Activities of Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11

(11) To enhance cost-effectiveness of enforcement of the social rules, the potential of the current and ~~future~~smart tachograph systems should be fully exploited, with regard to both international and national transport. Therefore the functionalities of the tachograph should be improved to allow for more precise positioning~~, in particular during international transport operations~~.

2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Invites the Commission and Member States to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and ~~to come forward with a ‘transport and climate’ legislative package with a view to achieving the climate objectives, covering all modes, including urban mobili~~support the market uptake of existing technologies that contribute to low- emission mobility by increasing the efficiency of vehicles, whilst preserving safety;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9

9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and ~~differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions; calls for the extension of distance-based charging to cover all passenger cars and vans, and for the principle to be extended to urban area~~the current possibility of differentiation on the basis of Euro standards;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Wim van de CAMP, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12

12. Considers that autonomous vehicles canould be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport; insists, however, that autonomous vehicles should be ~~electric, shared, and include smart measures to mitigate increasing us~~technologically neutral and sustainable;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Wim van de CAMP, Alberto CIRIO, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Henna VIRKKUNEN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)

13a. The contribution of Intelligent Transport Management System (ITS) to a more environmentally friendly transport system should be taken in consideration within future regulation;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO, Henna VIRKKUNEN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for ~~electric vehicle charging;~~ alternatively powered vehicles; calls on the Commission to fully support the market uptake of alternatively powered vehicles and to encourage the transposition and the implementation of the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure directive (COM 2014/94) through guiding recommendations to Member States;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Wim van de CAMP, Alberto CIRIO, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15

15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, hydrogen, sustainable conventional and advanced biofuels or, synthetic fuels or other low carbon fuels (e.g. CNG, LNG) would be the most effective approach for reducing the climate impact of ~~road~~ transport;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)

15a. Underlines the role that natural gas (e.g. CNG, LNG), bio-methane, synthetic methane and LPG could play in the transition towards the decarbonisation of the transport sector;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16

16. Concurs with the Commission that some food-based biofuels have a limited role in decarbonising the transport sector and ~~agrees with the state aid guidelines that food-based biofuels should not receive public support after 2020~~calls for a legislative framework for sustainable biofuels that incentivizes greenhouse gas emissions savings and reduces the risk of Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC);

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO, Henna VIRKKUNEN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17

~~17. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to phase-out food based biofuels;~~deleted

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)

18a. Underlines the needs to deliver the most cost-effective emissions reductions, also through the full exploitation of the existing infrastructure and by boosting technologies that facilitate cross-border impact between Member States;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21

21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and vans to be set for 2025 and 2030 on the basis of a linear trajectory and at a level corresponding to an annual improvement of at least 6-8 %, corresponding to 70 g New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) in 2025 and 50g NEDC in 203030. The new standards should be calculated as a percentage reduction from 2021 WLTP values. A mid-term review in 2025 should be included in order to adjust the targets for 2030 on the basis of the market uptake of alternatively powered vehicles and the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22

22. Insists that the future Union CO2 standards for vehicles should ~~also be measur~~be based ion ~~a real-world driving test in order to inform consumers, ensure the accuracy of test procedures and avoid test cycl~~the new WLTP laboratory test cycle, providing consumers with realistic information based on collected worldwide driving data more representative of the brea~~ting~~l conditions of use;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23

23. Reiterates its call for a revision of car labelling to improve consumer information and for the public procurement rules to incentivise clean vehicles; stresses that car labelling should be based on a comparative CO2 ~~footprin~~scheme provided by the new WLTP test;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Wim van de CAMP, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25

25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) for 2025 without further delay and based on a solid basis determined by VECTO tool, as well as for CO2 certification to allow for differentiation in road-user charging;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30

30. Stresses that, in order to ~~address current market barriers to ship efficiency and lower emissions, transparency and the real transport work data in~~ensure an effective global reduction of GHG emissions from international shipping, having regard to the target of the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement, the EU Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) system should be pre~~served if and when~~vised in case the EU decides to align its system with the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) Data Collection System (DCS);

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Henna VIRKKUNEN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31

31. Stresses that, in the ~~absence of an international agreement on an emissions reduction objective for the shipping sector and IMO measures to mitigate emission~~IMO roadmap to establish CO2 emissions reduction commitments in the international maritime sector~~, the Union~~ should ~~incor~~be supporated in~~ternational shipping into the Emissions Trading System from 2023~~ order to adopt ambitious short and long term measures consistently with the Paris Climate Agreement;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)

31a. Underlines the importance to fully transpose and implement the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure directive (COM 2014/94), including the establishment of LNG refuelling points across the TEN-T corridors and at maritime ports. The wider use of LNG in freight transport could contribute to the low-emission mobility, having regard to the international climate and energy long targets;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2327(INI)

Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alberto CIRIO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)

32a. Stresses that, a strong support from the EU is recommended in order to ensure the equipment of a sufficient amount of inland ports of the TEN-T core network with alternative fuels infrastructure and refuelling and storage points for inland waterways transports publicly accessible;

2017/05/23
Committee: TRAN

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. Acknowledges the role played by space technologies in making transport smarter, safer, more secure, sustainable and integrated; welcomes the Commission’s communication and believes it can contribute to meeting new transport needs of seamless connectivity, more robust positioning and interoperability;

2017/04/19
Committee: TRAN

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Notes that the EU’s transport sector, particularly in traffic management, tracking systems and satellite-based observation, depends on space technology and its ability to accurately determine a position at any moment; considers that the strategy should lead to independent and secure access to space services and data and non-dependence on third countries~~, while promoting~~; recognises, moreover, that international partnerships are a success factor for European industry; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to pursue international cooperation programmes in order to promote domestically built European space technology on the global market;

2017/04/19
Committee: TRAN

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4

4. Calls on the Commission for a fast implementation of the space strategy to allow the transport sector to benefit immediately from improved maritime surveillance, multimodality, passenger travel experiences and parcel delivery services; believes that the GALILEO and EGNOS programmes can greatly contribute to the proper enforcement of EU transport legislation;

2017/04/19
Committee: TRAN

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5

5. Calls on the Commission to support the EU space sector in anticipating the full deployment of GALILEO and EGNOS and to incentivise the development of compatible products; asks the Commission to en~~courage investments in~~sure that space activities ~~for~~in the transport ~~through smart financing (e.g. EFSI)~~sector are appropriately funded in the next MFF;

2017/04/19
Committee: TRAN

2016/2120(BUD)

Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Massimiliano SALINI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Notes that, even with the systematic mobilisation of the totality of the Flexibility Instrument under heading 3 in the coming years, the financial resources available will not be sufficient to tackle the increased needs; therefore considers as essential a fair distribution of funding according to priorities (with particular attention being paid to the needs of Member States of first arrival), full transparency, accountability and wise spending;

2016/10/21
Committee: LIBE

2016/2062(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)

- having regard to its resolution of 4 February 2016 on the special situation of islands,

2016/10/13
Committee: TRAN

2016/2062(INI)

Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Massimiliano SALINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

7. Considers that connectivity should not only be limited to number, frequency and quality of air transport services, but should also be assessed within an integrated transport network and extended to other criteria, such as time, affordability, territorial continuity and environmental cost, in order to reflect the actual added value of a route; calls, therefore, on the Commission to explore the possibility of developing an EU indicator based on other existing indices;

2016/10/13
Committee: TRAN

2016/2062(INI)

Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Massimiliano SALINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12

12. Notes that public and private financing in the aviation sector is vital to guarantee territorial cohesion, foster innovation and maintain or regain European leadership of our industry; recalls that all financing must respect EU state aid guidelines and competition law; observes that special tax regimes may be granted in certain cases so as to ensure compliance with the principle of territorial continuity and offset the natural disadvantages faced by islands and outlying areas in the EU;

2016/10/13
Committee: TRAN

2016/2062(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Takes note of the CO2 emissions generated by the aviation sector; stresses the wide range of actions already taken to achieve carbon neutral growth from 2020, both by developing alternative fuels and lighter aircraft, and by abiding to international agreements; welcomes the Commission’s intention to review EU measures to reduce CO2 emissions from aviation in light of the outcome of the 39th Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO); is of the opinion that, in view also of the Commission’s Circular Economy Package, further initiatives reducing emissions of operational activities from, to and within airports should be encouraged; calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament an annual report on sustainability, in terms of airport and airspace congestion , resulting from the increase of around 50% in the number of flights by between 2012 and 2035, as indicated in the communication entitled ‘A new Aviation Strategy for Europe’;

2016/10/13
Committee: TRAN

2016/2062(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17

17. Insists that the aviation sector is contributing, directly and indirectly, to the creation of jobs; believes that maintaining decent working conditions and preventing unfair practices contribute to the sustainability of the aviation sector; ~~acknowledges the necessity to bring clarity on~~recommending that the Commission's examination of the ‘'home base’' criterion~~, and welcomes the Commission’s decis~~ gives due attention to the competitiveness and job-creation benefits of the multiplicity of employment models in aviation; t~~o have guidelines issued on the applicable labour law and competent courts~~akes note that where employment models are demonstrated to be consistent with international aviation rules and compliant with the relevant national and EU employment, social security and taxation laws, there should be no a priori assumption that practice should conform to a traditional model;

2016/10/13
Committee: TRAN

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A

A. whereas the EU is now surrounded by an arc of instability, as large parts of the Middle East and North Africa are engulfed in ethno-religious conflicts and proxy wars and terrorist groups such as ISIS and the Jabhat al-Nusra Front proliferate throughout the region~~, while an aggressive, revisionist Russia continues to violate its neighbours’ sovereignty and openly challenges the European security order~~;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – introductory part

10. Takes the view that it is of crucial importance that the instruments provided by the Treaty of Lisbon be finally implemented, notably Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO); welcomes the joint paper by the defence ministers of France and Germany on the ‘renewal of the CSDP’, and fully supports its aim of taking a positive decision on the establishment of PESCO at the November 2016 Foreign Affairs and Defence Council; calls on the VP/HR to take the lead on this initiative, as well as on other recent proposals, such as the one proposed by Italy on the future European defence system, for strengthening the CSDP with a view to paving the way for further ambitious decisions on the CSDP to be taken at the November Foreign Affairs and Defence Council and the December European Council, including the following:

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Welcomes the Warsaw Summit Declaration, particularly the Joint Declaration on NATO-EU cooperation; fully supports deepened cooperation between NATO and the EU in the areas of cybersecurity, migration, and the response to hybrid threats; invites the VP/HR to present specific proposals for the follow-up to the Warsaw Joint Declaration by the end of 2016; is convinced that NATO is ~~crucial~~important for the collective security of Europe and that the EU should set up, as soon as possible, a security and defence policy that is able to be completely independent of NATO, should priorities and strategic interests not coincide;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15

15. Emphasises that the security of EU Member States is undividable and that in line with Article 42(7) TEU all Member States must enjoy the same level of security; believes it is crucial to strengthen the European security architecture, which is based on the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 ~~and which has been severely damaged by Russia’s illegal military interventions in Crimea and eastern Ukraine;~~

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16

16. Takes the view that it is time to define a new, more realistic strategy for the EU’s relations with Russia, based on credible deterrence but also on dialogue in areas of common interest; ~~stresses that sanctions have proven to be the most effective means for deterring Russian aggression;~~ recalls that the full implementation of the Minsk agreement is a prerequisite for the suspension of sanctions; ~~insists that the EU should consider imposing further sanctions in case Russia continues to violate international law;~~ believes it is in the common interest of the EU and Russia to achieve a better relationship, provided international law is applied;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17

17. Believes it is important to engage in dialogue with Russia ~~in order~~, also by resuming the activities of the Delegation to the EU- Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee, in order to obtain greater political cooperation and to identify measures aimed at reducing the risk of dangerous misunderstandings and miscalculations; underlines the importance of increased transparency in military activities in order to avoid air and maritime incidents with Russia and the need to develop common standards for the management of possible accidents and incidents;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18

18. Urges the EU to step up its cooperation with its Eastern partners, also through a greater interconnection of trading activities, in particular with the more stable partners of the Middle- Eastern area, such as Jordan and Lebanon, in order to strengthen their resilience and independence;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22

22. Underlines also the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism, which affects ever larger parts of the Middle East and North Africa and has also been creeping into Europe; urges the EU to undertake concerted diplomatic efforts, together with the US and other international ~~allie~~players, to convince partners in the region, such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Iran, of the need for a common strategy towards this global challenge;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27

27. Stresses the need for close cooperation with other global and regional powers on global threats and challenges; emphasises in particular the crucial importance of the transatlantic relationship, which is based on common interests and values, and relations with Latin America, based on a common cultural, linguistic and religious heritage;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2036(INI)

Lara COMI, Giovanni LA VIA, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT, Andreas SCHWAB

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29

29. Recalls the importance of Europe’s normative power, and calls for the further strengthening of the EU’s cultural and science diplomacy in order to project and promote European strengths and values beyond our borders; also points out the power of economic diplomacy~~, and in particular sanctions,~~ as a tool for enforcing EU polices;

2016/10/18
Committee: AFET

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Calls on the Commission to monitor the evolving postal sector, including the growth of e-commerce and e-substitution, and to respond where necessary to ensure the sustainability of the USO, including by promoting flexible implementation of Postal Services Directive at local level;

2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO

2016/2010(INI)

Lara COMI, Alberto CIRIO, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8

8. Highlights that the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and the online dispute resolution platform may benefit consumers and businesses in cross-border transactions; calls for further mechanisms for adequate consumer redress in postal services to be introduced~~, including a collective approach to redress where needed.~~;

2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO

2016/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4

(4) Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA35 lays down requirements on the criminalisation of money laundering. That Framework Decision is not comprehensive enough, however, and the current incrimination of money laundering is not sufficiently coherent to effectively combat money laundering across the Union, thus leading to enforcement gaps and obstacles in the cooperation between the competent authorities in different Member States. An example of this is the increase in cybercrimes linked to money laundering and to the use of digital currencies, a type of offence which in the past used hardly to exist. _________________ 35 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (OJ L 182, 05.07.2001).

2017/10/12
Committee: LIBE

2016/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a

(a) the offence was committed within the framework of a criminal organisation within the meaning of Framework Decision 2008/84153, including organisations of a terrorist nature; or _________________ 53 Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime, (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).

2017/10/12
Committee: LIBE

2016/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1

Each Member State shall ensure that effective investigative tools, such as those used in countering organised crime or other serious crimes are available to persons, units or services responsible for investigating or prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4. In addition, each Member State shall undertake to carry out actions to improve exchanges of information at both European and international level between Financial Information Units.

2017/10/12
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)

(32a) The rules on the destination of confiscated goods should include appropriate forms of compensation for the families of police officers and public servants killed in the line of duty and police officers and public servants permanently disabled in the line of duty. Each Member State should accordingly set up a fund earmarked for this purpose and assign to it a portion of the confiscated assets.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 b (new)

(32b) A portion of the confiscated assets should be earmarked for EU-managed structures to combat organised crime and terrorism. A portion of the assets confiscated by the Member States should be transferred to the Union budget to provide additional funding for Europol and the European Counter Terrorism Centre.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 c (new)

(32c) Confiscated assets should be properly managed in order to reaffirm and promote respect for legality through their reuse in the social and economic interest of the communities directly affected by the activities of terrorists and criminal organisations.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 12 a (new)

- offences against intellectual and industrial property,

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 13

- environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties and illicit waste trafficking,

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 22

- racketeering ~~and~~, extortion and usury,

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 23

- ⁪smuggling, counterfeiting and piracy of products,

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5

5. Where it is not possible in a specific case to meet the time limits set out in paragraphs 2 or 4, the executing authority shall, without delay, inform the issuing authority by any means capable of producing a written record, giving the reasons for the delay and shall consult with the issuing authority on the appropriate timing to carry out the confiscation. In such a case, the time limit laid down in paragraphs 2 or 4, may be extended by a maximum of 30 days.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3

3. The executing authority may decide to lift the freezing order if, during the execution, it becomes aware that one of the grounds for non-recognition and non- execution applies. The executing authority shall communicate to the issuing authority, by any means capable of producing a written record, the reasons for the decision to revoke the freezing order.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7

7. Where it is not possible in a specific case to meet the time limits set out in paragraphs 3 or 6, the executing authority shall immediately inform the issuing authority by any means capable of producing a written record, giving the reasons for the delay and shall consult with the issuing authority on the appropriate timing to carry out the freezing.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2

2. The notification shall contain information~~, at least briefly,~~ on the reasons of the freezing order, on the authority who issued the order and on the existing legal remedies under the national law of the executing State.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2

2. The executing authority shall, in accordance with its national law, guarantee the confidentiality of the facts and the substance of the freezing order, except to the extent necessary to execute it. If the executing authority cannot comply with the requirement of confidentiality, it shall notify the issuing authority immediately, indicating the reasons for this by any means capable of producing a written record.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2

2. After consulting the issuing authority, the executing authority, taking into account the circumstances of the case, may make a reasoned request to the issuing authority to limit the period for which the property shall be frozen. If the issuing authority does not agree to such a limitation, it shall inform the executing authority thereof by any means capable of producing a written record, stating its reasons. If the issuing authority does not do so within six weeks of receiving the request, the executing authority may lift the freezing order.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2

The executing State shall terminate the execution of the order as soon as it is informed by the issuing authority of that decision or measure and shall confirm this to the issuing country without delay by any means capable of producing a written record.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) if the amount obtained from the execution of the confiscation order is more than EUR 10 000, 570% of the amount shall be transferred by the executing State to the issuing State.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures, including the setting up of a national fund to guarantee appropriate compensation for the families of police officers and public servants killed in the line of duty and police officers and public servants permanently disabled in the line of duty. Each Member State shall earmark a portion of confiscated assets for this purpose.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 4 b (new)

4b. The Member States shall transfer a portion of the proceeds from confiscated assets to the Union budget to provide funding for the work of Europol and the European Counter Terrorism Centre.

2017/10/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0412(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 65

2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 101

(101) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to achieve at least 27% share of energy from renewable sources in the Union's gross final consumption of energy and a 10% share of energy from renewable sources in each Member State's transport energy consumption by 2030, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.

2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f f

(ff) ‘~~waste-based fossil~~low carbon fuels’ means liquid and gaseous fuels produced from gaseous waste streams ~~of non-renewable origin, including waste processing gases and exhaust gases;~~, being gaseous effluents which the holder is required to discard and which are generated as an unavoidable and not intentional consequence of the manufacturing or production of goods for commercial purposes. The amount of gaseous wastes or by-products used for "low carbon fuels" cannot be credited under other emissions reduction schemes, such as the EU Emission Trading Scheme, and shall be applied based on a full material life cycle approach.

2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE

2016/0382(COD)

Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. To reach the target set out in Article 3(1)(a), the contribution of fuels supplied in the aviation sector shall be considered to be 2 times the energy content.

2017/07/04
Committee: ITRE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

When lodging an application, applicants ~~are required to~~shall submit all the elements referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Qualification Regulation) needed for substantiating their application. He or she shall cooperate with the determining authority and shall remain present and available throughout the procedure. Following the lodging of their application, applicants shall be authorised to submit any additional elements relevant for its examination until a decision under the administrative procedure is taken on the application.

2017/06/26
Committee: LIBE

Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI, Barbara MATERA, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Carlos COELHO

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2

2. The appointed guardian shall have the duty of ensuring that the minor can access all rights stemming from this Regulation. The ~~appropriat~~responsible authorities shall ~~regularly~~ assess the performance of the ~~appointed~~ guardian within the first month after his/her appointment, and then regular~~dian~~ly.

2017/03/27
Committee: LIBE

2016/0223(COD)

Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI, Frank ENGEL, Barbara MATERA, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Carlos COELHO

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1601
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a – subparagraph 1

3a. In relation to the relocation of applicants referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1, but only of the quota for Greece, the admission by Member States to their territory of Syrian nationals present in Turkey under national or multilateral legal admission schemes for persons in clear need of international protection other than the resettlement scheme which was the subject of the Conclusions of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council of 20 July 2015 shall lead to a corresponding reduction of the obligation of the respective Member State.

2016/06/27
Committee: LIBE

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2

2. Deems substantial additional financial resources at EU level to be necessary to address humanitarian challenges, develop a new Common European Asylum System, ~~foster integration~~step up return operations, foster integration and respect for the law, for traditions and for European culture and prevent discrimination, racism and xenophobia;

2016/04/07
Committee: LIBE

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5

5. Expects the migratory emergency to continue due to sustained political instability and conflict in many regions ~~and the lack of legal means of access to the EU~~; considers that a genuine MFF revision is essential by the end of 2016 at the latest; requests an updated estimation of budgetary needs to respond to the challenges expected until the end of the MFF; calls for additional flexibility in the MFF and greater financial support for the Member States hardest hit by migration.

2016/04/07
Committee: LIBE

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10

10. Calls for redistribution of the money not used by cohesion Member States under the CEF, with priority being given to remote and island areas, and encourages calls for proposals, including on the subject of cross-border connections;

2016/04/20
Committee: TRAN

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12

12. Points out that tourism is a key potential growth area of the European economy and a driver of a substantial amount of employment, in particular for young people; considers that appropriate budgetary funds should be allocated to developing a genuine European tourism policy and stepping up funding for EU tourism-related programmes.

2016/04/20
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)

6a. Encourages the European Commission to finance better organized and more efficient projects for integrated transport services, allowing a progressive reduction of energy consumption; the reorganization of the timetables of the various public and private carriers of air, sea, land aimed at the intermodal and efficient management of passenger transport; the consolidation of tickets issued by public and private operators in a single pass and expendable journey through a digital application;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)

10a. Stresses that of these external costs, energy distribution in port systems (quaysides and port terminals) and airport systems (terminals) is mainly based on the use of electricity from the grid, and that energy from the grid is only partially produced from renewable sources because of the difficulty in storing energy from photovoltaic systems;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

11. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to improve environmental standards ~~with a view to reducing air pollution, along the lines of the Baltic Sea standards for sulphur emissions limits, fuel quality and more~~through continued efforts and coordination within the International Maritime Organisation with a view to reducing air pollution and increasing fuel- efficien~~t engines~~cy;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)

11a. Calls on the Commission to submit gradual measures to reduce the rate of pollution from ferries which use fossil fuels, to the extent of 50% in 10 years and 100% in 20 years, financing wholly or in part the conversion of the ferries' propulsion systems; to promote, through the port authorities, the development in the Mediterranean of a gas-based fuel distribution network, in order to encourage shipowners to use ferries with dual-fuel engines (diesel/gas);

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12

12. Supports the Commission in its promotion of non-fossil alternative fuels, electric, gas and hybrid systems based on renewable sources, and solar and wind energy for maritime vessels, and encourages it to tailor research and innovation with a particular focus on practicability for the WPT sector;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)

12a. Calls on the Commission to encourage energy self-sufficiency through the use of solar panels to be placed on the buildings of port terminals and the storage of the energy produced during the day for subsequent use at night;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16

~~16. Invites the Commission to propose a clear framework allocating responsibilities and costs, with a view to improving security; urges the Commission, furthermore, to address staff training;~~deleted

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)

16a. Calls on the Commission to promote, within the Member States, the adoption of tax-deductible instruments for any action shipowners take to improve safety and security mechanisms and staff training;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)

16b. Welcomes the Commission's new legislative proposals to simplify and improve the common rules on safety of ships carrying passengers in EU waters in view to enhance safety and competition and by making the rules clearer, simpler and up-to-date with legal and technological developments;

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2350(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22

22. Proposes that a European inland navigation agency be established to bring about the ‘single area for waterborne passenger transport’ and to strive to converge the governance and regulatory systems that already exist for the Rhine, the Danube and other inland waterways;deleted

2016/06/30
Committee: TRAN

2015/2348(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

6. Considers that while the comprehensive network is mainly a responsibility of the Member States, both layers are crucial to EU logistics, bringing capillarity to the core network, feeding the corridors with traffic, and performing last- mile distribution; takes the view that secondary networks should not be left outside the European purview, including in terms of financing and regulatory measures, in particular those pertaining to access to the network, slot allocation and charges; believes that, in view of what is happening with regard to immigration in the Mediterranean basin, and given the changed socio-economic context of the EU and the effects of Brexit, it would be advisable to assess the value of including some ports and airports, initially viewed as secondary, within the main TEN-T corridors as the ‘Mediterranean corridor’, as they are key for transporting freight to and from the main hubs of North Africa;

2016/10/19
Committee: TRAN

2015/2348(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

7. Notes that the distribution of a large number of nodes and freight traffic in the TEN-T network follows highly populated areas and dense networks that share capacity with passenger traffic; considers it necessary to rethink how freight infrastructure should be shaped in the TEN-T, in particular in highly congested areas; calls on the Commission to reassess the methodology for establishing freight networks and to pay increased attention to alternative freight routes linking less congested nodes, terminals ~~and port~~, airports and ports, with particular emphasis on those in the current secondary networks;

2016/10/19
Committee: TRAN

2015/2348(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Regrets that too often Member States’ national infrastructure plans are decided without reference to the TEN-T objectives; urges the Commission to increase coordination between the two levels of planning and suggests adding to the European Semester a chapter on supervising its coherence with appropriate corrective measures; calls on the Commission not to prioritise Member State projects that are not in line with the TEN-T programming and to examine, together with Member States, the possibility of including in the TEN-T corridors those nodes, terminals, ports and airports which were originally defined as secondary and which now, as a result of the changed socio-economic context and the effects of Brexit, should be considered to be strategic for the EU and, therefore, eligible for funding through the European instruments, such as the EIB funds;

2016/10/19
Committee: TRAN

2015/2348(INI)

Remo SERNAGIOTTO, Raffaele FITTO, Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15

15. Underlines the need to ensure enough EU funding for the TEN-T beyond the present MFF; expects the Commission to present the CEF mid-term review in 2017, proposing streamlining of measures; insists on the ‘use it or lose it’ principle, whereby unspent CEF funds are made available for upcoming calls for proposals; suggests launching a specific call on logistics in 2017, including multimodal transport and freight solutions in urban nodes, prioritising, partly through the leverage of financing and/or co- financing, those projects that form part of the framework of integrated intermodal platforms for freight transport, and that stand out through their modern planning, looking to investments in digitisation, incorporation of European standards and energy efficiency through the use of alternative sources of energy;

2016/10/19
Committee: TRAN

2015/2347(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)

Da. whereas some geographical areas covered by EUSALP have major social and economic problems because of their marginal position in relation to the Scandinavian-Mediterranean corridor, in the stretch running alongside the Brenner motorway;

2016/06/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2347(INI)

Remo SERNAGIOTTO, Raffaele FITTO, Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. Stresses the need, as a matter of priority and in order to rebalance European transport competition, to establish a new European corridor that links the Venice port hub directly with north-eastern Europe, by strengthening the current TEN-T;

2016/06/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2347(INI)

Remo SERNAGIOTTO, Raffaele FITTO, Massimiliano SALINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)

8a. Considers it a matter of priority for the socio-economic development of the eastern part of EUSALP to complete the Italian A27 motorway, with an exit in Austria, and to improve the Italian and Austrian road network in this geographical area, by means of appropriate ancillary works;

2016/06/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. whereas the humanitarian crisis affecting more than 65.3 million ‘displaced’ persons1 means that the distinction between people in need of international protection and migrants is becoming increasingly difficult to draw; whereas, however, that distinction needs to be made so that those entitled to international protection may be shown genuine solidarity and those who are not may be repatriated; _________________ 1 1 http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2016/6/5 763b65a4/global-forced-displacement-hits- record-high.html

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3a. Voices its support for the Emergency Trust Fund for Africa and the new Migration Partnership Framework with a view to promoting the development of African countries and tackling the root causes of emigration;

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. Calls on the Commission, in the context of EU external action, to negotiate new readmission agreements, in particular with African countries;

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Calls on the Commission to work together with Member States to promote campaigns in countries of origin and transit to raise awareness of the risks surrounding child migration and the risk of exploitation by organised criminal groups;

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

~~6. Is concerned by the growing tendency to make all EU policies conditional on management of migration flows and denounces the use of development and humanitarian aid funds in this area;~~deleted

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9

~~9. Expresses its concern about the treatment of migrants who are sent back to their country of origin or to a third country;~~deleted

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)

10a. Stresses that the EU is the world's most generous humanitarian and development assistance donor and that it should make the disbursement of its own monies for international cooperation projects for developing countries conditional on full and genuine cooperation by those countries in efforts to control outward migration and repatriate migrants who are denied political asylum or other forms of international protection;

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)

11a. Calls for the EU to provide support for the training of authorities responsible for border controls in neighbouring third countries, in particular those through which the main migrant flows pass on their way to Europe;

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2342(INI)

Claudia SCHMIDT, Elisabeth KÖSTINGER, Herbert DORFMANN, Markus FERBER, Marian-Jean MARINESCU, Renaud MUSELIER, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 b (new)

11b. Calls on the EU to help improve conditions in the refugee camps in Jordan and Lebanon, which are currently home to more than 1 800 000 refugees;

2016/12/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C

C. whereas financial resources should mainly be invested in the core network corridors, the development of local connectivity, in promoting small town centres, and facilitating the accessibility of work and tourist facilities ~~and ensuring essential health service~~is essential for the future development of the alpine regions;

2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2324(INI)

Claudia SCHMIDT, Elisabeth KÖSTINGER, Karoline GRASWANDER-HAINZ, Herbert DORFMANN, Markus FERBER, Marian-Jean MARINESCU, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)

5b. Considers that revenues from tolls and special tolls from the alpine regions for transport projects in the alpine regions should be earmarked. Firstly for the development of the TEN -T alpine corridors, secondly, for the regional access routes and, thirdly, for the local routes;

2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2324(INI)

Claudia SCHMIDT, Elisabeth KÖSTINGER, Herbert DORFMANN, Karoline GRASWANDER-HAINZ, Markus FERBER, Marian-Jean MARINESCU, Renaud MUSELIER, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)

5c. Determines that regional airports are of great importance for accessibility and for the economic development of regions, therefore a connection to the national railway network in terms of environmental compatibility is crucial;

2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2324(INI)

Claudia SCHMIDT, Herbert DORFMANN, Elisabeth KÖSTINGER, Karoline GRASWANDER-HAINZ, Markus FERBER, Marian-Jean MARINESCU, Renaud MUSELIER, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)

5d. Requests a sufficient amount of rail- road terminals along the corridor in order to promote the goal of shifting freight traffic from road to rail;

2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9

9. Highlights the fact that labour market conditions within host countries are a determining factor for the successful and durable integration of refugees; stresses that unemployment in the EU, in particular youth unemployment, is still at alarming levels, and that the Commission and the Member States should continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at quality job creation and economic growth, primarily for the benefit of EU citizens;

2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

10. Stresses the need for an early, fair, and transparent ~~and free-of-charge~~ assessment of refugees and asylum seekers’ formal and non-formal skills, as well as recognition of their qualifications, in order to develop tailored measures allowing them to make full use of their potential, and to match labour supply and demand in the host countries;

2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

~~14. Highlights the fact that the principles of equal treatment and equal opportunities should always be ensured when designing and implementing social inclusion and integration policies and measures;~~deleted

2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Believes that in order to ensure better conditions for job creation for the SME sector Member States must address the following problems, which are unequally present in different regions: skills scarcity and brain drain; regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty; the shadow economy; infiltration of the public sector by organised crime and corruption; and the de facto privileged position of multinational corporations (MNCs);

2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Takes the view that the artificial academisation of specific professions is not helpful if one wishes to tackle the problem of skills scarcities in SMEs; believes that vocational training, the link between schools and businesses, and especially dual systems operated in cooperation with SMEs, should be given more public support;

2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL

2015/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

10. Calls for a reform of the penal code, and in particular for the repeal of Article 230, which penalises homosexual practices and is contrary to the constitutional principles of non- discrimination and the protection of privacy~~, as well as amendments to Law No 92-52 on Narcotics, which propose disproportionate sentences for drug offences, to align it to international standards for the consumption of soft drugs;~~.

2016/05/19
Committee: AFET

2015/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17

17. Recalls the strategic importance of the agricultural sector in Tunisia and welcomes in this regard the measures foreseen in the 2016 Tunisian budget, including the cancellation of debts for farmers, and the launch of a national consultation on the agricultural sector; considers it essential for this national consultation to involve civil society and the broadest possible number of actors, including small farmers from the south of the country as well as young farmers; believes that the agricultural sector requires a deep reform and a series of urgent practical measures, such as developing the capacities of desalination plants to tackle the water deficit issue and other emerging problems owing to climate change; calls on the Tunisian authorities to ban the use of any pesticide that is already banned in the EU.

2016/05/19
Committee: AFET

2015/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34

34. Calls for a strengthened partnership in the creative, cultural and audiovisual sectors through the strengthening of networks as well as through initiatives for an increased intercultural dialogue, the highlighting of common historical and archaeological heritage from the Roman era, the mobility of players, the promotion and circulation of cultural and audiovisual content, including through festivals and exhibitions; encourages Tunisia to participate in the Creative Europe Programme;

2016/05/19
Committee: AFET

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Calls on the EU institutions to take a particular focus on the rights of children with disabilities and the needs of their families, assess current EU compatibility with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and work to remove all obstacles faced by children with disabilities in their day-to-day lives by offering their families proper support, including through the provision of grants and specific services;

2016/04/08
Committee: LIBE

2015/2258(INI)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9

9. Asks the relevant authorities in the Member States to facilitate transport staff’s training in awareness and disability equality and to encourage collaboration and the exchange of good practice among European organisations working in the disability field and public and private bodies responsible for transport.

2016/02/24
Committee: TRAN

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4

— having regard to Article 4(3) and 5 TEU, Article 295 TFEU and Protocol No 1 on the role of national parliaments in the European Union, and Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 19

~~– having regard to the statement by First Vice-President Timmermans on the situation in Hungary of 19 May 2015, SPEECH/15/5010,~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20

~~– having regard to the statement by First Vice-President Timmermans and Commissioner Oettinger on the situation in Poland of 19 January 2016, SPEECH/16/114,~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21

~~– having regard to the Commission's launch of a dialogue with the Polish government under the Rule of Law Framework, announced 13 January 2016,~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22

– having regard to its resolutions of 7 July 2013 on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary, in particular paragraph 795 , 27 February 2014 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2012)6 , 8 September 2015 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2013- 2014)7 , and 10 June 2015 on the situation in Hungary, in particular paragraph 128 , __________________ 5 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2013)0315. 6 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2014)0173. 7 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0286. 8 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0227.deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Recital C

C. whereas all Member States, the institutions of the Union and candidate countries share ~~obliged to uphold those principles and values, and they have the duty of loyal cooperation~~principles and values which result from the constitutional traditions coming from the Member States;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital D

D. whereas respect for the rule of law within the Union is a precondition for mutual recognition and trust, and a key factors for policy areas such as the internal market, police and justice cooperation, the Schengen area, and asylum and migration policies, and as a consequence, the erosion of the rule of law, democratic governance and fundamental rights are a serious threat to the stability, security and prosperity of the Unionthe monetary union and the common area of freedom, security and justice;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital E

E. whereas the EU shall respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities; Whereas the EU is based on a common set of core values and principles; Whereas the definition of core values and principles is a living and permanent process, and while those values and principles may evolve over time, they ~~must be protected against short termism and ad hoc changes as a resul~~should be the basis for political decisions, independent of different political majorities; and resist temporary changes

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital E

E. whereas the definition of core values and principles, based on a shared historical, cultural and spiritual heritage, is a living and permanent process, and while those values and principles may evolve over time, they must be protected against short termism and ad hoc changes as a result of different political majorities;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Recital I

I. whereas the European Parliamentary Research Service study on The Cost of Non-Europe in the area of Organised crime and Corruption ~~highlight~~estimates that integrating existing EU monitoring mechanisms into a broader Rule of Law monitoring framework ~~would~~might result in cost savings of € 70 billion annually;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J

J. whereas ~~the failure of a~~ candidate countryies need to meet the required standards ~~results in a delay of~~for the accession to the Union~~, while the failure of a Member State or an institution of the Union to meet those same standards has little consequence in practice~~; Whereas for negative developments in a Member State or breaches of the rule of law in the Union, the EU has limited possibilities to act;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital K

K. whereas the obligations incumbent on candidate countries under the Copenhagen criteria continue to apply to the Member States after joining the Union by virtue of Article 2 TEU and the principle of sincere cooperation~~, and w~~; Whereas a~~ll Member States~~n analysis and verification of the Member States' compliance with those criteria should therefore be ~~assess~~provided on a regular basis ~~in order to verify their continued compliance with the Union's common values;~~.

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital L

L. whereas the~~re are few~~ existing instruments to correct legislative and executive policy decisions by the institutions of the Union should be properly applied and enforced;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital M

M. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recently issued ~~various rulings~~rulings confirming, correcting or invalidating certain Union laws, Commission Decisions or legislative practices~~, for being in breach of the Charter of Fundamental Rights or contrary to Treaty principles on transparency and access to documents, but in several cases the institutions of the Union fail to~~; Whereas the Commission should, within its legislative powers, find the proper balance between different fundamental rights and fully comply with the letter and the spirit of the rulings;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital P

P. whereas the Union has at its disposal a multitude of instruments and processes for ensuring full and proper application of Treaty principles and values ~~but in practice they appear limited in scope, inadeq~~; whereas the existing instruments should be applied and enforced and, if necessary, evaluated and ~~ineffective, or they are unlikely to be used; while their uneven application is perceived by many as politically motivated, arbitrary and unfairly targeting certain countries~~complemented in the framework of a rule of law mechanism to be adequate and effective;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Recital S

S. whereas ~~some Member State governments deny that upholding Union principles and values is a Treaty obligation, or that the Union has the authority to ensure compliance~~recent developments in some Member States raise concerns whether the rule of law is still upheld throughout the EU;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital T

T. whereas in ~~situations where a Member State no longer guarantee respect for DRF~~cases of breaches of the rule of law, the Union and ~~its~~the Member States sha~~ve a duty to~~ll protect the ~~rights of the residents of that Member State~~integrity and application of the Treaties;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital V

V. whereas a new mechanism should be based on the following guiding principles: evidence based; objective; non- discriminatory and assessing on an equal footing, respecting the principle of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality; applying to both Member States and institutions of the Union; and based on a graduated approach, including both a preventative and corrective arm;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Requests the Commission to submit, by the end of 20167, on the basis of Article 295 TFEU, a proposal for the conclusion of an EU Pact for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights (DRF) in the form of an interinstitutional agreement laying down arrangements facilitating the cooperation of institutions of the Union and its Member States in the framework of Article 7 TEU, integrating, aligning and complementing existing mechanisms, following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2. Recommends, in particular, that the mechanisms of the EU Pact for DRF include preventative and corrective elements, and apply to all Member States as well as the three main institutions of the Union; with respect to the principles of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. Reiterates that the Member States are obliged to cooperate with each other and the EU, based on the principles of mutual trust and sincere cooperation;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)

2b. Welcomes the establishment of an inter-parliamentary debate in order to sort out as much as possible misunderstandings, maladministration and incorrect implementation via a structured dialogue;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Invites the ~~European Ombudsman to issue, as part of its annual report, specific recommendations to the institutions of the Union in the field of DRF;~~Commission to analyse recommendations of the European Ombudsman to the institutions of the Union and the Member States in the field of fundamental rights and rule of law.

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Calls for the creation of a Union Fund, on the basis of a pilot project, for legal assistance to individuals and organisations litigating cases relating to DRF violations by national governments or the institutions of the Union;deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

6. Calls on the Commission to develop and implement an awareness raising campaign, providing information about ~~citizens'~~fundamental rights, t~~o judicial redress and litigation routes in cases relating to DRF violations by national governments or institutions of the Union~~he rule of law and the possibility to enforce those rights;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

~~7. Invites the CJEU to make proposals in order to speed up its procedures, with a view to improving access to justice for individuals challenging violations of DRF;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Emil RADEV, Mariya GABRIEL, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Recommends that the DRF expert panel, as per the proposed interinstitutional agreement, also assess access to justice at the European level, ~~applying the same benchmarks to the CJEU and ECtHR,~~ including aspects such as independence and impartiality of courts and judges, length and cost of litigation, implementation of court rulings, scope of judicial control and redress available to citizens~~, and options for cross border collective redress~~;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Frank ENGEL, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – introductory part

9. Considers, furthermore, that ~~any future Treaty revision should include the following changes:~~if in the future further Treaty changes would be considered, the attention should be drawn - to Article 2 and the fulfilment of the Member States' obligation to protect the fundamental values the EU is based upon - to the consideration of further mechanisms how the rule of law could be strengthened or, if breaches appear, how the rule of law could be re-established while respecting national competences and sovereignty; - to a possible revision of Article 7, in order to make sanctions against Member States relevant and applicable;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 1

~~- Article 2 TEU to become a legal base for infringement procedures and legislative measures to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 2

~~- enabling national courts under Article 2 TEU to bring before the CJEU actions on the legality of Member States' actions;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 2

~~- Enabling national courts under Article 2 TEU to bring before the CJEU actions on the legality of Member States' actions;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 3

~~- Enabling individuals to bring actions before the CJEU;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 4

~~- Abolition of Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and the conversion of the Charter into a Bill of Rights of the Union;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – indent 5

~~- Reviewing the unanimity requirement in areas relating to respect for and protection and promotion of fundamental rights, such as equality and non-discrimination;~~deleted

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)

9a. Considers that existing tools and mechanisms for enforcement of rights should be properly applied and strengthened if possible breaches appear;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)

9b. Considers that the existing tools for rule of law monitoring, reporting and assessment should be further streamlined; Considers that a common platform could be established where all information sources are included and made public;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

10. Confirms that the recommendations must respect fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2254(INL)

Monika HOHLMEIER, Pál CSÁKY, Barbara MATERA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Michał BONI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Csaba SÓGOR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

11. Considers that any financial implications of the requested proposals for the budget of the Union should be covered by the existing budgetary allocations; stresses that both for the EU and its Member States, as well as for citizens, the adoption and implementation of those proposals wcould lead to substantial cost and time savings, and ~~will~~could thus be beneficial both in economic and social terms;

2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE

2015/2155(DEC)

Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT, Pina PICIERNO, Fredrick FEDERLEY, Anneliese DODDS, Margrete AUKEN, Dennis de JONG, Monika VANA, Josu JUARISTI ABAUNZ, Benedek JÁVOR, Kateřina KONEČNÁ, Anja HAZEKAMP, Elly SCHLEIN, Marietje SCHAAKE, Anneleen VAN BOSSUYT, Morten MESSERSCHMIDT, Josep-Maria TERRICABRAS, Jeroen LENAERS, Frédérique RIES, Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA, Ivan ŠTEFANEC, Lynn BOYLAN, Matt CARTHY, Luke Ming FLANAGAN, Liadh NÍ RIADA, Igor ŠOLTES, Bas EICKHOUT, Jan Philipp ALBRECHT, Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ, Luigi MORGANO, Ashley FOX, Estefanía TORRES MARTÍNEZ, Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA, Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY, Miguel URBÁN CRESPO, Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS, Ruža TOMAŠIĆ, Cora van NIEUWENHUIZEN, Ulrike LUNACEK, Kostadinka KUNEVA, Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ, Richard SULÍK, Diane DODDS, Lara COMI, Bart STAES, Nicola CAPUTO, Judith SARGENTINI, Ivo BELET, Remo SERNAGIOTTO, Merja KYLLÖNEN, Richard ASHWORTH, Alessia Maria MOSCA, Ernest URTASUN, Pascal ARIMONT, Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Fabio Massimo CASTALDO, Romana TOMC, Jan ZAHRADIL, Bodil VALERO, Daniel DALTON, Angelika MLINAR

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)

17a. Stresses that the Court of Auditors report adopted on 11.07.2014 states that the potential saving for the EU budget would be about 114 million EUR per year if the European Parliament centralised its activities; reiterates the call on Parliament and the Council to address, in order to create long term savings, the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as stated by Parliament in several previous resolutions;

2016/03/14
Committee: CONT

2015/2132(BUD)

3. Member States shall make the pursuit of the activity of dealer or broker within their territory conditional upon authorisation on the basis of at least a check of the p~~rivate~~ersonal and professional integrity and of the abilities of the dealer or broker. In the case of a legal person, the check shall be on the legal person and on the person who directs the undertaking.

2016/04/06
Committee: LIBE

2015/0269(COD)

Barbara MATERA, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Stefano MAULLU, Lara COMI

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a

Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

This filing system shall record each firearm's type, make, model, calibre and serial number, as well as the names and addresses of the ~~supplier~~person disposing of the firearm and the person acquiring or possessing it~~he firearm~~. The record of firearms, including deactivated firearms, shall be maintained until destruction of the firearm has been certified by the competent authorities.

2016/04/06
Committee: LIBE

2015/0269(COD)

Barbara MATERA, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Stefano MAULLU, Lara COMI

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b

Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Throughout their period of activity, dealers and brokers shall be required to maintain a register in which all firearms subject to this Directive and which are received or disposed of by them shall be recorded, together with such particulars as enable the firearm to be identified and traced, in particular the type, make, model, calibre and serial number thereof and the names and addresses of the persons ~~supplying~~disposing of and acquiring it.

2016/04/06
Committee: LIBE

2015/0269(COD)

Barbara MATERA, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Stefano MAULLU, Lara COMI

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5

Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4b – paragraph 2

2. The system referred to in paragraph 1 shall include at least a check of the p~~rivate~~ersonal and professional integrity and of the abilities of the dealer or broker. In the case of a legal person, the check shall be on the legal person and on the person who directs the undertaking.

2016/04/06
Committee: LIBE

2015/0218(COD)

Salvatore CICU, Antonio TAJANI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Lara COMI, Alberto CIRIO, Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE, Aldo PATRICIELLO, Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO, Barbara MATERA, Alessandra MUSSOLINI, Giovanni LA VIA, Raffaele FITTO, Massimiliano SALINI, Stefano MAULLU, Remo SERNAGIOTTO

Proposal for a regulation
–

The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.

2015/12/16
Committee: INTA

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a

(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, in particular~~ly in industrial centres~~ for the priorities as defined in Regulation (EU) 1315/2013 (TEN-T Guidelines); transport investments should represent at least 33% of the total investments under EFSI; energy, in particular energy interconnections; and digital infrastructure;

2015/03/19
Committee: TRAN

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a

(a) payments from the general budget of the Union, originating from, in order of priority, decommitments from the 2007- 2013 financial period, unused contingency margin, yearly surplus.

2015/03/19
Committee: TRAN

2015/0009(COD)