EU avoiding a ‘one size fits all approach’ when providing crisis assistance in developing countries, in particular paying attention to sub-national health systems by increasing the qualified health workforce, improving capacities for surveillance and increasing the predictability of supplies and coordinated supply chains.
Amendment 160 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Requires all actors involved in the response to take a much more flexible approach and allocate resources according to the most pressing needs at any given time and place, taking into account the long term objective to eradicate Ebola and prevent future outbreaks.
Amendment 164 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Requests the Commission, once this outbreak is under control, to come forward with a report drawing on the lessons from the West African Ebola outbreak, highlighting potential areas of improvement in future EU’s response to similar health crises.
Amendment 165 #
2014/2204(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Urges all actors involved in the crisis to consider the opportunities that new technologies have to offer in delivering improved speed of response
Amendment 6 #
2014/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that tackling the fragmentation of the digital single market and guaranteeing an open internet and net neutrality are essential to increase consumer confidence and foster competition and boost growth and competitiveness in the digital sector;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to closefind effective solutions for improving net neutrality, to ensure a level playing field in online search and advertising and to accelerate investigations into potential abuse of dominant positions in these sectors; calls on the Commission to closely and vigorously evaluate the implementation by Google of the binding commitments resulting from the agreement of February 2014; believes abusive dominant positions created by the so-called ‘first mover’ advantages and network effects in the digital sector should be more closely regulated and monitored;
Amendment 5 #
2014/2151(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that IPRs are not just copyrights, but trademarks and patents, among others, and each of these is vital to the values of Europe's goods and services;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2151(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need for Commission's actions on IPR enforcement to be adapted to the growth of the Digital Single Market and to address both digital and physical IPR infringement equally; notes that increasingly counterfeit and IPR infringing physical goods are traded and sold via online marketplaces, where Member States authorities have limited abilities to control sales; stresses the need to enrol marketplace platform owners in all efforts to enforce IPRs, including efforts towards the removal of counterfeit goods and the banning of sellers from their sites;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2151(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Asks Member States’ authorities to ensure that IPR infringing goods, that are a safety risk, are included into RAPEX notifications, regardless if the goods is sold legally or illegally in their Member State;
Amendment 25 #
2014/2151(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’'s proposed Green Paper on consulting stakeholders on the impact of chargeback and related schemes to tackle commercial scale IP infringements and to assess the need to take more concrete actions in this field; believes that introduction of a EU-wide right to ‘chargeback’ on all unwilling bought counterfeit goods would be a positive benefit for consumers and encourage traders to verify goods before putting them on sale;
Amendment 36 #
2014/2151(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes any potential actions on due diligence throughout the supply chain which leads to fewer IP infringing goods; stresses that such actions must be targeted in nature, without creating additional administrative burdens on the average trader, and flexible as IP infringers move from one product to another to avoid controls;
Amendment 150 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Products intended for private use to protect against atmospheric conditions that are not of an extreme nature should include items such as seasonal clothing and umbrellas. Products intended for private use to protect against damp and water should include items such as dishwashing gloves. Products intended for private use to protect against heat, for which the economic operator does not claim a protective function, should include items such as decorative oven gloves.
Amendment 160 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 b (new)
Recital 24 b (new)
(24b) In order to ensure that the review process takes place without placing an unnecessary burden on manufacturers, a simplified procedure should be applied for re-certification of the EU type examination certificate when the product, applied harmonised standards or other technical solutions applied by the manufacturer have not been changed and continue to meet the essential health and safety requirements in the light of the state of the art, making therefore unnecessary additional tests or technical examinations.
Amendment 169 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new)
(i) atmospheric conditions that are not of an extreme nature (including, but not limited to, seasonal clothing and umbrellas);
Amendment 171 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)
(ii) damp and water not of an extreme nature (including, but not limited to, dish- washing gloves);
Amendment 172 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (new)
(iii) heat (including, but not limited to, gloves) for which the economic operator does not explicitly claim a protective function against extreme heat;
Amendment 177 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) in the form of clothing, with reflective or fluorescent garments that do not completely encircle a part of the body (arm, leg, or chest), which are included for reasons of fashion and for which the economic operator does not explicitly claim a protective function against one or more risks to the user's health or safety;
Amendment 179 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
(c) connexion systems for equipment referred to in point (a) that are not held or worn by a person, that are intenddesigned to connect that equipment to an external device or structure, that are removable and not intended to be permanently fixed to a structurto a reliable anchorage point, that are not designed to be permanently fixed and that do not require fastening works before use;
Amendment 184 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. Manufacturers shall ensure that procedures are in place for series production to remain in conformity with this Regulation. Changes in the design or characteristics of the PPE and changes in the harmonised standards or in other technical specifications by reference to which the conformity of the PPE is declared shall be adequately taken into account. and accordingly attest it by the EU declaration of conformity. 4a. Changes in the harmonised standards or in other technical specifications as regards the EHSR and changes in Annexes I or II to this Regulation shall be adequately taken into account by either repeating or updating or integrating the conformity assessment procedures as provided for in Article 18. 4b. Changes in the harmonised standards or in other technical specifications not in relation with the EHSR shall be adequately taken into account by the manufacturers, which may decide to either repeat, update or integrate the conformity assessment procedures as provided for in Article 18. 4c. Changes by the manufacturer in the design or characteristics of the PPE that affect the compliance with EHSR shall be adequately taken into account by either repeating or updating or integrating the conformity assessment procedures as provided for in Article 18. 4d. With regard to PPE of categories II and III, manufacturers that intend to change the design or characteristics of the PPE without impact to the compliance with EHSR shall inform and obtain authorisation from the notified body.
Amendment 191 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Manufacturers shall ensure that performance as recorded during relevant technical tests to check the levels of classes of protection provided by the PPE is available electronically or upon request.
Amendment 207 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. For category III PPE, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body involved in the procedure for ensuring conformity to type based on product verification or the procedure for ensuring conformity to type based on quality assurance of the production process. The identification number of the notified body shall be affixed by the manufacturer or his authorised representative after having received permission and instructions from the notified body to do so.
Amendment 210 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. The application for notification shall be accompanied by a description of the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment procedure(s) and the kinds of PPE for which that body claims to be competent, as well as by an accreditation certificate, where one exists, issued by a national accreditation body attesting that the conformity assessment body fulfils the requirements laid down in Article 23.
Amendment 211 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Amendment 212 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4
Article 27 – paragraph 4
Amendment 214 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
Article 35 – paragraph 2
Amendment 218 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – section 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Annex I – section 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) contact with water or cleaning materials of weak action or prolonged contact with water;
Amendment 220 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – section 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex I – section 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) inhalation of harmful substanchealth hazardous substances, chemicals and mixtures;
Amendment 221 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – section 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Annex I – section 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) aggressive chemicalharmful biological agents;
Amendment 222 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – section 3 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
Annex I – section 3 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) occupational risk of severe impact to the head.
Amendment 224 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 1 – point 1.3 – point 1.3.3 a (new)
Annex II – part 1 – point 1.3 – point 1.3.3 a (new)
1.3.3 a. Protective clothing containing removable protectors Protective clothing containing removable protectors constitute PPE and should be assessed as a combination during conformity assessment procedures.
Amendment 225 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 1 – point 1.4 – introductory part
Annex II – part 1 – point 1.4 – introductory part
1.4. Manufacturer's instructions and information
Amendment 226 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 1 – point 1.4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Annex II – part 1 – point 1.4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 228 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 1
Annex II – part 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 1
As far as possible, PPE enclosing the parts of the body to be protected must be sufficiently ventilatdesigned to limit perspiration resulting from use; otherwise, it must be equipped with means of absorbing perspiration must be incorporated.
Amendment 229 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 2 – point 2.9 – paragraph 1
Annex II – part 2 – point 2.9 – paragraph 1
Where PPE incorporates components which can be adjusted or removed by the user for replacement purposes, they must be designed and manufactured so that they can be easily attached, adjusted and removed without tools.
Amendment 232 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 3 – point 3.4 – title
Annex II – part 3 – point 3.4 – title
3.4. Protection in the waterliquids
Amendment 233 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 3 – point 3.4 – point 3.4.2 – paragraph 1
Annex II – part 3 – point 3.4 – point 3.4.2 – paragraph 1
Clothing which will ensure an effective degree of buoyancy, depending on its foreseeable use, which is safe when worn and which affords positive support in waterliquids. In foreseeable conditions of use, this PPE must not restrict the user's freedom of movement but must enable him, in particular, to swim or take action to escape from danger or to rescue other persons.
Amendment 238 #
2014/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – section 1 – point 7 – point 7.6 a (new)
Annex V – section 1 – point 7 – point 7.6 a (new)
7.6.a When the product, harmonised standards or other technical solutions applied by the manufacturer have not been changed and continue to meet the essential health and safety requirements, in light of the state of the art standards, a simplified procedure shall be applied for automatic re-certification therefore making additional tests or technical examinations unnecessary.
Amendment 58 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is greatly concerned by the persistent uncertainty of private investors, their lack of confidence and theirPoints out that the incomplete operation of the Single Market represents a considerable loss both for private investors, who may be reluctancet to invest, in particular and consumers, who are deprived of easy a consequence of productivity standards with persisting Single Market fragmentationccess to the goods and services offered in other Member States;
Amendment 82 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that there is a clear need to update EU Single Market rules for the digital era, establishing a single area for online payments, e-invoicing, protecting intellectual property rights and clarifying VAT requirements, in order to generate trust in e-commerce and afford adequate protection to EU consumers online; points out, furthermore, the importance of effective enforcement of the rights of online consumers and affordable and effective means of redress in the event of a dispute;
Amendment 101 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Reiterates its support for comprehensive trade and investment agreements that wouldinsofar as they support the creation of quality jobs for European workers, directly benefit European consumers and open up new opportunities for EU companies, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
Amendment 110 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that consumer protection in the area of financial services should be strengthened and consumers’ financial capabilities raised, given the significant potential damage that financial servicesthey can cause to individual consumers and the Single Market– especially to vulnerable consumers – and the risks of excessive debt they may involve if they are poorly regulated, too complex, contain hidden fees or prove to be unsafe;
Amendment 122 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the fact that in 2014, the third generation of the EU regulation on public procurement was adopted with a view to simplifying and improving the 2004 regime – particularly in order to facilitate the procedures and make them more transparent, and offer more opportunities to SMEs and microenterprises – and overcoming interpretation problems and heterogeneity in concession contracts;
Amendment 133 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation and enforcement of rules such as the Cdirective on consumer Rrights Directiveand the right of appeal;
Amendment 152 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Acknowledges the continuous increase in the use of the Your Europe and Your Europe Advice portals, which should be able to provide the necessary information to anyone living, working or studying in, or moving around, the EU;
Amendment 158 #
2014/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Urges the Member States and the Commission to step up their efforts to enforce Single Market legislation and to monitor this enforcement, inter alia through regular EU inspection sweeps; calls urgently for increased monitoring of the effectiveness of consumer rights in the digital environment, particularly given the speed with which breaches of consumer legislation can spread in that environment;
Amendment 17 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that a better exchange of information between Member States is needed; calls on all Member States to create or assign a national focal point to which businesses and other victims of misleading practices can report them, and where they can obtain information on judicial and non-judicial means of redress, as well as help and expertise regarding the prevention and tackling of various forms of fraud; considers that each focal point should maintain a database recording all types of misleading marketing practices and including easy-to-understand examples; calls on the Commission to ensure coordination of a smooth exchange of information from the national databases, inter alia by facilitating the setting-up of a rapid alert system identifying new practices;
Amendment 19 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the national focal points should play an active role in sharing information between public authorities, citizens and businesses, and should work together in order to warn each other of new misleading practices and assist SMEs in the settlement of crossborder disputes by directproviding defrauded companies to the most appropriate legal mechanismwith information on judicial and non-judicial means of redress;
Amendment 23 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 27 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the need for national enforcement authorities to work more closely together with enablers of misleading marketing practices, such as banks, telephone companies, postal services and collection agencies, in order to prevent rogue companies from operating;
Amendment 37 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. RegretsNotes that the Commission’s failure to take up Parliament’s recommendation has no plans for a partial extension of the scope of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive by having Annex I (the blacklist) cover business-to-business (B2B) contracts; considers that amending this directive instead of Directive 2006/114/EC will result in a more coherent approach since it will ext and that it plans to broadend the concept of unfair commercial practices, together with the blacklist, to B2B relations; stresses that this will avoid the need for broadening the concept of misleading advertising, which is necessary in order to capture all forms of misleading practicmisleading advertising to encompass additional forms of misleading practice, including misleading directory schemes;
Amendment 42 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 50 #
2013/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes with concern that dispute resolution processes have proven inefficient, lengthy and costly, and that they offer no guarantee of adequate and timely compensation for the damage caused; calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal that makes it possible for the victims of misleading marketing practices to act collectively in a case against a rogue company; stresses that the victims should have the option of being represented by designated organisations, such as national entrepreneurs’ organisations; calls for effective remedies for victims, including the annulment of the contracts concernedstresses the need to remedy this state of affairs, and thus enable victims to obtain fair compensation;
Amendment 4 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the protection of consumers and their rights is one of the Union’s fundamental values,
Amendment 5 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Directive aims, through the ‘internal market clause, to ensure a high level of consumer protection throughout the European Union and to boost consumer confidence in the single market, whilst guaranteeing businesses significant legal certainty and a reduction in barriers to cross-border trade,
Amendment 9 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas some undertakings, particularly the smaller ones, as well as many consumers, are still insufficiently aware of consumers’ rights in Europe,
Amendment 10 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas it is necessary to strengthen the role of consumers’ associations and enable them to enhance their capacities,
Amendment 16 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Takes the view that the derogations laid down for the property and financial services sectors are justified and that it is appropriate for them to be retained;
Amendment 22 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that Member States may no longer since 12 June 2013 maintain the provisions retained until that date as temporary derogations; calls as a consequence on Member States to comply with the Directive as swiftly as possible; at the same time, calls on the Commission to rapidly evaluate the impact of the dropping of these provisions on consumer protection in the various Member States;
Amendment 29 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Supports the Commission’s wish to draw up a list of indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism whereby the Member States implement the directive;
Amendment 31 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reasserts the importance of enhanced cooperation between national authorities responsible for applying the Directive; encourages the Commission in this respect to examine thoroughly the scope, effectiveness and operational mechanisms of the Consumer Protection Cooperation Regulation (CPC Regulation), as it has committed itself to doing before the end of 2014; welcomes, with that in mind, the recent opening by the Commission of a public consultation on the revision of that regulation;
Amendment 38 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the efforts of the Commission to assist Member States in transposing and applying the directive;
Amendment 41 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises the importance of the guidance document produced by the Commission to assist in application of the Directive; welcomes the Commission s intention to revise this document by 2014; encourages the Commission to be transparent in its work on this document, holding wide-ranging consultations with stakeholders throughout the process;
Amendment 45 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Reiterates the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU to the effect that bundled sales, which do not feature on the ‘Black List’ in Annex I, can only be prohibited on a case by case basis, in accordance with the general principles of Directive 2005/29/EC; stresses that for reasons of legal certainty, and to guarantee a high level of consumer protection, the Commission should specify, at least as part of its review of the guidance document, or, if it considers it necessary, through a new legislative instrument on promotional sales, in what precise cases bundled sales should be deemed illegal;
Amendment 46 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Stresses that the use of false environmental claims is an unfair practice which is on the rise; encourages the Commission to expand the section of the guidance document devoted to this practice in order to clarify the application of the directive for economic operators; at the same time, calls on the Commission to explore the initiatives it could take to improve consumer protection against such practices;
Amendment 47 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to raise business' awareness of consumer rights in order to promote greater respect for these rights by economic operators;
Amendment 48 #
2013/2116(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 d (new)
Paragraph 12 d (new)
12d. Points out that many consumers hesitate to ask for redress when it seems to them that the amount concerned is not very high; stresses that consumers need to be made more aware of the support available to them from both consumer associations and the network of European consumer centres;
Amendment 37 #
2013/2073(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the personal and social development of young people is just as important as academic and professional development; whereas young people play an active role in the social infrastructure of Member States and are central to sustainable and vibrant communities;
Amendment 63 #
2013/2073(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the new EU programme for education, training, youth and sport; underlines the need for robust funding for this programme and both a separate chapter and a separate budget allocation for the youth part;
Amendment 72 #
2013/2073(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the importance of language learning to promote youth employability and labour mobility with a view to ensuring that young people fully benefit from their rights and freedoms in the EU employment market;
Amendment 139 #
2013/2073(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need for Member States to improve support for self-employed young people, provide a safety net for failed start- ups; calls on them to eliminate red tape;
Amendment 61 #
2013/2045(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance of bringing university education more closely into line with the skills required by economic operators in order to make it easier for graduates to find jobs;
Amendment 90 #
2013/2045(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to ensure young people have greater access to job offers and offers of traineeships; calls on the Member States to ensure that basic training in job-seeking skills is incorporated into students’ university courses;
Amendment 6 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance of developing the sustainability of our economy so as to achieve the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy, and calls for sustainability to form a key element of European industrial policy; notes the need to encourage environmentally friendly production processes, to ensure consumer goods have longer lifetimes, to encourage recycling and to further improve the energy efficiency of goods produced in the internal market.
Amendment 7 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Considers that, to encourage innovation and boost European competitiveness, it is essential to significantly increase Europe’s research and development capacity;
Amendment 50 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that a strong industrial policy must be accompanied by action to optimise our products’ market position, and consequently that it is essential to place the emphasis on product quality; stresses, also, the need to maintain, upgrade and develop the craft skills base in Europe;
Amendment 51 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the contribution made by companies producing high-end goods and services to growth, employment and competitiveness in the European Union, given that this sector accounts for 3% of EU GDP, has an annual turnover of over EUR 400 billion and generates almost 1.5 million direct and indirect jobs in Europe, according to the Commission’s Staff Working Document on the Competitiveness of the European High- End Industries published on 26 September 2012;
Amendment 34 #
2013/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Draws attention to the advantage of applying variable network use charges in order to encourage customers to consume outside peak periods in the interests of rational energy use;
Amendment 33 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) It is appropriate to provide for rules at Union level to approximate the national legislative systems so as to ensure a sufficient and consistent level of redress across the internal market in case of unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of a trade secret. For this purpose, it is important to establish a homogenous definition of a trade secret without restricting the subject matter to be protected against misappropriation. Such definition should therefore be constructed as to cover business information, technological information and know-how where there is both a legitimate interest in keeping confidential and a legitimate expectation in the preservation of such confidentiality. By nature, such definition should exclude trivial information and should not extend to the knowledge and skills gained by employees in the normal course of their employment and which are known among or accessible to persons within the circles that normally deal with the kind of information in question. It is also appropriate to define at Union level the situations where the acquisition, use and disclosure of a trade secret is lawful or unlawful, and to limit the period of application of redress procedures, for the Directive to serve its purpose of consistent protection of trade secrets in the Union.
Amendment 36 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The acquisition or disclosure of a trade secret by a public body, whether imposed or permitted by law, should not constitute an unlawful use or disclosure. Such acquisition or disclosure should however be clearly within the mandate of the relevant public body, and exceeding this mandate should constitute an unlawful act.
Amendment 39 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In line with the principle of proportionality the measures and remedies intended to protect trade secrets should be tailored to meet the objective of a smooth functioning internal market for research and innovation, in particular by having a deterrent effect against the unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure of a trade secret, without jeopardising other objectives and principles of public interest. In this respect, the measures and remedies ensure that competent judicial authorities account for the value of a trade secret, the seriousness of the conductall relevant circumstances resulting in the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret as well as the impact of such conductacquisition, use or disclosure. It should also be ensured that the competent judicial authorities are provided with the discretion to weigh up the interests of the parties to the litigation, as well as the interests of third parties including, where appropriate, consumers.
Amendment 43 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The smooth functioning of the internal market would be undermined if the measures and remedies provided for were used to pursue illegitimate intents, such as creating unjustified barriers to the internal market or to labour mobility, that are incompatible with the objectives of this Directive. Therefore, it is important to ensure that judicial authorities are empowered to sanction abusive behaviour by claimants who act in bad faith and submit manifestly unfounded applications. It is also important that measures and remedies provided for should not restrict the freedom of expression and information (which encompasses media freedom and pluralism as reflected in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) or whistleblowing activity. Therefore the protection of trade secrets should not extend to cases in which disclosure of a trade secret serves the public interest in so far as relevant misconduct or wrongdoing is revealed.
Amendment 50 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) For the same reason, it is also important to provide for measures to prevent further unlawful use or disclosure of a trade secret. For prohibitory measures to be effective, their dura and proportionate, wthen circumstances require a limitation in time,ir duration should be sufficient to eliminate any commercial advantage which the third party could have derived from the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret and should be limited in time to avoid the creation of unjustified barriers to competition in the internal market. In any event, no measure of this type should be enforceable if the information originally covered by the trade secret is in the public domain for reasons that cannot be attributed to the respondent.
Amendment 52 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) A trade secret may be unlawfully used to design, manufacture, develop or market services or goods, or components thereof, which may spread across the internal market, thus affecting the commercial interests of the trade secret holder and the functioning of the internal market. In those cases and when the trade secret in question has a significant impact on the quality, value or price of the resulting good or service or on reducing the cost, facilitating or speeding up its manufacturing, development or marketing processes, it is important to empower judicial authorities to order appropriate measures with a view to ensure that those goods or services are not put on the market or are removed from it. Considering the global nature of trade, it is also necessary that these measures include the prohibition of importing those goods into the Union or storing them for the purposes of offering or placing them on the market. Having regard to the principle of proportionality, corrective measures should not necessarily entail the destruction of the goods when other viable options are present, such as depriving the good of its infringing quality or the disposal of the goods outside the market, for example, by means of donations to by charitable organisations.
Amendment 55 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) To act as a supplementary deterrent to future infringers and to contribute to the awareness of the public at large, it is useful to publicise decisions, including where appropriate through prominent advertising, in cases concerning the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets, as long as such publication does not result in the disclosure of the trade secret nor disproportionally affect the privacy and reputation of natural persons. There is also a necessity to raise awareness, especially for small and medium-sized businesses, of the availability of redress and remedies in cases of unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets.
Amendment 75 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) ‘trade secret’ means undisclosed know- how and business information which meets all of the following requirements:
Amendment 84 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘infringing goods or services’ means goods whose design,or services whose quality, manufcharactuering processtics or marketing significantly benefits from trade secrets unlawfully acquired, used or disclosed.
Amendment 91 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The acquisition of a trade secret without the consent of the trade secret holder shall be considered unlawful whenever carried out intentionally or with gross negligence by:
Amendment 105 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) is in breach of a confidentiality agreement or any other duty to maintain secrecy ofnot to disclose the trade secret;
Amendment 107 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) is in breach of a contractual or any other duty to limit the use or disclosure of the trade secret.
Amendment 113 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. The conscious and deliberate production, offering or placing on the market of infringing goods, or import, export or storage of infringing goods for those purposes, shall be considered an unlawful use of a trade secret, when the person carrying out such activities knew, or should, under the circumstances, have known that the trade secret was used unlawfully.
Amendment 115 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) observation, study, disassembly or test of a product or object that has been made available to the public or that it is lawfully in the possession of the acquirer of the information, unless the information acquired is used in a manner contrary to honest commercial practices;
Amendment 118 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) exercise of the right of workers or workers’ representatives to information and consultation in accordance with Union and national law and/or practices;
Amendment 125 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall ensure that there shall be no entitlement to the application for the measures, procedures and remedies provided for in this Directive whenThe acquisition, use and disclosure of trade secrets shall be considered lawful to the extent that the alleged acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret was carried out in any of the following cases:
Amendment 132 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for the purpose of revealing an applicant’s misconduct, wrongdoing or illegal activity, provided that the alleged acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret was necessary for such revelation and that the respondent acted in the public interest;
Amendment 162 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that actions for the application of the measures, procedures and remedies provided for in this Directive may be brought within at least one year but not more than twohree years after the date on which the applicant became aware, or had reason to become aware, of the last fact giving rise to the action.
Amendment 172 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall also ensure that the competent judicial authorities may, on a duly reasoned application by a party, take specific measures necessary to preserve the confidentiality of any trade secret or alleged trade secret used or referred to in the course of the legal proceedings relating to the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of a trade secret. Member States may also allow the competent judicial authorities to take such measures on their own initiative.
Amendment 186 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. When deciding on the granting or the rejection of the application referred to in paragraph 2 and assessing its proportionality, the competent judicial authorities shall take into account the need to guarantee the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, the legitimate interests of the parties and, where appropriate of third parties, and any potential harm for either of the parties, and where appropriate third parties, resulting from the granting or rejection of such application.
Amendment 190 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the competent judicial authorities have, in respect of the measures referred to in Article 9, the authority to require the applicant to provide evidence that may reasonably be considered available in order to satisfy themselves that the know-how or business information involved qualifies as a trade secret exists, that the applicant is the legitimate trade secret holder and that the trade secret has been acquired unlawfully, that the trade secret is being unlawfully used or disclosed, or that an unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret is imminent.
Amendment 191 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that in deciding on the granting or rejecting of the application and assessing its proportionality, the competent judicial authorities shall be required to take into account all relevant aspects of the case, such as the value of the trade secret, the measures taken to protect the trade secret, the intentional or unintentional conduct of the respondent in acquiring, disclosing or using of the trade secret, the impact of the unlawful disclosure or use of the trade secret, the legitimate interests of the parties and the impact which the granting or rejection of the measures could have on the parties, the legitimate interests of third parties, the public interest and the safeguard of fundamental rights, including freedom of expression and information.
Amendment 198 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, in considering a request for the adoption of the injunctions and corrective measures provided for in Article 11 and assessing their proportionality, the competent judicial authorities take into account all relevant aspects of the case, such as the value of the trade secret, the measures taken to protect the trade secret, the conduct of the infringer in acquiring, disclosing or using of the trade secret, the impact of the unlawful disclosure or use of the trade secret, the legitimate interests of the parties and the impact which the granting or rejection of the measures could have on the parties, the legitimate interests of third parties, the public interest and the safeguard of fundamental rights, including freedom of expression and information.
Amendment 202 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 212 #
2013/0402(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the competent judicial authorities, on the application of the injured party, order the infringer who knew or ought to have known that he or she was engaging in unlawful acquisition, disclosure or use of a trade secret, to pay the trade secret holder damages commensurate to the actual prejudice suffered. as a result of the offence. In accordance with their national laws and practices, Member States may limit the liability for damages of employees towards their employers for the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of a trade secret of the employer when they act without intent.
Amendment 43 #
2013/0165(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The provision of accurate and reliable positioning information is an essential element of the effective operation of the eCall in-vehicle system. Therefore, it is appropriate to require its compatibility with the operational services provided by satellite navigation programmes, includingfor example the systems established under the Galileo and EGNOS programmes set out in Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo)8. __________________ 8 OJ L 196, 24.7.2008, p.1. OJ L 196, 24.7.2008, p.1.
Amendment 52 #
2013/0165(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to ensure open choice for customers and fair competition, as well as encourage innovation and boost the competitiveness of the Union’'s information technology industry on the global market, the eCall in-vehicle system should be accessible free of charge and without discrimination to all independent operators, and based on an interoperable and open- access platform for possible future in- vehicle applications or servict least for repair and maintenance purposes.
Amendment 60 #
2013/0165(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Vehicle manufacturers should be allowed sufficient time36 months from the date of publication of this Regulation and its delegated acts in the Official Journal of the European Union to adapt to the technical requirements of this Regulation.
Amendment 82 #
2013/0165(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Manufacturers shall ensure that the receivers in the in-vehicle systems are compatible with the operational positioning services provided by satellite navigation systems including, for example the Galileo and the EGNOS systems.
Amendment 110 #
2013/0165(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
Article 7
With effect from 1 October 2015the date specified in Article 12, national authorities shall only grant EC type- approval in respect of the eCall in-vehicle system to new types of vehicles which comply with this Regulation and the delegated acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation.
Amendment 120 #
2013/0165(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from 1 October 201536 months after the date of its publication and that of its delegated acts in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 87 #
2013/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Longer vehicles may be used in cross- border transport if the two Member States concerned already allow it and if the conditions for derogation under Article 4(3), (4) or (5) of the Directive are met. The European Commission has already provided guidance on the applicatTo ensure that there is no distortion of competition between hauliers from different Member States, it is essential that the dimensions of Article 4 of the Directive. Thethe vehicles used for international transport operations areferred to in Article 4(4) do not have a significant impact on international competition if the cross- border use remains limited to two Member States where the existing infrastructure and the road safety requirements allow it common to all. Any exceptions to these common standards are exclusively limited to national transport operations. This balances the Member States’ right under the principle of subsidiarity to decide on transport solutions suited to their specific circumstances with the need to prevent such policies from distorting the internal market. The provisions of Article 4 (4) are clarified in this respectobjectives set out in the White Paper.
Amendment 143 #
2013/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Directive 96/53/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(2) In Article 4 is amended as follows:(4), the following subparagraph is inserted after the second subparagraph: 'Without prejudice to Member States' rights laid down in Acts on Accession to the Union, international transport operations carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations with dimensions deviating from those laid down in Annex I shall be prohibited.'
Amendment 156 #
2013/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Amendment 99 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Passengers must enjoy specific protection in the event of flight cancellations due to the insolvency of an air carrier or the suspension of an air carrier’s operations due to the revocation of its operating licence; air carriers should be obliged to provide sufficient evidence of security for the reimbursement of passengers or their repatriation.
Amendment 116 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 2 – point l
Article 2 – point l
Amendment 126 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 2 – point v
Article 2 – point v
Amendment 131 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Amendment 153 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point 4 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point 4 a (new)
4a. If the aircraft is rerouted to land at an airport other than the one initially scheduled for reasons beyond the air carrier's control, the latter shall arrange to transfer its passengers as rapidly as possible to the scheduled point of arrival and shall provide them with assistance in accordance with Article 8(1)(a).
Amendment 158 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 5
Article 6 – paragraph 5
Subject to safety constraints, where a tarmac delay exceeds one hour, the operating air carrier shall provide free of charge access to toilet facilities and drinking water, shall ensure adequate heating or cooling of the passenger cabin, and shall ensure that adequate medical attention is available if needed. Where a tarmac delay reaches a maximum of fiveour hours, the aircraft shall return to the gate or another suitable disembarkation point where passengers shall be allowed to disembark and to benefit from the same assistance as specified in paragraph 1, unless there are safety-related or, security- related or legislative reasons why the aircraft cannot leave its position on the tarmac.'
Amendment 160 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c a
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Paragraph 5a (new) is added: "5a. In the event of cancellation of a flight due to the insolvency of an air carrier or suspension of operations of an air carrier due to the revocation of its operating licence, passengers shall have the right to reimbursement or a return flight to the point of departure in accordance with point (a) of Article 8(1) and the right to care as specified in Article 9. Air carriers shall provide sufficient evidence of security for reimbursement and repatriation costs.’
Amendment 164 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 a – paragraph 1
Article 6 a – paragraph 1
Where a passenger misses a connecting flight as a result of a delay or change of schedule to a preceding flight, the Community air carrier operating the onward connecting flightresponsible for the delay shall offer the passenger:
Amendment 192 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 14 – paragraph 5
Article 14 – paragraph 5
In the event of cancellation or delay in departure, passengers shall be informed by the operating air carrier of the situation as soon as possible and in any event no later than 30 minutes after the scheduled departure time, and of the estimated departure time as soon as this information is available, provided the air carrier has received the passenger's contact details in accordance with paragraphs 6 and 7 in case the ticket was acquired via an intermediary.
Amendment 211 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 2027/97
Article 6 d – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 6 d – paragraph 1 a (new)
Passengers shall be entitled to take on board free of charge, in addition to their cabin baggage allowance, any purchases from the airport departure area.
Amendment 221 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
Annex 1
War, conflicts political instability, security risks, acts of sabotage or terrorism rendering impossible the safe operation of the flight;
Amendment 53 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has confirmed that the provision of games of chance or gambling is an economic activity, which consequently falls within the scope of a particular nature, which can justify the restriction of fundamental freedoms of the TFEU, notably the free movement of services, and any restrictions imposed thereto need to comply with those provided for by the TFEU, notably under Articles 51 and 52 on the grounds of protecting consumers, preventing fraud and keeping the peace;
Amendment 61 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas games of chance or gambling help finance charitable works and projects in the public interest in most Member States;
Amendment 254 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Member States to take action to combat, in a meaningful manner, illegal online gambling and games of chance; advocates, therefore, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby an online gambling operator may only operate in a Member State if its activities do not contravene the law in any other Member State;
Amendment 256 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Stresses the need to raise consumers’ awareness of the distinction between legal and illegal gambling and of the risks that illegal gambling poses to them; calls, therefore, on the Commission to promote the exchange of good practices between Member States concerning the establishment of blacklists of illegal operators and ‘whitelists’ of legitimate operators on their territory;
Amendment 302 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to consider legislation to create an EU-wide self- exclusion register, accessible by national authorities and licensed gambling operators, so that any customer who chooses to exclude him- or herself from one gambling operator has the opportunity to be automatically self-excluded from all other licensed gambling operators; calls on the Commission to encourage the exchange of experience and best practice in the field of assistance for compulsive gamblers;
Amendment 340 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on Member States and operators to encourage responsible advertising in relation to on-line gambling; calls on the Commission to encourage the exchange of best practice and examine the possibility of drawing up a code of good conduct or minimum European rules on the subject;
Amendment 399 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Member States and sports federations to provide consumers and both amateur and professional sports players with appropriate information and education on integrity in sport; welcomes the Commission’s intention to promote better exchange of good practice in regard to combating match fixing; reiterates that significant progress in this field is expected;
Amendment 409 #
2012/2322(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Reiterates that the development of the online gaming market should not give rise to a fall in the funding the sports world benefits from via the contribution made by takings from gambling; considers that alternative financing arrangements involving sports betting operators should be studied; calls for balanced solutions – beneficial for both betting providers and sport as a whole – to be found;
Amendment 16 #
2012/2134(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that the mobilisation of household savings is a crucial instrument for stimulating investment in SMEs; urges the Commission to submit as soon as possible a proposal seeking to enhance the mobilisation of available capital for SMEs;
Amendment 18 #
2012/2134(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and Member States to provide entrepreneurs with complete and valid information, available in all EU languages with useful references, on access to adequate financing, via a single European website;
Amendment 21 #
2012/2134(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights the need to raise awareness of entrepreneurship among students and their teachers; stresses the importance of trainee entrepreneurs receiving appropriate education courses on access to funding;
Amendment 5 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
Citation 11
Amendment 6 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
Citation 14
Amendment 16 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 41
Citation 41
Amendment 26 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas consumers play a key role as agents ofin supporting European economic activity and boosting growth;
Amendment 30 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the objective is to achieve a high level of consumer awareness, empowerment and protection;
Amendment 36 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas it is necessary to boost consumer confidence, their trust in the market and knowledge of their rights, with a special focus on vulnerable consumerincrease confidence among European consumers – including the most vulnerable among them – and whereas in that respect it is essential to offer them better protection against the risks they face from products which represent a danger to their health or safety, and to ensure that they have a better understanding of their rights;
Amendment 47 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas e-commerce is very useful forallows all consumers to have easy access to numerous goods and services and thereby reap the fullest benefit from the single market, and whereas it is particularly beneficial to consumers with disabilities andor those living in rural and remote areareas or areas with geographic or natural handicaps;
Amendment 55 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas fragmentation of the digital single market jeopardizes the rights of consumers, given the absence of common rules; whereas most web sites are not suitable for cross-border shoppers and consumers andand whereas a legislative initiative is required to establish a comprehensive plan for redress, including mechanisms such as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), a system of online dispute resolution (ODR) and collective redress;
Amendment 56 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 61 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the current economic crisis is seriously affecting consumers, the internal market is weakened by the reduction in people's wages and working conditions and these rights should prevail over market liberalisationalso affects the purchasing power of consumers in the single market;
Amendment 67 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the internal market has to offer a range ofproduction of environmentally-friendly, high -quality products and services sold at competitive prices, to encouraginge sustainable consumption for sustainable development, employment and economic growth should be encouraged;
Amendment 69 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 71 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 75 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas there is a need to strengthen the role of consumer associations in all areas by adopting the necessary legal and economic measures;
Amendment 90 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Calls for consumers to be able to exercise their rights easimply and effectively in basic areas relating to, including food, health, energy, financial and digital services, pharmaceuticals and medical devices; access to broadband, data protection, transport, and telecommunication;
Amendment 108 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that EU policies need to promoteincreased cooperation between consumer associations and public institutions in all fields, providing easy access to the financial resources required; notes that a register of European associations should be set up to assist the formation of European associations needed in the elaboration of all public policies and EU legislation; notes that this implies that these associations can access the resources they need to carry out their activities;
Amendment 121 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that educating consumers reduces their risks vis-à-vis dangerous products, speculative financial products and misleading advertising; whereas there is the need to avoid information overload and instead reduce knowledge deficits and improve consumer awareness through reliable, clear, comparable and targeted information, and that such education and empowerment of consumers needs to be ongoing, from school onwards;
Amendment 123 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that in order for consumers to fully enjoy their rights, it is essential for enterprises to have a good knowledge of those rights; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary measures to that end, focusing on small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 129 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 140 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that consumer confidence is essential for both national and cross-border e-commerce; emphasises that Internet commerce needs to ensure the quality of products, avoid criminal or unfair practices and comply with the protection of personal data;
Amendment 149 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that market information must be reliable, clear and comparable, and that binding commercial guarantees need to be adopted that ensure the administration of justice in cases where intermediaries become insolvent; emphasises the need to prosecute unfair commercial practices and unfair contract terms or mass market manipulation such as occurred in the Libor and/or Euribor markets; highlights the need to protect consumers ‘trapped’ by a financial product, and those with mortgages who, for reasons not attributable to the consumer, are at risk of being evicted from their homese need to prosecute unfair commercial practices and unfair contract terms or mass market manipulation;
Amendment 155 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the application of the precautionary principleadequate consumer protection and product safety in the markets for consumer goods produced using nanotechnology or genetically modified organisms;
Amendment 167 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the need to providefor better protection of the rights of vulnerable consumer groups such as children and the elderly, particularly with regard to transportand for such groups to be better informed of their rights;
Amendment 173 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 184 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 189 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 206 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Emphasises the need to promote responsible and sustainable consumption, in line with the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy, and to make; considers it necessary to tackle food waste, markets fully accessible to consumers from the perspective of a social Europe based on solidarity consumer goods more durable, promote recycling and the consumption of second-hand goods and to further improve the energy efficiency of products available in the internal market;
Amendment 211 #
2012/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Draws attention to the fact that the next Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014 -2020 will have to incorporateallow the Consumer Agenda and provide it with properto benefit from sufficiently ambitious funding;
Amendment 10 #
2012/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph a (new)
Paragraph a (new)
5. Regards it as less than user-friendly that neither the website of the European Judicial Atlas in civil matters nor the e- Justice portal provide an option for downloading or properly printing outPoints out that improvements could be made as regards the accessibility, in terms of both format and visibility, of the necessary forms for legal aid orand other purposes; calls on the Commission to remedy this state of affairs immediately, including on the website of the European Judicial Atlas in Civil Matters and on the European e-Justice Portal;
Amendment 12 #
2012/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that in order to establish the economic criteria for granting legal aid, more consideration needs to be given to the differing cost of living in the various Member States needs to be taken into account, and the way in which these differences should be taken into account needs to be specified;
Amendment 13 #
2012/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. With regard to the economic criteria that need to be met in order to receive legal aid, emphasises the need for improvements and clarifications to be made so as to prevent unfortunate differences of interpretation, such as when the Member State of origin confirms eligibility for aid, but the competent court denies it, or vice versa, or when an applicant resident in another Member State submits supporting documents to demonstrate his or her financial situation that are difficult for the state providing the legal aid to assess;
Amendment 15 #
2012/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. TakUrges the view, unlike the Commission, that the Member States need to make greater efforts to comply with Article 18 of Directive 2003/8/EC (the Information Directive);
Amendment 16 #
2012/2101(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to inform consumers and businessespromote European information campaigns; calls on the Member States to inform consumers, businesses and the various parties involved in social assistance more effectively about European measures relating to civil and commercial disputes and the opportunities available to them in this connection, and to support and promote European information campaigns;
Amendment 12 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas businesses continue to face problems accessing public procurement contracts in other countries dueMember States, both as contractors and as subcontractors due in particular to differing national practices in public procurement and the complex administrative demands in some Member States; as well as existing language barriers,
Amendment 17 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Congratulates the European Commission on this significant initiative in response to the difficulties and concerns faced by citizens and businesses in exercising those rights conferred on them by the European Union; urges the Commission to verify and update this ‘snapshot of citizens’ and businesses’ 20 main concerns’ two years from now; (Reinsertion of paragraph 23 with addition.)
Amendment 36 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reaffirms the need to strengthen cooperation between Parliament, the Council, the Commission and, the Member States and civil society so that citizens feel more included in the main projects and day-to-day activities of the EU;
Amendment 38 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to develop the ‘Your Europe’ portal to turn it into a genuine digital ‘one-stop shop’ to provide citizens and businesses with information about the single market; calls on the Member States to supply the missing national information in the ‘Your Europe’ portal as soon as possible, to provide more links from their national Government portals related to the various sections of the website and to develop references to ‘Your Europe’ from relevant local and national administration portals so as to facilitate access for citizens;
Amendment 39 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the usefulness of ‘Your Europe Advice’, which allows citizens free access to personalised information; calls on the Commission and Member States to take action to considerably raise awareness amongst citizens of the ‘Europe direct’ telephone facility;
Amendment 40 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to analyse the involvement of local and regional authorities in the strategy for expanding the Single Market Information System;reform the Internal Market Information System (IMI), extending its scope and improving the way administrative cooperation operates, and to analyse the involvement of local and regional authorities in the strategy for expanding the Single Market Information System; calls on Member States to improve civil services’ understanding of their obligations regarding the use of the IMI and to ensure that their employees receive appropriate training; (Merged with first part of paragraph 28 and expanded)
Amendment 41 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to rethink the SOLVIT programme, giving it a new framework and appropriate resources and to ensure that all centres have experienced and sufficient staff to enable them to deal with queries submitted to them in a fully satisfactory manner; (Second part of paragraph 28 resumed with one addition)
Amendment 45 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to guarantee synergies between the existing instruments such as SOLVIT and the Internal Market Scoreboard, Your Europe Advice and Your Europe; (Resumption of paragraph 25 with one addition)
Amendment 55 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the European Commission to make use of all technological resources available to launch information campaigns, prioritising the 20 main concerns, informing citizens of the benefits of the single market and of their rights, thus encouraging them to participate in creating a competitive, just and balanced market;
Amendment 60 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses the importance of involvingUrges the Commission, together with the Member States, local and regional authorities, jointly with and civil society, in information campaigns, to periodically launch information campaigns in the national, regional and local media to inform citizens of the benefits of the single market, their rights and obligations as well as the means available to them for accessing information or assistance in order to solve their problems,with particular attention given to information campaigns in schools and universities in order to prepare the next generation for a more active European citizenship.; (Merged with paragraph 24)
Amendment 69 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
Amendment 70 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 71 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 76 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 77 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 78 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 79 #
2012/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 106 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) The Commission should monitor the developments and submit a report 53 years after the date of transposition of this Directive, in order to assess whether amendments to this Directive are necessary, in particular as regards packaging.
Amendment 11 #
2012/0299(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) The EU institutions and agencies should lead by example by improving gender balance. The principles laid down in this Directive should be incorporated into the rules governing the internal staffing procedures of the European Commission, the European Parliament, and all EU-institutions and agencies, including the European Central Bank. More efficient gender policies must be developed in all EU institutions to impact on recruitment to, training in, and the everyday functioning of the different EU institutions. For that purpose the institutions shall ensure that gender balance is achieved in the recruitment of senior management, including Director- Generals, Directors and Heads of Unit.
Amendment 13 #
2012/0299(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 b (new)
Recital 6 b (new)
(6 b) It is essential that the management of the Commission, the EU's executive body, improves its gender balance to represent better the European citizens. Member States are therefore called upon to nominate both male and female candidates for each position in the college of the Commissioners in order to achieve a gender balance in the Commission college.
Amendment 14 #
2012/0299(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 c (new)
Recital 6 c (new)
(6 c) The European Central bank (ECB), the European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS) – including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) – and the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) should comply with all aspects of equality and non-discrimination on the basis of gender. The Boards of Supervisors of the ESAs should also be encouraged to present a gender-balanced list of candidates for the positions of Chairmen and Executive Directors at the relevant hearing in the European Parliament. The final selection of these positions should be gender balanced. It is also important that the Steering Committee and Advisory Committees of the ESRB are gender balanced.
Amendment 15 #
2012/0299(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 d (new)
Recital 6 d (new)
(6 d) The supervisory board of the European Central Bank (ECB), including the roles of Chair and Vice Chair, should be balanced from a gender perspective. Whenever a vacancy arises on ECB Executive Board those Member States that have adopted the euro as a currency should be encouraged to nominate two candidates, a male and a female, for the vacant position. The Member States should also be encouraged to appoint women as governors of the national central banks (NCBs) in order to achieve a gender balance in the Governing Council and the General Council of the ECB and on the General Board of the ESRB.
Amendment 18 #
2012/0299(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Despite the existing Union legislation aimed at preventing and combating sex discrimination, the Council recommendations aimed specifically at increasing the presence of women in economic decision-making and Union- level actions encouraging self-regulation, women continue to be strongly outnumbered by men in the highest decision-making bodies of companies throughout the Union. In the private sector and especially in listed companies this gender imbalance is particularly significant and acute, although certain EU institutions and agencies, such as the European Central Bank, also display a deeply problematic gender imbalance. The Commission's key indicator of gender representation on corporate boards shows that the proportion of women involved in top-level business decision- making remains very low. In January 2012, women occupied on average just 13.7 per cent of board seats in the largest publicly listed companies in Member States. Among non- executive directors only 15 per cent were women.
Amendment 19 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) Article 2 of the Treaty of the European Union underlines that the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
Amendment 21 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
Recital 2 b (new)
(2 b) Article 6 of the Treaty of the European Union underlines that the Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Amendment 23 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (hereinafter the ‘Fund’) should strengthen social cohesion by contributing to the reduction of poverty in the Union by supporting, primarily through the provision of food supplies, national schemes that provide non-financial assistance to the most deprived persons to alleviate food deprivation, homelessness and material deprivation of children.
Amendment 26 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) The Fund cannot replace public policies undertaken by Member State governments to limit the need for emergency food aid and to develop sustainable targets and policies for the full eradication of hunger, poverty and social exclusion.
Amendment 39 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) It is necessary to establish a maximum level of co-financing from the Fund to the operational programmes to provide for a multiplier effect of Union resoThe Member States most in need of the Fund are least likely to be able to afford to co-finance the measurces, while the situation of Member States facing temporary budget difficulties should be addressetherefore the Fund should be 100% funded by the Union in order to ensure the highest possible uptake of the Fund.
Amendment 43 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 a) All citizens in the European Union should be treated equally and yet levels of deprivation differ across Member States. The Commission should produce a report showing what percentage the European funds make up of national budgets for aid programmes for most deprived persons.
Amendment 44 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 b (new)
Recital 16 b (new)
(16 b) Much of the work undertaken by associations working with the provision of food to Europe's most deprived is undertaken by volunteers. Therefore, the process for applying to be a beneficiary of the Fund must not be prohibitively complicated.
Amendment 47 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18 a) Member States and partner organisations should work actively with large and small scale companies throughout the food supply chain, in line with their corporate and social responsibility programmes, as well as economical incentives, to reduce food waste and to ensure this produce is made available to associations working with Europe's most deprived.
Amendment 75 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Fund shall be used to complement national strategies, not to replace or reduce national, long-term, sustainable poverty eradication and social inclusion programmes, which remain the responsibility of Member States.
Amendment 83 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The Fund may support accompanying measures, primarily complementing the provision of food and goods, contributing to the social inclusion of the most deprived persons. It should also encourage collaboration with organisations which focus on the eradication of poverty and long-term social reintegration.
Amendment 99 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 12 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 12 a (new)
(12 a) The Fund shall be used to complement national strategies, not to replace Member States' authorities' responsibilities, for eradicating poverty and social exclusion, notably through the provision of long-term, sustainable programmes aiming at social reintegration rather than alleviating immediate food deprivation and material needs.
Amendment 100 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 12 b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 12 b (new)
(12 b) Member States, and the bodies designated by them, shall build partnerships with companies throughout the food chain to create programmes allowing food companies to reduce waste and fulfil corporate and social responsability programmes, and for associations working with Europe's most deprived to gain access to food resources.
Amendment 105 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The global resources available for budgetary commitment from the Fund for the period 2014-2020 shall be EUR 23 500 000 000 at 2011 prices, in accordance with the annual breakdown set out in Annex II.
Amendment 136 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
This platform shall include encouraging an exchange between those working on immediate material deprivation alleviation and organisations working for longer- term, sustainable social reintegration, and looking at how links could be developed between these different objectives.
Amendment 166 #
Amendment 169 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The co-financing rate at the level of the operational programme shall not be higher than 85be 100% of the public eligible expenditure.
Amendment 174 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Amendment 178 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19
Article 19
Amendment 69 #
2012/0180(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) In implementing the provisions of the Directive, account should be taken of the specificity of each sector. In particular, the Directive should take into account the fact that, in the audiovisual sector, generally characterised by an unbalanced relationship between authors and producers, collective management is the preferred way to ensure fair remuneration for authors. This means that collecting societies which administer authors’ rights in the audiovisual sector must be able to anticipate a group authorisation to manage rights without any distinction of category. They should also be allowed to regulate the withdrawal conditions for authors in so far as is necessary to ensure their task of pooling management costs for the benefit of all authors and defending and promoting cultural diversity and legal certainty for users.
Amendment 114 #
2012/0180(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Rightholders shall have the right to authorise a collecting society of their choice to manage the rights, categories of rights or types of works and other subject matter of their choice, for the Member States of their choice, irrespective of the Member State of residence or of establishment or the nationality of either the collecting society or the rightholder.
Amendment 115 #
2012/0180(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For collecting societies which manage copyright in the audiovisual field, Member States may provide for measures authorising their general meeting to ask rightholders to entrust them with the management of a combination of rights, types of works and other subject matter of their choice.
Amendment 124 #
2012/0180(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Rightholders shall have the right to terminate the authorisation to manage rights, categories of rights or types of works and other subject matter granted to a collecting society or to withdraw from a collecting society any of the rights or categories of rights or types of works and other subject matter of their choice, for the Member States of their choice, upon serving reasonable notice not exceeding six months. The collecting society may decide that such termination or withdrawal will take effect only at the middle and at the end of the financial year, whichever is sooner after the expiry of the notice period.
Amendment 125 #
2012/0180(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Under competition law, Member States may provide for measures allowing collecting societies to adopt adjusted detailed rules aimed at restricting the scope for rightholders to go back and forth in an objectively abusive manner. .
Amendment 126 #
2012/0060(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Amendment 6 #
2011/2293(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas ‘volunteering’ means activities, including formal, non-formal, informal and vocational training, which are undertaken of a person's own free will, choice and motivation, and without concern for financial gain, which benefit the individual volunteervolunteers, those receiving services from an association, communities and society as a whole;
Amendment 43 #
2011/2293(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States to support cooperation between organisers of voluntary activities in EU countries to promote the mobility of young volunteers across Europe, with the aim of fostering mutual intercultural enrichment;
Amendment 48 #
2011/2293(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4b. Calls on the European Commission to publish a report identifying the obstacles to cross-border volunteering, for example age limits in insurance policies and, where appropriate, legislative proposals;
Amendment 72 #
2011/2293(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of providing information to and also permitting senior citizens to volunteer in another EU country, as already supported by the Grundtvig programme, encouraging active ageing as a way of strengthening social links and reducing the isolation of some elderly people and a rich source of wisdom and experience for society;
Amendment 79 #
2011/2293(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Supports the Commission’s proposal to establish a ‘European Skills Passport’, so that the skills acquired through volunteering may be officially recognised, both for professional and learning purposes, which is a vital element in motivating potential volunteers and in creating a link between non-formal learning and formal education; therefore suggests including the skills acquired through volunteering in the ECTS for students; calls on the Commission to consider developing a similar calculation and recognition system of the skills acquired through volunteering for adults who are not at university;
Amendment 95 #
2011/2293(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Asks the national, regional and local authorities and the EU to give stable financial and other support to the organisations involved in volunteering work, including all the associations and networks, with a view to enhancing their roles, activities and achievements for the benefit of society; calls on the European Commission and on the Member States to consider creating a European Statute for associations in order to facilitate cross- border volunteering;
Amendment 13 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
(C) Whereas vulnerable consumers are a heterogeneous group comprised of persons who are considered as such because of their mental, physical or psychological disability, their age, or their credulity or their education, or persons madepersons made particularly vulnerable by their social and financial situation (for example over-indebted persons) who require special protection and a specific strategy on the part of the authorities,
Amendment 17 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the diversity of vulnerable situations, both when consumers are placed under statutory protection and when they are in a specific situation of sectoral or temporary vulnerability, hinders a uniform approach and has led the legislation as well as the policies in existence up to the present time to address the problem of vulnerability on a case by case basis;
Amendment 28 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 36 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 47 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 67 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that, in the case of contractual relations, the consumer frequently is the weaker party in such relations; when said party to said contracts is in a vulnerable situarecommends that when persons are placed under statutory protection, for providers musto be involved in the protection of said party, and the authorities and administrations musto provide incentives to such involvement;
Amendment 81 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Asks the European Commission and the Member States that the regulation of safety standards and conditions for certain products, especially those intended for use by consumers in vulnerable situations, consider where possible not only the foreseen use but also the foreseeable use, and that quality requirements and protection measures be emphasised;
Amendment 88 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. In the same spirit, calls for the Member States and the European Commission to promote research and development of goods, services, equipment and facilities, which are universally designed, in other words usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialised design;
Amendment 100 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Deplores that advertising and promotional offers for food with high fat, salt and sugar content isare aimed at children and young peopleEuropeans, who increasingly suffer the consequences of sedentariness and obesityfrom obesity; supports, in this respect, the application of surveillance and restriction measures regarding the audiovisual and digital advertising of these types of products to children and young people, whatever the media used (television, internet, cinema, social networking sites); calls on the actors involved to educate and inform minors about the importance of a balanced diet;
Amendment 131 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that the liberalisation of the main supply markets, in general, has not resulted in a genermust be supported by measures al lowering of prices, and has in fact resulted in added difficulty for the majority of citizens in knowvulnerable consumers to easily determinge the best price, know how to changinge providers and understanding the items billed;
Amendment 137 #
2011/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the European Commission and the Member States to consider establishing free-of-charge mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution that canwhere access would be factivilitated automatically when afor vulnerable consumer is involveds, as well as for collective actions;
Amendment 22 #
2011/2180(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas mobility must be available to all and is the cornerstone of the higher education reform; whereas student mobility may ultimately help to foster professional mobility;
Amendment 77 #
2011/2180(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a commitment on the part of universities to new teaching and training strategies aimed at a learning-centred university system which provides the theoretical and practical knowledge which students will need in their working lives;
Amendment 108 #
2011/2180(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EU, the Member States and universities to improve information for students, academics and staff in order to foster structured mobility flows; calls for a strengthening of the services of Erasmus through better funding, improved credit recognition and greater flexibility of the time frame allowed, enhanced possibilities for including terms abroad as part of the training and greater flexibility of the time frame allowed; insists, nevertheless, that in no case must mobility create discrimination against students with limited financial resources;
Amendment 150 #
2011/2180(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Draws attention to the particular needs of the Bachelor’s degree, its curricula and its employability,; stresses in this respect the need for specific actions and for more effective cooperation between universities and the labour market with a view to developing more relevant curricula and enhancing employability; calls, therefore, on universities to develop their provision of apprenticeships and to improve the integration of traineeships in university courses;
Amendment 166 #
2011/2180(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Regards academic PhD degrees, including those carried out in enterprises, as a key link between higher education and research, and recalls their potential as a key component in the creation of knowledge- based innovation and economic growth; recognises the importance of carrying out PhD degrees in enterprises in terms of integrating individuals with higher degrees into the labour market;
Amendment 3 #
2011/2175(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that food waste represents an economic, environmental and societal cost and poses an internal market challenge for both business and consumers;
Amendment 14 #
2011/2175(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. ANotes the results of a survey conducted by the Commission (Consumer Empowerment in the EU – SEC(2011) 469), which found that 18% of European citizens asked did not understand the ‘Best before’ date; points out, therefore, the need to improve European consumers’ understanding of the exact meaning of the dates indicated; asks the Commission, therefore, to clarify food date labelling (‘Best before’, ‘Use by’) in order to reduce uncertainty regarding food edibility; encourages simplification rather than duplication (‘Sell by’ date and ‘Use by’ date) in order to avoid increasing confusion;
Amendment 33 #
2011/2175(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges retailers, public authorities and local actors to use their daily contact with consumers to communicate ways of storing and using food more efficiently, e.g. with practical tips and awareness campaigns;
Amendment 39 #
2011/2175(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commissionactors concerned at European, national, regional and local level to publish a user- friendly manual on the use of discarded and expired products for food donation and animal feed, building on best practices in the food supply chain;
Amendment 42 #
2011/2175(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes the interest in developing the composting of biodegradable food as an alternative to discarding products; welcomes initiatives in Member States to provide citizens with collective areas for this purpose; calls on the Commission to encourage these efforts by promoting the exchange of experience and good practice at European level;
Amendment 42 #
2011/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to supplement the Internal Market Scoreboard with new additional criteria, without affecting its 'readability', to monitor the correct implementation of current legislation;
Amendment 43 #
2011/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission to present in the Internal Market Scoreboard the changing distribution of infringement proceedings initiated by sector since the previous Scoreboard, and to propose an evaluation of the reasons for the most significant changes in terms of the number of proceedings initiated;
Amendment 20 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 59 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that, given the enormous increase in e-commerce, consumers’ confidence in cross-border online purchasing arrangements, particularly cross-border arrangements, needs to be increased by guaranteeing their rights on the internet as well;
Amendment 65 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. (to be inserted between the heading and paragraph 5) Points out that consumer confidence is a driving force in the economy with regard to both domestic and cross-border trade, online and offline;
Amendment 66 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to ensure a more consumer-oriented balance when it comes to internet use and intellectual property rights; , particularly with regard to intellectual property rights and personal data protection; Or. fr 32
Amendment 74 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the need to provide consumers with more transparent information, for example through unit price indication rules and, accurate and transparent internet price comparison websites, and the introduction of clear, easily identifiable and effective labelling;
Amendment 81 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underscores the importance of labelling and, in this context, calls on the Commission to take account of consumers’ growing calls concerning, for example, fair trade, carbon footprints, the scope for and types of recycling, and origin marking;
Amendment 84 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
40 7b. Stresses the need to educate consumers, from as early an age as possible, so that they understand and make use of the information appearing on products; calls on the Commission to make European logos more identifiable and more intuitive, for which the recognition rate still appears unsatisfactory (e.g., in particular, the inadequate recognition rate for the CE conformity marking logo, the European Ecolabel, the Möbius strip for recycling or risk marking;
Amendment 87 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. DeplorNotes the ever increasing information overload on the internet as regards contract terms and conditions; stresses consumers’ need for readability;
Amendment 92 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to provide better support, through funding for capacity-building and publicity, consumer organisationsand the development of training courses, consumer organisations, in particular in Member States in which they are underdeveloped, and public authorities in their role as intermediaries, thereby enhancing consumer empowerment;
Amendment 100 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to examine the implications for consumers of existing concentrations in liberaliseddifferent sectors;
Amendment 101 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Amendment 104 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises the need to provide better protection for vulnerable consumer groups, such as children and the elderly; points out that children are exposed to extensive advertising even though they have no possibility to make informed choicesstresses the need to educate and support them while making access to redress procedures easier;
Amendment 110 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
52 13. UrgNotes the Commission to include the protection of children among the main priorities of the Consumer Agendalarge-scale exposure of children to advertising and proposes a ban on TV advertising and direct advertising aimed at children under the age of 12;
Amendment 119 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 141 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 145 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for better product safety guarantees, particularly in e-commerce on the internal market, as regards chemical and/or dangerous substances (carcinogenic products, hormone disruptors, etc.); calls for better labelling of foodstuffs; calls for the issue of nanotechnologies to be taken into consideration;
Amendment 149 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for targeted research funding, in order to make for better consumer protection, given that project funding often does not cover the cost of scientific research; points out that, besides providing funding, it is also important to takefor action to encourage taking into account the views of consumers and households in EU research programmes;
Amendment 153 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Proposes expanding European support for research in emerging sectors, such as green and ethical consumption, and for pooling everyday consumer goods (cars, bicycles, household electricals, etc.);
Amendment 158 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading IV
Subheading IV
73 IV. Towards a more social and sustainable Europe geared towards innovation and growth
Amendment 163 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
75 23. Calls on the Commission to include a consumern affordability perspective in the Consumer Agenda and to stress the importance of a more social Europe where welfare services are financed on the basis of solidarity; points out that the elderly and disabled have difficult access to products and services; backs, accordingly, European-level standardisation efforts to provide straightforward and reliable universal access; stresses also the positive role of standardisation as regards economic growth and the smooth functioning of the internal market;
Amendment 168 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to address the issue of how private consumption can become more sustainable in order to promote innovation, economic growth and a low-carbon economy, in keeping with the objective set in the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 188 #
2011/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Amendment 1 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A (new)
Recital A (new)
A. whereas alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a mechanism for reaching out- of-court settlements by helping consumers and traders to resolve conflicts through the intervention of a third party (mediator or arbitrator),
Amendment 2 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B (new)
Recital B (new)
B. having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on ‘Governance and Partnership in the Single Market’1, in which it called on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution in the EU by the end of 2011, _______ 1 P7_TA-PROV(2011)0144.
Amendment 3 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C (new)
Recital C (new)
C. whereas the development of legislation on ADR is one of the twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence in the context of the Single Market Act, as set out in the communication adopted by the Commission on 13 April 2011,
Amendment 4 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital D (new)
Recital D (new)
D. whereas the legislative proposal on ADR in the EU is mentioned in the Commission’s work programme as a strategic initiative,
Amendment 12 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the Commission’s intention to encourage the use of alternative means of dispute resolution that are swift, effective and cheap and apt to enable the establishment of quality commercial relations and contribute to a high level of consumer protection;
Amendment 20 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Agrees with the Commission that appropriate access to reparation in the internal market requires both the possibility of easy recourse to ADR and the existence of an effective system for collective claims, the two being complementary; points out, in this connection, that facilitating the use of ADR in the EU must on no account serve as a pretext for avoiding or delaying the introduction of a system of collective recourse at the European level;
Amendment 29 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points to the importance of rectifying any existing shortcomings with regard to the geographical coverage of ADR in Europeout that, although there are numerous ADR systems operating effectively in Europe at present, there are still many shortcomings in terms of both geographical and sector-by-sector coverage; urges that existing shortcomings with regard to the geographical coverage of ADR in Europe be rectified rapidly, and calls for an effective out-of-court dispute settlement system for consumer matters which is operational across the EU; deplores the major sectoral deficiencies that persist in most Member States, when sector by sector coverage would enable the involvement of people who understand the way in which a given sector works; encourages the Member States to consider introducing single points of contact for each sector, to provide information and initiate procedures;
Amendment 35 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Proposes that a single European charter be drawn up containing the guidelines to be followed in relation toCalls on the Commission to incorporate in its legislative proposal, which could take the form of a framework directive, the following guidelines that will have to be followed by the ADR systems established in Europe, these being the following:
Amendment 56 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages those Member States that wish to do so to go further than the guidelines introduced as part of the future European legislative framework; proposes, therefore, that a European charter on ADR – drawing on the best practices implemented in the Member States – be drafted as an additional instrument; recommends, to this end, setting up an annual mediation forum as a means of pooling experience;
Amendment 61 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to support and strengthen, and enhance the capabilities of, existing bodies operating in this area which have demonstrated their effectiveness and value, such as SOLVIT, Europe Direct, ECC-NET and FIN-NET;
Amendment 63 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Amendment 64 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Points out the importance of better publicising the existence of ADR mechanisms and doing more to encourage consumers and professionals to use them as an alternative to court proceedings, which makes it possible to avoid a confrontational approach and offers the prospect of a win-win situation;
Amendment 65 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Takes the view that the provision of information to consumers is a responsibility shared by public authorities, information and advisory networks, regulators and consumer groups, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness- raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
Amendment 66 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 e (new)
Paragraph 8 e (new)
8e. Takes the view that the provision of information to consumers is a responsibility shared by public authorities and representative organisations, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness- raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
Amendment 81 #
2011/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Recommends, as a potential incentive for enterprises, that a quality label for mediation be introduced in relation to mediation in consumer disputes, which would be associated with guidelines recognising best practices, so that consumers can rapidly identify businesses that have opted into ADR systems.
Amendment 7 #
2011/2089(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, individual lawsuits are often notf a large group of citizens and businesses are victims of the same infringement, individual redress does not constitute an effective means tof stopping the unlawful practices in question or tof obtaining compensation, as consumers are reluctant to initiate private lawsuit for the damage caused by such practices, in particular if the individual loss is small in comparison to the costs,
Amendment 59 #
2011/2089(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that a momentum for harmonisation onat European level also arises since certain Member States are currently considering possibilities of introducing substantial reforms concerning their collective redress schemes and others are currently considering introducing such schemes;
Amendment 91 #
2011/2089(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Maintains that the court has a crucial role to play in deciding on the admissibility of the claim, and the representativeness of the claimant and controlling the ways to inform consumer, in order to ensure that only well-founded complaints are examined and guarantee a proper balance between preventing abusive action and protecting the right to effective access to justice both for EU citizens and businesses;
Amendment 102 #
2011/2089(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Emphasises that information about collective actions plays a major role in the effectiveness of the procedure as consumers need to be aware that they have been the victims of the same illegal practice and that there is a collective action launched; calls on Member States to put in place efficient mechanisms ensuring that a maximum of victims are informed, in particular when those are domiciled in several Member States, whilst avoiding unduly harming the reputation of the party concerned, in order to scrupulously respect the principle of the presumption of innocence;
Amendment 109 #
2011/2089(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Affirms that, in order to make collective actions practically possible, Member States should ensure that adequate funding mechanisms are made available; stresses that public authorities should refuse to allocate resources to unmeritorious claim and designed in such a way as, on the one hand, not to encourage the bringing of actions that are not well-founded and, on the other hand, to prevent citizens and businesses, in particular SMEs, from being denied access to justice because they do not have sufficient financial resources;
Amendment 119 #
2011/2089(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Is conscious that some consumer organisations may be unable to pursue collective actions due to a lack of resources, and therefore an equitable mechanism for bearing the costs of proceedings would need to be introduced for entities meeting the conditions for the granting of authority to stand in collective redress procedures, as without appropriate funding only a very limited number of cases will be taken.
Amendment 18 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas 24.1 % of all 15-year olds within Member States are low performers in reading literacy, whereas reading is a basic tool for all young persons, indispensable to making progress in any school subject as well as to becoming integrated into the world of work, understanding and analysing information, communicating correctly and participating in cultural activities, and whereas specific measures should therefore be taken to remedy deficiencies in reading skills,
Amendment 27 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that the foundations for a child’s future educational career are laid in the early years of childhood, a time when receptiveness, language learning and the ability to form social contacts – attributes that will be essential in tomorrow's society – should be encouraged so as to facilitate the child's integration into both school and society from an early age, thus combating ESL, and reiterates the call contained in its resolution on Early Years Learning in the EU for the development of a European framework for early childhood education and care services;
Amendment 48 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. States that equality of opportunities in education for individuals of all backgrounds is vital in creating an equal society;, and that school is one of the best places for giving everyone an equal chance of success and the opportunity to acquire knowledge and skills to enable them to become integrated into the world of work, thus breaking the inter- generational cycle,
Amendment 53 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for a personalised and inclusive approach to education which includes targeted support where necessary, particularly for children and young people suffering from a disability;
Amendment 84 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that financial pressures on disadvantaged families can force students to leave school early in order to enter the labour market and to supplement family resources; calls on Member States to consider introducing a system of means- tested financial support for those who need it in order to combat this problem;
Amendment 120 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Encourages Member States to invest in qualified and well-trained staff for both preschool and compulsory education; suggests that teaching assistants be employed in schools to work with struggling pupils and to assist classroom teachers in their work, along with auxiliary staff to help disabled pupils in their schooling in standard educational establishments or in ones that cater for their disability;
Amendment 134 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that students must be made aware of the range of career options open to them and suggests that schools and universities forge partnerships with local companies and organisations, enabling students to meet professionals from different fields;
Amendment 173 #
2011/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the Commission proposal for a Council Recommendation on policies to reduce ESL, which proposes a framework for comprehensive policies in this area, the analysis of the underlying conditions behind early school leaving at national and local level in each Member State, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the existing measures and the integration of the prevention, intervention and compensation measures for combating this phenomenon;
Amendment 27 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas verbal and physical violence and discriminatory behaviour may occur during sports competitions,
Amendment 50 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the specific nature of sport arises from the sum of sport’s individual and essential aspects which make it different from all other sectors of economic activity, and must be considered on a case-by-base basis,
Amendment 63 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas professional sport generally is vulnerable to financial instability,
Amendment 99 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on sports organisations to pay attention to the needs of disabled sportspeople by making every effort to promote their inclusion in sports activities and also by developing sports activities and competitions for people with disabilities;
Amendment 118 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to support the fight against doping, while respecting athletes’ individual freedom; urges the Member States to treat trafficking in illegal performance-enhancing substances in the same way as trafficking in illegal drugs and to adopt national legislation to this end; welcomes the progress achieved by the Council of Europe in that regard;
Amendment 146 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Member States to refuse access to stadiums to supporters who have displayed violent or discriminatory behaviour and to set up a European database of those who have been banned, drawing on the work done by the Council of Europe in this area;
Amendment 253 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Stresses the need to boost the protection of minors in the context of international transfers; takes the view that international transfers are potentially dangerous for young athletes, who are extremely vulnerable because they have left their families and countries at a young age and should therefore receive ongoing attention from sports organisations;
Amendment 265 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Proposes the setting up of a European register of sports agents, in which agents would list the players that they represent, and the amount they are paid; calls on sports organisations also to consider the idea of a blacklist of agents operating fraudulently and without a licence;sf
Amendment 310 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on clubs to ensure compliance with immigration laws when they recruit young people from non-member States and to ensure that they return to their country of origin under satisfactory conditions if their career does not take off; emphasises, in this connection, that it is essential to enforce the relevant legislation;
Amendment 13 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Internet gambling market is growing constantly,online gambling sector is growing constantly, and whereas to a large extent this growth is not being scrutinised by the national governments of the citizens to whom such gambling services are provided, (The first part of this amendment applies to the entire text, and consists in replacing the term ‘gambling market’ with the term ‘gambling sector’ and the term ‘Internet gambling’ with the term ‘online gambling’. Should it be adopted, these changes will be made throughout the text.)
Amendment 41 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services, but Internetsubject to any restrictions the Member States may impose in accordance with the Treaty, such that online gambling washad to be expressly exempted from the Services Directive because it is not a normal servicE- Commerce, Services and Consumer Rights Directives on account of its specific nature,
Amendment 53 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas Internet gambling and betting are liable to undermine the principle of equality among both sportspeople and the gamblers and betters, and involve a greater risk of addiction and dangers than traditional physical, location- based gambling,
Amendment 68 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas, in order to achieve these objectives, it is essential to introduce mechanisms for scrutinising sports competitions and financial flows, along with common supervisory mechanisms at the EU level,
Amendment 69 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
Ib. whereas international-level cooperation among all stakeholders (institutions, sports federations and betting operators) is also crucial with a view to pooling good practices,
Amendment 72 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph - 1 (new)
Paragraph - 1 (new)
-1. Welcomes the Commission’s clarification of the fact that the political process initiated by means of the Green Paper is in no way aimed at deregulating/liberalising online gambling;
Amendment 85 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point 3
Paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) guarantee effective protection for young people and gamblersgamblers, with specific attention to vulnerable groups, in particular young people,
Amendment 91 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point 6
Paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) that risks to the integrity of sporting competition are precludgradually eradicated and
Amendment 97 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Sees such regulation as having the potential to ensure that sports competitions are attractive to consumers and to the public, that sports results remain credible and that the competitions retain their prestige;
Amendment 100 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice12, that the Internet is simply a channel for offering games of chance; 12 12 12 , although Member States’ discretion in determining their own approach to the regulation of Carmen Media 2010 (C-46/08). Carmen Media 2010 (C-46/08). Carmen Media 2010 (C-46/08). Internet gambling is unaffected thereby and they can still restrict or prohibit the provision of certain services to consumers;
Amendment 125 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire on-line gambling market, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some sectors, a uniform European approachsuch as the implementation of the law, administrative cooperation and information sharing, technological standards, and a degree of cooperation on consumer protection, a uniform European approach, combined with effective and independent national-level regulation, would be appropriate;
Amendment 173 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level minimum standards with regard to preventing gambling addiction and betting fraud and to protecting young people and other vulnerable groups; states that, where a provider complies with those minimum standards, the other Member States should recognise this accordingly, but may set further conditions; is of the opinion that a pan- European code of conduct for Internet gambling could be a first step;
Amendment 222 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Observes that, according to a recently published study2, the gambling market was identified as the sector where the lack of an alternative dispute resolution system most frequently makes itself felt; suggests, therefore, that national regulatory agencies could establish alternative dispute resolution systems for the on-line gambling sector;
Amendment 235 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that betting on, in particular, minor-sports competitions may represent a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the view that sport fraud and betting fraud should be penalised throughout Europe; calls on the Member States to class such cases of fraud as criminal offences so as to punish effectively the manipulation of betting and sports results;
Amendment 244 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Considers stronger safeguards against the risks of on-line betting and gambling to be an essential part of protecting the integrity of sport; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to propose ways of raising the awareness of sportspeople and consumers of all ages and at all levels (both amateur and professional) from their childhood;
Amendment 255 #
2011/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Is aware of the importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of sport in the Member States; states that further development of the Internet gambling market should therefore not lead to a reduction in sports funding; considers that alternative financing arrangements involving sports betting operators should be studied; calls for balanced solutions – beneficial for both betting providers and sport as a whole – to be found;
Amendment 21 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the most vulnerable groups have been those most severely affected by the financial, economic and social crisis and the associated austerity measures,
Amendment 39 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas 17% of the EU population live below the poverty threshold, and 8% of Europeans live in conditions of severe material deprivation and are thus unable to afford even the most basic necessities which the observance of human rights would demand,
Amendment 58 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas poverty can be classed as a violation of human rights and is thus proof of the effort still needed to achieve the aims set out in Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment A #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Ccalls on the Commission to involve civil society at national and European level and to make discussions with people living in poverty a formal part of the annual convention on povertyboost the involvement in the development of a European strategy at all levels of governance (European, national, regional and local) of organised civil society and of all stakeholders, such as NGOs, social economy organisations, service providers, experts in social innovation and the social partners, as well as people living in poverty themselves, in partnership with the associations in which they freely express their opinions and which have acquired experience and knowledge, particularly through the development of national platforms against poverty and social exclusion in each Member State; calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation between local, regional and national authorities and European Institutions, particularly the European Parliament; believes that the synergies should concern all stakeholders, including SMEs and entrepreneurs; calls for discussions with people living in poverty and social exclusion to be institutionalised, and to be extended at national level, and for their participation and contribution to be made a formal and central part of the annual convention on poverty and social exclusion, and calls for appropriate and regular follow-up of the recommendations so developed;
Amendment C #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for regular, critical monitoring ofthe establishment of a regular, critical evaluation mechanism, involving the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee, based on precise indicators at national and European level, by which the multiple dimensions of poverty can be evaluated and the Member States’ progress, by gender and age, towards achieving the poverty reduction target, and towards breaking this target down into sub-targets, can be measured, in view of the fact that the lack of a precise definition of poverty leaves too much leeway for the Member States, to break this target down into sub-targets; hus risking aberrant interpretations; calls on the Commission to improve national and European indicators relating to the comparability of national statistics on the poverty of vulnerable people and to promote, with Eurostat, the production of more precise statistics within a comprehensive scoreboard on poverty and social exclusion by means of which it will be possible to track the number of people below the 50% and 40% levels of median income and on this basis to conduct an annual evaluation of the situations of poverty in the EU, the statistical approach of which should be supplemented by a qualitative and participatory approach; calls on the Commission to ensure the policies implemented are beneficial to all and not just to those close to the poverty threshold;
Amendment E #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to identify more precisely the budget lines relevant to the Platform and the level of appropriations allocated to them, particularly as regards the ESF and its contribution to this flagship initiative through the funding of political priorities such as preventing school drop-out and addressing poverty among children, women, older people and migrant workers; calls on the Commission to set out its proposals on combating poverty and social exclusion in the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework in order to ensure adequate funding of the initiatives launched to combat poverty and social exclusion; calls on the Commission to identify the financial support needed for agreed thematic priorities and to urge Member States to support financially the participation of civil society at national level in National Reform Programmes, the Flagship Platform and National Strategies for social protection and social inclusion; recommends pressing ahead with, and providing increased budgetary funding for, the European programmes which can help combat the various aspects of social exclusion, poverty and social and economic inequality, including health inequality (the research Framework Programme, the Progress programme, etc.);
Amendment FF #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas employmentgrowth and employment, even in a decent job, alone isare not sufficient to lift people out of poverty, and whereas the problem of the working poor has gained increasing recognition in recent years, and whereas the segmentation of the labour market has increased, working and living conditions have very much worsened, particularly during the financial crisis, and work has become much less secure – a trend which must be combated; whereas the problem of the working poor has gained increasing recognition in recent years but is not yet being addressed to an extent commensurate with the challenges it represents for our societies; whereas the number of the working poor has grown considerably in recent years, with 8% of the working population suffering in-work poverty and where 22% of those at risk of poverty are in work1; whereas the fact of people having access to decent, egalitarian working conditions constitutes an advance in terms of reducing poverty and social exclusion among families and people living alone, __________________ 1 EUROSTAT (2009), SPC Report: SPC Assessment of the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy (10 Feb. 2011)
Amendment 72 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas employment alone is not sufficient to lift people out of poverty, and whereas the problemnumber of the working poor has gainedrown considerably in recent years and the increasing precognition in recent yearsvalence of insecure working conditions should be combated,
Amendment L #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the creation of decent jobs through vocationalConsiders that a full and effective way out of poverty can only be found if the appropriate strengthening of social protection instruments is accompanied by significant reinforcement of education and training paths at every level; supports the development of more inclusive education systems to tackle the problem of students dropping out and enable young people from disadvantaged social groups to reach a higher level of education, with a view to countering the intergenerational transmission of poverty; supports access to validation of acquired experience and life-long training, and the provision of personalised job-seeking assistance, in particular for disadvantaged groups; s a means of reducing poverty by securing access to employment, in particular for disadvantaged groups, to help them to access decent jobs; regards it as essential, therefore, for life-long learning programmes to be implemented properly and developed, and for Member States to cooperate in the fields of education and vocational training and personalised job-seeking assistance, and stresses that more measures of this kind must be taken to assist the most vulnerable sectors of the population; recommends the development of an EU strategy to tackle in-work poverty and create quality jobs, agreeing principles for quality work;
Amendment MM #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas unemployment among young people, which is already higher than for other age groups, has exploded in the EU since the crisis and now runs at over 20% reaching a critical level in all Member States, which puts young people at risk of falling into poverty from a very early age; whereas this alarming situation calls for urgent political, economic and social responses and will, in combination with demographic changes, aggravate skills shortages; having regard to the vital role that vocational training can play in helping young people and low skilled workers to join the labour market; whereas, however, getting a job does not always mean escaping poverty, and whereas young people are especially susceptible to falling into the category of working poor,
Amendment S #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Commission’s desire to clarify the legal framework applicable to social economy enterprises so that there are no obstacles hindering their contribution to poverty reduction; , through various initiatives, to take more account of the role of social economy actors – as defined in Parliament’s resolution of 19 February 2009 on the social economy – in particular by clarifying the legal framework applicable to social economy enterprises (for mutual societies, foundations and cooperatives) so that there are no obstacles hindering their making a full contribution, with legal certainty, to reducing poverty and social exclusion by proposing innovative and sustainable responses to citizens’ needs, while stressing that the social economy is not limited to this scope of activities; is concerned, however, about the lack of reference to the Statute for a European association, given that the not-for-profit sector is a major actor in the fight against poverty; stresses, however, that the measures currently proposed to promote the social economy, in particular associations and mutual societies, do not adequately reflect its potential contribution to the policy to combat poverty and social exclusion, the economy and the European social model and, more generally, do not match its role in responding to the consequences of the economic and social crisis; stresses, in particular, its demands and expectations in relation to the recognition of SSGI, as reaffirmed in the resolution of the European Parliament on the future of social services of general interest adopted on 5 June 2011 (A7-0239/2011); notes the proposals for a revision of the Community provisions on public procurement procedures and state aid, and recalls its demand for them to be adapted to the specific nature of the tasks of SSGIs and to the way in which they are organised; supports the creation of decent jobs and the provision of personalised job-seeking assistance via specialised training and placement agencies and social economy enterprises in view of their expertise in helping disadvantaged persons enter employment; reiterates its call for a framework directive on the quality and accessibility of social services of general interest, in particular in the areas of health, education, public transport, energy, water and communication; Note: A citation referring to the De Rossa report will be added by oral amendment, and amendment 312 will be voted on outside the compromise.
Amendment Z #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the most vulnerable groups have been those most severely affected by the crisis and the associated austerity measures, 116 million people in the European Union are at risk of poverty and 42 million (i.e. 8%) live ‘in conditions of severe material deprivation and can not afford a number of necessities considered essential in order to live a decent life in Europe’1; whereas poverty is the unacceptable reflection of an uneven distribution of wealth, income and resources in a prosperous European economy; whereas the most vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and disabled people, have been those most severely affected by the financial, economic and social crisis and the austerity measures currently being taken in the EU in the context of the ‘Euro Plus Pact’ and the ‘governance package’, which could worsen the situation for these groups and put at risk of unemployment, economic insecurity or poverty millions of people who were still managing to live on, and meet their basic needs from, their wages or retirement pension, notably as a result of cuts in public service and social assistance budgets; whereas applying tougher conditions and penalties in social activation policies in response to the crisis aggravates the difficulties faced by the most vulnerable people at a time when few decent jobs are on offer; whereas the gap between rich and poor is getting ever wider as the crisis continues; __________________ 1 European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion (COM(2010)758 final).
Amendment 115 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas family policies are an essential part of policies to address poverty and social exclusion ,
Amendment 119 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas unemployment among young people, which is already higher than for other age groups, has exploded in the EU since the crisis, reaching a critical level in all Member States; whereas this alarming situation calls for urgent political, economic and social responses,
Amendment 142 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to involve civil society, in particular NGOs, social economy organisations and the social partners, at national and European level and to make discussions with people living in poverty a formal part of the annual convention on poverty; believes that the synergies should concern all stakeholders, including SMEs and entrepreneurs;
Amendment 162 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for regular, critical monitoring of, based on precise indicators at national and European level, by which the multiple dimensions of poverty can be evaluated and the Member States’ progress towards achieving the poverty reduction target can be measured, and for the Member States to break this target down into sub-targets; calls on the Commission to promote, with Eurostat, the production of more precise and more regular statistics and on this basis to conduct an annual evaluation of the situations of poverty in the EU;
Amendment 188 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to identify the budget lines relevant to the Platform in order to ensure adequate funding of the initiatives launched to combat poverty and social exclusion;
Amendment 221 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the creation o f decent jobs through vocational training and the provision of personalised job-seeking assistance, in particular for disadvantaged groups; stresses the importance of education, initial and on-going training, apprenticeships and vocational training as a means of reducing poverty by securing access to employment; regards the provision of personalised job-seeking assistance as essential, and stresses that more measures of this kind must be taken to assist the most vulnerable sectors of the population;
Amendment 313 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Commission’s desire to clarify the legal framework applicable to social economy enterprises, which are central actors in the fight against poverty and social exclusion, so that there are no obstacles hindering their contribution to poverty reductionsocial progress in the EU;
Amendment 392 #
2011/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls for the establishment of a mechanism to assess the work of the European Platform Against Poverty and Social Exclusion on a regular basis in order to improve the Platform’s work and effectiveness;
Amendment 16 #
2011/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the current economic climate makes it more important than ever to ensure optimal efficiency in public spending, whilst limiting costs borne by businesses as much as possible, and a better functioning procurement market would help achieve these two objectives;
Amendment 112 #
2011/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that increased awareness of the environmental and climate impact of products and activities means that the possibility for public authorities to favour local suppliers in certain cases should be considered, and the extent to which internal market rules allow this examined;
Amendment 158 #
2011/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Asks also that all avenues – both legislative and non-legislative – be explored to ensure that public procurement is more engaged in promoting innovation in Europe, for example by introducing a new procurement procedure that makes it possible to guarantee innovative businesses a better return on their investment;
Amendment 166 #
2011/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Criticises the Green Paper’s failure to mention the shortcomings, the lack of expertise and knowledge about procurement; stresses the importance of promoting professionalism on the part of both contracting authorities and market operators, particularly by supporting the development of targeted training programmes; recommends setting up a network of centres of excellence within the existing national frameworks;
Amendment 38 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Commission to make it clear that a declaration for the purposes of temporary mobility should be valid throughout the territory of a Member State and that competent authorities of different regions of the same Member State should not be allowed to ask for separate declarations for the same professional;
Amendment 45 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to look into the possibility of further extending the scope for automatic recognition in future;
Amendment 57 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out the need to update the minimum training requirements for the purposes of automatic recognition so as to reflect current professional practice; urges the Commission to adopt a competence-based approach in this regard by defining minimum training requirements not only in terms of duration, but also in terms of learning outcomes; considers that professional bodies, competent authorities, as well as consumer and patient organizations should be actively involved in this process;
Amendment 64 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Is of the opinion that, for the revised directive to be future-proof, the Commission should propose a simple mechanism for regular update of the minimum training requirements;
Amendment 83 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the cooperation between Member States and professional bodies in order to move towards a common practice in the area of continuous professional development;
Amendment 94 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that, in order to protect patients, practitioners providing e-Health services should ensure the same quality and safety standards as for the provision of non-electronic healthcare services; it should therefore be clarified that the requirements of this directive, and, if necessary, additional ones, should apply to e-Health service providers;
Amendment 112 #
2011/2024(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the mandatory introduction of the IMI for competent authorities in order to facilitate proactive administrative cooperation and simplify recognition procedures; considers that the IMI could be further enhanced, for instance by expanding the functionalities available in order to facilitate the work of national authorities;
Amendment 241 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) The services governed by the provisions of this Directive are listed in Annex XVIIa, Part A. Articles 84 to 86 of this Directive apply to the contracts for specific services listed in Annex XVIIb, Part B.
Amendment 295 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – c
Article 12 – c
(c) EUR 1 000 000 for contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVIIa B.
Amendment 467 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, at the latest 23 years after the date provided for in Article 101(1), all procurement procedures under this Directive are performed using electronic means of communication, in particular e-submission, in accordance with the requirements of this Article.
Amendment 638 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Contracting entauthorities may take account of variants which are submitted by a tenderer and meet the minimum requirements specified by the contracting entitieprohibit tenderers from submitting variants.
Amendment 643 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Contracting entities shall indicate in the specifications whether or not theyvariants are banned. Where no such indication is made, it shall be understood that variants are authorised. Where variants and, if so,re not prohibited, contracting entities shall specify the minimum requirements to be met by the variants and any specific requirements for their presentation. Where variants are authorised, tThey shall also ensure that the chosen award criteria can be usefully applied to variants meeting those minimum requirements as well as to conforming tenders which are not variants.
Amendment 647 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 58 – paragraph 2
Article 58 – paragraph 2
2. In procedures for awarding supply or service contracts, contracting entities that have authorisnot banned variants shallmay not reject a variant on the sole ground that it would, where successful, lead either to a service contract rather than a supply contract or to a supply contract rather than a service contract.
Amendment 683 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 70 – paragraph 6
Article 70 – paragraph 6
Amendment 701 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Without prejudice to national laws, regulations or administrative provisions on the remuneration of certain services, the criteriaon on which contracting entities shall base the award of contracts shall be one of the following:the most economically advantageous tender. Where the public contract concerns the supply of goods, particularly standardised goods, contracting authorities may base the award of the contract on the lowest cost criterion.
Amendment 705 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 710 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 815 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Title 2 – chapter 3 – section 3 – subsection 2 a (new)
Title 2 – chapter 3 – section 3 – subsection 2 a (new)
Amendment 894 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 1
Article 84 – paragraph 1
Contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVIIa(B) shall be awarded in accordance with this Chapter where the value of the contracts is equal to or greater than the threshold indicated in Article 12(c).
Amendment 999 #
Amendment 1003 #
2011/0439(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 17 a (new)
Annex 17 a (new)
Annex XVIIa Annex XVIIa – part A Services referred to in Article 1 1 Maintenance and repair 6112, 6122, 633, From 50100000-6 to 50884000-5 services 886 (except for 50310000-1 to 50324200-4 and 50116510-9, 50190000-3, 50229000-6, 50243000-0), and from 51000000-9 to 51900000-1 2 Land transport services 712 (except From 60100000-9 to 60183000-4 (1), including armoured 71235), (except 60160000-7, 60161000-4, car services, and courier 7512, 87304 60220000-6), and from 64120000-3 to services, excluding 64121200-2 transport of mail 3 Air transport services: 73 (except 7321) From 60410000-5 to 60424120-3 passengers and freight, (except 60411000-2, 60421000-5), excluding transport of and 60500000-3 from 60440000-4 to mail 60445000-9 4 Transport of mail by 71235, 7321 60160000-7,60161000-4 60411000-2, land (2) and by air 60421000-5 5 Telecommunications 752 From 64200000-8 to 64228200-2 services 72318000-7, and from 72700000-7 to 72720000-3 6 Financial services: ex 81, 812, 814 From 66100000-1 to 66720000-3 (a) Insurances services (b) Banking and investment services (3) 7 Computer and related 84 From 50310000-1 to 50324200-4, services from 72000000-5 to 72920000-5 (except 72318000-7 and from 72700000-7 to 72720000- 3), 9342410-4 8 R&D services (4) 85 From 73000000-2 to 73436000-7 (except 73200000-4, 73210000-7, 73220000-0) 9 Accounting, auditing 862 From 79210000-9 to 79223000-3 and bookkeeping services 10 Market research and 864 From 79300000-7 to 79330000-6, and public opinion polling 79342310-9, 79342311-6 services 11 Management consultant 865, 866 From 73200000-4 to 73220000-0 services (5) and related from 79400000-8 to 79421200-3 and services 79342000-3, 79342100-4 79342300-6, 79342320-2 79342321-9, 79910000-6, 79991000-7 98362000-8 12 Architectural services; 867 From 71000000-8 to 71900000-7 engineering services and (except 71550000-8) and 79994000-8 integrated engineering services; urban planning and landscape engineering services; related scientific and technical consulting services; technical testing and analysis services 13 Advertising services 871 From 79341000-6 to 79342200-5 (except 79342000-3 and 79342100-4) 14 Building-cleaning 874, 82201 to From 70300000-4 to 70340000-6, and services and property 82206 from 90900000-6 to 90924000-0 management services 15 Publishing and printing 88442 From 79800000-2 to 79824000-6, and services on a fee or from 79970000-6 to 79980000-7 contract basis 16 Sewage and refuse 94 From 90400000-1 to 90743200-9 disposal services; (except 90712200-3 from 90910000-9 sanitation and similar to 90920000-2 and 50190000-3, services 50229000-6 50243000-0 ) (1) Except for rail transport services covered by Category 18. (2) Except for rail transport services covered by Category 18. (3) Except contracts for financial services in connection with the issue, purchase, sale or transfer of securities or other financial instruments, and central bank services. Also excluded are services for the acquisition or rental, by whatever financial means, of land, existing buildings, or other immovable property or concerning rights in respect thereof; nevertheless, financial services supplied at the same time as, before or after the contract of acquisition or rental, in whatever form, shall be subject to this Directive. (4) Excluding research and development services other than those where the benefits accrue exclusively to the contracting authority for its use in the conduct of its own affairs, on condition that the service provided is wholly remunerated by the contracting authority. (5) Except arbitration and conciliation services. Annex XVII a – part B Services referred to in Article 12(c) and Article 84 Categories Subject CPC Reference CPV Reference No No 17 Hotel and restaurant 64 From 55100000-1 to 55524000-9, and services from 98340000-8 to 98341100-6 18 Rail Transport Services 711 From 60200000-0 to 60220000-6 19 Water transport services 72 From 60600000-4 to 60653000-0, and from 63727000-1 to 63727200-3 20 Supporting and 74 From 63000000-9 to 63734000-3 auxiliary transport (except 63711200-8, 63712700-0, services 63712710-3, and from 63727000-1, to 63727200-3), and 98361000-1 21 Legal services 861 From 79100000-5 to 79140000-7 22 Personnel placement 872 From 79600000-0 to 79635000-4 and supply services (1) (except 79611000-0, 79632000-3, 79633000-0), and from 98500000-8 to 98514000-9 23 Investigation and 873 (except From 79700000-1 to 79723000-8 security services, except 87304) armoured car services 24 Education and 92 From 80100000-5 to 80660000-8 vocational education (except 80533000-9, 80533100-0, services 80533200-1); 25 Health and social 93 79611000-0, and from 85000000-9 to services 85323000-9 (except 85321000-5 and 85322000-2) 26 Recreational, cultural 96 From 79995000-5 to 79995200-7, and and sporting services from 92000000-1 to 92700000-8 (except 92230000-2, 92231000-9, 92232000-6) 27 Other services (1) Except employment contracts.
Amendment 341 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The services governed by the provisions of this directive are listed in Annex XVI A. Articles 74 to 76 of this directive apply to the contracts for specific services listed in Annex XVI B.
Amendment 401 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) EUR 500 000 for public contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVI B.
Amendment 625 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
7. Member States shall ensure that, at the latest 23 years after the date provided for in Article 92(1), all procurement procedures under this Directive are performed using electronic means of communication, in particular e-submission, in accordance with the requirements of this Article.
Amendment 979 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 1
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. Contracting authorities may authoriseprohibit tenderers tofrom submitting variants. They shall indicate in the contract notice or, where a prior information notice is used as a means of calling for competition, in the invitation to confirm interest whether or not they authoriseprohibit variants. Variants shall not be authorised without such indication.
Amendment 983 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 2
2. Contracting authorities authorising variantWhere variants are not prohibited, contracting authorities shall state in the procurement documents the minimum requirements to be met by the variants and any specific requirements for their presentation. They shall also ensure that the chosen award criteria can be usefully applied to variants meeting those minimum requirements as well as to conforming tenders which are not variants.
Amendment 988 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
In procedures for awarding public supply or service contracts, contracting authorities thatwhich have authorisnot prohibited variants shallmay not reject a variant on the sole ground that it would, whereif successful, lead to either a service contract rather than a public supply contract or a supply contract rather than a public service contract.
Amendment 1038 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 3
Article 54 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1082 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Contracting authorities shall limit any conditions for participation to those that are appropriate to ensure that a candidate or tenderer has the legal and financial capacities and the commercial and technical abilities to perform the contract to be awarded. Consequently, in no case can a tender be rejected solely because it does not include a reference to previous contracts. All requirements shall be related and strictly proportionate to the subject- matter of the contract, taking into account the need to ensure genuine competition.
Amendment 1126 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to national laws, regulations or administrative provisions concerning the remuneration of certain services, the criteriaon on which contracting authorities shall base the award of public contracts shall be one of the following:the most economically advantageous tender. Where the public contract concerns the supply of goods, particularly standardised goods, contracting authorities may base the award of the contract on the lowest cost criterion.
Amendment 1130 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 1140 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1393 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 74
Article 74
Contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVI B shall be awarded in accordance with this Chapter, where the value of the contracts is equal to or greater than the threshold indicated in Article 4 (d).
Amendment 1585 #
Amendment 1592 #
2011/0438(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 16 a (new)
Annex 16 a (new)
Annex XVIa Annex XVIa - Part A Services referred to in Article 1 Categories Subject CPC reference CPV Reference No No [1] 1 Maintenance and repair 6112, 6122, 633, From 50100000-6 to 50884000-5 services 886 (except for 50310000-1 to 50324200-4 and 50116510-9, 50190000-3, 502290006, 50243000-0), and from 51000000-9 to 51900000-1 2 Land transport services, 712 (except for including armoured car 71235), 7512, From 60100000-9 to 60183000-4 services, and courier 87304 (except for 60160000-7, 60161000-4, services, except 60220000-6), and from 64120000-3 to transport of mail 64121200-2 3 Air transport services of 73 (except for passengers and freight, 7321) From 60410000-5 to 60424120-3 except transport of mail (except for 60411000-2, 60421000-5), and 60500000-3 From 60440000-4 to 60445000-9 4 Transport of mail by 71235, 7321 60160000-7,60161000-4 60411000-2, land [2] and by air 60421000-5 5 Telecommunications 752 From 64200000-8 to 64228200-2 services 72318000-7, and from 72700000-7 to 72720000-3 6 Financial services: ex 81, 812, 814 a) Insurance services From 66100000-1 to 66720000-3 b) Banking and investment services [3] 7 Computer and related 84 From 50310000-1 to 50324200-4 services From 72000000-5 to 72920000-5 (except for 72318000-7 and from 72700000-7 to 72720000-3), 9342410- 4 8 R&D services [4] 85 From 73000000-2 to 73436000-7 (except for 73200000-4, 73210000-7, 73220000-0 9 Accounting, auditing 862 From 79210000-9 to 79223000-3 and bookkeeping services 10 Market research and 864 From 79300000-7 to 79330000-6, and public opinion polling 79342310-9, 79342311-6 services 11 Management consulting 865, 866 From 73200000-4 to 73220000-0 services [5] and related From 79400000-8 to 79421200-3 and services 79342000-3, 79342100-4 79342300-6, 79342320-2 79342321-9, 79910000-6, 79991000-7 98362000-8 12 Architectural services; 867 engineering services and From 71000000-8 to 71900000-7 integrated engineering (except for 71550000-8) and services; urban planning 79994000-8 and landscape engineering services; related scientific and technical consulting services; technical testing and analysis services 13 Advertising services 871 From 79341000-6 to 79342200-5 (except for 79342000-3 and 79342100-4) 14 Building-cleaning 874, 82201 à services and property 82206 From 70300000-4 to 70340000-6, and management services from 90900000-6 to 90924000-0 15 Publishing and printing 88442 services on a fee or From 79800000-2 to 79824000-6 contract basis From 79970000-6 to 79980000-7 16 Sewage and refuse 94 From 90400000-1 to 90743200-9 disposal services; (except for 90712200-3 From sanitation and similar 90910000-9 to 90920000-2 and services 50190000-3, 50229000-6 50243000-0 (1) CPC Nomenclature (provisional version ), used to define the scope of Directive 92/50/EEC. (2) Except for rail transport services covered by category 18. (3) Except financial services relating to the issue, sale, purchase or transfer of securities and other financial instruments and services provided by central banks. Also excluded: services involving the acquisition or rental, by whatever financial procedures, of land, existing buildings, or other immovable property or concerning rights thereon; nevertheless, financial services supplied at the same time as, before or after the contract of acquisition or rental, in whatever form, shall be subject to this Directive. (4) Except research and development services other than those where the benefits accrue exclusively to the contracting authority and/or contracting entity for its use in the conduct of its own affairs on condition that the service provided is wholly remunerated by the contracting authority. (5) Except arbitration and conciliation services. Annex XVIa - Part B Services referred to in Articles 4(d) and 74 Categories Subject CPC reference CPV Reference No No [1] 17 Hotel and restaurant 64 From 55100000-1 to 55524000-9, and services from 98340000-8 to 98341100-6 18 Rail transport services 711 From 60200000-0 to 60220000-6 19 Water transport services 72 From 60600000-4 to 60653000-0, and from 63727000-1 to 63727200-3 20 Supporting and 74 auxiliary transport From 63000000-9 to 63734000-3 services (except for 63711200-8, 63712700-0, 63712710-3, and from 63727000-1, to 63727200-3), and 98361000-1 21 Legal services 861 From 79100000-5 to 79140000-7 22 Personnel placement 872 and supply services [2] From 79600000-0 to 79635000-4 (except for 79611000-0, 79632000-3, 79633000-0), and from 98500000-8 to 98514000-9) 23 Investigation and 873 (except for From 80100000-5 to 80660000-8 security services, except 87304) (except for 80533000-9, 80533100-0, armoured car services 80533200-1) 24 Education and 92 From 80100000-5 to 80660000-8 vocational education (except for 80533000-9, 80533100-0, services 80533200-1) 25 Health and social 93 79611000-0, and from 85000000-9 to services 85323000-9 (except for 85321000-5 and 85322000-2) 26 Recreational, cultural 96 From 79995000-5 to 79995200-7, and and sporting services [3] from 92000000-1 to 92700000-8 (except for 92230000-2, 92231000-9, 92232000-6) 27 Other services (1) CPC Nomenclature (provisional version), used to define the scope of Directive 92/50/EEC. (2) Except employment contracts. (3) Except contracts for the acquisition, development, production or co-production of programmes by broadcasting organisations and contracts for broadcasting time.
Amendment 368 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) It is necessary to clarify the conditions under which modifications of a concession during its execution require a new award procedure, taking into account the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Any concession in force may be modified by means of a supplementary agreement. A new award procedure is required in, however, in the case of material changes to the initial concession, demonstrating the intention of the parties to renegotiate essential terms or conditions of that concession. This is notably the case if the amended conditions would have had an influence on the outcome of the procedure, had they been part of the initial procedure. An exceptional and temporary extension of the term of the concession strictly aimed at ensuring the continuity of the provision of the service pending the award of a new concession should not normally qualify as a material change to the initial concession. Nevertheless, where a contract has reached its term the grantor and the concessionaire shall refrain from extensions for purposes of investments not essential to the performance of the concession and which would be implemented solely with a view to extending the duration thereof.
Amendment 505 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the acquisition, development, production or co-production of programme material intended for broadcasting, defined as transmission and distribution using any form of electronic network, that are awarded by broadcasterand related preparatory services intended for media services, nor to concessions for broadcasting time, that are awarded to broadcastersor distribution and transmission;
Amendment 844 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 8
Article 36 – paragraph 8
8. Any candidate or tenderer that is in one of the situations referred to in paragraphs 5 to 7 may provide the contracting authority or contracting entity with evidence demonstrating its reliability despite the existence of the relevant ground for exclusion.
Amendment 903 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 42 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 42 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Provided the overall nature of the concession remains the same, modification of the concession shall not be considered substantial where: (a) the modification has been provided for in the original concession contract in clear, precise and unequivocal review clauses or options which state the scope and nature of possible modifications as well as the conditions under which they may be used; (b) the value thereof does not exceed the threshold laid down in Article 6 and is below 10% of the updated value of the original contract. Where several successive modifications are made, the value shall be assessed on the basis of the updated cumulative value of the successive modifications.
Amendment 105 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Directive 2005/36/EC only applies to professionals who want to pursue the same profession in another Member State. There are cases where the activities concerned are part of a profession with a larger scope of activities in the host Member State. If the differences between the fields of activity are so large that in reality a full programme of education and training is required from the professional to compensate for shortcomings and if the professional so requests, a host Member State should under these particular circumstances grant partial access. However, in case of overriding reasons of general interest, such as in the case of a doctor of medicine or other health professionalsgrant partial access. In respect of professions with implications for public health, safety or health monitoring, a Member State could refuse to grant partial access were it to consider the quality of service provided to be lower. In case of overriding reasons of general interest, a Member State should always be able to refuse partial access.
Amendment 115 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Directive 2005/36/EC should also cover notaries. For recognition requests for establishment, Member States should be able to impose the necessary aptitude test or adaptation period to avoid any discrimination in the national selection and nomination procedures. In the case of free provision of services, notaries should not be able to draw up authentic instruments and carry out other activities of authentication which require the seal of the hostnot apply to the profession of notary in connection with recognition requests for establishment or the provision of services in another Member State.
Amendment 134 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Common training frameworks should also make it possible for regulated professions which are subject to an automatic recognition procedure based on coordination of minimum training conditions under Chapter III of Title III and in which new specialities are not covered by that automatic recognition procedure to secure recognition of such specialities on the basis of an automatic procedure.
Amendment 148 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Graduates wishing to pursue a remunerated traineeshiptraineeship which forms part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends in another Member State where such traineeship is possible should be covered by Directive 2005/36/EC in order to foster their mobility. It is also necessary to provide for the recognition of their traineeship by the home Member State.
Amendment 168 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts in order to lay down common and uniform rules regarding the specification of European Professional Cards for specific professions, the format of the European Professional Card, the translations necessary to support an application for issuing a European Professional Card, details for the assessment of the applications for a European Professional Card, the technical specifications and the measures necessary to ensure integrity, confidentiality and accuracy of information contained in the European Professional Card and in the IMI file, the conditions and the procedures for making available a European Professional Card, the conditions of access to the IMI file, the technical means and the procedures for the verification of the authenticity and validity of a European Professional Card and the implementation of the alert mechanism, due to the technical nature of those implementing acts.
Amendment 171 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts in order to lay down common and uniform rules governing whether or not a European Professional Card should be introduced for a regulated profession.
Amendment 183 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
This Directive also establishes rules concerning partial access to a regulated profession and access to and recognition of remunerated traineeships pursued in another Member State which form part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends.
Amendment 192 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall apply to all nationals of a Member State wishing to pursue a regulated profession or a remunerated traineeshiptraineeship which forms part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends in a Member State, including those belonging to the liberal professions, other than that in which they obtained their professional qualifications, on either a self-employed or employed basis.
Amendment 203 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – point ii
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) 'remunerated traineeship'‘traineeship which forms part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends’: the pursuit of supervised and remunerated activities, with a view to access to a regulated profession granted on the basis of an examination;
Amendment 237 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 6
Article 4 a – paragraph 6
6. TAt the request of professional organisations wishing to introduce European Professional Cards for the professions they represent, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying European Professional Cards for specific professions, establishing the format of the European Professional Card, the translations necessary to support any application for issuing a European Professional Card and details for the assessment of applications, taking into account the particularities of each profession concerned. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisoryexamination procedure referred to in Article 58(3).
Amendment 331 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
2005/36/CE
Article 4 f – paragraph 1
Article 4 f – paragraph 1
1. THaving consulted representative stakeholders, the competent authority of the host Member State shall grant partial access to a professional activity in its territory provided that the following conditions are fulfilled:
Amendment 337 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new)
2005/36/CE
Article 4 f – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
Article 4 f – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
b a) opening up a professional activity with implications for public health, safety or health monitoring to partial access does not result in the quality of the service normally offered in the host member State being undermined.
Amendment 357 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
2005/36/CE
Article 4 f – paragraph 2
Article 4 f – paragraph 2
2. Partial access may be rejected if such rejection is justified by an overriding reason of general interest, such as public healthrelating to the public interest, it would secure the attainment of the objective pursued and it would not go beyond what is strictly necessary.
Amendment 378 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
2005/36/CE
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point bb)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point bb)
Amendment 387 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Amendment 430 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c
Amendment 544 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a)
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a)
(a) at least four years of full-time study at a university or comparable teaching institution leading to successful completion of a university-level examination and at least two years of remunerated traineeshiptraineeship which form part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends;
Amendment 551 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b)
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b)
(b) at least five years of full-time study at a university or comparable teaching institution leading to successful completion of a university-level examination and at least one year of remunerated traineeship.traineeship which forms part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends;
Amendment 558 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 46 – paragraph 3
Article 46 – paragraph 3
3. The remunerated traineeshiptraineeship referred to in paragraph 1 must be carried out in a Member State, under the supervision of a person providing adequate guarantees regarding their ability to provide practical training. It must be undertaken after the completion of the study referred to in paragraph 1. The completion of the remunerated traineeship must be attested to in a certificate accompanying the evidence of formal qualifications.
Amendment 577 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49 a – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 49 a – paragraph 2 – point e
e) the profession concerned is neitherot covered by another common training framework nor regulated already under Chapter III of Title III;
Amendment 614 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Any language control shall be limited to the knowledge of one of the official languages of the Member State according towhich the choice of the person concerned,lder of a professional qualification needs in order to pursue his profession; it shall be proportionate to the activity to be pursued and free of charge for the professional. The person concerned shall be allowed to appeal such controls before national courts.
Amendment 632 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 55 a – title
Article 55 a – title
Recognition of remunerated traineeshiptraineeships which form part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends
Amendment 640 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 55 a
Article 55 a
With a view to grant access to a regulated profession, the home Member State shall recognise the remunerated traineeshiptraineeship, which forms part of the training for a regulated profession and on which the validity of evidence of formal qualifications depends, pursued in another Member State and certified by a competent authority of that Member State.
Amendment 657 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42 (new)
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 56 a – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
Article 56 a – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
ja) professions covered by the automatic recognition procedure under Chapter III of Title III of this Directive which are subject to a common training framework to ensure the relevant specialities are recognised in another Member State, with the exception of the profession of architect;
Amendment 707 #
2011/0435(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 46 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 46 (new)
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 58 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 58 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Amendment 56 #
2011/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Global competition, demographic changes, resothe limited naturce constraintsof natural resources, in particular fossil resources, and emerging social trends generate challenges and opportunities for some sectors. For example, design-based sectors facing global challenges and characterised by a high proportion of SMEs need to adapt to reap the benefits and harness the untapped potential of high demand for personalised, inclusive products. As these challenges apply to all SMEs in the Union in these sectors, a concerted effort at Union level is necessary.
Amendment 84 #
2011/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall contribute to promotencouraging entrepreneurship by improving framework conditions affecting the development of entrepreneurship. The Commission shall support a business environment favourable to enterprise developmentstart- up, development and transfer and growth.
Amendment 90 #
2011/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may support actions to improve SMEs access to the Single Market including information provision (including through digital services) and awareness- raising, particularly in respect of standardisation and public procurement. These actions may also seek the removal of existing legal and regulatory barriers.
Amendment 97 #
2011/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) ‘fitness checks’ of existing legislation and impact assessments of Union measures of particular relevance for the competitiveness and growth of enterprises, and in particular of SMEs and micro- enterprises, with a view to identifying areas of existing legislation that need to be simplified, or repealed and to ensure that burdens on SMEs are minimised in areas in which new legislative measures need to bare proposed;
Amendment 88 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) In accordance with Article 26(2) TFEU, the Internal Market is to comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods and services is ensured. In order for consumers to have confidence in and benefit from the digital dimension of the Internal Market, it is necessary that they have access to easy and low-cost, effective and free ways of resolving disputes which arise from the sale of goods or the supply of services online. This is particularly important when consumers shop cross- border.
Amendment 94 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Being able to seek easy and low-cost, effective and free dispute resolution can boost consumers' and traders' confidence in the digital market. Consumers and traders, however, still face barriers to finding out- of-court solutions in particular to their disputes arising from a cross-border online transaction. Thus, such disputes currently are often left unresolved.
Amendment 97 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Online dispute resolution offers a simple, effective and low-cost out-of-court solution to disputes arising from cross- border online transactions. However, there is currently a lack of mechanisms that allow consumers and traders to resolve such disputes via electronic means. This leads to consumer detriment, acts as a barrier to cross-border online transactions, creates an uneven playing field for traders and thus hampers the development of electronic commerce.
Amendment 103 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) This Regulation should not apply to disputes between consumers and traders that arise from the cross-border sale of goods or provision of services offline. This Regulation should not apply to neither claims by traders against consumers nor disputes between traders.
Amendment 107 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) This Regulation aims at creating an online dispute resolution ('ODR') platform at European level. The ODR platform should take the form of an dedicated interactive website offering a single point of entry to consumers and traders seeking to resolve disputes out-of-court which have arisen from a cross-border e-commerce transaction. It should provide general information regarding the out-of-court settlement of contractual disputes between traders and consumers arising from the online sale of goods or provision of services. It should allow consumers and traders to submit complaints by filling in an electronic complaint form available in all official languages of the Union and inform them of the possibility of seeking assistance from facilitators if necessary in completing the form correctly. It should transmit complaints to an alternative dispute resolution ('ADR') entity competent to deal with the dispute concerned. The platform should offer to ADR entities and the parties the possibility of conducting the dispute resolution procedure via the platform.
Amendment 116 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) An ODR system at European level should build on existing ADR entities in the Member States and respect Member States' legal traditions. ADR entities to which a complaint has been transmitted via the ODR platform should therefore apply their own rules of procedure, including rules on cost. However, this Regulation intends to establish some common rules applicable to those procedures that will safeguard their effectiveness. This should include rules ensuring that such dispute resolution is accomplished expeditiously and without the need for the parties to be physically present before the ADR entity unless they specifically decide otherwise.
Amendment 120 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) A network of online dispute resolution facilitators should provide support to parties seeking the resolution of disputes relating to complaints submitted via the ODR platform. That network should be composed of contact points for ODR in the Member States which host online dispute resolution facilitators. Facilitators should in particular provide consumers who so request with assistance in completing electronic claim forms correctly, as well as general information to parties requesting it regarding the principal consumer rights provisions applicable.
Amendment 126 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
Article 1
The purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the effective functioning of the internal market, and in particular its digital dimension, and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection by providing an online platform facilitating the impartial, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
Amendment 129 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2
Article 2
This Regulation shall apply to the out-of- court resolution of contractual disputes arising from the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between consumers and traders through the intervention of an alternativeextrajudicial dispute resolution entity complying with Directive [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] and involving the use of a European online dispute resolution platform.
Amendment 141 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point i
Article 4 – point i
(i) "complainant party" means the consumer or the trader that has submitted a complaint via the European online dispute resolution platform;
Amendment 143 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point j
Article 4 – point j
(j) "respondent party" means the consumer or the trader against whom a complaint has been submitted via the European online dispute resolution platform;
Amendment 144 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall establish a European online dispute resolution platform, (hereinafter ‘ODR platform’) on a dedicated internet site.
Amendment 146 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The ODR platform shall be an interactive website which can be accessed electronically and free of charge in all official languages of the Union. The ODR platform shall be a single point of entry to consumers and tradersseeking information regarding the out-of-court settlement of contractual disputes with traders arising from the online sale of goods or provision of services and/or seeking the out-of- court resolution of disputes covered by this Regulation.
Amendment 148 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a The ODR platform shall provide information regarding the out-of-court settlement of contractual disputes between consumers and with traders arising from the online sale of goods or provision of services.
Amendment 162 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be responsible for the ODR platform as regards its development, its operation, its maintenance and as regards data security and operation and as regards translations, user-friendliness maintenance, funding and data security. The development, operation, user- friendliness and maintenance of the platform shall respect the principles ‘privacy by design’ (respect for privacy from the design stage) and, as far as possible ‘design for all’ (useable by all, including the vulnerable, without the need for any particular adjustment).
Amendment 165 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Commission shall ensure that information contained in the ODR platform regarding concerning the existence and characteristics of ADR procedures are accurate and up to date.
Amendment 176 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) providing consumers who so request with assistance in completing electronic claim forms correctly;
Amendment 178 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
(ab) providing general information to parties who so request regarding the principal consumer rights provisions applicable;
Amendment 189 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The ODR platform shall provide an online guide for those seeking assistance in completing electronic claim forms.
Amendment 191 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. A complaint submitted to the ODR platform shall only be processed if the complaint form is fully completedall the necessary sections of the complaint form are fully completed. If this is not the case, the ODR platform shall inform the complainant party of the decision not to process the form and the reasons why. The platform shall also offer the complainant party the services of a facilitator in completing his electronic claim form should he so desire. If this is the case, the facilitator shall contact the complainant party for this purpose.
Amendment 232 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d
Amendment 248 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Where (a) the choice of the consumer corresponds to an ADR entity the trader has committed to use in accordance with Article 10(1) of Directive …./…/EU[Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] or where(b) the parties choose the same ADR entity in their replies, the platform shall automatically transmit the complaint to that ADR entity. within seven calendar days from receipt of the complainant party’s reply regarding the choice of ADR. .
Amendment 253 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – point b
Article 9 – point b
(b) if, following the notification of the dispute to the parties, the parties agree to institute proceedings before the entity, accomplish the conclusion of the dispute resolution procedure within 390 calendar days from when the proceedings have been instituted. In the case of complex disputes, the ADR entity may extend this time limit;
Amendment 257 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Access to information, including personal data, related to a dispute and stored in the database referred to in Article 10 shall be granted, for the purposes referred to in Article 9, only to the ADR entity to which the dispute was transmitted in accordance with Article 8. Access to the same information shall be granted also to ODR facilitators for the purposes referred to in Article 6(2) and (3).
Amendment 258 #
2011/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall provide parties to an ADR procedure with a guide containing clear and specific information regarding the treatment of their personal data by the ODR platform under Articles 11 and 12 of Regulation (CE) No 45/2001 and the relevant national legislation adopted under Articles 10 and 11 of Directive 95/46/EC, together with their rights in this respect.
Amendment 136 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) This Directive should apply to contractual disputes between consumers and traders that are arising from the sale of goods or provision of services in all economic sectors. This should includeIts scope should be limited to complaints submitted by consumers against traders but als. This Directive should not apply to complaints submitted by traders against consumers. This Directive should not apply or to disputes between traders; however, it should not prevent Member States from adopting or maintaining in force provisions on procedures for the out-of-court resolution of such disputes.
Amendment 142 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Consumers should be encouraged, as a first step, to contact the trader directly or to use the complaint handling system operated by the trader in an effort to find an amicable solution. This procedure could represent a swift way of resolving consumer disputes, although it should be available only for a limited period.
Amendment 147 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) This Directive should not apply to procedures before dispute resolution entities where the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed exclusively by the trader nor to procedures before consumer compliant handling systems operated by the trader. It should not apply or to direct negotiations between the parties. Furthermore, it should not apply to attempts made by a judge to settle a dispute in the course of a judicial proceeding concerning that dispute.
Amendment 154 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) This Directive should apply to procedures before dispute resolution entities if the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed or paid exclusively by the trader or a business association only if the following twin conditions are met, namely that the operating methods of the entities meet the requirements laid down in Chapter II of this Directive and the natural persons comply with the specific conditions laid down in Article 6(2a) of this Directive. In that connection, the dispute resolution entity in question should undergo at least once a year an evaluation conducted by the competent authority of the Member State in which the entity is established in order to ascertain whether it meets these twin conditions.
Amendment 164 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The natural persons in charge of alternative dispute resolution should only be considered independent and impartial if they cannot be subject to pressure that potentially influences their attitude towards the dispute. There is a particular need to ensure the absence of such pressure where ADR entities are financed by one of the parties to the dispute or an organisation of which one of the parties is a member. Special conditions should therefore apply to natural persons in charge of the alternative dispute resolution who are employed or remunerated exclusively by the trader or by a business association.
Amendment 171 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) ADR procedures should be effective. They should provide for a simple and fast procedure whose duration generally does not exceed 90 dayscalendar days from the date of receipt of the complete complaint file by the ADR entity. The ADR entity should be able to extend this time period when the complexity of the dispute in question so demands.
Amendment 175 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) ADR procedures should be free of charge or of moderate costs for consumers so that it remains economically reasonable for consumers to use such procedurefor consumers.
Amendment 194 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) When a dispute arises it is necessary that consumers are able to identify quickly which ADR entities are competent to deal with their complaint and to know whether or not the trader concerned will participate in proceedings submitt. Traders who commit to use ADR entities should therefore inform consumers about the address or website of the relevant ADR entity or entities by which they are covered. This information should be published in a clear and readily understandable form and mentioned toin an ADR entity. Traders should therefore provide such informaeasily, directly and permanently accessible way on the trader's website, where one exists, in the general terms and conditions on their main commercial documentsf contracts for the sale of goods or provision of services concluded between the trader and a consumer and, where they have a website, on their websitesnever a trader rejects a complaint submitted directly to him by a consumer. This obligation should be without prejudice to Articles 6(1)(t), 7(1) and 8 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights. Article 6(1)(t) of that Directive provides for consumer contracts concluded at a distance or off premises that the trader is to inform the consumer about the possibility of having recourse to an out- of-court complaint and redress mechanism to which the trader is subject, and the methods for having access to it, before the consumer is bound by the contract.
Amendment 203 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Member States should ensure that ADR entities cooperate on the resolution of cross-border disputes and conduct regular exchanges of good practice as regards the settlement of both cross-border and domestic disputes.
Amendment 207 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Close cooperation between ADR entities and national authorities entrusted with the enforcement of Union legislation on consumer protection should strengthen the effective application of such Union legislation. With the same aim in view, the Commission should support and facilitate exchanges of experience between ADR entities at European level in order to encourage the use of best practice and exchanges of experience.
Amendment 216 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) Since the objective of this Directive, namely to contribute, by achieving a high level of consumer protection, to the proper functioning of the internal market by ensuring a high level of consumer protection, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Amendment 217 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1
Article 1
This Directive is to contribute to the functioning of the internal market and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection, by achieving a high level of consumer protection, to the proper functioning of the internal market by ensuring that when disputes arise between consumers and traders can be submittedfollowing the sale of goods or the provision of services consumers can submit a complaint to entities offering impartial, independent, transparent, effective and fair alternative dispute resolution procedures.
Amendment 222 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall apply to procedures for the out-of-court resolution of domestic and cross-border contractual disputes arising from the sale of goods or provision of services by a trader established in the Union to a consumer resident in the Union through the intervention of a dispute resolution entity which proposes or imposes a solution or brings the parties together with the aim of facilitating an amicable solution, hereinafter ‘ADR procedures’, in cases where the consumer has been unable to obtain satisfaction from the trader.
Amendment 230 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) procedures before dispute resolution entities where the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed or paid exclusively by the trader; or a business association unless, in addition to the fact that the entities’ operating methods meet the requirements laid down in Chapter II of this Directive, the natural persons in question comply with the specific conditions laid down in Article 6(2a) of this Directive.
Amendment 234 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) disputes between traders;
Amendment 250 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall facilitate access by consumers to ADR procedures and shall ensure that disputes covered by this Directive can be submitted to an ADR entityies which compliesy with the requirementsquality criteria set out in this Directive in cases where the consumer has been unable to obtain satisfaction from the trader.
Amendment 258 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) have a website enabling the parties to submit a complaint onlinerun and keep up to date a website which provides the parties with easy access to information concerning ADR procedures and enables consumers to submit a complaint online or provides them with a postal address to which they can send complaints and the requisite supporting documents;
Amendment 260 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) have sufficient resources (appropriate human, material and financial resources) ;
Amendment 261 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) enable the parties to exchange information with them via electronic means or by post;
Amendment 275 #
Amendment 277 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the natural persons in charge of alternative dispute resolution possess the necessary expertise and are independent and impartial. This shall be guaranteed by ensuring that they:
Amendment 280 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) possess the necessary knowledge, skills and experience, including legal experience, in the field of alternative dispute resolution;
Amendment 288 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 291 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that ADR entities make publicly available on their websites and in printed form at their premises clear and easily understandable information on:
Amendment 303 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) a list of the main decisions likely to influence the way in which consumers’ rights are interpreted, accompanied by general recommendations intended to prevent the reappearance of certain recurrent or significant disputes;
Amendment 309 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the ADR procedure is free of charge or at moderate costs for consumers;
Amendment 315 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the dispute is resolved within 90 calendar days from the date on which the ADR entity has received the full complaint file.
Amendment 325 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the parties have the possibility to express their point of view and, hear the arguments and facts put forward by the other party and any experts' statements and respond within a reasonable period;
Amendment 331 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) the consumerparties, before agreeing to a suggested solution, isare informed that:
Amendment 336 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
i) they hasve the choice as to whether or not to agree to a suggested solution;
Amendment 339 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
ii) the suggestwhere applicable the proposed solution may be less favourable than an outcome determined by a court applying legal rules;
Amendment 362 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that traders established on their territories inform consumers about the ADR entities by which they are covered and which they undertake to use and which are competent to deal with potential disputes between themselves and consumers. Such information shall include the contact details and the addresses of the relevant ADR entities' websites and specify whether or not the trader commits to use these entities to resolve disputes with consumers.
Amendment 367 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be published in a clear and readily understandable form and mentioned in an easily, directly, prominently and permanently accessible way on the trader's website, where one exists, in the general terms and conditions of contracts for the sale of goods or provision of services between the trader and a consumer and in invoices and receipts rewhenever a trader rejects a complating to such contractst submitted directly to him by a consumer. It shall specify how further information on the ADR entity concerned and on the conditions for using it can be accessed.
Amendment 375 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – title
Article 13 – title
Cooperation between ADR entities on the resolution of cross-border disputand exchanges of experience between ADR entities
Amendment 376 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shallould ensure that ADR entities cooperate on the resolution of cross-border disputes and conduct regular exchanges of good practice as regards the settlement of both cross-border and domestic disputes.
Amendment 378 #
2011/0373(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission shall support and facilitate exchanges of experience between ADR entities in order to encourage the use of best practices, in particular through the ‘Consumers' programme.
Amendment 249 #
2011/0371(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The programme should include a strong international dimension particularly as regards higher educationvocational education and training, higher education and adult learning, not only to enhance the quality of European higher education and training in pursuit of the broader ET2020 objectives and the attractiveness of the Union as a study destination, but also to promote understanding between people and contribution to the sustainable development of higher education and training in the third countries.
Amendment 687 #
2011/0371(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) support to non-commercial European sport events involving several European countries and aimed at promoting social inclusion and equal opportunities, such as special events involving disadvantaged groups and people with disabilities;
Amendment 84 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
Amendment 93 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 2
This objective will be measured in particular through the level of information flow and the effectiveness of cooperation within the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network and the activity of the European Consumer Centres, how well known they are to consumers and how satisfied consumers are with the assistance they received during the most recent dispute resolution procedure.
Amendment 96 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 4
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 4
(4) bBuilding and improving access to the evidence base for policy- making in areas affecting consumers, for designing smart and targeted regulations and for detecting any market malfunctioning or changes in consumers’ needs;
Amendment 98 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 5 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 5 a (new)
(5a) capacity building for local, regional, national and European consumer organisations, increasing transparency and stepping up exchanges of best practice and expertise;
Amendment 106 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 9
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 9
(9) facilitating access to and monitoring of the functioning and the effectiveness of individual and, where appropriate, collective dispute resolution mechanisms for consumers, in particular of alternative dispute resolution schemes, including on- line, also through the development and maintenance of relevant IT tools, devoting particular attention to specific measures for vulnerable persons such as older people and/or people with lower levels of educational attainment;
Amendment 112 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point c
Annex I – point 2 – point c
(c) exchanges of enforcement officials and training focusing in particular on high- risk sectors;
Amendment 113 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 4 – introductory part
Annex I – point 4 – introductory part
4. Building and improving access to the evidence base for policy- making in areas affecting consumers , for designing smart and targeted regulations and for detecting any market malfunctioning or changes in consumers’ needs
Amendment 114 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 5 – introductory part
Annex I – point 5 – introductory part
5. Support toFinancial contributions to the functioning of European consumer organisations.
Amendment 115 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 5 – point b
Annex I – point 5 – point b
(b) capacity building for local, regional, national and European consumer organisations, notably through training available in various languages and throughout the European Union and exchange of best practice and expertise for staff members, in particular for consumer organisations in Member States where they are not sufficiently developed or which demonstrate a relatively low level of consumer confidence and awareness as evidenced by monitoring of consumer markets and the consumer environment in the Member States;
Amendment 117 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 5 a (new)
Annex I – point 5 a (new)
5a. Capacity building for local, regional, national and European consumer organisations, increasing transparency and stepping up exchanges of best practice and expertise;
Amendment 118 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 6 – introductory part
Annex I – point 6 – introductory part
6. Enhancing the transparency of consumer markets and consumer information, particularly through comparison websites providing comparable, reliable and easily accessible data, including for cross-border cases
Amendment 124 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7 – introductory part
Annex I – point 7 – introductory part
7. Enhancing consumer education as a life- long process
Amendment 125 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Objective III – title
Annex I – Objective III – title
Rights and redress: to consolidatedevelop and strengthen consumer rights in particular through regulatory action and improving access to individual and, where appropriate, collective redress including alternative dispute resolution
Amendment 126 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 9 – introductory part
Annex I – point 9 – introductory part
9. Facilitating access to and monitoring of the functioning and the effectiveness of individual and, where appropriate, collective dispute resolution mechanisms for consumers, in particular of alternative dispute resolution schemes, including on- line, also through the development and maintenance of relevant IT tools devoting particular attention to specific measures for vulnerable persons such as older people and/or people with lower levels of educational attainment; monitoring of the functioning and the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms for consumers, also through the development and maintenance of relevant IT tools and the exchange of existing best practice and experience in the Member States
Amendment 129 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 11 – introductory part
Annex I – point 11 – introductory part
11. Financial contributions for joint actions and the signing of partnership agreements with public or non-profit bodies constituting Community networks which provide information and assistance to consumers to help them exercise their rights and obtain access to appropriate dispute resolution, including out of court online resolution schemes (the European Consumer Centres Network), including
Amendment 133 #
2011/0340(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Objective 3 – title
Annex II – Objective 3 – title
Objective 3: Rights and redress: to consolidatedevelop and strengthen consumer rights in particular through regulatory action and improving access to individual and, where appropriate, collective redress including alternative dispute resolution
Amendment 340 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) In the frame of the revision of the consumer acquis started in 2004 by the European Commission's Green Paper, the recently adopted Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights deals with the most important contract law related areas of consumer distance and doorstep selling transactions. This directive will be operational as of mid-2014 and will provide a uniform legal framework for business-to-consumer transactions and in particular for business-to-consumer e- commerce.
Amendment 341 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 b (new)
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) Approximating consumer contract law through legal harmonization on a high level of protection which applies to all market players is the most appropriate approach to strengthen consumer confidence in cross-border transactions and to facilitate EU wide trade.
Amendment 342 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 c (new)
Recital 3 c (new)
(3c) The consumer acquis needs to be updated in order to face the challenges of societal and economic developments included the digital economy. Consumers need a framework of solid rights for purchasing safely and on fair conditions within the Single Market. Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights provided a review of consumer protection rules mainly in relation to specific selling methods, namely distance and door-step selling. The field of legal guarantees is highly important to consumers and business alike and requires further approximation and modernization which is provided by this directive.
Amendment 347 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) For the purchase of second hand goods, Article 7 (1) of Directive 1999/44 on Consumer Sales stipulates that Member States can allow traders to reduce the guarantee period to one year. Given the increasing importance of the second-hand market for European consumers in this time of economic crisis and given the need to promote more sustainable consumption, a reduction of the legal guarantee to one year is no longer justified. The guarantee period for second hand goods should rather be assessed on the base of the definition of requirements for the conformity of the goods or digital content as provided for in this directive.
Amendment 348 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 b (new)
Recital 9 b (new)
(9b) The rules on legal guarantees have an important role to play in promoting suitable products and are relevant in the context of the EU strategy on Integrated Product Policy. In order to promote sustainable consumption, consumers' confidence in products developed on the basis of the standards laid down in the eco-design legislation, it is necessary to ensure that the consumer counts on guarantee rights thorough the life cycle of the eco-designed product. This period of time should be established in reference to the implemented measures of Directive 2009/158/EC which requires an assessment of the life expectance of the product.
Amendment 488 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Article 141 a (new)
Annex 1 – Article 141 a (new)
Amendment 489 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Article 141 b (new)
Annex 1 – Article 141 b (new)
Direct producer's liability 1. The producer is liable towards the consumer to repair or replace the goods for any lack of conformity that existed at the time of the passing of risk to the consumer for the good or digital content within the time period specified in Article 10. The consumer has the right to choose between repair and replacement, under the conditions stipulated in Article 7 paragraph 1. 2. The producer shall repair or replace the goods, at the latest 30 days after having been notified of the lack of conformity. 3. This Article is without prejudice to the provisions of national law extending the liability to other parties such as the importer or the carrier or concerning the right of contribution or recourse.
Amendment 498 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Article 158 a (new)
Annex 1 – Article 158 a (new)
Reporting by the Commission (planned durability) By [...], the Commission shall (a) undertake research to identify, analyse and assess the impact of planned durability on the life cycle of products, and (b) submit a report to the European Parliament on the transposition of this directive with the necessary measures to address the problematic of planned durability of products.
Amendment 499 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Article 158 b (new)
Annex 1 – Article 158 b (new)
Right of redress 1. Where the final seller is liable to the consumer because of a lack of conformity resulting form an act or omission by the producer, a previous seller or any other intermediary, the final seller shall be entitled to pursue remedies against the person or persons liable in the contractual chain. 2. Member States shall establish the remedies refereed in paragraph 1 and conditions of exercise.
Amendment 500 #
2011/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Article 158 c (new)
Annex 1 – Article 158 c (new)
Reporting and review of unfair contract terms legislation The European Commission shall by [xxx] submit a report to the European Parliament on the application of Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts in different sectors which fall within its scope of application, and as appropriate, present proposals to the European Parliament and the Council for amending it.
Amendment 451 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) This Regulation should provide for the possibility of disposal of products bought in public intervention. Such measures should be taken in a way that avoids market disturbances and that, ensures equal access to goods and equal treatment of purchasers and enables produce to be made available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union.
Amendment 456 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In order to ensure that private storage has the desired effect on the market, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures for reducing the amount of aid to be paid where the quantity stored is lower than the contracted quantity; and conditions for granting of an advance payment and conditions for re-marketing and disposal of products including making them available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union.
Amendment 733 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Products may be disposed of by making them available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union set out in Regulation (EU) No […] if that scheme so provides. In that case, the accounting value of such products shall be at the level of the relevant fixed public intervention price referred to in Article 14(2).
Amendment 877 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) the conditions according to which it may be decided that products covered by private storage contracts may be re- marketed or disposed of, disposed of or made available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union set out in Regulation (EU) No [...];
Amendment 35 #
Amendment 48 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Consumers should have the right to opt for the separate sale of roaming services from their domestic mobile package. Basic principles should be laid down with regard to the separate provision of a separate sale offree roaming services which should be introduced in a coordinated manner across the Union. Consumers should be able to choose a different provider for roaming services without changing their number, and in a manner which ensures interoperability of services, with roaming services being provided anywhere in the Union and with the same level of quality. Consumers opting to keep the same operator for roaming services should be able to choose to have their roaming services directly deducted from their credit for national communications, so that they are only charged over and above their normal package tariff once their national credit has been used up.
Amendment 58 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) During the transitional period of safeguard caps, new roaming customers should be fully informed of the range of tariffs that exist for roaming within the Union, including the tariffs which are compliant with the transitory Eurotariff. Existing roaming customers should be given the opportunity to choose a new tariff compliant with the transitory Eurotariff or any other roaming tariff within a certain time frame. For existing roaming customers who have not made their choice within this time frame, it is appropriate to distinguish between those who had already opted for a specific roaming tariff or package before the entry into force of this Regulation and those who had not. The latter should be automatically accorded a tariff that complies with this Regulation. Roaming customers who already benefit from specific roaming tariffs or packages which suit their individual requirements and which they have chosen on that basis should remain on their previously selected tariff or package if, after having been reminded of their current tariff conditions, they fail to express a choice within the relevant time period and of the applicable Eurotariffs, they express a choice to their operator. Such specific roaming tariffs or packages could include, for example, roaming flat-rates, non-public tariffs, tariffs with additional fixed roaming charges, tariffs with per-minute charges lower than the maximum Eurotariff or tariffs with set-up charges.
Amendment 60 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) A common set of rules regarding unitisation of Eurotariff bills at retail level should therefore be introduced in order to further strengthen the single market and provide throughout the Union a commonthe same high level of protection to consumers of Union- wide roaming services.
Amendment 64 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) Providers of regulated roaming calls at the retail level should therefore be required to bill their customers on a per second basis, for all calls subject to a Eurotariff, subject only to the possibility to apply a minimum initial charging period of no more than 30rom the first seconds, for calls made. This will enable operators to cover any reasonable set-up costs and to provide flexibility to compete by offering shorter minimum charging periods. However, no minimum initial charging period is justified in the case of Eurotariff calls received, as the underlying wholesale cost is charged on a per second basis and any specific set-up costs are already covered by mobile termination rates calls made or received subject to a Eurotariff.
Amendment 70 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
Recital 57
(57) Providers of roaming services should not charge the roaming customer for any regulated data roaming service, unless and until the roaming customer accepts the provision of the service. Moreover, customers agreeing to the provision of such services should be made aware that smartphones may carry out roaming data transfers without their knowledge. They should be provided, free of charge, with details of how to prevent such transfers.
Amendment 77 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
Recital 67
(67) In order to improve the transparency of retail prices for making and receiving regulated roaming calls within the Union and to help roaming customers make decisions on the use of their mobile telephones while abroad, providers of mobile telephony services should enable their roaming customers easily to obtain information free of charge on the roaming charges applicable to them when making or receiving voice calls in a visited Member State. Moreover, providers should give their customers, on request and free of charge, additional information on the per- minute or per-unit data charges (including VAT) for the making or receiving of voice calls and also for the sending and receiving of SMS, MMS and other data communication services in the visited Member State. Since certain customer groups might be well informed about roaming charges operators should provide a possibility to easily opt-out from this automatic message service. However, this opt-out request should only concern the Member State visited, and should not automatically apply throughout the European Union unless the consumer has explicitly requested it.
Amendment 79 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
Recital 68
(68) Transparency also requires that providers furnish information on roaming charges, in particular on the Eurotariff and the all-inclusive flat-rate should they offer one, when subscriptions are taken out and each time there is a change in roaming charges. Home providers should provide information on roaming charges by appropriate means such as invoices, the internet, TV advertisements or direct mail. Home providers should ensure that all their roaming customers are aware of the availability of regulated tariffs for the period concerned and should send a clear and unbiased communication to these customers in writing describing the conditions of the Eurotariff and the right to switch to and from it.
Amendment 83 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
Recital 70
(70) In particular, mobile operators should provide their roaming customers, free of charge, with personalised tariff information on the charges applicable to those customers for data roaming services every time they initiate a data roaming service on entering another Member State. This information should be delivered to their mobile telephone or other mobile device in the manner best suited to its easy receipt and comprehension, and in such a manner as to enable easy access to it at a later date.
Amendment 85 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
Recital 71
(71) In order to facilitate customers’' understanding of the financial consequences of the use of regulated data roaming services and to permit them to monitor and control their expenditure, when the contract is signed and at any time thereafter upon the customer’s request, the home provider should give free examples for data roaming applications, such as e-mail, picture and web-browsing, by indicating their approximate size in terms of data usage.
Amendment 87 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 72
Recital 72
(72) In addition, in order to avoid bill shocks, mobile operators should define one or more maximum financial and/or volume limits for their outstanding charges for data roaming services, expressed in the currency in which the roaming customer is billed, and which they should offer to all their roaming customers, free of charge, with an appropriate notification, in a media format that can be consulted again subsequently, when this limit is being approached. Upon reaching this maximum limit, customers should no longer receive and be charged for those services unless they specifically request continued provision of those services in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the notification. In this case, they should receive free confirmation, in a media format that can be consulted again subsequently. Roaming customers should be given the opportunity to opt for any of these maximum financial or volume limits within a reasonable period or to choose not to have such a limit. Unless customers state otherwise, they should be put on a default limit system.
Amendment 91 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 74
Recital 74
Amendment 132 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Any switch to or from an alternative roaming provider shall be free of charge and shall not entail conditions or restrictions pertaining to elements of the subscription other than roaming, and shall be carried out within five working days, save that where a roaming customer who has subscribed to a domestic package which includes roaming prices other than the Eurotariff, Euro-SMS tariff or Euro- data tariff, the home provider may delay the switch from the old to the new subscription concerning roaming services for a specified period not exceeding three monthsone month as from the day on which the request to do so is made.
Amendment 135 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. At the time of making or renewing a contract on mobile communication services, home providers shall provide all customers individually and in a durable media format with full information on the possibility to choose an alternative roaming provider and facilitatenot hinder the conclusion of a contract with an alternative roaming provider. Customers concluding a contract with the home provider for roaming services shall explicitly confirm that they have been informed of such possibility. The providers of mobile communications services shall not restrict or prevent retailers serving as their points of sale tofrom offering contracts for separate roaming services with alternative roaming providers.
Amendment 179 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The retail charge (excluding VAT) of a Eurotariff which a home provider may levy from its roaming customer for the provision of a regulated roaming call may vary for any roaming call but shall not exceed EUR 0,32 per minute for any call made or EUR 0,11 per minute for any call received as of 1 July 2012. The price ceiling for calls made shall decrease to EUR 0,285 and EUR 0,2418 on 1 July 2013 and on 1 July 2014 respectively, and for calls received to EUR 0,10 and EUR 0,08 on 1 July 2013 and 1 July 2014 respectively. Without prejudice to Articles 13 and 19 these regulated maximum retail charges for the Eurotariff shall remain valid until 30 June 2016.
Amendment 182 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 199 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. With effect from 1 July 2012, the retail charge (excluding VAT) of a Euro-SMS tariff which a home provider may levy from its roaming customer for a regulated roaming SMS message sent by that roaming customer may vary for any roaming SMS message but shall not exceed EUR 0,10. With effect from 1 July 2014, that charge may not exceed EUR 0,06. Without prejudice to Articles 13 and 19, the regulated maximum retail charge for the Euro-SMS tariff shall remain at EUR 0,106 until 30 June 2016.
Amendment 227 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. No later than 30 June 2012, home providers shall inform all their roaming customers individually, and in a durable media format, about the Euro-data tariff, that it will apply from 1 July 2012 at the latest to all roaming customers who have not made a deliberate choice of a special tariff or package applicable to regulated data services, and about their right to switch to and from it in accordance with paragraph 5.
Amendment 260 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Home providers shall ensure that their roaming customers, both before and after the conclusion of a contract, are kept adequately informed of the charges which apply to their use of regulated data roaming services, in ways which facilitate customers' understanding of the financial consequences of such use and permit them to monitor and control their expenditure on regulated data roaming services in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3. The safeguard mechanisms referred to in paragraph 3 shall not apply to pre-paid customers.
Amendment 262 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where appropriate, home providers shall inform their customers, before the conclusion of a contract and on a regular basis thereafter, of the risk of automatic and uncontrolled data roaming connection and download. Furthermore, home providers shall explain tonotify their customers, free of charge and in a clear and easily understandable manner, howof what they have to do to switch off these automatic data roaming connections in order to avoid uncontrolled consumption of data roaming services.
Amendment 275 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Such basic personalised tariff information shall be delivered to the roaming customer’s mobile telephone or other device, for example by an SMS message, or an e-mail or a pop-up window on the computer, every time the roaming customer enters a Member State other than that of his home network and initiates for the first time a regulated data roaming service in that particular Member State. It shall be provided free of charge at the moment the roaming customer initiates a regulated data roaming service, by an appropriate means adapted to facilitate its receipt and easy comprehension.
Amendment 286 #
2011/0187(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6
Each home provider shall also ensure that an appropriate notification is sent to the roaming customer’s mobile telephone or other device, for example by an SMS message, or an e-mail or a pop-up window on the computer, when the data roaming services have reached 80 % of the agreed financial or volume limit. Customers shall have the right to require their operators to stop sending such notifications and shall have the right at any time and free of charge to require the home provider to provide the service again.
Amendment 22 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on food intended for infants and young children and on food for special medical purposes and for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) (Text with EEA relevance)
Amendment 27 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Directive 2009/39/EC foresees that specific provisions could be adopted regarding the two following specific categories of food falling within the definition of foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses: ‘food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, especially for sportsmen’ and ‘food for persons suffering from carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes)’. With regard to food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, no successful conclusion could be reached as regards the development of specific provisions due to widely diverging views among Member States and stakeholders concerning the scope of the specific legislation, the number of sub-categories of the food to be includ. Given that there is a genuine problem as regards harmonisation of this sector of the food market in the EU, high demand from sportspeople and a need, the criteria for establishing composition requirements and the potential impact on innovation in product developmento clarify the relevant labelling rules, by 2015, the Commission, having consulted the European Food Safety Authority, ought to update the report of 28 February 2001 on the foods concerned and, if necessary, come up with some proposals. As regards special provisions for food for persons suffering from carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes), a Commission report concludes that the scientific basis for setting specific compositional requirements is lacking.
Amendment 35 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) A limited number of categories of food constitutes the sole source of nourishment of certain groups of the population or represent a partial source of nourishment; such categories of food are vital for the management of certain conditions and/or are essential to maintain the intended nutritional adequacy for certain well-established vulnerable groups of the population. Those categories of food include infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food and, food for special medical purposes and foodstuffs intended for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction. Experience has shown that the provisions laid down in Commission Directives 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC, as well as Commission Directive 1999/212006/125/EC, 1999/21/EC and 96/8/EC ensure the free movement of such food in a satisfactory manner, while ensuring a high level of protection of public health. It is therefore appropriate that this Regulation focuses on the general compositional and information requirements for infant formula and follow-on formulae, processed cereal- based food and baby food for infants and young children and to, food for special medical purposes, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/21/EC and foodstuffs intended for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction, taking into account the four directives mentioned above.
Amendment 41 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) To ensure legal certainty, definitions laid down in Commission Directives 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/212006/125/EC, 1999/21/EC and 96/8/EC should be transferred to this Regulation. However, the definitions of infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes and foodstuffs intended for use in energy- restricted diets for weight reduction should be regularly adapted taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
Amendment 47 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should provide the criteria for the establishment of the specific compositional and information requirements for infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, taking into account Commission Directives 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/212006/125/EC, 1999/21/EC and 96/8/EC. In order to adapt the definitions of infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, foodstuffs intended for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction and food for special medical purposes laid down in this Regulation taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, to lay down the specific compositional and information requirements with respect to the categories of food covered by this Regulation, including for additional labelling requirements to, or derogations from, the provisions of Directive 2000/13/EC and for the authorisation of nutrition and health claims, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 62 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) ‘Meal replacement for weight control’ and ‘total diet replacement for weight control’ are considered as food for particular nutritional uses and are governed by specific rules adopted under Directive 96/8/EC. However, more and more food intended for the general population has appeared on the market carrying similar declarations which are presented as health claims for weight control. In order to eliminate any potential confusion between food marketed for weight control and in the interests of legal certainty and coherence of Union legislation, such statements should be regulated solely by Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and comply with requirements therein. It is necessary that technical adaptations pursua, foodstuffs used in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction should be covered in this regulation. In view of the risks that it presents to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, incorporating the health claims referring to the body weight controlhuman health and because it needs to be used under supervision, forod food presented as ‘total diet replacement for weight control’ and as ‘meal replacement for weight control’ and associated conditions of use as regulated under Directive 96/8/EC be completed prior to the entry into application of this Regulationr use in very low calorie diets (less than 800 calories a day) should be governed by Directive 1999/21/EC.
Amendment 73 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) infant formula and follow-on formula for infants in good health;
Amendment 74 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) processed cereal-based food and baby food for infants and young children in good health;
Amendment 81 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) foodstuffs for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction;
Amendment 92 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) ‘food for special medical purposes’ means food intended for the dietary management of patients to be used under medical supervision. It is intended for the exclusive or partial feeding of patients with a limited, impaired or disturbed capacity to take, digest, absorb, metabolise or excrete ordinary food or certain nutrients contained therein, or with other medically-determined nutrient requirements, whose dietary management cannot be achieved only by modification of the normal diet. Food for special medical purposes also includes food preparations used in very low calorie diets.
Amendment 97 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) foods for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction, specially formulated foods which, when used as instructed by the manufacturer, replace the whole or part of the total daily diet. These foods fall into three categories: (i) products presented as replacing all of the total daily diet; (ii) products presented as a replacement for one or more meals of the daily diet; (iii) products presented as replacing part of a meal. These do not include products or programmes intended to replace the daily diet in very low calorie diets (less than 800 calories a day), which come into the category of food for special medical purposes.
Amendment 106 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to adapt the definitions of ‘infant formula’, ‘follow-on formula’, ‘processed cereal-based food’ and ‘baby food’ and, ‘food for special medical purposes’ and ‘foods for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction’, taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
Amendment 109 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for normal consumption the following shall be prohibited: (a) the use of the expression ‘specialised nutrition’, either alone or in conjunction with other words, to designate those foodstuffs; (b) all other markings or any presentation likely to give the impression that one of the products referred to in Article 1 is involved.
Amendment 133 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Subject to the general requirements of Articles 7 and 9 and taking into account Directive 2006/141/EC, Directive 2006/125/EC and, Directive 1999/21/EC and Directive 96/8/EC as well as any technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated Regulations, no later than [2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation], in accordance with Article 15, with respect to the following:
Amendment 150 #
2011/0156(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Directive 96/8/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 areis repealed from [the first day of the month 2two years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 84 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Standards can contribute to helping European policy address the major societal challenges such as climate change, sustainable resource use, ageing, and innovation in general. By driving the development of European or international standards for goods and technologies in these expanding markets, Europe could create a competitive advantage for its companies and facilitate trade, preserve natural resources and promote social inclusion.
Amendment 98 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Standards can have a broad impact on society, in particular on the safety and well-being of citizens, the efficiency of networks, the environment, accessibility and other public policy fields. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that the role and the input of societal stakeholders in the elaboration of standards is strengthened, through the support of organisations representing the interests of consumers, the environment, business and societal stakeholders.
Amendment 134 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
(c) the characteristics required of a service including levels of quality, performance, interoperability, protection of the environment and public health, safety, including the requirements applicable to the provider as regards the information to be made available to the recipient, as referred to in Article 22(1) to (3) of Directive 2006/123/EC;
Amendment 141 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. No later than at the time oftwo months prior to the publication of its work programme, any European and national standardisation body shall notify the existence thereof to the other European and national standardisation bodies and to the Commission, which shall send their comments no later than one month after such communication.
Amendment 144 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Each European and national standardisation body shall systematically send any draft national standard, European standard and European standardisation deliverable to other European and national standardisation bodies and the Commission, upon their request.
Amendment 148 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) the avoidance of any act of recognition, approval or use by reference to a national standard adopted in breach of Articles 3 or 4 of this Regulation.
Amendment 157 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. European standardisation bodies shall ensure an appropriate representation and participation of small and medium-sized enterprises (hereinafter 'SME'), consumer organisations and environmental and social stakeholders, in particular through the organisations referred to in Annex III, at the policy development level and at least at the following stages of the development of European standards or European standardisation deliverables:
Amendment 162 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) consensus building;
Amendment 185 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. TAfter consultation with the European standardisation bodies and all relevant stakeholders, including the organisations referred to in Annex III, the Commission shall adopt an annual European standardisation work programme which shall indicate the European standards and European standardisation deliverables that it intends to request from the European standardisation bodies in accordance with Article 7.
Amendment 192 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission may request one or several European standardisation bodies to draft a European standard or European standardisation deliverable within a set deadline. They shall be market-driven, comply with the principle of universal design, take into account the public interest and be based on consensus. European standardisation bodies shall observe this deadline without prejudice to the requirement referred to in Article 5(1).
Amendment 233 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the drawing up of information to explain, interpret and simplify European standards or European standardisation deliverables, including the drawing up of user guides, abstracts of standards, best practice information and awareness- building actions;
Amendment 236 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) legal and technical expertise, including studies, in relation to assessment of the need for, and the development of, European standards and European standardisation deliverables, and training of experts;
Amendment 244 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) SME, consumer organisations and environmental and social stakeholders are appropriately represented and have appropriate participation in European standardisation work, as referred to in Article 5(1).
Amendment 262 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – point 3 – point f a (new)
Annex 2 – point 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) the principle of coherence is respected: the technical specifications must not contradict existing national, European and international standards or those in the process of being drafted, nor must they duplicate them.
Amendment 266 #
2011/0150(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 – point b – point ii
Annex 3 – point b – point ii
(ii) has as its statutory objectives and activities to represent consumer interests, including consumers who are particularly vulnerable because of their mental or physical disabilities, age or credulity, in the standardisation process at European level;
Amendment 38 #
2011/0058(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 25 a (new)
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) The common rules on the calculation of the common tax base must not give rise to disproportionate administrative costs for companies, in order to avoid damaging their competitiveness.
Amendment 93 #
2011/0058(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 104 – paragraph 3
Article 104 – paragraph 3
3. The principal tax authority shall transmit the notice to opt immediately to the competent authorities of all Member States in which group members are resident or established. Those authorities may submit to the principal tax authority, within one month of the transmission, their views and any relevant information on the validity and scope of the notice to opt. Once the option has been accepted, the principal tax authority shall coordinate fiscal supervision in all Member States where members of the group are resident or established.
Amendment 3 #
2011/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) It is necessary to assess the effectiveness and operational mechanisms of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and examine in detail the possible inclusion in its Annex of all laws that protect consumers' interests, with a view to broadening the scope of that regulation and providing national law-enforcement authorities with improved means of detecting, investigating and halting or preventing breaches of the law which harm the collective interests of consumers in cross-border situations. To that end, the Commission should submit as soon as possible, and at all events by 31 December 2014 at the latest, a report to the European Parliament and the Council based on an external evaluation and extended consultation of all stakeholders and accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 5 #
2011/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article -1 a (new)
Article -1 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21 a (new)
Amendment 150 #
2010/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Stresses the need to adopt a Statute for a European Private Company to facilitate the establishment and operation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Single Market;
Amendment 236 #
2010/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Urges the Commission to take all the necessary steps to stimulate the development of electronic commerce in the Single Market;
Amendment 237 #
2010/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Invites the Commission to propose legislative instruments to make public procurement procedures more flexible and less bureaucratic so that the participation of SMEs in award procedures is facilitated; encourages Member States to use public procurement in order to stimulate the market for innovative and green technologies;
Amendment 23 #
2010/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the Digital Agenda's 'Broadband for all' objectives and is convinced that universal access to broadband helps citizens and business to reap the full benefits of the Digital Single Market, in particular by improving social inclusion, and creating new opportunities for socially and environmentally innovative businesses driving jobs, growth and more opportunities for cross border trade;
Amendment 66 #
2010/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission to examine how messages sent via mobile telephones, videos, innovative services such as VoIP and the social networks can be used in emergency communications in order to facilitate and increase the use of the 112 number by EU citizens;
Amendment 77 #
2010/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Emphasises the need to guarantee accessibility of the 112 number to people with different types of disability and vulnerable groups and urges for the standardisation of 112 accessibility for these people; calls also on the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts to heighten awareness among these people of the 112 number through the use of means of communication specially adopted to their needs;
Amendment 36 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises the need to further analyse price differences in the EU, in order to ensure greater price transparency and comparability for consumers, without prejudice to national fiscal and labour market rules; recalls in this context the importance of methodically collecting prices of goods which are comparable throughout the Member States and the need for active cooperation between national statistical agencies to this effect;
Amendment 66 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that accessibility must be addressed in full respect of subsidiarity; underlines, however, that local planning must not circumvent the Services Directive and create hidden barriers to the establishment of retailers;
Amendment 73 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Emphasises that e-commerce is an important complement to offline trade and that appropriate action must be taken to develop its full potential; calls on the Commission to include in the upcoming Communication on e-commerce measures to enhance confidence, in particular by simplifying registration of domains across borders, improving secure online payment and facilitating cross-border debt recovery, and improving information to consumers on their rights, particularly concerning cancellations and opportunities to appeal;
Amendment 96 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Takes note, however, of a widespread concern about market dominance by bigger actors, who are perceived to impose unfair terms on suppliers and smaller traders, for instance through mechanisms of selective distribution, restrictive practices, territorial segmentation, price control and delisting without notice, thereby distorting competition; underlines that the entire retail supply chain is affected by such practices;
Amendment 109 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises that the development of private labels should not affectbe developed in such a way as to increase consumer choice or theand make it possibilityle for SMEs to expand;
Amendment 119 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Supports the excellent work underway by the Experts Platform on B2B contractual practices of the High Level Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain, in particular to define, list and assess what constitutes a manifestly unfair commercial practice, based on data and concrete examples; calls for strong support to be given to initiatives to promote dialogue on this between the interested parties;
Amendment 149 #
2010/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Asks the Commission to prepare a comprehensive European Action Plan for Retail in consultation with the retail sector in order to set out a strategy, building on achievements and addressing outstanding issues, with sector-specific recommendations;
Amendment 3 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas advertising fosters competition and competitiveness, combats abuses of dominant positions and encourages innovation in the internal market, and is consequently of benefit to consumers, from this point of view is of benefit to consumers, particularly by increasing the range of choice, lowering prices and providing information on new products,
Amendment 14 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas in view of a degree of consumer fatigue at the proliferation of advertising messages there is a temptation today to use the new communications technologies to disseminate commercial messages even when they are not clearly designated as such and are thus likely to mislead consumers,
Amendment 23 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas groups of people who are particularly vulnerable because of their mental or physical disabilities, age or credu, credulity or financial vulnerability need special protection,
Amendment 31 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Maintains that the UCPD provides an appropriateessential legal framework for combating misleading and aggressive advertising, althoughrecognises that it is not yet possible to undertake a comprehensive evaluation but that several difficulties with implementation and interpretation are already apparent;
Amendment 37 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 42 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to update its guidelines on the implementation of the UCPD on a regular basis; encourages, and calls on the Member States to take those guidelines into account as far as possible;
Amendment 53 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the practice of self- regulation, which i – even if it has its limits – as a dynamic, flexible and responsible adjunct to the existing legislative framework; calls on those Member States that do not yet have self- regulatory bodies to facilitate the establishment of such bodies and/or grant them formal recognition;
Amendment 56 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 61 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages co-regulation, whereby the various stakeholders are involved in legislative developmentCalls for the practice of co-regulation to be set up, associating the public authorities of the Member States with the various stakeholders concerned (professionals and associations) when self-regulation is insufficient, whether on particularly sensitive subjects or to define the penalties for serious breaches of the ethical rules;
Amendment 66 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Points out that the campaign at European level against this hidden advertising is of great importance for cleaning up the market and boosting consumer confidence, as to some professionals it may be a means of bending the competition rules and artificially over-valuing, without cost, their own company or even unfairly maligning a competitor;
Amendment 83 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 2
Paragraph 16 – indent 2
– prohibit the systematic, indiscriminate sending of text message advertisements to all mobile phone users within the coverage area of an advertising poster equipped with Bluetooth technology without their prior consent;deleted (moved to paragraph 16a)
Amendment 85 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 3
Paragraph 16 – indent 3
– prohibit the content of private e-mails being read by a third party for advertising purposes;deleted (amended and moved to paragraph 16a)
Amendment 89 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 4
Paragraph 16 – indent 4
– require advertisements sent by e-mail to contain an automatic link enabling the recipient to refuse all further advertising;deleted (moved to paragraph 16a)
Amendment 91 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5
Paragraph 16 – indent 5
– ensure the application of techniques making it possible to distinguish advertising tracking cookies, for which free and explicit prior consent is required, from other cookiesdeleted (moved to paragraph 16a);
Amendment 106 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 8 b (new)
Paragraph 16 – indent 8 b (new)
- pay particular attention, in cooperation with national advertising authorities and/or self-regulatory bodies, to misleading advertising, including online, in specific sectors such as the selling of food products, pharmaceuticals and medical care, where the health of consumers, on top of their economic interests, is likely to be affected with potential serious consequences;
Amendment 109 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission to explore by the end of 2011 the various means (whether legislative or not) and ascertain the technical options for securing, at European Union level: – prohibition of the systematic, indiscriminate sending of text message advertisements to all mobile phone users within the coverage area of an advertising poster equipped with Bluetooth technology without their prior consent; – prohibition of the reading by a third party, particularly for advertising purposes, of the content of private e- mails; – the requirement that advertisements sent by e-mail contain an automatic link enabling the recipient to refuse all further advertising; – the systematic application of techniques making it possible to distinguish advertising tracking cookies, for which free and explicit prior consent is required, from other cookies; – insertion of the words ‘behavioural advertisement’ in the relevant online advertisements, along with a window containing a basic explanation of this practice; – prohibition of any action financed directly or indirectly by companies to encourage the dissemination of messages or comments in electronic form on products and services appearing to emanate from consumers themselves, when in reality these are messages of an advertising or commercial nature;
Amendment 123 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 – indent 1
Paragraph 20 – indent 1
include some additional advertising-related indicators in the Consumer Markets Scoreboard (as well as the data already included on fraudulent or mendacious advertising); draws attention, however, in this connection to the terms of its resolution of 9 March 20101 stipulating that adding further indicators may be useful when the five basic indicators and the associated methodology have been developed to a sufficiently high level;
Amendment 129 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 – indent 4
Paragraph 20 – indent 4
– insert the clearly readable words ‘behavioural advertisement’ into the relevant online advertisements, along with a window containing a basic explanation of this practice;
Amendment 130 #
2010/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to set up common guidelines for SMEs and on the Member States to encourage national authorities and/or self- regulatory bodies to provide advisory services for SMEs and conduct information campaigns designed to alert SMEs to their legal obligations in respect of advertising;
Amendment 25 #
2010/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that the European Union and Member States should make it possible to take greater account of the interests of SMEs and craft enterprises when drawing up standards by implementing the strategic measures contained in the 'Small Business Act', in accordance with its seventh principle: EU financial support, cutting the cost of access to standards, the systematic publication of abstracts of European standards, and the equitable composition of standardisation committees;
Amendment 56 #
2010/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by SMEs, craft enterprises and societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees remains weak; affirms that, as very limited progress has been made to increase participation by SMEs, craft enterprises and societal stakeholder participations at national level, financial and political support for the European organisations established to represent such stakeholders needs to be maintained at least in the period to 2020;
Amendment 68 #
2010/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes recent developments in the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), in particular the model used to develop the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility, in which national standards bodies were entitled to nominate to the respective working group only one representative from each of six stakeholder categories (industry, consumers, government, labour, NGO, SSRO (service, support, research and others)) that were identified; considers however that the industry category should be represented, where appropriate, by a second expert representing SMEs;
Amendment 85 #
2010/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and, where necessary, providing financial support to SMEs, craft enterprises and weaker societal stakeholders in order to facilitate their participation;
Amendment 112 #
2010/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Recognises that fora and consortia contribute considerably to the standardisation system by providing specifications with global relevance, which are often more receptive to innovative technologies; points out that, most notably in the ICT sector, a number of fora and consortia have evolved into global organisations producing widely implemented specifications on the basis of open, transparent and consensus-based development processes; believes that the ESOs and fora/consortia must find ways of cooperating in planning their activities by transferring standards to the most appropriate level, international or European, in order to ensure coherence and avoid fragmentation or duplication; calls on the ESOs to develop and implement an improved mechanism for the adoption of fora/consortia specifications as European standards, which should not restrict the possibility of submitting them directly to international standards organisations in order to seek more global status, provided that this complies with the principles set out in the World Trade Organization's agreement on technical barriers to trade: transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, efficiency, relevance and consistency;
Amendment 14 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Europe should not only seek ways to completentinue developing the internal market for e- commerce but also look into how a sustainable re-launch of the internal market could be completachieved by e- commerce,
Amendment 22 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 38 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas uniformising the most essential consumer rights at a high level of protection, as well as postal and banking costs, copyright levies, VAT procedures and data protection practices would go a long way towards creating a genuine single market for businesses and consumers,
Amendment 60 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for standardStresses, in the context of the current review of the rules on obligations to supply information, the potential benefits of the future harmonisation of pre- contractual information in e-commerce, while at a high level of consumer protection; draws attention, however, to the difficulties which would be entailed by the creation, within distance selling, of any separate scheme for e-commerce; proposes retaining a minimum harmonisation approach for face-to-face contracts in specific sectors, such as health services or estate agents;
Amendment 66 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. CRecalls for uniformisation of specificthat there are major differences between the rules and practices to allowof distance traders and direct sellers to move beyond their national borders in the guarantees and liability offereds to the guarantees and liability they offer within and beyond their national borders and as to the benefits which harmonisation would bring them; calls for an in-depth impact analysis of the consequences for e-commerce of any harmonisation of specific rules concerning the legal guarantee of conformity with existing national legislation;
Amendment 92 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that specific measures should be put in place for the protection of children and young people, notably via the development of age verification systems and the prohibition of online marketing practices that have a negative impact on children’ behaviour;
Amendment 128 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a harmonisationStresses, in the context of the current review of the rules on unfair contract terms, to establish a single EU-wide clause on unfairness so as to ensure that national authorities and courts follow the same standards when assessinghe benefits which might result from a harmonisation aimed at establishing an EU-wide clause on unfairness; recalls in this connection that the Member States must continue to be able to react rapidly and flexibly to new unfair contract clauses;
Amendment 143 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for clearer and improved horizontal legal instruments and the harmonisation of certain aspects of consumer contract law and welcomes the Commission's proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights; considers that this should includeensure coherence with other directives, such as those on distance selling of financial services and e-commerce;
Amendment 154 #
2010/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls for a grant programme to be established and for use to be made of existing financial instruments for projects to increase users’ confidence in e- commerce, including educational and information campaigns and projects verifying online services in practice (such as 'mystery shopping'); emphasises the need to create an electronic learning module based on the Dolceta project (Development of On-Line Consumer Education Tools for Adults); develop online tools to educate consumers about e-commerce and new digital technology (principal rights of internet consumers, e-commerce, data protection rules, etc.) such as the Dolceta project (Development of On-Line Consumer Education Tools for Adults); recalls that the eventual objective is to provide basic teaching resources easily understandable by the greatest number, thus enabling citizens to enhance their digital skills and their knowledge of their rights and obligations, and to benefit responsibly and independently from the advantages of e-commerce in a digital society;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas too many obstacles, resulting from a lack of information about rights and opportunities, fragmented and insufficient regulation, inadequateregulation, a lack of legislative initiatives in a number of key areas, poor transposition, inadequate application and enforcement of rules, and a lack of administrative coordination and cooperation, stand in the way of citizens, consumers and SMEs wishing to move, shop, sell or trade across borders with the same sense of security and confidence they enjoy in their own Member States,
Amendment 14 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas many European citizens are not aware of their own practical benefits from the single market, as too little information on the single market is available and it is not explained properly,
Amendment 15 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the Union is facing a particularly problematic time in the history of single European market integration; takes the view that the current and future challenges must be addressed with coherence, determination, commitment and strength, necessarily coupled with sensitivity and practicality, in a spirit of cooperation and solidarity; emphasises that this process will necessitate firm authority and considerable initiative on the part of the European Commission, and political commitment from the Council, the Member States and the European Parliament;
Amendment 23 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that integration into the single market is not an irreversible process and that the continued existence of the single market should not be taken for granted; takes the view that failure to achieve the objective of the single market could produce a domino effect threatening to undo several years of European market integration;
Amendment 31 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 34 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the crisis shouldRecalls that policies to tackle the crisis should not detract from the single market integration process, but rather provide a window of opportunity for reforming, consolidating and improving the current structure of the single market and regaining the trust and confidence of citizens, especially consumers and SMEs;
Amendment 41 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 44 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Takes the view that the old perception of the single market as being primarily tied to economic considerations needs revisiting; stresses that all those involved in shaping and implementing the single market need to adopt a more holistic approach, fully integrating citizens’ concerns, particularly in relation to economic, social, fiscal, health and environmental issues and consumer protection;
Amendment 50 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the single market should be central in achieving the goal of a sustainable and highly competitive social market economy in the context of the EU 2020 Strategy’s long-term vidoes not affect English version;
Amendment 51 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. ProposesBelieves that the single market is a very important prerequisite for the success of the EU 2020 strategy; proposes therefore that any strategy and policies to revitalise the single European market, including the EU 2020 Strategy, should be should be coordinated by the European institutions and based on a pragmatic, comprehensive and wide-ranging deal supported by all the Member States and focusing mainly on priorities for which the Member States will truly take ownership and which they will implement effectively at national, regional and local level;
Amendment 69 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Takes the view that the major challenge facing the Union is to find a balance between an open economy, capable of stimulating economic growth and job creation and providing an integrated response to the major challenges of the future (such as competitiveness, research and development, industrial policy, demographic issues, the environment and new technologies), and an economic system which is equally up to the task of delivering consumer protection and the social and environmental safeguards that citizens need;
Amendment 84 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Endorses initiatives taken by the Commission to prioritise research, knowledge and innovation in any future strategy; expects that sufficient funds will be allocated in successive Union budgets in order to address these crucial matters; recalls, in this context, the urgent need to resolve the outstanding issue of the Community patent;
Amendment 89 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Is convinced that the ordinaryEuropean citizen’s perception, understanding and knowledge of the single market are low, non-existent, confused or even negative; is of the opinion that the majority of consumers view the single market – rightly or wrongly – as a system imbued with political horse-trading and vested interests rather than one whichdecisive action must be taken to ensure that future European Union policy on the single market better addresses the needs of the consumers, citizens and SMEs and provides them with tangible results;
Amendment 100 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that somein view of the most evident problems encountered by citizens who are consumers, especially in the services sector, are: (1) lack ofthe priorities in terms of policies and results that must be delivered are: (1) access to safe products and quality services (such as healthcare, food, energy, water, education, bank accounts, etc.), (2) access to reliable, comparable and objective information, including price comparisons;, (23) complexgreater legal security and clarity in contractual relations;, (34) uncertainty concerning payment and redress; and (4) lack of awareness andgreater payment security, (5) access to adequate, affordable and effective systems of redress, (6) the possibility of being trained and able to make optimal use of information and communication technologies, and (7) improved knowledge of and greater confidence in the system12 ;
Amendment 104 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Maintains that citizens are not being given thefforts must continue to be made to give citizens more information they need on single market legislation and the availability and enforcement of their rights; highlights the fact that manywelcomes in this respect the existence of the many relevant websites and the large number of information centres and ‘points of single contact’one- stop shops; is of the opinion that, as a result, better ways must be found of coordinating and publicising these initiatives which remain disorganised and are clearly still failing to reach people effectivelytheir target public effectively; stresses in this context the importance of promoting more highly aids in processing consumers complaints, such as ECC-Net and the SOLVIT;
Amendment 111 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Maintains that economic integration initiatives will fail to take off unlessbetter if citizens are convinced that their social rights are being safeguarded and that internal market policies will not impact negatively on nationalhave a positive impact on social policies;
Amendment 113 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Deplores the fact that only a small percentage of citizens, consumers and SMEs are aware of existing alternative redress mechanisms, or know how to register a complaint with the Commission; regrets that, despite the Commission’s recommendations, alternative conflict resolution mechanisms have not yet been correctly set up or are not yet running satisfactorily;
Amendment 115 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Stresses the major role consumer associations play as regards circulating information to citizen consumers about their rights, in supporting consumers in consumer disputes, and in promoting consumer interests in the construction of the internal market;
Amendment 123 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Will back future joint initiatives by the Commission and the Member States to: (1) support small businesses operating across borders throughout the EU; (2) effect a tangible reduction in administrative, financial and regulatory burdens, particularly the administrative hurdles faced by SMEs, in accordance with the principle of proportionality; in this regard calls on the Member States and the European Commission to strictly implement and apply the Think Small First principle as outlined in the Small Business Act.
Amendment 124 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Will backEncourages future joint initiatives by the Commission and the Member States to: (1) support small businesses operating across borders throughout the EU; (2) effect a tangible reduction in administrative, financial and regulatory burdens, particularly the administrative hurdles faced by SMEs, in accordance with the principle of proportionality;
Amendment 129 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Agrees that proper implementation of the Small Business Act - in particular regarding a strict application of the SME test by the Commission when proposing new legislative internal market measures - and the introduction of a European private company statute will guarantee the practical integration of SMEs into a relevant and viable single European system;
Amendment 132 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. States that the most important problem for SMEs in times of economic crisis is their access to finance; regrets that as a result of the withdrawal of large banks from rural and under populated or economically weak areas a major problem for SME regarding access to finance has emerged; welcomes the important role of savings banks and various cooperative movements as regards financing the regional economy and their contribution to the social market economy due to their promotion of ethical and social projects.
Amendment 143 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Calls on the Commission, in this context, to consider whether ‘sunrise clauses’ should be introduced, under which directives related to the EU single market could come into force automatically should Member States fail to transpose them in time;
Amendment 152 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Recommends that the Commission conduct an independent exercise to identify the top 20 single-market-related sources of dissatisfaction and frustration which citizens encounter every day, in particular in relation to cross-border e-business, the financial services, telephony, transport services, cross-border medical care, vehicle purchase and hire, portability of pensions, and mutual recognition of professional qualifications, child custody, adoption and maintenance and allowances;
Amendment 155 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Calls for the strengthening of Parliament’s role in the areas of transposition, application, enforcement and monitoring of single market legislation; considers that the enhanced role for the EP and the national parliaments under the Lisbon Treaty must entail better synergism between the two parliamentary levels;
Amendment 171 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Calls on the Commission, together withReiterates that it is important to run alongside the Member States, to develop outreach activities (‘road shows’) bringing together the various stakeholders (i.e. Commissioners, MEPs, national governments and parliamentarians) and attractlematic ‘publicity campaign’ style activities of the EU institutions or the Member States decentralised public relations measures that better associate local stakeholders and the national, regional and local media (placing special stress on the local media), who are more focused on the daily problems experienced by consumers in the single market (examples of bank charges ing as much media attention as possiblenother Member State, study on the possibilities of changing operator, comparisons of telephony costs, etc.);
Amendment 182 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Suggests to the Commission that the single market strategy should comprise four main stages: the first to include an evaluation or health check of the current situation to assess the degree of distortion and strain that the various stakeholders in the single market have suffered, notably as a result of the crisis; the second to see the launch of a consolidation process, tying up loose ends; the third to entail development and improvement of the single market; and the fourth to concentrate on the longer- term vision of the market (EU 2020 Strategy);
Amendment 207 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
54. Calls on the Commission to ensure that legislative proposals from the various DGs dealing with, or affecting, single market policy do not contradict one anothare devised and developed in a totally coherent manner and that the order of business in the Commission is revamped to provide citizens with a more coherent system;
Amendment 224 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
Paragraph 58
58. Notes that redress mechanisms applicable across the Union have yielded limited results and therefore urges the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal to ensure the implementation of anby May 2011 of a Europe-wide, ‘European- style’ collective redress system that is affordable, expedient and, accessible Europe-wide collective redress system by May 2011and designed in such a way as to avoid the aberrations of a system more beneficial to large law firms than to consumers themselves;
Amendment 231 #
2010/2011(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
Paragraph 60
60. Calls on the Commission to focus more closely on market monitoring, especially in the areas of financial services (including banking services and investment), insurance, telephony, banking servicesenergy and utilities, and believes that the effective monitoring of markets will increase their efficiency, thus benefitting both the economy and consumers;
Amendment 97 #
2010/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Directive 95/1/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 2 February 1995 on the maximum design speed, maximum torque and maximum net engine power of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles gave the possibility to Member States to refuse the initial registration and any subsequent registration within their territory of vehicles with a maximum net power of more than 74 kW. The anticipated correlation between safety and absolute power limitation could not be confirmed in several scientific studies. For that reason and in order to remove internal barriers to trade on the Union market, this option should no longer be maintained. Other, more effective safety measures should be introduced to help reduce the high numbers of fatalities and injuries among riders of powered two-wheel vehicles in road accidents in the Union. These measures should take into account in particular that driver behaviour is a major cause of accidents. In this connection, driver training focusing on defensive driving should be encouraged.
Amendment 103 #
2010/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. To be effective, they should be accompanied by regular roadside checks.
Amendment 202 #
2010/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 3
Article 58 – paragraph 3
3. That information shall be supplied in the official languages of the Member State where the vehicle is to be sold, registered and is to be entering into service, except where expressly otherwise agreed with the vehicle user. It shall be provided, after acceptance by the approval authority, in the owner’s manual.
Amendment 39 #
2010/0252(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The 800 MHz band is optimalcan be used for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013. In the longer term, additional spectrum below 790 MHzin the UHF band could also be envisaged, depending on actual market demand, social and cultural objectives, experience and the lack of spectrum in other bands adequate for coverage. Considering the capacity of the 800 MHz band to transmit over large areas, coverage obligations should be attached to rights.
Amendment 86 #
2010/0252(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC , the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall keep under review the use of the spectrum below 1UHF band (i.e. spectrum between 300 MHz and 3 GHz) and assess whether additional spectrum could be freed and made available for new applications.
Amendment 92 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 f (new)
Paragraph 12 f (new)
12f. Encourages the Member States to create a single Web access portal for all information relating to public contracts, as an upstream network for all calls for tenders; the aim will be to provide training and information, to direct undertakings towards contracts and to explain the applicable legislation, in particular for SMEs (which do not generally have a great deal of human and administrative resources with expertise in procurement-related terminology and procedures); specialist helpdesks could also assist them in evaluating whether they genuinely fulfil the conditions of the tender, and if so to complete their dossiers in response;
Amendment 5 #
2009/2173(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for effective compensation mechanisms for individual victims of anti-trust infringements; calls on the Commission to adopt a consistent approach between rules of collective redress in competition law and input forward as soon as possible a proposal on collective redress reflecting the principles outlined in the 'White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EU anti-trust rules' and the results of the public consultation, and consistent with the general consumer protection framework;
Amendment 17 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that the appointment in 2007 of a dedicated Commissioner for Consumer Affairs and her strong personal engagement, great openness and very proactive role have led to a dramatic rise in the profile of brought about progress in European consumer protection policy and consumer issues, much to the benefit of EU citizens;
Amendment 18 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. EmphasiseFears that splitting the responsibility for consumer affairs between two Commissioner portfolios should notmay lead to a reduction of the consumer focus in the new Commission and that, similarly, fears that the new organisational structure in different Directorates-General should notmay cause fragmentation or adversely eaffect the managementcoherence and effectiveness of consumer policy;
Amendment 31 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen consumer awareness and education in order to empower consumers throughout their lives; encourages Member States to include consumer aspects in their national curricula to equip children with the necessary skills to take complex decisions later in life and also to devise educational programmes for adult consumers; recalls that educated consumers who are aware of their rights and know where to turn in the event of non-compliance are also important for detecting non-compliant behaviour;
Amendment 44 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Suggests that, in the future, the Commission developonce the five basic indicators and the associated methodology have been sufficiently developed to produce results of a very high quality, the Commission consider the desirability of developing additional long-term indicators such as indicators relating to market shares, quality, advertising, transparency and comparability of offers, as well as indicators related to enforcement (including data on inspections, non- compliance notifications, court cases), consumer empowerment (skills, assertiveness, education, information), coverage of consumer issues in the media, and indicators to measure redress and consumer detriment; believes that the new indicators should be included in the Scoreboard when a satisfactory level of development of the five basic indicators is reachedand indicators to measure redress and consumer detriment; considers, however, that this should be done progressively in order to ensure a focused and comprehensible Scoreboard;
Amendment 49 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Is aware that consumers are less satisfied and experience more problems with services than goods which partly reflects the greater complexity in the contractual relations and delivery of services compared to goods; calls on the Commission to carry out in-depth analyses of all problematic sectors such as energy, transport and banking services and make specific policy recommendation, in order to refine and complete the Scoreboard and enable it, where appropriate, to adopt quickly specific legislative initiatives to remedy shortcomings identified in these fields;
Amendment 52 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Welcomes the interest and quality of the work done by the Commission in the study which it requested in 2009 on the prices of retail financial services, particularly the revelations which emerged from the study, regarding for example major problems concerning the transparency and comparability of current-account costs in the European Union;
Amendment 56 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that the available price data are not sufficient to monitor the internal market properly and calls on the Commission to provide more data and to further develop its methodology for collecting average prices of comparable and representative goods and services; recalls in this context the necessity for national statistical institutes to validate and participate more in the work of gathering data on, and calculating, average prices;
Amendment 79 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Encourages the establishment in all Member States of independent consumer protection agencies with fullthe power to bring proceedings before national courts in order to protect the interests of consumers;
Amendment 84 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Recalls that evidence shows major differences between Member States and room for improvement in terms of redress mechanisms; recalls that judicial collective redress systems currently exist in 13 Member States and calls on the Commission as quickly as possible to provide follow-up to its Green Paper of 27 November 2008 on Consumer Collective Redress (COM(2008)0794);
Amendment 85 #
2009/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
Paragraph 44
44. Takes into account the legal complexity related to the publication of the results of market surveillance and enforcement activities and the fact that the investigative work is often subject to strict confidentiality rules but holds the view that the Commission and the Member States should make those results public including their breakdown by individual companies, in order to ensure greater transparency, give more visibility to the enforcement work carried out by national authorities and enable consumers to make well- informed choices;
Amendment 213 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty establishon the Functioning of the European CommunityUnion, and in particular Article 95114 thereof,
Amendment 214 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Citation 4
Citation 4
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty3ordinary legislative procedure,
Amendment 215 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Those Directives have been reviewed in the light of experience with a view to simplifying and updating the applicable rules, removing inconsistencies and closing unwanted gaps in the rules. That review has shown that it is appropriate to replace those four Directives by this single Directive. This Directive should accordingly lay down standard rules for the common aspects and move away from the minimum harmonisation approach in the former Directives under which Member States could maintain or adopt stricter national rules.
Amendment 218 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Article 15369(1) and (32)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that the CommunityUnion is to contribute to the attainment of a high level of consumer protection by the measures it adopts pursuant to Article 95114 thereof.
Amendment 220 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In accordance with Article 14(2)26 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods and services and freedom of establishment are ensured. The harmonisation of certain aspects of consumer contract law is necessary for the promotion of a real consumer internal market striking the right balance between a high level of consumer protection and the competitiveness of enterprises, while ensuring the respect of the principle of subsidiarity.
Amendment 224 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The cross-border potential of distance selling which should be one of the main tangible results of the internal market is not fully exploited by consumers. Compared with the significant growth of domestic distance sales over the last few years, the growth in cross-border distance sales has been limited. This discrepancy is particularly significant for Internet sales for which the potential of further growth is high. The cross-border potential of contracts negotiated away from business premises (direct selling) is constrained by a number of factors including the different national consumer protection rules imposed upon the industry. Compared with the growth of domestic direct selling over the last few years, in particular in the services sector (e.g. utilities), the number of consumers using this channel for cross- border purchases has remained flat. Responding to increased business opportunities in many Member States, small and medium size enterprises (including individual entrepreneurs) or agents of direct selling companies should be more inclined to seek business opportunities in other Member States, in particular in border regions. Therefore the full harmonisation of certain aspects of consumer information and of the right of withdrawal in distance and off- premises contracts will contribute to thea high level of consumer protection and better functioning of the business to consumer internal market.
Amendment 226 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
Amendment 229 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) These disparitiesCertain disparities in the Member States’ legislation in the field of consumer contracts, particularly contracts concluded at a distance or away from business premises, create significant internal market barriers affecting business and consumers. They increase compliance costs to business wishing to engage in cross border sale of goods or provision of services. FInappropriate fragmentation also undermines consumer confidence in the internal market. The negative effect on consumer confidence is strengthened by an uneven level of consumer protection across the Community. This problem is particularly acute in the light of new market developments.
Amendment 233 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Full harmonisation of some key regulatory aspects will considerably increase legal certainty for both consumers and business. Both consumers and business will be able to rely on a single regulatory framework basedUnless otherwise specified and in accordance with Article 169 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the measures laid out in this Directive shall not prevent Member States from maintaining or introducing more stringent measures providing for a higher level onf clearly defined legal concepts regulating certain aspects of business-to-consumer contracts across the Community. The effect will be to eliminate the barriers stemming from the fragmentation of the rules and to complete the internal market in this area. These barriers can only be eliminatonsumer protection. However, full harmonisation of some key regulatory aspects is justified, in respect of distance and off-premises contracts, with a view to ensuring a consistent framework of consumer protection across the European Union and considerably increasing legal certainty for both consumers and business. In the fields to be harmonised, by establishing uniform rules at Community level. Furthermore consumers will enjoy a high common leveloth consumers and business will be able to rely on a clearer regulatory framework based on well-defined legal concepts regulating certain aspects of distance and off- protectionemises business-to-consumer contracts across the CommunityUnion.
Amendment 240 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The field harmonised by this Directive should cover certain aspects of business to consumer contracts. These are rules on information to be provided before conclusion and during performance of thedistance and off-premises contracts, the right of withdrawal for distance and off- premises contracts, consumer rights specific to contracts of sale and unfair contract terms in consumer contracts; certain consumer rights specific to contracts of sale and certain provisions relating to unfair contract terms in consumer contracts must also be harmonised.
Amendment 241 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) The provision of pre-contractual information on business premises lies outside the scope of this Directive, since Member States retain the right to maintain or introduce national rules on consumer information at points of sale, concerning inter alia: – the main characteristics of the goods or services; – the price of the goods or services; – the conditions of sale or service; and – any limits on the trader’s liability.
Amendment 259 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The new definition of distance contract should cover all cases where sales and service contracts are concluded without the simultaneous physical presence of the parties, using exclusively one or more means of distance communication (such as mail order, Internet, telephone or fax). This should create a level playing field for all distance traders. It should also improve legal certainty as compared to the current definition requiring the presence of an organised distance selling scheme run by the trader up to the conclusion of the contract.
Amendment 260 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) European markets feature an increasing amount of online digital content, and a growing number of new products are intertwined combinations of physical product and digital content and services; it should be clear, therefore, that the goods covered by this Directive also include digital products (such as downloads and software), where consumers acquire permanent use of those products or a form of use that is comparable to the physical possession of goods.
Amendment 272 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) An off-premises contract should be defined as a contract concluded with the simultaneous physical presence of the trader and the consumer, away from business premises, for example at the consumer's home or workplace. In an off- premises context, consumers are under psychological pressureContracts concluded away from the trader’s business premises are characterised by the fact that consumers are unprepared for contract negotiations and are temporarily in a special situation both from a psychological point of view and in terms of comparing items and prices, no matter whether they have solicited the trader's visit or not. Furthermore, in order to prevent circumventions of rules when consumers are approached away from business premises, a contract negotiated, for example at the consumer's home but concluded in a shop should be regarded as an off-premises contract.
Amendment 281 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Business premises should include premises in whatever form (such as shops, taxis or lorries) which serve as a permanent place of business for the trader. Market stalls and fair stands should be treated as business premises even though they may be used by the trader on a temporary basis. Other premises which are rented for a short time only and where the trader is not established (such as hotels, restaurants, conference centres, cinemas rented by traders who are not established there) should not be regarded as business premises. Similarly, all public spaces including public transport or facilities as well as private homes or workplaces should not be regarded as business premises.
Amendment 300 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Consumers should be entitled to receive information before the conclusion of the contract. However traders should not have to provide the information when already apparent from the context. For example in an on-premises transaction, the main characteristics of a product, the identity of the trader and the arrangements for delivery may be apparent from the context. In distance and off-premises transactions, the trader should always provide the information on arrangements for payment, delivery, performance and the complaint handling policy, since these might not be apparent from the context.
Amendment 303 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
Amendment 307 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Since in the case of distance sales, the consumer is not able to see the good before concluding the contract he should have a right of withdrawal, which allows him to ascertain the nature, quality and functioning of the goods.
Amendment 317 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) If the trader has not informed the consumer onwhether or not he has the right of withdrawal prior to the conclusion of a distance or off- premises contract, the withdrawal period should be extended. However, in order to ensure legal certainty over time, a three- month limitation period should be introduced, provided that the trader has fully performed his contractual obligations. The trader should be regarded as having fully performed his obligations when he has delivered the goods or has fully provided the services ordered by the consumer by 12 months.
Amendment 329 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Furthermore, in case of distance or off-premises contracts for the provision of services, for which the performance begins during the withdrawal period (e.g. data files downloaded by the consumer during that period), it would be unfair to allow the consumer to withdraw after the service has been enjoyed by the consumer in full or in part. Therefore the consumer should loses his right of withdrawal when performance begins with his prior express agreement, provided that it is a case of informed consent, ie that the consumer has been informed of the consequences of this decision in terms of losing his right of withdrawal.
Amendment 337 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) IGiven that in the context of consumer sales, the delivery of goods can take place in various ways. Only a rule which may be freely derogated from will allow the necessary flexibility to take into account those variation (either immediately or at a later date), where delivery is not immediate the trader must indicate a deadline by which he undertakes to deliver the goods. The consumer should be protected against any risk of loss or damage of the goods occurring during the transport arranged or carried out by the trader. The rule introduced on the passing of risk should not apply where the consumer unduly delays taking possession of the goods (for example, when the goods are not collected by the consumer from the post-office within the deadline fixed by the latter). In those circumstances, the consumer should bear the risk of loss or deterioration after the time of delivery as agreed with the trader.
Amendment 338 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 a (new)
Recital 38 a (new)
(38a) As regards delivery, it should be stipulated that if the trader exceeds the scheduled delivery date by more than seven days, the consumer is entitled to terminate the contract and demand the reimbursement of all sums paid in application of the contract. In such cases, the contract is deemed to be terminated on the date the trader receives a letter from the consumer informing him of this decision, provided that the delivery has not taken place in the meantime. The trader is required to reimburse all sums paid in application of the contract as soon as possible, and no more than seven days after receiving the letter terminating the contract.
Amendment 339 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 b (new)
Recital 38 b (new)
(38b) A single, common concept of conformity with contracts, which provides a high level of consumer protection, will provide businesses and consumers with greater legal certainty.
Amendment 341 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) If the good is not in conformity with the contract, firstly, the consumer should have the possibility to require the trader to repair the goods or to replace them at the trader's choice unless the trader proves that those remedies are unlawful, impossible or causes the trader disproportionate effort. The trader's effort should be determined objectively considering costs incurred by the trader when remedying the lack of conformity, the value of the goods and the significance of the lack of conformitymust be able to choose freely between the various forms of redress (repair, replacement, a discount or termination of the contract). However, the consumer may only rescind the contract if the lack of conformity is not minor. Moreover, the consumer cannot demand that the goods be repaired or replaced if the trader shows that this would be illegal, impossible or cause him disproportionate effort. The lack of spare parts should not be a valid ground to justify the trader's failure to remedy the lack of conformity within a reasonable time or without a disproportionate effort.
Amendment 354 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) WhenIf the trader has either refused or has more than once failed to remedy the lack of conformity the consumer should be entitled to choose freely any of the available remedies. The trader's refusal can be either explicit or implicit, meaning in the latter case that the trader does not respremedy chosen for the lack of conformity is repair or replacement, it should be made clear in which cases the consumer can nevertheless seek the cancellationd or ignores the consumer's request to remedy the lack of conformityf the contract or a reduction in the price.
Amendment 358 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) It should be stipulated that in certain cases the trader may be held liable for a lack of conformity which existed at the time the risk was transferred to the consumer, even if the lack of conformity becomes apparent only subsequently.
Amendment 360 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42 b (new)
Recital 42 b (new)
(42b) It should be stipulated that those Member States which so wish should have the possibility of maintaining in their national law provisions in force when this Directive is adopted which provide that the trader becomes liable as from the time the lack of conformity is discovered by the consumer.
Amendment 364 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
Recital 44
(44) Some traders or producers offer consumers commercial guarantees. In order to ensure that consumers are not misled, the commercial guarantees should include certain information, including their duration, territorial scope and a statement that the commercial guarantee does not affect the consumer's legal rights under the national provisions in force and those laid down by this Directive.
Amendment 369 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) Consumer contracts should be drafted in plain, intelligible language and be legible. Traders should be free to choose the font type or size in which the contract terms areconfirmed in textual form on a duraftedble medium. The consumer should be given an opportunity to read the terms before concluding the contract. This opportunity could be given to the consumer by providing him with the terms on request (for on-premises contracts) or making those terms otherwise available (e.g.where the consumer might reasonably expect to find them (e.g. placed prominently on the trader's website in respect of distance contracts) or attaching standard terms to the order form (in respect of off-premises contracts). The trader should seek the consumer's express prior consent to any payment in addition to the remuneration for the trader's main contractual obligation. Inferring consent by using opt-out systems, such as pre-ticked boxes online, should be prohibited.
Amendment 377 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) In order to ensure legal certainty and improve the functioning of the internal market, the Directive should contain two non-exhaustive lists of unfair terms. Annex II contains a list of terms which should in all circumstances be considered unfair. Annex III contains a list of terms which should be deemed unfair unless the trader proves otherwise. These same lists should apply in all Member States. As these lists are non-exhaustive, they may be supplemented by the Member States, which may maintain or adopt provisions that are more protective of consumer interests, in order to give a greater number of contract terms the status of terms that are deemed unfair in all circumstances.
Amendment 397 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
The purpose of this Directive is to achieve a high level of consumer protection and contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market and achieve a high level of consumer protection by approximating certain aspects of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning contracts between consumers and traders.
Amendment 404 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'consumer' means any natural person who, in contracts covered by this Directive, is acting primarily for purposes which are outsidenot related to his trade, business, craft or profession;. Member States may extend the scope of the rules laid down in this Directive to cover natural or legal persons who are not consumers within the meaning of this Directive.
Amendment 414 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) 'trader' means any natural or legal person, whether publicly or privately owned, who, in contracts covered by this Directive, is acting for purposes relating to his trade, business, craft or profession and anyone acting in the name of or on behalf of a trader;
Amendment 421 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) 'sales contract' means any contract for the sale of goods by the trader to the consumer including any mixed-purpose contract having as its object botransfer of ownership of goods, either immediately on conclusion of the contract or at a later date, by means of which the trader undertakes to deliver the goods and servto the consumer, with the latter undertaking to pay the relevant prices;
Amendment 426 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
(4) 'goods' means any tangible movable item, whether - intangible, if the consumer can make use of the item on a permanent basis or in a manner which can be equated with physical possession; - or tangible, with the exception of:
Amendment 445 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) 'service contract' means any contract other than a sales contract whereby a service is provided by thefor the provision of a service by a trader to thea consumer;
Amendment 449 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) 'distance contract' means any sales or service contract where the tradconcluded between a trader and a consumer where the parties are not simultaneously physically present and where, for the conclusion of the contract, they makes exclusive use of one or more means of distance communication;
Amendment 457 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
(a) any sales or service contract concluded away from business premises with the simultaneous physical presence of the trader and the consumer or any sales or service contract for which an offer was made by the consumer in the same circumstances, even if preceded by an offer from the consumer, or
Amendment 489 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
(b) market stalls and fair stands where the trader carries on his activity on a regular or temporary basis;
Amendment 492 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) 'public auction' means a method of sale where goods are offered by the tradera third party, acting as the trader's agent, offers goods or services to consumers, who attend or are given the possibility to attend the auction in person, through a transparent competitive bidding procedure run by an auctioneer and where the highest bidder is bound to purchase the goods;. The third party acting as agent intervenes in the conclusion of the sales or service contract by knocking down the goods or services to the highest bidder on completion of the procedure.
Amendment 494 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
(18) 'commercial guarantee' 'commercial guarantee' means any undertaking by the trader or producer (the 'guarantor') to the consumer, in addition to his legal obligations relating to the guarantee of conformity, to reimburse the price paid or to replace, repair or service goods in any way if they do not meet the specifications or any other requirement not related to conformity set out in the guarantee statement or in the relevant advertising available at the time of, or before the conclusion of the contract;
Amendment 495 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
(20) 'ancillary contract' means a contract by which the consumer acquires goods or services related to a distance contract or an off-premises contract concluded as a principal contract and these goods or services are provided by the trader or a third party on the basis of an arrangement between that third party and the trader.
Amendment 501 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Directive shall not apply to contracts concluded by means of public auctions.
Amendment 502 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. This Directive shall not apply to contracts concluded before notaries or members of equivalent professions.
Amendment 503 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 c (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. This Directive shall not apply to health or pharmaceutical services.
Amendment 511 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This Directive shall be without prejudice to the provisions contained in European Union legislation concerning special contracts or sectors.
Amendment 519 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Insofar as it is not harmonised by them, the rules laid down in this directive do not affect national law in the area of general contract law.
Amendment 522 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Articles 5, 7, 9 and 11This Directive shall be without prejudice to the provisions concerning information requirements contained in Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[1] and Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.[2].
Amendment 539 #
Amendment 544 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 and paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 and paragraph 1 a (new)
1. Except where provided for in paragraph 2, Member States may adopt or maintain in force more stringent provisions, in the field covered by this Directive, in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection. Member States shall ensure that such provisions are compatible with the Treaties. 1a. Member States may not maintain or introduce, in their national law, provisions diverging from those laid down in Articles 2, 3, 5, 12(1) to (3), 13 to 18, 22, 23, 24(1) and (2) and 31(1) to (3) of this Directive, including more or less stringent provisions to ensure a different level of consumer protection.
Amendment 556 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Chapter 2 – title
Chapter 2 – title
Consumer information and withdrawal right for distance and off-premises contracts
Amendment 560 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article - 5 (new)
Article - 5 (new)
Article - 5 Except as otherwise provided in this chapter with regard to consumer information and the right of withdrawal for distance and off-premises contracts, Member States may not maintain or introduce, in their national law, provisions diverging from those laid down in this Chapter.
Amendment 564 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Prior to the conclusion of any sales or serviceIn good time and at all events prior to the conclusion of the distance or off- premises contract, the trader shall providecommunicate to the consumer with the following information, if not already apparent from the contextn a clear and precise manner and in comprehensible language:
Amendment 580 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) contact details including the telephone number or any other means of distance communication (fax, e-mail, etc.) enabling the consumer in practice to contact and communicate with the trader rapidly and directly;
Amendment 585 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the final price inclusive of taxes, or where the nature of the productgoods or service means that the price cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the manner in which the price is calculated, as well as, where appropriate, all additional freight, delivery or postal charges or, where these charges cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the fact that such additional charges may be payable;
Amendment 599 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the arrangements for payment, delivery, performance and, the complaint handling policy, if they depart from the requirements of professional diligence and the geographical address to which the consumer may address any complaint;
Amendment 609 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the existence or the absence of a right of withdrawal, and, where applicable, the conditions and procedures for exercising that right pursuant to Annex I, including the withdrawal period and the name and address of the trader to whom the withdrawal is to be communicated;
Amendment 620 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) Where a right of withdrawal does not apply on account of an explicit request for performance of the service during the withdrawal period, in accordance with Article 19, the information that the consumer will not benefit from a right of withdrawal, as a result of that request;
Amendment 621 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(eb) the date by which the trader undertakes to deliver the goods or to perform the service;
Amendment 631 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) in addition to a reminder of the existence of a legal guarantee of conformity for goods, the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees, where applicable;
Amendment 640 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) the duration of the contract where applicable or if the contract is open-ended or to be extended automatically, the conditions for terminating the contract;
Amendment 649 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) where appropriate, the application of technical protection measures for digital products and the interoperability of digital products with hardware and software, in the light of what the trader knows or should reasonably have known (including non-interoperability).
Amendment 663 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 664 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall not provide for any other formal requirements applicable to the standard information on withdrawal besides those referred to in Annex I(A) and (A) a.
Amendment 686 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Member States may maintain or adopt in their national law stricter provisions than those set out in this article with a view to guaranteeing a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 689 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to Articles 7(2), 13 and 42, the consequences of any breach of Article 5, shall be determined in accordance with the applicable national law. Member States shall provide in their national laws for effective contract lawfor effective remedies for any breach of Article 5.
Amendment 693 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7
Article 7
Amendment 700 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8
Article 8
Amendment 702 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9
Article 9
Amendment 733 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. With respect to off-premises contracts, the information provided for in Article 9 5 shall be given in the order formsupplied to the consumer in the order form. Such information shall be legible and worded in plain and intelligible language and be legible. The order form shall include the standard withdrawal form set out in Annex I(B). It shall be forwarded to the consumer in good time, and at any event before the conclusion of the off-premises contract. Where the order form is not on paper, the consumer shall receive a copy of the order form on another durable medium of his choice. Accordingly the consumer shall in any event have the option of requesting a paper document.
Amendment 743 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 10 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Member States may maintain or adopt in their national law stricter provisions than those set out in this article with a view to guaranteeing a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 748 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. An off-premises contract shall only be valid only if the consumer signs an order form and in cases where the order form is not on paper, receives a copy of the order form on another durable mediuthe order form.
Amendment 756 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Amendment 770 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. With respect to distance contracts, the information provided for in Article 9(a) 5 shall be given or made available to the consumer prior toin good time and at any event before the conclusion of the contract, in plain and intelligible language and be legible, in a way appropriate to the means of distance communication used.
Amendment 782 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph - 1 (new)
Article 11 – paragraph - 1 (new)
-1. Member States may maintain or adopt in their national law stricter provisions than those set out in this article with a view to guaranteeing a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 786 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. If the trader makes a telephone call to the consumer with a view to concluding a distance contract,: - he shall disclose his identity - and where appropriate the identity of the person on whose behalf he is making the call - and the commercial purpose of the call at the beginning of the telephone conversation ; - he shall send the consumer a confirmation of his offer, in writh the consumering or on a durable medium, including the information referred to in Article 5; - the consumer shall not be bound by the contract unless or until he has signed it.
Amendment 795 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. If the contract is concluded through a medium which allows limited space or time to display the information, the trader shall provide at least, on that particular medium prior to the conclusion of such a contract, the information regarding the main characteristics of the product andor service, the total price referred to in Articles 5(1)(a) and (c) on that particular medium prior to the conclusion of such a contract, the duration of the contract and, if the contract is open- ended, the conditions for terminating the contract referred to in Article 5(1)(a), (c) and (g). The other information referred to in Articles 5 and 7 shall be provided by the trader to the consumer in an appropriate way in accordance with paragraph 1.
Amendment 805 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Amendment 809 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In order for the distance contract to be validly concluded, the consumer must have had the opportunity to verify the full details of his order and its total price and to correct any errors before confirming the order and thereby validly expressing his acceptance.
Amendment 816 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5
Article 11 – paragraph 5
Amendment 835 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. In the case of an off-premises contract, the withdrawal period shall begin from the day when the consumer signs the order form or in cases where the order form is not on paper, when the consumer receives a copy of the order form on another durable medium of his choice.
Amendment 854 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In the case of distance contracts, the Member States shall not prohibit the parties from performing their obligations as laid down in this Directive during the withdrawal period. In the case of off-premises contracts, this Article shall be without prejudice to any rule of national law establishing, within the withdrawal period, a period of time during which the performance of the contract may not begin.
Amendment 857 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 4
Article 12 – paragraph 4
Amendment 864 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13
Article 13
If the trader has not provided the consumer with the information on the right of withdrawal (or the fact that he does not have the right of withdrawal) in breach of Articles 9(b5(1)(e)), 10(1) and 11(4), the withdrawal period shall expire three months after the trader has fully performed his other contractual obligationsbe extended by twelve months from the day referred to in Article 12.
Amendment 870 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13
Article 13
If the trader has not provided the consumer with the information on the right of withdrawal in breach ofprovided for in Article 5 or in accordance with the arrangements provided for in Articles 9(b), 10(1) and 11(4), the withdrawal period shall expire three months after the trader has fully performed his other contractual obligationsbe extended by three months from the day referred to in Article 12.
Amendment 896 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The trader shall reimburse any payment received from the consumer without delay, and in any event within thirty days from the day on which he receives the communication of withdrawal. Reimbursement shall in principle be made by any means of payment. However, consumers who have exercised their right of withdrawal may, at the proposal of the trader, opt for a different method of reimbursement.
Amendment 959 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
-1. Member States may maintain or introduce, in their national law, more stringent provisions than those laid down in this Article, in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 966 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) services where performance has begun, with the consumer's prior express consent, before the end of the fourteen day period referred to in Article 12, with the consumer's prior express consent on a durable medium; in such cases, the consent should also extend to waiving his right of withdrawal;
Amendment 979 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the supply of foodstuffs, beverages or other hygienically sensitive goods whose packaging or sealing has already been opened by the consumer and the supply of products which might pose a health risk if returned within the fourteen-day right of withdrawal period;
Amendment 1052 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 20 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Member States may maintain or introduce, in their national law, more stringent provisions than those laid down in this Article, in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1061 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. This Chapter shall apply to sales contracts. Without prejudice to Article 24(5), where the contract is aArticle 26(1)(c) shall also apply to mixed- purpose contracts having as itstheir object both goods and services, this Chapter. 1a. Articles 23a and 23b shall onlyalso apply to the goods. service contracts and mixed-purpose contracts having as their object both goods and services.
Amendment 1063 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 a (new) (after the title ‘Chapter IV – Other consumer rights specific to sales contracts’)
Article 20 a (new) (after the title ‘Chapter IV – Other consumer rights specific to sales contracts’)
Article 20a Unless otherwise provided for in this chapter, Member States may maintain or introduce in their national law more stringent provisions than those laid down in this chapter, in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1066 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. This Chapter shall also apply toFor the purposes of this Directive, contracts for the supply of goods to be manufactured or produced shall also be defined as sales contracts.
Amendment 1069 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This chapter shall apply without prejudice to any rights which an injured party may have according to a special liability system existing in national law.
Amendment 1086 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, tThe trader shall deliver the goods by transferring the material possession of the goods to the consumer or to a third party, other than the carrier and indicated by the consumer, within a maximum of. Where delivery is not immediate, the trader shall indicate the deadline within which he undertakes to deliver the goods. Member States may not maintain or introduce in theirty days from the day of the conclusion of the contract national law provisions diverging from those laid down in this article, including more or less stringent provisions in order to ensure a different level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1096 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. Where the trader has failed to fulfil his obligations to deliver, the consumer shall be entitled to a refund of any sums paid within seven days from the date of delivery provided for in paragraph 1delivery does not take place within seven days of the delivery date indicated by the trader in accordance with paragraph 1, the consumer shall be entitled to rescind the contract and claim a refund of any sums paid under the contract. The contract shall be deemed to be terminated on the date the trader receives a letter from the consumer informing him of his decision, if the delivery has not taken place in the meantime. The trader shall be required to reimburse all sums paid under the contract as soon as possible, and no more than seven days after receiving the letter rescinding the contract. This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the rights of the consumer to claim damages. Member States may not maintain or introduce in their national law provisions diverging from those laid down in this article, including more or less stringent provisions in order to ensure a different level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1121 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 23 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Member States may not maintain or introduce in their national law provisions diverging from those laid down in this article, including more or less stringent provisions in order to ensure a different level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1124 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The risk referred to in paragraph 1 shall pass to the consumer at the time of delivery as agreed by the parties, if the consumer or a third party, other than the carrier and indicated by the consumer has manifestly failed to take reasonable steps to acquire the material possession of the goods.
Amendment 1131 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 a (new)
Article 23 a (new)
Amendment 1133 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 b (new)
Article 23 b (new)
Amendment 1140 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Delivered goods shall be presumed to be in conformity with the contract if they satisfy the following conditions: (-a) they possess the characteristics, in particular as regards quality and quantity, that were jointly agreed upon by the parties; (a) they comply with the description given by the trader and possess the qualities of the goods which the trader has presented to the consumer as a sample or model; (b) they are fit for any particular purpose for which the consumer requires them and which he made known to the trader at the time of the conclusion of the contract and which the trader has accepted; (c) they are fit for the purposes for which goods of the same type arewould normally be used or ; (dc) they show the quality and performance which are normal in goods of the same type and which the consumer can reasonably expect, given the nature of the goods and taking into account any public statements on the specific characteristics of the goods made about them by the trader, the producer or his representative, particularly in advertising or on labelling. (A new point (a) has been inserted before the current point (a) in the Commission proposal. There was also a need for clarification: the new points (b) and (c) are slightly amended versions of the current points (c) and (d) in the Commission proposal, concerning conditionsthat have to be met in all circumstances.)
Amendment 1142 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) they comply with the description given by the trader and possess the qualities of the goods which the trader has presented to the consumer as a sample or model;
Amendment 1144 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new)
Amendment 1145 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) they arbe fit for any particular purpose for which the consumer requires them and which hewas made known to the trader at the time of the conclusion of the contract and which the trader has accepted;
Amendment 1147 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 1152 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 1171 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 5
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. Any lack of conformity resulting from the incorrect installation of the goods shall be considered as a lack of conformity of the goods where the installation forms part of the sales contract and the goods were installed by the trader or under his responsibility. The same shall apply equally if the goods, intended to be installed by the consumer, are installed by the consumer and the incorrect installation is due to a shortcoming in the installation insThe trader shall be liable for lack of conformity arising as a result of the packaging, the installation instructions and of the installation, when the trader is responsible for this under the terms of the contruactions.
Amendment 1173 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 5 b (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Member States may not maintain or introduce in their national law provisions diverging from those laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2, including more or less stringent provisions in order to ensure a different level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1188 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. As provided for in paragraphs 2 to 5, where the goods do not conform to the contract, the consumer is entitled toWhen the goods present a lack of conformity, the consumer may, under the terms of paragraphs 2 to 5, choose between the following remedies:
Amendment 1202 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) haveing the lack of conformity remedied by repair or replacementgoods repaired,
Amendment 1208 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new)
(ac) having the goods replaced,
Amendment 1214 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) haveing the price reduced,
Amendment 1222 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) haveing the contract rescinded.
Amendment 1228 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. The consumer may only rescind the contract if the lack of conformity is not minor.
Amendment 1233 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Amendment 1248 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 1255 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 1264 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The consumer may resort to any remedy available under paragraph 1,When the remedy chosen is repair or replacement, the consumer may resort to having the contract rescinded or the price reduced wheren one of the following situations exists:
Amendment 1287 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point d
d) tThe same defect has reappeared more than once within a short period of tim a fresh defect has appeared after the goods have already been repaired or replaced once.
Amendment 1298 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Member States shall have the power to maintain or to adopt national provisions allowing greater consumer choice between the remedies set out in paragraph 1 in case of lack of conformity, so as to guarantee a higher level of consumer protection.
Amendment 1327 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. The trader shall be held liable under Article 25 where the lack of conformity becomes apparent within two years as from the time the risk passed to the consumer. However, those Member States which so wish may maintain the national legal provisions in force at the time the Directive is adopted, which make the trader liable under Article 25 from the time the lack of conformity is ascertained by the consumer.
Amendment 1339 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. When the trader has remedied the lack of conformity by replacement, the shall be held liable under Article 25 where the lack of conformity becomes apparent within two yearsperiod stipulated in paragraph 1 starts to run again as from the time the consumer or a third party indicated by the consumer has acquired the material possession of the replaced goods and only for defective elements which have been replaced, unless the trader agrees to extend the guarantee to the replaced goods in their entirety..
Amendment 1363 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 5
Article 28 – paragraph 5
5. Unless proved otherwise, any lack of conformity which becomes apparent within sixtwelve months of the time when the risk passed to the consumer, shall be presumed to have existed at that time unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature of the goods and the nature of the lack of conformity.
Amendment 1373 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 28 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 1393 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) legal rights of the consumer, both under the national legislation in force and as provided for in Article 26, and a clear statement that those rights are not affected by the commercial guarantee,
Amendment 1404 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. IAt the request of the consumer so requests, the trader shall make the guarantee statement available in a durable medium of his choice.
Amendment 1417 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. This Cchapter shall apply to, in contract terms drafted in advance by the trader or a third party, which the consumer agreed to without havs between traders and consumers, to contract terms which have not been the subject of individual negotiation. A contract term is deemed not to have been the subject of individual negotiation when it has been drafted in advance and the consumer has not been able to influence its content, specifically withing the possibility of influencframework of pre-formulated standard contract. Contract terms which have been the subject of individual negotiation do not fall withing their content, in particular where such contract terms are part of a pre-formulated standard contract scope of this Chapter. The Member States may therefore maintain or introduce national rules concerning such contract terms and decide that this Chapter also applies to them.
Amendment 1422 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Saving contrary provisions established in this Chapter, the Member States may maintain or introduce, in their national legislation, provisions stricter than those laid down in this Chapter of the Directive so as to ensure higher levels of consumer protection.
Amendment 1440 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Member States may not maintain or introduce in their national law provisions diverging from those laid down in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, including more or less stringent provisions in order to ensure a different level of consumer protection. (This article should be placed between the title of Article 31 and paragraph 21 of Article 1, in order to refer to the first three paragraphs of Article 31.)
Amendment 1453 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 4
Article 31 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1462 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Member States may, in order to provide for a higher level of consumer protection, maintain or introduce additional formal and presentational requirements as to the way the contract terms are expressed or made available to the consumer.
Amendment 1465 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. Where a contract term is not included in Annex II or III, Member States shall ensure that it is regarded as unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract, to the detriment of the consumer.
Amendment 1487 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that contract terms, as set out in the non-exhaustive list in Annex II, are considered unfair in all circumstances. That list of contract terms shall apply in all Member States and may only be amended in accordance with Articles 39(2) and 40. . r.fr
Amendment 1493 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 34 a (new)
Article 34 a (new)
Article 34 a As the list of terms in Annex II to this directive is not exhaustive, it may be supplemented by the Member States, which may maintain or adopt provisions that are more protective of consumer interests, in order to give a greater number of contract terms the status of terms that are unfair in all circumstances.
Amendment 1495 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure thate contract terms, as set out in the non-exhaustive list in point 1 of Annex III, are considered unfair, unless the trader has proved that such contract terms are fair in accordance with Article 32. That list of contract terms shall apply in all Member States and may only be amended in accordance with Articles 39(2) and 40.
Amendment 1499 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
As the list of terms in Annex II to this directive is not exhaustive, it may be supplemented by the Member States, which may maintain or adopt provisions that are more protective of consumer interests, in order to give a greater number of contract terms the status of terms that are presumed to be unfair.
Amendment 1536 #
2008/0196(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – heading 1 a (new)
Annex 1 – heading 1 a (new)