BETA

Activities of Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS

Plenary speeches (535)

Common rules for the internal market for natural gas (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0294(COD)
2018 Report on Turkey (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2150(INI)
Debate with the Prime Minister of Finland, Mr Juha Sipilä, on the Future of Europe (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Romanian Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Debate with the President of the Republic of Cyprus, Nicos Anastasiades, on the Future of Europe (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Establishing the European Defence Fund (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0254(COD)
Establishing Horizon Europe – laying down its rules for participation and dissemination - Programme implementing Horizon Europe (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0224(COD)
The use of Facebook users’ data by Cambridge Analytica and the impact on data protection (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2855(RSP)
Debate with the Prime Minister of Estonia, Jüri Ratas, on the Future of Europe (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18 and 19 October 2018 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU support to UNRWA, following the US withdrawal of financial support to UNRWA (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0293(COD)
Order of business EL
2016/11/22
State of the Union (debate) EL
2016/11/22
The future of pensions: fighting privatisation and strengthening public universal social security systems (topical debate) EL
2016/11/22
The threat of demolition of Khan al-Ahmar and other Bedouin villages (debate) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Austrian Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
European Defence Industrial Development Programme (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0125(COD)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance EL
2016/11/22
First anniversary after the signature of the Istanbul Convention: state of play (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 28 and 29 June 2018 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Modernisation of education in the EU (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2224(INI)
The use of IPA funds in Turkey (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Situation in Gaza Strip and the status of Jerusalem (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Situation in Gaza Strip and the status of Jerusalem (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Connecting Europe facility after 2020 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Commission decision adopted on the MFF post-2020 package (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Situation in Gaza Strip EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2663(RSP)
Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: Data protection and citizen's privacy as a line of defence against election manipulation (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Situation in Syria (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 22 and 23 March 2018 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
European Council informal meeting of 23 February 2018 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Debate with the Prime Minister of Croatia, Andrej Plenković, on the Future of Europe (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Situation of UNRWA (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Bulgarian Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative in the Member States (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2039(INI)
US President Trump’s announcement to recognise Jerusalem as capital of Israel (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Decision adopted on the State of Energy Union 2017 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Winter plan for asylum seekers (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Legacy of the 1917 totalitarian Bolshevik revolution (topical debate) EL
2016/11/22
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2269(INI)
The fight against illegal immigration and people smuggling in the Mediterranean (topical debate) EL
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19 and 20 October 2017 and presentation of the Leaders’ Agenda (Building our future together) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 19 and 20 October 2017 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
2017 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany (COP23) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2620(RSP)
State of the Union (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0287(COD)
Turkey-EU relationship (debate) EL
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Turkey (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2308(INI)
Review of the Maltese Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU defence plan and the future of Europe (topical debate) EL
2016/11/22
Working conditions and precarious employment (short presentation) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2221(INI)
President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the COP 21 Climate agreement (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Energy efficiency labelling - Compensation for wrongly labelled energy-related products (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0149(COD)
Assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2147(INI)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 29 April 2017 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Making relocation happen (debate) EL
2016/11/22
European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Wholesale roaming markets (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0185(COD)
Wholesale roaming markets (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0185(COD)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2215(INI)
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2342(INI)
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment - Landfill of waste - Waste - Packaging and packaging waste (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0272(COD)
Order of business EL
2016/11/22
Information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments in the field of energy (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0031(COD)
Possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union - Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty - Budgetary capacity for the Eurozone (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2249(INI)
Situation in the West Bank, in particular settlements (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0148(COD)
State of the Energy Union (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Programme of activities of the Maltese Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Support for Thalidomide victims (B8-1341/2016, B8-1343/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/3029(RSP)
Paediatric medicines (B8-1340/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2902(RSP)
International aviation agreements (B8-1337/2016, B8-1338/2016, B8-1339/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2961(RSP)
Insolvency proceedings and insolvency practitioners (A8-0324/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0159(COD)
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Georgia and Europol (A8-0343/2016 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0810(CNS)
Market access to port services and financial transparency of ports (A8-0023/2016 - Knut Fleckenstein) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0157(COD)
Research programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A8-0358/2016 - Jerzy Buzek) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0047(NLE)
Annual Report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter 2015 (A8-0355/2016 - Josef Weidenholzer) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2219(INI)
Implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (Article 36 TEU) (A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2036(INI)
Labour market reforms and labour relations in Greece (debate) EL
2016/11/22
European Commission Recommendation on the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement and the reinstatement of Dublin transfers (debate) EL
2016/11/22
"Clean Energy for All" package (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU-Algeria Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Algeria in Union programmes (A8-0367/2016 - Pier Antonio Panzeri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0195(NLE)
General revision of Parliament's Rules of Procedure (A8-0344/2016 - Richard Corbett) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2114(REG)
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2015 (A8-0345/2016 - József Nagy) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2009(INI)
A coherent EU policy for cultural and creative industries (A8-0357/2016 - Christian Ehler, Luigi Morgano) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2072(INI)
Rights of women in the Eastern Partnership States (A8-0365/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2060(INI)
Macro-financial assistance to Jordan (A8-0296/2016 - Emmanuel Maurel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0197(COD)
Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (A8-0011/2016 - Brian Hayes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0091(COD)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2015 (A8-0331/2016 - Notis Marias) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2150(INI)
Towards a definitive VAT system and fighting VAT fraud (A8-0307/2016 - Werner Langen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2033(INI)
EU action plan against wildlife trafficking (A8-0303/2016 - Catherine Bearder) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2076(INI)
New opportunities for small transport businesses (A8-0304/2016 - Dominique Riquet) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2349(INI)
Outcome of COP 22 in Marrakesh (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (A8-0249/2015 - Julie Girling) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0443(COD)
Finalisation of Basel III (B8-1226/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2959(RSP)
EU strategic communication to counteract anti-EU propaganda by third parties (A8-0290/2016 - Anna Elżbieta Fotyga) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2030(INI)
Sign language and professional sign language interpreters (B8-1230/2016, B8-1241/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2952(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106 : Renewing the approval of the active substance bentazone (B8-1228/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2978(RSP)
Decision adopted on the European Semester package including Annual Growth Survey 2017 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Ukraine and Europol (A8-0342/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0811(CNS)
Access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities (A8-0326/2016 - Emmanuel Maurel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0209(CNS)
European Central Bank annual report for 2015 (A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2063(INI)
Green Paper on Retail Financial Services (A8-0294/2016 - Olle Ludvigsson) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2056(INI)
European Defence Union (A8-0316/2016 - Urmas Paet) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2052(INI)
Unleashing the potential of waterborne passenger transport (A8-0306/2016 - Keith Taylor) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2350(INI)
Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation (A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2139(INI)
Situation in the West Bank, including settlements (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0271/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2156(DEC)
Discharge 2014: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0264/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2202(DEC)
Discharge 2014: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0276/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2199(DEC)
Discharge 2014: Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A8-0275/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2196(DEC)
Situation of journalists in Turkey (B8-1158/2016, RC-B8-1162/2016, B8-1162/2016, B8-1163/2016, B8-1167/2016, B8-1168/2016, B8-1170/2016, B8-1171/2016, B8-1172/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2935(RSP)
EU Youth Strategy 2013-2015 (A8-0250/2016 - Andrea Bocskor) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2351(INI)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 20 and 21 October 2016 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 20 and 21 October 2016 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Draft general budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections EL
2016/11/22
The MFF mid-term revision (B8-1173/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2931(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/003 EE/petroleum and chemicals (A8-0314/2016 - Victor Negrescu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2235(BUD)
Protective measures against pests of plants (A8-0293/2016 - Anthea McIntyre) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0141(COD)
Trans fats (B8-1115/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2637(RSP)
EU policies and actions to protect children in the context of migration (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Denmark (A8-0289/2016 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0813(CNS)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Denmark (A8-0288/2016 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0814(CNS)
EU-China Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports (A8-0281/2016 - Bodil Valero) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0293(NLE)
Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (A8-0292/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0193(COD)
EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement (A8-0286/2016 - Richard Howitt) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2274(INI)
Fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM resolution (A8-0284/2016 - Laura Ferrara) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2110(INI)
Human rights and migration in third countries (A8-0245/2016 - Marie-Christine Vergiat) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2316(INI)
Corporate liability for serious human rights abuses in third countries (A8-0243/2016 - Ignazio Corrao) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2315(INI)
EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage (A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2059(INI)
EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (A8-0283/2016 - Sophia in 't Veld) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2254(INL)
EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage (short presentation) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2059(INI)
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 9 (B8-1060/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2898(RSP)
Implementation of the Food Contact Materials Regulation (A8-0237/2016 - Christel Schaldemose) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2259(INI)
2014 Annual report on monitoring the application of Union law (A8-0262/2016 - Heidi Hautala) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2326(INI)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 20 and 21 October 2016 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Accession of Peru to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0267/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0168(NLE)
Accession of Kazakhstan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0268/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0169(NLE)
Accession of Korea to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0266/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0173(NLE)
Global goals and EU commitments on nutrition and food security in the world (B8-1042/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2705(RSP)
European Public Prosecutor's office and Eurojust (B8-1054/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2750(RSP)
Need for a European reindustrialisation policy in light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases (RC-B8-1051/2016, B8-1051/2016, B8-1052/2016, B8-1053/2016, B8-1055/2016, B8-1056/2016, B8-1057/2016, B8-1058/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2891(RSP)
Conclusion on behalf of the EU of the Paris Agreement adopted under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Giovanni La Via (A8-0280/2016)) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0184(NLE)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece following the earthquake that affected the Ionian Islands in November 2015 (A8-0270/2016 - Georgios Kyrtsos) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2165(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/001 FI/Microsoft (A8-0273/2016 - Petri Sarvamaa) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2211(BUD)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Giorgos Grammatikakis (A8-0279/2016 - António Marinho e Pinto) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2084(IMM)
Legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings (A8-0165/2015 - Dennis de Jong) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0409(COD)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0005(COD)
The future of ACP-EU relations beyond 2020 (A8-0263/2016 - Norbert Neuser) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2053(INI)
Tackling illegal logging, deforestation and forest degradation (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2824(RSP)
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (A8-0238/2016 - Petr Ježek) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0268(COD)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (A8-0236/2016 - Ska Keller) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0089(NLE)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0247/2016 - Laura Agea) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0043(NLE)
How best to harness the job creation potential of SMEs? (A8-0248/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2320(INI)
State of the Union (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment (A8-0252/2016 - Csaba Sógor) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0361(APP)
Recent developments in Poland and their impact on fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (B8-0865/2016, B8-0977/2016, B8-0978/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2774(RSP)
EU relations with Tunisia in the current regional context (A8-0249/2016 - Fabio Massimo Castaldo) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2273(INI)
Social dumping in the EU (A8-0255/2016 - Guillaume Balas) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2255(INI)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2010(INI)
Agenda of the next sitting : see Minutes EL
2016/11/22
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Cohesion Policy and Research and Innovation Strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) (A8-0159/2016 - Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2278(INI)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (A8-0246/2016 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2090(INI)
Statistics on natural gas and electricity prices (A8-0184/2016 - Barbara Kappel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0239(COD)
Towards a new energy market design (A8-0214/2016 - Werner Langen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2322(INI)
EU strategy on heating and cooling (A8-0232/2016 - Adam Gierek) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2058(INI)
EU strategy for the Alpine region (A8-0226/2016 - Mercedes Bresso) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2324(INI)
Creating labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance (A8-0253/2016 - Tatjana Ždanoka, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2017(INI)
Social dumping in the EU (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Order of business EL
2016/11/22
Towards a new energy market design - EU strategy on heating and cooling (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2322(INI)
New initiatives related to the Middle East Peace Process (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Order of business EL
2016/11/22
Energy efficiency labelling (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0149(COD)
Renewable energy progress report - Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (continuation of debate) EL
2016/11/22
Follow-up of the Strategic Framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET2020) (A8-0176/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2281(INI)
Renewable energy progress report (A8-0196/2016 - Paloma López Bermejo) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2041(INI)
Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (A8-0199/2016 - Markus Pieper) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2232(INI)
Promoting free movement by simplifying the acceptance of certain public documents (A8-0156/2016 - Mady Delvaux) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0119(COD)
A regulation for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (B8-0685/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2610(RSP)
Competitiveness of the European rail supply industry (B8-0677/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2887(RSP)
Mid-term review of the Investment Plan (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (accession of Croatia) (A8-0148/2016 - Elmar Brok) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0224(NLE)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (consent) (A8-0149/2016 - Elmar Brok) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0441(NLE)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (resolution) (A8-0143/2016 - Elmar Brok) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2234(INI)
Rules against certain tax avoidance practices (A8-0189/2016 - Hugues Bayet) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0011(CNS)
Space capabilities for European security and defence (A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2276(INI)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of GMO maize Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x GA21 (B8-0732/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2682(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: placing on the market of a genetically modified carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line SHD-27531-4) (B8-0731/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2683(RSP)
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (A8-0154/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0101(NLE)
Enhanced cooperation in the area of property regimes of international couples (A8-0192/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0061(NLE)
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (judicial cooperation in criminal matters) (A8-0198/2016 - Martina Anderson) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0100(NLE)
Markets in financial instruments (A8-0126/2016 - Markus Ferber) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0033(COD)
Markets in financial instruments, market abuse and securities settlement (A8-0125/2016 - Markus Ferber) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0034(COD)
State of play of the external aspects of the European migration agenda: towards a new 'Migration Compact' (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Virtual currencies (A8-0168/2016 - Jakob von Weizsäcker) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2007(INI)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/010 FR/MoryGlobal (A8-0182/2016 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2043(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/011 GR/Supermarket Larissa (A8-0181/2016 - Liadh Ní Riada) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2050(BUD)
Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Sweden (A8-0170/2016 - Ska Keller) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0314(NLE)
Delivering a new deal for energy consumers (A8-0161/2016 - Theresa Griffin) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2323(INI)
Poverty: a gender perspective (A8-0153/2016 - Maria Arena) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2228(INI)
Non-tariff barriers in the Single Market (A8-0160/2016 - Daniel Dalton) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2346(INI)
The Single Market strategy (A8-0171/2016 - Lara Comi) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2354(INI)
Follow-up and state of play of the Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (B8-0583/2016, B8-0587/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2696(RSP)
Framework Agreement on parental leave (A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2097(INI)
Exemptions for commodity dealers (A8-0064/2016 - Sander Loones) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0295(COD)
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (A8-0164/2016 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0091(COD)
Entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, volunteering, pupil exchange and au pairing (A8-0166/2016 - Cecilia Wikström) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0081(COD)
Acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy (B8-0562/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2550(RSP)
Economic growth and youth employment (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Economic growth and youth employment (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0257/2015 - Heidi Hautala) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0309(COD)
Protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0256/2015 - Heidi Hautala) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0309(COD)
EU-Liberia sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (A8-0142/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0224(NLE)
EU-Mauritania fisheries partnership agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0147/2016 - Gabriel Mato) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0229(NLE)
Cooperation agreement on a civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) with Korea (A8-0065/2016 - Gianluca Buonanno) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0265(NLE)
Statistics concerning balance of payments, international trade in services and foreign direct investment (A8-0227/2015 - Sven Giegold) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0194(COD)
Cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU (A8-0074/2016 - Iliana Iotova) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2279(INI)
West Bank displacement and demolitions, including of EU-funded projects (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Impact of Nord Stream 2 on the gas market in the CEE region (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Impact of Nord Stream 2 on the gas market in the CEE region (debate) EL
2016/11/22
European Investment Bank annual report 2014 (A8-0050/2016 - Georgi Pirinski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2127(INI)
Attacks on hospitals and schools as violations of international humanitarian law (B8-0488/2016, B8-0488/2016, B8-0489/2016, B8-0490/2016, B8-0491/2016, B8-0492/2016, B8-0493/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2662(RSP)
Public access to documents for the years 2014-2015 (A8-0141/2016 - Laura Ferrara) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2287(INI)
Women domestic workers and carers in the EU (A8-0053/2016 - Kostadinka Kuneva) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2094(INI)
Gender equality and empowering women in the digital age (A8-0048/2016 - Terry Reintke) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2007(INI)
EU-Georgia Common Aviation Area Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0128/2016 - Francisco Assis) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0134(NLE)
EU-Israel Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0129/2016 - Francisco Assis) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0187(NLE)
Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations (accession of Croatia) (A8-0054/2016 - Liisa Jaakonsaari) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0261(NLE)
Safeguarding the best interest of the child across the EU on the basis of petitions addressed to the European Parliament (B8-0487/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2575(RSP)
EU Agency for Railways (A8-0073/2016 - Roberts Zīle) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0014(COD)
Interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (A8-0071/2016 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0015(COD)
Railway safety (A8-0056/2016 - Michael Cramer) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0016(COD)
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (A8-0131/2015 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0314(COD)
Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2017 (A8-0131/2016 - Indrek Tarand) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2019(BUD)
2015 Report on Turkey (B8-0442/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2898(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/009 SE/Volvo Trucks (A8-0077/2016 - Victor Negrescu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2022(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: EGF/2016/000 TA 2016/Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0078/2016 - Andrey Novakov) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2025(BUD)
Draft Amending Budget No 1/ 2016 : New instrument to provide emergency support within the Union (A8-0130/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2037(BUD)
The EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world (A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2272(INI)
Zika virus outbreak (B8-0449/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2584(RSP)
2015 Report on Turkey (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2898(RSP)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2095(INI)
Products originating in certain ACP states (A8-0010/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0128(COD)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Denmark and Greenland: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0067/2016 - Marco Affronte) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0152(NLE)
Agreement on strategic cooperation between Brazil and Europol (A8-0070/2016 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0801(CNS)
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: fisheries aspects (A8-0042/2016 - Norica Nicolai) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2109(INI)
Breeding animals and their germinal products (A8-0288/2015 - Michel Dantin) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0032(COD)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (A8-0066/2016 - Roberta Metsola, Kashetu Kyenge) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2095(INI)
Learning EU at school (A8-0021/2016 - Damian Drăghici) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2138(INI)
The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (A8-0027/2016 - Sylvie Goulard) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2060(INI)
Counterterrorism following the recent terrorist attacks (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Counterterrorism following the recent terrorist attacks (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for Tunisia (A8-0013/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0218(COD)
Veterinary medicinal products (A8-0046/2016 - Françoise Grossetête) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0257(COD)
Towards a thriving data-driven economy (B8-0308/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2612(RSP)
Reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (A8-0037/2016 - Laura Ferrara) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0216(COD)
Trade diversion into the European Union of certain key medicines (A8-0038/2016 - Laura Ferrara) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0165(COD)
EU-Andorra agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0047/2016 - Miguel Viegas) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0285(NLE)
Appointment of a new Executive Director of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0045/2016 - Roberto Gualtieri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0902(NLE)
Procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings (A8-0020/2015 - Caterina Chinnici) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0408(COD)
Guidelines for the 2017 Budget - Section III (A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2004(BUD)
Interinstitutional agreement on Better law-making (A8-0039/2016 - Danuta Maria Hübner) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2005(ACI)
Tobacco agreement (PMI agreement) (B8-0311/2016, B8-0312/2016, B8-0312/2016, B8-0313/2016, B8-0313/2016, B8-0314/2016, B8-0315/2016, B8-0316/2016, B8-0317/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2555(RSP)
2015 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2895(RSP)
Market access to port services and financial transparency of ports (A8-0023/2016 - Knut Fleckenstein) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0157(COD)
Harmonised indices of consumer prices (A8-0313/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0346(COD)
Annual report 2014 on the Protection of the EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0026/2016 - Benedek Jávor) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2128(INI)
Gender mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament (A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2230(INI)
The situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU (A8-0024/2016 - Mary Honeyball) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2325(INI)
Communication on implementing the European agenda on migration (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Towards a thriving data-driven economy (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Authorisation for Austria to sign and ratify, and Malta to accede to, the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 (A8-0018/2016 - Viktor Uspaskich) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0177(NLE)
EU-San Marino agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (C8-0370/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Accession of Croatia to the Convention on the protection of the financial interests of the Union (A8-0019/2016 - Tomáš Zdechovský) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0210(NLE)
European network of Employment Services, workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets (A8-0224/2015 - Heinz K. Becker) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0002(COD)
Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for Tunisia (A8-0013/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0218(COD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/007 BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass (A8-0029/2016 - Tomáš Zdechovský) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2013(BUD)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0030/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2285(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0031/2016 - Sofia Ribeiro) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2330(INI)
Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (A8-0017/2016 - Catherine Stihler) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2256(INI)
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Tunisia Free Trade Agreement (B8-0255/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2791(RSP)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2014 (A8-0020/2016 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2231(INI)
European Central Bank annual report for 2014 (A8-0012/2016 - Notis Marias) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2115(INI)
Opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand (B8-0250/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2932(RSP)
Introduction of compatible systems for the registration of pet animals across Member States (RC-B8-0251/2016, B8-0251/2016, B8-0252/2016, B8-0253/2016, B8-0254/2016, B8-0256/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2540(RSP)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (B8-0147/2016, RC-B8-0151/2016, B8-0151/2016, B8-0152/2016, B8-0153/2016, B8-0155/2016, B8-0158/2016, B8-0160/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 - Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2256(INI)
2015 progress report on Serbia (B8-0166/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2892(RSP)
European integration process of Kosovo (B8-0167/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2893(RSP)
Situation in Libya (RC-B8-0146/2016, B8-0146/2016, B8-0169/2016, B8-0170/2016, B8-0177/2016, B8-0178/2016, B8-0179/2016, B8-0180/2016, B8-0181/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2537(RSP)
Insularity condition (B8-0165/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3014(RSP)
The role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) (B8-0171/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3013(RSP)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (B8-0147/2016, RC-B8-0151/2016, B8-0151/2016, B8-0152/2016, B8-0153/2016, B8-0155/2016, B8-0158/2016, B8-0160/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
Systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS (RC-B8-0149/2016, B8-0149/2016, B8-0154/2016, B8-0156/2016, B8-0157/2016, B8-0159/2016, B8-0161/2016, B8-0162/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2529(RSP)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18 and 19 February 2016 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU-Moldova Association Agreement: safeguard clause and the anti-circumvention mechanism (A8-0364/2015 Helmut Scholz) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0079(COD)
EU-Georgia Association Agreement: anti-circumvention mechanism (A8-0365/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0080(COD)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean FG72 (B8-0133/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2547(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 (B8-0134/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2547(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 89788 (B8-0135/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2547(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106 on emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (B8-0040/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2988(RPS)
Negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) (A8-0009/2016 - Viviane Reding) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2233(INI)
New Strategy for gender equality and women's rights post-2015 (B8-0148/2016, B8-0150/2016, B8-0163/2016, B8-0164/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2526(RSP)
Establishment of a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0124(COD)
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on heavy metals (A8-0002/2016 - Giovanni La Via) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0359(NLE)
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants (A8-0001/2016 - Giovanni La Via) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0358(NLE)
Eurojust and Ukraine Cooperation Agreement (A8-0007/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0810(CNS)
Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement (A8-0008/2016 - Nathalie Griesbeck) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0812(CNS)
Establishment of a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (A8-0172/2015 - Georgi Pirinski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0124(COD)
Refugee emergency, external borders control and future of Schengen - Respect for the international principle of non-refoulement - Financing refugee facility for Turkey - Increased racist hatred and violence against refugees and migrants across Europe (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (A8-0372/2015 - Ulrike Lunacek) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0094(NLE)
Appointment of the members of the Committee of Inquiry on emission measurements in the automotive sector EL
2016/11/22
Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine (RC-B8-0068/2016, B8-0068/2016, B8-0069/2016, B8-0077/2016, B8-0078/2016, B8-0079/2016, B8-0080/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3032(RSP)
Mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) (RC-B8-0043/2016, B8-0043/2016, B8-0045/2016, B8-0051/2016, B8-0057/2016, B8-0058/2016, B8-0059/2016, B8-0060/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3034(RSP)
EU priorities for the UNHRC sessions in 2016 (RC-B8-0050/2016, B8-0050/2016, B8-0052/2016, B8-0056/2016, B8-0063/2016, B8-0064/2016, B8-0065/2016, B8-0066/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3035(RSP)
Activities of the Committee on Petitions 2014 (A8-0361/2015 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2218(INI)
Programme of activities of the Dutch Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Programme of activities of the Dutch Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data (VRD) in Latvia (A8-0370/2015 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0813(CNS)
Presumption of innocence and right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings (A8-0133/2015 - Nathalie Griesbeck) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0407(COD)
Objection to delegated act on the specific compositional and information requirements for processed cereal-based food and baby food (B8-0067/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2863(DEA)
Colombian peace process (RC-B8-0041/2016, B8-0041/2016, B8-0042/2016, B8-0053/2016, B8-0054/2016, B8-0055/2016, B8-0061/2016, B8-0062/2016) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3033(RSP)
Systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Towards a Digital Single Market Act (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2147(INI)
Multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (A8-0367/2015 - Gabriel Mato) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0096(COD)
Annual report on EU Competition Policy (A8-0368/2015 - Werner Langen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2140(INI)
The role of intercultural dialogue, cultural diversity and education in promoting EU fundamental values (A8-0373/2015 - Julie Ward) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2139(INI)
Stocktaking and challenges of the EU Financial Services Regulation (A8-0360/2015 - Burkhard Balz) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2106(INI)
External factors that represent hurdles to European female entrepreneurship (A8-0369/2015 - Barbara Matera) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2111(INI)
Skills policies for fighting youth unemployment (A8-0366/2015 - Marek Plura) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2088(INI)
Towards a Digital Single Market Act (A8-0371/2015 - Kaja Kallas, Evelyne Gebhardt) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2147(INI)
Situation in Syria (debate) EL
2016/11/22
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0340/2015 - Sandra Kalniete) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0222(NLE)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (consent) (A8-0339/2015 - Barbara Lochbihler) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0440(NLE)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (resolution) (A8-0342/2015 - Barbara Lochbihler) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2096(INI)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0344/2015 - Cristian Dan Preda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2229(INI)
Arms export: implementation of the Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0338/2015 - Bodil Valero) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2114(INI)
Patents and plant breeders rights (RC-B8-1394/2015, B8-1394/2015, B8-1395/2015, B8-1399/2015, B8-1400/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2981(RSP)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 December 2015 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0347/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0903(NLE)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0348/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0904(NLE)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0346/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0905(NLE)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application from Ireland - EGF/2015/006 IE/PWA International (A8-0363/2015 - Victor Negrescu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2295(BUD)
Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies (A8-0349/2015 - Anneliese Dodds, Luděk Niedermayer) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2010(INL)
EU-China relations (A8-0350/2015 - Bas Belder) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2003(INI)
Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: Challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance (A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2051(INI)
Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals (A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2211(INI)
Situation in Hungary: follow-up to the European Parliament Resolution of 10 June 2015 (B8-1349/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1358/2015, B8-1359/2015, B8-1360/2015, B8-1361/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2935(RSP)
Arrangement with the Swiss Confederation on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office (A8-0345/2015 - Roberta Metsola) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0422(NLE)
EU-Dominica agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0322/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0050(NLE)
EU-Vanuatu agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0329/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0052(NLE)
EU-Trinidad and Tobago agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0323/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0054(NLE)
EU-Samoa agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0320/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0056(NLE)
EU-Grenada agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0326/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0057(NLE)
EU-Timor-Leste agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0327/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0058(NLE)
EU-Saint Lucia agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0321/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0060(NLE)
EU-Saint Vincent and the Grenadines agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0325/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0061(NLE)
EU-United Arab Emirates agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0324/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0062(NLE)
Methods and procedure for making available the traditional, VAT and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements (A8-0357/2015 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0204(NLE)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application from Finland - EGF/2015/005 FI/Computer Programming (A8-0362/2015 - Marco Zanni) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2298(BUD)
EU trade mark (A8-0354/2015 - Cecilia Wikström) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0088(COD)
Laws of Member States relating to trade marks (A8-0355/2015 - Cecilia Wikström) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0088(COD)
Scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the North-East Atlantic fisheries (A8-0294/2015 - Ole Christensen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0063(COD)
Strategic cooperation in the fight against serious crime and terrorism between the United Arab Emirates and Europol (A8-0351/2015 - Alessandra Mussolini) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0809(CNS)
Towards a European Energy Union (A8-0341/2015 - Marek Józef Gróbarczyk) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2113(INI)
Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (A8-0330/2015 - Peter Eriksson) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2108(INI)
Implementation of the European Progress Microfinance Facility (A8-0331/2015 - Sven Schulze) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2042(INI)
A new CFP: structure for technical measures and multiannual plans (A8-0328/2015 - Gabriel Mato) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2092(INI)
Towards a European Energy Union - Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2108(INI)
Towards a European Energy Union - Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2108(INI)
EU-Liechtenstein agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0334/2015 - Sander Loones) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0175(NLE)
Special report of the European Ombudsman in own-initiative inquiry concerning Frontex (A8-0343/2015 - Roberta Metsola, Ska Keller) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2215(INI)
Education for children in emergency situations and protracted crises (B8-1240/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2977(RSP)
Recent terrorist attacks in Paris (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (A8-0316/2015 - Rachida Dati) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2063(INI)
EU Strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020 (A8-0312/2015 - Ole Christensen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2107(INI)
Outcome of the Valletta summit of 11 and 12 November 2015 and of the G20 summit of 15 and 16 November 2015 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
State of the Energy Union (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis (A8-0250/2015 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0337(COD)
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0251/2015 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0337(COD)
Repealing certain acts in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0252/2015 - Claude Moraes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0339(COD)
Insurance mediation (A8-0315/2015 - Werner Langen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0175(COD)
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on child poverty (A8-0310/2015 - Inês Cristina Zuber) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2237(INI)
Cohesion policy and marginalised communities (A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2247(INI)
The role of the EU within the UN (A8-0308/2015 - Paavo Väyrynen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2104(INI)
EU Strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2107(INI)
European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Interoperability solutions as a means for modernising the public sector (A8-0225/2015 - Carlos Zorrinho) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0185(COD)
Reform of the electoral law of the EU (A8-0286/2015 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Jo Leinen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2035(INL)
Future aviation package (B8-1146/2015, B8-1147/2015, B8-1148/2015, B8-1149/2015, B8-1150/2015, B8-1151/2015, B8-1152/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2933(RSP)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities (A8-0307/2015 - Dariusz Rosati) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2210(INI)
Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market (B8-1093/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2820(RSP)
New challenges and concepts for the promotion of tourism in Europe (A8-0258/2015 - Isabella De Monte) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2241(INI)
EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region (A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2214(INI)
Cohesion policy and review of the Europe 2020 strategy (A8-0277/2015 - Fernando Ruas) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2246(INI)
European Structural and Investment Funds and sound economic governance (A8-0268/2015 - José Blanco López) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2052(INI)
Perspectives and review of the Europe 2020 strategy (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Draft general budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections EL
2016/11/22
Use of genetically modified food and feed (A8-0305/2015 - Giovanni La Via) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0093(COD)
Novel foods (A8-0046/2014 - James Nicholson) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0435(COD)
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (A8-0249/2015 - Julie Girling) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0443(COD)
European single market for electronic communications (A8-0300/2015 - Pilar del Castillo Vera) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0309(COD)
Situation in Israel and Palestine (debate) EL
2016/11/22
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance EL
2016/11/22
Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2112(INI)
Draft amending budget No 6/2015: Own resources, Union trust funds for external action, Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (A8-0280/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2150(BUD)
Draft amending budget No 7/2015: Managing the refugee crisis: immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration (A8-0289/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2252(BUD)
Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (A8-0275/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2112(INI)
Payment services in the internal market (A8-0266/2015 - Antonio Tajani) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0264(COD)
Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (A8-0213/2015 - Anna Záborská) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2160(INI)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Tunisia in Union programmes (A8-0254/2015 - Pier Antonio Panzeri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0118(NLE)
European small claims procedure and European order for payment procedure (A8-0140/2015 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0403(COD)
Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air (A8-0160/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0442(COD)
Doubling the capacity of the North Stream pipeline and impact on the energy union and the security of supply (debate) EL
2016/11/22
ILO Forced Labour Convention: judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0226/2015 - Helga Stevens) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0258(NLE)
Common provisions on European Structural and Investment Funds: specific measures for Greece (A8-0260/2015 - Iskra Mihaylova) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0160(COD)
Role of local authorities in developing countries in development cooperation (A8-0232/2015 - Eleni Theocharous) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2004(INI)
Emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2865(RSP)
Statement by the President EL
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on migration (14 September 2015) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0173/2015 - Tamás Deutsch) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2245(INI)
Assessment of the 2012 European Year for active ageing and solidarity between generations (A8-0241/2015 - Eduard Kukan) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2255(INI)
Empowering girls through education in the EU (A8-0206/2015 - Liliana Rodrigues) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2250(INI)
Migration and refugees in Europe (RC-B8-0832/2015, B8-0832/2015, B8-0833/2015, B8-0834/2015, B8-0835/2015, B8-0837/2015, B8-0838/2015, B8-0842/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2833(RSP)
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combatting unemployment (A8-0247/2015 - Verónica Lope Fontagné) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2236(INI)
Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century (A8-0222/2015 - Martina Dlabajová) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2235(INI)
Proposal to change the name of the Delegation for Relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council to the Delegation for Relations with Palestine EL
2016/11/22
Urban dimension of EU policies (A8-0218/2015 - Kerstin Westphal) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2213(INI)
The EU's role in the Middle East peace process (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combating unemployment - Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century - Precarious employment (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2235(INI)
ILO Forced Labour Convention: social policy (A8-0243/2015 - Patrick Le Hyaric) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0259(NLE)
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU (2013-2014) (A8-0230/2015 - Laura Ferrara) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2254(INI)
Commissioner hearings: lessons to be taken from the 2014 process (A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2040(INI)
Family businesses in Europe (A8-0223/2015 - Angelika Niebler) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2210(INI)
Research and innovation in the blue economy to create jobs and growth (A8-0214/2015 - João Ferreira) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2240(INI)
Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe (A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2149(INI)
Urban dimension of EU policies - Investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2245(INI)
Order of business EL
2016/11/22
Research and innovation in the blue economy to create jobs and growth (short presentation) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2240(INI)
Programme of activities of the Luxembourg Presidency (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Green employment initiative - Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2238(INI)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Sotirios Zarianopoulos (A8-0191/2015 - Laura Ferrara) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2015(IMM)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0139/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Udo Bullmann) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
Review of the economic governance framework: stocktaking and challenges (A8-0190/2015 - Pervenche Berès) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2145(INI)
Recent revelations of high-level corruption cases in FIFA (RC-B8-0548/2015, B8-0548/2015, B8-0549/2015, B8-0550/2015, B8-0571/2015, B8-0572/2015, B8-0573/2015, B8-0574/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2730(RSP)
Conclusion of the Doha amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0167/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0376(NLE)
EU-Iceland agreement on Iceland participation in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0166/2015 - Giovanni La Via) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0151(NLE)
European energy security strategy (A8-0164/2015 - Algirdas Saudargas) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
Situation in Hungary (RC-B8-0532/2015, B8-0532/2015, B8-0533/2015, B8-0534/2015, B8-0535/2015, B8-0536/2015, B8-0537/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2700(RSP)
Adjustment rate for direct payments in respect of 2015 (A8-0174/2015 - Czesław Adam Siekierski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0070(COD)
EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015 (A8-0163/2015 - Maria Noichl) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2152(INI)
Intellectual property rights in third countries (A8-0161/2015 - Alessia Maria Mosca) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2206(INI)
Intellectual property rights: an EU action plan (A8-0169/2015 - Pavel Svoboda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2151(INI)
European energy security strategy (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
European energy security strategy (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
Preparation of the G7 Summit (7-8 June) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments - 2014/0014(COD) (B8-0362/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0014(COD)
ACER - Human resources for monitoring wholesale energy markets (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0054/2015 - Arnaud Danjean) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2220(INI)
Financing the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0136/2015 - Eduard Kukan, Indrek Tarand) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2258(INI)
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0153/2015 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0025(COD)
Self-certification of importers of minerals and metals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0059(COD)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (B8-0460/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2684(RSP)
2014 Progress Report on Turkey (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (A8-0131/2015 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0314(COD)
Financing for development (A8-0143/2015 - Pedro Silva Pereira) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2044(INI)
Safer healthcare in Europe (A8-0142/2015 - Piernicola Pedicini) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2207(INI)
Green growth opportunities for SMEs (A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2209(INI)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance EL
2016/11/22
Report of the extraordinary European Council meeting (23 April 2015) - The latest tragedies in the Mediterranean and EU migration and asylum policies (RC-B8-0367/2015, B8-0367/2015, B8-0377/2015, B8-0378/2015, B8-0379/2015, B8-0380/2015, B8-0381/2015, B8-0384/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2660(RSP)
2014 Progress Report on Albania (B8-0358/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2951(RSP)
2014 Progress Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (B8-0359/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2952(RSP)
European Investment Bank annual report 2013 (A8-0057/2015 - Ernest Urtasun) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2156(INI)
Expo Milano 2015: Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life (B8-0360/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2574(RSP)
Money market funds (A8-0041/2015 - Neena Gill) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0306(COD)
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2016 - Section I - Parliament (A8-0144/2015 - Gérard Deprez) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2012(BUD)
European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0055/2015 - Monica Macovei) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0255(APP)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Albania (A8-0047/2015 - Andrzej Duda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0191(COD)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters with Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0017/2015 - Andrzej Duda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0206(COD)
Application of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU to certain categories of horizontal state aid (A8-0029/2014 - Andrzej Duda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0192(NLE)
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0288(COD)
International Convention on standards for fishing vessel personnel (A8-0064/2015 - Sofia Ribeiro) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0285(NLE)
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (A8-0025/2015 - Nils Torvalds) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0288(COD)
Reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (A8-0130/2015 - Margrete Auken) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0371(COD)
Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport (A8-0122/2015 - José Inácio Faria) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0224(COD)
Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Russia to take account of the accession of Croatia to the EU (A8-0129/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0052(NLE)
Implementation of the Bologna process (A8-0121/2015 - Krystyna Łybacka) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2039(INI)
Employment quotas for people with disabilities in the EU institutions (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Decision establishing the Social Protection Committee (A8-0066/2015 - Marita Ulvskog) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0802(CNS)
Decision establishing the Employment Committee (A8-0065/2015 - Marita Ulvskog) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0801(CNS)
Amendment of the MFF 2014-2020 (A8-0125/2015 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0010(APP)
Armenian genocide 100th anniversary (RC-B8-0342/2015, B8-0342/2015, B8-0343/2015, B8-0344/2015, B8-0346/2015, B8-0347/2015, B8-0348/2015, B8-0349/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2590(RSP)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (19-20 March 2015) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0056/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0005(COD)
Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament (A8-0039/2015 - Elmar Brok) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2219(INI)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0023/2015 - Pier Antonio Panzeri) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
Relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism (RC-B8-0215/2008, B8-0215/2015, B8-0216/2015, B8-0221/2015, B8-0222/2015, B8-0223/2015, B8-0224/2015, B8-0225/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2573(RSP)
Preparations for the European Council meeting (19-20 March 2015) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Import into the Union of agricultural products originating in Turkey (A8-0048/2014 - Andrzej Duda) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0272(COD)
Guidelines for the 2016 budget - Section III (A8-0027/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2008(BUD)
Annual report 2013 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0024/2015 - Georgi Pirinski) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2155(INI)
2014 Progress report on Montenegro (B8-0211/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2947(RSP)
2014 Progress report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (B8-0212/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2948(RSP)
2014 Progress report on Serbia (B8-0213/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2949(RSP)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2015 (A8-0037/2015 - Dariusz Rosati) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2221(INI)
Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (A8-0018/2015 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2212(INI)
Progress on equality between women and men in the EU in 2013 (A8-0015/2015 - Marc Tarabella) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
European Central Bank annual report for 2013 (A8-0011/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2157(INI)
Decision adopted on a Strategic framework for the Energy Union (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Preparation of the informal meeting of Heads of State or Government (12 February 2015) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (A8-0001/2015 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0218(COD)
US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0098/2015, RC-B8-0123/2015, B8-0123/2015, B8-0133/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2997(RSP)
Renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum (RC-B8-0099/2015, B8-0099/2015, B8-0121/2015, B8-0130/2015, B8-0131/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2526(RSP)
Initiatives in the framework of the International Labour Organization debate on the right to strike (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Shortage of funding for the UNRWA (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Roadmap towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (debate) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Pakistan, in particular the situation following the Peshawar school attack EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2514(RSP)
Situation in Ukraine (RC-B8-0008/2015, B8-0008/2015, B8-0018/2015, B8-0020/2015, B8-0021/2015, B8-0025/2015, B8-0027/2015, B8-0029/2015) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2965(RSP)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance EL
2016/11/22
Preparations for the European Council meeting (18-19 December 2014) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Recognition of Palestine statehood (RC-B8-0277/2014, B8-0277/2014, B8-0309/2014, B8-0310/2014, B8-0349/2014, B8-0357/2014, B8-0359/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2964(RSP)
Economic governance review of the 6-pack and 2-pack regulations (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Motion of censure on the Commission (B8-0249/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2197(INS)
Recognition of Palestine statehood (debate) EL
2016/11/22
One-minute speeches (Rule 163) EL
2016/11/22
Presentation by the Commission President-elect of the College of Commissioners and their programme (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2811(RSP)
Preparation of the European Council (23-24 October 2014) (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Structural shortage of payments in the Horizon 2020 budget (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Escalation of violence between Israel and Palestine (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Escalation of violence between Israel and Palestine (debate) EL
2016/11/22

Reports (2)

REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the re-use of public sector information (recast) PDF (1 MB) DOC (187 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/0111(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(187 KB)
REPORT on working conditions and precarious employment PDF (569 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2016/2221(INI)
Documents: PDF(569 KB) DOC(93 KB)

Shadow reports (23)

REPORT on a comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics PDF (318 KB) DOC (125 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/2088(INI)
Documents: PDF(318 KB) DOC(125 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund PDF (1 MB) DOC (197 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/0254(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(197 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination PDF (2 MB) DOC (503 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/0224(COD)
Documents: PDF(2 MB) DOC(503 KB)
REPORT on the role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed PDF (300 KB) DOC (65 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2018/2053(INI)
Documents: PDF(300 KB) DOC(65 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking PDF (668 KB) DOC (97 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/0003(NLE)
Documents: PDF(668 KB) DOC(97 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas PDF (716 KB) DOC (94 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2017/0294(COD)
Documents: PDF(716 KB) DOC(94 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (recast) PDF (959 KB) DOC (149 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/0378(COD)
Documents: PDF(959 KB) DOC(149 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry PDF (1 MB) DOC (166 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2017/0125(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(166 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings PDF (1 MB) DOC (195 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/0381(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(195 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1316/2013 and (EU) No 283/2014 as regards the promotion of Internet connectivity in local communities PDF (958 KB) DOC (150 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/0287(COD)
Documents: PDF(958 KB) DOC(150 KB)
REPORT on the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector PDF (1 MB) DOC (179 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMIS
Dossiers: 2016/2215(INI)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(179 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments between Member States and third countries in the field of energy and repealing Decision No 994/2012/EU PDF (783 KB) DOC (125 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/0031(COD)
Documents: PDF(783 KB) DOC(125 KB)
REPORT on EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage PDF (405 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/2059(INI)
Documents: PDF(405 KB) DOC(91 KB)
REPORT on social dumping in the European Union PDF (540 KB) DOC (186 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/2255(INI)
Documents: PDF(540 KB) DOC(186 KB)
REPORT on how best to harness the job creation potential of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) PDF (455 KB) DOC (175 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/2320(INI)
Documents: PDF(455 KB) DOC(175 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States PDF (603 KB) DOC (330 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2016/0043(NLE)
Documents: PDF(603 KB) DOC(330 KB)
Interim report on the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector PDF (402 KB) DOC (119 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMIS
Dossiers: 2016/2090(INI)
Documents: PDF(402 KB) DOC(119 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting a framework for energy efficiency labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU PDF (1 MB) DOC (677 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2015/0149(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(677 KB)
REPORT on Towards a European Energy Union PDF (302 KB) DOC (292 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2015/2113(INI)
Documents: PDF(302 KB) DOC(292 KB)
REPORT on the EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work 2014-2020 PDF (214 KB) DOC (150 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/2107(INI)
Documents: PDF(214 KB) DOC(150 KB)
REPORT on Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in combating unemployment PDF (165 KB) DOC (119 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2014/2236(INI)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(119 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States PDF (220 KB) DOC (353 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/0051(NLE)
Documents: PDF(220 KB) DOC(353 KB)
REPORT on European Energy Security Strategy PDF (288 KB) DOC (251 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
Documents: PDF(288 KB) DOC(251 KB)

Opinions (2)

OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of persons reporting on breaches of Union law
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(280 KB) DOC(151 KB)
OPINION on investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the Union
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(180 KB)

Shadow opinions (14)

OPINION on the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the EU institutional framework
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2017/2089(INI)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(59 KB)
OPINION on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/2046(BUD)
Documents: PDF(188 KB) DOC(64 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/825 to increase the financial envelope of the Structural Reform Support Programme and adapt its general objective
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2017/0334(COD)
Documents: PDF(483 KB) DOC(153 KB)
OPINION on modernisation of education in the European Union
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2017/2224(INI)
Documents: PDF(222 KB) DOC(81 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to continue current limitations of scope for aviation activities and to prepare to implement a global market-based measure from 2021
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2017/0017(COD)
Documents: PDF(508 KB) DOC(134 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and amending Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, EU No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013, (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Decision No 541/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/0282(COD)
Documents: PDF(242 KB) DOC(137 KB)
OPINION on European standards – implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2016/2274(INI)
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(70 KB)
OPINION with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2015/2103(INL)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(54 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020 and amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 1305/2013
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/0263(COD)
Documents: PDF(251 KB) DOC(100 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2015/0148(COD)
Documents: PDF(283 KB) DOC(142 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2015/0275(COD)
Documents: PDF(293 KB) DOC(223 KB)
OPINION on the EU Strategy for the Alpine Region
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/2324(INI)
Documents: PDF(128 KB) DOC(192 KB)
OPINION on resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2014/2208(INI)
Documents: PDF(113 KB) DOC(175 KB)
OPINION on family businesses in Europe
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2014/2210(INI)
Documents: PDF(123 KB) DOC(189 KB)

Institutional motions (102)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco, the Implementation Protocol thereto and an exchange of letters accompanying the said Agreement PDF (153 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2019/2565(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (144 KB) DOC (47 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2019/2543(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(47 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la situation au Togo FR PDF (169 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(59 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur le Soudan FR PDF (165 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2019/2512(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part PDF (151 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2019/2508(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on conflicts of interest and the protection of the EU budget in the Czech Republic PDF (272 KB) DOC (50 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2975(RSP)
Documents: PDF(272 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cuba PDF (181 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2926(RSP)
Documents: PDF(181 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rise in neo-fascist violence in Europe PDF (300 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2869(RSP)
Documents: PDF(300 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (280 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2853(RSP)
Documents: PDF(280 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of demolition of Khan al-Ahmar and other Bedouin villages PDF (267 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2849(RSP)
Documents: PDF(267 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the July 2018 fires in Mati in the Attica region, Greece, and the EU’s response PDF (267 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2847(RSP)
Documents: PDF(267 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of demolition of Khan al-Ahmar and other Bedouin villages PDF (266 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2849(RSP)
Documents: PDF(266 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on autonomous weapon systems PDF (174 KB) DOC (49 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2752(RSP)
Documents: PDF(174 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi PDF (286 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2785(RSP)
Documents: PDF(286 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on terrorist attacks in Somalia PDF (184 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2784(RSP)
Documents: PDF(184 KB) DOC(54 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la situation des droits de l’Homme au Bahreïn, notamment le cas de Nabeel Rajab FR PDF (389 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2755(RSP)
Documents: PDF(389 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan, notably the situation of Noura Hussein Hammad PDF (290 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2713(RSP)
Documents: PDF(290 KB) DOC(56 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur les défenseuses des droits des femmes en Arabie Saoudite FR PDF (457 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2712(RSP)
Documents: PDF(457 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua PDF (166 KB) DOC (46 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2711(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (165 KB) DOC (48 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2695(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Gaza strip PDF (179 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2663(RSP)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the violation of human rights and the rule of law in the case of two Greek soldiers arrested and detained in Turkey PDF (261 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2670(RSP)
Documents: PDF(261 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mercy killings in Uganda PDF (180 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2632(RSP)
Documents: PDF(180 KB) DOC(52 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur les arrestations des défenseurs des droits de l’Homme au Soudan, notamment le cas du Lauréat du Prix Sakharov Salih Mahmoud Osman FR PDF (399 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2631(RSP)
Documents: PDF(399 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria PDF (188 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2626(RSP)
Documents: PDF(188 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of UNRWA PDF (270 KB) DOC (48 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2553(RSP)
Documents: PDF(270 KB) DOC(48 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur l'esclavage d'enfants en Haïti FR PDF (373 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2562(RSP)
Documents: PDF(373 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (173 KB) DOC (48 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2559(RSP)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of UNRWA PDF (264 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2553(RSP)
Documents: PDF(264 KB) DOC(51 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la République Démocratique du Congo FR PDF (283 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2515(RSP)
Documents: PDF(283 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Nigeria PDF (292 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2513(RSP)
Documents: PDF(292 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan PDF (188 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2932(RSP)
Documents: PDF(188 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (282 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2849(RSP)
Documents: PDF(282 KB) DOC(59 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur La liberté d'expression au Soudan, notamment le cas de Mohamed Zine El Abidine FR PDF (379 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2961(RSP)
Documents: PDF(379 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on terrorist attacks in Somalia PDF (182 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2962(RSP)
Documents: PDF(182 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU PDF (282 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2897(RSP)
Documents: PDF(282 KB) DOC(53 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la situation aux Maldives FR PDF (375 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2870(RSP)
Documents: PDF(375 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation of people with albinism in Malawi and other African countries PDF (173 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2868(RSP)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(51 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur Myanmar: situation des Rohingyas FR PDF (376 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2838(RSP)
Documents: PDF(376 KB) DOC(57 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur le Cambodge et notamment le cas de M. Kem Sokha FR PDF (191 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2829(RSP)
Documents: PDF(191 KB) DOC(54 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la situation des droits de l'homme au Burundi FR PDF (350 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2756(RSP)
Documents: PDF(350 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 37(3) of the Rules of Procedure and the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission on Parliament’s priorities for the Commission Work Programme 2018 PDF (426 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2699(RSP)
Documents: PDF(426 KB) DOC(73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on building an ambitious EU industrial strategy as a strategic priority for growth, employment and innovation in Europe PDF (350 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2732(RSP)
Documents: PDF(350 KB) DOC(53 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la Situation des droits de l'Homme en Indonésie FR PDF (387 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2724(RSP)
Documents: PDF(387 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, notably the situation of human rights defenders and the death penalty PDF (173 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2723(RSP)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (278 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2703(RSP)
Documents: PDF(278 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zambia, particularly the case of Hakainde Hichilema PDF (288 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2681(RSP)
Documents: PDF(288 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan PDF (175 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2683(RSP)
Documents: PDF(175 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on achieving the two-state solution in the Middle East PDF (179 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2998(RSP)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria PDF (189 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2654(RSP)
Documents: PDF(189 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Dadaab refugee camp PDF (189 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2687(RSP)
Documents: PDF(189 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (188 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2651(RSP)
Documents: PDF(188 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bangladesh, including child marriages PDF (180 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2648(RSP)
Documents: PDF(180 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe, case of Pastor Evan Mawarire PDF (171 KB) DOC (50 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2608(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2017 PDF (378 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2598(RSP)
Documents: PDF(378 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the conclusion of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part PDF (304 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2525(RSP)
Documents: PDF(304 KB) DOC(60 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la République Centre Africaine FR PDF (273 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2507(RSP)
Documents: PDF(273 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-Turkey relations PDF (275 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2993(RSP)
Documents: PDF(275 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-Turkey relations PDF (266 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2993(RSP)
Documents: PDF(266 KB) DOC(68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement between Canada and the European Union on a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) PDF (256 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2981(RSP)
Documents: PDF(256 KB) DOC(63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists in Turkey PDF (177 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2935(RSP)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on nuclear security and non-proliferation PDF (178 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2936(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(72 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION Le Soudan FR PDF (278 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2911(RSP)
Documents: PDF(278 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda: the case of Victoire Ingabire PDF (267 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2910(RSP)
Documents: PDF(267 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for a European reindustrialisation policy in light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases PDF (177 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2891(RSP)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (267 KB) DOC (50 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(267 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (187 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2537(RSP)
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS PDF (177 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2529(RSP)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Yemen PDF (186 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
Documents: PDF(186 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) PDF (235 KB) DOC (59 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3034(RSP)
Documents: PDF(235 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2016 PDF (322 KB) DOC (111 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3035(RSP)
Documents: PDF(322 KB) DOC(111 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the peace process in Colombia PDF (183 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3033(RSP)
Documents: PDF(183 KB) DOC(76 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la Malaisie FR PDF (271 KB) DOC (77 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(271 KB) DOC(77 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur la situation aux Maldives FR PDF (256 KB) DOC (74 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3017(RSP)
Documents: PDF(256 KB) DOC(74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a new animal welfare strategy for 2016-2020 PDF (192 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2957(RSP)
Documents: PDF(192 KB) DOC(83 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION sur l'Afghanistan en particulier les meurtres dans la province de Zabul FR PDF (158 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2968(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on emission measurements in the automotive sector PDF (300 KB) DOC (87 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2865(RSP)
Documents: PDF(300 KB) DOC(87 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s role in the Middle East peace process PDF (297 KB) DOC (92 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2685(RSP)
Documents: PDF(297 KB) DOC(92 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on migration and the situation of refugees PDF (194 KB) DOC (89 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2833(RSP)
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(89 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Parliament’s priorities for the Commission Work Programme 2016 PDF (410 KB) DOC (117 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2729(RSP)
Documents: PDF(410 KB) DOC(117 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Xylella emergency PDF (235 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2652(RSP)
Documents: PDF(235 KB) DOC(64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the persecution of Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by Islamic terror group Al-Shabaab PDF (156 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2661(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the report of the extraordinary European Council (23 April 2015) - Latest tragedies in the Mediterranean and EU migration and asylum policies PDF (152 KB) DOC (69 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2660(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(69 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Yarmouk refugee camp PDF (127 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2664(RSP)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the commemoration of the centenary of the Armenian Genocide PDF (134 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2590(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (157 KB) DOC (75 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(75 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass graves of the missing persons of Ashia in Ornithi village in the occupied part of Cyprus PDF (135 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2551(RSP)
Documents: PDF(135 KB) DOC(70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass graves of the Missing Persons of Ashia, at Ornithi village in the occupied part of Cyprus PDF (132 KB) DOC (62 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2551(RSP)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(62 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Saudi Arabia, the case of Raif Badawi PDF (136 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2550(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Turkey: Recent arrests of journalists, media executives and systematic pressure against media PDF (131 KB) DOC (62 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3011(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(62 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Turkey: recent arrests of journalists and media executives, and systematic pressure against the media in Turkey PDF (138 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3011(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recognition of Palestine statehood PDF (133 KB) DOC (194 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2964(RSP)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(194 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the persecution of the democratic opposition in Venezuela PDF (141 KB) DOC (65 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2998(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(65 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission’s impact assessment guidelines PDF (132 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2967(RSP)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recognition of Palestinian statehood PDF (125 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2964(RSP)
Documents: PDF(125 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child PDF (159 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2919(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Turkish actions creating tensions in the exclusive economic zone of Cyprus PDF (131 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2921(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Northern Ireland peace process PDF (125 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2906(RSP)
Documents: PDF(125 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Turkish actions creating tensions in the exclusive economic zone of Cyprus PDF (133 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2921(RSP)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (127 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2844(RSP)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s response to the Ebola outbreak PDF (128 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2842(RSP)
Documents: PDF(128 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Israel-Palestine after the Gaza war and the role of the EU PDF (138 KB) DOC (67 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2845(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(67 KB)

Oral questions (23)

A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy PDF (45 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(18 KB)
A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy PDF (45 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Severe violations in the transportation of animals to third countries PDF (107 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(107 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) PDF (196 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Request for an investigation into compliance with the Tobacco directive following the Filtergate scandal PDF (195 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Major interpellation - Israel's involvement in projects financed under Horizon 2020 PDF (105 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2721(RSP)
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Investigation in the wake of the Dieselgate 2.0 scandal PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(197 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons PDF (193 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Fight against trafficking of women and girls for sexual and labour exploitation in the EU PDF (204 KB) DOC (21 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/3008(RSP)
Documents: PDF(204 KB) DOC(21 KB)
Compensation for wrongly labelled energy-related products PDF (106 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2725(RSP)
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Ruling by the General Court of the European Union on the Commission's decision of 10 September 2014 to refuse to register the European Citizens' Initiative 'STOP TTIP' PDF (198 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Mr Dijsselbloem's remarks on what caused the economic crisis in southern Europe PDF (105 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Minor interpellation - VP/HR - Israeli settlement policy PDF (191 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(191 KB) DOC(17 KB)
EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses PDF (97 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Regarding leaked consolidated TTIP chapter PDF (109 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(109 KB) DOC(26 KB)
EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses PDF (98 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Impunity of Francoist crimes in the Spanish state PDF (196 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(27 KB)
EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses PDF (98 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Access to finance for the SMEs PDF (7 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(7 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Volkswagen's emissions fraud and the protection of EU citizens PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC
EU reconfirms its commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC
End of milk quotas PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC
End of milk quotas PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC

Written explanations (235)

Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Jakop Dalunde) EL

Οι στόχοι που τίθενται στην έκθεση και οι προτάσεις που προωθούνται δεν ανταποκρίνονται στην ανάγκη που υπάρχει για δραστικά μέτρα ώστε να προστατευτεί πραγματικά το περιβάλλον και να αντιμετωπιστούν ουσιαστικά οι κλιματικές αλλαγές.Παρόλο που το τελικό κείμενο είναι ελαφρώς βελτιωμένο σε σχέση με την αρχική πρόταση που κατέθεσε η Κομισιόν, στα κύρια θέματα που τίθενται υπάρχει, ωστόσο, σημαντική υποχώρηση από το φιλόδοξο κείμενο που είχε αρχικά υιοθετήσει το Ευρωκοινοβούλιο. Για παράδειγμα, τίθεται στόχος για αξιοποίηση των ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας κατά 32% μέχρι το 2030, ενώ η ολομέλεια του Ευρωκοινοβουλίου ζητούσε 35%. Επίσης, απουσιάζει ένα ολοκληρωμένο σχέδιο δράσης για αξιοποίηση των ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας ώστε να καταπολεμηθεί η ενεργειακή φτώχεια και να στηριχτούν έμπρακτα οι ευάλωτες ομάδες.Ο πλανήτης μας, μέσω των ακραίων καιρικών φαινομένων, μας στέλνει σήμα κινδύνου και γι’ αυτό πρέπει να δράσουμε άμεσα και αποφασιστικά, θέτοντας τις ανάγκες των ανθρώπων πάνω από τα συμφέροντα των πολυεθνικών που καταχρώνται καθημερινά τους φυσικούς πόρους καταστρέφοντας το περιβάλλον. Δεν αρκεί να θέτουμε δεσμευτικούς στόχους εάν δεν τεθούν και φιλόδοξοι εθνικοί δεσμευτικοί στόχοι, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη και τις ιδιαιτερότητες του κάθε κράτους, ώστε να στηρίξουμε την ανάπτυξη των ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας στον αγώνα μας για την προστασία του περιβάλλοντος. Γι’ αυτό τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
The situation in Hungary (A8-0250/2018 - Judith Sargentini) EL

Η κυβέρνηση Όρμπαν, του Ευρωπαϊκού Λαϊκού Κόμματος, αποτελεί τρανή απόδειξη για το τι σημαίνει στην πράξη νεοφιλελευθερισμός, αντεργατική πολιτική και κοινωνική αναλγησία απέναντι στους ευάλωτους, ακόμα και στους αστέγους. Η οικονομική της πολιτική εξυπηρετεί πλήρως την ελίτ και στρέφεται εις βάρος του ουγγρικού λαού. Απαγόρευση των απεργιών· διαφθορά· αυταρχισμός και υπερσυγκέντρωση εξουσιών· ρατσισμός και ξενοφοβία· όλα αυτά, μαζί με τον αντικομμουνισμό της ουγγρικής Κυβέρνησης, συνθέτουν την πραγματικότητα που εξοντώνει τον ουγγρικό λαό. Η πολιτική Όρμπαν όχι μόνο δεν συνιστά «αντισυστημική εναλλακτική» στα αδιέξοδα που συσσωρεύει η κυρίαρχη πολιτική στην ΕΕ, αλλά αποτελεί μια από τις πιο αντιλαϊκές, αντιδραστικές και οπισθοδρομικές εκδοχές αυτού του συστήματος και αυτών των πολιτικών. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την πρόταση για την ενεργοποίηση του Άρθρου 7, στέλνοντας σαφές και ηχηρό μήνυμα στην ουγγρική κυβέρνηση αλλά και στους υπόλοιπους ακροδεξιούς ομοϊδεάτες της σε όλη την Ευρώπη πως οι πολιτικές τους δεν θα γίνουν ανεχτές. Κρίσιμο ζήτημα παραμένει το γεγονός πως οι ευαισθησίες της ΕΕ σε τέτοια θέματα είναι επιλεκτικές. Ωστόσο η Αριστερά, μακριά από λογικές δύο μέτρων και δύο σταθμών, θα συνεχίσει να αγωνίζεται ενάντια στην ιδεολογία, τα συμφέροντα και τις πολιτικές που πρεσβεύει ο «κάθε Όρμπαν» στην Ευρώπη, με όποιο περιτύλιγμα κι αν αυτές προωθούνται.
2016/11/22
Progress on UN Global compacts for safe, orderly and regular migration and on refugees (B8-0184/2018) EL

Υπερψήφισα, όχι επειδή το ψήφισμα είναι ολοκληρωμένο αλλά επειδή πρέπει να σταλεί ισχυρό μήνυμα ενάντια στις φωνές της ακροδεξιάς, της ξενοφοβίας και του ρατσισμού, προεξάρχοντος του Προέδρου των ΗΠΑ ο οποίος απέσυρε τη χώρα του από τις διαπραγματεύσεις για τα Σύμφωνα για τη Μετανάστευση αλλά και των ομοϊδεατών του σε ευρωπαϊκές κυβερνήσεις. Ο ρατσισμός δεν μπορεί ποτέ να είναι η απάντηση. Η απάντηση είναι το βασικό μήνυμα που στέλνει αυτό το ψήφισμα για την ανάγκη μιας μεταναστευτικής πολιτικής που να έχει στο επίκεντρο τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα. Ωστόσο, για να μπορεί η ΕΕ να συμβάλει σε μια πραγματικά ανθρωποκεντρική παγκόσμια πολιτική μετανάστευσης, θα πρέπει πρώτα η ίδια να εγκαταλείψει την σημερινή αντιμεταναστευτική πολιτική της, τη στρατηγική της «Ευρώπης-Φρούριο», την καταστολή των προσφυγικών ροών με στρατιωτικές επιχειρήσεις και θαλάσσιες περιπολίες, τις συμφωνίες με αυταρχικά γειτονικά κράτη για να καθίστανται οι συνοριοφύλακες της Ευρώπης κέρβεροι. Δυστυχώς αυτά δεν αναφέρονται στο ψήφισμα. Τασσόμαστε ενάντια στους πολέμους, τις επεμβάσεις και τις νεοαποικιοκρατικές οικονομικές πολιτικές των ΗΠΑ και ΝΑΤΟ που δυστυχώς στηρίζει η ΕΕ. Είναι αυτές οι πολιτικές που δημιουργούν τους πρόσφυγες και εξαθλιωμένους φτωχούς που αναγκάζονται να ξεριζωθούν για να αναζητήσουν μια καλύτερη ζωή.
2016/11/22
Enhancing developing countries' debt sustainability (A8-0129/2018 - Charles Goerens) EL

Η έκθεση προτείνει μέτρα για να διασφαλιστεί ότι τα δάνεια προς τις αναπτυσσόμενες χώρες τυγχάνουν διαχείρισης με μεγαλύτερη διαφάνεια και εξυπηρετούν την κοινωνική και οικονομική πρόοδο και αυτό είναι κάτι που στηρίζουμε. Διατηρούμε επιφυλάξεις όμως ως προς τις κοινές βάσεις για το φόρο χρηματοπιστωτικών συναλλαγών.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister) EL

Η έκθεση βασίζεται στην πολιτική της αύξησης και ανάπτυξης του στρατιωτικού μέρους της κοινής πολιτικής άμυνας και ασφάλειας και υπογραμμίζει την ανάγκη για 2% ΑΕΠ σε στρατιωτικές δαπάνες, όπως εξάλλου είναι και η θέση του ΝΑΤΟ. Η θέση μας ενάντια στην στρατιωτικοποίηση της ΕΕ είναι ξεκάθαρη. Για αυτό το λόγο καταψηφίσαμε και την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Extension of the duration of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0198/2017 - Udo Bullmann, José Manuel Fernandes) EL

Είναι πλέον αποδεδειγμένο πως με το πακέτο Γιούνκερ οι επενδύσεις που επιδιώκονται εξαρτώνται κυρίως από τα μεγάλα ιδιωτικά κεφάλαια, τα οποία προφανώς ενδιαφέρονται μόνο για την δική τους κερδοφορία. Αυτός είναι και ο λόγος που επενδύουν κυρίως στα κράτη μέλη με δυνατές οικονομίες, και όχι σε εκείνα που χρειάζονται στήριξη για επανεκκίνηση της οικονομίας τους. Το πρόγραμμα του Ευρωπαϊκού Ταμείου Στρατηγικών Επενδύσεων (ΕΤΣΕ) διευρύνει τις κοινωνικές και περιφερειακές ανισότητες και εδραιώνει τα συμφέροντα των μεγάλων πολυεθνικών μονοπωλίων. Δεν εξυπηρετεί τις ανάγκες των λαών της ΕΕ, οι οποίοι φτωχοποιούνται μέσα από τις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές λιτότητας του Συμφώνου Σταθερότητας και Ανάπτυξης. Το γεγονός ότι στην έκθεση αναγράφεται πως «τα μέχρι στιγμής αποτελέσματα του ταμείου δεν μπορούν να αξιολογηθούν επαρκώς», δικαιώνει τη διακηρυγμένη κριτική της Ομάδας της GUE/NGL προς το πακέτο Γιούνκερ. Επαναλαμβάνουμε πως για να υπάρξει κοινωνική ανάπτυξη, το επενδυτικό πακέτο πρέπει να στηριχτεί σε δημόσιες μακροχρόνιες επενδύσεις στην πραγματική οικονομία, οι οποίες θα διασφαλίσουν τη δημιουργία μόνιμων αξιοπρεπών θέσεων εργασίας με πλήρη εργασιακά δικαιώματα. Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους καταψηφίσαμε την επέκτασή του.
2016/11/22
Towards a digital trade strategy (A8-0384/2017 - Marietje Schaake) EL

Στόχος της έκθεσης είναι να αρθούν τα κανονιστικά εμπόδια και οι φραγμοί που υπάρχουν στη δράση των πολυεθνικών στο ηλεκτρονικό εμπόριο με σκοπό να επενδύουν και να δρουν με μεγαλύτερο κέρδος εντός αλλά και εκτός της ΕΕ. Η ψηφιακή ατζέντα δε, η οποία σύμφωνα με την έκθεση πρέπει να προωθηθεί στις πολιτικές της ΕΕ, αποτελεί απάντηση στους στόχους των μεγάλων ευρωπαϊκών επιχειρήσεων και μονοπωλίων για ακόμη μεγαλύτερη ενίσχυση της επιχειρηματικής τους δραστηριότητας, για μαζικές εξοικονομήσεις στην κλίμακα της παραγωγής, και εν τέλει για αύξηση των επιχειρηματικών τους κερδών. Οι στόχοι αυτοί θα επιτευχθούν μέσω της ψηφιακής ενιαίας αγοράς με την ενίσχυση της ανταγωνιστικότητας, την ολοκλήρωση της ενιαίας αγοράς και την άρση των κρατικών ρυθμίσεων. Ιδιαίτερα αρνητική όμως είναι και η πρόταση της έκθεσης να επαναρχίσουν επειγόντως οι διαπραγματεύσεις για την συμφωνία ελευθέρου εμπορίου TiSA, που αποτελεί μορφή προστατευτισμού και στήριξης των συμφερόντων των πολυεθνικών.Υποστηρίζουμε την τεχνολογική ανάπτυξη, αλλά όχι υπό αυτές τις συνθήκες. Πρωταρχικός στόχος της ψηφιακής αγοράς και του ψηφιακού εμπορίου θα έπρεπε να ήταν η χρήση των δυνατοτήτων της τεχνολογίας για την βελτίωση της ποιότητας ζωής των ανθρώπων και την ενίσχυση των δικαιωμάτων των καταναλωτών αλλά και των εργαζομένων. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast) (A8-0345/2017 - Cecilia Wikström) EL

Για να σταματήσει το έγκλημα εις βάρος των προσφύγων πρέπει να αντιταχθούμε στον απάνθρωπο χαρακτήρα της Ευρώπης-φρουρίου. Να καταργηθεί το «Δουβλίνο II», να δημιουργηθεί ένα κοινό, δίκαιο σύστημα ασύλου στηριγμένο στην έμπρακτη αλληλεγγύη και να δημιουργηθούν νόμιμοι και ασφαλείς οδοί, καθώς και ένα μόνιμο, δεσμευτικό και δίκαιο σύστημα μετεγκατάστασης των προσφύγων. Η πρόταση του Κοινοβουλίου εμπεριέχει αρκετά από αυτά που πρέπει να γίνουν και σίγουρα είναι κατά πολύ καλύτερη και ισοζυγισμένη από την πρόταση της Επιτροπής. Γι’ αυτό και υπερψηφίσαμε το κείμενο που ζητά να αρχίσουν οι διαπραγματεύσεις για την αναθεώρηση των κριτηρίων για την παροχή διεθνούς προστασίας.
2016/11/22
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Consent) (A8-0327/2017 - Charles Tannock) EL

Οι δύο εκθέσεις αφορούν τη συμφωνία εταιρικής σχέσης για τις σχέσεις και τη συνεργασία ΕΕ-Νέας Ζηλανδίας. Η πρώτη αφορά την έγκριση εκ μέρους του Κοινοβουλίου της σύναψης αυτής της συμφωνίας και η δεύτερη είναι ψήφισμα σχετικά με αυτό. Η διαχρονική μας στάση είναι ότι τέτοιες συμφωνίες οδηγούν σε συμφωνίες ελευθέρων συναλλαγών, όπως καταγράφεται ως στόχος και στο ψήφισμα, με όσα αρνητικά αυτές επιφέρουν στους λαούς. Ωστόσο, η στάση μας ανέκαθεν ήταν ότι δεν εναντιωνόμαστε σε τέτοιες συμφωνίες εφόσον αυτές αποτελούν την επιθυμία των δημοκρατικά εκλεγμένων κυβερνήσεων των χωρών, σεβόμενοι την κυριαρχία τους και το δικαίωμά τους να συνάπτουν συμφωνίες τις οποίες θεωρούν προς όφελός τους.
2016/11/22
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0333/2017 - Charles Tannock) EL

Οι δύο εκθέσεις αφορούν τη συμφωνία εταιρικής σχέσης για τις σχέσεις και τη συνεργασία ΕΕ-Νέας Ζηλανδίας. Η πρώτη αφορά την έγκριση, εκ μέρους του Κοινοβουλίου, της σύναψης αυτής της συμφωνίας και η δεύτερη είναι ψήφισμα σχετικά με αυτό. Η διαχρονική μας στάση είναι ότι τέτοιες συμφωνίες οδηγούν σε συμφωνίες ελευθέρων συναλλαγών, όπως καταγράφεται ως στόχος και στο ψήφισμα, με όσα αρνητικά αυτές επιφέρουν στους λαούς. Ωστόσο, η στάση μας ανέκαθεν ήταν ότι δεν εναντιωνόμαστε σε τέτοιες συμφωνίες εφόσον αυτές αποτελούν την επιθυμία των δημοκρατικά εκλεγμένων κυβερνήσεων των χωρών, σεβόμενοι την κυριαρχία τους και το δικαίωμά τους να συνάπτουν συμφωνίες τις οποίες θεωρούν προς όφελός τους.
2016/11/22
The EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development (A8-0334/2017 - Maurice Ponga) EL

Η έκθεση προωθεί τις ισχύουσες συμφωνίες οικονομικής εταιρικής σχέσης μεταξύ ΕΕ-Αφρικής, τις πολιτικές μετανάστευσης, τις εταιρικές σχέσεις δημόσιου και ιδιωτικού τομέα και την εξωτερική πολιτική και πολιτική ασφάλειας της ΕΕ στην Αφρική, με τις οποίες διαχρονικά διαφωνούμε. Ως εκ τούτου, καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2016 (A8-0328/2017 - Marlene Mizzi) EL

Πρόκειται περί μιας προοδευτικής έκθεσης, αφού αναγνωρίζει τις τρέχουσες και πρωτοφανείς προκλήσεις που αντιμετωπίζει η ΕΕ, όπως η ανεργία, οι οικονομικές και κοινωνικές ανισότητες, η μεταναστευτική κρίση και το Brexit, ενώ τονίζει παράλληλα την ανάγκη βελτίωσης του κοινωνικού διαλόγου. Σημειώνει τις διαπιστώσεις του Διαμεσολαβητή για περιπτώσεις κακοδιοίκησης όσον αφορά τον κώδικα συμπεριφοράς των Επιτρόπων. Τονίζει τη σημασία των υψηλών ηθικών και ηθικών προτύπων στο εσωτερικό της διοίκησης της ΕΕ και υποστηρίζει τις συστάσεις του Διαμεσολαβητή για περαιτέρω αναθεώρηση του κώδικα. Τέλος, υπογραμμίζει την ανάγκη παρακολούθησης της εφαρμογής των συστάσεων του Διαμεσολαβητή για τη διαφάνεια των τριμερών διαλόγων. Καλεί το Συμβούλιο και την Επιτροπή να δημοσιεύσουν σχετικές πληροφορίες σχετικά με τις αποφάσεις που λαμβάνονται στους τριμερείς διαλόγους. Ως εκ τούτου, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Environmental Implementation Review (EIR) (B8-0590/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα επισημαίνει ότι η εφαρμογή της περιβαλλοντικής πολιτικής της ΕΕ θα πρέπει να είναι ένα από τα εργαλεία που χρησιμοποιούνται για να επιτευχθεί μεγαλύτερη συνοχή με τους στόχους της βιώσιμης ανάπτυξης και να λειτουργήσει ως μηχανισμός έγκαιρης προειδοποίησης για τους αρμόδιους για τη λήψη αποφάσεων και, σε τελική ανάλυση, να βελτιώσει την εφαρμογή της ευρωπαϊκής περιβαλλοντικής νομοθεσίας και της ευρωπαϊκής περιβαλλοντικής πολιτικής. Ιδιαίτερη αναφορά γίνεται σε διάφορα μέτρα που πρέπει να προωθηθούν ώστε η εφαρμογή της περιβαλλοντικής πολιτικής να αποδώσει καλύτερα αποτελέσματα, αλλά και σε προτάσεις για να βελτιωθεί η εφαρμογή της περιβαλλοντικής νομοθεσίας. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα.
2016/11/22
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (A8-0340/2017 - Javi López) EL

Στα θετικά της έκθεσης εντάσσονται οι υποενότητές της που αφορούν τη «βελτίωση των εργασιακών και κοινωνικών συνθηκών», την «ενδυνάμωση του κοινωνικού κράτους και την κοινωνική προστασία», την «καταπολέμηση της φτώχειας και του κοινωνικού αποκλεισμού» και την «ισότητα των φύλων». Επίσης, πολύ θετικές μπορούν να χαρακτηριστούν οι προτάσεις για καθολική πρόσβαση στην υγεία, την παιδεία και τις κοινωνικές παροχές στη βάση των προτάσεων της ILO, οι προτάσεις για διαχείριση της φοροαποφυγής κάτω από τον ΟΗΕ, και η ανάγκη επενδύσεων σε κοινωνικούς τομείς. Τα αρνητικά της έκθεσης μπορούν να κωδικοποιηθούν στη σταθερή υποστήριξη της δημοσιονομικής πειθαρχίας και του ευρωπαϊκού εξαμήνου, όπως επίσης και στη στήριξη της κοινής νομισματικής πολιτικής. Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση διότι περιέχει αρκετά θετικά στοιχεία για την καταπολέμηση των κοινωνικών ανισοτήτων.
2016/11/22
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0236/2017 - Salvatore Cicu) EL

Η αύξηση δασμών σε προϊόντα από τρίτες χώρες είναι ένα μέτρο που, προσωρινά, μπορεί εν μέρει να προστατεύσει τις βιομηχανίες της ΕΕ και χιλιάδες θέσεις εργασίας. Ωστόσο, οι νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές είναι το βασικό πρόβλημα που οδηγεί στο κλείσιμο των βιομηχανιών και στην ανεργία των εργαζομένων. Με την επιβολή αυστηρότερων δασμών στα προϊόντα τα οποία προέρχονται από τρίτες χώρες που, όπως αναφέρεται, δεν στηρίζονται στους «κανόνες της αγοράς» αλλά προωθούν τις κρατικές επιδοτήσεις και τη συμμετοχή του κράτους στις επιχειρήσεις, αυτοί που επωφελούνται είναι οι μεγάλες πολυεθνικές και το κεφάλαιο (εντός και εκτός ΕΕ), που στηρίζεται πλήρως στους κανόνες αγοράς του καπιταλιστικού συστήματος.Ωστόσο, το κείμενο περιλαμβάνει επίσης πολύ σημαντικές αναφορές, όπως είναι η ανάγκη οι χώρες εξαγωγής των προϊόντων να τηρούν τους κανόνες της Διεθνούς Οργάνωσης Εργασίας, καθώς και τα περιβαλλοντικά πρότυπα. Για τους λόγους αυτούς τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Rule of law in Malta (B8-0596/2017, B8-0597/2017) EL

Η δολοφονία της δημοσιογράφου Daphne Caruana Galizia, στις 16 Οκτωβρίου, έφερε ξανά στην επικαιρότητα το τραύμα στο κράτος δικαίου της Μάλτας, το οποίο είναι διαχρονικό και έρχεται σε μία χρονική συγκυρία όπου οι κατηγορίες και οι αποκαλύψεις των εγγράφων του Παναμά για τον ρόλο της χώρας στο κύκλωμα της παγκόσμιας φοροδιαφυγής εντείνονται.Ένα σημαντικό πρόβλημα που υπογραμμίζεται στο ψήφισμα είναι το βεβαρημένο ιστορικό της Μάλτας όσον αφορά την αντιμετώπιση πολλών σοβαρών καταγγελιών για διαφθορά και παραβίαση των υποχρεώσεων σε θέματα καταπολέμησης της νομιμοποίησης εσόδων από παράνομες δραστηριότητες και της εποπτείας των τραπεζών, καθώς η αστυνομία δεν διεξάγει τις απαραίτητες έρευνες και η Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) βρίσκεται υπό πολιτική πίεση. Ως εκ τούτου, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-0593/2017) EL

Η εν λόγω έκθεση προωθεί διάφορες προτάσεις νεοφιλελεύθερων πολιτικών που πλήττουν τα συμφέροντα των λαών και εξυπηρετούν αποκλειστικά τις κυρίαρχες δυνάμεις της αγοράς. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Eastern Partnership: November 2017 Summit (A8-0308/2017 - Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Knut Fleckenstein) EL

Η έκθεση αφορά την ανατολική γειτονία της ΕΕ. Αφορά μια περιοχή που, δυστυχώς, λόγω των ανταγωνισμών έχει υποφέρει, και μαζί της υποφέρουν οι λαοί που κατοικούν εκεί. Η έκθεση δυστυχώς ενισχύει αυτές τις αντιπαραθέσεις, επιμένει στην περαιτέρω αντιπαράθεση με τη Ρωσία και προτείνονται πολιτικές στρατιωτικοποίησης της περιοχής και μακροικονομικής συνδρομής στις χώρες της περιοχής, με στόχο να έρθουν πιο κοντά στην ΕΕ. Αυτές οι πολιτικές είναι, δυστυχώς, επικίνδυνες και, σε τελική ανάλυση, οι μόνοι που δεν ωφελούνται είναι οι λαοί της ανατολικής γειτονίας. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (B8-0589/2017) EL

Το εκτενές σχέδιο δράσης αποσκοπεί στην ταχεία βελτίωση της πρακτικής εφαρμογής των οδηγιών για τη φύση και στην επιτάχυνση της προόδου για την επίτευξη του στόχου της ΕΕ για το 2020, δηλαδή την ανάσχεση και την αντιστροφή της απώλειας βιοποικιλότητας και υπηρεσιών οικοσυστήματος, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της ανθεκτικότητας στην αλλαγή του κλίματος και του μετριασμού της. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/004 IT/Almaviva (A8-0346/2017 - Daniele Viotti) EL

Όπως και στις πλείστες των περιπτώσεων ψηφοφοριών για το ταμείο προσαρμογής στην Παγκοσμιοποίηση, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση. Η θέση μας όμως παραμένει σταθερή: ότι το ταμείο δεν απαντά στο πρόβλημα της μαζικής απόλυσης εργαζομένων και της ανεργίας. Γι’ αυτά η απάντηση βρίσκεται σε ολοκληρωμένες κρατικές πολιτικές με δημόσιες επενδύσεις για επαναβιομηχανοποίηση, ενδυνάμωση του κοινωνικού κράτους και δημιουργία αξιοπρεπών και ασφαλών θέσεων εργασίας.
2016/11/22
Saving lives: boosting car safety in the EU (A8-0330/2017 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch) EL

Η έκθεση ζητά υποχρεωτική χρήση συστημάτων υποστήριξης των οδηγών σε όλα τα καινούργια οχήματα. Κάθε χρόνο, χιλιάδες άνθρωποι χάνουν τη ζωή τους στην άσφαλτο και εκατοντάδες χιλιάδες τραυματίζονται. Πολλά από αυτά τα ατυχήματα θα μπορούσαν να έχουν αποφευχθεί με τη χρήση συστημάτων υποβοήθησης οδηγού. Στο κείμενο ζητείται η χρήση των προηγμένων συστημάτων σε όλους τους τύπους αυτοκινήτων. Προκειμένου να μειωθεί το κόστος και να γίνει προσιτή η χρήση των συστημάτων σε όλους τους τύπους οχημάτων, προτείνεται η υποχρεωτική ενσωμάτωση αυτόματης υποβοήθησης πέδησης έκτακτης ανάγκης με ανίχνευση πεζών, ποδηλατών, μηχανοκίνητων δίκυκλων και μοτοσικλετιστών σε αυτοκίνητα. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation (A8-0338/2016 - Gesine Meissner) EL

Όλα τα κράτη μέλη που διαθέτουν εσωτερική ναυσιπλοΐα θα πρέπει να αναγνωρίσουν το πιστοποιητικό της ΕΕ για τα επαγγελματικά προσόντα στην επικράτειά τους. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε το κείμενο που περιέχει πολλές θετικές προτάσεις προς αυτήν την κατεύθυνση.
2016/11/22
Cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (A8-0077/2017 - Olga Sehnalová) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση διότι ο υφιστάμενος μηχανισμός για την προστασία των καταναλωτών ενισχύεται περαιτέρω, βελτιώνοντας έτσι την προστασία των καταναλωτών και τηρώντας παράλληλα την αρχή της επικουρικότητας.
2016/11/22
Action plan on retail financial services (A8-0326/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson) EL

Παρόλο που η μεγαλύτερη διαφάνεια και ασφάλεια των πολιτών όσον αφορά χρηματοπιστωτικές υπηρεσίες είναι θεμιτή, εντούτοις, με τον τρόπο που γίνεται στο πλαίσιο της χρηματοπιστωτικής ένωσης, προωθείται όλο και περισσότερο η συσσώρευση κεφαλαίου και δύναμης στους μεγάλους χρηματοπιστωτικούς ομίλους. Στόχος της Επιτροπής δεν είναι άλλος από τη στήριξη αυτών των ομίλων για την περαιτέρω ανταγωνιστικότητά τους σε παγκόσμιο επίπεδο, απέναντι σε αμερικανικούς, κινεζικούς, ρωσικούς και άλλους ομίλους/τράπεζες. Λόγω της διαφωνίας μας με την εμβάθυνση της χρηματοπιστωτικής πολιτικής της ΕΕ σε ενωσιακό επίπεδο, καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation (A8-0387/2016 - Paul Tang) EL

Η έκθεση αφορά την τιτλοποίηση μετοχών και τη συμμετοχή στο χρηματιστήριο. Το ενιαίο πλαίσιο που προτείνεται εντάσσεται στην κοινή τραπεζική και δημοσιονομική ένωση με την οποία διαφωνούμε κάθετα. Θεωρούμε πως προωθεί την διασφάλιση των κερδών του τραπεζικού και του μεγάλου κεφαλαίου εις βάρος των εργαζομένων. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (A8-0388/2016 - Othmar Karas) EL

Η συγκεκριμένη έκθεση εντάσσεται στα πλαίσια της κοινής τραπεζικής και δημοσιονομικής ένωσης με την οποία διαφωνούμε κάθετα. Θεωρούμε πως προωθεί τη διασφάλιση των κερδών του τραπεζικού και του μεγάλου κεφαλαίου εις βάρος των εργαζομένων. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU (RC-B8-0576/2017, B8-0576/2017, B8-0577/2017, B8-0578/2017, B8-0579/2017, B8-0580/2017, B8-0581/2017, B8-0582/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα καταδικάζει απερίφραστα όλες τις μορφές σεξουαλικής βίας, αποδοκιμάζει την ευκολία με την οποία γίνονται ανεκτές οι πράξεις αυτές και ζητά τη δίωξη των δραστών. Επίσης, επαναλαμβάνει την έκκληση του Ευρωκοινοβουλίου προς την Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή να προωθήσει μια συνολική στρατηγική της ΕΕ και να υποβάλει πρόταση οδηγίας για την καταπολέμηση όλων των μορφών έμφυλης βίας, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της σεξουαλικής παρενόχλησης και της σεξουαλικής βίας κατά των γυναικών και των κοριτσιών. Ιδιαίτερη αναφορά γίνεται στις βασικές δράσεις για την καταπολέμηση της σεξουαλικής παρενόχλησης, μεταξύ των οποίων η αντιμετώπιση των θεμάτων της ανεπαρκούς καταγγελίας και του κοινωνικού στιγματισμού και η καθιέρωση διαδικασιών λογοδοσίας στον χώρο εργασίας. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with Australia (A8-0311/2017 - Daniel Caspary) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση για τη συμφωνία με την Αυστραλία αφού θεωρούμε ότι, όπως και οι συμφωνίες CETA, TTIP, JEFTA και TiSA, θα δώσει προτεραιότητα στα εταιρικά συμφέροντα έναντι των συμφερόντων των λαών. Αν και η προστασία των επενδύσεων (ICS) θα έχει διαφορετική συμφωνία, οι εμπορικές συμφωνίες εξακολουθούν να περιλαμβάνουν κανονιστική συνεργασία και μηχανισμό που υπονομεύει τη δημοκρατία, καθώς θεσμοποιεί την εταιρική εξουσία σε σχέση με τους κανονισμούς και τη νομοθεσία. Επιπρόσθετα, τα πρότυπα για τα περιβαλλοντικά θέματα, την ασφάλεια των τροφίμων, τα εργασιακά δικαιώματα και ούτω καθεξής θα βρεθούν υπό πίεση.
2016/11/22
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with New Zealand (A8-0312/2017 - Daniel Caspary) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση για τη συμφωνία με τη Νέα Ζηλανδία αφού θεωρούμε ότι, όπως και οι συμφωνίες CETA, TTIP, JEFTA και TiSA, θα δώσει προτεραιότητα στα εταιρικά συμφέροντα έναντι των συμφερόντων των λαών. Αν και η προστασία των επενδύσεων (ICS) θα έχει διαφορετική συμφωνία, οι εμπορικές συμφωνίες εξακολουθούν να περιλαμβάνουν κανονιστική συνεργασία και μηχανισμό που υπονομεύει τη δημοκρατία, καθώς θεσμοποιεί την εταιρική εξουσία σε σχέση με τους κανονισμούς και τη νομοθεσία. Επιπρόσθετα, τα πρότυπα για τα περιβαλλοντικά θέματα, την ασφάλεια των τροφίμων, τα εργασιακά δικαιώματα και ούτω καθεξής θα βρεθούν υπό πίεση.
2016/11/22
Draft general budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections EL

Ως ΕΕΑ/ΒΠΑ καταψηφίζουμε τον γενικό προϋπολογισμό της Ένωσης αφού αποτελεί τρόπο επιβολής της λιτότητας και της διάλυσης του κοινωνικού κράτους.
2016/11/22
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (A8-0299/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth) EL

Στη συγκεκριμένη έκθεση ψηφίστηκε ο έλεγχος του Ευρωπαϊκού Συμβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου των Υπουργών αναφορικά με έργα και δαπάνες διοικητικού περιεχομένου. Στηρίζοντας διαφανείς διαδικασίες ελέγχου των δαπανών, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0291/2017 - Bart Staes) EL

Στη συγκεκριμένη έκθεση ψηφίστηκε ο έλεγχος του Ευρωπαϊκού Συμβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου των Υπουργών αναφορικά με έργα και δαπάνες διοικητικού περιεχομένου. Στηρίζοντας διαφανείς διαδικασίες ελέγχου των δαπανών, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens (A8-0064/2017 - Marita Ulvskog) EL

Παρόλο που η έκθεση δεν μας βρίσκει απολύτως σύμφωνους με το αρκετά χαμηλό επίπεδο καρκινογενών και μεταλλαξιογόνων ουσιών που προτείνεται, εντούτοις θεωρούμε πως η συμφωνία που επιτεύχθηκε μεταξύ συντεχνιών και Επιτροπής (που επικύρωσε και το Κοινοβούλιο) είναι βήμα προς τη σωστή κατεύθυνση. Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism (A8-0294/2017 - Soraya Post) EL

Στην έκθεση προωθούνται διάφορα μέτρα ώστε να σταματήσει η πατερναλιστική αντιμετώπιση των Ρομά, τόσο σε λεκτικό επίπεδο όσο και σε επίπεδο πράξεων. Επί της ουσίας τονίζεται πως πρέπει να διασφαλιστεί η πρόσβαση και η άσκηση των θεμελιωδών ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων των Ρομά και να σταματήσει η κάθε είδους διάκριση. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (A8-0303/2017 - Dominique Riquet) EL

Στόχος της συμφωνίας είναι να προχωρήσει προς την ευθυγράμμιση της νομοθεσίας στον τομέα των αεροπορικών μεταφορών και στις δύο πλευρές, ιδίως όσον αφορά βασικές πτυχές των ευρωπαϊκών αερομεταφορών, συμπεριλαμβανομένων εκείνων που αφορούν την ασφάλεια, την οικονομική ρύθμιση, και ιδίως τον ανταγωνισμό, τον έλεγχο της εναέριας κυκλοφορίας και την προστασία των καταναλωτών. Το Μαρόκο θεωρεί το έδαφος της Δυτικής Σαχάρας ως αναπόσπαστο τμήμα της εθνικής του επικράτειας, και το εδαφικό πεδίο εφαρμογής της συμφωνίας των αεροπορικών μεταφορών ΕΕ-Μαρόκου περιλαμβάνει τη Δυτική Σαχάρα. Καταψηφίσαμε λοιπόν την έκθεση καθώς, όσον αφορά την Δυτική Σαχάρα, πρέπει να τονιστεί πως πρόκειται για κατεχόμενα εδάφη και για τα οποία πρέπει να εφαρμοστούν τα σχετικά ψηφίσματα του ΟΗΕ ώστε να υπάρξει πλήρης σεβασμός των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων των Σαχαράουι.
2016/11/22
Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking: financial contributions (A8-0293/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Ο προϋπολογισμός της κοινής επιχείρησης βιομηχανιών βιοπροϊόντων κανονικά θα έπρεπε να μοιράζεται μεταξύ της ΕΕ και της κοινοπραξίας βιομηχανιών βιοπροϊόντων. Ωστόσο, οι ιδιώτες δεν εκπληρώνουν τις υποχρεώσεις τους και παρατηρείται χαμηλή ιδιωτική χρηματοδοτική συμμετοχή. Γι’ αυτό η Κομισιόν προτείνει να αλλάξει ο κανονισμός και να επιτρέπεται στα μέλη της κοινοπραξίας βιομηχανιών βιοπροϊόντων να συνεισφέρουν άμεσα σε μεμονωμένα έργα στο πλαίσιο του συνολικού προγράμματος της ΚΕ BBI έτσι ώστε να στηρίζουν μονάχα τα έργα από τα οποία θεωρούν πως θα έχουν άμεσο όφελος. Ο εναλλακτικός τρόπος χρηματοδότησης που προτείνεται από την Κομισιόν, υποστηρίζεται από την εν λόγω. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση επειδή καμία άλλη αλλαγή δεν επιτράπηκε δε να γίνει στον κανονισμό και ως αποτέλεσμα δεν υπάρχει η δυνατότητα για πραγματική βελτίωση όσον αφορά την αξιοποίηση της δημόσιας στήριξης, το πεδίο εφαρμογής και τον προσανατολισμό των ερευνητικών δραστηριοτήτων που χρηματοδοτούνται ώστε να εξυπηρετούνται οι ανάγκες και τα συμφέροντα της κοινωνίας. Το νέο σύστημα που προτείνεται για την ιδιωτική χρηματοδότηση στην κοινή επιχείρηση βιομηχανιών βιοπροϊόντων καταστρατηγεί τον αρχικό στόχο που τέθηκε για χρηματοδότησης της έρευνας με πιθανά οφέλη για την κοινωνία, δεδομένου ότι παρέχει κίνητρα για την καταβολή συνεισφορών μόνο στα έργα τα οποία θα αποφέρουν άμεσα όφελος στις επιχειρήσεις. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
CE marked fertilising products (A8-0270/2017 - Mihai Ţurcanu) EL

Τηρήσαμε αποχή στην έκθεση αφού περιλαμβάνει αρκετά στοιχεία που είναι ασυμβίβαστα με τον γενικό στόχο αύξησης της χρήσης ανακυκλωμένων θρεπτικών ουσιών. Έχει ως αποτέλεσμα από τη μία πλευρά τον αποκλεισμό των βιολογικών αποβλήτων για τα προϊόντα λιπασματοποίησης με σήμανση CE και από την άλλη θα τοποθετούσε έτσι το Κοινοβούλιο ενάντια στους συνολικούς στόχους της κυκλικής οικονομίας.
2016/11/22
Renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0567/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα εκφράζει την αντίθεσή του στην πρόταση της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής για ανανέωση της αμφιλεγόμενης άδειας κυκλοφορίας των ζιζανιοκτόνων που περιέχουν γλυφοσάτη για δέκα χρόνια. Στο ψήφισμα τονίζεται επίσης πως πρέπει να υπάρξει πλήρης απαγόρευση της χρήσης της γλυφοσάτης σε οικιακά προϊόντα και απαγόρευσή της στον γεωργικό τομέα έως το 2022, εφαρμογή άμεσων περιορισμών στη χρήση της εν λόγω δραστικής ουσίας και δημοσιοποίηση των αξιολογήσεων που εκπονούνται αναφορικά με τους σχετικούς κινδύνους. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 5/2017: financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development and increasing the Emergency Aid Reserve (A8-0301/2017 - Jens Geier) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε τη συγκεκριμένη πρόταση για τον λόγο ότι στο όνομα της αναπτυξιακής βοήθειας, χρηματοδοτούνται αγορές πολεμικού εξοπλισμού και δημιουργούνται οργανισμοί αποσταθεροποίησης των αναπτυσσόμενων περιοχών.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to provide the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (A8-0298/2017 - Jens Geier) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε τη συγκεκριμένη πρόταση για τον λόγο ότι στο όνομα της αναπτυξιακής βοήθειας, χρηματοδοτούνται αγορές πολεμικού εξοπλισμού και δημιουργούνται οργανισμοί αποσταθεροποίησης των αναπτυσσόμενων περιοχών.
2016/11/22
Reflection paper on the future of EU finances (B8-0565/2017) EL

Η έκθεση δεν μπορούσε να μας βρει σύμφωνους, αφού χαιρέτιζε τις σημερινές οικονομικές πολιτικές της ένωσης και ζητούσε τη συνέχιση, αν όχι την εμβάθυνση τους. Το μέλλον των οικονομικών πολιτικών της ΕΕ δεν μπορεί να είναι άλλο από τις δημόσιες επενδύσεις και την ενίσχυση του κοινωνικού κράτους. Μια απλή αύξηση του προϋπολογισμού με βάση τις σημερινές πολιτικές προτεραιότητες της Ένωσης, απλά θα συνεχίσει τον φαύλο κύκλο λιτότητας και απορρύθμισης. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Legitimate measures to protect whistle-blowers acting in the public interest (A8-0295/2017 - Virginie Rozière) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αφού πρόκειται για μια προοδευτική έκθεση η οποία καλύπτει τις ανησυχίες της ομάδας μας όσον αφορά την προστασία των καταγγελτών που ενεργούν προς το δημόσιο συμφέρον. Η υπό αναφορά έκθεση κάνει ρητές αναφορές σχετικά με την αναγκαιότητα δημιουργίας ενός συνεπούς και αξιόπιστου συστήματος που να επιτρέπει την παράδοση των αναφορών εντός του οργανισμού, στις αρμόδιες αρχές και εκτός του οργανισμού. Τα κανάλια αναφοράς πρέπει να διασφαλίζουν την ανωνυμία του καταγγέλλοντα και την απαραίτητη εμπιστευτικότητα κατά τη διάρκεια της επεξεργασίας της καταγγελίας. Το πλαίσιο θα πρέπει επίσης να εξασφαλίζει την προστασία από ενδεχόμενες άμεσες ή έμμεσες πιέσεις ή και αντίποινα από τον εργοδότη, καθώς και ψυχολογική και οικονομική στήριξη, εφόσον ζητηθεί. Γίνεται επίσης αναφορά στη δημιουργία μιας ευρωπαϊκής οντότητας/μηχανισμού που θα διευκολύνει την καταγγελία πρακτικών που θέτουν σε κίνδυνο το δημόσιο συμφέρον, ιδίως σε διασυνοριακές περιπτώσεις, προκειμένου να διευκολυνθεί η ανταλλαγή πληροφοριών και βέλτιστων πρακτικών μεταξύ των αρμόδιων οργάνων των κρατών μελών. Προτείνεται να ανατεθεί στον Ευρωπαίο Διαμεσολαβητή αυτό το καθήκον. Τέλος, υπάρχει επίσης σαφής αναφορά ότι η προστασία των πηγών για τον δημοσιογράφο είναι μια βασική αρχή που πρέπει να προστατευθεί προκειμένου να διασφαλιστεί η ελευθερία του Τύπου.
2016/11/22
Minimum income policies as a tool for fighting poverty (A8-0292/2017 - Laura Agea) EL

Παρόλη τη συνέχεια της συζήτησης που πρέπει να γίνει αναφορικά με τα ελάχιστα εγγυημένα εισοδήματα, θεωρούμε πως η έκθεση άγγιξε τον κύριο προβληματισμό μας που είναι η καταπολέμηση της φτώχιας. Υποστηρίζει την πρωτοβουλία των κρατών μελών, αντί γενικά μονολιθικές πολιτικές της Ένωσης, και υπογραμμίζει την ανάγκη δημόσιων κοινωνικών επενδύσεων ενάντια στη λιτότητα. Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Enhanced cooperation: European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0290/2017 - Barbara Matera) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση, αφού αρκετές ανησυχίες μας που αφορούσαν την ανάγκη δημιουργίας του υπό αναφορά οργανισμού δεν ικανοποιήθηκαν/τεκμηριώθηκαν από την Επιτροπή/Εισηγήτρια. Όπως για παράδειγμα ο ισχυρισμός ότι η αναγκαιότητα της δημιουργίας αυτού του νέου υπερεθνικού φορέα ήταν αποτέλεσμα της ελλιπούς συνεργασίας της OLAF με τα κράτη μέλη. Επιπρόσθετα και πέραν από ζητήματα επικουρικότητας υπήρχε και η διαφωνία σειράς κρατών-μελών (9 τον αριθμό) για την αναγκαιότητα του θεσμού. Τέλος η έκθεση δεν παρουσίασε με σαφήνεια τον τρόπο με τον οποίο θα σχετίζεται ο φορέας με την Eurojust και τα εθνικά δικαστήρια των κρατών μελών που δεν αποτελούν μέρος της EPPO (ως εκ τούτου υπάρχει μεγάλη ανησυχία ότι θα προκαλέσει μεγάλη παρέμβαση στα εθνικά δικαστήρια).
2016/11/22
Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation (A8-0279/2017 - Javier Couso Permuy) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση για τη σύσταση Διεθνούς Ιδρύματος Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και Λατινικής Αμερικής και Καραϊβικής. Το Ίδρυμα υπάρχει από το 2011, ωστόσο μέσω αυτής της απόφασης, η οποία είναι η κατάληξη των διαπραγματεύσεων που διεξήγαγε η Επιτροπή, το Ίδρυμα γίνεται διεθνής οργανισμός με μέλη την ΕΕ, τα κράτη μέλη και τα κράτη της Λατινικής Αμερικής και Καραϊβικής.
2016/11/22
Schengen acquis provisions relating to the Visa Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0286/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra) EL

Δεν είμαστε ενάντια στον χώρο Σένγκεν (ελεύθερη διακίνηση), αλλά είμαστε ενάντια στον τρόπο συλλογής των στοιχείων, στη δημιουργία και τη χρήση των βάσεων δεδομένων (ευρωφακέλωμα). Γι’ αυτό και διαφωνούμε με την επέκταση του χώρου Σένγκεν αλλά επίσης σεβόμαστε και το αίτημα μιας χώρας να ενταχθεί σε αυτό. Γι’ αυτό και τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in the Czech Republic (A8-0288/2017 - Maria Grapini) EL

Οι αυτοματοποιημένες ανταλλαγές προσωπικών δεδομένων άρχισαν από τη λεγόμενη απόφαση Prüm (απόφαση του Ευρωπαϊκού Συμβουλίου της 23ης Ιουνίου 2008) για την καταπολέμηση της τρομοκρατίας. Γεννήθηκε προφανώς από την πολιτική μεγαλύτερης συλλογής και ανταλλαγής προσωπικών δεδομένων στα πλαίσια του «πολέμου ενάντια στην τρομοκρατία». Ως Ομάδα της Αριστεράς ζητήσαμε και συνεχίζουμε να ζητούμε εδώ και χρόνια από την Επιτροπή και τα κράτη μέλη μια ανάλυση και μια αξιολόγηση αντικτύπου των αποτελεσμάτων των αντιτρομοκρατικών νόμων που θεσπίστηκαν σε αυτό το πλαίσιο. Δυστυχώς δεν εισακουστήκαμε, και είναι πλέον ξεκάθαρο πως οι νόμοι αυτοί πολλές φορές καταπατούν τον Χάρτη των Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ (και της ΕΕ), ενώ τα αποτελέσματά τους είναι αμφίβολα. Για αυτούς τους λόγους καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Portugal (A8-0289/2017 - Jaromír Štětina) EL

Οι αυτοματοποιημένες ανταλλαγές προσωπικών δεδομένων άρχισαν από τη λεγόμενη απόφαση Prüm (απόφαση του Ευρωπαϊκού Συμβουλίου της 23ης Ιουνίου 2008) για την καταπολέμηση της τρομοκρατίας. Γεννήθηκε προφανώς από την πολιτική μεγαλύτερης συλλογής και ανταλλαγής προσωπικών δεδομένων στα πλαίσια του «πολέμου ενάντια στην τρομοκρατία». Ως Ομάδα της Αριστεράς ζητήσαμε και συνεχίζουμε να ζητούμε εδώ και χρόνια από την Επιτροπή και τα κράτη μέλη μια ανάλυση και μια αξιολόγηση αντικτύπου των αποτελεσμάτων των αντιτρομοκρατικών νόμων που θεσπίστηκαν σε αυτό το πλαίσιο. Δυστυχώς δεν εισακουστήκαμε, και είναι πλέον ξεκάθαρο πως οι νόμοι αυτοί πολλές φορές καταπατούν τον Χάρτη των Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ (και της ΕΕ), ενώ τα αποτελέσματά τους είναι αμφίβολα. Για αυτούς τους λόγους καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Greece (A8-0287/2017 - Claude Moraes) EL

Οι αυτοματοποιημένες ανταλλαγές προσωπικών δεδομένων άρχισαν από τη λεγόμενη απόφαση Prüm (απόφαση του Ευρωπαϊκού Συμβουλίου της 23ης Ιουνίου 2008) για την καταπολέμηση της τρομοκρατίας. Γεννήθηκε προφανώς από την πολιτική μεγαλύτερης συλλογής και ανταλλαγής προσωπικών δεδομένων στα πλαίσια του «πολέμου ενάντια στην τρομοκρατία». Ως Ομάδα της Αριστεράς ζητήσαμε και συνεχίζουμε να ζητούμε εδώ και χρόνια από την Επιτροπή και τα κράτη μέλη μια ανάλυση και μια αξιολόγηση αντικτύπου των αποτελεσμάτων των αντιτρομοκρατικών νόμων που θεσπίστηκαν σε αυτό το πλαίσιο. Δυστυχώς δεν εισακουστήκαμε, και είναι πλέον ξεκάθαρο πως οι νόμοι αυτοί πολλές φορές καταπατούν τον Χάρτη των Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ (και της ΕΕ), ενώ τα αποτελέσματά τους είναι αμφίβολα. Για αυτούς τους λόγους καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Safety rules and standards for passenger ships (A8-0167/2017 - Daniela Aiuto) EL

. – Η εν λόγω οδηγία 2009/45/ΕΚ θεσπίζει κανόνες και πρότυπα ασφαλείας για τα νέα και τα υπάρχοντα επιβατηγά πλοία που είναι κατασκευασμένα από χάλυβα και ισοδύναμα υλικά, καθώς και για τα ταχύπλοα σκάφη που εκτελούν εσωτερικά δρομολόγια στα κράτη μέλη της ΕΕ. Η αναθεώρηση των ισχυόντων κανόνων έρχεται μετά από έναν έλεγχο που διενεργήθηκε σχετικά με την καταλληλότητα της ισχύουσας νομοθεσίας για την ασφάλεια των επιβατηγών πλοίων, συμπεριλαμβανομένων διαβουλεύσεων με τα κράτη μέλη και τους ενδιαφερόμενους φορείς. Αυτός ο έλεγχος κατέδειξε ότι ορισμένες αμφισημίες στις νομικές διατάξεις έχουν οδηγήσει σε διαφορετικές ερμηνείες από τις εθνικές αρχές. Η πρόταση που κατατίθεται τώρα αποσκοπεί στην απλούστευση και την αποσαφήνιση των αντίστοιχων απαιτήσεων. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships operating to or from ports of the Member States (A8-0168/2017 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica) EL

Η έκθεση προωθεί διάφορους κανόνες που απλοποιούν τη διαβίβαση πληροφοριών σχετικά με τους επιβάτες σε περίπτωση έκτακτης ανάγκης. Ο κύριος στόχος της συμφωνίας σχετικά με τους κανόνες καταχώρισης των επιβατών είναι να επωφεληθούν από την ψηφιοποίηση για να βελτιωθεί η ασφάλεια των επιβατών στη θάλασσα και η επεξεργασία των προσωπικών τους δεδομένων. Λόγω των προβλημάτων που μπορεί να προκύψουν με την καταχώριση τόσων προσωπικών δεδομένων τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Ending child marriage (B8-0535/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα τονίζει πως οι γάμοι παιδιών αποτελούν παραβίαση των δικαιωμάτων του παιδιού και μορφή βίας κατά των γυναικών και των κοριτσιών. Καλεί λοιπόν την ΕΕ και τα κράτη μέλη να εργαστούν από κοινού με τη Μονάδα του ΟΗΕ για τις Γυναίκες, το Ταμείο των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα Παιδιά, την UNFPA και άλλους εταίρους, για να επισύρουν την προσοχή στο θέμα των γάμων παιδιών, των πρόωρων γάμων και των καταναγκαστικών γάμων, εστιάζοντας στην ενδυνάμωση των γυναικών, μεταξύ άλλων, μέσω της εκπαίδευσης, της οικονομικής ενδυνάμωσης και της ενίσχυσης της συμμετοχής στη λήψη αποφάσεων, καθώς και στην προστασία και την προαγωγή των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων όλων των γυναικών και των κοριτσιών. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα.
2016/11/22
2017 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany (COP23) (B8-0534/2017) EL

Η αδράνεια που επιδείχθηκε μέχρι σήμερα είχε ως αποτέλεσμα τους καταστροφικούς τυφώνες, την όξυνση της ενεργειακής φτώχειας, την περαιτέρω αποψίλωση των δασών, την ανεπανόρθωτη μόλυνση των θαλασσών, τη συνέχιση της καταστροφής του πλανήτη μας. Επίσης, επειδή δεν βάλαμε φραγμό στην ανεξέλεγκτη δράση των πολυεθνικών, οδηγηθήκαμε μεταξύ άλλων και στο μεγάλο σκάνδαλο με τους ρύπους στην αυτοκινητοβιομηχανία. Το ψήφισμα πολύ ορθά τονίζει πως δεν γίνεται να παραμείνουμε και άλλο στις εξαγγελίες, αλλά πρέπει να ληφθούν δεσμευτικές αποφάσεις για ουσιαστική δράση. Στην έκθεση επισημαίνεται πως στο Παρίσι επιτεύχθηκε ένα σημαντικό πλαίσιο για την αντιμετώπιση των κλιματικών αλλαγών. Ωστόσο στην 23η Διάσκεψη στη Βόννη πρέπει να ληφθούν αποφάσεις για δράση. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα.
2016/11/22
Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0205/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean) EL

Η ισχύουσα οδηγία 2011/65/ΕΕ σχετικά με τον περιορισμό της χρήσης ορισμένων επικίνδυνων ουσιών σε είδη ηλεκτρικού και ηλεκτρονικού εξοπλισμού (ή RoHS 2) τέθηκε σε ισχύ τον Ιούλιο του 2011. Στην έκθεση προωθούνται διάφορα μέτρα για την αντιμετώπιση προβλημάτων πεδίου εφαρμογής της RoHS 2, που θα προκύψουν μετά την 22α Ιουλίου 2019, οπότε προβλέπεται η λήξη της μεταβατικής περιόδου οκτώ ετών που εισήγαγε η οδηγία RoHS 2. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the ICCAT Convention area (A8-0173/2017 - Gabriel Mato) EL

Στηρίξαμε την έκθεση, αφού, από τη μια, περιέχει σημαντικά στοιχεία που αφορούν τη βελτίωση της προστασίας των πιο ευπαθών ειδών, που συχνά καταλήγουν ως παρεμπίπτοντα αλιεύματα και των οποίων η θνησιμότητα συνδέεται ιδιαίτερα με κάποιες μεθόδους αλιείας, ενώ, από την άλλη, λαμβάνει ιδιαιτέρως υπόψη την παραδοσιακή και μικρής κλίμακας αλιεία, καθώς και την παροχή κινήτρων σε ενωσιακά αλιευτικά σκάφη που χρησιμοποιούν επιλεκτικά αλιευτικά εργαλεία ή αλιευτικές τεχνικές με μειωμένες περιβαλλοντικές επιπτώσεις.
2016/11/22
Women’s economic empowerment in the private and public sectors in the EU (A8-0271/2017 - Anna Hedh) EL

Η έκθεση περιλαμβάνει πολλές θετικές αναφορές. Συγκεκριμένα τονίζει ότι για να ενισχυθούν τα δικαιώματα και η οικονομική ενδυνάμωση των γυναικών απαιτείται να αντιμετωπιστούν οι βαθιά ριζωμένες άνισες σχέσεις εξουσίας μεταξύ των φύλων, που δημιουργούν διακρίσεις και βία κατά των γυναικών, καταδικάζει τις μισθολογικές διαφορές μεταξύ ανδρών και γυναικών και τονίζει την ανάγκη να διασφαλιστεί σε μεγαλύτερο βαθμό η ίση μεταχείριση ανδρών και γυναικών σε θέματα εργασίας. Καλεί επίσης τα κράτη μέλη να εφαρμόσουν πλήρως την οδηγία για την ίση μεταχείριση στην απασχόληση και την οδηγία 2010/41/ΕΕ για την εφαρμογή της αρχής της ίσης μεταχείρισης ανδρών και γυναικών και υπογραμμίζει τον καίριο ρόλο που διαδραματίζουν οι δημόσιες υπηρεσίες υψηλής ποιότητας, η καθολική πρόσβαση σε δημόσιες υπηρεσίες υψηλής ποιότητας, οικονομικά προσιτές. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries (A8-0283/2017 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio) EL

Οι περιορισμοί στην κοινωνία των πολιτών έχουν καταστεί πιο κατασταλτικοί την τελευταία δεκαετία παγκοσμίως με όλο και περισσότερους ακτιβιστές να διώκονται ή να παρενοχλούνται στις αναπτυσσόμενες χώρες. Τηρήσαμε στάση αποχής επειδή στην έκθεση οι αναφορές για την εταιρική ευθύνη για παραβιάσεις των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων και παρενοχλήσεις κατά υπερασπιστών των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων είναι ένα βήμα πίσω σε σχέση με προηγούμενες εκθέσεις. Επίσης στην έκθεση δίνεται υπέρμετρη σημασία και σύνδεση αναφορικά με συνέργειες της ΕΕ με θρησκευτικούς φορείς στις αναπτυσσόμενες χώρες.
2016/11/22
The fight against cybercrime (A8-0272/2017 - Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi) EL

H έκθεση εμπεριέχει θετικά και αρνητικά στοιχεία για ένα πολύ σοβαρό ζήτημα, αυτό της αντιμετώπισης κυβερνοεπιθέσεων. Τηρήσαμε αποχή στην έκθεση γιατί αναφέρεται στην σημαντικότητα του Κέντρου αντιμετώπισης κυβερνοσυμβάντων του ΝΑΤΟ, ζητεί την περαιτέρω ανάπτυξη και ενίσχυση μηχανισμών της ΕΕ για την αντιμετώπιση κυβερνοεπιθέσεων με κοινές πολιτικές και διαδικασίες μέσω μηχανισμών, όπως η Europol, Eurojust κ.λπ. Επιπρόσθετα, οι αναφορές για νόμιμες υποκλοπές είναι προβληματική.
2016/11/22
EU political relations with ASEAN (A8-0243/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer) EL

Η έκθεση προωθεί την περαιτέρω οικονομική συνεργασία μέσω της σύναψης συμφωνίας ελευθέρου εμπορίου συνολικά με ολόκληρη την περιοχή με πολύ δυσμενείς όρους για τον λαό. Επίσης στην έκθεση προτείνεται συνεργασία στους τομείς της θαλάσσιας ασφάλειας, πρόταση ιδιαίτερα προβληματική, εάν λάβουμε υπόψη τις μεγάλες αντιπαραθέσεις που υπάρχουν στην Νότια Κινεζική Θάλασσα μεταξύ μιας σειράς χωρών του ASEAN και της Κίνας. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Accessibility requirements for products and services (A8-0188/2017 - Morten Løkkegaard) EL

Η έκθεση επιχειρεί να καλύψει τις ανάγκες των πλέον ευάλωτων πολιτών ενισχύοντας την προσβασιμότητα για τα άτομα με αναπηρία, τους ηλικιωμένους και όλα τα άτομα με οργανική βλάβη σε συγκεκριμένο κατάλογο προϊόντων και υπηρεσιών σε ολόκληρη την ΕΕ ως μέρος της εφαρμογής της Σύμβασης των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα δικαιώματα των ατόμων με αναπηρίες (ΣΗΕΔΑΑ). Εντούτοις δεν προβλέπεται η υποχρεωτική εφαρμογή της ΣΗΕΔΑΑ από τα κράτη μέλη και, επομένως, το συνολικό πρόβλημα της άρσης των εμποδίων για τα άτομα με αναπηρία δεν έχει διευθετηθεί. Επιπρόσθετα το πεδίο εφαρμογής της πρότασης περιορίζεται σε συγκεκριμένες πτυχές των υπηρεσιών/προϊόντων, καλύπτοντας συνεπώς εν μέρει μόνο τις ορθές απαιτήσεις προσβασιμότητας. Τέλος δεν λαμβάνει υπόψη η επιβάρυνση των ατόμων με οργανική βλάβη (τα οποία ως επί το πλείστο αντιμετωπίζουν σοβαρές οικονομικές δυσχέρειες, δεν έχουν πρόσβαση στην απασχόληση και συχνά ζουν κοντά ή ακριβώς στο όριο της φτώχειας) του κόστους προσαρμογής των προϊόντων και των υπηρεσιών. Για τους λόγους αυτούς ψηφίσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
EU-Chile Agreement on trade in organic products (A8-0257/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández) EL

Η έκθεση αυτή δεν έδινε το δικαίωμα στο Κοινοβούλιο να συναποφασίσει, αφού επέτρεπε μόνο την υπερψήφιση ή την καταψήφιση της πρότασης της Κομισιον. Ως Αριστερά καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση, αφενός γιατί αποτελεί μέρος ενός είδους συμφωνίας νέου τύπου (όπως η ΤΤΙΡ) και αφετέρου γιατί περιέχει παραπλανητικές πρόνοιες. Για παράδειγμα η επιγραφή βιολογικού προϊόντος θα δίνεται σύμφωνα με τα κριτήρια της χώρας παραγωγής. Αυτά τα κριτήρια όμως δεν είναι εναρμονισμένα μεταξύ Χιλής-ΕΕ, οδηγώντας σε παραπλάνηση του καταναλωτή.
2016/11/22
Extension of the European statistical programme to 2020 (A8-0158/2017 - Roberto Gualtieri) EL

Παρόλο που είμαστε ξεκάθαρα υπέρ της συλλογής στατιστικών στοιχείων, θεωρούμε πως είναι λάθος να επικεντρώνονται αυτές οι στατιστικές σε πολιτικές που ήδη φτωχοποιούν τον πληθυσμό. Αυτές οι πολιτικές δεν είναι άλλες από τις πολιτικές του ευρωπαϊκού εξαμήνου, της δήθεν καλύτερης απόδοσης της νομοθεσίας (Better regulation) και της ευρωπαϊκής ενεργειακής πολιτικής. Κατά συνέπεια τηρήσαμε στάση αποχής στην έκθεση του Κοινοβουλίου.
2016/11/22
European venture capital funds and European social entrepreneurship funds (A8-0120/2017 - Sirpa Pietikäinen) EL

Τα επενδυτικά ταμεία επενδύουν σε επιχειρήσεις μόνο για το δικό τους κέρδος. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αυτή γιατί δεν μπορούμε να στηρίξουμε μια διαδικασία η οποία αφήνει τις εταιρίες κοινωνικής επιχειρηματικότητας (π.χ συνεταιρισμούς) στο έλεος επενδυτικών ταμείων, όσο και αν αυτά θα έχουν την εποπτεία των αρχών της ΕΕ ή μια πανευρωπαϊκή άδεια.
2016/11/22
A new skills agenda for Europe (A8-0276/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Momchil Nekov) EL

Ως Αριστερά δεν παραγνωρίζουμε την ανάγκη του (ψηφιακού) αλφαβητισμού, των νέων τεχνικών δεξιοτήτων και της ανάγκης τεχνικής ή άλλης εκπαίδευσης των νέων ή των μακροχρόνια ανέργων. Όμως απορρίπτουμε την προσέγγιση των υπόλοιπων ομάδων που λέει πως η εκπαίδευση πρέπει να γίνεται με βάση των αναγκών της αγοράς και των μεγάλων επιχειρήσεων. Αυτή πρέπει να γίνεται με βάση τις ανάγκες της κοινωνίας, με μια ολιστική πολιτική από το κράτος με κρατικά κονδύλια και μακροχρόνιες επενδύσεις για επαναβιομηχανοποίηση και εργοδότηση σε αξιοπρεπείς θέσεις εργασίας με πλήρη δικαιώματα. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
EU political relations with India (A8-0242/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda) EL

Δυστυχώς οι πολιτικές που προωθούνται στην έκθεση δεν θα λειτουργήσουν προς όφελος των λαών. Αντιθέτως αυτό που επιχειρείται είναι να προωθηθούν συγκεκριμένα αλλότρια συμφέροντα με διάφορα ανταλλάγματα. Για τους λόγους αυτούς καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0280/2017 - Giovanni La Via) EL

Πρόκειται για κινητοποίηση περίπου 1δις για βοήθεια των πληγέντων και των περιοχών του Abruzzo, Lazio, Mache και Umbria της Ιταλίας, οι οποίες πλήγηκαν από τους σεισμούς μεταξύ Αυγούστου 2016 και Γενάρη 2017.Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση και τον προϋπολογισμό της προφανώς λόγω του ανθρωπιστικού θέματος.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 4/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0281/2017 - Jens Geier) EL

Πρόκειται για κινητοποίηση περίπου 1δις για βοήθεια των πληγέντων και των περιοχών του Abruzzo, Lazio, Mache και Umbria της Ιταλίας, οι οποίες πλήγηκαν από τους σεισμούς μεταξύ Αυγούστου 2016 και Γενάρη 2017.Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση και τον προϋπολογισμό της προφανώς λόγω του ανθρωπιστικού θέματος.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/002 FI Microsoft 2 (A8-0278/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa) EL

Συνειδητά ψηφίζουμε υπέρ του ΕΤΠ πάντοτε τονίζοντας πως για την Αριστερά χρειάζεται ολοκληρωμένη προσέγγιση αναφορικά με τη μετακίνηση ή το μαζικό κλείσιμο επιχειρήσεων, η οποία να διασφαλίζει πρώτα από όλα την διασφάλιση των εργαζομένων.
2016/11/22
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling) EL

Διαφωνούμε με το σύστημα εμπορίας ρύπων που προτείνεται, κυρίως όσον αφορά στη φιλοσοφία της εμπορευματοποίησης των δικαιωμάτων εκπομπής αερίων του θερμοκηπίου, καθώς θεωρούμε πως δεν απαντά στο στόχο για προστασία του περιβάλλοντος αλλά εξυπηρετεί αλλότρια συμφέροντα. Η συγκεκριμένη οδηγία, δεν επιτυγχάνει παρά μόνο ελάχιστη μείωση εκπομπών αερίων του θερμοκηπίου, και αποτελεί ένα μέτρο που ευνοεί τις αναπτυγμένες χώρες, εις βάρος των λιγότερο αναπτυγμένων και αναπτυσσόμενων χωρών. Αξίζει να σημειωθεί ότι η Επιτροπή σε αναφορά της για τη μέχρι τώρα λειτουργία του μέτρου αυτού παραδέχεται πως δεν υπήρχε σημαντική μείωση των εκπομπών αερίων του θερμοκηπίου και αυτό το απέδωσε στην υπερβάλλουσα κατανομή δικαιωμάτων σε ορισμένα κράτη μέλη και σε ορισμένους τομείς όπως την εξάρτηση από προβλέψεις και την έλλειψη εξακριβωμένων δεδομένων εκπομπών. Αυτό θέτει εύλογα το ερώτημα κατά πόσο αυτά τα προβλήματα είναι εφικτό να επιλυθούν έτσι ώστε ο στόχος που τίθεται για μείωση των εκπομπών μέχρι το 2020 κατά 20% δεν αποτελεί παρά μόνο ένα ανέφικτο στόχο. Για τους λόγους αυτούς δεν υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 3/2017: budgetary resources of the Youth Employment Initiative; establishment plans of ACER and SESAR2 (A8-0282/2017 - Jens Geier) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε τη συγκεκριμένη αύξηση του προϋπολογισμού για την πρωτοβουλία απασχόλησης των νέων για το 2017. Παρόλο που ως Αριστερά αντιλαμβανόμαστε την πρωτοβουλία απασχόλησης των νέων ως μόνο ένα ημίμετρο, εντούτοις είναι σημαντικό, έστω και αυτές οι πρωτοβουλίες να χρηματοδοτούνται κατάλληλα.
2016/11/22
Corruption and human rights in third countries (A8-0246/2017 - Petras Auštrevičius) EL

Η έκθεση επικεντρώνεται κυρίως στα θέματα διαφθοράς στις τρίτες χώρες. Ωστόσο οι σοβαρότερες περιπτώσεις καταπάτησης ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων σχετίζονται με τις βασικές ανάγκες των ανθρώπων για να έχουν μια ποιοτική ζωή και αυτά δεν αναφέρονται. Επίσης είναι υποκριτικό να γίνονται υποδείξεις στις τρίτες χώρες όταν εντός της ίδιας της ΕΕ υπάρχει καταπάτηση βασικών ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων όπως και αρκετά ζητήματα διαφθοράς. Για τους λόγους αυτούς δεν υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Mediation Directive (A8-0238/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos) EL

Το άρθρο 5 παράγραφος 2 της οδηγίας για τη διαμεσολάβηση επιτρέπει στα κράτη μέλη να καταστήσουν τη διαμεσολάβηση υποχρεωτική ή να τη συνδέσουν με κίνητρα ή κυρώσεις, ανεξάρτητα αν γίνεται πριν από ή μετά την έναρξη της δίκης. Στην έκθεση προτείνεται να θεσπιστούν κατάλληλες διασφαλίσεις στις διαδικασίες διαμεσολάβησης προκειμένου να μειωθεί ο κίνδυνος τα πιο αδύναμα μέρη, όπως καταναλωτές και μη εκπροσωπούμενοι διάδικοι, να στερηθούν το δικαίωμά τους σε ανεξάρτητη δικαστική απόφαση ή να θεωρήσουν ότι το στερούνται. Για τον σκοπό αυτό, είναι εξαιρετικά σημαντικό εκείνοι που συνιστούν, απαιτούν ή διενεργούν διαδικασίες διαμεσολάβησης να διασφαλίζουν ότι τα αδύναμα μέρη δεν επιλύουν μια διαφορά χωρίς να έχουν κατανοήσει τα πλήρη νομικά τους δικαιώματα και ότι τα ισχυρότερα μέρη δεν χρησιμοποιούν ταχείες διαδικασίες επίλυσης διαφορών, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της διαμεσολάβησης, ως μέσο για να αποφύγουν νομικές υποχρεώσεις ή για να βελτιώσουν με αθέμιτο τρόπο τη νομική θέση τους έναντι άλλων μερών. Η έκθεση προωθεί τα σημαντικά αυτά θέματα γι’ αυτό και την υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
A Space Strategy for Europe (A8-0250/2017 - Constanze Krehl) EL

Διαφωνούμε με την στρατηγική που προτείνεται για το διάστημα και δη με την χρήση Δορυφορικών Συστημάτων Πλοήγησης καθώς εμπερικλείει σοβαρούς κινδύνους. Υπάρχουν σαφείς ενδείξεις πως τα συστήματα αυτά δεν περιορίζονται απλά και μόνο στη συλλογή δεδομένων αλλά μπορούν να χρησιμοποιηθούν και για στρατιωτικούς σκοπούς. Γι’ αυτό δεν υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Academic further and distance education as part of the European lifelong learning strategy (A8-0252/2017 - Milan Zver) EL

Η έκθεση εστιάζει στις διαδικτυακές πλατφόρμες εκπαίδευσης, τις οποίες και ως αριστερά καταλαβαίνουμε ως μέσο διάδοσης της γνώσης σε όλους. Μέσα από τροπολογίες που προωθήσαμε στο κείμενο, θέλαμε να τονίσουμε δύο πυλώνες. Αφενός πως η εκπαίδευση πρέπει να είναι προσβάσιμη σε όλους (άρα χρειάζεται να προωθηθεί και ο τεχνολογικός αλφαβητισμός) και αφετέρου να μεταφερθεί το κέντρο βάρους της από τις ανάγκες των επιχειρήσεων στις ανάγκες της κοινωνίας.Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση, παρόλο που βλέπαμε περιθώρια βελτίωσης.
2016/11/22
Repeal of obsolete regulations with regard to inland waterway and road haulage sectors (A8-0228/2017 - Karima Delli) EL

Η έκθεση αφορούσε μόνο την κατάργηση τριών κανονισμών: του 1101/89 αναφορικά με τα δίκτυα εσωτερικής ναυσιπλοΐας μεταξύ Βελγίου, Γερμανίας, Γαλλίας, Λουξεμβούργου, Ολλανδίας και Αυστρίας, του 2888/2000 για τα βαρέα οχήματα από την Ελβετία, και του 685/2001 αναφορικά με συμφωνίες τις ΕΟΚ με την Βουλγαρία και την Ρουμανία. Επειδή οι χώρες αυτές είναι πλέον μέλη της ΕΕ, δεν χρειάζονται οι συμφωνίες, όπως επίσης επικαιροποιήθηκαν οι άλλοι δύο κανονισμοί.Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (A8-0181/2017 - Carlos Zorrinho) EL

Η έκθεση βελτιώνει κατά πολύ την πρόταση της Επιτροπής. Ως ομάδα θέσαμε ως προτεραιότητα πως πρέπει να επωφεληθούν από την ασύρματη συνδεσιμότητα ιδιαίτερα τα κράτη και οι περιοχές που είναι λιγότερο αναπτυγμένες, τα νησιά και οι ορεινές, παραμεθόριες, απομακρυσμένες, και δυσπρόσιτες περιοχές. Στόχος μας ήταν να εξυπηρετηθούν οι ανάγκες όλων των πολιτών, να επιτευχθεί το μέγιστο δυνατό δημόσιο όφελος και να δοθεί η δυνατότητα στους πολίτες από όλα τα κοινωνικά στρώματα να επωφεληθούν από τα πλεονεκτήματα της δωρεάν συνδεσιμότητας. Πολλές από αυτές τις αναφορές έχουν συμπεριληφθεί στο κείμενο καθώς στηρίχτηκαν και από τον εισηγητή της έκθεσης. Τέλος, ζητήσαμε και πετύχαμε να υπάρξει συγκεκριμένη αναφορά στην ανάγκη πως πρέπει να διασφαλιστεί ότι ο διαθέσιμος προϋπολογισμός θα κατανεμηθεί με γεωγραφικά ισορροπημένο τρόπο. Η προσθήκη αυτή εξισορροπεί κάπως την προβληματική πρόνοια που ενσωμάτωσε η Επιτροπή στο κείμενο πως ο προϋπολογισμός θα κατατίθεται στα κράτη μέλη κατά κανόνα με βάση τη ‘σειρά παραλαβής των προτάσεων’ (first come -first serve). Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (A8-0310/2016 - Jerzy Buzek) EL

Επί της ουσίας δεν προτείνεται κανένα μέτρο το οποίο θα μπορέσει πραγματικά να βοηθήσει τα κράτη μέλη να ξεπεράσουν τα σοβαρά προβλήματα που αντιμετωπίζουν στον ενεργειακό εφοδιασμό φυσικού αερίου. Επίσης, κανένα μέτρο δεν προτείνεται για τα κράτη που είναι απομονωμένα από τα ενεργειακά δίκτυα και έχουν σοβαρές ενεργειακές ελλείψεις. Ως απάντηση σε όλα τα προβλήματα παρουσιάζεται η παραχώρηση μεγαλύτερης εξουσίας στην Επιτροπή (περισσότερη πληροφόρηση, έλεγχος και παρέμβαση στα εσωτερικά των κρατών αναφορικά με τις συμβάσεις που κάνουν για τον εφοδιασμό φυσικού αερίου). Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
EU accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (A8-0266/2017 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt) EL

Η έκθεση καταδικάζει όλες τις μορφές βίας κατά των γυναικών, τονίζει την ανάγκη να εκπονηθεί μια ολιστική στρατηγική της ΕΕ για την καταπολέμηση της βίας κατά των γυναικών και υπογραμμίζει πως η προσχώρηση της ΕΕ στη Σύμβαση της Κωνσταντινούπολης θα εξασφαλίσει ένα συνεκτικό ευρωπαϊκό νομοθετικό πλαίσιο για την πρόληψη και την καταπολέμηση της βίας κατά των γυναικών και της βίας λόγω φύλου. Η Σύμβαση της Κωνσταντινούπολης αποτελεί το πιο ολοκληρωμένο, διεθνές, δεσμευτικό νομικό πλαίσιο για την εξάλειψη όλων των μορφών βίας κατά των γυναικών, συμπεριλαμβανομένου και του βιασμού. Καλύπτει τους τομείς της πρόληψης, της προστασίας των θυμάτων και της δίωξης των δραστών, για όλες τις μορφές βίας κατά των γυναικών, περιλαμβανομένης της σωματικής, της ψυχολογικής, της σεξουαλικής και της οικονομικής βίας. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Permitted uses of certain works and other protected subject-matter for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled (A8-0097/2017 - Max Andersson) EL

Η προτεινόμενη οδηγία αποσκοπεί στην ευθυγράμμιση του δικαίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης με τις διεθνείς δεσμεύσεις της βάσει της Συνθήκης του Μαρακές για τη διευκόλυνση της πρόσβασης σε δημοσιευμένα έργα για άτομα που είναι τυφλά ή έχουν προβλήματα όρασης. Συγκεκριμένα, θα ενισχύσει τη διαθεσιμότητα έργων και άλλων προστατευόμενων αντικειμένων, π.χ. βιβλίων, περιοδικών, εφημερίδων, περιοδικών και άλλων γραπτών, παρτιτούρων και άλλου έντυπου υλικού, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της ακουστικής μορφής, σε μορφές που είναι προσιτές στους δικαιούχους.Αυτό θα επιτευχθεί εξασφαλίζοντας ότι όλα τα δικαιούχα άτομα και οι οργανισμοί που εξυπηρετούν τις ανάγκες τους σε μη κερδοσκοπική βάση μπορούν να βασίζονται σε μια υποχρεωτική και εναρμονισμένη εξαίρεση από τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας και τα συγγενικά δικαιώματα εντός της Ένωσης. Αυτό θα επιτρέψει τη δημιουργία αντιγράφων προσβάσιμου μορφότυπου μη προσπελάσιμων έργων και άλλων αντικειμένων που έχουν ήδη δημοσιευθεί ή διατεθεί. Η προτεινόμενη οδηγία θα εξασφαλίσει ότι τα αντίγραφα που είναι προσβάσιμα σε μορφότυπο και εκδίδονται σε ένα κράτος μέλος μπορούν να διαδοθούν και να αποκτήσουν πρόσβαση σε αυτά σε ολόκληρη την Ένωση.Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους, ως ΑΚΕΛ υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Cross-border exchange of accessible format copies of certain works and other protected subject-matter for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled (A8-0102/2017 - Max Andersson) EL

Σκοπός του προτεινόμενου κανονισμού είναι η τήρηση των υποχρεώσεων της Ένωσης βάσει της Συνθήκης για ανταλλαγή αντιγράφων σε προσβάσιμο μορφότυπο ορισμένων προστατευόμενων έργων και άλλου προστατευόμενου υλικού δυνάμει δικαιωμάτων πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας και συγγενικών δικαιωμάτων προς όφελος των τυφλών, των αμβλυώπων ή ατόμων με άλλα προβλήματα ανάγνωσης εντύπων, μεταξύ της Ένωσης και τρίτων χωρών που είναι συμβαλλόμενα μέρη της Συνθήκης του Μαρακές, προς όφελος των δικαιούχων.Η Συνθήκη του Μαρακές απαιτεί από τα συμβαλλόμενα μέρη να προβλέπουν εξαιρέσεις ή περιορισμούς όσον αφορά τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας και τα συγγενικά δικαιώματα προς όφελος των τυφλών, των αμβλυώπων και των ατόμων με άλλα προβλήματα ανάγνωσης εντύπων και προβλέπει τη διασυνοριακή ανταλλαγή αντιγράφων βιβλίων σε ειδικό μορφότυπο.Δυστυχώς, η πρόσβαση σε βιβλία και άλλου είδους υλικό για τα άτομα αυτά είναι αρκετά περιορισμένη. Μόνον το 7-20% των έργων αυτών είναι προσβάσιμα στα άτομα με προβλήματα ανάγνωσης.Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους, ως ΑΚΕΛ υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Consent) (A8-0232/2017 - Elena Valenciano) EL

Η «συμφωνία πολιτικού διαλόγου ΕΕ-Κούβας» καταργεί την προηγούμενη «Κοινή Θέση για την Κούβα» του 1996, που καθόριζε την πολιτική της ΕΕ έναντι της Αβάνας και η οποία ουσιαστικά απαιτούσε ως προϋπόθεση την ανατροπή της Επανάστασης στην Κούβα προκειμένου να υπάρξουν ουσιαστικές σχέσεις. Η συμφωνία που εγκρίθηκε από το Ευρωκοινοβούλιο με συντριπτική πλειοψηφία είχε συνομολογηθεί με την κουβανική κυβέρνηση από το 2016 και αποτελεί ένα πρώτο βήμα για την ομαλοποίηση των σχέσεων και τη συνέχιση του διαλόγου. Γι’ αυτό κι εμείς υπερψηφίσαμε τη συμφωνία.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0233/2017 - Elena Valenciano) EL

Το ψήφισμα που συνόδευσε τη σύναψη της συμφωνίας εντάσσεται δυστυχώς στο πλαίσιο της εξυπηρέτησης των στόχων της ΕΕ και των ΗΠΑ. Σε αυτό εντάχθηκαν αναφορές, όπως να «στηριχθεί η οικονομική και πολιτική μετάβαση στην Κούβα», που προφανώς παραπέμπουν στην ανατροπή της Επανάστασης και στην εγκαθίδρυση ενός καπιταλιστικού και συνεργάσιμου με τη Δύση καθεστώτος, σαν να είναι δικαίωμα της ΕΕ –και όχι του ίδιου του κουβανικού λαού– να καθορίσει ποιο θα είναι το κοινωνικοοικονομικό σύστημα της χώρας. Επίσης, καταψηφίστηκαν δύο τροπολογίες της πολιτικής μας ομάδας, που ζητούσαν την επιστροφή στην Κούβα του εδάφους του Γκουαντάναμο (εκεί όπου οι ΗΠΑ διατηρούν ναυτική βάση, καθώς και τη διαβόητη φυλακή βασανιστηρίων) και αναγνώριση του δικαιώματος κάθε λαού να επιλέγει το πολιτικό και οικονομικό του σύστημα χωρίς έξωθεν παρεμβάσεις. Η δεύτερη τροπολογία καταδίκαζε την εξαγγελθείσα πολιτική Τραμπ σε βάρος της Κούβας και την υπαναχώρηση των ΗΠΑ από την προηγούμενη συμφωνία με την Αβάνα. Επιπρόσθετα, εγκρίθηκαν τροπολογίες του ΕΛΚ προκειμένου να μην είναι έντονες οι αναφορές στην ανάγκη να τερματιστεί ο οικονομικός, χρηματοπιστωτικός και εμπορικός αποκλεισμός των ΗΠΑ σε βάρος της Κούβας, ο οποίος διαρκεί εδώ και μισό αιώνα με ανυπολόγιστες ζημιές για την κουβανική οικονομία. Γι’ αυτούς τους λόγους καταψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα.
2016/11/22
Memorandum of Understanding between the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and Eurojust (A8-0215/2017 - Claude Moraes) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση εγκρίνει το σχέδιο εκτελεστικής απόφασης του Συμβουλίου για την έγκριση της σύναψης από τη Eurojust του μνημονίου κατανόησης μεταξύ της eu-LISA και της Eurojust.Ο σκοπός του μνημονίου είναι η θέσπιση ενός πλαισίου συνεργασίας μεταξύ των μερών, προσδιορίζοντας τους τομείς συνεργασίας που βασίζονται στο κοινό συμφέρον. Τα μέρη θα συνεργάζονται και θα ανταλλάσσουν εμπειρογνωμοσύνη και βέλτιστες πρακτικές σε διάφορους τομείς, όπως η ανταλλαγή πληροφοριών. Το μνημόνιο καθορίζει το περιεχόμενο (μη εξαντλητικό) των πληροφοριών που μπορούν να ανταλλάσσονται.Παρόλο που διασφαλίζεται ότι οι πληροφορίες που παρέχονται ή ανταλλάσσονται προστατεύονται σύμφωνα με τους αντίστοιχους κανόνες και αρχές ασφαλείας που αναφέρονται στις αντίστοιχες πράξεις θέσπισης, το περιεχόμενο των πληροφοριών που μπορούν να ανταλλάσσονται δεν είναι εξαντλητικό. Επομένως, δεν υπάρχει κάποια δικλίδα ασφαλείας ή περιορισμός στον τομέα αυτόν.Ως ΑΚΕΛ, τηρήσαμε αποχή για τον πιο πάνω λόγο.
2016/11/22
Recommendation to the Council on the 72nd session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0216/2017 - Andrey Kovatchev) EL

Υποστηρίζουμε ένθερμα πως η διεθνής συνεργασία στο πλαίσιο του ΟΗΕ πρέπει να αποτελεί θεμελιώδη αρχή της εξωτερικής πολιτικής. Εντούτοις, η εν λόγω έκθεση αναπτύσσει μια προβληματική προσέγγιση του θέματος, προτείνοντας αλλαγή της πολιτικής δομής και δράσης του ΟΗΕ προς εξυπηρέτηση των πολιτικών συμφερόντων της Ένωσης και δη του απώτερου της στόχου να καταστεί ισχυρός παίχτης με πρωταγωνιστικό ρόλο στη διεθνή σκηνή. Οι θέσεις για ενιαία θέση της ΕΕ στα πλαίσια του ΟΗΕ, για το Διεθνές Ποινικό Δικαστήριο και την πολιτική αλλά και στρατιωτική συνεργασία στο πλαίσιο της Κοινής Πολιτικής Ασφάλειας και Άμυνας αποτελούν αρνητικά σημεία της έκθεσης. Στον αντίποδα, θετικά στοιχεία της έκθεσης είναι η προώθηση των Αναπτυξιακών Στόχων της Χιλιετίας, η υπογράμμιση της ανάγκης για καταπολέμηση της πείνας, καθώς και της διεθνούς συνεργασίας για αντιμετώπιση της προσφυγικής κρίσης και των κλιματικών αλλαγών, όπως επίσης και της προώθησης μέτρων για την προστασία του περιβάλλοντος. Γι’ αυτούς τους λόγους τηρήσαμε στάση αποχής.
2016/11/22
EU-Kosovo Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Kosovo in Union programmes (A8-0207/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek) EL

Η διαχρονική μας θέση και η θέση της Κυπριακής Δημοκρατίας είναι η μη αναγνώριση του Κοσσυφοπεδίου ως ανεξάρτητου κράτους. Υποστηρίζουμε τον διάλογο μεταξύ Βελιγραδίου και Πρίστινας για εξεύρεση μιας συμφωνημένης λύσης στο ζήτημα. Γι’ αυτό και καταψηφίσαμε τη συγκεκριμένη έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Limitation periods for traffic accidents (A8-0206/2017 - Pavel Svoboda) EL

Η προτεινόμενη οδηγία αποσκοπεί στη θέσπιση ενός ειδικού καθεστώτος παραγραφής σε περίπτωση τροχαίων ατυχημάτων σε διασυνοριακές υποθέσεις, το οποίο θα διασφαλίζει την ουσιαστική πρόσβαση στη δικαιοσύνη και θα διευκολύνει την ομαλή λειτουργία της εσωτερικής αγοράς.Θεωρούμε απαραίτητη τη θέσπιση ελάχιστων κοινών κανόνων για προθεσμίες παραγραφής, οι οποίες θα εφαρμόζονται σε διασυνοριακές διαφορές που αφορούν σωματική βλάβη και υλικές ζημίες συνεπεία τροχαίων ατυχημάτων, ώστε να μειωθούν τα εμπόδια που αντιμετωπίζουν οι προσφεύγοντες κατά την άσκηση των δικαιωμάτων τους σε κράτη μέλη εκτός του δικού τους.Θεωρούμε ότι τα προτεινόμενα ελάχιστα πρότυπα σχετικά με τη συνολική προθεσμία υποβολής μιας αξίωσης, την έναρξη και την αναστολή της προθεσμίας, καθώς και τις υποχρεώσεις ενημέρωσης, θα συμβάλουν στην επίλυση αρκετών προβλημάτων που αντιμετωπίζουν επί του παρόντος τα θύματα που κατοικούν σε κράτος μέλος διαφορετικό από εκείνο στο οποίο συνέβη το ατύχημα, και θα μπορούσαν να επιφέρουν μείωση των νομικών εξόδων και των καθυστερήσεων.Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους, υπερψηφίσαμε την προτεινόμενη οδηγία.
2016/11/22
Common minimum standards of civil procedure (A8-0210/2017 - Emil Radev) EL

Η παρούσα οδηγία αποσκοπεί στη θέσπιση κοινών ελάχιστων προτύπων πολιτικής δικονομίας. Συγκεκριμένα, αποσκοπεί στη θέσπιση κανόνων σχετικά με την αποδοτική και αποτελεσματική πρόσβαση στη δικαιοσύνη, την καλύτερη λειτουργία και διεξαγωγή αστικών διαδικασιών και την αποτελεσματικότερη προστασία του δικαιώματος σε δίκαιη δίκη.Οι στόχοι αυτοί ως τέτοιοι, αποτελούν το Α και το Ω στην ομαλή λειτουργία ενός Κράτους Δικαίου και του δικαστικού συστήματος. Δεν αντιτασσόμαστε στις αρχές αυτές βεβαίως. Αντιθέτως, τις υποστηρίζουμε και παλεύουμε γι’ αυτές, αφού αποτελούν θεμελιώδη ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα.Εντούτοις, δεν μπορούμε να παραβλέψουμε το γεγονός ότι η έκθεση λέει ξεκάθαρα ότι «αποσκοπεί επίσης στην παροχή ερείσματος για μια σταδιακά βαθύτερη εναρμόνιση των συστημάτων πολιτικής δικονομίας των κρατών μελών». Επιπλέον, η δημιουργία ενός «Ευρωπαϊκού Κώδικα Πολιτικής Δικονομίας» δεν μας βρίσκει σύμφωνους. Θεωρούμε ότι παρόλο που υπογραμμίζεται στην έκθεση το γεγονός ότι η οδηγία δεν αποσκοπεί στην αντικατάσταση των εθνικών συστημάτων πολιτικής δικονομίας, εντούτοις αποτελεί το πρώτο βήμα προς την πλήρη εναρμόνιση των συστημάτων αυτών, μη σεβόμενη τις εθνικές ιδιαιτερότητές τους.Παρόλο που ο στόχος της οδηγίας περιορίζεται στη θέσπιση θετικών κοινών ελάχιστων προτύπων, ο μακροπρόθεσμος στόχος της δεν μας βρίσκει σύμφωνους.Γι’ αυτό και το ΑΚΕΛ τήρησε στάση αποχής.
2016/11/22
Macro-financial assistance to Moldova (A8-0185/2017 - Sorin Moisă) EL

Πρόκειται περί έκθεσης για μακροοικονομική βοήθεια στη Μολδαβία με επιβολή μνημονίου. Από τη στιγμή που διαφωνούμε με αυτές τις πολιτικές λιτότητας και ιδιωτικοποιήσεων στις ίδιες μας τις χώρες δεν μπορούμε παρά να διαφωνούμε και στην επιβολή αυτών σε χώρες εκτός της ΕΕ. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa) EL

Η πρόταση κανονισμού αφορά την εφαρμογή επιπλέον προσωρινών εμπορικών μέτρων στην Ουκρανία, τα οποία αποτελούν επέκταση της συμφωνίας DCFTA που υπογράφηκε μεταξύ της ΕΕ και της Ουκρανίας.Εξ αρχής δεν συμφωνήσαμε με τη συμφωνία αυτή, γι’ αυτό και ως ΑΚΕΛ καταψηφίσαμε την εφαρμογή επιπλέον μέτρων.
2016/11/22
Addressing human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide (A8-0222/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda) EL

Τηρήσαμε στάση αποχής στο συγκεκριμένο θέμα διότι, ενώ καταγράφονται θετικά στοιχεία στην έκθεση, είναι υποκριτική η στάση της ΕΕ στο θέμα, στο οποίο χρησιμοποιεί δύο μέτρα και δύο σταθμά. Εμμένει στο Ποινικό Δικαστήριο της Χάγης, του οποίου όλη η λειτουργία είναι κατά την άποψη μας προβληματική, όπως επίσης και στην πολιτική της επιβολής κυρώσεων, που σε πολλές περιπτώσεις δεν στρέφονται κατά των πραγματικών ενόχων αλλά κατά των λαών.
2016/11/22
Private security companies (A8-0191/2017 - Hilde Vautmans) EL

Στην έκθεση προωθούνται τα συμφέροντα ιδιωτικών εταιριών στον τομέα της ασφάλειας και άμυνας κυρίαρχων κρατών. Για εμάς η άμυνα και ασφάλεια κάθε κράτους είναι ζήτημα εθνικής κυριαρχίας και δεν πρέπει να παραχωρείται σε ιδιώτες. Επίσης, διαφωνούμε με τη χρησιμοποίηση δημόσιων πόρων για τη χρηματοδότηση αυτών των εταιριών.Οι ιδιωτικές αυτές εταιρίες ξεφεύγουν από τον έλεγχο και τη δικαιοδοσία που θα έπρεπε να έχουν τα κράτη και οι λαοί, όπως επίσης και σε επίπεδο ΕΕ, όταν γίνεται ανάθεση τέτοιων συμβολαίων σε ιδιωτικές εταιρίες για αποστολές και αντιπροσωπείες της ΕΕ.Η πολιτική μας ομάδα καταψήφισε την έκθεση και κατέθεσε άποψη μειοψηφίας.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Marine Le Pen EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση προτείνει την άρση ασυλίας της Marine Le Pen, η οποία κατηγορείται για δυσφήμιση εκλεγμένου αξιωματούχου, αδίκημα που διώκεται σύμφωνα με το γαλλικό δίκαιο. Γι’ αυτό, υπερψήφισα την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
European agenda for the collaborative economy (A8-0195/2017 - Nicola Danti) EL

Η Ομάδα μας κατέθεσε συγκεκριμένες τροπολογίες που αποσκοπούσαν στην καταπολέμηση της μαύρης οικονομίας και των γκρίζων περιοχών, δίνοντας προτεραιότητα σε υψηλά πρότυπα προστασίας των καταναλωτών, διασφαλίζοντας τη διαφάνεια και προωθώντας τον διάλογο με τους κοινωνικούς εταίρους, οι οποίοι διαδραματίζουν σημαντικό ρόλο στη δημιουργία και την υποστήριξη κωδίκων δεοντολογίας για την προστασία της εργασίας της συνεργατικής οικονομίας (ειδικότερα όσον αφορά ζητήματα που συνδέονται με την αυτοαπασχόληση και την ασφάλεια της απασχόλησης, καθώς και τα δικαιώματα απασχόλησης και το γεγονός ότι οι εργαζόμενοι ενδέχεται να μην έχουν πραγματική νομική προστασία).Επιπρόσθετα, θέση της Ομάδας μας ήταν ότι οι φόροι πρέπει να καταβάλλονται όταν τα κέρδη παράγονται σύμφωνα με τους εθνικούς και τοπικούς φορολογικούς νόμους (αν και οι τοπικές ιδιαιτερότητες ενδέχεται να απαιτούν διαφορετικές προσεγγίσεις κατά τη ρύθμιση των δραστηριοτήτων της συνεργατικής οικονομίας).Αν και κάποιες τροπολογίες αποδυναμώθηκαν (ειδικότερα αυτές που αφορούν την φορολογική διαφάνεια) εντούτοις υπάρχουν και άλλοι τομείς, όπως ο τουρισμός και τα ταξίδια, που μπορούν να επωφεληθούν από την ψηφιοποίηση ανοίγοντας ορισμένες ευκαιρίες για τις ΜΜΕ και τις πολύ μικρές επιχειρήσεις.Για αυτούς τους λόγους ψηφίσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Online platforms and the Digital Single Market (A8-0204/2017 - Henna Virkkunen, Philippe Juvin) EL

Οι επιγραμματικές πλατφόρμες αφορούν την λειτουργία της ψηφιακής ενιαίας αγοράς, την οποία ως GUE/NGL έχουμε καταψηφίσει καθώς εξυπηρετεί πλήρως τους στόχους των μεγάλων ευρωπαϊκών επιχειρήσεων και μονοπωλίων για ακόμη μεγαλύτερη ενίσχυση της επιχειρηματικής τους δραστηριότητας και των κερδών τους. Πρόκειται για ένα εργαλείο που στηρίζεται στην ανάγκες της αγοράς και στόχο έχει την ενίσχυση της ανταγωνιστικότητας της Ένωσης, την ολοκλήρωση της ενιαίας αγοράς, την ανάπτυξη μιας πλήρους ανταγωνιστικής οικονομίας, προώθηση των συμφερόντων των μεγάλων επιχειρήσεων καθώς και την ενίσχυση του ρόλου της ΕΕ στην παγκόσμια αγορά.Ωστόσο στο κείμενο υπάρχουν επιμέρους θετικές αναφορές όπως είναι η προώθηση μέτρων για προστασία των εργασιακών δικαιωμάτων, προστασία των προσωπικών δεδομένων καθώς και των πνευματικών δικαιωμάτων των δημιουργών. Για τους λόγους αυτούς, τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy) EL

Παρόλο που διαφωνούμε και έχουμε έντονους προβληματισμούς για το κατά πόσο θα συμβάλει στην προστασία του περιβάλλοντος το ΣΕΔΕ (σύστημα εμπορίας ρύπων), εν τούτοις η εν λόγω έκθεση και η πρόταση της Κομισιόν στην οποία αναφέρεται, αποτελεί ένα πρώτο θετικό βήμα για μείωση των εκπομπών της τάξης του 30% έως το 2030 σε σύγκριση με τα επίπεδα του 2005. Για αυτό, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Rolandas Paksas (Rule 150) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση συνιστά την άρση ασυλίας του Rolandas Paksas. Υπάρχουν υπόνοιες εναντίον του βουλευτή, ο οποίος φέρεται να έχει συμφωνήσει να δωροδοκηθεί στις 31 Αυγούστου 2015 με ποσό ύψους 15.000 EUR, υποσχόμενος να εκμεταλλευτεί την θέση του, τις διασυνδέσεις του και την επιρροή του σε δημόσιες αρχές για να ασκήσει επιρροή σε δημόσιους υπαλλήλους. Προκειμένου να καταστεί δυνατό για τις λιθουανικές δικαστικές αρχές να κινήσουν ποινική διαδικασία, απαιτείται η άρση της ασυλίας του κ. Paksas. Ο κ. Rolandas Paksas κατά την διάρκεια της ακρόασης στην αρμόδια επιτροπή δεν έδωσε κανένα πειστικό επιχείρημα ενάντια στην άρση της ασυλίας του. Για τους λόγους αυτούς, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Mylène Troszczynski (Rule 150) EL

Στις 23 Σεπτεμβρίου 2015, αναρτήθηκε στον λογαριασμό Τwitter της κ. Troszczynski φωτογραφία που πρόσβαλλε ομάδα γυναικών. Η κ. Troszczynski, κατά τη διάρκεια της ακρόασης στην αρμόδια επιτροπή, δεν έδωσε κανένα πειστικό επιχείρημα ενάντια στην άρση της ασυλίας της. Για αυτό και το ΑΚΕΛ υπερψήφισε την έκθεση υποστηρίζοντας την άρση της ασυλίας της.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen (Rule 150) EL

Στις 20 Αυγούστου 2009, ο Jean-Marie Le Pen προέβη σε μια δήλωση που προωθούσε τη μισαλλοδοξία και τη φυλετική βία. Συγκεκριμένα, δήλωσε ότι «το 90% των περιστατικών που θέτουν σε κίνδυνο την ασφάλεια των πολιτών και αναφέρονται στα ΜΜΕ, προκαλούνται είτε από μετανάστες».Τέτοιου είδους δηλώσεις δεν αντιπροσωπεύουν και δεν τιμούν τις πανανθρώπινες αξίες ούτε σέβονται τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα.Για τους λόγους αυτούς, το ΑΚΕΛ υπερψήφισε την έκθεση υποστηρίζοντας την άρση της ασυλίας του, καθώς κάτι τέτοιο θα συμβάλει στην αποτελεσματικότερη διεξαγωγή της δικαστικής διαδικασίας.
2016/11/22
The need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap (A8-0197/2017 - Constance Le Grip) EL

Η έκθεση περιλαμβάνει ορισμένες σημαντικές, θετικές αναφορές. Συγκεκριμένα καταδικάζει τις μισθολογικές διαφορές μεταξύ ανδρών και γυναικών και τον «ανεξήγητο» παράγοντα των διαφορών αυτών που απορρέουν από τις διακρίσεις στον χώρο εργασίας, και επαναλαμβάνει την έκκλησή του για την αναθεώρηση της οδηγίας 2006/54/ΕΚ, η οποία έχει μεταφερθεί επαρκώς μόνο σε δύο κράτη μέλη, ώστε να διασφαλιστεί σε μεγαλύτερο βαθμό η ίση μεταχείριση ανδρών και γυναικών σε θέματα εργασίας και αμοιβής, κατ’ εφαρμογή της αρχής της ίσης αμοιβής για ίση εργασία μεταξύ ανδρών και γυναικών. Επίσης ζητά κατάλληλη αξιολόγηση, και παρακολούθηση του αντικτύπου στα δύο φύλα, των συστάσεων ή μέτρων που έχουν ληφθεί μέχρι σήμερα. Ωστόσο, στην έκθεση υπάρχουν και πολλά προβληματικά σημεία. Καλούνται τα κράτη μέλη να εφαρμόσουν επειγόντως τις απαραίτητες διαρθρωτικές αλλαγές στα συνταξιοδοτικά συστήματα. Γνωρίζουμε πάρα πολύ καλά πως τέτοιες διαρθρωτικές αλλαγές συνήθως προωθούν την ιδιωτική ασφάλιση και τη μεταφορά του κόστους των συντάξεων και της εργασιακής ασφάλισης στους εργαζόμενους. Σε αυτό το πλαίσιο, η έκθεση καλεί την Κομισιόν και τα κράτη μέλη να μελετήσουν διεξοδικότερα τον πιθανό αντίκτυπο που θα μπορούσε να έχει στο συνταξιοδοτικό χάσμα ο προσανατολισμός των δημόσιων συντάξεων προς περισσότερο «ευέλικτους μηχανισμούς» καταβολής συνταξιοδοτικών εισφορών σε επαγγελματικά και ιδιωτικά συστήματα. Γι’ αυτό, τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Serbia (A8-0063/2017 - David McAllister) EL

Σεβόμαστε την επιθυμία της κυβέρνησης και του λαού της Σερβίας για στενότερη σχέση με την ΕΕ, ωστόσο, διαφωνούμε με τη στάση της Ένωσης που εκφράζεται μέσα στην έκθεση και παρεμβαίνει στην άσκηση της εξωτερικής πολιτικής της Σερβίας. Επίσης, διαφωνούμε και με την προσπάθεια για επιβολή οικονομικών μοντέλων που αποδεδειγμένα έχουν επηρεάσει σε τόσο αρνητικό βαθμό τους λαούς της Ευρώπης. Για αυτούς τους λόγους, τηρήσαμε στάση αποχής στην έκθεση.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Kosovo (A8-0062/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek) EL

Στην έκθεση το Κοσσυφοπέδιο παρουσιάζεται ως ανεξάρτητο κράτος και διατυπώνονται εκκλήσεις προς τα πέντε κράτη μέλη που δεν έχουν αναγνωρίσει την ανεξαρτησία να το πράξουν άμεσα. Αυτό, κατά την άποψη μας, αποτελεί παρέμβαση στην συνομιλίες που διεξάγονται μεταξύ Βελιγραδίου και Πρίστινας για εξεύρεση κοινά αποδεκτής λύσης στο πρόβλημα. Εμείς στηρίζουμε αυτή τη διαδικασία και θεωρούμε ότι δεν θα πρέπει να γίνονται έξωθεν παρεμβάσεις που να επηρεάζουν το όλο κλίμα, αλλά καθαρά υποστήριξη στην ίδια την διαδικασία. Υποστηρίζουμε μια λύση βασισμένη στο ψήφισμα 1244/99 του ΟΗΕ και σεβασμό του διεθνούς δικαίου. Για αυτό, καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0055/2017 - Ivo Vajgl) EL

Η έκθεση για την πΓΔΜ αποτυγχάνει να αποτυπώσει την πραγματική κατάσταση για τη χώρα. Δεν αναφέρεται στα σοβαρά προβλήματα που αντιμετωπίζει η χώρα τα οποία δεν της επιτρέπουν να ικανοποιεί τα κριτήρια της Κοπεγχάγης τα οποία είναι το βασικό εργαλείο για κάθε κράτος υπό ένταξη. Επιπρόσθετα, το θέμα των σχέσεων Ελλάδας-πΓΔΜ ούτε είναι ένα διμερές ζήτημα ούτε περιορίζεται στην ονοματολογία. Αποτελεί ένα άλυτο διεθνές και περιφερειακό πρόβλημα που πρέπει να λυθεί υπό την αιγίδα του ΟΗΕ. Η επίλυσή του αποτελεί προϋπόθεση για τις σχέσεις καλής γειτονίας, οι οποίες αποτελούν βασικό στοιχείο στη διαδικασία διεύρυνσης. Για αυτούς τους λόγους, καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (RC-B8-0397/2017, B8-0397/2017, B8-0398/2017, B8-0399/2017, B8-0400/2017, B8-0401/2017, B8-0402/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα αναφέρεται σε χώρα στην οποία από το 1996 έχουν πεθάνει χιλιάδες άνθρωποι. Μη Κυβερνητικές Οργανώσεις ανεβάζουν αυτό τον αριθμό μέχρι και στα 6 εκατομμύρια. Αυτό έγκειται και στην αδυναμία της διεθνούς κοινότητας και του ΟΗΕ να προσφέρει πραγματικές λύσεις. Δυστυχώς, ο λαός του Κονγκό θυσιάζεται για τα οικονομικά συμφέροντα και τις γεωστρατηγικές επιδιώξεις των μεγάλων δυνάμεων. Πρέπει, επιτέλους, να αφεθεί να ορίσει ο ίδιος τις τύχες του και να μπορεί να αξιοποιήσει τον πλούτο της χώρας προς όφελος του και όχι για τα ξένα συμφέροντα. Σε αυτό πρέπει να συμβάλουν όλοι. Πρέπει να υιοθετηθούν κριτήρια και προδιαγραφές για τις ξένες εταιρίες που δραστηριοποιούνται στη χώρα και ειδικά για τις ευρωπαϊκές ώστε τα ίδια πρότυπα που ισχύουν στην ΕΕ να ισχύουν και για τις δραστηριότητες τους εκεί.
2016/11/22
Increasing engagement of partners and visibility in the performance of European Structural and Investment Funds (A8-0201/2017 - Daniel Buda) EL

Η έκθεση εντοπίζει ότι τα αποτελέσματα των πολιτικών χρηματοδότησης της ΕΕ δεν κοινοποιούνται πάντα σωστά και προτείνει νέους τρόπους προβολής των αποτελεσμάτων των επενδύσεων της πολιτικής συνοχής.Ενώ η έκθεση αναγνωρίζει πως η κύρια προτεραιότητα της πολιτικής συνοχής παραμένει η παροχή υποστήριξης στις λιγότερο ανεπτυγμένες περιφέρειες, εντούτοις εστιάζει στην αύξηση της ανάπτυξης και της ανταγωνιστικότητας στις περισσότερο ανεπτυγμένες περιφέρειες.Ιδιαίτερα προβληματική είναι η αναφορά στον ευρωσκεπτικισμό και την αντιευρωπαϊκή, λαϊκίστικη προπαγάνδα που, όπως υποστηρίζει το κείμενο, διαστρεβλώνει τις πληροφορίες σχετικά με τις πολιτικές της Ένωσης, γι’ αυτό και καλεί την Κομισιόν και το Συμβούλιο να αναλύσουν και να αντιμετωπίσουν τα βαθύτερα αίτιά τους. Παραβλέπονται δε εντελώς οι ευθύνες της ίδιας της ΕΕ για τις καταστροφικές νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές λιτότητας που προωθεί και επιβάλλει.Επίσης, καλεί την Επιτροπή και το Συμβούλιο να αναλύσουν τον αντίκτυπο στις αντιλήψεις για τις πολιτικές της ΕΕ όσον αφορά στα μέτρα που αποσκοπούν στην ενίσχυση του δεσμού με το Ευρωπαϊκό Εξάμηνο και στην υλοποίηση διαρθρωτικών μεταρρυθμίσεων μέσω προγραμμάτων που χρηματοδοτούνται από τα ΕΔΕΤ.Γι’ αυτό, τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Statelessness in South and South East Asia (A8-0182/2017 - Amjad Bashir) EL

Η έκθεση αφορά το δικαίωμα στην ιθαγένεια που κατοχυρώθηκε στην Οικουμενική Διακήρυξη των Δικαιωμάτων του Ανθρώπου πριν από περίπου εβδομήντα έτη. Η έκθεση εκφράζει την ανησυχία του Κοινοβουλίου για τα εκατομμύρια των περιπτώσεων ανιθαγένειας σε όλο τον κόσμο, ιδίως στη Νότια και στη Νοτιοανατολική Ασία, και εκφράζει την αλληλεγγύη του προς τους ανιθαγενείς. Εστιάζεται βασικά στις περιπτώσεις των Rohingya στη Μιανμάρ και των Μπιχάρι στο Μπανγκλαντές αφού αποτελούν τις μεγαλύτερες πληθυσμιακά ομάδες ανιθιγενών. Παρά το γεγονός ότι απουσιάζει ο ρόλος που έπαιξαν οι δυτικές δυνάμεις στην περιοχή, ο οποίος οδήγησε στην εμφάνιση αυτού του φαινομένου, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Cross-border mergers and divisions (A8-0190/2017 - Enrico Gasbarra) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση εκφράζει την ανάγκη τροποποίησης και βελτίωσης των κανόνων για τις διασυνοριακές συγχωνεύσεις των επιχειρήσεων, αλλά και την επέκταση της νέας πρότασης στις διασυνοριακές διασπάσεις, ζήτημα για το οποίο η ΕΕ δεν έχει έως σήμερα νομοθετήσει.Υπάρχουν μερικά θετικά σημεία στην έκθεση όσον αφορά την διασφάλιση των εργασιακών δικαιωμάτων με τα οποία θα μπορούσαμε να συμφωνήσουμε.Εντούτοις, η έκθεση προωθεί την απλούστευση διαδικασιών γεγονός που μας βρίσκει αντίθετους αφού το μόνο που προσπαθεί να επιτύχει είναι η διευκόλυνση της κινητικότητας των εταιρειών χωρίς κανέναν έλεγχο από το κράτος. Δυστυχώς, με τις προτάσεις που προωθούνται πλέον οι εθνικές νομοθεσίες επί του θέματος δεν θα γίνονται σεβαστές. Επίσης υπάρχουν μεγάλα περιθώρια βελτίωσης, ιδιαίτερα στις προτάσεις σχετικά με τον τομέα των εργασιακών δικαιωμάτων. Δυστυχώς οι πλείστες των εισηγήσεων μας αναφορικά με την ανάγκη να συμμετέχουν καλύτερα οι οργανώσεις των εργαζομένων στη συνολική διαδικασία και να αναφερθεί ρητά η αρχή ότι η μελλοντική νομοθεσία για τις διασυνοριακές συγχωνεύσεις και διασπάσεις θα επιτρέψει τη διεξαγωγή συζητήσεων για την αποφυγή νομικών υποχρεώσεων βάσει του εθνικού δικαίου και το κοινωνικό ντάμπινγκ απορρίφθηκαν.Γι’ αυτό τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Participation of the Union in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0112/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa) EL

Το PRIMA είναι μια πρωτοβουλία προς την σωστή κατεύθυνση που μπορεί να στηρίξει τους λαούς και να συμβάλει συνεισφέροντας στην βελτίωση της αποτελεσματικότητας, της βιωσιμότητας των γεωργοδιατροφικών συστημάτων και της διαχείρισης του δημόσιου αγαθού του νερού στη Μεσόγειο. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters (A8-0070/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova) EL

Η έκθεση αναφέρεται στην πρόταση της Κομισιόν για την τροποποίηση του άρθρου 120 του κανονισμού περί κοινών διατάξεων (ΚΚΔ)(1), εισάγοντας χωριστό άξονα προτεραιοτήτων για έργα ανοικοδόμησης που υποστηρίζονται από το ΕΤΠΑ στο πλαίσιο ενός επιχειρησιακού προγράμματος. Η πρόταση έγινε με αφορμή τους πρόσφατους σεισμούς στην Ιταλία και τις καταστροφικές επιπτώσεις που είχαν στις περιοχές που επλήγησαν.Η πολιτική συνοχής πρέπει να προσαρμόζεται σε νέες προκλήσεις και να παρέχει άμεση βοήθεια σε όλα τα κράτη μέλη των οποίων περιοχές έχουν πληγεί από μεγάλες φυσικές καταστροφές. Ως εκ τούτου υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano) EL

Η ομάδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ενωτικής Αριστεράς υποστήριξε εξαρχής πως πρέπει να διασφαλίσουμε ένα σύστημα ενεργειακής επισήμανσης ευνόητο στους καταναλωτές, το οποίο όμως να περιλαμβάνει και όλες τις απαραίτητες πληροφορίες. Χαιρετίζουμε λοιπόν τις προτάσεις που έχουν περιληφθεί στην τελική συμφωνία για διαγραφή των παραπλανητικών συμβόλων και μετάβαση σε ένα απλούστερο ενιαίο σύστημα επισήμανσης από «A έως G».Εξίσου σημαντική θεωρούμε την απόφαση για δημιουργία της νέας ψηφιακής βάσης δεδομένων για τα προϊόντα, στην οποία οι καταναλωτές θα έχουν δωρεάν πρόσβαση.Η βάση αυτή πρέπει να δίνει όσο το δυνατό περισσότερες πληροφορίες για τα προϊόντα αλλά και για τα δικαιώματα των καταναλωτών, ώστε να ενισχυθεί η διαφάνεια και να τεθεί φραγμός στην αισχροκέρδεια και στην παραπλάνηση των καταναλωτών από τις μεγάλες επιχειρήσεις.Δυστυχώς με τα χρονοδιαγράμματα που τίθενται οι θετικές προτάσεις που περιλαμβάνονται στην τελική συμφωνία δεν θα προωθηθούν στο άμεσο μέλλον αλλά μετά από 8 με 10 χρόνια. Το γεγονός αυτό είναι πολύ απογοητευτικό και αποτελεί σημαντικό λόγο για επανεξέταση της συμφωνίας.
2016/11/22
European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (A8-0061/2017 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà) EL

Η δράση «πολιτιστικές πρωτεύουσες της Ευρώπης» διέπεται από την απόφαση αριθ. 445/2014/ΕΕ. Στο παράρτημα της εν λόγω απόφασης περιλαμβάνεται χρονολογικός κατάλογος των κρατών μελών που έχουν δικαίωμα να φιλοξενήσουν τη δράση (δύο κράτη μέλη ανά έτος). Σε σύγκριση με την προηγούμενη απόφαση αριθ. 1622/2006/ΕΚ, η απόφαση 445/2014/ΕΕ επεκτείνει τη δράση σε υποψήφιες και δυνάμει υποψήφιες χώρες για ένταξη στην ΕΕ, υπό τον όρο ότι συμμετέχουν στο πρόγραμμα «Δημιουργική Ευρώπη» ή στα επόμενα προγράμματα της Ένωσης για τη στήριξη του πολιτισμού. Ωστόσο, η απόφαση αριθ. 445/2014/ΕΕ δεν περιλαμβάνει τις χώρες της Ευρωπαϊκής Ζώνης Ελεύθερων Συναλλαγών που είναι συμβαλλόμενα μέρη της συμφωνίας για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο (Νορβηγία, Ισλανδία και Λιχτενστάιν). Ως εκ τούτου, αυτές οι χώρες δεν μπορούν να ανακηρυχθούν ΠΠΕ κατά την περίοδο από το 2020 έως το 2033.Με σκοπό την ενίσχυση των πολιτιστικών δεσμών μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και των χωρών του Ευρωπαϊκού Οικονομικού Χώρου προτείνεται να τροποποιηθεί η απόφαση 445/2014/ΕΕ ώστε οι πόλεις των χωρών αυτών που συμμετέχουν στο πρόγραμμα «Δημιουργική Ευρώπη» ή στα επόμενα προγράμματα της Ένωσης για τη στήριξη του πολιτισμού να μπορούν να υποβάλουν αίτηση για τον τίτλο της ΠΠΕ. Ως εκ τούτου υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation (A8-0209/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz) EL

Το πρόγραμμα «Ορίζοντας 2020» μπορεί να αποτελέσει ένα πολύ σημαντικό πρόγραμμα για την έρευνα και την καινοτομία και να δώσει ώθηση στην οικονομία, να στηρίξει τις μικρομεσαίες επιχειρήσεις, να προωθήσει νέες θέσεις εργασίας και να ενισχύσει την κοινωνική ανάπτυξη. Eν τούτοις, έως τώρα έχει αποδειχτεί πως η πρόσβαση στην χρηματοδότηση, ιδιαίτερα για τις ΜΜΕ, είναι πάρα πολύ δύσκολη. Οι συνέργειες δε μεταξύ ακαδημαϊκής κοινότητας και ιδιωτικού τομέα που ευνοούνται από το πρόγραμμα μετατρέπουν τις πλείστες φορές την έρευνα σε εργαλείο των μεγάλων πολυεθνικών, το οποίο αναπτύσσεται βάσει των δικών τους συμφερόντων αντί των αναγκών της κοινωνίας.Παρά τις μεμονωμένες θετικές αναφορές που υπάρχουν στην έκθεση, αναπτύσσονται και προβληματικές προτάσεις. Χαρακτηριστικό παράδειγμα αποτελεί η επικίνδυνη πρόταση να κατατεθεί σχέδιο χρηματοδότησης της έρευνας στον στρατιωτικό τομέα, με ειδικό προϋπολογισμό με νέους πόρους και ειδικούς κανόνες.Εξίσου σοβαρό είναι το ότι δεν γίνεται καμία κριτική στο γεγονός ότι σήμερα, μέσω του προγράμματος «Ορίζοντας 2020», χρηματοδοτούνται ισραηλινοί φορείς, των οποίων η έδρα βρίσκεται στα κατεχόμενα εδάφη της Παλαιστίνης, και συντονίζουν τις εθνικές αστυνομικές και σωφρονιστικές υπηρεσίες, οι οποίες ευθύνονται για σοβαρές παραβιάσεις των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων. Για τους λόγους αυτούς, τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Building blocks for a post-2020 EU cohesion policy (A8-0202/2017 - Kerstin Westphal) EL

Η έκθεση αναφέρεται στα δομικά στοιχεία για την πολιτική συνοχής της ΕΕ μετά το 2020. Υποστηρίζει ότι η πολιτική συνοχής θα πρέπει να μειώνει τις ανισότητες και να είναι ευέλικτη ώστε να μπορεί να αντιμετωπίζει απρόβλεπτες καταστάσεις. Επίσης, γίνονται σημαντικές αναφορές στον αγώνα κατά της ανεργίας, κατά της κλιματικής και της δημογραφικής αλλαγής, όπως και στη στήριξη των μικρομεσαίων επιχειρήσεων, την ένταξη των μεταναστών, και την ελαχιστοποίηση της γραφειοκρατίας που επιβαρύνει περιφέρειες. Σημαντική είναι επίσης η στήριξη της έκθεσης στη χρηματοδότηση μέσα από τις επιχορηγήσεις για να διατηρηθούν ως το κεντρικό εργαλείο της πολιτικής της συνοχής, ειδικά για τους μικρότερους δικαιούχους. Γι’ αυτό, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Status of fish stocks and socio-economic situation of the fishing sector in the Mediterranean (A8-0179/2017 - Marco Affronte) EL

Η Μεσόγειος Θάλασσα, με τα 17.000 θαλάσσια είδη της, είναι μία από τις περιοχές με τη μεγαλύτερη βιοποικιλότητα στον κόσμο. Ωστόσο, το συνολικό επίπεδο των υπεραλιευόμενων αλιευτικών πόρων είναι διπλάσιο ή τριπλάσιο από το επίπεδο της μέγιστης βιώσιμης απόδοσης. Η Μεσόγειος κινδυνεύει να μετατραπεί σε έρημο.Εκτός από την υπεραλίευση, η Μεσόγειος αντιμετωπίζει και άλλες σημαντικές απειλές, όπως η παρουσία υπερβολικών ποσοτήτων θρεπτικών στοιχείων ή λιπασμάτων, η ρύπανση και η αλλοίωση των ακτών και των οικοτόπων. Επιπλέον, η Μεσόγειος είναι ιδιαίτερα ευαίσθητη στην κλιματική αλλαγή. Συνεπώς, χρειάζεται προστασία. Θεωρούμε ότι η έκθεση αντικατοπτρίζει την γεωλογική, κοινωνική, οικονομική και οικολογική πολυπλοκότητα του τομέα της αλιείας στην Μεσόγειο. Πιστεύουμε ότι οι προτάσεις της έκθεσης είναι σημαντικές για την ευημερία των ψαράδων, τις παράκτιες κοινότητες και τη βιωσιμότητα. Το τελικό κείμενο εκφράζει τις ανησυχίες μας στους τομείς αυτούς. Για τους παραπάνω λόγους, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács (A8-0203/2017 - Heidi Hautala) EL

Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ του αιτήματος για την άρση της βουλευτικής ασυλίας του Béla Kovács έτσι ώστε να προχωρήσει άμεσα η διαδικασία εξέτασης των κατηγοριών εναντίον του για κατάχρηση δημοσίων κονδυλίων που χορηγούνται από το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο και εσκεμμένη περιφρόνηση των κανόνων του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου σχετικά με τις υποτροφίες που χορηγούνται στους ασκούμενους.
2016/11/22
Rates of value added tax applied to books, newspapers and periodicals (A8-0189/2017 - Tom Vandenkendelaere) EL

Πρόκειται για τροποποίηση της οδηγίας 2006/112/EΚ, η οποία αφορά τον ΦΠΑ στα βιβλία, εφημερίδες και περιοδικά. Η συγκεκριμένη οδηγία προβλέπει την εξαίρεση των ηλεκτρονικών μορφών βιβλίων, εφημερίδων κλπ από το 15% ΦΠΑ που έχουν οι έντυπες μορφές τους. Τα κράτη μέλη μπορούν να αιτηθούν για μείωση του ΦΠΑ των ηλεκτρονικών μορφών σε 5% ΦΠΑ. Η Επιτροπή προτείνει την αύξηση του ΦΠΑ στις ηλεκτρονικές μορφές στο 15% όπως ισχύει και στις έντυπες μορφές. Η έκθεση αναφέρει επίσης ξεκάθαρα πως η αύξηση στον ΦΠΑ δεν πρέπει να μεταφερθεί στους καταναλωτές. Η έκθεση ήταν ισορροπημένη και την υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Internet connectivity for growth, competitiveness and cohesion: European gigabit society and 5G (A8-0184/2017 - Michał Boni) EL

Βασικός στόχος της έκθεσης παραμένει η αύξηση της ανταγωνιστικότητας της Ένωσης και η ολοκλήρωση της ενιαίας ψηφιακής αγοράς για να καταστεί η ΕΕ κυρίαρχη δύναμη στην παγκόσμια αγορά. Παρά τις μεμονωμένες θετικές αναφορά όσον αφορά την ανάγκη αξιοποίησης των νέων τεχνολογιών, η πρόταση για την ανάπτυξη της τεχνολογίας 5G στηρίζεται κυρίως στις ανάγκες της αγοράς και όχι στις ανάγκες της κοινωνίας. Γι’ αυτό τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Protection of vulnerable adults (A8-0152/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αφορά την προστασία των ευάλωτων ανηλίκων οι οποίοι βρίσκονται προσωρινά ή οριστικά σε κατάσταση ανικανότητας να διαχειριστούν το άτομό τους ή την περιουσία τους.Σήμερα δεν υφίσταται κανένα ενιαίο νομικό πλαίσιο εντός της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, το οποίο να επιτρέπει την κατάλληλη προστασία των ευάλωτων ενηλίκων σε καταστάσεις διασυνοριακής μετακίνησης. Η κάλυψη του νομικού κενού θα προστατεύσει τα δικαιώματα των ενηλίκων. Η προστασία των ευάλωτων ομάδων του πληθυσμού αποτελεί μία από τις προτεραιότητές μας και θεωρούμε πως η έκθεση αυτή μπορεί να αποτελέσει μια καλή βάση για την αποτελεσματικότερη προστασία των δικαιωμάτων τους. Για τους λόγους αυτούς, υπερψήφισα την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa) EL

Η έκθεση αφορά τις εμπορικές σχέσεις με την Ουκρανία, και συγκεκριμένα την αύξηση των προϊόντων τα οποία θα έχουν μηδενική φορολογία. Αυτά είναι μεταξύ άλλων το καλαμπόκι, σιτάρι, κριθάρι και η βρώμη. Την ίδια ώρα, η Επιτροπή εισηγείται την συμπερίληψη προϊόντων όπως παπούτσια, προϊόντα αλουμινίου και άλλων στη λίστα μηδενικής φορολόγησης. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση. Πρόκειται για μια προσπάθεια ενδυνάμωσης της επιρροής της ΕΕ στην Ουκρανία και περαιτέρω ανάμιξης στα εσωτερικά της. Ως Αριστερά γνωρίζουμε πως αυτό χρησιμοποιείται κυρίως για δημιουργία έντασης και ανταγωνισμού με την Ρωσία, θυματοποιώντας στο τέλος τον ίδιο τον ουκρανικό λαό.
2016/11/22
Uniform format for visas (A8-0028/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση είναι τεχνικού περιεχομένου σχετικά με την καθιέρωση θεώρησης ενιαίου τύπου. Η πρόταση της Επιτροπής αναφέρεται στην εισαγωγή νέων αυτοκόλλητων ετικετών θεώρησης που δεν επιδέχονται παραποίηση και που θα πληρούν εξαιρετικά ψηλές τεχνικές προδιαγραφές. Θα μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται από όλα τα κράτη μέλη και θα περιλαμβάνουν κοινώς αναγνωρίσιμα στοιχεία ασφαλείας ορατά. Το κόστος των νέων ετικετών δεν θα υπερβαίνει αυτό των παλαιών. Η έκθεση αυτή είναι καθαρά τεχνικού περιεχόμενου και γενικά η Επιτροπή δεν προτείνει ουσιαστικές αλλαγές στο διατακτικό του σχετικού κανονισμού. Γι’ αυτό και υπερψήφισα την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (A8-0177/2017 - Angelika Mlinar) EL

Η παρούσα σύσταση του Κοινοβουλίου εγκρίνει την πρόταση του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με την θέσπιση του πενταετούς πλαισίου του Οργανισμού Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της ΕΕ (2018-2022). Οι προτεινόμενοι θεματικοί άξονες εμπερικλείουν σε γενικές γραμμές τις σημαντικές ενότητες στις οποίες τα θεμελιώδη δικαιώματα πρέπει να γίνονται σεβαστά. Εντούτοις, δεν μπορεί να περάσει απαρατήρητο το γεγονός ότι ο Οργανισμός δεν ασχολείται με άλλα θεμελιώδη δικαιώματα όπως τα εργασιακά τα οποία είναι υψίστης σημασίας για εμάς. Σε αυτό τον τομέα, εκφράζουμε τις σοβαρές μας ανησυχίες και ενδοιασμούς. Παρόλο που διατηρούμε σημαντικές επιφυλάξεις, υπερψηφίσαμε την σύσταση αφού, ελλείψει νέου πλαισίου ως τις αρχές του 2018, ο Οργανισμός δεν θα μπορεί να αναλαμβάνει δράση με δική του πρωτοβουλία.
2016/11/22
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (B8-0384/2017) EL

Η εν λόγω πρόταση ψηφίσματος ζητά τη συμπερίληψη της αστυνομικής και δικαστικής συνεργασίας σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στο νέο πολυετές πλαίσιο κάτι που είναι θετικό. Σίγουρα οι προτεινόμενοι θεματικοί άξονες ασχολούνται με σημαντικές πτυχές των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων χωρίς ωστόσο να απαιτείται η εναρμόνιση των τομέων που αναφέρονται σε ενωσιακό επίπεδο. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Digitising European industry (A8-0183/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer) EL

Στο κείμενο περιλαμβάνονται ορισμένες θετικές αναφορές σχετικά με τους εργαζόμενους και την ανάγκη διασφάλισης των εργασιακών δικαιωμάτων. Ωστόσο οι επιμέρους αυτοί στόχοι αναιρούνται από άλλους στόχους που τίθενται όπως η ανάγκη προώθησης των ευέλικτων μορφών εργασίας. Έπειτα ο βασικός σκοπός της στρατηγικής για την ψηφιοποίηση της βιομηχανίας δεν είναι οι νέες τεχνολογίες να αξιοποιηθούν στη βιομηχανία για την εξυπηρέτηση των αναγκών της κοινωνίας αλλά να αξιοποιηθούν για την εξυπηρέτηση των αναγκών της αγοράς. Όπως αναφέρεται, θα αυξηθεί με τον τρόπο αυτό η ανταγωνιστικότητα της Ένωσης και έτσι θα μπορέσει να καταστεί η Ένωση κυρίαρχη δύναμη στην παγκόσμια αγορά. Στην πραγματικότητα, η στρατηγική για την ψηφιοποίηση της βιομηχανίας της Ένωσης, έτσι όπως προτείνεται, όχι μόνο δεν μπορεί να επιλύσει τα πραγματικά προβλήματα που υπάρχουν (αποβιομηχανοποίηση, κλείσιμο των μικρών βιομηχανιών λόγων των μέτρων λιτότητας, καταστρατήγηση των εργασιακών σχέσεων κτλ), αλλά θα δημιουργήσει νέα προβλήματα. Γι’ αυτό τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
The new European Consensus on Development - our world, our dignity, our future (B8-0387/2017, B8-0390/2017) EL

Η ομάδα μας είχε καταθέσει δικό της ψήφισμα μαζί με άλλες πολιτικές ομάδες το οποίο δυστυχώς δεν εγκρίθηκε. Σε αυτό τονίζαμε ότι η κοινή δήλωση του Συμβουλίου και των αντιπροσώπων των κυβερνήσεων των κρατών μελών συνερχομένων στα πλαίσια του Συμβουλίου, του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και της Επιτροπής για τη νέα ευρωπαϊκή κοινή αντίληψη για την ανάπτυξη – ο κόσμος μας, η αξιοπρέπειά μας, το μέλλον μας, αποκλίνει από τη θέση του Κοινοβουλίου σχετικά με αυτά τα βασικά στοιχεία και επιπρόσθετα αποτελεί πισωγύρισμα σε σύγκριση με την ευρωπαϊκή κοινή αντίληψη για την ανάπτυξη που συμφωνήθηκε το 2005. Επιπρόσθετα καταθέσαμε τροπολογίες αναφορικά με την ανισότητα, την μετανάστευση και την αναπτυξιακή βοήθεια που και πάλι δυστυχώς δεν εγκρίθηκαν για να ενσωματωθούν στην πρόταση ψηφίσματος της Επιτροπής Ανάπτυξης.
2016/11/22
Resilience as a strategic priority of the EU external action (B8-0381/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα κινείται στο πλαίσιο και στη λογική της Παγκόσμιας Στρατηγικής για την Εξωτερική Πολιτική και την Πολιτική Ασφάλειας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (EUGS), η οποία χαρακτηρίζει την «κρατική και κοινωνική ανθεκτικότητα στην Ανατολή και Νότια της Ένωσης» ως μια από τις πέντε προτεραιότητες της εξωτερικής δράσης της ΕΕ και ζητεί μια αυξημένη συνεργασία μεταξύ δημόσιου και ιδιωτικού τομέα σχετικά με την ανθεκτικότητα. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση καθώς διαφωνούμε με τις βασικές αρχές και τους στόχους που θέτει η Παγκόσμια Στρατηγική για την Εξωτερική Πολιτική και την Πολιτική Ασφάλειας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (ΠΣΕΕ).
2016/11/22
High-level UN Conference to support the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14 (UN Ocean Conference) (B8-0382/2017) EL

Κρατήσαμε αποχή σχετικά με τη διάσκεψη υψηλού επιπέδου του ΟΗΕ για την υποστήριξη της υλοποίησης του ΣΒA 14 (Διάσκεψη του ΟΗΕ για τους ωκεανούς) καθώς από το ψήφισμα απουσιάζουν σημαντικές αναφορές σχετικά με την εξόρυξη του βυθού (seabed mining), την αναζήτηση πετρελαίου, καθώς και για την προστασία της παραδοσιακής αλιείας και των παράκτιων κοινοτήτων.
2016/11/22
Agreement between the EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021 (A8-0072/2017 - David Borrelli) EL

Η έκθεση αφορά μια ανανεωμένη συμφωνία για την συμμετοχή της Νορβηγίας, Ισλανδίας και Λιχτενστάιν στην ενιαία αγορά. Με βάση την θέση μας για τη ενιαία αγορά και λαμβανομένου υπόψη της διαχρονικής μας στάσης για σεβασμό στις επιθυμίες κυρίαρχων κρατών και των λαών τους, τηρήσαμε αποχή στην έκθεση.
2016/11/22
The right funding mix for Europe’s regions: balancing financial instruments and grants in EU cohesion policy (A8-0139/2017 - Andrey Novakov) EL

Η έκθεση τονίζει πόσο σημαντικά είναι τα Χρηματοπιστωτικά Μέσα, έναντι των διαρθρωτικών Ταμείων και του Ταμείου Συνοχής, καθώς προωθούν την ανάπτυξη ιδιωτικών και τραπεζικών κεφαλαίων. Ωστόσο δεν ασπαζόμαστε αυτή τη θέση καθώς στην πραγματικότητα αυτό που συμβαίνει είναι να τίθενται σε κίνδυνο οι στόχοι συνοχής της κοινωνικής και εδαφικής ανάπτυξης. Γι' αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση
2016/11/22
Future perspectives for technical assistance in cohesion policy (A8-0180/2017 - Ruža Tomašić) EL

Η έκθεση έχει να κάνει με τη παροχή τεχνικής βοήθειας σε κράτη μέλη με σκοπό να παρέχει στήριξη για τη βελτίωση της διοικητικής λειτουργίας κυρίως των τοπικών αρχών. Η τεχνική βοήθεια συνδέεται µε τη διαχείριση του Ταμείου, µε μελέτες, µε πιλοτικά σχέδια και ανταλλαγές εμπειριών µε στόχο, ιδιαίτερα, την ενθάρρυνση καινοτόμων προσεγγίσεων και πρακτικών. Γι΄ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement (A8-0123/2017 - Adam Szejnfeld) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση σχετικά με την εφαρμογή της συμφωνίας ελεύθερων συναλλαγών μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και της Δημοκρατίας της Κορέας λόγω της έκρυθμης κοινωνικής κατάστασης στην χώρα και της απουσίας υποστήριξης των διατάξεων για τα κοινωνικά δικαιώματα και ελευθερίες. Επιπρόσθετα, στην έκθεση απουσιάζει συνεκτίμηση των περιβαλλοντικών επιπτώσεων στην αξιολόγηση της εμπορικής/οικονομικής συμφωνίας από την ΕΕ.
2016/11/22
Achieving the two-state solution in the Middle East (RC-B8-0345/2017, B8-0345/2017, B8-0346/2017, B8-0347/2017, B8-0348/2017, B8-0352/2017, B8-0354/2017) EL

Τηρήσαμε αποχή γιατί το ψήφισμα δεν καταδικάζει τις ένοπλες πράξεις βίας που διαπράττουν οι έποικοι εις βάρος των Παλαιστινίων, ούτε περιλαμβάνει προτάσεις για άσκηση πιέσεων από την ΕΕ στο Ισραήλ ώστε να σταματήσει να παραβιάζει το διεθνές δίκαιο. Επίσης δεν γίνεται καμία κριτική προς την ΕΕ για την αποτυχία της να πιέσει το Ισραήλ ώστε να σεβαστεί τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα των Παλαιστινιών και να πάψει τα παραβιάζει το άρθρο 2 της Συμφωνίας Σύνδεσης που έχει με την ΕΕ. Το ψήφισμα δεν αναφέρεται καθόλου στην κατοχή και δεν αποδίδει ευθύνες στο Ισραήλ για τις καθημερινές πράξεις βίας εις βάρος του Παλαιστινιακού λαού, ούτε για τις ενέργειες στις οποίες προβαίνει θέτοντας σε κίνδυνο την λύση δύο κρατών. Εξίσου προβληματικό είναι το ότι το ψήφισμα τηρεί στάση ίσων αποστάσεων καλώντας και τις δύο πλευρές να απέχουν από μονομερείς ενέργειες που βλάπτουν την επίτευξη λύσης, εξισώνοντας έτσι τον καταπιεσμένο Παλαιστινιακό λαό με την κατοχική δύναμη του Ισραήλ.
2016/11/22
EU Strategy on Syria (RC-B8-0331/2017, B8-0331/2017, B8-0333/2017, B8-0335/2017, B8-0337/2017, B8-0338/2017, B8-0341/2017, B8-0342/2017) EL

Σχετικά με ψήφισμά για την στρατηγική της ΕΕ για τη Συρία ως Ομάδα καταθέσαμε το δικό μας ψήφισμα στο οποίο τονίζουμε ότι μακροπρόθεσμη λύση στη συριακή σύγκρουση δεν μπορεί να υπάρξει μέσω στρατιωτικών δράσεων. Υποστηρίζουμε την εδαφική ακεραιότητα της Συρίας και το δικαίωμα του συριακού λαού να καθορίζει το μέλλον του χωρίς εξωτερικές παρεμβάσεις και καλούμε να τερματιστεί κάθε παράνομη εξωτερική παρέμβαση στη Συρία που παραβιάζει την εθνική κυριαρχία της χώρας. Τέλος στο ψήφισμα μας καλούμε την ΕΕ να ξεκινήσει διάλογο με όλα τα μέρη που εμπλέκονται στη σύγκρουση, εξαιρουμένων μόνον των τρομοκρατικών ομάδων και τονίζεται ότι για τον τερματισμό του πολέμου και την εξεύρεση πολιτικής λύσης στη σύγκρουση απαιτείται διάλογος με όλα τα τμήματα της συριακής κοινωνίας.
2016/11/22
Road transport in the European Union (B8-0290/2017) EL

Η έκθεση πετυχαίνει σε αρκετά ικανοποιητικό βαθμό να συνδυάσει την οικονομική, περιβαλλοντική και κοινωνική πτυχή του οδικού τομέα. Ο τομέας αυτός παραμένει εξαιρετικά σημαντικός για την οικονομία της ΕΕ αφού δημιουργεί θέσεις εργασίες και παράγει οικονομική ανάπτυξη προωθώντας την ανταγωνιστικότητα. Βέβαια, όσο σημαντική και να είναι η οικονομική πτυχή, η εισηγήτρια την αντιπαραθέτει με την ανάγκη προστασίας και σεβασμού των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων των εργαζομένων. Συγκεκριμένα, αναφέρεται στην ποιότητα της εργασίας στον τομέα αυτόν, στην εξασφάλιση σωστής ισορροπίας μεταξύ της επαγγελματικής και προσωπικής ζωής των οδηγών και υπογραμμίζει το υφιστάμενο πρόβλημα των κακών συνθηκών εργασίας για τους οδηγούς. Εν τέλει, είναι ζωτικής σημασίας η εξεύρεση και χρήση εναλλακτικών καυσίμων ούτως ώστε να υπάρξει συμμόρφωση με τους στόχους της Συμφωνίας του Παρισιού του 2015 (COP21). Προτείνει συγκεκριμένα την μετάβαση σε βιώσιμα ηλεκτροκίνητα οχήματα και ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας. Επιπρόσθετα, κατά τη διάρκεια των διαπραγματεύσεων η πλειοψηφία των τροπολογιών με στόχο την απελευθέρωση και την ιδιωτικοποίηση όλων των τομέων των οδικών μεταφορών απορρίφθηκαν και ως εκ τούτου υπερψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα.
2016/11/22
Dadaab refugee camp (RC-B8-0300/2017, B8-0300/2017, B8-0332/2017, B8-0334/2017, B8-0336/2017, B8-0339/2017) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε το ψήφισμα καθώς επαινεί την Κένυα και την τοπική περιοχή του Dadaab για τον ρόλο που έχουν διαδραματίσει στην υποδοχή πρωτοφανούς αριθμού προσφύγων για τόσο μεγάλο χρονικό διάστημα· Επισημαίνει, ωστόσο, το γεγονός ότι η σημερινή κατάσταση στην περιοχή δεν είναι βιώσιμη και απαιτεί μια αποτελεσματική και συντονισμένη αντίδραση της διεθνούς κοινότητας συνολικά, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της ΕΕ, προκειμένου να εξευρεθεί βιώσιμη λύση στο ζήτημα των σομαλών προσφύγων, παράλληλα με τις προσπάθειες για μακροπρόθεσμη κοινωνικοοικονομικής ανάπτυξης στην περιοχή. Επίσης το ψήφισμα εκφράζει λύπη του για τον πολύ μικρής έντασής ρόλο που διαδραματίζουν τα κράτη μέλη της ΕΕ σε ό,τι αφορά τις προσπάθειες μετεγκατάστασης των προσφύγων του Dadaab και καλεί την ΕΕ να αναλάβει την ευθύνη που της αναλογεί για την εξασφάλιση της δίκαιης κατανομής των βαρών.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Council's LGBTI Guidelines, particularly in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in Chechnya, Russia (B8-0349/2017, B8-0349/2017, B8-0350/2017, B8-0351/2017, B8-0353/2017, B8-0355/2017, B8-0356/2017) EL

Ψηφίζουμε υπέρ ό,τι αφορά την προστασία των δικαιωμάτων των ατόμων ΛΟΑΔΜ και την δράση κατά της ομοφοβίας και των διακρίσεων λόγω σεξουαλικού προσανατολισμού και ταυτότητας φύλου.Ωστόσο εκφράζουμε επιφύλαξη για τις αναφορές που περιλαμβάνονται όσον αφορά την απαίτηση εφαρμογής των κατευθυντήριων γραμμών και πολιτικών της ΕΕ για το ζήτημα αυτό σε χώρες που δεν είναι μέλη της ΕΕ. Κάτι τέτοιο σημαίνει παρέμβαση σε τρίτη χώρα. Άλλο είναι η συζήτηση του θέματος και άλλο η απαίτηση εφαρμογής.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems (A8-0196/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa) EL

Παρόλο που γνωρίζουμε πως οι πόροι του ταμείου, αλλά και ο τρόπος που διατίθενται δεν βοηθά μακροχρόνια και εποικοδομητικά τους απολυόμενους, εντούτοις ψηφίζουμε υπέρ του. Ο λόγος είναι πως τα χρήματα αυτά χρησιμοποιούνται και για μετεκπαίδευση των απολυόμενων εργαζομένων. Φυσικά για να αντιμετωπιστεί η ανεργία πρέπει να γίνουν δημόσιες και μακροχρόνιες επενδύσεις και να ενδυναμωθεί το κοινωνικό κράτος. Την ίδια ώρα πρέπει η ΕΕ να αλλάξει πλεύση από τις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές λιτότητας και μνημονίων.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2014 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0114/2017 - Sajjad Karim) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αναλύει την ετήσια έκθεση της Επιτροπής του 2014 για την επικουρικότητα και την αναλογικότητα. Σκοπός της έκθεσης είναι να αναλύσει πώς αυτές οι αρχές έχουν εφαρμοστεί από την Επιτροπή.Οι αρχές της αναλογικότητας και της επικουρικότητας περιλαμβάνονται στις κατευθυντήριες αρχές της ΕΕ όταν επιλέγει να αναλάβει δράση και θεωρούνται αναπόσπαστα μέρη της διαδικασίας χάραξης πολιτικής. Παρόλο που αυτό διατυπώνεται στην έκθεση, είναι έκδηλα φανερό πώς οι αρχές αυτές δεν τυγχάνουν πάντα σεβασμό από την Επιτροπή αφού - όπως αναφέρεται και στην έκθεση στο 32% των περιστάσεων, η ανάλυση της Επιτροπής σχετικά με της δύο αυτές αρχές είναι ανεπαρκής.Παρόλο που θεωρητικά η έκθεση αναγνωρίζει τα σημαντικά προβλήματα που υπάρχουν κατά το στάδιο εφαρμογής των αρχών αυτών από την Επιτροπή, εν τούτοις δεν εισηγείται καμία ουσιαστική λύση για την λύση του προβλήματος. Η εισαγωγή της πράσινης κάρτας δεν μπορεί να λύσει το πρόβλημα αφού η διακριτική εξουσία της Επιτροπής διασφαλίζεται πλήρως. Επίσης, σημειώνεται ότι η έκθεση απλά εξαντλείται σε τυπικότητες σχετικές με τη συμμετοχή των εθνικών κοινοβουλίων στη νομοθεσία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και απλώς «αναφέρει» τα προβλήματα που υπάρχουν τα οποία παραμένουν άλυτα από το 2010.Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
FinTech: the influence of technology on the future of the financial sector (A8-0176/2017 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen) EL

Η έκθεση βασίζεται στην υπόθεση πως η τεχνολογία θα βοηθήσει την περεταίρω ενίσχυση και ανταγωνιστικότητα του χρηματοπιστωτικού τομέα. Σίγουρα θα βοηθήσει την επέκταση των δυνατοτήτων των χρηματηστηρίων και του καπιταλισμού-καζίνο. Καμία προσπάθεια δεν έγινε ούτως ώστε η οποιαδήποτε νέα τεχνολογία στον τομέα να προωθήσει προστασία των κρατών ή των επιχειρήσεων από κερδοσκοπικές πρακτικές στα χρηματιστήρια. Αντίθετα η έκθεση ζητά την μείωση των ελάχιστων προτύπων ρύθμισης των χρηματιστηρίων. Για αυτό την καταψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Croatia (A8-0171/2017 - Claude Moraes) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση καθώς δεν διασφαλίζεται η προστασία των προσωπικών δεδομένων.
2016/11/22
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0294/2017) EL

Το ψηφίσματος απορρίπτει τον κατ’ εξουσιοδότηση κανονισμό της Επιτροπής για διαγραφή της Γουιάνας από τον πίνακα στο σημείο I του παραρτήματος και την προσθήκη της Αιθιοπίας στον εν λόγω πίνακα.Ο κατ’ εξουσιοδότηση κανονισμός έχει ως στόχο να προσδιορίσει τις τρίτες χώρες υψηλού κινδύνου με στρατηγικές ανεπάρκειες όσον αφορά την καταπολέμηση της νομιμοποίησης εσόδων από παράνομες δραστηριότητες και την καταπολέμηση της χρηματοδότησης της τρομοκρατίας.Ωστόσο, η πρόταση της Επιτροπής βασίζεται και πάλι αποκλειστικά σε έναν κατάλογο που καταρτίστηκε από την FATF και έχει πολλές ελλείψεις. Χαρακτηριστικό παράδειγμα αποτελεί το ότι η πρόταση δεν ασχολείται καθόλου με φορολογικά αδικήματα. Για αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την πρόταση ψηφίσματος που απορρίπτει τον κανονισμό της Επιτροπής.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: GMO cotton GHB119 (B8-0293/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα ζητεί από την Επιτροπή να αποσύρει το σχέδιο εκτελεστικής απόφασης της για την έγκριση διάθεσης στην αγορά προϊόντων που περιέχουν, αποτελούνται ή παράγονται από γενετικώς τροποποιημένο βαμβάκι.Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Genetically modified maize DAS-40278-9 (B8-0292/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα ζητά από την Επιτροπή να αποσύρει το σχέδιο της εκτελεστικής της απόφασης για την έγκριση της διάθεσης στην αγορά προϊόντων που περιέχουν, αποτελούνται ή παράγονται από γενετικώς τροποποιημένο αραβόσιτο.Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Situation in Hungary (B8-0295/2017, B8-0296/2017) EL

Αντιλαμβανόμαστε πλήρως την αντιδραστική πολιτική, τον αυταρχισμό, το ρατσισμό και τη συντήρηση που προωθείται από την κυβέρνηση της Ουγγαρίας. Ωστόσο, δεν μπορούμε να συμφωνήσουμε σε παρεμβατικές ενέργειες της ΕΕ και συγκεκριμένα στην έκκληση για εγκαθίδρυση μηχανισμού της ΕΕ για παρακολούθηση της δημοκρατίας στα κράτη-μέλη και προπαντός στην έκκληση για ενεργοποίηση του άρθρου 7 της ΣυνθΕΕ που προνοεί μέχρι και κυρώσεις στα κράτη-μέλη. Μια τέτοια εξέλιξη θα άνοιγε τους ασκούς του Αιόλου για κάθε είδους παρεμβάσεις στα εσωτερικά των κρατών-μελών. Υπερψηφίζουμε το ψήφισμα με επιφύλαξη επί της συγκεκριμένης πρόνοιας.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (accession of Croatia) (A8-0074/2017 - Helmut Scholz) EL

Τηρήσαμε αποχή στην συγκεκριμένη έκθεση. Παρά τον τεχνικό χαρακτήρα της έκθεσης για συμπεριληφθεί η Κροατία στην ήδη υπάρχουσα συμφωνία τηρήσαμε την ίδια στάση που είχαμε και συνολικά για την ίδια την συμφωνία.
2016/11/22
EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0169/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda) EL

Παρά τον τεχνικό χαρακτήρα της έκθεσης για συμπεριληφθεί η Κροατία στην ήδη υπάρχουσα Συμφωνία Σταθεροποίησης και Σύνδεσης ΕΕ - Βοσνίας-Ερζεγοβίνης τηρήσαμε την ίδια στάση που είχαμε αρχικά και για την ίδια την συμφωνία σταθεροποίησης δηλαδή αποχή .
2016/11/22
EU-Norway Agreement on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa (A8-0174/2017 - Tomáš Zdechovský) EL

Η πρόταση δίνει στη Νορβηγία το δικαίωμα πρόσβασης στο Ταμείο Εσωτερικής Ασφάλειας και ταυτόχρονα καθορίζει την οικονομική της συνδρομή στο Ταμείο ως «συνδεμένη χώρα». Το ΤΕΑ (αποτελούμενο από το τμήμα για τα σύνορα και θεωρήσεις και το τμήμα για την αστυνομική συνεργασία και τη διαχείριση των κρίσεων) συμβάλλει στη διασφάλιση υψηλού επιπέδου ασφάλειας και πρόληψης της εγκληματικότητας στην Ένωση, ενώ ταυτόχρονα διευκολύνει τα νόμιμα ταξίδια και εξασφαλίζει αποτελεσματική διαχείριση των εξωτερικών συνόρων της Ένωσης. Για τη νέα περίοδο του δημοσιονομικού πλαισίου (2014-2020), το Ταμείο Εσωτερικής Ασφάλειας διαθέτει 2764 εκατ. ευρώ για τη χρηματοδότηση δράσεων που συνδέονται με τη διαχείριση των εξωτερικών συνόρων, και ενδεχομένως του κόστους λειτουργίας συστημάτων και εξοπλισμού που έχουν ήδη αποκτηθεί. Διατίθεται επίσης χρηματοδότηση για την αγορά εξοπλισμού από κράτη μέλη της ΕΕ για κοινές δράσεις Frontex, και «Έξυπνα Σύνορα».Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση λόγω της κριτικής μας θέση ενάντια στο Σύστημα Σένγκεν, στην πολιτική στρατιωτικοποίησης και διαχείρισης των εξωτερικών συνόρων (πχ «Έξυπνα Σύνορα») καθώς και των πολιτικών που εντείνουν το φακέλωμα πολιτών και επισκεπτών της ΕΕ.
2016/11/22
EU accession to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) (A8-0187/2017 - Fernando Ruas) EL

Το παρόν κείμενο εγκρίνει τη σύναψη της συμφωνίας για προσχώρηση της ΕΕ στη Διεθνή Συμβουλευτική Επιτροπή Βάμβακος (ICAC). Η προσχώρησης της ΕΕ στην ICAC είναι ένα βήμα για την μεγαλύτερη συμμετοχή της ΕΕ στην παγκόσμια αλυσίδα αξίας της κλωστοϋφαντουργίας. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
EU eGovernment action plan 2016-2020 (A8-0178/2017 - Sabine Verheyen) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε το Σχέδιο δράσης της ΕΕ για την ηλεκτρονική διακυβέρνηση 2016-2020 αφού αν και περιέχει πολλές καινοτόμες ιδέες για απλοποίηση των δημόσιων διοικητικών διαδικασιών για τις επιχειρήσεις και τους πολίτες καθιστώντας τις συναλλαγές τους με τις δημόσιες διοικήσεις ταχύτερες και αποτελεσματικές, περισσότερο εύκολες και διαφανείς και λιγότερο δαπανηρές εντούτοις δεν λαμβάνει υπόψη τις αρμοδιότητες των κρατών μελών στην υλοποίηση της στρατηγικής αυτής.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2015 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0159/2017 - Julia Pitera) EL

Η έκθεση προτείνει τη βελτίωση στην ανταλλαγή πληροφοριών ενάντια στην απάτη είτε αυτή είναι στον ΦΠΑ, είτε αφορά τη διαφθορά, είτε αφορά προβληματικές πρακτικές. Είναι διακηρυγμένη η θέση μας ενάντια στην απάτη και υπέρ της διαφάνειας. Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety (A8-0175/2017 - Biljana Borzan) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αποτελεί μέρος του σχεδίου δράσης για την κυκλική οικονομία, το οποίο περιέχει ένα τμήμα σχετικά με τις προγραμματισμένες δράσεις για τη μείωση των απορριμμάτων τροφίμων. Συμβαδίζει με τα μέτρα που υιοθετήθηκαν τον περασμένο Μάρτιο και προσθέτει ορισμένα νέα στοιχεία σχετικά με τα απόβλητα τροφίμων. Η ομάδα της Ευρωπαικής Ενωτικής Αριστεράς κατέθεσε διάφορες τροπολογίες για την ανάγκη της βιώσιμης χρήσης των πόρων και της μείωσης της σπατάλης των τροφίμων, οι οποίες υιοθετήθηκαν. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Evaluation of external aspects of customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade (A8-0162/2017 - Tiziana Beghin) EL

Αναμφίβολα είμαστε υπέρ της συνεργασίας για καταπολέμηση του παράνομου εμπορίου και των τελωνειακών ελέγχων. Ωστόσο η έκθεση εμπεριέχει στοιχεία με τα οποία διαφωνούμε, όπως η πλήρης εναρμόνιση στον ΦΠΑ. Θεωρούμε ότι η έκθεση θα μπορούσε σε γενικές γραμμές να συμβάλει σε κάποιο βαθμό μέσα από τις προτάσεις της στην καταπολέμηση του παράνομου εμπορίου εφόσον περιορίζεται σε μέτρα συνεργασίας. Ορισμένα όμως εναρμονιστικά μέτρα που προωθούνται μας προβληματίζουν και γι’ αυτό τηρήσαμε ΑΠΟΧΗ.
2016/11/22
Request for waiver of the immunity of António Marinho e Pinto (A8-0163/2017 - Gilles Lebreton) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε το αίτημα άρσης της ασυλίας του Ευρωβουλευτή António Marinho e Pinto, αφού ήταν και δικό του αίτημα, έτσι ώστε να μπορέσει να υπερασπιστεί τον εαυτό του σε μια σειρά κατηγοριών που του έχει προσάψει μια μη κυβερνητική οργάνωση στην Πορτογαλία.
2016/11/22
EU trade mark (A8-0054/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) EL

Η συγκεκριμένη πρόταση είναι τεχνικής φύσεως αποσκοπώντας στην κωδικοποίηση των υφιστάμενων κειμένων. Δεν επιφέρει καμία ουσιαστική αλλαγή στο περιεχόμενο των κειμένων, γι’ αυτό και προτείνεται υπερψήφιση της πρότασης.
2016/11/22
Minamata Convention on Mercury (A8-0067/2017 - Stefan Eck) EL

Η σύμβαση της Μιναμάτα για τον υδράργυρο έχει συναφθεί υπό την αιγίδα του Προγράμματος των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για το Περιβάλλον. Αποτελεί το βασικό διεθνές νομικό πλαίσιο για τη συνεργασία και τη λήψη μέτρων για τον έλεγχο και τον περιορισμό της χρήσης και των ανθρωπογενών εκπομπών υδραργύρου και ενώσεων υδραργύρου στον αέρα, το νερό και το έδαφος. Σκοπός της είναι η προστασία της ανθρώπινης υγείας και του περιβάλλοντος από τις αρνητικές συνέπειες του υδραργύρου. Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο της 30, η Σύμβαση της Μιναμάτα υπόκειται σε επικύρωση, αποδοχή ή έγκριση από τα κράτη και από τους οργανισμούς περιφερειακής οικονομικής ολοκλήρωσης. Προκειμένου να θεσπιστούν τα απαραίτητα τεχνικά μέτρα που περιγράφονται παραπάνω, η ΕΕ θα πρέπει να επικυρώσει τη Σύμβαση της Μιναμάτα το συντομότερο δυνατόν. Υπό το φως των ολοκληρωμένων διαπραγματεύσεων και της έκδοσης του κανονισμού για τον υδράργυρο, είναι πλέον ώρα να ολοκληρωθεί η επικύρωση της Σύμβασης της Μιναμάτα, καθώς αποτελεί ζήτημα ασφάλειας της δημόσιας υγείας. Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την επικύρωση.
2016/11/22
Hybrid mismatches with third countries (A8-0134/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson) EL

Η έκθεση αφορούσε την ενδυνάμωση της οδηγίας για την φοροαποφυγή μέσω χωρών που δεν ανήκουν στην ΕΕ. Ως ΑΚΕΛ έχουμε ξεκάθαρη θέση ενάντια στην φοροαποφυγή. Στα πλαίσια αυτά υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2015 (A8-0161/2017 - Nedzhmi Ali) EL

Τα προβλήματα αδιαφάνειας που υπάρχουν στην Τράπεζα δεν μας επέτρεψαν να ψηφίσουμε υπέρ αυτής της έκθεσης, καθώς και το γεγονός ότι, παρόλο που η τράπεζα υποτίθεται πως ελέγχεται και από το Κοινοβούλιο, καμία παραίνεση από αυτό δεν έχει ληφθεί υπόψη τα τελευταία χρόνια. Ψηφίσαμε κατά της έκθεσης.
2016/11/22
Structural Reform Support Programme for 2017-2020 (A8-0374/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl) EL

Η έκθεση ουσιαστικά αφορά σε ένα νέο πρόγραμμα διαρθρωτικών μεταρρυθμίσεων που προωθείται στα μέλη κράτη. Σκοπό έχει τη χρηματοδότηση ειδικών ή εργαστηρίων τα οποία θα αποστέλλονται από την ΕΕ και θα συμβουλεύουν τα κράτη μέλη για τις μεταρρυθμίσεις που θεωρούν αναγκαίες.Τα λεφτά που θα χρησιμοποιηθούν για το εν λόγω πρόγραμμα - 142 800 000 ΕΥΡΩ - θα αντληθούν από τα ταμεία κοινωνικής συνοχής, γεγονός που μας βρίσκει αντίθετους.Μεταξύ άλλων οι μεταρρυθμίσεις που θα προωθήσουν θα αφορούν σε ιδιωτικοποιήσεις, διαχείριση ανθρώπινου δυναμικού, δημόσια οικονομική και δημοσιονομική μεταχείριση, διαδικασία προϋπολογισμού και χρέος. Επίσης, θα είναι δυνατές οι παρεμβάσεις στη δημόσια διοίκηση ενός κράτους μέλους.Αν και αναφέρεται μέσα στην έκθεση η καταπολέμηση της φτώχειας και η προστασία του περιβάλλοντος, εντούτοις οι αναφορές που γίνονται στις εργασιακές πολιτικές και οι συνέπειες που θα έχουν στους λαούς της ΕΕ δεν μας επιτρέπουν να στηρίξουμε μια τέτοια έκθεση.Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση
2016/11/22
European Year of Cultural Heritage (A8-0340/2016 - Mircea Diaconu) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την Έκθεση για το Ευρωπαϊκό Έτος Πολιτιστικής Κληρονομιάς αφού σε αυτήν συμπεριλαμβάνονται σημαντικές αναφορές που προτάθηκαν από την Ομάδα της Αριστερά. Συγκεκριμένα η Έκθεση περιλαμβάνει πρόνοιες για υποστήριξη τοπικών κοινοτήτων που έχουν πληγεί από φυσικές καταστροφές μέσω της οικονομικής υποστήριξης/οργάνωσης σχετικών εκδηλώσεων, γεγονός που θα συνεισφέρει στην επανόρθωση των πολιτιστικών ζημιών που έχουν υποστεί. Ιδιαίτερο ρόλο σε αυτή την προσπάθεια θα έχουν μικρές και μεσαίες επιχειρήσεις. Τέλος είναι σημαντικό να αναφερθεί και η ενίσχυση του ρόλου του Ευρωκοινοβουλίου σε αυτή την προσπάθεια, και δη στον συντονισμό και τη λειτουργία του Ευρωπαϊκού Έτους Πολιτιστικής Κληρονομιάς.
2016/11/22
Union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing (A8-0291/2016 - Theodor Dumitru Stolojan) EL

Το κείμενο του Κοινοβουλίου βελτίωσε στο ελάχιστο την πρόταση της επιτροπής αναφορικά με την ελεγκτική υπηρεσία η οποία υποστηρίζει την Επιτροπή στον λογιστικό έλεγχο. Κυρίως οι βελτιώσεις σημειώνουν στην έκθεση πως το δημόσιο συμφέρον υπο-εκπροσωπείται στην υπηρεσία αυτή σε αντίθεση με διάφορα ιδιωτικά συμφέροντα. Επίσης, οι υπηρεσία αυτή πρέπει να ελέγχεται και από το Κοινοβούλιο και το Συμβούλιο, αφού η ΕΕ είναι και ο κύριος χρηματοδότης της. Άποψη της ομάδας είναι πως οι εταιρίες/υπηρεσίες οι οποίες υποστηρίζουν την ελεγκτική δουλειά της Επιτροπής πρέπει να μετατραπούν σε δημόσιο σώμα. Τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Union programme to enhance the involvement of consumers in financial services policy making (A8-0008/2017 - Philippe Lamberts) EL

Η έκθεση αφορούσε τη συνέχιση της οικονομικής στήριξης συγκεκριμένων ΜΚΟ οι οποίες ιδρύθηκαν μέσω ευρωπαϊκών κονδυλίων με σκοπό τον έλεγχο του τραπεζικού λόμπυ και των τραπεζικών υπηρεσιών στην ΕΕ (Finance Watch και Better Finance). Σε γενικές γραμμές έκαναν αρκετά καλή δουλειά. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ για συνέχιση της χρηματοδότησής τους από την ΕΕ.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0125/2017 - Younous Omarjee) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0131/2017 - Bart Staes) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Justice (A8-0136/2017 - Benedek Jávor) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Auditors (A8-0151/2017 - Benedek Jávor) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0144/2017 - Bart Staes) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0141/2017 - Bart Staes) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0122/2017 - Benedek Jávor) EL

Η αιτιολόγηση ότι οι εκθέσεις δημοσιονομικής απαλλαγής απλά είναι δήλωση ότι ο προϋπολογισμός χρησιμοποιήθηκε όπως καθορίστηκε δεν ισχύει για μας σε αυτή την περίπτωση διότι διαφωνούμε κάθετα ακριβώς με τους όρους εντολής αλλά και με την δράση της ΕΥΕΔ. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0142/2017 - Benedek Jávor) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0140/2017 - Bart Staes) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0147/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Διαφωνούμε με τον όρο εντολής του ACER και δη με την υλοποίηση της τρίτης δέσμης μέτρων για την ενέργεια, καθώς στόχο έχει να ενισχύσει την ανταγωνιστικότητα της ενιαίας αγοράς, κάτι που συμβάλλει στην προώθηση των συμφερόντων των μονοπωλίων και πολυεθνικών και λειτουργεί εις βάρος των λαών. Επίσης εξίσου σημαντικό είναι πως ο στόχος για περαιτέρω ενίσχυση των εξουσιών σε κεντρικό κοινοτικό επίπεδο, δηλαδή η μεταφορά εξουσιών από τις εθνικές ή ανεξάρτητες αρχές στην δικαιοδοσία του ACER, καταστρατηγεί τα δικαιώματα των κρατών μελών και λειτουργεί εις βάρος των συμφερόντων των καταναλωτών. Δυστυχώς παραγνωρίζεται ο ρόλος των κρατών και δη η σημαντικότητα του κρατικού ελέγχου στη ρύθμιση της ενεργειακής αγοράς.Εν τούτοις στη συγκεκριμένη περίπτωση η έκθεση αφορά την ανάγκη να καλυφθούν οι ανάγκες που υπάρχουν ώστε να πληρωθούν μισθοί υφιστάμενων υπαλλήλων του ACER καθώς και να εργοδοτηθούν νέα άτομα, προκειμένου να αποφορτιστεί το υφιστάμενο προσωπικό. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0143/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά την δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητα του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0075/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά την δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητα του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0145/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητα του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0087/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0093/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (C8-0293/2016) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0086/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0098/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0130/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) (A8-0115/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0128/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (A8-0105/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0116/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) (A8-0129/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Η αιτιολόγηση ότι οι εκθέσεις δημοσιονομικής απαλλαγής απλά είναι δήλωση ότι ο προϋπολογισμός χρησιμοποιήθηκε όπως καθορίστηκε δεν ισχύει για μας σε αυτή την περίπτωση, διότι διαφωνούμε κάθετα ακριβώς με τους όρους εντολής αλλά και με την δράση της Eurojust. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0146/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών του Οργανισμού, αφού αξιολογήσαμε θετικά τη δράση του για το οικονομικό έτος 2015. Ειδικά όσον αφορά την αποτελεσματικότητά του μέσω της ενίσχυσης των συνεργιών και των κοινών υπηρεσιών του με άλλους οργανισμούς, τη βελτίωση της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας, της δημοσιότητας και της διαφάνειας της δράσης τους καθώς και την υιοθέτηση μέτρων για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών (whistle-blowers).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (A8-0137/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Η αιτιολόγηση ότι οι εκθέσεις δημοσιονομικής απαλλαγής απλά είναι δήλωση ότι ο προϋπολογισμός χρησιμοποιήθηκε όπως καθορίστηκε δεν ισχύει για μας σε αυτή την περίπτωση, διότι διαφωνούμε κάθετα ακριβώς με τους όρους εντολής της FRONTEX αλλά και με τη δράση της. Γι’ αυτό καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0103/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την απαλλαγή της κοινής επιχείρησης βιομηχανιών βιοπροϊόντων όσον αφορά την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού της κοινής επιχείρησης για το οικονομικό έτος 2015 και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών της.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (A8-0094/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την απαλλαγή της κοινής επιχείρησης Clean Sky 2 όσον αφορά την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού της κοινής επιχείρησης για το οικονομικό έτος 2015 και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών της.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (A8-0113/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την απαλλαγή της κοινής επιχείρησης ECSEL όσον αφορά την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού της κοινής επιχείρησης για το οικονομικό έτος 2015 και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών της.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH) (A8-0109/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την απαλλαγή της κοινής επιχείρησης ‘Κυψέλες καυσίμου και υδρογόνου 2΄ όσον αφορά την εκτέλεση του προϋπολογισμού της κοινής επιχείρησης για το οικονομικό έτος 2015 και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών της.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0083/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: ITER Joint Undertaking (A8-0108/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση αναφορικά με την απαλλαγή της ευρωπαϊκής κοινής επιχείρησης για τον ITER και την ανάπτυξη της ενέργειας από τη σύντηξη και για το κλείσιμο των λογαριασμών της γιατί έχουμε κάποιες επιφυλάξεις σχετικά με παρατυπίες, τις οποίες το Ευρωπαϊκό Ελεγκτικό Συμβούλιο αναγνωρίζει λόγω της πολυπλοκότητας των εργασιών του ITER, όπως επίσης γιατί δεν συμφωνούμε με την έρευνα για την πυρηνική σύντηξη.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0096/2017 - Miroslav Poche) EL

Οι απαλλαγές αφορούν την έγκριση κονδυλίων για τη λειτουργία των διάφορων υπηρεσιών της ΕΕ οι οποίες αφορούσαν το 2015 και τα τρέχοντα έξοδα των υπηρεσιών αυτών. Ψηφίσαμε υπέρ της απαλλαγής. Εντούτοις συνεχίζει η πάγιά μας διαφωνία ενάντια στις νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες προάγονται από τον γενικό της προϋπολογισμό.
2016/11/22
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions (A8-0138/2017 - Ulrike Rodust) EL

Η έκθεση αφορά εννέα απομακρυσμένες περιοχές της ΕΕ, οι οποίες αποτελούν τμήμα της Γαλλίας (Γουαδελούπη, Γαλλική Γουιάνα, Ρεϊνιόν, Μαρτινίκα, Μαγιότ και Άγιος Μαρτίνος), της Πορτογαλίας (Μαδέρα και Αζόρες) και της Ισπανίας (Κανάριες Νήσοι) για τις οποίες γίνεται έκκληση για να τους δοθεί η δυνατότητα ανανέωσης και εκσυγχρονισμού των στόλων τους. Οι εν λόγω περιοχές ισχυρίζονται ότι οι ιδιαιτερότητές τους δικαιολογούν την ανανέωση και τον εκσυγχρονισμό των στόλων τους. Για αυτούς τους λόγους υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
EU flagship initiative on the garment sector (A8-0080/2017 - Lola Sánchez Caldentey) EL

Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση σχετικά με την εμβληματική πρωτοβουλία της ΕΕ στον τομέα της ένδυσης γιατί εισάγει σημαντικά στοιχεία και ο συγκεκριμένος τομέας συγκαταλέγεται μεταξύ εκείνων με τον υψηλότερο κίνδυνο παραβιάσεων των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων και προσβολής της ανθρώπινης αξιοπρέπειας. Η έκθεση καλεί την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και τα κράτη μέλη να δεσμευτούν ενεργά και αποτελεσματικά ούτως ώστε να δοθεί τέλος στις συνεχιζόμενες παραβιάσεις των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων σε ολόκληρη την αλυσίδα εφοδιασμού. Τέλος χαιρετίζει και θεωρεί αναγκαία τις προετοιμασία που γίνονται για μια δεσμευτική συνθήκη του ΟΗΕ για τις επιχειρήσεις και τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα.
2016/11/22
State of play of farmland concentration in the EU: how to facilitate the access to land for farmers (A8-0119/2017 - Maria Noichl) EL

Η πρόσβαση σε γεωργική γη είναι ουσιώδους σημασίας. Η συγκέντρωση γεωργικής γης στην ΕΕ έχει πολυπληθείς επιπτώσεις στην κοινωνία και στους ενεργούς γεωργούς. Το μέλλον του γεωργικού τομέα εξαρτάται ιδιαίτερα από την πρόσβαση των νέων σε γεωργική γη. Η προθυμία τους για καινοτομία και επενδύσεις είναι ουσιαστική για το μέλλον των αγροτικών περιοχών. Μόνο τότε θα μπορέσει να σταματήσει η γήρανση του πληθυσμού που ασχολείται με τη γεωργία, να εξασφαλιστεί η διαδοχή στις εκμεταλλεύσεις, και να επιτευχθεί ο στόχος μιας πολυλειτουργικής γεωργίας με οικογενειακές εκμεταλλεύσεις και συνεταιριστικές επιχειρήσεις. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0121/2017 - Georgios Kyrtsos) EL

Η έκθεση αυτή ήταν εν πολλοίς απολογητής όλων των επενδύσεων της ΕΤΕ, κάτι που δεν μας βρίσκει σύμφωνους. Αρκετά έργα τα οποία χρηματοδοτεί η τράπεζα δεν ακολουθούν περιβαλλοντικά πρότυπα και για άλλα υπάρχουν υπόνοιες κακοδιαχείρισης.Ψηφίσαμε κατά της έκθεσης.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Mining Waste Directive (A8-0071/2017 - György Hölvényi) EL

Η οδηγία για τη διαχείριση των αποβλήτων της εξορυκτικής βιομηχανίας θεσπίστηκε στον απόηχο δύο σοβαρών ατυχημάτων με διαρροή επικίνδυνων εξορυκτικών αποβλήτων το 1998 και το 2000. Προβλέπει μέτρα, διαδικασίες και κατευθύνσεις για την κατά το δυνατόν πρόληψη και μείωση παντός είδους δυσμενών επιπτώσεων στο περιβάλλον και στην ανθρώπινη υγεία, κατά τη διαχείριση εξορυκτικών αποβλήτων. Η οδηγία καθιερώνει αυστηρότερες απαιτήσεις για τις λεγόμενες εγκαταστάσεις της «κατηγορίας Α», των οποίων η ανεπαρκής διαχείριση θα μπορούσε να προκαλέσει σοβαρά ατυχήματα, δηλαδή ατυχήματα που ενέχουν σοβαρό κίνδυνο για την ανθρώπινη υγεία και το περιβάλλον. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0270/2017, B8-0270/2017, B8-0271/2017, B8-0272/2017, B8-0274/2017, B8-0275/2017, B8-0276/2017, B8-0277/2017) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε το κείμενο επειδή δεν ανταποκρίνεται στην πραγματικότητα. Αποσιωπούνται εντελώς οι πραγματικοί λόγοι που οδήγησαν στην αποσταθεροποίηση της χώρας. Για παράδειγμα, δεν γίνεται καμία αναφορά στις συνεχείς εξωτερικές παρεμβάσεις που πλήττουν τη χώρα ούτε στο οικονομικό εμπάργκο που εφαρμόζει η Αμερική με ολέθριες συνέπειες για τον λαό. Επίσης αποσιωπάται εντελώς πως οι διαδηλωτές εφαρμόζουν βία, ενώ δεν δέχονται να υπάρξει ειρηνικός διάλογος με τον Μαδούρο ώστε να επιλυθούν τα διάφορα προβλήματα. Οι επιθέσεις των διαδηλωτών αποτελούν συνέχεια της διαχρονικής προσπάθειας του ακροδεξιού κατεστημένου της χώρας και των ξένων δυνάμεων να ανατρέψουν με κάθε μέσο την κυβέρνηση του Ν. Μαδούρο. Οι κινητοποιήσεις της αντιπολίτευσης έγιναν αρκετές φορές η αφορμή για το ξέσπασμα ακραίων επιθέσεων που οδηγούσαν στον τραυματισμό και στον θάνατο πολιτών, σε ζημιές σε δημόσια κτήρια και υπηρεσίες, και σε γενικότερη παράλυση της χώρας και σε συνθήκες πολιτικής κρίσης. Υπό αυτά τα δεδομένα, κλιμακώνονται οι ανησυχίες για τις πραγματικές προθέσεις της αντιπολίτευσης. Το Ευρωκοινοβούλιο πρέπει να στηρίξει τις προσπάθειες της εκλελεγμένης κυβέρνησης Μαδούρο, τις οποίες στηρίζει και η Ένωση των Εθνών της Νότιας Αμερικής UNASUR, για διάλογο και ειρηνική επίλυση των προβλημάτων. Ως ΑΚΕΛ εκφράζουμε την αλληλεγγύη μας στον δύσκολο αγώνα που συνεχίζει να δίνει ο λαός της Βενεζουέλας.
2016/11/22
Combating terrorism (A8-0228/2016 - Monika Hohlmeier) EL

Ενώ η πρόθεση της οδηγίας –για την καταπολέμηση της τρομοκρατίας– είναι σαφώς σημαντική, το ίδιο το κείμενο είναι αρκετά ασαφές και δεν φαίνεται να περιέχει μέτρα άλλα από αυτά που ήδη καλύπτονται από την ισχύουσα νομοθεσία. Κατά κύριο λόγο, η έκθεση στην ολότητα της επιδιώκει την συσσώρευση των εξουσιών στην ΕΕ υπό το πρόσχημα της απειλής της τρομοκρατίας που μαστίζει ολόκληρη την Ευρώπη, εις βάρος των κυριαρχικών δικαιωμάτων των κρατών μελών. Άλλο αρνητικό στοιχείο είναι η συνεχής αναφορά στην αναγκαιότητα της ανταλλαγής δεδομένων και πληροφοριών. Tα μέτρα που προτείνονται εν γένει θέτουν σε κίνδυνο βασικές ελευθερίες και θεμελιώδη ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα, όπως είναι η προστασία των προσωπικών δεδομένων και το δικαίωμα στην ιδιωτική ζωή. Πρόσθετα, η οδηγία έχει επίσης τη δυνατότητα να κάνει τις προθέσεις να τιμωρούνται ως εγκλήματα, ακόμα και όταν δεν υπάρχει πραγματικό έγκλημα, δηλαδή τείνει να θεσπίζει τις προθέσεις ως εγκλήματα με βάση υποψίες και θεωρητικές παραδοχές, γεγονός το οποίο έρχεται σε σύγκρουση με τα αναγνωρισμένα συστήματα ποινικής δικαιοσύνης. Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders (A8-0218/2016 - Monica Macovei) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αφορά την τροποποίηση του κώδικα συνόρων του Σένγκεν και τη θέσπιση υποχρεωτικών συστηματικών ελέγχων κατά βάσεις δεδομένων για όλους τους τύπους διέλευσης των εξωτερικών συνόρων (χερσαία, θαλάσσια, εναέρια σύνορα) για όλους όσους εισέρχονται ή εξέρχονται, εννοώντας τους υπηκόους τρίτων χωρών, τους πολίτες της ΕΕ και τους ανθρώπους που επωφελούνται από το δικαίωμα της ελεύθερης διακίνησης εντός Σένγκεν. Ουσιαστικά, δεν υπάρχει πραγματική αιτιολόγηση και απόδειξη της αναγκαιότητας, της αποτελεσματικότητας και της αναλογικότητας των διατάξεων που περιλαμβάνονται στον παρόντα κανονισμό. Αντιθέτως, η παρούσα πράξη εύκολα μπορεί να χαρακτηρισθεί ως μια μαζικά επεμβατική πράξη που θα αντιμετωπίζει όλους τους ταξιδιώτες ως ύποπτους και εν δυνάμει εγκληματίες, μια πολίτική προς επίτευξη του στόχου για δημιουργία μιας Ευρώπης Φρούριο. Για αυτό και καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union (A8-0390/2016 - Guy Verhofstadt) EL

Η έκθεση έχει στόχο της την εμβάθυνση της ευρωπαϊκής ολοκλήρωσης με μέτρα εκτός των συνθηκών λειτουργίας. Με όραμα τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Ευρώπης, ο εισηγητής ζητά τη μετατροπή της Επιτροπής σε κυβέρνηση της ΕΕ, αποδυνάμωση του ρόλου του Συμβουλίου, αποκλεισμό των βουλευτών από χώρες εκτός ευρωζώνης από αποφάσεις για την ευρωζώνη, και αλλαγή των Συνθηκών. Η κυβέρνηση της ΕΕ θα αποφασίζει τότε τόσο για την οικονομική πολιτική όσο και για την εξωτερική πολιτική και την άμυνα. Για το ΑΚΕΛ είναι ξεκάθαρο πως η ομοσπονδιοποίηση της ΕΕ μόνο το μεγάλο Κεφάλαιο και τους θιασώτες του θα εξυπηρετήσει. Οι λαοί της ΕΕ θα χάσουν όποια κυριαρχικά δικαιώματα είχαν και η έλλειψη δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας θα διογκωθεί. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty (A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso, Elmar Brok) EL

Στο ίδιο μήκος κύματος με την έκθεση Verhofstadt είναι και η παρούσα έκθεση. Αυτή τη φορά προωθεί την ομοσπονδιοποίηση της ΕΕ μέσα στο πλαίσιο των Συνθηκών. Προτείνει υπερυπουργό οικονομικών, αλλαγές στο ρόλο του Συμβουλίου, και κοινή γραμμή στην εξωτερική πολιτική και την άμυνα. Στην πραγματικότητα, οι δύο αυτές εκθέσεις αποτελούν δύο όψεις του ίδιου νομίσματος. Όπως και σε σχέση με την έκθεση Verhofstadt, ψηφίσαμε εναντίον.
2016/11/22
Budgetary capacity for the Eurozone (A8-0038/2017 - Reimer Böge, Pervenche Berès) EL

Οι συνεισηγητές της συγκεκριμένης έκθεσης δημιούργησαν ένα συνονθύλευμα των θέσεων του ΕΛΚ, των Σ&Δ και των Φιλελευθέρων σε θέματα της ευρωζώνης ούτως ώστε να δώσουν πολιτική υποστήριξη στην Επιτροπή Juncker για την παροχή δημοσιονομικής ικανότητας στην ευρωζώνη. Έτσι, αντί να γίνονται προσπάθειες ενίσχυσης του κοινωνικού κράτους και των επενδύσεων στην πραγματική οικονομία, η έκθεση προτείνει ένα Ευρωπαϊκό Νομισματικό Ταμείο στα πρότυπα του ΔΝΤ. Όμως ούτε και οι μεγάλες ομάδες κατάφεραν να συμφωνήσουν τις προτεραιότητες του ταμείου αυτού, αφήνοντας την πρωτοβουλία στην Επιτροπή. Οι λαοί γνωρίζουν πολύ καλά τις θέσεις και τις πρακτικές του ΔΝΤ όταν αυτό πρόκειται να επιβάλει διαρθρωτικές αλλαγές σε μια χώρα. Το ξέρουν οι λαοί σε όλο τον κόσμο, αλλά και στην ΕΕ τα τελευταία 8 χρόνια. Η θεσμοθέτηση της λιτότητας και των νεοφιλελεύθερων επιθέσεων ενάντια στους εργαζόμενους δεν θα μας βρει ποτέ σύμφωνους. Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
European Cloud Initiative (A8-0006/2017 - Jerzy Buzek) EL

Η εν λόγω πρωτοβουλία στηρίζεται σε σχέδιο της Επιτροπής για υπηρεσίες βασιζόμενες στο υπολογιστικό νέφος και για υποδομή δεδομένων παγκόσμιας εμβέλειας με σκοπό να διασφαλιστεί ότι η επιστήμη, οι επιχειρήσεις και οι δημόσιες υπηρεσίες επωφελούνται από την επανάσταση των μαζικών δεδομένων. Θα διευκολύνει τα άτομα που ασχολούνται με την έρευνα και την καινοτομία στην πρόσβαση και την επαναχρησιμοποίηση δεδομένων και θα περιορίσει το κόστος της αποθήκευσης και της προηγμένης ανάλυσης των δεδομένων. Ωστόσο, η εν λόγω έκθεση αναφέρει επίσης ότι το Ευρωπαϊκό Νέφος Ανοικτής Επιστήμης είναι το κλειδί για την ανάπτυξη της ενιαίας ψηφιακής αγοράς και της ανάγκης να κατασκευασθεί ιδιωτικός τομέας για τη δημιουργία ευρωπαϊκών υποδομών δεδομένων. Για αυτούς τους λόγους τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (A8-0009/2017 - Artis Pabriks) EL

Το ΑΚΕΛ αλλά και όλα τα κόμματα της Αριστεράς σε Ευρώπη και Καναδά καταδίκασαν τη CETA ήδη από την πρώτη στιγμή. Πρόκειται για μια συμφωνία η οποία μόνο στόχο έχει την μεγιστοποίηση του κέρδους των πολυεθνικών επιχειρήσεων εις βάρος των υγειονομικών προτύπων, των δικαιωμάτων των εργαζομένων και των θέσεων εργασίας. Αρθρογράφησα πολλάκις ενάντια στη συμφωνία αυτή και παραμένω σταθερά ενάντια στην CETA. Καταψήφισα την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (A8-0382/2016 - Helmut Scholz) EL

Η παρούσα σύσταση αφορά σε συμφωνία εταιρικής σχέσης και συνεργασίας μεταξύ της ΕΕ και της Μογγολίας. Πάγια θέση του ΑΚΕΛ είναι ότι μέσω τέτοιων συμφωνιών προωθούνται νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές που σε καμία περίπτωση δεν είναι προς όφελος των απλών ανθρώπων. Για αυτό και τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0383/2016 - Helmut Scholz) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αφορά σε σχέδιο απόφασης του Συμβουλίου για τη σύναψη συμφωνίας εταιρικής σχέσης και συνεργασίας μεταξύ της ΕΕ και της Μογγολίας. Πάγια θέση του ΑΚΕΛ είναι ότι μέσω τέτοιων συμφωνιών προωθούνται νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές που δεν είναι προς όφελος των απλών ανθρώπων. Για αυτό και τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017) EL

Δυστυχώς το σύστημα εμπορίας εκπομπών, το οποίο προτείνεται, αντί να έχει πρωταρχικό στόχο την προστασία του περιβάλλοντος και την ενίσχυση της ποιότητας ζωής των ανθρώπων, στην πραγματικότητα επιδιώκει την παροχή δωρεάν δικαιωμάτων στις μεγάλες βιομηχανίες ως κίνητρο για να παραμείνουν στην ΕΕ. Γι’ αυτό τον λόγο καταψηφίσαμε την πρόταση για ένα σύστημα το οποίο θα ευνοεί τις μεγάλες πολυεθνικές, που είναι οι κύριοι υπαίτιοι των κλιματικών αλλαγών, να αυξάνουν την κέρδη τους. Καταψηφίσαμε το εν λόγω σύστημα εμπορίας εκπομπών, καθώς, όπως έχει αποδειχτεί, δεν μπορεί να συμβάλει στη μείωση των εκπομπών.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Albania (A8-0023/2017 - Knut Fleckenstein) EL

Παρόλο που διαφωνούμε τόσο με την οικονομική πολιτική της Ένωσης, όσο και με την εξωτερική της πολιτική, δεν αμφισβητούμε τη θέληση κυβερνήσεων και του λαού χωρών που θέλουν να ενταχτούν σε αυτή. Πάγια μας θέση ως ΑΚΕΛ είναι πως ο κάθε λαός είναι και πρέπει να είναι κυρίαρχος στη χώρα του και οι αποφάσεις του πρέπει να γίνονται σεβαστές. Για τους πιο πάνω λόγους, τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2017 (A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark) EL

Καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση. Μεταξύ άλλων, υποστηρίζει την Ένωση Κεφαλαίων και την τραπεζική ένωση στην ΕΕ, υποστηρίζει τη σύζευξη του μισθού με την παραγωγικότητα, την τυφλή υπακοή στο Σύμφωνο Σταθερότητας και Ανάπτυξης. Αντ’ αυτού, η ομάδα της Αριστεράς κατάθεσε άποψη μειοψηφίας, η οποία απαιτεί την άμεση ακύρωση του Δημοσιονομικού Συμφώνου και του ευρωπαϊκού εξαμήνου.
2016/11/22
European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2017 (A8-0037/2017 - Yana Toom) EL

Η συγκεκριμένη έκθεση καταπιάνεται ιδιαίτερα με την αύξηση της φτώχειας (τόσο στην εργασία όσο και στην ανεργία) και ιδιαίτερα με την παιδική φτώχεια. Επίσης (προς μεγάλη μας έκπληξη), καταδικάζει την επισφάλεια στην εργασία και τα συμβόλαια μηδενικών ωρών μεταξύ άλλων. Την ίδια ώρα όμως, στηρίζει ξεκάθαρα ένα μηχανισμό μόνιμων διαρθρωτικών μεταρρυθμίσεων στα κράτη μέλη, κάτι που εξάλλου είχε προταθεί και στην έκθεση των πέντε προέδρων με τα λεγόμενα «μόνιμα συμβούλια ανταγωνιστικότητας» σε κάθε κράτος μέλος. Την ίδια ώρα, θεραπεία διά πάσαν νόσον που έχει να κάνει με την ανεργία και τη φτώχεια στην εργασία αποτελεί φυσικά η κινητικότητα των εργαζομένων και η αναπροσαρμογή της σύνταξης προς τα πάνω. Γι’ αυτό τον λόγο γίνεται εκτεταμένη αναφορά το ERASMUS +, αλλά και η ανάγκη για προσαρμογή «της αγοράς εργασίας» στις «ανάγκες των ηλικιωμένων εργαζομένων». Γι’ αυτό τον λόγο καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Single Market Governance within the European Semester 2017 (A8-0016/2017 - Antonio López-Istúriz White) EL

Σε αυτή την έκθεση γίνεται εκτενής αναφορά σε μηχανισμούς μόνιμων διαρθρωτικών μεταρρυθμίσεων στα κράτη μέλη, κάτι που θα επιτρέπει στην Επιτροπή να διεξάγει σύμφωνα με την έκθεση «ελέγχους στην νομοθεσία των κρατών μελών για νόμους που δεν ευθυγραμμίζονται» με την ενιαία αγορά. Αυτοί οι έλεγχοι θα διεξάγονται και μέσα από τις ανά χώρα συστάσεις που γίνονται στα πλαίσια του ευρωπαϊκού εξαμήνου. Επίσης, η έκθεση ζητά ένα καλύτερο επενδυτικό κλίμα, κάτι που σημαίνει περισσότερες διευκολύνσεις σε τράπεζες και επιχειρήσεις και μεγαλύτερη πίεση ενάντια στους εργαζόμενους και τα δικαιώματα τους, για δήθεν περισσότερη ανταγωνιστικότητα. Όπως ήταν αναμενόμενο, η έκθεση κατακρίνει κάθε είδους «προστατευτισμό» εντός της εσωτερικής αγοράς και καλωσορίζει τις προσπάθειες που γίνονται για να ανοίξουν τα κλειστά επαγγέλματα που έμειναν στην ΕΕ. Τέλος, τάσσεται ανεπιφύλακτα υπέρ του REFIT (του προγράμματος «εκμοντερνισμού» των νομοθεσιών της Ένωσης, το οποίο οι προοδευτικές δυνάμεις μέσα και έξω από το Κοινοβούλιο καταδικάζουν ανεπιφύλακτα, αφού στην πραγματικότητα κοστολογεί όλες τις πολιτικές των κρατών με βάση το κέρδος και τη δήθεν ανταγωνιστικότητα).Όπως και σε όλο το πακέτο για την εσωτερική διακυβέρνηση, καταψηφίσαμε.
2016/11/22
Banking Union - Annual Report 2016 (A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner) EL

Σε γενικές γραμμές, η έκθεση ζητά την ολοκλήρωση της τραπεζικής ένωσης στα πλαίσια της ολοκλήρωσης της ενοποίησης των δημοσιονομικών και νομισματικών πολιτικών της Ένωσης. Η γραμμή για υπερυπουργό οικονομικών και για ένταξη της ΕΚΤ στα πλαίσια μιας νέας δομής κράτους στις Βρυξέλλες είναι πλέον η επίσημη από την Επιτροπή και τις τρείς μεγάλες ομάδες στο Ευρωκοινοβούλιο και μας βρίσκει αντίθετους. Σε αυτό το πλαίσιο γίνονται και μεγάλες παραχωρήσεις στο τραπεζιτικό κεφάλαιο και οι κανόνες που θέτουν οι ίδιοι οι εποπτικοί μηχανισμοί γίνεται προσπάθεια να παρακαμφθούν. Τέλος η έκθεση προτείνει την πώληση των μη εξυπηρετούμενων δανείων (μεταξύ άλλων προφανώς σε επενδυτικά ταμεία) και απαιτεί περισσότερη «ευελιξία» για τους τραπεζιτικούς ομίλους στο υπάρχον πλαίσιο εξυγίανσης των τραπεζών. Προφανώς σε καμία περίπτωση η έκθεση δεν δίνει λύσεις στο πρόβλημα της υπερσυσσώρευσης κεφαλαίου από τις τράπεζες (αυτό που οι ίδιοι ονομάζουν too-big-to-fail) και δεν προτείνει πραγματικά τίποτα για τη στήριξη της πραγματικής οικονομίας από τις τράπεζες. Όπως και σε όλα τα θέματα τραπεζικής ένωσης και ευρωπαϊκού εξαμήνου, καταψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Biological low risk pesticides (B8-0140/2017) EL

Η Ομάδα μας ήταν πάντα πολύ επικριτική για την εντατική χρήση των φυτοφαρμάκων, τα περισσότερα από τα οποία είναι χημικά, κάποια από αυτά είναι εξαιρετικά επικίνδυνα και τοξικά, και για αυτό και η προώθηση των βιολογικών φυτοφαρμάκων χαμηλού κινδύνου μας βρίσκει σύμφωνους. Γενικά, το ψήφισμα είναι ισορροπημένο και εξυπηρετεί τους σκοπούς για τους οποίους ζητήθηκε. Για τον λόγο αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
EU-Cook Islands sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (A8-0010/2017 - João Ferreira) EL

Η σύναψη συμφωνίας σύμπραξης βιώσιμης αλιείας εμπλέκει στρατηγικά την ΕΕ και τις Νήσους Κουκ, παρέχοντας αλιευτικές δυνατότητες σε σκάφη που φέρουν σημαίες των κρατών μελών της ΕΕ, θεωρητικά με βάση τις βέλτιστες διαθέσιμες επιστημονικές γνωμοδοτήσεις και σε πλαίσιο σεβασμού των μέτρων διατήρησης και διαχείρισης της Επιτροπής Αλιείας Δυτικού και Κεντρικού Ειρηνικού (WCPFC) και εντός των ορίων του διαθέσιμου πλεονάσματος. Θετικό στοιχείο της έκθεσης είναι το ότι προτείνεται υποβολή ετήσιας έκθεσης στο Κοινοβούλιο και το Συμβούλιο σχετικά με τα αποτελέσματα του πολυετούς τομεακού προγράμματος. Για αυτό και υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Control of the Register and composition of the Commission's expert groups (A8-0002/2017 - Dennis de Jong) EL

Οι συστάσεις που περιέχονται στην παρούσα έκθεση αντικατοπτρίζουν πλήρως τις θέσεις της ομάδας μας, σχετικά με την ενίσχυση της δημοσιότητας, της διαφάνειας, της δημοκρατικής λογοδοσίας και την καταπολέμηση της σύγκρουσης συμφερόντων. Για αυτό και υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
The role of whistleblowers in the protection of EU´s financial interests (A8-0004/2017 - Dennis de Jong) EL

Μέσα από την παρούσα έκθεση προωθείται η υποβολή από την Επιτροπή μιας νομοθετικής πρωτοβουλίας για την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση, γεγονός που αντικατοπτρίζει πλήρως τις θέσεις που εκφράζονται από την ομάδας GUE/NGL σχετικά με την προστασία των πληροφοριοδοτών, και συνοψίζονται στο γεγονός ότι απαιτείται νομοθετική δράση στον συγκεκριμένο τομέα. Για αυτό και υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
List of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements (A8-0035/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αφορά την πρώτη διαβούλευση, και συγκεκριμένα αυτήν για την τροποποίηση της απόφασης 2009/935/ΔΕΥ με σκοπό τη συμπερίληψη της Δανίας στον κατάλογο τρίτων κρατών με τους οποίους η Europol συνάπτει συμφωνίες διεθνούς συνεργασίας. Αυτό είναι αναγκαίο, καθότι με τον νέο κανονισμό της Europol η Δανία αποκλείεται από την εφαρμογή του. Επ’ αυτού, τον Δεκέμβριο του 2015, η Δανία πραγματοποίησε δημοψήφισμα για τη μετατροπή της ισχύουσας μη ευέλικτης ρήτρας σχετικά με την εξαίρεση σε θέματα δικαιοσύνης και εσωτερικών υποθέσεων στο πρωτόκολλο αριθ. 22 σε μια πιο ευέλικτη επιλεκτική συμμετοχή. Ωστόσο, η βούληση της πλειοψηφίας του λαού ήταν σαφής: να αποχωρήσουν από τη Europol, με την αιτιολογία ότι αυτό είναι ένα υπερεθνικό όργανο, το οποίο αφαιρεί την εθνική κυριαρχία στον τομέα της αστυνομικής συνεργασίας, και τόνισαν την ανάγκη η κυβέρνηση της Δανίας να επιστρέψει σε ένα διακυβερνητικό καθεστώς στο οποίο η Δανία ναι μεν εξακολουθεί να συνεργάζεται με τη Europol, αλλά με τη δική της λογοδοσία και την κυριαρχία της, γεγονός που καθιστά δυνατό τον έλεγχο των προσωπικών δεδομένων που στέλνει στη Europol και κατ’ επέκταση διατηρεί τις δικές της πολιτικές επιβολής του νόμου. Για αυτούς τους λόγους, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance methyl 2-[[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-CHMICA) to control measures (A8-0024/2017 - Lorenzo Fontana) EL

Ο στόχος της παρούσας πρότασης είναι να καλέσει τα κράτη μέλη να υποβάλουν τη νέα ψυχοτρόπο ουσία MDMB-CHMICA σε μέτρα ελέγχου και να επιβάλουν ποινικές κυρώσεις. Παρόλο που η έκθεση έχει θετικά στοιχεία, τηρήσαμε αποχή καθώς ο εισηγητής είναι μέλος της ομάδας ENF.
2016/11/22
Annual report on EU competition policy (A8-0001/2017 - Tibor Szanyi) EL

Η ανταγωνιστικότητα χρησιμοποιείται από την Επιτροπή και τους θιασώτες του νεοφιλελευθερισμού ως μηχανισμός διάλυσης των εργασιακών θέσμιων, ως πίεση των μισθών και των εργασιακών δικαιωμάτων προς τα κάτω, και ως μέσο διάλυσης του κοινωνικού κράτους. Εντούτοις, η έκθεση του Κοινοβουλίου περιείχε θετικά στοιχεία. Τέτοια ήταν κριτική στο κοινωνικό ντάμπιγκ, η κριτική στην ΤΤΙΡ και η συμπερίληψη τομέων όπου χρειάζεται να υπάρχει κοινωνική ευαισθησία (π.χ. γεωργία, υγεία). Τηρήσαμε στάση αποχής, διότι, παρ’ όλα τα θετικά στοιχεία της, η έκθεση έχει θέμα τον ανταγωνισμό και την προώθηση του, κάτι που οι μεγάλες δυνάμεις του Κοινοβουλίου αντιλαμβάνονται με τον τρόπο που αναλύθηκε πιο πάνω.
2016/11/22
Promoting gender equality in mental health and clinical research (A8-0380/2016 - Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση επισημαίνει πως η έρευνα και η πρακτική εξακολουθεί να μη λαμβάνει επαρκώς υπόψη τις διαφορές μεταξύ ανδρών και γυναικών στον τομέα της υγείας, της ασθένειας και της θεραπείας. Το κύριο μήνυμα της έκθεσης είναι ότι υπάρχει επείγουσα ανάγκη για τη βελτίωση της πρόσβασης τόσο των ανδρών όσο και των γυναικών στον τομέα της υγείας. Στην έκθεση προστέθηκαν και διάφορες τροπολογίες της ομάδας μας οι οποίες αφορούν τη σεξουαλική και αναπαραγωγική υγεία και τα δικαιώματα, τα δικαιώματα των LGBTI, τα δικαιώματα των μεταναστών και τις κοινωνικο-οικονομικές πτυχές της πρόσβασης στην υγειονομική περίθαλψη εν γένει καθώς και τις επιπτώσεις των πολιτικών λιτότητας ειδικότερα. Η έκθεση αναπτύσσει επίσης τη θέση πως πρέπει να κυρωθεί η Σύμβαση της Κωνσταντινούπολης. Για αυτούς τους λόγους, υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Priorities for the 61th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0018/2017 - Constance Le Grip, Maria Arena) EL

Η έκθεση περιλαμβάνει εισηγήσεις αναφορικά με την ενδυνάμωση των γυναικών και των κοριτσιών, την ενίσχυση της οικονομικής τους χειραφέτησης και την εξάλειψη των εμποδίων στην αγορά εργασίας, την διασφάλιση ίσου μεριδίου σε όλα τα επίπεδα λήψης αποφάσεων και την αντιμετώπιση των αναγκών των πιο περιθωριοποιημένων γυναικών. Γι’ αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
An integrated approach to Sport Policy: good governance, accessibility and integrity (A8-0381/2016 - Hannu Takkula) EL

Η έκθεση προτείνει κατευθυντήριες γραμμές και συστάσεις τις οποίες θα μπορούσε να αξιοποιήσει η Επιτροπή κατά την αξιολόγηση της πολιτικής για τον αθλητισμό. Γενικά, η έκθεση υπερασπίζεται την ιδέα ότι ο αθλητισμός μπορεί να συμβάλει στην ενσωμάτωση και την κοινωνική ένταξη. Ιδιαίτερη σημασία δίνεται στην προσβασιμότητα για όλους στον αθλητισμό, ο οποίος χαρακτηρίζεται ως θεμελιώδες δικαίωμα για όλους συμπεριλαμβανομένων και των κοινωνικά ευπαθών ομάδων (ηλικιωμένοι, μετανάστες, άτομα με αναπηρίες). Πρόσθετα, η έκθεση επικρίνει τις καταχρήσεις και τις απαράδεκτες αθέμιτες πρακτικές. Για αυτούς τους λόγους υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Cross-border aspects of adoptions (A8-0370/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) EL

Κύριος σκοπός αυτού του ψηφίσματος είναι η αντιμετώπιση του θέματος της διασυνοριακής αναγνώρισης εγχώριων αποφάσεων υιοθεσίας. Γενικότερα, ο προτεινόμενος κανονισμός δεν επιδιώκει να τροποποιήσει το οικογενειακό δίκαιο που επικρατεί σε κάθε κράτος μέλος αλλά να ενισχύσει την ασφάλεια του δικαίου για τους πολίτες που μετακινούνται από ένα κράτος μέλος σε άλλος καθώς και να συμπληρώσει τα υπάρχοντα νομικά κενά. Για αυτούς τους λόγους υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Bilateral safeguard clause and stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (A8-0277/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez) EL

Αν και αυτό το νομοσχέδιο δεν προβλέπει τίποτα αναφορικά με τις κοινωνικές ή/και περιβαλλοντικές συνθήκες για την παραγωγή των μπανανών, ωστόσο ανταποκρίνεται στη σημερινή πραγματικότητα σύμφωνα με την οποία η εμπορική συμφωνία (ΕΕ- Περού και Κολομβίας) έχει επανειλημμένα οδηγήσει το Περού να υπερβεί τα όρια εξαγωγής μπανανών. Ο εν λόγω κανονισμός που αναφέρεται στην έκθεση σκοπό έχει να ξεπεράσει αυτά τα ζητήματα και να προστατεύσει τους ευρωπαίους παραγωγούς μπανάνας. Για αυτούς τους λόγους υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0377/2016 - Linnéa Engström) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αφορά στην αναθεώρηση του κανονισμού 1006/2008 σχετικά με τις αλιευτικές άδειες για τα σκάφη που δραστηριοποιούνται εκτός των χωρικών υδάτων της Ένωσης. Στην έκθεση τονίζεται επίσης ότι η ΕΕ πρέπει να προωθήσει τα περιβαλλοντικά και κοινωνικά της πρότυπα στο διεθνές πλαίσιο. Υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση γιατί είναι σημαντικό το πεδίο εφαρμογής του συστήματος αδειοδότησης να επεκταθεί ώστε να συμπεριλάβει τις πρακτικές που δεν ελέγχονται πλήρως.
2016/11/22
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (A8-0260/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) EL

Η παρούσα έκθεση αφορά την πρόταση της Επιτροπής για τροποποίηση του Κανονισμού 539/2001 και μεταφορά της Γεωργίας στο Παράρτημα ΙΙ, το οποίο περιλαμβάνει τον κατάλογο των τρίτων χωρών οι υπήκοοι των οποίων απαλλάσσονται από την υποχρέωση θεώρησης για τη διέλευση των εξωτερικών συνόρων των κρατών μελών. Η απελευθέρωση των θεωρήσεων ήταν αίτημα του λαού της Γεωργίας εδώ και καιρό. Για αυτό υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Implementation of Erasmus + (A8-0389/2016 - Milan Zver) EL

Χωρίς αμφιβολία το Πρόγραμμα Erasmus+ έχει επιδείξει καλό έργο (τόσο ποσοτικά όσον αφορά την προσβασιμότητα των φοιτητών, όσο και ποιοτικά). Εντούτοις η διασύνδεση του με τον μηχανισμό εγγύησης σπουδαστικών δανείων δεν μας βρίσκει σύμφωνους. Η μέχρι στιγμής εμπειρία έχει δείξει ότι είναι πάρα πολύ δύσκολο να πάρεις δάνειο μέσω αυτού του μηχανισμού. Τη ίδια στιγμή ο τομέας των φοιτητικών δανείων έχει μετατραπεί σε φούσκα και αναμένεται να έχει χειρότερες παρενέργειες από την προηγούμενη των στεγαστικών. Για τους λόγους αυτούς τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement: procedures for its application (A8-0361/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld) EL

Η έκθεση είναι τεχνικού χαρακτήρα θέλοντας να θεσπίσει κάποιους κανόνες στην εφαρμογή της συμφωνίας που ήδη υπάρχει. Η συμφωνία σταθεροποίησης είχε ψηφιστεί στην Ολομέλεια τον Ιανουάριο του 2016 και τέθηκε σε ισχύ τον περασμένο Απρίλιο. Ως ΑΚΕΛ είχαμε τότε τοποθετηθεί κατά και διατηρήσαμε την ίδια στάση καταψηφίζοντας την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by specific Union import rules (A8-0311/2016 - Hannu Takkula) EL

Η εν λόγω έκθεση αφορά τον Κανονισμό (ΕΕ) 2015/936 ο οποίος καθορίζει τους κοινούς κανόνες για την εισαγωγή κλωστοϋφαντουργικών προϊόντων από τρίτες χώρες τα οποία δεν καλύπτονται από διμερείς συμφωνίες, πρωτόκολλα ή άλλους διακανονισμούς ή άλλους κανόνες εισαγωγής της Ένωσης. Επί του παρόντος, καλύπτει τη Λευκορωσία και τη Λαοκρατική Δημοκρατία της Κορέας. Συγκεκριμένα, η τροποποίηση του κανονισμού αφορά στην άρση των ποσοστώσεων που επιβάλλονται στις εισαγωγές κλωστοϋφαντουργικών προϊόντων και ειδών ένδυσης από την Λευκορωσία. Για αυτούς τους λόγους υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Center (A8-0363/2016 - Elmar Brok) EL

Πρόκειται για ένα τεχνικό φάκελο που αφορά τη συνέχιση της λειτουργίας του Διεθνούς Κέντρου Επιστήμης και Τεχνολογίας που υπάρχει στην Ουκρανία. Το Κέντρο εξελίχθηκε σε ένα πεδίο συνεργασίας μεταξύ των χωρών με σκοπό την προώθηση της βελτίωσης των διεθνών μηχανισμών για την πρόληψη της διάδοσης των όπλων μαζικής καταστροφής και την ανάπτυξη τέτοιων καινοτόμων συστημάτων που θα διασφαλίζουν την ασφάλεια και την οικονομική ανάπτυξη για ολόκληρη την ήπειρο. Με δεδομένο ότι το Κέντρο έχει ως κύριο στόχο την πρόληψη της διάδοσης των όπλων μαζικής καταστροφής και την προώθηση μιας κουλτούρας ασφάλειας, υπερψηφίσαμε τη σχετική σύσταση.
2016/11/22
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0001/2017) EL

Το ψήφισμα σχετίζεται με τις προσπάθειες της ΕΕ για καταπολέμηση της νομιμοποίησης εσόδων από παράνομες δραστηριότητες και της χρηματοδότησης της τρομοκρατίας.Αφορά ουσιαστικά την τροποποίηση του κατ’ εξουσιοδότηση κανονισμού ο οποίος υιοθετήθηκε από την Επιτροπή τον περασμένο Νοέμβρη. Ο κανονισμός αυτός ονοματίζει τρίτες χώρες υψηλού κινδύνου με στρατηγικές ανεπάρκειες όσον αφορά την καταπολέμηση της νομιμοποίησης εσόδων από παράνομες δραστηριότητες και την καταπολέμηση της χρηματοδότησης της τρομοκρατίας.Για τους λόγους αυτούς υπερψηφίσαμε την έκθεση.
2016/11/22
Logistics in the EU and multimodal transport in the new TEN-T corridors (A8-0384/2016 - Inés Ayala Sender) EL

Η έκθεση υποστηρίζει και προωθεί την απελευθέρωση του εμπορίου για ενίσχυση της ανταγωνιστικότητας και την άρση όλων των εμποδίων για ενίσχυση της δράσης και των κερδών των μεγάλων πολυεθνικών.Στην έκθεση αντικατοπτρίζονται όλες οι πολιτικές μεταφορών της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, με τις οποίες έχουμε καταθέσει τις διαφωνίες μας τα προηγούμενα χρόνια.Επιπρόσθετα, άξιο αναφοράς είναι το γεγονός ότι στο παρελθόν, τα κράτη µέλη ήταν οι κυρίως αρμόδιες οντότητες για την κατασκευή και τη συντήρηση υποδομών μεταφοράς. Ωστόσο, άρχισαν να εμπλέκονται και άλλες οντότητες, και δη ιδιωτικές, στην υλοποίηση του πολυτροπικού διευρωπαϊκού δικτύου μεταφορών, μεταξύ των οποίων οι διαχειριστές υποδομών, οι ανάδοχοι ή οι λιμενικές και οι αερολιμενικές αρχές, κάτι που η έκθεση αναγνωρίζει ως θετικό.Για αυτούς τους λόγους τηρήσαμε αποχή.
2016/11/22
A European Pillar of Social Rights (A8-0391/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues) EL

Ο πολυδιαφημιζόμενος πυλώνας των κοινωνικών δικαιωμάτων είναι στην πραγματικότητα ένα πυροτέχνημα της Επιτροπής Γιούνκερ χωρίς πραγματικές προτεραιότητες και σχεδιασμό. Η έκθεση του Κοινοβουλίου είχε όμως αρκετά θετικά στοιχεία, όπως την απαίτηση για προς τα πάνω βελτιωμένη κοινωνική ασφάλιση, την ασφάλεια των εργαζομένων και την απόρριψη των επισφαλών συμβολαίων εργασίας όπως τα συμβόλαια μηδενικών ωρών κ.α. Εντούτοις οι αναφορές για ευασφάλεια και η άρνηση των φιλελευθέρων και συντηρητικών να αυξήσουν τα κονδύλια για δημιουργία νέων ασφαλών θέσεων εργασίας μέσα από προγράμματα της ΕΕ δεν μας επέτρεψαν να υπερψηφίσουμε. Αντ’ αυτού κρατήσαμε στάση αποχής.
2016/11/22

Major interpellations (1)

Israel's involvement in projects financed under Horizon 2020 PDF (105 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(17 KB)

Written questions (196)

Compensation for farmers and creation of a Cyprus-based European mechanism to provide assistance to Member States in addressing the consequences of natural disasters PDF (40 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(18 KB)
VP/HR - Provocative actions by Turkey in Cyprus' EEZ PDF (43 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Force-feeding in foie gras production PDF (100 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for the redundant employees of the airline Cobalt PDF (100 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Compensation for Cobalt Air Staff PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Participation of the firm AHAVA in the Horizon 2020 programme PDF (102 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Blockage of Cypriot fishing vessels by Turkey PDF (6 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Unilateral decisions by the government of the Republic of Cyprus regarding teachers PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
EU trade with Israeli settlements PDF (101 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The collapse of public hospitals in Cyprus PDF (102 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Employment of teachers in Cyprus PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The need to protect the beaches in Cyprus PDF (97 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Freedom of expression of journalists in Cyprus PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Detention of unaccompanied children in police station cells in Greece PDF (200 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(200 KB) DOC(19 KB)
DG MARE evaluation of the EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement PDF (105 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(20 KB)
Western Sahara and the safety of EU airlines and passengers PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
EU-authorised establishments based in Western Sahara PDF (101 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(20 KB)
Moroccan authorised importers based in Western Sahara PDF (105 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The Commission's compliance with procedures relating to authorised establishments in Western Sahara PDF (101 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(20 KB)
DG SANCO visit to Western Sahara in December 2017 PDF (98 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(19 KB)
VP/HR - Activities of the EU Delegation to Morocco in occupied Western Sahara PDF (103 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Reduction in US funding for UNRWA PDF (104 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Fear campaign launched against the Turkish-Cypriot newspaper Afrika PDF (103 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Provocative attitude taken by the Azerbaijani government towards the Republic of Cyprus PDF (102 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(18 KB)
VP/HR - Leyla Zana dismissed from the Turkish Parliament PDF (103 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(18 KB)
NGO monitoring PDF (99 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Doctoral Scientists in Teaching and Research (DEDE) PDF (101 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Neofascism in Poland PDF (98 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(17 KB)
VP/HR - Slave markets in Libya attributable to the EU PDF (100 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(16 KB)
VP/HR - PESCO PDF (101 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Refugee question and Slovenia PDF (101 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Defence industry programme PDF (99 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Amendment to the Directive on natural gas PDF (4 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Measures to support Member States with long-term and youth unemployment rates above the Eurozone average PDF (199 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(18 KB)
VP/HR Further crimes committed by Israel against the Palestinian people PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Need of financial support for children studying in the occupied Karpass peninsula PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Adjusting local time in the occupied territory of Cyprus PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Need to cancel plans for the European Defence Fund PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Need to help Cyprus cope with refugees PDF (99 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Turkey issues a new NAVTEX for Cyprus' EEZ PDF (99 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Application of Relocation Decisions 2015/1523 and 2015/1601 ahead of their expiration date (26 September 2017) PDF (196 KB) DOC (21 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(21 KB)
Financial support needed for education for children with disabilities PDF (100 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Destruction of Akamas beach PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Spread of Islam in the occupied territories of the Republic of Cyprus PDF (101 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(18 KB)
VP/HR - Crisis in the Persian Gulf PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Anti-terror laws in the EU PDF (103 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Pension gender gap PDF (101 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Gaza Strip energy supply PDF (102 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(14 KB)
Development assistance PDF (98 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Refugee relocation PDF (4 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(14 KB)
Free wireless connectivity in EU's local communities PDF (97 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(14 KB)
VP/HR - Hunger strike by Palestinian prisoners PDF (4 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Children of the Arab world PDF (4 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(14 KB)
Zero-hour contracts and security of employment PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
The violation of human rights in Poland PDF (4 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Personal data in the EU - US Privacy Shield PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Adequate protection of the EU-US Privacy Shield PDF (4 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(15 KB)
New information on homelessness PDF (102 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Hungary and refugees PDF (99 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(14 KB)
VP/HR - Commission plans to cooperate with Libya on migration issues PDF (193 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Illegal detention of journalists in Turkey PDF (102 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Complaints about the treatment of the inhabitants of Kuruköy PDF (99 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Israeli law legalising illegal settlements in the West Bank PDF (102 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(16 KB)
LAW-TRAIN, Horizon 2020 and Israeli human rights abuses PDF (104 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(16 KB)
EU fishing in Western Sahara waters under the EU-Morocco Fishing Agreement PDF (106 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(20 KB)
Western Sahara and the decision of the European Court of Justice on EU-Morocco relations PDF (104 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Western Sahara and EU-Morocco negotiations on a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) PDF (6 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Arrest of Barbaros Şansal PDF (186 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(186 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Violation of fundamental rights in Turkey PDF (101 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Refugee children in Turkey PDF (4 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Palestinian Salah Khawaja arrested PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
VP/HR - Palestinian children imprisoned PDF (100 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Trapped refugees PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
McDonald's PDF (99 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(14 KB)
Disregard for the human rights of indigenous peoples in Brazil PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Football leaks PDF (4 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Situation in Turkey PDF (91 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(91 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Commission decision on tax evasion PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
VP/HR - Protection of human rights in Morocco PDF (100 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Protection of refugees in Chios PDF (100 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(14 KB)
Insecurity in the 'contact centre' sector PDF (118 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(118 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Case of refugee Αhmad H. facing a life sentence in Hungary PDF (101 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Dismissal of workers by the MSC/Medlog multinational company PDF (112 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(112 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Need for child protection measures PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Arrest of the HDP leadership PDF (100 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Illegal arrest of Kurdish mayors PDF (100 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Closure by the Turkish Government of television channels PDF (100 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(15 KB)
The case of unaccompanied minors in Calais PDF (18 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(18 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Supporting energy programmes for low-income households from EU funds PDF (103 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Protection of refugees stranded in Turkey PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Continued violation of the rule of law and human rights in Turkey PDF (5 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Use of firearms by Frontex to stop boats PDF (101 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Need to assist Lebanon in providing Syrian refugee children with an education PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Wage and rights dumping in the fast-food industry PDF (98 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Moria refugee settlement on the island of Lesbos PDF (101 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Common defence PDF (97 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Non-standard forms of employment - International Labour Organization (ILO) PDF (101 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Conflicts of interest with regard to former Commissioners PDF (5 KB) DOC (14 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(14 KB)
Proposal for the creation of a regional mechanism to deal with natural disasters PDF (100 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(15 KB)
VAT exemption PDF (4 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Infringement of labour rights PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
NATO Summit PDF (100 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(16 KB)
International campaign for the ratification of the Forced Labour Convention PDF (4 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Lifting the immunity of MPs in the Turkish Grand National Assembly PDF (100 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(16 KB)
VP/HR - EU maps representing the territories of Western Sahara and Morocco PDF (192 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(192 KB) DOC(19 KB)
VP/HR - Status of Morocco in Western Sahara under international humanitarian law PDF (192 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(192 KB) DOC(18 KB)
VP/HR - Implementation of General Court decision on Western Sahara and trade in goods originating from occupied Western Sahara PDF (95 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(95 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Implementation of General Court decision on Western Sahara PDF (193 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Need for solidarity and humanitarian aid to address the refugee crisis PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
VP/HR - Imprisonment of young Saharawis PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Murder of Palestinians in the West Bank PDF (102 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Closing the Brenner Pass PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Statements by the UN Secretary-General PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Need for permanent refugee relocation mechanism PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Coordination between the Council, the Commission and the Kingdom of Morocco in relation to the appeal against the General Court judgment delivered on 10 December 2015 in Case T-512/12 Polisario Front v Council PDF (194 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Compliance of EU-Turkey deal with the non-refoulement principle PDF (193 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(26 KB)
EU aid for Sahrawi refugee camps PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Commission recommendations regarding emission reductions PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
EU-Turkey Agreement on the refugee question PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. PDF (102 KB) DOC (22 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(22 KB)
VP/HR - Israel murders Palestinian children PDF (5 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Commission investment planning for the first quarter of 2016 PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Israeli government decision to strip three Members of their parliamentary privileges PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
VP/HR - Turkey's military offensive in northern Syria PDF (101 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Revival of the ideology of fascism in Europe PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Proposed European Border and Coast Guard (EBCG) and Complaints Mechanism in respect of violation of human rights PDF (105 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Need to promote a new gender equality strategy PDF (103 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Emergency funding - Sahrawi refugee camps PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Inhumane exploitation of refugee children in Turkey PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
10 000 missing children PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Need to develop a humanitarian approach to managing refugees PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Xenophobic practices encouraging racism PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Turkey and the refugee crisis PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
New OXFAM statistics PDF (187 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Turkish support for ISIS PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
The jailing of Palestinians PDF (99 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Protestors killed in Diyarbakir PDF (100 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Refugee crisis PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Restrictions imposed on Kurds by Turkey PDF (104 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Turkish fishing vessels PDF (4 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Cooperative credit institutions and banking union PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
The Akamas peninsula in Cyprus - a Nature 2000 protected area PDF (103 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Arrest of journalists in Turkey PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Implementation of Council decisions on the relocation of 160 000 asylum seekers from Italy and Greece PDF (195 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Compatibility of the establishment and management of hotspots with EU law PDF (196 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Measures to halt the brain drain PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Organisation of working time for permanent members of the Cypriot army PDF (6 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Need to assist refugee children PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
VP/HR - Imprisonment of Palestinian children in Israel PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Repatriation of possible victims of trafficking in breach of the suspension order issued by the Rome Court (First Chamber) PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Need to strengthen collective agreements PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Bomb attacks in Ankara PDF (100 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Exploitation of domestic energy sources in the EU PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Infringements of Palestinian human rights PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Strengthening of the Horizon 2020 programme PDF (102 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Infringement of democratic rights in Turkey PDF (6 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Recent Oxfam findings regarding poverty in Europe PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Subject: Aid for children in the Middle East and Northern Africa PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Need to the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Ensuring the sovereign rights of the Member States in the field of energy PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Combating energy poverty PDF (101 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Addressing energy poverty in Europe PDF (195 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Violation of labour and trade union rights in the European Patent Organisation (EPO) PDF (105 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Prosecution of Turkish Cypriot couple for flying the flag of the Republic of Cyprus in the occupied part of Cyprus PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Cancellation of debt for countries affected by Ebola PDF (100 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Cancellation of debt for countries affected by Ebola PDF (100 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Germany's account surplus PDF (107 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(107 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Breach of privacy on Facebook PDF (195 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Animals as sentient beings PDF (187 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(24 KB)
European Fund for Strategic Investments - need to protect the public interest PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
The Palestinian problem PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
End of the common position on Cuba PDF (195 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(27 KB)
International arrest warrants against asylum seekers and refugees PDF (7 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(7 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Illegal changes to place names PDF (106 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(25 KB)
VP/HR - Netanyahu's rejection of a two-state solution PDF (106 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Employment and collective agreements PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Persecution of the Ukraine Communist Party PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(185 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Pernicious effects of liberalisation and deregulation in the electric sector PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Election results and policy changes PDF (193 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Youth employment PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Strike by Birleşik Metal-İş union workers in Turkey PDF (103 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Youth employment PDF (101 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Coca-Cola Iberian Partners' redundancy plan PDF (195 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Unlawful action by Turkey in Cypriot EEZ PDF (102 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Measures to support microenterprises PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Syrian refugees in Athens PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Law on Public Safety PDF (104 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(25 KB)
VP/HR - Self-determination and statehood in Western Sahara PDF (196 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Human rights violations in Sudan PDF (99 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Human rights violations in the occupied territories of the Republic of Cyprus PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Compliance with EU law and fundamental rights of Italian circular and annexes thereto on fingerprint collection from irregular migrants PDF (102 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Protection of the cultural heritage in occupied Cyprus PDF (103 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Upholding human rights in Cyprus PDF (6 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Violation by Turkey of the sovereign rights of the Republic of Cyprus PDF (103 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Assistance to Cyprus to enable it to support 345 Syrian refugees and asylum seekers PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
VP/HR - Lethal offensive by Israel in Palestine PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)

Written declarations (6)

Written declaration on the ‘fish war’ and the safety of fishermen

Written declaration on regulation of the milk market

Written declaration on an EU rail disability pass

Amendments (1745)

Amendment 2 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Recital A
A. whereas the 23 million micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the EU, which make up around 99 % of all businesses and provide more than 90 million jobs while generating some EUR 3.9 trillion in added value, make a vital contribution to economic growth, social cohesion and job creation and are a major source of innovation in the EU, and depend highly on domestic demand and consumption;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 9 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Recital B
B. whereas SMEs are disproportionately affected by administrative burdens andaffected by financial obstacles byin comparison withto larger firms, but also benefit from specific support, including financing opportunities, and simplified procedures; whereas at EU and Member State level further efforts could be made to create an SME-friendly environment which go beyond the political pledges already given;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 11 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Recital C
C. whereas the SME definition is referred to in approximately 100 EU legal acts, primarily in the areas of competition policy and structural, research and innovation funds, but also labour, environmental, energy, consumer protection and social security legislation, for example in the REACH secondary legislation and the Energy Efficiency Directive;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Recital D
D. whereas a coherent legal environment is favourable to all businesses and whereas thea stringent SME definition is a tool to overcommitigate market failures and problems stemming frominherent to competition between enterprises different in size, volume of assets and business models;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas an SME definition has to contribute to facilitating quality job creation, improving working conditions and security, limiting to the absolute minimum any abuses.
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 22 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s initial impact assessment, and approves the focus on enterprises that are need in of support and simple rules and the objective to increase planning and legal certainty for businesses and create a level playing field;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 25 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that given the nature of this strategic instrument and the many differences between SMEs and Member States, the flexibility offered by the 2003 recommendation should be maintained; is convinced that strictly applying the SME definition runs counter to the intentions of the recommendation and ultimately hinders the growth of SMEremoved; a wider and more flexible definition would affect legal and administrative certainty, leading to bigger companies to take undue advantage of SME support measures;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to prevent larger players from attempting to create specific corporate structures to take advantage of the SME definition, which would lead to a system in which the available support is wrongly distributed more widely and hence not available to SMEs in need, specially micro and small enterprises; emphasises that an adjustment of the SME definition should not work to the detriment of SMEs, denying them access to public support;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the employee numbers is not a criterion which can be used to draw up for accurate EU-wide comparisons, as labour productivity varies from one Member State to another; welcomes, therefore, a shift towards the criteria of turnover and balance sheet totals;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 66 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that there is a need to clarify not only the terms ‘linked enterprise’ and ‘partner enterprise’ but also SMEs’ status in mergers and consortiums, and regards the simplification of procedures and the cutting of red tape as imperativein order to avoid the creation of specific corporate structures to take advantage of the SME definition; calls on the Commission in that connection to further simplify the applicable rules;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 71 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission’s start- up and scale-up initiative; views the promotion of entrepreneurship as important for economic growth in the EU; calls on the Commission to introduce a two-year transitional period during which enterprises which no longer qualify for SME status would retain that status;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that economic diplomacy instruments employed at EU level, such as the Mission for Growth, could be used to address economic challenges and exploit economic opportunities at global level more effectively; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts in that area, without creating duplicate structures; calls, in that connection, for an ‘Export growth in relation to enterprise size’ indicator to be developed and forCalls on the Commission to step up its efforts to help SMEs to take the utmost advantage from economic opportunities; calls, in that connection, not to focus merely on additional support to be offered to small enterprises with high export volumes but on developing domestic demand;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 92 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 9
9. Is concerned that, despite the considerable contribution they make to employment and growth by virtue of their productivity, MidCaps (enterprises that have outgrown the SME definition but still have typically medium-sized structures) are being neglected by policy- makers; calls, therefore, for a definition to be established for these companies based on the criteria that they are family- run, have high equity ratio and employ up to 3000 people;deleted
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 114 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission, in addition to the priority EU measures for SMEs, to launch a MidCaps-oriented initiative for micro-enterprises using new funding, which would cover collaborative research access, digitalisation strategies, export market development and an easing of the Basel specifications and data protection rules;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 129 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 11
11. Takes the view that SME categorisation should not be exclusively based on the criteria of employee headcount, annual turnover and balance sheet totals; calls, therefore, for the criteria of ‘export-intensive’ (high level of exports in relation to number of employees), ‘largely independently-run’ and ‘high equity ratio’ - to be defined in due course - to be taken into account when categorising companies and for enterprises with these characteristics to at least be exempted from the relevant specific reporting obligations and/or for it to be made easier for them to access financial support;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 135 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to conduct a study into the impact of the SME definition on business development and on lock-in-effects, i.e. when enterprises deliberately opt not to expand in order to avoid bureaucratic burdens and other obligations that arise from the loss of their SME status, business models and employment;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 151 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to conduct a feasibility study of sector- specific SME definitions in order to scrutinise the impact of such an approach on these sectors of the economy and the added value generated when set against the additional costs incurred, and to adapt the SME definition accordingly, should the study prove its feasibility;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 156 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 14
14. Calls for an SME categoryimpact test to be made mandatory for all EU legislative proposals, beyond the Commission’s own undertakings; stresses that the result should be clearly indicated in the impact assessment; calls on the Commission to give such an undertaking in the next Interinstitutional Agreement on better law- making;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2018/2545(RSP)


Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to provide guidance to enterprises on the procedures used to determine SME status in an unbureaucratic and pragmaticoptimal manner;
2018/04/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to its previous resolutions on Turkey, in particular those of 24 November 2016 on EU-Turkey relations1 , of 27 October 2016 on the situation of journalists in Turkey2 , and of 8 February 2018 on the human rights situation in Turkey3 and to its previous resolution of 13 November 2014 on Turkish actions creating tensions in the exclusive economic zone of Cyprus, _________________ 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0450. 2 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0423. 3 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0040.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
— having regard to the Negotiating Framework for Turkey of 3 October 2005 and to the fact that Turkey’s accession to the EU depends on full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the mission report on the Fact-finding Visit to Famagusta, Cyprus adopted on 21/11/18 by the Committee of Petitions,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses serious concern about the disproportionate and arbitrary measures curtailing freedom of expression, media freedom and access to information; condemns the closure of more than 160 media outlets and the large number of arrests of journalists in the aftermath of the coup attempt, where increasing restrictions were put in place on the rights of journalists and human rights defenders working on the Kurdish issue while other associations and Kurdish-language media outlets were closed; urges Turkey to guarantee media freedom as a matter of priority and to immediately release and acquit all unlawfully detained journalists;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses concern at the shrinking space for civil society and the promotion of fundamental rights and freedoms; notes that a large number of activists, including human rights defenders, were arrested and demonstrations were recurrently banned during the state of emergency; calls on Turkey to protect the fundamental rights of minorities, such as LGBTI people; reminds that legislation on hate speech is not in line with European Court of Human Rights case-law;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is deeply concerned at the situation in Turkey’s South-East and the serious allegations of human rights abuses, especially since the collapse of the Kurdish settlement process in 2015; reiterates its firm condemnation of the return to violence by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has been on the EU list of terrorist organisations since 2002stresses that the inclusion of PKK on the EU's list of terrorist organisations is standing in the way of the establishment of peace, dialogue and negotiations, at the same time that facilitates the infringement of human rights; calls therefore on the Council to revise the list and remove the PKK from the list of terrorist organisations; calls on the Turkish authorities to restart talks with PKK leaders for a peaceful solution for the Kurdish question; stresses the urgency of resuming a credible political process leading to a peaceful settlement of the Kurdish issue; calls on Turkey to promptly investigate serious allegations of human rights abuses and killings and to allow international observers to carry out an independent verification;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the state of emergency further constrained the capacity of the Grand National Assembly to fulfil its fundamental role of democratic scrutiny and accountability; notes with great concern the arrest of two members of parliament from the Republican People’s Party (CHP), as well as the way the People’s Democratic Party (HDP) has been particularly marginalised, with many HDP lawmakers being arrested on the grounds of alleged support for terrorist activities; calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners held without proof of individual involvement in committing crime or without any charges presented against them;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 183 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that while the EU accession process was at its start a strong motivation for reforms in Turkey, there has been a stark regression in the areas of the rule of law and human rights during the last few years; recalls that Parliament repeatedly called for the opening of Chapter 23 on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights and Chapter 24 on Justice, Freedom and Security at a time when the Turkish government had pledged to conduct serious reforms; regrets deeply that the accession instruments could not be used to the fullest extent owing to a continued blockage by the Council;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that a door should be left open for the modernisation and upgrading of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to include relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that thec believes that the upgrade can be contemplated provided that Turkey proceeds first to the full and indiscriminate implementation of its obligations deriving from the current Customs Union Agreement between EU- Turkey. Following this, its upgrade wcould provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap where upgrading the Ccustoms Uunion would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkey on democratic reforms reinforcing the full compliance of the Copenhagen criteria; believes further that the upgrading of the Ccustoms Uunion would provide an important opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory work for the upgrading of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Government indicates its readiness for serious reforms;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Deplores Turkey´s refusal to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-à-vis all member states, the Republic of Cyprus in particular; reiterates that Turkey's refusal to normalize its relations with all EU Member States has started having a negative impact on its relations with the EU, including its accession process;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 242 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that visa liberalisation is of great importance for Turkish citizens, particularly for students, academics, business representatives and people with family ties in EU Member States; encourages the Turkish Government to fully comply with the 72 criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap; stresses that the revision of Turkey’s anti-terrorism legislation is a key condition for ensuring fundamental rights and freedoms, and that visa liberalisation will be possible once all the criteria have been met fully and in a non-discriminatory manner towards all EU Member States;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 268 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls upon the Turkish government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyuy nuclear power plant; points out that the envisaged site is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, hence posing a major threat not only to Turkey but to the Mediterranean region as a whole; requests accordingly that the Turkish government join the Espoo Convention, which commits parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; asks the Turkish government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyuy venture;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 291 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement upon agreement on terms of reference within the framework of the long agreed solution of bicommunal bizonal federation with political equality, as this is set out in relevant UN SC resolutions; recalls the Framework of the UN Secretary General and his appeal for resuming the negotiations from where things were left off at Crans Montana; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement which must guarantee the single sovereignty, the single international legal personality and the single citizenship of the united federal Cyprus and be in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, international law and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of dispuits lawful inhabitants in accordance with UNSC Resolution 550(1984) and to allow access to experts to explore and evaluate the situation of the city; it also urges Turkey to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island contrary to the Geneva Convention and the principles of international law. It praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons and calls on Turkey to allow access to all relevant sites and military zones for exhumation and assist the CMP to the discovery of relocated and other remains by providing all relevant information from its military archives; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone and condemns all the provoking actions of Turkey within the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus which are a source of instability and calls on Turkey to terminate them; urges Turkey to respect the sovereign rights of all EU Member States, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations while at the same time respecting the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 307 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls on Turkey to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which has been signed and ratified by the EU, the 28 Member States and all other candidate countries and forms part of the acquis in line with December 2015 Council Conclusions and other relevant Council Conclusions;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas transparent and ethics embedded AI and robotics have the potential to reshape multiple industries and lead to greater efficiencies;
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that in order to maximize the benefits of artificial intelligence it must not be used for a mere substitution of workers, but it must help to create more quality and decent jobs and scale-up the whole production of a company.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that the development of robotics in the EU will have a strong impact on industrial relations. Believes that this impact should be addressed in a balanced manner so as to promote the reindustrialisation and allow also the workers to enjoy the productivity gains.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Urges the Commission and the Member States to develop and pursue digital skills training and retraining strategies that can ensure European society’s active and inclusive participation in the paradigm shift;
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 71 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure protection of workers and working conditions in the face of technological transformation, providing for those who lose their jobs during re-skilling to avoid large-scale economic or social unrest in line with the European Pillar of Social Rights;
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 79 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Commission to invest in education and skills for workers but at the same time to explore and evaluate other supporting measures such as a universal basic income or an increased social security for a transitional period and for specific job sectors that might be drastically affected by the introduction of advanced AI systems and automation.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 188 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that public sector information represent an extraordinary source of data that can contribute to rapidly progress and create a new strategy to embrace new digital technologies, especially Artificial Intelligence.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 244 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Ensure that any future legal framework for artificial intelligence and robotics shall also develop consistent rules on liability in the field of penal law and war crimes, in order to avoid crimes without criminal accountability.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 254 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Notes that in order to implement a socially balanced framework on artificial intelligence and robotics that allows the development of European industries without mass destruction of jobs, social partners have to be involved and considered at EU, Member States and industry level.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 284 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Notes that although transparency may allow for the discovery of deficiencies, they do not guarantee the reliability, security and fairness of an ADS; therefore, accountability is the most important requirement that can be achieved via different means such as algorithm impact assessments (AIA), auditing and certification.
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 287 #

2018/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
29b. Stresses that algorithm misused in decision-making systems should not be deployed without a prior Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) unless it is clear that they have no significant impact on the life of individuals;
2018/12/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas EFP, especially ESOPs or similar schemes could act as a shock absorber, allowing bonuses or other rewards to be managed in trusts by third parties, spreading the investment risk among the company’s principal shareholders and ensuring that workers have a portfolio of saved shares; whereas in EFP models that use an intermediate entity in listed companies, this entity can exercise voting rights or other forms of governance on behalf of employees allowing for collective representation;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, while not affecting their mobility, their remuneration or their social security allowances;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, which supports re- skilling and EFP, is an avenue for continuously training workers, maintaining their employability and reducing the risks of getting laid offshould remain a complementary instrument on training workers;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that EFP should always provide additional income and not be a substitute for fair and decent pay; stresses that EFP should equally not be an alternative to public pensions or to collectively agreed pension schemes;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that EFP has to be embedded in a whole system of workers’ involvement at all levels, and schemes should include the possibility of employee representatives in company decision making through seats on the board;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the transnational obstacles that are faced by both companies offering such schemes in several Member States, and employees, namely discrepancies in legislation and taxation which may impinge on the freedom of movement of workers, which plays an important role in enhancing convergence and integration among Member States;deleted
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote financial education with respect to retail and equities investment in order to empower EU citizens;deleted
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to engage with social partners, employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders to design the most appropriate EFP schemes, negotiated on a ‘plant-by-plant’ basis and considering the type of company, its workforce and financial situation, but also the national legislation and practices; underlines, that any design and introduction of EFP should be subject of prior consultation and agreement with worker representatives and trade unions;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider the rapid evolution and change of the labour market and the consequent challenges regarding skills, digitalisation, automation and, potentially, wealth inequalities, and therefore continuously create new opportunities for the labour force to adapt in order to be financially sustainable and independentsocial security cuts;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reiterates that Union budget should be of benefit to the citizens and should be focused primarily on sustainable growth and quality jobs, energy transition to more efficient and renewable-based energy system, fight against climate change, and eradicating energy poverty; underlines, in this regard, that public money shall not be spent for military investments or defence implications;
2018/09/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates that investment in research and innovation needs to be stepped up with a view to improving access to knowledge, promoting social development and raising living standards;
2018/09/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 15 #

2018/2046(BUD)

3. Recognises the importancTakes note of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI); recalls that, in order to secure additional funding for EFSI, Horizon 2020 and CEF had to be reduced; stresses that the general budget of the Union should not be financing new initiatives to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies; intends to deliver on the commitment made by Parliament during the EFSI negotiations to reduce insofar as possible the impact on those programmes and to increase appropriations for the affected lines for 2019;stresses that according to the Article 41 (2) TEU any expenditure arising from actions having military or defence implications should not be financed from the Union budget.
2018/09/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that given the current economic situation, it is highly important to establish and strengthen the support mechanism for micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises;
2018/09/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #

2018/0254(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to propose the rejection of the Commission proposal.
2018/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2018/0254(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 0
PRejects the proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the European Defence Fund (Text with EEA relevance)
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 48 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) With 1.8% of EU GDP, down from 2.2% in 2009, infrastructure investment activities in the Union in 2016 were about 20% below investment rates before the global financial crisis. Thus, while a recovery in investment-to-GDP ratios in the Union can be observed, it remains below what might be expected in a strong recovery period and is insufficient to compensate years of underinvestment. According to the most recent data on national accounts, there no indication of a significant surge in investment since the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) was launched, while growth is unevenly distributed among Member States and mainly export led. More importantly, the current investment levels and forecasts do not cover the Union’s structural investment needs in the face of technological change and global competitiveness, including for innovation, skills, infrastructure, small and medium- sized enterprises ('SMEs') and the need to address key societal challenges such as sustainability or population ageing. Consequently, continued support is necessary to address market failures and sub-optimal investment situations to reduce the investment gap in targeted sectors to achieve the Union's policy objectives.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 51 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Acknowledges that one of the main barrier to business investment is the lack of demand resulting from austerity measures, that provoked a sharp drop in workers’ disposable income and in public consumption and investment; believes that only an increase in workers’ income and ambitious public investment will be able to avoid risks of continued weak growth, or even recession, and continuing high unemployment rates; urges to an immediate reverse of the austerity measures, repeal the budget deficit and public debt limits and create a broad public investment plan;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In the last years, the Union has adopted ambitious strategies to complete the Single Market and to stimulate sustainable growth and jobs, such as the Capital Markets Union, the Digital Single Market Strategy, the Clean Energy for all Europeans package, the Union Action Plan for the Circular Economy, the Low- Emission Mobility Strategy, the Defence and the Space Strategy for Europe. The InvestEU Fund should exploit and reinforce synergies between those mutually reinforcing strategies through providing support to investment and access to financing.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of those reform priorities. The strategies should be presented alongside the yearly National Reform ProgrammMember States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national or Union funding, or by both. Theyse strategies should also serve to use Union funding in a coherent manner and to maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the European Structural and Investment Funds, the European Investment Stabilisation Function and the InvestEU Fund, where relevant.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The InvestEU Fund should contribute to improving the competitiveness of the Union, including in the field of innovation and digitisation, the sustainability of the Union's economic growth, the social resilience and inclusiveness and the integration of the Union capital markets, including solutions addressing their fragmentation and diversifying sources of financing for the Union enterprisbe geared to social, economic and territorial cohesion and be capable of helping to increase aggregate demand and carry out investment in public infrastructure, which may subsequently leverage and boost private investment. Only a plan of this nature can be effective in reviving growth, fighting unemployment and combating social, economic and territorial inequalities. To that end, it should supportfavour projects that are technically and economically viable by providing a framework for the use of debt, risk sharing and equity instruments underpinned by a guarantee from the Union's budget and by contributions from implementing partners. It should be demand-driven while support under the InvestEU Fund should at the same time focus on contributing to meeting policy objectives of the Union. and to encourage social and regional cohesion through the creation of quality jobs and the broadening and improvement of the productive base of Member States, especially those facing severe economic imbalances, suffering from austerity measures and undergoing violent structural adjustments;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 70 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Additionality, a key feature of the EFSI, should be strengthened in the InvestEU selection criteria. In particular, operations should only be eligible if they address clearly identified market failures or sub-optimal investment situations. InvestEU should not support public- private in infrastructure, given that these are in general more expensive for taxpayers and consumers.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 89 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Low infrastructure investment rates in the Union during the financial crisis undermined the Union's ability to boost sustainable growth, competitiveness and convergence. Sizeable investments in the European infrastructure are fundamental to meet the Union's sustainability targets, including the 2030 energy and climate targets as well as the EU 2050 commitment to reduce Greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95%. Accordingly, support from the InvestEU Fund should target investments into transport, energy, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, environmental, climate action, maritime and digital infrastructure. To maximise the impact and the value added of Union financing support, it is appropriate to promote a streamlined investment process enabling visibility of the project pipeline and consistency across relevant Union programmes. Bearing in mind security threats, investment projects receiving Union support should take into account principles for the protection of citizens in public spaces. This should be complementary to the efforts made by other Union funds such as the European Regional Development Fund providing support for security components of investments in public spaces, transport, energy and other critical infrastructure.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 108 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in the Union. However, they face challenges when accessing finance because of their perceived high risk and lack of sufficient collateral. Additional challenges arise from SMEs' need to stay competitive by engaging in digitisation, internationalisation and innovation activities and skilling up their workforce. Moreover, compared to larger enterprises, they have access to a more limited set of financing sources: they typically do not issue bonds, have only limited access to stock exchanges or large institutional investors. The challenge in accessing finance is even greater for those SMEs whose activities focus on intangible assets. SMEs in the Union rely heavily on banks and debt financing in the form of bank overdrafts, bank loans or leasing. Supporting SMEs that face the above challenges and providing more diversified sources of funding is necessary for increasing the ability of SMEs to finance their creation, growth and development, withstand economic downturns, and for making the economy and the financial system more resilient during economic downturn or shocks. Particular attention should be paid to social enterprises. This is also complementary to the initiatives already undertaken in the context of the Capital Markets Union. The InvestEU Fund should provide an opportunity to focus on specific, more targeted financial products.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 116 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The InvestEU Fund should operate under four policy windows, mirroring the key Union policy priorities, namely sustainable infrastructure; research, innovation and digitisation: SMEs; and social investment and skills. Supported actions should address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations at Union level or in one or several Member States, in a proportionate manner, including vulnerable and remote areas such as the outermost regions of the Union and should have a clear European added value.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 121 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Each policy window should be composed of two compartments, that is to say an EU compartment and a Member State compartment. The EU compartment should address Union-wide market failures or sub-optimal investment situations in a proportionate manner; supported actions should have a clear European added value. The Member State compartment should give Member States the possibility to contribute a share of their resources of Funds under shared management to the provisioning of the EU guarantee to use the EU guarantee for financing or investment operations to address specific market failures or sub- optimal investment situations in their own territory, including in vulnerable and remote areas such as the outermost regions of the Union, to deliver objectives of the Fund under shared management. Actions supported from the InvestEU Fund through either EU or Member State compartments should not duplicate or crowd out private financing or distort competition in the internal market.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 126 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) The Member State compartment should be specifically designed to allow the use of funds under shared management to provision a guarantee issued by the Union. That combination aims at mobilising the high credit rating of the Union to promote national and regional investments while ensuring a consistent risk management of the contingent liabilities by implementing the guarantee given by the Commission under indirect management. The Union should guarantee the financing and investment operations foreseen by the guarantee agreements concluded between the Commission and implementing partners under the Member State compartment, the Funds under shared management should provide the provisioning of the guarantee, following a provisioning rate determined by the Commission based on the nature of the operations and the resulting expected losses, and the Member State would assume losses above the expected losses by issuing a back-to-back guarantee in favour of the Union. Such arrangements should be concluded in a single contribution agreement with each Member State that voluntarily chooses such option. The contribution agreement should encompass the one or more specific guarantee agreements to be implemented within the Member State concerned. The setting out of the provisioning rate on a case by case basis requires a derogation from [Article 211(1)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No XXXX19 (the 'Financial Regulation'). This design provides also a single set of rules for budgetary guarantees supported by funds managed centrally or by funds under shared management, which would facilitate their combination. _________________ 19deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 135 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) The EU guarantee underpinning the InvestEU Fund should be implemented indirectly by the Commission relying on implementing partners with outreach to final recipients. A guarantee agreement allocating guarantee capacity from the InvestEU Fund should be concluded by the Commission with each implementing partner, to support its financing and investment operations meeting the InvestEU Fund objectives and eligibility criteria. TIn order to improve transparency, efficiency, accountability and ensure the appropriate use of the EU guarantee, the InvestEU Fund should be provided with a specific governance structure to ensure the appropriate use of the EU guarantee, completely separate from that of the EIB Group.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 141 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) A Project Team consisting of experts put at the disposal of the Commission by the implementing partners in order to provide professional expertise in financial and technical assessment of proposed financing and investment operations should score those submitted by the implementing partners to be assessed by the Investment Committee.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 146 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In selecting implementing partners for the deployment of the InvestEU Fund, the Commission should consider the counterpart's capacity to fulfil the objectives of the InvestEU Fund and contribute its own resources, in order to ensure adequate geographical coverage and diversification, to avoid disproportionate benefit to larger Member States with more developed capital markets, to crowd-in private investors and to provide sufficient risk diversification as well as new solutions to address market failures and sub-optimal investment situations. Given its role under the Treaties, its capacity to operate in all Member States and the existing experience under the current financial instruments and the EFSI, the European Investment Bank (‘EIB’) Group should remain a privileged implementing partner under the InvestEU Fund's EU compartment. In addition to the EIB Group, national promotional banks or institutions should be able to offer a complementary financial product range given that their experience and capabilities at regional level could be beneficial for the maximisation of the impact of public funds on the territory of the Union. Moreover, it should be possible to have other international financial institutions as implementing partners, in particular when they present a comparative advantage in terms of specific expertise and experience in certain Member States. It should also be possible for other entities fulfilling the criteria laid down in the Financial Regulation to act as implementing partners.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 152 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) In order to ensure that interventions under the EU compartment of the InvestEU Fund focus on market failures and sub-optimal investment situations at Union level, but, at the same time, satisfy the objectives of best possible geographic outreach and avoid disproportionate benefit to larger Member States with more developed capital markets, the EU guarantee should be allocated to implementing partners, which alone or together with other implementing partners, can cover at least three Member States. However, it is expected that around 75 % of the EU guarantee under the EU compartment would be allocated to implementing partner or partners that can offer financial products under the InvestEU Fund in all Member States.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 154 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The EU guarantee under the Member State compartment should be allocated to any implementing partner eligible according to [Article 62(1)(c)] of the [Financial Regulation], including national or regional promotional banks or institutions, the EIB, the European Investment Fund and other multilateral development banks. When selecting implementing partners under the Member State compartment, the Commission should take into account the proposals made by each Member State. In accordance with [Article 154] of the [Financial Regulation], the Commission must carry out an assessment of the rules and procedures of the implementing partner to ascertain that they provide a level of protection of the financial interest of the Union equivalent to the one provided by the Commission.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 162 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) In order to ensure a wide geographic outreach of the advisory services across the Union and to successfully leverage local knowledge about the InvestEU Fund, a local presence in each Member State and in regions of the InvestEU Advisory Hub should be ensured, where needed, taking into account existing support schemes, with a view to provide tangible, proactive, tailor-made assistance on the ground.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 169 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the InvestEU Fund providing for an EU guarantee for financing and investment operations carried out by the implementing partners in support of the Union’s internal policies.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 175 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) 'implementing partner' means the eligible counterpart such as a financial institution or other intermediarybeing the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group, or national promotional banks or institutions with whom the Commission signs a guarantee agreement and/or an agreement to implement the InvestEU Advisory Hub;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) 'midcap companies' means entities employing up to 3 000 employees that are not SMEs or small midcap companies;deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 178 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15
(15) 'small midcap companies' means entities employing up to 499 employees that are not SMEs;deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 183 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the competitiveness of the Unsocial and regional cohesion, including innovation and digitisation;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 186 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the integration of the Union capital markets and the strengthening of the Single Market, including solutions addressing the fragmentation of the Union capital markets,addressing diversifying sources of financing for Union enterprises and promoting sustainable finance.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 194 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) to increase the access to and the availability of finance for SMEs and, in duly justified cases, for small mid-cap companies;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 244 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Financing and investment operations under the sustainable infrastructure policy window referred to in point (a) of paragraph (1) shall be subject to climate, environmental and social sustainability proofing with a view to minimise detrimental impacts and maximise benefits on climate, environment and social dimension. For that purpose, promoters requesting financing shall provide adequate information based on guidance to be developed by the Commission and avoiding any operations involving intensive fossil fuel infrastructures. Projects below a certain size defined in the guidance shall be excluded from the proofing.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 258 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
1. Article 7(1) shall consist of two compartments addressing specific market failures or sub-optimal investment situations as follows: (a) any of the following situations: (i) investment situations related to Union policy priorities and addressed at the Union level; (ii) Union wide market failures or sub- optimal investment situations; or (iii) new or complex market failures or sub-optimal investment situations with a view to developing new financial solutions and market structures; (b)8 deleted Compartments Each policy window referred to in the EU compartment shall address specific market failures or sub-optimal investment situations in one or several Member States to deliver objectives of the contributing Funds under shared management. 2. The compartments referred to in paragraph 1 may be used in a complementary manner to support a financing or investment operation, including by combining support from both compartments.the Member State compartment
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 264 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
[...]deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 303 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the EU compartment, tThe eligible counterparts shall have expressed their interest and shall be able to cover financing and investment operations in at least three Member States. The implementing partners may also cover together financing and investment operations in at least three Member States by forming a group.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 304 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
For the Member State compartment, the Member State concerned may propose one or more eligible counterparts as implementing partners from among those that have expressed their interest pursuant to Article 9(3)(c).deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 308 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) achieves geographical diversification by Member State and by region;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 317 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. Where the guarantee agreement is concluded under the Member State compartment, it may provide for the participation of representatives from the Member State or the regions concerned in the monitoring of the implementation of the guarantee agreement.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 330 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18
1. experts, put at the disposal of the Commission by the implementing partners free of charge for the Union budget, shall be established. 2. assign experts to the project team. The number of the experts shall be established in the guarantee agreement. 3. whether the proposed financing and investment operations by the implementing partners comply with Union law and policies. 4. Commission referred to in paragraph 3, the project team shall perform a quality control of the due diligence of the proposed financing and investment operations carried out by the implementing partners. Financing and investment operations shall be then submitted to the Investment Committee for approval of the coverage by the EU guarantee. The project team shalArticle 18 deleted Project team A project team consisting of Each implementing partner shall The Commission shall confirm Subject to the confirmation by the the benefit for final prepare the scoreboard on the proposed financing and investment operations for the Investment Committee. The scoreboard shall, in particular, contain an assessment of: (a) the risk profile of the proposed financing and investment operations; (b) (c) criteria. Each implementing partner shall provide adequate and harmonised information to the project team in order for it to be able to carry out its risk analysis and prepare the scoreboard. 5. assess the due diligence or appraisal relating to a potential financing or investment operation submitted by the implementing partner that has put the expert at the disposal of the Commission. That expert shall also not prepare the scoreboard in relation to those proposals. 6. declare to the Commission any conflict of interest and shall communicate without delay to the Commission all information needed to check on an ongoing basis the absence of any conflict of interest. 7. detailed rules for the functioning of the project team and for the verification of conflict of interest situations. 8. detailed rules for the scoreboard to enable the Investment Committee to approve the use of the EU guarantee for a proposed financing or investment operation.cipients; the respect of the eligibility A project team expert shall not Each project team expert shall The Commission shall lay down The Commission shall lay down
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 345 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Conclusions of the Investment Committee approving the support of the EU guarantee to a financing or investment operation shall be publicly accessible and shall include the rationale for the approval. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive informat, the criteria applied and the scoreboard of indicators. Particular focus should be given on compliance with the additionality criterion.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 346 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
The scoreboard shall be publicly available after the signature of a financing or investment operation or sub-project, if applicable. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive information or personal data not to be disclosed under the Union data protection rules.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 348 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4
Twice a year, the conclusions of, the criteria applied and the scoreboard indicators related to the Investment Committee rejecting the use of the EU guarantee shall be transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council, subject to strict confidentiality requirements.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 364 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6
6. The InvestEU Advisory Hub shall have local presence, where necessary. It shall be established in particular in in each Member States or and in regions that face difficulties in developing projects under the InvestEU Fund. The InvestEU Advisory Hub shall assist in the transfer of knowledge to the regional and local level with a view to building up regional and local capacity and expertise for support referred to in paragraph 1.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 378 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) up to EUR 11 5000 000 000 for objectives referred to in point (a) of Article 3(2);
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 379 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) up to EUR 11 25000 000 000 for objectives referred to in point (b) of Article 3(2);
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 380 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) up to EUR 11 25000 000 000 for objectives referred to in point (c) of Article 3(2);
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 381 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) up to EUR 45 000 000 000 for objectives referred to in point (d) of Article 3(2).
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 463 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 12
12. Development of the defence industry, thereby enhancing the Union's strategic autonomy, in particular through support for: (a) the Union’s defence industry supply chain, in particular through financial support to SMEs and mid-caps; (b) companies participating in disruptive innovation projects in the defence sector and closely related dual- use technologies; (c) the defence sector supply chain when participating in collaborative defence research and development projects, including those supported by the European Defence Fund; (d) infrastructure.deleted defence research and training
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 471 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 13 – introductory part
13. Space, in particular through the development of the space sector with an exclusive focus on civil applications in line with Space Strategy objectives:
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 475 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point d
(d) to foster Union's autonomy for safe and secure access to space, including dual use aspects.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 480 #

2018/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 a (new)
2a. Number of regions covered by projects;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In order to be in line with the Paris Agreement and the long term EU climate objectives and to achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to stimulate job creation, the Union needs an up-to-date, high-performance infrastructure to help connect and integrate the Union and all its regions, in the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors. Those connections should help to improve the free movement of persons, goods, capital and services. The trans-European networks should facilitate cross-border connections, foster greater economic, social and territorial cohesion and contribute to a more competitive social market economy and to combatingfight against climate change.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 85 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The Programme should aim at supporting climate change, environmentally and socially sustainable projects and, where appropriate, climate change mitigation and adaptation actions. In particular, the contribution of the Programme to achieving the goals and objectives of the Paris Agreement as well as the proposedto both keep global average temperature rise well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, as well as pursue efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C. 2030 climate and energy targets shall be increased and long-term decarbonisation objective should be reinforced.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 202 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Following the Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the European Union of November 201724 , the Action Plan on Military Mobility adopted on 28 March 2018 by the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy25 highlighted that transport infrastructure policy offers a clear opportunity to increase synergies between defence needs and TEN-T. The Action Plan indicates that by mid-2018, the Council is invited to consider and validate the military requirements in relation to transport infrastructure and that, by 2019 the Commission services will identify the parts of the trans-European transport network suitable for military transport, including necessary upgrades of existing infrastructure. Union funding for the implementation of the dual-use projects should be implemented through the Programme on the basis of specific work programmes specifying the applicable requirements as defined in the context of the Action Plan. __________________ 24 JOIN(2017) 41 25 JOIN(2018) 5deleted
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 266 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The viability of the anticipated next generation digital services, such as Internet of Things services and applications which are expected to bring significant benefits across various sectors and for society as a whole, will require uninterrupted cross- border coverage with 5G networks, in particular in view of allowing users and objects to remain connected while on the move. However, the cost sharing scenarios for 5G deployment across these sectors remain unclear and the perceived risks of commercial deployment in some key areas are very high, such as environment and public health haven't been duly assessed. Road corridors and train connections are expected to be key areas for the first phase of new applications in the area of connected mobility and therefore constitute vital cross-border projects for funding under this Programme.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 269 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) 5G is more than an evolution of mobile broadband and has the potential to be a key enabler of the future digital world as the next generation of ultra-high broad band infrastructure that should provide affordable, agile, flexible, interactive, reliable and highly personalised services aiming to improve every citizen's life, namely through transformation of processes in all sectors such as: public sector, education, healthcare, research, energy, utilities, manufacturing, transportation, the automotive industry, audiovisual, farming precision, among others.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 276 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Actions contributing to projects of common interest in the area of digital connectivity infrastructure shall deploy the technology best suited for the specific project, while proposing the best balance between state-of-the-art technologies in terms of data flow capacity, transmission security, network resilience, energy sustainability and cost efficiency, and should be prioritised by way of work programmes taking into account criteria set out in this Regulation. Deployments of very high capacity networks can include passive infrastructure, in view of maximising socio-economic as well as environmental benefits. Finally, when prioritising actions, the potential positive spill-overs in terms of connectivity shall be taken into account, for example when a project deployed can improve the business case for future deployments leading to further coverage of territories and population in areas which have remained uncovered so far.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 277 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) Cooperation between academia, research institutions, the private sector and the public sector on research and development concerning 5G should be reinforced and encouraged through the continued involvement all relevant sectors in the process.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 294 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The policy objectives of this Programme will be also addressed through financial instruments and budgetary guarantee under the policy window(s) [...] of the InvestEU Fund. The Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added value.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 307 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of these reform priorities. These strategies should be presented alongside the yearly National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and/or Union funding. They should also serve to use Union funding in a coherent manner and to maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund, the European Investment Stabilisation Function, InvestEU and the Connecting Europe Facility, where relevant. Financial support should also be used in a manner consistent with Union and national energy and climate plans where relevant.deleted
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 376 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) “Energy efficiency first” means the prioritisation, in all energy planning, policy and investment decisions, of measures to make energy demand and energy supply more efficient, by means of cost-optimal energy end-use savings, demand-side response initiatives and more efficient conversion, transmission and distribution of energy;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 408 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme has the general objective to develop and modernise the trans-European networks in the fields of transport, energy and digital and to facilitate cross-border cooperation in the field of renewable energy and energy efficiency, taking into account the long-term decarbonisation commitmentsParis Agreement, the zero emission objective and with emphasis on synergies among sectors.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 453 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) to adapt the TEN-T networks to military mobility needs;deleted
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 475 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) In the energy sector, to contribute to the development of projects of common interest relating to further integration of thean efficient internal energy market, the reduction or elimination of Member States’ energy isolation, interoperability of networks across borders and sectors, facilitating decarbonisation and energy efficiency and ensuring security of supply, and to facilitate cross- border cooperation in the area of energy, including renewable energy;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 530 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i i i
(iii) EUR 6,500,000,000 from the Defence cluster for the specific objective referred to in Article 3(2)(a)(ii);deleted
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 597 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 4 a (new)
– respect the fundamental rights.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 650 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) with regard to projects deploying operational digital platforms, priority shall be given to actions based on state-of-the- art technologies, taking into account aspects such as interoperability, cybersecurity, data privacy, energy efficiency and sustainability and re-use.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 653 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point g
(g) the extent to which the deployed technology is best suited for the specific project, while proposing the best balance between state-of-the-art technologies in terms of data flow capacity, transmission security, network resilience, environment protection and energy and cost efficiency.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 766 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Under the specific objective referred to in Article 3(2)(a)(ii): actions, or specific activities within an action, supporting transport infrastructure on the TEN-T Network in order to adapt it to military mobility requirements with the purpose of enabling a civilian-military dual-use of the infrastructure.deleted
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 796 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. actions supporting energy efficiency projects.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 843 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) economic, social and environmental impact (benefits and costs)Climate, environmental, economic and social (benefits and costs), including through a lifecycle assessment;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 852 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(ab) Compliance with the Paris Agreement and the climate and energy EU long term objectives;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 861 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cross-border dimension;deleted
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 960 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) The co-financing rates may be increased to a maximum of 75 % for actions contributing to the development of projects of common interest which, based on the evidence referred to in Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) No 347/2013, provide a high degree of regional or Union-wide security of supply, strengthen the solidarity of the Union or comprise highly innovative solutionsprojects in the area of renewable energy.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 990 #

2018/0228(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Grants cannot be combined with funds granted to Projects of Energy Community’s Interest.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 248 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) The Specific Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing and have a clear European added valuereinforce, widen and extend the excellence of the Union's scientific and technological base, tackle major global challenges, environment and economic sustainability and climate changes as well as to improve people's life namely through better employment, access to health and education, social inclusion, active citizenship.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 287 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) Reinforcement of the investment towards Social Sciences and Humanities
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 296 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) strengthening research into needs expressed by civil society organisations;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 297 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(c b) boosting social leadership for a fair economy through a participatory and transdisciplinary research and social innovation;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 423 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For each mission implementation and definition, a mission board may be established for co-designing and monitor its implementation. It shall be composed of around 15 high level individuals including relevant end-users' representatives to the defined mission. The mission board shall include representatives from academia, research and technology organizations, NGOs, Industry of all sizes, SMEs, Start Ups, national and local authorities, and relevant end-users representatives such as Trade Unions, Civil Society Organizations, Consumer Protection Organizations, among others. The members of the mission board shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their selection, including an open call for expressions of interest. They shall advise upon the following:
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 469 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Scientific Council shall be composed of scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, of both women and men in different age groups, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests. The composition of the Scientific Council shall have into account gender balance, different age groups and geographical distribution and representation.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 509 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The EIC Board shall be composed of 15 to 20 independent high level individuals drawn from various parts of Europe's innovation ecosystem, namely the social innovation, including entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors and researcherrepresentatives, investors, researchers and other relevant actors from cultural domains. It shall contribute to outreach actions, with EIC Board members striving to enhance the prestige of the EIC brand.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 525 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The EIC Board shall have a President who shall be appointed by the Commission following a transparent recruitment process. The President shall be a high profile public figure linked tofigure with a proven expertise in the innovation world.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 609 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 19 a (new)
International cooperation participation and agreements are subject to the full compliance of human rights' respect and duly observation of the principles acknowledge by the Charter of Fundamental rights of the EU.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 617 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – paragraph 2
Open and excellent science is inextricably linked to the achievement of world leading innovation. Scientific and technological paradigm shifts have been identified as key drivers for productivity growth, comopetitivenessration, wealth, sustainable and ecological development and social progress and inclusion. Such paradigm shifts have historically tended to originate from the public-sector science base before going on to lay the foundations for whole new industries and sectors.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 643 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 1 – point 1.3 – point 1.3.1 – paragraph 4
The President of the ERC will reside in Brussels for the duration of the appointment and devote most of his/her working time12should be full time committed to ERC business. He/she will be remunerated at a level commensurate with the Commission's top management and will be provided by the Dedicated Implementation Structure with the necessary support to carry out his or her functions. _________________ 12She or He should abstain from representing at a board level any public or private institution and take part in any activities that could result in a conflict of interests with her/his duties as president of the ERC. In principle at least 80 %.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 651 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Mobility programs will ensure effective equal opportunities between men and women and include specific measures to remove obstacles to the mobility of female researchers.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 655 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2
Europe is a scientific powerhouse with around 1.8 million researchers working in thousands of universities, research centres and world-leading companies. However, it is estimated that the EU will need to train and employ at least one million new researchers by 2027 in order to achieve the targets beings set for increased investment in research and innovation. This need is particularly acute in the non-academic sector. The EU must reinforce its efforts to entice more young women and men to a career in research, to attract researchers from third countries, retain its own researchers and reintegrate European researchers working elsewhere back to Europe. In addition, in order to more widely spread excellence, the conditions under which researchers perform must be further improved throughout the European Research Area (ERA). In this respect, stronger links are needed notably with the European Education Area (EEdA), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and European Social Fund (ESF+).
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 658 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Key activities shall provide excellent and innovative training to early-stage researchers at post-graduate level via interdisciplinary projects or doctoral programs allowing researchers to develop their research curriculum and involving Universities, research institutions, businesses, SMEs and other socio- economic groups from different countries. This will develop and improve career prospects for young post-graduate researchers in both a public and private sectors.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 663 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 7
The MSCA contribute to making the ERA more effective, competitive and attractive on a global scale. This can be achieved by focusing on a new generation of highly- skilled researchers and providing support for emerging talent from across the EU and beyond; by fostering the diffusion and application of new knowledge and ideas to European policies, the economy and society, inter alia through improved science communication and public outreach measures; by facilitating cooperation between research-performing organisations; and by having a pronounced structuring impact on the ERA, advocating an open labour market, guaranteeing labor rights, and setting standards for quality training, attractive and non precarious employment conditions and open recruitment for all researchers.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 678 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 1
In order to foster excellence, promote cooperation between research-performing organisations and create a positive structuring effect, high-quality training standards, good working conditions, such as equal payment at all levels across European countries, and effective career development of researchers need to be more widely spread across the ERA. This will help modernise or enhance research training programmes and systems as well as increasing institutions' worldwide attractiveness.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 707 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part I – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Networks of pan EU, national and regional research infrastructures, including small and medium size research infrastructures, addressing global challenges for the provision of access to researchers as well as for the harmonisation and improvement of the infrastructures' services;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 716 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – title
II GLOBAL CHALLANGES AND INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 730 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – paragraph 3
Research and innovation are key drivers of sustainable growth and industrial comopetitivenessration, and they will contribute to finding solutions to today’s problems, to reverse as quickly as possible, the negative and dangerous trend that currently links economic development, the use of natural resources and social issues, and turn it into new business opportunities.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 783 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– Early development and the aging process throughout the life course, with emphasis on dementia;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 789 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Maternal, paternal, infant and child health as well as the role of parents;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 829 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– Diagnostics for earlier and more accurate diagnosis and for patient-adapted treatment, with emphasis in diseases with major prevalence such as cancer and diabetes types I and II;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 871 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.5 – paragraph 1
Health technologies and tools are vital for public health and contributed to a large extent to the important improvements achieved in the quality of life, health and care of people, in the EU. It is thus a key strategic challenge to design, develop, deliver and implement suitable, accessible, trustable, safe, and cost-effective tools and technologies for health and care, taking due account of the needs of people with disabilities and the aging society. These include artificial intelligence and other digital technologies, offering significant improvements over existing ones, as well as stimulating a competitive and sustainable health-related industry that creates high-value jobs. The European health-related industry is one of the critical economic sectors in the EU, accounting for 3% of GDP and 1.5 million employees.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 885 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.5 – paragraph 2 – indent 5
– The safety, efficacy and, quality and access tof tools and technologies for health and care as well as their ethical legal and social impact;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 893 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.6 – paragraph 1
Health systems are a key asset of the EU social systems, accounting for 24 million employees in the health and social work sector in 2017. It is a main priority to render health systems accessible, cost- effectivaffordable, resilient, sustainable and trusted as well as to reduce inequalities, including by unleashing the potential of data-driven and digital innovation for better health and person-centred care building on open European data infrastructures. This will advance the digital transformation of health and care.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 895 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.6 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– Reforms in public health systems and policies in Europe and beyond, keeping its universal character and protecting workers rights;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 903 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.6 – paragraph 2 – indent 8
– Solutions for citizen and patient empowerment, self-monitoring, and interaction with health and social care professionals, and care givers for more integrated care and a user-centred approach;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 910 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – introductory part
2. CLUSTER 'INCLUSIVE AND SECUR, INNOVATIVE AND REFLECTIVE SOCIETYIES'
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 921 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
The EU stands for a unique way of combining economic growth with social policies, with high levels of social inclusion, shared values embracing democracy, human rights, gender equality and the richness of diversity. This model is constantly evolving and needs to deal with the challenges from amongst other things, globalisation and technological change. Europe also has to respond to the challenges arising from persistent security threats. Terrorist attacks and radicalisation, as well as cyber-attacks and hybrid threats, raise major security concerns and put particular strain on societies.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 926 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2
The EU must promote a model of inclusive and sustainable growth while reaping the benefits of technological advancements, enhancing trust in and promoting innovation of democratic governance, combatting inequalities, unemployment, marginalisation, discrimination and radicalisation, guaranteeing human rights, fostering cultural diversity and European cultural heritage and empowering citizens through social innovation. The management of migration and the integration of migrants will also continue to be priority issues. The role of research and innovation in the social sciences and the humanities in responding to these challenges and achieving the EU’s goals is fundamental.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 931 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 3
European citizens, state institutions and the economy need to be protected from the continued threats of organised crime, including firearms trafficking, drug trafficking and trafficking in human beings. Strengthening protection and security through better border management is also key. Cybercrime is on the increase and related risks are diversifying as the economy and society digitalise. Europe needs to continue its effots to improve cybersecurity, digital privacy, personal data protection and combat the spread of false and harmful information in order to safeguard democratic and economic stability. Lastly, further efforts are required to limit the effects on lives and livelihoods of extreme weather events which are intensifying due to climate change, such as floods, storms or droughts leading to forest fires, land degradation and other natural disasters, e.g. earthquakes. Disasters, whether natural or man-made, can put at risk important societal functions, such as health, energy supply and government.deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 937 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 4
The magnitude, complexity and trans- national character of the challenges call multi-layered EU action. Addressing such critical social, political, cultural and economic issues, as well as security challenges, only at national level would carry the danger of inefficient use of resources, fragmented approaches and dissimilar standards of knowledge and capacity.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 940 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 5
Security research is part of the wider comprehensive EU response to security threats. It contributes to the capability development process by enabling the future availability of technologies and applications to fill capability gaps identified by policy-makers and practitioners. Already, funding to research through the EU's framework programme has represented around 50% of total public funding for security research in the EU. Full use will be made of available instruments, including the European space programme (Galileo and EGNOS, Copernicus, Space Situational Awareness and Governmental Satellite Communications). Synergies are sought with the activities supported by EU- funded defence research and duplication of funding is avoided. Cross-border collaboration contributes to developing a European single security market and improving industrial performance, underpinning the EU's autonomy.deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 945 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 6
Research and Innovation activities in this Global Challenge will be overall aligned with the Commission's priorities on Democratic Change; Jobs, Growth and Investment; Justice and Fundamental Rights; Migration; A Deeper and Fairer European Monetary Union; Digital Single Market. It will respond to the commitment of the Rome Agenda to work towards: "a social Europe" and "a Union which preserves our cultural heritage and promotes cultural diversity". It will also support the European Pillar of Social Rights, and the Global Compact for safe, orderly and regular migration. Security research responds to the commitment of the Rome Agenda to work towards "a safe and secure Europe", contributing to a genuine and effective Security Union. Synergies with the Justice Programme and with the Rights and Values Programme, which support activities in the area of access to justice, victims' rights, gender equality, non-discrimination, data protection and promotion of the European citizenship will be exploited.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 948 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point –2.2.1 (new)
-2.2.1. Social sciences and humanities Social sciences and humanities research shall be fully integrated into each of the priorities of Horizon Europe, contributing to the evidence base for policymaking at international, Union, national, regional and local level. Broad lines - Analysis and development of social, economic and political inclusion and positive inter-cultural dynamics in Europe and with international partners; - Greater understanding of the societal changes in Europe and their impact on social cohesion; - Tackle of major challenges concerning European models for social cohesion and well-being such as immigration, integration, demographic change, the ageing society and disability, education and lifelong learning, as well as the reduction of poverty and social exclusion; - Support research to understand identity and belonging across communities, regions and nations; - Support policymakers in designing policies that foster employment, combat poverty and prevent the development of various forms of divisions, conflict and political and social exclusion, discriminations and inequalities, such as gender and intergenerational inequalities, discrimination due to disability or ethnic origin, or digital or innovation divides;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 953 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Innovative approaches to support the transparency, responsiveness, accountability effectiveness and legitimacy of democratic governance in full respect of fundamental and human rights and of the rule of law;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 955 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Strategies to address populism, extremism, radicalisation, terrorism and to includediscrimination and hate speeches and to actively include, empower and engage disaffected, vulnerable and marginalised citizens;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 961 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.2 – introductory part
2.2.2. Diverse Cultural Heritage
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 963 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.2 – paragraph 1
Cultural heritage is the fabric of our lives, meaningful to communities, groups and societies, giving a sense of belongingDiverse cultural heritage has a universal value for us as individuals, communities and societies across Europe and beyond. Diverse cultural heritage is the fabric of our lives, meaningful to communities, groups and societies, giving a sense of belonging in plural and diverse societies through the sharing of knowledge and experiences and promoting active engagement in the community. It is the bridge between the past and the future of our societies. It is a driving force of local economies and communities and a powerful source of inspiration for creative and cultural industries. Accessing, conserving, safeguarding and restoring, interpreting and harnessing the full potential of our cultural heritage are crucial challenges now and for future generations. CDiverse cultural heritage is thea major input and inspiration for the arts, traditional craftsmanship, the cultural, entrepreneurial, social innovation and creative sectors that are drivers of sustainable economic growth, new job creation and external trade.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 975 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 4
– The contribution of diverse cultural heritage to sustainable development through conservation, safeguarding and regeneration of cultural landscapes, with the EU as a laboratory for heritage-based innovation and cultural tourism;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 978 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 6
– Influemportance of traditions, behavioural patterns, perceptions and beliefs on values and sense of belongingpluralistic and diverse traditions, customs, perceptions and beliefs on values in the development of communities, promoting the active engagement and participation of all citizens through the share of multicultural knowledge and experiences.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 984 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 1
European societies are undergoing profound socio-economic transformations, especially as a result of globalisation and technological innovations. At the same time there has been an increase in income inequality in most European countries14 . Forward-looking policies are needed, with a view to promoting inclusive and sustainable growth and reversing inequalities, boosting productivity (including advancements in its measurement) and human capitalcitizens living and working conditions and promoting their personal development, responding to migration and integration challenges and supporting intergenerational solidarity and social mobility. EFree, accessible, inclusive, innovative and high-quality education and training systems are needed for a more equitable and prosperous future. _________________ 14 OECD Understanding The Socio- Economic Divide in Europe, 26 January 2017.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 986 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– Knowledge base for advice on investments and policies especially educationeducation and training policies and strainingtegies, for high value added skills, productivityersonal development, social mobility, growth, social innovation and job creation. The role of education and training to tackle inequalities and to promote social and economic inclusion and active participation in the society;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 988 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Social sustainability beyond GDP only indicators especially new economicinnovation and bsusiness models and new financial technologiestainability;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 992 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Statistical and other economic tools for a better understanding of growth and social innovation in a context of sluggish productivity gains;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1001 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 8
– Modernisation of public authorities and services to meet citizens’ expectations and needs regarding service provision, transparency, accessibility, openness, accountability and user centricity.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1002 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 9
– Efficiency of justice systems and improved access to justice based on judiciary independence and rule of law principles, with fair, efficient, accessible, affordable and transparent procedural methods both in civil and criminal matters.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1004 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 9 a (new)
- Mechanisms to improve the transition from formal education to the fast growing digital education, without prejudice of a educational system that should be based on cooperation and shared knowledge where citizens can enhance their personal development, competences and skills.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1009 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 a (new)
2.2.3 a. 3. 'SECURE SOCIETIES'
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1010 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.3 b (new)
2.2.3 b. European citizens, state institutions and the economy need to be protected from the continued threats of organised crime, including firearms trafficking, drug trafficking and trafficking in human beings.Cybercrime is on the increase and related risks are diversifying as the economy and society digitalise.Europe needs to continue its efforts to improve cybersecurity, digital privacy, personal data protection and combat the spread of false and harmful information in order to safeguard democratic and economic stability.Lastly, further efforts are required to limit the effects on lives and livelihoods of extreme weather events which are intensifying due to climate change, such as floods, storms or droughts leading to forest fires, land degradation and other natural disasters, e.g. earthquakes.Disasters, whether natural or man-made, can put at risk important societal functions, such as health, energy supply and government. Security research is part of the wider comprehensive EU response to security threats. It contributes to the capability development process by enabling the future availability of technologies and applications to fill capability gaps identified by policy-makers and practitioners. Already, funding to research through the EU's framework programme has represented around 50% of total public funding for security research in the EU. Full use will be made of available instruments, including the European space programme (Galileo and EGNOS, Copernicus, Space Situational Awareness and Governmental Satellite Communications).
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1017 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.4 – paragraph 1
Disasters arise from multiple sources, whether natural or man-made, including those from terrorist attacks, climate- related and other extreme events (including from sea level rises), from forest fires, heat waves, floods, earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic events, from water crises, from space weather events, from industrial and transport disasters, from CBRN events, as well as those from resulting cascading risks. The aim is to prevent and reduce the loss of life, harm to health and the environment, economic and material damage from disasters, ensure food security as well as to improve the understanding and reduction of disaster risks and post-disaster lesson learning. The alarming effects of climate change, visible in the more common heat waves and increase of forest fires, demand higher concern and investment on how the effects of such events can be reverted and prevented.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1039 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.5 – paragraph 1
There is a need to protect citizens from and to respond to security threats from criminal including terrorist activities andto hybrid threats; to protect people, public spaces and critical infrastructure, from both physical (including CBRN-E) attacks and cyber- attacks; to fight terrorism and radicalisation, including understanding and tackling terrorist ideas and beliefs; to prevent and fight serious crime, including cybercrime, and organised crime; to support victims; to trace criminal financial flows; to support the use of data for law enforcement and to ensure the protection of personal data in law enforcement activities; to support air, land and sea EU border management, for flows of people and goods. It is essential to maintain flexibility rapidly to address new security challenges that may arise.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1069 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.6 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
AStrengthening the European cybersecurity competence network and its competence centre as well as providing training and competences on the most innovative technologies that are being developed in the field of cybersecurity at local, national and European level.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1100 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 7
The EU has the unique chance of being a global leader and increase its share of world markets, by showcasing how digital transformation, leadership in key enabling and space technologies, the transition to a low-carbon, circular economy and comopetitivenessration can reinforce each other through scientific and technological excellence.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1104 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 8
To make the digitised, circular, low-carbon andsustainable low-emission economy a reality, action is needed at EU level because of the complexity of value chains, the systemic and multi-disciplinary nature of the technologies and their high development costs, and the cross-sectoral nature of the problems to be addressed. The EU must ensure that all industrial players, and society at large, can benefit from advanced and clean technologies and digitisation. Developing technologies alone will not suffice. Industrially-oriented infrastructures, including pilot lines, will help set up EU businesses and in particular SMEs deploy these technologies and improve their innovation performance.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1111 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.1 – paragraph 1
Manufacturing is a key driver of employment and prosperity in the EU, producing over three quarters of the EU's global exports and providing over a 100 million direct and indirect jobs. The key challenge for EU manufacturing is to remain competitive at a global level with smarter and more customised products of high added value, produced at much lower energy costsin line with energy efficiency and environment sustainability and protection, boosting the use of renewable energy. Creative, social and cultural inputs will be vital to help generate added value.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1123 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
Skills and wWorkspaces fully adapted to the new technologies, in line with European social values;mproving better working conditions, preventing occupational and working related diseases, boosting psychological and motivational wellbeing.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1137 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– Nano-electronics design and processing concepts responding to the specific requirements of digital transformation and global challenges, in terms of functionality, energy consumption and efficiency and integration;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1144 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Sensing technologies and their co- integration with computational units as the enabler of the Internet of Things, including innovative solutions on flexible and conformable materials for human-friendly, safe, secure and environment-friendly interacting objects;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1174 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 4
– An EU innovation ecosystem of technology infrastructures16 , including medium and small infrastructures, identified and prioritised in agreement with Member States, which provide services to accelerate technological transformation and uptake by EU industry, notably by SMEs and start ups as well as for research institutions, academia and local and regional communities and educational and training centres; this will cover all key technologies necessary to enable innovations in the field of materials; _________________ 16 These are public or private facilities that provide resources and services primarily for the European industry to test and validate key enabling technologies and products. Such infrastructures may be single sited, virtual or distributed, and must be registered in a Member State or a third country associated to the Programme.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1178 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.4 – paragraph 1
Making any object and device intelligent is one of the megatrends. Researchers and innovators developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and offering applications in Robotics and other areas will be key drivers of future economic and productivity growth. Many sectors including health, neural and language technologies, manufacturing, construction, and farming will use and further develop this key enabling technology, in other parts of the Framework Programme. Developments must ensure the safety of AI-based applications, assess the risks and mitigate its potential for malicious use and unintended discrimination such as gender or racial bias. It must also be ensured that AI is developed within a framework which respects the EU's values and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1199 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.5 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Next Generation Internet applications and services for consumers, industry and society building on trust, interoperability, interconnectivity, better user control of data, transparent language access, new multi modal interaction concepts, inclusive and highly personalised access to objects, information and content, including immersive and trustworthy media, social media and social networking;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1229 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.8
3.2.8. Low-Carbon and Clean Industries Industrial sectors, including energy- intensive industries, contribute millions of jobs and their competitiveness is key for the prosperity of our societies. However, they account for 20% of the global greenhouse gas emissions and have a high environmental impact (particularly in terms of air, water and soil pollutants). Breakthrough technologies to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gases and pollutants, often combined with the technologies for circular industry above, will lead to strong industrial value chains, revolutionise manufacturing capacities and improve the global competitiveness of industry; and at the same time make key contributions to our targets for climate action and environmental quality. Broad Lines – Process technologies, including heating and cooling, digital tools and large-scale demonstrations for process performance and efficiency; substantial reductions or avoidance of industrial emissions of greenhouse gases and pollutants, including particulate matter; – Industrial CO2 valorisation; – Electrification and use of unconventional energy sources within industrial plants, and energy and resource exchanges between industrial plants (for instance via industrial symbiosis); – Industrial products that require low or zero carbon emissions production processes through the life cycle.deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1298 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 2
To meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement the EU will need to transition to low-carbon, resource-efficient and resilient economies and societies. This will be based on profound changes in technology and services, to the ways in which businesses and consumers behave, as well as involving new forms of governance. Limiting the increase of global average temperature to well below 2°C, and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C, requires rapid progress in decarbonising the energy system and substantially reducing greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions from the transport sector17 . It will also need new impetus to accelerate the pace of developing next-generation breakthroughs as well as demonstrating and deploying innovative technologies and solutions, using also the opportunities provided by digital and space technologies. This will be pursued through an integrated approach encompassing decarbonisation, resource efficiency, reduction of air pollution, access to raw materials and circular economy. _________________ 17 Substantial decarbonisation of other sectors is addressed in other areas of the Horizon Europe Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness pillar.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1305 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 5
The EU has established a comprehensive policy framework in the Energy Union strategy, with binding targets, legislative acts and research and innovation activities aiming to lead in developing and deploying efficient energy production systems based on renewables.deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1308 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 6
Transport ensures the mobility of people and goods necessary for an integrated European single market, territorial cohesion and an open and inclusive society. At the same time, transport has significant negative effects on human health, congestion, land, air quality and noise, as well as safety resulting in numerous premature deaths and increased socio-economic costs. Therefore, environment and economic sustainable mobility and efficient transport networks need to become clean, safe, smart, innovative, secure, silent, reliable and affordable, offering a seamless integrated door-to-door service.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1309 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 6
Transport ensures the mobility of people and goods necessary for an integrated European single market, territorial cohesion and an open and inclusive society. At the same time, transport has significant negative effects on human health, congestion, land, air quality and noise, as well as safety resulting in numerous premature deaths and increased socio-economic costs. Therefore, sustainable urban mobility and planning and transport networks need to become clean, safe, smart, secure, silent, reliable and affordable, offering a seamless integrated door-to-door service.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1318 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 9
Finding new ways to accelerate the deployment of clean technologies and solutions for the decarbonisation of the European economy requires also increased demand for innovation. This can be stimulated through the empowerment of citizens as well as socio-economic and public sector innovation and will lead to approaches broader than technology-driven innovation. Socio-economic research covering inter alia user needs and patterns, foresight activities, environmental, economic, social and behavioural aspects, business cases and models and pre- normative research for standard setting, will also facilitate actions fostering regulatory, financing and social innovation, skills, as well as engagement and empowerment of all market players, including small and medium ones, and consumers.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1325 #

2018/0225(COD)

Activities under this Cluster contribute in particular to the goals of the Energy Union, as well as to those of the Digital Single Market, the Jobs, Growth and Investment agenda, the strengthening of the EU as a global actor, the new EU Industrial Policy Strategy, the Circular Economy, the Raw Materials Initiative, the Security Union and the Urban Agenda, as well as the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU as well as EU legal provisions to reduce noise and air pollution.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1330 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.1 – paragraph 1
Effective implementation of the Paris Agreement has to be based on science, requiring continuously updating of our knowledge on the climate-earth system, as well as the mitigation and adaptations options available, allowing for a systemic and comprehensive picture of challenges and opportunities for the EU's economy. On this basis, science-based solutions for a cost-effective transition to a low-carbon, climate- resilient and resource-efficient society will be developed.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1350 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.2 – paragraph 1
The EU aims to be world leader in affordable, secure and sustainable energy technologies improving its competitiveness in global value chains and its position in growth marketsto the benefit of its citizens and the environment. Diverse climatic, geographical, environmental and socio- economic conditions in the EU as well as the need to ensure energy security and access to raw materials, dictate a broad portfolio of energy solutions, including of non-technical nature. As regards renewable energy technologies, costs need to decrease further, performance must improve, integration into the energy system must be improved and breakthrough technologies need to be developed. As regards fossil fuels, decarbonising their usage will be essential to meet the climate objectives.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1376 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Technologies and solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel-based power generation via CO2 capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS).deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1391 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.3 – paragraph 1
The expected growth of variable electricity production and shift towards more electric heating, cooling and transport dictates the need for new approaches to manage energy grids and supports the decentralised solutions such as local energy communities and self-consumption. Next to decarbonisation, the goal is to ensure energy affordability, security and stability of supply, achieved through investments in innovative network infrastructure technologies and innovative system management. Energy storage in different forms will play a key role in providing services to the grid, also improving and reinforcing network capacities. Exploiting synergies between different networks (e.g. electricity grids, heating and cooling networks, gas networks, transport recharging and refuelling infrastructure, hydrogen, and telecom networks) and actors (e.g. industrial sites, data centres, self- producers, energy cooperatives, consumer organisations) will be crucial for enabling the smart, integrated operation of the relevant infrastructures.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1404 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Pan-European energy network approaches to management;deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1415 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.4 – paragraph 1
Buildings and industry installations play an increasingly active role in their interaction with the energy system. Therefore, they are crucial elements in the transition to renewable energydecarbonised economy based on renewable energy sources and higher share of energy efficient measures.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1422 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.4 – paragraph 3
Industries, and especially those that are energy-intensive, cshould further improve energy efficiency, and favou and consumption, and engage efforts for the integration of renewable energy sources.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1453 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.5 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Quality of life for the citizens, safe mobility, urban and rural social innovation, cities' circular and regenerative capacity, reduced environmental footprint and pollution;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1498 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 4 – point 4.2 – point 4.2.9 – paragraph 1
Massive, cConcentrated and decentralised storage solutions (comprising chemical, electrochemical, electrical, mechanical and thermal) for the energy system will increase efficiency, flexibility, technology independence and accessibility as well as the security of supply. Low-emission, decarbonised transport will require a growing share of electrical and/or other alternatively fuelled vehicles, with better- performing and cheaper, recyclable and reusable batteries, as well as local provision of synthetic/renewable fuels such as hydrogen and innovative solutions for on-site storage.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1519 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 5 – point 5.1 – paragraph 2
Meeting the goals of sustainable development, guaranteeing the production and consumption of safe and healthy food, promoting sustainable practices in agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry, ensuring access to clean water, soil and air for all, cleaning up the seas and oceans, preserving and restoring the planet’s vital natural systems and environment requires that we harness the potential of research and innovation. But the pathways for the transition to sustainability and ways to overcome resilient barriers are hardly understood. Making the transition to sustainable consumption and production and restoring planetary health requires investing in technologies, new business models, and social and environmental innovation. This creates new opportunities for a sustainable, resilient, innovative and responsible European economy, boosting resource efficiency, productivity and competitiveness, and generating jobs andsupporting the creation of quality jobs and sustainable economic and social growth.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1530 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 5 – point 5.1 – paragraph 4
They will help to maintain and enhance the provision of biodiversity and secure the long-term provision of ecosystem services, climate adaptation and carbon sequestration (both on land and sea). They will help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) and other emissions, waste and pollution from primary production (both terrestrial and aquatic), processing, consumption and other human activities. They will trigger investments, supporting the shift towards a circular economy, bioeconomy and blue economy, whilst protecting environmental health, sustainability and integrity.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1546 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 5 – point 5.2 – point 5.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Biodiversity status, ecosystem protection, climate mitigation and adaptation, food security, agriculture and forestry, land use and land use change, rural, urban and peri-urban development, natural resources management, ocean exploitation and conservation, maritime security, and other relevant domains;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1591 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 5 – point 5.2 – point 5.2.3 – paragraph 2 – indent 8
– Innovations in farming at the interfaces between agriculture, aquaculture and forestry and in urban and rural areas;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1628 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 5 – point 5.2 – point 5.2.4 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 a (new)
- Oceans' health: ensure the exhaustive observation of the entire Ocean with the aim to reduce in 50% the micro-plastics level by 2030.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1685 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 5 – point 5.2 – point 5.2.7 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Solutions for sustainable and regenerative development of cities, peri- urban and rural areas and regions, integrating the circular economy transformation with nature-based solutions, technological, digital, social, cultural and territorial governance innovations;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1700 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 2 – introductory part
2. Inclusive and securInnovative and Reflective sSocietyies
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1706 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 2 – indent 3 a (new)
- 3 - Secure Society
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1710 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 2 – indent 5
– Support to security policies in the areas of protection of critical infrastructures and public spaces, CBRN-E (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive materials) and hybrid threats, border protection and document security, and information and intelligence for countering terrorism;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1720 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 – indent 1
– Support to implementation of the EU climate, energy and transport policies, transition to a low-carbonsustainable economy and strategies for decarbonisation towards 2050; analysis of integrated national climate and energy plans; assessment of decarbonisation pathway in all sectors, including agriculture and Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1723 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 – indent 3
– Analysis of the R&I dimension of Energy Union; assessment of EU competitiveness in the global clean energy market;deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1729 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 – indent 8
– Support to energy transition, including local energy communities, the Covenant of Mayors, clean energy for EU Islands, sensitive regions, and Africa;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1736 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 5 – indent 3
– Assessment of climate change and potential mitigation and adaptation measures for agricultural and, fisheries and forestry policies, including food security;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1737 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.2 – paragraph 2 – point 5 – indent 4
– Monitoring and forecasting of agricultural and forestry resources in EU and neighbourhood countries;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1741 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 6 – point 6.2 – point 6.2.3 – paragraph 1
The JRC will contribute to innovation and technology transfer.. It will support the functioning of the internal market and the economic governance of the Union. It will contribute to development and monitoring of policies targeting a more social and sustainable Europe. It will support the EU's external dimension and international goals and help in promoting good governance. A well- functioning internal market with a strong economic governance andresilient and sustainable fair social system will foster innovation and, competitiveness, jobs creation, social inclusion and well-being.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1759 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – paragraph 5
A new global wave of breakthrough innovation is coming up, one that will be based on more 'deep-tech' technologies such as block-chain, artificial intelligence, genomics and robotics, and other technologies, which may also emerge from individual innovators and communities of citizens. They have in common that they are taking shape at the intersection between different technologies, industry sectors, social innovation and scientific disciplines, offering radically new combinations of products, processes, services and business models, and have the potential to open up new markets worldwide. Additional sectors such as manufacturing, financial services, transport or energy will also be impacted.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1760 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – paragraph 6
Europe has to ride that wave. It is well positioned as the new wave comes in 'deep- tech' areas, such as artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, clean energy sources, where Europe has some competitive advantages regarding science and knowledge, and can build on close public-privateublic cooperation (e.g. in health care or energy).
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1785 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – paragraph 12
Additionally, as a continued effort to enhance risk-finance capacities for research and innovation in Europe and where necessary, this pillar will link with the InvestEU programme. Building on the successes and the experiences gained under Horizon 2020 InnovFin, as well as under EFSI, the InvestEU Programme will enhance access to risk finance for bankable research organisations, innovators and entrepreneurs, in particular for SMEs and small midcaps, as well as for investors.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1803 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 3 – indent 3
– Innovations that cut across different scientific, technological (e.g. combining physical and digital) and social fields and sectors will be encouraged;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1836 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.2 – paragraph 7
The Accelerator will mainly operate through a continuously open and bottom- up call, targeting individual entrepreneurs (mainly start-ups and SMEs), with a particular attention paid to young and to women innovators as well as to a geographical balance. This open and bottom- up call will be complemented by targeted support for on emerging breakthrough or disruptive technologies of potential strategic significance. Proposals may also be submitted by investors, including public innovation agencies, but the support will be awarded to the company.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1858 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.2 – paragraph 3
Programme managers will come from multiple spheres, including companies, social innovation communities, universities, national laboratories and research centers. They will bring deep expertise from personal experience and years in the field. They will be recognised leaders, either having managed multidisciplinary research teams or directing large institutional programs, and know the importance of communicating their visions tirelessly, creatively, and broadly. Lastly, they will have experience in overseeing important budgets, which require sense of responsibility.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1880 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2
The EU must also aim to develop ecosystems that support social innovation and public sector innovation, in addition to innovation in private enterprises. Indeed, the government sector must innovate and renew itself in order to be able to support the changes in regulation and governance required to support the large-scale deployment of new technologies and a growing public demand for the more efficient and, effective, accessible and inclusive delivery of services. Social innovations are crucial to enhance the welfare, inclusion and active engagement of our societies.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1883 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– Promote the alignment of research and innovation agendas with EU efforts to consolidate an open market for capital flows and investment, such as the development of key framework conditions in favour of innovation under the Capital Markets Union;deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1886 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
– Establish a joint communication strategy on innovation in the EU. It will aim at stimulating the EU's most talented innovators, entrepreneurs, particularly young drivers, SMEs and start-ups, also from fresh cornerthe most deprived regions of the EU. It will stress the EU added-value that technical, non- technical, and social innovators can bring to EU citizens by developing their idea/vision into a thriving enterprise (social value/impact, jobs and growth, societal progression).
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1892 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 3 – indent 2
– Support also joint programmes for mentoring, coaching, technical assistance and other services that are delivered close to innovators, by networks such as Enterprise Europe Network (EEN), clusters, pan-European platforms such as Startup Europe, local innovation actors, public but also private, in particular incubators and innovation hubs that could moreover be interconnected to favour partnering between innovators. Support mayshould also be given to promote soft skills for innovation, including to networks of vocational institutions and in close relation with the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, special attention should be given to support the participation and engagement of the most deprived EU regions to which the lack of technical knowledge and human resources can be impeditive to participate in these programmes;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1896 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 3
To address future challenges, embrace the opportunities of new technologies and contribute to sustainable economic growth, jobs, competitiveness and the well-being of Europe’s citizens, there is the need to further strengthen Europe’s capacity to innovate by: fostering the creation of new environments conducive to collaboration and innovation; strengthening the innovation capabilities of academia and the research sector; supporting a new generation of entrepreneurial and research people; stimulating the creation and the development of innovative ventures.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1901 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – introductory part
3.2.2. Entrepreneurial and innovation skills in a lifelong learning perspective and the entrepreneurial transformation of EU universities
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1904 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 1
The EIT education activities will be reinforced to foster innovation and entrepreneurship through better education and training. A stronger focus on human capital development will be grounded on the expansion of existing EIT KICs education programmes in the view of continuing to offer students and professionals high quality curricula based on innovation and entrepreneurship in line in particular with the EU industrial and skills strategy. This may include researchers and innovators supported by other parts of Horizon Europe, in particular MSCA. The EIT will also support the renewal of European Universities and their integration in innovation ecosystems by stimulating and increasing their entrepreneurialinnovation potential and capabilities and encouraging them to better anticipate new skills requirements.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1907 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– Strengthening and expanding the EIT label in order to improve the quality of education programmes based on partnerships between different higher education institutions, research centres and companies and offering learning-by-doing curricula and robust multidisciplinary innovative and entrepreneurshipial education as well as international, inter- organisational and cross-sectorial mobility;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1909 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part III – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– Development of innovation, capacity building, social innovation and entrepreneurship capabilities of the higher education sector, by leveraging the EIT Community expertise in linking education, research and business;
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1946 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 4 – point 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 5
– Providing researchers with attractive career environments, such as equal payment for equal career, skills and competences needed in the modern knowledge economy36 . Linking the ERA and the European Higher Education Area by supporting the modernisation of universities and other research and innovation organisations, through recognition and reward mechanisms to spur actions at national level, as well as incentives promoting the adoption of open science practices, entrepreneurship (and links to innovation ecosystems), trans- disciplinarity, citizen engagement, international and inter-sectoral mobility, gender equality plans and comprehensive approaches to institutional changes. In that context, also complementing the Erasmus programme support for the European Universities initiative, in particular its research dimension, as part of developing new joint and integrated long term and sustainable strategies on education, research and innovation based on trans- disciplinary and cross-sectoral approaches to make the knowledge triangle a reality, providing impetus to economic growth. _________________ 36 Including notably the European Charter for researchers, the code of conduct for the recruitment of researchers, EURAXESS and RESAVER Pension Fund.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1965 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4 a. Inclusive, Innovative and Reflective Societies
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1969 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5
5. Inclusive and Secure Society
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 300 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) It is the Union's objective to strengthen its scientific and technological bases and encourage its competitiveness, including in its industry, while promoting all research and innovation activities to deliver on the Union's strategic priorities, which ultimately aim at promoting peacetackling global societal challenges, including climate change, and promoting peace and a sustainable development, the Union's values and the well-being of its peoples.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 304 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) To deliver scientific, economic and societal impact in pursuit of this general objective, the Union should invest in research and innovation through Horizon Europe - a Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2021-2027 (the ‘Programme’) to support the creation and diffusion and transfer of high-quality knowledge and technologies, to strengthen the impact of research and innovation in addressing global societal challenges as defined by the Sustainable Goals, and in developing, supporting and implementing Union policies, to support the uptake of innovative sustainable solutions in industry and society to address global challenges and promote industrial competitivenessimprove people's well-being and promote social development; to foster all forms of innovation, including breakthrough innovation, and strengthen market deployment of innovative solutions; and optimise the delivery of such investment for increased impact within a strengthened European Research Area.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 331 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The Programme's actions should be used to reinforce the Union's scientific and technological base, tackle major global challenges, environment and economic sustainability and climate changes as well as to improve people's life namely through better employment, access to health and education, and social inclusion.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 418 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Building on the experience of Horizon 2020, Horizon Europe should enhance the encouragement of SMEs participation to the Framework Programme according to an integrated approach to innovation. Adequate measures and related budget provisions should be foreseen in order to support SMEs research and innovation activities throughout the different stages of the innovation cycle.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 529 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the specific programme on defence research established by Regulation …/…/EU.deleted
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 602 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) to support the creation and diffusion of high-quality new knowledge, skills, technologies and solutions to global challenges including climate and Sustainable Development Goals;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 616 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to strengthen the impact of research and innovation in developing, supporting and implementing Union policies, and support the uptake of innovative solutions in industry and society to address global challenges including climate and Sustainable Development Goals;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 624 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) Reinforcement of the investment towards Social Sciences and Humanities.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 625 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) strengthening research into needs expressed by civil society organisations;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 725 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
1. the specific programme referred to in Article 1(3)(b) and which are laid down in Regulation …. establishing the European Defence Fund, shall be research with an exclusive focus on defence applications, with the objective to foster the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation of defence industry. 2. the specific programme referred to in Article 1(3)(b), with the exception of this Article, Article 1(1) and (3) and Article 9(1).Article 5 deleted Defence research Activities to be carried out under This Regulation does not apply to
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 808 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) have a clear EU-added value and contribute to reaching Union priorities, including meeting climate and Sustainable Development Goals;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 823 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) be selected on the basis of an open and transparent process inclusive of social partners;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 957 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b – point 1
(1) EUR 7 712 000 000 000 for cluster 'Health';
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1125 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 1 – point ii
ii. commitment to a rules-based open market economy, including fair and equitable dealing with intellectual property rights, respect of human rights and duly observe the principles acknowledged by the Charter of Fundamental rights of the EU, backed by democratic institutions;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1232 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A proposal shall be evaluatedThe anonymous projects shall be evaluated by EU independent external experts on the basis of the following award criteria:
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1240 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) impactsocietal impact for the Union;
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1245 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) consistency with Union priorities Sustainable Development Goals.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1248 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The evaluation committee shall rank where necessary the proposals having passed the applicable thresholds, according to the evaluation scores. Priority shall be given to proposals that meet the following criteria: (a) their contribution to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (b) those involving smaller-scale collaborative projects for widening participation.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1324 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In addiBy derogation tofrom the criteria set out in Article 197 of the Financial Regulation, for beneficiaries with project-based remuneration, costs of personnel are eligible up to thbased on unique remuneration that the person is paid for work in similar projects funded by national schemescalculated at the European Union level for researchers participating in the Programme, in accordance with the principle "equal pay for equal work".
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1414 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. The beneficiary of the EIC Accelerator shall be a legal entity qualifying as a start-up, an SME or as a mid-cap, established in a Member State or associated country. The proposal may be submitted by the beneficiary, or by one or more natural persons or legal entities intending to establish or support that beneficiary.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1440 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 a (new)
Article 43a Mainstreaming SMEs support through a dedicated instrument 1. In addition to the establishment of better conditions for SMEs to participate in all relevant opportunities in Horizon Europe, building on the experience of Horizon 2020, a SME instrument that is targeted at micro and small enterprises shall be created under a single centralised management system and implemented primarily in a bottom-up manner through a continuously open call tailored to the need of SMEs. 2. A minimum of 20% of the total combined budget for Pillar II "Global Challenges and Industrial competitiveness and Pillas II "Open Innovation" shall go to SMEs.
2018/09/11
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1532 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part
(a) Cluster 'Health': Improving and protecting the health of citizens at all ages, by developing innovative, effective, safe and accessible solutions to prevent, diagnose, monitor, treat and cure diseases; reducing disability and impairment and promoting full integration into social and economic life; mitigating health risks, protecting populations and promoting good health; making public health systems more cost- effective, person-centred, equitable and sustainable; and supporting and enabling patients' participation and self- management.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1538 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – paragraph 1
Areas of intervention: Health throughout the life course; Environmental and social health determinants; Non-communicable and rare diseases (including child rare diseases and major chronic diseases); Infectious diseases; Tools, technologies and digital solutions for health and care; Hperson-centred and equitable health care systems
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1736 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 16
16. Synergies with the European Defence Fund will benefit civil and defence research. Unnecessary duplication will be excluddeleted.
2018/09/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Title 1
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on Open Data and the re-use of public sector information (recast)
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The substantive changes introduced to the legal text so as to fully exploit the potential of public sector information for the European economy and society focus on the following areas: the provision of real-time access to dynamic data via adequate technical means, increasing the supply of high-value public data for re-use, including from public undertakings, providing services of general interest through a contract with a public sector body, research performing organisations and research funding organisations, tackling the emergence of new forms of exclusive arrangements, the use of exceptions to the principle of charging the marginal cost and the relationship between this Directive and certain related legal instruments, including Directive 96/9/EC31 and Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . _________________ 31 Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases (OJ L 77, 27.3.1996, p. 20). 32 Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (OJ L 108, 25.4.2007, p.1).
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The public sector in the Member States collects, produces, reproduces and disseminates a wide range of information in many areas of activity, such as social, economic, geographical, environmental, weather, tourist, business, patent and educational information. Documents produced by public sector bodies of executive, legislative or judicial nature constitute a vast, diverse and valuable pool of resources that can benefit the knowledge economysociety. Member States and public sector bodies shall be able to benefit and received adequate financial support from the Digital Europe Programme or relevant Union funds and programmes aimed at digitizing Europe, a wide use of digital technologies or the digital transformation of public administration and public services in their efforts to make data easily available for re-use.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 86 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) The Directive lays down an obligation for Member States to make all documents re-usable unless access is restricted or excluded under national rules on access to documents and subjectwithout prejudice to the other exceptions laid down in this Directive. The Directive builds on the existing access regimes in the Member States and does not change the national rules for access to documents. Neither does it establish access rights or obligations to publish information. This decision remains at the discretion of the Member States. It does not apply in cases in which citizens or companies can, under the relevant access regime, only obtain a document if they can prove a particular interest. At Union level, Articles 41 (right to good administration) and 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union recognise the right of any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State to have access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. Public sector bodies should be encouraged to make available for re-use any documents held by them. Public sector bodies should promote and encourage re- use of documents, including official texts of a legislative and administrative nature in those cases where the public sector body has the right to authorise their re-use.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 114 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) In order to get access to the data opened for re-use by this Directive, the use of suitable and well-designed Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) is neededuseful. An API describes the kind of data can be retrieved, how to do this and the format in which the data will be received. Itmeans a set of functions, procedures, definitions and protocols for machine-to-machine communication and the seamless exchange of data. APIs should be supported by clear technical documentation that is complete and available online. Where possible, open APIs should be used. European or internationally recognised standards protocols should be applied and international standards for datasets should be used where applicable. APIs can hasve different levels of complexity and can mean a simple link to a database to retrieve specific datasets, a web interface, or more complex set-ups. There is general value in re-using and sharing data via a suitable use of APIs as this will help developers and start-ups to create new services and products. It is also a crucial ingredient of creating valuable ecosystems around data assets that are often unused. The set-up and use of API needs to be based on several principles: availability, stability, maintenance over lifecycle, uniformity of use and standards, user- friendliness as well as security. For dynamic data, meaning frequently updated data, often in real time, public sector bodies and public undertakings shallould make this available for re-use immediately after collection by ways of suitable APIs and, where relevant, as a bulk download, save for cases where this would impose a disproportionate effort. Assessment of the proportionality of the efforts should take into account the size and operating budget of the public sector body or the undertaking in question.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) existingpublicly accessible documents held by public sector bodies of the Member States;
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) existing documents held by public undertakings providing services of general interest through a contract with a public sector body active in the areas defined in Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council42 and by public undertakings acting as public service operators pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council43 , public undertakings acting as air carriers fulfilling public service obligations pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council44 , and public undertakings acting as Community shipowners fulfilling public service obligations pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/9245 . _________________ 42 Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243). 43 Regulation (EC) No. 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC)Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70. 44 Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3– 20). 45 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage) (OJ L 364, 12.12.1992, p. 7–10).
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 166 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) documents held by public undertakings,: – produced outside the scope of the provision of services in the general interest as defined by law or other binding rules in the Member State; – having commercial character within the scope of an activity directly exposed to competition as defined in Article 34 Directive 2014/25/EU;
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 195 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. 'public undertaking' means any undertaking over which the public sector bodies may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it;(public or private) providing services of general interest, through a contract.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 205 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
'open data' means data in open formats that can ideally be freely used, re-used and shared by anyone for any purpose.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 228 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Public sector bodies and public undertakings shall make dynamic data available for re-use immediately after collection, via suitable Application Programming Interfaces (APIs)shall facilitate the immediate re-use of dynamic data after collection, via suitable Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).To ensure the sustained supply of dynamic data, public sector bodies shall be supported in order to be able to provide a high level of training to their employees dealing with new technologies.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 261 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States and public sector bodies shall be able to benefit from relevant Union funds and programmes aimed at digitizing Europe, a wide use of digital technologies and the digital transformation of public administration and public services or facilitating access to technology and knowhow in their efforts to make data easily available for re-use."
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 289 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The high value datasets may include a comprehensive selection of permissible formats for each type of data and technical modalities of dissemination.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 314 #

2018/0111(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The evaluation shall in particular address the scope and the socio- economic impact of this Directive, including the extent of the increase in re- use of public sector documents to which this Directive applies , especially by SMEs, the impact of the high values datasets, the effects of the principles applied to charging and the re-use of official texts of a legislative and administrative nature, the re-use of documents held by other entities than public sector bodies, the interaction between data protection rules and re-use possibilities, as well as further possibilities of improving the proper functioning of the internal market and the development of the European data economy and the impact on the labour market.
2018/10/12
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 16, 33, 43, 50, 53(1), 62, 91, 100, 103, 109, 114, 153, 154, 168, 169, 192, 207 and 325(4) thereof and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 31 thereof,
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 2 a (new)
Having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights, notably Article 10,
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 3 a (new)
Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Article 11,
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) The most appropriate persons or departments within a private legal entity to be designated as competent to receive and follow up on reports depend on the structure of the entity, but, in any case, their function should ensure absence of conflict of interest and independence. In smaller entities, this function could be a dual function held by a company officer well placed to report directly to the organisational head, such as a chief compliance or human resources officer, a legal or privacy officer, a chief financial officer, a chief audit executive or a member of the board.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 51 a (new)
(51a) EU institutions should create a competent authority to receive and handle reports. EU should ensure that the competent authority establish independent and autonomous external reporting channels, which are both secure and ensure confidentiality, for receiving and handling information provided by the reporting person; give feedback to the reporting person about the follow-up of the report within a reasonable timeframe not exceeding three months or six months in duly justified cases and transmit the information contained in the report to competent bodies, offices or agencies of the Union, as appropriate, for further investigation, where provided for under national or Union law. EU should also ensure that competent authorities follow up on the reports by taking the necessary measures and investigate, to the extent appropriate, the subject matter of the reports. The competent authorities should communicate to the reporting person the final outcome of the investigations. EU shall ensure that any authority which has received a report but does not have the competence to address the breach reported transmits it to the competent authority and that the reporting person is informed.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 64
(64) Persons making a public disclosure directly should also qualify for protection in cases where a breach remains unaddressed (for example, it was not properly assessed or investigated or no remedial action was taken) despite having been reported internally and/or externally following a tiered use of available channels; or in cases where reporting persons have valid reasons to believe that there is collusion between the perpetrator of the breach and the competent authority is reasonably suspected , that evidence may be concealed or destroyed, or that the effectiveness of investigative actions by competent authorities might be jeopardised; or in cases of imminent and manifest danger for the public interest, or where there is a risk of irreversible damage, including, inter alia, harm to physical integritunder this Directive, regardless of whether the breach has been reported internally and/or externally.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 82
(82) The material scope of this Directive is based on the identification of areas where the introduction of whistleblower protection appears justified and necessary on the basis of currently available evidence. Such material scope may be extended to further areas or Union acts, if this proves necessary as a means of strengthening their enforcement in the light of evidence that may come to the fore in the future or on the basis of the evaluation of the way in which this Directive has operatedall Union Acts.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) breaches falling within the scope of the Union acts set out in the Annex (Part I and Part II) as regardare amongst others the following areas:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘reporting person’ means a natural or legal person who reports or discloses information on breaches acquired in the context of his or her work-related activities; , without necessarily being in a traditional employee-employer relationship and without necessarily having witnessed such acts first hand;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘retaliation’ means any threatened or actual act or omission prompted by the internal or external reporting which occurs in a work-related context and causes or may cause unjustified detriment to the reporting person;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties applicable to persons making malicious or abusive reports or disclosures, including measures for compensating persons who have suffered damage from malicious or abusive reports or disclosures.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2018/0106(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
[...]deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authority (the ‘Authority’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness and trustcombat social dumping in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authority should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and, employers and social partners about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations as well as access to relevant services, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross-border disputes or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Authority should perform its activities in the areas of combating abusive practices and social dumping related to cross-border labour mobility and social security coordination, including free movement of workers, posting of workers and highly mobile services. It should also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work. In cases where the Authority, in the course of the performance of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities, including in areas of Union law beyond its scope, such as violations of working conditions, health and safety rules, or the employment of illegally staying third-country nationals, it should be able to report them and cooperate on these matters with the Commission, competent Union bodies, and national authorities where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Authority should contribute to facilitatingcombating social dumping in relation to the free movement of workers governed by Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council40 and Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council41 . It should facilitate the posting of workers governed by Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and the Council42 and Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and the Council43 , including by supporting the enforcement of those provisions implemented through universally applicable collective agreements in line with the practices of Member States. It should also help the coordination of social security systems governed by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council44 , Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council45 , Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and the Council46 ; as well as Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/7147 and Council Regulation (EC) No 574/7248 . __________________ 39 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1). 40 Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 8). 41 Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers’ access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (OJ L 107, 22.04.2016, p. 1). 42 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1). 43 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 11). 44 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.1, corrigendum OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1). 46 Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality (OJ L 344, 29.12.2010, p. 1). 47 Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, 5.7.1971 p. 2). 48 Council Regulation (EC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons, and to their families moving within the Community (OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1).
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To ensure they can benefit from a fair and effective internal market, the Authority should promote opportunities for individuals and employers to be mobile or provide services and recruit anywhere within the Union. This includes supporting the cross-border mobility of individuals by facilitating access to cross- border mobility services, such as the cross-border matching of jobs, traineeships and apprenticeships and by promoting mobility schemes such as 'Your first EURES job' or 'ErasmusPRO’. The Authority should also contribute to improving transparency of information, including on rights and obligations stemming from Union law, and access to services to individuals and employers, in cooperation with other Union information services, such as Your Europe Advice, and taking full advantage and ensuring consistency with the Your Europe portal, which will form the backbone of the future single digital gateway53 . __________________ 53 Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authority should cooperate with other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54 , the European Enterprise Network55 , the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57 , as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. The Authority should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card59 , notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform. The Authority should replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, and the operation and development of the IT infrastructure, which will continue to be ensured by the Commission. __________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 Commission Recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Member States, the social partners and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to ensure the effective functioning of the Authority. The composition of the Management Board, including the selection of its Chair and Deputy-Chair, should respect the principles of gender balance, experience and qualification. In view of the effective and efficient functioning of the Authority, the Management Board, in particular, should adopt an annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Authority’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Authority, appoint an Executive Director, and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Authority by the Executive Director. Representatives from countries other than Union Member States, which are applying the Union rules within the scope of the Authority, may participate in the meetings of the Management Board as observers.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The Authority should directly rely on the expertise of relevant stakeholders in the areas under its scope through a dedicated Stakeholder Group. The members should be representatives of Union-level and Member State-level social partners. In carrying out its activities, the Stakeholder Group will take due account of the opinions and draw on the expertise of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems established by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and the Advisory Committee on the Free Movement of Workers established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Authority shall assist Member States and the Commission in matters relating to combating social dumping and abusive practices in relation to cross- border labour mobility and the coordination of social security systems within the Union.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This regulation shall not in any way affect the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in the Member States and at Union level, including the right or freedom to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States, in accordance with national law and/or practice. Nor does it affect the right to negotiate, to conclude and enforce collective agreements, or to take collective action in accordance with national law and/or practice.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 277 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. This regulation is without prejudice to the diversity of national industrial relations systems as well as the autonomy of social partners as explicitly recognised by the TFEU. Taking part in the activities of the Authority is without prejudice to the Member States' competences, obligations and responsibilities under, inter alia, relevant and applicable International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions, such as Convention No 81 concerning Labour Inspection in Industry and Commerce, and to the Member States' powers to regulate, mediate or monitor national industrial relations, in particular on the exercise of the right to collective bargaining and to take collective action.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to combating social dumping and ensuring fair labour mobility in the internal market. To this end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 298 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) facilitate access for individuals and, employers and social partners to information on their rights and obligations as well as to relevant services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) mediate and facilitate a solution in cases of cross-border disputes between national authorities or labour market disruptions without prejudice to the diversity of national industrial relations systems as well as the autonomy of social partners and the right to collective bargaining and to take collective action.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 340 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) facilitate access to information by individuals and, employers and social partners on rights and obligations in cross-border situations as well as access to cross-border labour mobility services, in accordance with Articles 6 and 7;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 398 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Authority shall improve the availability, quality and accessibility of information offered to individuals and, employers and social partners to facilitate fair labour mobility across the Union, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 589/2016 on EURES and Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]. To that end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 415 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) provide relevant information to employindividuals, employers and social partners on labour rules, and the living and working conditions applicable to workers in cross- border labour mobility situations, including posted workers;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 434 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) support Member States in streamlining the provision of information and services to individuals and, employers and social partners pertaining to cross-border mobility on a voluntary basis, while fully respecting Member States' competences.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 440 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
Access to cross-border labour mobility 1. services to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union. To that end, the Authority shall: (a) initiatives supporting the cross-border mobility of individuals, including targeted mobility schemes; (b) of job, traineeship, and apprenticeship vacancies with CVs and applications for the benefit of individuals and employers, particularly via EURES; (c) initiatives and networks, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, the European Enterprise Network and the Border Focal Point, in particular to identify and overcomrticle 7 deleted services The Authority shall provide promote the development of enable the cross- border obstacles to labour mobility; (d) competent services at the national level designated in accordance with Directive 2014/54/EU to provide information, guidance and assistance to individuals and employers on cross-border mobility, and the national contact points designated in accordance with Directive 2011/24/EU to provide information on healthcare. 2. EURES European Coordination Office and ensure that it fulfils its responsibilities in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2016/589, except for the technical operation and development of the EURES portal and related IT services, which shall continue to be managed by the Commission. The Authority, under the responsibility of the Executive Director as set out in Article 23(4)(k), shall ensure that this activity fully complies with requirements of the applicable data protection legislation, including the requirement to appoint a Data Protection Officer, in accordance with Article 37.matching cooperate with other Union facilitate cooperation between The Authority shall manage the
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 469 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Authority shall facilitate cooperation between Member States and support their effective compliance with cooperation obligations, including meeting deadlines on information exchange, as defined in Union law within the scope of the Authority’s competences.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 597 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Concerted and joint inspections and their follow-up shall be carried out in accordance with the national law and/or practice of the Member States concerned and without prejudice to the Member States' competences, obligations and responsibilities under, inter alia, relevant and applicable International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions, such as Convention No 81 concerning Labour Inspection in Industry and Commerce.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 623 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Staff of the Authority may participate be present as an observer during a concerted or joint inspection with the prior agreement of the Member State on whose territory they will be providing their assistance to the inspection.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 649 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. In the event that the Authority, in the course of concerted or joint inspections, or in the course of any of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities in the application of Union law, including beyond the scope of its competences, it shall report those suspected irregularities to the Commission and authorities in the Member State concerned, where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 660 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall assess risks and carry out analyses regarding cross-border labour flows, such as labour market imbalansocial dumping, abusive practices, sector-specific threats and recurring problems encountered by individuals and employers in relation to cross-border mobility. For that purpose, the Authority shall ensure complementarity with, and draw on the expertise of, other Union agencies or services, including in the areas of social dumping, skills forecasting and health and safety at work. Upon a request by the Commission, the Authority may carry out focused in-depth analyses and studies to investigate specific labour mobility issues related to social dumping in the internal market.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 680 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. The Authority shall collect statistical data compiled and provided by Member States in the areas of Union law within the scope of the Authority’s competences. In doing so, the Authority shall seek to streamline current data collection activities in those areas. Where relevant, Article 16 shall apply. The Authority shall liaise with the Commission (Eurostat), Eurofound and European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) and share the results of its data collection activities, where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 767 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
At the request of the national authorities, and without prejudice to the autonomy of social partners and the right to collective bargaining and to take collective action, the Authority may facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders in order to address labour market disruptions affecting more than one Member State, such as large-scale restructuring events or major projects impacting employment in border regions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 800 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The Management Board shall be composed of: (a) one senior representative from each Member State and two representatives of the Commission, all of whom; (b) one member representing employers' organisations from each Member State; (c) one member representing employees' organisations from each member State; (d) one member representing the Commission. All members referred to points (a) to (d) shall have voting rights.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 811 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Members of the Management Board representing their Member States and their alternates shall be appointed by their respective Member States in light of their knowledge in the fields referred to in Article 1(2), taking into account relevant managerial, administrative and budgetary skills. Members of the Management Board representing the social partners referred to in points (b) and (c) shall be appointed by their respective organisations in the Member States.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 846 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall elect a Chairperson and a Deputy Chairperson from among the members with voting rights, and shall strive forrespect gender balance. The Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of two-thirds of the members of the Management Board with voting rights.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 893 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Stakeholder Group shall be composed of six representatives of Union- level social partners equally representing trade unions and employer’s organisations,; two representatives from the social partners in each Member State equally representing trade unions and employer's organisation; and two representatives of the Commission.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 898 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The members of the Stakeholder Group shall be nominated by their respective organisations and appointed by the Management Board. The Management Board shall also appoint alternate members, in accordance with the same conditions as members, who shall automatically replace any members who are absent or indisposed. To the extent possible, an appropriate gGender balance shall be respected, as well as adequate representation of SMEs.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The involvement of academic and research institutions and other stakeholders, should be encouraged with a view to maintaining and supporting integrated scientific data infrastructures and High Performance Computing.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 46 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Access time to the supercomputers should not be proportionate to financial contributions, and a level playing field for users from all Member States, scientists and industries in the Union should be ensured.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Voting rights should be, in principle, proportional to the financial and in-kind contributions of its members. Participating States should only have the right to vote on activities related to procurement of the Joint Undertaking if they contribute resources to the procurement activities respectively should only vote on activities related to the indirect actions if they contribute resources. The voting rights should be calculated on an annually on the basis of the actual contributions.deleted
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
(41a) The Joint Undertaking should guarantee that the High Performance Computing supercomputers in the Union are accessible exclusively to entities which comply with Union law on data protection, privacy and security.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 69 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to provide scientists, industry and the public sector from the Union or an Associated Country to Horizon 2020 with latest High Performance Computing and Data Infrastructure and support the development of its technologies and its applications across a wide range of fields for civilian use.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to provide Union level coordination and adequate financial resources to support the development and acquisition of such infrastructure, which will be accessible to users from the public and private sector primarily forexclusively for civilian research and innovation purposes;
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 80 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) to provide access to High Performance Computing-based infrastructures and services to a wide range of users from the research and scientific community as well as the industry including, micro enterprises, SMEs, and the public sector, for new and emerging data and compute- intensive applications and services with civilian purposes;
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 85 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) to increase the innovation potential of industry, and in particular of SMEs,micro and SMEs, as well as of research and scientific communities using advanced High Performance Computing infrastructures and services;
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 93 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) geographic balance.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 103 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) Access to the supercomputers shall be granted exclusively for the purpose of civilian research and innovation activities.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 104 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The share of the Union’s access time to each pre-exascale supercomputer shall be directly proportional to the financial contribution of the Union to its acquisition cost in relation to the total cost of acquisition and operation of the pre- exascale supercomputer. The Governing Board shall define the access rights to the Union’s share of access time.deleted
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 105 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Each Participating State shall be allocated a share of access time to each pre-exascale supercomputer that shall be directly proportional to the total value of its financial and in-kind contributions for the acquisition and operation costs of the pre-exascale supercomputer. Without prejudice of Article 12(3) the Participating State shall be responsible for defining the access rights for the users, in accordance with the access conditions defined by the Governing Board in accordance with Article 9(2).
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 106 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
(1) Specific conditions shall apply to industrial users applying for access right foronly for civilian private research purposes, non-research and innovation purposes or commercial purposes. This commercial service shall be a paying service, based on market prices. The level of the fee shall be established by the Governing Board.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 119 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 1 – paragraph 2
For the general administrative tasks referred to in Article 7(3), the voting rights of the Participating States shall be in proportion to their actual financial commitment to the activities of the Joint Undertaking over the duration of the Joint Undertaking.deleted
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 120 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 2 – paragraph 1
For the tasks related to the implementation of the actions of the Joint Undertaking, as defined in Article 7(4), the voting rights of the Participating States shall be in proportion to their actual contributions to the activities of the Joint Undertaking over the duration of the Joint Undertaking.deleted
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 121 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 2 – paragraph 2
Voting rights of the Participating States shall be calculated on an annual basis, taking into consideration the contributions made since their accession to the Joint Undertaking. For the calculation of the voting rights the contributions of the Participating States to the operational costs of the supercomputers acquired by the Joint Undertaking and for the contributions of the Participating States to the acquisition costs of the petascale supercomputers shall only be taken into account if they have been certified ex-ante by an independent auditor.deleted
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 122 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 2 – paragraph 3
The Participating States of the Joint Undertaking shall only have the right to vote on the issues related to the acquisition of a pre-exascale supercomputer by the Joint Undertaking on the condition that they provide a financial or in-kind contribution to the acquisition or operation of the pre-exascale supercomputer. In particular the Participating State shall have the right to vote on the work plan with corresponding expenditure estimates for the procurement, selection of hosting entity, the award of the contracts, the allocation of the access rights, and the transfer of ownership to the hosting entity.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 123 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 2 – paragraph 4
The Participating States of the Joint Undertaking shall only have the right to vote on the issues related to the indirect actions implemented by the Joint Undertaking if they provide a financial contribution to the Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the corresponding parts of the workplan. In particular, in this case the Participating State shall have the right to vote on the work plan with corresponding expenditure estimates for the indirect actions, and the list of indirect actions selected for fundingfor the implementation of the corresponding parts of the workplan.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 125 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 3
(3) The members of the Governing Board shall make every effort to achieve consensus. Failing consensus, the Governing Board shall take its decisions by a majority of at least 75% of all vothe votes of the Participating Member States, including the votes of the members who are absent.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 126 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 4
(4) Any member of the Joint Undertaking other than the Union that fails to meet its commitments concerning the contributions referred to in Article 5 of the Regulation within six months of the time-limit as defined by the Governing Board shall be disqualified from voting in the Governing Board and shall have no access to the pre-exascale supercomputers owned by the Joint Undertaking until such time as its obligations have been met.deleted
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 128 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 6 – point 6 – paragraph 2
The quorum of the Governing Board shall be constituted by the Commission and at least half of the number of three Participating States’ representatives.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 133 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 15 – point 5
(5) Should any member of the Joint Undertaking be in default of its commitments concerning its financial contribution, the Executive Director shall put this in writing and shall set a reasonable period within which such default shall be remedied. If the situation is not remedied within that period, the Executive Director shall convene a meeting of the Governing Board to decide whether the defaulting member’s membership is to be revoked or whether any other measures are to be taken until its obligations have been met. The defaulting member’s voting rights shall be suspended until the default of its commitments is remedied
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 134 #

2018/0003(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Joint Undertaking shall ensure compliance with Union law on data protection, and privacy.
2018/05/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas antimicrobial resistance (AMR)-related challenges will increase in the years ahead and effective action is reliant on two equally important strategies: on the one hand, continued, cross-sectoral investments in research & innovation (R&I) and, on the other hand, comprehensive strategies for timely tackling the excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobials both in humans and animals, so that better tools, products and approaches can be developed following a One Health approach;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics both in humans and animals is turning AMR into a massive threat for the future of humankind;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 37 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises the need to increase funding for R&I regarding the rare diseases (orphan drugs);
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Emphasises the need to increase the funding for different instruments under H2020 so as to boost the research for improving our knowledge on detection, emergence and spread of AMR, prevention measures and effective infection control;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 42 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recalls that the most rapid and cost-effective strategy for addressing AMR is to ensure the adequate and rational use of the existing antimicrobials; highlights that all actors involved in the antimicrobials life-cycle chain shall take responsibility and cooperate towards this goal, including in particular the pharmaceutical, health and livestock industries; calls on the Commission to update and strengthen its guidelines and requirements for a prudent and rational use of antimicrobials in humans and animals;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that substantial R&D efforts are made for increasing knowledge and properly assessing the role of the human, animal and manufacturing waste streams play in the development and spread of AMR, as foreseen in the One-Health action plan;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the EU should be at the forefront of the fight to address AMR, providing practical guidance to ensure sustainable effective action, in line with the Global Action Plan agreed by the World Health Assembly in 2015; expresses the urgent need to foster partnerships throughout the EU in order to enhance the exchange of best practices and improve knowledge on AMR;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that the EU should co- fund the Member States so as to help them establish and implement their national One-Health action plans against AMR;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the importance to improve awareness and understanding of AMR through effective sanitation, prevention measures, education and training, including EU public awareness campaigns and targeted training for health professionals, pharmacists, veterinaries and livestock breeders;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the significant part that the pharmaceutical industry shall play in this long-term effort on Combating AMR. Calls on the Commission to further explore the requirements of this contribution by the pharmaceutical industry, namely, interalia, by asking for AMR information in the labelling of antimicrobial products and involving the industry in the monitoring and evaluation of the average use of each commercialized product;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 88 #

2017/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Recalls, as stated in the Commission Guidelines for the prudent use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine, that the untargeted use of antimicrobials, its use in sub-therapeutic doses and its use for inappropriate periods of time severely increases the risk of development of AMR; stresses that the EU livestock industry must remain a global leader in phasing out the misuse of antimicrobials as a matter of routine, specially through feed and drinking water, and calls on the Commission for further strengthening the requirements for the use of antimicrobials in the livestock industry;
2018/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the advanced character of the EU economy, as well as digitalisation, automation and robotisation of the EU labour market, has increased demand for high-level qualificaunderlines the need for modern educational systems, which equally combine all eight key competences aimed by the Commissions' Key Competences Recommendation, and which also include knowledge and attitudes (dispositions and skills, while demand for low-level qualifications and skills has decreasedmind sets to react to ideas, persons or situations including values, thoughts and beliefs) other than only skills;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that education and training should not be adapted to the demands of the markets, but should deepen critical, analytical and independent thinking, helping people reach their full potential personally and professionally;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that according to Cedefop1a, the distribution of skills in the labour force largely matched the qualification requirements of the labour market in 2016; further notes that Cedefop forecasts a parallel rise in skills from both the demand and the supply side until 2025 and that skills levels are expected to change faster for the labour force than those required by the job market; calls therefore on the Commission and the Member States to carefully reassess the difficulties concerning access to the world of work; __________________ 1ahttp://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/Europe_2020_indica tors_- _employment#Skills_mismatches_in_the_ labour_market
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that skills mismatch and shortages are responsible for bothnot the reasons of unemployment and unfilled job vacancies3 ; considers that these worrying phenomena should be tackled by modernising education systems, making education systems cooperate more closely, and that in order to create new decent jobs with full labour market actors and fsocusing more on training in soft and transversal skills to accommodate future skillsial rights, public investments in sectors of the economy are needsed; __________________ 3 http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/events- and-projects/projects/assisting-eu- countries-skills-matching
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Insists that the solution to skills mismatches or shortages is not further labour market segmentation in the form of non-standard and atypical forms of employment, including temporary jobs, involuntary part-time work, zero-hour contracts and unpaid traineeships; considers these atypical forms of employment as one of the reasons leading to the impoverishment of parts of the European citizens; reiterates its demand to ban zero-hour contracts and abusive atypical forms of employment;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue their efforts to enable the recognition and validation of non-formal and informal learning – gained from free online courses such as MOOCs – which often broaden access to education for underprivileged groups and therefore increase their opportunities for a better job and life, as well as investing in quality jobs with full social and labour rights for these groups;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to internationalise education systems and expand student mobility programmes to better prepare students for the EU labour marketworld of work, in which a lack of skills in foreign languages and cultures is the first barrier to mobility;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights that, in the context of labour market evolution, thinking in terms of ‘jobs/positions’ is obsolete and is of the opinion that ‘task/skills’ categories should be used instead, in both the education process and the recognition of education and qualifications;deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. In this regard, welcomnotes the Commission communication on ‘A New Skills Agenda for Europe’ (COM(2016)0381), which proposes solutions for skills mismatch and shortages and for finding the right system of skills recognition;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make vocational and educational training more visible and enhance its quality and attractiveness, and to promote dual education, work-based learning and reality-based learningin all its forms at every level and form of education, including universities, in order to ensure stronger ties between the education and labour markets; calls for the policy of apprenticeships and entrepreneurship for young people to be developed, to make their entry into the labour market smootheracknowledges that education and training are Members State competences and that the EU can only support, coordinate or supplement actions of the Member States;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls the importance of life-long learning in developing adult skills and qualifications to ensure people’s active participation in the labour marketworld of work through upskilling and reskilling.
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the social provisions of the Charter arshould be at the heart of the Union’s structure and reinforce respect for fundamental rights across the Union;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets in that regard that the Economic Adjustment Programmes under the Memorandum of Understandings were not bound by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; recalls that the programmes violated several social rights in the programme countries such as the right to health care, education, collective bargaining;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the European Union to accede to the European Social Charter of the Council of Europe;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that all EU actors should devote equal consideration to social and economic rights as to theprioritise social rights and fully respect all other fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that Member States should respect their obligations relating to the social and economic requirements of the Charter when seeking to fulfileven when those obligations are in conflict with the compliance with other EU instruments, such as the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG).
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the life-cycle assessment (LCA) of energy sources, distribution networks and technologies should be taken as reference when addressing concrete policies and incentives aimed at fostering lowzero-emission solutions at EU level;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 47 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that a cost-effectivejust energy transition towards environmentally friendly, consumer-orientrenewable based and more digitalised, decentralised systems with active customers and communities requires research and the deployment of innovation in all energy system sectors, including non- technology specific, systemic solutions; recognises that this transition is fostering new organisational models, particularly in energy generation, transmission, distribution and storage, business and needs management, as well as service provision; underlines the role that sustainable and community-based large- scale pilot projects can play in deploying systemic energy innovation;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that innovations tackling energy poverty must be considered as a priority;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that research and innovation in energy crucially depends on predictability and certainty, which require long-term policy vision in line with the Union's long-term energy and climate goals for 2050 and the Paris Agreement, sustained targeted incentives and patient equity capital in order to attain the necessary critical mass for market deployment; welcomes the focus on key technologies, as confirmed in the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) and Commission communication; stresses, however, the need for greater prioritisation of cross- cutting, systemic innovation in energy, as innovation is not only technology-driven;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 72 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. SIs concerned about the variety and complexity of the existing financial instruments and stresses the need for greater coherence between the relevant funds, including structural funds, dedicated to technology-neutralenergy efficiency and renewable energy projects, and for the existing financing instruments at EU and Member State level to be made more comprehensible; calls on the Commission to provide mapping of different funding and financing instruments and introduce cross-cutting sustainability criteria; considers that the possibility of pooling the various instruments should be assessed;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 87 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the fundamental role that re-use and cascade use of materials can play in energy savings and sustainable energy innovations and calls on the Commission and Member States to step up their efforts for ensuring coherence and consistency among both policy fields;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 94 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point b
(b) reinforce existing stakeholder fora on energy research and innovation, especially on energy efficiency and renewable and establish new ones where necessary; provide tools for inter-sectoral, inter- disciplinary and inter-regional exchanges, including on energy innovation projects, national and local long-term energy innovation policies, joint investment opportunities, the appropriation of the energy transition by citizens and grass-root initiatives;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 109 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls that energy innovation policies have to go in line with the EU commitment to conserve and enhance CO2 sinks while preserving biodiversity, especially in forests, lands and seas;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 116 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates Parliament’s call for an increased overall budget of EUR 120 billion for FP9 and urges the Commission to increase by 50 % the proportion of sustainable energy-related financing under FP9 from the corresponding H2020 level, so as to ensure sufficient funding to support effective implementation of the Eenergy Untransition;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 128 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that citizen-driven energy innovation opens untapped opportunities for innovation financing; calls on the Commission to explore effective ways to promote energy innovation crowdfunding and to consider the setting up of a clean energy innovation crowd equity fund, considers, nevertheless, that those new ways of financing shall be additional and complementary to the current ones;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 135 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to privilege investments and research focusing in energy- cooperatives and community-driven models of the self-generation of decentralized renewable energy;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 139 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recognises the role that the Paris Agreement couldan play in fostering global efforts for accelerated clean energy innovation; calls on the Commission to explore means by which capacity-building measures under the Agreement can help strengthen energy innovation ecosystems in developing countries;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 140 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Encourage technology transfers to developing countries’ citizen and community-driven and public initiatives, in a spirit of cooperation;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 142 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to exploit the full potential of the Mission Innovation initiative by seeking synergies with initiatives such as the Breakthrough Energy Coalition and with global equity and investment funds, and through a possible coordinated division of labour in energy innovation on a global scaleother possible stakeholders;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 146 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of enhancing the promotion of cleansustainable energy technology exports within the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTA)its foreign policies, including through a dedicated support facility and focused assistance from EU delegations in third countries;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 154 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that accelerating clean energy innovation requires Europeans to undergo a change in their mindset that would transcend simple awareness of energy issues and move towards a deeper understanding of the behavioural changes and newneeded, specially energy savings and production and consumption new patterns, needed to meet the pressing challenges of sustainable growth, so as to reap the advantages of the digital revolution and innovation in all fields and succeed in energy transition;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 160 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Recognises the importance of a fully democratic involvement of European citizens and communities, as an essential tool to a successful energy transition; recognises the need for systemic education and engagement schemes designed to enable society to fully engage in the transformation of the energy system and enable Europeans of all ages to gradually progress from awareness and understanding to active involvement and taking a guiding role; calls on the Commission, the Member States, local authorities and the private sector to promote conscious consumer choices and energy-related citizens’ engagement through, inter alia, EU-supported awareness campaigns, comprehensive information on energy bills and price comparison tools, the promotion of self- generation, demand response and cooperative sharing schemes, participatory budgets for energy-related investments, tax and investment incentives, as well as by steering technological solutions and innovations;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 168 #

2017/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Believes that regions and cities have a crucial role to play in enhancing sustainable energy models; calls the Commission and Member States to include them, together with civil society, in the dialogue for elaboration and implementation of the energetic transition;
2017/10/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 4 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the importance of completing the energy union, the digital single market, the capital markets union and the European research areaConsiders that the future MFF should promote increased public investment to support research and innovation, knowledge economy, environmentally sustainable infrastructure and SMEs, so that to achieve sustainable growth, creation of stable and quality jobs and a low-carbon circular economy, consistent with 2030 climate and energy efficiency goals;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 20 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Whereas Council Regulation No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the years 2014-2020 provides that the Commission should present its proposal for the future post-2020 MFF before 1 January 2018;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 26 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Whereas the legislative proposals for the next MFF need to be presented as soon as possible, so that the new funding can be agreed before the end of the current programming period in order to prevent delays in programming and implementation for the new period;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Whereas according to the Treaty, the Parliament and the Council constitute the two arms of the budgetary authority; therefore the Parliament should be fully involved in the decision making, as well as, in the implementation of the new MFF;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 30 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Whereas the adoption of the last MFF 2014-2020, involved up to 1% of Member States' GNI, represented a sharp reduction from the previous MFF and undermined territorial, economic and social cohesion and the principle of solidarity within the EU;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 31 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Whereas suitable measures should be taken to ensure that the budgetary challenge deriving from the United Kingdom's departure from the EU does not have a negative effect on the next MFF budget;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 32 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Points out that the economic and social crisis that hit the Member States in 2007/2018 is far from over, while new priorities, challenges and unforeseen crises need to be addressed; therefore post-2020 MFF budget should at least be equivalent to the current period, if not increased;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Recalls its opposition to macroeconomic conditionality and rejects any proposal that the next MFF should maintain the link between disbursement of funds and the implementation of structural reforms, economic governance, European Semester and the rule of law in Member States;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 34 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Calls on the Commission to structure the next MFF in a manner that clearly reflects the current and new priorities and allow a response to unforeseen crises; in this context it underlines that new priorities should be financed with fresh money without jeopardizing long-term policy objectives and programmes like HORIZON 2020 and COSME that have clearly demonstrated their European added value and enjoy lasting popularity among beneficiaries;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that funding should be guaranteed for thea new job-creating industrial policy strategy so that the EU can become the world leader in innovation, digitisation and decarbonisation; calls for the necessary financial programme to be safeguarded through a dedicated investment programme that facilitates the development of a comprehensive industrial strategythat is an important driver for growth, employment and innovation in Europe;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 58 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the next MFF period should make provision for adequaten increase in EU funding, including structural and investment funds, in order to deepen the integration of the EU energy market, especially for key energy infrastructure projects such as projects of common interest (PCIs)reach affordable, secure and clean energy and secure the Union resources in the field of research, development and innovation;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 70 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for an upgraded and, more effective and environmentally sustainable Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) which will close the missing links in Europe’s energy and digital backbone by supporting the development of high- performance, sustainable and efficiently interconnected trans-European networks in the fields of energy and digital services;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 84 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates that, in the next MFF, financial instruments canshould not replace grants in financing energy efficiency, renewable energy, innovative technologies for conventional energy and R&I projects, as only grants are suitable for stable funding and can maximise output on the ground;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 94 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the importance of completing thea reoriented digital single market by makingin order to make sure that a full use of spectrum, 5G and internet connectivity, and by making further progress on EU telecom rules will lead to job creation, facilitate SMEs accession to finance and strengthen the rights of workers and consumers;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Further stresses the need to better coordinate EU instrumentfunds relating to investment in SMEs, information and communication technology and energy infrastructure, and considers that a combination of grants and innovative financial instruments could facilitate project implementation and stimulate private financingvironmentally sustainable energy infrastructure;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 117 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates the need to continue with Horizon 2020 and to provide it with at least the same share of funding as at present in order to respond to societal challenges and secure Europe’s global competitiveness and industrial leadership in innovation; considers that programmes such as the successor programme to Horizon 2020 should receive twice the funding available under the current framework programme in order to respond to societal challenges and alleviate the research and innovation funding gap; calls also for a greater focus on implementing innovation through joint undertakings, on supporting investment in key technologies and on ensuring that SMEs have better access to risk capital;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for an upgraded EFSI that would make it possible to bridge the gap between research and the market and would focus on boosting market innovationthe Commission to facilitate greater synergies and complementarities between the different EU funds and programmes, including cohesion policy, Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility, while complying with their respective specific rules;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 142 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises that the next EU budget should include sufficient space-related funding to continue and further develop the EU’s flagship Galileo, EGNOS and Copernicus space programmers; reminds that all research and innovations shall have an exclusive focus on civil applications;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 152 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Believes strongly that space- related funding in FP 9 should be higher than under Horizon 2020 and that the necessary amounts should be allocated to the future Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) on innovative materials for space equipment; calls for the establishment of an integrated GOVSATCOM ensuring cost-effective secure satellite communication services for European public authorities; recalls its long- standing position that the Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) support framework should be converted into a Union programme and that its remit should be extended, and considers that the budget allocated to this activity should be increased accordingly;deleted
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Draws attention toStrongly rejects further EU militarisation through the European Defence Fund and the recent Commission proposal for a European defence industrial development programme which is intended to cover the period 2019-2020; welcomes the Commission’s intention to submit both a more substantial defence industrial development programme and a programme to support defence research as part of the MFF; considers that these programmes should not draw funds away from other programmes in the same heading. at the expense of other programmes;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 166 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls the importance of enhanced flexibility that allows the mobilisation of additional resources to respond to unforeseen situations; stresses however that intensive recourse to MFF flexibility instruments is not the best way to face complicated crises that are likely to continue; therefore an in-depth reform of the financing system of the Union towards a genuine system of own resources is needed, including new own resources, in order to reduce the share of GNI-based national contributions with a view to abandon fair return and omit all rebate mechanisms and to make the EU budget more effective, stable, sustainable and predictable, while improving transparency for the citizens;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Points out that while acknowledging the need to consolidate and further increase flexibility within MFF, all funds, financial instruments, financial mechanisms and agencies’ finances should be recorded in the union balance sheet, in full compliance with the principle of the unity of the budget and on the grounds of democratic accountability and transparency;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 180 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Considers it essential, in the context of the new MFF, to ensure that rules are redesigned along the principles of performance-based budgeting, result- oriented management and overall simplification, in order to increase EU added value and encourage more beneficiaries to apply for EU funding;
2017/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 12 #

2017/0334(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to propose the rejection of the Commission proposal.
2018/05/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2017/0334(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Structural Reform Support Programme (‘the Programme’) was established with the objective of strengthening the capacity of Member States to prepare and implement growth- sustaining administrative and structural reforms, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds. Supp and promote economic coordination, which unfort under the Programme is provided by the Commission, upon request by a Member State, and can cover a wide range of policy areas. Developing resiliately could not prevent reconomies built on strong economic and social structures, which allow Member States to efficiently absession and economic stagnation in the Member States orb shocks and swiftly recover from them, contributes to economic and social cohesion. The implementation of institutional, administrative and growth-sustaining structural reforms is an appropriate tool for achieving such a developmentafeguard those in the lowest income brackets.
2018/05/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2017/0334(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The increase of the financial envelope dedicated to the Programme should be linked to a revision of the Programme's objectives as it is necessary in many Member States to strengthen public social security systems as well as collective bargaining and real-wage growth.
2018/05/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2017/0334(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) It is therefore necessary to revise the Programme's objectives in order to ensure social and environmental protection, the creation of decent jobs with full workers’ rights, renationalisation of public goods and services, and long-term public investments in the real economy which strengthen the public social security systems and collective bargaining.
2018/05/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2017/0334(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) It is also necessary to indicate that actions and activities of the Programme may support reforms that may help Member States that wish to adopt the euro to prepare for participation in the euro area.deleted
2018/05/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2017/0334(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In order to meet the growing demand for support from Member States, and in view of the need to support the implementation of structural reforms in Member States whose currency is not the euro, the financial allocation for the Programme should be increased to a sufficient level that allows the Union to provide support that meets the needs of the requesting Member States.deleted
2018/05/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) This Directive seeks to address the remaining obstacles to the completion of the internal market in natural gas resulting from the non-application of Union market rules to gas pipelines to and from third countries. The amendments introduced by this Directive will ensure that the rules applicable to gas transmission pipelines connecting two or more Member States, are also applicable to pipelines to and from third countries within the Union. This will establish consistency of the legal framework within the Union while avoiding distortion of competition in the internal energy market in the Union. It will also enhance transparency and provide legal certainty as regards the applicable legal regime to market participants, in particular investors in gas infrastructure and network users.deleted
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) To take account of the previous lack of specific Union rules applicable to gas pipelines to and from third countries, Member States should be able to grant derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2009/73/EC to such pipelines which are completed at the date of entry into force of this Directive. The relevant date for the application of unbundling models other than ownership unbundling should be adapted for gas pipelines to and from third countries.
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 32 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) The applicability of Directive 2009/73/EC for gas pipelines to and from third countries remains confined to the territorial limit of Union's jurisdiction. As regards offshore pipelines, it shouldcannot be applicabled in the territorial waters and eExclusive eEconomic zZones of the Member States as defined by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 2 – point 17
(17) ‘interconnector’ means a transmission line which crosses or spans a border between Member States or between Member States and third countries up to the border of Union jurisdiction;
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 2 – point 36 a (new)
(1a) in Article 2, the following point 36a is added: "(36a) "Import pipeline network" means any pipeline or network of pipelines exclusively or primarily used to transport gas from third countries to the first physical interconnection point with a transmission network in the Union."
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) as regards infrastructure to and from third countries between the border of Union jurisdiction and the first interconnection point with the Union network, where the transmission system belonged to a vertically integrated undertaking on [PO: date of adoption of this proposal];
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 66 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 9 – point b
(b) as regards infrastructure to and from third countries between the border of Union jurisdiction and the first interconnection point with the Union network, where the transmission system belonged to a vertically integrated undertaking on [PO: date of adoption of this proposal].;
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 70 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) as regards infrastructure to and from third countries between the border of Union jurisdiction and the first interconnection point with the Union network, where the transmission system belonged to a vertically integrated undertaking on [PO: date of adoption of this proposal].
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 71 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 34 – paragraph 4
(4) In Article 34, paragraph 4, the following third sentence is added: "Where the network concerned is covered by at least one Member State and at least one third country, the Member States concerned shall consult each other and shall consult the third countries concerned, with a view to ensuring, as regards the network concerned, that the provisions of this Directive are applied consistently up to the border of Union jurisdiction."deleted
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 76 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 34 a (new)
(4a) The following Article 34a is added: "Article 34a A Member State may decide to apply the rules concerning transmission systems to import pipelines, provided that: (a) a cost benefit analysis demonstrates that doing so will progress the objectives of this Directive; and (b) the Member State has reached an agreement with the third country concerned which would allow the application of the rules to the entire import pipeline network."
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 92 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – second sentence
Where the infrastructure in question is under the jurisdiction of a Member State and one (or more) third countries, the national regulatory authority shallmay consult the relevant authorities of the third countries prior to adopting a decision.;
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 95 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 36 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – second sentence
Where the infrastructure in question is also under the jurisdiction of one or more third countries, the national regulatory authorities of the Member States shallmay consult the relevant authorities of the third countries prior to adopting a decision with a view to ensuring, as regards the concerned infrastructure, that the provisions of this Directive are applied consistently up to the border of Union jurisdiction.;
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cooperating in regard to cross- border issues with the regulatory authority or authorities of the Member States concerned and with the Agency, as well as, for infrastructure to and from third countries, with the relevant authorities of the third country aiming at, as regards this infrastructure, consistent application of the provisions of this Directive up to the border of Union jurisdiction; No obligations for consultation or cooperation with the relevant authorities of a third country shall arise for offshore interconnectors that only cross or span the jurisdiction of a third country.
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 105 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 42 – paragraph 6
6. Regulatory authorities shall endeavour to consult and cooperate with the relevant authorities of third countries in relation to the operation of gas pipelines to and from third countries with a view to ensuring, as regards the concerned infrastructure, that the provisions of this Directive are applied consistently up to the border of Union jurisdiction. No obligations for consultation or cooperation with the relevant authorities of a third shall arise for offshore interconnectors that cross or span the jurisdiction of a third country.
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 118 #

2017/0294(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2009/73/EC
Article 49 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
In respect of gas pipelines to and from third countries completed before [PO: date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States may decide to derogate from Articles 9, 10, 11 and 32 and Article 41(6), (8) and (10) for the sections of such pipelines between the border of Union jurisdiction and the first interconnection point, provided that the derogation would not be detrimental to competition on or the effective functioning of the internal market in natural gas in the Union, or the security of supply in the Union.
2018/01/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The European Strategy for Low- Emission Mobility16 sets a clear ambition: by mid-century, greenhouse gas emissions fromIn order to meet the Union's commitments made at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), held in Paris in 2015, the decarbonisation of the transport willsector needs to be at least 60% lower than in 1990 anccelerated and greenhouse gas emissions from that sector should be firmly on the path towards zero emission. Emissions of air pollutants from transport that harm our health need to be drastically reduced without delay. Emissions from conventional combustion engines will need to further reduce after 2020. Zero- and low emission vehicles will need to be deployed and gain significant market share by 2030. __________________ 16 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility (COM(2016) 501 final).
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 44 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) An evaluation of Regulations (EC) No 443/2009 and (EU) No 510/2011 in 2015 concluded that those Regulations have been relevant, broadly coherent, and have generated significant emissions savings, whilst being more cost-effective than originally anticipated. They have also generated significant added value for the Union that could not have been achieved to the same extent through national measures. However, that evaluation also concluded that actual CO2 savings achieved are considerably less than those suggested by the type-approval test performance and that the ‘emissions gap’ between type- approval test and real-world performance has considerably undermined the effectiveness of the CO2 performance standards as well as consumers' trust in the potential fuel savings of new vehicles.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Better designed on car labelling providing consumers with comparable, reliable and user friendly information about the benefits of low emission cars, including information concerning air pollutants and running costs in addition to CO2 emissions and fuel consumption, could support the uptake of the most fuel efficient and environmentally friendly cars across the Union. The Commission should therefore review Directive 1999/94/EC no later than 31 December 2019 and put forward a relevant legislative proposal.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 55 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Reduction levels for the Union- wide fleets of new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles should therefore be set for 2025 and for 2030, taking into account the vehicle fleet renewal time and the need for the road transport sector to contribute to the 2030 climate and energy targets and long-term climate goals. This stepwise approach also provides a clear and early signal for the automotive industry not to delay the market introduction of energy efficient technologies and zero- and low-emission vehicles.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) A dedicated incentive mechanismsales mandate should be introduced to facilitate and accelerate a smooth transition towards zero-emission mobility. This creditingmandatory mechanism should be designed so as to promote the deployment on the Union market of zero- and low- emission vehicleswill create volume certainty thus incentivising domestic production.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 69 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Setting a benchmark for the share of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the EU fleet together with a well-designed mechanism for adjusting a manufacturer's specific CO2 target based on the share of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the manufacturer's own fleet should provide a strong and credible signal for the development and deployment of such vehicles while still allowing for the further improvement of the efficiency ofsales mandate would provide a strong and credible signal for the production and marketing as such vehicles in the Union and ensure manufacturers make timely investments and supply adequate vehicles theat conventional internal combustion enginessumers wish to buy.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In determining the credits for the zero- and low-emission vehicles, it is appropriate to account for the difference in CO2 emissions between the vehicles. The adjustment mechanism should ensure that a manufacturer exceeding the benchmark level would benefit from a higher specific CO2 target, whereas a manufacturer not achieving the benchmark would have to comply with a stricter CO2 target. In order to ensure a balanced approach, limits should be set to the level of adjustment possible within that mechanism. This will provide for incentives, promoting a timely roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure and yielding high benefits for consumers, competitiveness, and the environment.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 79 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Recharging and refuelling infrastructure needs to be put in place quickly and different support instruments at both Union and Member State level need to effectively work together mobilising significant public investment.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 b (new)
(17b) A successful transition to zero- emission mobility requires a comprehensive enabling landscape through the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, robust car labelling schemes, strong enforcement of air quality and climate change mitigation standards. Strong support schemes for workers in the automotive industry are needed for a just transition.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 110 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38 a (new)
(38a) It is of critical importance to consider the inevitable social impacts of the low-carbon transition in the automotive sector and to be proactive in addressing the unavoidable job implications that will be particularly pronounced in certain most affected regions. It is paramount therefore that current measures facilitating the low- carbon transition are also accompanied by targeted programmes for redeployment, re-skilling and up-skilling of workers, as well as education conducted in close dialogue with the social partners. Such efforts should be co-financed by earmarked revenues from the collected excess emissions premiums.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 112 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The effectiveness of the targets set out in this Regulation in reducing CO2 emissions in reality is strongly dependent on the representativeness of the official test procedure. In accordance with the Opinion of the Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM)23 and the recommendation of the European Parliament, following its inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector24 , a mechanism should be put in place to assess the real world representativeness of vehicle CO2 emissions and energy consumption values determined in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1151. The Commission should have the powers to ensure the public availability of such data, and, where necessary, develop the procedures needed for identifying and collecting the data required for performing such assessmentsmost reliable way to ensure the real world representativeness of type-approval values is by introducing a real-world CO2 emissions test, which the Commission should be empowered to develop. That test should be developed by means of delegated acts and introduced at the latest two years after the date of application of this Regulation. However, in the meantime, and until it becomes applicable, compliance should be ensured by using data from the fuel consumption meters to be reported by manufacturers coupled with a not-to-exceed (NTE) limit of a maximum of 15 % above the type- approval values measured as of 2021 using the WLTP test. __________________ 23 High Level Group of Scientific Advisors, Scientific Opinion 1/2016 "Closing the gap between light-duty vehicle real-world CO2 emissions and laboratory testing" 24 European Parliament recommendation of 4 April 2017 to the Council and the Commission following the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (2016/2908(RSP))
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes CO2 emissions performance requirements for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal machievement of the Union’s climate commitments and tarkget s.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 135 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. From 1 January 2025 the following EU fleet-wide and manufacturers targets shall apply:
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 142 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) for the average emissions of the new passenger car fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 125% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.1 of Part A of Annex I;
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 150 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 125% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.1 of Part B of Annex I;
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 154 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(ba) for the share of zero and low emission vehicles, a sales target equal to a 20% market share of the sales of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles in 2025, determined in accordance with point 6.3 of Part A of Annex I and point 6.3 of Part B of Annex I;
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 163 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) for the average emissions of the new passenger car fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 350% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.2 of Part A of Annex I;
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 174 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet- wide target equal to a 350% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.2 of Part B of Annex I.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 180 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new)
(ba) for the share of zero and low emission vehicles, a sales target equal to a 40-60% market share of the sales of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles in 2030, determined in accordance with point 6.3 of Part A of Annex I and point 6.3 of Part B of Annex I.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 231 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The amounts of the excess emissions premium shall be considered as revenue for the general budget of the Union and shall be earmarked for policy measures, conducted in close cooperation with social partners, promoting re-skilling and redeployment in the automotive sector in order to contribute to a just transition to a low-carbon economy.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 257 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission shall adopt, by 2. means of implementingdelegated acts, detailed provisions for a procedure to approve the innovative technologies or innovative technology packages referred to in paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2) of this Regulation. Those detailed provisions shall be based on the following criteria for innovative technologies:
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 261 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Until the real-world CO2 emissions test becomes applicable, compliance shall be measured on the basis of data from fuel consumption meters and subject to a not-to-exceed (NTE) limit of a maximum of 15 % above a manufacturer’s specific CO2 emissions that is measured for the purpose of type approval certification procedures initiated from 2021 onwards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 267 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall ensure that the public is informed of how the real world representativeness evolves over time.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 286 #

2017/0293(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The Commission shall by 31 December 2019 review Directive 1999/94/EC in order to provide consumers with accurate, robust and comparable information on the fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and air pollutant emissions of new passenger cars placed on the market.
2018/05/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 32 #

2017/0125(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
rejects the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2017/0125(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
PRejects the proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry
2017/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 54 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The subject areas shall include one or more of the following topics as further detailed in Annex I:
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 55 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) Labour inputs and conditions of employment;
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 62 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point m f (new)
(mf) Financial condition
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 66 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. When exercising its power to adopt delegated acts, the Commission shall ensure that the following threewo conditions are fulfilled:
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) not more than a maximum of one detailed topic for the subject area "short term business statistics", five detailed topics for the subject area "country-level business statistics", two detailed topics for the subject area "regional business statistics" and two detailed topics for the subject area "statistics on international activities" in an existing delegated act are added or replaced by another detailed topic over a period of five consecutive years. The maximum does not apply to amendments that result from agreements, Treaties and conventions and from other international institutions in which the Union is a member, and to changes that result from the changes to accounting frameworks of national and regional accounts in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 549/2013 and of balance of payments statistics in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 184/2005.The number of characteristics for detailed topics of dynamic business statistics shall not increase significantly between two consecutive reference periods and shall not exceed the number of characteristics of the first year of implementation of this Regulation;deleted
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 70 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) (b) delegated acts are adopted at least 15 months before the end of the reference period of the data except for the topics of "Innovation" and "ICT usage and e- commerce" for which the delegated acts shall be adopted at least six and twelve months respectively before the end of the reference period of the data.
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 73 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For the detailed topics listed in Annex I, Member States shall compile data relevant to each detailed topic. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementingdelegated acts for the purpose of further specifying the following elements of the data to be transmitted under this Regulation, their technical definitions and simplifications:
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 75 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. When exercising the powers referred to in paragraph 1 with regard to the simplifications, the Commission shall take into account the size and importance of the business economies, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, in order to alleviate the burden on enterprises. In addition, the Commission shall ensure that the input needed for compiling the accounting frameworks of national and regional accounts according to Regulation (EC) No 549/2013 and of balance of payments statistics according to Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 is maintained. Implementing acts, except for those that regulate the first implementation of this Regulation, shall be adopted at least 15 months before the end of the reference period of the data for the topics listed in Annex I. For the topics "Innovation" and "ICT usage and e-commerce" the implementing acts shall be adopted at least six and twelve months respectively before the end of the reference period of the data.
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. In order to ensure that the data exchanged under this Article is used exclusively for statistical purposes, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementingdelegated acts setting out the format, security and confidentiality measures for such data, as well as the procedure for the data exchange, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 22(2)1.
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 84 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementingdelegated acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 22(2)1 for the purpose of specifying the modalities of the collection respectively compilation of the information referred to under paragraph 1 and for the purpose of further specifying the modalities for the application of the coverage rate referred to under paragraph 2.
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 85 #

2017/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementingdelegated acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 22(2)1 for the purpose of specifying the statistical data elements referred to in points (a) to (i), and for specifying the list of statistical data elements applicable for the specific goods or movements and the data compiled by using the particulars of customs declarations referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 12(1).
2017/12/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 26 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) While the Commission is currently empowered to decide in such cases, due to the particular sensitivity of the issues at stake, Member States should also fully assume their responsibility in the decision- making process. This, however, is not the case wWhen Member States are not able to reach a qualified majority, due to, amongst others, a significant number of absten in favour of proposals to grant authorisations for non-appearances at the moment of the votea product or substance, that authorisation should be deemed to have been refused.
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The voting rules for the appeal committee should be changed in order to reduce the risk of no opinion being delivered and to provide an incentive for Member State representatives to take a clear position. To this end only Member States which are present or represented, and which do not abstain, should be considered as participating Member States for the calculation of the qualified majority. In order to ensure that the voting outcome is representative a vote should only be considered valid if a simple majority of the Member States are participating members of the appeal committee. If the quorum is not reached before expiry of the time-limit for the committee to take a decision, it will be considered that the committee delivered no opinion, as is the case today.deleted
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 42 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The Commission should have the possibility, in specific cases, to ask the Council and the European Parliament to indicate itstheir views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of an opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications. The Commission should take account of any position expressed by the Council and the European Parliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 43 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Transparency onshould be increased throughout the entire advisory, examination and appeal committee procedure, in particular as regards the votes taken in each procedure. In particular, the votes of individual Member State representatives at the appeal committee level should be increased and the individual', including their voting intentions where no formal vote takes place, should be made public. In addition, where the draft implementing act involves a proposal to grant authorisation for a product or substance, a record of the substantive reasons should be given by each Member State’s representatives' vot for their vote. Detailed information on the composition of expert committees should also be made public.
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 47 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Discussions should be web streamed live.
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 48 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 b (new)
(11b) Where there appears to be a systematic difficulty in obtaining positive opinions from a committee in relation to several draft implementing acts Under the same basic act, the implementing powers conferred on the Commission in the corresponding basic act should be reviewed.
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 62 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission may refer the matter to the Council for an opinion indicating its views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implicationsand the European Parliament for an opinion. The Commission shall take account of any position expressed by the Council and the European Parliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.;
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(ba) the following paragraph is inserted: "4a. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, where the draft implementing act involves granting authorisation for a product or a substance, in the absence of a positive opinion voted by the majority provided for in Article 5(1), the Commission shall not adopt that draft implementing act and the authorisation shall be deemed to have been refused.";
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 73 #

2017/0035(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The references of aAll documents referred to in points (a) to (d), (f) and (g) of paragraph 1 as well as the information referred to in points (e) and (h) of that paragraph shall be made public in the register. That public register shall be available for access via the internet.
2018/02/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 24 #

2017/0017(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In the light of the resolution adopted at ICAO's 39th Assembly in October 2016 on the implementation of a global market-based measure from 2021 to offset international aviation emissions above 2020 levels, it is consideredn't appropriate to continue the existing derogation pending further progress on the design elements and the implementation of the global market-based measure. In this regard, the adoption of Standards and Recommended Practices by ICAO to complement that Resolution and implement the global system is planned for 2018. However, its concrete operationalisation will require action by ICAO parties at domestic level. Also, governance arrangements must be developed by ICAO, including a registry system. In this context, the current derogation of the EU ETS obligations for flights to and from third countries should be extended, subject to the review on implementing the ICAO scheme, in order to promote momentum in ICAO and facilitate the operationalisation of the ICAO scheme. As a result of the extension of the derogationAs a result, the amount of allowances to be auctioned and issued for free, including from the special reserve, should be the same as would correspond to 2016, and should be proportional to the reduction of the surrender obligationreduced.
2017/06/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2017/0017(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Aviation has also an impact on climate through releases of nitrogen oxides, water vapour and sulphate and particles at high altitudes. It is highly important to take action in order to address the non-CO2 effects of aviation in view of increasing scientific evidence. Therefore, pending scientific progress, all impacts of aviation should be addressed.
2017/06/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2017/0017(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 28a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
From 1 January 2017, by way of derogation from Articles 3d to 3f and until amendments subsequent to the review referred to in Article 28b have entered into force, aircraft operators shall be issued, each year, the lower number of allowances that correspondscompared to the year 2016. From 20218 onwards that number of allowances shall be subject to the application of the linear factor in Article 9.
2017/06/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 51 #

2017/0017(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 28b – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the relevant ICAO standards and recommended practices (SARP's), ICAO Council approved recommendations relevant to the global measure or other legal instruments as well as on domestic measures taken by third countries to implement the global market-based measure to be applied to emissions from 2021, and on other relevant international developments. This reporting shall be done by 1 January 2018, 1 January 2019 and regularly afterwards in accordance with the ICAO's standards-making procedures.
2017/06/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 55 #

2017/0017(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 28b – paragraph 2
2. The report should consider ways for those ICAO instruments to be implemented in Union law through a revision of this Directive. The report shall also consider the rules applicable in respect of flights within the European Economic Area (EEA) as appropriate. The reports shall also examine the ambition and overall environmental integrity of the global measure including its general ambition in relation to targets under the Paris Agreement, level of public participation, enforceability, transparency, penalties for non-compliance, processes for public input, monitoring, reporting and verification of emissions registries and accountability.
2017/06/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe,
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 24 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Commission to review in 2017 the conformity factor for RDE tests of NOx emissions, as provided for by the 2nd RDE package, and to phase-out the conformity factor, allowing only for the measuring accuracy;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 29 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Asks the Commission to set more strict limits for NOx emissions since air pollution is the largest environmental health hazard in Europe, resulting in a lower quality of life due to illnesses and an estimate of thousands premature deaths per year;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 39 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for a more formal approach and clearer rules about contacts of Commission officials with lobbyists and for the proper implementation of the rules;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 40 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls upon Member States to introduce or strengthen the regulation of lobby activities of, in particular, the car manufacturing industries and thus to ensure that public health and other public interests are well represented in their national decision-making procedures;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 57 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to strictly monitor the enforcement by Member States of the exemptions to the use of defeat devices and to issue detailed interpretative guidelines; calls on the Commission to launch infringements procedures if it deems them necessaryagainst those countries having authorized vehicles using illegal defeat devices, as the evidence collected shows that national authorities were complicit in their unlawful authorization;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 74 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Urges the Commission in this respect to examine how competition among type approval authorities and among testing services can be eliminated, for example, by restricting the choice of car manufacturers to authorities and testing services to those in the Member State in which the car manufacturers' main offices are located.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 75 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 21
21. Believes that the new framework for EU type-approval should empower the Commission to verify type approvals by asking Member States to retesting vehicles and to initiate corrective measures where necessarynever Member States do not follow up any such requests;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 89 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 23
23. Draws attention to the US type- approval system – whereby fees collected from manufacturers to cover the cost of certification and compliance programmes are sent to the US Treasury, and the US Congress in turn allocates funds to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement its programmes – as a paradigm that may be useful for improving the independence of the EU system of Member States;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 119 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 28
28. Calls for stricter and more effective enforcement of vehicle emission measurement rules in the EU; considers that only stronger oversight at EU level can ensure that the EU law on emissions is properly enforced; proposes that the governance structure on car emissions be reformed without delay and brought into line with the other transport sectors;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 126 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 31
31. Suggests that the Commission should be empowered to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative fines where non- compliance of vehicles is establishdeleted;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 128 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 31
31. Suggests that the Commission should be empowered to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative fines and to command remedial and corrective actions where non-compliance of vehicles is established; considers that the possible sanctions should include type-approval withdrawal and the establishment of EU-wide recall programmes;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 143 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Considers that EU consumers affected by the VW scandal should be adequately and financially compensated, and that the recall programmes which have been only partially implemented should not be viewed as a sufficient form of reparation.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 144 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Asks the Commission and Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure that consumers will be adequately compensated, including through mechanisms of collective redress;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 149 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 36 c (new)
36c. Calls on the Commission to review the existing rules on consumer protection in order to create consistent standards across the Union and the possibility for class action against fraudulent companies; urges the European Commission to review all relevant EU legislation in order to support the establishment of a common compensation scheme and proper rules to compensate European consumers;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 158 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 37 a (new)
37a. Considers that it is vital for exercise of democratic control over the executive for the Parliament to be empowered with powers of inquiry that match those of national parliaments of the EU; believes that in order to exercise this role of democratic oversight the Parliament must have the power to summon and compel witnesses to appear and compel the production of documents; believes that in order for these rights to be exercised the Member States must agree to implement sanctions against individuals for failure to appear or produce documents in line with national law governing national parliamentary inquiries; reiterates the Parliament's support for the position outlined in the 2012 report on this issue;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 159 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 37 b (new)
37b. Considers that the limitation on the subject matter of a committee of inquiry set out in the Lisbon Treaty means that special committees must also have the same powers of investigation as a committee of inquiry in order to effectively examine broader public policy questions that may not involve alleged contravention or maladministration of EU law;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 160 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 37 c (new)
37c. Considers that in order to closely align with the parliamentary inquiry powers of Member States, the Parliament should establish a permanent subcommittee on investigations;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 161 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 37 d (new)
37d. Considers that the 12-month time limit on committees of inquiry is arbitrary and often insufficient; believes the members of the inquiry committee are best placed to determine if an inquiry should be extended and if so, for what period; calls for the only pre-existing binding time limit on an inquiry committee to be linked to the Parliamentary term;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 163 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 38
38. Considers that the powers of Parliament’s committees of inquiry should be better aligned with those of the national parliaments, in particular as regards the summoningto ensure the effective summoning and participation of individuals and the application of sanctions in the event of refusal to cooperate; calls on the Commission and the Member States to support the related provisions in Parliament’s current proposal;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 165 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Considers that the operating period of any inquiry committee should be synchronised with the legislative processes relating to the subject under investigation;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 167 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Notes that in several recent committees of inquiry and special committees, the Commission and Council have in some cases failed to provide the documents requested and in other cases provided the requested documents only after long delays; considers that there must be an accountability mechanism introduced in order to ensure the immediate and guaranteed transfer of documents to the Parliament that the committee of inquiry or special committee requests and is entitled to access;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 171 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 45
45. Notes that Rule 198 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure should define more clearly when the 12-month duration of a committee of inquiry should start; suggests to have enough flexibility to ensure that there is enough time for the investigations; calls for the inquiry committee work to start only after the requested documents are received from the EU institutions;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 172 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 46
46. Considers that an interim report should not be included in future mandates in order not to pre-empt the final conclusions of the inquiry;deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 174 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 47
47. Considers that committees of inquiry should be kept as small as possible in future in order to ensure greater efficiency and effectiveness in organising and conducting the committees’ work, in particular during the public hearings;deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 176 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 48
48. Underlines that Parliament’s internal administrative rules are aligned to the established practice of standing committees and as such are often not suited to the ad-hoc and temporary nature of a committee of inquiry, which operates under more unusual circumstances, with a very specific scope and during a limited timeframe; considers, therefore, that the development of a defined set of rules relating to the effective functioning of committees of inquiry in regards to the conducting of hearings and missions, for example, in a way that guarantees fair political representation, would increase efficiency; considers that there is a risk that financial constraints may prevent committees of inquiry from hearing all the experts deemed necessary for the committee to perform its duty; considers that internal authorisation deadlines for hearings and missions should be made more flexible;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 177 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 48 a (new)
48a. Notes that inquiry committees are temporary committees overlapping with the members' standing committee work and therefore requests flexibility of using members outside of the inquiry committee to cover the absence of any member or substitute member;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 179 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 48 b (new)
48b. Considers that the inquiry committee mandate should be able to be altered according to the findings during the investigation in order to have full picture of the issues under investigation;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 180 #

2016/2908(RSP)


Paragraph 50
50. Notes that accredited parliamentary assistants are not allowed to consultthe current rules for accessing classified and other confidential information made available by Council, Commission or Member States to the European Parliament in the context of an inquiry do not provide full legal clarity but are generally interpreted as excluding parliamentary assistants (APAs) from consulting and analysing non- classified ‘other confidential information’ in a secure reading room under the current rules; notes that somea range of Members found that this rule stands in the way of effective and thorough consultation of such documents within the limited time available to committees of inquiry, and that the TAX2 committee, during which access was temporarily and exceptionally granted to APAs, was able to make use of these resources in a more comprehensive and effective manner; calls therefore for the introduction of a clearly worded provision guaranteeing the right of access to documents for APAs on the basis of the 'need to know' principle, in their support role for Members, in a renegotiated Inter- institutional Agreement; urges the relevant bodies to expedite the renegotiation of this point so as not to hamper the effectiveness and efficiency of future and ongoing parliamentary inquiries;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 2 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to its previous resolutions, in particular those of 24 November 2016 on EU-Turkey relations1 , and 27 October 2016 on the situation of journalists in Turkey2 , and of 13 November 2014 on Turkey's actions creating tensions in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cyprus, _________________ 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0450. 2 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0423.
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to Turkey not having implemented for the eleventh consecutive year the provisions stemming from the EC-Turkey Association Agreement and the Additional Protocol thereto; this refusal continues to have a profound negative effect on the negotiation process,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
- having regard to the fact that the basis for accession to the EU for Turkey is the full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria and the EU's integration capacity, in accordance with the conclusions of the December 2006 European Council meeting,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18
— having regard to the crisis in Syria, the efforts towards a ceasefire and a peaceful settlement, and Turkey’s obligations to enhance stability and promote good neighbourly relations through intensive efforts in order to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, disputes and conflicts with the neighbouring countries over land and maritime borders and airspace, in accordance with the UN Charter and the UNCLOS,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines, however, that measures taken under the state of emergency had large-scale, disproportionate and long- lasting negative effects on the protection of fundamental freedoms in the country; condemns the collective dismissal of civil servants, the mass liquidation of media outlets, the arrests of journalists, academics, judges, human rights defenders, elected officials and ordinary citizens, and the confiscation of property and passports on the basis of emergency decree laws without individualised decisions, and without the possibility of timely judicial review; calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners held without proof of individual involvement in committing crime or without any charges presented against them;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 174 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Expresses its serious concern at the continuously deteriorating situation in south-east Turkey, especially in the areas where curfews were imposed, where some 2 000 people were reportedly killed in the context of security operations and an estimated half a million people became displaced in the period from July 2015 to December 2016; notes that local prosecutors have consistently refused to open investigations into the reported killings; recalls that the Turkish Government has a responsibility to protect all people living on its territory, irrespective of their ethnic and cultural origin, religion or beliefs; is convinced that only a fair political settlement of the Kurdish question can bring sustainable stability and prosperity both to the area and to Turkey as a whole; notes that a series of laws have created an atmosphere of ‘systematic impunity’ for the security forces; regrets the decision of the Turkish Parliament to waive the immunity of a large number of MPs unconstitutionally, paving the way for the arrests of opposition politicians;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 220 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the deepening ofNotes that there has not been much progress in the EU- Turkey relations in key areas of joint interest, such as counter-terrorism, migration, energy, the economy and trade; believes EU-Turkey coopbelieves EU- Turkey cooperation in key areas can be an investment in the stability and prosperity of both Turkey and the EU; insists that the Turkish government has to revise in line with Internation in these areas to be an investment in the stability and prosperity of both Turkey and the EUal and European Law the legal framework as regards organised crime and terrorism in order to ensure the freedom and fundamental rights, notably the right to fair trial and freedom of expression, of assembly and association in practice;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 237 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that strengthening trade relations could bring concrete benefits to citizens in Turkey and the EU, and therefore supports the Commission’s proposal to start negotiations on the upgrading of the Customs Union; reiterates that the EU is Turkey’s main trading partner and tha can be contemplated provided that Turkey proceeds first two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States; ce full and indiscriminate implementation of its obligationsi ders the involvement of social partners in negotiations as crucialiving from the current Customs Union Agreement between EU- Turkey; calls on the Commission to include political benchmarks on human rights and fundamental freedoms inonce the negotiations for the upgraded Customs Union begin;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 250 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Deplores Turkey´s refusal to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-à-vis all member states, the Republic of Cyprus in particular; reiterates that Turkey's refusal to normalize its relations with all EU Member States has started having a negative impact on its relations with the EU, including its accession process;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 263 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that visa liberalisation is important for the Turkish population and will enhance people-to-people contacts; encourages the Turkish Government to comply with the final outstanding criteria, including revision of its anti-terrorism legislation and to fully and in a non- discriminatory manner meet all the criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap towards all Member States;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 293 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Condemns in the strongest terms all terrorist attacks carried out in Turkey, and stands firmly by Turkey’s population in our joint fight against terrorism; welcomes the close bilateral relations between EU Member States and Turkey in the field of anti-terrorism cooperation, including on ‘foreign fighters’; reiterates its condemnation of the return to violence by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has been on the EU’sstresses that the inclusion of PKK on the EU's list of terrorist organisations is standing in the way of the establishment of peace, dialogue and negotiations, at the same time that facilitates the infringement of human rights; calls therefore on the Council to revise the list and remove the PKK from the list of terrorist organisations since 2002; inv; calls on the Turkish authorities the Member States to enforce legislation banning the use of signs and symbols of organisations which are on that listo restart talks with PKK leaders for a peaceful solution for the Kurdish question; and to end the confinement of Abdullah Ocalan in prison;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 299 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Calls on European Council for EU embargo on arms sales to Turkey, following the decision of Germany and Austria;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 306 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Commends the engagement by the Turkish Government and the hospitality shown by the population in hosting around 3 million refugees; notescalls on the EU and the Heads of States and Governments of the EU to revoke the EU-Turkey statement on migration, and urges the Member States to initiate the voluntary resettlement scheme for the most vulnerable refugees in Turkey; calls on the Commission to ensure long-term investment in both refugees and their host communities in Turkey; encourages the Turkish Government to grant work permits to all Syrian refugees; calls on Ankara to keep up its patrolling efforts in the Aegean and to implement fully the bilateral readmission agreements signed with Bulgaria and Greece;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 334 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls upon the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyuy nuclear power plant; points out that the envisaged site is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, hence posing a major threat not only to Turkey but to the Mediterranean region; accordingly, requests that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention, which commits parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; to this end, asks the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines that a settlement of the Cyprus problem would have a positive impact on the entire region, while first and foremost benefiting both Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots; praises the leaders of the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities in Cyprus for having achieved major progress in the settlement talks; welcomes the exchange of preferred maps, thus far unprecedented, and the first international conferenceConference on Cyprus held with the guarantor powers; supports the settlement based on a bi- communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, a single international legal personality, single sovereignty and single citizenship with political equality between the two communities, in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and on the basis of respect for international law and the principles on which the Union is founded; welcomes the intensified engagement by the parties to achieve the settlement of the Cyprus problem; expects Turkey to show active support for the negotiations, and reiterates that Turkey’s commitment and contribution to a comprehensive settlement remain crucial; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons (CMP), and calls on Turkey to allow access to all relevant sites and to assist the CMP by providing information from its military archivemilitary zones for exhumation and to assist the CMP to the discovery of relocated and other remains by providing all relevant information from its military archives; welcomes, in this respect, the appointment of EP standing rapporteur on missing persons;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 372 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls on Turkey to immediately withdraw its troops from Cyprus and to transfer Varosha to its lawful inhabitants in accordance with UNSC Resolution 550(1984);
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 375 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Calls on Turkey to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which has been signed and ratified by the EU, the 28 Member States and all other candidate countries and forms part of the acquis in line with December 2015 Council Conclusions and other relevant Council Conclusions; also condemns all the provoking actions of Turkey within the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus which are a source of instability and calls on Turkey to terminate them; it recalls that Ankara must respect the sovereign rights of all EU Member States and to refrain from any action damaging good neighbourly relations while at the same time respecting the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 384 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19 c. Deplores Turkey's policy of illegal settlement and calls on Turkey to refrain from further settlement of Turkish citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus, which is contrary to the Geneva Convention and the principles of international law; urges Turkey to revoke relevant threats and terminate all actions aiming to alter the demographic balance on the island thus impeding a future solution;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 1 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that voluntary, inclusive and consensus-oriented standardisation processes have been effectiveneeds to be a successful and effective way of reaching common standards to the advantage of the European people, consumers' needs and workers' rights and safety;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 22 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises the strategic importance of ICT standardisation and calls on the Commission to support an EU presence in international ICT fora;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 30 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the ICT priority areas as the essential technology building blocks on which equally important areas such as public eHealth, smart and efficient energy use, intelligent public transport systems and advanced manufacturing will rely; Considers that public institutions should democratically settle these priorities as the public sector supports the most important of technology development in the EU;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 40 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Recognises the strategic importance of ICT standardisation and calls for a continuous dialogue between the European Parliament, the Commission, the Council and the European Standardisation Organisations (ESOs).
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 50 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Commission to rationalise the number of platforms and coordination mechanisms maximizing the participation of all relevant stakeholders, such as public authorities, workers organizations and civil society organisations;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 57 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Asks the Commission to regularly update the European Parliament on the progress of ICT standardisation in Europe and in other markets in the framework of a comprehensive reporting about standardisation and its contribution to public health, consumers' rights, workers' safety and to reindustrialisation.
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Asks the Commission to involve the existing recognised standardisation organizations (i.e. the ESOs) on new initiatives, in order to avoid duplications of efforts for stakeholders, in particular SMEs.
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recalls the negative impact that globalization has had for both European and third countries workers, with the re- localization of industries in Europe and the development of less added value but more environmental and social costs in third countries. Considers that any model for the future industries should be based in the principle of "local production for global market".
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 72 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of effective digitalisation of vertical industries and the need to represent their concerns of their workers appropriately in international ICT standardisation;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the importance of agile standardisation processes, with appropriate involvement of manufacturing industries, trade unions, SMEs and NGOs;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 90 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Supports the inter-institutional dialogue on standardisation's contribution to growth and quality jobs and calls for the involvement of the European manufacturing, ICT industries, ESOs, trade unions, consumers' associations and civil society organisations.
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 92 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the fact that timely delivery is crucial;of standards is crucial, including the citation of their references in the OJEU in case of harmonised standards
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 98 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to develop with international partners an agenda for closer cooperation based on specific areas of common interest;deleted
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 113 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. AcknowledgWelcomes the recent landmark decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Huawei-ZTE;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 115 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Considers that open knowledge and licenses are the best instrument to boost innovation and technology development. Encourage the research institutions that use EU funds to use open patents and licenses in order to have a bigger role on standard setting;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 118 #

2016/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Notes the need for an evidence- based approach to monitoring and further developing the licensing framework, including the evaluation of open licensing schemes, in order to ensure a dynamic ecosystem;
2017/02/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 8 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas energetic efforts to reindustrialise Europeand rebalance the economy of Member States must be pursued with the aim of combining competitiveness andgrowth and quality job creation with social and environmental sustainability;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas it is an imperative for European industrial strategy to create a digital single marketshape digitalization in a socially-just manner;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the digitalisation of industrial manufacturing can be an important stepping stone in increasing the resilience, sustainability and competitiveness of our economy;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 42 #

2016/2271(INI)

F. whereas digitalisation has the potential toshould increase efficient use of resources, energy and capital, contributing to a more integrated circular economy and industrial symbiosis;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 44 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas digitaliszation can contribute to safer working conditions, to greater product safety, and to the individualisad the individualisation and decentralisation of production should be made compatible with decent working conditions and decentralisation ofgreater production safety;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 54 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas there is widespread concern as regards the labour market effects of digitalisation in industrial manufacturing on workers as well as its possible effects on workplace democracy and regional development;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the Commission’s Communication on Digitising European Industry;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point a
(a) Strengthening economic dynamics, cohesion and resilience vis-à-vis technological transformations and disruptions;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 75 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) Ensuring public control over critical digital infrastructure and knowledge, as well as favouring open access to new digital technologies;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 80 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point b
(b) Fostering quality job creation and improving working standards and the attractiveness of industrial sector jobs through a socially just transformation;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 86 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point d
(d) Strengthening European cohesion through a reliable European investment policy (in digital infrastructure) and a coordinated European industrial policy con the basis oftributing to sustainable moderniszation and regional cohesion, through a territorially-based approach;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 94 #

2016/2271(INI)

(f) Strengthening economic, policy and social innovation through the principles of openness and accessibility of public and private data and information, with due consent and respect for private safety, both for workers and consumers;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 106 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point i
(i) Improving energy security through a digitised, more flexible industrialthe flexibility of energy production;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 109 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point j
(j) Partnering with other macro- regions in the world in developing innovative and fair digital open marketsContributing to the development of digital technology at a global level;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 120 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of an EU governance structure coordinated EU forum for the digitalisation of industry that facilitates the coordination of national initiatives and platforms on industrial digitalisation; calls on the Commission to consider setting a non- binding orientation target, that allows the EU to remain a global industrial leadert the frontier of digital development; underlines the importance of advancing digitalisation particularly in those regions that are lagging behind; expects that, besides industry leaders and the social partners, as well as stakeholders from academia, the standardisation community, trade unions, policy-makers and civil society as wewill asbe industry leaders, especially SMEs, will also be invited to play an active rolevited to play an active role; stresses the importance, in order to ensure a socially-just digital transition, of involving workers' representatives at every step of its digital strategy;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 130 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Commission to establish a specific industrial foresight unit that examines manufacturing and digitalisation trends, studies pertinent developments in other regions, identifies new key technologies and ensures that European leadership in these areas is maintained and new trends are integrated into policies and actionsnew trends are integrated into policies and actions in order to allow the European economy to benefit from new digital developments, while embedding them in a policy framework that ensures data protection and privacy and worker's rights as well as a more cohesive European economy;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 141 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Creating conditions for successful industrial digitalisation: infrastructure, investment, innovation, social dialogue
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 150 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that integrated industrial digitalisation must be based on strong enabling conditions and strengthened social dialogue;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 156 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights in this context the need to advance public investment in connectivity through 5G and fibre optics as an instrument for convergence and ensuring a robust digital infrastructural backbone for Europe’s industry; stresses the importance of public control and regulation of said sector, in order to better serve the needs of a changing economy; highlights the importance of timing the transition to ensure that enough spectrum remains available for current users such as radio and television broadcasters, considering also their importance for European creative and cultural industries;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 175 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that clusters and synergies between SMEs, industrial players, the skilled crafts sector, start-ups, academia, finance and other stakeholders can be successful models in advancing digital manufacturing and innovation; notes the importance of utilising digitalisation for advancing business model innovationshighlights the fundamental role of the public sector in creating new digital knowledge and innovation; notes the importance of digitalisation in changing business models and calls on the EU and Member States to ensure labour legislation is adapted to the new environment, in order to preserve workers' rights and strengthen collective bargaining;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 204 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes the important role of cities in providing digital infrastructure and support for SMEs, entrepreneurs and industry, and the immense opportunities which digital- industrial innovation holds for cities; asks the Commission to look into the US ‘Cities Innovation Technology Investment Initiative (CITIIS)’; welcomes the publication of a European Digital City Index;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 209 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the role that public procurement can play in advancing new industrial digital innovations and technology; asks the Commission to include a digital check in its REFIT Programmestresses, however, that digitalization of public services must not be used to advance austerity measures in the public sector or to reduce necessary physical services; calls, in this respect, for the involvement of workers in the public sector in the definition and implementation of public digital strategies;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 215 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of financing the digitalisation of Europe’s industry; expresses disappointment that the European Fund for Strategcalls for the strengthening of public Iinvestment (EFSI) has so far invested only 11 % in digital projectsin digital innovation and research;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 246 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the role of cybersecurity within the digitalisation of Europe’s industry; considers cyber-resilience as crucial and cybersecurity as a core sector for European digitalisation efforts; believes that producers are responsible for ensuring safety and security standards on the basis of the available state of the art technology; notes that cybersecurity requirements for theexpresses concern and the lack of cybersecurity in the current Internet of Things (IoT) and calls for the development of IT security standards musthat strengthen European cyber- resilience; believes that European standardisation bodies have a special role to play in this respect;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 263 #

2016/2271(INI)

17. Stresses the need for monitoring of data sovereignty; believes that industrial data protection and data ownership, especially b2b, require special attention; notes that open data and open standards can promote new technologies and calls for EU-financed projects to ensure them;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 270 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recognises the potential of digitising industry for the purpose of sectoral data retrieval and of governance by public and semi-public authorities and market participants, but calls for strong public regulation ensuring data safety and privacy;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 273 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Recognises the importance of protectsharing technical know-how as regards the exchange and interlinkage of industrial- digital components while at the same time allowing and furthering connectivity;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 283 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that European leadership in industrial digitalisation requires a strong and open standardisation strategy; emphasises the important and unique make-up of Europe’s standardisation bodies, including their inclusive approach; calls on the Commission to promote the development of open standards and welcomes its intention to guarantee access to standard essential patents under FRAND (fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory) conditions; calls for an EU coordinated approach towards international fora and consortia such as the Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC);
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 292 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Highlights the fact that the digital transformation of industry will have a major societal impact on areas ranging from employment, working conditions, workers’ rights to education and skills; calls on the Commission and the Member States to adequately study the social effects of industrial digitalisationzation in consultation with the social partners and to adapt social and labour legislation accordingly;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 307 #

2016/2271(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses that Europe faces a digital gap in terms of skills; calls for the implementation of a skills guarantee, after consultation and with participation of social partners, and the right to (re- )training and life-long- learning; emphasises the importance of ensuring the promotion and recognition of digital skills; calls on industry to grant employees a paid ‘digital sabbatical’; asks the Commission to launch a pan-European up-skilling initiative;
2017/02/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 13 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound European Working Conditions Survey and its Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview report1a, __________________ 1a http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/def ault/files/ef_publication/field_ef_docume nt/ef1634en.pdf
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report (2010) Flexible forms of work: ‘very atypical’ contractual arrangements,
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 c (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report (2016) Exploring the fraudulent contracting of work in the European Union1a, __________________ 1a http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/def ault/files/ef_publication/field_ef_docume nt/ef1639en.pdf
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard the EESC report on “The changing nature of employment relationships and its impact on the living wage”1a, __________________ 1ahttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.201 6.303.01.0054.01.ENG&toc=OJ:C:2016:3 03:TOC
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the most recent issues of representation due to either weaknesses of the social partners’ organisations in certain sectors or some representativeness reforms across European countries limiting social partners’ roles’ impinge on all employment relationships;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Understands standard employment to mean full-time, regular employment on the basis of open-ended contracts, and non- standard or atypical forms of employment to include, i.a., marginal part-time work, temporary agency work, fixed-term contract work, dependent self-employment zero-hour contracts, internships that are not part of an education programme, and informal or undeclared work; as well as weakening the rights of dependent self- employed workers;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Condemns all forms of precariousness in work relationships recognizing at the same time that precariousness can be inflicted on workers in whatever contractual situation;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that social protection, and protection by collective agreements and collective bargaining, should be available to all workers irrespective of the legal status and the duration of their work relationship; calls on the Commission and the Member States to guarantee effective protection for workers who perform work in the context of an employment relationship, and a comprehensive policy response that includes policies towards reducing and ultimately eradicating precarious work; calls for policies that empower workers by strengthening social dialogue and promoting the extension of collective bargaining, ensuring that all workers can access and exercise their right to associate, and to bargain collectively, freely and without fear;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the European Commission and the Member States within their respective competences to ensure that self-employed workers can be covered by collective bargaining coverage, given that many of self-employed workers in an employee-like situation are placed outside collective bargaining structures and trade union representation; notes that the right of self-employed workers to associate freely may be in question in several occasions if their association could be regarded as forming a cartel, running a risk of being put in conflict with EU rules on anti-competitive practices; stresses that in this context, the use by the Commission and Member States of the ILO understanding of ‘worker’ rather than the more narrowly defined ‘employee’, could be helpful to better understand how fundamental principles and rights at work apply, the enjoyment of which EU competition rules should not impede;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes with concern the decrease in collective bargaining and the coverage of collective agreements; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote strategic policies of universal coverage of workers under collective agreements, safeguarding and enhancing, at the same time, the role of the trade unions as social partners;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe,1a _________________ 1a OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p.1.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 14 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. There are large discrepancies between the NOx emissions of most Euro 3-6 diesel cars measured during the type- approval process with the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) laboratory test, which meet the legal emission limit, and their NOx emissions measured in real driving conditions, which substantially exceed the limit. Those discrepancies affect most diesel cars and are not limited to Volkswagen vehicles equipped with prohibited defeat devices.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 17 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. The existence of the discrepancies, and their significant negative impact on attaining air quality objectivestandards, in particular with regard to urban areas, had been known to the Commission, to the responsible authorities of the Member States and to many other stakeholders since at least 2004-2005 when the Euro 5/6 Regulation was being prepared. The discrepancies have been confirmed by a large number of studies by the Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) and other researchers since 2010-2011.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 19 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Before September 2015, the discrepancies were generally attributed to the inadequacy of the NEDC laboratory test, which is not representative of real world emissions, and to the optimisation strategies put in place by car manufacturers to pass the laboratory test, not to the use of prohibited. The discrepancies were not recognised to originate from the use of prohibited defeat devices because there were no authorities looking into the illegal use of defeat devices.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 27 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. The excessive length of the process leading to the introduction of regulatory RDE tests can be explained only in part by the complexity of the development of a new test procedure, the time needed for the technological development of PEMS, and the length of the decision-making and administrative processes at the EU level. The delays were also due to choices of political priorities, such as the focus ofmainly the result of lobby influence, and of the political priority given by the Commission and the Member States ton avoiding burdens on industry in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 30 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The car industry put considerable pressure on the European Commission and Member States and that is why they delayed action on reducing toxic emissions by passenger vehicles.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 33 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. It is justified to propose a lower NOx emission limit for diesel cars since there are standards in the world that are much more demanding than the current European standards and because the technology already exists to reduce the NOx emissions since EU car manufacturers are placing diesel cars on the US market that have to comply with much lower NOx emission limits.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 35 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. The Commission in its initial draft for the second RDE package had proposed to the TCMV conformity factors towards the lower end of the 1.6-2.2 range for the first phase and of the 1.2-1.6 range for the second phase. The initial proposal was based on conformity factors identified at the lower end of identified ranges and thus corresponded to the strongest environmental objectives.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 36 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Notwithstanding the reasons mentioned the Commission lacked the political will and decisiveness to act upon the seriousness of the high NOx emissions and to give priority to the protection of public health of citizens that was at stake;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 38 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. The Member States’ failure to take an active part in the “Real Driving Emissions - Light Duty Vehicles” (RDE- LDV) working group constitutes maladministration. With the exception of a few Member States, such as the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Denmark and Spain, the vast majority did not participate in the RDE-LDV working group, despite voicing criticisms of the Commission’s proposals. Given the lead role played by the Member States in the enforcement of the Regulation, and given the known discrepancies in the NOx emissions of diesel vehicles and their significant negative impact on air quality objectives, Member States should have participated in the group’s proceedings. This would also have helped to achieve a better balance within the other participants in the working groupworking group instead of having a central role played by the overrepresented industry.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 45 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. The Member States contravened their legal obligation to monitor that the manufacturers equip vehicles so that the components likely to affect emissions are designed, constructed and assembled so as to enable the vehicle, in normal use, to comply with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and its implementing measures.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 49 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. The Commission did not use all possiblfailed to use the means at its disposal, at the level of the TCMV and of the RDE-LDV working group, to advance the decision making process and ensure a timely adaptation of the type-approval tests to reflect real world conditions, as required by Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 58 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Better coordinCoordination and cooperation between the different Commission departments involvedservices, including the JRC, was unstructured and neglectful. Better coordination could have been instrumental in accelerating the process of adapting the tests.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 63 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Over half of the RDE-LDV working group participants consisted of experts from car manufacturers and other automotive industries. This can inter alia be attributed to the lack of sufficient technical expertise in the Commission departments. While the Commission consulted a wide range of stakeholders and ensured open access to the RDE-LDV group, it leading to imbalanced composition of the working group where research institutes, civil society and NGO's were heavily underrepresented. The Commission should have taken further steps to “as far as possible, ensure a balanced representation of relevant stakeholders, taking into account the specific tasks of the expert group and the type of expertise required”, as required by the horizontal rules for Commission expert groups of 10 November 2010.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 72 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Defeat devices were generally not considered among the possible reasons behind the discrepancies between laboratory and on-road NOx emissions and it was not generally suspected that they could be in actual use in any passenger car produced in the EU before the Volkswagen revelations in September 2015. However, the Commission and the Member States were informed about the possibility of the use of defeat strategies under normal conditions of use ever since the conclusions of the JRC's 2013 report titled "A complementary emissions test for light-duty vehicles" were presented to them.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 96 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. There is no consistent application of EU law in the 28 Member States, thus creating uncertainty in the interpretation of legal provisions and undermining the single market.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 102 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Member States contravened their legal obligation to monitor and enforce the ban on defeat devices set out in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007. None of them found the defeat devices installed in the Volkswagen vehicles. Moreover, according to our investigations, most Member States, and at least Germany, France, Italy and Luxembourg, had evidence that irrational emission control strategies, based on conditions similar to the NEDC test cycle (temperature, duration, speed), were used in order to pass the type-approval test cycle. OWithout prejudice to the ongoing investigations and court cases at national level will decid, it is clear that the widespread use iof emission control strategies used by car manufacturers constituted an illegal use of defeat devices orather than a lawful application of the derogations.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 108 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. After the warnings of the JRC in 2013 regarding the possibility of the use of defeat strategies under normal conditions of use, the Commission should have taken additional measures to monitor and ensure that Member States carry out all necessary checks and that there is no infringement of EU legislation.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 112 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. The Commission had no legal basis to search for defeat devices itself, but had the legal obligation to oversee the Member States’ enforcement of the ban on defeat devices. However, in spite of the awareness of, and communication between the relevant Commission services on, possible illegal practices by manufacturers, the Commission neither undertook any further technical or legal research or investigation on its own nor requested any information or further action from the Member States to verify whether the law may have been infringed. This constitutes maladministration.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 116 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Even if there was no concrete evidence that indicated cheating in emissions tests, the Commission should have launched an investigation to check if the car manufactures were using defeat devices in contravention with Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and should have taken measures to prevent the fraud.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 117 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22 b. The Commission failed to monitor the development of national policies and the enforcement of the EU legislation by national authorities ensuring that there is no infringement of EU legislation. This constitutes maladministration.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 118 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22 c. The Commission failed to give a mandate to the JRC to investigate the possible illegal use of defeat devices as a possible explanation for the discrepancies between the laboratory and road emissions.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 125 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. The Commission should have ensured that the JRC’s research findings and concerns discussed among the Commission services with regard to possible illegal practices by manufacturers reach the level of the hierarchy and lead to actions needed to correct the situation. Altogether, the Commission's lack of action constitutes maladministration.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 126 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. The Commission should have shown more initiative and diligence as regards the possible use of illegal defeat devices by car manufacturers given the general suspicion and numerous indications thereof. The JRC should have received the mandate from the Commission to investigate whether the reported suspicious behaviours of certain vehicles have any illegal connotations.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 129 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. The level of technical expertise and human and financial resources may vary substantially between type-approval authorities and technical services, and the fact that car manufacturers are free to choose any of the existing type-approval authorities combined with a lack of a harmonised interpretation of the rules can leads to competition among them, especially since the authorities act in this respect as commercial parties and not as bodies serving only the public interest. Car manufacturers are, in principle, free to address the type-approval authority and technical service with the most flexible and least stringent interpretation of the rules, as well as the lowest fees.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 132 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. There is an evident lack of control after type-approval, which is partly due to the current rules and partly due to uncertainty as to which authority is in charge of market surveillance. Effective conformity of production, in-service and end-of- lifecycle conformity checks to uncover cases where production vehicles and vehicles in use do not conform to the type- approved vehicle are often not in place or verified only through documents instead of physical tests carried out in the presence of the authorities.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 138 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. The Member States should have ensured that their type-approval authorities have sufficient human and financial resources to either perform in-house testing or purchase reliable testing services. They should have not relied on tests performed in the car manufacturers’ certified laboratories under the supervision of technical services. The potential conflicts of interest arising from the contracting of technical services by car manufacturers for carrying out tests is a direct result of the current system set out in the EU type- approval framework directive and cannot therefore be considered maladministration. The Commission proposal for a new market surveillance and type-approval regulation addresses this weakness by proposing a fee structure for the financing of type-approval tests, although under the system proposed by the Commission it remains possible for car manufacturers to choose the testing service and type approval authority of their preference in any of the Member States. It is regrettable that the Commission did not consider a complete overhaul of the system by eliminating competition among testing services and among type approval authorities by making it obligatory for car manufacturers to use the national testing services and national type approval authorities.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 142 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. However, wWhere technical services also offer consultancy services to car manufacturers on obtaining type-approval, as is the case in certain Member States, a potential conflict of interest arises due to the existence of an additional financial link between technical services and car manufacturers related to the provision of advice on how to successfully acquire type-approval. Member States should have investigated such potential conflicts of interests. This constitutes maladministration.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 146 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. The Member States should have ensured that type-approval authorities adequately audit technical services. This constitutes maladministration. TUnfortunately, the choice of the technical service is primarily the choice of the car manufacturer, and the role of the type- approval authority is often just to validate the procedure at the end. The possibility available to type-approval authorities to audit technical services and to challenge the choice of technical service is very rarely used.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 150 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. The Member States’ failure to organise an efficient and reliable market surveillance system constitutes a contravention of EU law. The verification of the conformity of production and in- service conformity of light-duty vehicles is often based only on laboratory tests performed on the car manufacturers’ premises.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 156 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37 a. In particular, the Commission should have examined how competition among type approval authorities and among testing services worked out in practice and should have submitted alternatives for this type of unnecessary and harmful competition.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 157 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 b (new)
37 b. The Commission failed to make use of the provision of Regulation (EC) No 692/2008, to request Member States type approval authorities for information on the functioning of emission technology at low temperatures.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 158 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. The governance structure in place in the automotive sector, where the EU merely has regulatory power and the responsibility to implement EU law on car emission measurement lies primarily with the Member States, prevents the efficient enforcement of EU legislation. The enforcement powers of the Commission are limited to initiating infringement procedures against Member States where a Member State has failed to apply EU law correctly.deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 161 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38 a. The initial test results performed by the national authorities in the framework of the diesel emissions screening campaign give credence to suspicions that Volkswagen case is not the only violation but the emissions scandal is more widespread and prevents the efficient enforcement of EU legislation.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 162 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38 a. One of the structural weaknesses of the current type-approval framework in Europe is that it is only the type-approval authority that granted a type-approval to a given vehicle that can effectively withdraw the certificate of conformity that was given to the vehicle concerned.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 167 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. The majority of the Member States did not launch or participate to any investigations. Some Member States were very reluctant to share the results of their investigations and the technical test data with the Commission and this committee of inquiry. or they published only parts of their findings.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 181 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 a (new)
46 a. Furthermore, the Member States have not taken up their role to actively inform and support consumers to claim their rights in respect of the Volkswagen emissions case and possible involvement of other car-brands.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 183 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Following a strict interpretation of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, the Commission considered that it is the sole duty of the Member States, and not part of its responsibility as guardian of the Treaties, to investigate the possible illegal use of defeat devices. On this basis, the Commission did notThe Commission failed to undertake furtherany technical research, did not request additional information from the Member States and did not askor request the responsible national type-approval authorities to undertake further investigative and corrective actions regarding the possible illegal use of the defeat devices.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 187 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
48 a. The Commission should have asked for the emissions tests to be done in real driving conditions as set in the Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 since it was known that there was a difference between the results of the emissions in the laboratory and in the real driving conditions.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 192 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
53. The participation of sSome former Commissioners was further complicated byrefused to cooperate and contribute to the research of this committee of inquiry using as an excuse the lack of a clear obligation in the current Code of Conduct for Commissioners that former Commissioners must cooperate with ongoing inquiries and in general remain accountable for actions undertaken during their term in office.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 202 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
60. The requirement to produce an interim report six months after the start of the committee’s work, as per its mandate, was superfluous, as this timeframe was insufficient to gather evidence which could represent a sound basis for conclusions.deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 204 #

2016/2215(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
61. Given the temporary nature of committees of inquiry, collecting evidence in an efficient and timely manner is essential. The approach taken by the committee to devote the first months of its mandate to hearing technical experts before moving on the political level proved successful. Ideally, the hearings should start only once the first phase of evidence collection, including receiving all the relevant documents from the parties under inquiry, is concluded.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 129 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Call on the Commission to better define 'impact'; stresses that the assessment of the impact of fundamental research and SSH projects should remain flexible and its relative weight in the evaluation procedure should be decreased; asks the Commission to check that the balance between bottom- up and top-down calls is maintained and to analyse which procedure (one or two stage) is more useful to avoid oversubscription;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Insists that the Commission should adopt measures minimising the risk that the results of a research project could be misused or used malevolently;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 183 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recognises the importance of incorporating research and entrepreneurship skills into Member States' primary and high school education systems in order to encourage young people to develop these skills, as R&D should be viewed in structural rather than cyclical or temporal terms; calls on the Member States and the Commission to enhance employment stability for young researchers and to reject all forms of precarious working conditions under H2020 funded projects; calls on the Commission to provide new increased levels of support for young researchers, such as a new funding scheme for early-stage researchers with less than three years of experience after PhD completion;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 212 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Recalls that SSH integration means SSH research in interdisciplinary projects and not an ex-post add-on to otherwise technological projects, and that the most pressing problems faced by the EU require methodological research that is more conceptually focused on SSH; calls on the Commission either to introduce a minimum percentage dedicated to SSH funding, or to create an evaluation sub- criterion that takes account of its inclusion in projecproper funding dedicated to SSH, Enhance efforts to integrate SSH at programme and topic level through truly interdisciplinary approaches clearly reflected throughout call texts;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 238 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes initiatives which bring the private and public sectors together to stimulate research; rRegrets the low level of public return on public investment in some sensitive areas such as health; highlights the need for enhanced EU leadership in prioritising public research needs and a fair public return; calls on the Commission to study the possibilities of co-ownership of IP for key projects funded by FP public grants;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 253 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Welcomes the Open Science pilot funding as a first step towards an Open Science Cloud; recognises the relevance of e-infrastructures and supercomputing, the need for public and private sector stakeholders and civil society to be involved and the importance of citizen science in ensuring that society plays a more active part in the definition of the problems; calls for a public scientific metadata structure and procedures for the generation of such data in order to feed the European OSC and ensure data exploitationopen access to data; calls on the Commission and the public and private research community to explore new models that integrate private cloud resources and public e- infrastructures and the launch of citizen agendas in science and innovation;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 370 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that actions and funding of the next FP9 should respect fundamental rights and observe the principles acknowledged in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Such actions should be in conformity with any legal obligation, including international law and in particular the EU's obligation not to recognise as lawful a situation created by a serious breach of a peremptory norm of international law and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining that situation with any relevant Commission decisions as well as with ethical principles, which include avoiding any breach of research integrity;
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 372 #

2016/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 b (new)
33b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that as regards the project evaluation procedures both ethical and technical, envisaged for the next FP9, need to be transparent and participatory as well as based on international law and Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In addition external evaluators of the FP9 projects needs to be appointed independently not by the project participants but by an external body and in consultations with the European Parliament and civil society.
2017/04/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 3 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesRegrets the fact that although the investment mobilised by EFSI to date, which amounts to EUR 169.9 billion and accounts for 52 % of the total target investment to be mobilised by 2018, recent data on national accounts do not indicate any surge in investment since EFSI was launched; reiterates that only direct public investment can close the large investment gap in Europe;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 16 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets the lack of official information on the amount of used guarantee; notes, however, that unofficial information indicates a and of the multiplier of 14.1effect; calls on the EIB to make the exact multiplier public and to use the OECD calculation methodology;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 26 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that, according to the EY 2016 independent evaluation, EU-15 received over 90 % of EFSI support and the 13 new Member States received about 9 %; regrets the disproportionate benefit from a market-driven instrument such as EFSI to certain larger Member States with more developed capital markets; recalls that three Member States should not account for more than 45 % of total EFSI funding and therefore calls on the EFSI Steering Board to continuously monitor sectoral and geographical spread, especially in crucial sectors such as modernizing and improving productivity and sustainability of all Member- States economies;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Regrets the relative lack of investments in countries facing severe economic imbalances and undergoing violent structural adjustments;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that only 10 projects under the IIW and two under the SMEW, corresponding to nine Member States, benefited from blended EFSI/ESIF funding; encourages a timely adoption of the Financial Regulation and Omnibus Regulation revision that would allow the simplification of the combined ESIF and EFSI funds in order to avoid competition and overlaps, substitution, overlaps, any generation of profit and to ensure complementarity;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 46 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that 31 % of the EFSI funding was used for SMEs, 22 % for energy projects, 21 % for RDI and 10 % for the digital sector; regrets, however, the lack of information regarding the additionality of the projects funded; calls for an urgent improvement of the sectorial diversification as well as the consideration of any further extension of support to other sectors;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 58 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the need to revise the current definition of additionality by adding new factors and in particular the sectorial and geographical diversification; notes that geographical concentration is working against the principle of cohesion; recalls that the current regulation enabled the possibility of projects with lower-than- minimum risk than EIB Special Activities; notes that many projects could have been carried out without EFSI support and calls the EIB to ensure real additionality;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 73 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that National Promotional Banks are not well established in all Member States and that their limited geographical spread poses additional barriers to the EFSI geographical coverage; considers that the establishment of National Promotional Banks should be a high EFSI priority in order to address regions where support is needed, to boost small scale projects and to improve regional and sectorial diversification; calls on the EIB and the Commission to ensure that National Promotional Banks are high in the priorities of the European Advisory Investment Hub; calls on the Commission to encourage and support the establishment of National Promotional Banks in regions where their presence is limited;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 92 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Deplores the fact that, on account of EFSI, a series of budgetary lines were reduced for the period 2015-2020, negatively affecting programmes like Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility; considers that in the context of MFF revision this budgetary deficit should be redressed taking into consideration the assessment of the opportunity cost of the relevant cuts and that EFSI should be financed from sources independent from EU programmes that have already been approved;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 99 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. StresseRegrets the needlack for transparency in the selection of EFSI operations, especially the need for information concerning additionalityrelated to the use of the scoreboard and the criteria applied in the selection of EFSI operations towards the EU institutions as well as for all EU citizens; stresses the need for accessible, accurate and updated information especially concerning additionality, their contribution to growth and job creation and the reasons for granting the EU guarantee;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 104 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls for publication of all information of all EFSI operations and decisions on the European Investment Project Portal (EIPP);urges the Commission to increase EIPP potential and visibility;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 106 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Reminds that for improving the transparency, efficiency and accountability of EFSI, its governance structures should be completely separate from that of the EIB;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 109 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Is of the opinion that further evaluation of the original EFSI regulation would have been desirableis crucial before the adoption of the any proposed EFSI extension; hop in order to identify possible areas of improvement and whether maintaining a scheme for supporting investment is warranted; anticipates that the conclusions of this report will be duly taken into consideration in the final elaboration of EFSI II Regulation.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 113 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Acknowledges that EFSI has a strong impact on EU budget and calls for further proposals on how to permanently boost public investment in Europe;
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the increasing use of precarious employment models in aviation inside the Union further creates downwards pressure on social and labour rights and has adverse effects on health and safety; whereas high-quality employment and training is directly linked to the safety and security of passengers and staff;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the importance of strong, independent social partners in the aviation sector, an institutionalised social dialogue and the participation of employees in company matters; underlines that the rights to form and to join a trade union and to undertake collective action are fundamental rights in the Union;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Insists that direct employment must remain the usualbe the standard form of employment in aviation in order to ensure safety and high- quality jobs; stresses that in particular airline pilots cannot be considered to be independent of the companies for which they work; further calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that workers' rights are safeguarded in the sense of Directive 2001/23/EC in the event of acquisition or transfer of company;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to come forward with legislative initiatives to prevent flags of convenience, rule shopping and unfair competition in aviation, including a ban on zero-hours contracts and pay-to-fly schemes; stresses that bogus self-employment has significant consequences with regard to the social protection of workers and safety and has an adverse effect on the level playing field; insist therefore that the Commission and Member States clarify the provisions, drawing on ILO Convention 198, so that a distinction can be drawn between employees and self- employed workers in order to put an effective stop to bogus self-employment;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to prevent social dumping and possible illegal use of foreign workers on board EU-registered planesthird- country workers on board EU-registered planes; believes that third-country workers on board EU-registered planes must have the same social and labour rights as those applying to the operators' employees residing inside the EU;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Insists that any agreements in the field of EU External Aviation Policy must include respect for human rights and fundamental ILO conventioninclude all relevant ILO conventions; in this regard, insists that Member States have the right to deny airlines landing rights on their territory if non-EU operators do not respect human rights or exercise unfair competition, including respect for workers' rights;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to invest in mandatory education and training in all parts of the aviation value chain; recognizes the importance of establishing minimum requirements for education and training in the EU in order to ensure a high level of quality and safety in the aviation sector;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Member States to guarantee all workers in the aviation sector decent working conditions, including health and safety at work; stresses that this includes protection against exposure to particle pollution in airports.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas energy is a basic human good and an important goal of the EU energy strategy must be to combat energy poverty and ensure equal access to affordable energy for all; whereas energy and climate policies must be better interlinked;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the EU should actively pursue the development of EU's domestic conventional gas resources, such as those discovered in Cyprus;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 44 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas it is important to promote an integrated proposal for the use of indigenous energy sources, such as natural gas deposits in the Cyprus EEZ, and to support the creation of a LNG liquefaction terminal in Cyprus to exploit deposits from neighbouring areas also;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the framework strategy for a resilient Energy Unionof the EU's energy strategy with a forward- looking climate change policy should defines as a priority fighting energy poverty, enhancing supply security, diversification, sustainability goals, and promotes more competitivshould promote also affordable energy prices for all;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 60 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the Commission communication entitled ‘An EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage’; believes that an internal energy market which fully integrates LNG and gas storage will play a significant role in achieving the ultimate objective of a resilient Energy Unionensuring equal access to energy, as a public social good, for all;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges that the availability of LNG, including supporting pipeline infrastructure, in these Member States could significantly improve the current supply security situation not only in physical but also in economic terms, contributing to more competitivaffordable energy prices;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 95 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas storage are of particular importance in order to achieve energy diversification and enhance energy security; calls in this context for the promotion and development of new natural gas nodes and LNG storage stations in the central and south-eastern regions, the Baltic and the Mediterranean;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 99 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. UStresses the need to ensure the coherent development of LNG infrastructure with the needs of national energy markets, so as to avoid asymmetries or over-capacities in its development; underlines that priority should be given to market-baspublic-led solutions and to the utilisation of existing LNG infrastructure on a regional level;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 127 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Supports the Commission proposal in the ongoing revision of the Security of Supply Regulation to review the existing reverse flow exemptions on interconnectors and endorses the increased role of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) in the process;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 132 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that geology is a major determining factor when developing new gas storages and notes the current excess capacities in European gas storages; stresses that regional cooperation could significantly improve the utilisation rate of existing gas storages; highlights the need to ensure the application of the highest environmental standards in the planning, construction and use of LNG storage infrastructure;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 138 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses that it is of high importance to ensure that Member States maintain control over the infrastructure of LNG for maximising the benefits for the peoples;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 140 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that a more extensive use of Ukraine’s storage capacity will only be possible if an appropriate, stable commercial and legal framework and the integrity of supply infrastructure is guaranteed in Ukraine;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importance of finding cost efficient energy supply options to increase supply security in the Member States on the periphery of the EU, such as Cyprus, Malta and IreIreland, which is not well connected to the internal energy market; highlights also the need to support the most vulnerable countries that continuous to remain energy islands, which are not well connected to the internal energy market; such as Cyprus and Malta, in order to diversify their sources and routes of supply; in this context stresses that LNG and gas storage shall contribute towards ending any kind of energy isolation of the Member States and regions of the EU; furthermore, urgent action is needed for the implementation of key PCIs in these countries;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 173 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Expresses concern at the proposed doubling of capacity of the Nord Stream pipeline, and the effects this would have on energy security and diversification of supply sources and the principle of solidarity among Member States; highlights that the project runs contrary to the underlying principles of a fully integrated, secure, competitive and sustainable Energy Union and as such should not benefit from the EU’s financial support or from derogations from EU law;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 183 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that if, contrary to European interests, Nord Stream 2 were to be built, the importance of enabling access to LNG terminals and completing the North-South Gas Corridor in central and south-eastern Europe will significantly increase;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 191 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Member States to fully implement the Third Energy Package and gas network codes;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 200 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Insists that the completion of the internal gas market and the elimination of regulatory obstacles would greatly improve the liquidity of gas markets; urges stakeholders to finalise the network code on rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas as soon as possible;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 235 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses the necessity of eliminating all barriers to global free trade of LNG; urges, in this context, US policy makers to increase investment certainty by introducing clear criteria and deadlines in the authorisation process for gas exports to non-FTA countries;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 243 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Stresses that the development of LNG should be compatible with the reduction of the EU's dependency or gas imports and should not facilitate the entry of gas from hydraulic fracturing;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 255 #

2016/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Stresses that the Eastern Mediterranean is a promising future source of gas supply for the EU, with significant resources available in the EEZ of Egypt, Israel, Lebanon and Cyprus. No single energy source will ever fulfil EU's energy needs, and diversity from both domestic and foreign markets is essential. Therefore, the development of the domestic conventional gas resources discovered in Cyprus should be actively pursued;
2016/06/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 145 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39 a. Deems it necessary to increase appropriations for the Turkish Cypriot Community budget line (+EUR 3 million) for the purpose of contributing decisively to the continuation and intensification of the mission of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus and of supporting the bicommunal Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage, thus promoting trust and reconciliation between the two communities;
2016/10/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
- having regard to the UN report, through the UNISRD (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) as part of the 2005 Hyogo Framework for Action to manage the risk of disasters,
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 5 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 b (new)
- having regard to the studies produced by the World Bank and its International Development Association (IDA) on the situation for women in disasters,
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 19 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the instrument was comprehensively overhauled in 2014 with a view to ensuring as rapid a response as possible and thus improving the effectiveness of relief funding, even though it has proved insufficient and there is still a significant delay in paying out aid, which means that the effectiveness offered by early assistance is lost;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 27 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas women are among the groups that suffer the consequences of natural disasters most acutely, as reflected in many reports by international organisations researching and working in this field; these include the UN report, through the UNISRD (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) as part of the 2005 Hyogo Framework for Action to manage the risk of disasters, which states that the gender perspective should be ‘integrated into all disaster risk management policies, plans and decision-making processes, including those related to risk assessment, early warning, information management and education and training’; the World Bank makes the same point, in the studies drawn up by its International Development Association (IDA), which states that ‘women are much more likely than men to be killed in natural disasters’ and that ‘including gender in disaster planning can help avoid costly mistakes and save lives’;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that, since it was established in 2002, the EUSF has been a significant source of funding in the context of natural disasters occurring across Europe, from floods to earthquakes and forest fires, and a means of demonstrating European solidarity with affected regions; takes the view that the goals of the Solidarity Fund should be widened to include humanitarian disasters, such as the current refugee crisis, and not only natural disasters; takes the view, likewise, that other man-made crises should also be included, such as industrial accidents or public health crises, while upholding the principle that those causing the damage should pay for it;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that, since the Fund was established natural disasters in the Union have increased significantly in number, severity and intensity as a consequence of climate change; stresses, therefore the added value of a sound and flexible instrument as a means of showing solidarity and providing proper, rapid assistance for people affected by major natural disasters; points out that the amount allocated to the fund, EUR 500 million a year, will be insufficient owing to the consequences of climate change, which are being reflected in a steady increase in natural disasters and forecasts of a further increase in the coming years; suggests, therefore, that the budget allocated to the Solidarity Fund should be increased accordingly;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 39 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that, just as consideration should be given to widening the goals of the Fund to include humanitarian and other disasters, such as industrial accidents and public health crises, the amount of money allocated to the Fund should also be increased to cover these new goals;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 41 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the EUSF is financed outside the European Union budget, with a maximum allocation of EUR 500 million (at 2011 prices), on top of any amounts remaining from the previous year; points out that this is leading to increased delays in payments, since every time there is an emergency a special procedure must be carried out to allocate and release funds; proposes, in this connection, that the financing of the Solidarity Fund should be brought within the Union budget so that it can be made available more quickly and thereby provide an earlier and more effective response to citizens affected by a disaster;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of the 2014 revision, which represented a belated response to its repeated calls to improve the effectiveness of aid in order to ensure a rapid response in support of people affected by natural disasters; takes the view, however, that fresh reforms should be undertaken, especially relating to the goals of the fund, eligibility thresholds and matters linked to procedure, such as transparency, simplification, and the inclusion of gender policies among the eligibility criteria;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 47 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the main components of the reform, such as the introduction of advance payments of up to 10 % of the anticipated financial contribution available on demand soon after an application for a financial contribution from the Fund has been submitted to the Commission (upper limit of the contribution set at EUR 30 million), the eligibility of technical assistance directly linked to project operations (a key European Parliament request), the extension of the deadlines by which Member States must make applications (12 weeks after the first damage) and set up the project (18 months), as well as the introduction of a six-month deadline by which the Commission must respond to applications; takes the view, however, that this amount is insufficient and that it should be increased to 20%; takes a positive view of the eligibility of technical assistance directly linked to project operations (a key European Parliament request), but considers it vital that the remaining external technical assistance should also be included as an eligible cost, including management, monitoring, information and communication, dealing with complaints and control and auditing; welcomes the fact that the reform envisages extending the deadlines by which Member States must make applications (12 weeks after the first damage) and set up the project (18 months), even though it considers the time granted to be insufficient and takes the view that it should be increased to 24 months; points out that the introduction of a six-month deadline by which the Commission must respond to applications allows too much time and efforts should be made to shorten this deadline as far as possible in order to ensure that aid can be brought to the people affected more quickly;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 51 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises, however, that, in spite of the introduction of an advance payment mechanism upstream of the standard procedure, beneficiaries still face problems as a result of the length of the overall process, which culminates in payment of the final contribution; emphasises, in this context, the need to speed up the processing of applications and ensure that as many as possible are dealt with by the deadline set; takes the view that it would be of enormous help in this connection if the budget of the EUSF were included in the Union budget; urges that excessive bureaucracy in the procedure be simplified while at the same time stressing the need for maximum transparency in the awarding, management and implementation of funds;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States themselves to improve communication and cooperation with local and regional authorities, both in preparing applications and setting up projects; proposes, in this connection, that part of the fund be earmarked for the creation of a training programme for staff working for public authorities in each of the Member States who currently hold positions with responsibility for managing emergencies and disasters, in order to enhance their capacity in relation to applying for and managing funds;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 65 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Proposes that the system of economic thresholds for the eligibility of proposals be changed so that the poorest countries and regions have easier access to funding, moving from a proportional system like the one currently in place to a progressive system where the richest countries and regions would have higher thresholds than the poorest countries and regions; stresses that this change would offer genuine support for cohesion policy and represent a fairer and more solidarity-based way of using EU resources; proposes, in this connection, that the following thresholds be used: for serious disasters at state level, a progressive threshold in line with gross national income (GNI) of 0.6% for the highest-income state (or candidate country for accession) and 0.4% for the lowest-income state, applying the corresponding percentage between those figures to the remaining states; recalls that the 0.6% threshold, or estimated cost of over EUR 3 billion in 2011 prices, currently applies to all states; for serious disasters at regional level, a progressive threshold in line with regional gross domestic product (GDP) of 1% for the region with the highest GDP and 0.75% for the region with the lowest GDP, applying the corresponding percentage between those figures to the remaining regions; recalls that a threshold of 1.5% currently applies to all regions;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 68 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Proposes that a criterion needs to be introduced for regional disasters affecting NUTS level 3 areas in cases where several neighbouring regions together make up an area equivalent in size to a NUTS level 2 region; suggests that in this case the threshold would be calculated on the basis of the weighted average of the various NUTS level 3 areas affected; points out that disasters evidently affect geographical areas that do not necessarily coincide with the boundaries of administrative areas, and it would be absurd if the European Union had no procedural mechanisms to deal fairly with all areas affected by disasters; proposes, further, in keeping with the proposal made by the Committee of the Regions, that the term ‘exceptional cross- border natural disaster’ be used where, as in the above case, several NUTS level 3 regions may belong to different Member States;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 69 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Points out that women are among the groups that suffer the consequences of natural disasters most acutely, and consequently proposes that gender equality policies and women’s rights be included as criteria for the eligibility of proposals;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 78 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Points out, in that connection, the importance of developing synergies between the various Union funds and policies with a view to forestalling, as far as possible, the impact of natural disasters and, in cases where the EUSF is activated, to guaranteeing the consolidation and the long-term development of reconstruction projects;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 80 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improventroduce mandatory procedures to ensure maximum transparency and calls for guaranteed public access to information throughout the assistance mobilisation process, from the submission of the application to project closure;
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 95 #

2016/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its call, therefore, that in the near future the eligibility threshold for regional natural disasters should be set at 1 between 0.75% of regional GDP, in particular for the regions worst affected by the economic crisis and the refugee crisis (for the poorest regions) and 1% of regional GDP (for the richest regions);
2016/07/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the 21 September 2005 EU declaration pertaining to the full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol by Turkey to all EU Member States,
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the EU Common Position at the 53rd Association Council of 18 May 2015,
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that while the modernisation of the Customs Union will further strengthen the already strong economic ties between Turkey and the European Union (EU), and will keep Turkey economically anchored to the EUthis cannot proceed when Turkey has not fully and effectively implemented the existing Customs Union towards all member states including the Republic of Cyprus; believes that strengthening trade relations could bring concrete benefits to citizens in Turkey and EU Member States, and also contribute to both sides engaging in a positive reform agenda while mitigating political tensions with Ankara on the deteriorating situation of the rule of law and fundamental freedoms in the country;
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas Turkey has not proceeded to the full, effective and non- discriminatory implementation of the existing CU towards the Republic of Cyprus;
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 19 #

2016/2031(INI)

2. Notes that the upgrade of the EU-Turkey trade relations forms an essential part of the efforts made by the EU and Turkey to deepen their relations in key areas of joint interest identified at the EU-Turkey Summit of 29 November 2015 and in the EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 2016; states that this is even more important now that the accession talks are stalled despite the significant short- and long-term strategic interests for both the EU as Turkey, such as trade, migration, the fight against terrorism, energy and stability in the neighbourhood;
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of Turkey’s recent rapprochement with Russia and the statements of the Turkish Government regarding the country’s possible accession to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation; rReiterates that the EU is Turkey’s main trading partner and that two thirds of the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States; emphasises that the Customs Union requires Turkey to align its legislation with the acquis communautaire;
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that modernising, balancing and widening the CU to include services, public procurement and agriculture would involve benefits for both parties; had Turkey proceeded to the full and effective implementation of the existing CU towards all EU Member States including the Republic of Cyprus, in a non-discriminatory manner;
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 30 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. having regard to the will of the parties to expand and improve trade relations and the decision to launch negotiations to modernise the Customs Union and extend its scope;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the growing geopolitical and economic challenges facing Turkey as a result of instability in its neighbourhood, terrorism and the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016; stresses that while the chaos and instability in the Middle East, the Russian annexation of Crimea and intervention in Ukraine, are adversely affecting Turkey’s foreign trade within its neighbourhood, an upgraded Customs Union can help Turkey to overcome the challenges it faces, and contribute to transforming Turkey into a pillar of stability and an engine of growth for its citizens, if the necessary reforms are made by the governmentgiven that Turkey fulfils its obligations towards all EU member states and respects the rule of law;
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomNotes the fact that Turkish regulatory alignment with EU standards resulting from the conclusion of the Customs Union has made the country more competitive; believes that the modernisation of the Customs Union would provide an opportunity for Turkey to revisit its growth model and escape from the ‘middle income (country) trap’; welcomnotes the fact that the deepening of the Customs Union will have a positive influence on Turkey’s economic governance and strengthen Turkey’s independent regulatory institutions;
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to include political benchmarks in the upgraded Customs Union between Turkey and the EUuncil and the Commission to demand from Turkey to fulfil all its obligations towards all Member States in a non-discriminatory manner before an upgraded Customs Union is finalised that must include political benchmarks on human rights and fundamental freedoms.
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. CWith respect to the principle of non-discriminatory reciprocity by Turkey, considers that visa-free travel or the creation of a long-term multiple-entry visa for business travellers would have a positive impact on bilateral trade;
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 55 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) while recognising Turkey’s strategicimportant role due to its geographical proximity and to its historical, cultural, political and commercial ties with the EU, the development of a new trade framework has to be an integral, albeit specific, part of the EU’s global policy and, in particular, of the principles and objectives of its external action;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that to date Turkey has not fulfilled 7 out of 72 benchmarks of the visa liberalisation roadmap and recalls the need for Turkey to meetfulfil all 72 benchmarks towards all Member States in a non- discriminatory manner before an update of the Customs Union in the field of services can take places considered; considers that the criteria for visa liberalisation should never be bent for political reasons.
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 62 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey should be set against the background of the common will of the parties to share the set of values and principles laid down in the EU's founding treaties, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and to work together to implement them fully and comprehensively; reiterates its deep concern over the severe deterioration of human rights situation, democratic principles and the rule of law in Turkey;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) with a view to the start of the negotiations, the economic, social, political and legal conditions under which they possible negotiations are to take place and which, in any case, will determine the effects of those negotiations on citizens' lives, should be specifically and carefully considered; social partners and civil society should be involved in this process;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point v
(v) the agreement on the modernisation of the Customs Union and the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey will have to be applied fully and, equally to all Member Stateand in a non-discriminatory manner to all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point vi
(vi) the entire negotiating process should be based on the principles of transparency and full access to the proceedings; the Commission shall continue to monitor and report closely the ongoing human rights, social and economic situation in Turkey at every step of this process and in the event of the deterioration of the situation, suspension of the process shall be invoked;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new)
(ia) a prerequisite for launching negotiations for the modernisation of the Customs Union is that Turkey should proceed to the full, effective and non- discriminatory implementation of the existing Customs Union vis a vis all MS, including the Republic of Cyprus;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) in order to enable Turkey to become more involved in the decision- making process related to the EU's trade policy, and provided there is significant progress in terms of convergence and legislative harmonisation, it would be helpful to allow Turkey access as an observer;deleted
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The activities covered by this Directive should concern the regulated professions falling within the scope of Directive 2005/36/EC. This Directive should apply in addition to Directive 2005/36/EC and without prejudice to other provisions laid down in a separate Union act concerning access to, and the exercise of a given regulated profession. Following Article 168 TFEU, professions in the health and social service sector should be excluded from the scope of this directive.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The burden of proof of justification and proportionality lies on the Member States. The reasons for regulation invoked by a Member State by way of justification should thus be accompanied by an analysis of the appropriateness and proportionality of the measure adopted by that State and by specific evidence substantiating its arguments, substantiating its arguments.In accordance with the Court of Justice, Member States must be allowed discretion in the election of the measure and level of protection of the public interest, which may vary from one Member State to another.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) It is appropriate to monitor the proportionality of the provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions on a regular basis and with a frequency appropriate to the regulation concernafter they are adopted. A review of the proportionality of restrictive national legislation in the area of regulated professions should be based not only on the objective of that legislation at the time of its adoption, but also on the effects of the legislation, assessed after its adoption. The assessnot exceed the requirements of the proportionality of the national legislation should be based on developments found to have occurred in the area since the legislation was adoptedArticle 59(3) of Directive 2005/36/EC.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Member States should carry out proportionality assessments in an objective and independent manner, including where a profession is regulated indirectly, by giving a particular professional body the power to do so. In particular, while the assessment of the local authorities, regulatory bodies or professional organisations, whose greater proximity to local conditions and specialised knowledge could in certain cases make them better placed to identify the best way of meeting the public interest objectives, there is particular reason for concern in cases where the policy choice made by those authorities or bodies provides benefits to established operators at the expense of new market entrants.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Where the taking-up and pursuit of certain employed or self-employed activities are conditional on complying with certain provisions relating to specific professional qualifications, laid down directly or indirectly by the Member States, it is necessary to ensure that such provisions are justified by public interest objectives, such as those within the meaning of the Treaty, namely public policy, public security and public health or by overriding reasons of general interest, recognised as such in the case-law of the Court of Justice. It is important to ensure that public interest objectives are adequately identified in order to determine the intensity of the regulation. For example, in order to ensure a high level of protection of public health, Member States should enjoy a margin of discretion to decide on the degree of protection which they wish to afford to public health and on the way in which that protection is to be achieved. It is also necessary to clarify that among the overriding reasons of general interest, recognised by the Court of Justice, are preserving the financial equilibrium of the social security system; the protection of consumers, recipients of services and workers; the safeguarding of the proper administration of justice; fairness of trade transactions; combating fraud and prevention of tax evasion and avoidance; roadtransport safety; the protection of the environment and the urban environment; the health of animals; intellectual property; the safeguarding and conservation of the national historic and artistic heritage, social policy objectives, the protection of individual and collective workers' rights, vocational training systems, workers' self- management, and cultural policy objectives. According to settled case-law, purely economic reasons, having essentially protectionist aims, as well as purely administrative reasons, such as carrying out controls or gathering statistics cannot constitute an overriding reason of general interest.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) To meet the requirement of proportionality, the measure should be suitable for securing the attainment of the objective pursued. A measure should only be considered suitable for securing the attainment of the objective pursued, if it genuinely reflects a concern to attain that objective in a consistent and systematic manner, for instance where similar risks related to certain activities are addressed in a comparable way and where any exceptions to the restrictions involved are applied in line with the stated objective. Furthermore, the national measure should contribute to achieving the objective pursued and therefore, where it has no effect on the ground for justification, it should not be considered as suitable.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) RAccording to European case-law1a, requirements linked to professional qualifications shouldmay be considered as necessary only where existing measures, such as consumer protection law, cannot be regarded as being suitable or genuinely effective to achieve the aim pursued.ppropriate and necessary without Member States having to prove, positively, that no other conceivable measure could enable that objective to be attained under the same conditions. _________________ 1a Case C-110/05; Case-518/06
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Among the elements tohat may be taken into account by national authorities, the following are of most relevancre are: the link between the scope of professional activities covered by a profession and the professional qualification required; the complexity of the tasks in particular as regards the level, the nature and the duration of the training or experience required; the existence of different routes to obtain the professional qualification; the scope of the professional activities, reserved to holders of a particular professional qualification, and in particular whether the activities reserved to certain professionals can be shared with other professionals; the degree of autonomy in exercising a regulated profession in particular where the activities relating to a regulated profession are pursued under the control and responsibility of a duly qualified professional.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Where a Member State regulates a profession, account should be taken of the fact that technological developments may reduce the asymmetry of information between consumers and professionals. In view of the speed of technological change and scientific progress, up-dates in access requirements may be of particular importance for a number of professions.deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The economic impact of the measure, including a cost-benefit analysis with particular regard to the degree of competition in the market and on the quality of the service provided, as well as the impact on the right to work and on the free movement of persons and services within the Union should be duly taken into account by the competent authorities. Based on this analysis, Member States should ascertain, in particular, whether the extent of the restriction of access to or pursuit of regulated professions within the Union is proportionate to the importance of the objectives pursued and the expected gains.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Member States should carry out a comparison between the national measure at issue and the alternative and less restrictive solutions that would allow the same objective to be attained but would impose fewer restrictions. Where the measures are justified by consumer protection and where the risks identified are limited to the relationship between the professional and the consumer without negatively affecting third parties, the objective could be attained by less restrictive means than reserving activities to professionals, such as protection of the professional title or enrolment on a professional register. Regulation by way of reserved activities should be used only in cases where the measures aim at preventing a risk of serious harm to public interest objectives.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) The national authorities should carry out a global assessment of the circumstances in which the restrictive measure is adopted and implemented and examine in particular the cumulative effect of imposing several requirements in addition to the specific professional qualification. The taking-up and pursuit of certain activities may be conditional on complying with certain provisions such as rules relating to the organisation of the profession, compulsory membership of a professional body, professional ethics, supervision and liability. Therefore, when assessing the cumulative effect of the measures, the competent authorities should also take into account other existing requirements, such as continuous professional development, compulsory chamber membership, registration or authorisation schemes, quantitative restrictions, specific legal form requirements and shareholding requirements, territorial restrictions, multidisciplinary restrictions and incompatibility rules, requirements concerning insurance cover as well as language knowledge requirements, to the extent necessary to practise the profession. When doing so, existing procedures that are not amended should not be subject to a new proportionality assessment. A measure introduced by a Member State cannot be regarded as necessary to achieve the objective pursued if it essentially duplicates requirements which have already been introduced in the context of other rules or procedures.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) It is essential for the proper functioning of the internal market to ensure that Member States provide information to the social partners, as well as citizens, representative associations, or other relevant stakeholders with a legitimate interest, before introducing new measures restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions and give them the opportunity to make known their views.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive lays down rules on a common framework for conducting proportionality assessments before introducing new legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions, or amending existing ones, with a view to ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market. It does not affect the Member States' prerogative and margin of discretion to decide whether and how to regulate a profession within the limits of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Without prejudice to the application of Directive 2005/36/EC, this directive shall not apply to professions providing health care services and social services, whether or not those services are provided within the framework of healthcare or social service establishments and independently of the manner in which they are organised and financed at national, regional and local level and independently from its provision by the public or private (non-profit or commercial) sector.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – title
Ex ante aAssessment of new measures
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that before introducingundertake an assessment of proportionality when introducing significant new legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions, or amending existing ones, the relevant competent authorities undertake an assessment of their proportionality in accordance with the rules laid down in this Directive.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Any provision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be accompanied by a detailed statementn explanation making it possible to appraise compliance with the principle of proportionality.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The reasons for considering that a provision is justified, necessary and proportionateAny provision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be substantiated by qualitative and, wherever possible relevant, quantitative evidence.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall monitor the proportionality of legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions on a regular basis and with a frequency appropriate to the regulation concerned, having due regard to any developments that have occurred since the measure concerned was adoptedafter adoption.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the assessment of proportionality referred to in paragraph 1 is carried out in an objective and independent manner including through involvement of independent scrutiny bodies.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The relevant competent authoritiMember States shall consider in particular whether those provisions are objectively justified on the basis of public policy, public security or public health, or by overriding reasons in the public interest, such as. These include, inter alia, preserving the financial equilibrium of the social security system, the protection of consumers, recipients of services and workers, the safeguarding of the proper administration of justice, fairness of trade transactions, combating fraud and prevention of tax evasion and avoidance, roadtransport safety, the protection of the environment and the urban environment, the health of animals, intellectual property, the safeguarding and conservation of the national historic and artistic heritage, social policy objectives; the protection of individual and collective worker’s rights, vocational training systems, workers‘ self-management and cultural policy objectives.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. When assessing the necessity and the proportionality of the provisions, the relevant competent authoritiFor the purposes of the assessment in paragraph 1, Member States shall consider in particular:
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the suitability of the provision namely as regards its appropriateness to attain the objective pursued and whether it genuinely reflects that objective in a consistent and systematic manner and thus, addresses the risks identified in a similar way as in comparable activities;
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the necessity of the provision and in particular whether existing rules of a specific or more general nature, such as product safety legislation or consumer protection law, are insufficient to protect the objective pursued;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) the economic impact of the measure, with particular regard to the degree of competition in the market and the quality of the service provided, as well as the impact on the free movement of persons and services within the Union;
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the possibility to use less restricalternative means to achieve the public interest objective;
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point k
(k) the cumulative effect of restrictions to both access to and pursuit of the profession, and in particular how each of those requirements contributes to and whether it is necessary to achieve the same public interest objective.deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point k a (new)
(k a) the necessity to uphold the precautionary principle, so that the maximum protection of public health, consumer safety and the environment is ensured in the face of risks that are uncertain or not fully apparent;
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of paragraph 2(j), where the measures are justified by consumer protection and where the risks identified are limited to the relationship between the professional and the consumer without negatively affecting third parties, the relevant competent authorities shall assess in particular whether the objective can be attained by protected professional title without reserving activities.deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. For the purposes of paragraph 2(k), the relevant competent authorities shall assess in particular the cumulative effect of imposing any of the following requirements:deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) reserved activities, existing alongside protected professional title;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) continuous professional development requirements;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) rules relating to the organisation of the profession, professional ethics and supervision;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 260 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) compulsory chamber membership, registration or authorisation schemes, in particular where those requirements imply the possession of a particular professional qualification;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) quantitative restrictions, in particular requirements limiting the number of authorisations to practise, or fixing a minimum or a maximum number of employees, managers or representatives holding particular professional qualifications;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) specific legal form requirements or requirements which relate to the shareholding or management of a company, to the extent those requirements are directly linked to the exercise of the regulated profession;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 269 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point g
(g) territorial restrictions, in particular where the profession is regulated in parts of a Member State’s territory in a different manner;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point h
(h) requirements restricting the exercise of a regulated profession jointly or in partnership, as well as incompatibility rules;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point i
(i) requirements concerning insurance cover or other means of personal or collective with regard to professional liability;deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point j
(j) language knowledge requirements, to the extent necessary to practise the profession.deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 293 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Member States shall, by appropriate means, inform the social partners, as well as citizens, service recipients, representative associations and relevant stakeholders other than the members of the professionwith a legitimate interest, before introducing new legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions, or amending existing ones, and give them the opportunity to make known their views.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Promoting renewable forms of energy is one of the goals of the Union energy policy. The increased use of energy from renewable sources, together with energy savings and increased energy efficiency, constitutes an important part of the package of measures needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and comply with the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change, which requires the rise in global temperatures to stay below 2 Celsius degrees from pre-industrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit it at 1.5 Celsius degrees, and the Union 2030 energy and climate framework, including the binding target to cut emissions in the Union by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. It also has an important part to play in promoting the security of energy supply, technological development and innovation and providing opportunities for employment and regional development, especially in rural and isolated areas or regions with low population density. Finally, it provides an opportunity for a transition towards a more democratic energy model, through public ownership of renewable energy projects and decentralized and collective forms of energy management.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 101 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In particular, increasing technological improvements, incentives for the use and expansion of public transport, the use of energy efficiency technologies and the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources in the electricity, heating and cooling sectors as well as in the transport sector are very effective tools, together with energy efficiency measures, for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the Union and the Union's dependence on imported coal, gas and oil.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 104 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Directive 2009/28/EC established a regulatory framework for the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources which set binding national targets on the share of renewable energy sources in energy consumption and transport to be met by 2020. Commission Communication of 22 January 201412 established a framework for future Union energy and climate policies and promoted a common understanding of how to develop those policies after 2020. The Commission proposed that the Union 2030 target for the share of renewable energy consumed in the Union should be at least 27%, though this target would likely be met without any action at Union level. __________________ 12 "A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030" (COM/2014/015 final).
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 108 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The European Parliament, in its Resolutions on "A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030" and on "the Renewable energy progress report", has favoured a binding Union 2030 targets of at least 30% of total final energy consumption from renewable energy sources, stressing that that target should be implemented by means of individual national targets taking into account the individual situation and potential of each Member State.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 112 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) It is thus appropriate to establn light of the need to set a realistic path towards the achievement of the goals in the Parish a Union binding target of at least 27% sharegreement, it seems necessary to develop a set of binding targets for renewable development in the Member States that achieves at least a binding 45% target of renewable energy in the EU in 2030. Member States should definevelop their contribution to the achievement of this target as part of their Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans through the governance process set out in Regulation [Governance].
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 128 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The establishment of a Union binding renewable energy targets for 2030 would continue to encourage the development of technologies which generate renewable energy and provide certainty for investors. A tTarget defined at the Union level would leave greater flexibility for Member States to meet their greenhouse gas reduction targets in the most cost-effective manner in accordance withs must take into account the differences in Member States in their capability to meet their greenhouse gas reduction targets according to their specific circumstances, energy mixes and capacities to produce renewable energy.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 129 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The national targets set for 2020 shouldmust constitute Member States' starting point and minimum contribution to the new 2030 framework. Under no circumstances the national share of renewables should fall below such contribution and, in case this happens, the relevant Member States should take the appropriate measures to ensure that this baseline is maintained as well as contribute to the financial instrument referred to in Regulation [Governance].
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 136 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Member States should take additional measures in the event that the share of renewables at the Union level does not meet the Union trajectory towards the at least 27% renewable energy target. As set out in Regulation [Governance], if an ambition gap is identified by the Commission during the assessment of the Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans, the Commission may take measures at Union level in order to ensure the achievement of the target. If a delivery gap is identified by the Commission during the assessment of the Integrated National Energy and Climate Progress Reports, Member States should apply the measures set out in Regulation [Governance], which are giving thdoes not achieve binding renewable energy targets, also at Union level. The Commission should be empowered to assess the development of renewable energy at Member State level, including their compliance with the Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans, and to take measures in order to ensure the achievem enough flexibility to chooset of the targets.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 145 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) In order to support Member States' ambitious contributions to the Union target, a financial framework aiming to facilitate investments ininvestment in renewable energy, a financial framework ensuring reliable access to finance for renewable energy projects in those Member States should be established, also through the use of financial instruments.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 151 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The Commission should focus the allocation of funds on the reduction of the cost of capital of renewables projects, which has a material impact on the cost of renewable energy projects and on their competitiveness.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 153 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The Commission should facilitate the exchange of best practices between the competent national or regional authorities or bodies, for instance through regular meetings to find a common approach to promote a higher uptake of cost-efficient renewable energy projects, encourage investments in new, flexible and clean technologies, and set out an adequate strategy to manage the retirement of technologies which do not contribute to the reduction of emissions or deliver sufficient flexibility, based on transparent criteria and reliable market prindicators of economice signalsustainability.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 159 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Support schemes for electricity generated from renewable sources have proved to be an effective way of fostering deployment of renewable electricity. If and when Member States decide to implement support schemes, such support should be provided in a form that is as non-distortive as possible for the functioning of electricity markets. To this end, an increasing number of Member States allocate support in a form where support is granted in additi, while taking into account the particularities of different technologies and the different abilities of small and large producers to respond to market revenuesignals.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 167 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Electricity generation from renewable sources should be deployed at the lowest possible cost for consumers and taxpayers. When designing support schemes and when allocating support, Member States should seek to minimise the overall system cost of deployment, taking full account of grid and system development needs, the resulting energy mix, and the long term potential of technologies. Member States may use tenders to award support to renewable projects. In all cases, renewable energy mechanisms should be clear, transparent and predictable.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 181 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) The opening of support schemes to cross-border participation limits negative impacts on the internal energy market and can, under certain conditions, help Member States achieve the Union target more cost- efficiently. Cross-border participation is also the natural corollary to the development of the Union renewables policy, with a Union-level binding target replacing national binding targets. It is therefore appropriate to require Member States to progressively and partially open support to projects located in other Member States, and define several ways in which such progressive opening may be implemented, ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, including Articles 30, 34 and 110.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 191 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Without prejudice to adaptations of support schemes to bring them in line with State aid rules, rRenewables support policies should be spredictable and avoid frequent and retroactive changes. Such changes have a direct impact on capital financing costs, the costs of project development and therefore on the overall cost of deploying renewables in the Union. Member States should prevent the revision of any support granted to renewable energy projects from having a negative impact on their economic viability. In this context, Member States should promote cost-effective support policies and ensure their financial sustainability, as well as the self- production of energy to minimize support costs.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 204 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) To create opportunities for reducing the cost of meeting the national and Union targets laid down in this Directive and to give flexibility to Member States to comply with their obligation not to go below their 2020 national targets after 2020, it is appropriate both to facilitate the consumption in Member States of energy produced from renewable sources in other Member States, and, where appropriate, to enable Member States to count energy from renewable sources consumed in other Member States towards their own renewable energy share. For this reason, cooperation mechanisms are required to complement the obligations to open up support to projects located in other Member States. Those mechanisms include statistical transfers, joint projects between Member States or joint support schemes.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 208 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Member States should be encouraged to pursue all appropriate forms of cooperation in relation to the objectives set out in this Directive. Such cooperation can take place at all levels, bilaterally or multilaterally. Apart from the mechanisms with effect on target renewable energy share calculation and target compliance, which are exclusively provided for in this Directive, namely statistical transfers between Member States, joint projects and joint support schemes, cooperation can also take the form of, for example, exchanges of information and best practices, as provided for, in particular, in the e-platform established by Regulation [Governance], and other voluntary coordination between all types of support schemes.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 213 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) It should be possible for imported electricity, produced from renewable energy sources outside the Union to count towards Member States’ renewable energy shares In order to guarantee an adequate effect of energy from renewable sources replacing conventional energy in the Union as well as in third countries it is appropriate to ensure that such imports can be tracked and accounted for in a reliable way and that they are in full respect of international law. Agreements with third countries concerning the organisation of such trade in electricity from renewable energy sources will be considered. If, by virtue of a decision taken under the Energy Community Treaty18 to that effect, the contracting parties to that Treaty are bound by the relevant provisions of this Directive, the measures of cooperation between Member States provided for in this Directive should be applicable to them. __________________ 18 OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 18. OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 18.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 225 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Guarantees of origin issued for the purpose of this Directive have the sole function of showing to a final customer that a given share or quantity of energy was produced from renewable sources. A guarantee of origin can be transferred, independently of the energy to which it relates, from one holder to another. However, wWith a view to ensuring that a unit of renewable energy is disclosed to a customer only once, double counting and double disclosure of guarantees of origin should be avoided. Energy from renewable sources in relation to which the accompanying guarantee of origin has been sold separately by the producer should not be disclosed or sold to the final customer as energy from renewable sources.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 240 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) It is important to provide information on how the supported electricity is allocated to final customers. In order to improve the quality of that information to consumers, Member States should enmay issure that guarantees of origin are issued for all units of renewable energy produced. In addition, with a view to avoiding double compensation, renewable energy producers already receiving financial support should not receive guarantees of originthe financial value of guarantees of origin provided to renewable energy producers should be deducted from the financial support they receive. However, those guarantees of origin shouldmay be used for disclosure so that final consumers can receive clear, reliable and adequate evidence on the renewable origin of the relevant units of energy. Moreover, for electricity that received support, the guarantees of origin shouldmay be auctioned to the market and the revenues should be used to reduce public subsidies for renewable energy.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 261 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 52
(52) It is appropriate to allow for the development of decentralised renewable energy technologies under non- discriminatoryfavourable conditions and without hampering the financing of infrastructure investments. The move towards decentralised energy production has many benefits, including the utilisation of local energy sources, increased local security of energy supply, shorter transport distances and reduced energy transmission losses. Such decentralisation also fosters community development and cohesion by providing income sources and creating jobs locally.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 340 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive establishes a common framework for the promotion of energy from renewable sources. It sets aminimum binding national and Union targets for the overall share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy in 2030. It also lays down rules on financial support to electricity produced from renewable sources, self-consumption of renewable electricity, and renewable energy use in the heating and cooling and transport sectors, regional cooperation between Member States and with third countries, guarantees of origin, administrative procedures and information and training and access to the electricity grid for energy from renewable resources. It establishes sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 409 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a
(aa) ‘renewable self-consumer’ means an active customer or group thereof as defined in Directive [MDI Directive] who consumes and may store and sell renewable electricity which is generated within his or its premises, including a multi-apartment block, an industrial, commercial or shared services site or a closed distribution system, provided that, for non-household renewable self- consumers, those activities do not constitute their primary commercial or professional activity;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 417 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point aa a (new)
(aa a) "renewable energy community" means a local energy community, including municipalities and energy cooperatives, that acts as a renewable self- consumer;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 432 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e e
(ee) ‘advanced biofuels’ means biofuels that are produced from waste and residual feedstocks listed in part A of Annex IX, and that do not have a significant impact on land uses;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 462 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point uu a (new)
(uu a) 'energy poverty' means a household's inability to afford the necessary domestic energy services which guarantee decent human standard levels of comfort and health, as such costs represent a significant proportion of disposable income.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 471 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – title
Union binding overallBinding targets for 2030
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 484 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall collectively ensure that the share of energy from renewable sources in the Union's gross final consumption of energy in 2030 is at least 2745%.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 492 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Member States' respective contributions to this overall 2030 target shall be set andnational binding 2030 targets are listed in Annex I. Additionally, Member States shall notifiedy to the Commission their strategies to achieve said targets, as part of their Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans in accordance with Articles 3 to 5 and Articles 9 to 11 of Regulation [Governance].
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 507 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall support the high ambition of Member States through an enabling framework comprising the enhanced use of Union funds, in particular financial instruments, especially in view of reducing the cost of capital for renewable energy projects.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 509 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. In case the Commission finds in the 5. context of the assessment of the Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans in accordance with Article 25 of Regulation [Governance] that the Union trajectory is not collectively met or that the baseline referred to in paragraph 3 is not maintained, Article 27(4) of that Regulation shall applythat the national binding targets are not individually met or that the Union trajectory is not collectively met or that the baseline referred to in paragraph 3 is not maintained, it will be empowered to apply sanctions. The Commission shall also monitor that Member States legislation and policies for renewable energy are consistent and do not undermine the objectives set in this Directive.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 512 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – title
Financial sSupport for electricity from renewable sources
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 514 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Subject to State aid rules, iIn order to reach the Union target set in Article 3(1) and the national targets set in Article 3(2), Member States may apply support schemes. Support schemes for electricity from renewable sources shall be designed so as to avoid unnecessary distortions of electricity markets and ensure that producers take into account the supply and demand of electricity as well as possible grid constraints, while providing the necessary flexibility to take into account the particularities of different renewable technologies and the constraints of renewable energy communities and self-consumers. Support schemes shall be predictable, stable and transparent.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 537 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Support for electricity from renewable sources shall be designed so as to integrate progressively electricity from renewable sources in the electricity market and ensure that renewable energy producers are responding to market price signals and maximise their market revenuese profitability of renewable investments as well as to favour the introduction of more efficient and sustainable renewable technologies and the development of self-consumption.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 549 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that support for renewable electricity is granted in an open, detailed, transparent, competitive, non- discriminatory and cost-effective manner. and cost- effective manner, with the necessary exceptions to promote new, more sustainable renewable technologies or the development of small-scale production and renewable energy communities. If tender procedures are used, Member States shall be allowed to choose between technology-neutral or specific tender procedures.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 583 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission and the Member States shall assess the effectiveness of their support for electricity from renewable sources at least every four years and report on their operation to the European Parliament and the Council. Decisions on the continuation or prolongation of support and design of new support shall be based on the results of the assessments, considering their overall effectiveness in achieving renewable targets and other goals, such as affordability and the development of energy communities.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 601 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Member States shall ensure that all public administrations (national, regional or local) integrate the consumption of renewable energy in their activities. Member States shall include in their Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans intended targets for this consumption for 2025 and 2030.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 607 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Public investments in renewable energy shall be excluded from public deficit calculations in the context of the SGP and Economic Governance rules;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 616 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall open support for electricity generated from renewable sources to generators located in other Member States under the conditions laid down in this Articlewhen it is necessary to contribute to the achievement of the targets set for renewable energy and climate policy.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 622 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that support for at least 10% of the newly- supported capacity in each year between 2021 and 2025 and at least 15% of the newly-supported capacity in each year between 2026 and 2030 is open to installations located in other Member States.deleted
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 636 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Support schemes may be opened to cross-border participation through, inter alia, opened tenders, joint tenders, opened certificate schemes or joint support schemes. The allocation of renewable electricity benefiting from support under opened tenders, joint tenders or opened certificate schemes towards Member States respective contributions shall be subject to a cooperation agreement setting out rules for the cross-border disbursement of funding, following the principle that energy should be counted towards the Member State funding the installation.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 645 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall assess by 20253 the benefits on the cost-effective deployment of renewable electricity in the Union of provisions set out in this Article. On the basis of this assessment, the Commission may propose to increase theset percentages set out in paragraph 2for support to installations in other Member States.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 656 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to adaptations necessary to comply with State aid rules, Member States shall ensure that the level of, and the conditions attached to, the support granted to renewable energy projects are not revised in a way that negatively impacts the rights conferred thereunder and the economics of supported projects.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 687 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8
Statistical transfers between Member 1. statistical transfer of a specified amount of energy from renewable sources from one Member State to another Member State. The transferred quantity shall be: (a) energy from renewable sources that is taken into account in measuring the renewable energy share of the Member State making the transfer for the purposes of this Directive ; and (b) from renewable sources that is taken into account in measuring the renewable energy share of Member State accepting the transfer for the purposes of this Directive . 2. paragraph 1 may have a duration of one or more years. They shall be notified to the Commission not later than 12 months after the end of each year in which they have effect. The information sent to the Commission shall include the quantity and price of the energy involved. 3. only after all Member States involved in the transfer have notified the transfer to the Commission.Article 8 deleted States Member States may agree on the deducted from the amount of added to the amount of energy The arrangements referred to in Transfers shall become effective
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 696 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) there is reasoned evidence that the Member State is unable to reach its renewable energy targets by other means;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 701 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) make a statistical transfer of specified amounts of energy from renewable sources from one Member State to another Member State in accordance with Article 8; ordeleted
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 704 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that any national rules concerning the authorisation, certification and licensing procedures that are applied to plants and associated transmission and distribution network infrastructures for the production of electricity, heating or cooling from renewable energy sources, and to the process of transformation of biomass into biofuels or other energy products, are proportionate and necessary, necessary and simplified; giving preference to public entities, renewable self-consumers and energy communities. To this end, Member States shall set-up single administrative points, as set in article 16 of this regulation, to support renewable self-consumers and energy communities in their administrative procedures and in the fulfilment of the technical requirements referred in paragraph 2 of this article.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 708 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) simplified and less burdensome authorisation procedures, including through simple notification if allowed by the applicable regulatory framework, are established for decentralised devices for producing energy from renewable sources, including renewable self-consumers and renewable energy communities.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 747 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall ensure that public procurement contracts and new public buildings, and existing public buildings that are subject to major renovation, at national, regional and local level fulfil an exemplary role in the context of this Directive from 1 January 2012 onwards. Member States may, inter alia, allow that obligation to be fulfilled by providing that the roofs of public or mixed private-public buildings are used by third parties for installations that produce energy from renewable sources or by setting renewable energy consumption targets in the provision of public goods and services.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 756 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities at national, regional and local level include provisions for the integration and deployment of renewable energy transport and the development of renewable transport modal shift when planning, designing and implementing local, urban, regional and national mobility and transport plans.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 763 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 9
9. Member States shall remove regulatory and administrative barriers to corporate long- termindustrial long-term bilateral and multilateral power purchase agreements to finance renewables and facilitate their uptake.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 769 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The single administrative contact point shall guide the applicant through the application process in a transparent manner, provide the applicant with all necessary information, support coordinate and involve, where appropriate, other authorities, and deliver, in the case of small-scale projects and renewable self- consumers and energy communities, a legally binding decision at the end of the process.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 779 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. The permit granting process referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed a period of three year18 months, except for the cases set out in Article 16(5) and Article 17. In the case of projects below 1MW, the procedure shall not exceed 9 months.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 820 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Member States shall aim to boost quality job creation in the sector. To this end, Member States shall develop together with the social partners, a global strategy for training and skills development in the sector of renewable energy with the objective of supporting quality job creation in the sector.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 835 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States may require that transfers of guarantees of origin reflect an exchange of physical energy transfers.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 852 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
The guarantee of origin shall have no function in terms of a Member State’s compliance with Article 3. Transfers of guarantees of origin, separately or together with the physical transfer of energy, shall have no effect on the decision of Member States to use statistical transfers, joint projects or joint support schemes for target compliance or on the calculation of the gross final consumption of energy from renewable sources in accordance with Article 7.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 872 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 8
8. Where an electricity supplier is required to prove the share or quantity of energy from renewable sources in its energy mix for the purposes of Article 3 of Directive 2009/72/EC, it shallmay do so by using guarantees of origin. Likewise, guarantees of origin created pursuant to Article 14(10) of Directive 2012/27/EC shallmay be used to substantiate any requirement to prove the quantity of electricity produced from high-efficiency cogeneration. Member States shall ensure that transmission losses are fully taken into account when guarantees of origin are used to demonstrate consumption of renewable energy or electricity from high efficiency cogeneration.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 878 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 13
13. Where energy suppliers market energy from renewable sources or high- efficiency cogeneration to customers with a reference to environmental or other benefits of energy from renewable sources or from high-efficiency cogeneration , Member States shallmay require those energy suppliers to use guarantees of origin to disclose the amount or share of energy from renewable sources or from high efficiency cogeneration
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 880 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 14
14. Member States shall assess and report every two years on the functioning of their Guarantee of Origin schemes. These reports shall be made public, and shall include an independent assessment of their contribution to the development of renewable energy consumption. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 32 establishing the rules to monitor the functioning of the system set out in this Article.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 890 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Member States shall take the appropriate steps to develop transmission and distribution grid infrastructure, intelligent networks, storage facilities and the electricity system, in order to allow the secure operation of the electricity system as it accommodates the further development of electricity production from renewable energy sources, including interconnection between Member States and between Member States and third countries. Member States shall also take appropriate steps to accelerate authorisation procedures for grid infrastructure and to coordinate approval of grid infrastructure with administrative and planning procedures. Or. en (See wording of Article 16 (1) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 891 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Subject to requirements relating to the maintenance of the reliability and safety of the grid, based on transparent and non-discriminatory criteria defined by the competent national authorities: (a) Member States shall ensure that transmission system operators and distribution system operators in their territory guarantee the transmission and distribution of electricity produced from renewable energy sources; (b) Member States shall also provide for either priority access or guaranteed access to the grid-system of electricity produced from renewable energy sources; (c) Member States shall ensure that when dispatching electricity generating installations, transmission system operators shall give priority to generating installations using renewable energy sources in so far as the secure operation of the national electricity system permits and based on transparent and non- discriminatory criteria. Member States shall ensure that appropriate grid and market-related operational measures are taken in order to minimise the curtailment of electricity produced from renewable energy sources. If significant measures are taken to curtail the renewable energy sources in order to guarantee the security of the national electricity system and security of energy supply, Members States shall ensure that the responsible system operators report to the competent regulatory authority on those measures and indicate which corrective measures they intend to take in order to prevent inappropriate curtailments. Or. en (See wording of art 16(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 892 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 b (new)
-1b. Member States shall require transmission system operators and distribution system operators to set up and make public their standard rules relating to the bearing and sharing of costs of technical adaptations, such as grid connections and grid reinforcements, improved operation of the grid and rules on the non-discriminatory implementation of the grid codes, which are necessary in order to integrate new producers feeding electricity produced from renewable energy sources into the interconnected grid. Those rules shall be based on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria taking particular account of all the costs and benefits associated with the connection of those producers to the grid and of the particular circumstances of producers located in peripheral regions and in regions of low population density. Those rules may provide for different types of connection. Or. en (See wording Article 16(3) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 893 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 c (new)
-1c. Where appropriate, Member States may require transmission system operators and distribution system operators to bear, in full or in part, the costs referred to in paragraph 3. Member States shall review and take the necessary measures to improve the frameworks and rules for the bearing and sharing of costs referred to in paragraph 3 by 30 June 2011 and every two years thereafter to ensure the integration of new producers as referred to in that paragraph. Or. en (See Article 16(4) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 894 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 d (new)
-1d. Member States shall require transmission system operators and distribution system operators to provide any new producer of energy from renewable sources wishing to be connected to the system with the comprehensive and necessary information required, including: (a) a comprehensive and detailed estimate of the costs associated with the connection; (b) a reasonable and precise timetable for receiving and processing the request for grid connection; (c) a reasonable indicative timetable for any proposed grid connection. Member States may allow producers of electricity from renewable energy sources wishing to be connected to the grid to issue a call for tender for the connection work. Or. en (See wording of Article 16 (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 895 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 e (new)
-1e. The sharing of costs referred in paragraph 3 shall be enforced by a mechanism based on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria taking into account the benefits which initially and subsequently connected producers as well as transmission system operators and distribution system operators derive from the connections. Or. en (See wording of Article 16(6) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 896 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 f (new)
-1f. Member States shall ensure that the charging of transmission and distribution tariffs does not discriminate against electricity from renewable energy sources, including in particular electricity from renewable energy sources produced in peripheral regions, such as island regions, and in regions of low population density. Member States shall ensure that the charging of transmission and distribution tariffs does not discriminate against gas from renewable energy sources. Or. en (See wording of Article 16(7) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 897 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph -1 g (new)
-1g. Member States shall ensure that tariffs charged by transmission system operators and distribution system operators for the transmission and distribution of electricity from plants using renewable energy sources reflect realisable cost benefits resulting from the plant's connection to the network. Such cost benefits could arise from the direct use of the low-voltage grid. Or. en (See wording of Article 16 (8) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 904 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Subject to their assessment included in the integrated national energy and climate plans in accordance with Annex I of Regulation [Governance],Member States in their national renewable energy action plans shall assess the necessity to build new infrastructure for district heating and cooling produced from renewable energy sources in order to achieve the 2030 national target referred to in Article 3(1). Subject to their assessment on the necessity to build new infrastructure for district heating and cooling produced from renewable energy sources in order to achieve the Union target referred to in Article 3(1) of this Directive, Member States shall, where relevant, take steps with a view to developing a district heating infrastructure to accommodate the development of heating and cooling production from large biomass, solar and geothermal facilities.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 914 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Member States shall take into account the specificities of energy grid from small- scale installations, renewable self- consumers and energy communities, in order to facilitate their access to the grid.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 925 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) are entitled to carry out self- consumption and sell, without penalizing charges, fees or taxes, including through power purchase agreements, their excess production of renewable electricity without being subject to disproportionate procedures and charges that are not cost- reflective;
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 940 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) are not considered as energy suppliers according to Union or national legislation in relation to the renewable electricity they feed into the grid not exceeding 10 MWh for households and 500 MWh for legal persons on an annual basis. In the case these legal persons are renewable energy communities or public bodies, including municipalities or entities directly or indirectly controlled by municipalities, the annual limit shall be calculated as the sum of the individual limit of all households of the municipality; and
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 964 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that renewable self-consumers living in the same multi-apartment block, or located in the same commercial, industrial or shared services, site or closed distribution system, are allowed to jointly engage in self- consumption as if they were an individual renewable self-consumer. In this case, the threshold set out in paragraph 1(c) shall apply to each renewable self-consumer concerned.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 971 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. The renewable self-consumer's installation may be managed by a third party for installation, operation, including metering, and maintenance. The self- generated electricity flowing through the cables of common areas of blocks and sites shall be considered as self-consumed electricity.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 978 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall not hinder final customers from becoming renewable self-consumers, by introducing, inter alia, cumulative or single-installation volume or capacity caps, burdensome and disproportionate procedures, charges, contractual arrangements and technical rules
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 988 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
For the purposes of this Directive, a renewable energy community shall be an SME, a public entity or public company or a not-for-profit organisation, the shareholders or members of which cooperate in the generation, distribution, storage or supply of energy from renewable sources, fulfilling at least four out of the following criteria:
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1000 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) at least 51% of the shareholders or members with voting rights of the entity are natural persons or public bodies;
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1094 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Member States shall support the development of actions and programs to tackle energy poverty in this sector. Supporting measures in this sense shall have adequate funding from Member States and from EU funds in order to guarantee access to energy as a basic social right.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1095 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Member States shall develop renewable heating and cooling solutions, in a cost-effective manner, in new public buildings and while renewing old public buildings. Prioritizing public building with vulnerable population, such as schools, hospitals, elder houses, etc.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1153 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Member States shall integrate district heating and cooling in public buildings, supporting financially the development of the adequate investments to make it possible, and maximizing the contribution of public systems to district heating and cooling. Member States shall develop, in full cooperation with the relevant stakeholders, a strategy for the identification of the needs and priorities in this area.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1154 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Member States shall ensure that regional and local authorities, when developing urban planning strategies and plans, integrate sustainable heating and cooling solutions in their approach. Actions as regards of, inter alia, urban tree planning or urban waste management, need to take into account the possibilities of sustainable district heating and cooling. These plans and strategies shall be developed, in full collaboration with relevant stakeholders.
2017/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1180 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum share shall be at least equal to 1.50% in 2021, increasing up to at least 6.85.0% in 2030, following the trajectory set out in part B of Annex X. Within this total share, the contribution of advanced biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock listed in part A of Annex IX shall be at least 0.5% of the transport fuels supplied for consumption or use on the market as of 1 January 2021, increasing up to at least 3.62.3% by 2030, following the trajectory set out in part C of Annex X.
2017/07/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1207 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b – paragraph 2
For the calculation of the numerator, the contribution from biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock included in part B of Annex IX shall be limited to 1.7% of the energy content of transport fuels supplied for consumption or use on the market and the contribution of fuels supplied in the aviation and maritime sector shall be considered to be 1.2 times their energy content.
2017/07/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1267 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 a (new)
(See wording of Article 22 ofArticle 29 a Reporting by the Member States 1. Each Member State shall submit a report to the Commission on progress in the promotion and use of energy from renewable sources by 31 December 2021, and every two years thereafter. The sixth report, to be submitted by 31 December 2031, shall be the last report required. These reports shall be elaborated in consultation with the social partners and relevant civil society stakeholders. The report shall detail, in particular: (a) the sectoral (electricity, heating and cooling, and transport) and overall shares of energy from renewable sources in the preceding two calendar years and the measures taken or planned at national level to promote the growth of energy from renewable sources taking into account the indicative trajectory in part B of Annex I, in accordance with Article 5; (b) the introduction and functioning of support schemes and other measures to promote energy from renewable sources, and any developments in the measures used with respect to those set out in the Member State's national renewable energy action plan, and information on how supported electricity is allocated to final customers for the purposes of Article 3(6) of Directive 2003/54/EC; (c) how, where applicable, the Member State has structured its support schemes to take into account renewable energy applications that give additional benefits in relation to other comparable applications, but may also have higher costs, including biofuels made from wastes, residues, non-food cellulosic material, and ligno-cellulosic material; (d) the functioning of the system of guarantees of origin for electricity and heating and cooling from renewable energy sources and the measures taken to ensure the reliability and protection against fraud of the system; (e) progress made in evaluating and improving administrative procedures to remove regulatory and non-regulatory barriers to the development of energy from renewable sources; (f) measures taken to ensure the transmission and distribution of electricity produced from renewable energy sources, and to improve the framework or rules for bearing and sharing of costs referred to in Article 16(3); (g) developments in the availability and use of biomass resources for energy purposes; (h) changes in commodity prices and land use within the Member State associated with its increased use of biomass and other forms of energy from renewable sources; (i) the development and share of biofuels made from feedstocks listed in Annex IX including a resource assessment focusing on the sustainability aspects relating to the effect of the replacement of food and feed products for biofuel production, taking due account of the principles of the waste hierarchy established in Directive 2009/28/98/EC and wording of Article 2(9)a of Directivethe biomass cascading principle, taking into consideration the regional and local economic and technological circumstances, the maintenance of the necessary carbon stock in the soil and the quality of the soil and the ecosystems; (j) the estimated impact of the production of biofuels and bioliquids on biodiversity, water resources, water quality and soil quality within the Member State; (k) the estimated net greenhouse gas emission saving due to the use of energy from renewable sources; (l) the estimated excess production of energy from renewable sources compared to the indicative trajectory which could be transferred to other Member States, as well as the estimated potential for joint projects, until 2020; (m) the estimated demand for energy from renewable sources to be satisfied by means other than domestic production until 2020; (n) information on how the share of biodegradable waste in waste used for producing energy has been estimated, and what steps have been taken to improve and verify such estimates; and (o) the amounts of biofuels and bioliquids in energy units corresponding to each category of feedstock group listed in part A of Annex VIII taken into account by that Member State for the purpose of complying with the targets set out in Article 3(1) and (2), and in the first subparagraph of Article 3(4). (p) the effects and challenges of the transition towards the renewable energy targets on labour conditions in the energy sector, along with proposed actions to ensure the development of renewable energy contributes to decent job creation; 2. In estimating net greenhouse gas emission saving from the use of biofuels, the Member State may, for the purpose of the reports referred to in paragraph 1, use the typical values given in part A and part B of Annex V. 3. In its first report, the Member State shall outline whether it intends to: (a) establish a single administrative body responsible for processing authorisation, certification and licensing applications for renewable energy installations and providing assistance to applicants; (b) provide for automatic approval of planning and permit applications for renewable energy installations where the authorising body has not responded within the set time limits; or (c) indicate geographical locations suitable for exploitation of energy from renewable sources in land-use planning and for the establishment of district heating and cooling. 4. In each report the Member State may correct the data of the previous reports. Or. en 2015/1513 for letter (i) and Art 2(9)b of the same directive for letter (o).)
2017/07/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1270 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(See wording of3a. In its reports, the Commission shall, in particular, analyse: (a) the relative environmental benefits and costs of different biofuels, the effects of the Community's import policies thereon, the security of supply implications and the ways of achieving a balanced approach between domestic production and imports; (b) the impact of increased demand for biofuel on sustainability in the Community and in third countries, considering economic and environmental impacts, including impacts on biodiversity; (c) the scope for identifying, in a scientifically objective manner, geographical areas of high biodiversity value that are not covered in Article 3017(3); (5d) of Directive 2009/28/CE and Article 2(10)c of Directivethe impact of increased demand for biomass on biomass using sectors; (e) the availability and sustainability of biofuels made from feedstocks listed in Annex IX, including an assessment of the effect of the replacement of food and feed products for biofuel production, taking due account of the principles of the waste hierarchy established in Directive 2008/98/EC and the biomass cascading principle, taking into consideration the regional and local economic and technological circumstances, the maintenance of the necessary carbon stock in the soil and the quality of soil and ecosystems; (f) information on, and analysis of, the available scientific research results regarding indirect land-use change in relation to all production pathways, accompanied by an assessment of whether the range of uncertainty identified in the analysis underlying the estimations of indirect land-use change emissions can be narrowed and the possible impact of Union policies, such as environment, climate and agricultural policies, can be factored in; and (g) technological developments and availability of data on the use, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels and bioliquids produced in the Union from dedicated non-food crops grown primarily for energy purposes. Or. en 2015/1513 for letters (e), (f) and (g).)
2017/07/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 62 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) The Union is committed to a sustainable, competitive, secure and decarbonised energy system. The Energy Union and the Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030 should establish ambitious Union commitmen, binding Union targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions further (by at least 40 % by 2030, as compared with 1990), to increase the proportion of renewable energy consumed (by at least 2730 %) and to make energy savings of at least 27 %, reviewing this level having in mind an Union level of 30 %10 40 %, and to improve Europe’s energy security, competitiveness and sustainability. __________________ 10 EUCO 169/14, CO EUR 13, CONCL 5, Brussels 24 October 2014.
2017/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 98 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The deep renovation of the existing building stock must create new quality jobs in the Union, in particular in small and medium-sized enterprises. In that context, it is necessary for Members States to provide a clear link between their national long-term renovation strategies and adequate initiatives to promote skills and education in the construction and energy efficiency sectors including initiatives to facilitate compliance with relevant health and safety legislation such as directive 148/2009/EC with a focus on the needs of micro enterprises.
2017/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 162 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) To ensure their best use in building renovation, public financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of the renovation, which should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovation and promote holistic building renovations as the best way of ensuring high energy performance and a healthy indoor climate.
2017/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 218 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 – point 3 a (new)
(1a) in Article 2, the following point is added: ‘3a. ‘energy poverty’ means a household’s inability to afford the necessary domestic energy services so that basic human standard levels of comfort and health can be guaranteed, as such costs represent a significant proportion of the disposable income;’
2017/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 255 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 1
(a) the firstollowing paragraph consists of Article 4 of the Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency16 , other than its last subparagraph; __________________ 16is inserted:; ‘1. Member States shall establish a long-term strategy for mobilising investment in the renovation of the national stock of residential and commercial buildings, both public and private. This strategy shall encompass: (a) an overview of the national building stock based, as appropriate, on statistical sampling; (b) identification of cost-effective approaches to renovations relevant to the building type and climatic zone; (c) policies and actions to stimulate cost-effective deep renovations of buildings, including staged deep renovations including the simultaneous removal of asbestos and other harmful substances (d) a forward-looking perspective to guide investment decisions of individuals, the construction industry and financial institutions; (e) an evidence-based estimate of expected energy savings and wider benefits.’ OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 13
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 264 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
‘2. In their long-term renovation strategy referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall set out a roadmap with clear milestones and measures to deliver on the long-term 2050 goal to decarbonise their national building stock, with specific milestones for 2030 and 2040 and on the pollutant emission objectives set in the Directive (EU) 2016/2284 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, while achieving affordability for the tenants and owners of the buildings.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 285 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 2– subparagraph 2
In addition,Part of the long term renovation strategy shall contribube dedicated to the alleviation offight against energy poverty through concrete measures.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 299 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the use of public funding to leverage additional private-sector investment or address specific market failuresfight energy poverty.;
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 308 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 3 a (new)
(ba) the following paragraph is added: ‘3a. To guide the further development of energy efficiency renovation, Member States shall introduce mechanisms for: (a) prioritising the allocation of part of the European Social Fund to the upskilling of workers in energy efficiency; (b) the support of new forms of training and qualification or structural improvements in existing ones; (c) strengthening informal training schemes and ensure they are equally important as formal qualification requirements; (d) facilitating the aggregation of SMEs in groups and consortia to enable them to offer packaged solutions to potential clients;’
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 337 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 7 – subparagraph 5
(4) in Article 7, the fifth subparagraph is deleted;replaced by the following; ‘Member States shall ensure that energy performance upgrades also contribute to achieving a healthy indoor environment including the removal of asbestos and other harmful substances.’
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 373 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that newly built residential buildings and those undergoing major renovations, with more than ten parking spac, with parking spaces in the building's plot, include empty pipes to enable the installation of recharging points for electric vehicles. The number is to be defined by the member states, include the pre- cabling to enabl accordance with the building types, for example social housing. Member States shall ensure theat installation of recharging points for electric vehicles for every parking space residential buildings undergoing major renovations, including the electricity system, conditions are created such that, at the request of a tenant, charging sockets may be provided at the parking space of the building's plot. All charging sockets should only be normal charging points.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 411 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that, when a technical building system is installed, replaced or upgraded, the overall energy performance of the complete alteredenergy efficiency of the altered parts of the system isare assessed, documented it and passed on to the building owner, so that it remains available for the verification of compliance with the minimum requirements set pursuant to paragraph 1 and the issue of energy performance certificates. Member States shall ensure that this information is included in the national energy performance certificate database referred to in Article 18(3). Where changes to a technical building system affect the energy performance of a building or building unit, energy performance certificates have to be updated by the owner or landlord of the building. Energy performance certificates have to be updated at the latest before the building or building unit is to be sold or rented out. The installer of the technical building system has to ensure that changes to the energy performance certificate are entered into the national database for energy performance certificates. This provision applies regardless of the size of a building.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 434 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 supplementing this Directive with a definition of a voluntary ‘smartness indicator’ and with the conditions under which the voluntary ‘smartness indicator’ would be providtested as additional information to prospective new tenants or buyers.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 440 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
The voluntary smartness indicator shall cover flexibility features, enhanced functionalities and capabilities resulting from more interconnected and built-in intelligent devices being integrated into the conventional technical building systems. The features shall be tested to assess whether they enhance the ability of occupants and the building itself to react to comfort or operational requirements, take part in demand response and contribute to the optimum, smooth and safe operation of the various energy systems and district infrastructures to which the building is connected.; The cost effectiveness and real added-value of such an indicator shall be assessed.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 459 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 6
‘6. Member States shall link their financial measures for energy efficiency improvements in the renovation of buildings to the energy savings to be achieved due to such renovation. These savings shall be determined by comparing energy performance certificates issued before and after renovation.’;
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 473 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 6a a (new)
6aa. Member States shall set up financial schemes that will incentivise energy efficiency improvements for instance by adapting the financial support for the building renovation to the achieved energy performance.’
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 477 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10– paragraph 6b a (new)
6ba. Member States shall ensure financial measures are available also for small-scale renovations, with a particular emphasis in rural and remote areas, as well as in energy-poor households.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 481 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 6b b (new)
(6bb) Energy performance certificates used for the purposes stated in Article 12, must accurately reflect the current energy performance of the property, incorporating the current form of the property, and current energy prices as specified by the relevant methodology.
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 580 #

2016/0381(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall in particular provide information to the owners or tenants of buildings on energy performance certificates, their purpose and objectives, on cost-effective ways to improve the energy performance of the building and, where appropriate, on financial instruments available to improve the energy performance of the building.; The Member States shall create a "one- stop-shop" where the owners or tenants obtain all the relevant information.;
2017/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 223 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 c (new)
energy poverty means a household's inability to afford the necessary domestic energy services which guarantee decent human standard levels of comfort and health, as such costs represent a significant proportion of disposable income.
2017/09/28
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 257 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure the protection of energy poor or vulnerable customers in a targeted manner by other means than public interventions in the price-setting for the supply of electricitydomestic households and ensure right of equal access and affordable services.
2017/09/28
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 271 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States whichmay apply public interventions in price setting for the supply of electricity for energy poor or vulnerable household customers at the [OP: please insert the date of entry into force of this Directive] may continue to apply such public interventions until [OP: insert the date – five years from the entry into force of this Directive]domestic households in order to ensure affordability. Such public interventions shall pursue a general econompublic interest, be clearly defined, transparent, non- discriminatory, verifiable and guarantee equal access for Union electricity companies to customers. The interventions shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the general economic interest which they pursue, be limited in time and proportionate as regards their beneficiaries.
2017/09/28
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 283 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
After[OP – insert the date – five years from the entry into force of this Directive], Member States may still apply public interventions in the price-setting for the supply of electricity for vulnerable household customers in so far as it is strictly necessary for reasons of extreme urgency. Such interventions shall comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 3.deleted
2017/09/28
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 296 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall notify the measures taken in accordance with the first subparagraphof public intervention in price setting to the Commission within one month after adoption and may apply them immediately. The notification shall be accompanied by an explanation why other instruments could not sufficiently address the situation and how the beneficiaries and the duration of the measure have been determined. The notification shall be considered as complete if, within two months from its receipt, or from the receipt of any additional information requested, the Commission does not request any further information.
2017/09/28
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 879 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. . Member States shall take appropriate measures to protect customers and shall, in particular, ensure that there are adequate safeguards to protect vulnerable customers. In this context, each Member State shall define the concept of vulnerable customers which mayshall refer to energy poverty and, inter alia, to the prohibition of disconnection of electricity to such customers in critical times. Member States shall ensure thata free provision of a basic minimum quantity of electricity to vulnerable customers and guarantee that all other rights and obligations linked to vulnerablthese customers are applied. In particular, they shall take all necessary measures to protect customers in remote areas. They shall ensure high levels of consumer protection, particularly with respect to transparency regarding contractual terms and conditions, general information and, dispute settlement mechanisms and data protection.
2017/09/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 886 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall organize an independent ombudsman service for energy, where it not already exists, to mediate conflicts between the consumer and the supplier.
2017/09/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 892 #

2016/0380(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1
Member States shall define a set of criteriain close collaboration with the Energy Poverty Observatory define a set of common criteria and indicators for the purposes of measuring energy poverty. Member States shall continuously monitor the number of households in energy poverty and shall report through a national action plan on the evolution of energy poverty and measures taken to prevent it to the Commission every two years as part of their Integrated National Energy and Climate Progress Reports in accordance with Article 21 of [Governance Regulation as proposed by COM(2016)759].
2017/09/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 239 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15a Decision-making The Agency shall adopt and publish adequate and proportionate rules of procedure for all Agency tasks under Chapter I. For all Agency decisions, the rules of procedure shall ensure a transparent and reasonable decision- making process guaranteeing fundamental procedural rights based on the rule of law, in particular the right to be heard, the right to access file and the duty to give reasons. For all other Agency tasks under Chapter I, the rules of procedure shall at least ensure that fundamental procedural rights are guaranteed.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 249 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Agency may establish local offices in the Member States, subject to their consent and in accordance with Article 25(j).deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 258 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The Administrative Board shall elect by a two-thirds majorityappoint its Chairman and its Vice- Chairman from among its members, striving for a balanced geographical representation of Member States over time. The Vice-Chairman shall automatically replace the Chairman if the latter is not in a position to perform his duties. The term of office of the Chairman and of the Vice-Chairman shall be two years, renewable once. The term of office of the Chairman and that of the Vice- Chairman shall expire when they cease to be members of the Administrative Board.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 274 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. Decisions of the Administrative Board shall be adopted on the basis of a simpletwo- thirds majority of the members present, unless provided otherwise in this Regulation. Each member of the Administrative Board or alternate shall have one vote.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 281 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 8
8. The members of the Administrative Board shall undertake to act independently and objectively in the public interest without seeking or following any political instructions. For that purpose, each member shall make a written declaration of commitments and a written declaration of interests indicating either the absence of any interest which may be considered prejudicial to his independence or any direct or indirect interest which might be considered prejudicial to his independence. Those declarations shall be made public annually.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 303 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. The annual work programme shall comprise detailed objectives and expected results including performance indicators. It shall also contain a description of the actions to be financed and an indication of the financial and human resources allocated to each action, in accordance with the principles of activity-based budgeting and management. The annual work programme shall be coherent with the multi-annual work programme referred to in paragraph 4. It shall clearly indicate tasks that have been added, changed or deleted in comparison with the previous financial year. Annual and multi- annual programming shall include the strategy for relations with third countries or international organisations referred to in Article 43 and the actions linked to that strategy.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 315 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The Board of Regulators and sub- committees pursuant to Article 7 shall act by a simpletwo-thirds majority of the members present, with one vote for each member, except for the opinion pursuant to paragraph 5(b) which shall be taken on the basis of a two-thirds majority of its members present.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 332 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) provide opinions to the Director on theall documents containing opinions, recommendations and decisions referred to in Articles 4 to 14, 16, 30, which are considered for adoption. In addition, tThe Board of Regulators, within its field of competence, shall provide guidance to the Director in the execution of his tasks, with the exception of decisions pursuant to Article 16(6) of Regulation 1227/200138. __________________ 38 Regulation (EU) 1227/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency, OJ L 326, 8.12.2011, p. 1 may amend the opinions, recommendations and decisions drafted by the Director pursuant to Article 25. In addition, the Board of Regulators, within its field of competence, shall provide guidance to the Director and the Agency working groups in the execution of their tasks.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 364 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) be responsible for deciding whether it is necessary for the purpose of carrying out the Agency's tasks in an efficient and effective manner to locate one or more staff in one or more Member States for the purpose of carrying out the Agency's tasks in an efficient and effective manner. The decision to establish a local office requires the prior consent of the Commission, the Administrative Board and the Member State or Member States concerned. The decision shall specify the scope of the activities to be carried out at that local office in a manner that avoids unnecessary costs and duplication of administrative functions of the Agency.deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 409 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2
2. Under the relevant provisions of those agreements, arrangements shall be made specifying, in particular, the nature, a performance assessment and a sunset clause, scope and procedural aspects of the involvement of those countries in the work of the Agency, including provisions relating to financial contributions and to staff. Third countries participating in the Agency shall respect the sovereignty and sovereign rights of all Member States.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 410 #

2016/0379(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 3
3. The Administrative Board shall adopt a strategy for relations with third countries or international organisations for which the Agency is competent. The Commission shall ensure that the Agency operates within its mandate and the existing institutional framework by concluding an appropriate working arrangement with the Agency's Director.deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Despite significant progress in integrating and interconnecting the internal electricity market, some Member States or regions still remain isolated or not sufficiently interconnected. This is particularly the case for insular Member States or Member States located in the periphery. The Agency in its work should appropriately take account of the specific situation of these Member States or regions.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 55 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Since the stepwise harmonisation of the Union energy markets involves finding regional solutions regularly as an interim step, it is appropriate to reflect the regional dimension of the internal market and to provide for appropriate governance mechanisms. Regulators responsible for coordinated regional approvals should be able to prepare Board of Regulators decisions on issues of regional relevance in a regional subcommittee of the Board of Regulators, unless those issues are of general importance for the Union.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The Agency should have the necessary powers to perform its regulatory functions in an efficient, transparent, reasoned and, above all, independent manner. The independence of the Agency from electricity and gas producers and transmission and distribution system operators is not only a key principle of good governance but also a fundamental condition to ensure market confidence. Without prejudice to its members’ acting on behalf of their respective national authorities, the Board of Regulators should therefore act independently from any market interest, should avoid conflicts of interests and should not seek or follow instructions or accept recommendations from a government of a Member State, from Union institutions or another public or private entity or person. The decisions of the Board of Regulators should, at the same time, comply with Union law concerning energy, such as the internal energy market, the environment and competition. The Board of Regulators should report its opinions, recommendations and decisions to the Union institutions.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Through the cooperation of national regulators within the Agency it is evident that majority decisions are a key pre- requisite to achieve progress on matters concerning the internal energy market which have significant economic effects in various Member States. National regulators should therefore vote with simplecontinue to vote with two- third majority within the Board of Regulators. The Agency should be accountable to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Countries which are not members of the Union should be able to participate in the work of the Agency in accordance with appropriate agreements to be concluded by the Union and after the approval of the Member States.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 83 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The Agency’s host Member State should provide the best possible conditions to ensure the smooth and efficient functioning of the Agency, including multilingual, European- oriented schooling and appropriate transport connections.deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 135 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. In cases where the network codes and guidelines developed pursuant to Chapter VII of [recast Electricity Regulation as proposed by COM(2016) 861/2] provide for the development of proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies for the implementation of those network codes and guidelines which require regulatory approval by all regulatory authorities or by all regulators of the concerned region, the terms and conditions or methodologies shall be submitted for revision and approval to the Agency. Before approving the terms and conditions or methodologies, the Agency shall revise and change them where necessary in order to ensure that they are in line with the purpose of the network code or guideline and contribute to market integration, non-discrimination and the efficient functioning of the market for the benefit of the people. The procedure for the coordination of regional tasks in accordance with Article 7 shall apply.
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 139 #

2016/0378(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. In the context of the bidding zone review, the Agency shall approve and may request amendments to the methodology and assumptions that will be used in the bidding zone review process pursuant to Article 13 paragraph 3 of [recast Electricity Regulation as proposed by COM(2016) 861/2].deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 27 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The electricity sector in the Union is undergoing a profound transformation, characterised by more decentralised markets with more players, better interlinked systems and a higher proportion of renewable energy. In response, Directive xxx/ Regulation xxx [Reference to the proposed Electricity Directive and Electricity Regulation] aim to upgrade the legal framework governing the Union's internal electricity market, so as to ensure that markets and networks function in an optimal manner, to the benefit of businesses and consumerEU citizens.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 66 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) This Regulation should enable electricity undertakings and customers to rely on market mechanisms as laid down in [proposed Electricity Directive and Electricity Regulation] for as long as possible when coping with electricity crisis situations. Rules governing the internal market and system operation rules shcould be resuspected evennded in crisis situations. This means that non-market measures, such as forced demand disconnection, or the provision of extra supplies outside normal market functioning should be taken only as a last resort, when all possibilities offered by the market have been exhaustedwhen the continuation of market activities could lead to the further deterioration of a crisis situation. Therefore forced demand disconnection can be introduced only after all possibilities for voluntary demand disconnection have been exhausted. In addition, any non-market measures should be necessary, proportionate, non- discriminatory and temporary.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 75 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down rules for the cooperation between Member States in view of preventing, preparing for and handling electricity crises in a spirit of solidarity and transparency and in full regard for the requirements of a competitive internal market for electricity.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 88 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall notify the Commission without delay of the name and the contact details of the competent authority, once designated and make it public.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 98 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. By [OPOCE to insert exact date: two months after entry into force of this Regulation], ENTSO-E shall submit to the Agency a proposal forthe Agency shall establish a methodology for identifying the most relevant electricity crisis scenarios in a regional context.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 112 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. Within two months of receiving the proposed methodology, the Agency shall either approve the proposal or amend it. In the latter case, it shall consult ENTSO- E before adopting the amended version and publish it on its website.deleted
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 153 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Within two months of receiving the proposed methodology, the Agency shall either approve the proposal or amend it. In the latter case, it shall consult ENTSO- E before adopting the amended version and publish it on its website.deleted
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 164 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. On the basis of the regional and national electricity crisis scenarios identified pursuant to Articles 6 and 7, the competent authority of each Member State shall establish a risk-preparedness plan, after consulting the electricity and gas undertakings, the relevant environmental organisations, trade-unions, organisations representing the interests of household and industrial electricity customers and the national regulatory authority (where it is not the competent authority).
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. The Member States shall make the plans publicensure that all relevant information is made public and easily accessible, while ensuring that the confidentiality of sensitive information is preserved, notably information on measures relating to the prevention and mitigation of malicious attacks.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 182 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) identify possiblethe contribution of non- market measures to be implemented in electricity crisis situations, specifying the trigger, conditions and procedures for their implementation, and indicating how they comply with the requirements set out in Article 15;
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 184 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) provide a detailed load shedding plan, stipulating when loads are to be shed, in what circumstances and what values of load are to be shed. The plan shall specify which categories of electricity users are to receive special protection against disconnection, and justify the need for such protection, notably with regard to public safety and, personal security and the continuity of essential public services;
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 187 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) Take into account the environmental impacts of the defined measures;
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 188 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. As far as possible, priority should be given to measures based on renewable energy sources.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 205 #

2016/0377(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. Where necessary and possible Member States shall offer each other assistance to prevent or mitigate an electricity crisis. Such assistance shall be subject to fair compensation, taking into account the financial capacities of the Member States.
2017/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 87 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Moderation of energy demand is one of the five dimensions of the Energy Union Strategy adopted on 25 February 2015. Improving energy efficiencyImproving energy efficiency for environmental and social purposes will benefit the environment, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy security by reducing dependence on energy imports from outside the Union, cut energy costs for households and companies, help alleviate energy poverty and lead to increased jobs and economy-wide economic activity. This is in line with the Union commitments made in the framework of the Energy Union and global climate agenda established by the Paris Agreement of December 2015 by the Parties of the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change to keep a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre- industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 101 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) With the objective of achieving the ambitious energy efficiency target, financial barriers should be removed. Therefore, public investments in energy efficiency shall not be considered as public deficit as established by the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 119 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) There are no binding targets at national level in the 2030 perspective. The need for the Union to achieve its energy efficiency targets at EU level, expressed in primary and final energy consumption, in 2020 and 2030 should be clearly set out in the form of a binding 340 % target. This clarification at Union level should not restrict Member States as their freedom is kept to set their national contributions based on either primary or final energy consumption, primary or final energy savings, or energy intensity. Member States should set their national indicative Member States should set their national binding energy efficiency contributiontargets taking into account that the Union’s 2030 energy consumption has to be no more than 1 1321 Mtoe of primary energy and no more than 987846 Mtoe of final energy. This means that primary energy consumption should be reduced by 234 % and final energy consumption should be reduced by 1729 % in the Union compared to 2005 levels. A regular evaluation of progress towards the achievement of the Union 2030 target is necessary and is provided for in the legislative proposal on Energy Union Governance.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 149 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) In view of the climate goals of the Paris Agreement and the climate and energy framework for 2030 the energy savings obligation should be extended beyond 2020. Extending the commitment period beyond 2020 or even beyond 2030 would create greater stability for investors and thus encourage long term investments and long term energy efficiency measures, such as the renovation of buildings.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 192 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) I125 million Europeans are affected by energy poverty, therefore improvements to the energy efficiency of buildings should benefit in particularas a priority consumers affected by energy poverty. Member States can already require obligated parties to include social aims in energy saving measures, in relation to energy poverty, and this possibility should now be extended to alternative measures and transformed into an obligation while leaving full flexibility to Member States with regard to the size, scope and content of such measures. In line with Article 9 of the Treaty, the Union's energy efficiency policies should be inclusive and therefore also ensure accessibility of energy efficiency measures for energy poorlow-income consumers.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 209 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Energy generated on or in buildings from renewable energy technologies reduces the supplied fossil energy. The reduction of energy consumption and the use of energy from renewable sources in the buildings sector are importantkey measures to reduce the Union’s energy dependency and greenhouse gas emissions, especially in view of ambitious climate and energy objectives set for 2030 as well as the global commitment made in the Conference of the Parties of the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) held in Paris in December 2015. Support for renewable energy generated on or in buildings for own use should be complementary and additional to Members States should therefore' energy savings requirements under Article 7. Therefore, Member States should not be able to take into account a certain amount of renewable energy generated on or in buildings for own use into account to satisfy their energy savings requirements. For this purpose Member States should be allowed to use calculation methodologies established under Directive 2010/31/EU.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 241 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In order to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of Directive 2012/27/EU, a requirement for a general review of the Directive and a report to the European Parliament and the Council by 28 February 20242 should be introduced.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 252 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. This Directive establishes a common framework of measures to promote energy efficiency within the Union, in accordance with the 'energy efficiency first' principle, in order to ensure that the Union’s 2020 20 % headline targets and its 2030 340 % binding headline targets on energy efficiency are met and paves the way for further energy efficiency improvements beyond those dates, in line with the climate commitments made under the Paris Agreement and Union's long term energy and climate targets for 2050. It lays down rules designed to remove barriers in the energy market and overcome market failures that impede efficiency in the supply and use of energy, and provides for the establishment of bindicativeng national energy efficiency targets and contributions for 2020 and 2030.;
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 333 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall set bindicativeng national energy efficiency contributionstargets expressed in terms of an absolute level of primary energy consumption and final energy consumption, towards the Union's 2030 target referred to in Article 1 paragraph 1 in accordance with Articles [4] and [6] of Regulation (EU) XX/20XX [Governance of the Energy Union]. When setting those contributions, Member States shall take into account that the Union’s 2030 energy consumption has to be no more than 1 1321 Mtoe of primary energy and no more than 987846 Mtoe of final energy. Member States shall notify those contributiontargets to the Commission as part of their integrated national energy and climate plans in accordance with the procedure pursuant to Articles [3] and [7] to [11] of Regulation (EU) XX/20XX [Governance of the Energy Union].;
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 342 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall evaluate whether the sum of the national targets submitted by the Member States are in line with the 2030 primary and final energy consumption targets at the EU level. In case the sum does not meet with the objectives, the Commission and the Member States shall take additional measures to secure the compliance of the Union's 2030 energy efficiency targets as set in Article 1.
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 365 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) new savingsand additional savings, cumulative to savings achieved under point (a), each year from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2030 of 1.5 % of annual energy sales to final customers by volume, averaged over the most recent three-year period prior to 1 January 2019.
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 394 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall continue to achieve new annual savings ofeach year of at least 1.5% for ten year periods after 2030, unless reviews by the Commission by 2027 and every 10 years thereafter conclude that this is not necessary to achieve the Union's long term energy and climate targets for 2050in line with the Union's long term energy and climate targets for 2050. Members States shall ensure that all savings counted are new, additional and cumulative.
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 405 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
For the purposes of point (b), and without prejudice to paragraphs 2 and 3, Member States may count only those energy savings that stem from new policy measures introduced after 31 December 2020 or policy measures introduced during the period from 1 January2014 to 31December 2020 provided it can be demonstrated that those measures result in individual actions that are undertaken after 31 December 2020 and deliver savings.deleted
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 415 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
The sales of energy, by volume, used in transport may be partially or fully excluded from these calculations.deleted
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 447 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) exclude from the calculation of the energy savings requirement referred to in paragraph 1 the verifiable amount of energy generated on or in buildings for own use as a result of policy measures promoting new installation of renewable energy technologies.deleted
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 457 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. All the options chosen under paragraph 2 shall be taken only for the period referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 and the options taken together must amount to no more than 25 % of the amount of energy savings referred to in paragraph 1. Member States shall apply and calculate the effect of the options chosen for the periods referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 separately:
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 463 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) for the calculation of the amount of energy savings required for the period referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 Member States may make use of points (a), (b), (c), and (d) of paragraph 2;deleted
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 468 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) for the calculation of the amount of energy savings required for the period referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 Member States may make use of points (b), (c), (d) and (e) of paragraph 2, provided individual actions in the meaning of point (d) continue to have a verifiable and measurable impact after 31 December 2020.deleted
2017/07/07
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 498 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7a – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) shall include requirements with a social aim in the saving obligations they impose, including by requiring a sharethe majority of energy efficiency measures to be implemented as a priority in low- income households affected by energy poverty and in social housing. For this purpose, specific measures should be implemented to facilitate and encourage participation of local energy communities, in particular those that are driven by social aims connected to the saving obligations;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 531 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
2. In designing alternative policy measures to achieve energy savings, Member States shall take into account the effect onestablish specific measure dedicated to low-income households affected by energy poverty.
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 536 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7b – paragraph 3
3. For all measures other than those relating to taxation measures, Member States shall put in place measurement, control and verification systems under which documented audits are carried out on a statistically significant proportion and representative sample of the energy efficiency improvement measures put in place by the participating or entrusted parties. This measurement, control and verification shall be conducted independently of the participating and entrusted parties. Member States shall ensure that no double counting of energy savings are made between policy measures and individual actions.;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 631 #

2016/0376(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 12
12. The Commission shall evaluate this Directive by 28 February 20242 at the latest, and every five years thereafter, and shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council. That report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by proposals for further measures.;
2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 32 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Following the Communication setting out a European vision of Internet connectivity for the Digital Single Market and in order to promote digital inclusion, the Union should support the provision of free, high speed, local wireless connectivity of high quality in the centres of local public life, including outdoor spaces accessible to the general public, through targeted support. Such support is so far not covered by Regulations (EU) No 1316/201315 and (EU) No 283/201416 . Digital inclusion should not discriminate remote location and rural zones. _________________ 15 Regulation (EU) No 1316/20136 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010, OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 129, as last amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2015, OJ L 169, 1.7.2015, p. 1. 16 Regulation (EU) No 283/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 on guidelines for trans- European networks in the area of telecommunications infrastructure and repealing Decision No 1336/97/EC, OJ L 86, 21.3.2014, p. 14.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Support of this kind should encourage entities with a public mission such as public authorities and providers of public services to offer free local wireless connectivity as an ancillary service to their public mission so asand thus help to ensure that local communities in the centres of public life are guaranteed access to information and involvement in (digital) public life, can improve their digital skills and can experience the benefits of very high-speed broadband in the centres of public life. Such entities could include municipalities, public buildings, community centres, parks, town squares and other local public authorities, libraries, universities and hospitals. The offer of high-speed free wireless connectivity should be also provided to freely accessible spaces of public transport.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Local wireless connectivity should only qualify as free where it is provided without corresponding remuneration, whether by direct payment or other types of consideration, including, but not limited to, advertising and the provision of personal data. Under no circumstances the wireless Internet co-financed by the Union can be made dependent on purchasing any goods or services.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 55 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Improving access to fast and ultra- fast broadband and ICT services, especially in remote areas, could increase the quality of peoples' life by facilitating access to services (e.g. e-Health and e- Government) and promote the development of local SMEs. The authorities should therefore ensure that nobody is left behind and that the Internet content and online services are accessible to all.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 79 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Giving local SMEs priority in the context of the procurement and installation of equipment with a view to the provision of WLAN in accordance with this Regulation could safeguard the potential for innovation and creation of quality jobs in municipalities.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 80 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) To ensure that connectivity in accordance with this Regulation is provided quickly, local authorities should be informed promptly and in an appropriate manner about the availability of this support, and where necessary helped to apply for it, and financial assistance should be implemented using to the fullest extent possible on-line tools that allow for the swift submission and handling of applications and support the implementation, monitoring and auditing of the local wireless access points installed.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10 a) Given the problems and difficulties that rural, remote and sparsely populated areas are facing, there should be guarantees that these areas also benefit from free, high speed local wireless connectivity of high quality.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 90 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Given Internet connectivity needs within the Union and the urgency of promoting access networks that can deliver, throughout the EU, an Internet experience of high quality based on very high-speed broadband services, financial assistance should seek to attain a geographically balanced distribution by taking particular account of the needs of local communities.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 92 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) Information about the planned action and the relevant conditions should reach the local authorities as early as possible in order to initiate preparations and be able to apply when calls for proposals are issued.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 101 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 283/2014
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) support the provision of free, high speed, local wireless connectivity in local communities.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 283/2014
Article 6 – paragraph 8a
8a. Actions contributing to projects of common interest in the field of providing free, high speed, local wireless connectivity in local communities shall meet conditions set out in Section 4 in the Annex.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 115 #

2016/0287(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 283/2014
Annex – section 4 – paragraph 5
The available budget shall be allocated to projects in a geographically balanced manner to projects meeting the above conditions in view of the proposals received and, in principle, on a 'first come, first served' basisby taking particular account of the needs of the people and keeping with the objectives of bringing about economic, social and territorial cohesion and offsetting regional differences in the provision of fast internet access across the Union. At least 20% of the budget should be allocated to areas that are less developed economically and digitally, with particular emphasis on islands and on mountainous, border and peripheral areas, in order to invest the resources where they are most needed.
2017/03/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to reinforce the take-up of the EFSI in less-developed and transition regions and to encourage social and regional cohesion through the creation of quality jobs and the broadening and improvement of the productive base of Member States, especially those most affected by the crisis, the scope of the general objectives eligible for EFSI support should be enlarged.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 91 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In line with the exceptional market demand for SME financing under the EFSI which is expected to continue, the EFSI SME Window should be enhanced. Particular attention should be paid to social enterprises, including through the development and deployment of new instrument with additional resources, as well as the support capacities for SME of the advisory hub. Particular attention should be paid to social enterprises.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 99 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) With a view to enhancing the transparency of EFSI operations, the Investment Committee should explain in its decisions, which are made public and accessible, the reasons why it deems that an operation should be granted the EU guarantee, with particular focus on compliance with the additionality criterion. The scoreboard of indicators should be made public once an operation under the EU guarantee is signapproved.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 121 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
To better address market failures or sub- optimal investment situations, EIB special activities supported by the EFSI shall typically have features such as subordination, participation in risk- sharing instruments, cross-border characteristics, exposure to specific risks or other identifiable aspects as further described in Annex IIFSI shall maximise the number of projects aiming to maximise the number of beneficiaries and the potential leverage effect. To this end at least one third of total guarantees will be used to support MSMEs and cooperatives.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) In Article 5 the following paragraph is added: 2a. To this end, the EFSI shall assess the environmental and social performance of every project supported. In order to not only base the additionality criteria by financial or risk variables but also for their environmental and social impact.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 132 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(3a) In Article 6(1) the following subparagraph is added: The Investment Committee shall be responsible to ensure that overall, projects under the EU guarantee foster European social and regional cohesion.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a
The EIB shall target that at least 480 % of EFSI financing under the infrastructure and innovation window supports projects with components that contribute to climate action, in line with the COP21 commitmentscluding at least 35% of EFSI financing to support energy efficiency projects, are in line with the COP21 commitments and the EU 2050 commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emission by 80-95%. The Steering Board shall provide detailed guidance to that end.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 181 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. In order to achieve the objective referred to in paragraph 1 and to facilitate the provision of advisory support at local level, the EIAH shall seek to use the expertise of the EIB,and collaborate with the Commission, national promotional banks or institutions, and the managing authorities of the European Structural and Investment Funds.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 197 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2
Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 is amended as follows: (1) replaced by the following: ‘1. implementation of the CEF for the period 2014 to 2020 is set at EUR 29 992 259 000 in current prices. That amount shall be distributed as follows: (a) 000, of which EUR 11 305 500 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund; (b) 091 602 000; (c) These amounts are without prejudice to the application of the flexibility mechanism provided for under Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013(*). ________________ (*) Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-20 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884). ’Article 2 deleted in Article 5, paragraph 1 is The financial envelope for the transport sector: EUR 23 895 582 telecommunications sector: EUR 1 energy sector: EUR 5 005 075 000.
2017/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 437 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 6 – second sentence
Cooperation between, on the one hand, the EIAH and, on the other hand, a national promotional bank or institution, an international financing institution or an institution or a managing authority, including those acting as a national advisor, having expertise relevant for the purposes of the EIAH, may take the form of a contractual partnership. The EIAH shall make at least one cooperation agreement with a national promotional bank or any other institution per Member State. In Member States where such an institution does not exist, the EIAH shall provide pro-active advisory support on its establishment, when requested by the Member State in question.;
2017/03/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 463 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
In their financing and investment operations covered by this Regulation, the EIB and the EIF shall not make use of or engage in tax avoidance structures, in particular aggressive tax planning schemes, or practices not complying with EU tax good governance principles, as set out in the Union legislation, including Commission recommendations and communications.
2017/03/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 465 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
The Commission shall provide detailed guidance, where needed.delete
2017/03/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 5 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the report on Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals (P8_TA(2015)0460)
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 1
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 21 – point b
(b) the consistency and the possible duplication with other RTD programmes at Community and national level, in order to ensure the additionality of the selected projects and their contribution to the strengthening and long-term viability of European steel and coal production;
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 1
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 21 – point i a (new)
(ia) assessment of finalized projects, including further support measures to ensure their continuity and the long-term viability of coal and steel production in the areas concerned;
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 55 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22– paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Each Advisory Group shall be composed in accordance with the tables set out in the Annex. Members of the Advisory Groups shall be individuals appointed by the Director General of Directorate General for Research and Innovation to represent a common interest shared by stakeholders, after consultation with the social partners. They shall not represent an individual stakeholder, but shall express an opinion common to the different stakeholder organisations.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
They shall be active in the field concerned and be aware of the industrial priorities. contribution of the steel and coal sectors to the social and regional cohesion in the areas concerned.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. Within each Advisory Group, the Commission shall aim at ensuring, as far as possible, a high level of expertise, as well as a balanced representation of relevant areas of expertise and areas of interest and a balanced representation of gender and geographical origin, taking into account the specific tasks of the Advisory Groups, the consultation of the social partners and the type of expertise required and the outcome of the experts' selection procedure.;
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Members of the Technical Groups shall be appointed in their personal capacity by the Director General of Directorate General for Research and Innovation, after consultation with the social partners.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 71 #

2016/0047(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Within each Technical Group, the Commission shall aim at ensuring a high level of professional expertise, and as far as possible, a balanced representation of relevant areas of expertise and a balanced representation of gender and geographical origin, taking into account the specific tasks of the Technical Groups, the consultation of the social partners, the type of expertise required and the outcome of the experts' selection procedure.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 9 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
1. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) stipulates in Article 145 that Member States and the Union shall work towards developing a coordinated strategy forMember States and the Union should seek to pursue strategic cooperation on employment and particularly forto promotinge a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce as well asnd labour markets that are responsive to economic change and with a view to achieving the objectives defin. Member States should promote work with rights, in accordance with labour regulations and collective agreements and based ion Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)higher wages, eliminating the harmful economic and social consequences that austerity policies have entailed for their peoples.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The "Europe 2020 Strategy" proposed by the Commission enables the Union to turnfailed to achieve high level employment and social cohesion. The EU its economy towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, accompanied by high level employment, productivity and social cohesion. Five headline targets, listed under the relevant guidelines, constitute shared objectives which guide the action of the Member States, and take into account their relative starting posiin need of holistic policies and public investments that will fight against unemployment and poverty at work, as well as promote social inclusion, decent work with rights, strengthen collective agreements and collective bargaining, help the Member States on reindustrializations and national circumstances as well as the positions and circumstances of the Union. The European Employment Strategy has the leading role in the implementation of the employment and labour market objectives of the new strategyfully respect their rights to plan their own employment policies based on their own needs and circumstances.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) The integratedemployment guidelines are in line with the conclusions of the European Council. They give precise guidance to theshould support Member States on definforming their National Reform Programmes and implementing reforms, reflecting interdependence and in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. The employment guidelines should form the basis for any country-specific recommendations that the Council may address to the Member States under Article 148(4) of the TFEU, in parallel withown strategies on employment and respect their subsidiarity, revoking the country- specific recommendations' addressed to the Member States under Article 121(2) of that Treaty. The employment guidelines should also form the basis for the establishment of the Joint Employment Report sent annually by the Council and the European Commission to the European Councilusterity measures that caused impoverishment and unemployment in the Member States.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
4. The examination of the Member States’ National Reform Programmes contained in the Joint Employment Report shows that Member States should continue to make every effort to address the priority areas of increasing labour market participation and reducing structural unemployment, developing a skilled workforce responding to labour markethose programmes have served to increase unemployment, lower wages, deregulate labour markets, reduce welfare provision, and wreck public services, leaving roughly a quarter of the Union population exposed to the risk of poverty and social exclusion. A policy of economic cooperation, basing labour relations on collective bargaining, raising wages and pursuing active policies to combat uneedsmployment and promoting job qualitye social support, and lifdeveloping learning, improving the performance of education and training systems at all levels and increasing participation in tertiary education, promoting social inclusion and combating povertyuniversal free public services in the areas of education, health, and social security are the best ways to enhance the well-being of, and improve living conditions for, the workers and peoples of Member States.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) It is important not to jeopardise the ability of Member States to negotiate the content of the intergovernmental agreements.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) However, Decision No 994/2012/EU proved ineffective in terms of ensuring compliance of intergovernmental agreements with Union law. That Decision mainly relied on the assessment of intergovernmental agreements by the Commission after they were concluded by the Member States with a third country. Experience gained in the implementation of the Decision 994/2012/EU demonstrated that such an ex-post assessment does not fully exploit the potential for ensuring compliance of intergovernmental agreement with Union law. In particular, intergovernmental agreements often contain no appropriate termination or adaptation clauses which would allow Member States to bring the intergovernmental agreement in compliance with Union law within a reasonable period of time. Furthermore, the positions of the signatories have already been fixed, which creates political pressure not to change any aspect of the agreement.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) In order to avoid any incompliance with Union law and enhance transparency, Member States shcould, on a voluntary basis, inform the Commission of their intent to enter into negotiations with regard to new intergovernmental agreements or amendments to existing intergovernmental agreements as soon as possible. The Commission shcould be kept informed regularly of the progress of the negotiations. Member States should have the possibility, on a voluntary basis, to invite the Commission to participate in the negotiations as an observer.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) During the negotiations of an intergovernmental agreement, the Commission should have the possibility, at the request of the Member States involved, to advicse on how to avoid incompatibility with Union law. In particular, the Commission could develop, together with Member States, optional model clauses or guidelines. Tthat framework, the Commission should also have the possibility to draw attention of the Member States concerned to the Union’s energy policy objectives and the principle of solidarity between Member States and Union policy positions adopted in Council or European Council conclusions where relevant. However, this should not form part of the legal assessment of the Commission of the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure compliance with Union law, Member States should notify the draft intergovernmental agreement to the Commission before it becomes legally binding for the parties (ex-ante). In a spirit of cooperation, the Commission should support the Member State, following their request, in identifying compliance issues of the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment. The respective Member State would then be better prepared to conclude a Union law compliant agreement. The Commission should have sufficient time for such an assessment in order to provide for as much legal certainty as possible while avoiding undue delays. In order to fully benefit from the Commission's support Member States shcould, on a voluntary basis, refrain from concluding an intergovernmental agreement until the Commission has informed the Member State of its assessment. The Member States should take all necessary steps to find a suitable solution to eliminate the incompatibility identified.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The Commission should consider shortening the periods provided for its assessment, in particular if a Member States so requests.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Member States establish relations to third countries not only by concluding intergovernmental agreements, but also in the form of non-binding instruments. Even if legally non-binding, such instruments can be used to set out a detailed framework for energy infrastructure and energy supply. In this respect non-binding instruments can have similar impacts on the internal energy market as intergovernmental agreements as their implementation might result in a violation of Union law. In order to ensure greater transparency regarding all measures applied by Member States that can have an impact on the internal energy market and energy security, Member States should therefore submit to the Commission, ex post, also the respective non-binding instruments. The Commission should assess the submitted non-binding instruments and, if appropriate, inform the Member State accordinglyMember states should be able, on a voluntary basis, to submit to the Commission non-binding instruments for example legally non-binding arrangements between one or more Member States and one or more third countries which set conditions for energy supply or for the development of energy infrastructures.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 77 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 14
(14) The Commission should make information it receives available to all other Member States in secure electronic form. The Commission should respect requests from Member States to treat information submitted to it as confidential. Requests for confidentiality should, however, not restrict access of the Commission itself to confidential information, as the Commission needs to have comprehensive information for its own assessments. The Commission should be responsible for guaranteeing the application of the confidentiality clause. Requests for confidentiality should be without prejudice to the right of access to documents as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council11 . _________________ 11 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 299, 27.10.2012, p. 13).
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 91 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
(18) The Commission should facilitate and encouragthe coordinperation between Member States with a view to enhancing the overall strategic role of the Union through a strong and effective coordinated approach to producer, transit, and consumer countries.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 98 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Decision establishes a mechanism for the exchange of information between Member States and the Commission with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non- binding instruments in the field of energy as defined in Article 2, in order to optimise the functioning of the internal energy market.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 105 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘intergovernmental agreement’ means any legally binding agreement, regardless of its formal designation, between one or more Member States and one or more third countries thaving an impact on the operation or the functiont concerns: (a) the purchase, trade, sale, storage or supply of energy ing ofr the internal energy marketo at least one Member State; or on(b) the security of energy supply in the Unionconstruction or operation of energy infrastructure with a physical connection to at least one Member State; however, where such a legally binding agreement also covers other issues, only those provisions that related to those energy, includingssues and the general provisions applicable to those energy-related provisions, are deemed to constitute an 'intergovernmental agreement';
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 108 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘non-binding instrument’ means a legally non-binding arrangement between one or more Member States and one or more third countries, such as a memorandum of understanding, joint declaration, ministerial joint declaration, joint action or joint code of conduct, which contains interpretation of Union law, sets the conditions for energy supply (such as volumes and prices) or the development of energy infrastructures;deleted
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 109 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) 'existing non-binding instrument' means a non-binding instrument signed or otherwise agreed prior to the entry into force of this Decision.deleted
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 115 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
As soon as an agreement has been reached by the parties on all the main elements of a draft intergovernmental agreement or an amendment to an existing intergovernmental agreement, but before the closure of formal negotiations, the Member State concerned shallthe Member State concerned could, on a voluntary basis, notify to the Commission this draft agreement or amendment together with any annexes thereto for ex-ante assessment in accordance with Article 5.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 116 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment to an existing intergovernmental agreement refers explicitly to other texts, the respective Member State shall also submit those other texts in so far as they contain elements which may have an impact on the functioning of the internal energy market or on the security of energy supply in the Union.deleted
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 133 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. All notifications pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 3 of this Article, Article 6(1) and (2) and Article 76(1) and (2) shall be made through a web- based application provided by the Commission. The periods referred to in Article 5(1) and (2) and Article 6(3) shall start to run on the date when the complete notification file has been registered in the application.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, within sixtwo weeks of the date of notification of the complete draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment, including annexes thereto, pursuant to Article 3(2), inform the Member State concerned of any doubts it may have as to the compatibility of the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment with Union law, in particular with internal energy market legislation and Union competition law. In the absence of a response from the Commission within that period, the Commission shall be deemed not to have any such doubts.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission informs the Member State concerned pursuant to paragraph 1 that it has doubts, it shall inform the Member State concerned of its opinion on the compatibility with Union law, in particular with internal energy market legislation and Union competition law, of the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment concerned within 12four weeks of the date of notification referred to in paragraph 1. In the absence of an opinion from the Commission within that period, the Commission shall be deemed not to have raised any objections.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 160 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Member State shall not sign, ratify or agree to the draft intergovernmental agreement or amendment to an existing intergovernmental agreement until the Commission has informed the Member State of any doubts, in accordance with paragraph 1, or, where applicable, has issued its opinion in accordance with paragraph 2, or, in the absence of a response or opinion from the Commission, until the periods referred to in paragraphs 1 or, where applicable, 2, have elapsed.deleted
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 183 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7
Notification obligations and assessment by the Commission with respect to non- 1. Upon adopting a non-binding instrument or an amendment to a non-binding instrument, the Member State concerned shall notify the non-binding instrument or the amendment, including any annexes thereto, to the Commission. Where the non-binding instrument or the amendment to the non-Article 7 deleted binding instrument refers explicitly to other texts, the Member State concerned shall also submit those other texts in so far as they contain elements which may have an impact on the functioning of the internal energy market or on the security of energy supply in the Union. 2. By [3 months following the entry into force of this Decision] at the latest Member States shall notify to the Commission all existing non-binding instruments, including annexes and amendments thereto. Where the existing non-binding instrument refers explicitly to other texts, the Member State concerned shall also submit those other texts in so far as they contain elements which may have an impact on the functioning of the internal energy market or on the security of energy supply in the Union. 3. The obligation to notify to the Commission according to paragraphs 1 and 2 does not apply in respect of agreements between undertakings. 4. 4. Where, following its first assessment, the Commission considers that the measures implementing the non-binding instrument notified to it under paragraphs 1 and 2 could conflict with Union law, in particular with internal energy market legislation and Union competition law, the Commission may inform the Member State concerned accordingly.s
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 204 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
When providing information to the Commission in accordance with Article 3(1) to (3), Article 6(1) and Article 76(1) and (2), a Member State may indicate whether any part of the information, be it commercial or other information the disclosure of which could harm the activities of the parties involved, is to be regarded as confidential and whether the information provided can be shared with other Member States.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 208 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Where a Member State has identified as confidential in accordance with paragraph 1 an existing intergovernmental agreement, an amendment to an existing intergovernmental agreement, or a new intergovernmental agreement, an existing non-binding instrument, an amendment to an existing non-binding instrument or a new non-binding instrument, that Member State shall make available a summary of the information submitted.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 218 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) reviewing developments in relation to intergovernmental agreements and non- binding instruments and striving for consistency and coherence in the Union’s external energy relations with producer, transit, and consumer countries;
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 229 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The report shall, in particular, assess the extent to which this Decision promotes compliance of intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments with Union law and a high level of coordination between Member States with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments. It shall also assess the impact that this Decision has on Member States’ negotiations with third countries and whether the scope of this Decision and the procedures it lays down are appropriate.
2016/07/01
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 140 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 c (new)
(1c) Access to affordable energy is a basic social right and energy poverty must be tackled.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 141 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 d (new)
(1d) As the gas accounts for almost 50% of the EU´s primary energy consumption for heating and cooling, of which 80% is used in buildings, Member States should primarily focus on energy efficiency measures, particularly in the buildings, in order to reduce gas demand and thus EU dependence on foreign suppliers.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 163 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Energy efficiency measures has a fundamental role to play towards a secure energy system. Reduced gas consumption should be a priority to insure Europe's energy sovereignty and secure gas supply.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 198 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The infrastructure standard should oblige Member States to maintain a minimum level of infrastructure such as to ensure a degree of redundancy in the system in the event of a disruption of the single largest infrastructure. As an analysis by reference to the N-1 indicator constitutes a purely capacity-based- approach, the results of N-1 should be complemented with a detailed analysis that also captures gas flowslimit redundancy and also take in consideration gas consumption's trends (The European gas demand has declined by 14% since 2000 and by 23% since 2010) and impacts of energy efficiency policies (the European Union gas imports fall by 2.6% for every 1% improvement in energy efficiency according to COM(2014)520) in order to limit the risk of stranded assets and a new carbon lock- in.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 251 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) The complementarity of European gas and electricity systems and demand side management can significantly improve European resilience and energy security and at the same time support the development of renewable energies.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 259 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) The roles and responsibilities of all natural gas undertakings and competent authorities should therefore be defined precisely in order to keep the internal gas market functioning properlyunder the supervision of national regulatory authorities, particularly in the event of supply disruptions and crises. Such roles and responsibilities should be established in such a way as to ensure that a three-level approach is respected which would involve first the relevant natural gas undertakings and industry, then Member States at national or regional level, and then the Union. This Regulation should enable natural gas undertakings and customers to rely on market mechanisms for as long as possible when coping with disruptions. However, it should alsoas a priority provide for mechanisms that can be deployed when markets alone are no longer able to deal adequately with a gas supply disruption.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 263 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In the event of a supply crisis, market playernational regulatory authorities should be given sufficient opportunity to respond to the situation with market-based measures. Where market measures have been exhausted and they. Where market measures are still insufficient, Member States and their competent authorities should take measures to remove or mitigate the effects of the supply crisis.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 280 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The preventive action plans and emergency plans should be updated regularly and published. They should be subject to peer review. The peer review process allows for early identification of inconsistencies and measures that could endanger other Member States' security of supply, thereby ensuring that plans from different regions are consistent with one another. It also enables Member States to share best practice. The plans should be coherent with the EU energy and climate targets on greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency and renewable energy. The plans should be regularly updated in order to ensure their coherence with those objectives.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 352 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – subparagraph 2 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) 'protected customer’ means a household customer connected to a gas distribution network, including household in situation of energy exclusion, and, in addition, where the Member State concerned so decides, may also mean one or more of the following:
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 517 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent authorities of the Member States of each region as listed in Annex I, after consulting the natural gas and electricity undertakings, the relevant organisations representing the interests of household and industrial gas customers, including electricity producers, the national environmental agency, and the national regulatory authorities, where they are not the competent authorities, shall establish jointly:
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 525 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a sustainable preventive action plan containing the measures, including energy efficiency measures, to be adopted to remove or mitigate the risks identified in the region, including risks of purely national dimension, in accordance with the risk assessment undertaken pursuant to Article 6 and in accordance with Article 8; and
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 559 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) may distort competition or hamper the functioning of the internal energy market;deleted
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 566 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) is not in line with the EU climate and energy targets.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 22 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) In the multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) established by Decision No 243/2012/EU20 , the European Parliament and the Council set the objectives of identifying at least 1 200 MHz of spectrum suitable for wireless broadband electronic communications services in the Union by 2015, of supporting the further development of innovativebroadcasting and audiovisual media services, including public broadcasting services, by ensuring sufficient spectrum for the satellite and terrestrial provision of such services, if the need is clearly substantiated, and of ensuring sufficient spectrum for programme making and special events (PMSE). __________________ 20 Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (OJ L 81, 21.3.2012, p. 7).
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 46 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) Spectrum in the 470-790 MHz frequency band is a valuable asset for the cost-efficient deployment of wireless networks with universal indoor and outdoor coveragepublic good. This spectrum is currently used across the Union for digital terrestrial television (DTT) and wireless audio PMSE equipment. It supports the development of the media, creative and cultural sectors, which extensively rely on this spectrum resource for the wireless provision of content to mass audiences.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 73 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) In his report to the Commission (the ‘Lamy report’)22 , Pascal Lamy, the Chairman of the high-level group on the future use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band, recommended that the 700 MHz frequency band be made available for wireless broadband by 2020 (+/- two years). This would help achieve the goal of long-term regulatory predictability for DTT in having access to the sub-700 MHz frequency band until 2030, although this would have to be reviewed by 2025. The Lamy Report also recommended national flexibility in spectrum use of the sub-700 MHz frequency band, which is limited to downlink-only. Downlink-only is the restriction of all transmissions in a wireless system, independent of its technology, to unidirectional transmission from central infrastructure stations such as a TV broadcasting tower or a mobile base station to portable or mobile terminals such as TV sets or mobile phones. Flexibility in use of the sub-700 MHz frequency band should be introduced only when it allows for continued spectrum access by DTT and PSME and should take into account the need to preserve the specificities of the European audiovisual model. __________________ 22 Report by Mr Pascal Lamy, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital- agenda/en/news/report-results-work-high- level-group-future-use-uhf-band.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 79 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
(8) The Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG) recommends in its opinion on a long-term strategy on the future use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union (the ‘RSPG opinion’) the adoption of a coordinated approach across the Union to make the 700 MHz frequency band available for effective use for wireless broadband electronic communications services by the end of 2020. This would be in conjunction with ensuring long-term availability until 2030 of the sub-700 MHz frequency band for the downlink-only provision of audiovisual media services. The RSPG particularly recommends introducing flexibility so that the sub-700 MHz frequency band can also be used for downlink-only wireless broadband electronic communications services, though Member States should be able to decide to delay the availability of the band for up to two years. This would be in conjunction with ensuring long-term availability until 2030 of the sub-700 MHz frequency band for DTT.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 89 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) As some Member States have already launched or completed a national process to authorise the use of the 700 MHz frequency band for bidirectional terrestrial wireless broadband electronic communications services, the Union should take immediate action in order to prevent fragmentation of the single market. What is needed is a coordinated approach to the future use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band, which should also provide regulatory predictability, balance Member State diversity with single market objectives and promote a coherent Union position on the international scene. In this context, Member States should be required to repurpose the 700 MHz frequency band in a timely manner in accordance with Union and national law.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 105 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12
(12) In line with Articles 9 and 9a of Directive 2002/21/EC, Member States should apply a flexible approach where possible and may allow the introduction of alternative downlink-only uses such as terrestrial wireless broadband electronic communications services in the sub-700 MHz frequency band in accordance with national needs for distribution of audiovisual media services to a mass audienceonly where there is no significant demand for DTT and PMSE services at national level. When allowing use within the sub-700 MHz frequency band for downlink-only terrestrial wireless broadband electronic communications services, Member States should ensure that such use does not affect the use of sub-700 MHz band for digital terrestrial broadcasting or PMSE services in neighbouring Member States, as provided for in the agreement at the Regional Radiocommunication Conference of 200625 . __________________ 25 Regional Radiocommunication Conference of 2006 for planning of the digital terrestrial broadcasting service in parts of Regions 1 and 3, in the frequency bands 174-230 MHz and 470-862 MHz (RRC-06) in Geneva.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 110 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
(13) In any case, spectrum usage in the 470-694 MHz frequency band should be reassessed at Union level no later than 2025. Such an assessment should also take into account the planned review of this frequency band at the World Radiocommunication Conference in 2023. Changes in the use of the sub-700 MHz frequency band should take into consideration technological developments, consumer behaviour, the importance of continuing the delivery of free television26 service and social, economic and cultural general interest objectives. In this context, studies on technical and regulatory conditions for co-existence between incumbent and new spectrum uses in the sub-700 MHz frequency band are necessary. These would ensure coherence between the approaches taken by different Member States on flexible and efficient spectrum use and would enable technical harmonisation measures for use and co- existence in this band. Such studies and measures may be developed pursuant to Decision No 676/2002/EC. __________________ 26In the meaning of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (Audiovisual Media Services Directive).deleted
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 121 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 14
(14) Member States should adopt coherent national roadmaps to facilitate the use of the 700 MHz frequency band for terrestrial wireless broadband electronic communications services while ensuring continuity for the television broadcasting services that vacate the band. Once adopted, Member States should communicate the roadmaps in a transparent manner around the Union. The roadmaps should cover activities and timescales for frequency re-planning, technical developments for network and end-user equipment, co-existence between radio and non-radio equipment, avoiding harmful interferences to users in adjacent bands, existing and new authorisation regimes and information on the possibility to offer compensation for migration costs, where these would arise, in order to avoid, inter alia, costs for end- users of DTT and PMSE services. Where Member States intend to maintain DTT, the roadmaps should give particular attention to facilitating upgrades of broadcasting equipment to more spectrum- efficient technologies such as advanced video formats (e.g. HEVC) or signal transmission technologies (e.g. DVB-T2).
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
(15) The scope and mechanism of possible compensation for completing the transition in spectrum use within the 470- 790 MHz frequency band should be analysed in accordance with the relevant national provisions as provided by Article 14 of Directive 2002/20/EC27 , and have to be consistent with the provisions of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU. __________________ 27 Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ L 108, 24.04.2002, p. 21)
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 133 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
(16) Since the objective of this Decision, namely to ensure coordinated transition in spectrum use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union according to common objectives, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective,
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 141 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
(1) By 30 June 2020, Member States shall allow the use of the 694-790 MHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing wireless broadband electronic communications services only under harmonised technical conditions set by the Commission pursuant to Article 4 of Decision 676/2002/EC by 31 December 2020, or 31 December 2022 if this is justified by economic, social or cultural grounds. Where necessary, Member States shall carry out the authorisation process or amend relevant existing rights to use the spectrum in accordance with Directive 2002/20/EC, in order to allow that use.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
(3) Member States shall not be bound by the obligations under paragraphs 1 and 2 in geographical areas where frequency coordination with non-Union countries remains unresolved, as long as Member States make all practicable efforts to minimise the duration and geographical scope of such unresolved coordination and annually report the results to the Commission until the outstanding coordination issues have been resolved. This paragraph shall also apply to the spectrum coordination problems in the Republic of Cyprus arising from the fact that the Government of Cyprus is prevented from exercising effective control in part of its territory, due to the illegal occupation by Turkey.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 168 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
(1) Member States shall ensure, at least until 2030, availability of the 470-694 MHz frequency band or parts of the band for the terrestrial provision of broadcasting and audiovisual media services to mass audiences, including free television, and for use by wireless audio PMSE equipment, based on national broadcasting needs. Member States shall ensure that any other use of the 470-694 MHz frequency band on their territory does not cause harmful interference with the terrestrial provision of audiovisual media services in a neighbouring Member State. Any use shall be in accordance with existing international agreements.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 179 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 2
(2) If Member States authorise the use of spectrum in the 470-694 MHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communication services other than television broadcasting networks, such use shall be limited to downlink-only and be compatible with broadcasting services. Such use shall be without prejudice to obligations resulting from international agreements and Union law.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 182 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1
By 30 June1 December 2017, Member States shall adopt and make public their national plan and schedule (‘national roadmap’) for fulfilling their obligations under Articles 1 and 4 of this Decision.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 191 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2
In order to ensure that the use of the 694- 790 MHz frequency band is in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 1, Member States shall include in their national roadmaps, where appropriate, information on measures to limit the impact of the forthcoming transition process on the public and users of wireless audio PMSE equipment and to facilitate the timely availability of interoperable television broadcasting network equipment and receivers in the internal market. Members States shall adopt all necessary measures to ensure that the changes in the use of the 700MHz frequency band avoids interferences with other spectrum bands and to provide adequate compensation where needed. Member States shall elaborate those roadmaps ensuring the public participation of all relevant stakeholders with a legitimate interest, including broadcasters, consumer organisations and social partners.
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 198 #

2016/0027(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 1
By 1 January 2025, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall carry out an assessment and report to the Council and Parliament on developments in the use of the 470-694 MHz frequency band, taking into account the social, economic, cultural and technological aspects affecting the use of the band pursuant to Articles 1 and 4. The report shall assess whether it is necessary to change the use of the 470-694 MHz frequency band, or any part of it, in the Union.deleted
2016/07/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 335 #

2016/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘market surveillance’ means the activities carried out and measures taken by the market surveillance authorities to ensure that vehicles, systems, components or separate technical units as well as parts and equipment made available on the market comply with the requirements set out in the relevant Union legislation and do not endanger health, safety, the environment or any other aspect of public interest protection including consumer rights;
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 398 #

2016/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Approval authorities shall only approve such vehicles, systems, components or separate technical units that comply with the requirements of this Regulation. The authority shall ensure that the vehicles and systems, components, or separate technical units tested for approval are equivalent to those that will be placed on the market.
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 624 #

2016/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – title
Obligations of importers concerning their vehicles, systems, components or separate technical units that are not in conformity or concerning their vehicles, systems, components, separate technical units, parts or equipment that present a serious risk
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 703 #

2016/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The required tests shall be performed on those vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units that are strictly representative of the type to be approved.
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 931 #

2016/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 6
6. The type-approval authority shall have a sufficient number of competent personnel and other resources at its disposal for the proper performance of the tasks foreseen by this Regulation
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesExpresses its concern on the Single Market Strategy (SMS), which will help to inject new life into Europe’s economies by likely aggravate social dumping and the negative effects on worker's labour and social conditions of enhanced competition in goods and services in the current Single Market; calls for the developmening up borders and removing barriers for goods and services; t of a Social Progress Protocol that ensures a revision of the EU's regulation on the Single Market so that it does not jeopardize fundamental social rights; notes, in this respect, the reference to the European Social Charter in TFEU's article 151;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. BelievStresses that barriers to doing business across borders are barriers to growth and job creationMember States have a right to regulate services, professions and commerce in line with their social policy objectives;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the deepening of the single market and the digital single market will bring new opportunities and challenges, such asdigital single market poses new challenges in terms of skills, and new forms of employment an, which will have to be addressed financial structures, which will have to be addressed regular dialogue with the social partners; stresses that under no circumstances "digitalization" should be used as a tool to lower current social standards by circumventing existing labour and social regulations;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the potential of the collaborative economy for job creation and a more inclusive labour market across Member States; believes that a country-by-country taxation principle needs to be established;deleted
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the opportunities that the SMS offers to SMEs; believes that developing the right business environment by improving private venture capital frameworks for SMEs and fully applying the ‘Think Small First’ principle across the single market is crucial for growth and job creationExpresses its concern on the ways the SMS may affect SMEs; believes that increased dependence on capital markets will transfer risk and volatility from the financial sector to the SMEs, thus jeopardizing its potential development; objects to the ‘Think Small First’ principle as it is leading to the exemption of SMEs from social and employment law;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that the services market remains fragmented; cCalls on the Commission to deliver the necessary reforms that will remove barriers in the service sector by adopting a targeted sector-specific approach for serviceensure high social standards in the service sector in full respect of national rules on service provision and labour standards; stresses the need to protect Member States right to include social and environmental criteria in their public procurement tenders;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Urges the Commission to enforce proper information and consultation rights for workers in its revision of bankruptcy legislation, in order to avoid the irregular use of bankruptcy procedures; stresses that the protection of workers should be the cornerstone of any revision of insolvency legislation;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support quality job creation in the "collaborative" economy by developing appropriate safeguards, while at the same time providing a platform that will allow entrepreneurs to grow, innovate and create jobs. that ensure that employment and social security legislation fully applies to workers in this sector and are extended to self-employed workers; stresses the need to fight practices such as "bogus" self- employment and undeclared work in this sector;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the Commission should undertakeCalls for a comprehensive review of the functioning of the current MFF, followed by a legislative revision including an adjustment on the ceilings, in order for the EU to respond to a number of unforeseen serious crises that is faced with, and address new political priorities;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 2 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that according to the Treaty, the Parliament and the Council constitute the two arms of the budgetary authority; therefore calls for the full involvement of the Parliament in the mid- term review and revision of the MFF regulation;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 3 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that, while the MFF Regulation has to a large extent remained unchanged since its adoption, the framework conditions for its implementation have changed; highlights the fact that, following a genuine review, a legislative proposal should addres intensive recourse to MFF flexibility instruments after exhausting all available margins is not the best way to face complicated crises that are likely to continue; therefore a permanent system allowing for the mobilization of additional resources twhese challenges; points out in this regard that the new instruments, such as EFSI, that have been set up since the adoption of the MFF Regulation should be duly incorporated inton needed should be established through a genuine review, accompanied by a legislative proposal; while acknowledging the need to consolidate and further increase flexibility within MFF, points out that any new financial instrument should be set up according to the community method, in full compliance with the principle of the unity of the EU budget without any negative financial impact on the agreed programmesand on the grounds of democratic accountability and transparency;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 17 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that new political priorities should not be proposed at the expense of the agreed programmes of the current MFF, in particular H2020, CEF, COSME, Galileo and Copernicus, and pre-allocated national envelopes; therefore any redeployment of funds to the benefit of new financial instruments, such as EFSI, should not have any negative financial impact on agreed programmes with proven added value, such as H2020, CEF and COSME;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a further strengthening of coordination, and a maximising of synergies between, ESIF funds and EU programmes such as Horizon 2020, COSME and CEF;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that Union programmes have not significantly contributed to ensuring access to finance for SMEthe majority of SMEs in the EU and especially for the ones operating in countries facing severe and persistent financial crisis; calls for further consideration to be given to ways of extendmeeting the programme to even more SMEs and meeting the various needs of SMEsvarious urgent needs of the SMEs and especially of the ones in danger of shut down, more adequately;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that Union funding can actually trigger and catalyse actions that Member States are unable to carry out on their own and create synergies and complementarities with Member States’ activities; encourages Member States to better explore areas in which the EU is not taking action;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the mid-term evaluation of the MFF programmes on the basis of theirNotes that given the fact of the late implementation of the current framework, the revision of the MFF is a key point in the management of EU spending in order to assess whether investment programmes performance against stipulated targets and objectives, present adequate absorption capacity and generate EU added value, taking into account the late implementation of the current framework.; underlines also that the mid-term review/revision is an opportunity for an MFF comprehensive simplification encompassing reforms in application, management, reporting and control of funds;
2016/04/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas conventional indigenous sources of oil and gas contribute significantly to Europe's current energy needs and are crucial at present for our energy security and energy diversity;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 24 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underscores the fact that the Member States already have the world's best-performing offshore safety regimes and that overregulation in this area would seriously harm the competitiveness of their industriesNotes current Member States' offshore safety regimes; stresses the need to improve the requirements in relation to financial liability, so as to ensure that operators have the capacity to provide adequate compensation in the case of accident;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the need to promote measures to strengthen prevention and enhance safety and environmental protection standards in all offshore operations in order genuinely to enhance energy security for the benefit of peoples.
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 34 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines the importance of strengthening solidarity and cooperation between Member States so that safety systems can be made more effective;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Invites the Member States and the Commission to consider the special situation of small and medium-sized businesses. Offshore oil and gas incidents may have particularly serious implication for fishing and tourism industries, for workers and employees on the platforms as well as and on other sectors that rely in the good condition of the shared marine environment for doing business, since these sectors, which include many SMEs, could suffer significant economic loss in the event of a major offshore accident;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 42 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that there is a 'broad variety of financial security products available to hedge oil and gas companies’ operating risk. These range from self-insurance options, to third-party insurance, to mutual schemes such as the Offshore Pollution Liability Association Ltd (OPOL), to alternative risk transfer mechanisms and others'; expresses its opposition at public- private arrangements when they entail a non-proportional transfer of private risk to the public purse;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 45 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes the way civil liability is handled varies considerably from one State to another and there is often uncertainty as to how their legal systems would deal with the diversity of civil claims that could result from offshore oil and gas incidents;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the success of the eurozone is dependent on increasing the welfare of all its citizens, and on well- functioning labour markets and welfare systems, based on decent work with rights, a strong role for the social partners, social dialogue, collective bargaining and collective agreements, and preventing individual Member States from trying to gain an unfair competitive advantage by infringing workers’ rights or,by promoting social dumping, by dismantling collective agreements, or by lowering the workers' social protection;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the fact that the current system of European economic governance is highly unbalanced and focuses almost exclusively on fiscal stability and wage competitiveness, while concerns about economic recovery, public investment policies and more and better jobs and social cohesion are largely ignored; notes that the economic governance framework has proven to be counter-productive as it forces Member States to adopt pro- cyclical measures; points out that the narrow focus on public deficit and debt numbers along with austerity measures pursued among others through MoUs promoted the distortion of social security and wage levels in several Member States;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
- Having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2014 on an EU Homelessness Strategy;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas unemployment has been diminishing since 2013 thanks to supportive macroeconomic policies and the impact of structural reforms; whereas it nevertheless remains too high, currently affecting 9.9 % of active citizremains too high, currently affecting 9.9 % of active citizens, i.e. 23 million Europeans, about half of them being long-term unemployed; whereas unemployment has been diminishing since 2013 only gradually due to the persisting macroeconomic austerity regimes and structural reforms in many Member States that hamper large-scale public investmenst, i.e. 23 million Europeans, about half of them being long-term unemployedweaken social dialogue, destabilise labour markets, dismantle social security and perpetuate social exclusion;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas many Member States cut funding in the education sector, hampering quality education, putting pressure on pay and working conditions of teachers, and increasing precarious contractual arrangements for teachers and employees in the education sectors; whereas about 20 % of active citizens in the EU have only basic skills while 39 % of companies have difficulty finding staff with the required skills, whereas low educational level is one ofand a lack of comprehensive social inclusion measures are the key causes of young people becoming NEETs;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas although atypical or non- standard forms of employment do not in themselves constitute precarious work, it is more likely to be foundare continuously increasing, especially in Member States that implemented labour market reforms with a negative effect on worker's rights; whereas contracts of this nature apply, albeit such contracts account for a minority of existing employment relationshipsre one of the root causes of precarious work, as they are often fix-termed and occur with no sufficient protection against dismissal, a lack of social security, insufficient contributions to pension schemes, and the absence of works council and trade union representation;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas - although one of the five Europe 2020 targets aims at reducing by at least 20 million the number of people in or at risk of poverty and social exclusion - poverty rates in the EU have increased even further and are at an unacceptably high level; whereas almost 123 million people in the EU are in this situation; whereas in 2013 26.5 million children in the EU28 were at risk of falling into poverty or social exclusion; whereas homelessness is increasing in a majority of Member States;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission's Annual Growth Survey (AGS) underlines the need to pay more attention to social fairness in the context of the new macroeconomic adjustment programmes,; Deplores that the addinged three social indicators (activity rate, youth unemployment and long-term unemployment) in the 2016 Alert Mechanism Report have no triggering effect and therefore are at risk of not preventing the further dismantling of social standards; calls for the inclusion of social indicators that trigger concrete measures for inclusive growth and the eradication of poverty; stresses that the need to invest in social development is not just a means of guaranteeing that economic growth and convergence can be achieved, but must also be a specific target in itself;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to fospromoter, at Member State level, a broader investment strategy for the full cycle of education and training, encompassing all sectors of lifelong learning, work-based and workplace learning, formal and non- formal learning, and to foster forms of cooperation involving governments, enterprises, educational institutions and social partners, with a view to adapcreating Member States’inclusive education and training systems to the needs offor a successful access to the labour market;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission´s proposal to enhance the Youth Guarantee at national, regional and local level, and stresses its importance for school-to-work transitions; stresses the need to guarantee suitable forms of collaboration between public and private employment services, and social support services; emphasises the need to ensure that the Youth Guarantees reaches young people facing multiple exclusions and extreme poverty;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Emphasises the urgent need to ensure that the EU's efforts to fight poverty and social exclusion are at the core of its growth strategy; calls on the Commission and Member States to actively address the growing number of people facing extreme housing exclusion and homelessness, which are currently not captured by indicators used to measure the EU poverty target, but nevertheless represent an alarming social reality, affecting at least 4 million people every year; is concerned by the fact that 22,348,834 households, or 11% of the population, in the EU are facing housing cost overburden and a further 10.5 million households suffer severe housing deprivation;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the EU continues to suffer from structural social problems that need to be addressed urgently, pointing up the need to continue prioritising investment, structural reformsprioritise large-scale public investment, socially progressive reforms (like the invention of an EU target for minimum wages to provide for a remuneration of at least 60 % of the respective national average wage, accompanied by an EU target for minimum income schemes providing income support of at least 60 % of national median equalised income), and responsible fiscal consolidation, thus reinforcing a favourable economic environment for business with a view tothe creatingon of more quality jobs while re-balancing the social and economic dimensions; stresses that those priorities will only be achieved if investment in human capital is prioritised as a common strategy;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considering that flexicurity contributes to avoidingObjects to the Commission's attempt to re-introduce the failed flexicurity concept, as more flexibility led to more labour market fragmentation and promoting the creation of more quality jobs, more precarious work and a re-commodification of labour, permanent uncertainty for employees, psychological stress, and the hampering of a stable life planning and a decent family life; calls on the Member States to modernise their employment protection legislation in order to guarantee more stability inhigh quality jobs with dismissal protection, high quality public services for the transitions between jobs, as well as employees' access to high standards of social security and welfare rights; calls on the Commission to step up monitoring of the abusive practice of successive fixed- term contracts, in both private and public sectors;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to gradually shift taxes from labour to other sourcesand consumption to capital and property, and to implement tax rules that foster incentives to entrepreneurship and employment creation, especially for highly qualified young people, in order to boost research and innovation projects within European enterprises;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to modernise their current social protection systems, in order to guarantee their sustainability in the face of expected ageing; considers that pension schemes should be linked not only to life expectancy but aa holistic approach for a new inclusive, demand driven growth model, including: - income support sufficient to avoid social exclusion and income poverty; - inclusive labour markets with comprehensive support for disadvantaged groups; - better access to quality services, especially for the most disadvantaged (like the rising number of homeless people in the EU, Roma, single-parent households, elderly, NEETs, and refugees); - strategies to end homelessness; - strategies to end child poverty; - gender mainstreaming, - anti-discrimination and active participation of those people affected in policy design; considers that pension schemes should be linked to various economic, social and labour factors, such as the consideration of long-term effects of different job profiles on the physical and mental health of employees, life expectancy, future productivity growth, decent wage levelso to other social and labour factors, while not jeopardisinghat allow contributions to pension schemes allowing a decent revenue when employees reach pension age, and immigration policies with a focus on fast social and economic integration measures, in order to stabilise the sustainability of public finances;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 269 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Member States to examine the persistrengthen efforts to eradicate the gender pay gap and to take more active measures to strence of low fertility rates in the EUgthen women's participation in the labour market, such as investment in child and elderly care, adequate maternity and paternity leave provisions and the access to social services; cCalls on the Commission and the Member States to promote family-friendly policies that enhance parents' capacity to ensure their children's wellbeing; encourages the Member States to consider applying more favourable fiscal differentiation in line with the number of children in a family;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Member States to implement and monitor more efficientinclusive forms of social protection systems and income support, in order to ensure that these systems offer a minimumdecent standard of living for the unemployed and those at risk of social exclusion, while guaranteeing that such mechanisms do not perpetuate social dependency and constitute an incentive to education ordevelop integrated strategies to tackle homelessness and housing exclusion, while guaranteeing that such mechanisms provide access to education and training and opportunities to entering the joblabour market;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 373 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on theall Member States to agree on a common policy for the welcoming of refugees and to implement the necessary national measures for their inclusion of refugees; stresses that such an approach will require the allocation of funds that, in so fragile a situation, cannot be provided solely by Member States; calls on the Commission to provide the funding required to develop such a strategy as part of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF); calls on the Commission and the Member States to invite the social partners to play a key role in the common task of integrating migrants and refugees into the labour market, to cut the waiting period before asylum seekers are allowed to work to a minimum, to develop mechanisms for the fast recognition of skills and competences, to introduce labour market policies that offer language courses, training and consultation, to develop a framework to guarantee decent work and equal treatment, and to prevent a drift of immigrants and refugees into undeclared work;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 388 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work together on removing the obstacles to fairrights-based, socially secure and voluntary labour mobility, ensuring that EU mobile workers are not treated abusively; calls, therefore, for a full implementation of the principle of equal pay for equal work (and work of equal value) at the same work place, and for respect for collective agreements; rejects any attempt of Member State governments or the Commission to discriminate workers from EU or third countries by excluding them from in-work benefits; rejects any attempt to revise the regulations 883/2004 and 987/2009 in a way that reduces access of EU and EFTA citizens to social benefits;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 405 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31 a. Rejects the establishment of National Competitiveness Boards as new bureaucratic institutions to interfere in collective bargaining at national level;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that timely and correct transposition of EU law into national legislation and a clear domestic legislative framework should be a priority for the Member States in order to reduce breaches of EU law and therefore deliver benefits to people and business;; expresses its concern at the high number of cases of late or incorrect transposition of EU Directives which result in restrictions to workers' freedom of movement, the non-application of the non-discrimination principle or the circumvention of maximum working time requirements in several Member States1 a; ___________ 1a http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/applying-eu- law/docs/annual_report_32/20140701_an nual_report_2014_member_states_en.pdf
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the fact that in 2014 the Commission received its highest number of new complaints in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion since 2011; stresses the fundamental role of trade unions and civil society organisations in monitoring shortcomings in the transposition and application of EU law by Member State authorities;
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the Commission, when drafting and assessing legislation, to take greater acensure adequate parliamentary participation, count of the burden it may impose on SMEs, which create 85% of new jobrol and supervision, as well as the involvement of social partners;
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Expresses its concern at the Commission's initiatives under the "Better Regulation" agenda, which is being used to lower the rights and protection afforded to workers under existing regulation;
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomNotes the efforts made by the Commission during the past years and acknowledges the range of measures that have been put in place to assist the Member States with implementation such as correlation tables, an annual scoreboard and guidelines; is concerned by the discretion of the Commission in setting up these instruments;
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to coordinate their efforts at an earlier stage of the legislative process with a view to ensuring that future EU law can be implemented more effectively;deleted
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to strengthen cooperation with the Member States in order to speed up the correction of breaches of EU law where necessary; highlights that this cooperation must be transparent and open to parliamentary scrutiny;
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to give greater support to the Member States with regard to implementing EU law by providing tailor-made tools, such as detailed implementation plans and guidance documents; stresses that an increase in the staffing of Member States' labour inspectorates, in line with ILO recommendations, and the establishment of a regular dialogue with social partners are essential to ensure effective implementation of EU labour law in Member States.
2015/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of increasing the economic potential of the strategic sectors of agriculture, forestry, tourism, energy, the bioeconomy, organic products, health and the latest technologies, and giving strong backing to SMEs with which research centres should form link, and promoting at the same time public investment for decent and secure job creation , which will respect collective bargaining and collective agreements;
2016/03/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that an environment needs to be created that fosters innovation and research with smart specialisation strategies and stronger links between the complementary strengths of the Alpine Region and its interests; notes that research and innovation may in some cases cost a number of jobs; stresses in this regard the importance of holistic employment and development strategies that create new, secure and decent jobs;
2016/03/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that multi-skills training and training courses that match the needs of the labour market and its strategic sectors should be encouraged, with specific training centres and an online multilingual regional job centre in particular; training courses should be combined to broader public strategies of fighting unemployment and promote secure and decent jobs;
2016/03/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Towards a well-functioning energy market benefiting consumeritizens
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 106 #

2015/2323(INI)

6. Calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to rigorously ensure full implementation of the Third Energy Package, and calls for its revision to take account of the following recommendations:
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 153 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point c
c. Recommends developing rules for price comparison tools to ensure that consumers can access independent, up-to-date and understandable comparison tools; believes those tools should also include the energy generation costs for every type of technology, the energy mix used and more information about the energy companies such as ethical responsibility, job quality and gender equality; believes Member States should develop accreditation schemes covering all price comparison tools, in line with CEER guidelines;
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 234 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Democratising the energy system by helping consumeritizens take ownership of the energy transition, produce their own energy and become energy-efficient
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 267 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that access to capital, high upfront investment costs and long repayment periods represent barriers to the take-up of self-generation and energy efficiency measures; calls, therefore, for the development of new business models and innovative financial instrumentspublic financial support to incentivise self-generation, consumption and energy efficiency for all consumers; considering the importance of self-generation and energy efficiency measures, suggests that the public funds mobilised to reach those objectives should not be considered as public deficit in the terms of the TSCG ; suggests that this should become a priority for the EIB, EFSI and the Structural Funds;
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 294 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recommends self-consumed energy should not be monitored and should be free of taxes and fees, recommends the establishment of a contractual framework between consumers who produce their own energy and suppliers; in case of a positive net balance, during a period of one year, consumers should be paid for the provided energy.
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 305 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recommends reducing to an absolute minimum the administrative barriers to new self-generation capacity, suggests establishing a "one-stop-shop" to provide information and suggests replacing lengthy authorisation procedures with a simple notification requirement; suggests that the revision of the renewable energy directive could include specific provisions to remove barriers and promote community/cooperative energy schemes;
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 384 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for the development of a strong EU framework to fight energy poverty, including a broad, common but non- quantitative definition of energy poverty, focusing on the idea that access to affordableconsidering energy as a public social good and access to energy ias a basic social right; urges the Commission to prioritise measures to alleviate energy poverty in upcoming legislative proposals and to present a dedicated action plan by mid- 2017;
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 388 #

2015/2323(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Considers that, as a basic rule, it is forbidden to cut off power supplies to European citizens in financial difficulties; recommends social services as the responsible structure to determinate the poverty situation, suggests that suppliers should propose social tariffs adequate to consumers economics capacities;
2016/03/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the Commission's planned transformation of the electricity market must contribute to efficiency and, security of supply and to achieving the goal for the European Union to become the world number one in renewable energies;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 27 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the integration of the energy markets willcan enhance achievement of the Treaty goals of secure, low-costaffordable and sustainable energy;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas national capacity markets make it harder to integrate electricitechanisms distort national and potentially also EU-energy markets and run contrary to the objectives of the common energy policy;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 86 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the support for renewables is necessary due to clear distortion of the energy market due to significant subsidies to the incumbent sector;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 110 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission communication on the transformation of the energy market and endorses the view that the transformed electricity market should enhance regional cooperation on security of energy supply and should focus on more market and less regulationthe integration of variable supply of renewable energy and decentralized renewable energy generation to the benefit of citizens;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 137 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the existing regulatory framework of the European markets to be adjusted to allow for a growing share of renewable energy sources; stresses that a new market design for electricity must promote sustainable, renewable and efficient electricity supply;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 163 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to be more pro-actively involved in the design of a European internal market in electricity and to avoid undermining the objectives of Articles 114 and 194 TFEU by means of permanent capacity marketechanisms;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 224 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the right of Member States to determine the conditions for the use of their energy resources, the national energy mix and the overall structure of their energy supply; nevertheless underlines the EU's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions domestically and to increase the share of renewable energies and improve energy efficiency;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 237 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Supports the closer linkage of differing priorities in the national energy mix, such as wind energy with nuclear or with water reservoirspatchable renewable power generation with variable renewable energy sources;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 245 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that network expansion in particular is indispensablemight be necessary with a view to completing the internal market in electricity with a growing share of renewables; regrets that there are still large gaps in the interconnections between Member States, leading to network bottlenecks and significantly impairing cross-border energy trading; calls for the electricity interconnection objectives to be differentiated by region and aligned with the ENTSO-E ten-year network plan;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 262 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that new approaches should be developed to overcome bottlenecks and achieve a smart distribution grid that allows for the smooth integration and provision of services by decentralised generators, prosumers and consumers;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 272 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that rapid network expansion and the removal of network bottlenecks are also essential if uniform price zones are to be retained, and that the splitting of bidding zones could be a sensible market economy approach to reflect actual electricity shortages in certain regions; takes the view that in closely integrated electricity networks the allocation of price zones should be decided together with all neighbours concerned in order to prevent both the inefficient use of networks and the reduction of cross-border capacities, which is incompatible with the internal market; stresses that decentralized small scale production increases security of supply and reduces the investment needs in infrastructure;
2016/04/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 323 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Insists that national capacity markets should be open to cross-border participation and should only create the capacity strictly necessary for security of supply;deleted
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 353 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Insists that, before a capacity market is authorised, it must be shown that all efforts have been made to reinforce the internal market and dismantle obstacles to flexibility;deleted
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 385 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that the expectation of future price surges can create incentives for producers and investors to invest in production capacity, particularly in high- efficiency modern gas-fired power stations, urges politicians not to intervene in the market even in the event of large price surges and calls, in the medium term, for the complete abolition of regulated final consumer prices;
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 434 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that the Member States must meet ambitious specific quantitative objectives for the share of renewables in energy consumption, irrespective of the market situation, and therefore stresses the importance of promoting renewables in a way that focuses on competition and cost efficiency; therefore regards the promotion of investment as more compatible with the market than feed-in priorities and fixed priceertainty for investors in renewable energy sources; therefore regards feed-in priorities and fixed prices as necessary for meeting investors’ needs;
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 449 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. InsistStresses that, with the increasing technical maturity and widespreadgrowing use of renewable energy sources, subsidy rules must be geared to market conditions in order to keep costs for energy consumers within reasonable boundthe objective of support schemes is to allow newer and more costly technologies, to progress along their learning curve; demands that support schemes take into consideration the different maturity levels, specific barriers as well as risk profiles of different renewable energy technologies;
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 458 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Warns against mixing energy supply objectives withStresses the link between energy policy and climate policy objectives; calls for the ETS to be consistently reinreforcmed and the market to be redesigned with a view to greater flexibility, so that in future CO2 and fuel prices can give more support to the expansion of renewablesin a way to help achieve the decarbonisation objectives of the European economy whilst allowing a ‘just transition’ for all workers without undermining quality of life or generating windfall profit;
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 468 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for operators of renewable power plants to be held strictly responsible for balancing within their areas and stresses that, in the event of departure from the schedule announced by the operator, an appropriate compensatory energy price should be charged;deleted
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 487 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Is convinced that, alongside renewables, all energy sources which serve the objective of gradual decarbonisation will continue to have a role to play in electricity generation;deleted
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 548 #

2015/2322(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls for measures to facilitate necessary investments in distribution systems which are not yet prepared for taking in growing quantities of renewables or for digitalisation; in this connection, data collection and distribution must be accorded a greater role and data protection must be secured; each party requesting data from consumers should provide justification why the data is needed, i.e. the burden of proof should be extended to DSOs/metering operators;
2016/03/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 44 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that in order to ensure better conditions for job creation for the SME sector Member States must address the following problems, which are unequally present in different regions: skills scarcity and brain drain; regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty; the shadow economy; and the de facto privileged position of multinational corporations (MNCs); lack of investment in real economy; lack of public investment and creation of decent secure jobs; one-sided austerity measures which minimize the buying power of people due to wage cuts and social spending cuts and force SMEs to closure; skills scarcity and brain drain, and regulatory uncertainty; the shadow economy; and the de facto privileged position of multinational corporations (MNCs); stresses the need to include SMEs into the centre of public investment policies of economy revitalization, which will also promote investments in real economy and local businesses;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that tackling the above-mentioned structural problems would result, inter alia, in social development, fairer competition and the extension of the social contribution and tax base to a higher number of economic operators, lthus creadting to lower labour and administrative costs and thus creating better condition forbetter condition for job creation, which should be part of holistic policies of social development, which will promote viable and sustainable SMEs and safe and decent job creation;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that labour costs have an impactwages and social benefits onf SMEs’ job creation workers should be protential and competitivenesscted, since higher wages favour SME growth;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned at the growing phenomenon of bogus self-employment across the EU, which cannot be considered in positive terms as contributing to the ‘growing number of micro-enterprises’, but, rather, undermines the image of entrepreneurshipshould rather be dealt with policies against bogus self-employment by expanding social security, the welfare state, collective bargaining, promoting the role of social partners and secure and decent jobs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Takes note of the Investment Plan for Europe, which is designed to create new jobs and boost innovation, and hopes that the European Investment Project Portal, as a transparent pipeline for investable projects in the EU, will help orientate investors towards existing opportunities, in favour of financing SMEs and start-up development as the fastest way to reduce unemployment; deplores the fact that the Investment Plan does not promote public investments and has failed to promote investment in countries of the European Periphery that need these the most;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that apprenticeship schemes within SMEs should be promoted by Member States, including through financial incentives;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Member States tocould create opportunities for young people to acquire entrepreneurship skills; also stresses the importance of mentoring for young entrepreneurs if they include these in broader social development programs of job creation and strong social security; also stresses the importance of mentoring for young entrepreneurs; deeply regrets the phenomena where young people are taken advantage of (amongst others in bad quality internships) and have to work under precarious conditions, sometimes without payment or social security;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Takes the view that reducing the regulatory and administrative burden, together with improving the quality of regulation and enforcement, constitute the right way to lower SMEs’ costs, including labour costs, in order to increase their job creation potential; strongly believes, that any regulation change should aim to strengthen social security, collective bargaining, and the role of the social partners;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to adopt, in the framework of the European Semester’s country-specific recommendations, a differentiated approach to improve the environment for SMEs and to promote stronger social security and workers’ rights, taking into account the country- specific circumstances and the EU regions’ specific structural differences; calls further more on the Commission to focus not only on SME but on Micro Enterprises as well;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Member States to adopt favourable legislative frameworks for newly- created SMEs, focusing in particular on incentive measures aimed at tackling the shadow economy; recognizes that austerity measures implemented in many Member States had a catalytic impact in the growth of the shadow economy;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the view that overregulated and bureaucratic economic systems induce higher labour costs, which represent a higher financial burden for SMEs than for big companies owing to the differences in business volumes;deleted
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Notes that a reduced regulatory burden, bettermong others, regulation and improvement of law enforcement can contribute to tackling the issues of the shadow economy and tax avoidance, as the attractiveness of such ‘exits’ from the regulatory systems would be substantially reduced;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Takes the view that new EU regulations and agreements with third countries should take into account the EU regions’ specific structural differences in the SME sectorfor micro- and SMEs, assessing the impact of future rules on employment perspectives;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment regarding the disastrous implications of the future TTIP agreement for jobs in the SME sector in all Member States;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that Erasmus and other mobility programmes have fostered European integration and strengthened the idea of citizenship; notes that these programmes have had an indiwithin the European Union have contributed to the potential increase in the cultural universality of their beneficiaries, and have been an important mechanism for promoting tolerance, solidarity and dialogue between citizens of differecnt impact on employmentnationalities and experiences; points out that mobility in the context of vocational education and training (VET) is fundamental to the fight against unemployment,an important factor in increasing and diversifying technical and academic capacities, which enhances employability and reduces the skills gap;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that, despite improvements tothe propaganda around the benefits of the Bologna Treaty and other processes for the standardisation of education and training systems, serious inconsistencies persist in the arrangements for the recognition of diplomas, credits, skills certificates, competency accreditations and acquired expertise in the context of VET, a legal basis applicable throughout the EU is needewhich fail to meet the expectations of students and workers who seek to make use of these arrangements of their own accord;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomesPoints out that the tools developed by the Commission, such as Ploteus and Eures, which offer information about VET and mobility, but deplores the fact that they are little known and little used; notes, however, that mobility cannot be understood as a solution to the problems of unemployment and should not be promoted as a policy in substitution of the responsibility of the Member States to invest in education, training and the creation of employment, ensuring that mobility is a personal choice and not a ‘survival solution’ for citizens;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for a revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) based on criteria included ing the prior assessment of the social effectiveness of measures to combat unemployment, with funding for the less effective provisions being cut, an approach which iensuring that the allocations made to these programmes particularly important at times of crisis such as the strengthened, encouraging the independence of beneficiaries and truly universal acceses, which are marked by unacceptable imbalanceslst at the same time avoiding the elitisation of mobility by means of under-financialisation.
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the decision of the European Parliament and the Council on establishing a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the scale of mass unemployment in Europe, the difference in wage levels between countries and the tactic of pitting workers against one another necessarily leads to lower wages for everyone and an increase in unemployment;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union, in its judgment in the C- 341/05 Laval case of 18 December 20073, highlighted the legitimacy of the struggle against social dumping, but whereas the first strikes and protest actions held to denounce this type of practice were sharply criticised by the Court of Justice of the European Union, which found that they ‘hampered the free movement of persons’; whereas the Laval judgment found against the Swedish trade unions that had paralysed the workshop of a Latvian construction company, which was building a school in Sweden and paying Latvian wages; __________________ 3 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?te xt=&docid=71925&pageIndex=0&doclang =FR&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1& cid=498309
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for a thorough review of the 1996 directive on the posting of workers, rather than a simple strengthening of controls in the event of breaches of the rules;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for social contributions to be calculated in accordance with the rules in force in the host country and to be paid into the social security fund of the country of origin;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on Member States to increase the staffing levels and resources ofor their labour inspectorates and their liaison offices, in particular for interpretation and translation and not to impose restrictions on the scope for carrying out checks, including by trade unions;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls for the main contractor to be held fully liable in the event of social fraud in the organisation, at all levels;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce legislation for compulsory and automatic inclusion of posted workers in the relevant collective agreements at their place of work; where no local collective agreement exist, posted workers shall covered by the relevant sectorial collective agreement or law of the country they work in;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 411 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for the setting up of a framework to prevent fundamental social rights being weakened and argues for the establishment of a social progress clause during the revision of the Posted Workers Directive;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 602 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that a social protocol is necessary to ensure the primacy of fundamental rights over economic freedoms and that a social progress clause needs to be included in directives relating to working conditions for workers in the European Union;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 603 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that a social protocol is necessary to ensure the primacy of fundamental rights over economic freedoms; calls, in this respect, for the EU to complete the process of accession to the European Convention of Human Rights and to systematically align its legislative and policy-making proposals with the European Social Charter, while starting the process for a future accession of the EU to the European Social Charter;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 644 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Desires that wage floors be established, possibly in the form of a minimum wage; emphasises that this instrument should be set up on the basis of legislation or convention, in accordance with national practices, with due respect for the role of the social partners; believes that these wage floors should represent at least 60% of the average national wage; calls on the Commission to consult the social partners with a view to introducing, where appropriate, a minimum wage in some border areas associated with highly mobile workers, a compulsory and automatic inclusion of posted workers in the relevant collective agreements at their place of work; where no local collective agreement exist, posted workers shall covered by the relevant sectorial collective agreement or law of the country they work in;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 686 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Demands a thorough revision of the Posted Workers Directive, and calls for the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ to be laid down in black and white and for the host country to be entitled to apply to foreign workers its own legislation on working conditions and collective labour agreements;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas increased energy efficiency and energy saving are key factors for environmental and climate protection and supply securi, in line with the COP 21 agreement to limit global warming below 2°C, and pursue efforts to limit the increase to 1.5°C, supply security and energy sovereignty; whereas the Energy Efficiency Directive provides an important basis in this connection;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 23 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU is making good progress towards its environmental targets for 2020 (reducing CO2 emissions, increasing the share of renewable energy sources, energy efficiency) and is playing a leadingn important role at world level;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 45 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Energy Efficiency Directive only inadequately implemented – savings targets achieved nonethelesprovides framework for reaching energy savings targets
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 54 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that up to now neither the 2012 Energy Efficiency Directive nor the 2010 Buildings Directive have been adequately implemented by the Member States; considers, therefore, that one reason why the energy efficiency targets are being achieved lies in the fact that citizens and undertakings themselves have an interest in low energy consumption and cutting costsregrets the substantial delays in implementation despite that citizens and undertakings themselves have an interest in low energy consumption and cutting costs; highlights that the European Commission assessed in the energy efficiency progress report to the European Parliament and the Council that currently only 17.6% primary energy savings will be achieved by 2020 according to the national indicative targets and that the 20% target will probably not be reached;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Urges the Member States to quickly implement the EU legislation in order to take the necessary measures to achieve the energy saving targets;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls Parliament's resolutions of 5 February 2014, 26 November 2014 and 15 October 2015, which call for three binding energy and climate targets for 2030, in particular the 40 % energy efficiency target;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 71 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the directive’s flexibility has allowed many Member Statese existence of many loopholes in the existing directive in particular in Article 7; calls the European Commission to rembark on energy efficiency measurove these loopholes;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 106 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the Energy Efficiency Directive became an Energy Saving Directive as a result of political decisions; calls for the focus of the directive to be turned more towards energy efficiency considerations;deleted
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 121 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Competing legal provisions slow down environmental progress, create red tape and increase energy costsdeleted
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 129 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Criticises the 2 000 or soNotes that energy reporting obligations imposed on businesses, consumers and public authorities; regrets that it is ultimately electricity consumers who bear the consequences of an overly complex reporting systemas part of a framework, are essential to evaluate the progress on the implementation of the existing EU legislation;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 146 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that energy saving rules and rules on increased use of renewable energy sources have a direct and indirect impact on the carbon footprint and the ETS system (certificate prices)pricing instruments such as the ETS system (certificate prices) is not appropriate tool to reach energy efficiency target; notes that low ETS certificate prices reduce the incentives for investment in energy saving;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 154 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that national legislation (exit from coal, payment schemes for renewable energy, capacity markets) restricts the scope for European solutions that provide the best possible results in terms of cost and supply and cancels out the price advantages obtained through energy saving; calls for increased possibilities for binding coordination by ththe Energy Efficiency Directive gives the necessary flexibility that enables Member States to tailor European solutions that provide the best possible results in terms of cost and supply according to national circumstances; notes that Member States have the possibility to introduce more stringent measures that are Ccommissionpatible with Union law (Article 1.2);
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 184 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls for the prioritisation of energy efficiency measures focus on low-income populations, especially regarding social building renovation in order to eradicate the energy poverty;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 190 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Energy legislation needs to be more coherent and more flexible
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 213 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that a barrier-free internal energy market will optimisepublic supervision of the energy market will enable the control of the costs of energy production and distribution and significantly improve energy efficiency across Europe;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 221 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the positive impact that certification schemes or saving obligations (Article 7) are having in many Member States; considers the flexibility of the rules to be a major factor in guaranteeing their acceptance; asks that the calculation of certification schemes and energy-saving measures should not be hampered by overly restrictive interpretations and time limitsnotes that actions under Article 7.2 are no longer relevant and that the statistical removal of energy used in transport and ETS sectors from setting the target has diminished the effectiveness of the energy savings requirement;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 244 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Takes the view that more flexibility is needed in order to reach the EU’s climate protection and efficiency targets; calls for ‘target flexibility’ for Member States; takes the view that rebates should be available for targets relating to energy saving and increasing the share of renewable energy sources (Article 3 of the Energy Efficiency Directive) where for example the CO2 targets have been exceeded must be collectively increased and binding targets for energy efficiency are essential to ensure ambitious objectives, and to allow sufficient flexibility for Member States to tailored the measures at the national level;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 252 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls in this connection for the Energy Efficiency Directive to be adapted in line with the EU’s climate protection targets for 2030, as the minimum basis and in line with the COP 21 agreement;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 309 #

2015/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is working on guidelines for the implementation of Articles 9 to 11 of the Energy Efficiency Directive; considers cost transparency – taking account of cost- effectiveness and technical feasibility – to be a prerequisite for energy saving; takes the view that this topic could potentially be included in the Buildings Directive; considers that the basis of cost- effectiveness should not be the decisive criteria to implement energy efficiency measures;
2016/03/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes with concern that the financial crisis and response to it has impacted disproportionately on women in the EU in a number of ways - layoffs in the public service, where women constitute on average more than two-thirds of the workforce, have driven many women into unemployment or precarious, low-paid work; funding cuts to public services have increased women's risk of poverty, social exclusion, health problems and violence; home repossessions by banks have increased poverty and the risk of homelessness among women and children; notes that single mothers and single women pensioners have faced the biggest cumulative losses as a result of austerity policies;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that cuts to family benefit and welfare systems implemented as part of austerity programmes in some Member States have reduced the income of women and increased the level of poverty among women and children; urges Member States in which this has occurred to immediately restore their family benefit and welfare systems to ensure an adequate minimum income;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Notes that women struggle to build up sufficient contributions across both the private and public pension systems as a result of the pay gap, precarious and low- paid work, carrying out unpaid caring, and being excluded from the labour market for long periods over the course of their lives as a result of the prohibitive cost of childcare in many Member States; calls for Member States to introduce "care credits" to allow women outside the formal labour market to collect pension contributions;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Considers that austerity policies are resulting in the reprivatisation of care, which not only reduces access to care services but significantly increases the burden on women in childcare and care for older people and people with disabilities by shifting the responsibility for care from society to women; calls on the Member States to restore high-quality and accessible public services including childcare, disability and elderly care;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that women are disproportionately and often involuntarily concentrated in precarious work; urges the Member States to consider implementing the International Labour Organisation (ILO) recommendations intended to reduce the scale of precarious work2 , such as restricting the circumstances in which precarious contracts can be used, using tax measures to disincentivise the over-use of temporary contracts, and limiting the length of time workers can be employed on such a contract, after which they must be given a permanent contract; __________________ 2 International Labour Organisation, Policies and regulations to combat precarious employment, 2011.
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the lack of free or affordable high-quality childcare contributes to the gender employment gap, the pay gap and related pension gap, and the disproportionate number of women who are in precarious work and in or at risk of poverty; urges the Member States to ensure access to childcare by, for example, increasing expenditure on the provision of childcare services and/or subsidies to households, incentivising employer contributions to childcare costs, and making better use of EU funds;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that women’s economic independence plays a crucial role in their ability to escape situations of domestic violence, and that women who have exhausted their paid leave are at risk of losing their jobs and economic independence; notes that the recent introduction of domestic violence leave in Australia and the US has provided many workers with employment protection when dealing with the impact of domestic violence, for example, moving house and attending medical and legal appointments; calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider introducinge a statutory right to paid domestic violence leave.
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that while the promotion of female entrepreneurship may reduce poverty for some women in the EU, it is not nearly a sufficient policy measure to address the scale of the problem; believes that policies which promote a guaranteed adequate minimum income, accessible public services including care services, and secure jobs which incorporate a living wage and a fair work-life balance will make a more significant impact on reducing poverty for a much larger number of women;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
- Having regard to the Commission Communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2010)2020) and to its resolution of 16 June 2010 on that communication, __________________ 1 JO C 236 E of 12.8.2011, p. 57.deleted
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
- Having regard to the Commission Communication of 19 March 2014 entitled ‘Taking stock of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2014)0130),deleted
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 15 July 2015 on the follow-up to the European Citizens' Initiative Right2Water1 a; __________________ 1 a Text adopted, P8_TA(2015)0294
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas between 2008 and 2013, the number of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU27 increased from 117 million to 121 million of which the number of people severely materially deprived increased from 42 to 45 million, the number of people at risk of poverty after social transfers increased from 82 to 86 million; whereas this development runs counter to the EU target to reduce poverty by 20 million by 2020; whereas certain groups are more at risk of poverty than others such as children, women, people with disabilities, Roma communities, and older people;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. Whereas one of the consequences of rising energy prices is that many families live in houses without heating and that not having adequate heating has a negative impact on a person’s health, in particular for children and older persons;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the wide gap between Member States in the provision of welfare and a minimum income means that in some Member States welfare reduces the risk of poverty by 60% and in others by only 15%; whereas the average impact of the provision of welfare on reducing the risk of poverty in the EU is 35%;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the UN has affirmed that the human right to water and sanitation entitles everyone to water for personal and domestic uses which is of good quality, safe, physically accessible, affordable, sufficient and acceptable; whereas a further UN recommendation has stated that 3% of household income should be seen as a maximum for water payments where payments apply; whereas the privatisation of water services has a negative impact on households living in, or at risk of, poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B c (new)
Bc. whereas there are 12 million more women than men living in poverty in the EU; whereas factors contributing to this inequality include the gender pay and pension gaps, the large proportion of women in precarious work, and the fact that women are often forced to be economically inactive due to the prohibitive cost of childcare;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Da (new)
D a. Whereas privatisation and deregulation of energy services have contributed to the rise in prices, which prevents growing numbers of the population from having access to these services;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Invites the Commission, in the context of the announced social pillar, to present an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income in 2016;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. FPoindts it regrettableout that the EU2020 target to reduce poverty in Europe by, lifting 20 million people out of poverty, appears even further out of reach than when it was set; reiterates that one of the target groups is people that face severe material deprivation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to renew their commitment to the poverty reduction targetsupport measures to reduce poverty by adopting the following measures:
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Finds regretunacceptable that the EU2020 target to reduce poverty in Europe by lifting 20 million people out of poverty appears even further out of reach than when it was set; reiterates that one of the target groups is people that face severe material deprivation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to renew their commitment to the poverty reduction target by:
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new)
- taking measures to address extreme forms of poverty that currently fall beyond the scope of the target, namely homelessness;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. WelcomeHighlights the Commission’s intention to present a new social pillar; recalls that to deliver on Article 9 TFEU, such a pillar should be aimed at setting a European framework for a minimum income above the poverty level, continuing with a rights- based approach to social policy and improving implementation of existing social, labour and anti-discrimination legislation;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. WelcomeHighlights the Commission’s intention to aim for a social triple A score for the Union; finds regrettable that this is currently out of reach owing to increasing inequality, high poverty and social exclusion and less and less availability of quality and affordable social, health and care services; recalls that a social triple A must be based on Article 9 TFEU aimed at a ‘high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion and a high level of education, training and protection of human health’; recalls that achieving a social triple A as a benchmark requires assessing both policies that hinder and work towards achieving the benchmark; finds regrettable that so far the latter has not been addressed at Union level;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop, adopt and implement an EU framework to reduce poverty and social exclusion, in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, consisting of concrete measures and actions, including energy poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 A. Calls on the Commission to bear in mind the proposals contained in the Opinion published by the European Economic and Social Committee, ‘For coordinated European measures to prevent and combat energy poverty’, and to encourage the urgent adoption of a European energy security and solidarity commitment and, within this framework, the setting-up of a European Poverty Observatory and a European fund with the specific aim of eradicating energy poverty
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on Member States to reassess their progress towards ending homelessness given that rising rental costs and decreasing social housing stock in some Member States have caused the homelessness rate to rise;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to urgently identify, implement and maintain policy measures that enable households to meet housing costs, including provision of housing allowances, given that 22, 348,834 households (approximately 11% of the EU population) spend more than 40% of their disposable income on housing and 21,942,491 households (approximately 10.8% of the EU population) experience difficulty maintaining adequate household temperature;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12 c. Notes that contributing factors to housing stress and the risk of homelessness include: a lack of social housing stock; uncontrolled rental costs; high mortgage interest rates; insufficient rental, housing and mortgage allowances; and a lack of restrictions on banks in repossessing homes of households in poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 255 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 d (new)
12 d. Stresses that while rent controls and higher housing allowances can lower housing costs for households at risk of poverty in the short term, these measures should also be accompanied by long-term housing and community programmes to increase the housing stock for different socially disadvantaged target groups and middle income households;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 e (new)
Notes that low-income households and those in or at risk of poverty are more dependent on the provision of free, high- quality public services; stresses that the austerity measures implemented by many Member States since 2008 including funding cuts to, and privatisation of, public services has had a detrimental and disproportionate impact on low-income households and those in or at risk of poverty; urges Member States to act to halt and reverse these cuts and privatisations; (Note: to be inserted after subheading 4)
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Expresses its concern that since 2008, due to the financial and economic crisis and the austerity policies which have increased poverty and the number of low-income households in Europe, an increasing number of people have been facing difficulties in paying their water bills and affordability is becoming a matter of growing concern; deplores the fact that in the EU-28 more than 1 million people still lack access to a safe and clean drinking water supply and nearly 2% of the population lacks access to sanitation, according to the World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), and therefore urges the Commission to act immediately;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Rejects water cut-offs and the enforced switching-off of the water supply of households unable to pay water bills as a violation of human rights, and calls on Member States to put an immediate end to these situations when they are due to socioeconomic factors in low-income households; welcomes the fact that in some Member States 'water banks' or minimum water quotas are being used in an effort to help the most vulnerable with their utility costs, to guarantee water as an inalienable component of fundamental rights;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13 c. Notes that the gender pay gap in the EU is on average 16%, and stresses that the cumulative effect of lower earnings for women (including interruptions from work due to caring responsibilities) is a far wider gender pension gap of 39%, which puts older women at a much greater risk of poverty than older men;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13 d. Notes that lone parents, the majority of whom are women, are at a higher than average risk of poverty (34%); notes that a major contributing factor to this increased risk is the fact that due to childcare costs lone parents either face exclusion from employment or are in precarious, low- paid employment; urges Member States to act to legislate for a living wage that guarantees workers' basic needs can be met;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13 e. Urges Member States to implement policies that can ensure quality and affordable childcare is available to all who require it, including through the provision of subsidised childcare and childcare allowances for lone parents and low-income households;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Notes that 55 million EU citizens (9.6% of the population) are not able to afford a quality meal every second day (Eurostat 2014.) The inability to afford nutritious meals has a serious detrimental impact on the health and wellbeing of affected individuals and in turn erects obstacles in terms of employment, job- seeking and caring responsibilities; urges the Commission and Member States to enact policies that will end food poverty including the provision of subsidised food for those in poverty in the short term, and the provision of an adequate minimum income;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that there is a lock-in effect as regards energy poverty, as poor households cannot afford the initial upfront investment needed to combat energy poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Calls on the Commission to map the problem of fuel poverty in the EU, and in particular winter deaths amongst people living in cold homes; and to support the Member States in developing effective solutions;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 295 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. Stresses that poor people living in poor quality and energy inefficient housing are particularly vulnerable to fuel poverty, that investment in this target group can leverage maximal social, health and energy impacts, and that specific measures are required to reach them;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Emphasises that there are a range of barriers to ensuring that the EU Structural and Investment Funds available for energy efficiency reach those living in the poorest quality and most energy inefficient housing, including limited household savings for those living in cold homes and the split incentive between landlords and tenants; calls therefore on the Commission, national, regional and local authorities, and the European Investment Bank to develop innovative funding mechanisms that overcome these barriers, working with stakeholders and building on existing good practice;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Calls on Member States to develop energy policies which are at the service of economic development and populations, which reduce consumption and energy deficits, and which can be seen as a factor for inclusion and not as a constraint on the development of small and medium- sized enterprises and the well-being of peoples;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Deems it necessary to increase appropriations for the Turkish Cypriot Community budget line (Article 13 07 01) for the purpose of contributing decisively to the continuation and intensification of the mission of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus and of supporting the bicommunal Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage, thus promoting trust and reconciliation between the two communities;
2015/10/06
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 23 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the sovereignty and sovereign rights of Member States to explore and develop their natural resources should be respected by all and safeguarded in all circumstances;
2015/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 85 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the future vision of the Energy Union must be one in which Member States recognise that they depend on each other to combat energy poverty, reiterate that the Energy is a public social good, ensure equal access to affordable energy for all and deliver secure energy to their citizens, based on true solidarity and trust, and in which the Energy Union speaks with one voice in global affairs;
2015/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 151 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas ex-post assessment and verification of all energy-related agreements as regards compliance with EU law is already possible through, inter alia, competition and energy regulations; whereas insufficient ex-ante compliance checks at national and EU level lead to severe market distortions;
2015/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 241 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Y a (new)
Ya. whereas the promotion of the exploitation of indigenous conventional oil and gas resources in full compliance with EU acquis, both in traditional production areas (e.g. the North Sea) and in newly discovered areas (e.g. Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea) should be promoted and supported;
2015/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 242 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Y a (new)
Ya. whereas exploitation of indigenous coal and other conventional fossil resources contributes to energy security; whereas adequate funding for coal- mining and extraction of other conventional fossil resources and for research and adaptation of coal- fossil- based energy plants is required to ensure that the mining of indigenous coal and other conventional fossil resources is both economically viable and environmentally sustainable;
2015/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 304 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that energy suppliers coming from third countries must be subject to the EU acquis while Highlights the need to actively strengthen cooperation with the EU's partners and recognize the important role of international cooperating oon in the common market, and calls on the Commission to enforce EU law by all means available in order to allow energy to flow freely in the EU and prevent distortions in the internal marketfield of Energy, and especially energy security; in this regard stresses that all intergovernmental agreements must be based on the principle of mutual respect with the third countries involved;
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 309 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that it is of upmost importance to the EU to end the isolation of some Member States from the internal energy marketand regions from European gas and electricity networks, as demonstrated by the gas stress tests carried out by the Commission; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to carry out such tests every two years; Is of the opinion that the EU should help those most vulnerable countries to diversify their sources and supply routes, as a matter of priority;
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 317 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that, in the context of the future Energy Union, security of energy supply is the most pressing issue and that Member States must coordinate and cooperate in this respect with their neighbours when developing their energy policies; calls on the Commission, in this respect, to examine how the current architecture of national preventive and emergency response measures could be streamlined at both regional and EU level;deleted
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 339 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that a basic precondition for ensuring energy security and stability in the Energy Union is the protection of the sovereignty and sovereign rights of Member States, including those relating to the exploration and exploitation of natural resources;
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 344 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to support those Member States that wish to negotiate energy contracts on a voluntary basis by introducing a common negotiating mechanism, and stresses that the functioning of such a mechanism must be subject to compliance with the EU internal market acquis and with EU competition and World Trade Organisation rules;deleted
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 355 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that greater transparency of intergovernmental agreements could be achieved by strengthening the role of the Commission in energy-related negotiations involving one or more Member States and third countries, including by having the Commission participatethe Commission could, on the request of the Member States, participate as an observer in those negotiations if there is a risk of abuse of a dominant position by one supplier; notes that furthermore the Commission should carry out ex-ante and ex-post assessments and draw up both a positive and a negative list of agreement clauses, such as export ban and destination clauses;for intergovernmental agreements; However, it is important not to jeopardise the ability of Member States to negotiate the content of the agreements.
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 369 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that all future intergovernmental energy agreements with non-EU parties must be discussed with the Commission ahead of signing in order to make sure that they comply with EU legislation, in particular with the Third Energy Package;deleted
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 383 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Ccalls on the Commission to enhance the transparency of commercial gas contracts in order to effectively remove abusive clauses and ensure better ex-ante compliance checks with EU law and energy security provisionsMember States to communicate to the Commission, on a voluntary basis, commercial gas contracts that are referred explicitly in intergovernmental agreements in order to effectively remove abusive clauses; As regards commercial gas contracts, the confidentiality of commercially sensitive information needs to be guaranteed;
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 387 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to prepare draft contract templates and guidelines including an indicative list of abusive clauses in order to create a reference for competent authorities and companies in their contracting activities;deleted
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 391 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that in order to ensure a level playing field and strengthen the bargaining position of EU companies vis- à-vis external suppliers, key features of the contracts should be aggregated and regularly published so as to establish a transparent benchmark which can be referred to by competent authorities and companies in their future negotiations, whilst protecting the confidentiality of sensitive information;deleted
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 428 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the Union can reduce its dependency on particular suppliers and fuels and should terminate its dependency on nuclear energy by maximising its use of indigenous sources of energy, including conventional and unconventional low-emission fossil fuels and renewables, and therefore stresses that no fuel or technology contributing to energy security and climate goals should be discriminated against; above all by promoting energy savings and sustainable consumption. Notes that energy dependency must be reduced following strict rules of environmental protection, including on drillings in sea and on the efforts of production of alternative sources of energy.
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 450 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines that the EU should take advantage of the opportunities that emerge from the energy sources of the Eastern Mediterranean, in particular with a view to creating a Mediterranean gas hub through a corridor from the South- eastern Mediterranean to Europe in order to enhance EU's energy security; calls the EU to promote initiatives for the cooperation in the sector of Energy between the countries in the eastern Mediterranean contributing thus to peace and economic prosperity for the people.
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 487 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission, and in particular DG TRADE, to continue to press for a dedicated energy chapter within the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), with a view to removing US export restrictions on both crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) and eliminating protectionist measures;deleted
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 807 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Believes that the energy-efficiency target must work alongside energy and climate goals and strengthen the competitiveness of the EU economy vis-à- vis its major trade partners;
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 951 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Recognises that indigenous energy sources such as nuclear, clean coal technologies and fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage (CCS) would make a fundamental contribution to EU energy security and decarbonisation, with shale gas facilitatSustainable consumption of resources as well as low emission economy, should be in the core of Energy Union; accordingly the transition to a low- emission economy; believes, in this respect, that the Energy Union must reflect the need foris must be reflected in the EU policies, and the effort of the EU to usbe all low and lower emission sources at Member States' disposal pioneer towards climate change tackling;
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1031 #

2015/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43 a (new)
43a. Reiterates that Energy is a public social good and therefore the EU should closely focus on the issue of energy poverty and promote measures to tackle this problem. Insists, therefore, that the Energy Union should ensure equal access to energy for all, contribute to affordable energy prices for the benefit of the consumers, promote connections and energy infrastructures that have a strategic role for the benefit of the people and strengthen public control and regulation.
2015/06/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2015/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that special support must be given to Member States, such as Cyprus and Malta, that face serious problems due to their isolation from the electricity grids. New measures should therefore be promoted forthwith, particularly for those States, to ensure that they can attain the 10% target for electricity interconnection by 2020, thereby also enhancing the Union’s energy security.
2015/08/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 169 #

2015/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Emphasises the importance of promoting the Israel-Cyprus-Greece electricity interconnection project (Euro- Asia Interconnector), which has already been included in the projects of common interest for the EU. The completion of this project, in conjunction with the region’s energy reserves, will help channel cheap energy to Europe and overcome the energy isolation of the States in question.
2015/08/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas good health, both mental and physical, is a fundamental right that hasis of positive value in itself;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the right to work in a proper health and safety environment is a fundamental employment right that is constantly under challenge as a result of the working conditions currently on offer for workers, who, faced with the prospect of unemployment and impoverishment, are forced to accept anything; whereas the economic crisis has been contributing to the aggravation of working conditions;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas preventing occupational risks and promoting health and safety at the workplace are fundamental ways of creating and maintaining healthier and safer working environments, improving working conditions and effectively combating workplace accidents and occupational diseases;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas identifying at-risk workers and detecting symptoms early are vital strategies for preventing musculoskeletal disorders, as is the introduction of a follow-up and monitoring system based on clinical assessments, in order to produce a more up-to-date reference model;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas in the present situation, with the widespread implementation of ‘austerity policies’ by the EU and its Member States, it is essential to discuss the 'social' cost of workplace accidents resulting from non-compliance, carelessness or negligence on the part of employers, who still regard health and safety at work as a cost;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the whole of society is overburdened by the cost of both workplace accidents and occupational diseases, and it should therefore be the employers of the workers affected who are liable for compensation;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the proportion of workers, who report their health and safety to be at risk because of their work, varies significantly across Member States14 and sectors of economic activity; __________________ 14 5th Working Conditions Survey, Overview Report, Eurofound (2012) http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/defa ult/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ ef1182en.pdf
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas work-related stress is the second most frequent health problem in Europe - after musculoskeletal disorders - and almost half of all workers consider it to be common at their workplace; whereas it accounts for almost half the number of working days lost each year and represents an annual cost to society put at EUR 240 billion;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the most common causes of work-related stress – precarious employment, longer working times, shorter rest periods, more intensive work patterns and competition among workers, as well as bullying by supervisors and managers – have increased with the austerity policies imposed on the peoples and workers of the Member States, largely as a result of the European Union Treaties;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas worker representation at company level and commitment from management is importantnecessary to successful risk prevention at the workplace15 ; __________________ 15 Worker representation and consultation on health and safety, EU-OSHA (2012) https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/repo rts/esener_workers-involvement
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas worker representation at company level and commitment from management is important to successful risk prevention at the workplace3, but the fight against workplace accidents, occupational diseases and psychosocial risks will be fully effective only if anthropocentric models are promoted in both business and public administration; __________________ 3 Worker representation and consultation on health and safety, EU-OSHA (2012) https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/repo rts/esener_workers-involvement
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. Whereas the EU needs sufficient resources to appropriately deal with workplace health and safety against the background of on-going traditional risks at work and continually emerging new risks like risks deriving from nanomaterials, psycho-social risks, aging of the workforce, demands concerning the mobility and flexibility of workers, or changes in the forms of employment;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. Whereas chronic health problems are widespread in the EU and the number of work-related diseases is alarmingly high, including an extreme high number of up to 192.000 work related annual deaths;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Dc. Whereas the pandemic of asbestos related diseases is far from its end, and especially construction workers in maintenance, demolition, repair and similar occupations but also workers in other sectors are potentially exposed;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Dd. Whereas low exposure to asbestos as for example in the environment or in schools and long latency periods can result in mesothelioma;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D f (new)
Df. Whereas the precarisation of employment conditions is undermining existing structures of occupational safety and health and excludes workers with unstable contracts from training and access to OHS services;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D g (new)
Dg. Whereas the fundamental role of European social partner organisations in the dynamic world of work is established in TFEU Art. 153 – 155;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that all employees have a right to the highest level of protection regarding health and safety in the workplace, which must be guaranteed regardless of the size of the employer, the underlying contract or the Member State of employment;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Commission to work out a precise strategy to cover all forms of employment under the EU legislation on OHS and to integrate self-employment and other types of employment not covered into OHS services and training;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Calls on the Commission to rethink its SME concept which in its current form covers some 99 % of all companies and therefore does not allow making precise distinctions between varying conditions or needs of specific type of economic activity or company size;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to address the increasing number of musculoskeletal diseases resulting from working conditions;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. is concerned by the fact that some employers use the financial crisis as an excuse to reduce health and safety standards, and calls for better and more effective controls by the Member States in cooperation with the social partners;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that it is vital and necessary to ensurguarantee a safe and healthy working environment throughout people’s working life in order to achieve the goal of active and healthy ageing for all workers;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Council and the Commission to ensure that all EU trade agreements with third countries respect the obligation of the EU to improve the working environment in order to protect workers' health and safety;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. stresses furthermore that the participation of workers' organizations in planning national and risk assessment strategies both in public and in private sector are essential
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls for enhancing the role of trade unions, assuming its importance in informing, preventing, whistling and fighting against labour practices which are an offense to human dignity and reveal contrary to corporate social responsibility and decent work
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on Member States to ensure that the action taken by the authorities responsible for working conditions is coordinated with the judicial authorities, so as to hold to account employers who unlawfully and immorally violate the most basic human rights at the workplace;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on Member States to pass on to employers the costs relating to treatment of occupational diseases and accidents at work - the cost of drugs, sick-leave-related social security costs, the cost of rehabilitating and reintegrating workers, especially where occupational diseases that are work-related are involved, the cost of occupational-disease-based invalidity pensions, and the cost of exemptions in connection with transport and other public services for pensioners and persons with a disability, where those costs are attributable to poor working conditions;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. recalls that undeclared work is the most unprotected form of work and calls all Member states to develop practical tools both for control and compliance of employers using undeclared workers
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Calls on the Member States to strength public investment (both in terms of human and technical resources, but also in regarding financial means) headed for the supervision regarding the compliance of labour standards and for the sanctioning of their violation, and also headed for the promotion of specialized training in health and safety fields and for campaigns to aware, inform and to advice on issues concerned to labour relations;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes efforts to improve the quality of the regulatory framework; reminds the Commission, however, that the submission of OSH directives to the REFIT exercise and modifications of legislation should focus on further enhancing protection of employees, be transparent, involve social partners and must under no circumstances result in reductions in occupational health and safety provisions; reminds that EU Directives in this field are setting minimum standards and Member States are invited to implement higher standards and that the often used term of "gold- plating" is misleading and inappropriate in connection with EU OHS legislation;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 360 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Urges the Commission to conduct a study, broken down by gender and age, into well-being and exposure to stress at work;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Calls on Member States to conduct studies, broken down by gender, age and area of economic activity, into the incidence of musculoskeletal disorders among the working population at national level, with a view to preventing and combating the emergence of these disorders;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the opening of the consultation on the Capital Markets Union, and underlines the need to learn lessons from the crises in order to enhance marketfinancial stability and facilitate non-bank financing of the real economy; believes that this initiative, by widening access to funding and unlocking investment, can be an important tool to get Europe back on track for economic growth;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights the opening of the consultation on the Capital Markets Union, and underlines the need on the one hand to consider the impact of the single market on the worsening economic and social asymmetries between Member States, and on the other hand to learn lessons from the 2007/2008 financial crisis, whose harmful effects on world economies, and in particular on people and workers, are still being felt; in this context, rejects the idea that (i) forms of financing associated with complex financial products should be promoted; (ii) financing the real economy, in particular industry, should be subject to the dictates of financial speculators (also known as investors), and (iii) there should be no separation of retail and investment banking;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need to take into account the wider global context; calls for a set of measures to improve the investment climate, attracting capital flows into the EU and restoring the international competitiveness of the Unregulate international financial flows in order to reduce dependence on short-term and foreign currency loans; points out that industrial development is particularly vulnerable to hot capital flows and financial speculation; regrets, in this respect, that official public loans have often been made conditional on financial liberalisation;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomesStresses that the envisaged diversification of funding channels, which should be complementary to the existing ones and promote instruments which have proved their usefulness; underlines the need to reduce administrative burd may increase significantly the risks of financial fragility and instability; underlines that the development of new financial instruments and foster the application of the principles of proportionality, coherence and practicability in EU legislation, in the interests of efficient, liquid and cost- effective capital marketsmust be effectively linked to the needs of the real economy and calls on the Commission to apply the precautionary principle in matters of financial regulation;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the launch of consultationsExpresses its concern on the review of the Prospectus Directive and the efforts being made to remove regulatory barriers to access to securitisation; underlines, in particular, the need to open up financial markets to SMEs; supports broadening the funding options available for SMEs; callss it may lead to lower regulatory standards for securitisation; stresses that efforts be made to ensure that SMEs can access finance without increasing their exposure to financial markets; calls, in this respect, for improved access to long-term financing and forthrough the development of a pan- European private placement market promoting venture capital, as well as altpublic, coopernative instruments such as peer-to- peer lending and crowdfundand industrial banking;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 58 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to take into account the specificities of individual markets and propose changes only in those areas that require intervention in order to eliminate the existing barriersnhance financial stability; believes that the bottom-up approach and sharing national best practices should be at the core of the Capital Markets Union initiative;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of comprehensive and cross-sectional impact assessments, andwith adequate emphasis on the risks for industry of external funding in case of enhanced financial fragility, volatility or concentration as result of the Capital Markets Union; calls on the Commission to undertake detailed consultations on matters of concern to allsocial partners and other stakeholders, and to ensure the coherence of the delegating and implementing acts.
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 71 #

2015/2106(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Rejects the establishment of the Capital Markets Union, on the grounds that the further development of the EU single market has accentuated the dismantling of sovereign instruments of economic regulation; takes the view, further, that this process does not represent convergence, cooperation or solidarity, and that instead it represents economic dominance, divergences and asymmetries in development;
2015/09/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2105(INI)

1a. In the context of world market contraction and recession, trade and investments policies should take this into account and take alternatives to promote the job creation and sustainable and environmental friendly growth, boosting the public investment as a key priority for economic recovery;
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of SMEs to trade and investment, given that there are more than 600 000 SMEs in the EU, which account for one third of EU exports, representing the majority of the social fabric and of the job creation in Europe;
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls trade and investment policies to have into account the full respect of EU and international law and policies, specifically in what regards occupied and under conflict territories, as well as in full compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls the European Commission to promote the women employment and decent working conditions in the development of the implementation of trade and investment policies;
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 65 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls the Commission to support the inclusion of minorities in the trade and investment policies;
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls the trade and investment policies of the EU to fully respect the public ownership of strategic assets and to refuse the unfair and unsustainable exploitation of natural resources for trade purposes specifically on the third and poorest countries,
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 83 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the requirement in the Commission’s ‘Investment Plan for Europe’ to boost investment within the EU, and considers trade strategies to be an essential means of achieving this goal.deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 23 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that the development of robotics in the EU will have a strong impact on industrial relations. Believes that this impact should be addressed in a balanced manner so as to promote the reindustrialisation and allow also the workers to enjoy the productivity gains for example by reducing the working time without loss of salary;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 27 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Considers that in order to maximize the benefits of robotics, it must not to be used for a mere substitution of workers, but it must help to create more quality jobs and scale-up the whole production of a company;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Believes that in order to implement a socially balanced framework on robotics that allows the development of European industries without mass destruction of jobs, social partners, both trade union and industry, have to be involved and considered at EU, Member States and industry level;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 70 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Ensure that any future legal framework for robotics shall also develop consistent rules on liability in the field of penal law and war crimes, in order to avoid crimes without criminal accountability;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the EU as a whole is facing a serious demographic challenge as birth rates are constantly decreasing in most Member States, and family policies that are fair to men and women should both improve women’s prospects on the job market and have a positive impact on demographic processes; not because of a choice made by women and couples over whether to have children but because of the growing deterioration in their living and working conditions as a direct result of so-called austerity policies, which have created unemployment and precarious employment and led to the absence of and violation of maternity and paternity rights at the workplace, increasing the cost of essential goods and services, destroying public services and making it more difficult to access facilities for children;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas many workers who are in precarious employment or unemployed do not have the right to parental leave;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers it regrettable that not all Member States have provided the Commission with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures; considers it crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents' rights is being complied with;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it regrettable that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application, thus creating systems that benefit workers to varying degrees depending on their employment sector (public or private) and the length of their contract; stresses that everyone should be guaranteed the right to parental leave without discrimination, regardless of the type of contract working fathers and mothers are employed under;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, should be individual rather than transferable, with a view to encouraging both parents to achieve a better work-life balance; designed to encourage both parents to achieve a better work-life balance, minimising the discriminatory effects that prolonged periods of labour market inactivity have on women who take up maternity and parental leave; takes the view that the Member States should define ways in which leave can be shared or used simultaneously, in line with the outcome of consultations with women's organisations and trade unions, whereby this arrangement should not jeopardise the social rights already in place at present;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the flexibility the directive grants to the Member States to define forms of parental leave – part-time or full-time – and the working and notice periods established as conditions for granting parental leave, whereby these different arrangements should depend on requests being made by mothers and fathers; welcomes the initiatives introduced by the Member States to give workers as much flexibility as possible in this area, ensuring that parental leave ties in with their professional and personal circumstances, but; believes that any choices made to cede some of the decision-making power to employers should notwill undermine the target of increasing the taking of parental leave; points out that consideration needs to be given to a minimum period of leave of six weeks, which would be compulsory for mothers after confinement, in line with Parliament's proposal of 20 October 2010 with a view to amending Directive 92/85/EEC;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Emphasises the need to activate the revision clause in EU legislation on parental leave for that purpose, including, in particular: the adoption of measures guaranteeing the allocation of parental leave allowances always on the basis of 100% of reference pay, a specific form of maternity leave in the case of premature birth for as long as the newborn baby has to remain in hospital, and subsidised leave where babies are born with conditions that require hospitalisation;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the social partners to offer to extend this minimum duration from four to six months, paid at 100%, to improve work-life balance;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. having regard to the varying job types and conditions under which women are employed as domestic workers or carers, which can be, among other possibilities, as undeclared, undocumented, casual or migrant workers with no contract, or nomigrant workers with no contract, with a casual contract, workers on full- or part-time contracts, working for one or more employers, hired by individuals or companies, internally or externally, with or without recognition of their qualifications,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas domestic and care work is primarily characterised by the following: job instability, geographical mobility, ad- hoc hours, seasonal work patterns, shifts, lack of job security, casual employment, mainly undeclared labour,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas undocumented female migrant workers are the subject of worrying levels of discrimination, and fail to report instances of abuse, unfair dismissal, non-payment of wages, violence, discrimination, maltreatment, forced labour, servitude or confinement owing to a lack of awareness about their rights, obstacles such as a language barrier or out of fear of being arrested, deported or losing their job,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas domestic and care work is a sector that creates jobs; these jobs must be of a high quality, as it is because of the work carried out by workers in this sector that many people are able to be economically and socially active outside of the home,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. having regard to the particular relationship of dependency between a male or female employer and a female employee as a result of the latter's working in the former's private space,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. having regard to the absence of a legal framework at EU level and the variety of ways of arranging and proposing legislation over domestic and care work, which differ between the Member States,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the observation and application of existing national laws for the protection of domestic and care workers’ labour rights remains an outstanding issue for some Member States,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas regulated and declared domestic and care work improves the quality of life of the people who carry it out, provides them with social services and protection against abuse and discrimination, reduces the risk of poverty, marginalisation, stigmatisation and loss of face, and also gives the employer a better guarantee of a quality service and helps to increase revenue for the Member States’ social security funds,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C d (new)
Cd. whereas providing adequate protection for people with disabilities, the elderly, ill people, dependants and minors is a fundamental EU principle and domestic and care work is a sector that is essential to ensuring that it is maintained,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C e (new)
Ce. whereas austerity measures introduced as a result of the crisis have reduced public investment in the care sector, which has forced many people, mainly women, to cut their working hours or return to the home to take care of dependants, elderly people, ill people or children,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C f (new)
Cf. whereas the place in which these people carry out their work does not make the employer exempt from complying with health and safety and risk prevention requirements, or from respecting the privacy of those who stay overnight on the premises,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Encourages the Member States to ratify ILO Convention 189, and urges those who have already done so to apply it stringentlyin its entirety, implementing the appropriate measures to ensure compliance with the articles of said Convention and ILO Recommendation R-201 of 2011 on decent work for domestic workers;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women domestic and care workers through the removal of EU labour provisions that specifically exclude women domestic and/or care workers with a view to ensuring that these people are included;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for measures to be taken to ensure fullimprovements to the existing national labour legislation through the development of systems to ensure effective application and greater compliance with the lawis legislation on issues affecting this group, to step up labour inspections in the workplace so as to clamp down on unlawful behaviour and to facilitate and incentivise legal hiring practices; ;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Member States to better regulate the labour market to create high- quality jobs, and recalls that not regularising undocumented workers causes the underground economy to grow and results in workers being unable to defend or protect themselves;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Welcomes the initiatives for preventing and discouraging undeclared work, as the underground economy threatens job security, reduces the quality of work available, puts the sustainability of the social welfare system at risk and reduces the tax income to the State’s coffers; insists that female workers should not be held responsible or face penalties;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to invest in more and better ways of preventing, detecting and combating illegal employment through better, more streamlined labour control and inspection mechanisms that penalise employers who break the law, without this having a detrimental or harmful effect on the person who has complained about their employer, irrespective of the former’s legal-administrative situation;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Calls on the Commission to provide new lines of funding with sufficient resources to raise awareness among and provide specific training to the relevant authorities (labour, judicial, immigration, State security bodies, etc.), enabling more efficient coordination between all of these entities, the introduction of protocols to upgrade and enhance the skills of civil servants responsible for assessing and suitably dealing with complaints raised by these female workers;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2e. Calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to commit more public investment to cover families’ care needs (elderly care homes, day-care centres, centres for dependants, nurseries, etc.) to ensure that families who provide care are able to do so on a voluntary basis rather than as punishment for having a low income, as a result of having been abandoned by the State;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recommends the establishment of an office, a helpline and a website providing assistance and, with information on the rights of women workers in each Member State; and responsibilities of workers and employers (families or agencies) in each Member State, and a European Observatory of Domestic and Care Work tasked with devising methods for providing protection, lodging complaints and raising awareness;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines the need to provide women domestic and care workers with an understanding of the employment conditions stipulated in their job contract, access to information on resources and services available to them, knowledge of existing legislation, rules and collective agreements, access to and knowledge of trade union activities and the advantages of collective organisation;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recommends that a consensual contract be drawn up for domestic and care work in each Member State, following a social dialogue between social workers, employers and female workers;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Stresses the need to raise awareness among employers of their obligations, and to provide them with information on good hiring practices, their legal obligations, penalties in the event of infringement and information and assistance available to the parties, and emphasises the need for the employer to recognise this group as workers with rights;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Recommends that the Member States develop campaigns to improve visibility, enhance understanding and raise awareness among public and private bodies, families and public opinion as a whole with a view to dignifying the profession and gaining recognition for the important work and contribution of women domestic and care workers to the functioning of society;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Reminds the Commission of its obligation to verify the application of the European Convention on the legal status of migrant workers, the Council of Europe Convention on action against trafficking in human beings, and the International Convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their families, adopted by UN General Assembly Resolution 45/158 of 18 December 1990;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Calls for the provision of public aid and subsidies to establish and support cooperatives, autonomous associations and women domestic and care worker platforms, as these organisations contribute to the collective defence of these people’s rights;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g. Stresses the importance of taking action to ensure the full application of the laws for the prevention of occupational hazards in the homes of employers, in order to guarantee occupational health and safety at the same levels as those enjoyed by other workers and prevent work-related accidents, risks of illness and exposure to hazards, such as intoxication with cleaning products, which are detrimental to health and well- being;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets that women domestic and care workers continue to be poorly represented in trade union organisations in the various Member States and stresses the need to encourage these female workers to join trade unions;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recommends that the Commission promote the exchange of best practices between the Member States, following the example of successful models that have had a positive impact on the sector in social and labour terms, e.g. the ‘service vouchers’ introduced by Belgium and the ‘universal service employment cheque (CESU)’ in France;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to commit more public investment to creating stable, high-quality jobs in the sector;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to establish systems for professionalisation, training, continuous skills development and recognition of women domestic and care workers’ qualifications, including literacy (if applicable), to enhance their prospects of personal, professional and career development;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Expresses concern over the lack of inspections to oversee, monitor and supervise the hiring of women domestic and care workers carried out by companies or recruitment agencies and reiterates the need to increase the number of public inspectors and inspections to ensure compliance with the law;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends affording women domestic workers and carers the same status as the rest of the labour forceany other worker in any Member State, recognising their work as an occupation in its own right and paving the way for working conditions to be genuinely afforded the same status as the rest of the productive sectors in fundamental aspects such as the following: a minimum wage, working days of the same length as the rest of the country’s workers, a weekly rest period and the right to holidays, recognised paid sick, maternity, paternity and breastfeeding leave, unemployment benefits, social security, occupational health and safety, restrictions on cash-in- hand pay, paid overtime, a precise definition of the tasks involved in the position and clear information on general working conditions, freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining and the right to a pension, etc.;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. recalls that, pursuant to the Vienna Convention of Diplomatic Relations of 1961, civil servants from the diplomatic corps must respect the laws and regulations of the State, including employment law, but that, owing to the fact that employers have immunity from the criminal justice system of the host State and their homes enjoy inviolability, the latter are protected against prosecution, leaving their employees defenceless and without access to justice if they suffer abuse or any prospect of changing employer due to the risk of losing their residence permit;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls for compliance with the European Convention on au pair placement and for an increase in inspections as this employment method is sometimes exploited by employers to obtain cheap internal female domestic workers;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the 2016 budget should focus on initiatives that contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and the creation of high-quality and durable employment across the Union and that programmes contributing directly to these objectives should be given priority when budgetary decisions are made;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 9 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Draws attention to the need for funding under the Horizon 2020 framework programme to be shared out in a more even-handed way among the Member States and to the fact that several cohesion countries are net contributors to the framework programme; points out that the ‘Innovation Union’ initiative has to involve all countries and regions and that there must be no ‘innovation divide’ between more innovative countries and regions and the rest;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 17 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the considerable impact of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) on the 2016 budget; believes that the objectives of the EFSI can only be achieved ifBelieves that the level of financing for Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) ismust be fully maintained;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 20 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers it to be essential, given that they make up 99 % of the Union's corporate fabric and account for 80 % of jobs in the Union, to provide greater support to micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in order to boost their productivity within a stable business environment, minimise the effect of dominant market positions occupied by large companies and conglomerates, and help MSMEs and worker cooperatives to be set up and to grow;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 21 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for an increase in resources for budget headings providing subsidies for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and cooperatives in order to cope with rising production factor costs and keep pace with the evolving knowledge society and with development based on balanced economic growth, especially in Member States where the crisis has had a greater impact in terms of MSME closures;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 23 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the commitments agreed in the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 should be met in full; expresses concern at the growing number of unpaid invoices; notes that interest on late payments in 2014 has risen more than sevenfold since 2012; calls for immediate action to reduce the backlog of outstanding payment claims; draws attention to the scantiness of the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework and to the need for it to be revised as soon as possible with a view to substantial expansion;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that funding for research should be focused on areas in which the greatest added value can be achieved and that improving energy efficiency should therefore be one of the priorities for European research; draws attention to the inequalities among Member States;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes with disquiet that, because of the budget cuts being imposed on Member States, investment in science, technology, and innovation (STI) will be reduced still further, with highly damaging results;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Points to the crucial role of structural and investment funds in promoting STI investment; believes that the European Social Fund and the European Regional Development Fund have a central role to play in, respectively, training and skills development for workers in the area of innovation and the funding of regional innovation strategies that could bring benefits in terms of territorial policy, improving living conditions, promoting social justice and well-being, and preserving the environment; points to the importance of strengthening cohesion policy and the related objectives by supporting innovation and other fields and, to that end, revising the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that greater priority must be given to parts of the budget earmarked for increasing Europe's security of supply by building a network of interconnectors to ensure a free flow of energy between Member States; stresses the importance of enlarging the concept of security so as to include and address the problem of energy poverty;
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Insists that the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) be provided with sufficient resources to execute the tasks conferred on it by the EU legislative authorities.deleted
2015/05/22
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2010(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the recent initiatives of the Commission and encourages Member States to tackle further tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, promoting clear and fair tax rulings, combatting aggressive tax planning and re-launching the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base scheme, stressing the importance to avoid any increase in administrative burdens and cost of compliance;
2015/10/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #

2015/2010(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that taxes must be paid where profits are made or value is created and where public services and infrastructures are used; stresses, in this respect, the need for clear, transparent and coherent rules on the accounting of profits and value creation, thus avoiding their "ad hoc" transfer for taxation purposes, particularly by means of intangibles;
2015/10/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 48 #

2015/2010(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that the sovereign rights of Member States should be taken into consideration, as well as the diversities on economic, commercial and corporate sectors in terms of affecting the growth and development as well as the social cohesion within the Member State and the EU as such;
2015/10/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #

2015/2010(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of guaranteeing personal data protection, confidentiality of information exchanged and freedom to conduct a business; encourages the identification of solutions that strike a balance between transparency and confidentiality while ensuring transparency in corporate taxation;
2015/10/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 72 #

2015/2010(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Condemns the complicity of financial and consultancy corporations in the development of aggressive tax planning in the EU;
2015/10/06
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U – point i
(i) whereas a mandatory Union-wide Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) would be a major step towards solving those problems associated with aggressive tax planning within the Union; whereas the ultimate goal should remain a full, mandatory CCCTB with possible exemptions for small- and medium-sized enterprises and companies with no cross-border activity; whereas until a full CCCTB is in place, the Commission is considering temporary measures to counteract profit shifting opportunities; whereas it is necessary to ensure that those measures, including the offsetting of cross-border losses, do not increase the risk of BEPS;deleted
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 174 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital V – introductory part
V. whereas improved coordination alone will not solve fundamental problems arising from the fact that different rules regarding corporate taxation exist in different Member States; whereas part of the overall response to aggressive tax planning must involve the convergence of a limited number of national tax practices; whereas this can be achieved while still preserving the sovereignty of Member States in relation to other elements of their corporate tax systems; whereas, we should take into consideration the sovereign rights of Member States and the diversities on economic, commercial and corporate sectors in terms of affecting the growth, development and national income on which they depend on as well as the social cohesion within the Member State and the Union as such;
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 205 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital W a (new)
Wa. whereas this report does not aim to harmonise Member States' corporate tax rates and respects their sovereign rights to set their own taxation policy as well as their economic and social cohesion and stability;
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 316 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – title 2 – subtitle 1
Recommendation B1. Introduction of a Common Corporate Tax Base The European Parliament calls on the European Commission to bring forward as soon as possible a legislative proposal for the introduction of a common corporate tax base: As a first step, by June 2016, a mandatory Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) in the Union, with an exemption for small- and medium-sized enterprises and companies with no cross-border activity, in order to have only one set of rules for companies operating in several Member States to calculate their taxable profits. As a second step, as soon as possible and certainly no later than the end of 2017, a mandatory CCCTB, taking into due consideration the range of different options (factoring in the costs, for example, of incorporating small and medium enterprises and companies with no cross-border activity); During the interim period between the introduction of mandatory CCTB and that of full CCCTB, a set of measures to reduce profit shifting (mainly via transfer pricing) including a Union anti-BEPS legislative proposal. These measures should include a temporary cross-border loss offset regime only if the Commission can guarantee that it will be transparent and will not create the possibility of misuse for aggressive tax planning. The Commission should consider to what extent it would be necessary to harmonise accounting principles in order to prepare the underlying accounting data to be used for CCCTB purposes.deleted
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The circular economy sector has an enormous job creation potential. Member States should ensure that labour standards are not lowered as a result of the resource transition, which should be based on the creation of quality jobs.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 79 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Many Member States have yet to develop the necessary waste management infrastructure. It is therefore essential to set long-term policy objectives and financial and political support in order to guide measures and investments, notably by preventing the creation of structural overcapacities for the treatment of residual waste or for landfilling and lock-ins of recyclable materials at the bottom of the waste hierarchy. In this context it is also essential to use the European Structural and Investment Funds in order to finance the development of the waste management infrastructure needed to meet the relevant targets.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The different starting positions in the Member States with regard to the progressive increase in the targets mean that different levels of effort will be required to achieve the goals set. Consequently, the Member States should be accorded the necessary time flexibility to guarantee the feasibility of complying with these targets.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) The EU should increase the resources at the Member States' disposal to support them in making the necessary investments in order to achieve the goals set.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 90 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Commission and Member States should put in place adequate incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy, in particular, by means of financial incentives aimed at achieving the waste prevention and recycling objectives of this Directive, such as landfill and incineration charges, pay as you throw schemes, extended producer responsibility schemes and incentives for local authorities.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 94 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Commission and Member States should develop measures to guarantee the sustainable recovering of landfill area or landfill damaged area;
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 100 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Extended producer responsibility schemes form an essential part of efficient waste management, but their effectiveness and performance differ significantly between Member States. Thus, it is necessary to set minimum mandatory operating requirements for extended producer responsibility schemes. Those requirements should reduce costs and boost performance, facilitate better implementation of enforcement of separate collection and sorting, ensure quality recycling, secure cost- efficient access to secondary raw material as well as ensure a level-playing field, including for small and medium sized enterprises, and avoid obstacles to the smooth functioning of the internal market. They should also contribute to the incorporation of end-of-life costs into product prices and provide incentives for producers to take better into account recyclability and reusability when designing their products. The requirements should apply to both new and existing extended producer responsibility schemes. A transitional period is however necessary for existing extended producer responsibility schemes and for Member States without extended producer responsibility to adapt their structures and procedures to the new requirements. Support measures should be provided to those Member States.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 110 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) It is necessary to take into account the Food and Agriculture Organization reports entitled “Food wastage footprint: Full-cost accounting” and "Food wastage footprint: Impacts on natural resources “ in order to better assess the real costs of food waste and bear in mind the best practices in this field.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) In order to achieve the objectives of this Directive, the Commission should promote the coordination and exchange of information and best practices both between Member States, civil society organizations, regional and local authorities and social partners including trade-unions, and the waste industry. This could be achieved through the establishment of communication platforms.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 140 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Union funds that are allocated to support the transition to the circular economy could therefore be used for research programmes on the treatment of hazardous waste. Extended producer responsibility schemes should be applied for any hazardous waste putting the burden on the producer of this kind of waste that should be the responsible of their collection and environmental costs.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 146 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) The Union is one of the larger importers of raw materials of the world; the circular economy is an opportunity to reduce our dependency on imports; this could lead to a reduction of many conflicts at global level, a better environmental performance and to the development of a more resilient European industry.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 150 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) The Commission should promote support measures for small establishments or undertakings in order to be able to achieve goals set.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 153 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statisticsreported data should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. Therefore, when reporting on the achievement of the targets set out in waste legislation, Member States shall use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States and the national authorities responsible for waste management. The Commission should provide financial and technical support to the Member States with difficulties to achieve the objectives in terms of data collection.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 285 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1– point b
(b) are modulated on the basis of the real end-of-life cost of individual products or groups of similar products, notably by taking into account their re-usability and recyclability, and the use of permanent materials which can be recycled multiple times without losing its properties;
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 323 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 - indent 5 a (new)
- promote the production of organic fertilizers and environmental efficient uses of food wastage, animal by-products and bio-waste such as worm composting.
2016/07/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 348 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
1. Member States shall take measures, as appropriate, to promote preparing for re- use activities, notably by encouraging the establishment of and support for re-use and repair networksof preparing for re-use operators and their networks, in particular those which operate as social and solidarity enterprises, and by facilitating the access of such networks to waste collection points and facilities, and by promoting the use of economic instruments, procurement criteria, quantitative objectives or other measures.
2016/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 360 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
(aa) in paragraph 1, the following subparagraph is inserted: “Member States shall promote measures such as VAT reductions, in order to incentivise the uptake of secondary raw materials. Those measures shall encourage, inter alia, the replacement of natural primary raw materials with the secondary ones, and green public procurement criteria”.
2016/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 387 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Estonia, Greece, Cyprus, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtain five additional years for the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 2(c) and (d). The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 24 months before the respective deadlines laid down in paragraphs 2(c) and (d). In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measures to increase the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste to a minimum of 50% and 60% by weight, by 2025 and 2030 respectively.
2016/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 395 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point f a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11– paragraph 5a (new)
(fa) the following paragraph is added: “5a. In order to build an accurate baseline to set targets for recycling of non-hazardous commercial and industrial waste, the Commission shall gather data on such waste, based on common reporting from Member States. The Union is to provide financial and technical support to Member States with difficulties to achieve these targets.”
2016/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 415 #

2015/0275(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 a– paragraph 8
8. Waste exported from the Union for preparation for re-use or recycling shall only count towards the attainment of the targets laid down in Articles 11(2) and (3) by the Member State in which it was collected if the requirements of paragraph 4 are met and if, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, the exporter can prove that the shipment of waste complies with the requirements of that Regulation and that the treatment of waste outside the Union took place in conditions that are equivalent to the requirements of the relevant Union environmental legislation.
2016/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 24 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Biodegradable municipal waste accounts for a large proportion of municipal waste. Landfilling of untreated biodegradable waste poses significant negative envioronmental effects in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and pollution of surface water, groundwater, soil and air. While Directive 1999/31/EC already sets landfill diversion targets for biodegradable waste it is appropriate to put in place further restrictions on the landfilling of biodegradable waste by prohibiting the landfilling of biodegradable waste that has been separately collected in accordance with Article 22 of Directive 2008/98/EC. The Commission and the Member States should encourage the use of alternative measures for the sustainable treatment of biodegradable waste in line with new technologies and techniques such as worm composting, bio-digestion, etc.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) The Commission should promote the coordination and exchange of information and best practices both between Member States, regional and - specially- local authorities, involving all relevant civil society organizations, including the social partner and environmental and consumer organizations.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 39 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 c (new)
(8c) To adequately implement and enforce the objectives of this Directive it is necessary to ensure that the local authorities of the territories where landfills are located are recognized as relevant actors, as they suffer directly the consequences of landfilling. In this respect, public and democratic consultation should be ensured in the localities and supra-municipal areas where a landfill is going to be established beforehand and appropriated compensation should be established for the local population.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 40 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 d (new)
(8d) In order to ensure the proper implementation of this regulation local platforms of control should be set, with the participation of social partners, local administrations and civil society organizations to ensure that landfilling areas respect national and EU regulation.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 e (new)
(8e) The European Commission should ensure that every landfill in the EU is in full compliance with the Environmental Impact Assessment requirements, and that the latter are renewed on a regular basis, at minimum every 8 years.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 42 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 f (new)
(8f) The European Commission should guarantee that every landfill in the EU is audited in order to ensure the proper implementation of EU and national law.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 50 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Statistical data reported by Member States are essential for the Commission to assess compliance with waste legislation across the Member States. The quality, reliability and comparability of statistics should be improved by introducing a single entry point for all waste data, deleting obsolete reporting requirements, benchmarking national reporting methodologies and introducing a data quality check report. Reliable reporting of statistical data concerning waste management and waste landfill capacity is paramount to efficient implementation and to ensuring comparability of data among Member States. Therefore, when preparing the reports on compliance with the targets set out in Directive 19991/31/EC, Member States should be required to use the most recent methodology developed by the Commission and the national statistical offices of the Member States.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) In order to supplement or amend Directive 1999/31/EC, in particular with the view to adapting its Annexes to scientific and technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Article 16. It is particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council. Any amendments to the Annexes should only be made in line with the principles laid down in this Directive. To this end, as regards Annex II, the Commission should take into account the general principles and general procedures for testing and acceptance criteria as set out in Annex II. Moreover, specific criteria and test methods and associated limit values should be set for each class of landfill, including if necessary specific types of landfill within each class, including underground storage, and specific data of its maximum capacity. Proposals for the standardisation of control, sampling and analysis methods in relation to the Annexes should be considered for adoption by the Commission where appropriate within two years after the entry into force of this Directive.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 54 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Extended producer responsibility schemes should apply to hazardous waste. Producer of this kind of waste should be held responsible for its collection and all related environmental and public health costs.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 58 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) Commission and Member States should ensure the development of plans for the sustainable recovery and sustainable alternative usage of landfills and landfill-damaged areas.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(aa) the following paragraph is inserted: "(2a) Member States shall ban every waste on landfills that have been filled.";
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 77 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 7
7. By 31 December 2024 at the latest, the Commission shall examine the target laid down in paragraph 5 with a view to reducing it and introducing restrictions to the landfilling of non-hazardous waste other than municipal waste. To this end, a report of the Commission accompanied by a proposal, if appropriate, shall be sent to the European Parliament and the Council. Additionally the Commission shall assess the feasibility of introducing maximum levels of kilogramme of landfilled waste per area of authorized landfill.
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 7 – point c a (new)
(4a) in Article 7, the following point is inserted: '(ca) this capacity shall be considered the maximum capacity;';
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 83 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 7 – point g a (new)
(4b) in Article 7, the following point is inserted: '(ga) these plans shall include regeneration, reparation and alternative sustainable uses for landfills;';
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 85 #

2015/0274(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 c (new)
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 8 – point a – point iv a (new)
(4c) in Article 8(a), the following point is added: '(iva) the maximum capacity has not been achieved;';
2016/06/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Articles 120 and 121 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provide that Member States shall conduct their economic policies with a view to contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the Union and in the context of the broad guidelines that the Council shall formulate. Thereby, the coordination of the economic policies of the Member States is a matter of common concernUnfortunately, economic coordination has so far resulted in recession and economic stagnation in the Member States, while transferring the burden of reforms to those in the lowest income brackets.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Several Member States have been undergoing and continue to undergo adjustment processes to correct macroeconomic imbalances accumulated in the past and many are facing the challenge of low potential growth. The Union has identified the implementation of structural reforms among its policy priorities to setentire euro area has been affected by sluggish growth rates and public investment is the recovery on a sustainable path, unlock the growth potential to strengthen the adjustment capacity, and support the process of convergencfore necessary to create new, decent and sustainable jobs, and reinvigorate the welfare state.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Reforms are by their very nature complex processes that require a complete chain of highly-specialised knowledge and skills. Addressing structural reforms in a variety of public policy areas is challenging since their benefits often take time to materialise. Therefore, early and efficient design and implementation is crucial, be it for crisis-struck or structurally-weak economies. In this context, the provision of support by the Union in the form of technical assistance has been crucial in supporting the economic adjustment of Greece and Cyprus in the last years.deleted
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Member States may benefit from support in addressing challenges as regards the design and implementation of structural reforms. These challenges may be dependent on various factors, including limited administrative and institutional capacity or inadequate application and implementation of Union legislationand succeed in launching programmes strengthening the welfare state and promoting public investment for the creation of new, decent and sustainable jobs, social development and economic growth.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Union has a long-lasting experience on providing specific support to national administrations and other authorities of Member States as regards capacity building and similar actions in certain sectors (e.g. taxation, customs, support to small and medium-sized enterprises) and in relation to the implementation of cohesion policy. The experience gained by the Union in assisting national authorities carrying out reforms should be used in order to enhance the capacity of the Union to provide support to Member States. Comprehensive and integrated action is indeed necessary in order to provide support to those Member States that are undertaking growth- enhancing reforms in social terms and request assistance from the Union in this respect.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Against this background, it is necessary to establish a Structural Reform Support Programme ('the Programme') with the objective of strengthening the capacity of Member States to prepare and implement growth-enhancing administrative and structureconomic and social reforms, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds. The Programme is intended to contribute to the achievement of common goals towards obtaining economic recovery, jobthe creation, boosting Europe's competitiveness of stable quality employment, boosting the welfare state and stimulating public investment in the real economy.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Competitivenessbating energy poverty, increasing energy self-sufficiency and supply, ensuring equal access to energy as a social good, developing healthy competition, sustainability and energy security are the overarching goals of a resilient Energy Union with a forward- looking climate change policy.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) High quality, comparable, up-to-date, reliable and harmonised information on natural gas and electricity prices charged to final customers are needed in order to draft Energy Union policy and monitor the Member States’ energy marketsmonitor whether the objective of security of energy supply is being attained, while safeguarding the human right to equal and affordable access to energy as a social development good.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 43 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) This Regulation aims to provide European statistics to underpin energy policies in particular towards the creation of a fully integrated internal energy market for ensure security of energy supply for all customers. Greater transparency on energy costs and prices, as well as on the level of public support, should be made available to improve market integrationachieve healthy competition and protect households and final consumers from profiteering.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) Confidentiality of customer data should always be protected.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 65 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to maintain the high quality of the data provided by the Member Stateallow for derogations from certain obligations of this Regulation whose implementation in the national statistical systems of Member States requires major adjustments and is likely to entail a significant additional burden for respondents, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission, with a view to adjusting the thresholds that may apply to the natural gas market. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations, during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, wappropriate consultations, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with then preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council. inciples laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council should receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically should have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
(1) Member States shall ensure that the data collection and compilation system is representativeBy verifying the adequacy of the methodology with respect to price controls, Member States shall ensure that the data are representative of energy price and consumption levels.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
(3) The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10, taking account of economic and technical trends, concerning the adjustment of the threshold.
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 93 #

2015/0239(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
(1) Derogations may be granted by means of implementing acts in relation to those specific obligations for which the application of this Regulation to the national statistical system of a Member State requires major adaptations and is likely to lead to a significant additional burden on respondents. Those implementingdelegated acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 11(2)0 no later than [xx-xx-xxx].
2016/04/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 184 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Energy efficiency labelling and complete product information allows consumers to make informed choices with regard to energy consumption of productschoose more efficient and sustainable products in order to reduce their total consumption of energy and other resources, and thereby promotes innovation.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 220 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The provision of accurate, relevant and comparable information on the specific energy consumption of energy-related products facilitates the customer's choice in favour of those products which consume less energy and other essential resources during use. A standardised mandatory label is an effective mean to provide potential customers with comparable information on the energy consumption of energy-related products. It should be supplemented with a product information sheet. The label should be easily recognisable, simple and concise. To this end the existing dark green to red colour scale of the label should be retained as the basis to inform customers about the energy efficiency of products. A classification using letters from A to G has shown to be most effective for customers. In situations where because of ecodesign measures under Directive 2009/125/EC products can no longer fall into classes 'F' or 'G', those classes should not be shown on the label. For exceptional cases this should also be extended to the 'D' and 'E' classes, although this situation is unlikely to occur given that the label would be rescaled once a majority of product models falls into the top two classesproducts can no longer fall into lower classes as a result of ecodesign measures under Directive 2009/125/EC , this information should be included on the label.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 221 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Primary goal of this Regulation is to use information to empower citizens to reduce their energy consumption and save money. Therefore the information is not a by-product of this Regulation, but its main objective, and it should be treated accordingly.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 226 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 b (new)
(9b) The product database in article 8 and Annex 1 should be inclusive of the needs of different stakeholders along the full life-cycle of products made available on the Union market. Accordingly, it should offer different degrees of protection of the information it contains: at one end of the spectrum, a significant amount of that information should be fully accessible to and highly usable by the public, at the other end, access to specific documents and transactions should be reserved to the national authorities and the Commission.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 232 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Advances in digital technology allow for alternative ways of delivering and displaying labels electronically, such as on the internet, but also on electronic displays in shops. In order to take advantage of such advances, this Regulation should allow the use of electronic labels as replacement of or complementary to the physical energy label. In cases where it is not feasible to display the energy label, such as certain forms of distance selling and in advertisements and technical promotional material, potential customers should be provided at least with the energy class of the product.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 256 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) The revision of labels could be immediately implement for those product groups for which the development of the label system under Directive 2010/30/EC has led to a concentration of a majority of product models in the highest energy classes, in order to adapt them to the requirements of this Regulation and provide customers with the adequate labelling information.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 258 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) In order for customers to retain trust in the energy label, other labels that mimic the energy label should not be allowed to be used for energy-related products. Additional labels, marks, symbols or inscriptions that are likely tosimilar to the energy efficiency label and could mislead or confuse customers with respect to the consumption of energy or any other characteristics covered by the relevant delegated act, should not be allowed either.20
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 287 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Energy consumption and other information concerning the products covered by product-specific requirements under this Regulation should be measured by using reliable, accurate and reproducible methods that take into account the generally recognised state-of- the-art measurements and calculation methods. It is in the interests of the functionThese methods should be as close to real life conditions as possible ing of the internal market to have standards which have been harmonised at Union levelrder for consumers to be able to relate and trust the information conveyed by labels. In the absence of published standards at the time of application of product-specific requirements the Commission should publish in the Official Journal of the European Union transitional measurement and calculation methods in relation to those product-specific requirements. Once a reference to such a standard has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union compliance with it should provide a presumption of conformity with measurement methods for those product-specific requirements adopted on the basis of this Regulation.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 307 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down a framework on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy- related products during use and supplementary information concerning energy-related products in order to allow customers to choose more efficient products and to reduce energy consumption.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 354 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
(18) 'Rescale' means a periodic exercise to make more stringent the requirements for achieving the energy class on a label for a particular product, which, for existing labels may imply the deletion of certain energy classes;
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 382 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) they shall deliver labels and product information sheets promptly and free of charge on request from dealers. This applies to all models, existing and new ones;
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 442 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) they shall make reference to the energy efficiency class of the product, the range of the energy efficiency classes available on the label and the energy consumption in any advertisement or technical promotional material for a specific model of products in accordance with the relevant delegated act;
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 451 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission in cooperation with the Member States must ensure that every product model placed on the Union market is duly registered in the product database established pursuant to Article 8 prior to making it available on the market.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 522 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. When, for a given product group, no models belonging to energy classes D, E, F or G are allowed to be placed on the market any more because of an implementing measure adopted under Directive 2009/125/EC, the class or classes in question shall no longer be shown on the label.deleted
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 601 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall establish and maintain a single product database including the information referred to in Annex I. That database shall have public and reserved sections, depending on the type of information. Its structure shall contain at least a product-specific section, where information will be organised in fields assigned to every single product model, and a general section, where information can be stored according to different criteria. The interface with the public shall follow the same structural principle, channelling the product- specific information through single, easily identifiable sections. The information listed under point 1 of Annex I shall be made publicly available.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 608 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall establish and maintain a product database including the information referred to in Annex I. The information listed under point 1 of Annex I shall provide the energy label of each product as well as the complete product information sheet and shall be made publicly available.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 613 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The public information on the database shall be made available free of charge.
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 643 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) where appropriate, the use of other resources and supplementary information concerning energy related products, in which case the label shall emphasise the energy efficiency and energy consumption of the product;
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 660 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point l
(l) wthether measures ensuring that for larger appliances a higher level of energy efficiency is required to reach a given energy class;
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 674 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
However, Article 3(1)(d) shall apply from 1 January 2019.deleted
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 681 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 1 – point d
(d) theall class(es) and other parameters on the label;
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 685 #

2015/0149(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) aggregated sale figures
2016/03/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 101 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In order to reflect technological progress in the sectors concerned and adjust them to the relevant period of allocation, provision should be made for the values of the benchmarks for free allocations to installations, determined on the basis of data from the years 2007-8, to be updated in line with observed average improvement. For reasons of predictability, this should be done through applying a factor that represents the best assessment of progress across sectors, which should then take into account robust, objective and verified data from installations so that sectors whose rate of improvement differs considerably from this factor have a benchmark value closer to their actual rate of improvement. Where the data shows a difference from factor reduction of more than 0.5% of the 2007-8 value higher or lower per year over the relevant period, the related benchmark value shall be adjusted by that percentage. To ensure a level playing field for the production of aromatics, hydrogen and syngas in refineries and chemical plants, the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas should continue to be aligned to the refineries benchmark19. The benchmarks should be reviewed every two years.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 134 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) The main long-term incentive from this Directive for the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS), new renewable energy technologies and breakthrough innovation in sustainable low-carbon technologies and processes is the carbon price signal it creates and that allowances will not need to be surrendered for CO2 emissions which are permanently stored or avoided. In addition, to supplement the resources already being used to accelerate demonstration of commercial CCS facilities and innovative renewable energy technologies, EU ETS allowances should be used to provide guaranteed rewards for deployment of CCS facilities, new renewable energy technologies and industrial innovation in sustainable low-carbon technologies and processes in the Union for CO2 stored or avoided on a sufficient scale, provided an agreement on knowledge sharing is in place. The majority of this support should be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, while some support may be given when pre-determined milestones are reached taking into account the technology deployed. The maximum percentage of project costs to be supported may vary by category of project.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 144 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The European Council confirmed that the modalities, including transparency, of the optional free allocation to modernise the energy sector in certain Member States should be improved. Investments with a value of €10 million or more should be selected by the Member State concerned through a competitive bidding process on the basis of clear and transparent rules to ensure that free allocation is used to promote real investments modernising the energy sector in line with the EU energy Unionand climate objectives. IAll investments with a value of less than €10 millionfulfilling the criteria should also be eligible for funding from the free allocation. The Member State concerned should select such investments based on clear and transparent criteria. The results of this selection process should be subject to public consultation. The public should be duly kept informfully involved at the stage of the selection of investment projects as well as of their implementation.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 232 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 3– point (j)
(j) to fund financial measures in favour of sectors or subsectors that are exposed to a genuine risk of carbon leakage due to significant indirect costs that are actually incurred from greenhouse gas emission costs passed on in electricity prices, provided that these measures meet the conditions set out in Article 10a(6);deleted
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 237 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10– paragraph 3- point b
(b) In paragraph 3, the point b is amended as follows: to develop renewable energies to meet the commitment to use at least 30% of renewable energies by 2030 to help meet the commitment to increase energy efficiency by 40% by 2030.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 239 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10– paragraph 3- point (e)
(ka) in paragraph 3, the point (e) is deleted
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 274 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – Paragraph 2
In paragraph 2, "in the years "2007- 2008" is replaced by "in 2019";
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 294 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The benchmark values for free allocation shall be adjustedreviewed every two years in order to avoid windfall profits and reflect technological progress in the period between 2007-8 and each later period for which free allocations are determined in accordance with Article 11(1). This adjustment shall reduce the benchmark values set by the act adopted pursuant to Article 10a by 1% of the value that was set based on 2007-8 data in respect of each year between 2008 and the middle of the relevant period of free allocation, unless:
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 307 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 (i)
(i) On the basis of information submitted pursuant to Article 11, the Commission shall identify whether the values for each benchmark calculated using the principles in Article 10a differ from the annual reduction referred to above by more than 0.5% of the 2007-8 value higher or lower annually. If so, that benchmark value shall be adjusted either 0.5% or 1.5% in respect of each year between 2008 and the middle of the period for which free allocation is to be made;deleted
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 324 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 (ii)
(ii) By way of derogation regarding the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas, these benchmark values shall be adjusted by the same percentage as the refineries benchmarks in order to preserve a level playing field for producers of these products.deleted
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 337 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 b (new)
The Commission shall adopt an implementing act for this purpose in accordance with Article 22a. The implementing act should take into consideration sectoral specificities and shall aim at reducing the administrative burden on small emitters and SMEs, in data collection and analysis.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 410 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point f
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a– paragraph 8, subparagraph 1
400 million allowances shall be available to support innovation in sustainable low- carbon technologies and processes in industrial sectors listed in Annex I, and to help stimulate the construction and operation of commercial demonstration projects that aim at thof innovative renvironmentally safe capture and geological storage (CCS) of CO2 as well as demonstration projects of innovative renewable energy technologieewable energy technologies and projects supporting energy efficiency improvements, in the territory of the Union.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 438 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point f
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
The allowances shall be made available for innovation in sustainable low-carbon industrial technologies and processes and support for demonstration projects for the development of a wide range of CCS and innovative renewable energy technologies that are not yet commercially viable in geographically balanced locations. In order to promote innovative projects, up to 60% of the relevant costs of projects may be supported, out of which up to 40% may not be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions provided that pre-determined milestones are attained taking into account the technology deployed.
2016/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 546 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 c– paragraph 1
1. By derogation from Article 10a(1) to (5), Member States which had in 2013, or in 2014, or in 2015 a GDP per capita in € at market prices below 60% of the Union average may give a transitional free allocation to installations for electricity production for the modernisation of the energy sector.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 555 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The Member State concerned shall organise a competitive bidding process for projects with a total amount of investment exceeding €10 million to select the investments to be financed with free allocation. This competitive bidding process shall:
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 577 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point (i)
(i) on the basis of a cost-benefit analysisbest available technology (BAT), ensure a net positive gain in terms of emission reduction and realise a pre-determined significant level of CO2 reductions;
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 586 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Where investments with a value of less than €10 million are supported with free allocation, the Member State shall select projects based on objective and transparent criteria. The results of this selection process shall be published for public comment. On this basis, the Member State concerned shall establish and submit a list of investments to the Commission by 30 June 2019.deleted
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 622 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 d– paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
A fund to support investments in modernising energy systems and improving energy efficiency in Member States with a GDP per capita below 60% of the Union average in 2013 or in 2014, or in 2015, shall be established for the period 2021-30 and financed as set out in Article 10.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 629 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 d– paragraph 1– subparagraph 2
The investments supported shall be consistent with the aims of this Directive and the European Fund for Strategic Investments.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 645 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 d – paragraph 2
2. The fund shall also finance small- scale investment projects in the modernisation of energy systems and energy efficiency including energy cooperatives. To this end, the investment board shall develop guidelines and investment selection criteria specific to such projects.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 648 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 d – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Modernisation Fund shall support investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy, focusing on improving energy savings in building sector, heating, sector and decentralised energy production, grid connections (smart grids) and storage infrastructure.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 664 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The fund shall be governed by an investment board and a management committee, which shall be composed of representatives from the beneficiaryall the Member States, the Commission, and the EIB and three representatives elected by the other Member States for a period of 5 years. The investment board shall be responsible to determine an Union- level investment policy, appropriate financing instruments and investment selection criteria. The management committee shall be responsible for the day- to-day management of the fund.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 722 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
A list of installations
Article 11– paragraph 1– subparagraph 2
A list of installations covered by this Directive for the fivetwo years beginning on 1 January 2021 shall be submitted by 30 September 2018, and lists for the subsequent fivetwo years shall be submitted every fivetwo years thereafter. Each list shall include information on production activity, transfers of heat and gases, electricity production and emissions at sub- installation level over the five calendar years preceding its submission. Free allocations shall only be given to installations where such information is provided.
2016/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 1
(1) Member States and the Union should work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce and labour markets responsive to economic change and with a view to achieving the full employment and, decency of wages, collective bargaining and other social progress objectives set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. Member States, having regard to national practices related to the responsibilities of management and labour, are to regard promoting employment as a matter of common concern and coordinate their action in this respect within the Council.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 3
(3) The employment guidelines are consistent with the broad guidelines for the economic policiesdeleted
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 5
(5) In accordance with the Treaty provisions, the Union has developed and implemented policy coordination instruments for fiscal policy and macro- structural policies. The European Semester combines the different instruments in an overarching framework for integrated multilateral economic and budgetary surveillance. The streamlining and strengthening of the European Semester as set out in the Commission's 2015 Annual Growth Survey will further improve its functioning.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 6
(6) The financial and economic crisis revealed and emphasised important weaknesses in the economy of the Union and its Member States. It has also underscored the close interdependence of the Member States' economies and labour markets. Moving the Union to a state of strong, sustainable and inclusive growth and job creation is the key challenge faced today. This requires coordinated and ambitious policy action both on Union and national level, in line with the provisions of the Treaty and the Union economic governance. Combining supply and demand side measures, these actions should encompass a boost to investment, a renewed commitment to structural reforms and exercising fiscal responsibil. Combining economic and social policies which promote social cohesion, combat poverty and unemployment, and protect collective bargaining, should safeguard growth and social security.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 8
(8) Action in line with the guidelines is an important contribution to reaching the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy. The guidelines constitute an integrated set of European and national policies, which Member States and the Union should implement in order to achieve the positive spill-over effects of coordinated structural reforms, an appropriate overall economic policy mix and a more consistent contribution from European policies to thesocial objectives set in Europe 2020 sStrategy’s objectives.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 10
(10) The broad guidelines for economic policies give guidance to the Member States on implementing reforms, reflecting interdependence. They are in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. The guidelines should form the basis for country-specific recommendations that the Council may address to the Member States.deleted
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 1
Member States should facilitate job creation, reduce barriers for business to hire people, promote entrepreneurship which promote sustainable, decent and quality jobs, respecting workers’ rights and collective agreements, and in particular support the creation and growth of small enterprises in order to increase the employment rate of women and men. Member States should also actively promote the social economywelfare state and foster social innovation.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 2
The tax burden should be shifted away from labour to other sources of taxation that are less detrimental to employment and growth while protecting revenue for adequate social protection and growth enhancing expenditures. Reductions in labour taxation should be aimed at the relevant components of the tax burden and at removing barriers and disincentives to labour market participation, in particular for those furthest away from the labour marketfair and more evenly distributed across labour, profits and consumption, while shifted on to top managerial income, profits and wealth.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 3
Member States should strengthen active labour market policies by increasing their targeting, outreach, coverage and interplay with passive measures. These policies should aim at improving labour market matchtecting collective bargaining and support sustainable transitions on the labour market, with public employment services delivering individualised support and implementing performance measurement systems. Member States should also ensure that their social protection systems effectively activate and enable those who can participate in the labour market, protect those (temporarily) excluded from the labour markets and/or unable to participate in it, and prepare individuals for potential risks, by investing in human capital Member States should promote inclusive labour markets open to all and also put in place effective anti-discrimination measures.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 1
Member States should modernisimprove their social protection systems to provide effective, efficient, and adequate protection throughout all stages of an individual’s life, ensuring life in dignity, access to social protection, full respect of social rights, fairness and addressing inequalities. There is a need for simplified and better targeted social policies complemented by affordable quality childcare and education, training and job assistance, housing support and accessible health care, access to basic services such as bank account and Internet and for action to prevent early school leaving and fight social exclusion.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The economic and financial crisis has led to a lowering of the level of investments within the Union. Investment has fallen by approximately 15% since its peak in 2007. The Union suffers in particular from a lack of investment as a consequence of austerity policies, including lower wages and public spending, which have depressed aggregate demand and increased market uncertainty regarding the economic future; and the fiscal constraints placed on Member States by SGP rules and the unwillingness of the ECB to intervene decisively in public bond markets. This lack of investment slows economic recovery and negatively affects job creation, and long-term growth prospects and competitiveness.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Comprehensive action is required to reverse the vicious circle created by a lack of investment. Structural reforms and fiscal responsibility are necessary preconditions for stimulating investment. Along with a renewed impetus towards investment financing, these preconditions can contribute to establishing a virtuous circle, whereNew investment projects help support employment and demand and lead to a sustained increase in growth potential, while ensuring social and regional cohesion.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 60 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Throughout the economic and financial crisis, the Union has made efforts to promote growth, in particular through initiatives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy that put in place an approach for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The European Investment Bank ('EIB') has also strengthened its role in instigating and promoting investment within the Union, partly by way of an increase in capital in January 2013. Further abeen responsible for structural reforms and budgetary cuts which have moved the economy away from the Europe 2020 targets. Action is required to ensure that the investment needs of the Union are addressed and that the liquidity available on the market is used efficiently and channelled towards the funding of viable investment projects, which reinforce social and regional cohesion through the creation of quality jobs and the broadening and improvement of the productive base of Member States, especially those most affected by the crisis.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The EFSI is part of a comprehensive approach to address uncertainty surrounding public and private investments. The strategy has three pillars: mobilising finance for investment, making investment reach the real economy and improving the investment environment in the Union.deleted
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The investment environment within the Union should be improved by removing barriers to investment, reinforcing the Single Market and by enhancing regulatory predictability. The work of the EFSI, and investments across Europe generally, should benefit from this accompanying work.deleted
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 80 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises. It is alsoMSMEs and cooperatives. It may be appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees, when projects contribute to quality job creation, industrial development and social and environmental sustainability. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing, reinforcing social and regional cohesion through the creation of quality jobs and the broadening and improvement of the productive base of Member States, especially those most affected by the crisis. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 93 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The EFSI should support public and other strategic investments with high economic and social value added contributing to achieving Union policy objectives.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 127 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The EFSI should target projects delivering high societal and economic value. In particular, the EFSI should target projects that promote job creation, long- term growth and competitiveness. The EFSI should support a wide range of financial products, including equity, debt or guarantees, to best accommodate the needs of the individual project. This wide range of products should allow the EFSI to adapt to market needs whilst encouraging private investment in the projects. The EFSI should not be a substitute for private market finance but should instead catalyse private finance by addressing market failures so as to ensure the most effective and strategic use of public money. The requirement for consistency with State aid principles should contribute to such effective and strategic usEFSI should not be a substitute for private market finance.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 140 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The EFSI should target projects with a higher risk-return profile than existing EIB and Union instruments to ensure additionality over existing operations. The EFSI should finance projects across the Union, including in the countries most affected by the financial crisis. The EFSI should only be used where financing is not available from other sources on reasonable termand investments can be shown to make a positive contribution towards social and regional cohesion, by improving public investment and services, the creation of quality jobs and the improvement and broadening of the productive base of Member States, particularly those most affected by the crisis.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 154 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Decisions on the use of the EFSI support for infrastructure and large mid- cap projects should be made by an Investment Committee, with appropriate involvement of social partners. The Investment Committee should be composed of independent experts who are knowledgeable and experienced in the areas of investment projects and the fields of employment policy, industrial policy, energy and research and innovation. The Investment Committee should be accountable to a Steering Board of the EFSI, who should supervise the fulfilment of the EFSI's objectives with appropriate involvement of social partners. To effectively benefit from the experience of the EIF, the EFSI should support funding to the EIF to allow the EIF to undertake individual projects in the areas of small and medium enterprises and small mid-cap companies.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 162 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In order to enable the EFSI to support investments, the Union should grant a guarantee of an amount equal to EUR 16 000 000 000. When provided on a portfolio basis, the guarantee coverage should be capped depending upon the type of instrument, such as debt, equity or guarantees, as a percentage of the volume of the portfolio of outstanding commitments. It is expected that when the guarantee is combined with EUR 5 000 000 000 to be provided by the EIB, that the EFSI support should generate EUR 60 800 000 000 additional investment by the EIB and EIF. This EUR 60 800 000 000 supported by the EFSI is expected to generate a total of EUR 315 000 000 000 in investment in the Union within the period 2015 to 2017. Guarantees that are attached to projects which are completed without a call on a guarantee are available for supporting new operations.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 172 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) In order to allow for further increase in its resources, participation in the EFSI should be open to third parties, including Member States, national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, private sector entities and entities outside the Union subject to the consent of existing contributors. Third parties mayshould contribute directly to the EFSI and take part in the EFSI governance structure.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 181 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects that are supported by the EU guarantee. The flexibility of this approach should maximise the potential to attract investors to se projects should be considered on a project-by-project basis, withe areas of investment targeted by the EFSIdequate involvement of social partners and public authorities.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 194 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Alongside the financing operations that will be conducted through the EFSI, a European Investment Advisory Hub ('EIAH') should be created. The EIAH should provide strengthened support for project development and preparation across the Union, by building on the expertise of the Commission, the EIB, national promotional banks, social partners and the managing authorities of the European Structural and Investment Funds. This should establish a single point of entry for questions related to technical assistance for investments within the Union.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 205 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) To partially finance the contribution from the Union budget, the available envelopes of the Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020, provided by Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council2, and the Connecting Europe Facility, provided by Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council3, should be reduced. Those programmes serve purposes that are not replicated by the EFSI. However, the reduction of both programmes to finance the guarantee fund is expected to ensure a greater investment in certain areas of their respective mandates than is possible through the existing programmes. The EFSI should be able to leverage the EU guarantee to multiply the financial effect within those areas of research, development and innovation and transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructure compared to if the resources had been spent via grants within the planned Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility programmes. It is, therefore, appropriate to redirect part of the funding presently envisaged for those programmes to the benefit of EFSI. __________________ 2 Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 104). 3Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 129).deleted
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 219 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Within the Union, there are a significant number of potentially viable projects that are not being financed due to a lack of certainty and transparency with respect to such projects. Often, this is because private investors are not aware of the projects or have insufficient information to make an assessment of the investment risks. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States, should promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and future investment projects in the Union suitable for investment. This 'project pipeline' should ensure that information is made publicly available regarding investment projects on a regular and structured basis to ensure that investors have reliable information on which to base their investment decisions. </>The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and the European Parliament, should promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and future investment projects in the Union suitable for investment. Or. en
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 242 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support public and strategic investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprisMSMEs and cooperatives, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 251 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSI Agreement shall be open to accession by Member States. Subject to the consent of existing contributors, the EFSI Agreement shall also be open to accession by other third parties, including national promotional banks or public agencies owned or controlled by Member States, and private sector entities.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 290 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
To meet that objective, the EIAH shall use the expertise of the EIB, the Commission, national promotional banks, social partners and the managing authorities of the European Structural and Investment Funds.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 316 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The EFSI Agreement shall provide that the EFSI shall have an Investment Committee, which shall be responsible for examining potential operations in line with the EFSI investment policies and approving the support of the EU guarantee for operations in line with Article 5, irrespective of their geographic location, with appropriate involvement of social partners in the decision-making process.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 328 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant marketExperts shall be selected on the basis of relevant knowledge and experience in management in project finance and the fields of employment policy, industrial policy, energy and research and innovation; They shall be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of three years.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 390 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) expansion of renewable energy and energy and resource efficiency and savings;
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 427 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The Investment Committee shall be responsible to ensure that overall, projects under the EU guarantee foster European social and regional cohesion.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 438 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. At least one third of total guarantees will be used to support MSMEs and cooperatives.
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 470 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and the European Parliament, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
2015/03/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 8 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that many Member States still have largeausterity programmes implemented in Member States, including those imposed by the Troika (Eurogroup, European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund), have often resulted in further economic contraction and increased deficits, and that there is a need to develop fiscal responsibility programmes that are fullyfor a new stimulus-based economic direction that is compatible with quality job creation, economic growth and welfare state sustainability; calls on the Commission, which has already received the national budget proposals for 2016, and within the framework of COM(2015)00121, to provide a flexible process of fiscal responsibilitypolicy-making at national level that allows for the adoption of socially responsible and economically efficient policies aimed at decent job creation; __________________ 1 COM(2015)0012, ‘Making the best use of the flexibility within the existing rules of the SGP’.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the country-specific recommendations (CSR) to include the Commission’s recommendation2 on private debt aimed at creating second chances for enterprises; calls for these programmes, as the first priority, to be extended to families at risk of eviction from their first home and for theseis extension to apply to those evicted since the financial crisis began; calls for the CSR to include a call on Member States place a moratorium on further evictions, and for this to be guaranteed, in particular, in banking entities within bank restructuring programmes supported by public money; __________________ 2 Recommendation of 12 March 2014 on a new approach to business failure and insolvency.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the recommendations on the need to move forward within new labour reforms, and calls for such reforms, if carried out, to guarantee social dialogue and to ensure necessary political consensus in order to be sustainable and effectivelabour reforms; considers it regrettable that many labour reforms have not ensured the required baattacked job security, workplance between flexibility and securityrights and trade unions' representation rights, resulting in, for example, the exclusion of millions of workers from collective bargaining, increased job insecurity and increased inequality; calls for labour reforms capable of reducing fragmentation, putting an end to insecurity and increasing the productivity and competitiveness of our economy while ensuring decent jobs and living wages through investment in human capital;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have warned of the social (in-work poverty) and economic (depressed internal demand) problems caused by the wage devaluation that has occurred in recent years; considers it regrettable that there is no reference to the importance of increasing wages, especially in those countries where wages are below the poverty threshold; recalls that minimum wages differ substantially between Member States (Bulgaria EUR 184/month, Luxembourg EUR 1 923/month), and reiterates its request for a study4 on this issue; calls for the inclusion of recommendations that Member States set their minimum wage as a 'living wage' - i.e., calculated according to the basic cost of living in the particular Member State; __________________ 4 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraph 47.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that some labour reforms have introduced new contractual formulas that, according to the Commission, have increased precariousness in the labour markets; of particular concern are some Member States whose rates of temporary employment are over 90 % for new contracts, which particularly affects young people and women and which, according to the OECD1, is one of the direct causes of increasing inequality; calls for inclusion of a recommendation that Member States take steps to restrict and reverse the growth of such precarious employment contracts; __________________ 1 OECD report ‘In it together: Why less inequality benefits all’, 21 May 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that there is significant disparity in the success of the implementation of the Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative between Member States to date; notes that the International Labour Organisation has estimated that resolving youth unemployment in the EU requires a budget of EUR 21 billion and that the Commission's current financial commitment is wholly inadequate and needs to be raised to a sufficient level; calls on the Commission to work with Member States and representative youth organisations to propose minimum standards and best practice in the implementation of the Youth Guarantee;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the financial crisis has undermined the positive effects of cohesion policy and led to even higher unemployment rates, increasedeven more poverty and social exclusion, and less convergence than expected;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that the economic crisis has seriously damaged economic, social and territorial cohesion, in the Union with an unemployment rate growing by more than 3% since the beginning of the crisis and resulting in huge differences between Member States; recalls that since the onset of the crisis over 3.8 million jobs have been lost in manufacturing in the EU1 ; __________________ 1 Industrial Scoreboard 2013, Commission Staff Working Document, p.6.
2015/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 20 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that EU must promote environmental friendly policy, emphasizing on the renewable energy sources and severe sanctions for the industrial pollution.
2015/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 22 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers it regrettable that the job creation potential of EU funds for the creation of high- quality jobs is still insufficient, and notes that it should be further strengthened;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Underlines that SMEs make up 99% of the EU's corporate fabric and account for 80% of jobs in the EU
2015/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 24 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that austerity measures in several Member States are having a negative impact on jobs and growth, resulting in decreasing investments, increasing unemployment, and in the destruction of the job creation potential; considers that all the new projects and investments promoted by EU funds should have an employment clause that includes the obligation to create new and non- precarious jobs;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for an inclusive jobs and growth strategy that will tackle unemployment and secure more growth, more jobs with enhanced workers' rights, and access to public health and education as one of the means of achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion that is needed in the EU; considers that the ultimate goal should be sustainable development and a high quality of life, together with prosperity and decent work for everyone;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers it regrettable that the unemployment rate among young people is still too high; calls on the Member States to make the best and promptest possible use of the money available under the Youth Employment Initiative, especially the EUR 1 billion in pre-financing once it has been released, with adequate involvement of social partners;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that it is essential to provide greater support especially to micro and small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and worker cooperatives in order to boost their productivity within a stable business environment, minimize the effect of dominant market positions occupied by large companies and conglomerates, and help MSMEs and worker cooperatives to be set up and to grow".
2015/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that it is high time for the EU to invest in businesses and support business creation; welcomesupport public investment to increase employment and social and regional cohesion; regrets, therefore, the intention to set up the new European Fund for Strategic Investments as a complementary tool with the potential to generate 1.3 million additional jobtool to guarantee private investments without any conditionality as regards within three yearss effects on employment or social and regional cohesion.
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for an inclusive industrial strategy that will tackle unemployment and secure more growth, more jobs with enhanced workers’ rights, and better working conditions, promote measures for ensuring safety and access to public health and education as one of the means of achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion that is needed in the EU; considers that the ultimate goal should be sustainable development and a high quality of life, together with prosperity and decent work for everyone.
2015/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 87 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for a direct support to promote solid growth and sustainable development of MSMEs in order improve labour productivity and resource use efficiency and keep pace with the evolving knowledge society and with development based on balanced economic growth, especially in Member States where the crisis has had a greater impact in terms of MSME closures;
2015/03/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. Whereas the concept of the blue economy covers a wide range of economic sectors linked to the seas and oceans, spanning traditional or established and emerging sectors including fisheries, aquaculture, (seagoing) shipping and inland waterway transport, ports and logistics, tourism, pleasure sailing, and cruising, shipbuilding and ship-repairing, maritime works and protection of the coastline, prospecting for, and exploitation of, offshore mineral resources, prospecting for, and exploitation of, offshore energy resources, and biotechnology;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 23 #

2014/2240(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that blue growth should never be considered in isolation from the maintenance and sustainability of the natural resources of the seas, the restoration of those which have been lost and measures which are certainly sustainable and have been proven to be so;
2015/04/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2014/2240(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of improving the necessary skills for applying the new technologies to the marine environment and of strengthening research coordination in order to create sustainable quality jobs and contribute to the full achievement of the social and employment objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
2015/04/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. Whereas the sectoral priorities for the development of the Blue Economy may differ from Member State to Member State, depending on the one hand, on the respective development record of traditional or established sectors and, on the other hand, on existing resources and the development potential of emerging sectors in each Member State;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 37 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. Whereas increased investment in research and innovation associated with the seas and oceans may be a useful tool to support the goals of economic, social and territorial cohesion, tackling the asymmetries and growing differences between Member States;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #

2014/2240(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the need to focus on environmental aspects and on improving the quality of the marine environment in order to ensure we have a sustainable blue economy without restricthile realising its employment potential;
2015/04/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. Whereas in several Member States, and especially in countries where the troika has intervened, investment levels - public and private - have been reduced to historically low levels, which has had and is having negative repercussions on the development of various sectors of the Blue Economy which should be taken into account and reversed;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. Whereas there may be advantages in extending the scope of action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in order to cover a wider range of common issues associated with the promotion and sustainable development of the maritime economy;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 54 #

2014/2240(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that coastal and maritime tourism can contribute to economic growth and to reducing casual or temporary work, providedhe creation of quality jobs; stresses, however, that theall activities armust be carried out in an environmentally-friendlysustainable way;
2015/04/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2014/2240(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that in order to maximise sustainable economic growth and employment andincrease the creation of quality jobs based on blue technologies, exchanges of ideas between the world of research and that of business should be encouraged, to promote and increase their ability to cooperate and network.
2015/04/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Draws attention to the need to promote an integrated approach to different sectors of the Blue Economy, recognising and respecting the priorities of the different Member States and supporting them in developing these priorities;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 117 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the European Commission and its agencies to support Member States in the formulation and implementation of national and regional strategies for the development of the maritime economy;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 120 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Considers the shortage of qualified professionals in various fields of study and activity – including, though not confined to, researchers, engineers, and technicians, and workers - to be a huge hurdle that could prevent the blue economy from fully realising its potential; maintains that this shortcoming is closely bound up with the growing disengagement and disinvestment by Member States in the spheres of science and education and with the decline in the professional status and social standing of several of the professions concerned, and therefore calls for these two trends to be reversed without delays;;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 126 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Considers that proper development of the Blue Economy requires the dignity of the professions associated with it and the creation of stable employment with rights;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 134 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Considers that public investment, especially in some Member States, plays a decisive role in promoting the development and full exploitation of the potential of the Blue Economy;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 137 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for an appropriate financial framework to be established in order to stimulate the development of the blue economy and job creation, combining and coordinating the financial instruments available – structural and investment funding (EMFF, ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund), the research framework programme, and so forth; points out that the instruments should be better geared to the needs of individual stakeholders – public institutions, local authorities, businesses, especially SMEs, non-governmental organisations, etc. – and the opportunities being offered widely publicised;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 150 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Draws attention to the negative development and clear deterioration of some of the more traditional sectors of the Blue Economy (such as fisheries and shipbuilding and repair), especially in areas where they functioned as authentic anchor activities, boosting economic activities either upstream or downstream, creating jobs and promoting development; considers that any EU strategy on the Blue Economy should not forget these activities and regions, and should highlight the potential of innovation in reversing this decline;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 152 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Draws attention to the importance of public or majority-owned state companies in areas such as merchant shipping, port management, the shipping industry and maritime and coastal defence works; rejects the vision that tends only to focus on the private sector and believes that the strengthening and modernisation of the public sector can be an important driving force behind the promotion of the Blue Economy;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 154 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Suggests evaluating the possibility of extending the scope of action of the European Maritime Safety Agency, as a way of strengthening coordination, cooperation and support to Member States in the development and full use of the Blue Economy’s potential; in stressing the key role of Member States in this area, considers that this could be an important stimulus towards achieving this goal;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13d. Considers that the implementation of strategies, plans and programmes, as well as specific national legislation, may provide a political and institutional framework which is more favourable to the development of the Blue Economy in the various Member States; stresses that these strategies, plans and programmes, together with specific national legislation, should contribute to harmonious and sustainable interaction between human activities and the marine and coastal environment;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 156 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13e. Stresses that the sovereignty of Member States in their exclusive economic zones and over their resources on the continental shelf should be respected, subject to the necessary deepening of cooperation for the sustainable development of the Blue Economy and the preservation of the marine environment;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2014/2240(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that coastal and island communities should be fully involved at every stage in the development of the blue economy, this being a sine qua non for realising its potential in terms of innovation, jobs, prosperity, and sustainable development; advocates greater appreciation and a substantial increase in the budget of the Community- Based Local Development Programmes;
2015/04/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas there is clear evidence that shifting from labour to environmental taxation, investing in energy and resource efficiency, and developing the supply chain through a clear industrial strategy has a positive impact on job creation;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Commission to maintain policy coherence on the need for green employment, a just transition and decent work across all areas of its work, including by promoting this agenda in its Integrated Guidelines on economic and employment policies;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the 'just transition' and decent work agenda are part of its position in the climate negotiations at the COP21 summit in Paris this year;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the critical importance of workers’ participation in achieving these changes; calls fornotes that trade unions have stated that the lack of any legal obligation on employers to include workers' representatives in green workplace programmes is blocking the potential of this partnership; calls for the Member States to ensure the involvement of trade union ‘green representatives’ working with employers on increasing sustainability at their workplaces;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the tools for skills development and the forecasting of skill needs proposed by the Commission; stresses, however, that more ambitious action and investment is needed;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that these strategies should include the identification of skill gaps and targeted vocational and lifelong training programmes; stresses the need to actively include in the strategies both displaced workers and low-skilled workers at risk of being excluded from the labour market by ensuring that skills training must be targeted, accessible and free for these workers; stresses that steps need to be taken to counter the gender imbalance in certain sectors;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to use the EU Semester and the review of the Europe 2020 strategy to support green job creation; calls on the Commission to issue country- specific recommendations that contribute to higher employment and smaller ecological footprints, including a shift from labour to environmental taxation and the phasing out of counterproductive subsidies by 2020;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Notes that environmental taxes in the form of consumption taxes are often regressive in nature and impact disproportionately on lower-income groups who should be exempt from consumption-based environmental taxes; calls for any new environmental taxation to target the major polluters; notes that if successful, environmental taxation will result in a lowering of pollution and therefore a fall in tax revenue in the medium to long term, which must be taken into account;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A a (new)
-Aa. Whereas, under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, all children should be guaranteed the right to an education, health-care services, housing, protection, participation in decisions that affect them, leisure and free time, a balanced diet, and the receipt of care in a family environment;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. Whereas the factors with the greatest influence on child poverty are wealth- redistribution policies and labour policy9 a, particularly parental income levels and social rights; __________________ 9aSave the Children, ‘Child Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe’, Brussels, 2014, p.5
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
A B. Whereas, although the children of parents with very low work intensity are 56.7 % more likely to be at risk of poverty or social exclusion, families with high work intensity remain at risk of child poverty today (Romania, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, Greece, Latvia, Slovakia, Poland or Luxembourg);
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. Whereas the destrucdistribution of incomes has a major impact on reducing cycles of social inequality and the Member States with lowest rates of child poverty – such as Sweden and Denmark – are also those with the lowest levels of general poverty and inequality;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. Whereas between 2008 and 2012, the number of children at risk of poverty or social exclusion in Europe (EU27+Norway, Iceland and Switzerland) rose by almost one million, increasing by half a million between 2011 and 2012 alone9, and, according to data from Eurostat in 2013, 26.5 million children in the EU28 are at risk of falling into poverty or social exclusion; in the EU27, the risk of poverty or social exclusion increased between 2008 and 2012 from 26.5% to 28%; in 2013, in the Member States of the EU28, 28% of the total population under 18 was at risk of poverty or social exclusion and, in the vast majority of countries, the risk of poverty and social exclusion is greater for children than for adults; __________________ 9 Save the Children, ‘Child Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe’, Brussels, 2014, p.5
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. Whereas the latest reports by the European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless highlight an increase in women, young people and families with children (with migrant children over- represented) taken into homeless shelters;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. Whereas the first few years, even before compulsory education, are crucial to children’s development, given that it is during this period that they develop essential capacities and that access to a high-quality education has a significant impact on self-esteem, ability to participate in social life, better health, social inclusion and, in the future, access to better job opportunities; whereas the educational gap between children from different socioeconomic backgrounds has increased;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. Whereas, in 2012, the average school-dropout rate was 13 % for the EU and over 20 % in some countries (Portugal, Spain and Malta)9 a __________________ 9aEU-SILC (2013) EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
H b. Whereas working parents who do not have access to a nursery school are often forced to leave children in the care of another child, or to recourse to paid and uncertified informal care networks, which jeopardises their children’s safety and well-being;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
I a. Whereas children born into poverty are at greater risk of suffering chronic illnesses and having more health problems, which leads to the perpetuation of inequality;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
I b. Whereas, even in countries where the right to health is enshrined in law, many children do not have access to appointments with a general practitioner or dentist, particularly because of a lack of available public services; whereas some children have very limited access to health-care services, which does not go beyond accident and emergency;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I c (new)
I c. Whereas the financial problems of families have been contributing to increased mental health problems in parents and to instances of family breakdown, which has undeniable repercussions on the psychological and social well-being of children;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I d (new)
I d. Whereas the environment in which a child lives, including the pre-birth period, has a decisive influence on the development of the cognitive system, on communication and language, and on social and emotional skills, which will have a consequence for health, well- being, participation in communities and learning capacities9 b; __________________ 9b Drivers, 2014, ‘Universal, quality early childhood programmes that are responsive to need promote better and more equal outcomes in childhood and later life’.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
J a. Whereas child poverty has a high economic cost for societies, particularly as regards increased spending on social support;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. Whereas families living at risk of poverty are more likely to live in unsanitary and unsafe areas, and that 17% of children in the EU28 still live in these conditions, with 15 countries above average11; the price of energy means that many children live in homes without heating, which increases the number of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases; the increasing number of evictions due to the inability to pay housing costs has pushed children into shelters; __________________ 11 EU-SILC (2013) Statistics on Income and Living Conditions
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
K a. Whereas migrant children are over- represented in the group at risk of poverty and there is more discrimination against them because of language barriers, with this situation worse for illegal immigrant children; whereas, today, with the intensification of migratory flows, there are a growing number of cases in which the children of emigrants remain in the country of their birth under the care of other family members or third parties, negatively influencing the children’s development, particularly at the emotional level;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
K b. Whereas there should be financial reinforcement of food-aid programmes aimed at disadvantaged families, since a growing number of children only have access to food at school; whereas these programmes are important, but cannot be seen as a long-term solution;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that Member States increase the quantity, amounts, scope and effectiveness of the social support specifically directed to children, but also to parents (such as unemployment benefits) and to promote labour laws that guarantee social rights and security to families and fight precarious employment while promoting work with rights;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States actually to realise the right to housing, by guaranteeing citizens and families an appropriate home that meets their needs and ensures their well-being, privacy and quality of life, thereby contributing to the achievement of social justice and cohesion and the combating of social exclusion and poverty;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends that Member States’ national budgets contain visible and transparent provisions for appropriations and costs to combat child poverty and to fulfil their duty to protect children;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recommends that the Commission and Member States set targets for reducing child poverty and social exclusion;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on Member States to introduce legislation to protect or increase maternity and paternity rights; regrets the announced withdrawal of the revised draft of the Maternity Leave Directive by the Commission, which guarantees working women more rights during the pre- and post-birth periods;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends that Member States develop proactive social policies that prevent poverty and the departureremoval of children from their family environment, ensuring that it is not through poverty that children are institutionalised; calls on the Member States to use the EU Structural Funds and the European Fund for Strategic Investments to support the transfer of institutionalised children to host families and community-based services;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recommends that Member States guarantee all children access to free, quality public education at all ages, including early childhood, and establish appropriate teacher-student ratios, in order to safeguard the safety and well-being of children;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 A. Calls on the Member States to promote inclusive schooling, which should involve not just increasing the number of special education teachers, but also integrating children with special educational needs into normal classes;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Urges Member States to guarantee universal, public, free and quality health care with regard to prevention and primary care, access to diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation, guaranteeing women the right to sexual and reproductive health by ensuring health care for babies, maternity care in the pre- and post-natal care period, particularly in the case of premature birth, access to family doctors, dentists and mental health specialists for all children and their families, and integrate these aspects into national and the EU public health strategies;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on Member States, particularly those where social inequalities are greater, to strengthen social rights that the state must guarantee, increasing the number of employees and technicianprofessionals in the social security services working with and for children and their families, and increasing the medical, psychological and social care of children;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to participate actively in combating the trafficking of children for any form of exploitation, including work, forced marriage, illegal adoption, illegal activities and sexual exploitation;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 294 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Calls on the Member States to support, through their municipalities, local centres for supporting children and their families, particularly in the communities and/or areas most affected by the issue of child poverty, which provide not just for legal aid and/or advice, parental advice and school support, but also for education and guidance on a healthy lifestyle and on safe Internet use, amongst other things;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13 c. Recommends that the Member States guarantee refugee citizens, particularly children and young people, the same rights of access to education, health care, work and housing as other citizens of the Member State in question;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 305 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recommends that the Commission and Member States develop statistical methods that integrate multidimensional indicators in measuring poverty to take into account the limitations of relative poverty measurements and the work of the UNDP, UNICEF and the OECD, going beyond the AROPE(parents’ income, access to high-quality public services, participation in social and cultural activities, access to adequate formal and informal education services, exposure to physical risk, safety, stable family environment, and level of life satisfaction) and to take into account the limitations of relative poverty measurements and the work of the UNDP, UNICEF and the OECD, which take these multidimensional indicators into account in their statistics; recommends that these indicators be cross-referenced with indicators of socioeconomic classification (parents’ income and literacy level, country of origin, gender, disability, geographical location, etc.), going beyond the AROPE (at risk of poverty and/or exclusion) indicators;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, as a consequence of the economic and financial crisis, the policies imposed on Member States under reconstruction programmes, and the deepening of the economic governance framework, levels of poverty and social exclusion have increased, as has long-term unemployment;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas social innovation refers to new ideas, whether they be products, services or social organisation models, designed to meet new social and environmental demands and challenges, such as the ageing population, balancing work and family life, managing diversity, youth unemployment and climate change, but under no circumstances can it replace the role of the welfare state;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas education and training must be priority areas in fostering the entrepreneurial spirit among our young people;deleted
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that social economy cannot replace the welfare state and public services
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that social economy enterprises have a strong local and regional basis, which means that they are more aware of specific needs and able to offer products and services which match those needs, thus improving social and territorial cohesion;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. BelievNotes that social innovation makes a significanty, along with public investments and the safeguarding of the welfare state, contributione towards laying the foundations for a type of growth which serves a more sustainable, inclusive society generating social cohesion;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on Member States to include the entrepreneurial spirit and the principles of the social economy in education and training curricula;deleted
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
— having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2014 on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities1 , __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2014)0038.deleted
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
— having regard to its resolution of 15 April 2014 entitled ‘How can the European Union contribute to creating a hospitable environment for enterprises, businesses and start-ups to create jobs?'2 , __________________ 2deleted Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0394.
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas labour market rigiditieausterity and labour reforms are having a negative impact on job creation, while a competitive EU labour market can contribute to achieving the Europe and its quality, moving the economy away from its 2020 employment and poverty targets;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that in the wake of the European economic crisis a number of Member States are struggling with high unemployment levels (EU28: 9.9 %) as well as public debt; is further concerned that youth unemployment rates (EU28: 21.4 %) are generally much higher;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that ambitious economic polpublic servicies and labour markeinvestment areforms are needed in order to boost smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and create more jobs; further stresses the need for economically sustainable social welfare systems which are based on incentives to work pivotal in order to create decent jobs and an environmentally and socially sustainable economy; in this respect, further stresses the need for robust social welfare systems;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Situation on the EU labour market, including labour market shortages
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that several important challenges are affecting Europe's labour market, including increasing demand for highly skilled labour, rapid technological change and development, as well as an ageing society which requires that early retirement be made less attractivechanges in the patterns of demand for a broad range of labour skills, rapid technological change and development; notes that early retirement may contribute to improving working opportunities for younger workers;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the intra-EU labour mobility remains low (EU27: 0.29 %), with high unemployment rates in some Member States and unfilled job vacancies in othershigh unemployment rates in some Member States and regions has a devastating effect on social and regional cohesion;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the economic and motivational incentives to work are too low in many European countries;deleted
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Notes with concern the persistence of involuntary temporary and involuntary part-time work; condemns the wide- spread use of opt-out clauses by Member States in the setting of maximum working hours and the rising worker intensities suffered by many workers;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Draws attention to social dumping as one of the factors deteriorating job quality in the Union; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure the reinforcement of social dialogue and collective bargaining institutions and the improvement of minimum employment conditions and wage standards, both at the national and European level, to avoid a race-to-the-bottom in working conditions between Member States;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Fostering a competitive EU labour marketskills
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that in order to achieve a competitive EUthe light of constantly changing labour market,s ambitious reforms are needed which increase inclusiveness, flexibility and mobility, in the light of constantly changing labour markets and production patterns; nd production patterns, States are encouraged to build a safety net to tackle the effects of technological unemployment on workers, ensuring that they receive an appropriate income and training during periods of transition;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of human development, career flexibility and self- responsibility; recalls in this respect that investment is needed to actively support employabilityvocational training and prevent skills depletion among the unemployed; emphasiszes that such measures should be combined with reforms in pension and social welfare systems that encourage more people to worke importance of an adequate supervision of training schemes by public authorities and trade unions;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importance of ensuring that the mobility of workers for a competitive labour market, and stresses the need to reduce the administrative and linguistic barriers that are liable to restrain it; encourages raising of awareness of andis voluntary and fair; encourages further improvement of the EU-wide EURES job portal;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of partnerships between universities, businesses andsocial partners and public authorities with a view to estimating labour needs for the future, as well as fostering cooperation between Member States in this regard;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Stresses the importance of public leadership in the transition towards a socially and environmentally sustainable economy; calls for an adequate planning of the skills required in the development of sectors such as renewable energy, improved housing and industrial efficiency or the development of public and social welfare services;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recalls the need to strive for a more flexible approach to individual career development and lifelong education and training across one's personal career pathimportance of the availability of lifelong support, education and training for workers;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that training and re- qualification programs for the unemployed should be designed and implemented in close cooperation with employers' associations, with a view to better aligning workers' new skills with the needs of employerbetween social partners and public authorities;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that it is of utmost importance to giveprovide job guidance and counselling to jobseekers in how to look for a jobworkers and to ensure that their skills are recognised through ‘competences passports' reflecting the skills acquired through both formal and informal learning;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6
StrengthenImproving connections between education and employment
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Underlines the importance of better synergies between education systems and the labour market, including exposure to the workplace and cooperation with businesses;deleted
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that for a successful transition to employment, it is of great importance to take informed decisions, and that motivation, self-awareness and initiative should be encouraged;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Fostering labouLabour migration and fair mobility
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that there are curreDraws attention to the 7 million EU citizens living or working, as of 2013, in a member country other than their countlry 2 million unfilled vacancies in the EU; emphasises the need for labour mobility in the Union in order to fill this gap,of citizenship, the 1.1 cross-border workers and the 1.2 posted workers across the EU; emphasises the need for their citizenship and labour rights to be fully respected and reiterates the importance of ERASMUS+ andimproving EURES in this respect;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Recalls that fair mobility is closely linked to the right of free residence for EU workers; emphasizes that it cannot act as a substitute for policies aiming at improving regional and social cohesion in those areas with high unemployment rates;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls the importance of the mobility of highly skilled workers from third countries in the light of the demographic challengesat migration of workers from third countries must be respectful of their resident and labour rights; is concerned by the negative effects on third countries of European migration policies, including on social cohesion and availability of relevant worker skills e.g. "brain drain";
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 9
Nurturing the entrepreneurial spirit among citizens: SMEs and micro- enterprises
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 260 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Believes that teaching self- responsibility and fostering entrepreneurial education from an early age further improves links between school and the labour market, and can contribute to lowering unemployment levels;deleted
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the importance of support measures for SMEs and micro-enterprises, in order to reduce the administrative and financial barriers to their establishment and operation as well as facilitating the hiring of qualified labour and training of employeesimprove their access to financing and workers training;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that incentives should be introduced for entrepreneurs who invest in training and apprenticeshiptraining and apprenticeships schemes should be adequately funded and supervised by public authorities;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 290 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses the importance of innovation and digitalisation for competitivenessproductivity and growth, and, in this respect, of the need to provide the knowledge and skills that are needed, as well as of motivation and determination on the part of employees and prospective employees with a view to creating innovative, creative and digital products and services;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 298 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Highlights the job creation potential offered by completing the digital single market, building the energy union, creating jobs through investing in research and development and innovation, and fostering transport networksplanning for a transition towards a socially and environmentally sustainable economy;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Notes with concern the failure and delays of Youth Guarantee schemes in most Member States and calls on the Commission to provide a detailed impact assessment of this initiative and its various implementations and assess the possibilities for increased funding within the current MFF;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses the importance of special measures and support for employers, in particular SMEs, to encourage them to hire young people for their first job and ensure their in-house training, as also for older workers; rRecalls the importance of social responsibility on the part of employers towards all employees and towards society; believes that such social responsibility should also be required of institutions responsible for education and training;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 322 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider innovative ways to encouragerevise rules constraining public spending and investment in the EU in order to boost growth and jobs;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 334 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Member States to learn and draw from best practices that deliver lower unemployment rates and undertake reforms which draw on those practiceson employment policies that contribute to the creation of decent employment;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 343 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Member States to include leadership, management and financial education and business start-up advice in their education programmes, and to prioritise the further development of vocational training and education (VET) programmes, under adequate supervision of trade unions;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point ii
(ii) to ensurguarantee that TTIP includes comprehensive provisions on labour laws and policies that are consistent with the core ILO Conventions and the Decent Work Agenda, with a clear commitment to promote higher standards and, furthermore, to ensurguarantee that where disputes arise, labour provisions will have a conditional dimensionprimacy over provisions of free movement;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point ii a (new)
(ii a) to guarantee a clear commitment from the EU and the US to revoke anti- trade union laws and actors such as the Troika and the right to work legislation;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point iii
(iii) to ensurguarantee that the horizontal dimensions of labour and social provisions are recognised and fully integrated into all relevant operational parts of the agreement to ensure a coherent and comprehensive approach to trade and sustainable development;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point iv
(iv) to ensure that civil society can make a meaningful contribution to implementing relevant TTIP provisionsrespect the overwhelming opposition in civil society against TTIP which has been clearly expressed by the 1.5 million European citizens who have signed the Citizens' Initiative against TTIP;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point v
(v) to take immediate steps to safeguard the right of EU governments to legislate, organise, set quality and safety standards for, manage and regulate public servicesunequivocally exclude public services, including Services of General Interest and Services of Non-Economic Interests, as well as rules on public procurement from areas that can be liberalised;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vi
(vi) to ensure that the specific challenges faced by SMEs are fully taken into accouthe 87 percent of all SMEs in Europe which are not involved in export but relies on domestic demand are fully taken into account; and to identify and clearly communicate which sectors and branches are likely to be adversely affected by TTIP prior to the signing of an agreement;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vii
(vii) to take steps to promote the uptake of corporate social responsibility (CSR), which must be additional to and not replace existing labour and environmental laws;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point viii
(viii) to guarantee that agreement on anyno mechanism for investor-state dispute- settlement mechanism must take into accoun(ISDS) will be part of a final agreement; and to respect the results of the public consultation on investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), must be fully transparent and democratically accountable and must not hinder legislators from passing laws in the area of employment policywhich showed wide opposition against ISDS rather than public support of a reformed ISDS; Believes that the ISDS undermines democratically adopted legislation which has been put in place to safeguard public interests;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to ensure that statistical projections on job losses/gains, and on sectors, affected are constantly updated so that timely intervention can be undertaken by the Commission to support affected sectors, regions or Member States.; Believes that the negotiations are based on a flawed and biased impact assessment study which has not addressed the negative impacts on employment, job displacement, public finances and trade diversion1 ; __________________ 1 The Commission Impact assessment of TTIP is based on analysis carried out by the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). However, a number of independent studies which have critically assessed the CEPR studies points out that the study has exaggerated the claims of growth and job creation. "Nor does it contain an adequate assessment of the risks or drawbacks", says the European Parliament Impact Assessment team (IMPA) (page 8 of the EP Initial appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/et udes/note/join/2013/507504/IPOL- JOIN_NT%282013%29507504_EN.pdf )
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x a (new)
(x a) to abandon the export-led growth model and explore and prioritise other ways of stimulating much needed growth and creation of decent jobs in the EU: - promote counter-cyclical actions aimed at stimulating domestic demand and consumption and countering high; unemployment and social exclusion - revoke the 1/20 rule on debt reduction; - allow all public investments to be regarded as fiscally neutral as regards the Stability and Growth Pact;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x b (new)
(x b) to reject the Regulatory Cooperation Council as it lacks democratic accountability, does not ensure multi- stakeholder representation and does not foresee social impact assessments of how new laws and regulations will affect working and living conditions of citizens;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x c (new)
(x c) to insert a sunset clause that activates after 5 years and that ensures that any subsequent re-activation can only be proposed after an extensive evaluation of the effects of the TTIP agreement;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/2224(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the increase of EUR 244,2 million in the overall level of commitment appropriations compared to the original position of the Council of 2 September 2014; is satisfied with the fact that the EUR 521,9 million of cuts by the Council in commitments have been fully reversed and that a further EUR 170,7 million of commitments have been added, including the full package of pilot projects and preparatory actions;deleted
2014/12/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2014/2224(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that the research and innovation programmes of the EU, a fundamental pillar of growth strategy, should support social development and resolve problems of the European Union such as poverty and social exclusion;
2014/12/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2014/2224(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses that the EU Budget must promote social development and cohesion over austerity, wage reductions and distortion of social fabric in countries under adjustment programmes;
2014/12/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 30 #

2014/2224(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reaffirms its position that a new system of Own Resources is vitally important to get out of the current impasses in budgetary negotiations and therefore attaches the highest importance to the work of the Monti group;deleted
2014/12/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2014/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recognises that sustainable forest management is essential to balance ecological, social and economic functions that forests serve, and that the existing sustainable forest management frameworks often do not adequately address risks associated with the lack of a balanced approach to forestry such as increasing demands;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #

2014/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the study assessing the impact of EU consumption on deforestation published by the European Commission in July 2013; regrets that despite the request made by the Parliament in its resolution 2010/C 184 E/08 of 23 April 2009, the study does not deal with forest degradation; Calls on the Commission to bring forward proposals to reduce the impacts identified in the study and contribute to EU and international environmental goals and commitments to sustainable development; calls on the Commission to publish an EU action plan on deforestation and forest degradation to this end as called for by the 7th Environmental Action Programme Decision No 1386/2013/EU;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 37 #

2014/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Takes the view that it is important to promote the implementation of the concept of bioeconomy while respecting the sustainability boundaries of raw material supply, to boost the economic viability of forest value chains through innovation and technology transfer, and, to this end, provide more support for forest products other than timber, and to ensure that different demands on forest products are balanced and evaluated against the sustainable supply potentials;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 45 #

2014/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the carrying out of a cost assessment of all EU legislation affecting the value chains of forest-based industries, with a view to cutting out all unnecessary and burdensome bureaucracy and increasing the industry’s long-term competitiveness in a sustainable manner.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Aarticle 192s 147, 173, 174, 192 and 345 thereof,
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 73 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas to ensure cohesion within the European economy, excessive concentration of high value-added industry in a few regions, including the base-metal sector, should be avoided;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 76 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas the base-metal sector plays a key role in the development of the overall economy, both technologically and in overcoming supply bottlenecks;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Fc. whereas research, development and innovation in this sector is key for European industry; whereas plant closures often result in irreversible loss of technology and know-how and unskilling of industrial workforce;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 118 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the two dimensions of competitivenessproduction and emissions cuts are becoming complementary since, if European production becomes carbon- virtuous, preservation of its share of the European and world markets is an effective means of contributing to an overall limitation of greenhouse gas emissions of industrial origin; adds that the same applies to the production of imported goods, for which the same approach should be followed;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 121 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for an EU-level plan for the development of base-metal recycling, in order to move closer to a circular economy; calls for the development of strong linkages between the base-metal recycling sector and other industries to strengthen the size and resilience of the industrial base, in particular in regions affected by deindustrialisation;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 126 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Recalls the importance of public investment and, in the European context, of Horizon 2020 funds, in improving the environmental and energy efficiency of the base-metal industry, including the achievement of lower carbon emissions in line with EU2020 targets;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 211 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Urges that free allowances be allocated strictly on the basis of programmes for investment in new equipment, R&D - including CCS - and the training of workers, as soon as possible and at all events during the fourth stage, covering the period 2021-2028;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 236 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that it remains possible to conclude long-term contracts, under certain conditions, which must be compatible with a return on investment, the duration of which must be no less than 15 yearsCalls for higher flexibility in the conclusion of long-term contracts, including bilateral contracts, in the case of highly capitalenergy-intensive industries, to ensure a stable environment for investment;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 244 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Expresses concern for market regulations allowing for a structural gap between electricity prices and generation costs; calls on the Commission to fight against anti-competitive practices of private oligopolies in the energy market;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 263 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 10 a (new)
Calls for a better involvement of social partners and, in particular, workers organizations and trade unions at the national and European level to avoid social dumping practices in the sector and ensure the creation of quality employment; calls for the involvement of workers in the decision-making process of the industry;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 271 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls for a revision of competition policy and state aid rules in order to facilitate public intervention aiming at maintaining social and regional cohesion, improving labour and environmental standards or addressing public health concerns;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 274 #

2014/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Emphasises the importance of the skills and qualifications of the workers of the base-metal sector; calls for active employment and industrial policies ensuring that this knowledge is developed and recognized as an important asset of the European base-metal industry; asks that the maintenance of industrial know- how and a skilled workforce be considered in assessing the viability of production in any particular plant;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 17 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas family businesses differ in terms of values from non-family corporations as regards long-term orientation, have a special degree of commitment to their local community – rooted in the European tradition of the ‘honourable merchant’ – and are generally slower to close down and put workers out of jobs;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas it is impossible, due to the lack of a definition, to gather comparable data in the EU Member States in order to draw attention to the special situation and contribution of family businesses;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 40 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the work being undertaken on an EU definition of ‘family business’, and calls for the specificities within Member States’ definitions to be taken into account, in particular with regard to guaranteeing social rights, social security, pension entitlements and health and safety at work;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that family businesses should not constitute a separate category from existing definitions of Micro- and SMEs; notes that a majority of family businesses have less than 5 employees and calls on the Commission to protect and define their activity accordingly;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the importance of supporting micro, small and medium enterprises not only by funding, but also through a fair and progressive taxation, and a fairer and more even distribution of tax burden across labour, profits and consumption;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2.Welcomes EU efforts, in cooperation with national authorities, in promoting entrepreneurship education, in schools, universities and VET, as an important tool to fight unemployment and create new jobs while stressing that topics related to running family businesses, like succession, ownership transfer, personnel management and innovation shall be included in curricula;deleted
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, because of their history, family businesses are very rooted in a particular location and thus also create and maintain jobs in rural and in less attractivefavoured areas; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to provide the necessary infrastructure in order to ensure the competitivenessviability, continuity, renewal and growth of such businesses;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that highly specialised family businesses in particular play an important role as suppliers and innovators to larger companies and that, given their long-term and intergenerational approach to business, they provide the companies they supply with material security and thereby make a significant contribution to economic growth;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 86 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States, with this in mind, to ensure that national rules on the taxation of inheritance and gifts and on corporate taxation do not discriminate against equity financing which is so vital for family businesses; points out, in this connection, that in Hungary inheritance tax on business assets has been abolished;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 89 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Draws the Commission’s attention to the need for equal treatment of big multinationals and family businesses so as to ensure a balanced level playing field in terms of competition, while respecting the unique nature of family businesses, in particular in those Member States in which such businesses were destroyed after 1945.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to improve access to credit for family businesses, avoiding securitisation as proposed in the Capital Markets Union Green Paper.
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 116 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recognises that the fiscal, legal and administrative environment in which family businesses operate is defined by the combined effect of corporate legislation and private law;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 128 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and especially the Member States therefore to improve the legal framework forand create financing instruments supporting the transfer of family businesses, and create special financing instruments for transfers and thus prevent liquidity shortages so as to ensure the survival of family businesses and prevent distress saless well as promote family business specific education on topics such as business transfer, governance structures, ownership strategies and implementing innovation;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 141 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Member States to ensure that tax practices, shown to be conducive to long-term family entrepreneurship, through exemptions on gift and progressive inheritance tax, are applied and are not eroded through short sighted reforms adopted under the pressure of the current debt crisis;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 146 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission to acknowledge the necessity of a progressive access to internationalisation of the family businesses, avoiding total exposure to international markets risks, while maintaining territorial added value attributed to this kind of business;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to commission studies that analyse the importance of ownership for the success and survival of a business and, highlight the specific challenges facing family businesses; calls on the Commission and develop a statistically workable definition of family businesses in cooperation with Eurostat; calls on the Commission to set a framework to identify and measure positive externalities generated by family businesses and also to collect enough data on family businesses in the various Member States both, to allow a comparison of the situation of family businesses, as well as between family businesses and non-family businesses and to promote exchanges of examples of good practices;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 170 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment of the extent to which a revision of the European SME definition from 2003 would be possible, moving away from purely quantitative criteria to qualitative criteria that also take into account the ownership of a company, bearing in mind the interdependence of ownership, control and management and, generally, the personal aspect of running a business, and the consequences this could have on family businesses, for example, with regard to state aid and the eligibility of such businesses;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 182 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission in the meantime, as part of its regulatory impact assessment, to establish a ‘family business test’ modelled on the SME test, in order to be able determine the effect of certain legal acts on family businesses in advance and thereby avoid unnecessary red tape for family businesses, paying special attention to the combined effect of corporate legislation and private law;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 195 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to strive to strengthen entrepreneurship throughout the EU and to create an favourable environment for business excellence;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 206 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to urgently draw up a communication analysing the role ofon family businesses with a view to boosting the competitiveness of the EU’s economy by 2020, and to produce a road map listing the measures likely to strengthen the economic environment and development of family businesses in the EU and raise awareness on the family businesses specific characteristics and challenges to be addressed ;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 210 #

2014/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission in the meantime to urgently launch calls within the framework of HORIZON, COSME and ERASMUS (for young entrepreneurs) programmes focusing on the specific problems faced by the family businesses that are SMEs ; calls on the Commission and the Member States to coordinate specification and activation of the Partnership Agreements and related Operational Programmes within the EU Cohesion Policy current Programming period to the benefit of family businesses that are SMEs, especially in the Member States devastated by the crisis;
2015/04/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 16 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the circular economy has the potential to generate millions of jobs across Europe, which should be sustainable, decent and quality jobs, respecting workers’ rights and collective agreements;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that a circular economy will lead to sustainable and inclusive growth and have lasting beneficial effects on the labour market if among others the new jobs created are decent and sustainable;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. education and skills development should be part of a longterm and longlasting reindustrialization framework of public investments in the regions hit the most by the economic crisis
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to put in place a regulatory environment and fiscal incentives that encourages the development of a circular economy, such as reducing or lifting taxation on renewable resources, including labour, and differentiating VAT rates in accordance with the waste hierarchypromotes sustainable, decent and quality jobs, ensures progressive taxation, and a more even distribution of tax burden accross labour, profits and consumption.
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas the promotion of the exploitation of indigenous conventional oil and gas resources in full compliance with EU acquis, both in traditional production areas (e.g. the North Sea) and in newly discovered areas (e.g. Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea) will lessen the dependence of the EU on external suppliers and transit countries;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 164 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that it is important to put an end to any isolation of Member States and regions from European gas and electricity networks and strongly believes that the EU should help those most vulnerable countries to diversify their sources and supply routes, as a matter of priority; therefore recalls, in the context of energy diversity, the essential role of energy mix including all sorts of energy production and allowing for specific conditions of individual Member State in order to achieve the EU energy goals.
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 195 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to recognise that energy efficiency is by virtue of its lowest cost, availability and sustainability "the first fuel" in the merit order of energy resources, and thus plays a prime role in maintaining security of supply
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 231 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the EU is not yet on track to meet its commitment of saving 20 % of energy (371 Mtoe) by 2020, and that over one third of reduced energy consumption is actually attributable to lower levels of economic activity; stresses the fact that in countries under stabilisation programmes energy poverty has become a social plague and to this end calls for emergency measures to be taken on a European level;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 298 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to closely monitor the implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive and the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and to carry out a limited review of the Energy Efficiency Directive in order to update the provisions relevant to the indicative 2030 energy efficiency improvement target of at least 27 %; such a revision should result in a fair burden sharing and take into account the difficulties for public investments and leveraging private capital in Member States that face financial recession; believes that measurement and verification of energy efficiency improvements should be an integral part of the annual European semester reporting;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 396 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that nuclear energy, which is carbon-neutral, continues to be a significant alternative for electricity production; notes that the choice of whether to use nuclear energy remains the competence of Member States;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 414 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Believes that the energy security and eventually self-sufficiency of the EU, can be primarily achieved by promoting energy savings and renewable energy, which will, together with other alternative sources of energy, reduce import dependency. Notes that energy security must be achieved alongside with strict rules of environmental protection, on all kinds of energy production, offshore and an onshore operations, as well as during production of alternative forms of energy.
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 494 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses that effective use of research and technological innovations fosters the leadership of European industry and contributes to the main EU energy policy goals, including security of supply, competitiveness and sustainable development of energy production, transportation and consumption; and combatting energy poverty;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 561 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Acknowledges that in order to reduce energy dependence, diversify and consolidate supply options, optimise energy network infrastructure and, increase energy efficiency in the medium and long term and combat energy poverty, it is necessary to develop new energy technologies, using funds from the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 696 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Insists that the EU's energy policy should ensure the access to energy for all, contribute to affordable energy prices for the benefit of all consumers and strengthen public control and regulation in this sector. Reiterates that the Energy is a basic human need and therefore the EU should closely focus on the issue of energy poverty and promote measures to tackle this problem, which affected one in four EU citizens - 124 million people - in 2012; reminds that this problem is likely to be aggravated in the coming years by a renewed rise in energy prices;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 701 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. 39. Stresses that the EU's energy diversification must prioritise those projects that diversify not only routes but also sources and must meet all requirements of EU law; emphasises that the diversification of routes must be directed towards reliable suppliers;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 723 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Expresses the opinion that Russia can no longer be considered a reliable partner as it explicitly questions EU law, including at the World Trade Organisation, and uses energy supply for political purposes; stresses, therefore,stresses that more attention should be concentrated on the development and further expansion of the gas supply infrastructure with Norway, the Southern Gas Corridor and the Mediterranean gas hub;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 738 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Underlines the strategic importance of the completion of the Southern Gas Corridor for Europe's energy diversification and energy security; recognises that the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) is the European leg of the Southern Gas Corridor delivering Caspian gas to European markets;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 741 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 b (new)
40b. Stresses that TAP will facilitate the EU's objective of diversifying the gas supply to Member States and Energy Community Countries in South East Europe; Recognises that the realisation of TAP will incentivise the development of new energy infrastructure, the integration of energy networks and the completion of the internal energy market;
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 752 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Underlines that the EU should take advantage of the opportunities that emerge from the energy sources of the Eastern Mediterranean, in particular with a view to create a Mediterranean gas hub through a corridor from the South- eastern Mediterranean to Europe in order to enhance EU's energy security. The EU should promote initiatives for the cooperation in the sector of Energy between the countries in the eastern Mediterranean contributing thus to peace and economic prosperity for the people.
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 755 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase their efforts towards the implementation of strategic energy infrastructure projects; believes the existing infrastructure needs to contribute to regional integration; and that energy should not be used as a means of political pressure in any context of international cooperation
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 761 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 a (new)
42a. Highlights the need to actively strengthen cooperation with the EU's partners and recognize the important role of international cooperation in the field of Energy, and especially energy security; in this regard stresses that all intergovernmental agreements must be based on the principle of mutual respect with the third countries involved.
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 763 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 b (new)
42b. Stresses that strategic infrastructures that promote the diversification of supplies, sources and routes, such as storage, import and transport facilities, as well as liquefaction and regafication of natural gas plants, can facilitate enhanced supply when emergency situations occur. Under normal market conditions, these infrastructures may not be fully economically and commercially feasible; therefore they may be supported by means of specific regulatory arrangements and/or public funding as provided by the 'trans-European energy infrastructure' Regulation (EU) No. 347/2013 and the 'Connecting Europe Facility' Regulation (EU) No. 1316/2013.
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 783 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Invites the Commission to analyse the potential structure of a collective purchasing mechanism and its impact on the functioning of the internal gas market and contribution to ensuring security of gas supply; notes that since there are several models of collective purchasing mechanisms, further work needs to be done to determine the best market-based model applicable for EU regions and the suppliers concerned;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 804 #

2014/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
48. Highlights the need to enhance the EU’s ability to speak with one voice in order to deliver a more coherent energy diplomacy in partner countries and in multilateral fora; notes in this regard that the mandatovoluntary participation of the Commission as an observer in negotiations for intergovernmental agreements, as well as both ex ante and ex post evaluation of the negotiated agreements, should be required in order toon request of the member state, can minimise the possibility of non-conformity with EU law; However, it is important not to jeopardise the ability of Member States to negotiate the content of the agreements.
2015/02/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 13 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Draws attention to the fact that the EU is facing a demographic crisis which by 2040 willmay result in a shortfall of 24 million in the labour force, creating an economic necessity to further include women in the labour market; emphasises that increasing women’s employment rate to the level of men’s employment would reducemay contribute to the reduction of the labour force shortfall to 3 million;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that gender equality is a necessary condition for meeting the Europe 2020 strategy’s 75 % employment rate target and is crucial for maintaining sustainable pension systems;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that economic growth and competitiveness in the EU are dependent one need to closinge the gap between women’s educational attainment and their participation and position in the labour market;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the unequal division of family responsibilities is at the root of the unequal position of women in the labour market; stresses that reconciliation of work and home duties is a key condition for gender equality, which should be promoted by investment in care infrastructure and encouragement of men’s participation in domestic labour by means of legislation on parental and paternity leave and flexible working time arrangements; , particularly by guaranteeing infants’ education from 0 years and the care of elderly and dependent persons by means of universal public services, in addition to encouraging men’s participation in domestic labour by means of legislation on parental and paternity leave. The trend should be towards establishing equal and non-transferable paternity and maternity leave for the birth and adoption of children, by increasing the length of paternity leave until it is the same as maternity leave. This would reduce the discrimination at work that women suffer, and guarantee the right of fathers to look after their children;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the unequal division of family responsibilities is at the rootone of the sources of the unequal position of women in the labour market; stresses that reconciliation of work and home duties is a key condition for gender equality, which should be promoted by investment in public care infrastructure and encouragement of men’s participation in domestic labour by means of legislation on parental and paternity leave and flexible working time arrangements;universal public provision of social services, with particular emphasis on children education since age zero and dependency services for adults; stresses the need to encourage men’s participation in domestic labour by means of legislation on parental and paternity leave, inter alia; emphasises that paternity and maternity leaves for birth and adoption should be equal and non-transferrable.
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the feminisation of poverty is the result of factors including women’s career breaks, the gender pay gap, the pension gap and poverty in households headed by single mothers, and that the reduction of poverty levels by 20 million by 2020 can be achieved by anti-poverty policies that are grounded in gender mainstreaming. In particular, older women suffer high rates of poverty because many of them have not worked outside the home long enough to have a decent pension; it is therefore necessary to increase the amount of non-contributory pensions;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the feminisation of poverty is the result of factors including women’s career breaks, the gender pay gap, the pension gap and poverty in households headed by single mothers, and that the reduction of poverty levels by 20 million by 2020 can be achievrequires changes in women's access to labour markets, supported by anti-poverty policies that are grounded in gender mainstreaming;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for transparency and greater gender balance in recruitment for decision-making positions, not just in the business world, but also in political institutions and in senior positions in the university system;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the high levels of undeclared work which negatively impact on women’s social security and the EU’s GDP levels; calls for the creation of incentives for employers and workers to move from the informal to the effective use of sanctions to employers operating in the informal economy.
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. HighlightsCombating tax fraud – especially that committed by large companies, which has the biggest economic impact – is key to funding the extension of paternity leave and the necessary public services to encourage the incorporation of women into the labour market in conditions of equality. In addition, the high levels of undeclared work which negatively impact on women’s social security and the EU’s GDP levels; calls for the creation of incentives for employers and workers to move from the informal to the formal economy.
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that the victims of undeclared work are mainly women, something which is not always their decision; calls for a comprehensive policy against employers who employ women in undeclared work.
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that REFIT represents a first step towards reducing the burden of regulation on businesses and eliminating barriers to growth and job creation;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the Commission’s commitment on cutting red tape and better regulation; believes that cutting red tape should deliver proportionate, evidence-based protection for workers, while ensuring that businesses can grow, create jobs and boost competitiveness; notes that deregulation and better regulation are not mutually exclusivebe evidence-based and under no circumstances diminish the protection for workers;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes efforts to identify genuine opportunities for simplification of legislation; stresses the need for simpler, clearly-worded rules that remove complexity and can be implemented in a simple manner in order to improve compliance, particularly in the area of health, safety and employment legislation;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Insists that legislation on employment and Health & Safety represents minimum standards of protection of workers which Member States can go beyond. The EU legislation will not be interpreted as maximum standards in situations in which these regulations can be seen as obstacles for competition in the single market;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Insists that a worker have the right to occupational health and safety protection and minimum working conditions regardless whether the workplace is in a small, medium-sized or large enterprise.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. WelcomesCalls on the Commission’s indication that to continue negotiations on the maternity leave directive should be considered for withdrawal;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to increase the protection of workers; in particular, calls the Commission to present a proposal on muscular skeletal disorders, environmental tobacco smoke and make necessary updates to carcinogens and mutagens.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Encourages the Commission to present a proposal on the health & safety hairdressers' agreement to respect the experience of European Employers' associations and European workers representation in this sector and their decision of protecting of workers and to respect the possibility provided by the Social Dialogue based in the Treaties.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomesTakes note of the SME -test; calls on the Commission to use lighter regimes for micro-enterprises and SMEs and to consider exemptions for micro-enterprisesbelieves that micro-enterprises could be considered for exemption on a case-by-case -basis, while not compromising onleading to lower health, safety and employment standards;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for further measures to check that legislation is doing what it was intended to do and to identify areas where there are inconsistencies and ineffective measures; as a consequence legislation needs to be better enforced;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to continue to improve the legislative cycle and to introduce sunsetprotection of workers via employment and Health and Safety standards and that revision clauses to ensure that employment legislation is periodically reviewed;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Opposes the setting of a net target for reducing regulatory costs, as this ignores the aim pursued by regulation and its corresponding benefits;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to prioritise action in the fields of what have been identified asnot to use the ‘Top Ten’ most burdensome laws for SMEs, including as justification to review the working time and temporary agency directives; because the protection of workers must be guaranteed regardless whether the workplace is in a small, medium sized or large enterprise.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. There are no satisfactory criteria to measure "efficiency" and "costs; these terms are not adequate in terms of occupational accidents and disease. This could lead to decisions taken by administration and controllers thereby circumventing the legitimate democratic legislators;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the European Parliament to systematically review Commission impact assessments and review IMPAs analysis as early as possible in the legislative process, and to call for impact assessments on its own reports.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. "Simplification" and "burden reduction" are void of meaning in a situation which is ever more complex. New technologies and procedures could endanger the health of workers with requires new protection and this may be administrative burdens.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Questions the balance of representation of the High Level Group of Administrative Burdens (HLG) and its recommendations (24 July 2014), rejects its recommendations and asks for recognition of the Dissenting Opinion of four members of the HLG;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers it essential, given that they make up 99% of the EU’s corporate fabric and account for 80% of jobs in the EU, to provide greater support to micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in order to boost their competitiveness within a stable business environment, minimise the effect of dominant market positions occupied by large companies and conglomerates, encourage the culture of entrepreneurship, and help SMEs to be set up and to grow;
2014/09/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 11 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for an increase in resources for budget headings providing subsidies for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and cooperatives and for 40% of the amounts entered under those headings to be earmarked as direct support to promote solid growth and sustainable development of MSMEs and cooperatives in order to cope with rising production factor costs and keep pace with the evolving knowledge society and with development based on balanced economic growth, especially in Member States where the crisis has had a greater impact in terms of MSME closures;
2014/09/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 12 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Points to the importance of narrowing the gulf between entities considered to be excellent and those which are not, the object being to ensure that science and research can also be supported in institutes which, though not considered excellent, are progressing towards excellence or could be raised to that level in cooperation with others already considered to have attained it; believes that achieving a more even-handed share- out of Horizon 2020 appropriations is an aim that should continue to be pursued with a view to improving upon the status quo created under the earlier research framework programmes;
2014/09/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) In accordance with Article 148(4) of the Treaty, the Council by Decision 2010/707/EU25 adopted guidelines26 for the employment policies of the Member States. These integrated guidelines give orientations to the Member States on defining their national reform programmes and on implementing reforms. The employment guidelines form the basis for country-specific recommendations that the Council addresses to the Member States under that Article. In recent years, those recommendations have included country- specific recommendations on the fight against undeclared work. __________________ 25 Council Decision 2010/707/EU of 21 October 2010 on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (OJ L 308, 24.11.2010, p. 46) 26The guidelines have been maintained for 2011, 2012 and 2013.deleted
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6 b (new)
(6b) Domestic and cross-border undeclared work are two distinctive forms of undeclared work, and cross-border undeclared work can contribute to the phenomena of social dumping, salary reductions in the member states where the services are offered, deregulation of labour relations and individualism in the labour market.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The implemented fiscal consolidation dictated by the EU through both the European Semester and the Troika aggravates the problem of undeclared work. Undeclared work is not a worker’s choice but very often his/her only alternative to receive income
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The financial crisis leading to poor labour market and social conditions: increase of unemployment, reduced salaries, risk of poverty, cuts in social spending, is driving the practice of undeclared work.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) National labour inspection systems need to be organised in an efficient manner, have sufficient qualified staff at their disposal and carry out systematic and frequent controls.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The identification, analysis and solving of practical problems related to the enforcement of Union legislation on working conditions and social protection at work fall mainly within the competence of national labour inspection systems, for which reason they require close and effective cooperation and common principles and practices at Union level.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
(13) Three different national enforcement authorities are mainly involved with undeclared work: labour inspectorates, social security inspectorates and tax authorities. In some cases, migration authorities and employment services as well as customs authorities, the police, the public prosecutor’s office and the social partners are also involved.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
(1) A European Platform to enhance EU cooperation in the prevention, control and deterrence of undeclared work, and in the reinafter referred to agularisation of jobs (‘the Platform’), is hereby established.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) the European Parliament.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 318 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Platform shall also encourage the Member States to: (a) combat non-permanent employment conditions for the performance of tasks corresponding to permanent needs, promoting stable and lasting contractual conditions; (b) combat forms of undeclared and illegal work and labour trafficking; (c) combat practices involving the use of labour without any employment relationship; (d) combat the use of part-time contracts when this is not the choice of the worker concerned; (e) promote the exercise of workers’ individual and collective rights.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(ab) Examine the relation between the financial situation of the member-states and its effects to undeclared work.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 404 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2
(2) In appointing their representatives, Member States should involve all public authorities having a role in the prevention and/or deterrence of undeclared work, such as labour inspectorates, social security authorities, tax authorities, and employment services and migration authorities, hereinafter referred to as "enforcement authorities". They may also, in accordance with national law and/or practice, involve the social partners.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) While the freedom of movement for workers is an important right, labour mobility is not the solution to high unemployment, and labour mobility cannot replace the need to create more jobs in areas with high unemployment.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In the ‘Compact for Growth and Jobs’, the European Council requested to explore the possibility of extending to apprenticeships and traineeships the EURES network, apprenticeships and traineeships can be covered under the present Regulation, provided that the persons concerned are considered workers with reference to the rights conferred on citizens under Article 45 of the Treaty. An appropriate exchange of general information on mobility for apprenticeships and traineeships within the Union needs to be introduced and adequate assistance to the candidates for those positions should be developed, based on a mechanism for clearance of offers, once such a clearance is deemed feasible in accordance with the appropriate standards and with due respect to the competences of the Member States. EURES will cooperate with national institutions to ensure that apprenticeship and traineeship offers do not hide irregular labour relationships.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The composition of the EURES network as regards other organisations than the ones above should be flexible to adjust to changing developments on the market for recruitment services. The emergence of a variety of employment services coupled with the reshaped role of the PES relating to national recruitment services points towards the need for a concerted effort by Member States and the European Commission to open up the EURES network, as the main Union tool delivering intra-Union recruitment services.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) A broader membership of the EURES network has social, economic and financial benefits. It improves efficiency in service delivery by facilitating partnerships, enhancing complementarity and quality improvements. It increases the market share of the EURES network insofar as new members make available job vacancies, job applications and curriculum vitae ('CV’s'). Transnational and cross-border co- operation, which is a key feature of the operation of the EURES network, could generate innovative forms of learning and co-operation between employment services, including on quality standards for job vacancies and support services. The EURES network wshould therefore enhance its relevance as one of the key Union tools available to Member States and the European Commission for supporting concrete measures towards a high level ofactive employment policies within the Union.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The right of freedom of movement entails the necessity to set up the means to support clearance, that is to say, the exchange of job vacancies, job applications and CV's, in order to make the labour market fully accessible to both workers and employers in accordance with Article 46(d) of the Treaty, and therefore a common IT platform should be established at Union level and run by the Commission. Securing this right means empowering workers to actually gain access to all employment opportunities throughout the Union.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The common IT platform which brings together job vacancies and the possibility of applying for those vacancies, while enabling job seekers and employers to automatically match data according to various criteria and levels, should facilitate the achievement of equilibrium on the Union labour markets which would bring a high level of employment and help avoid serious threats to the standard of living and levels of employment in the various regions and industries.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) A profound understanding of labour demand in terms of occupations, sectors and needs of employers would benefit the right of free movement of workers within the Union and therefore support services should include good quality assistance to employers, small and medium sized enterprises in particular. Close working relationships between employment services and employers will increase the pool of job vacancies and job matching of suitable candidates, secure pathways for job seekers in particular those in vulnerable groups and improve labour market intelligence.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Particular attention should be paid to supporting mobility in the cross-border regions for and providing services to frontier workers who are living in one Member State and working in another and have to cope with different national practices and legal systems and encounters specific administrative, legal or tax obstacles to mobility. Member States may choose toshould set up specific support structures to facilitate this kind of mobility, s including public authorities, employment services and social partners. Such structures should, within the framework of the EURES network, address the specific needs for information, guidance, cross- border matching between labour demand and supply and the resulting placements.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The freedom of movement for workers and high levels of employment are closely linked and make it necessary for Member States to develop mobility policies supporting a better functioning of labour markets in the Union. Member States' mobility policies should be considered as an integral part of their social and employment policies.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The sharing of draft activity plans under the programming cycle among Member States should enable the National Coordination Offices, acting on behalf of the Member States, together with the European Coordination Office and with the appropriate involvement of the social partners, to direct the resources of the EURES network toward appropriate actions and projects, and thereby steer the development of the EURES network as a more result-oriented tool responsive to the needs of workers according to the dynamics of labour markets.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) In order to obtain adequate information for measuring the results of the EURES network, common indicators should be established. Those indicators and a thorough assessment of the impact of mobility on labour markets be made. Those indicators and that impact assessment should guide the organisations participating in the EURES network in identifying their results and should help assess the progress made against the objectives set for the EURES network as a whole, including its contribution towards the implementation of a coordinated strategy for employment in accordance with Article 145 of the Treaty.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The aim of this Regulation is to facilitate the exercise of the freedom of movement for workers within the Union in accordance with Article 45 TFEU, by establishing a common framework for cooperation between Member States and the Commission.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. For the purpose of the first paragraph, tThis Regulation provides for objectives, principles and rules on
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) actions by and between Member States to facilitate the achievement of a balance between supply and demand in the labour market of the Union, with a view to promote a high level of employment;deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the functioning of a European network of employment services between Member States and the Commission, with the appropriate involvement of the social partners;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. In cross-border regions, EURES cross-border partnerships comprising regional or local public authorities and employment services, trade unions and employers' organisations from at least two Member States, provide cross-border support services.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) increasedto support voluntary geographical and occupational mobility in the Union on a fair basis, in full respect and promotion of safe, decent and regulated working conditions and rights;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) the development of a net of support services on worker and labour rights, access to social security, public and social services and, where appropriate, integration support in matters such as linguistic competence and others related to the full exercise of resident and citizenship rights supporting worker mobility.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 303 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the rights benefiting, and rules applicable to, workers;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 322 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) where applicable, the situation of frontier workers in particular in cross- border regions in close cooperation with the EURES cross-border partnerships.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 334 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with the national social partners and other stakeholders such as career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 345 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. Each Member State ensures that its National Coordination Office gets the staff and other resources necessary to carry out its tasks as defined under this Regulation. It shall also define the fees required from EURES partners to carry out those tasks.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 377 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. EURES Partners are authorised to participate in the EURES network in accordance with the minimum common criteria laid down in the Annex. The participation of any EURES Partner in the EURES network, with the exception of public employment services, may be suspended upon the request of a Member State.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 393 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission may, by means of implementingdelegated acts, adopt a template for the description of the national system and procedures for sharing information on national systems between Member States. Those implementing acts shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 34(2).
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 421 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the functioning of the national hub referred to in Article 15(5) through a fee or in another fproportional to the EURES Partner's activity within the EURES networmk;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 438 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Coordination Group ishall be composed of representatives of the European Coordination Office and the National Coordination Offices and the social partner organisations.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 440 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
It invites representatives of the social partners at Union level to attend the meetings.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 466 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) shall not make any distincmay consider exceptions according to the nature and duration of contracts nor the recruitment intentions of employers, of which workers must be duly informed;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 578 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) where appropriate, to refer to another EURES Partnerthe public employment services.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 587 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. Upon recruitment of a worker in another Member State as a result of the services provided in accordance with this Article, the EURES Partners concerned provide the person concerned with the contact details of organisations in the Member State of destination which can offer post- recruitment assistance, including on the subject of worker and labour rights, access to social security, public and social services and, where appropriate, integration support in matters such as linguistic competence and others related to the full exercise of resident and citizenship rights. The EURES network shall be responsible for the development of an affordable network of those services.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 603 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) where appropriate, to refer to another EURES Partnerthe public employment services.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 610 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) to jointly promote in the Member State's territory the registration of employers on the EURES network and their use of the common platform for European clearance;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 619 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. By derogation from Article 18(5), EURES Partners may offer the assistance referred to in paragraph 1 to workers against a fee.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 660 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. Taking into account the exchange of information and the joint analysis, Member States shall develop mobility policies as an integral part of their employment policies. These mobility policies provide the framework on the basis of which Member States carry out the programming referred to in Article 28.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 671 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The National Coordination Offices, after consulting the national social partners, and the European Coordination Office review together the draft work programmes before finalising them.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 682 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 33 to develop further the common indicators and ensure their quality.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 683 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Taking into account the information gathered as referred to in this Chapter, the European Commission shall submit every two years a report to the European Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee on labour mobility within the Union, its effects on the structure and functioning of national labour markets, including worker protection and wages and the services provided to workers to facilitate the exercise of the freedom of movement in accordance with Article 46 TFEU.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL