BETA

Activities of Antanas GUOGA

Plenary speeches (645)

InvestEU (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0229(COD)
Better enforcement and modernisation of EU consumer protection rules (debate) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0090(COD)
Work-life balance for parents and carers (debate) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0085(COD)
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector - Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs - Adapting to development in the road transport sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0123(COD)
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0280(COD)
Contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services - Contracts for the sale of goods (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0287(COD)
Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting
2016/11/22
Order of business
2016/11/22
State of EU-Russia political relations (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2158(INI)
Comprehensive European education, research and remembrance of the totalitarian past (topical debate)
2016/11/22
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0251(NLE)
Establishing the InvestEU Programme (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0229(COD)
Establishing the Digital Europe programme for the period 2021-2027 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0227(COD)
The rule of law in Romania (debate)
2016/11/22
Free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0228(COD)
Distributed ledger technologies and blockchains: building trust with disintermediation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2772(RSP)
The situation in Hungary (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2131(INL)
Cyber defence (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2004(INI)
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2259(INI)
Media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2209(INI)
Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: Data protection and citizen's privacy as a line of defence against election manipulation (debate)
2016/11/22
Gender equality in the media sector in the EU - Empowering women and girls through the digital sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2210(INI)
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2573(RSP)
EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2194(INI)
Summer-time arrangements (debate)
2016/11/22
Geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0152(COD)
Academic further and distance education as part of the European lifelong learning strategy (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2142(INI)
Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2240(INI)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0271/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2156(DEC)
Discharge 2014: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0264/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2202(DEC)
Discharge 2014: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0276/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2199(DEC)
Discharge 2014: Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A8-0275/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2196(DEC)
Situation in Northern Iraq/Mosul (RC-B8-1159/2016, B8-1159/2016, B8-1160/2016, B8-1161/2016, B8-1164/2016, B8-1165/2016, B8-1166/2016, B8-1169/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2956(RSP)
Situation of journalists in Turkey (B8-1158/2016, RC-B8-1162/2016, B8-1162/2016, B8-1163/2016, B8-1167/2016, B8-1168/2016, B8-1170/2016, B8-1171/2016, B8-1172/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2935(RSP)
Nuclear security and non-proliferation (B8-1120/2016, RC-B8-1122/2016, B8-1122/2016, B8-1125/2016, B8-1129/2016, B8-1130/2016, B8-1131/2016, B8-1132/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2936(RSP)
European Voluntary Service (B8-1126/2016, B8-1126/2016, B8-1127/2016, B8-1128/2016, B8-1133/2016, B8-1134/2016, B8-1135/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2872(RSP)
EU Youth Strategy 2013-2015 (A8-0250/2016 - Andrea Bocskor)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2351(INI)
How the CAP can improve job creation in rural areas (A8-0285/2016 - Eric Andrieu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2226(INI)
The MFF mid-term revision (B8-1173/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2931(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/003 EE/petroleum and chemicals (A8-0314/2016 - Victor Negrescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2235(BUD)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2016 priorities (A8-0309/2016 - Alfred Sant)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2101(INI)
Trans fats (B8-1115/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2637(RSP)
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Denmark (A8-0289/2016 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0813(CNS)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Denmark (A8-0288/2016 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0814(CNS)
EU-China Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports (A8-0281/2016 - Bodil Valero)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0293(NLE)
Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (A8-0292/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0193(COD)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen (A8-0301/2016 - Evelyn Regner)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2108(IMM)
Request for the defence of the privileges and immunities of Jane Collins (A8-0297/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2087(IMM)
Request for the defence of the privileges and immunities of Mario Borghezio (A8-0312/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2028(IMM)
Rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents (A8-0300/2016 - Michael Cramer)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0297(COD)
Draft amending budget No 3/2016: Security of the Institutions (A8-0295/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2121(BUD)
EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement (A8-0286/2016 - Richard Howitt)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2274(INI)
Fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM resolution (A8-0284/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2110(INI)
Human rights and migration in third countries (A8-0245/2016 - Marie-Christine Vergiat)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2316(INI)
Corporate liability for serious human rights abuses in third countries (A8-0243/2016 - Ignazio Corrao)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2315(INI)
EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage (A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2059(INI)
How to make fisheries controls in Europe uniform (A8-0234/2016 - Isabelle Thomas)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2093(INI)
Improving connection and accessibility of transport infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe (A8-0282/2016 - Tomasz Piotr Poręba)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2347(INI)
EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (A8-0283/2016 - Sophia in 't Veld)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2254(INL)
Conclusion on behalf of the EU of the Paris Agreement adopted under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Giovanni La Via (A8-0280/2016))
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0184(NLE)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece following the earthquake that affected the Ionian Islands in November 2015 (A8-0270/2016 - Georgios Kyrtsos)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2165(BUD)
Legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings (A8-0165/2015 - Dennis de Jong)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0409(COD)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0005(COD)
Europol-China Agreement on Strategic Cooperation (A8-0265/2016 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0808(CNS)
Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting : see Minutes
2016/11/22
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (A8-0238/2016 - Petr Ježek)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0268(COD)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (A8-0236/2016 - Ska Keller)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0089(NLE)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0247/2016 - Laura Agea)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0043(NLE)
Access to finance for SMEs and increasing the diversity of SME funding in a Capital Markets Union (A8-0222/2016 - Othmar Karas)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2032(INI)
How best to harness the job creation potential of SMEs? (A8-0248/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2320(INI)
Activities, impact and added value of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund between 2007 and 2014 (A8-0227/2016 - Marian Harkin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2284(INI)
Sporazum o provedbi Konvencije o radu u ribolovu (B8-0976/2016)
2016/11/22
EU relations with Tunisia in the current regional context (A8-0249/2016 - Fabio Massimo Castaldo)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2273(INI)
Cohesion Policy and Research and Innovation Strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) (A8-0159/2016 - Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2278(INI)
European territorial cooperation - best practices and innovative measures (A8-0202/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2280(INI)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (A8-0246/2016 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2090(INI)
EU-China Agreement relating to the accession of Croatia (A8-0231/2016 - Iuliu Winkler)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0298(NLE)
Statistics on natural gas and electricity prices (A8-0184/2016 - Barbara Kappel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0239(COD)
Towards a new energy market design (A8-0214/2016 - Werner Langen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2322(INI)
EU strategy on heating and cooling (A8-0232/2016 - Adam Gierek)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2058(INI)
Enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs (A8-0162/2016 - Rosa D'Amato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2282(INI)
EU strategy for the Alpine region (A8-0226/2016 - Mercedes Bresso)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2324(INI)
EU Trust Fund for Africa: implications for development and humanitarian aid (A8-0221/2016 - Ignazio Corrao)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2341(INI)
Creating labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance (A8-0253/2016 - Tatjana Ždanoka, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2017(INI)
71st session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0146/2016 - Andrey Kovatchev)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2020(INI)
Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (A8-0203/2016 - Helga Stevens)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2258(INI)
Participation of Azerbaijan in Union programmes (A8-0210/2016 - Norica Nicolai)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0420(NLE)
High common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (A8-0211/2016 - Andreas Schwab)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0027(COD)
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0149(COD)
European Border and Coast Guard (A8-0200/2016 - Artis Pabriks)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0310(COD)
European Maritime Safety Agency (A8-0215/2016 - Michael Cramer)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0313(COD)
Community Fisheries Control Agency (A8-0068/2016 - Alain Cadec)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0308(COD)
Secretariat of the OLAF Supervisory Committee (A8-0188/2016 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0064(COD)
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (TAXE 2) (A8-0223/2016 - Jeppe Kofod, Michael Theurer)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2038(INI)
Synergies between structural funds and Horizon 2020 (RC-B8-0851/2016, B8-0851/2016, B8-0852/2016, B8-0857/2016, B8-0858/2016, B8-0860/2016, B8-0861/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2695(RSP)
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme 2017 (RC-B8-0885/2016, B8-0885/2016, B8-0886/2016, B8-0892/2016, B8-0893/2016, B8-0894/2016, B8-0895/2016, B8-0896/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2773(RSP)
Japan's decision to resume whaling in the 2015-2016 season (B8-0853/2016, B8-0853/2016, B8-0855/2016, B8-0862/2016, B8-0863/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2600(RSP)
EU-Peru Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0197/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0199(NLE)
Emission limits for non-road mobile machinery (A8-0276/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0268(COD)
Refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market (A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2321(INI)
Social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility (A8-0217/2016 - Eleonora Forenza)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2038(INI)
A forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment (A8-0220/2016 - Tiziana Beghin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2105(INI)
The fight against trafficking in human beings in the EU's external relations (A8-0205/2016 - Barbara Lochbihler)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2340(INI)
High common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0027(COD)
Outcome of the referendum in the United Kingdom (B8-0838/2016, B8-0839/2016, B8-0840/2016, B8-0841/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2800(RSP)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon (accession of Bulgaria and Romania) (A8-0195/2016 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0027(NLE)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon (Framework Agreement) (A8-0193/2016 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0110(NLE)
EU-Monaco agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0206/2016 - Andreas Schwab)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0109(NLE)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon (2004 enlargement) (A8-0194/2016 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0078(NLE)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/012 BE/Hainaut Machinery (A8-0207/2016 - Victor Negrescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2074(BUD)
Appointments to the Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion
2016/11/22
Multiannual recovery plan for Bluefin tuna (A8-0367/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0096(COD)
Multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks
2016/11/22
Jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (A8-0209/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0059(CNS)
Jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships (A8-0208/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0060(CNS)
Massacres in eastern Congo (RC-B8-0801/2016, B8-0801/2016, B8-0802/2016, B8-0804/2016, B8-0805/2016, B8-0807/2016, B8-0808/2016, B8-0809/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2770(RSP)
Follow-up of the Strategic Framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET2020) (A8-0176/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2281(INI)
Renewable energy progress report (A8-0196/2016 - Paloma López Bermejo)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2041(INI)
Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (A8-0199/2016 - Markus Pieper)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2232(INI)
Promoting free movement by simplifying the acceptance of certain public documents (A8-0156/2016 - Mady Delvaux)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0119(COD)
Transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in EU civil service cases (A8-0167/2016 - Mady Delvaux)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0906(COD)
A regulation for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (B8-0685/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2610(RSP)
Competitiveness of the European rail supply industry (B8-0677/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2887(RSP)
Setting up of a Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion, its powers, numerical strength and term of office (B8-0745/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2726(RSO)
EU-Palau Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0177/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0193(NLE)
EU-Tonga Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0179/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0196(NLE)
EU-Colombia Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0178/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0201(NLE)
Expansion of trade in Information Technology Products (ITA) (A8-0186/2016 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0067(NLE)
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with the exception of aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0191/2016 - Pavel Svoboda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0135(NLE)
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with regard to aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0190/2016-Pavel Svoboda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0136(NLE)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (accession of Croatia) (A8-0148/2016 - Elmar Brok)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0224(NLE)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (consent) (A8-0149/2016 - Elmar Brok)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0441(NLE)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (resolution) (A8-0143/2016 - Elmar Brok)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2234(INI)
Macro-financial assistance to Tunisia (A8-0187/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0039(COD)
Rules against certain tax avoidance practices (A8-0189/2016 - Hugues Bayet)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0011(CNS)
Follow-up to the resolution of Parliament of 11 February 2015 on the US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0580/2016, B8-0584/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2997(RSP)
Space capabilities for European security and defence (A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2276(INI)
Space market uptake (B8-0739/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2731(RSP)
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0700/2016, B8-0700/2016, B8-0723/2016, B8-0724/2016, B8-0725/2016, B8-0726/2016, B8-0728/2016, B8-0729/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2699(RSP)
Endocrine disruptors: state of play following the Court judgment of 16 December 2015 (RC-B8-0733/2016, B8-0733/2016, B8-0734/2016, B8-0735/2016, B8-0736/2016, B8-0737/2016, B8-0738/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2747(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of GMO maize Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x GA21 (B8-0732/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2682(RSP)
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (A8-0154/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0101(NLE)
Uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles: UNECE agreement (A8-0185/2016 - Bernd Lange)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0249(NLE)
EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0155/2016 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0234(NLE)
Enhanced cooperation in the area of property regimes of international couples (A8-0192/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0061(NLE)
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (judicial cooperation in criminal matters) (A8-0198/2016 - Martina Anderson)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0100(NLE)
Markets in financial instruments (A8-0126/2016 - Markus Ferber)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0033(COD)
Markets in financial instruments, market abuse and securities settlement (A8-0125/2016 - Markus Ferber)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0034(COD)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Rimantas Šadžius (A8-0183/2016 - Bart Staes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0805(NLE)
2015 Report on policy coherence for development (A8-0165/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2317(INI)
The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (A8-0169/2016 - Maria Heubuch)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2277(INI)
International Accounting Standards (IAS) evaluation (A8-0172/2016 - Theodor Dumitru Stolojan)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2006(INI)
Peace Support Operations - EU engagement with the UN and the African Union (A8-0158/2016 - Geoffrey Van Orden)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2275(INI)
Unfair trading practices in the food supply chain (A8-0173/2016 - Edward Czesak)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2065(INI)
Technological solutions for sustainable agriculture (A8-0174/2016 - Anthea McIntyre)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2225(INI)
Enhancing innovation and economic development in future European farm management (A8-0163/2016 - Jan Huitema)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2227(INI)
The Single Market strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2354(INI)
Virtual currencies (A8-0168/2016 - Jakob von Weizsäcker)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2007(INI)
Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Sweden (A8-0170/2016 - Ska Keller)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0314(NLE)
Transatlantic data flows (B8-0622/2016, RC-B8-0623/2016, B8-0623/2016, B8-0633/2016, B8-0639/2016, B8-0642/2016, B8-0643/2016, B8-0644/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2727(RSP)
Delivering a new deal for energy consumers (A8-0161/2016 - Theresa Griffin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2323(INI)
Poverty: a gender perspective (A8-0153/2016 - Maria Arena)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2228(INI)
Non-tariff barriers in the Single Market (A8-0160/2016 - Daniel Dalton)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2346(INI)
The Single Market strategy (A8-0171/2016 - Lara Comi)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2354(INI)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0157/2016 - Dariusz Rosati)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0010(CNS)
China's market economy status (B8-0604/2016, B8-0605/2016, RC-B8-0607/2016, B8-0607/2016, B8-0608/2016, B8-0609/2016, B8-0610/2016, B8-0611/2016, B8-0612/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2667(RSP)
Follow-up and state of play of the Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (B8-0583/2016, B8-0587/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2696(RSP)
Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for certain foods (B8-0545/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2583(RSP)
Framework Agreement on parental leave (A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2097(INI)
Preventing and combating trafficking in human beings (A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2118(INI)
Exemptions for commodity dealers (A8-0064/2016 - Sander Loones)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0295(COD)
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (A8-0164/2016 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0091(COD)
Entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, volunteering, pupil exchange and au pairing (A8-0166/2016 - Cecilia Wikström)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0081(COD)
Acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy (B8-0562/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2550(RSP)
Protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0257/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0309(COD)
Protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0256/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0309(COD)
EU-Liberia sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (A8-0142/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0224(NLE)
EU-Mauritania fisheries partnership agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0147/2016 - Gabriel Mato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0229(NLE)
Cooperation agreement on a civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) with Korea (A8-0065/2016 - Gianluca Buonanno)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0265(NLE)
New territorial development tools in cohesion policy 2014-2020 (A8-0032/2016 - Ruža Tomašić)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2224(INI)
Statistics concerning balance of payments, international trade in services and foreign direct investment (A8-0227/2015 - Sven Giegold)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0194(COD)
Cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU (A8-0074/2016 - Iliana Iotova)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2279(INI)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: EGF/2016/000 TA 2016/Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0078/2016 - Andrey Novakov)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2025(BUD)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Samo Jereb (A8-0060/2016 - Bart Staes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0804(NLE)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Mihails Kozlovs (A8-0059/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0814(NLE)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Jan Gregor (A8-0057/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0815(NLE)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Ladislav Balko (A8-0055/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0816(NLE)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Janusz Wojciechowski (A8-0061/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0817(NLE)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate (B8-0439/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2624(RSP)
The EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world (A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2272(INI)
Implementation and review of the EU-Central Asia Strategy (A8-0051/2016 - Tamás Meszerics)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2220(INI)
Zika virus outbreak (B8-0449/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2584(RSP)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Denmark and Greenland: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0067/2016 - Marco Affronte)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0152(NLE)
EU-Macao Agreement on certain aspects of air services (A8-0072/2016 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0015(NLE)
Minimum standard rate of VAT (A8-0063/2016 - Peter Simon)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0296(CNS)
Agreement on strategic cooperation between Brazil and Europol (A8-0070/2016 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0801(CNS)
Request for waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Hermann Winkler (A8-0062/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2000(IMM)
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: fisheries aspects (A8-0042/2016 - Norica Nicolai)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2109(INI)
Breeding animals and their germinal products (A8-0288/2015 - Michel Dantin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0032(COD)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (A8-0066/2016 - Roberta Metsola, Kashetu Kyenge)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2095(INI)
Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0301/2015 - Sajjad Karim)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2252(INI)
Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (A8-0208/2015 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2150(INI)
Towards improved single market regulation (A8-0278/2015 - Anneleen Van Bossuyt)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2089(INI)
Learning EU at school (A8-0021/2016 - Damian Drăghici)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2138(INI)
The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (A8-0027/2016 - Sylvie Goulard)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2060(INI)
Small-scale coastal fishing in regions dependent on fishing (A8-0044/2016 - Ruža Tomašić)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2090(INI)
External dimension of the CFP, including fisheries agreements (A8-0052/2016 - Linnéa Engström)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2091(INI)
Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for Tunisia (A8-0013/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0218(COD)
Veterinary medicinal products (A8-0046/2016 - Françoise Grossetête)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0257(COD)
Authorisation and supervision of veterinary medicinal products (A8-0035/2016 - Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0256(COD)
Towards a thriving data-driven economy (B8-0308/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2612(RSP)
Situation in Eritrea (B8-0318/2016, B8-0319/2016, B8-0320/2016, B8-0321/2016, B8-0322/2016, B8-0323/2016, B8-0324/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2568(RSP)
2015 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (B8-0310/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2895(RSP)
2015 Report on Montenegro (B8-0309/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2894(RSP)
Banking Union - Annual report 2015 (A8-0033/2016 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2221(INI)
Reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (A8-0037/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0216(COD)
Trade diversion into the European Union of certain key medicines (A8-0038/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0165(COD)
EU-Andorra agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0047/2016 - Miguel Viegas)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0285(NLE)
Appointment of a new Executive Director of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0045/2016 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0902(NLE)
Procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings (A8-0020/2015 - Caterina Chinnici)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0408(COD)
Guidelines for the 2017 Budget - Section III (A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2004(BUD)
Interinstitutional agreement on Better law-making (A8-0039/2016 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2005(ACI)
Tobacco agreement (PMI agreement) (B8-0311/2016, B8-0312/2016, B8-0312/2016, B8-0313/2016, B8-0313/2016, B8-0314/2016, B8-0315/2016, B8-0316/2016, B8-0317/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2555(RSP)
Animal health (A8-0041/2016 - Jasenko Selimovic)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0136(COD)
Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments (A8-0006/2016 - Marc Tarabella)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0014(COD)
Market access to port services and financial transparency of ports (A8-0023/2016 - Knut Fleckenstein)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0157(COD)
Harmonised indices of consumer prices (A8-0313/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0346(COD)
Annual report 2014 on the Protection of the EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0026/2016 - Benedek Jávor)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2128(INI)
Gender mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament (A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2230(INI)
The situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU (A8-0024/2016 - Mary Honeyball)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2325(INI)
Authorisation for Austria to sign and ratify, and Malta to accede to, the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 (A8-0018/2016 - Viktor Uspaskich)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0177(NLE)
EU-San Marino agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (C8-0370/2015)
2016/11/22
European network of Employment Services, workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets (A8-0224/2015 - Heinz K. Becker)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0002(COD)
Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for Tunisia (A8-0013/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0218(COD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/007 BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass (A8-0029/2016 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2013(BUD)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0030/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2285(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0031/2016 - Sofia Ribeiro)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2330(INI)
Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (A8-0017/2016 - Catherine Stihler)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2256(INI)
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Tunisia Free Trade Agreement (B8-0255/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2791(RSP)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2014 (A8-0020/2016 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2231(INI)
European Central Bank annual report for 2014 (A8-0012/2016 - Notis Marias)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2115(INI)
Opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand (B8-0250/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2932(RSP)
Introduction of compatible systems for the registration of pet animals across Member States (RC-B8-0251/2016, B8-0251/2016, B8-0252/2016, B8-0253/2016, B8-0254/2016, B8-0256/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2540(RSP)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (B8-0147/2016, RC-B8-0151/2016, B8-0151/2016, B8-0152/2016, B8-0153/2016, B8-0155/2016, B8-0158/2016, B8-0160/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 - Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2256(INI)
2015 progress report on Serbia (B8-0166/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2892(RSP)
European integration process of Kosovo (B8-0167/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2893(RSP)
Situation in Libya (RC-B8-0146/2016, B8-0146/2016, B8-0169/2016, B8-0170/2016, B8-0177/2016, B8-0178/2016, B8-0179/2016, B8-0180/2016, B8-0181/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2537(RSP)
Insularity condition (B8-0165/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3014(RSP)
The role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) (B8-0171/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3013(RSP)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (B8-0147/2016, RC-B8-0151/2016, B8-0151/2016, B8-0152/2016, B8-0153/2016, B8-0155/2016, B8-0158/2016, B8-0160/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
Systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS (RC-B8-0149/2016, B8-0149/2016, B8-0154/2016, B8-0156/2016, B8-0157/2016, B8-0159/2016, B8-0161/2016, B8-0162/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2529(RSP)
EU-Georgia Association Agreement: anti-circumvention mechanism (A8-0365/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0080(COD)
Ratification of the Marrakesh Treaty, based on petitions received, notably Petition 924/2011 (B8-0168/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2542(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean FG72 (B8-0133/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2547(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 (B8-0134/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2547(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 89788 (B8-0135/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2547(RSP)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106 on emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (B8-0040/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2988(RPS)
Negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) (A8-0009/2016 - Viviane Reding)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2233(INI)
New Strategy for gender equality and women's rights post-2015 (B8-0148/2016, B8-0150/2016, B8-0163/2016, B8-0164/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2526(RSP)
Rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (A8-0359/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0006(COD)
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on heavy metals (A8-0002/2016 - Giovanni La Via)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0359(NLE)
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants (A8-0001/2016 - Giovanni La Via)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0358(NLE)
Eurojust and Ukraine Cooperation Agreement (A8-0007/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0810(CNS)
Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement (A8-0008/2016 - Nathalie Griesbeck)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0812(CNS)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Robert Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (A8-0015/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2313(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Robert Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (A8-0016/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2240(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Florian Philippot (A8-0014/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2267(IMM)
Establishment of a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (A8-0172/2015 - Georgi Pirinski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0124(COD)
Mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy (A8-0003/2016 - Mark Demesmaeker)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2137(INI)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0340/2015 - Sandra Kalniete)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0222(NLE)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (consent) (A8-0339/2015 - Barbara Lochbihler)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0440(NLE)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (resolution) (A8-0342/2015 - Barbara Lochbihler)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2096(INI)
Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (B8-1347/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2936(RSP)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0344/2015 - Cristian Dan Preda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2229(INI)
20th anniversary of the Dayton Peace agreement (B8-1350/2015, RC-B8-1362/2015, B8-1362/2015, B8-1363/2015, B8-1364/2015, B8-1396/2015, B8-1397/2015, B8-1398/2015, B8-1401/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2979(RSP)
Arms export: implementation of the Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0338/2015 - Bodil Valero)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2114(INI)
Patents and plant breeders rights (RC-B8-1394/2015, B8-1394/2015, B8-1395/2015, B8-1399/2015, B8-1400/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2981(RSP)
Situation in Burundi (RC-B8-1348/2015, B8-1348/2015, B8-1352/2015, B8-1353/2015, B8-1354/2015, B8-1355/2015, B8-1356/2015, B8-1357/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2973(RSP)
Protection of Virunga national park in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (B8-1346/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2728(RSP)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0347/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0903(NLE)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0348/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0904(NLE)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0346/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0905(NLE)
Operational and strategic cooperation between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Europol (A8-0352/2015 - Lorenzo Fontana)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0808(CNS)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application from Ireland - EGF/2015/006 IE/PWA International (A8-0363/2015 - Victor Negrescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2295(BUD)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: list of invasive alien species
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603xT25
2016/11/22
EU-China relations (A8-0350/2015 - Bas Belder)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2003(INI)
Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: Challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance (A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2051(INI)
Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals (A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2211(INI)
Situation in Hungary: follow-up to the European Parliament Resolution of 10 June 2015 (B8-1349/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1358/2015, B8-1359/2015, B8-1360/2015, B8-1361/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2935(RSP)
Arrangement with the Swiss Confederation on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office (A8-0345/2015 - Roberta Metsola)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0422(NLE)
EU-Dominica agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0322/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0050(NLE)
EU-Vanuatu agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0329/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0052(NLE)
EU-Trinidad and Tobago agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0323/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0054(NLE)
EU-Samoa agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0320/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0056(NLE)
EU-Grenada agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0326/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0057(NLE)
EU-Timor-Leste agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0327/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0058(NLE)
EU-Saint Lucia agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0321/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0060(NLE)
EU-Saint Vincent and the Grenadines agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0325/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0061(NLE)
EU-United Arab Emirates agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0324/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0062(NLE)
Methods and procedure for making available the traditional, VAT and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements (A8-0357/2015 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0204(NLE)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos (A8-0358/2015 - Evelyn Regner)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2238(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Stelios Kouloglou (A8-0356/2015 - Pavel Svoboda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2239(IMM)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application from Finland - EGF/2015/005 FI/Computer Programming (A8-0362/2015 - Marco Zanni)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2298(BUD)
EU trade mark (A8-0354/2015 - Cecilia Wikström)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0088(COD)
Suspension of exceptional trade measures with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0060/2015 - Goffredo Maria Bettini)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0197(COD)
Strategic cooperation in the fight against serious crime and terrorism between the United Arab Emirates and Europol (A8-0351/2015 - Alessandra Mussolini)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0809(CNS)
Towards a European Energy Union (A8-0341/2015 - Marek Józef Gróbarczyk)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2113(INI)
Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (A8-0330/2015 - Peter Eriksson)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2108(INI)
Implementation of the European Progress Microfinance Facility (A8-0331/2015 - Sven Schulze)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2042(INI)
Setting up a special committee on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect, its powers, numerical strength and term of office (B8-1335/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3005(RSO)
Appointments to special committee on tax rulings
2016/11/22
EU-Liechtenstein agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0334/2015 - Sander Loones)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0175(NLE)
Special report of the European Ombudsman in own-initiative inquiry concerning Frontex (A8-0343/2015 - Roberta Metsola, Ska Keller)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2215(INI)
Sustainable urban mobility (A8-0319/2015 - Karima Delli)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2242(INI)
Accession of Ecuador to the EU-Peru and Colombia trade agreement (B8-1241/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2656(RSP)
A new animal welfare strategy for 2016-2020 (B8-1278/2015, B8-1278/2015, B8-1279/2015, B8-1280/2015, B8-1281/2015, B8-1282/2015, B8-1283/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2957(RSP)
Education for children in emergency situations and protracted crises (B8-1240/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2977(RSP)
Towards simplification and performance orientation in cohesion policy for 2014-2020 (B8-1231/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2772(RSP)
Draft amending budget No 8/2015: Own resources and European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0337/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2269(BUD)
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for immediate budgetary measures to address the refugee crisis (A8-0336/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2264(BUD)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide for payment of advances in the 2016 budget (A8-0335/2015 - Lefteris Christoforou)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2123(BUD)
2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2132(BUD)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: granting an authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexhyl) phthalate (DEHP) (B8-1228/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2962(RSP)
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (A8-0317/2015 - Elisa Ferreira, Michael Theurer)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2066(INI)
Prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (A8-0316/2015 - Rachida Dati)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2063(INI)
EU Strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020 (A8-0312/2015 - Ole Christensen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2107(INI)
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis (A8-0250/2015 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0337(COD)
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0251/2015 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0337(COD)
Repealing certain acts in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0252/2015 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0339(COD)
Accession to the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (A8-0318/2015 - Carlos Iturgaiz)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0036(NLE)
Insurance mediation (A8-0315/2015 - Werner Langen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0175(COD)
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on child poverty (A8-0310/2015 - Inês Cristina Zuber)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2237(INI)
Cohesion policy and marginalised communities (A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2247(INI)
The role of the EU within the UN (A8-0308/2015 - Paavo Väyrynen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2104(INI)
European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate)
2016/11/22
Interoperability solutions as a means for modernising the public sector (A8-0225/2015 - Carlos Zorrinho)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0185(COD)
Reform of the electoral law of the EU (A8-0286/2015 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Jo Leinen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2035(INL)
Future aviation package (B8-1146/2015, B8-1147/2015, B8-1148/2015, B8-1149/2015, B8-1150/2015, B8-1151/2015, B8-1152/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2933(RSP)
Transparency of securities financing transactions (A8-0120/2015 - Renato Soru)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0017(COD)
Follow-up to the European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2014 on the electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens (B8-1092/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2635(RSP)
EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region (A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2214(INI)
Cohesion policy and review of the Europe 2020 strategy (A8-0277/2015 - Fernando Ruas)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2246(INI)
European Structural and Investment Funds and sound economic governance (A8-0268/2015 - José Blanco López)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2052(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities - Steps towards completing the Economic and Monetary Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2210(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities - Steps towards completing the Economic and Monetary Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2210(INI)
Court of Justice of the European Union: number of judges at the General Court (A8-0296/2015 - António Marinho e Pinto)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0901B(COD)
Provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area (A8-0295/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0213(COD)
Use of genetically modified food and feed (A8-0305/2015 - Giovanni La Via)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0093(COD)
Novel foods (A8-0046/2014 - James Nicholson)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0435(COD)
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (A8-0249/2015 - Julie Girling)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0443(COD)
European Citizens' Initiative (A8-0284/2015 - György Schöpflin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2257(INI)
Common Agricultural Policy: repealing obsolete acts (A8-0255/2015 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0090(COD)
EU-Switzerland agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0271/2015 - Jeppe Kofod)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0076(NLE)
Taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments: repealing the Savings Directive (A8-0299/2015 - Molly Scott Cato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0065(CNS)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Sweden (A8-0304/2015 - Monika Flašíková Beňová)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0804(CNS)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Belgium (A8-0303/2015 - Monika Flašíková Beňová)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0805(CNS)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Poland (A8-0302/2015 - Monika Flašíková Beňová)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0806(CNS)
Package travel and linked travel arrangements (A8-0297/2015 - Birgit Collin-Langen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0246(COD)
European single market for electronic communications (A8-0300/2015 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0309(COD)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0005(COD)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0306/2015 - Markus Ferber)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0068(CNS)
Discharge 2013: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0283/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2132(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0282/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2125(DEC)
Discharge 2013: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0285/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2135(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0269/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2079(DEC)
Ebola crisis: long-term lessons (A8-0281/2015 - Charles Goerens)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2204(INI)
Emission measurements in the automotive sector (B8-1075/2015, B8-1075/2015, B8-1076/2015, B8-1077/2015, B8-1078/2015, B8-1079/2015, B8-1080/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2865(RSP)
Access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by Member States and Europol for the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences (A8-0287/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0807(CNS)
Draft amending budget No 6/2015: Own resources, Union trust funds for external action, Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (A8-0280/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2150(BUD)
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration (A8-0290/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2253(BUD)
Draft amending budget No 7/2015: Managing the refugee crisis: immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration (A8-0289/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2252(BUD)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Béla Kovács (A8-0291/2015 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2044(IMM)
Appointment of Deputy Managing Director of EFSI (A8-0293/2015 - Jean Arthuis, Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0902(NLE)
Appointment of Managing Director of EFSI (A8-0292/2015 - Jean Arthuis, Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0901(NLE)
Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (A8-0275/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2112(INI)
Council Decision establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy, Greece and Hungary [COM(2015)0451 - C8-0271/2015 - 2015/0209(NLE)]
2016/11/22
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme 2016 (B8-0656/2015, B8-0659/2015, B8-0660/2015, B8-0661/2015, B8-0662/2015, B8-0663/2015, B8-0664/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2729(RSP)
Investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0173/2015 - Tamás Deutsch)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2245(INI)
Assessment of the 2012 European Year for active ageing and solidarity between generations (A8-0241/2015 - Eduard Kukan)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2255(INI)
Implementation of the 2011 White paper on transport (A8-0246/2015 - Wim van de Camp)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2005(INI)
Women's careers in science and university (A8-0235/2015 - Elissavet Vozemberg)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2251(INI)
EEA-Switzerland: Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market (A8-0244/2015 - Andreas Schwab)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2061(INI)
Empowering girls through education in the EU (A8-0206/2015 - Liliana Rodrigues)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2250(INI)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Guinea-Bissau: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (recommendation) (A8-0233/2015 - João Ferreira)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0134(NLE)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Guinea-Bissau: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (report) (A8-0236/2015 - João Ferreira)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2119(INI)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Cape Verde: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (recommendation) (A8-0201/2015 - Peter van Dalen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0329(NLE)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Cape Verde: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (report) (A8-0200/2015 - Peter van Dalen)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2100(INI)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Madagascar: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0196/2015 - Ricardo Serrão Santos)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0319(NLE)
Protocol amending the Marrakesh agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (A8-0237/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0029(NLE)
Protocol amending the Marrakesh agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (Trade facilitation agreement) (A8-0238/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2067(INI)
Authorisation for Austria, Belgium and Poland to ratify, or to accede to, the Convention on the contract for the carriage of goods by inland waterways (CMNI) (A8-0231/2015 - Pavel Svoboda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0345(NLE)
Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece (A8-0245/2015 - Ska Keller)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0125(NLE)
Urban dimension of EU policies (A8-0218/2015 - Kerstin Westphal)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2213(INI)
ILO Forced Labour Convention: social policy (A8-0243/2015 - Patrick Le Hyaric)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0259(NLE)
Correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters (A8-0234/2015 - Liisa Jaakonsaari)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0410(COD)
Trade in seal products (A8-0186/2015 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0028(COD)
Cloning of animals kept and reproduced for farming purposes (A8-0216/2015 - Giulia Moi, Renate Sommer)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0433(COD)
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU (2013-2014) (A8-0230/2015 - Laura Ferrara)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2254(INI)
Commissioner hearings: lessons to be taken from the 2014 process (A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2040(INI)
Human rights and technology in third countries (A8-0178/2015 - Marietje Schaake)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2232(INI)
Protecting the EU's financial interests: towards performance-based controls of the CAP (A8-0240/2015 - Petri Sarvamaa)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2234(INI)
Family businesses in Europe (A8-0223/2015 - Angelika Niebler)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2210(INI)
Research and innovation in the blue economy to create jobs and growth (A8-0214/2015 - João Ferreira)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2240(INI)
Promoting youth entrepreneurship through education and training (A8-0239/2015 - Michaela Šojdrová)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2006(INI)
Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe (A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2149(INI)
Follow up to the European citizens' initiative Right2Water (A8-0228/2015 - Lynn Boylan)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2239(INI)
Maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination following a nuclear accident (A8-0176/2015 - Esther Herranz García) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0451(NLE)
Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2256(INI)
Building a Capital markets union (B8-0655/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2634(RSP)
European Agenda on Security (B8-0676/2015, B8-0679/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2697(RSP)
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0680/2015, B8-0680/2015, B8-0681/2015, B8-0682/2015, B8-0683/2015, B8-0686/2015, B8-0687/2015, B8-0688/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2760(RSP)
Security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa and prospects for political stability (A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2229(INI)
Review of the European neighbourhood policy (A8-0194/2015 - Eduard Kukan) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2002(INI)
Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) (A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2231(INI)
Situation in Burundi (RC-B8-0657/2015, B8-0657/2015, B8-0658/2015, B8-0665/2015, B8-0666/2015, B8-0667/2015, B8-0668/2015, B8-0669/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2723(RSP)
Srebrenica commemoration (RC-B8-0716/2015, B8-0716/2015, B8-0717/2015, B8-0718/2015, B8-0719/2015, B8-0720/2015, B8-0721/2015, B8-0722/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2747(RSP)
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (A8-0215/2015 - Sirpa Pietikäinen) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2208(INI)
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors - Bettina Michelle Jakobsen (A8-0198/2015 - Igor Šoltes) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0803(NLE)
Exercise of the Union’s rights under international trade rules (A8-0203/2015 - Jiří Maštálka) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0174(COD)
Protection against injurious pricing of vessels (A8-0202/2015 - Jiří Maštálka) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0280(COD)
Fishing opportunities in EU waters for fishing vessels flying the flag of Venezuela off the coast of French Guiana (A8-0195/2015 - João Ferreira)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0001(NLE)
Draft amending budget No 3/2015: surplus from 2014 (A8-0219/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) LT
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 4/2015: mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for Romania, Bulgaria and Italy (A8-0220/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) LT
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: Floods in Romania, Bulgaria and Italy (A8-0211/2015 - Siegfried Mureşan) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2079(BUD)
Delivering multimodal integrated ticketing in Europe (A8-0183/2015 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2244(INI)
Extension of the term of office of the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect LT
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 1/2015: European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) (A8-0221/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) LT
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 5/2015 - Responding to migratory pressures (A8-0212/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) LT
2016/11/22
Review of the implementation of the Dairy package (A8-0187/2015 - James Nicholson) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2146(INI)
External impact of EU trade and investment policy on public-private initiatives (A8-0182/2015 - Jan Zahradil) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2233(INI)
The fruit and vegetables sector since the 2007 reform (A8-0170/2015 - Nuno Melo) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2147(INI)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Sotirios Zarianopoulos (A8-0191/2015 - Laura Ferrara) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2015(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Udo Voigt (A8-0192/2015 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2072(IMM)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0139/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Udo Bullmann) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/000 TA 2015 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0185/2015 - Gérard Deprez) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2076(BUD)
Review of the economic governance framework: stocktaking and challenges (A8-0190/2015 - Pervenche Berès) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2145(INI)
Strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia (A8-0171/2015 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2036(INI)
Recent revelations of high-level corruption cases in FIFA (RC-B8-0548/2015, B8-0548/2015, B8-0549/2015, B8-0550/2015, B8-0571/2015, B8-0572/2015, B8-0573/2015, B8-0574/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2730(RSP)
Conclusion of the Doha amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0167/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0376(NLE)
EU-Iceland agreement on Iceland participation in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0166/2015 - Giovanni La Via) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0151(NLE)
Accession of Croatia to the Convention on mutual assistance in criminal matters (A8-0156/2015 - Birgit Sippel) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0321(NLE)
Accession of Croatia to the Convention on the fight against corruption involving EC officials or officials of Member States (A8-0157/2015 - Filiz Hyusmenova) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0322(NLE)
State of EU-Russia relations (A8-0162/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2001(INI)
OLAF Supervisory Committee's annual report 2014 (B8-0539/2015, B8-0539/2015, B8-0540/2015, B8-0541/2015, B8-0542/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2699(RSP)
Situation in Hungary (RC-B8-0532/2015, B8-0532/2015, B8-0533/2015, B8-0534/2015, B8-0535/2015, B8-0536/2015, B8-0537/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2700(RSP)
2014 Progress Report on Turkey (B8-0455/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2953(RSP)
Adjustment rate for direct payments in respect of 2015 (A8-0174/2015 - Czesław Adam Siekierski) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0070(COD)
EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015 (A8-0163/2015 - Maria Noichl) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2152(INI)
Intellectual property rights in third countries (A8-0161/2015 - Alessia Maria Mosca) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2206(INI)
Intellectual property rights: an EU action plan (A8-0169/2015 - Pavel Svoboda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2151(INI)
European energy security strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
Cyber-attacks against the media - new level of threat to cybersecurity (debate)
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments - 2014/0014(COD) (B8-0362/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0014(COD)
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0054/2015 - Arnaud Danjean) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2220(INI)
Financing the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0136/2015 - Eduard Kukan, Indrek Tarand) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2258(INI)
Security and defence capabilities in Europe (A8-0159/2015 - Ana Gomes) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2037(INI)
Parliament's calendar of part-sessions – 2016 LT
2016/11/22
Trade, development and cooperation agreement with South Africa (Protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0146/2015 - Davor Ivo Stier) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0236(NLE)
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0153/2015 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0025(COD)
Information accompanying transfers of funds (A8-0154/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope, Peter Simon) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0024(COD)
Insolvency proceedings (A8-0155/2015 - Tadeusz Zwiefka) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0360(COD)
Self-certification of importers of minerals and metals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0059(COD)
Commission Delegated Directive ../…/EU amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, Annex III to Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards an exemption for cadmium in illumination and display lighting applications" (B8-0464/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2542(DEA)
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No …/.. amending Regulation (EC) No 376/2008 as regards the obligation to present a licence for imports of ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin (B8-0440/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2580(DEA)
Maternity leave (B8-0453/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2655(RSP)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (B8-0460/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2684(RSP)
Outbreak of Xylella fastidiosa affecting olive trees (B8-0450/2015, B8-0451/2015, B8-0451/2015, B8-0452/2015, B8-0456/2015, B8-0457/2015, B8-0458/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2652(RSP)
Decision adopted on the Digital Single Market (debate)
2016/11/22
Safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement with the Swiss Confederation (A8-0145/2015 - Andrzej Duda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0158(COD)
European Convention on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access (A8-0071/2015 - Pavel Svoboda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0361(NLE)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Viktor Uspaskich (A8-0149/2015 - Laura Ferrara) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2203(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Jérôme Lavrilleux (A8-0152/2015 - Heidi Hautala) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2014(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Janusz Korwin-Mikke (A8-0150/2015 - Kostas Chrysogonos) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2049(IMM)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Theodoros Zagorakis (A8-0151/2015 - Andrzej Duda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2071(IMM)
Request for consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty’ LT
2016/11/22
Request for consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee on "Possible evolutions and adjustments of the current institutional set up of the European Union" LT
2016/11/22
Request for consultation of the Committee of the Regions on "Possible evolutions and adjustments of the current institutional set up of the European Union" LT
2016/11/22
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (A8-0131/2015 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0314(COD)
Financing for development (A8-0143/2015 - Pedro Silva Pereira) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2044(INI)
Safer healthcare in Europe (A8-0142/2015 - Piernicola Pedicini) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2207(INI)
Green growth opportunities for SMEs (A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2209(INI)
Rules on VAT and VAT mini one-stop shop (MOSS) for digital services, books and papers in the EU (debate)
2016/11/22
Second anniversary of the Rana Plaza building collapse and the state of play of the Sustainability Compact (RC-B8-0363/2015, B8-0363/2015, B8-0364/2015, B8-0365/2015, B8-0366/2015, B8-0368/2015, B8-0372/2015, B8-0376/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2589(RSP)
Report of the extraordinary European Council meeting (23 April 2015) - The latest tragedies in the Mediterranean and EU migration and asylum policies (RC-B8-0367/2015, B8-0367/2015, B8-0377/2015, B8-0378/2015, B8-0379/2015, B8-0380/2015, B8-0381/2015, B8-0384/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2660(RSP)
Suspension of exceptional trade measures with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0060/2015 - Goffredo Maria Bettini) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0197(COD)
Persecution of the Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabaab (B8-0369/2015, RC-B8-0382/2015, B8-0382/2015, B8-0383/2015, B8-0385/2015, B8-0386/2015, B8-0387/2015, B8-0388/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2661(RSP)
Destruction of cultural sites perpetrated by ISIS/Da'esh (B8-0375/2015, B8-0375/2015, B8-0389/2015, B8-0390/2015, B8-0391/2015, B8-0393/2015, B8-0403/2015, B8-0405/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2649(RSP)
Situation in the Maldives (RC-B8-0392/2015, B8-0392/2015, B8-0395/2015, B8-0397/2015, B8-0399/2015, B8-0401/2015, B8-0402/2015, B8-0404/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2662(RSP)
2014 Progress Report on Albania (B8-0358/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2951(RSP)
Expo Milano 2015: Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life (B8-0360/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2574(RSP)
Situation in Nigeria (B8-0128/2015, B8-0129/2015, RC-B8-0370/2015, B8-0370/2015, B8-0371/2015, B8-0374/2015, B8-0394/2015, B8-0396/2015, B8-0398/2015, B8-0400/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2520(RSP)
Discharge 2013: European GNSS Agency (GNSS) (A8-0095/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2114(DEC)
Discharge 2013: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0103/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2132(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking (A8-0107/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2131(DEC)
Discharge 2013: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0104/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2135(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (A8-0112/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2134(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (A8-0106/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2133(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Joint Undertaking for ITER and the development of fusion energy (A8-0108/2015 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2129(DEC)
Discharge 2013: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0110/2015 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2130(DEC)
Money market funds (A8-0041/2015 - Neena Gill) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0306(COD)
Imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by specific Union import rules (A8-0016/2015 - Jarosław Wałęsa) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0177(COD)
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2016 - Section I - Parliament (A8-0144/2015 - Gérard Deprez) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2012(BUD)
European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0055/2015 - Monica Macovei) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0255(APP)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0116/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2079(DEC)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters with Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0017/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0206(COD)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0132/2015 - Andrzej Duda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0199(COD)
Application of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU to certain categories of horizontal state aid (A8-0029/2014 - Andrzej Duda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0192(NLE)
Rules for the application of Article 108 TFEU (A8-0047/2014 - Andrzej Duda) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0246(NLE)
Court of Auditors special reports in the context of the 2013 Commission discharge (A8-0067/2015 - Ingeborg Gräßle) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2140(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - 8th, 9th and 10th EDFs (A8-0102/2015 - Martina Dlabajová) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2077(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2078(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0109/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2086(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0105/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2083(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0115/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2084(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0118/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2139(DEC)
2013 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0070/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2139(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0117/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2123(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0081/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2124(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CDT) (A8-0084/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2101(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (A8-0079/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2087(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Police College (CEPOL) (A8-0086/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2112(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0074/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2106(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0085/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2126(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0072/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2120(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0069/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2109(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0073/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2116(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0083/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2099(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2115(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0097/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2108(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0098/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2119(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0096/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2121(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0077/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2125(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0075/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2102(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0068/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2090(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0088/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2105(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0089/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2110(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0078/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2111(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0087/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2122(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0090/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2104(DEC)
Discharge 2013 : European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (EU-LISA) (A8-0099/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2128(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0076/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2100(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Euratom Supply Agency (EURATOM) (A8-0119/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2117(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) (A8-0092/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2088(DEC)
Discharge 2013: The European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) (A8-0091/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2103(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Police Office (EUROPOL) (A8-0080/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2118(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) (A8-0093/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2089(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (FRONTEX) (A8-0094/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2113(DEC)
International Convention on standards for fishing vessel personnel (A8-0064/2015 - Sofia Ribeiro)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0285(NLE)
Draft amending budget No 2/2015: Revision of the MFF for 2014-2020 (A8-0138/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2013(BUD)
Deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system (A8-0053/2015 - Olga Sehnalová)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0165(COD)
Reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (A8-0130/2015 - Margrete Auken)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0371(COD)
European statistics (A8-0137/2015 - Hugues Bayet)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0084(COD)
Multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0128/2015 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0285(COD)
Landing obligation (A8-0060/2014 - Alain Cadec)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0436(COD)
Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Russia to take account of the accession of Croatia to the EU (A8-0129/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0052(NLE)
Implementation of the Bologna process (A8-0121/2015 - Krystyna Łybacka)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2039(INI)
A new EU Forest Strategy (A8-0126/2015 - Elisabeth Köstinger)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2223(INI)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/017 FR/Mory-Ducros (A8-0124/2015 - Jean-Paul Denanot)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2056(BUD)
Decision establishing the Employment Committee (A8-0065/2015 - Marita Ulvskog) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0801(CNS)
Amendment of the MFF 2014-2020 (A8-0125/2015 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0010(APP)
Armenian genocide 100th anniversary (RC-B8-0342/2015, B8-0342/2015, B8-0343/2015, B8-0344/2015, B8-0346/2015, B8-0347/2015, B8-0348/2015, B8-0349/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2590(RSP)
International Roma Day – anti-Gypsyism in Europe and EU recognition of the memorial day of the Roma genocide during WW II (B8-0326/2015) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2615(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/018 GR/Attica Broadcasting (A8-0050/2015 - Georgios Kyrtsos)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2031(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/015 GR/Attica Publishing activities (A8-0051/2015 - Lefteris Christoforou)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2032(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/016 IE/Lufthansa Technik (A8-0052/2015 - Victor Negrescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2045(BUD)
Request for waiver of the immunity of Viktor Uspaskich (A8-0061/2015 - Evelyn Regner)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2095(IMM)
Macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0056/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0005(COD)
Annual Tax report (A8-0040/2015 - Eva Kaili) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2144(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2015 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2015 - Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2212(INI)
Common rules for imports from certain third countries (A8-0014/2015 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0168(COD)
Establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (A8-0038/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0274(NLE)
Guidelines for the 2016 budget - Section III (A8-0027/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2008(BUD)
Annual report 2013 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0024/2015 - Georgi Pirinski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2155(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2015 (A8-0037/2015 - Dariusz Rosati)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2221(INI)
Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (A8-0018/2015 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2212(INI)
Fight against child sexual abuse on the Internet (RC-B8-0217/2015, B8-0217/2015, B8-0218/2015, B8-0219/2015, B8-0220/2015, B8-0226/2015, B8-0227/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2564(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/009 PL/Zachem (A8-0036/2015 - Jan Olbrycht)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2016(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/012 BE/ArcelorMittal (A8-0035/2015 - Victor Negrescu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2020(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/014 DE/Aleo Solar (A8-0030/2015 - Iris Hoffmann)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2018(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/007 BE/Hainaut Steel (Duferco-NLMK) (A8-0031/2015 - Andrej Plenković)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2019(BUD)
Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (A8-0032/2015 - Jörg Leichtfried)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0105(COD)
European long-term investment funds (A8-0021/2015 - Alain Lamassoure)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0214(COD)
Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions (A8-0022/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0265(COD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/011 BE/Saint-Gobain Sekurit (A8-0034/2015 - Liadh Ní Riada)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2017(BUD)
Progress on equality between women and men in the EU in 2013 (A8-0015/2015 - Marc Tarabella)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
Annual report on EU competition policy (A8-0019/2015 - Morten Messerschmidt)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2158(INI)
Impact of Russian restrictions on international road transport carriers (debate)
2016/11/22
Ombudsman's annual report 2013 (A8-0058/2014 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2159(INI)
Situation in Libya (RC-B8-0011/2015, B8-0011/2015, B8-0013/2015, B8-0014/2015, B8-0030/2015, B8-0031/2015, B8-0032/2015, B8-0033/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3018(RSP)
Situation in Ukraine (RC-B8-0008/2015, B8-0008/2015, B8-0018/2015, B8-0020/2015, B8-0021/2015, B8-0025/2015, B8-0027/2015, B8-0029/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2965(RSP)
Situation in Egypt (RC-B8-0012/2015, B8-0012/2015, B8-0019/2015, B8-0022/2015, B8-0023/2015, B8-0024/2015, B8-0026/2015, B8-0028/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3017(RSP)
The case of the two Italian "Marò" (RC-B8-0006/2015, B8-0006/2015, B8-0009/2015, B8-0010/2015, B8-0015/2015, B8-0016/2015, B8-0017/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2512(RSP)
Commission work programme 2015 (RC-B8-0001/2015, B8-0001/2015, B8-0007/2015, B8-0034/2015, B8-0035/2015, B8-0037/2015, B8-0038/2015, B8-0039/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2829(RSP)
Freedom of expression in Turkey: Recent arrests of journalists, media executives and systematic pressure against media (RC-B8-0036/2015, B8-0036/2015, B8-0040/2015, B8-0041/2015, B8-0042/2015, B8-0043/2015, B8-0044/2015, B8-0045/2015)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3011(RSP)
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and São Tomé and Príncipe: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0061/2014 - João Ferreira)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0115(NLE)
EU-Seychelles Agreement on access for fishing vessels to waters of Mayotte (A8-0055/2014 - Alain Cadec)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0079(NLE)
Request for consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee on "Implementation of the 2011 White Paper on Transport: taking stock and way forward towards sustainable mobility"
2016/11/22
Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs (A8-0038/2014 - Frédérique Ries) LT
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0208(COD)
Provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area (A8-0057/2014 - Gabriel Mato)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0213(COD)
Autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova (A8-0053/2014 - Sorin Moisă)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0250(COD)
Tariff treatment for goods originating from Ecuador (A8-0056/2014 - Helmut Scholz)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0287(COD)
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2014 (A8-0068/2014 - Gérard Deprez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2037(BUD)
Draft amending budget No 3/2014: Revenue from fines, interest payments, reimbursements and repayments – Payment appropriations – Establishment plans of the Commission, the Committee of the Regions and the European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0069/2014 - Gérard Deprez)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2036(BUD)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: Floods in Italy - Earthquakes in Greece - Ice in Slovenia - Ice and floods in Croatia. (A8-0073/2014 - Patricija Šulin)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2072(BUD)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: Floods in Serbia, Croatia and Bulgaria (A8-0075/2014 - José Manuel Fernandes)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2161(BUD)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: Regions affected by disasters (A8-0077/2014 - Siegfried Mureşan)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2038(BUD)
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) establishing a discard plan in the Baltic Sea (B8-0319/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2912(DEA)
Economic governance review of the 6-pack and 2-pack regulations (debate)
2016/11/22
Election of the Ombudsman
2016/11/22
Scientific examination of questions relating to food (A8-0059/2014 - Giovanni La Via)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0132(COD)
Renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology with Ukraine (A8-0039/2014 - Jerzy Buzek)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0154(NLE)
Participation of Croatia in the European Economic Area (A8-0026/2014 - Alexander Graf Lambsdorff)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0047(NLE)
Dock dues in the French outermost regions (A8-0054/2014 - Iskra Mihaylova)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0308(CNS)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/010 IT/Whirlpool (A8-0064/2014 - Daniele Viotti)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2170(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2013/006 PL/Fiat Auto Poland S.A. (A8-0062/2014 - Jan Olbrycht)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2181(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/013 EL/Odyssefs Fokas (A8-0063/2014 - Monika Vana)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2183(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France (A8-0065/2014 - Marco Zanni)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2185(BUD)
Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank (A8-0027/2014 - Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0808(CNS)
The powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (A8-0028/2014 - Kay Swinburne)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0807(CNS)
2014 UN Climate Change Conference - COP 20 in Lima, Peru (1-12 December 2014) (B8-0251/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2777(RSP)
Digital single market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2973(RSP)
Protocol on matters specific to railway rolling stock (A8-0030/2014 - Heidi Hautala)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0184(NLE)
Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on choice of Court agreements (A8-0034/2014 - Pavel Svoboda)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0021(NLE)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/008 FI/STX Rauma (A8-0043/2014 - Petri Sarvamaa)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2137(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/005 FR/GAD (A8-0044/2014 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2137(BUD)
Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Canadian Border Services Agency (B8-0265/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2966(RSP)
The EU and the global development framework after 2015 (A8-0037/2014 - Davor Ivo Stier)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2143(INI)
Employment and social aspects of the EU2020 strategy (B8-0252/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2779(RSP)
Conclusion of an Association agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova (A8-0022/2014 - Petras Auštrevičius)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2817(INI)
Association agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova (A8-0020/2014 - Petras Auštrevičius)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0083(NLE)
Peace process in Northern Ireland (B8-0218/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2906(RSP)
Peace process in Northern Ireland (B8-0218/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2906(RSP)
Humanitarian situation in South Sudan (RC-B8-0213/2014, B8-0213/2014, B8-0214/2014, B8-0215/2014, B8-0219/2014, B8-0220/2014, B8-0222/2014, B8-0224/2014)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2922(RSP)
Customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine (A8-0021/2014 - Gabrielius Landsbergis)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0279(COD)
Election of the Commission
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities (A8-0019/2014 - Philippe De Backer)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2059(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2059(INI)
Customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0279(COD)
Roll-out of the European Youth Initiative (debate)
2016/11/22
EU-Ukraine association agreement, with the exception of the treatment of third country nationals legally employed as workers in the territory of the other party (A8-0002/2014 - Jacek Saryusz-Wolski)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0151A(NLE)
Impact on European agriculture of the trade ban on agricultural products and foodstuffs from the EU, imposed by the Russian Federation (debate)
2016/11/22
Adoption by Lithuania of the euro on 1 January 2015 (debate)
2016/11/22
Adoption by Lithuania of the euro on 1 January 2015 (debate)
2016/11/22

Shadow reports (5)

RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union PDF (428 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2013/0027(COD)
Documents: PDF(428 KB) DOC(76 KB)
REPORT on the Single Market Strategy PDF (396 KB) DOC (175 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2015/2354(INI)
Documents: PDF(396 KB) DOC(175 KB)
REPORT on Non-Tariff Barriers in the Single Market PDF (292 KB) DOC (104 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2015/2346(INI)
Documents: PDF(292 KB) DOC(104 KB)
REPORT on the Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 PDF (455 KB) DOC (124 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2015/2256(INI)
Documents: PDF(455 KB) DOC(124 KB)
REPORT on Single Market governance within the European Semester 2015 PDF (210 KB) DOC (123 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2014/2212(INI)
Documents: PDF(210 KB) DOC(123 KB)

Shadow opinions (9)

OPINION on the comprehensive European industrial policy on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2018/2088(INI)
Documents: PDF(185 KB) DOC(68 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on addressing geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2016/0152(COD)
Documents: PDF(709 KB) DOC(158 KB)
OPINION on the implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2016/2064(INI)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(63 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2015/0268(COD)
Documents: PDF(207 KB) DOC(821 KB)
OPINION on virtual currencies
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(185 KB)
OPINION on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2015/2210(INI)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(192 KB)
OPINION on the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2014/2256(INI)
Documents: PDF(117 KB) DOC(182 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Fund for Strategic Investments and amending Regulations (EU) No 1291/2013 and (EU) No 1316/2013
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(788 KB)
OPINION on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2014/2059(INI)
Documents: PDF(117 KB) DOC(316 KB)

Institutional motions (74)

JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, in particular the situation of the Rohingya PDF (164 KB) DOC (86 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2809(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain PDF (157 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2808(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of people with albinism in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (162 KB) DOC (86 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2807(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Djibouti PDF (176 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2694(RSP)
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(93 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The Gambia PDF (163 KB) DOC (88 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2693(RSP)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Crimean Tatars PDF (158 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2692(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria PDF (167 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2649(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Honduras: situation of human rights defenders PDF (162 KB) DOC (85 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2648(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the attack in Lahore PDF (159 KB) DOC (85 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2644(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of the missing book publishers in Hong Kong PDF (157 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2558(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain: the case of Mohammed Ramadan PDF (149 KB) DOC (82 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2557(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(82 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars PDF (155 KB) DOC (80 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2556(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Malaysia PDF (157 KB) DOC (79 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (285 KB) DOC (84 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3017(RSP)
Documents: PDF(285 KB) DOC(84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ibrahim Halawa, potentially facing the death penalty PDF (287 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3016(RSP)
Documents: PDF(287 KB) DOC(83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ibrahim Halawa, potentially facing the death penalty PDF (268 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3016(RSP)
Documents: PDF(268 KB) DOC(70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of two Christian pastors in Sudan PDF (146 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2766(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain, in particular the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (155 KB) DOC (80 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2758(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in particular the case of the two detained human rights activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma PDF (159 KB) DOC (89 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2757(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(89 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia’s draft laws on NGOs and trade unions PDF (153 KB) DOC (79 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2756(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (155 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2760(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan, "Situation of two Christian pastors" PDF (165 KB) DOC (74 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2766(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain, in particular the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (153 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2758(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The Democratic Republic of CONGO, the case of two detained human rights activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma PDF (167 KB) DOC (78 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2757(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(78 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia, draft laws on NGOs and trade unions PDF (166 KB) DOC (69 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2756(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(69 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (147 KB) DOC (79 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2760(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nepal following the earthquakes PDF (178 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2734(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria: situation in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish PDF (191 KB) DOC (87 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2732(RSP)
Documents: PDF(191 KB) DOC(87 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Paraguay: legal aspects related to child pregnancy PDF (157 KB) DOC (82 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2733(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(82 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nepal after the earthquakes PDF (135 KB) DOC (65 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2734(RSP)
Documents: PDF(135 KB) DOC(65 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Paraguay: the legal aspects related to the child pregnancy PDF (150 KB) DOC (71 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2733(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(71 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria, the situation in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish PDF (146 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2732(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(73 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the plight of Rohingya refugees, including the mass graves in Thailand PDF (138 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2711(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(68 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe, the case of human rights defender Itai Dzamara PDF (140 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2710(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the plight of Rohingya refugees, including the mass graves in Thailand PDF (138 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2711(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe, the case of human rights defender Itai Dzamara PDF (155 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2710(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the imprisonment of workers and human rights activists in Algeria PDF (144 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2665(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Nadiya Savchenko PDF (136 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2663(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Yarmouk refugee camp in Syria PDF (145 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2664(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nigeria PDF (154 KB) DOC (80 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2520(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(80 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the imprisonment of human and workers' rights activists in Algeria PDF (148 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2665(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Yarmouk refugee camp in Syria PDF (133 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2664(RSP)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Nadiya Savchenko PDF (132 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2663(RSP)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent atrocities in Northern Nigeria PDF (131 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2520(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the killing of students in Kenya by terror group al-Shabaab PDF (131 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2661(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania, notably the issue of land grabbing PDF (145 KB) DOC (71 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2604(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(71 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (151 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2603(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks and abductions by Da’esh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians PDF (150 KB) DOC (75 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2599(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(75 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the murder of the Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and the state of democracy in Russia PDF (150 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2592(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (143 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism PDF (142 KB) DOC (67 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2573(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(67 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s priorities for the UN Human Rights Council in 2015 PDF (183 KB) DOC (104 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2572(RSP)
Documents: PDF(183 KB) DOC(104 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania, notably the issue of land grabbing PDF (134 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2604(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (140 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2603(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks and abductions by Daesh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians PDF (131 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2599(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the murder of the Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and the state of democracy in Russia PDF (133 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2592(RSP)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela PDF (134 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan: the case of Dr Amin Mekki Medani PDF (144 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3000(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(73 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Mauritania, in particular the case of Biram Dah Abeid PDF (144 KB) DOC (69 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2999(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(69 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the persecution of the democratic opposition in Venezuela PDF (142 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2998(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan, the case of Dr. Amin Mekki Medani PDF (129 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3000(RSP)
Documents: PDF(129 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Mauritania, in particular the case of Biram Dah Arbeid PDF (139 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2999(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Persecution of the democratic opposition in Venezuela PDF (140 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2998(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Serbia: the case of accused war criminal Šešelj PDF (136 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2970(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(63 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan: blasphemy laws PDF (156 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2969(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the revision of the Commission’s impact assessment guidelines and the role of the SME test PDF (142 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2967(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the digital single market PDF (159 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2973(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights in Uzbekistan PDF (137 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2904(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(68 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the closing-down of the NGO ‘Memorial’ (winner of the 2009 Sakharov Prize) in Russia PDF (146 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2903(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the dissappearance of 43 teaching students in Mexico PDF (131 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2905(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Closing down of Memorial (Sakharov Prize 2009) in Russia PDF (136 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2903(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ukraine and state of play of EU-Russia relations PDF (131 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2841(RSP)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Youth Employment PDF (125 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2713(RSP)
Documents: PDF(125 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ukraine PDF (130 KB) DOC (62 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2717(RSP)
Documents: PDF(130 KB) DOC(62 KB)

Oral questions (3)

Call for a limitation of abusive fees charged for cross-border intra-EU phone calls and SMSs in the upcoming review of the telecoms framework PDF (106 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Germany's law on minimum wage PDF (199 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Compliance of the German provisions on the minimum wage with European law PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC

Written explanations (764)

Eurojust-Denmark Agreement on judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0192/2019 - Claude Moraes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report approves the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Criminal Justice Cooperation between Eurojust and the Kingdom of Denmark.
2016/11/22
Coordination of social security systems (A8-0386/2018 - Guillaume Balas)

I voted against the report. The proposed revision aims to facilitate the free movement of workers and to protect their rights while reinforcing the tools for national authorities to fight risks of abuse or fraud. However, the compromise texts were not discussed enough and many unresolved problematic areas, for example regarding the mobility of workers, remain.
2016/11/22
CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0354/2018 - Bas Eickhout)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal sets, for the first time ever, CO2 emissions performance standards for lorries. Parliament adopted the 15% reduction for 2025 and 30% from 2030. The latter will be assessed during the review in 2022 in accordance with the European Union commitments under the Paris Agreement.
2016/11/22
Promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles (A8-0321/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb)

I voted in favour of the report, which agreed on minimum procurement targets at Member State level. Proposed targets for light-duty vehicles will be increased by 10%. For heavy-duty vehicles, the targets for buses are set for clean vehicles at up to 45% for 2025 and up to 65% for 2030 and half of the targets are to be met by zero-emission vehicles.
2016/11/22
Use of digital tools and processes in company law (A8-0422/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the agreement is to give European entrepreneurs a modern, safe and transparent environment in which to operate and to facilitate establishing a business electronically and promote online operations throughout a company’s lifecycle.
2016/11/22
Cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions (A8-0002/2019 - Evelyn Regner)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the agreement is to make it easier for companies to move within the Single Market. The new rules will allow companies to retain their legal personality throughout the transformation procedure, while at the same time effective safeguards will be introduced to prevent cross-border operations designed for abusive, fraudulent or criminal purposes.
2016/11/22
European Defence Fund (A8-0412/2018 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)

I voted in favour of the report. The establishment of the EUR 13 billion European Defence Fund leads Europe one step closer to a fully-fledged EU defence research programme.
2016/11/22
Exposures in the form of covered bonds (A8-0384/2018 - Bernd Lucke)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed Directive defines covered bonds as debt obligations issued by credit institutions and secured against a ring-fenced pool of assets to which bondholders have direct recourse as preferred creditors. The Directive, in continuity with this tradition, only allows credit institutions to issue covered bonds.
2016/11/22
InvestEU (A8-0482/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes, Roberto Gualtieri)

I voted in favour of the report. The InvestEU Fund is the Union’s new investment instrument for the period 2021-2027. It brings together the multitude of financial programmes currently available and expands the successful model of the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI).
2016/11/22
European Maritime Single Window environment (A8-0006/2019 - Deirdre Clune)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission will establish a complete list of harmonised data elements to be reported (the ‘EMSWe data set’). Each Member State will have to establish a national single window (building on the existing structures) where all the required information would be provided once (the ‘once-only principle’), and be responsible for the development, availability, maintenance, security and operation of its national window.
2016/11/22
Disclosures relating to sustainable investments and sustainability risks (A8-0363/2018 - Paul Tang)

I voted in favour of the report. The current disclosure requirements set out in EU legislation do not envisage disclosing all of the information that can be considered as necessary to properly inform end investors about the sustainability-related impact of their investments. The regulation requests disclosure of more information on the sustainability of investment portfolios, both in terms of composition and risks.
2016/11/22
Persistent organic pollutants (A8-0336/2018 - Julie Girling)

I voted in favour of the report. The recast proposal ensures the alignment of the existing regulation with the latest amendments to the Stockholm Convention (the UN-agreed list of dangerous substances), which provides the global legal framework for the elimination of the production, use, import and export of persistent organic pollutants.
2016/11/22
Clearing obligation, reporting requirements and risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives, and trade repositories (A8-0181/2018 - Werner Langen)

I voted in favour of the report. This is the first review of the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). The objective is to simplify the rules applicable to over—the—counter derivatives and make them more proportionate in order to reduce costs and the regulatory burden weighing on market participants, without putting at risk financial stability.
2016/11/22
Authorisation of CCPs and recognition of third-country CCPs (A8-0190/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner)

I voted in favour of the report. This proposal aims to introduce specific amendments to the EMIR and ESMA regulations with a view to establishing clear and coherent supervisory arrangements for CCPs established in the EU and in third countries. The objective is to ensure that the EU authorities and national authorities are able to cope with a failing CCP, maintain financial stability and avoid that costs associated with the restructuring and the resolution of failing CCPs fall on taxpayers.
2016/11/22
Promotion of the use of SME growth markets (A8-0437/2018 - Anne Sander)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim is to provide cheaper and easier access to ‘SME growth markets’, a recently introduced category of trading venue dedicated to small issuers. The administrative burden and high compliance costs faced by SMEs trying to list and issue securities are currently too high.
2016/11/22
Negotiations with Council and Commission on European Parliament's right of inquiry: legislative proposal (B8-0238/2019)

I voted in favour of the report. The resolution calls on the political parties to ensure that their election programmes express their commitment to Parliament’s proposal for a new and updated regulation on its right of inquiry, and invites the different Spitzenkandidaten to offer their public and political support on this matter.
2016/11/22
A comprehensive European Union framework on endocrine disruptors (B8-0241/2019)

I voted in favour. The MfR calls on the Commission to swiftly take all the necessary action to ensure a high level of protection for humans and the environment against exposure to endocrine disruptors and to promote research in this field. Moreover the MfR calls on the Commission to make, no later than June 2020, legislative proposals aimed at inserting specific provisions on endocrine disruptors in other pieces of legislation which have not been updated so far.
2016/11/22
European Border and Coast Guard (A8-0076/2019 - Roberta Metsola)

I voted in favour of the report. The Joint statement of the European Parliament and of the Council, annexed to the legislative resolution, on the possible mechanisms to ensure the attractiveness of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in terms of fulfilling exceptional needs for recruiting, training and retaining qualified staff from the broadest possible geographical basis, was approved with a large majority.
2016/11/22
Interpretation of Rule 32(5), first subparagraph, second indent of the Rules of Procedure

. ‒ I voted in favour regarding the text update of the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, Rule 32(5) regarding ‘Establishment and dissolution of political groups’.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Denmark Agreement on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum and 'Eurodac' (A8-0196/2019 - Ignazio Corrao)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The negotiations on an agreement between the European Union and Denmark on the modalities of the participation by Denmark in the procedure for comparison and data transmission for law enforcement purposes foreseen in Chapter VI of the ‘recast’ Eurodac Regulation have been finalised and an Agreement in the form of a Protocol to the abovementioned Agreement of 8 March 2006, extending the application of the Agreement of 8 March 2006 to law enforcement, was initialled.
2016/11/22
Establishing Horizon Europe – laying down its rules for participation and dissemination (A8-0401/2018 - Dan Nica)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It is the biggest research framework programme worldwide for the period 2021—2027, tackling major challenges such as digitisation, health, including paediatric cancer, climate change and industrial transformation processes.
2016/11/22
Programme implementing Horizon Europe (A8-0410/2018 - Christian Ehler)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The budget for the programme is increased to EUR 120 billion. Also, other major improvements are included such as simplifications are added with a fast-track procedure of maximum six months, as well as in the audit and accounting procedures, excellence is safeguarded as sole criterion for the European Research Council, etc.
2016/11/22
Market surveillance and compliance of products (A8-0277/2018 - Nicola Danti)

I voted in favour of the report. This regulation’s proposal is part of the ‘The Goods Package’ presented by the Commission in December 2017 and it aims at strengthening compliance and enforcement of EU product rules by intensifying compliance checks. This Regulation applies to products that are subject to the Union harmonisation legislation.
2016/11/22
Promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services (A8-0444/2018 - Christel Schaldemose)

I voted in favour of the report. The Regulation aims at improving the functioning of the Digital Single Market to safeguard a fair, predictable, transparent, sustainable and trusted business environment in the online economy for smaller businesses and traders when using online platforms. Businesses such as hotels, traders selling online, app developers, and other similar companies that rely on search engines for attracting internet traffic to their websites are amongst those who will benefit from the new rules.
2016/11/22
Better enforcement and modernisation of EU consumer protection rules (A8-0029/2019 - Daniel Dalton)

. ‒ I voted against the report. The final agreement did not manage successfully to cover one of the biggest issues on the European single market – dual quality products. Central and eastern European Member States suffer significantly and I do not accept such a discrimination. I want to have a fair EU single market, fair for all Member States, therefore I do not want to settle for a worse deal.
2016/11/22
Transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain (A8-0417/2018 - Pilar Ayuso)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the proposal is to strengthen transparency in the risk assessment process and provide additional guarantees in terms of reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies used by EFSA in risk assessments.
2016/11/22
Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (A8-0039/2019 - Luis de Grandes Pascual)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the regulation is to introduce an exception that will allow EU-based companies to manufacture a generic or biosimilar version of an SPC-protected medicine during the term of the certificate, either for exporting these products to third countries or creating a stock in order to enter the EU market immediately after the protection has expired.
2016/11/22
Space programme of the Union and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (A8-0405/2018 - Massimiliano Salini)

I voted in favour of the report. The EU Space Programme will consolidate all space-related activities of the EU into one single Regulation. The Programme will ensure investment continuity in EU space activities. Also, it will also exploit the growing possibilities that space offers for the security of Europeans, including by make the most of synergies between the civil and defence sectors.
2016/11/22
Digital Europe Programme for the period 2021-2027 (A8-0408/2018 - Angelika Mlinar)

I voted in favour of the report. It is the first European Programme to increase the EU capabilities and strengthen the EU’s competitiveness in five priorities of the digital agenda: high performance computing, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, digital skills and digital deployment.
2016/11/22
Fiscalis programme for cooperation in the field of taxation (A8-0421/2018 - Sven Giegold)

I voted in favour of the report. Fiscalis is an EU cooperation programme, which enables national tax administrations to create and exchange information and expertise. The proposal is part of the package for the next MFF for the period 2021-2027.
2016/11/22
Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) (A8-0397/2018 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)

I voted in favour of the report. Projects under the new Clean Energy Transition sub-programme of the LIFE Programme should focus on the creation of capacity building and diffusion of knowledge, skills, innovative techniques, methods and solutions for reaching the objectives of the Union legislation and policy on the transition to renewable energy and increased energy efficiency. This aims at small and middle-size stakeholders, multiple actors including local and regional public authorities and non-profit organisations, as they are typically engaged in these fields.
2016/11/22
Justice programme (A8-0068/2019 - Josef Weidenholzer, Heidi Hautala)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the Justice programme is to support training of the judiciary and judicial staff as a tool to improve judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgements and of judicial decisions.
2016/11/22
Rights and Values programme (A8-0468/2018 - Bodil Valero)

I voted in favour of the report. The report creates a new programme which results from the grouping of existing the Europe for Citizens Programme and the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme. It is one of two programmes under the Justice, Rights and Values Fund.
2016/11/22
Adapting a number of legal acts in the area of Justice providing for the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to Article 290 TFEU (A8-0012/2018 - József Szájer)

I voted in favour of the report. Following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, a number of pre-Lisbon acts containing a reference to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS) still requires adaptation to Articles 290 TFEU. The Proposal covers, as indicated before, the legal acts included in the three legislative alignment proposals adopted by the Commission in 2013 plus an act which was not covered by the 2013 proposal, but which requires alignment, and that has been added to this Proposal.
2016/11/22
Implementation and financing of the EU general budget for 2019 in relation to the UK's withdrawal from the Union (A8-0197/2019 - Jean Arthuis)

I voted in favour. This regulation provides a legal basis for the United Kingdom to pay its budgetary contribution to the 2019 EU budget, in the event of a no-deal exit this year. This will allow for the UK, persons or entities established in the UK, to continue receiving Union funding, for eligible expenditure incurred in 2019.
2016/11/22
EU-Russia Agreement on cooperation in science and technology (A8-0188/2019 - Christian Ehler)

I voted in favour. It gives its consent to extent the ‘Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation’ (S&T Agreement) which exists since 2001. Since then, the Agreement has been renewed three times in 2004, 2009 and 2014 for an additional period of five years each time. It is in the interest of the EU to renew this Agreement in order to continue to facilitate cooperation with the Russian Federation in common S&T priority areas leading to benefits for both parties.
2016/11/22
Amendment of the European Investment Bank's Statute (A8-0189/2019 - Danuta Maria Hübner)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the targeted amendments proposed by the EIB is to adapt the statute of the Bank to the new situation created by the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 105(3): Deployment and operational use of cooperative intelligent transport systems (B8-0239/2019)

I voted in favour of the objection. The Delegated Act is not technology neutral, a fact that is unacceptable because the European Commission should not put preference of a technology over the other, no matter whether one is already present.
2016/11/22
Visa Code (A8-0434/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed changes to the Visa Code will make it easier for legitimate travellers to obtain a visa to come to Europe, facilitating tourism, trade and business, whilst strengthening security.
2016/11/22
Conservation and control measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (A8-0017/2019 - Ricardo Serrão Santos)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal covers conservation and management measures, among which provisions on catch limitations, closure of fisheries, transfer of quotas, by-catches and provisions for research vessels. It also contains a regulation on bottom fishing activities, technical measures and a series of control measures including provisions to prevent illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
2016/11/22
Rules facilitating the use of financial and other information (A8-0442/2018 - Emil Radev)

I voted in favour of the report. The report forms part of the Action plan on strengthening the fight against terrorist financing, complementing the Anti-Money Laundering Directive 5. The proposal provides for direct access to the national centralised bank account registries or data retrieval systems to competent authorities. It facilitates the cooperation between the FIUs and FIUs and competent authorities and use of the financial and other information for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of certain criminal offences.
2016/11/22
European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and Network of National Coordination Centres (A8-0084/2019 - Julia Reda)

I voted in favour of the report. European Cybersecurity Competence Centre is linked to the implementation of the cybersecurity aspects of both, the Horizon Europe and the Digital Europe programme. The Centre will establish and support a network of national centres to facilitate cooperation on cybersecurity.
2016/11/22
Connecting Europe Facility (A8-0409/2018 - Henna Virkkunen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Pavel Telička)

I voted in favour of the report. The CEF Programme beyond 2020 will continue to accelerate investment in the field of TEN with the aim to complete (60% of the budgetary resources) and modernise (40% of the budgetary resources) the networks taking into account climate objectives and climate tracking requirements, making explicit horizontal objectives and priorities.
2016/11/22
Tackling the dissemination of terrorist content online (A8-0193/2019 - Daniel Dalton)

I voted against the report. The proposed agreement creates unnecessary burden for e-commerce companies, especially for SMEs and start-ups regarding the removal of the possible terrorists content within 1 h. Most of the small companies do not have a capacity for that. Also, the Commission did not conduct an impact assessment which would prove the advantage of the removal of the content within 1h.
2016/11/22
Community statistics on migration and international protection (A8-0395/2018 - Cecilia Wikström)

I voted in favour of the report. The main goal is to revise and complete the legal basis for existing data collections of European statistics on migration and international protection already conducted by most national authorities, while providing the necessary flexibility to adapt to future data needs. Further data on several new types of migration and migrants are needed, and they have to be more precise, more frequent and timely.
2016/11/22
EU Accession to the Geneva Act on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (A8-0187/2019 - Virginie Rozière)

I voted in favour. The adoption gives consent to the accession of the Union to the Geneva Act in order for the Union to fully exercise its exclusive competence in relation the common commercial policy. This proposal will allow the effective participation of the Union to Lisbon Union.
2016/11/22
Action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (A8-0036/2019 - Virginie Rozière)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The adoption gives consent to the accession of the Union to the Geneva Act in order for the Union to fully exercise its exclusive competence in relation to the common commercial policy. This proposal will allow the effective participation of the Union in the Lisbon Union.
2016/11/22
EU-Philippines Agreement on certain aspects of air services (A8-0191/2019 - Jozo Radoš)

I voted in favour. The Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of the Philippines that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the Republic of the Philippines.
2016/11/22
International Agreement on olive oil and table olives (A8-0186/2019 - Eleonora Forenza)

I voted in favour. In November 2013, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations on behalf of the Union in order to conclude a new international agreement on olive oil and table olives. The Agreement establishes a decision making body, called the Council of Members, which exercises all powers and performs all the functions necessary to achieve the objectives of the Agreement.
2016/11/22
Protection of persons reporting on breaches of Union law (A8-0398/2018 - Virginie Rozière)

I voted in favour of the report. It sets out a set of common minimum standards providing for robust protection against retaliation for whistle-blowers reporting on breaches of EU law in specific policy areas where there is a need to strengthen enforcement and breaches may result in serious harm to the public interest.
2016/11/22
Cross-border distribution of collective investment undertakings (Directive) (A8-0430/2018 - Wolf Klinz)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to remove the current regulatory barriers to the cross-border distribution of investment funds in order to make their cross-border distribution simpler, faster and cheaper. It seeks to harmonise the procedure and requirements on marketing communications by the national competent authorities. The proposal improves transparency by harmonising national marketing requirements and regulatory fees.
2016/11/22
Cross-border distribution of collective investment undertakings (Regulation) (A8-0431/2018 - Wolf Klinz)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to remove the current regulatory barriers to the cross-border distribution of investment funds in order to make their cross-border distribution simpler, faster and cheaper. The adopted regulation seeks to harmonise the procedure and requirements on marketing communications by the national competent authorities. The proposal improves transparency by harmonising national marketing requirements and regulatory fees.
2016/11/22
Capital Requirements (Regulation) (A8-0242/2018 - Peter Simon)

I voted in favour for the report. The proposal includes more risk-sensitive capital requirements, in particular in the area of market risk, counterparty credit risk, and exposures to central counterparties (CCPs) and a binding Leverage Ratio (LR) to prevent institutions from building up excessive leverage. The texts adopted includes a binding Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) to address banks' excessive reliance on short-term wholesale funding and to reduce long-term funding risk and more proportionate and flexible reporting and remuneration requirements for smaller and less complex banks.
2016/11/22
Capital Requirements (Directive) (A8-0243/2018 - Peter Simon)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal includes more risk-sensitive capital requirements, in particular in the area of market risk, counterparty credit risk, and exposures to central counterparties (CCPs) and a binding Leverage Ratio (LR) to prevent institutions from building up excessive leverage. The texts adopted includes a binding Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) to address banks’ excessive reliance on short-term wholesale funding and to reduce long-term funding risk and more proportionate and flexible reporting and remuneration requirements for smaller and less-complex banks.
2016/11/22
Loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity for credit institutions and investment firms (Regulation) (A8-0216/2018 - Gunnar Hökmark)

I voted in favour of the report. It is a part of the Banking Package. The proposal aims at aligning the EU framework with and implement the internationally agreed standards on total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC). Overall, the package should help to reduce risks in the banking sector and create greater financial stability.
2016/11/22
Loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity of credit institutions and investment firms (Directive) (A8-0218/2018 - Gunnar Hökmark)

I voted in favour of the report. It is a part of the Banking Package. The proposal aims at aligning the EU framework with, and implementing, the internationally-agreed standards on total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC). Overall, the package should help to reduce risks in the banking sector and create greater financial stability.
2016/11/22
Sovereign bond-backed securities (A8-0180/2019 - Jonás Fernández)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to enable a market-demand-led development of Sovereign Bond-Backed Securities (SBBSs), to support further integration and diversification within Europe’s financial sector, leading to a stronger and more resilient Economic and Monetary Union.
2016/11/22
European Supervisory Authorities and financial markets (A8-0013/2019 - Othmar Karas, Pervenche Berès)

I voted in favour of the report. The revision of the supervisory authority will increase the responsibilities of the EU watchdogs for banking, for securities and financial markets, and for insurance and pensions, and improve their governance structure. This will allow them to keep up with the increasingly complex world of finance, thereby protecting consumers and taxpayers better, and settle disputes and breaches of EU law more effectively.
2016/11/22
European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board (A8-0011/2019 - Othmar Karas, Pervenche Berès)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims to improve the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board, so that it can better monitor risks in the EU financial system.
2016/11/22
Markets in financial instruments and taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (A8-0012/2019 - Othmar Karas, Pervenche Berès)

I voted in favour of the report. The objective of the review is to adjust the European supervisory authorities framework to ensure they can assume an enhanced responsibility for financial market supervision.
2016/11/22
Prudential supervision of investment firms (Directive) (A8-0295/2018 - Markus Ferber)

I voted in favour of the report. It revises and simplifies existing EU rules governing the prudential treatment of investment firms in order to better accommodate and address risks in their business models and to improve the level playing field among firms and enhance supervisory convergence.
2016/11/22
Prudential requirements of investment firms (Regulation) (A8-0296/2018 - Markus Ferber)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed regulation lays down requirements in terms of own funds, levels of minimum capital, concentration risk, liquidity, reporting and public disclosure for all investment firms that are not systemic.
2016/11/22
Transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union (A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon)

I voted in favour of the report. The new rules reinforce the type of information provided by the employer, shorten the deadline to provide information and provide new material rights such as the right to compensation when the employer cancels the work assignment after a specific deadline, and the right to cost-free mandatory training.
2016/11/22
European Labour Authority (A8-0391/2018 - Jeroen Lenaers)

I voted in favour of the report. The newly-created authority will enforce the implementation of the legislation related to ensuring fair labour mobility within EU. ELA will support the Member states in their efforts towards fighting fraud and unfair practices and will facilitate their cooperation in this aspect. The seat of the new body is still to be decided according to a specially-launched procedure and the EP is looking forward to its completion.
2016/11/22
Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures (A8-0381/2017 - Gabriel Mato)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims at enhancing regionalisation for tailored made measures adapted to the specificities of each fishery and each sea basin, reducing ‘micro-management’ and rigid technical rules, adopting a more flexible, simplified, results-based management, ensuring greater involvement of the sector in decisions on the CFP.
2016/11/22
Regulation on European business statistics (A8-0094/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)

I voted in favour of the report. In the context of the work of reviewing the fitness of current regulations (REFIT), the Commission decided to repeal 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics and replace them with one. This simplification puts an end to legal fragmentation in the field of European business statistics.
2016/11/22
OLAF investigations and cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0179/2019 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report. It proposes further measures, such as a better protection of persons involved in OLAF investigations. Also, other measures are the laying down of a procedural code, improving the Supervisory Committee’s access to information, a faster closure of investigations and the admissibility of OLAF reports in national judicial proceedings.
2016/11/22
Establishing the instrument for financial support for customs control equipment (A8-0460/2018 - Jiří Pospíšil)

I voted in favour of the report. The New instrument would ensure financial support for customs control equipment hardware: purchase, maintenance, and upgrades such as new scanners, automated number plate detection systems, mobile laboratories for sample analysis.
2016/11/22
Establishing the 'Customs' programme for cooperation in the field of customs (A8-0464/2018 - Maria Grapini)

I voted in favour of the report. The Programme covers financing for Member State cooperation such as information exchange and IT systems, exchange of best practices, training, in the field of customs. The report, however, asks for stricter obligations as regards reporting and underlines the importance of avoiding any misuse of EU money.
2016/11/22
Marketing and use of explosives precursors (A8-0473/2018 - Andrejs Mamikins)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to amend the existing legal framework in order to address a series of challenges faced by Member States and the supply chain when implementing the current Regulation. It harmonises the restrictions regarding explosives precursors across the EU and thereby makes it more difficult for terrorists to obtain the necessary substances for ‘homemade explosives’ such as the ones used in recent terrorist attacks. Moreover, the proposal seeks to increase the capacity of everyone involved in implementing and enforcing the restrictions and controls.
2016/11/22
Common framework for European statistics relating to persons and households (A8-0247/2017 - Tamás Meszerics)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to establish a common framework for European statistics relating to persons and households, based on data at individual level collected from samples. This is necessary to simplify and make more efficient the data collections in the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the strengthening of economic governance.
2016/11/22
Interoperability between EU information systems in the field of borders and visa (A8-0347/2018 - Jeroen Lenaers)

I voted in favour of the report. Recent terrorist attacks have brought this into even greater focus, highlighting the urgent need for information systems to be interoperable and to eliminate the current blind spots where terrorist suspects can be recorded in different, unconnected databases under different aliases. The proposal aims to establish a framework for interoperability between EU information systems (borders and visas) and amend the relevant legislation in force as a consequence.
2016/11/22
Interoperability between EU information systems in the field of police and judicial cooperation, asylum and migration (A8-0348/2018 - Nuno Melo)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to establish a framework for interoperability between EU information systems – police and judicial cooperation, asylum and migration.
2016/11/22
European network of immigration liaison officers (A8-0040/2019 - Cécile Kashetu Kyenge)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to enhance coordination and to optimise the utilisation of immigration liaison officers (ILOs) deployed in third countries to enable them to respond more effectively to EU priorities in the field of migration and cross-border crime, mainly through a better exchange of information horizontally (between liaison officers deployed in the same location) and vertically (between the liaison officers of Member States’ national authorities, the EU institutions and EU agencies).
2016/11/22
Type-approval requirements for motor vehicles as regards general safety (A8-0151/2019 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)

I voted in favour of the report. The Regulation aims at bringing together two aspects of safety, those related to vehicle users (drivers and passengers) and those related to vulnerable road users (mainly pedestrians and cyclists) in a single and coherent legal text.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Georgios Epitideios (A8-0185/2019 - Angel Dzhambazki)

I voted in favour of the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Georgios Epitideios in accordance with the recommendations by the JURI Committee.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Lampros Fountoulis (A8-0183/2019 - Angel Dzhambazki)

I voted in favour of the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Lampros Fountoulis in accordance with the recommendations by the JURI Committee.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Eleftherios Synadinos (A8-0184/2019 - Angel Dzhambazki)

I voted in favour of the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Eleftherios Synadinos in accordance with the recommendations by the JURI Committee.
2016/11/22
Listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, as regards the UK's withdrawal from the EU (A8-0047/2019 - Sergei Stanishev)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to provide UK citizens with the possibility of visa-free travel to the EU after the United Kingdomʼs withdrawal from the European Union.
2016/11/22
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0177/2019 - Miroslavs Mitrofanovs)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Employment guidelines are common priorities and targets for employment policies proposed by the Commission, agreed by national governments. This year, the Commission proposes to maintain the guidelines from 2018 with no changes. According to the Commission, there are no such developments in the economic and labour market situation that would require the change of priorities and targets.
2016/11/22
Waste management (B8-0231/2019)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The resolution calls on Member States and industries, as key partners in the waste management sector, to improve their engagement in promoting circular supply chains, in order to gain access to high-quality secondary raw materials, often at competitive prices, that should be recovered for further use and production.
2016/11/22
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)

I voted against the report. The posting rules which were agreed prohibit fair competition for the Member States which are in the periphery, such as Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria etc. Instead of creating better working conditions for drivers, this report just makes the situation worse. I strongly oppose it.
2016/11/22
Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (A8-0205/2018 - Wim van de Camp)

I voted against the report. The provisions which were agreed for this report do not correspond to the real situation which we have in Europe for driving sector. For example, the report prohibits a weekly rest inside the cabin. However, the current situation on European roads is terrible. We have more than 400 000 drivers and only 7000 proper resting places for them. First, the infrastructure should be in place.
2016/11/22
Adapting to development in the road transport sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)

I voted against the report. The agreed provisions on the report violate competition and equal working conditions for drivers in the EU. It will greatly damage businesses in the peripheral Member States, but will also hit the national economies of the countries, which are heavily dependent on the transport sector.
2016/11/22
Common rules for the internal market for natural gas (A8-0143/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The amended rules will cover both internal EU gas pipelines and all gas pipelines from non-EU countries into the EU, creating legal clarity for existing and new gas infrastructure. The rule stating that ownership of gas transmission infrastructure must be separate from that of the gas already applies to EU pipelines. With the new legislation, that rule would be applicable in principle to all gas pipelines in the EU, even if they originate outside the Union, with the possibility of derogations for existing gas pipelines and exemptions for new ones.
2016/11/22
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (A8-0176/2019 - Gabriel Mato)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The new European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) will cover the budgetary period 2021-2027. Focusing on the socio-economic sustainability of the European fishing fleet, the new fund will continue to support the European fisheries sector in order to move towards more sustainable, innovative and competitive fishing practices.
2016/11/22
Multiannual plan for the fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea (A8-0005/2019 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Western Mediterranean is one of the most developed fishery sub-regions in the Mediterranean, accounting for around 31% of total landings in that area. The agreement provides for postponing the achievement – expected in 2020 – of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) within five years from the entry into force of the plan, taking into account socioeconomic aspects.
2016/11/22
Strengthening the security of identity cards and of residence documents issued to Union citizens (A8-0436/2018 - Gérard Deprez)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It aims to strengthen the security standards applicable to identity cards and to residence documents issued by Member States to European Union citizens and their family members respectively.
2016/11/22
Road infrastructure safety management (A8-0008/2019 - Daniela Aiuto)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. This directive will strengthen the road infrastructure management to reduce road fatalities and serious injuries as well contributing significantly to the improvement of road infrastructure safety across the European Union. Also, it will become mandatory to take systematic account of pedestrians, cyclists and other vulnerable road users in road safety management procedure.
2016/11/22
Pan-European Personal Pension Product (A8-0278/2018 - Sophia in 't Veld)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It is a voluntarily scheme which intends to raise more capital and channel it towards European long-term investments in the real economy. Also, it aims to offer enhanced product features so that citizens benefit from a simple, safe and cost-effective personal pension product while being able to choose from different types of PEPP providers and to encourage PEPP cross-border provision and portability.
2016/11/22
Work-life balance for parents and carers (A8-0270/2018 - David Casa)

I voted in favour of the report. The new rules for a better work-life balance aim to increase women’s employment rate, create incentives for fathers to take family-related leave and promote gender equality and equal opportunities. These more adaptable working conditions and family and care-related leave would help working parents and carers balance private and professional interests and avoid the need to choose between family and career.
2016/11/22
Protection of the Union's budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States (A8-0469/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission proposal, part of the MFF package, establishes rules to protect the Union’s budget in the case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in Member States.
2016/11/22
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (A8-0461/2018 - Verónica Lope Fontagné)

I voted in favour of the report. The ESF+ will provide the main EU financial instrument for improving workers’ mobility and employment opportunities and strengthening social cohesion, improving social fairness and increasing competitiveness across Europe for the 2021-2027 period.
2016/11/22
Computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods (A8-0010/2019 - Kay Swinburne)

I voted in favour of the report. The report lays down the arrangements for computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods. It is part of a package of four proposals from May 2018, in which the Commission proposed a series of new rules on excise duties.
2016/11/22
Re-use of public sector information (A8-0438/2018 - Neoklis Sylikiotis)

I voted in favour of the report. is a step forward in expanding the re-use of public sector information as part of the European data economy. The purpose of the proposed recasting amendment is to encourage and facilitate more re-use. Opening up high value datasets for access is essential to the aim of the recast. It is of particular importance to define a list of categories of datasets at EU level in order to ensure coherence and harmonisation at national level.
2016/11/22
Multiannual recovery plan for Mediterranean swordfish (A8-0389/2018 - Marco Affronte)

I voted in favour of the report. The EU plays a major role in Mediterranean swordfish fisheries, with more than 70% of the total catches. The Member States involved are Italy, Spain and Greece, which together account for over 90% of the EU quota, with the remainder going to Malta, France, Cyprus and Croatia. Thus, the report highlights the urgency of adopting the recovery plan, and supports the higher standards for data collection and control
2016/11/22
Minimum level of training of seafarers (A8-0007/2019 - Dominique Riquet)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission evaluated the EU regulatory framework on the minimum level of training and certification requirements for seafarers and on the mutual recognition of seafarers’ certificates issued by Member States in the context of its regulatory fitness and performance programme (REFIT). The mutual recognition of seafarers’ certificates under Directive 2005/45/EC has fostered the mobility of seafarers among EU flagged vessels.
2016/11/22
Adjustment of annual pre-financing for the years 2021 to 2023 (A8-0181/2019 - Mirosław Piotrowski)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission intends to lower the annual pre-financing rate for the years 2021 to 2023 from 3% to 1%.
2016/11/22
Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders (A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon)

I voted against the report. The purpose of the proposal is to update the Schengen Borders Code to adapt the rules for the reintroduction of temporary internal border controls to the current needs as a response to evolving and persistent serious threats to public policy and internal security. The report creates unnecessary paranoia towards border control and reinforces overprotective measures.
2016/11/22
Motion for a resolution pursuant to Rule 108(6) seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice relating to the EU accession to the Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (B8-0232/2019)

I voted in favour. The motion for a resolution encourages to seek an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed accession of the EU to the Istanbul Convention and the procedure for that accession.
2016/11/22
Tax treatment of pension products, including the pan-European Personal Pension Product (A8-0481/2018 - Sophia in 't Veld)

I voted in favour of the report. The report stresses that in order to enhance the uptake of the pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP), the report called on the Council to elaborate proposals regarding incentives for PEPP savers.
2016/11/22
Listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo) (A8-0261/2016 - Tanja Fajon)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal amends the regulation on listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement. In its last report, the Commission set out recommendations corresponding to outstanding requirements of the visa roadmap, including four key priorities. It noted the border/boundary delineation agreement with Montenegro should be ratified by Kosovo before visa free status is granted to persons from Kosovo.
2016/11/22
Quality of water intended for human consumption (A8-0288/2018 - Michel Dantin)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal concerns the quality of water intended for human consumption. Its objective is to protect human health from adverse effects of any contamination of water intended for human consumption by ensuring that it is wholesome and clean.
2016/11/22
Increasing the efficiency of restructuring, insolvency and discharge procedures (A8-0269/2018 - Angelika Niebler)

I voted in favour of the report. An increasingly interconnected single market with stronger digital dimension means that very few companies operate at purely national level. Many investors mention uncertainty over insolvency rules or the risk of lengthy or complex insolvency procedures in another country as a main reason for not investing outside their own country. The proposal puts in place an insolvency framework and encourage effective preventive restructuring, second chance, including measures to increase the efficiency of restructuring.
2016/11/22
Exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions and retransmissions of television and radio programmes (A8-0378/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal complements the existing Satellite and Cable Directive that aims at facilitating cross-border satellite broadcasting and retransmission by cable of TV and radio programmes from other Member State.
2016/11/22
Establishing the Creative Europe programme (2021 to 2027) (A8-0156/2019 - Silvia Costa)

I voted in favour of the report. The main objectives of the new Creative Europe programme for the period 2021-2027are: the promotion of European cultural and linguistic diversity and Europe’s cultural heritage, the support of quality and diverse European works, reaching large audiences across borders and the strengthening of the international dimension of the European cultural and creative sectors.
2016/11/22
'Erasmus': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport (A8-0111/2019 - Milan Zver)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal provides a sound implementation for this successful and popular programme in the new MFF. The EP’s position emphasised his report on the inclusiveness of the programme, on the simplification of the procedures and on a stronger scrutiny of the European Parliament.
2016/11/22
Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (A8-0175/2019 - Bas Eickhout, Sirpa Pietikäinen)

I voted in favour of the report. The taxonomy establishes the conditions and the framework to gradually create a unified classification system on environmentally sustainable economic activities. This is an essential step in the efforts to fulfil the Paris Climate Agreement and to channel investments into sustainable activities.
2016/11/22
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2020 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0182/2019 - Vladimír Maňka)

I voted in favour of the report. It adopts the estimates of the financial year of the Parliament for 2020. The amount of the Preliminary Draft Estimates 2020 was set at EUR 2 050 430 000, which means an increase of 2.68% over the budget 2019.
2016/11/22
Emergency situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0225/2019, B8-0225/2019, B8-0226/2019, B8-0227/2019, B8-0228/2019, B8-0229/2019)

. ‒ I voted in favour. Parliament’s resolution recognises Juan Guaidó as the legitimate interim president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. Also, it calls for additional sanctions targeting illegitimate state authorities’ assets abroad and those individuals responsible for human rights breaches and repression.
2016/11/22
Situation of rule of law and fight against corruption in the EU, specifically in Malta and Slovakia (B8-0230/2019)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The resolution focuses on and raises concerns regarding constitutional challenges, independence of the media and safety of journalists, and the fight against corruption in Malta and Slovakia.
2016/11/22
Decision establishing a European Peace Facility (A8-0157/2019 - Hilde Vautmans)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. This instrument is a new off-budget fund with a budget of EUR 10.5 billion for seven years (next MFF 2021-2027) based on contributions by Member States. It will cover those expenditures that are excluded from financing by the EU budget because of their operational implications in the military or defence field in order to prevent conflict, preserve peace and strengthen international security.
2016/11/22
Resources for the specific allocation for the Youth Employment Initiative (A8-0085/2019 - Iskra Mihaylova)

I voted in favour of the report. The Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) is part of the Youth Guarantee, which is a scheme whereby Member States implement measures to ensure that young people up to the age of 25 receive a good quality offer of employment, continued education, an apprenticeship or a traineeship within four months of leaving school or becoming unemployed. The increase is considerable, namely by an amount of EUR 116.7 million, which brings the total YEI budget for 2019 to EUR 350 million.
2016/11/22
General arrangements for excise duty (A8-0117/2019 - Miguel Viegas)

I voted in favour of the report. The Directive sets out general arrangements for goods subject to excise duty, with particular emphasis on the production, storage and movement of excise goods between Member States. The main objective of the Directive is to allow the free movement of goods while at the same time ensuring that the correct tax debt is ultimately collected by the Member States.
2016/11/22
Products eligible for exemption from or a reduction in dock dues (A8-0112/2019 - Iskra Mihaylova)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim is to allow a greater number of local products to benefit from tax exemptions or reductions in the outermost regions of the EU of Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion.
2016/11/22
Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (A8-0173/2019 - Pier Antonio Panzeri, Cristian Dan Preda, Frank Engel, Charles Goerens)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal for a regulation establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument is made in the context of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027. The objective is to uphold and promote the Union’s values and interests worldwide in order to pursue the objectives and principles of its external action.
2016/11/22
Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA III) (A8-0174/2019 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Knut Fleckenstein)

I voted in favour of the report. The objective of an instrument for pre-accession is to prepare the beneficiaries for future membership of the Union and support their accession process, in line with the general objectives of the Union’s external action, including respect for fundamental rights and principles as well as the protection and promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law.
2016/11/22
Framework for the recovery and resolution of central counterparties (A8-0015/2018 - Babette Winter, Kay Swinburne)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed regulation lays down rules and procedures relating to the recovery and resolution of central counterparties CCPs authorised in accordance with Regulation on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories. It also lays down rules relating to the arrangements with third countries in the field of recovery and resolution of CCPs.
2016/11/22
European Crowdfunding Service Providers (ECSP) for business (A8-0364/2018 - Ashley Fox)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission’s proposal introduces an optional EU scheme that allows crowdfunding platforms to easily deliver their services across the EU single market. It establishes a one-stop-shop access to the EU market and therefore helps crowdfunding platforms in overcoming the barriers they face operating cross-border.
2016/11/22
Markets in financial instruments (A8-0362/2018 - Caroline Nagtegaal)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims to amend Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments in order to extend access to finance to innovative companies, start-ups and other non-listed companies.
2016/11/22
European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund (A8-0094/2019 - Andrea Cozzolino)

I voted in favour of the report. This is the fund-specific regulation for the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds within the cohesion policy. The regulation provides for a new, partially re-constructed architecture of both ERDF and the Cohesion Fund, in particular in terms of categories of regions and eligibility indicators, for the years 2021-2027. The operation of the funds will be simplified, with concurrent strengthening of auditing and controls.
2016/11/22
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars and vans, recasting the current regulations. An update of these measures will be in line with the 2030 climate and energy framework, which foresees a 30% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 in sectors not subject to the EU emissions trading system (including transport, among others) compared to 2005 levels.
2016/11/22
Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (A8-0317/2018 - Frédérique Ries)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal focuses on the top 10 single-use plastics items found on beaches as well as on fishing gear. The proposal would introduce a differentiated approach for the items concerned. Proposed measures reach from market restrictions for products where alternatives are available to reduce consumption, product design requirements, marking requirements, awareness raising measures, as well as a separate collection target for bottles and extended producer responsibility requirements.
2016/11/22
EU fertilising products (A8-0270/2017 - Mihai Ţurcanu)

I voted in favour of the report. The regulation will mean up-to date, harmonised EU rules for the fertiliser industry and farmers, both mineral and organic fertilisers.
2016/11/22
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (A8-0382/2018 - Laura Agea)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal is going to improve protection of workers against substances provoking cancer at work place. The Directive introduces stricter limit values for exposure of workers to the substances provoking cancers.
2016/11/22
Common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States (A8-0259/2018 - Daniela Aiuto)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal better defines the vehicles included in the scope of the Directive, making a distinction between vehicles/load units accompanied or not by their drivers. However, more clarity is needed to define combined transport operations with third countries, especially for the calculation of the distance limit for each road leg.
2016/11/22
Disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches (A8-0227/2017 - Hugues Bayet, Evelyn Regner)

I voted in favour of the report. In the last years, attention to corporate income tax avoidance has increased considerably and has become a major focus of concern within the EU as well as on a global level. The objective of the proposal is to expand existing transparency obligations of companies to publicly disclose certain information in order to improve tax-related information transparency.
2016/11/22
Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those (A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov, Constanze Krehl)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal updates the financial envelope of cohesion policy according to the Parliament’s agreed figures in the November 2018 plenary. Also, it reintroduces the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD, as a shared management fund in the scope of the Regulation for limited provisions, provides for the possibility of a gradual contribution to InvestEU and encourages the possibility of combining financial instruments with grants.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 105(3): Instrument for financial support for external borders and visa (B8-0215/2019)

I voted in favour of the objection, which states that ‘In response to events that take place after the adoption of the agenda for a part session, the President, after consulting the Chairs of the political groups, may propose an extraordinary debate. Any such proposal shall be voted on at the start of a sitting or at a scheduled voting time. Members shall be notified of any such proposal for an extraordinary debate at least one hour before the vote’.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 105(3): Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (B8-0214/2019)

I voted in favour of the objection to Rule of Procedure 105(3) which states that ‘In response to events that take place after the adoption of the agenda for a part session, the President, after consulting the Chairs of the political groups, may propose an extraordinary debate. Any such proposal shall be voted on at the start of a sitting or at a scheduled voting time. Members shall be notified of any such proposal for an extraordinary debate at least one hour before the vote’.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Genetically modified soybean MON 87751 (MON-87751-7) (B8-0216/2019)

I voted against the objection. I believe that the Commission has reached a balanced approach towards GMO authorisation.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Genetically modified maize 1507 x NK603 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 x MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) (B8-0217/2019)

I voted against the objection. I believe that the Commission has reached a balanced approach towards GMO authorisation.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Certain uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (DEZA a.s.) (B8-0218/2019)

I voted in favour of the objection regarding the implementing act by the Commission regarding certain uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (DEZA a.s.). A further analysis on the matter has to be conducted.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Certain uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Kędzierzyn S.A.) (B8-0219/2019)

I voted in favour of the objection on the implementing act by the Commission regarding certain uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). A further analysis is needed on the matter.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Certain uses of chromium trioxide (B8-0221/2019)

I voted against the objection on the implementing act by the Commission regarding certain uses of chromium trioxide. The authorisations were issued accordingly.
2016/11/22
Post-Arab Spring: way forward for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region (A8-0077/2019 - Brando Benifei)

I voted in favour of the report. Parliament welcomes the EU and its Member States’ continued efforts to promote democracy, the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as economic development and the important nexus with democracy and sustainable security in post-Arab Spring countries. Parliament supports the aspirations of all those in the MENA region, including the majority of young people, who want to establish free, stable, prosperous, inclusive and democratic countries, and welcomes democratic processes in the region and the consequent partnership with the EU.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jørn Dohrmann (A8-0178/2019 - Evelyn Regner)

I voted in favour of the request for the waiver of the immunity of Jørn Dohrmann on the basis of the recommendation and analysis of the JURI Committee.
2016/11/22
Representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers (A8-0447/2018 - Geoffroy Didier)

I voted in favour. The directive introduces representative actions for national or cross-border infringements of EU law which harm the collective interests of consumers. These representative actions can be brought only by ʻqualified entitiesʼ. The crucial point here is that any collective redress instrument, if needed, should not provide incentives for competitors, third-party investors and law firms to litigate against companies at the expense of consumers.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Israel Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0164/2019 - Cristian Dan Preda)

I voted in favour. The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Israel, of the other part, was signed on 20 November 1995. The Agreement entered into force on 1 June 2000. According to its Act of Accession, Croatia undertakes to accede to the international agreements signed or concluded by the European Union and its Member States by means of a protocol to those agreements. On 14 September 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the State of Israel. The negotiations with the State of Israel were successfully concluded on 28 September 2017.
2016/11/22
EU-Uzbekistan comprehensive agreement (A8-0149/2019 - David McAllister)

I voted in favour of the report. The agreement covers areas such as political dialogue and reforms, the rule of law, justice, freedom and security, human rights, migration, and trade, as well as economic and sustainable development. It will promote a favourable business and investment environment. It also provides for cooperation on foreign policy issues and global challenges such as climate change, corruption and the fight against terrorism.
2016/11/22
Discontinuing seasonal changes of time (A8-0169/2019 - Marita Ulvskog)

I voted in favour of the report. This directive should apply from 1 April 2021, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00, Coordinated Universal Time, on the last Sunday in March 2021. Member States will notify the Commission by 1 April 2020 at the latest if they intend to change their standard time.
2016/11/22
Common rules for the internal market for electricity (A8-0044/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed directive obliges Member States to ensure a more competitive, customer-centred, flexible and non-discriminatory EU electricity market with market-based supply prices. It strengthens existing customer rights, introduces new ones and provides a framework for energy communities. Also, the proposal clarifies the tasks of distribution system operators and emphasises the obligation of neighbouring national regulators to cooperate on issues of cross-border relevance.
2016/11/22
Internal market for electricity (A8-0042/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to overhaul and modernise the general framework of electricity markets in Europe with the aim of improving competitiveness and flexibility in an increasingly decentralised electricity system. An overhaul of EU electricity market rules was informally agreed to tackle barriers to cross-border trade in electricity and create a real European electricity market in which 70% of all electricity can cross EU borders freely.
2016/11/22
European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (A8-0040/2018 - Morten Helveg Petersen)

I voted in favour of the report. Until now the role of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) has largely been confined to coordinating, advising and monitoring national regulators and entities for electricity and gas. With this revision of ACERʼs rules, the agencyʼs role will be enlarged and clarified, in particular regarding the rules for the internal market for electricity and gas.
2016/11/22
Risk-preparedness in the electricity sector (A8-0039/2018 - Flavio Zanonato)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It addresses shortcomings in the existing legislation, notably a lack of regional coordination, and differing national rules and procedures. The proposal would replace the existing legislation, and establish common rules on crisis prevention and crisis management in the electricity sector. Regional interdependencies are taken into account in the preparation of national risk-preparedness plans and in managing crisis situations.
2016/11/22
Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters (A8-0086/2019 - Michał Boni)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Regulation seeks to increase consumer awareness of the tyre label and improve market surveillance across the EU Member States. It would oblige suppliers to display the tyre label in all forms of purchase, including on the internet.
2016/11/22
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss)

. ‒ I voted against the report. I believe that the provisional agreement did not reach a balanced approach, especially towards Articles 11 and 13. It just creates fragmentation of the sector and burden for new businesses. Also, I believe that Article 13 violates fundamental rights and freedom of expression because online platforms would have to use upload filters in order to comply with the Article 13 and its requirements.
2016/11/22
Contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services (A8-0375/2017 - Evelyne Gebhardt, Axel Voss)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It aims at addressing a gap in European and national legislation by creating a standard set of contract law rules, thus preventing the rise of divergent national rules that would hamper cross-border trade, consumer confidence and the growth of the Digital Single Market. The proposed directive concerns business-to-consumer contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services and covers: data produced and supplied in digital form (e.g. music, online video, etc.), services allowing for the creation, processing or storage of data in digital form (e.g. cloud storage), services allowing for the sharing of data (e.g. Facebook, YouTube, etc.), and any durable medium used exclusively as a carrier of digital content (e.g. DVDs).
2016/11/22
Contracts for the sale of goods (A8-0043/2018 - Pascal Arimont)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The directive which is based on maximum harmonisation, lays down common rules on certain requirements concerning sales contracts concluded between the seller and the consumer. These include rules on conformity of goods with the contract (including a definition of conformity based on objective and subjective criteria), remedies in case of lack of conformity, how these remedies can be exercised, and commercial guarantees.
2016/11/22
Fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area (A8-0381/2018 - Linnéa Engström)

I voted in favour of the report. The GFCM adopts, on the basis of scientific advice, recommendations and resolutions designed to promote the development, conservation, rational management and best utilisation of stocks of living aquatic resources in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea at levels are considered sustainable and at low risk.
2016/11/22
Alignment of reporting obligations in the field of environment policy (A8-0324/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It ensures a more coherent and consistent approach to environmental reporting. By simplifying the existing reporting obligations, it helps to reduce administrative costs, improve the quality of available data for future evaluations and increase transparency.
2016/11/22
Low carbon benchmarks and positive carbon impact benchmarks (A8-0483/2018 - Neena Gill)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the amendment to the Benchmarks Regulation is to include ESG considerations in the decision-making process of investors and asset managers. Indexes and benchmarks have an indirect but important impact on investments. Many investors rely on benchmarks, in particular in portfolio allocation and to measure the performance of financial products.
2016/11/22
Specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) (A8-0470/2018 - Pascal Arimont)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal lays down the specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments for the period 2021-2017.
2016/11/22
Fundamental rights of people of African descent (B8-0212/2019)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls on Member States and the EU institution to fight against racism, xenophobia and hate crimes against people of African descent. It includes a call to develop an EU framework for national strategies for the social inclusion and integration and to develop national anti-racism strategies that address the comparative situation of people of African descent in areas such as education, housing, health, employment, policing, social services, the justice system and political participation/representation, and encourage their presence in media and television programmes to adequately address the lack of representation, as well as the lack of role models for children of African Descent.
2016/11/22
Report on financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance (A8-0170/2019 - Jeppe Kofod, Luděk Niedermayer)

I voted in favour of the report. It calls for a European financial police within the framework of Europol with its own investigatory capacities, as well as for a European framework for cross-border tax investigations and other cross-border financial crimes. Also, it criticises Belgium, Cyprus, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands on the basis of the 2018 European Semester for facilitating aggressive tax planning globally while acknowledging that some of these Member States have already taken measures to address these criticisms.
2016/11/22
EU-Switzerland Institutional Framework Agreement (A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică)

I voted in favour of the report. Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Therefore, the report calls for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - Commission and executive agencies (A8-0110/2019 - Inés Ayala Sender)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2017 Commission discharge (A8-0088/2019 - Inés Ayala Sender)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Special Reports of the Court of Auditors provide information on issues of concern related to the implementation of funds, which are thus useful for Parliament in exercising its role of discharge authority. According to these reports, the Commission was granted discharge for the financial year 2017.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0107/2019 - Marco Valli)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report highlights the need to ensure that development aid is pursued in accordance with its original purpose in line with aid effectiveness principles as well as a sharper emphasis on performance and visible actions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0108/2019 - Claudia Schmidt)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Discharge was granted to the European Parliament for the implementation of the 2017 budget. The report welcomes Parliament’s work in the area of human resources and procurement to face the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union. Although noting some improvements in Parliament’s communication strategy, it is critical about the progress of Parliament’s public website, the cost of the House of European History and the means available for the European messages to reach the European citizens.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0096/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It postpones its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2017. It reiterates that the budget of the European Council and the budget of the Council should be separated in order to contribute to transparency in the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0098/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Registrar of the Court of Justice discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice for the financial year 2017. However, the institution should consider the adoption of more active case management procedures based on an individual approach and realistic deadlines, while closely monitoring manpower deployment and adopting additional administrative streamlining methods in the future.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - Court of Auditors (A8-0097/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the fact that 92% of the Court’s recommendations issued in 2014 were implemented by the end of 2017, as were 53% of those issued in 2017.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0100/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Economic and Social Committee for the financial year 2017. It welcomes the interinstitutional administrative cooperation with Parliament and the mid-term evaluation results on the implementation of the cooperation agreement between the Committee and the Committee of the Regions, which highlights the successful implementation of several measures.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0101/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Committee of the Regions for the financial year 2017. It welcomes the commitment to set clear political goals to enhance the Committee’s involvement throughout the political and legislative cycle of the Union’s policies by strengthening the effective partnerships with other Union institutions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0109/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European External Action Service (EEAS) for the financial year 2017. It asks the EEAS to keep Parliament informed about the results achieved through the aforementioned efforts to improve procurement procedures in delegations, in particular through the Public Procurement Management Tool system and eProcurement and eTendering procedures.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0099/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the European Ombudsman discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2017. It emphasises the fact that on the basis of its audit work, the Court concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2017 for administrative expenditure of the Ombudsman were free from material error.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0116/2019 - Arndt Kohn)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The report grants the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2017. It notes that in its annual report for 2017, the Court observed no serious weaknesses in respect of the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement activities of the European Data Protection Supervisor.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0140/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. All agencies were granted discharge for the financial year 2017.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0113/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the Director of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. It acknowledges that the Agency overall delivered on its work programme, despite significant challenges related to the available resources.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0114/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the Management Committee of the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications discharge in respect of the implementation of the Office’s budget for the financial year 2017. It welcomes the Commission’s proposal to incorporate into the Office’s founding regulation an obligatory periodical external performance evaluation every five years.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0122/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. The report grants the Director of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2017. It insists on the adequate geographical distribution of its staff as well as of its middle and senior management.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0119/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the centre’s budget for the financial year 2017.The report welcomes the centre’s focus on the development of competences and skills, in particular among the low-skilled, to support the objective of labour-market inclusion through vocational education and training (VET), work-based learning and apprenticeships. It also welcomes its contributions to the Erasmus+ Programme, the New Skills Agenda for Europe, Europass and Skills Panorama, which has succeeded in reaching its primary target groups, namely policymakers and experts.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) (A8-0121/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2017.The report calls on the agency further to incorporate in its curriculum and its training activities a significant element of anti-radicalisation, anti-racism and anti-discrimination training, wherever possible; and requests it to develop specific training on the procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused in criminal proceedings.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0120/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Aviation Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the further steps taken to enhance the transparency of the agency’s activities by reporting the meetings that its staff have with external stakeholders and making the relevant information available on the agency’s website.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0123/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, postponing the decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Asylum Support Office discharge in respect of the implementation of the office’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report acknowledges the major risks inherent in the nature of the office’s activities, and extraordinary operational challenges caused by the migration influx in 2015, 2016 and 2017. However, it finds it regrettable that those risks were not mitigated by a solid governance structure and effective controls.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0124/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the authority’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report acknowledges the measures the authority already has in place and its ongoing efforts to secure transparency, to prevent and manage conflicts of interests, and to protect whistle-blowers.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0134/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control discharge in respect of the implementation of the centre’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the fact that the centre has prioritised activities addressing the threats posed by antimicrobial resistance and the rise of vaccine hesitancy in the Union.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0125/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report acknowledges the agency’s existing measures and ongoing efforts to secure transparency and whistle-blower protection. According to the Agency, all meetings of its senior management with interest groups are registered and published on its website to ensure full transparency.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0127/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, granting discharge to the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report calls on the agency to take measures ensuring better gender balance within its senior management.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0133/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Fisheries Control Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes the agency’s efforts to ensure a cost-effective and environment-friendly workplace. However, the agency does not have any additional measures in place to reduce or offset CO2 emissions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0128/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report granting discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority in respect of the implementation of the authority’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that the authority should continue paying special attention to public opinion, and commit itself to openness and transparency.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0150/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It grants discharge to the Director of the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) in respect of the implementation of the institute’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report calls for the EIGE, as the European Union expertise centre on gender equality, to be assigned to monitor the implementation of the Istanbul Convention.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0137/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report stresses the need to allocate sufficient resources, to address existing anti money laundering competences and to ensure a swift exchange with the European Banking Authority regarding money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0152/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the interim director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology discharge in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report highlights the number of outstanding issues and ongoing corrective measures in response to the Court’s comments in 2014, 2015 and 2016 related in particular to funding condition, funding from public, grants and private sources.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0135/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour for the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report reiterates the important role of the Agency in protecting and promoting public and animal health by assessing and supervising medicines for human or veterinary use.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0139/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that the Centre put in place a procurement plan which was successfully executed in close collaboration with all units.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0130/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report highlights that the Agency’s know-how and in-house capabilities provide the opportunity to expand its action and service provision to a more global scale, thereby contributing to increasing the reach of Union regulatory frameworks and safety and environmental standards.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0129/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that the Agency finds it difficult to recruit, attract and hold suitably qualified staff, mainly due to the types of post that are being offered (contract agents posts) and the low correction coefficient factor which applies to the salaries of the Agency’s employees in Greece.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) (A8-0158/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Railway Agency (now the European Union Agency for Railways) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report supports the progress of the Agency towards an increased cooperation with the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to develop a common safety culture.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0141/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Securities and Markets Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budgetary and personnel resources should be reallocated.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0131/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Training Foundation discharge in respect of the implementation of the Foundation’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the fact that the Foundation launched an obligatory on-line anti-fraud awareness exercise among its existing staff, as well as among its new staff in form of an obligatory induction exercise.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (A8-0145/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It rants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report requests the Commission, the Member States and other concerned parties to take into account the importance of ensuring gender balance when presenting their nominees for members of the Management Board.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0138/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the Agency’s strong commitment to ensure that all workers enjoy the same occupational health and safety rights regardless of the size of the company, the type of contract or the employment relationship.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) (A8-0132/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director-General of the Euratom Supply Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the fact that the cancellation of carryovers from 2016 to 2017 amounted to EUR 148.09, representing 1.44% of the total amount carried over, and a decrease of 2.07% in comparison to 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0143/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions discharge in respect of the implementation of the Foundation’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report acknowledges the Foundation’s progress in completing its four-year programme that identified four specific priority policy areas for the Foundation’s future work programme.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Union Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) (A8-0155/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Administrative Director of Eurojust discharge in respect of the implementation of Eurojust’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report encourages Eurojust to consider adopting a fundamental rights strategy, including a reference to fundamental rights in a code of conduct that could define the duties of its staff and training for staff.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0154/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) discharge in respect of the implementation of Europol’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report asks Europol to cooperate with the eight other agencies on justice and home affairs with a view to investigating possible mergers.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0136/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report encourages the Agency to intensify its co-operation with international organisations, such as the Council of Europe and the United Nations, in order to find and use synergies, whenever possible.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (A8-0153/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the executive director of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year2017. The report welcomes the fact that the Agency promotes interagency cooperation, especially in the field of coastguard function, but also in the field of customs and law enforcement cooperation, in order to fully exploit the advantages of multi-purpose operations as an important element of integrated border management.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0142/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency (GSA) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that, according to the Court’s report, in 2017, a mid-term evaluation of the Galileo and European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) programmes and of the Agency’s performance in the period 2014-2016 was carried out on behalf of the Commission.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0103/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017, The report notes that experts confirm that the Joint Undertaking has attracted a satisfactory level of participation of the best Union players in the areas of the selected value chains.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (A8-0095/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the successful closure of the Clean Sky programme with the delivery in 2017 of a total of 28 significant demonstrators (ground and flight tested) together with having selected all its core partners and having achieved the addition of the partners to the programme, bringing the total to 497 participants.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership Joint undertaking (ECSEL) (A8-0102/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (ECSEL) Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report acknowledges the fact that the Court’s report states that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2017 were, in all material respects, legal and regular.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH2) (A8-0105/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH 2 JU) discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the numerous communication activities organised in 2017 that further contributed to increased visibility of the (FCH 2 JU).
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0104/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the strategy to involve SMEs as IMI Joint Undertaking´s beneficiaries and thus contributing to the creation of a value chain.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy Joint Undertaking (A8-0126/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Director of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that the content, structure and therefore the reliability and effectiveness of the schedules has been improved during the last years.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0118/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the SESAR Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report notes that the first audits of SESAR 2020 indicate that the number and level of errors is lower due to simplifications introduced in Horizon 2020 and the increased experience major beneficiaries.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (A8-0163/2019 - Martina Dlabajová)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2017. The report welcomes the Joint Undertaking’s willingness to experiment in 2018 a simplification of the administrative procedures through the implementation of the pilot Lump Sum Grant in a confined Programme control framework.
2016/11/22
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania (A8-0413/2018 - Rebecca Harms)

I voted in favour of the report. The decommissioning of the Ignalina power plant is the only sort of a kind project in Europe both in size and technical characteristics of the reactors which are of a same type as in Chernobyl. When entering to the EU, Lithuania took a responsibility and agreed to an early closure of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in order to complete its accession in 2004. Nevertheless, the complete decommissioning of Ignalina power plant is a responsibility not only of Lithuania, but also of the EU and it is our efforts to ensure that the closure process is smooth and efficient. An efficient long-term financial certainty for the project is they key.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2017 (A8-0479/2018 - Georgi Pirinski)

I voted in favour of the report. One of the main fallouts from the economic crisis has been the decline in investment in the EU. Therefore, the EIB should further support the EU countries in order to contribute to economic recovery. The report welcomed the EIB Group’s willingness to enhance EU competitiveness, provide real support for growth and job creation, and contribute to solving socio-economic challenges by pursuing its overarching public policy goals relating to innovation, SMEs and midcap finance, infrastructure, the environment, economic and social cohesion, and the climate.
2016/11/22
Cross-border restitution claims of works of art and cultural goods looted in armed conflicts and wars (A8-0465/2018 - Pavel Svoboda)

I voted in favour of the report. The problem of looted cultural goods, which were plundered in wartime through acts of violence, confiscation or by apparently legal transactions or auctions, remains part of human history. The report calls on the Commission to develop common principles regarding access to public or private archives containing information on property identification and to identify common principles on how ownership or title is established, prescription and standards of proof and to define the notion of looting and art.
2016/11/22
Cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions (A8-0002/2019 - Evelyn Regner)

I voted in favour of the report. Currently legislation varies across Member States, which contributes to legal uncertainty and discourages business from engaging in cross-border operations. To combat this, it is important to bring a level of consistency and clear, uniform and easily accessible and enforceable rules in legislation across Member States, especially when dealing with cross-border mergers.
2016/11/22
Establishing a multi-annual plan for the fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea (A8-0005/2019 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)

I voted in favour of the report. The high levels of overfishing and the ineffective regulatory framework have been identified as the main problems affecting the demersal fisheries in the western Mediterranean. The proposed multiannual plan at EU level is intended to address these problems, and to ensure that fishing activities are environmentally sustainable and able to secure economic, social and employment benefits.
2016/11/22
Protection of the Union's budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States (A8-0469/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Petri Sarvamaa)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal establishes rules to protect the Union’s budget in the case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in Member States. The report proposes to strengthen in particular the procedure to adopt/lift measures needed in case of deficiency. Also it makes the request to reinforce the protection of the final beneficiaries of programmes.
2016/11/22
Establishing the Fiscalis programme for cooperation in the field of taxation (A8-0421/2018 - Sven Giegold)

I voted in favour of the report. Fiscalis is an EU cooperation programme which enables national tax administrations to create and exchange information and expertise. The proposal is a part of the package for the next MFF. The budget of the programme 2021-2027 is proposed to be EUR 339 million.
2016/11/22
Establishing the Rights and Values programme (A8-0468/2018 - Bodil Valero)

I voted in favour of the report. The goal of the programme is to promote common European values and rights. For that reason, the EU has combined several instruments in a policy mix of legislation, policies and funding.
2016/11/22
European Instrument for Nuclear Safety complementing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (A8-0448/2018 - Vladimir Urutchev)

I voted in favour. The proposed new European instrument should complement activities to promote the establishment of effective nuclear safety standards in third countries, building on the experience of nuclear safety operations within the Euratom Community in order to ensure nuclear safety in Europe.
2016/11/22
Combating late payment in commercial transactions (A8-0456/2018 - Lara Comi)

I voted in favour of the report. The situation on late payments within the EU is improving in some Member States but it is still quite bad in others. Therefore, both the Late Payment Directive and national legislation on late payments should be better enforced through measures aimed at improving rules on payment terms. Special attention should also be paid to late payments by public authorities who bear a special responsibility in fostering a business environment supportive of timely payments.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0415/2018 - Barbara Kappel)

I voted in favour of the report. The report recognises the valuable contribution of the EIB to provide long-term finance and expertise for projects and to leverage additional investment to help achieve the EU’s objectives. Also, it calls on the EIB to step up its efforts in terms of communication and to further enhance transparency.
2016/11/22
Differentiated integration (A8-0402/2018 - Pascal Durand)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasises that differentiated integration should reflect the idea that Europe does not work on a one-size-fits-all approach, but can adapt to the needs and wishes of its citizens. Therefore, differentiation should be a constitutional tool to ensure flexibility when needed, without compromising the entire political system and equality between citizens.
2016/11/22
Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU (A8-0420/2018 - Jo Leinen, Yana Toom)

I voted in favour. The report endorses the Ombudsman’s recommendations for the Council’s work to: systematically record the identity of Member State governments when they express positions in Council preparatory bodies; to develop clear and publicly available criteria for how it designates documents as ‘LIMITE’ in line with EU law; and to systematically review the ‘LIMITE’ status of documents at an early stage, before the final adoption of a legislative act, including before informal negotiations in trilogies.
2016/11/22
Closure of the accounts for the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) for the financial year 2016 (B8-0052/2019)

. ‒ I voted in favour. This Commission document concerns the EU’s consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. It is the responsibility of the Commission’s Accounting Officer to prepare the EU’s consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Asylum Support Office (EASO), with a view to granting discharge.
2016/11/22
EU-Morocco Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0478/2018 - Marietje Schaake)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The adoption of the Protocol on agriculture products between the European Union and Morocco, with a very broad majority, puts an end to the legal instability created by the decision of the Court of Justice in Luxembourg of December 2016 that had an impact on the status of the political relationship with Morocco.In its decision to exclude from the application of the protocol the territory of the Western Sahara, the court indicated the way to adjust the process by obtaining the support of the population in Western Sahara affected by the protocol. Also, it permits a strong re-launch of the political relationship with Morocco, which remains a key partner for the European Union.
2016/11/22
EU-Morocco Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (A8-0471/2018 - Marietje Schaake)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The adoption of the Protocol on agriculture products between the European Union and Morocco, with a very broad majority, puts an end to the legal instability created by the decision of the Court of Justice in Luxembourg of December 2016 that had an impact on the status of the political relationship with Morocco.In its decision to exclude from the application of the protocol the territory of the Western Sahara, the court indicated the way to adjust the process by obtaining the support of the population in Western Sahara affected by the protocol. Also, it permits a strong re-launch of the political relationship with Morocco, which remains a key partner for the European Union.
2016/11/22
EU-China Agreement in connection with the WTO dispute settlement proceedings DS492 - Measures affecting tariff concessions on certain poultry meat products (A8-0472/2018 - Iuliu Winkler)

. ‒ I voted in favour. On 12 March 2018, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations on a mutually agreed solution with China. Those negotiations were concluded and an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and China was initialled on 18 June 2018. The agreement seeks to open tariff rate quotas on certain poultry meat products.
2016/11/22
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) (A8-0445/2018 - Maria Arena)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) is and will remain one of the special instruments that allow the European Union to react to unforeseen circumstances. Also, the Commission proposal comes with new elements such as a wider scope of significant restructuring events that will be eligible for funding, lowering from 500 to 250 the threshold of displaced workers for a case to be eligible, etc.
2016/11/22
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (A8-0461/2018 - Verónica Lope Fontagné)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal merges the current European Social Fund (ESF), the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), the EU Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the European Health Programme in order to simplify, inject flexibility into and optimise current procedures, facilitate visibility and accessibility for the EU beneficiaries and ensure synergies.
2016/11/22
Specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) (A8-0470/2018 - Pascal Arimont)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The regulation provides for a new, partially reconstructed architecture for the territorial dimension of cohesion policy for the years 2021-2027. Cross-border and other territorial cooperation inside and on the external borders of the EU will be simpler, focusing on its core tasks. The report also reaches out to the future, with the new interregional innovative investment initiative, while re-integrating maritime regions into the broader cross-border cooperation.
2016/11/22
Apportionment of tariff rate quotas included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the UK's withdrawal from the EU (A8-0361/2018 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. To prepare for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU on 30 March 2019, it is necessary to address the apportionment of the respective EU and UK tariff rate quotas (TRQ) for agricultural and non-agricultural products included in the EU’s WTO schedule of concessions and commitments annexed to the GATT 1994. The proposal lists how tariff rate quotas figuring in the EU’s WTO schedule of concessions and commitments will be apportioned between the EU and the UK.
2016/11/22
Establishing a dedicated financial programme for decommissioning of nuclear facilities and management of radioactive waste (A8-0441/2018 - Peter Kouroumbashev)

I voted in favour of the report. This funding programme for financial assistance addresses the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and the management of the arising waste under a common instrument to optimise synergies and knowledge sharing in order to secure meeting of relevant obligations. The proposed budget is EUR 466 000 000 and is planned to be used for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Slovakia, Bulgaria, Belgium, Italy, Germany and the Netherlands.
2016/11/22
Implementation report on the trade pillar of the Association Agreement with Central America (A8-0459/2018 - Reimer Böge)

I voted in favour of the report. The Association Agreement between the EU and Central America was the first region-to-region association agreement concluded by the EU. The Agreement tries to meet one of its key initial aims as it intends to strengthen the process of regional integration among the Central American countries by supporting intra-regional institutions, cooperation and dialogues.
2016/11/22
Establishing the InvestEU Programme (A8-0482/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes, Roberto Gualtieri)

I voted in favour of the report. The InvestEU Fund is the Union’s new investment instrument for the period 2021-2027. It brings together the multitude of financial programmes currently available and expands the successful model of the Investment Plan for Europe, the Juncker Plan, to further boost job creation, investment and innovation. The Programme provides for an EU budget guarantee to support investment and access to finance in the EU with the aim of triggering EUR 650 billion in additional investment. The InvestEU Fund is meant to support four policy windows: sustainable infrastructure; research, innovation and digitisation; small and medium-sized businesses; and social investment and skills.
2016/11/22
EU Emergency Travel Document (A8-0433/2018 - Kinga Gál)

I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of the proposed directive is to simplify formalities for unrepresented EU citizens in third countries whose passport or travel document have been lost, stolen or destroyed, in order to ensure that they are provided with an emergency travel document by other Member States, allowing them to travel back home.
2016/11/22
Euratom Research and Training programme 2021- 2025 (A8-0406/2018 - Miapetra Kumpula-Natri)

I voted in favour. The Commission proposes a new five-year programme Euratom research and training programme which will pursue the current key research activities and expand research into non-power applications of ionising radiation, and make improvements in the areas of education, training and access to research infrastructure. The proposal is part of the legislative package for the research and innovation framework programme Horizon Europe.
2016/11/22
European Central Bank Annual report 2017 (A8-0424/2018 - Gabriel Mato)

I voted in favour of the report. The report recalled that the euro remains unchallenged as the second most important currency in the international monetary system. The ECB expects inflation to gradually pick up over the medium term, supported by the impact of the current monetary policy stance, continuing economic expansion, rising wages and the absorption of economic slack. Lastly, the report noted that the EU economy grew at its fastest rate in ten years in 2017 and that all Member States saw their economies expand. Unemployment in the EU is at its lowest level since 2008, although it continues to dramatically affect young people.
2016/11/22
Banking Union - Annual report 2018 (A8-0419/2018 - Nils Torvalds)

I voted in favour of the report. The report provides us with a view of how the Banking Union has helped foster the single market, contributed to the level playing field as well as to financial stability. It recalled that the completion of the Banking Union, including a European Deposit Insurance Scheme and a fiscal backstop for the Single Resolution Fund, must continue, as must measures to achieve risk reduction, which contributes to further increasing financial stability and growth prospects.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)

I voted in favour of the report. The assessment of the implementation of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and Colombia/Peru 5 years after its entry into force shows some significant positive effects on the bilateral trade relationships. The stronger cooperation originated by the Trade Agreement has given both parties mechanisms and leverage to tackle commercial irritants by solving part of them as well as increase the number of SMEs starting exporting from Colombia and Peru into the European Union. The Agreement has also increased a the dialogue on social and environmental issues. In this context the two Latin American countries have done important progress and such a way should be encouraged by the European Union.
2016/11/22
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017 (A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras)

I voted in favour of the report. The text condemns all forms of violence against women and urges Member States that have not yet ratified the Istanbul Convention to do so ‘without delay’. It supports the 2017 demonstrations against the regression of women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights as well as the extensive media coverage of sexual harassment cases. Also, it emphasizes that the rule of law must be regularly and impartially assessed based on objective criteria in all the Member States.
2016/11/22
Establishing, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, the instrument for financial support for customs control equipment (A8-0460/2018 - Jiří Pospíšil)

I voted in favour of the report. The report on the multiannual framework also presented a new financial instrument to provide financial support for customs control equipment, namely for purchasing, maintenance, and upgrading. The instrument could be implemented in synergy with other activities under the Border Management Fund; the equipment financed could also be used, if this were needed, for controlling human movement on the border.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the EU-Albania status agreement on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Albania (A8-0463/2018 - Bodil Valero)

I voted in favour. The agreement will ensure a legally binding framework for the joint operations and rapid border interventions conducted by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency on the territory of Albania. The main provisions concern the operational plan which must be agreed between the Agency and Albania and the tasks and powers of the team members, who should respect fundamental rights in the exercise of their powers.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Kyrgyzstan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0443/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda)

I voted in favour. The agreement provides the basis for strong and lasting relations and the stable, secure and sustainable development of both parties in the areas of market economy and international trade, fighting corruption, strengthening of international cooperation, countering terrorism and conflict prevention.
2016/11/22
EU-Kyrgyzstan comprehensive agreement (A8-0450/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda)

I voted in favour. The agreement provides the basis for strong and lasting relations and the stable, secure and sustainable development of both parties in the areas of market economy and international trade, fighting corruption, strengthening of international cooperation, countering terrorism and conflict prevention.
2016/11/22
Autonomous driving in European transport (A8-0425/2018 - Wim van de Camp)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It is key for Europe to be at the forefront of this field, in order to reap the benefits of automated road transport and to successfully compete with the enormous thrust of efforts elsewhere in the US, China or Japan. Standardisation efforts at international level, namely in the framework of the UNECE and Vienna Convention, need to be further coordinated and help to ensure seamless interoperability of vehicles across borders.
2016/11/22
Use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road (A8-0193/2018 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Road transport is the dominant transport mode for goods and passengers in the EU and employs around 1.6 million people. Over the years, the EU has developed a range of rules to ensure a fair, well-functioning, safe and socially sustainable road transport sector. European legislation on the use of hired vehicles without drivers for the carriage of goods by road has been in operation for 25 years. The adopted directive is closely linked to the new rules on access to the profession and access to the haulage market, as well as to the access to the coach and bus market, with an overall aim to ensuring fair competition, simplifying existing rules, preserving the internal market and ensuring the rights of workers in this sector.
2016/11/22
Temporary withdrawal of preferences in certain agreements concluded between the EU and certain third countries (A8-0330/2018 - Christofer Fjellner)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The new Regulation on the horizontal safeguard clause in trade agreements is the result of a close and fruitful cooperation among the three Institutions. A safeguard instrument is designed to provide a safety net by suspending further tariff liberalisation or increase the customs duty rate up to the Most Favoured Nation rate when, as a result of commitments in an free trade agreement and unforeseen developments.
2016/11/22
Establishing the 'Customs' programme for cooperation in the field of customs (A8-0464/2018 - Maria Grapini)

I voted in favour of the report. The report introduces stricter obligations for reporting and underlines the importance of avoiding any misuses of EU funding and lack of financing due to Brexit.
2016/11/22
Amendment of the European Investment Bank Statute (A8-0476/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner)

I voted in favour of the report. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union shall bring an end to the membership of the United Kingdom in the European Investment Bank (EIB), to its subscribed capital in the Bank, to its right to nominate members and alternate members of the board of directors, and to the term of office of the members and alternate members of the board of directors nominated by the United Kingdom. The report set out certain amendments to the statue of the EIB after Brexit.
2016/11/22
Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament (A8-0429/2018 - Angelika Mlinar)

I voted in favour of the report. The report takes stock of the state of play inside the European Parliament on promoting and achieving gender mainstreaming both, in the administration and at policy level from the perspective of gender mainstreaming.
2016/11/22
European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A8-0393/2018 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)

I voted in favour of the report. The report outlines that fusion is expected to play an important role in the future European and global energy landscape as a potentially inexhaustible, safe, climate-friendly, environmentally responsible and economically competitive source of energy. Europe has, from the start, played a leading role in the ITER project, developed in close collaboration with the non-European signatories to the ITER Agreement (the US, Russia, Japan, China, South Korea and India). The proposal by the Commission seeks to secure funding for the EU participation in the project in the MFF 2021-2027.
2016/11/22
Assessing how the EU budget is used for public sector reform (A8-0378/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. Effective public sector reform is essential to help Member States to adapt to changing circumstances, increase resilience, expand eGovernment and improve delivery of services. The report notes that public administration and governance policies are spread across various Commission services and that complicates the coordination among concerned services. Therefore the recently created Structural Reform Support Programme service responsible for that coordination should have enough resources. The report also calls for the topic to be allocated to a Commissioner in the future.
2016/11/22
EU guidelines and the mandate of the EU Special Envoy on the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU (A8-0449/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb)

I voted in favour of the report. The report stresses that freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) is a universal human right, a value of the EU and an important and undeniable pillar of dignity, greatly impacting all individuals. The report strongly welcomes the fact that the 2013 Guidelines mainstream the promotion and protection of FoRB in EU foreign policy and external actions. It considers the appointment of the Special Envoy as an important step forward and a clear recognition of FoRB within the human rights agenda of EU foreign policy and external actions, both bilateral and multilateral, and within development cooperation.
2016/11/22
Gender equality and taxation policies in the EU (A8-0416/2018 - Marisa Matias, Ernest Urtasun)

I voted against the report. The report intends to highlight how the taxation system discriminates against women. It calls on a shift from joint taxation to individual taxation to ensure that tax and cash benefits as well as in-kind government services are equally shared. However the report seems highly ideological. Moreover, freedom of choice between individual and joint taxation systems was not properly enough established in the report.
2016/11/22
Minimum loss coverage for non-performing exposures (A8-0440/2018 - Esther de Lange, Roberto Gualtieri)

I voted in favour. In March 2018, the European Commission presented a proposal to introduce statutory backstops for ‘non-performing exposures’. These concern loans, debt securities or certain overdue off-balance-sheet items. Since the financial crisis, the EU has aimed to address the high numbers of these non-performing exposures, including in particular non-performing loans, as they risk destabilising the financial sector and thereby the EU economy.
2016/11/22
Expedited settlement of commercial disputes (A8-0396/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)

I voted in favour of the report. The report tackles the slow settlement of commercial disputes in the EU. In a number of Member States, it takes up to 3-4 years to enforce a commercial contract. Many companies are by law obliged to make reservations in their books for amounts under dispute. Civil procedures are currently not well harmonised in the EU. In addition, the choice of law in commercial contracts is not evenly distributed between the different Member States.
2016/11/22
Establishing the space programme of the Union and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (A8-0405/2018 - Massimiliano Salini)

I voted in favour of the report. The report simplifies space governance, improves the allocation of responsibilities, increases the space budget, includes downstream markets, safeguards Govsatcom, bolsters the EU’s space diplomacy and promotes EU technology and industry. The EP budget proposal for space: overall budget of EUR 16.9 billion for the period 2021-2027 (EC originally proposed EUR 16), with the following indicative breakdown: Galileo/ EGNOS: EUR 9.7 billion; Copernicus: EUR 6 billion; SSA/Govsatcom: EUR 1.2 billion.
2016/11/22
Establishing the Digital Europe programme for the period 2021-2027 (A8-0408/2018 - Angelika Mlinar)

I voted in favour of the report. The Digital Europe Programme is a new instrument with its main objective to boost Europe’s digital transformation to the benefit of citizens and businesses. The Commission’s proposal foresees EUR 9.1 billion over the period 2021—2027 to be spent in the five areas (Supercomputers, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Digital Skills and digital transformation of public service).
2016/11/22
US-EU Agreement on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety (A8-0432/2018 - Theresa Griffin)

I voted in favour of the report. Following the Council Decision concerning its conclusion, the original Agreement between the US and the EU on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety entered into force on 1 May 2011, in order to ensure the continuation of high-level cooperation and harmonisation between parties.
2016/11/22
Common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services (A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang)

I voted in favour of the report. Given the rapidly growing digital economy it is of utmost importance to adopt taxation laws to ensure that a level playing field is maintained concerning either digital or traditional companies. The most preferred solution would be the international solution developed by OECD, but pending a comprehensive solution which may take time to adopt and implement, the EU faces pressure to act on this issue, particularly when Member States start to adopt unilateral solutions to address the problem.
2016/11/22
Blockchain: a forward-looking trade policy (A8-0407/2018 - Emma McClarkin)

I voted in favour of the report. This report recognises the recent proliferation of research and investment in both the public and private sectors to implementing blockchain for a variety of uses. Therefore, a measured and rational approach is required to investigate exactly where blockchain can offer tangible benefits.
2016/11/22
Conflict of interest and the protection of the EU budget in the Czech Republic (RC-B8-0582/2018, B8-0582/2018, B8-0583/2018, B8-0584/2018, B8-0585/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution notes that the Agrofert Group, founded by Mr Babiš received last year EUR 82 million of EU funding and tens of millions of euro annually since 2013. The text quotes the legal opinion of the Commission, which states that according to the declaration of income of Czech public officials during the first half of this year, Mr Babiš himself received an income of EUR 3.5 million from Agrofert via his trust funds. The resolution calls on the Commission to suspend all EU funding to Agrofert until the conflict of interest is fully investigated and resolved. It also requests the Commission to recover all funds that have been illegally or irregularly paid out.
2016/11/22
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2017 (A8-0411/2018 - Eleonora Evi)

I voted in favour. The annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman in 2017 was formally submitted to the President of the European Parliament on 22 May 2018 and the Ombudsman, Emily O’Reilly, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels on 16 May 2018.The Ombudsman’s top three concerns in the inquiries closed in 2017 were: transparency, accountability and public access to information and documents (20.6%), culture of service (16.8%) and respect for procedural rights (16.5%). Other concerns include ethical issues, public participation in EU decision-making, respect for fundamental rights, proper use of discretion including in infringement procedures, sound financial management of EU tenders, grants and contracts, recruitment and good management of EU personnel issues.
2016/11/22
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions 2017 (A8-0404/2018 - Cecilia Wikström)

I voted in favour of the report. The work of the Committee on Petitions arises from the right to petition Parliament exercised by the citizens, and is not directly attached to the legislative programme of the Commission. According to the statistics, 1 569 petitions were submitted to the European Parliament in 2016 which represents an increase of 9.6% compared to 2015 when 1 431 petitions were received. Users of the petitions web portal have the possibility to support petitions. In 2015, 902 users supported one or several petitions, while in 2016, seven times as many users (6 132) acted as supporters.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 6/2018: Reduction of payment and commitment appropriations (own resources) (A8-0399/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims at updating both the revenue and expenditure sides of the EU’s 2018 budget to cover more recent economic forecasts.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to finance immediate budgetary measures to address the on-going challenges of migration, refugee inflows and security threats (A8-0455/2018 - Daniele Viotti)

I voted in favour of the report. The report states that the Parliament and the Council agreed, at the budgetary trilogue of 4 December 2018, to further mobilise the Flexibility Instrument by EUR 178 715 475 as a result of reinforcements of Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+ programmes.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the EU general budget for 2019 (A8-0453/2018 - Lefteris Christoforou)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) supports EU Member States struck by natural disasters, through providing financial assistance to contribute to a rapid return to normal conditions. EUR 50 million is the budgetary proposal to mobilise the EUSF in order to have advance payments available for affected countries in the 2019 budget.
2016/11/22
New general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019 - all sections

I voted in favour of the report. The agreement includes the following elements: boosting funds for jobs, in particular youth unemployment; Erasmus+; research, SMEs; climate protection; tackling migration and root causes of migration; enforcing security -related agencies, additional support for Member States affected by African swine fever and cuts in funding for Turkey.
2016/11/22
EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (A8-0366/2018 - Pedro Silva Pereira)

I voted in favour. This is the biggest-ever free trade agreement concluded by the EU in the world, with 40% of global trade, 30% of world GDP within 635 million people. It will remove EUR 1 billion of duties paid annually by the EU companies exporting to Japan.
2016/11/22
EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (resolution) (A8-0367/2018 - Pedro Silva Pereira)

I voted in favour. This is the biggest-ever free trade agreement concluded by the EU in the world, with 40% of global trade, 30% of world GDP within 635 million people. It will remove EUR 1 billion of duties paid annually by the EU companies exporting to Japan.
2016/11/22
EU-Japan Strategic Partnership Agreement (A8-0383/2018 - Alojz Peterle)

I voted in favour. This is the biggest-ever free trade agreement concluded by the EU in the world, with 40% of global trade, 30% of world GDP within 635 million people. It will remove EUR 1 billion of duties paid annually by the EU companies exporting to Japan.
2016/11/22
EU-Japan Strategic Partnership Agreement (resolution) (A8-0385/2018 - Alojz Peterle)

I voted in favour. This is the biggest-ever free trade agreement concluded by the EU in the world, with 40% of global trade, 30% of world GDP within 635 million people. It will remove EUR 1 billion of duties paid annually by the EU companies exporting to Japan.
2016/11/22
EU-Jordan Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0371/2018 - Keith Taylor)

I voted in favour of the report. The Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union, its Member States and Jordan was negotiated on the basis of the Council Decision adopted in October 2007 authorising the opening of negotiations. The Agreement was signed on 15 December 2010. It opens the respective markets and integrates Jordan into a Common Aviation Area with the EU, enabling all EU airlines to operate direct flights to Jordan from anywhere in the EU and vice-versa for Jordanian carriers. Cross-investments are encouraged and it removes all restrictions on prices, routes and quotas of flights between Jordan and the EU.
2016/11/22
Establishing Horizon Europe – laying down its rules for participation and dissemination (A8-0401/2018 - Dan Nica)

I voted in favour of the report. The Decision lays down the operational objectives, activities and rules for the implementation of the specific programme. It establishes shorter time to grant and more bottom-up calls, safeguards the ‘excellence’ criterion, strengthens the European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT) as well as adds a new ‘Excellence initiative’ to the widening part supporting excellence in EU 13, building networks and increase synergies with the European Regional Development Fund.
2016/11/22
Programme implementing Horizon Europe (A8-0410/2018 - Christian Ehler)

I voted in favour of the report. The report’s main points include an increased budget of EUR 120 billion, administrative simplifications for quicker funding, safeguard of the excellence criterion and a stronger involvement of all Member States.
2016/11/22
Single Market package (RC-B8-0557/2018, B8-0557/2018, B8-0558/2018, B8-0559/2018, B8-0560/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution addresses the fact that the goal of the European Commission to create a fully functioning Single Market has not been reached during the mandate and asks for more ambitious goals and legislative proposals to be implemented in the next mandate so that Europe would reach its goal.
2016/11/22
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on Terrorism (A8-0374/2018 - Monika Hohlmeier, Helga Stevens)

I voted in favour of the report. The report suggests to the Council to expand the powers of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to include the fight against organised crime and terrorism. Also, the creation of an EU ‘Centre of Excellence for Preventing Radicalisation’ (CoE PR) is encouraged. The report encourages Member States to ban and remove all printed and online propaganda that explicitly incites violent extremism and terrorist acts. It asks the Commission to create an online European platform for citizens to flag online terrorist content as well as to propose legislation establishing one centralised ECRIS system, allowing for the exchange of criminal record information concerning both EU nationals and third-country nationals. Europol should become a hub for decrypting information lawfully obtained in criminal investigations and to better support Member States. The establishment of a European Union Terrorist Financing Tracking System (TFTS) targeted on transactions by individuals with links to terrorism and their financing within the Single Euro Payments Area is strongly desired.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0392/2018 - David McAllister)

I voted in favour of the report. This report rolls out the European Parliament’s (EP) position to the 2017 Annual Report from the Council to the EP on the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The report provides a holistic view of the ongoing trends in international relations and the place and role of the European Union therein. Particular attention is paid to: a general strategic outlook, the EU approach, strengthening the strategic approach of the EU, financing of EU external action, the nexus between hard and soft power, as well as possible new solutions strengthening the coherence of EU external action.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0375/2018 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)

I voted in favour. In this resolution, the European Parliament reacts to the 2017 Annual Report from the Council to the EP on the Common Foreign and Security Policy, in particular the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy. It focuses primarily on: the Union’s strategic environment, general future of CSDP, capabilities for the Union’s security and defence, PESCO, CSDP missions and operations, EU-NATO relationship, CSDP partnerships, and last but not least, the parliamentary dimension.
2016/11/22
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2017 and the European Union’s policy on the matter (A8-0373/2018 - Petras Auštrevičius)

I voted in favour of the report. The main aim of this report is to look at the human rights and democracy challenges in third countries and the parliamentary scrutiny of human rights in external policies for the year 2016. It also seeks to clarify the cycle of human rights policy-making within the European Union. The rapporteur sees the role of Parliament as essential for the mainstreaming of human rights in the EU’s external policy.
2016/11/22
Establishing the European Defence Fund (A8-0412/2018 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)

I voted in favour of the report. European defence is one of the key priorities for the EU as underlined by the European Defence Action Plan adopted by the Commission in 2016. For that reason, the Commission has proposed the creation of a special fund to foster the EU’s defence capabilities as well as research and development in this sector. It was proposed to establish a dedicated fund under the 2021—2027 multiannual financial framework, ‘scaling up the funding for collaborative research in innovative defence products and technologies and for subsequent stages of the development cycle, including the development of prototypes’.
2016/11/22
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (A8-0409/2018 - Henna Virkkunen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Pavel Telička)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The CEF Programme beyond 2020 will continue to accelerate investment in the field of the trans-European networks (TEN) with the aim to complete and modernise the networks (core and comprehensive) taking into account climate objectives and making explicit horizontal objectives and priorities (cross-border and missing links), with a view to adapting to military requirements supporting dual-use civil and military transport infrastructure. With simplified rules on eligible actions and entities, synergies between the transport, energy and digital sectors, grants and award criteria, the view of the co-rapporteurs is to maintain the direct management by the Commission and introduce a more transparent approach on the work programmes. It will make the Programme more coherent and complementary with other EU programmes, respecting the current rules applied as provided for in the Financial Regulation.
2016/11/22
EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (A8-0369/2018 - Michael Gahler)

I voted in favour of the report. The report is the first of annual reports assessing the pace of the implementation of the AA/DCFTA with Ukraine. It sheds light on the general political climate and reform effort. It outlines areas where there has been positive change and where progress lags. It identifies as well EP’s major concerns in relation to Ukraine: a proper functioning legal framework to fight corruptions, including institutions, financial transparency and audit; finalisation of the decentralisation reform; lack of efforts in de-oligarchisation and privatisation. The report also addresses the latest security developments in the Sea of Azov in relation to the construction of the bridge over the Strait of Kerch and the incident of 25 November 2018.
2016/11/22
Education in the digital era: challenges, opportunities and lessons for EU policy design (A8-0400/2018 - Yana Toom)

I voted in favour of the report. This report is based on the fact that given the rapid technological changes, education systems should seek to adapt, both in terms of using new technologies and of teaching skills and competences and training teachers and trainers. The acquisition of digital skills requires a coherent lifelong approach anchored in formal, non-formal and informal education settings.
2016/11/22
Coordination of social security systems (A8-0386/2018 - Guillaume Balas)

I voted against the report. The compromises that were reached in the EMPL Committee do not provide a balanced approach, especially with regard to the posting of workers. Also, the unfair mechanism for reimbursement of workersʼ unemployment benefits ʻdrainsʼ poorer social security systems in favour of richer ones.
2016/11/22
Establishing a European Labour Authority (A8-0391/2018 - Jeroen Lenaers)

I voted in favour of the report. The creation of a European Labour Authority is necessary because of the fast increase in the number of Europeans working in a Member State other than their country of origin, the large number of daily commuters and the important need for information on job opportunities and rights at home and abroad. The new concept of a European Labour Authority is closely related to three principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, on active support for employment, on secure and adaptable employment and on social protection.
2016/11/22
Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund: Re-commitment of remaining amounts (A8-0370/2018 - Miriam Dalli)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Commission has committed funds to Member States’ national programmes under the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) to support the implementation of Council Decisions establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece. Of the EUR 843 million committed in 2016 to Member States’ national programmes under the AMIF, some EUR 567 million are still available. However, payments should be made for these commitments before the end of 2018, after which the amounts will no longer be available to Member States for their national programmes under the AMIF.
2016/11/22
Establishing a Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) (A8-0397/2018 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)

I voted in favour of the report. The programme for the environment and climate action (LIFE), established for the period 2014 to 2020, is the latest in a series of Union programmes over 25 years which support the implementation of environmental and climate legislation and policy priorities. Through its catalytic role, the programme supports small scale actions intended to initiate, expand or promote sustainable production, distribution and consumption practices, as well as to protect natural heritage.
2016/11/22
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (A8-0142/2018 - Claude Rolin)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The directive sets obligations for employers such as to eliminate or replace with a substance, which is not or less dangerous. This obligation is mandatory only if an alternative is available. Also, it reduces workers’ level of exposure as much as is technically possible, wherever a carcinogen or mutagen is used, the employer shall apply prescribed protection procedure.
2016/11/22
Transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain (A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer)

I voted against the report. The report is supposed to strengthen the transparency rules applicable to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), increase the reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies on which EFSA relies for risk assessment and improve EFSA’s governance and strengthen risk communication. However, a more balanced approach should have been reached in regard to the disclosure of information.
2016/11/22
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0273/2017 - Anne Sander)

I voted in favour of the report. The report states that the European Parliament will nominate one independent expert to the Management Board without voting rights. The person selected for the post of executive director will make a statement before the European Parliament and respond to questions, without this delaying his/her appointment. Gender balance in the Management Board is strengthened. A management board at the most senior level of each agency is responsible for the adoption of the budget and the approval of strategic priorities. It also has appointing authority powers.
2016/11/22
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0274/2017 - Czesław Hoc)

I voted in favour of the report. This proposed regulation seeks to revise the founding regulation of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) for a fourth time. This revision will allow to define more precisely the role of EU-OSHA in supporting the Commission and other EU institutions and bodies, the Member States, the social partners and those involved in the field in shaping and implementing policies on health and safety at work at both national and European levels.
2016/11/22
European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0275/2017 - Enrique Calvet Chambon)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The revision of the agreement updated the objectives and tasks of Eurofound in order to reflect the developments within the agency. Involvement of the European Parliament will be ensured through an independent expert appointed by the parliamentary committee responsible. Eurofound’s governance structure has also been improved: the Management Board is responsible for the adoption of the budget and approval of strategic priorities. The board keeps its tripartite structure and is assisted in its tasks by an executive board, which supports the decision-making and monitoring processes. Emphasis on gender balance on the Management Board is strengthened.
2016/11/22
Complementing EU type-approval legislation with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (A8-0359/2018 - Marlene Mizzi)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The approach is based on two main principles: trying to keep the EU type-approval system as consistent as possible, and not undermining the general Brexit negotiations.The report aims to address the consequences of the UK’s withdrawal for the European system of type approval of motor vehicles, in order to ensure regulatory compliance and business continuity. Following Brexit, manufacturers who obtained approvals in the UK in the past will be able to obtain new approvals from EU27 type-approval authorities, in order to ensure continued compliance with EU legislation and retain access to the Union market. The principle of liability is maintained on both sides, for manufacturers and for the type-approval authorities.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: maximum residue levels for acetamiprid in certain products (B8-0556/2018)

. ‒ I voted against. The proposed maximum level set by the Commission for acetamiprid in certain products complies with EU standards.
2016/11/22
Humanitarian Visas (A8-0423/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Commission is being asked for a legislative proposal to establish a European Humanitarian Visa giving access to European territory – exclusively to the Member State issuing the visa – for the sole purpose of submitting an application for international protection. Despite many announcements and requests for safe and legal pathways for asylum-seekers into Europe, the EU lacks a harmonised framework of protected entry procedures.
2016/11/22
Visa Code (A8-0434/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Although an increasing number of people have been travelling to the EU for tourism and business in recent years, visa application procedures are still costly and cumbersome. With the recast proposal on the visa code, the Commission aims to facilitate tourism, trade and business, whilst strengthening security and mitigating irregular migration.
2016/11/22
Common system of value added tax as regards the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of goods and services above a certain threshold (A8-0418/2018 - Gabriel Mato)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Adoption of the report is Parliament’s response by means of consultation to the COM amending proposal to the VAT Directive as regards the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of goods and services above a certain threshold.
2016/11/22
Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0365/2018 - Sergei Stanishev)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the report is to confirm the position of the European Parliament in the process of the full accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen area. As a part of the implementation of the Entry/Exit System, passive access to the Visa Information System (VIS) and Schengen Information System (SIS) was granted to both Member States.
2016/11/22
Military mobility (A8-0372/2018 - Tunne Kelam)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Military mobility is considered to be a concrete step designed to meet the EU’s specific security and defence needs, related to collective defence and the ability to intervene in crises abroad is fundamentally dependent on the capability to move troops, material and equipment across Member States territory freely and rapidly. A substantial number of obstacles, physical, legal and regulatory, often make these movements difficult by imposing significant delays. The aim of military mobility is to overcome those limitations. Achieving military mobility in Europe is an undertaking derived first and foremost from the expressed commitment and political will of Member States, while the EU should contribute by guiding the process by setting a framework for requirements, providing funding and drafting protocols to facilitate the efficient movement of technical equipment and human resources.
2016/11/22
New European Agenda for Culture (A8-0388/2018 - Giorgos Grammatikakis)

I voted in favour of the report. Europe is facing multiple challenges, such as growing social inequalities, diverse populations, populism, radicalisation, and security threats that shake the foundations of European integration and call into question the solidarity between Member States. Therefore, the aim of the report is not only to feed into the shaping of cultural policies and the assessment of the results of the previous Agenda. It is also to ensure that the right balance is struck between social, economic and cultural policies and that there is consistency between the new Agenda and other programmes such as Creative Europe and Europe for Citizens.
2016/11/22
Public procurement strategy package (A8-0229/2018 - Carlos Coelho)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report asks Member States for more timely and efficient implementation of the relevant Directives from 2014 and the Commission for better and more clearly organised guidelines to help the Member States. It underlines the importance of the quality criteria: other factors than the lowest price, disregarding quality, sustainability and social inclusion, should be applied. Also, it suggests concrete ways to encourage SMEs to take part in tenders and avoid the risk of single supplier dependency.
2016/11/22
EU Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) (A8-0320/2017 - Axel Voss)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. In July 2013, the Commission presented its proposal for a single, updated legal framework for Eurojust. Whilst building on Council Decision 2002/187/JHA which established Eurojust, the proposal included a new governance model for the Agency and provisions to streamline its functioning and structure. The new legislation will provide Eurojust with an updated mandate, a streamlined administrative structure and high data protection standards.
2016/11/22
Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders (A8-0001/2018 - Nathalie Griesbeck)

I voted in favour of the report. It will facilitate cross-border recovery of criminal assets and lead to more efficient freezing and confiscation of funds from illicit origin in the EU without cumbersome formalities. Recovered assets will be used for the compensation of victims, where national legislation allows it. It also provides additional funds to invest back into law enforcement activities or other crime prevention initiatives or it can be used for other public interest or social purpose.
2016/11/22
Free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (A8-0201/2018 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)

I voted in favour of the report. The regulation unifies the EU data market by prohibiting requirements for data to be located in a specific territory of the Union. It could be called as an establishment of the fifth EU fundamental right – free movement of data. In the case where personal and non-personal data are overlapping this Regulation shall not prejudice the application of General Data protection regulation. The grounds of public security as an exception for possible restriction should comply with the principle of proportionality.
2016/11/22
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0444/2018, B8-0444/2018, B8-0445/2018, B8-0446/2018, B8-0447/2018, B8-0448/2018, B8-0449/2018, B8-0450/2018)

I voted in favour of the resolution. It condemns the ongoing violence in Yemen and all attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure. Also it stresses that only a political, inclusive and negotiated solution to the conflict can restore peace and preserve the unity, sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Yemen, and calls on all international and regional actors to engage constructively with the parties in Yemen to enable a de-escalation of the conflict and a negotiated settlement.
2016/11/22
Fighting customs fraud and protecting EU own resources (B8-0400/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls on the Commission to contribute to the completion and financial sustainability of the EU customs information systems as well as to develop a suitable methodology and produce periodic estimates of the customs gap as from 2019, and to report back to Parliament every six months.
2016/11/22
Harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the VAT system (A8-0280/2018 - Jeppe Kofod)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The proposal introduces fundamental principles for the future definitive VAT-system and also quick fixes (such as a simplification for call-off stock arrangements in cross-border trade and a simplification for chain transactions). The aim is to reduce cross-border VAT fraud as well as to reduce compliance costs for business.
2016/11/22
VAT: period of application of the reverse charge mechanism and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism (A8-0283/2018 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims to amend Council Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of VAT in order to combat fraud affecting certain supplies of goods and services and to assist Member States in dealing with cases of sudden and massive VAT fraud. These arrangements, which should enter into force on 1 July 2022, provide a fundamental response to missing trader intra-Community (MTIC) fraud.
2016/11/22
Administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register (A8-0285/2018 - Ivana Maletić)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal lays down the legal basis for administrative cooperation between Member States. It concerns the automation of the supervision of movements of excise goods which have been released for consumption in one Member State and that are being moved to another Member State in order to be delivered for commercial purposes in that other EU country.
2016/11/22
Health technology assessment (A8-0289/2018 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Health technology assessment (HTA) is a research-based tool to support decision-making in healthcare. HTA assesses the added value of new or existing health technologies – medicines, medical devices, diagnostic tools, surgical procedures, and measures for disease prevention, diagnosis or treatment – compared with other health technologies. The aim, with the adoption of this report, is to boost cooperation amongst EU Member States in assessing health technology.
2016/11/22
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli)

. ‒ I voted against the report. The Commission proposal sets new CO2 emission standards for passenger cars and vans in the EU for the period after 2020. I believe that the agreed compromise for CO2 emission standards is too high and most of the Member States – especially those in which the usage of electric vehicles is still low due to unaffordable prices – will have difficulties in implementing these new CO2 standards. It is important to be ambitious when fighting climate change: but measures must also be reasonable in order to be efficient.
2016/11/22
Rates of value added tax (A8-0279/2018 - Tibor Szanyi)

I voted in favour of the report. The report endorses further advancement towards the definitive VAT regime, while underlining that Member States should not ignore the objective of ensuring greater convergence in VAT rates. It highlights that current fragmentation of the VAT system within the internal market places obstacles in the way of the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). With particular focus on the needs of SMEs engaged in intra-Community cross-border business, and in order to facilitate trade and to increase legal certainty in the single market, the report proposes that the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, should establish a comprehensive and publicly accessible Union VAT Web Information Portal for businesses.
2016/11/22
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts (B8-0442/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution notes that IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts necessitate a fundamental change in the accounting for insurance contracts which would bring the benefits of more consistency and transparency.
2016/11/22
Distributed ledger technologies and blockchains: building trust with disintermediation (B8-0397/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls for an open and innovation friendly regulation on blockchain technology. The resolution sends us a clear message: blockchain technology is a new technology which can benefit Europe in many areas by bringing more efficiency and transparency, for example, into the supply chain, energy, public services and financial services, to name a few. Nevertheless, the technology is still in a pre-mature stage; therefore, we should aim towards a progressive regulation that would not hinder its progress and which Europe can greatly benefit from.
2016/11/22
EU Agenda for Rural, Mountainous and Remote Areas (B8-0399/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls for the EU Agenda for Rural, Mountainous and Remote Areas to promote socioeconomic development, economic growth and diversification, social wellbeing, protection of nature, and cooperation and interconnection with urban areas in order to foster cohesion and prevent the risk of territorial fragmentation. It urges the establishment of a Smart Villages Pact in order to ensure a more effective, integrated and coordinated approach to EU policies on rural areas.
2016/11/22
Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (A8-0290/2018 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)

I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of this proposal is to codify Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement. The text lists third countries whose nationals must have a visa to cross the external borders of a Member State. It also lists the countries whose nationals are exempt from the visa requirement for stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period.
2016/11/22
EU-Morocco Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: terms and conditions for the participation of Morocco in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0281/2018 - Aldo Patriciello)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the agreement is to allow Morocco to participate in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA). PRIMA aims to implement a joint programme to foster research and innovation capacities and to develop knowledge and common innovative solutions for improving the efficiency, safety, security and sustainability of agro-food systems and of integrated water provision and management in the Mediterranean area.
2016/11/22
EU-Canada air transport agreement (A8-0254/2018 - Francisco Assis)

I voted in favour. It sets the objective of establishing an Open Aviation Area between the EU and Canada, to create a single market for air transport in which investment could flow freely and where European and Canadian airlines would be able to provide air services without any restriction, including in the domestic markets of both parties.
2016/11/22
Inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union (A8-0284/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)

I voted in favour of the report. At Italy’s request, the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano should be included in the EU customs territory and in the territory of the Union to which Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty 1 (the ‘excise directive’) applies. The geographic location of the two territories as Italian exclaves within the territory of Switzerland has historically justified their exclusion from the EU customs territory but Italy considers this exclusion to be no longer necessary, in particular because otherwise Switzerland now wishes to include them within its customs territory.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/001 NL/Financial service activities (A8-0294/2018 - Ivana Maletić)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim is to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist the Netherlands, which are faced with redundancies in the financial services industry. On 23 February 2018, the Netherlands submitted an application for a financial contribution from the EGF following 1 324 redundancies in the economic sector. The application relates to 1 324 workers made redundant; the majority of workers are aged between 30 and 54. The redundancies are expected to have a significant adverse effect on the local economy.
2016/11/22
Provision of audiovisual media services (A8-0192/2017 - Sabine Verheyen, Petra Kammerevert)

I voted in favour of the report. This final agreement improves the current AVMS legislation. The new directive will extend the scope of the legislation to non-linear services (Video Sharing Platforms and other audio-visual media service providers on internet), to avoid unfair competition between these two media: this is the case in the promotion of European works and on hate speech and protection of minors.Among other things, it strengthens the country of origin principle, offers a better protection of minors against harmful content, provides stronger rules against hate speech and public provocation, helps to promote the European works and gives more flexibility in television advertising with a new rule including a prime time period from 18.00 to midnight, during which advertising will be allowed to take up a maximum of 20 % (72 minutes) of broadcasting time, with interruption only every 30 minutes.
2016/11/22
Draft Amending Budget No 5/2018: cancellation of the reserve related to the support to Turkey from the Instrument for Pre-Accession and reinforcement of the European Neighbourhood Instrument and of the Humanitarian Aid for orther urgent actions (A8-0292/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report amends the budget regarding the reserved funds to support Turkey to its pre-accession. It was decided to cancel the reserved amounts of EUR 70 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 35 million in payment appropriations which were in support for political reforms and related progressive alignment with the Union acquis. However, the condition set to release these amounts – namely sufficient progress by Turkey in the areas of the rule of law, democracy, human rights and freedom of the press – has not been met.
2016/11/22
Eurojust and Albania Cooperation Agreement (A8-0275/2018 - Laura Ferrara)

I voted in favour of the report. The Eurojust-Albania Cooperation agreement follows the model of similar agreements concluded by Eurojust in the past. The purpose of such agreements is to foster cooperation as regards combating serious crime, especially organised crime and terrorism. They provide, inter alia, for liaison officers, contact points and exchange of information.
2016/11/22
Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and free movement of such data (A8-0313/2017 - Cornelia Ernst)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal seeks to update the data protection legal framework for the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies (Regulation 45/2001) and align it with the rules and principles of the GDPR.
2016/11/22
Single Digital Gateway (A8-0054/2018 - Marlene Mizzi)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the proposal is to improve online availability, quality and findability of certain information and certain online procedures, certain problem-solving and assistance services on EU rights and national rules concerning the operation and movement in EU. National rules across Member States are not harmonised, so users need help finding out which rules they have to comply with in a Member State. As a result, the Commission has decided to create a single digital gateway, which will become the central, online and easily accessible entry point for people and businesses looking for complete, accurate and up-to-date information, administrative procedures and assistance services linked to their single market rights.
2016/11/22
July 2018 fires at Mati in the Attica Region, Greece and the EU response

I voted in favour. The resolution recognizes significant damage that fires caused in Mati in the Attica Region in Greece and calls for the quick adoption of the revised regulation on the EU Civil Protection Mechanism to enable more and more effective cooperation as well as to strengthen the response capacity, particularly with regard to fighting the devastating consequences of climate change across the EU.
2016/11/22
The threat of demolition of Khan al-Ahmar and other Bedouin villages

I voted against. The resolution calls for the Israeli government to shelve the relocation plan that would lead to the demolition of Khan al-Ahmar and the forcible transfer of its population to another location, and considers it of the utmost importance that the EU continue to speak with one voice on this matter. It calls on the Israeli Government to put an immediate end to its policy of threats of demolition and actual eviction against the Bedouin communities living in the Negev and in Area C in the occupied West Bank.
2016/11/22
A European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy (A8-0262/2018 - Mark Demesmaeker)

I voted in favour. The strategy identifies key challenges, including the low reuse and recycling rates of plastic waste, the greenhouse gas emissions associated with plastics production and incineration, and the presence of plastic waste (including micro plastics) in oceans. The Commission depicts its ‘vision for Europe’s new plastics economy’, where among other things, all plastic packaging should be designed to be recyclable or reusable by 2030.
2016/11/22
Options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation (B8-0363/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls upon the Commission, the Member States and the European Chemicals Agency to step up their efforts to substitute substances of very high concern and to restrict substances that pose unacceptable risks to human health or the environment in the context of REACH, not least as a means to fulfil the requirement of the 7th Environment Action Programme to develop non-toxic material cycles so that recycled waste can be used as a major, reliable source of raw material within the European Union.
2016/11/22
A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (A8-0257/2018 - Karin Kadenbach)

I voted in favour. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for an estimated 25 000 deaths and EUR 1.5 billion in extra healthcare costs every year in the EU alone. The rise in AMR is due to a number of factors such as excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics in humans, veterinary overuse in livestock, and poor hygiene conditions in healthcare settings or in the food chain. The resolution calls for more stringent measures, increased surveillance and monitoring, as well as for more research to be performed on new antimicrobials.
2016/11/22
Europe on the Move: an agenda for the future of mobility in the EU (A8-0241/2018 - István Ujhelyi)

I voted in favour. The Commission Communication on ‘Europe on the Move: an agenda for a socially fair transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility for all’ addresses a wide range of issues facing the road mobility sector and focuses on the issues which are subject to legislative proposals in the framework of the Mobility package.The purpose of this strategic own-initiative report is to build on the ideas presented in the Commission’s communication and to highlight the key aspects of the transport policy which have not been covered by legislative proposals in the framework of the Mobility package.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Plant Protection Products Regulation (A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc)

I voted in favour of the report. The INI report analyses the application of the Plant Protection Products Regulation No 1107/2009 on the placing on the market of plant protection products (PPP) since it entry into force on 14 June 2011. The regulation also aims to clarify, harmonise and accelerate procedures linked to PPPs. It also aims to encourage mutual recognition of PPP authorisations by Member States and make relevant information available for applicants, importers, users, public authorities and consumers.
2016/11/22
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová)

I voted in favour of the report. The draft report draws attention to the issue that products marketed and sold under the exact same brands do not always have identical product compositions. It calls among others for legal adjustments of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and for better and more efficient awareness raising activities to avoid the intentional misleading of consumers.
2016/11/22
Nominal quantities for placing on the Union market of single distilled shochu (A8-0255/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Commission proposal is connected to the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Japan. It aims at introducing a derogation from Union rules concerning bottle sizes, for single distilled shochu, a spirit drink produced by pot still and bottled in Japan.
2016/11/22
Amendment to the US-EU Memorandum of Cooperation (deployment of air traffic management systems) (A8-0214/2018 - Rolandas Paksas)

. ‒ I voted in favour. Sharing the common goal to develop safer and more efficient air transport, in 2011, the European Union and the United States of America signed the Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) in civil aviation research and development. Parliament is now giving its consent to conclusion of the agreement on Amendment 1 to the MoC, which includes a revised text of the MoC and a revised Annex 1 on ‘ATM modernisation and global interoperability’.
2016/11/22
Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the EU (accession of Croatia) (A8-0256/2018 - Francisco Assis)

I voted in favour. The Council is requesting the consent of Parliament to conclude a Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement with Canada, to take account of the accession to the EU of Croatia. It will allow Croatia to accede as a new Member of the EU to the Air Transport Agreement with Canada.
2016/11/22
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss)

I voted against the proposal. I believe that the compromise reached by the rapporteur was not balanced and it will cause legal uncertainty and unnecessary burden for start-ups and SMEs. Also, it does not enhance Europe’s potential for innovation, especially when it comes to text and data mining (TDM) and its direct impact on artificial intelligence (AI).
2016/11/22
Controls on cash entering or leaving the Union (A8-0394/2017 - Mady Delvaux, Juan Fernando López Aguilar)

I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of the regulation is to update the EU legal framework on cash controls in view of the latest developments in the relevant preventive measures to fight money-laundering and terrorist financing. It replaces the ‘Cash Controls Regulation’ (1889/2005) which has applied since 2007.
2016/11/22
Countering money laundering by criminal law (A8-0405/2017 - Ignazio Corrao)

I voted in favour of the report. The Directive forms part of the Commission Action Plan to strengthen the fight against terrorist financing. It establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of money laundering and thereby supplements the 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive.
2016/11/22
The situation in Hungary (A8-0250/2018 - Judith Sargentini)

I voted in favour of the report. The report identifies key issues in Hungary which undermine the rule of law and democracy principles such as functioning of constitution and electoral system, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, academic freedom and instructs the European Commission to start Article 7 procedure of the TEU.
2016/11/22
Autonomous weapon systems (RC-B8-0308/2018, B8-0308/2018, B8-0309/2018, B8-0355/2018, B8-0359/2018, B8-0360/2018, B8-0361/2018, B8-0362/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls to outlaw internationally so called lethal autonomous weapons systems known as killer robots. The UN has already started initiative to outlaw killer robots as well.
2016/11/22
State of EU-US relations (A8-0251/2018 - Elmar Brok)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasizes that the EU-US partnership is unparalleled based on the historical and strategic partnership and shared common values, and thus this relationship remains crucial for both sides. It touches upon key issues such as the global rules based order, the role of international institutions, defence and security policy, strengthening relations with the US Senate and House of Representatives, support for Ukraine and the Western Balkans, relations with China and Russia, the JCPOA agreement for Iran, denuclearisation of North Korea, Middle East Peace Agreement, the issue of migration management, cooperation on the environment, and the need for the EU to advance its own defence capacities and work for a strategic autonomy.
2016/11/22
State of EU-China relations (A8-0252/2018 - Bas Belder)

I voted in favour of the report. The EU-China Strategic Partnership is one of the most important partnerships for the EU and there is still much more potential for deepening this relationship and for further cooperation in the international arena. Parliament points out that the EU’s engagement with China should be principled, practical and pragmatic, staying true to its interests and values. It is underlined that the promotion of human rights and the rule of law must be at the core of the EU’s engagement with China. Parliament calls on China to act upon the issues raised at the Human Right Dialogue, to fulfil its international obligations and to respect its own constitutional safeguards to upholding the rule of law.
2016/11/22
Equivalence of field inspections (A8-0253/2018 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the proposal is to implement several articles of directives on recognition of the equivalence of fodder plant, cereal, vegetable and oil and fibre plantseed harvested in a non-EU country, in this case Brazil.
2016/11/22
Common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises (A8-0260/2018 - Tom Vandenkendelaere)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to ease the VAT compliance burden on SMEs, which I strongly support. Small businesses bear proportionally higher VAT compliance costs than larger businesses, which not only violates the principle of fair taxation, but also hampers entrepreneurship. Therefore, this proposal aims to foster entrepreneurship across the Union by introducing some administrative simplification measures for small enterprises.
2016/11/22
Implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0271/2018 - Branislav Škripek)

I voted in favour of the report. The implementation of the Council decision on information exchange concerning, and risk assessment and control of, new psychoactive substances aims to establish measures which would ensure the continuity of control measures across Member States on the new substances.The Council requested an assessment of the risks caused by these new substances from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland (A8-0272/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations and to show solidarity with the populations of regions struck by disasters. The report aims to earmark the Fund contribution for Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland, which suffered serious natural disasters during 2017.
2016/11/22
Draft Amending Budget No 4/2018: mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland (A8-0273/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)

I voted in favour of the report. The report approves the allocation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland because of the natural disasters that happened in those countries in 2017.
2016/11/22
The impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland (A8-0240/2018 - Derek Vaughan)

I voted in favour of the report. The report presents an overview of the cohesion policy investment’s influence in the province. One of the key points of the report is the importance of the cohesion funding, not only for the Northern Irish economy, but also for the peace process. Projects funded under the Peace programme, as well as under the Interreg programmes, are of particular importance, as they encourage cross-border and cross-community contacts.
2016/11/22
Specific measures for Greece (A8-0244/2018 - Pascal Arimont)

I voted in favour of the report. The report looks into the implementation of the specific measures proposed by the European Commission which aimed to ensure the necessary liquidity to both finalise the implementation of programmes under the 2007-2013 programming period and to start the implementation of the current programming period. The measures were adopted in 2015. The report acknowledges the positive impact of the measures taken on the Greek economy.
2016/11/22
Pathways for the reintegration of workers recovering from injury and illness into quality employment (A8-0208/2018 - Jana Žitňanská)

I voted in favour of the report. The own-initiative report seeks to find EU added value in policies reintegrating workers back to employment after a serious injury or illness, for example by helping Member States to develop preventive measures, comprehensive policy responses and a cultural shift when it comes to general attitudes. The report highlights that, in addition to proven benefits for worker’s economic and social well-being, successful reintegration back to work also has a strong economic case for companies and for the society as a whole.
2016/11/22
Relationships between the EU and third countries concerning financial services regulation and supervision (A8-0263/2018 - Brian Hayes)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The own-initiative report pretends to streamline the relationships with 3rd countries in the field of financial services, which currently are organised mainly with the ‘equivalence procedure’ tool. This report has attract a lot of attention due to Brexit.
2016/11/22
Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions (A8-0266/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Differing legal frameworks and availability of public services in the Member States require greater focus and intensive measures at both national and EU levels. Problems faced by the border regions also vary and depend on their particular characteristics.
2016/11/22
European Solidarity Corps (A8-0060/2018 - Helga Trüpel)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The European Solidarity Corps was launched by President Juncker in his State of the Union address in 2016, after the Brexit referendum, to allow young people to commit in solidarity activities and to reinforce their feeling of belonging with European Union values. The programme replaces the European Voluntary Service and started in 2017 and is supposed to involve 100 000 young people.
2016/11/22
Structural Reform Support Programme: financial envelope and general objective (A8-0227/2018 - Ruža Tomašić)

I voted in favour of the report. The aim of the Commission Proposal is to amend Regulation (EU) 2017/825 in order to increase the financial envelope of the Structural Reform Support Programme from EUR 142.8 million to EUR 222.8 million through the use of the Flexibility Instrument in the MFF and to adapt its general objective in order to allow funding for euro preparation actions and activities.
2016/11/22
Euratom Programme complementing the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (A8-0258/2018 - Rebecca Harms)

I voted in favour of the report. The current proposal extends the Euratom research programme for two years, until 2020, to ensure the seamless continuation until the start of the next programme.
2016/11/22
Measures to prevent and combat mobbing and sexual harassment at the workplace, in public spaces, and in political life in the EU (A8-0265/2018 - Pina Picierno)

I voted in favour of the report. In the EU, up to 55% of women have been sexually harassed. The draft report deplores the fact that laws and definitions in this area vary across Member States. It also reiterates the call on the Commission to propose a directive against all forms of violence against women, including updates in common definitions and legal standards that treat it as a crime.
2016/11/22
Language equality in the digital age (A8-0228/2018 - Jill Evans)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report. It proposes different policy options that would improve language equality in Europe through the use of new technologies, by improving the institutional frameworks for language technology policies, by creating new research policies to increase the use of language technology in Europe, by using education policies to secure the future of language equality in the digital age, and by increasing support for both private companies and public bodies in making better use of language technologies.
2016/11/22
Structural and financial barriers in the access to culture (A8-0169/2018 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims to carry out a cross-sectoral analysis of existing obstacles to cultural access and participation and therefore it concerns not only structural and financial barriers to access but also social and digital barriers and – by far the most important problem – educational barriers.
2016/11/22
Proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions (A8-0395/2017 - Andreas Schwab)

I voted in favour of the report. The Directive harmonises the way in which these proportionality tests are carried out and the criteria that will be applied. It will require Member States to carry out a proportionality test before establishing new provisions or changing current ones for regulated professions complementing the existing provisions of the Professional Qualifications Directive. Therefore, it will ensure that national measures are proportionate and that they do not unduly restrict access to professional activities or create unjustified burdens in the internal market.
2016/11/22
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations: Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)

I voted in favour. I supported the compromise amendments reached in TRAN committee regarding international transport which supposed to be exclude the posting for drivers operating in international transport from posting rules. Otherwise it would create significant burden for international transport drivers in the EU, especially in the peripheral Member States like Lithuania and would hinder the EU internal market.
2016/11/22
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations: Amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (A8-0205/2018 - Wim van de Camp)

I voted in favour of the report agreed in TRAN committee. It was reached the agreement on rest in cabin and secured parking areas. The regular weekly rest periods, reduced weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours shall not be taken in a vehicle. This shall not apply if the rest is taken in locations certified as Dedicated Parking areas and the vehicle has suitable sleeping facilities for each driver.
2016/11/22
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Amending Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)

I voted against the report. In my opinion, the final report reached in TRAN committee in regard to cabotage was not sufficient and too burdensome. It was supposed to allow cabotage operations in one Member State for 48h, the overall possible term for performing cabotage operations is seven days; there is a cooling-off period (when no cabotage operations are allowed) of 72 h and the return home would be mandatory with the vehicle.
2016/11/22
Insolvency proceedings: updated annexes to the Regulation (A8-0174/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)

I voted in favour. The vote was of a legislative technical matter to agree to replace Annex A to the regulation on the proposal agreed between the European Parliament and the Council on insolvency proceedings.
2016/11/22
EU-Iceland Agreement on supplementary rules for external borders and visas for 2014-2020 (A8-0196/2018 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen)

I voted in favour. This is regarding the draft agreement between the European Union and Iceland on supplementary rules in relation to providing financial support for external borders and visas. It is a part of the Internal Security Fund for the period between 2014 and 2020.
2016/11/22
EU-Switzerland Agreement on supplementary rules for external borders and visas for 2014-2020 (A8-0195/2018 - Claude Moraes)

. ‒ I voted in favour of giving consent to the draft Council decision on the agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to providing financial support for external borders and visas. This is a part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0192/2018 - Monica Macovei)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report. Full participation of all the Member States in the Schengen Information System will increase security in the Schengen area and improve the fight against serious crime and terrorism.
2016/11/22
Cohesion policy and the circular economy (A8-0184/2018 - Davor Škrlec)

I voted in favour of the report. As one of the core EU policies, cohesion policy is providing significant investment in this field, ensuring appropriate delivery tools for the circular economy. This report looks into ways cohesion policy is already contributing to the objective of circular economy, highlighting both the achievements at this stage and the problems which are still to be solved.
2016/11/22
Further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0183/2018 - Jarosław Wałęsa)

I voted in favour of this report because it is necessary to continue supporting Ukraine. The European Commission can begin to negotiate the Memorandum of Understanding with Ukraine in order to help the country to cover part of its external financing needs and to provide incentives to set up reforms.
2016/11/22
Negotiations on the modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0158/2018 - Charles Tannock)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report, which calls for cooperation between Chile and the EU to be considerably strengthened. Multilateral collaboration plays an important role in promoting international security and effectively tackling global challenges. This agreement also benefits mobility between the EU and Chile via student exchange programmes, as well as scientific and technological exchanges and cultural cooperation.
2016/11/22
EU-NATO relations (A8-0188/2018 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report. More effective and efficient cooperation between the EU and NATO is a means to achieve shared security priorities as well as strengthened mutual values such as liberal democracy, multilateralism, human rights protection and the rule of law. This report focuses on areas of cooperation such as cybersecurity/cyber-defence, capabilities, maritime issues, counter-terrorism, military mobility, women, peace and security.
2016/11/22
Cyber defence (A8-0189/2018 - Urmas Paet)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report which is an appreciation of the increasing importance of the cyber—domain in security and defence matters. The effective competences in the cyber—domain are with the Member States. However, it also acknowledges an important coordination role for the European Union level in regard to national efforts.
2016/11/22
State of play of recreational fisheries in the EU (A8-0191/2018 - Norica Nicolai)

I voted in favour. The significant impacts of recreational fishing should be taken into account in the assessment of the stocks at stake, given that the impact varies between fish stocks and represents 2% to 72% of the total catch. Since evidence for managing these fisheries is often limited, it is necessary for the Commission and Member States to collect more data regularly and to adopt the necessary regulation in order to ensure a good level of reliable data throughout the EU.
2016/11/22
Clearing obligation, reporting requirements and risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives and trade repositories (A8-0181/2018 - Werner Langen)

I voted in favour. The main objective of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) is to reduce systematic risk by increasing the transparency of the derivatives market through different requirements. The proposal to amend the EMIR Regulation simplifies the rules applicable to over-the-counter derivatives and makes them more proportionate in order to reduce costs and the regulatory burden weighing on market participants.
2016/11/22
Common rules in the field of civil aviation and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (A8-0364/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The new regulation contains Europe-wide rules for the registration and certification of drones. The EASA will start developing risk-based safety procedures for national aviation authorities instead of the one-size-fits-all that is currently used. This regulation will improve the effectiveness of our safety controls and significantly cut red tape for airlines and airports.
2016/11/22
CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0010/2018 - Damiano Zoffoli)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report. This report contains new rules to monitor and report carbon dioxide emissions from heavy-duty vehicles (HDV), such as trucks and buses, in a standardised way. The European Commission will be able to fine companies that do not report their data or are caught falsifying results. Data will be made publicly available through the European Environment Agency.
2016/11/22
Modernisation of education in the EU (A8-0173/2018 - Krystyna Łybacka)

I voted in favour of this report, which sends a strong signal to Member States and regional authorities to increase investment in education and to support teachers and managers, both in the area of modern technologies and in the development of learner—centred teaching methods. Education is a key aspect of economic potential and a crucial factor for the development of the individual as a whole.
2016/11/22
Towards a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector (A8-0186/2018 - Carlos Iturgaiz)

I voted in favour of this report. In Europe, aquaculture accounts for about 20% of fish production. Therefore, it is very important to obtain a growing, sustainable and innovative EU aquaculture sector. This report is intended to overcome challenges facing the EU aquaculture sector by taking measures and financial means.
2016/11/22
Odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework (A8-0155/2018 - Ismail Ertug)

I voted in favour. Odometer fraud should be regarded as an offence because it distorts the proper functioning of the internal market and imposes unfair additional costs to consumers, insurers, and leasing companies. This results in economic damage for the whole of the EU that ranges between EUR 5.6 and 9.6 billion.
2016/11/22
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A8-0180/2018 - Elisabetta Gardini)

I voted in favour of the report. The Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) was established in 2001 to improve the EU response to natural and man—made disasters inside and outside Europe. However, the role of Member States was of a voluntary nature. The European Commission has offered new incentives on how to improve the mechanism, such as reinforcing the collective ability to respond to disasters and to address identified capacity gaps. Also, red tape was simplified in order to ensure rapid access to assistance.
2016/11/22
Connecting Europe facility after 2020 (RC-B8-0242/2018, B8-0242/2018, B8-0243/2018, B8-0245/2018, B8-0246/2018, B8-0247/2018)

I voted against. Further consideration must be taken into account in order to effectively decide on a budget that would be sustainable for transnational cooperation and consideration which would benefit the EU.
2016/11/22
Situation in Nicaragua (RC-B8-0244/2018, B8-0244/2018, B8-0248/2018, B8-0249/2018, B8-0250/2018, B8-0251/2018, B8-0252/2018, B8-0253/2018)

I voted against the resolution. Further discussion must be completed when considering the political, economic and social situation in Nicaragua. Moreover, there must be an active dialogue between national and international actors in Nicaragua with regard to crime and corruption before an effective resolution can be put in place.
2016/11/22
Gender equality and women's empowerment: transforming the lives of girls and women through EU external relations 2016-2020 (A8-0167/2018 - Linda McAvan, Dubravka Šuica)

I voted in favour. A motion of the resolution touches upon the key areas on how to empower girls and women by ensuring girls’ and women’s physical and psychological integrity, promoting the economic and social rights as well as empowerment of girls and women, strengthening girls’ and women’s voice and participation. Also it emphasises the importance of modern technologies which is the sector that still has a small percentage of women who are getting involved.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (A8-0162/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)

I voted in favour. The youth is a priority for the EU; therefore, initiatives to tackle youth unemployment, to increase youth participation, to foster inclusion and to promote volunteering are necessary. We should promote the development of new educational tools that increase the participation in and accessibility to education.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries)

I voted in favour. The EU has embarked on the transition to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy. Ecodesign has generated real benefits, as acknowledged by the industrial sectors concerned, NGOs and experts from the Member States. This directive is an effective tool to deliver cost-effective energy savings.
2016/11/22
Responding to petitions on tackling precariousness and the abusive use of fixed-term contracts (B8-0238/2018)

I abstained from the vote. This question needs more consideration in regards to the social and economic benefits and harm that may result from the response to business contracts. Also, the response must be consistent and take into account the current EU laws effecting contracts in the public and private sectors.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (A8-0175/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposal. The European Union Solidarity Fun (EUSF) aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency solutions to show solidarity with the population of the regions struck by disasters. This report proposes to mobilise the EUSF to grant financial assistance relating to forest fires in Portugal and Spain, hurricanes in France and earthquakes in Greece.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 1/2018 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (C8-0181/2018)

. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposal. The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient, and flexible manner to emergency situations and to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. This report proposes to mobilise the EUSF to grant financial assistance relating to forest fires in Portugal and Spain, hurricanes in France and earthquakes in Greece.
2016/11/22
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0182/2018 - Christofer Fjellner)

. ‒ I voted in favour. This proposal focuses on the reform of the two basic trade defence instruments, notably anti-dumping and anti-subsidy. The legislation is intended to improve the predictability for business.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/000 TA 2018 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0172/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. The objective of this proposal is to provide technical assistance to better advise Member States on using, following up and evaluating the EGF.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize GA21 (MON-ØØØ21-9) (D056125) (B8-0232/2018)

I voted against. In my opinion the European Commission submitted a balanced proposal regarding GA21 genetically modified maize. There have been a number of discussions following scientific explanations in order to make sure that this specific type of genetically modified maize does not have a damaging effect on mammals.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize 1507 × 59122 × MON 810 × NK603, and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events 1507, 59122, MON 810 and NK603 (D056123) (B8-0233/2018)

I voted against. In my opinion the European Commission submitted a balanced proposal regarding GA21 genetically modified maize. There have been a number of discussions following scientific explanations in order to make sure that this specific type of genetically modified maize does not have a damaging effect on mammals.
2016/11/22
The future of food and farming (A8-0178/2018 - Herbert Dorfmann)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, which is a follow-up to the Commission communication on modernising the common agriculture policy (CAP). The main task which the EU has to face is to ensure that the CAP budget can address such challenges as migration and Brexit. The CAP has to be modernised in line with the future needs of the market, implementing innovative solutions.
2016/11/22
Interpretation and implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making (A8-0170/2018 - Pavel Svoboda, Richard Corbett)

I voted in favour. This report aims at offering political guidance to the interpretation and implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on Better Law-making, which entered into force April 13th, 2016. The report concludes that the progress achieved and the experience gained in the two years of application of the new IIA is overall positive but further efforts are needed to fully implement the agreement.
2016/11/22
2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and own resources (B8-0239/2018, B8-0240/2018, B8-0241/2018)

I voted in favour. The motion for a resolution expressed the position of the European Parliament concerning the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 7 years. The MFF sets a direction where the EU will be heading in its near future. It addresses the challenge that Brexit has caused of the EU budget. I support the decision by the European Commission to give to boost its investment in IT sector as well as educational programmes such as Erasmus and Life+.
2016/11/22
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative on Libya (A8-0159/2018 - Pier Antonio Panzeri)

I voted in favour of this report. The EU is assisting Libya’s political transition towards a stable and functioning state. This recommendation explains how the EP intends to provide guidance to the EEAS, the EC and the Council on how to proceed with the very complicated situation in Libya.
2016/11/22
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (A8-0160/2018 - Carlos Coelho)

I voted in favour of this report. The purpose of this report is to highlight the major shortcomings encountered in the implementation of the Schengen acquis. It brings forward the progress that has been made to remedy the situation, but first and foremost it will point out the actions that the European institutions, the agencies and the Member States should take.
2016/11/22
Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Angelika Mlinar)

I voted in favour. The report provides information on the measures Member States took in order to enable individuals to recognise their right and obligations under this Directive. One of the key elements of this Directive is putting the victims at the centre of the criminal justice system and strengthening their rights.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy (A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)

I voted in favour of this report. The key element of the Directive in this report is to put victims in the centre of the criminal justice system and strengthen their rights, regardless of their nationality or residence status.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0104/2018 - Jozo Radoš)

I voted in favour of the report. On 14 December 2016, the European Parliament granted its consent to a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Uzbekistan, amending the Agreement in order to extend the provisions to bilateral trade in textiles. The European Parliament is of the opinion that such consent constitutes a positive sign of encouragement to the Uzbek Government to further pursue its efforts to fully eradicate child labour and all other forms of forced labour, as well as to further strengthen cooperation with the EU.
2016/11/22
EU-Korea Framework Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0120/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)

I voted in favour. The Framework Agreement was signed on 10 May 2010 and entered into force on 1 June 2014, and is the first agreement of its kind between the European Union and a country in Asia. It has made for closer cooperation between the EU and Korea, a key partner in the region, in many areas, such as peace and security, human rights and the rule of law, the environment, energy, combating terrorism, good governance and combating corruption and organised crime.
2016/11/22
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance ADB-CHMINACA to control measures (A8-0133/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)

I voted in favour of the report. This implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substance N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (ADB-CHMINACA) to control measures aims at ensuring the continuity of control measures across Member States on the new substances.
2016/11/22
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance CUMYL-4CN-BINACA to control measures (A8-0134/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Council Decision (2005/387/JHA) on information exchange, risk-assessment and control in respect of new psychoactive substances provides for a procedure that may lead to the introduction of control measures across the EU.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0148/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was created to provide additional assistance to workers suffering the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. This is the 4th application to be examined under the 2018 budget and the 15th in the economic sector classified under NACE Rev. 2 division 28 (Manufacture of machinery and equipment) since the establishment of the EGF. It concerns 2 287 workers made redundant and the mobilisation of a total amount of EUR 4 621 616 from the EGF for Belgium.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2016 on the protection of EU’s financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0135/2018 - Gilles Pargneaux)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2016 (19 080 cases) was 15 % lower than in 2015 and their value had decreased by 8 % (to EUR 2.97 billion in 2016). Also it calls on the Commission to submit as a matter of urgency a horizontal legislative proposal on the protection of whistle-blowers in order to effectively prevent and combat fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified sugar beet H7-1 (B8-0220/2018)

I voted against the objection of the motion for a resolution in regard to genetically modified sugar beet H7-1.The objectors oppose the draft measures on the grounds that they exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. However, I believe that the Commission provided a balanced approach on the issue.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2016 (A8-0139/2018 - Marco Valli)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that investment in SMEs, start-ups, research, innovation, the digital economy and energy efficiency is essential to economic recovery in the EU and to promoting the creation of quality jobs. That is why EIB should pay a particular attention to it.
2016/11/22
Presidential elections in Venezuela (B8-0225/2018)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Venezuelan presidential elections should be suspended until conditions for credible, transparent and inclusive elections are met. For this reason the EU will only recognise elections based on a viable electoral calendar, agreed in the context of a national dialogue with all relevant actors and political parties, and respecting equal, fair and transparent conditions of participation.
2016/11/22
Cohesion policy and thematic objective ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ (A8-0136/2018 - Andrey Novakov)

I voted in favour of the report. The report presents a comprehensive implementation overview of cohesion policy’s investment priority, focused on transport and its infrastructure, and aimed at delivering added value to citizens, creating synergies between the projects funded and avoiding excessive fragmentation of funding.
2016/11/22
Protection of children in migration (B8-0218/2018)

I voted in favour. The motion for a resolution calls on Member States to implement the requirements in the Commission Communication on minors migrants which was presented over a year ago. We have to make sure that refugee children are given a real chance to integrate themselves as a part of European society. I believe that education which would also include learning about European values is the key element for integration as well as the prevention of crime and radicalisation.
2016/11/22
A global ban on animal testing for cosmetics (B8-0217/2018)

I voted in favour. The resolution calls for a worldwide ban on testing cosmetics on animals before 2023. Around 80% of countries worldwide still allow animal-testing and the marketing of cosmetics tested on animals. It is important to stress that that most ingredients in cosmetic products are also used in many other products, such as pharmaceuticals, detergents or foods, and may therefore have been tested on animals under different laws.
2016/11/22
Current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU (A8-0064/2018 - Esther Herranz García)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report makes a series of recommendations to boost the prospects for this sector which is vital for maintaining productive agriculture in regions where farming conditions are especially difficult and in terms of delivering public goods, especially environmental protection.
2016/11/22
Media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (A8-0144/2018 - Barbara Spinelli)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It calls on Member States to take adequate measures to safeguard and promote pluralist, independent and free media. It also calls for the creation and maintenance of a safe and secure environment for journalists, in particular in the light of the recent assassinations of anti-corruption journalists Daphne Caruana Galizia, in Malta, and Ján Kuciak, in Slovakia.
2016/11/22
Common system of value added tax, with regard to the obligation to respect a minimum standard rate (A8-0124/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The proposal will finally permanently set an agreed limit that ensures the proper functioning of the internal market whilst leaving flexibility for Member States in setting the standard VAT rate, instead of numerous last-minute prolongations of a temporary minimum rate.
2016/11/22
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0056/2017 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The agreement was confirmed by CRP on 20 December 2017. The draft directive has two main objectives: 1) preventing the use of the financial system for the funding of criminal activities; 2) strengthening transparency rules to prevent the large-scale concealment of funds.
2016/11/22
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Directive 2007/46 was subject to a comprehensive fitness check in 2013 – as foreseen by Cars2020 Action plan – that confirmed that the EU type-approval legal framework was appropriate for achieving harmonisation, internal market effective operation and fair competition.
2016/11/22
Organic production and labelling of organic products (A8-0311/2015 - Martin Häusling)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The development of organic production is a political objective of the EU. The aim of the regulation is to overcome the regulatory and non-regulatory obstacles to the development of organic farming in the EU, to increase consumer confidence and address shortcomings in the control system and in the trade regime, and to avoid unfair competition among producers and risks for the functioning of the internal market.
2016/11/22
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0140/2018 - Miroslavs Mitrofanovs)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The main aim is to develop and deliver an effective and coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting inclusive labour markets responsive to economic, social, technological and environmental realities and changes, with a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce, and for safeguarding the well-being of all workers.
2016/11/22
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2019 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0146/2018 - Paul Rübig)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report explains the estimates of revenue and expenditure of the European Parliament for the financial year 2019.
2016/11/22
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on European business statistics, amending Regulation (EC) no 184/2005 and repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (A8-0094/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)

I voted in favour of the report. The regulation establishes a common legal framework for the development, production and dissemination of European statistics related to the structure, the economic activities and the performance of businesses, as well as on the international transactions and research and development activities of the Union economy.
2016/11/22
Protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová (B8-0186/2018)

I voted in favour. It calls on the Commission to safeguard, promote and apply the values enshrined in the Treaty on European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as in the ICCPR, and, in this context, to monitor and address challenges to media freedom and pluralism across the EU.
2016/11/22
A European values instrument to support civil society organisations which promote democracy, rule of law and fundamental values within the European Union (B8-0189/2018)

I voted in favour. It calls for the EU to set up a dedicated funding instrument for the promotion and protection of the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, especially democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, within the EU budget under the next, post-2020 multiannual financial framework.
2016/11/22
The violation of human rights and the rule of law in the case of two Greek soldiers arrested and detained in Turkey (B8-0194/2018, B8-0196/2018)

I voted in favour. It is stressed that, using the failed coup attempt in Turkey in July 2016 as a pretext, the Turkish Government is still imposing a state of emergency two years later, thereby legitimising any move to abolish the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights, which unquestionably constitute not only the essence of democracy but also the cornerstone of the EU.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national Parliaments (A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel)

I voted in favour of the report. The report assesses the use of current mechanisms for national parliaments’ participation in the European political process under the Lisbon Treaty . Based on that assessment, the report then looks into possible improvements to those mechanisms, in order to bring national parliaments closer to the overall integration process. The report also evaluates the political, structured debate established between the European Commission and national parliaments.
2016/11/22
Annual Report on Competition Policy (A8-0049/2018 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the Report on Competition Policy 2016 and strongly emphasises the independence of the Commission and national competition authorities in their mission of shaping and effectively enforcing EU competition rules.
2016/11/22
Vaccine hesitancy and drop in vaccination rates in Europe (B8-0188/2018, B8-0195/2018)

I voted against. The vaccination rates in Europe should not be dropped. Vaccination continues to be one of most important tools for public health. It saves two to three million people every year and if coverage was increased then vaccination would prevent another 1.5 million deaths, according to the World Health Organisation.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the European Protection Order Directive (A8-0065/2018 - Soraya Post, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)

I voted in favour of the report. The report underlines that the wide variety of protection orders across the Member States and the different judicial systems (for instance, stalking is not recognised as a criminal offence across all EU countries) have created many obstacles for EPOs and the situation has to be improved in order to secure the maximum efficiency of EPOs.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Bologna Process – state of play and follow-up (B8-0190/2018)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The motion for a resolution calls on participating countries to increase political engagement and foster mutual cooperation in the implementation of commonly agreed goals throughout the European Higher Education Area, as well as developing, where necessary, appropriate legislative frameworks in order to consolidate its development and strengthen its credibility.
2016/11/22
Fixing the period for the ninth election of representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (A8-0145/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner)

I voted in favour of the report. It calls the reform of the electoral law of the EU, for the European Parliament to have the power, after consulting the Council, to determine the electoral period
2016/11/22
Parliament's calendar of part-sessions – 2019

I voted in favour. The Parliament’s calendar of part sessions for the year 2019 was approved.
2016/11/22
EU-Australia Framework Agreement (A8-0110/2018 - Francisco José Millán Mon)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The agreement aims to foster cooperation between the European Union and Australia in order to tackle joint challenges in foreign and security policy, sustainable development, climate change and economic and trade matters. It aims at encouraging closer links between leaders across government, business and civil society.
2016/11/22
EU-Australia Framework Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0119/2018 - Francisco José Millán Mon)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The Framework Agreement aims to foster cooperation between the European Union and Australia in order to tackle joint challenges in foreign and security policy, sustainable development, climate change, and economic and trade matters. It aims at encouraging closer links between leaders across government, business and civil society.
2016/11/22
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (A8-0131/2018 - Helga Stevens)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The aim is to strengthen Member States’ efforts to prevent terrorism by establishing public provocation, recruitment and training as criminal offences, as they might lead to the commission of terrorist offences, and by reinforcing cooperation on prevention internally and internationally.
2016/11/22
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (Additional Protocol) (A8-0132/2018 - Helga Stevens)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The aim is to strengthen Member States’ efforts to prevent terrorism by establishing public provocation, recruitment and training as criminal offences, as they might lead to the commission of terrorist offences, and by reinforcing cooperation on prevention internally and internationally.
2016/11/22
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted in favour of the report. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive is part of the Circular Economy Package tabled by the Commission in December 2015. It sets recycling targets for packaging waste to be met by 2025 and 2030, with specific targets for various packaging materials.
2016/11/22
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0013/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted in favour of the report. Its aim is to stimulate the transition towards a circular economy which will boost global competition, foster sustainable economic growth and generate new jobs. The six revised directives on waste set clear targets for reduction of waste and establish an ambitious and credible long-term path for waste management and recycling.
2016/11/22
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted in favour of the report. The Waste Framework Directive is part of the Circular Economy Package adopted by the Commission in December 2015. Its aim is to stimulate the transition towards a circular economy which will boost global competition, foster sustainable economic growth and generate new jobs. To ensure effective implementation, the waste reduction targets in the new proposal are accompanied by concrete measures to address obstacles on the ground and the different situations across Member States.
2016/11/22
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted in favour of this report. The Landfill Directive is part of the Circular Economy Package adopted by the Commission in December 2015. Its aim is to stimulate the transition towards a circular economy which will boost global competition, foster sustainable economic growth and generate new jobs. The Commission proposal introduces a landfilling ban for separately collected waste and limits the share of municipal waste landfilled to 10% by 2030.
2016/11/22
Procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting (A8-0253/2017 - Francesc Gambús)

I voted in favour of the report. The Standardised Reporting Directive introduced a three-year reporting cycle for all covered legislation, e.g. in the areas of water and waste.
2016/11/22
Progress on UN Global compacts for safe, orderly and regular migration and on refugees (B8-0184/2018)

I voted in favour. It analyses the progress of the objectives of the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants and the corresponding process for developing a global governance regime, for enhancing coordination on international migration, human mobility, large movements of refugees and protracted refugee situations, and for putting in place durable solutions and approaches to clearly outline the importance of protecting the rights of refugees and migrants.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU external financing instruments: mid-term review 2017 and the future post-2020 architecture (A8-0112/2018 - Marietje Schaake)

I voted in favour of the report. The report reflects on the existing external financing instruments up until this point and considers the future elements which come into play for the new architecture after 2020. It reiterates the usefulness of the financial performance reward for countries making progress and calls for better coordination with other instruments.
2016/11/22
Annual reports 2015-2016 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0141/2018 - Mady Delvaux)

I voted in favour. The report looks at how the these two principles have been implemented by the European institutions and their partners with a view to meeting the expectations of citizens and their national institutions and how the practice has evolved in comparison with previous years.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Commission and executive agencies (A8-0137/2018 - Joachim Zeller)

I voted in favour of the report on granting discharge for the financial year 2016 to the Commission and its six executive agencies. The report encourages the Commission to keep providing comprehensive analysis on the areas where the estimated level of error is persistently high, its root causes and the corrective actions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2016 Commission discharge (A8-0130/2018 - Joachim Zeller)

I voted in favour of the report on granting a discharge for the financial year 2016. The report calls on the Commission to commit itself to fundamentally reviewing the young farmers and greening schemes in the light of the findings of the Court of Auditors before the next financing period and to speed up the delivery of cohesion policy programmes and related payments.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0123/2018 - Barbara Kappel)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasises the following issues: the challenging issue of increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the development policy and EDFs: the need for consistency between various EU policies such as climate change, migration; the efficiency of the control strategy and implementation of Union trust funds and budget support activities.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0105/2018 - Derek Vaughan)

I voted in favour of the report. The report focused on security improvement points regarding the infrastructure of three EP buildings.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0116/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report. It postpones its decision on granting the Secretary—General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0122/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the financial year 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0097/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Secretary—General of the European Economic and Social Committee discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Economic and Social Committee for the financial year 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0117/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report. It grants the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Committee of the Regions for the financial year 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0128/2018 - Marco Valli)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasises that some improvements are needed to be done to the effectiveness of the EEAS’ services: the continuous streamlining of the overall organisation, the need for budgetary simplification, the priority given to the management of gender and geographical balance at Headquarters and in EU delegations.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0100/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report. It welcomes the improved communication to the public. However, it also notes that some of the targets set by the Ombudsman to assess its performance through key performance indicators were not reached.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0099/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

I voted in favour of the report to grant a discharge for the budget year 2016. The report welcomes the ongoing work of the Internet Privacy Engineering Network which is a group composed of IT experts from all sectors providing a platform for cooperation and information exchange on engineering methods and tools which integrate data protection and privacy requirements into new technologies, an essential issue in the implementation of the GDPR.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0115/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report calls on the Commission to work in close cooperation with the agencies Network and the individual agencies when preparing its proposal for the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework and examining alternative sources of financing for the Union’s decentralised agencies.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0074/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report especially welcomes that the Agency issued its annual Market Monitoring Report on the remaining barriers to the Internal Energy Market.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0069/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The Office expanded its transparency policy, including by the adoption of an updated communication strategy and communication plan. Also, it performed an internal audit, which was highly welcomed in the report.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0106/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the Centre developed its Strategy 2016-2020 which was adopted by its management board. On the other hand, the Centre does not yet have a business continuity plan in place, according to the Court’s comment.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0068/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the Agency complied with all the Court’s comments on the building, repair work, structural strengthening and various safety issues which there were before.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0066/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that in 2016 the Agency performed an annual assessment of the ‘EASA management standards’, which integrate both the internal control standards and the international standards organisation standards.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0083/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the Office was faced with big issues concerning late payments, internal control standards (ICS) and high staff turnover which still need to be fixed and brought under control.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0067/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the Authority successfully developed the Single Rulebook for banking in the Union, by producing 12 Guidelines, 7 Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards and 15 Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0085/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the Centre has changed the format and process to create the financing decision for its procurement procedures, which brought more transparency.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0086/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes the significant efforts made to support in particular small and medium—sized enterprises through adequate IT- ools and multilingual guidance in light of the 3rd REACH.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0090/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the publication in 2016 of its first assessment report on ‘Circular economy in Europe—Developing the knowledge base’, addressing the perspective of reducing the environmental pressures and impacts from material resource use.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0107/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the Agency successfully established cooperation with other Union Agencies towards the establishment of a European Coast Guard capacity.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0091/2018 - Indrek Tarand)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the management board of the Authority adopted a new policy on independence to ensure the independence of all professionals involved in its scientific operations. It is a very welcome change.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0087/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the development and launch of an online tool to facilitate gender equality within research–performing organisations. The Institute also positively contributed to show the economic benefits of gender equality for economic growth and increased employment.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0088/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. It is very positive that the Authority contributed to strengthen the conduct of business supervision and the capacity of the supervisory community to maintain pace with key developments such as FinTech, in particular InsurTech.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0096/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the Institute has to fix a number of issues, in particular to funding conditions, ex-ante verification of cost statements, funding from public and private sources, unused appropriations, financial autonomy and respect for the principle of sound financial management.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0103/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the Agency fulfilled its legal obligations of supporting innovation, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products thus promoting and protecting public health.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0081/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the Centre put in place a new procurement plan which was successfully executed in close collaboration with all units.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0078/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the Agency implemented a new methodology for visits to Member States, and piloted the integration of cost efficiency assessment in the horizontal analyses related to cycles of visits to Member States.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0114/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that the mandate of ENISA will be renewed in order to get more power in maintaining the efficient control and help towards cybersecurity strategies and the implementation process in Member States.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) (A8-0079/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the Agency efficiently introduced the new name and mandate under the new legal regime (4th Railways Package, in force as of 15 June 2016) and made significant progress in preparing for its new role.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0080/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the ETF met the targets for achieving all Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (A8-0111/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes the number of outstanding issues and ongoing corrective measures related to a framework contract for the procurement of services and to the relations between the Agency and Schengen associated countries.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0084/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The Agency completed the three—year pilot project ‘Safer and healthier work at any age – occupational safety and health in the context of an ageing workforce’, initiated by Parliament, and the launch of the Healthy Workplaces Campaign 2016—2017 on ‘Healthy Workplaces for All Ages’.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) (A8-0102/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The Agency made significant progress in ensuring consistency of supervisory reviews, evaluations and supervisory measures across Member States, which are very welcoming efforts.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0092/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the successful implementation of the Foundation’s four—year work programme with a high level of organisational effectiveness, as evidenced by an overall improvement of the Foundation’s key performance indicators.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) (A8-0113/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasises that corrective actions have been taken and one comment related to the definition of the respective roles and responsibilities of the Director and the College of Eurojust.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0109/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the efforts by Europol in establishing the European Counter Terrorism Centre and the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, including the on—the—spot deployment of staff.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0093/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The Agency organised the Fundamental Rights Forum, its largest event, gathering over 700 participants for four days of discussions on the three themes of inclusion, refugee protection and the digital age.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (A8-0108/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report acknowledges that the Regulation on the European Border and Coast Guard Agency opened up new possibilities for cooperation with other Agencies in relation to the coastguard function.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0082/2018 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes that the Agency successfully completed negotiations for, and signed, a working arrangement with the European Space Agency on Galileo.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0071/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. It welcomes that the Joint Undertaking achieved all the priority objectives set in the Annual Work Programme 2016 for the internal control system.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH2) (A8-0073/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the fact that the FCH2 has set up ex-ante control procedures based on financial and operational desk reviews, and performs ex-post audits of grant cost claims under the Seventh Framework Programme.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0075/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasizes that the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking has to improve its communication measures with Union citizens through the institutions of the Union about the important research and collaboration that it is undertaking, and stresses the importance of highlighting real improvements as a consequence of this work.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy Joint Undertaking (A8-0095/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that further to the adoption of the Joint Undertaking’s whistle—blowing rules in 2015, an implementation process was drafted, establishing a concise and detailed process map on how serious irregularities and wrongdoings can be reported and are being followed up within the Joint Undertaking.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0077/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the signing of the renewed Eurocontrol/SESAR Joint Undertaking agreement in 2016, which outlines the new role of Eurocontrol as a co-founder of SESAR and includes a series of commitments and engagements regarding the implementation of SESAR 2020.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (S2R) (A8-0076/2018 - Brian Hayes)

I voted in favour of the report. The report notes that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market. Also, it highlights that changes in the Regulation establishing the Joint Undertaking and in its Statutes will be very important for the future development of the Joint Undertaking in order to improve its efficiency.
2016/11/22
EU-Lebanon Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0352/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The decision gives a green light for a cooperation between the EU and Lebanon in regard to scientific and technological purposes. Both sides will be able to share best practices as well as share their knowledge of expertise in specific scientific sectors.
2016/11/22
EU-Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0053/2018 - Norica Nicolai)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The fisheries partnership agreement between the EU and Mauritius provides the EU with fishing rights in exchange for technical and financial support to Mauritius in that area.
2016/11/22
EU-Norway Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0126/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)

. ‒ I voted in favour. As part of the deal, EU and Norway mutually liberalise 36 tariff lines and open new quotas. Norway would grant the EU additional quotas for poultry, beef, duck meat, pork, hams and sausages in the meat sector, in addition to cheese, flower, lettuce and maize tariff rate quotas. EU would grant Norway additional quotas for poultry, preserved meat, whey products, flowers, potato chips, ethyl alcohol and animal feed.
2016/11/22
A European strategy for the promotion of protein crops (A8-0121/2018 - Jean-Paul Denanot)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The adopted report calls for the implementation of a major strategic European vegetable protein production and supply plan based on the sustainable development of all the protein crops grown throughout the EU. There is the need to increase the profitability and competitiveness of domestic production. Also, the report identifies means by which the CAP can contribute to this, including the use of Voluntary Coupled Support.
2016/11/22
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins)

. ‒ I voted in favour. This legislative proposal is part of the climate package presented by the Commission on 20 July 2016. It proposes to integrate greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use-change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework.
2016/11/22
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. On 20 July 2016, the Commission adopted a package of measures aimed at accelerating Europe’s transition to a low-carbon economy. One of the legislative proposals in this package is the proposal for a regulation on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030. This proposal is the follow-up to the Effort Sharing Decision which established national emission targets for Member States in the non-ETS sectors between 2013 and 2020.
2016/11/22
Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (A8-0373/2017 - Mercedes Bresso, Rainer Wieland)

I voted in favour of the report, which addresses concerns regarding the level of co-financing requested and the possibility of multi-party membership for the European Parliament’s Members. It also includes additional changes to enhance the transparency between parties at Member State level and the European parties with which they are affiliated.
2016/11/22
Energy performance of buildings (A8-0314/2017 - Bendt Bendtsen)

I voted in favour of the report. On 30 November 2016 the European Commission presented a proposal for a review of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (2010/31/EU) within the broader clean energy package that will help to deliver the EU 2030 energy and climate goals. Improving the energy performance of buildings would enable the EU to make a cost-efficient transition towards the achievement of the overall energy efficiency ambitions, and CO2 emissions would decrease by about 5%.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the 7th Environment Action Programme (A8-0059/2018 - Daciana Octavia Sârbu)

I voted in favour of the report. The seventh environment action programme (EAP) provides important strategic guidance for both the EU and Member States. It drives an agenda which has a positive effect on citizens and the environment, and it increases accountability. However, there are several key areas in which poor implementation of the EAP is contributing to environmental degradation and posing direct health threats to citizens. These areas include: unsustainable land use and fishing; biodiversity loss; air quality; environmental noise; waste management; and exposure to chemicals.
2016/11/22
Gender equality in the media sector in the EU (A8-0031/2018 - Michaela Šojdrová)

I voted in favour of the report. The report analyses the state of affairs in the media sector and pursues strategic aims: women’s participation in, and access to, expression and decision-making in and through media and new communication technologies, as well as a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women by the media.
2016/11/22
Empowering women and girls through the digital sector (B8-0183/2018)

I voted in favour. The motion for a resolution addressed the issue that the participation of women in the ICT sector is still very low in comparison with men. Only a small percentage of girls and women are interested in digital skills and that is why we have few women working in the ICT sector. The motion for a resolution explores new ways to empower women through the digital sector, such as promoting mentoring programmes for women within ICT companies, increasing the level of ICT education in schools etc.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Development Cooperation Instrument, the Humanitarian Aid Instrument and the European Development Fund (A8-0118/2018 - Enrique Guerrero Salom)

I voted in favour of the report, which makes a series of recommendations aimed at improving the functioning of the EDF and the DCI until the end of its term in 2020. It also makes a number of proposals and recommendations regarding the new Multiannual Financial Framework, which will be presented in the coming months by the European Commission, and with regard to which the Committee on Development will in due course have to exercise its role as co-legislator and political assessor.
2016/11/22
Enhancing developing countries' debt sustainability (A8-0129/2018 - Charles Goerens)

I voted in favour of the report. The main goal of the report is to draw attention to developing—country debt, and propose the EU with basic ground rules that might help prevent further transgressions.
2016/11/22
Strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0138/2018 - Marc Joulaud)

I voted in favour of the report. The report stresses that cohesion policy should remain ambitious and keep covering all EU regions after 2020. It also makes concrete proposals to simplify the policy and to reinforce the territorial approach, and insists on the need to invest in innovation and support for SMEs, among other things.
2016/11/22
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (B8-0134/2018, B8-0135/2018)

I voted in favour of the resolution. The guidelines on behalf of the European Parliament on future EU-UK relations support the position of the European Commission in Brexit negotiations. It states that if the UK wants to leave the EU Single Market, the free trade agreement is seen as an alternative. The EU has to protect its core values of economic stability as well as its citizens to make sure that the free movement of citizens would be protected. Also, future cooperation between the EU and UK on such matters as international security, cooperation fighting terrorism, foreign policy, cooperation on research and development and education is very welcome.
2016/11/22
Rail transport statistics (A8-0038/2018 - Karima Delli)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Commission proposal is a purely technical adaptation in the context of a recast procedure. The main element is a deletion of Article 4(5) on delegated powers, which has become obsolete as the co-legislators did not delegate any powers to the Commission in the last revision in 2016.
2016/11/22
Measures for the control of Newcastle disease (A8-0026/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission adopted a proposal to amend Council Directive 92/66/EEC which lays down measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of Newcastle disease in poultry and in certain birds. The current European Reference Laboratory for Newcastle disease is located in the United Kingdom.
2016/11/22
Further macro-financial assistance to Georgia (A8-0028/2018 - Hannu Takkula)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission proposes for the third time macro-financial assistance at the request of the Government of the Republic of Georgia. Although Georgia has made significant progress with economic reforms, its macroeconomic outlook remains vulnerable. This time, the Commission proposes EUR 45 million EUR - of that EUR 35 million in loans and EUR 10 million in grants to help the country to cover part of its external financing needs for the period 2017-2020.
2016/11/22
Objection to Commission delegated regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 as regards the Union list of projects of common interest (B8-0136/2018)

. ‒ I voted against the objection to the proposal by the Commission on the list of projects of common interest in the European Union. The proposal sets out the conditions for greater transparency and effectiveness regarding projects of common interest within the Union.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/008 DE/Goodyear (A8-0061/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. On 9 February 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in favour of Germany to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by one enterprise operating in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 22 (Manufacture of rubber and plastic products). The redundancies made by Goodyear are located in the NUTS level 2 region of Regierungsbezirk Karlsruhe (DE12) in Germany.
2016/11/22
The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 (A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Parliament is calling for a decision on the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) to be taken before the end of the current parliamentary term, which will allow for the swift adoption of all sectoral regulations and the launch of the new EU programmes on 1 January 2021. The report sets out Parliament’s position in such areas as flexibility, structure, the duration of the MFF, its mechanism and a decision-making procedure.
2016/11/22
Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski)

I voted in favour of the report. The report sets out Parliament’s position on the main elements of a reform of the EU own resources system. It states that the MFF and own resources will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations and that no agreement on the MFF will be reached without corresponding headway on own resources. Also, the report underlines the need to address the shortcomings of the current system, which is predominantly based on national (GNI or VAT based) contributions to the EU budget, reinforcing the logic of ‘juste retour’ between Member States.
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0047/2018 - Hugues Bayet)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, which reflects a clear commitment to the EU fiscal framework, structural reforms, competitiveness and productivity, as well as a compromise formulation on the euro area aggregate fiscal stance.
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0052/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)

I voted in favour of the report. The Annual Growth Survey (AGS) sets out the general economic priorities for the EU and offers EU governments’ policy guidance for the following year. It is intended to encourage sustainable economic and social convergence by boosting investments, pursuing structural reforms and ensuring responsible public finances.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A8-0034/2018 - Jean Arthuis)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed Commission Decision aims to allow the use of all appropriations corresponding to de-commitments under the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) since 2003. The Commission assesses the potential gains that could be recycled at EUR 40.3 million. The adoption of the proposal would thus enable the Commission to supplement the RFCS from 2018 by an additional EUR 40 million and to use the remaining appropriations for 2019.
2016/11/22
EU-New Zealand agreement on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (A8-0029/2018 - Daniel Caspary)

I voted in favour. The customs cooperation agreement aims to boost direct cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters in order to ensure the supply chain security and facilitate legitimate trade. Also, the Agreement can become a basis to further develop customs cooperation, for example through the establishment of mutual recognition of respective trade partnership programmes.
2016/11/22
A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (A8-0036/2018 - István Ujhelyi)

I voted in favour of the report. Advances in digital technologies in the transport sector enable real-time data exchange among the various means of transport, thereby reducing, for example, the number of accidents, rationalising transport systems and lowering emissions of noxious substances, which the report is touching on.
2016/11/22
Cross-border parcel delivery services (A8-0315/2017 - Lucy Anderson)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims to make markets work more effectively by making the regulatory oversight of the parcels markets more effective and consistent as well as to increase the transparency of tariffs in order to reduce unjustifiable tariff differences and lower the tariffs paid by individuals and small businesses, especially in remote areas.
2016/11/22
Initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles and driving licences (A8-0321/2017 - Peter Lundgren)

I voted in favour of the report. The report proposes measures, among other things, allowing for more flexibility in choosing and conducting training and tailoring the requirements depending on drivers’ specific needs. The possibility to use innovative training methods, such as online training, is permitted, but only as a part of a programme that is mainly conventional.
2016/11/22
Establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry (A8-0037/2018 - Françoise Grossetête)

I voted in favour of the report. It aims at fostering the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry, by supporting the cooperation between undertakings in the development phase of defence products and technologies. Specifically, the programme would fund projects such as defining common technical specifications, prototyping, testing, qualification and certification of new and updated defence products, as well as feasibility studies and other support activities.
2016/11/22
Gender equality in EU trade agreements (A8-0023/2018 - Eleonora Forenza, Malin Björk)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasises that trade policy can serve as a tool to promote global and European values, including gender equality, recognising that there is a crucial need for recognising and better understanding gender—specific impacts of trade policy to deliver adequate policy responses. The report covers a wide range of trade-related topics and its relation to gender, including the exclusion of public services from the scope of trade agreements, IPR, SMEs, agriculture, procurement, GSP/GSP+ or the continued work with the ILO to improve labour conditions in global value chains.
2016/11/22
Lagging regions in the EU (A8-0046/2018 - Michela Giuffrida)

I voted in favour of the report. The report is looking to examine the factors that hold back growth and investment, identifying critical development aspects and also suggesting solutions to increase competitiveness and income in these regions.
2016/11/22
The role of EU regions and cities in implementing the COP 21 Paris Agreement on climate change (A8-0045/2018 - Ángela Vallina)

I voted in favour of the report. The report is linked much more to climate change than regional development or urban policy, foreseeing ‘ambitious mandatory targets’ of climate change spending on all levels, enshrined in Member State legislation, or a uniform, EU-wide approach to ‘climate refugees’.
2016/11/22
Insurance distribution: date of application of Member States' transposition measures (A8-0024/2018 - Werner Langen)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Directive (EU) 2016/97 on insurance distribution harmonises the provisions concerning the distribution of insurance and reinsurance products and insurance-based investment products by insurance intermediaries, insurance companies, their employees, and ancillary insurance intermediaries in the Union. In order to ensure legal certainty and avoid potential market disruption, it is necessary that this Directive enters into force as a matter of urgency and that it applies, with retroactive effect, from 23 February 2018.
2016/11/22
EU-USA Bilateral Agreement on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (A8-0008/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)

I voted in favour. The EU-US agreement on insurance and reinsurance was signed in September 2017. It aims at eliminating some key trade barriers in the sector, in particular collateral and local presence requirements. The agreement also tackles the issue of supervisory authority and exchange of information.
2016/11/22
Definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks and protection of geographical indications thereof (A8-0021/2018 - Pilar Ayuso)

I voted in favour of the report. The EC proposal aligns EU legislation on spirit drinks with the Lisbon Treaty. In addition, it contains minor technical adjustments and replaces the existing procedures for the management of geographical indications in the spirit drinks sector, with new procedures modelled on the more exhaustive and well tested procedures for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
2016/11/22
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal includes a compilation of the features and elements of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse. It obliges intermediaries such as tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers and etc. who design or promote tax planning arrangements with a cross-border element and which meet certain hallmarks defined in the proposal to provide information to tax authorities.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of genetically modified maize 59122 (DAS-59122-7) (B8-0122/2018)

I voted against the resolution to object Commission’s proposal regarding the authorisation of genetically modified maize 59122 (DAS-59122-7). In my view, the Commission presented a balanced and in line with the Union laws proposal.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two of the events MON 87427, MON 89034 and NK603 (B8-0124/2018)

I voted against the objection to Commission’s proposal on the authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two of the events MON 87427, MON 89034 and NK603.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/006 ES/Galicia apparel (A8-0033/2018 - Esteban González Pons)

I voted in favour of the report. On 28 November 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Spain to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by five enterprises operating in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 14 (Manufacture of wearing apparel) in the NUTS level 2 region of Galicia (ES11) in Spain. The decision was approve by the European Parliament.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/007 SE/Ericsson (A8-0032/2018 - Urmas Paet)

I voted in favour of the report. On 18 December 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Sweden with a view to supporting the reintegration into the labour market of workers made redundant by one enterprise operating in the economic sector classified under NACE Revision 2 Division 26 (manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Stockholm (SE11), Västsverige (SE23), Östra Mellansverige (SE12) and in the area of Sydsverige (SE22) in Sweden.
2016/11/22
Commission decision to activate Article 7 (1) TEU as regards the situation in Poland (B8-0119/2018, B8-0120/2018, B8-0121/2018)

I voted in favour of the Commission’s decision to activate Article 7 (1) TEU regarding the situation in Poland. MEPs expressed their concerns regarding the rule of law in Poland, the separation of powers, the independence of the judiciary and fundamental rights.
2016/11/22
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (A8-0025/2018 - Frank Engel)

I voted in favour of the report. The regular annual reports analyses situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 in regards to rule of law, corruption, migration, integration, hate speech, discrimination, minorities, vulnerable groups, digital rights.
2016/11/22
Prospects and challenges for the EU apiculture sector (A8-0014/2018 - Norbert Erdős)

I voted in favour of the report. The beekeeping sector is an integral part of European agriculture. The biggest problem is the spread of fake honey in the internal market, which is responsible for the purchase price of honey falling to half its 2014 value by the end of 2016,primarily in the major honey-producing countries. In addition, a number of animal diseases cause serious problems for beekeepers. The report asks for a revision of EU support for beekeepers.
2016/11/22
Banking Union - Annual Report 2017 (A8-0019/2018 - Sander Loones)

I voted in favour of the report. The report analyses the 2017 Banking Union year. It is divided into three big areas: supervision, resolution and deposit insurance. It also stresses the importance of preparedness to mitigate the disruptive effect of Brexit. There is a concern that some banks, in particular smaller ones, might be lagging behind in their preparations for Brexit, therefore the report calls on them to intensify their work.
2016/11/22
Cutting the sources of income for Jihadists - targeting the financing of terrorism (A8-0035/2018 - Javier Nart)

I voted in favour of the report. The report takes the view that preventive strategies based on the sharing of best practice and exchange of suspicious and relevant information among intelligence agencies is vital in combating the financing of terrorism and more generally terrorist attacks.
2016/11/22
EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0022/2018 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Ángela Vallina)

I voted in favour of the report. The report sets general conditions for empowering women and girls and provides recommendations to empower rural women, which is linked to the main theme of the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women.
2016/11/22
Monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0010/2018 - Damiano Zoffoli)

I voted against the committee’s decision to enter into the negotiation process. I believe that this topic needs further debate in the European Parliament.
2016/11/22
Establishing a centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third country nationals and stateless persons (TCN) to supplement and support the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS-TCN system) (A8-0018/2018 - Daniel Dalton)

I voted in favour of the report to enter into the negotiations process on this issue with the Council and the Commission.
2016/11/22
Guarantee Fund for external actions (A8-0132/2017 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)

I voted in favour of the report. The guarantee is used to finance projects in less—developed markets, with higher risks and more complex challenges, and enables the EIB to conduct operations without negatively impacting the EIB ‘A’ credit ranting and its operations inside the EU. In September 2016, the Commission presented a legislative proposal on the mid—term review of the ELM. In quest of a continuation, the European Commission also introduced certain changes for further improving the EIB work outside of the EU by increasing the overall ELM ceiling to EUR 32.3 billion, adding a new horizontal high—level objective covering the response to the migration crisis and reinforcing the climate change dimension of the mandate.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0013/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)

I voted in favour of the report. It emphasises the positive efforts of the EIB to fight global challenges. For example, it welcomes the fact that the EIB has responded to the crisis by expanding its activities significantly, including in the countries worst affected; calls on the EIB to further support EU countries in order to contribute to their economic recovery, and well as for accountability and compliance efforts. It stresses the need for more efforts to achieve greater transparency and better communication with a view to ensuring that information reaches final recipients at regional and local level and to increasing the visibility of projects.
2016/11/22
Current human rights situation in Turkey (B8-0079/2018, RC-B8-0082/2018, B8-0082/2018, B8-0084/2018, B8-0091/2018, B8-0092/2018, B8-0095/2018, B8-0097/2018, B8-0103/2018)

I voted in favour of the joint motion for a resolution. It calls on Turkey to lift an ongoing state of emergency declared after a failed coup in July 2016 that they say is now being used to silence dissent and opposition. It condemns the recent arrests of journalists, activists, doctors and ordinary citizens for expressing their opposition to Turkey’s military intervention in the Kurdish—controlled enclave of Afrin in Syria .
2016/11/22
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0078/2018, B8-0078/2018, B8-0080/2018, B8-0081/2018, B8-0083/2018, B8-0087/2018, B8-0094/2018)

I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution. It strongly rejects the decision by the internationally non—recognised National Constituent Assembly to call early presidential elections by the end of April 2018, and states that under the current circumstances, the European Parliament will recognise neither the elections nor the authorities put in place by this illegitimate process.
2016/11/22
Situation of UNRWA (RC-B8-0085/2018, B8-0085/2018, B8-0086/2018, B8-0088/2018, B8-0089/2018, B8-0090/2018, B8-0093/2018)

I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution. It stresses the importance of ensuring the unimpeded operation of UNRWA and its provision of services for the well—being, protection and human development of the Palestinian refugees, but also for the stability of the region as a whole. Also, it calls on Israel, as the occupying power, to lift the multiple restrictions which impede UNRWA’s daily operations in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza, and to respect the neutrality of UNRWA installations in line with international humanitarian law and UNRWA’s UN diplomatic status.
2016/11/22
Summer-time arrangements (B8-0070/2018, B8-0071/2018)

I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution. It calls on the EU Commission to propose ending the twice-yearly switch between summer and winter time. Citizens’ initiatives have shown that the public is concerned about the biannual clock change marking the beginning and end of summer time, which currently takes place on the last weekends in March and October. Numerous studies have failed to reach a conclusive outcome, but indicate negative effects on human health.
2016/11/22
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0007/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira)

I voted in favour of the report. The EP has the right of initiative on a proposal for the European Council decision on the allocation of seats in the EP for the legislative period 2019-2024. The current distribution of seats in the Parliament does not respect degressive proportionality in all instances. The timely adoption of this file before summer 2018 is important, because some Member States have legal requirements to start preparations for the elections by the end of summer 2018. The European Council decides by unanimity on the composition of the EP.
2016/11/22
Revision of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (A8-0006/2018 - Esteban González Pons)

I voted in favour of the report. The most important political message of the report is that Parliament will be ready to reject any candidate for the post of Commission President who was not appointed as Spitzenkandidat in the run-up of the European elections. The report calls on European political parties to put forward Spitzenkandidaten for the upcoming European elections as they did in 2014, nominating candidates through an open, democratic and transparent competition. The report stresses that the Spitzenkandidaten process is a contribution to transparency, as candidates for Commission President are made known prior to the European elections and not after them, as before.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (A8-0017/2018 - Ignazio Corrao)

I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Portugal to receive and supply vehicle registration data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combatting terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Protection and non-discrimination with regard to minorities in the EU Member States (B8-0064/2018)

I voted in favour. While respecting Member States competences, the resolution outlines various forms of discrimination claimed by petitions, related to the right of free movement, preservation of cultural heritage as a pillar of social cohesion, protection of minority languages etc. It calls on the EU institutions to raise awareness and to monitor more closely the situation of autochthonous and linguistic minorities and to enlarge the scope of studies, carried out by the Fundamental Rights Agency.
2016/11/22
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018)

I voted in favour of the report. The resolution states that the European Union is committed to working collectively to eradicate female genital mutilation (FGM) as part of broader efforts to combat all forms of violence against women and girls, and to support the efforts of its Member States in this field.
2016/11/22
Request for waiver of the immunity of Steeve Briois (A8-0011/2018 - Evelyn Regner)

I voted in favour for the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Steeve Briois.
2016/11/22
EU-Brazil Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0004/2018 - Angelo Ciocca)

I voted in favour of the report. The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and Brazil entered into force on 7 August 2007. It was valid for a period of five years and may be renewed by agreement between the Parties. ITRE committee prepared its recommendation on the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement for further collaboration.
2016/11/22
Geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment (A8-0172/2017 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)

I voted in favour of the report. The regulation seeks to provide more legal certainty and enforceability by defining specific situations when there can be no justified reason for discrimination on the grounds of nationality or residence. In addition, it bans the blocking of access to websites and the use of automatic re-routing without the customer’s prior consent. The proposed regulation also includes provisions of non-discrimination within accepted payment means. This is a big step forward to boost e-commerce in Europe as well as the Digital Single Market.
2016/11/22
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017 - Julie Girling)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposal aims to meet the EU’s 2030 greenhouse gas emissions target of ‘at least’ 40% while protecting European industry from the risk of carbon leakage and promoting innovation and modernisation in Europe’s industrial and power sectors over the decade from 2020. The proposed directive introduces further reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in the EU Emissions Trading System sector to achieve the EU climate targets for 2030, new rules for addressing carbon leakage, and provisions for funding innovation and modernisation in the energy sector and industry.
2016/11/22
European Central Bank Annual Report for 2016 (A8-0383/2017 - Jonás Fernández)

I voted in favour of the report. The report acknowledged the federal nature of the ECB, which enables it to act decisively in various matters such as addressing the crisis. It also noted the contribution of the ECB’s accommodative monetary policy in the period 2012-2016 to cyclical economic recovery and employment creation, also by preventing deflation. However, it emphasised that at the consequences of the unconventional monetary policy measures for individual savers and the financial equilibrium of pension and insurance schemes as well as the build-up of asset bubbles, which the ECB should carefully monitor.
2016/11/22
Accelerating clean energy innovation (A8-0005/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)

I voted in favour of the report. The report replaces the Parliament’s annual evaluation of the state of the Energy Union. The report looks at various aspects of the clean energy transition in the Union, in particular the coherence of EU actions, the importance of long-term financing certainty, the leading role of the EU on the international stage and the importance of a bottom-up approach where citizens drive energy innovation.
2016/11/22
Marrakesh Treaty: facilitating the access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired, or otherwise print disabled (A8-0400/2017 - Max Andersson)

I voted in favour. It aims at facilitating the availability and cross-border exchange of books and other print material in formats that are accessible to persons with print disabilities around the world. The agreed legislation will introduce into EU law a new mandatory exception to copyright rules, which will allow beneficiary persons and organisations to make copies of works in accessible formats and to disseminate them across the EU and in third countries which are party to the Treaty without asking the prior permission of the rightholders. The text ensures that no commercial availability checks prior to the exchange of accessible format books will be required. Members States will have the option of establishing limited compensation schemes for publishers when their books are turned into accessible format copies.
2016/11/22
Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, and international child abduction (A8-0388/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)

I voted in favour of the report. The main aspects of the proposal includes such key aspects as clarification of the time limit for issuing an enforceable return order of a child, new obligation for Member States to concentrate jurisdiction for child abduction cases in a limited number of courts. Also, the changes to the existing legislative framework relate in particular to the efficiency of procedures in the event of cross-border abductions of children by one of the parents.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative in the Member States (A8-0406/2017 - Romana Tomc)

I voted in favour of the report. The report is an implementation report focusing on the implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) which is the main financial instrument to fund the activities of Youth Guarantee in the Member States. The initiative has benefited more than 1.4 million young people so far. The report states that the funding instrument is necessary but due to its rapid implementation, still has some deficiencies. For example, Member States should better identify and outreach NEETs (Young people not in employment, education or training), minimum standards on what constitutes a ‘quality offer’ should be established, Member States’ reporting activities should provide with more consistent and transparent data.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (A8-0401/2017 - Nicola Danti)

I voted in favour for the report. The report highlights the fundamental role played by the professions in the EU economy stressing that the quality of professional services is of paramount importance to preserve the European economic, social and cultural model.
2016/11/22
Control of exports, transfer, brokering, technical assistance and transit of dual-use items (A8-0390/2017 - Klaus Buchner)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It aims at upgrading the current EU export control system and reflecting new challenges, such as the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism as well as rapid scientific and technological developments. Key export control notions are being revised, in particular to include cyber surveillance technologies in the dual-use definition. New licensing authorisations are introduced for ‘large-projects’ such as nuclear power plants, and for encryption, low-value shipments and intra-company transfers in non-sensitive countries.
2016/11/22
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. It sets a new EU renewables target of 35%, removes the binding element to national targets and introduces flexibility for Member States of 10% of their overall renewables target in case of exceptional and duly justified circumstances, as well as removing the binding year-on-year target for heating and cooling. Also the report widens the definition of advanced biofuels to include other wastes and residues.
2016/11/22
Energy efficiency (A8-0391/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour of the report. Energy efficiency is one of the key dimensions of the EU’s energy union strategy. An ambitious policy in this area will contribute to achieving both our climate and energy goals as well as to increasing our competitiveness. It is also one of the best ways how to fight energy poverty in Europe.
2016/11/22
Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Claude Turmes)

I voted in favour of the report. The proposed Regulation contributes to the implementation of the Paris Agreement including its 5-year review cycle and ensures that monitoring, reporting and verification requirements.
2016/11/22
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström)

I voted in favour of the report. The regulation aims to transpose existing SPRFMO conservation and management measures. It refers to management, conservation and control measures concerning certain species and certain fishing methods.
2016/11/22
Implementation of EU macro-regional strategies (A8-0389/2017 - Andrea Cozzolino)

I voted in favour of the report. Macro—regional strategies (MRS) are platforms for transnational cooperation between Member States, but also with third countries. They provide an integrated framework for addressing mutual challenges and exploiting common potential. The report looks into the implementation of the four existing MRS, identifying both the common and the specific problems they are confronted with and making suggestions for their future development.
2016/11/22
Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures (A8-0381/2017 - Gabriel Mato)

I voted in favour of the report. This is the most important file of this mandate in PECH committee. Despite that which ‘technical measures’ implies, these are highly political. In response to the Commission’s proposal, the rapporteur aims at regionalisation for tailored made measures adapted to the specificities of each fishery and each sea basin, reducing ‘micro-management’ and rigid technical rules and adopt a more flexible, simplification, results based management and greater involvement of the sector in decisions on the common fisheries policy.
2016/11/22
International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (A8-0399/2017 - José Inácio Faria)

I voted in favour of the report. The report follows up on the Joint Communication ‘International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans’, in which the Commission and the High Representative set out a set of actions as part of the EU response to the global commitment indicated in the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Joint Communication sets out 14 actions in three priority areas: improving the international ocean governance framework, reducing pressure on oceans and seas, and creating the conditions for strengthening international ocean research and data.
2016/11/22
Multilateral Agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (A8-0260/2017 - Roberts Zīle)

I voted in favour of the report. In February 2017, the European Commission proposed a regulation to prolong the derogation for extra-European Economic area flights, gradually reduce the number of aviation allowances from 2021 onwards, and prepare for the implementation of the global market based measure.
2016/11/22
Subjecting acryloylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0284/2017 - Brice Hortefeux)

I voted in favour of the report. The report highlights the solid foundation of mutual values as the pillar of the relationship citing the democratic tradition, respect of human rights and pluralism as well as powerful political, economic, social and cultural links.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0280/2017 - Giovanni La Via)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) aims to enable the Union to respond in rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations and to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. The Commission proposed to mobilise the EUSF to grant financial assistance relating earthquakes that took place in Italy between end of August 2016 and mid-January 2017.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 4/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0281/2017 - Jens Geier)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) aims to enable the Union to respond in rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations and to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. The Commission proposed to mobilise the EUSF to grant financial assistance relating earthquakes that took place in Italy between end of August 2016 and mid-January 2017.
2016/11/22
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins)

I voted in favour of the report. This legislative proposal is part of the climate package presented by the Commission on 20 July 2016. It proposes to integrate greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use-change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework.
2016/11/22
Uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals (A8-0065/2017 - Jussi Halla-aho)

I voted in favour of the reports. The new proposal presented by the Commission favours a uniform format for residence permits, as is the case of visa sticker. It aims at harmonisation of documents in the Member States (introduction of the same card model, design and some security features) in order to avoid serious incidents of counterfeiting and fraud.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 105: Commission delegated regulation of 2 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the specific compositional and information requirements for total diet replacement for weight control (B8-0497/2017)

I voted in favour of the report. The regulation lays down specific requirements with regard to total diet replacement for weight control products in their composition, labelling and advertising, as well as placing products on the market.
2016/11/22
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing Regulation amending Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/6 as regards feed and food subjected to special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station (B8-0502/2017)

I voted in favour. The motion for a resolution calls to ensure that all food and feed imported from Japan into the Union, including the categories listed in Annex I, are subject to controls and checks.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 3/2017: budgetary resources of the Youth Employment Initiative; establishment plans of ACER and SESAR2 (A8-0282/2017 - Jens Geier)

I voted in favour of the report. The main purpose is to enter additional EUR 500 million commitment appropriations to the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI). This allocation for YEI was part of the political agreement on the budget 2017, which was reached during last year’s budgetary conciliation between Parliament and Council.
2016/11/22
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0264/2017 - Bodil Valero)

I voted in favour of the report. In the report the European Parliament calls for stricter application of the eight criteria of the Common Position and more coordination at EU level. It supports the creation of a new supervisory body at EU level for arms control and calls to sanction those Member States which fail to comply with the Common Position when granting export licenses.
2016/11/22
EU political relations with Latin America (A8-0268/2017 - Javi López)

I voted in favour of the report. The new geo—political scenario reinforces the LAC region as a strategic priority and opportunity for the EU’s foreign policy to tackle the common challenges such as lack of good governance, the eradication of poverty, mass migration, drug trafficking, organised crime and terrorism. Special attention is given to the trading system, namely European companies playing a very important role for national economies of LAC. Political stability, economic rules and institutional strength guaranteeing respect for the rule of law and transparency are the cornerstone of a long-term investments, through legal certainty.
2016/11/22
Corruption and human rights in third countries (A8-0246/2017 - Petras Auštrevičius)

I voted in favour of the report. The report calls on states to be actively engaged on policies suited to the specific situation in each region, with a view to tackling corruption as an interlinked, complex and cross-cutting phenomenon that obstructs political, economic and social development and fuels international crime, including terrorism-related activities. It highlights the crucial importance of the anti—corruption agenda during the process of EU accession negotiations.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Marie-Christine Boutonnet (A8-0259/2017 - Heidi Hautala)

I voted in favour of the request of the immunity waiver of Marie-Christine Boutonnet under the recommendation of Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI).
2016/11/22
Nominal composition of the special committee on terrorism

I voted in favour of the nominal composition of the special committee on terrorism. The committee that consists of 30 members will assess the extent of the terrorist threat on European soil and highlight any potential faults, deficiencies and malfunctions in counter-terrorism measures.
2016/11/22
EU-Iceland Agreement on the protection of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs (A8-0254/2017 - David Borrelli)

I voted in favour. The negotiated Geographical Indications (GI) Agreement will provide protection in Iceland for the full list of EU foodstuff GIs. The Agreement includes only foodstuff GIs as wine and spirit drinks’ GIs are already protected directly under the EEA Agreement.
2016/11/22
EU-Iceland Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0256/2017 - David Borrelli)

I voted in favour. With this agreement, Iceland will fully liberalise an additional 163 tariff lines for products such as baking potatoes, leeks, cereals for feed, sugars and live animals. As a result almost 90% of EU agricultural products will enter Iceland duty free. In addition, Iceland will reduce duties on 26 tariff lines. Iceland will increase the existing quotas for EU beef, pig meat, poultry, salted, dried or smoked meat, cheese, and sausages as processed meat products.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Mediation Directive (A8-0238/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos)

I voted in favour of the report. The main goal of this Directive was to facilitate access to alternative dispute resolution and to promote the amicable settlement of disputes, by encouraging the use of mediation and by ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings. Also, the Commission considers that the application of the Directive can be further improved by Member States increasing their efforts to promote and encourage the use of mediation and by the Commission continuing to co-finance mediation-related projects.
2016/11/22
The functioning of franchising in the retail sector (A8-0199/2017 - Dennis de Jong)

. – I voted in favour of the report. Franchising has the potential of being a business model that can help in completing the single market in the retail sector, but is currently under-performing in the EU. The fact that existing legislation covering franchising as a business model varies widely between Member States and may prevent developing cross-border franchise networks, because both franchisees and franchisors are not familiar with other legal systems and may not be protected against unfair trading practices. Parliament welcomed franchising as a business model which supports new business and small business ownership but noted that several improvements are needed.
2016/11/22
A Space Strategy for Europe (A8-0250/2017 - Constanze Krehl)

I voted in favour of the report. The Commission is proposing a new space strategy for Europe focused on four strategic goals: maximising the benefits of space for society and the EU economy; fostering a globally competitive and innovative European space sector; reinforcing Europe’s strategic autonomy; and strengthening Europe’s role as a global actor.
2016/11/22
Academic further and distance education as part of the European lifelong learning strategy (A8-0252/2017 - Milan Zver)

I voted in favour of the report. Distance education is so important in ensuring easier access for all, as well as in lowering the cost of study. E-learning can be a more suitable, more accessible form of education because it avoids the normal operating costs of education institutions. Distance education can improve accessibility for all, without discrimination in terms of nationality, region, social status, age or sex.
2016/11/22
Repeal of obsolete regulations with regard to inland waterway and road haulage sectors (A8-0228/2017 - Karima Delli)

I voted in favour of repealing the three regulations mentioned, relating to the inland waterway and road haulage sectors. In order to clean up and reduce the volume of the legislative acquis, it needs to be regularly reviewed and obsolete legislation identified. Repealing obsolete legislation keeps the legislative framework transparent, clear and easy for Member States and relevant stakeholders, in this case the road haulage sector, to use.
2016/11/22
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (A8-0181/2017 - Carlos Zorrinho)

I voted in favour of the report. With these proposals, the Commission delivered on its digital single market strategy commitments to accelerate investment in very high capacity networks and encourage public access to Wi-Fi for Europeans. Public administrations and other bodies with a public mission will be able to promote local digital services: e-government, e-health, and e-tourism. Local public authorities will be able to apply. The budget for this initiative would be EUR 120 million for some 6 000 municipalities, and the call for projects should be launched after summer 2017.
2016/11/22
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (A8-0310/2016 - Jerzy Buzek)

I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of the proposed regulation is to ensure that all Member States put in place appropriate tools to prepare for, and manage, the effects of a gas shortage due to a possible disruption in supply or exceptionally high demand.
2016/11/22
EU accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (A8-0266/2017 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)

I voted in favour. On 4 March 2016, the Commission proposed the EU’s accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. All EU Member States have signed it, but only 14 of them have thus far ratified it. The interim report calls for EU accession to the Istanbul Convention and its ratification and implementation by EU Member States, and addresses a set of recommendations to the Council, the Commission and Member States on combating violence against women in an efficient and holistic way.
2016/11/22
Agreement to amend the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, adopted in Kigali (A8-0237/2017 - Kateřina Konečná)

I voted in favour. The Montreal Protocol adds hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) to the list of substances regulated by the Protocol and amends the applicable articles. HFCs are commonly used in air conditioners, refrigerators, aerosols, foams and other products. It has been discovered, however, that HFCs are active greenhouse gases whose global warming potential can be one thousand times greater than that of carbon dioxide. The EU’s prompt adoption of the Kigali Amendment will signal its commitment to making a substantial contribution to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and thereby meeting the targets set in the Paris Agreement.
2016/11/22
Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution to abate acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone (A8-0241/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)

I voted in favour. The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) is intended to protect the human environment against air pollution, and was supposed to be signed by 2010; 26 have ratified it including the EU. These amendments now need to be ratified by the Parties in order to make them binding. In the EU, the Gothenburg Protocol is implemented through the National Emission Ceilings Directive. The ratification of the amendments will be an important step towards a higher level of protection of human health and the environment from transboundary air pollution.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Consent) (A8-0232/2017 - Elena Valenciano)

I voted in favour. The report highlights the commitments that the Republic of Cuba is undertaking with the European Union and the responsibility of both parties when fulfilling the provisions of [the agreement]. The EU urges the Cuban Government to align its human rights policy with international standards defined in the Charters, declarations and international instruments to which Cuba is a signatory. Cuba should ratify all pending UN human rights conventions, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0233/2017 - Elena Valenciano)

I voted in favour. The report highlights the commitments that the Republic of Cuba is undertaking with the European Union and the responsibility of both parties when fulfilling the provisions of [the agreement]. The EU urges the Cuban Government to align its human rights policy with international standards defined in the Charters, declarations and international instruments to which Cuba is a signatory. Cuba should ratify all pending UN human rights conventions, in particular The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
2016/11/22
Memorandum of Understanding between the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and Eurojust (A8-0215/2017 - Claude Moraes)

I voted in favour. The draft Council implementing decision on the Memorandum of Understanding between eu-LISA and Eurojust aims to establish a cooperation framework between the two EU bodies. In addition to the exchange of information, expertise and best practices, it covers cooperation regarding ICT-related matters, the access rights of Eurojust to SIS II, as well as other strategic and administrative matters.
2016/11/22
Fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (A8-0230/2017 - Ingeborg Gräßle, Juan Fernando López Aguilar)

I voted against the proposal to reject the Council proposal. The objective of the Directive is to establish minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences, sanctions and limitation periods in the field of the fight against fraud and other illegal activities affecting the Union’s financial interests, with a view to contributing effectively to a stronger protection against crime affecting those financial interests, in line with the acquis of the Union in this field. It will improve the level of protection currently existing on the basis of the 1995 Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, which the Directive will replace for the Member States bound by it.
2016/11/22
Union legal framework for customs infringements and sanctions (A8-0239/2016 - Kaja Kallas)

It was an approval without vote. The report had been referred back to committee at the sitting of 25 October 2016 for interinstitutional negotiations.
2016/11/22
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme for 2018 (RC-B8-0434/2017, B8-0434/2017, B8-0435/2017, B8-0450/2017, B8-0451/2017, B8-0454/2017, B8-0455/2017, B8-0456/2017)

I voted against. Parliament urged the Commission to provide more information on its work programme for 2018 especially in regards to the digital sector and their approach towards SMEs in different sectors in order to boost Europe’s economic climate.
2016/11/22
2018 Budget - Mandate for the trilogue (A8-0249/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan)

I voted in favour. The report highlights the main areas of interest for the 2018 budget such as delivering growth, jobs and security, and support on R&D, and gives a mandate for the trilogue.
2016/11/22
Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations (A8-0220/2017 - Elmar Brok, Silvia Costa)

I voted in favour. The report welcomes the approach of the joint communication, which identifies three work streams: supporting culture as an engine for sustainable social and economic development; promoting culture and intercultural dialogue for peaceful inter-community relations; and reinforcing cooperation on cultural heritage. It suggests that each Member State could launch joint actions together with the EU in order to increase the visibility of their actions and initiatives abroad. Also, it stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU neighbourhood, and further support cultural relations with neighbourhood countries through technical assistance.
2016/11/22
Recommendation to the Council on the 72nd session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0216/2017 - Andrey Kovatchev)

I voted in favour. The report addresses recommendations to the Council concerning peace and security, the fight against terrorism, non-proliferation and disarmament, migration, human rights, democracy and the rule of law, development, climate change, the EU and reform of the UN system. Parliament recommends the Council to push for stronger multilateral commitments to find lasting sustainable political and peaceful solutions to current conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa, particularly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya, and: to reinvigorate diplomatic efforts to resolve frozen conflicts around the world; to continue to support UN special envoys’ work, actions and initiatives aimed at solving these conflicts; to support the full implementation of the UN Security Council’s resolutions on women, peace and security.
2016/11/22
EU-Kosovo Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Kosovo in Union programmes (A8-0207/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek)

I voted in favour. The Framework Agreement will permit the gradual opening of or reinforced participation in certain European Union programmes for Kosovo, offering an opportunity to promote further cultural, educational, environmental, technical and scientific links, enhancing people-to-people contacts and sectoral cooperation, in addition to the strengthening of political and economic relations through the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/001 ES/Castilla y León mining (A8-0248/2017 - Monika Vana)

I voted in favour of the report. On 2 June 2017 the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Spain to support the reintegration into the labour market of workers made redundant in five mining enterprises. Moreover, the region suffers from a lack of job offerings in the mining district and from high emigration of persons of employable age, which leads to a distortion of the unemployment figures, particularly as regards the younger age groups. Given the latest redundancies, the danger is that the employment situation and depopulation of the area will become even worse. The application has been approved.
2016/11/22
European standards for the 21st century (A8-0213/2017 - Marlene Mizzi)

I voted in favour. The Communication on European standards for the 21st century brings together the standardisation initiatives contained in the ICT standardisation priority plan, the annual Union work programme for standardisation 2017, the staff document on standardisation and services and the result from the REFIT evaluation of the Regulation on standardisation. It wishes to establish new forms of cooperation to set a new best practice for a more collaborative and agile approach in line with the better regulation principles.
2016/11/22
Towards a pan-European covered bonds framework (A8-0235/2017 - Bernd Lucke)

I voted in favour. The report proposed a common definition of covered bonds with three categories: some covered bonds would become Premium Covered Bonds and others stay Ordinary Covered Bonds. In addition, they also propose creating a new category of European Secured Notes consisting of non-government-backed infrastructure investments or credits to small and medium-sized enterprises.
2016/11/22
The role of fisheries-related tourism in the diversification of fisheries (A8-0221/2017 - Renata Briano)

I voted in favour of the report. Over the last decades many of the traditional fishing communities in the European Union have come under increasing pressure from many different negative factors, such as overfishing and dwindling fishing stocks, climate change, pollution, decreasing populations and lowering appeal of fisherman’s profession. It is necessary to help fishing communities and tourists find each other and to make sure that sufficient interest on both sides is generated in order to create a lasting beneficial partnership.
2016/11/22
Limitation periods for traffic accidents (A8-0206/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)

I voted in favour. Limitation periods for claims are essential to ensure legal certainty and the finality of disputes. Back in February 2007, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on ‘Limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving personal injuries and fatal accidents’, where it called on the Commission ‘to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty’. The report concludes that a certain level of harmonisation is required in order to address the main problems currently encountered by visiting victims and safeguard effective access to justice.
2016/11/22
Common minimum standards of civil procedure (A8-0210/2017 - Emil Radev)

I voted in favour. European citizens, especially those who move across borders, are now far more likely to come into contact with the civil procedure of another Member State. Civil procedure provides the means for the enforcement of substantive rights and duties of legal subjects in legal proceedings. The report asks for a harmonised regulatory framework – common minimum standards in regards to civil disputes cross—border.
2016/11/22
Macro-financial assistance to Moldova (A8-0185/2017 - Sorin Moisă)

I voted in favour of the report, which supported the Commission proposal to a large extent. The report introduced stronger conditionality for granting macro-financial assistance to contribute to greater political and macroeconomic stability of the country. These conditions include the strengthening of economic and financial governance, including a thorough, result-oriented investigation into bank fraud, good energy governance, an accountable, transparent and merit-based civil service, the freedom, independence and pluralism of the media, sustainable development and poverty reduction and the political independence of the judiciary.
2016/11/22
Disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches (A8-0227/2017 - Hugues Bayet, Evelyn Regner)

I voted in favour. In the last years, the attention paid to corporate income tax avoidance has increased considerably and has become a major focus of concern within the EU as well as at global level. The objective of the proposal is to expand existing transparency obligations of companies to publicly disclose certain information in order to improve tax-related information transparency.
2016/11/22
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa)

I voted in favour. The autonomous trade measures for Ukraine are proposed in view of the difficult economic situation in the country, with the aim to support its economic reform efforts and the development of closer economic relations with the EU, in line with the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement, applied provisionally since 1 January 2016.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget n° 2 to the General budget 2017 entering the surplus of the financial year 2016 (A8-0229/2017 - Jens Geier)

I voted in favour. The report overviews the budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 as well as calling on the institutions to process swiftly the pending and upcoming draft amending budgets for the Youth Employment Initiative and for the European Fund for Sustainable Development, in line with the commitments taken as part of the outcome of the conciliation on the 2017 budget.
2016/11/22
A longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies (A8-0214/2017 - Pascal Durand)

I voted in favour. The report calls on the Commission to set criteria of minimum resistance per product category, to support the right to have products repaired, to promote a usage-oriented economic model, to better inform consumers on products’ durability including via an assessment of the impact of aligning lifespan labelling with the duration of the legal guarantee, to stop planned obsolescence, to reinforce consumer rights to have access to the legal guarantee of conformity, and to combat software planned obsolescence.
2016/11/22
Addressing human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide (A8-0222/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)

I voted in favour. The report focuses on EU action in the field of preventing and ensuring accountability for the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, also known as ‘atrocity crimes’. It underlines that the international community has equally engaged to prevent such crimes taking place and suggests the setting-up of an instrument that can minimise the warning response gap. It recommends the development of an efficient approach to crisis and conflict situations, which should include exchange information and coordination of preventive measures.
2016/11/22
Private security companies (A8-0191/2017 - Hilde Vautmans)

I voted in favour. This own initiative report aims to address the increasing role of Private Military Companies in the security and defence domain. The report suggests drawing up an open list of contractors complying with EU standards on transparency, criminal records, financial and economic capacity, licences, strict vetting of personnel and adhering to an international code of conduct.
2016/11/22
Working conditions and precarious employment (A8-0224/2017 - Neoklis Sylikiotis)

I voted in favour. Over the last decade, non-standard, atypical forms of employment have been emerging, fixed termed and part-time contracts have increased. The report analyses the effect of these new forms of arrangements on employment conditions and brings forward ideas to prevent possible insecurity they might cause. Furthermore it addresses questions around precarious employment which does not respect existing labour law standards and calls for measures to be taken to prevent it.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Rolandas Paksas (Rule 150)

I voted in favour of the report to wave immunity of Rolandas Paksas. The request was brought to the Parliament’s attention by the General Prosecutor of Lithuania. Rolanas Paksas is accused of having agreed to take a bribe in exchange for influencing public authorities and state officials to exercise their powers in 2015.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Mylène Troszczynski (Rule 150)

I voted in favour to wave immunity of Mylène Troszczynski requested by Minister of Justice of France on grounds of public hatred speech.
2016/11/22
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen (Rule 150)

I voted in favour to wave the immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen. The request was brought by the Prosecutor-General of France on the grounds of suspecting of having committed the offence of public defamation against a publicly-elected official.
2016/11/22
The need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap (A8-0197/2017 - Constance Le Grip)

I voted in favour of the report. The report reaffirms the importance of investment in education to enable especially women to stay longer in the labour market which would have positive effects on their pensions. The European Parliament calls on the European Commission and the EU Member States to tackle inequalities and discrimination in the labour market, in particular through education and empowerment of girls and women to enter sections of the labour market that are currently dominated by men.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Serbia (A8-0063/2017 - David McAllister)

I voted in favour of the report. Serbia made the progress in developing a functioning market economy and the improvement of the overall economic situation in the country. The Parliament welcomes that the restructuring of publicly owned enterprises has advanced, particularly in the field of energy and railway transportation, and underlines the importance of their professional management in order to make them more effective, competitive and economic. However, the report expresses concern that no progress has been made to improve the situation regarding freedom of expression and self-censorship of the media. It calls on the authorities to provide adequate resources to investigate more proactively all cases of attacks against journalists and media outlets and to swiftly bring the perpetrators to justice.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Kosovo (A8-0062/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek)

I voted in favour of the report. The report welcomes the progress made in implementing the various agreements signed since August 2016 in the normalisation process with Serbia, and calls on both Kosovo and Serbia to show more engagement and sustained political will as regards the normalisation of relations and to refrain from any actions that would jeopardise the progress achieved so far in this process. It is important to guarantee, respect, support and intensify efforts to improve the rule of law. However, the Parliament expresses serious concerns at the lack of progress made with regard to the protection of freedom of expression and media freedom, and at the increased political interference and pressure and intimidation on the media as well as lack of effectiveness fighting corruption and organised crime.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0055/2017 - Ivo Vajgl)

I voted in favour of the report. It highlights that there is a need for serious commitment by all political forces for the country to continue to maintain its EU integration path. The country needs to fully implement robust reforms marked by tangible results particularly to the areas of the rule of law, justice, corruption, fundamental rights, home affairs and good neighbourly relations. At the same time, the Parliament urges all parties to demonstrate the political will and responsibility to overcome the divisive political environment, polarisation, lack of culture of compromise and re-engage in dialogue.
2016/11/22
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (RC-B8-0397/2017, B8-0397/2017, B8-0398/2017, B8-0399/2017, B8-0400/2017, B8-0401/2017, B8-0402/2017)

I voted in favour. The resolution expressed deep concern at the deterioration of the political, security and humanitarian situation in the DRC. It strongly condemns all human rights violations, including acts of violence by all perpetrators, abductions, killings, torture, sexual violence, and arbitrary arrests and illegal detentions. It is necessary to open an independent and comprehensive committee of inquiry, including UN experts, in order to shed light on the violence in the Kasai region and to ensure that the perpetrators of these massacres are held to account for their actions.
2016/11/22
State of play of the implementation of the Sustainability Compact in Bangladesh (B8-0396/2017)

I voted in favour. The resolution underlines that responsible business conduct and decent working conditions are a shared responsibility of the Bangladeshi Government, the local private sector, the international community and business partners. Therefore, the government must improve its level of engagement in all areas of labour rights and working conditions and to effectively address the freedom of association and collective bargaining.
2016/11/22
Increasing engagement of partners and visibility in the performance of European Structural and Investment Funds (A8-0201/2017 - Daniel Buda)

I voted in favour. The own-initiative report seeks to scrutinise actual experiences and work on an increased visibility of the EFSI and proposes an approach to link Cohesion Policy instruments with local policies, in order to increase the effectiveness of decisions at the local level through developing participatory governance as an effective tool to increase the visibility of EFSI Funds.
2016/11/22
Cost effectiveness of the 7th Research Programme (A8-0194/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of the report. The report calls on the Commission to ensure that modernisations introduced under Horizon 2020, such as flat rates for indirect costs, a single audit strategy, and single participant portal are applied in a similar way in other policy areas, such as structural funds.
2016/11/22
Statelessness in South and South East Asia (A8-0182/2017 - Amjad Bashir)

I voted in favour of the report. The report reiterates its concerns about the insufficient availability of data on statelessness as well as lack of access to education, health services, work, freedom of movement and security. It urges governments in developing countries to prevent denial, loss or deprivation of nationality on discriminatory grounds, to adopt equitable nationality laws and to implement accessible, affordable and non-discriminatory nationality documentation procedures.
2016/11/22
Cross-border mergers and divisions (A8-0190/2017 - Enrico Gasbarra)

I voted in favour of the report, which focuses on company law aspects, while stressing the importance of cross-border mobility for businesses and welcoming justified entrepreneurial decisions. The report stresses the effectiveness of Directive 2005/56/EC on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies, which has served to facilitate cross-border mergers between limited liability companies in the European Union and to reduce the associated costs and administrative procedures.
2016/11/22
Participation of the Union in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0112/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)

I voted in favour of the report. PRIMA is a research partnership gathering together EU and non-EU countries from the Mediterranean region which aims to develop novel solutions for sustainable water management and food production. The participation of the EU would bring a EUR 200 million contribution through Horizon 2020. The partnership is scheduled to run for 10 years, starting in 2018.
2016/11/22
Specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters (A8-0070/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)

I voted in favour of the report. After the devastating earthquakes that affected Italy in the second half of 2016, the Commission put forward a proposal amending Article 120 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) by introducing a separate priority axis for reconstruction projects supported by the ERDF within an operational programme. The co-financing rate for the new priority axis is to be up to 100%, without affecting the overall allocation for the period 2014-2020 for the Member State concerned.
2016/11/22
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Commission proposed on 15 July 2015 a new regulation on energy efficiency labelling as part of its summer energy package repealing the existing directive. The new regulation was supposed to come into force on 1 January 2017 to contribute towards meeting the EU energy efficiency target. The proposed regulation would restore the legislation on energy labelling of household appliances.
2016/11/22
European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (A8-0061/2017 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)

I voted in favour of the report. The European Capitals of Culture initiative aims to safeguard and promote the richness and diversity of cultures and encourage citizens’ sense of belonging to a common cultural area. The ‘European Capitals of Culture’ decision included in its annex an indicative chronological list where two Member States per year are entitled to host the action.
2016/11/22
Assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation (A8-0209/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)

I voted in favour of the report. The report stresses that the evaluation of FP7 and monitoring of Horizon 2020 show that the EU Framework Programme (FP) for research and innovation is a success and brings clear added value to the EU. The FP intends to incentivise industry participation in order to increase R&D spending by industry, also it calls on the Commission to assess the European added value and relevance to the public of funding for industry-driven instruments such as Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs), as well as the coherence, openness and transparency of all joint initiatives.
2016/11/22
Building blocks for a post-2020 EU cohesion policy (A8-0202/2017 - Kerstin Westphal)

I voted in favour of the report. The draft report underlines the added value of cohesion policy for the citizens of the EU and points to the need for continuity of the main elements of the last reform, namely making the policy more effective and simpler to implement. It indicates also areas where improvement is necessary, such as better communication of the positive results of the policy, more flexibility, real partnership and validation of the territorial approach in all phases of the implementation cycle.
2016/11/22
Status of fish stocks and socio-economic situation of the fishing sector in the Mediterranean (A8-0179/2017 - Marco Affronte)

I voted in favour of the report. The report also suggests developing a common EU-funded database with comprehensive and reliable data on fishing resources. Also it aims to achieve the following goals: long-term management of resources giving greater sustainability with use of more selective fishing gear, cooperation with third countries, closure of some areas as nursery areas or for restocking of the overfished stock, preferential access to resources for small-scale (artisanal) fleets, stepping up of the monitoring of illegal and unreported and unregulated fishing together with special measures for those breaking the rules and fishing without a licence.
2016/11/22
Minamata Convention on Mercury (A8-0067/2017 - Stefan Eck)

I voted in favour. The Minamata Convention on Mercury (2013) is the main international legal framework for cooperation and measures to control and limit the use and anthropogenic emissions of mercury and mercury compounds to air, water and land. It provides for a ban on mercury mines, the phase-out and reduction of mercury use in a number of products and processes, control measures on emissions and releases, and the regulation of artisanal and small-scale gold mining. The Convention also addresses the storage of mercury, its disposal as waste, and mercury contaminated sites.
2016/11/22
Hybrid mismatches with third countries (A8-0134/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson)

I voted in favour. The hybrid mismatch arrangements exploit differences in the tax treatment of an entity or instrument under the laws of two or more tax jurisdictions to reduce tax paid on profits or even achieve double non-taxation. The report introduces additional definitions, like ‘hybrid entity’, ‘disregarded permanent establishment’, ‘payer jurisdiction’, it also stresses the need to ensure that profits are taxed where economic activities deriving the profits are performed and where value is created.
2016/11/22
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Denmark and Europol (A8-0164/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)

I voted in favour. The draft operational and strategic cooperation agreement seeks to ensure a sufficient level of cooperation between Europol and Denmark to maintain the Union’s capacity to effectively fight terrorism and organised crime. However, the agreement does in no way equal full membership of Europol and will be conditional upon Denmark’s continued membership of the EU and the Schengen area, the full transposition of the Police Directive into Danish law by 1 May 2017, and Denmark’s recognition of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice and the competences of the European Data Protection Supervisor.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2015 (A8-0161/2017 - Nedzhmi Ali)

I voted in favour. The report focuses on the EIB’s investment programme and EU policy objectives: accelerating economic recovery, promoting youth employment, innovation and SMEs, enhancing environmental sustainability and climate action alongside promoting economic and social cohesion.
2016/11/22
Structural Reform Support Programme for 2017-2020 (A8-0374/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl)

I voted in favour. The Commission Proposal aims establishing a new instrument, the Structural Reform Support Programme (SRSP) in order to provide technical support to all Member States on a voluntary basis to address challenges of the design and implementation of growth-enhancing institutional, structural and administrative reforms. A budget of EUR 142.8 million for 2017-2020 is foreseen for the support.
2016/11/22
European Year of Cultural Heritage (A8-0340/2016 - Mircea Diaconu)

I voted in favour. The purpose is to designate 2018 as the European Year of Cultural Heritage in order to promote the role of European cultural heritage as a crucial component of cultural diversity, intercultural dialogue and EU’s international dimension. The main objectives of this European Year are: to promote cultural diversity, intercultural dialogue and social cohesion, to highlight the economic contribution of cultural heritage in the cultural and creative sectors, including small and medium-sized enterprises, to emphasise the role of cultural heritage in EU external relations, including conflict prevention, post-conflict reconciliation and rebuilding destroyed cultural heritage.
2016/11/22
Union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing (A8-0291/2016 - Theodor Dumitru Stolojan)

I voted in favour. The objectives of the programme established by the Regulation are to ensure stable, diversified, sound and adequate funding and to enable European Financial Reporting Advisory Group to accomplish its mission which is to serve the European public interest by developing and promoting European views in the field of financial reporting, in an independent and efficient manner. It has been concluded that Union co-financing is the most efficient option.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2015 Commission discharge (A8-0160/2017 - Joachim Zeller)

I voted in favour. The report presented the collection of special reports of the Court of Auditors on performance of audits on the efficiency, economy and effectiveness of spending on various programmes which have been published during last year.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0125/2017 - Younous Omarjee)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge. The report called for a higher level of consistency in the management of development policy, so as to further develop the existing assurance frameworks. In my opinion, this will give greater guarantees when funding development interventions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0153/2017 - Dennis de Jong)

I voted in favour of granting discharge. The report in general focuses on the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015. I strongly support the chapter on transparency when it comes to more transparency with regard to the spending of MEPs’ allowances, provision of more information and maximum transparency on Parliament’s website with regard to MEPs’ activities as well as publication on Parliament’s website of decisions regarding the financing of political parties and foundations.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0131/2017 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour of postponing discharge of the EU general budget of 2015 for the European Council and the Council. The main reason is the lack of cooperation with regard to submitting necessary documents. However, it was agreed that a more efficient procedure will occur.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Justice (A8-0136/2017 - Benedek Jávor)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the EU general budget for the European Court of Justice. All the necessary documentation and procedural steps were completed by the European Court of Justice.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Auditors (A8-0151/2017 - Benedek Jávor)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for the EU general budget 2015 for the European Court of Auditors. All the necessary documentation and procedural steps were completed by the European Court of Auditors.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0144/2017 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge EU general budget for the financial year 2015 for European Economic and Social Committee. I encourage to reach for a more effective information and communication policy.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0141/2017 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for EU general budget for the financial year 2015 for the Committee of the Regions. Particularly, I welcome the Committee’s interest in having a more systematic approach to the cooperation with Parliament, especially in political areas and with Parliament’s research service. I am certain that further development of synergies will bring positive results to both institutions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0122/2017 - Benedek Jávor)

. ‒ I voted in favour to grant a discharge for the European External Action Service (EEAS) for the EU general budget for the year 2015. The report states that the EEAS should provide better administrative assistance to the EU delegations as regards financial management, procurement and human resources and the costs of buildings, support in relation to the purchasing policy of residences and security issues, the priority given to the management of gender and geographical balance in staff and the different domains where cost reductions must still be achieved.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0142/2017 - Benedek Jávor)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for European Ombudsman of EU general budget for the financial year 2015. The report positively emphasises the provision of exhaustive information on all the human resources at the Ombudsman’s disposal, broken down according to grade, sex and nationality and requests that information be automatically included in the Ombudsman’s annual activity report.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0140/2017 - Bart Staes)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for European Data Protection Supervisor for EU general budget for the financial year 2015. In my opinion, European Data Protection Supervisor played an effective advisory role during the development of legislation in the data protection package (the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Directive), the Europol reform and the Passenger Name Record Directive, the EU-US Privacy Shield as well as its opinion on the First reform package on the Common European Asylum System (Eurodac, EASO and Dublin regulations) as well as its involvement in the setting-up of the European Data Protection Board.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0149/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for EU agencies on performance, financial management and control for the financial year 2015. The report identifies that one of the most frequent issues is related with the budgetary principle of annuality.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0147/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2015. The report showed that the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2015 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0143/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for the office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications for the financial year 2015. However, the report made a series of observations regarding commitments, carry-overs, transfers, procurement, recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0075/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2015. According to the report the Centre cancelled EUR 5.9 million of appropriations available at the end of 2015. These cancellations were related to the overestimation of the cost of external translators as well as to the fact that the fulfilment of the establishment plan did not reach the level foreseen in the budget. While this fact raises some concerns, the Centre notes that it monitored the evolution of external translation costs more closely and based its budget forecasts for 2016 onwards on up-to-date figures.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0145/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2015. The annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year 2015 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Centre’s accounts. The report, however suggests that the current building calls into question not only its economic viability, but more importantly the safety and security of its personnel and whether relocation to a new building would be a more preferable solution.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Police College (CEPOL) (A8-0081/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for European Police College for the financial year 2015. It was noted that there is a significant need for reinforcement in both human and financial resources where the Commission should take initiative by proposing some solutions.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0087/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2015.The report highlighted the Agency’s vital role in ensuring the highest possible level of aviation safety throughout Europe. The report noted that a common European assessment and alerting system is needed in Europe, in particular in the context of flights over conflict zones. Also, it stressed that, in the context of a fast-developing civil aviation sector, exemplified by the ever more widespread use of pilotless aircraft (‘drones’), the Agency should be given the necessary financial, material and human resources to successfully perform its regulatory and executive tasks in the fields of safety and environmental protection.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0093/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour to grant a discharge for European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2015. The report recognised that the growth of the Office’s budget in 2016 was significant in order to cope with additional tasks relating to the European Agenda on Migration. A range of steps were taken by the Office to deal with such an unprecedented increase in tasks and recalled that in 2015 a record number of almost 1.4 million applications for international protection were made.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0079/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Banking Authority (EBA) for the financial year 2015. Following the outcome of the UK referendum, the EBA, whose headquarters is in London, drafted impact assessments for all support areas, namely IT, human resources, procurement, corporate services and communications, which will be updated according to developments. However, there is some concern regarding the potential operational and business continuity risks and related costs of a relocation decision.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (C8-0293/2016)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2015. The centre noted that in 2015, 37 different events were addressed, for example, the Ebola epidemic, the influx of refugees, the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), poliomyelitis, the shortage of medical countermeasures, the Zika virus, and the explosion of a chemical factory in China.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0086/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2015. I welcome that the Agency has implemented a robust conflict of interest policy and a detailed anti-fraud strategy in order to contribute to a culture of high ethical behaviour among the staff and experts working for the Agency.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0085/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the Agency put more efforts into social media and media relations in order to enhance into more effective communication with citizens. Also, they Agency invested in better design, data visualisation and infographics and updated its corporate identity to this effect, as well as that more efforts were put into social media and media relations. I welcome such steps and hope that the Agency will continue promoting dialogue with stakeholders and citizens and incorporate it as part of the priorities and activities to be implemented.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Fisheries Control Agency for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the implementation of the e-Prior modules for electronic tendering, ordering and invoicing were progressively used leading to an increase in electronic work flows, and subsequently greater efficiency, reliability of the data and audit trail. Also important is the Agency’s role in implementing the reformed Common Fisheries Policy and in achieving the objectives.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0098/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2015. The Authority launched in 2015 the ‘Transparency and Engagement in Risk Assessment’ project to provide clarity regarding, and further develop approaches towards transparency and engagement in its scientific processes. In my opinion, the Authority should give special attention to public opinion and engage more in dialogue with them.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0106/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2015. The report positively emphasised that the Institute is looking for synergies by pooling certain tasks and introducing shared services with other agencies.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0101/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2015. The report underlined the Authority should ensure that resources are maximised in order to fully fulfil its legal mandate given to it by the European Parliament and the Council which could lead to a more effective achievement of its objectives.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0127/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Institute for Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2015. The report noted the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy, therefore the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0084/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Medicines Agency for the financial year 2015. The report noted that due to Brexit, the Agency established a task force to focus on relocation preparedness, operational and financial preparedness, HR-related matters and communication (internal and external) aspects. They observed that the work currently ongoing is focussed on the impact of a loss of EMA staff in the event of relocation and loss of external expertise due to the potential unavailability of UK expertise in the scientific committees and other EMA fora.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0099/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2015. The report noted the Centre’s ongoing efforts to strengthen cooperation with other Union agencies, particularly those working in Justice and Home Affairs and in the health field. Also, its implementation of anti-fraud strategy is a very positive step towards more efficiency.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0130/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2015. The report noted the Agency’s contribution to maritime safety, the prevention of pollution from ships as well as from offshore installations for gas and oil exploitation in Europe, and the assistance provided to Member States and the Commission under international and Union law.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) (A8-0115/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2015. The report highlighted that it is important for the Greek authorities, the Commission and the Agency to find a solution for the issue of the Agency’s two locations in Greece as soon as possible in order to ensure a much more efficient use of Union funds.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0128/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Railway Agency for the financial year 2015. The report positively noted that in 2016 the Agency undertook several actions in order to better communicate its activities, achievements and added value to the public through several public events, including the InnoTrans fair in September 2016, a forum on digitalisation of railways in Florence, a celebration on the occasion of the positive vote on the 4th Railway Package.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0124/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2015. The report noted that it should ensure that resources are maximised in order to fully fulfil its legal mandate. Also, the Authority needs to inform the European Parliament and the Council about its activities in a timely, regular and comprehensive manner.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0118/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Training Foundation for the financial year 2015. The report noted positive efforts of the Foundation to modernise the education and training systems and to strengthen the human capital of partner countries.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (A8-0105/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) for the financial year 2015. The report noted that at the end of 2014, the Agency concluded the negotiations and signed the headquarters agreement with Estonia for its seat in Tallinn and with France for its operational site in Strasbourg.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0116/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2015. The report emphasised the efficiency of the Agency’s contribution to promote healthy and safe workplaces across the Union. The progress in the implementation of its Multiannual Strategic Programme, in particular the pilot project on ‘Safer and healthier work at any age’ and the online interactive risk assessment is much appreciated.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) (A8-0126/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for Euratom Supply Agency for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2015 represented an increase of 20.19% compared to 2014.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0111/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the Foundation’s target of 80% regarding the number of planned outputs in its work programme was not achieved, even though the Foundation improved its performance in comparison to 2014. The reasons why the Foundation missed the target are principally related to delays by contractors and the scarcity of staff resources.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) (A8-0129/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour for grating a discharge for European Union’s Judicial Cooperation Unit for the financial year 2015. The report noted that Eurojust is currently, together with its host Member State, in the process of preparing for the transition to its new premises. The construction of the premises started in spring 2015 and the expected move was planned for spring 2017.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0107/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Police Office for the financial year 2015. The report noted that in 2016 the Office updated its ICT network architecture in order to strengthen the protection of its core business data and related systems, including information exchange capabilities with the Member States and third parties. I welcome its efficient involvement in fighting cyber crime such as the creation of the European Cybercrime Centre and, since 2016, the European Counter Terrorism Centre, have increased its cyber threat profile.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0146/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge to the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the Agency developed an anti-fraud strategy, evaluating the introduction of new controls, where necessary after a dedicated risk assessment, which is very good step. Also, the Agency is planning to include a standard chapter on transparency, accountability and integrity in its annual report.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (A8-0137/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2015. The report positively noted the contribution of the Agency to saving more than 250 000 people at sea in 2015 and the support provided to national authorities in hotspot areas in relation to the identification and registration of migrants, return-related activities and Union internal security.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0148/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the Agency is a main partner and the initiator of the European Space Expo project that visited Luxembourg, Milan, Oslo, Zagreb, Stockholm, Riga, Ljubljana and Athens in 2015, and welcomed hundreds of thousands of local citizens. Each Expo visit was the result of collaboration with many local actors including local industry, municipalities and academia.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0103/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report contains a number of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the legal framework and the prevention and management of conflicts of interests.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (A8-0094/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report noted that in terms of widening participation during the first year of Clean Sky 2 programme 76 new core partners joined the programme and took note of the progress made by the Joint Undertaking in involving SMEs in the programme by achieving a 36% participation rate by the end 2016.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (A8-0113/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for ECSEL Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report expressed concern that the Court’s report found it was impossible for the Joint Undertaking to calculate a reliable weighted error rate or a residual error rate because of the significant variation in the methodologies and procedures used by the national funding authorities and thus the Court could not conclude whether ex-post audits were functioning effectively.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH) (A8-0109/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report positively noted that the Joint Undertaking manifested a clear intention to invest, develop and commercialise its innovative technologies, both on the side of industry and research.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0083/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the Joint Undertaking is encouraged to continue in its effort towards higher participation of SMEs in its projects and to present transparency guidelines on its reports.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: ITER Joint Undertaking (A8-0108/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour of granting a discharge for ITER Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report noted the development of contract tracker tool which is an important tool for monitoring milestones and overall project progress, the adoption of the single intellectual property document in 2016, and the signature of a renewed long-term lease agreement with Spain for its offices.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0096/2017 - Miroslav Poche)

I voted in favour for granting a discharge for SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The report noted that the Commission issued guidelines to the Joint Undertaking-related rules on conflicts of interest, including a common template for the declaration of absence of a conflict of interest which helps to optimise better human resources.
2016/11/22
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions (A8-0138/2017 - Ulrike Rodust)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The prime reason for this report is the call from the outermost regions, which are part of France (Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Réunion, Martinique, Mayotte and Saint-Martin), Portugal (Madeira and Azores) and Spain (Canary Islands), for a way to renew and modernise their fleets. Currently, the lack of safety on board is a major problem in the outermost regions.
2016/11/22
EU flagship initiative on the garment sector (A8-0080/2017 - Lola Sánchez Caldentey)

I voted in favour. The aim of the report is to call on the Commission to advance on the EU initiative on the garment sector. It seeks to make this industry more responsible to improve labour, human rights and environmental conditions in garment-producing countries and to prevent tragedies like the Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh in 2013.
2016/11/22
State of play of farmland concentration in the EU: how to facilitate the access to land for farmers (A8-0119/2017 - Maria Noichl)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The report underlines the different aspects of land concentration in the EU and suggests possible solutions on how to improve access to arable land for European farmers, such as better coordination between the Commission and the Member States, together with regular exchanges of data on rent levels, land prices and market behaviour.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0121/2017 - Georgios Kyrtsos)

I voted in favour. The report notes the stability of the EIB lending signed in 2015 emphasizes that a fresh increase in EIB capital in order to safeguard the bank’s financing capacity for the future, deserves serious consideration. it is also important to ensure the efficient and responsible management of resources. The report also calls on the EIB to present a comprehensive assessment of the potential impact that the UK’s decision to leave the EU might have on its financial status and activities.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Mining Waste Directive (A8-0071/2017 - György Hölvényi)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The report underlines the incomplete implementation of the Mining Waste Directive and the difficulty of obtaining a clear picture of the effectiveness of Member States’ actions. Therefore it calls for reform of the current reporting mechanism as a matter of priority, taking into account the upcoming deadlines for the third reporting period (2014-2017).
2016/11/22
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0270/2017, B8-0270/2017, B8-0271/2017, B8-0272/2017, B8-0274/2017, B8-0275/2017, B8-0276/2017, B8-0277/2017)

I voted in favour. The resolution condemns the continued unconstitutional violation of the democratic order in Venezuela, including the recent ruling issued by the Venezuelan Supreme Court to take over the legislative powers of the National Assembly and the lack of separation of powers and independence of the branches of government. It expresses its grave concerns at the seriously deteriorating democracy, human rights and the socio-economic situation in Venezuela, characterised by an increasing climate of political violence and social instability.
2016/11/22
Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (RC-B8-0237/2017, B8-0237/2017, B8-0241/2017, B8-0242/2017, B8-0243/2017)

I voted in favour. The resolution acknowledges the United Kingdom's (UK) notification to withdraw from the European Union and states general principles that both sides should seek to follow such as principles of negotiation, transparent withdrawal procedure, future relationship between the EU and the UK, futures institutional structure of the EU as the Union of 27 Member States.
2016/11/22
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with the exception of aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0076/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)

I voted in favour. The International Conventions on Liability and Compensation for Damage in connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS) by Sea 1996 is the last one of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Conventions dealing with liability and compensation for damages arising from the carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by sea, including liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas that have not yet been ratified. The 2010 HNS Convention and its ratification establishes strict liability of the owner of the ship carrying HNS for any damage resulting from an incident in connection with the carriage of HNS by sea and on board that ship. The conclusion of the 2010 Protocol to the HNS Convention will ensure uniform application of rules on liability and compensation in connection with accidents caused by ships carrying HNS at sea across the EU.
2016/11/22
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with regard to aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0078/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)

I voted in favour. The International Conventions on Liability and Compensation for Damage in connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS) by Sea 1996 is the last one of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Conventions dealing with liability and compensation for damages arising from the carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by sea, including liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas that have not yet been ratified. The 2010 HNS Convention and its ratification establishes strict liability of the owner of the ship carrying HNS for any damage resulting from an incident in connection with the carriage of HNS by sea and on board that ship. The conclusion of the 2010 Protocol to the HNS Convention will ensure uniform application of rules on liability and compensation in connection with accidents caused by ships carrying HNS at sea across the EU.
2016/11/22
Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Croatia (A8-0073/2017 - Nuno Melo)

I voted in favour. With the proposed Decision, the Council shall set a date for the application of certain provisions of the Schengen acquis in the area of the Schengen Information System (SIS) to be applied in Croatia, in line with Croatia’s Act of Accession to the EU. Following the technical and legal arrangements, concerning data protection, processing SIS data and exchange of supplementary information, the Schengen Committee on 6 October 2016 confirms that a satisfactory level of data protection is met in Croatia. The next step now will be the lifting of checks at the EU internal borders to Croatia.
2016/11/22
Medical devices (A8-0068/2017 - Glenis Willmott)

I voted against the proposal to reject Council’s opinion. With this proposal there will be tighter controls of the safety of products, such as breast implants, not only prior to authorisation, but also as unannounced inspections later at the production sites. Furthermore, mandatory counselling ahead of sensitive medical tests will be introduced.
2016/11/22
In vitro diagnostic medical devices (A8-0069/2017 - Peter Liese)

I voted against the proposal to reject Council’s position. With the new proposal, the new standards of medical devices will also apply to in-vitro diagnostic medical devices. HIV or DNA tests will be subject to tight controls prior to and after authorisation. In addition, sensitive tests such as on the DNA of embryos will come with a mandatory consultation by a specialist.
2016/11/22
Money market funds (A8-0041/2015 - Neena Gill)

I voted in favour. Money market funds (MMF) offer a short-term cash management tool that provides a high degree of liquidity, diversification, and stability of value combined with a market-based yield.The proposed Regulation aims to create a regulatory framework for MMFs ensuring an increased protection of investors in MMFs, as well as enhancing financial stability by preventing contagion risk. It also aims to ensure that the liquidity of the fund is adequate to face investor redemption requests and to render the structure of MMFs safe enough to withstand adverse market conditions.This proposal is in line with the Commission Green Paper (March 2012) on shadow banking.
2016/11/22
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (A8-0238/2016 - Petr Ježek)

I voted in favour. The reform of the prospectus rules was announced in the Investment Plan for Europe and is an important step to build the Capital Markets Union. It aims particularly to reduce fragmentation in financial markets and to increase investor protection in capital markets. The prospectus shall contain all relevant and necessary information which an investor would reasonably require in relation to an investment in securities. Also, the conditions of prospectus regarding the setup of thresholds were reached in order to make it easier and cheaper for SMEs to raise funding in the EU.
2016/11/22
Multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 (A8-0110/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)

I voted in favour. The Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) sets the maximum level of resources for each major category of EU spending for the years 2014-2020. Based on the compulsory mid-term review of the MFF, the European Commission proposes to modify the flexibility provisions and special instruments of the MFF Regulation. The aim is to increase the capacity of the EU budget to address unforeseen events and new priorities, against a backdrop of persistent challenges inside and outside the EU.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin (A8-0104/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)

I voted in favour. The report advises to mobilise the contingency margin to the proposed amount in order to be able to face challenges of 2017 because additional financial needs are likely to arise in 2017, in relation to the internal security crises and the current humanitarian, migratory and refugee challenges.
2016/11/22
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2018 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0156/2017 - Richard Ashworth)

I voted in favour. The report stresses the key point of transparency that has to be met counting estimates of revenue and expenditure. The report touches upon different areas such as EU staff, Member State related issues etc. In regard to administrative procedures, I welcome the efforts to further digitise and computerise procedures. Therefore, it is important to introduce more possibilities for the use of secure digital signatures in administrative procedures in order to reduce the use of paper and save time.
2016/11/22
Draft Amending Budget No 1/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal (A8-0155/2017 - Jens Geier)

I voted in favour. The report addresses the urgent need to release financial assistance through the European Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to the regions of the countries affected by the natural disaster such as the floods that occurred in the United Kingdom during December 2015 to January 2016, drought and fires in Cyprus between October 2015 and June 2016 and fires on the Portuguese island of Madeira in August 2016.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/000 TA 2017 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0157/2017 - Victor Negrescu)

I voted in favour. The report addresses technical assistance that needs to be used in order to improve the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: the efficient navigation of the website with the appropriate amount of different languages, also the creation of a knowledge base, also administrative support of experts, promotion within Member States.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal (A8-0154/2017 - José Manuel Fernandes)

I voted in favour. The report addresses the urgent need to release financial assistance through the European Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to the regions of the countries affected by the natural disaster such as the floods that occurred in the United Kingdom during December 2015 to January 2016, drought and fires in Cyprus between October 2015 and June 2016 and fires on the Portuguese island of Madeira in August 2016.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Latvia (A8-0089/2017 - Claude Moraes)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Latvia to receive and supply dactyloscopic data for the purpose of automated searching, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combatting terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium (A8-0091/2017 - Judith Sargentini)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise in Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium. to receive and supply DNA data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combating terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland (A8-0092/2017 - Tomáš Zdechovský)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland to receive and supply dactyloscopic data for the purpose of automated searching, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combatting terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Automatic exchange of data concerning vehicles registered in Finland, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Hungary (A8-0095/2017 - Filiz Hyusmenova)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Finland, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Hungary to receive and supply vehicle registration data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combatting terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Malta, Cyprus and Estonia (A8-0090/2017 - Maria Grapini)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Malta, Cyprus and Estonia to receive and supply vehicle registration data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combatting terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (A8-0045/2017 - Elena Valenciano, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)

I voted against. The report seeks to take stock of the EU priorities concerning mobility challenges. It welcomes the Commission’s proposal for the External Investment Plan, the new Partnership Framework with third countries and the use of common security and defence policy (CSDP). It stresses that the international migration is a global responsibility and calls on the EU to create a value-based common European policy on migration including cooperation with third countries. However, the role of EU External Action is not properly addressed. There is a need for a further discussion.
2016/11/22
Characteristics for fishing vessels (A8-0376/2016 - Werner Kuhn)

I voted in favour. The Commission gives great importance to simplifying and clarifying the law of the Union so as to make it clearer and more accessible to citizens, thus giving them new opportunities and the chance to make use of the specific rights it gives them. For this reason a codification of rules that have frequently been amended is essential for the law to be clear and transparent. The new regulation grants the Commission the power to adopt acts to bring the standards for engine power in the line with the technical developments in regards to fishing vessels.
2016/11/22
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton)

I voted in favour. In September 2015, the Volkswagen case highlighted weaknesses in the implementation of type-approval rules for motor vehicles in the European Union, in particular as regards standards on emissions of air pollutants and carbon dioxide. The new proposal presents the new system that provides the obligation for Member States and the Commission to perform market surveillance checks. The two levels in parallel can ensure more effective results compared with the current system in which there is a clear lack for market surveillance at Member State level. Also, there will be established a forum in order to share information and best practices between Member States.
2016/11/22
Palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (A8-0066/2017 - Kateřina Konečná)

I voted in favour. The aim of the report was to address the environmental impact of the palm oil industry. This industry is linked to major environmental issues, such as deforestation and habitat degradation, as the land and forests must be cleared for the development of the oil palm plantations. The report makes reference to these environmental impacts of the palm oil industry and calls for measures to be taken to encourage the sustainable production of palm oil, through the use of, more robust certification schemes, voluntary partnership agreements, and more restrictive import conditions. It also calls for the phasing out of the use of palm oil as a biodiesel by 2020, for information campaigns to be launched, and for further research on the impact of the consumption of palm oil on deforestation to be carried out.
2016/11/22
Women and their roles in rural areas (A8-0058/2017 - Marijana Petir, Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez)

I voted in favour. It seeks to improve working and living conditions in rural areas through provision of services, increase the participation of women as beneficiaries of common agricultural policy and regional development programmes and also in the management of farms and in representative bodies.
2016/11/22
Draft recommendation following the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (B8-0177/2017)

I voted in favour. The EMIS committee presented its final report and recommendations in regards to the Volkswagen scandal in 2015. The committee calls for the urgent finalisation of the RDE package, the reduction of the ‘conformity factor’ that allows cars higher NOx emissions in the new RDE tests than in the lab, and the swift adoption of the new regulation on type-approval and market surveillance. Also, the committee recommends that, for a better functioning of the system in the future, competences over air quality and vehicles emissions legislation be placed under a single Commissioner’s portfolio, and that a strengthened role be played by the Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
2016/11/22
EU priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2017 (RC-B8-0183/2017, B8-0183/2017, B8-0184/2017, B8-0185/2017, B8-0186/2017, B8-0187/2017, B8-0188/2017, B8-0189/2017)

I voted in favour. It encourages all states to grant access to the Human Rights Council for independent experts and to take concrete steps to act on Universal Periodic Review recommendations by establishing national plans of action and coordination mechanisms. It expresses its serious concerns at the numerous increasing attempts made to shrink the space of civil society, namely human rights defenders. A safe and enabling environment for NGOs, civil society, journalists and human rights defenders must be ensured.
2016/11/22
Supply chain due diligence by importers of minerals and metals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler)

I voted in favour. The EU is a major importer of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, accounting for approximately 35% of global trade. The report supported the overall objective of the Commission proposal and foresaw voluntary due diligence obligations for EU smelters and refiners. For companies operating downstream, it laid down provisions for voluntary labelling and the setting up of so-called conformity assessment bodies in the Member States to oversee that process.
2016/11/22
Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector (A8-0150/2016 - Marco Affronte)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The proposal aims at aligning the EU’s current data collection framework with the new common fisheries policy, as well as simplifying the current system by collecting only what is needed and avoiding duplication of data collection efforts. The agreement includes an improved framework for gathering extensive and reliable information and for making it available at regional and European level. The improvement in data collection will enable the maximum sustainable yield to be evaluated more reliably and will ensure long-term sustainability.
2016/11/22
Constitutional, legal and institutional implications of a Common Security and Defence Policy: possibilities offered by the Lisbon Treaty (A8-0042/2017 - Esteban González Pons, Michael Gahler)

. ‒ I voted in favour. The report calls on Member States to commit to the provisions of the Treaty on the common security and defence policy (CSDP) and to increase their efforts in achieving its objectives. It encourages the setting-up of a permanent ‘European Integrated Force’, the creation of a permanent civilian and military headquarter and the promotion of a closer relationship between the CSDP and NATO, as a political opportunity for collaboration and complementarity at every level. It supports an increase in defence expenditure to 2% of GDP.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Montenegro (A8-0050/2017 - Charles Tannock)

I voted in favour. The report welcomes the continued progress in Montenegro’s EU integration, and recalls that it is essential to deliver concrete results with a strong and sustainable implementation record, especially in the field of the rule of law, justice and fight against corruption and organised crime. The Parliament welcomes the fact that Montenegro’s NATO Accession Protocol was signed in May 2016, and it is currently being ratified by NATO members, as NATO is an important factor for stability and peace in the Western Balkans.
2016/11/22
e-Democracy in the EU: potential and challenges (A8-0041/2017 - Ramón Jáuregui Atondo)

I voted in favour. It states the importance of enhancing the democratic linkage between citizens and political institutions, the role of e-democracy tools to help foster more active citizenship and help promote awareness of EU. However, there is a risk of distortion and manipulation of the outcome of deliberations of on-line discussion tools. Therefore it is crucial to protect privacy and personal data when using e-democracy tools as well as to foster a more secure internet environment.
2016/11/22
EU-Brazil Agreement: modification of concessions in the schedule of Croatia in the course of its accession (A8-0052/2017 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)

I voted in favour. With the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the EU, the EU enlarged its customs union and was therefore required under WTO rules to enter into negotiations with Brazil regarding the tariff schedule of Croatia in order to eventually agree on a compensatory adjustment as the EU’s external tariff regime results in an increase of tariffs. The compensations granted to Brazil, as a consequence of Croatia’s accession to the EU, can be concentrated on two main products: raw sugar, and poultry and turkey meat.
2016/11/22
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Denmark (A8-0051/2017 - Maria Grapini)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Denmark to receive and supply vehicle registration data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combating terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece (A8-0053/2017 - Claude Moraes)

I voted in favour. The purpose of the draft Council implementing decision is to authorise Greece to receive and supply DNA data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison, with the aim to facilitate and strengthen cross-border cooperation of responsible authorities in combating terrorism and cross-border crime.
2016/11/22
Use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union (A8-0327/2016 - Patrizia Toia)

I voted in favour. The main objective of the Commission proposal is to free up additional spectrum for wireless broadband in light of the exponential growth in mobile traffic and in preparation for the arrival of 5G in the next few years. The 700 MHz band is currently used in most Member States for digital terrestrial television, so under the proposal these broadcasting services would have to be migrated to the sub-700 MHz band.
2016/11/22
Commission's approval of Germany's revised plan to introduce a road toll (B8-0180/2017)

I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution. The resolution stresses that the introduction of national road charging systems should not hinder the market access, growth, competitiveness and flexibility of transport and cross-border transport operators in the EU, in order to ensure further development and integrity of the European single market. It emphasises the need for common rules to establish a coherent, fair, non-discriminatory and harmonised framework for road charging systems for all types of vehicles in the European Union.
2016/11/22
Responsible ownership and care of equidae (A8-0014/2017 - Julie Girling)

I voted in favour. The estimated 7 million equidae in the EU perform hugely varied roles and make a considerable economic, environmental and social contribution. Good equid health and welfare boosts the economic output of farms and related businesses as well as meeting the expectations of citizens in terms of health and welfare standards. The Report calls for greater EU-level acknowledgement of the contribution made by the equid sector to the rural economy and for it to be incorporated to a greater extent into the various components of the CAP.
2016/11/22
Mercury (A8-0313/2016 - Stefan Eck)

I voted in favour. The Minamata Convention, agreed in 2013, is a global treaty under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of mercury and its compounds. In parallel, the Commission proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on mercury is meant to address those provisions of the Convention that are not yet covered by EU legislation. It also repeals Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008, which sets an export prohibition on mercury and several compounds, qualifies mercury from certain sources as waste, and establishes rules on the storage of mercury.
2016/11/22
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (A8-0158/2015 - Sergio Gaetano Cofferati)

I voted in favour. The proposal for a directive was made with the background of the financial crisis. Therefore, the main aim was to remedy insufficient long-term ownership, combat short-termism in the institutional investment chain and improve shareholder engagement.
2016/11/22
Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (A8-0251/2016 - Vicky Ford)

I voted in favour. The Commission’s proposal had as objective to introduce further harmonisation and stricter rules for addressing potential security loopholes in regards to firearms directive. The revised text includes an initial political agreement on the medical review provisions, the categorisation of high-capacity semi-automatic weapons, the provisions on high capacity magazines. There were granted exceptions to restrictions for – among others – sport shooters, collectors/museums, and reservists. It also did choose to guarantee the rights of certain categories of current legal owners in order to meet some specific national concerns.
2016/11/22
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted against. Member States shall make greater use of economic instruments to provide incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy. New recycling targets for commercial and industrial must be preceded by impact assessments and only if appropriate followed by a legislative proposal as well as general waste reduction targets.
2016/11/22
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted in favour. This is part of the waste review package. The main modifications proposed relate to the phase-out of landfilling of any untreated, recyclable waste and to more ambitious landfill reduction targets.
2016/11/22
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè)

I voted against. The majority of proposed points focus on the calculation method and the general targets for packaging waste and for specific packaging materials. Some of them also expressed the wish to strengthen the life-cycle approach and the application of the waste hierarchy as regards packaging waste. Promotion of bio-based packaging, multiple-use packaging, recycled packaging materials was also proposed as well as mandatory minimum recycled content. However, regarding the packaging materials I do think the Parliament needs to engage in the further discussion. Also, I do not support the compromise which attempted to restrict the market for certain packaging.
2016/11/22
Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 (A8-0046/2017 - Ernest Urtasun)

I abstained from the vote. The draft report assesses the situation of gender Equality 2015-2014 in the EU and provides data that clearly shows that the EU is only half way towards achieving gender equality. Many worthy recommendations are formulated to overcome the existing challenges. However, I believe that the Parliament has to engage in further discussion in order to find the common ground on the topics like abortion, gender perspective in European Semester.
2016/11/22
Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz)

I voted in favour. The report emphasises the principle of equal treatment of men and women in the field of access to and supply of goods and services, with particular significance for the insurance sector. It outlines remaining gaps in the implementation in relevant sectors, such as transport and insurance as well as with regards to insufficient protection of women on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity. It equally recommends to enhance gender-mainstreaming in the sectors which fall within the remit of the directive, to strengthen the application of the directive.
2016/11/22
EU funds for gender equality (A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody)

I voted in favour. The report highlights the sporadic nature of the implementation of gender mainstreaming in the EU budget allocations and spending decisions and underlines the need of mainstreaming of gender equality as a cross-cutting policy objective. It equally deplores that gender mainstreaming principle is not yet internalised in the budget allocations and spending decisions of all EU policy areas.
2016/11/22
Fundamental rights implications of big data (A8-0044/2017 - Ana Gomes)

I voted in favour. In view of the increasing use of big data techniques in various sectors, the report examines the implications of the related collection, analysis and the recurring accumulation of large amounts of data for fundamental rights. The report puts particular emphasis on the rights to privacy, data protection, security and non-discrimination while drawing a distinction between the use of big data for commercial purposes and for law enforcement purposes.
2016/11/22
Minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits (A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck)

I voted against. The initiative report seeks to start a broad discussion about rabbit farming in the EU and the methods for the keeping of farm rabbits, as well as to encourage the European Commission to present specific EU legislation on minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits. However, rabbit farming is a significant way of diversifying the income of many small farms in rural areas while providing at the same time a source of employment. Given the fact that the sector accounts for only a very small share of the EU livestock production and complies with European rules on food safety, hygiene and animal welfare, the call for specific EU legislation is disproportionate.
2016/11/22
An integrated approach to Sport Policy: good governance, accessibility and integrity (A8-0381/2016 - Hannu Takkula)

I voted in favour of the report. The report emphasises the new sport policy, accessibility, because access to sport is now perceived as a fundamental right and everyone, including socially more vulnerable groups such as older people, migrants and people with disabilities, must have equal rights to engage in physical activity and sport. Therefore, the Commission should allocate more funds to sport under Erasmus+, with a focus on grassroots sports and education, as well as to enhance its visibility and accessibility.
2016/11/22
Cross-border aspects of adoptions (A8-0370/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)

I voted in favour of the report. The report states that for an easier cross-border recognition of domestic adoption orders, legislative action at European level is necessary. International adoptions are regulated by the 1993 Hague Convention, but there are no instruments allowing for automatic recognition of a purely domestic adoption in another Member State, for example where a family moves to another Member State after an adoption. Failure to recognise such adoptions can lead both to legal problems, requiring lengthy recognition or re-adoption procedures, and more importantly to practical problems in the child’s life.
2016/11/22
Bilateral safeguard clause and stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (A8-0277/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)

I voted in favour of the report. The report includes such proposals as a better and more stringent system of information, based on reliable statistics, on the trends of imports of bananas from the three countries to the EU. It also proposes that this analysis should be extended to the trend of imports of bananas from Central America in order to assess the global impact on EU production.
2016/11/22
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0377/2016 - Linnéa Engström)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The proposal, which dates from 11 December 2015, replaces the current Fishing Authorisations Regulation 1006/2008 and would bring an overhaul of the system for delivering licences to European Union vessels to fish outside EU waters and to third-country vessels to fish in EU waters. Also it creates a register of fishing licences in order to monitor the EU external fleet more effectively and make its activities more transparent.
2016/11/22
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (A8-0260/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)

I voted in favour of the report. The agreement provides for visa-free travel for the citizens of the European Union and for the citizens of Georgia when travelling to the territory of the other Contracting Party for a maximum period of 90 days in any 180-day period. The visa waiver covers all categories of persons – ordinary, diplomatic, service/official and special passport holders, travelling for all kinds of purposes, except for the purpose of carrying out a paid activity.
2016/11/22
Rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in Gabon (RC-B8-0120/2017, B8-0120/2017, B8-0121/2017, B8-0122/2017, B8-0123/2017, B8-0124/2017, B8-0125/2017, B8-0126/2017)

Democracy and the rule of law have recently been challenged in some countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, notably in the DRC and in Gabon, plunging those countries into a lasting period of political instability and violence. Therefore, the motion for a resolution calls on the Government of Gabon to conduct a thorough and expeditious reform of the electoral procedure to improve it and make it fully transparent especially in the next parliamentary elections as well as urging the EU to support the implementation of the agreement and the conduct of the electoral process.
2016/11/22
Implementation of Erasmus + (A8-0389/2016 - Milan Zver)

. ‒ The creation of Erasmus+ brought about a a major change, with the integration of all programmes for education and training and for youth under one umbrella. The motion for a resolution emphasises the importance of the Erasmus+ programme to the EU and calls on the Commission to optimise the performance and user-friendliness of IT tools, as well as promoting cross-border collaboration and the sharing of best practices.
2016/11/22
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement: procedures for its application (A8-0361/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld)

I voted in favour of the report. The Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Kosovo was signed on 27 October 2015. The Agreement entered into force on 1 April 2016. Therefore, it was necessary to lay down rules for the implementation of certain provisions of the Agreement, as well as the procedures for the adoption of detailed rules of implementation.
2016/11/22
Imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by specific Union import rules (A8-0311/2016 - Hannu Takkula)

I voted in favour of the report. The release of the political prisoners in Belarus on 22 August 2015 was an important step, which together with several positive initiatives undertaken by Belarus over the last two years contributed to the improvement of EU-Belarus relations. Recognising the positive political developments in relations between the EU and Belarus, the Commission proposes to abolish the autonomous quotas on imports of textiles and clothing originating in Belarus, also considering their limited use.
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Center (A8-0363/2016 - Elmar Brok)

I voted in favour. The aim of the current Council Draft Decision is to conclude the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Centre (ISTC) after the withdrawal of Russian participation, signed on 9 December 2015. The ISTC Continuation Agreement will ensure that the on-going and new projects will continue with a changed membership and a possibly broader geographical scope including the Middle East region.
2016/11/22
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0001/2017)

I abstained from the vote. The list of countries, including after the amendment introduced in the amending Delegated regulation adopted by the Commission on 24 November 2016, matches those identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). This point raised criticism, as the Commission should perform an independent analysis as well as present more ambitious delegated act. The most efficient option which I strongly support would be to invite the Commission to explain in details its position.
2016/11/22
Logistics in the EU and multimodal transport in the new TEN-T corridors (A8-0384/2016 - Inés Ayala Sender)

I voted in favour of the report. Efficient and sustainable freight transport logistics play a vital role for the smooth functioning of many other services and activities in our economy. In fact, the European logistic sector is contributing about 14% to the EU GDP and employing over 11 million people in EU Member States when considering all activity as a whole. This report aims to formulate European Parliaments position and stimulate initiatives with introducing digital and innovative technologies to logistics sector which I highly support as well as other initiatives.
2016/11/22
A European Pillar of Social Rights (A8-0391/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The report is intended to deliver such key issues as: fair working conditions for all forms of employment, issues on social and educational investments, which include a potential Child Guarantee, skills guarantee, youth guarantees and integration of long-term unemployed, new legislative EU proposals for family leave schemes, and the creation of a European framework on minimum income schemes.
2016/11/22
Tackling the challenges of the EU Customs Code (UCC) implementation (B8-0024/2017)

. ‒ I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution. The resolution calls for increased effectiveness of the regulatory framework and asks the Commission to carry out a thorough review of the whole policy area, together with a ‘fitness check’ and a new impact assessment.
2016/11/22

Written questions (44)

Status of legislative initiatives on digital health PDF (39 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Payment of temporary staff at the European Institute on Gender Equality PDF (39 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Universal basic income in EU Member States PDF (40 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(18 KB)
On the Commission's Start-up and Scale-up Initiative PDF (38 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The decision not to include Russia on the list of high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies in their anti-money-laundering and anti-terrorism-financing regimes PDF (51 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(20 KB)
Application of artificial intelligence in Europe under the existing EU legal framework PDF (39 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(20 KB)
Status quo of initial coin offerings in EU legislation PDF (39 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Digital tax PDF (39 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Consistent legislation on the online platform economy PDF (39 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Commission's efforts to deploy blockchain technologies in the EU PDF (38 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The sale of products bearing symbols of totalitarian regimes PDF (102 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Dual quality for products PDF (103 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The situation of the pharmacy market in Germany PDF (103 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(18 KB)
EU stress tests on the Ostrovets nuclear power plant PDF (100 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Application of artificial intelligence to the European labour market PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Next Commission steps with regard to online platforms PDF (5 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Unpaid internships at the Commission PDF (194 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Car taxes in Italy PDF (100 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(18 KB)
On the Mobility Package and the situation of drivers from Eastern Europe PDF (101 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Payment Service Directive II and screen scraping PDF (102 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Future legislation on virtual currencies by the Commission PDF (4 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(4 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Cheaper water at airports in the EU PDF (101 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(15 KB)
EFSI and its further development in Member States - a follow-up question PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
EFSI and its further development in Member States PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
New rules of the Union Customs Code PDF (103 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Problems encountered in Italy by hauliers of the Lithuanian National Road Carriers Association (LINAVA) PDF (6 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Regulation (EU) 2015/751 PDF (97 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(24 KB)
VP/HR - Spanish Government consent to Russian warships using Ceuta's port facilities PDF (193 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(26 KB)
EU counter-measures to Russian trade sanctions against Ukraine PDF (95 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(95 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Introduction of an export exception (waiver) within the existing Supplementary Protection Certificate Regulation PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Agricultural sector in Europe PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Mobility of fitness professionals PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Member States' taxpayers' support to Greece PDF (98 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Fitness Sector Qualification Framework PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
EU-wide 'once only' principle for citizens PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
VP/HR - Appointing an EU Special Representative for Ukraine PDF (190 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(190 KB) DOC(26 KB)
VP/HR - Addition of the so-called 'Donetsk People's Republic' and 'Lugansk People's Republic' to the EU list of proscribed terrorist organisations PDF (194 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(26 KB)
Minimum hourly wage applying in Germany PDF (103 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(25 KB)
EU VAT for service providers PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Internal electricity market PDF (99 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Commission initiatives for the EU pharmaceutical sector PDF (102 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Residential institutions in the EU PDF (193 KB) DOC (28 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(28 KB)
Rental in accordance with EU law PDF (105 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(27 KB)
EGF and Russian embargo PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)

Individual motions (2)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on fighting discrimination based on race, religion and nationality PDF (254 KB) DOC (48 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(254 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on support for the preservation of the heritage of ethnic minorities in Europe PDF (155 KB) DOC (47 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(47 KB)

Written declarations (8)

Written declaration on the potential of digital technologies for an improved and widespread access to knowledge

Written declaration on supporting the growth of accessible toilets for people with disabilities in the EU

Written declaration on promoting labour mobility of fitness professionals through the recognition of their skills and qualifications

Written declaration on the protection of European seas from chemical and conventional weapons

Written declaration on the promotion of deinstitutionalisation of people with disabilities in the EU

Written declaration on the funnelling of EU aid to terrorist organisations

Amendments (968)

Amendment 17 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Stresses the importance of internal market governance tools in ensuring not only proper application of EU rules but also better information and assistance for consumers and businesses; Calls, therefore, to increase the relevant budget line 02 03 04 in order to ensure better functioning of the Single Market and specifically information and assistance services;
2018/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Notes that 91,6 % of citizens and businesses are unaware of any European- level information or assistance service1a and is of the opinion that consumer and businesses awareness of the information and assistance tools, in particular Your Europe portal and European Consumer Centres Network, is of paramount importance and that a significant effort is needed to increase it and therefore expects an important increase of funding allocations; _________________ 1a2017 data taken from Study on information and assistance needs of businesses operating cross-border within the EU, including gap and cost analysis p.30.
2018/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Notes that EU institutions already reached informal agreement on the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on establishing a single digital gateway to provide information, procedures, assistance and problem solving services and expects adequate funding allocations already in 2019 for the preparation of the gateway;
2018/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 21 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Reminds the Commission, in the context of the entry into application on 3 December 2018 of the Regulation(EU) 2018/302 on addressing unjustified geo- blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market, of its commitment to perform by March2020 a substantive analysis of the feasibility of extending the scope of the regulation to fully cover copyright- protected electronically supplied services, including audio-visual services, in the full scope of this regulation and therefore calls for adequate funding allocation for this purpose already in 2019;
2018/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Asks for the financing of all the pilot projects endorsed by IMCO and in particular the ones on “Monitoring of possible unfair consumer profiling and price adjustment by airlines” (that investigates whether airlines practise the so-called “consumer profiling” in order to adjust the flight fares), on “Application of web accessibility requirements in web- authoring tools and platforms by default” (that encourages and supports the adoption of the relevant accessibility requirements of the European Standard EN 301 549 v1.1.2 by awarding grants to firms), and on “Assessing alleged differences in the quality of products sold on the Single Market” (that develops further relevant consumer and market-related research on alleged dual quality of food products on the Single Market).
2018/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. In regard to the pilot project on "Assessing alleged differences in the quality of products sold on the Single Market", calls on the Commission to ascertain that Members of the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee are closely involved in the planning and oversight of all activities related to this pilot project and reiterates that the role of MEPs should be prominent in informing the general public about results of the final report;
2018/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that Europe faces many opportunities and some challenges linked to globalisation, but it is important to adapt the texts in force in a measured way, which should be addressed with effective measures by the Union ain area-by-area basis, with due respect for national identities and the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality so as to take into account the fears expressed by a growing number of citizens aboutorder to stop the raising scepticism in some parts of society towards globalization in their future;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 11 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that this adjustment should take place in at least fourive areas: the protection of intellectual property, the growth of data economy, the protection of protected geographical indications (PGIs), the taking into account of opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the possible creation of a multilateral investment court for the settlement of disputes relating to investments;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 15 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that, as regards intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks and copyright, the Committee on International Trade is responsible for the international aspects, but the Committee on Legal Affairs is responsible for substantive rules, and they should work together to ensure that the Union continues to protect European creators and interests, particularly in the face of the challenges posed by digital technologyUnion should aim to ensure efficient level of protection to these intangible assets in its trade agreements in order to facilitate growth and competitiveness;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 16 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises the importance and recognition of the exponential growth of data flows and data economy. Welcomes the Commission proposal on the free flow of non-personal data (COM(2017)495) which will boost Europe's technological potential, will create job places as well as strengthen the Union's position in international trade;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 17 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recognises data protection as a fundamental right in the European Union; calls to guarantee high standards of data protection in trade agreements through a so called mutual adequacy decision between the European Union and a non-EU country;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 19 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, with regard to PGIs and agricultural Geographical Indications, or AGIs (including wine and cheese), the Union must be determined strictly to controlensure a good level of protection of the use of the traditional European designations of origin, especially in negotiating free trade agreements;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 22 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. InsistWelcomes thate opinion 2/15 of the CJEU be taken into account, in particular in that it offers a key for the clear division of the competences between the Union and the Member States, and recalls that, as regards investment protection, the Court considers that the protection of non-direct investment and the investor-State dispute settlement mechanism are a competence shared between the Union and the Member States, whereas the protection of direct investment falls within the exclusive competence of the Union;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 25 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need, in order to protect the public interest, to replace the arbitration courtrespond to some of the legitimate public concerns raised in the context of the traditional invest to state dispute settlement, to replace the bilateral investment court systems with a multilateral investment court to settle investment disputes, and welcomes the fact that the Council has just adopted a negotiating mandate to this effect;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 29 #

2018/2005(INI)

7. Supports, in the light of the above, initiatives likely to establish fair and undistorted conditions of competition, without excluding reasonable protection measures such as those already decided on by the Union in the fight against dumping to limit imports of some Chinese products.;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 31 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses, in the light of the above, the need for the strengthening of global governance and global rules in order to avoid trade wars;
2018/07/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 98 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) This Regulation aims at ensuring the smooth functioning of the digital single market in an open and democratic society, by preventing the misuse of hosting services for terrorist purposes. The functioning of the digital single market should be improved by reinforcing legal certainty for hosting service providers, reinforcing users' trust in the online environment, and by strengthening safeguards to the freedom of expression and information as well as fundamental rights, the rights to privacy and protection of personal data.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The presence of terrorist content online has serious negative consequences for users, for citizens and society at large as well as for the online service providers hosting such content, since it undermines the trust of their users and damages their business models. In light of their central role and the technological means and capabilities associated with the services they provide, online service providers have particular societal responsibilities to protect their services from misuse by terrorists and to help competent authorities to tackle terrorist content disseminated through their services.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The application of this Regulation should not affect the application of Articles 14 and 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC8 . In particular, as provided in these provisions, any measures taken by the hosting service provider in compliance with this Regulation, including any proactive measures, should not in themselves lead to that service provider losing the benefit of the liability exemption provided for in that provisionor being imposed with an obligation to monitor. This Regulation leaves unaffected the powers of national authorities and courts to establish liability of hosting service providers in specific cases where the conditions under Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC for liability exemption are not met. _________________ 8 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce') (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1).
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) This Regulation aims at contributesing to the protection of public security while establishing appropriate and robust safeguards to ensure protection of the fundamental rights at stake. This includes the rights to respect for private life and to the protection ofhe rights to privacy and personal data protection, the right to effective judicial protection, the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to receive and impart information, the freedom to conduct a business, and the principle of non-discrimination. Competent authorities and hosting service providers should only adopt measures which are necessary, appropriate and proportionate within a democratic society, taking into account the particular importance accorded to the freedom of expression and information, which constitutes one of the essential foundations of a pluralist, democratic society, and is one of the values on which the Union is founded. Measures constituting interference in the freedom of expression and information should be strictly targeted, in the sense that they must serve to prevent the dissemination of terrorist content, but without thereby affecting the right to lawfully receive and impart information, taking into account the central role of hosting service providers in facilitating public debate and the distribution and receipt of facts, opinions and ideas in accordance with the law.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In order to provide clarity about the actions that both hosting service providers and competent authorities should take to prevent the dissemination of terrorist content online, this Regulation should establish a definition of terrorist content for preventative purposes drawing on the definition of terrorist offences under Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 . Given the need to address the most harmful terrorist propaganda online, the definition should capture material and information that incites, encourages or advocates the commission or contribution to terrorist offences, provides instructions for the commission of such offences or promotes the participation in activities of a terrorist group. Such information includes in particular text, images, sound recordings and videos. When assessing whether content constitutes terrorist content within the meaning of this Regulation, competent authorities as well as hosting service providers should take into account factors such as the nature and wording of the statements, the context in which the statements were made and their potential to lead to harmful consequences, thereby affecting the security and safety of persons. The fact that the material was produced by, is attributable to or disseminated on behalf of an EU-listed terrorist organisation or person constitutes an important factor in the assessment. Content disseminated for educational, journalistic or research purposes should be adequately protected. Furthermore, the expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions should not be considered terrorist content. _________________ 9 Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 6).
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In order to provide clarity about the actions that both hosting service providers and competent authorities should take to prevent the dissemination of terrorist content online, this Regulation should establish a definition of terrorist content for preventative purposes drawing on the definition of terrorist offences under Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 . Given the need to address the most harmful terrorist propaganda online, the definition should capture material and information that incites, encourages or advocates the commission or contribution to terrorist offences, provides instructions for the commission of such offences or promoterrorist offences and content that is produced by, is attributable to or disseminated on behalf of an EU-listesd the participation in activities of a terrorist grouperrorist organisation or person. Such information includes in particular text, images, sound recordings and videos. When assessing whether content constitutes terrorist content within the meaning of this Regulation, competent authorities as well as hosting service providers should take into account factors such as the nature and wording of the statements, the context in which the statements were made and their potential to lead to harmful consequences, thereby affecting the security and safety of persons. The fact that the material was produced by, is attributable to or disseminated on behalf of an EU-listed terrorist organisation or person constitutes an important factor in the assessment. Content disseminated for educational, journalistic or research purposes should be adequately protected. Furthermore, the expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions should not be considered terrorist content. _________________ 9 Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 6).
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to cover those online hosting services where terrorist content is disseminated, this Regulation should apply to information society services which store information provided by a recipient of the service at his or her request and in makingthe dissemination of the information stored available to third parties, irrespective of whether this activity is of a mere technical, automatic and passive nature. By way of example such providers of information society services include social media platforms, video streaming services, video, image and audio sharing services, file sharing and other cloud services to the extent they make the information available to third parties and websites where users can make comments or post reviews. Providers of services such as online encyclopaedias, educational and scientific repositories, open source software developing platforms, cloud infrastructure service providers that do not have access to customer content and cloud providers (including business-to-business cloud services) that do not share content to the general public, and services at other layers of the Internet infrastructure than the application layer, should not be considered hosting service providers within the meaning of this Regulation. The Regulation should also apply to hosting service providers established outside the Union but offering services within the Union, since a significant proportion of hosting service providers exposed to terrorist content on their services are established in third countries. This should ensure that all companies operating in the Digital Single Market comply with the same requirements, irrespective of their country of establishment. The determination as to whether a service provider offers services in the Union requires an assessment whether the service provider enables legal or natural persons in one or more Member States to use its services. However, the mere accessibility of a service provider's website or of an email address and of other contact details in one or more Member States taken in isolation should not be a sufficient condition for the application of this Regulation.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to cover those online hosting services where terrorist content is disseminated, this Regulation should apply to information society services which store information provided by a recipient of the service at his or her request and in making the information stored publicly available to third parties, irrespective of whether this activity is of a mere technical, automatic and passive nature. By way of example such providers of information society services include social media platforms, video streaming services, video, image and audio sharing services, file sharing and other cloud services to the extent they make the information available to third parties and websites where users can make comments or post reviews. The Regulation should also apply to hosting service providers established outside the Union but offering services within the Union, since a significant proportion of hosting service providers exposed to terrorist content on their services are established in third countries. This should ensure that all companies operating in the Digital Single Market comply with the same requirements, irrespective of their country of establishment. The determination as to whether a service provider offers services in the Union requires an assessment whether the service provider enables legal or natural persons in one or more Member States to use its services. However, the mere accessibility of a service provider’s website or of an email address and of other contact details in one or more Member States taken in isolation should not be a sufficient condition for the application of this Regulation. Services that provide file sharing or other cloud services should not be considered in scope of this Regulation.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 150 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Given the scale and speed necessary forcomplexity of effectively identifying and removing terrorist content at scale, proportionate proactive measures, including by using automated meare also ans in certain cases, are an essentialmportant element in tackling terrorist content online. With a view to reducing the accessibility of terrorist content on their services, hosting service providers should assess whether it is appropriate to take proactive measures depending on the risks and level of exposure to terrorist content as well as to the effects on the rights of third parties and the public interest of information. Consequently, hosting service providers should determine what appropriate, effective and proportionate proactive measure should be put in place. This requiremenIt should not imply a general monitoring obligation. In the context of this assessment, the absence of removal orders and referrals addressed to a hosting provider, is an indication of a low level of exposure to terrorist content.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) When putting in place proactive measures, hosting service providers should ensure that users’ right to freedom of expression and information - including to freely receive and impart information - is, the rights to privacy and protection of personal data - are preserved. In addition to any requirement laid down in the law, including the legislation on protection of personal data, hosting service providers should act with due diligence and implement safeguards, including notably human oversight and verifications, where appropriate, to avoid any unintended and erroneous decision leading to removal of content that is not terrorist content. This is of particular relevance when hosting service providers use automated means to detect terrorist content. Any decision to use automated means, whether taken by the hosting service provider itself or pursuant to a request by the competent authority, should be assessed with regard to the reliability of the underlying technology and the ensuing impact on fundamental rights.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Effective legal protection according to Article 19 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union requires that persons are able to ascertain the reasons upon which the content uploaded by them has been removed or access to it disabled. For that purpose, the hosting service provider should make available to the content provider meaningful information enabling the content provider to contest the decision. However, this does not necessarily require a notification to the content provider. Depending on the circumstances, hosting service providers may replace content which is considered terrorist content, with a message that it has been removed or disabled in accordance with this Regulation. Further information about the reasons as well as possibilities for the content provider to contest the decision should be given upon request. Where competent authorities decide that for reasons of public security including in the context of an investigation, it is considered inappropriate or counter- productive to directly notify the content provider of the removal or disabling of content, they should inform the hosting service provider.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Both hosting service providers and Member States should establish points of contact to facilitate the swift handling of removal orders and referrals. In contrast to the legal representative, the point of contact serves operational purposes. The hosting service provider’s point of contact should consist of any dedicated means allowing for the electronic submission of removal orders and referrals and of technical and personal means allowing for the swift processing thereof. The point of contact for the hosting service provider does not have to be located in the Union and the hosting service provider is free to nominate an existing point of contact, provided that this point of contact is able to fulfil the functions provided for in this Regulation. With a view to ensure that terrorist content is removed or access to it is disabled within one hour from the receipt of a removal order, hosting service providers should ensure that the point of contact is reachable 24/7. The information on the point of contact should include information about the language in which the point of contact can be addressed. In order to facilitate the communication between the hosting service providers and the competent authorities, hosting service providers are encouraged to allow for communication in one of the official languages of the Union in which their terms and conditions are available.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Penalties are necessaryIn some cases, penalties could be used as one of many instruments to ensure the effective implementation by hosting service providers of the obligations pursuant to this Regulation. Member States should adopt rules on penalties, including, where appropriate, fining guidelines. Particularly severe penalties shall be ascertained in the event that for cases where the hosting service provider systematically fails to remove terrorist content or disable access to it within one hour from receipt of a removal order. Non- compliance in individual cases could be sanctioned while respecting the principles of ne bis in idem and of proportionality and ensuring that such sanctions take account of systematic failure. In order to ensure legal certainty, the regulation should set out to what extent the relevant obligations can be subject to penalties. Penalties for non-compliance with Article 6 should only be adopted in relation to obligations arising from a request to report pursuant to Article 6(2) or a decision imposing additional proactive measures pursuant to Article 6(4). When determining whether or not financial penalties should be imposed, due account should be taken of the financial resources of theand the size of the hosting provider. Member States shall ensure that penalties do not encourage the removal of content which is not terrorist content.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 183 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) Based on the findings and conclusions in the implementation report and the outcome of the monitoring exercise, the Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation no sooner than three years after its entry into force. The evaluation should be based on the five criteria of efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, coherence and EU added value. It will assess the functioning of the different operational and technical measures foreseen under the Regulation, including the effectiveness of measures to enhance the detection, identification and removal of terrorist content, the effectiveness of safeguard mechanisms as well as the impacts on potentially affected rights and interests of third parties, including a review of the requirement to inform content providersfundamental rights, especially the freedom of expression and information, the right to privacy and protection of personal data.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Regulation lays down uniform rules to address and prevent the misuse of hosting services for the dissemination of terrorist content online. It lays down in particular:
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a set of measures to be put in place by Member States to identify terrorist content, to enable its swift removal by hosting service providers and to facilitate cooperation with the competent authorities in other Member States, hosting service providers and where appropriate relevant Union bodies.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'hosting service provider' means a provider of information society services consisting in the storage of information provided by and at the request of the content provider and in makdisseminating the information stored available to third parties;publicly to third parties; Providers of services that do not share content publicly to third parties, and services at other layers of the Internet infrastructure than the application layer, shall not be considered as hosting service providers within the meaning of this Regulation.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'hosting service provider' means a provider of information society services consisting in the storage of information provided by and at the request of the content provider and in making the information stored publicly available to third parties;
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 211 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – introductory part
(5) 'terrorist content' means one or more of the following information:refers to the offences committed internationally and unlawfully as defined in Articles 5 to 8 in Directive 2017/541 on combating terrorism.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 218 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
(a) inciting or advocating, including by glorifying, the commission of terrorist offences, thereby causing a danger that such acts be committed;deleted
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 222 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
(b) encouraging the contribution to terrorist offences;deleted
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 227 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
(c) promoting the activities of a terrorist group, in particular by encouraging the participation in or support to a terrorist group within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Directive (EU) 2017/541;deleted
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d
(d) instructing on methods or techniques for the purpose of committing terrorist offences.deleted
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘dissemination of terrorist content’ means making terrorist content available to third parties on the hosting service providers’ services; Content disseminated for educational, scientific or documentary purposes, and for purposes for anti- radicalisation. and counter-narratives shall be adequately protected.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 235 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘dissemination of terrorist content’ means making terrorist content publicly available to third parties on the hosting service providers’ services;
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
(9 a) ‘competent authority 'means a designated national authority in the Member State.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 241 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Hosting service providers shall take appropriate, reasonable and proportionate actions in accordance with this Regulation, against the dissemination of terrorist content and to protect users from terrorist content. In doing so, they shall act in a diligent, proportionate and non- discriminatory manner, and with due regard to the fundamental rights of the users and take into account the fundamental importance of the freedom of expression and information in an open and democratic society. Those actions shall be in accordance with Article 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Hosting service providers shall remove terrorist content or disable access to it within one houras soon as possible from receipt of the removal order.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 263 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) a detailed statement of reasons explaining why the content is considered terrorist content, at least, by reference to the categories of terrorist content listed in Article 2(5);
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 264 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) aA detailed statement of reasons explaining why the content is considered terrorist content, at least, by reference to the categories of terrorist content listed in Article 2(5) shall be systematically included in each removal order;
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Hosting service providers shall, where appropriate, take proactive measures to protect their services against the dissemination of terrorist content. The measures shall be effective and proportionate, taking into account the risk and level of exposure to terrorist content, the fundamental rights of the users, and the fundamental importance of the freedom of expression and information as well as the right to privacy and protection of personal data in an open and democratic society.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 296 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Hosting service providers shall, where appropriatedepending on the risk and level of exposure to terrorist content, take proactive measures to protect their services against the dissemination of terrorist content. The measures shall be effective and proportionate, taking into account the risk and level of exposure to terrorist content, the fundamental rights of the users, and the fundamental importance of the freedom of expression and information in an open and democratic society.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 300 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Where it has been informed according to Article 4(9), the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c) shallmay request the hosting service provider to submit a report, within three months after receipt of the request and thereafter at least on an annual basis, on the specific proactive measures it has taken, including by using automated tools, with a view to:
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 301 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing the re-upload of content which has previously been removed or to which access has been disabled because it is considered to be terrorist content, unless such content has been re-uploaded for educational, scientific or documentary purposes, and for anti-radicalisation and counter-narratives purposes;
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The reports shall include all relevant information allowing the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c) to assess whether the proactive measures are effective and proportionate, including to evaluate the functioning of any automated tools used as well as the human oversight and verification mechanisms employed.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 305 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Where the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c) considers that the proactive measures taken and reported under paragraph 2 are insufficient in mitigating and managing the risk and level of exposure, it may request the hosting service provider to take specific additional proactive measures. For that purpose, the hosting service provider shall cooperate with the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c) with a view to identifying the specific measures that the hosting service provider shall put in place, establishing key objectives and benchmarks as well as timelines for their implementation taking into account, in particular, the economic capacity of the hosting service provider and the effect of such measures on the fundamental rights of the users and the fundamental importance of the freedom of expression and information, the right to privacy and the protection of personal data.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Where no agreement can be reached within the three months from the request pursuant to paragraph 3, the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c) may issue a decision imposing specific additional necessary and proportionate proactive measures. The decision shall take into account, in particular, the economic capacity of the hosting service provider and the effect of such measures on the fundamental rights of the users and the fundamental importance of the freedom of expression and information. Such a decision shall be sent to the main establishment of the hosting service provider or to the legal representative designated by the service provider. The hosting service provider shall regularly report on the implementation of such measures as specified by the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c).deleted
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 314 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. A hosting service provider may, at any time, request the competent authority referred to in Article 17(1)(c) a review and, where appropriate, to revoke a request or decision pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3, and 43 respectively. The competent authority shall provide a reasoned decision within a reasonable period of time after receiving the request by the hosting service provider.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 323 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Hosting service providers shall set out clearly in their terms and conditions their policy ton preventing the dissemination of terrorist content, including, where appropriate, a meaningfuln explanation of the functioning of proactive measures including the use of automated toolsthat a hosting service provider has a right to take.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 326 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Hosting service providers, competent authorities and relevant Union bodies shall publish annual transparency reports on action taken against the dissemination of terrorist content.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 328 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Hosting service providers shallexposed to terrorist content shall publicly publish annual transparency reports on action taken against the dissemination of terrorist content.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 334 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(d a) Transparency reports of competent authorities and relevant Union bodies shall include information on the number of removal orders and referrals issues, and on their use of the terrorist content, which has been preserved pursuant to Article 7 for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 342 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. HThe relevant Union bodies and competent authorities shall, in co- operation with hosting service providers shall, establish effective and accessible mechanisms allowing content providers whose content has been removed or access to it disabled as a result of a removal order pursuant to Article 4 or a referral pursuant to Article 5 or of proactive measures pursuant to Article 6, to submit a complaint against the action of the hosting service provider requesting reinstatement of the content.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall establish a point of contact to handle requests for clarification and feedback in relation to removal orders and referrals issued by them. IA database with information about the contact points in Member States shall be made publicly available by the European Commission.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 375 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) Article 6(2) and (4) (reports on proactive measures and the adoption of measures following a decision imposing specific proactive measures);deleted
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The penalties provided for shall be effective, and proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall, by [within six months from the entry into force of this Regulation] at the latest, notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 396 #

2018/0331(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [618 months after its entry into force].
2019/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2018/0227(COD)

(7a) On 10th April 2018 Member States expressed their support and a joint will to cooperate together on initiatives on artificial intelligence and distributed ledger technologies (e.g. blockchain) infrastructure services by signing cooperation agreements.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) A central role in the implementation of the Programme should be attributed to Digital Innovation Hubs, which should stimulate the broad adoption of advanced digital technologies by industry, by public organisations and academia. A network of Digital Innovation Hubs should ensure the widest geographical coverage across Europe59 . A first set of Digital Innovation Hubs will be selected based on Member States’ proposals and then the network will be enlarged through an open and competitive process. The Digital Innovation Hubs will serve as access points to latest digital capacities including high performance computing (HPC), artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, as well as other existing innovative technologies such as Key Enabling Technologies, available also in fablabs or citylabs. They shall act as single-entry pointone- stop shops in accessing tested and validated technologies and promote open innovation and assistance to businesses especially SMEs and start-ups with regard to their business structure and access to finance. They will also provide support in the area of advanced digital skills. The network of Digital Innovation Hubs should also contribute to the participation of the outermost regions in the Digital Single Market. _________________ 59 As indicated in the Communication on Digitising European Industry (COM(2016) 180 final)
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The support to the Union’s intervention in this area was expressed by the Council60 and, by the European Parliament61 . Moreover, in 2017 nine Member States signed the EuroHPC Declaration62 , a multi-government agreement where they commit to collaborate with the Commission to build and deploy state-of-the-art HPC and data infrastructures in Europe that would be available across the Union for scientific communities, public and private partners and would boost the Union’s innovative potential. _________________ 60 61 62
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) For the high performance computing specific objective a joint undertaking is deemed the most suited implementation mechanism, in particular to coordinate national and Union strategies and investments in high performance computing infrastructure and research and development, pool resources from public and private funds, and safeguard the economic and strategic interests of the Union63 . Moreover, high performance computing competence centres in Member States will provide high performance computing services to industry, especially SMEs and start-ups, academia and public administrations. _________________ 63 Impact Assessment accompanying the document “Proposal for a Council Regulation on establishing the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking” (https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single- market/en/news/proposal-council- regulation-establishing-eurohpc-joint- undertaking-impact-assessment)
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) The availability of large-scale data sets and testing and experimentation facilities and access to text and data mining are of major importance for the development of artificial intelligence.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) On 25 April 2018 the Commission committed to propose a European approach by developing draft Artificial Intelligence guidelines in cooperation with stakeholders within the AI alliance, a group of artificial intelligence experts, in order to boost AI-powered applications and businesses in Europe.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In September 2017, the Commission put forward a package of initiatives65 setting out a comprehensive Union approach to cybersecurity, with the aim of reinforcing Europe’s capacities to deal with cyber-attacks, to increase cyber resilience and threats and to strengthen technology and industrial capacity in this field. _________________ 65 https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single- market/en/policies/cybersecurity
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The European Council in its conclusions of 19 October 2017 stressed that to successfully build a Digital Europe, the Union needs in particular labour markets, life-long learning and innovation-driven training and education systems fit for the potential and challenges of the digital age and that there is a needit is crucial to invest in digital skills, in order to empower and enable all European citizens and businesses;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) The advanced digital technologies supported by this Programme, such as high performance computing, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence are now sufficiently mature to move beyond the research arena and be deployed, implemented and scaled- up at Union level. Just as the deployment of these technologies require a Union response so does the skills dimension. Training opportunities in advanced digital skills need to be scaled up, increased and made accessible throughout the EU. Failing this could impede the smooth deployment of advanced digital technologies, increase the shortage of a qualified workforce in Europe and hamper the overall competitiveness of Union’s economy. The actions supported by this programme are complementary to those supported by the ESF, ERDF and Horizon Europe programmes.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Modernising public administrations and services through digital means is crucial to reducing administrative burden on industry and on citizens in general by making their interactions with public authorities faster, more convenient and less costly, as well as by increasing the efficiency, transparency and the quality of the services provided to citizens and businesses. Since a number of services of public interest already have a Union dimension, the support to their implementation and deployment at Union level should ensure that citizens and businesses will benefit from the access to high quality digital services across Europe.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Interoperability of European public services concerns all levels of administration: Union, national, regional and local. Besides removing barriers to a functioning Single Market, interoperability facilitates successful implementation of policies and offers great potential to avoid cross-border electronic barriers, to cut red tape, further securing the emergence of new, or the consolidation of developing, common public services at Union level. In order to eliminate fragmentation of European services, to support fundamental freedoms and operational mutual recognition in the EU, a holistic cross- sector and cross-border approach to interoperability should be promoted in the manner that is the most effective, and the most responsive to end- users. This implies that interoperability is to be understood in a broad sense, spanning from technical to legal layers and encompassing policy elements in the field. Accordingly, the span of activities would go beyond the usual lifecycle of solutions to include all the interventions elements that would support the necessary framework conditions for sustained interoperability at large.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘Digital Innovation Hub’ means existing or new legal entity designated or selected in an open and competitive procedure in order to fulfil the tasks under the Programme, in particular providing businesses across the EU with access to technological expertise and experimentation facilities, such as equipment and software tools to enable the digital transformation of the industry as well as to consult on facilitating access to finance. The Digital Innovation Hubs shall act as one-stop shops where companies, especially SMEs and start-ups can get assistance on how to improve their business model as well as knowledge on EU funding programmes available.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) ‘small and medium-sized enterprises’ or ‘SMEs’ means small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Programme has the following general objective: to support the digital transformation of the European economy and society, to boost Europe’s innovative capacity and bring its benefits to European citizens and businesses. The Programme will:
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) deploy, coordinate at the Union level and operate an integrated world-class exascale77 supercomputing and data infrastructure in the Union that shall be accessible on a non-commercial basis to public and private users and for publicly funded research purposes; _________________ 77 Billions of billions of floating operations per second
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) strengthen possibilities of specific funding for industry and B2B application of AI in sectors where Europe already leads such as robotics, automotive, manufacturing, space and defence technologies, sanitary tools.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 121 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) encourage development of innovative business models using AI with a perspective to future needs of Europe’s economy.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) support, together with Member States, the procurement of advanced cybersecurity equipment, tools and data infrastructures in full compliance with data protection legislation as well as exchange of best practices;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2018/0227(COD)

(c) ensure a wide deployment of the latest cybersecurity solutions across the economy;, especially for SMEs and start- ups in order to ensure that companies have a basic level of security.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) support the design and delivery of long-term, life-long learning and innovative driven approach based trainings and courses for students, teachers, IT professionals and the workforce;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) support the design and delivery of short-term trainings and courses for entrepreneurs, smallSMEs and start up business leaders and the workforce;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) support the uptake of advanced digital and related technologies, including in particular high performance computing, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and future emerging technologies by the Union industry, notably SMEespecially SMEs and start-ups;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) support the design, testing, implementation and deployment of interoperable digital solutions for EU level public services delivered through a data- driven reusable solutions platform, fostering innovation and establishing common frameworks in order to unleash the full potential of the public administrations’ services by cutting red tape and increasing transparency for European citizens and businesses;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ensure a continuous capacity at the Union level to observe, analyse and adapt to fast-evolving digital trends, as well as sharing and mainstreaming best practices between Member States;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The cooperation with third countries and organisations mentioned in paragraph 1 under Specific Objective 3.2, Artificial Intelligence, Specific Objective 3, Cybersecurity and Trust shall be subject to Article [12].
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 187 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) appropriate competences related to the functions of the Digital Innovation Hubs as defined in Article 2;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 188 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission shall adopt a decision on the selection of entities forming the initial network. These entities shall be selected by the CommissionMember States from candidate entities designated by Member States on the basis of the criteria mentioned in paragraph 2 and the following additional criteria:
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) provide digital transformation services - including testing and experimentation facilities - targeted towards SMEs and midca, midcaps and start-ups, also in sectors that are slow in the uptake of digital and related technologies;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) transfer expertise and know-how between regions, in particular by networking SMEs and midca, midcaps and start- ups established in one region with Digital Innovation Hubs established in other regions which are best suited to provide relevant services;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) provide thematic services, including services related to artificial intelligence, high performance computing and cybersecurity and trust to the administrations, public sector organisations, SMEs and, midcaps and start- ups. Individual Digital Innovation Hubs may specialise in specific thematic services and do not need to provide all thematic services mentioned in this paragraph;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2018/0227(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The award criteria shall be defined in the work programmes and in the calls for proposals, taking into account at the minimum the following elements:
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Online intermediation services are key enablers of entrepreneurship, trade and innovation, which can also improve consumer welfare and which are increasingly used by both the private and public sectors. They offer access to new markets and commercial opportunities allowing undertakings to exploit the benefits of the internal market. They also allow consumers in the Union to exploit those benefits, in particular by increasing their choice of goods and services offeredas well as by offering competitive pricing online.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 63 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Online intermediation services can be crucialan important element for the commercial success of undertakings who use such services to reach consumers. The growing intermediation of transactions through online intermediation services, fuelled by strong data-driven indirect network effects, lead to an increased dependence of such business users, including micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as large traditional business users on those services in order for them to reach consumers. Given that increasing interdependence, the providers of those services oftenmay have superior bargaining power, which enables them to effectively behave unilaterally in a way that can be unfair and that can be harmful to the legitimate interests of their businesses users or smaller providers of online intermediation services and, indirectly, also of consumers in the Union.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The dependence of business users on online intermediation services and vice versa also leads to a situation in which business users oftenr providers of online intermediation services may have limited possibilities to seek redress where unilateral actions of the providers of those services lead to a dispute. In manysome cases, those providers do not offer accessible and effective internal complaint- handling systems. Existing alternative out- of-court dispute settlement mechanisms can also be ineffective for a variety of reasons, including a lack of specialised mediators and business users’ fear of retaliation by smaller business users or providers of online intermediation services.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Online intermediation services and online search engines, as well as the commercial transactions facilitated by those services, have an intrinsic cross- border potential and are of particular importance for the proper functioning of the Union’s internal market in today’s economy. The potentially unfair and harmful trading practices of certain providers of those services in respector of business users and corporate website users who abuse a dominant position may hamper the full realisation of that potential and negatively affect the proper functioning of the internal market and the emergence of new market participants. In addition, the full realisation of that potential is hampered, and the proper functioning of the internal market is negatively affected, by diverging laws of certain Member States which, with a varying degree of effectiveness, regulate those services, while other Member States are considering adopting such laws.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) A uniform and targeted set of mandatory rules should therefore be established at Union level to ensure a fair, predictable, sustainable and trusted online business environment within the internal market by ensuring, in particular, that the business users ofand online intermediation services are afforded appropriate transparency as well as effective redress possibilities throughout the Union. Those rules should also provide for appropriate transparency as regards the ranking of corporate website users in the search results generated by online search engines. At the same, those rules should be such as to safeguard and strengthen the important innovation potential of the wider online platform economy.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to effectively protect business users where needed, this Regulation should apply whereto the terms and conditions of a contractual relationship, regardless of their name or form, are not individually negotiated by the parties to them. Whether or not terms and conditions were individually negotiated should be determined on the basis of an overall assessment, whereby the fact that certain provisions thereof may have been individually negotiated is, in itself, not decisive.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) To ensure that the general terms and conditions of a contractual relationship enable business users to determine the commercial conditions for the use, termination and suspension of online intermediation services, and to achieve predictability regarding their business relationship, those terms and conditions should be drafted in clear and unambiguousplain and intelligible language which is easily understood by an average business user. Terms and conditions should not be considered to have been drafted in clear and unambiguousplain and intelligible language where they are vague, unspecific or lack detail on important commercial issues and thus fail to give business users a reasonable degree of predictability on the most important aspects of the contractual relationship.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Providers of online intermediation services should bear a reasonable proportion of the total costs of the mediation, taking into account all relevant elements of the case at hand. To that aim, the mediator should suggest which proportion is reasonable in the individual case. However, that proportion should never be less than half of those costs.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules to ensure that business users of online intermediation services and corporate website users in relation to online search engines are granted appropriate transparency, fairness and effective redress possibilities.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 269 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘online search engine’ means a digital service that allows users to perform searches of, in principle, all websites or websites in a particular language on the basis of a query on any subject in the form of a keyword, phrase or other input, and returns links in which information related to the requested content can be found;
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 280 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) ‘terms and conditions’ means all terms, conditions, clauses and other information, irrespective of their name or form, which govern the contractual relationship between the provider of online intermediation services and their business users and are unilaterally determined by the provider of online intermediation services.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 291 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) are drafted in clear and unambiguousplain and intelligible language;
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) set out the objective grounds for decisions to suspend or terminate, in whole or in part, the provision of their online intermediation services to business users.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 317 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Providers of online intermediation services shall notify to the business users concerned any envisaged modification of their terms and conditionsthat terms and conditions have been modified.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 329 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The envisaged modifications shall not be implemented before the expiry of a notice period which is reasonable and proportionate to the nature and extent of the envisaged modifications and to their consequences for the business user concerned. That notice period shall be at least 15 days from the date on which the provider of online intermediation services notifies the business users concerned about the envisaged modifications.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 335 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
During the notice period or unless the business user accepts the new terms and conditions, business users shall not be able to submit new goods, content or services to the platform.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 350 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
5a. Without prejudice to EU and national rules concerning illegal content, if the terms and conditions have been modified in order to protect the legitimate interest of the consumers or of the provider of online intermediation services, in response to practices that can cause immediate harm to consumers, intermediary service providers or providers of operating systems shall apply a 15 days’ notice period for application of the new terms and conditions.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 354 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where a provider of online intermediation services and of online search engines decides to sanction suspend or terminate, in whole or in part, the provision of its online intermediation services to a given business user, it shall provideinform the business user concerned at least 15 days before implementing that decision, and provide the business user, without undue delay, with a statement of reasons for that decision.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 361 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where a provider of online intermediation services decides to suspend or terminate, in whole or in part, the provision of its online intermediation services to a given business user, it shall provideinform the business user concerned, without undue delay, with a statement of reasons for that decision.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 369 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The statement of reasons referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain a reference to the specific facts or circumstances that led to the decision of the provider of online intermediation services, as well as a reference to the applicable objective ground or grounds for that decision referred to in Article 3(1)(c).
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 379 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Article 4.1 shall not apply where a provider of online intermediation services is subject to a legal obligation to sanction, suspend, or terminate, in whole or in part, the provision of its online intermediation services to a given business, or does so in order to fight against illicit content. In such cases, the business user shall be notified without undue delay.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 381 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Providers of online intermediation services shall set out in their terms and conditions the main parameters determining ranking and the reasons for the relative importance of those main parameters as opposed to other parametmake them easily available for business users.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 397 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where those main parameters include the possibility to influence ranking against any direct or indirect remuneration paid by business users to the provider of online intermediation services concerned, that provider of online intermediation services shall also include in its terms and conditions a description of those possibilities and of the effects of such remuneration on ranking.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 406 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Providers of online search engines shall set out for corporate website users the main parameters determining ranking, by providing an easily and publicly available description, drafted in clear and unambiguousplain and intelligible language on the online search engines of those providers. They shall keep that description up to date.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 421 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The descriptions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be sufficient to enable the business users or corporate website users to obtain an adequate understanding of whether, and if so how and to what extent, the ranking mechanism takes account of the following:
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 570 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) communicate to the complainant the outcome of the internal complaint- handling process, in an individualised manner and drafted in clear and unambiguousplain and intelligible language.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 575 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Providers of online intermediation services shall annually establish and make easily available to the public information on the functioning and effectiveness of their internal complaint- handling system.deleted
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 587 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
That information shall include the total number of complaints lodged, the subject- matter of the complaints, the time period needed to process the complaints and the decision taken on the complaints.deleted
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 598 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The decision which led to the complaint shall remain in force for the duration of internal decision-making process.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 624 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Providers of online intermediation services and business users shall engage in good faith in any attempt to reach an agreement through the mediation of any of the mediators which they identified in accordance with paragraph 1, with a view to reaching an agreement on the settlement of the dispute.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 632 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Providers of online intermediation services shalland business users shall each bear a reasonable proportion of the total costs of mediation in each individual case. A reasonable proportion of those total costs shall be determined, on the basis of a suggestion by the mediator, by taking into account all relevant elements of the case at hand, in particular the relative merits of the claims of the parties to the dispute, the conduct of the parties, as well as the size and financial strength of the parties relative to one another. However, providers of online intermediation services shall in any case bear at least half of the total cost.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 637 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Should the mediator find that the business user is acting in bad faith or is seeking to abuse the mediation process, it can decide to make the business user bear more than half of the total cost.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 656 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Organisations and associations qualified in advance under national collective redress mechanisms that have a legitimate interest in representing business users or in representing corporate website users, as well as public bodies set up in Member States, shall have the right to take action before national courts in the Union, in accordance with the rules of the law of the Member State where the action is brought, to stop or prohibit any non- compliance by providers of online intermediation services or by providers of online search engines with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation. Qualified organisations and associations shall be expressly appointed and authorised by a representative number of business users or corporate website users for each action.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 664 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Organisations or associations shall have the right referred to in paragraph 1 only where, at the time of bringing the action, they and for the duration of the action, they continue to meet all of the following requirements:
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 669 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) they are properly constituted according to the law of a Member State which allows them to bring a claim;
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 674 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) they pursue objectives that are in the collective interest of the group of a majority of business users or corporate website users that they represent;
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 681 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) They comply with all the codes of ethics and conduct of the public body issuing their license, and demonstrably act in accordance with the wider public interest;
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 703 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The Commission shall encourage the drawing up of codes of conduct by providers of operating systems and by organisations and associations representing them, intended to contribute to the proper application of this Regulation.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 714 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. By [date: threewo years after the date of entry into force], and subsequently every three years, the Commission shall evaluate this Regulation and report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee.
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 726 #

2018/0112(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. It shall apply from [date: sixtwelve months following the day of its publication].
2018/10/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 38 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) The purpose of this Directive is to enable qualified entities, which represent the collective interest of consumers, to seek remedy through representative actions against infringements of provisions of Union law. The qualified entities should be able to ask for stopping or prohibiting an infringement, and for confirming that an infringement took place and to seek redress, such as compensation, repair or price reduction as available under national laws.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) As only qualified entities can bring the representative actions, to ensure that the collective interests of consumers are adequately represented the qualified entities should comply with the criteria established by this Directive. In particular, they would need to be properly constituted according to the law of a Member State, which could include for example requirements regarding the number of members, the degree of permanence, or transparency requirements on relevant aspects of their structure such as their constitutive statutes, management structure, objectives and working methods. They should also be not for profit and have a legitimate interest in ensuring compliance with the relevant Union law. These criteria should apply to both qualified entities designated in advance and to ad hoc qualified entities that are constituted for the purpose of a specific action.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Independent public bodies and consumer organisations in particular should play an active role in ensuring compliance with relevant provisions of Union law and are all well placed to act as qualified entities. Since these entities have access to different sources of information regarding traders' practices towards consumers and hold different priorities for their activities, Member States should be free to decide on the types of measures that may be sought by each of these qualified entities in representative actions.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) To increase the procedural effectiveness of representative actions, qualified entities should have the possibility to seek different measures within a single representative action or within separate representative actions. These measures should include interim measures for stopping an ongoing practice or prohibiting a practice in case the practice has not been carried out but there is a risk that it would cause serious or irreversible harm to consumers, measures establishing that a given practice constitutes an infringement of law and, if necessary, stopping or prohibiting the practice for the future, as well as measures eliminating the continuing effects of the infringement, including redress. If sought within a single action, qualified entities should be able to seek all relevant measures at the moment of bringing the action or first seek relevant injunctions order and subsequently and if appropriate redressdeclaratory order.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Qualified entities should be able to seek measures aimed at eliminating the continuing effects of the infringement. These measures should take the form of a redress order obligating the trader to provide for, inter alia, compensation, repair, replacement, price reduction, contract termination or reimbursement of the price paid, as appropriate and as available under national laws.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Member States may require qualified entities to provide sufficient information to support a representative action for redress, including a description of the group of consumers concerned by an infringement and the questions of fact and law to be resolved within the representative action. The qualified entity should not be required to individually identify all consumers concerned by an infringement in order to initiate the action. In representative actions for redress the court or administrative authority should verify at the earliest possible stage of the proceedings whether the case is suitable for being brought as a representative action, given the nature of the infringement and characteristics of the damages suffered by consumers concerned.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Member States should be allowed to decide whether their court or national authority seized of a representative action for redress may exceptionally issue, instead of a redress order, a declaratory decision regarding the liability of the trader towards the consumers harmed by an infringement which could be directly relied upon in subsequent redress actions by individual consumers. This possibility should be reserved to duly justified cases where the quantification of the individual redress to be attributed to each of the consumer concerned by the representative action is complex and it would be inefficient to carry it out within the representative action. Declaratory decisions should not be issued in situations which are not complex and in particular where consumers concerned are identifiable and where the consumers have suffered a comparable harm in relation to a period of time or a purchase. Similarly, declaratory decisions should not be issued where the amount of loss suffered by each of the individual consumers is so small that individual consumers are unlikely to claim for individual redress. The court or the national authority should duly motivate its recourse to a declaratory decision instead of a redress order in a particular case.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Where consumers concerned by the same practice are identifiable and they suffered comparable harm in relation to a period of time or a purchase, such as in the case of long-term consumer contracts, the court or administrative authority may clearly define the group of consumers concerned by the infringement in the course of the representative action. In particular, the court or administrative authority could ask the infringing trader to provide relevant information, such as the identity of the consumers concerned and the duration of the practice. For expediency and efficiency reasons, in these cases Member States in accordance with their national laws could consider to provide consumers with the possibility to directly benefit from a redress order after it was issued without being required to give their individual mandate before the redress order is issued.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In low-value cases most consumers are unlikely to take action in order to enforce their rights because the efforts would outweigh the individual benefits. However, if the same practice concerns a number of consumers, the aggregated loss may be significant. In such cases, a court or authority may consider that it is disproportionate to distribute the funds back to the consumers concerned, for example because it is too onerous or impracticable. Therefore the funds received as redress through representative actions would better serve the purposes of the protection of collective interests of consumers and should be directed to a relevant public purpose, such as a consumer legal aid fund, awareness campaigns or consumer movements.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Member States may provide that a qualified entity and a trader who have reached a settlement regarding redress for consumers affected by an allegedly illegal practice of that trader can jointly request a court or administrative authority to approve it. Such request should be admitted by the court or administrative authority only if there is no other ongoing representative action regarding the same practice. A competent court or administrative authority approving such collective settlement must take into consideration the interests and rights of all parties concerned, including individual consumers. Individual consumers concerned shall be given the possibility to accept or to refuse to be bound by such a settlement.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Any out-of-court settlement reached within the context of a representative action or based on a final declaratory decision should be approved by the relevant court or the administrative authority to ensure its legality and fairness, taking into consideration the interests and rights of all parties concerned. Individual consumers concerned shall be given the possibility to accept or to refuse to be bound by such a settlement.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) Ensuring that consumers are informed about a representative action is crucial for its success. Consumers should be informed of ongoing representative action, the fact that a trader's practice has been considered as a breach of law, their rights following the establishment of an infringement and any subsequent steps to be taken by consumers concerned, particularly for obtaining redress. The reputational risks associated with spreading information about the infringement are also important for deterring traders infringing consumer rights.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) To enhance legal certainty, avoid inconsistency in the application of Union law and to increase the effectiveness and procedural efficiency of representative actions and of possible follow-on actions for redress, the finding of an infringement established in a final decision, including a final injunction order under this Directive, issued by an administrative authority or a court should not be relitigated in subsequent legal actions related to the same infringement by the same trader as regards the nature of the infringement and its material, personal, temporal and territorial scope as determined by that final decision. Where an action seeking measures eliminating the continuing effects of the infringement, including for redress, is brought in a Member State other than the Member State where a final decision establishing this infringement was issued, the decision should constitute a rebuttable presumption that the infringement has occurred.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) Evidence is an important element for establishing whether a given practice constitutes an infringement of law, whether there is a risk of its repetition, for determining the consumers concerned by an infringement, deciding on redress and adequately informing consumers concerned by a representative action about the ongoing proceedings and its final outcomes. However, business-to-consumer relationships are characterised by information asymmetry and the necessary information may be held exclusively by the trader, making it inaccessible to the qualified entity. Qualified entities should therefore be afforded the right to request to the competent court or administrative authority the disclosure by the trader of evidence relevant to their claim or needed for adequately informing consumers concerned about the representative action, without it being necessary for them to specify individual items of evidence. The need, scope and proportionality of such disclosure should be carefully assessed by the court or administrative authority overseeing the representative action having regard to the protection of legitimate interests of third parties and subject to the applicable Union and national rules on confidentiality.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive sets out rules enabling qualified entities to seek representative actions aimed at the protection of the collective interests of consumers, while ensuring appropriate safeguards at EU and Member State level and their consistent EU-wide application to avoid abusive litigation.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) it has a legitimate interest ins statutes, governance and track record demonstrate its legitimate interest in protecting consumers and ensuring that provisions of Union law covered by this Directive are complied with;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) it has sufficient capacity in terms of human resources, and legal expertise to represent multiple claimants acting in their best interest;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c b (new)
(c b) it has in place due procedures to identify, prevent and deal with conflicts of interests;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c c (new)
(c c) it has existed for at least 2 years before initiating a representative action.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may designate a qualified entity on an ad hoc basis for a particular representative action, at its request, if it complies with the criteria referred to in paragraph 1.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that in particular consumer organisations and independent public bodies are eligible for the status of qualified entity. Member States may designate as qualified entities consumer organisations that represent members from more than one Member State.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 181 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may set out rules specifying which qualified entities may seek all of the measures referred to in Articles 5 and 6, and which qualified entities may seek only one or more of these measures.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 182 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. TWithout predjudice to the compliance by a qualified entity with the criteria referred to in paragraph 1 is without prejudlaid down in Article to the right of4, the court or administrative authority toshall examine whether the purpose of the qualified entity justifies its taking action in a specific case in accordance with Article 5(1) or Article 6(1) of this Directive.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 183 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Member States shall ensure that representative actions can be brought before national courts or administrative authorities by qualified entities provided that there is a direct relationship between the main objectives of the entity and the rights granted under Union law that are claimed to have been violated in respect of which the action is brought.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that representative actions can be brought before national courts or administrative authorities by qualified entities provided that there is a direct relationship between the main objectives of the entity and the rights granted under Union law that are claimed to have been violated in respect of which the action is brought.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In order to seek injunction orders, qualified entities shall not have to obtaindemonstrate that they have the mandate of at least 10 of the individual consumers concerned or, but shall not be required to provide proof of actual loss or damage on the part of the consumers concerned or of intention or negligence on the part of the trader.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 196 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that qualified entitionly entities qualified for Article 6 measures are entitled to bring representative actions seeking measures eliminating the continuing effects of the infringement. These measures shall be sought on the basis of any final decision establishing that a practice constitutes an infringement of Union law listed in Annex I harming collective interests of consumers, including a final injunction order referred to in paragraph (2)(b)a declaratory decision regarding the liability of the trader towards the consumers harmed by an infringement of Union law listed in Annex I.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Without prejudice to Article 4(4), Member States shall ensure that qualified entities are able to seek the measures eliminating the continuing effects of the infringementwhich are eligible to bring actions under Article 6 are able to seek a declaratory decision regarding the liability of the trader towards the consumers harmed by an infringement of Union law listed in Annex I together with measures referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article within a single representative action, provided the identity of all individuals seeking redress is known to the court before its judgment.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 224 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. By derogation to paragraph 1, Member States may empower a court or administrative authority to issue, instead of a redress order, a declaratory decision regarding the liability of the trader towards the consumers harmed by an infringement of Union law listed in Annex I, in duly justified cases where, due to the characteristics of the individual harm to the consumers concerned the quantification of individual redress is complex.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 228 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply in the cases where: (a) consumers concerned by the infringement are identifiable and suffered comparable harm caused by the same practice in relation to a period of time or a purchase. In such cases the requirement of the mandate of the individual consumers concerned shall not constitute a condition to initiate the action. The redress shall be directed to the consumers concerned; (b) consumers have suffered a small amount of loss and it would be disproportionate to distribute the redress to them. In such cases, Member States shall ensure that the mandate of the individual consumers concerned is not required. The redress shall be directed to a public purpose serving the collective interests of consumers.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. The redress obtained through a final decision in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall be without prejudice to any additional rights to redress that the consumers concerned may have under Union or national law.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 243 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The qualified entity seeking a redress order as referred in Article 6(1)entity qualified for Article 5 actions shall declare at an earlythe stage of the action the source of the funds used for its activity in general and the funds that it uses to support thadmissibility of the action if it uses any funds to support the representative action. It shall demonstrate that it has sufficient financial resources to represent the best interests of the consumers concerned and to meet any adverse costs should the action fail.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 252 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) to receive any direct or indirect financial benefit through the litigation process or decision;
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Individual consumers concerned shall be given the possibility to accept or to refuse to be bound by settlements referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3. The redress obtained through an approved settlement in accordance with paragraph 4 shall be without prejudice to any additional rights to redress that the consumers concerned may have under Union or national lawThe redress obtained through an approved settlement in accordance with paragraph 4 must be definitive and applicable to all cases involving the same practice, the same consumers and the same company.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the court or administrative authority shall require the infringing trader to inform affected consumers at its expense about the final decisions providing for measures referred to in Articles 5 and 6, and the approved settlements referred to in Article 8, by means appropriate to the circumstance of the case and within specified time limits, including, where appropriate, through notifying all consumers concerned individually.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that an infringement harming collective interests of consumers established in a final decision of an administrative authority or a court, including a final injunction order referred to in Article 5(2)(b), is deemed as irrefutably establishing the existence of that infringement for the purposes of any other actions seeking redress before their national courts against the same trader for the same infringement.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that a final decision referred to in paragraph 1, taken in another Member State is considered by their national courts or administrative authorities as a rebuttable presumption that an infringement has occurrdeleted.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
In accordance with national law, Member States shall ensure that the submission of a representative action as referred to in Articles 5 and 6 shall have the effect of suspending or interrupting limitation periods applicable to any redress actions for the consumers concerned, if the relevant rights are subject to a limitation period under Union or national law.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 284 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, at the request of a qualified entity that has presented reasonably available facts and evidence sufficient to support the representative action, and has indicated further evidence which lies in the control of the defendant, provided such information is precisely described and narrowly limited to what is proportionate, the court or administrative authority may order, in accordance with national procedural rules, that such evidence be presented by the defendant, subject to the applicable Union and national rules on confidentiality.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 289 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that procedural costs related to representative actions do not constitute financial obstacles for qualified entities to effectively exercise the right to seek the measures referred to in Articles 5 and 6, such as limiting applicable court or administrative fees, granting them access to legal aid where necessary, or by providing them with public funding for this purpose.deleted
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2018/0089(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that any qualified entity designated in advance in one Member State in accordance with Article 4(1) may apply to the courts or administrative authorities of another Member State upon the presentation of the publicly available list referred to in that Article. The courts or administrative authorities shall accept this list as proof of the legal standing of the qualified entity without prejudice to their right to examine whether the purpose of the qualified entity justifies its taking action in a specific case.
2018/09/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2018/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) In order to allow for a competitive Union-framework, crowdfunding service providers should be permitted to raise capital through their platforms using tokens. Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) offer new and innovative ways of funding but can also generate substantial market, fraud and cyber security risks to investors. Therefore, crowdfunding service providers that wish to offer ICOs through their platform, should comply with specific additional requirements under this Regulation. Whilst project owners can still opt for the private placement of an ICO or use a prospectus for an ICO, this regulation only covers those who opt to use a crowdfunding service provider as an intermediary. Further to this, ICOs raising in excess of EUR 8 000 000 or ICOs that do not use a centralised issuer should not fall within the scope of this Regulation. Only tokens that represent either a loan or transferable security and that have a central issuer who takes responsibility for the issuance of the tokens should be covered by the Regulation. Crowdfunding Service providers who offer ICOs via their platform should ensure that all requisite due diligence checks have been conducted in accordance with this regulation.
2018/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2018/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) crowdfunding service providers that facilitate the raising of capital through their platforms via Initial Coin Offerings (ICO) that issue tokens that do not have a centralised issuer.
2018/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 216 #

2018/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) ‘Initial Coin Offering’ or ‘ICO’ means a method of raising funds from the public using tokens that are put for sale by a business or an individual in exchange for fiat or cryptocurrencies.
2018/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #

2018/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l b (new)
(lb) ‘token’ means any form of digital medium of exchange, a digital unit of account and/or a store of value that is used to serve as or represent an asset
2018/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 218 #

2018/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l c (new)
(lc) ‘cryptocurrency’ means a maths- based decentralised convertible virtual currency that is protected by cryptography, relies on public and private keys to transfer value from one person to another and may be cryptographically signed each time it is transferred;
2018/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 224 #

2018/0048(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Provision of Initial Coin Offerings 1. This Regulation shall apply to crowdfunding service providers authorised in accordance with Article 10 who facilitates ICOs that fall within the scope of this Article 4a. 2. This Regulation shall only apply to ICOs of tokens where there is a centralised issuer of the tokens. 3. This Regulation shall only apply to ICOs of tokens that are either loans or transferable securities. 4. This Regulation shall only apply to the primary issuance or selling of tokens and not secondary trading of such tokens. 5. This Regulation shall not apply to private placement of tokens. 6. This Regulation shall not apply to ICOs with a consideration of more than EUR 8 000 000 per issuance in an ICO.
2018/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas three-dimensional (3D) printing became accessible to the general public when 3D printers for individuals were placed on the market; whereas that market should, however, remain marginal in the medium term, taking into account the cost of printers and materials, the limited capacity of 3D printers designed for individual use, and the limited number and nature of materials made available to consumer and when companies arrived on the market offering both digital models and 3D printing services;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 3 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas most of today’s high-tech industries use this technology, whereas opportunities to use 3 D printing have highly increased in many areas, and whereas expectations are high in many areas, for example, the medical, aeronautics, aerospace, automotive, building, architect (ranging from regenerative medicine to the manufacture of prosthetics), aeronautics, aerospace, automotive, household electrical appliance, building, archaeological research, architecture, mechanical engineering, leisure and design sectors;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 4 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas 3D-printing technology could helpis expected to create more new jobs that arefor skilled labour that are in some cases less physically demanding and less dangerous (maintenance technicians, engineers, designers, etc.), and also reduce production and storage costs (low-volume manufacturing, personalised manufacturing, etc.)whereas with the creation of new technician positions (e.g. operator for 3D printers) new liabilities will emerge and the 3D-printing industry will need to provide the appropriate trainings in order for the technicians to be at the same level with their counterparts in traditional manufacturing; whereas 3D-printing technology will also reduce production and storage costs (low-volume manufacturing, personalised manufacturing, etc.); whereas, however, the decrease in manufacturing jobs will greatly affect the economy of countries that rely on a large number of low-skill jobs;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 5 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas 3D-printing technology raisesmight raise some specific legal and ethical issueconcerns regarding all areas of intellectual property law, such as copyright, patents, designs, three-dimensional trademarks and even geographical indications, and civil liability, and whereas those issue, moreover, those concerns fall within the remit of the Committee on Legal Affairs;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 6 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas 3D-printing technology might also raises security issueand especially cyber-security concerns, particularly with regard to the manufacturing of weapons, explosives and drugs and any other hazardous objects, and particular care should be taken with regard to production of that kind;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 8 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas Directive 85/374/EEC on liability for defective products covers all contracts; whereas it should be noted that it is progress in 3D printing amongst other things that has led the Commission to undertake a revision of that Directive to check whether it still meets current needpublic consultation with the aim of assessing whether this Directive is fit for purpose in relation to new technological developments;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 8 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas three-dimensional (3D) printing became accessible to the general public when 3D printers for individuals were placed on the market; whereas that market should, however, remain marginal in the medium term, taking into account the cost of printers and materials, the limited capacity of 3D printers designed for individual use, and the limited number and nature of materials made available to consumers;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 10 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that to anticipate problems relating to accidentcivil liability or intellectual property infringement that 3D printing might cause in the future, the EU willmight have to adopt new legislation orand tailor existing laws to the specific case of 3D technology, taking into account the decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and the relevant case law of the EU and Member State courts and after having carried out a thorough impact assessment evaluating all policy options; stresses that, in any case, the legislative response should avoid duplicating existing rules and should take into account projects that are already under way, in particular the legislation on copyright currently applicable to 2D printing; adds that innovation needs to be promoted and accompanied by law, without the law acting as a brake or a constraint;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 11 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that solutions of a legal nature if necessary could make it feasible to control the legal reproduction of 3D objects protected by copyright, for example, digital and 3D- printing providers could systematically display a notice on the need to respect intellectual property, a legal limit could be introduced on the number of private copies of 3D objects in order to prevent illegal reproduction, and a tax on 3D printing could be levied to compensate intellectual property rights holders for damages suffered asemphasises, in that context, the importance of elements that make it possible to trace 3D objects or of the introduction of a legal limit on the number of private copies of 3D objects in order to prevent illegal reproduction; emphasises that if a 3D copy constitutes a private copy, national laws governing exemptions for private copies will apply, including as regards compensation or revenue collection schemes, where they a result of private copies being made in 3D provided for in national law;
2018/04/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 12 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas 3 D printing is viewed as one of the most prominent technologies where Europe can play a leading role; whereas the European Commission recognized the benefits of 3 D printing by sponsoring 21 projects based on the technology by Horizon 2020 between 2014-2016.
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 19 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the majority of thesome industries have been using final parts made by using 3D- printed products being cing for a number of years already and the final parts market continues to grow at a related are prototypesively fast rate;;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 28 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas expectations are highopportunities to use 3 D printing have highly increased in many areas, for example, the medical, aeronautics, aerospace, automotive, building, architecture and design sectors;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 39 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas 3D-printing technology could helpis expected to create more new jobs for skilled labour that are less physically demanding and less dangerous (maintenance technicians, engineers, designers, etc.) and also reduce production and storage costs (low-volume manufacturing, personalised manufacturing, etc.);
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 46 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas 3D-printing technology might raises specificome legal and ethical issueconcerns regarding intellectual property and civil liability, and whereas those issueconcerns fall within the remit of the Committee on Legal Affairs;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 53 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas 3D-printing technology also raisesmight raise some security issueconcerns, particularly with regard to the manufacturing of weapons, explosives and drugs, and particular care should be taken with regard to production of that kind;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 67 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas, from a copyright point of view, useful certain distinctions should be made: for instance, between home printing for private use and printing for commercial use, and between B2B services and B2C services.
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 86 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas Directive 85/374/EEC on liability for defective products covers all contracts; whereas it should be noted that it is progress in 3D printing amongst other things that has led the Commission to undertake a revision of that Directive to check whether it still meets current needs;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 90 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas general liability rules also apply to 3D printing; whereas a specific liability regime could be envisaged for damage caused by an object created using 3D-printing technology, asacknowledging that the number of stakeholders involved in the process often makes it difficult for the victim to identify the person responsible; whereas those rules could make the creator or vendor of the 3D file liable, or the producer of the 3D printer, the producer of the software used in the 3D printer, the supplier of the materials used or even the person who created the object, depending on the cause of the defect discovered;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 104 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that to anticipate problems relating to accident liability or intellectual property infringement that 3 D printing might cause in the future, the EU willmay have to adopt new legislation or tailor existing laws to the specific case of 3D technology; stresses that, in any case, the legislative response should avoid duplicating rules and should take into account projects that are already under way; adds that innovation needs to be accompanied by law, without the law acting as a brake or a constraint;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 110 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that it goes without saying that care should be taken in the 3D-printing sector, particularly with regard to the quality of the printed product and any dangers that the product may pose to users or consumers, and it would be appropriate to consider including identification means to make it possible to distinguish between objects produced in the traditional way and objects produced using 3D printing;deleted
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 118 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that solutions of a legal nature if necessary could make it feasible to control the legal reproduction of 3D objects protected by copyright, for example, digital and 3D- printing providers could systematically display a notice on the need to respect intellectual property, a legal limit could be introduced on the number of private copies of 3D objects in order to prevent illegal reproduction, and a tax on 3D printing could be levied to compensate intellectual property rights holders for damages suffered as a result of private copies being made in 3D;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 128 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses, however, that technical solutions – currently underdeveloped – must not be overlookcould be further investigated, for example, the creation of databases of encrypted and protected files and the design of printers connected to and equipped with a system capable of managing intellectual property rights;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 131 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Criticises the fact that at this stage, none of those options is wholly satisfactory on its own;deleted
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 140 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Therefore cCalls on the Commission to give comprehensive consideration to every aspect of 3D-printing technology when taking the measures referred to in its communication (COM(2017)0707); stresses the importance of involving stakeholders in that work;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 145 #

2017/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibility ofreview whether setting up a civil liability regime for damages not covered by Directive 85/374/EEC is necessary;
2018/03/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 63 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) While certification and other forms of conformity assessment for ICT products, services, and processes plays an important role, improving cybersecurity requires a multi-faceted approach spanning people, processes, and technologies. The EU must also continue to strongly emphasise and promote other efforts including cybersecurity education, training, and skills development; raising awareness at corporate executive and board-levels; promoting voluntary cyber threat information sharing; and shifting the EU from a reactive to a proactive approach to responding to threats by emphasising the prevention of successful cyber-attacks.
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 1
(1) in cooperation with industry stakeholders in a formal, standardised, and transparent process, identifying and preparing candidate European cybersecurity certification schemes for ICT products and services in accordance with Article 44 of this Regulation;
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 183 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 3
(3) compiling and publishing guidelines and developing good practices concerning the cybersecurity requirements of ICT products and services, in cooperation with national certification supervisory authorities and the industry; in a formal, standardised, and transparent process;
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 3 a (new)
(3a) in consultation with all relevant stakeholders, identifying whether standards or certification processes do not yet exist globally for identified needs, and if such gaps are determined to exist, requesting that standards development organisations to develop standards or processes;
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) facilitate the establishment and take-up of European andor international standards for risk management and for the security of ICT products and services, as well as draw up, in collaboration with Member States, advice and guidelines regarding the technical areas related to the security requirements for operators of essential services and digital service providers, as well as regarding already existing standards, including Member States’ national standards, pursuant to Article 19(2) of Directive (EU) 2016/1148;
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 188 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) prioritise its work on inventorying existing national level schemes as well as developing guidelines for a possible harmonisation of these schemes in order to create mutual recognition within the Union;
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 237 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. When preparing candidate schemes referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, ENISA shall consult all relevant stakeholders in a formal, standardised, and transparent process and closely cooperate with the Group. The Group and all relevant stakeholders shall provide ENISA with the assistance and expert advice required by ENISA in relation to the preparation of the candidate scheme, including by providing opinions where necessary.
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 279 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. A European cybersecurity certification scheme may specify one or more of the following assurance levels: basic, substantial and/or high, for ICT products and services issued under that In consultation with relevant stakeholders, ENISA shall identify or develop assurance levels to be specified in European cybersecurity certification schemes.
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 288 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2
2. The assurance levels basic, substantial and high shall meet the following criteria respectively: (a) assurance level basic shall refer to a certificate issued in the context of a European cybersecurity certification scheme, which provides a limited degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted cybersecurity qualities of an ICT product or service, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to decrease the risk of cybersecurity incidents; (b) assurance level substantial shall refer to a certificate issued in the context of a European cybersecurity certification scheme, which provides a substantial degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted cybersecurity qualities of an ICT product or service, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to decrease substantially the risk of cybersecurity incidents; (c) assurance level high shall refer to a certificate issued in the context of a European cybersecurity certification scheme, which provides a higher degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted cybersecurity qualities of an ICT product or service than certificates with the assurance level substantial, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to prevent cybersecurity incidents.deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) assurance level basic shall refer to a certificate issued in the context of a European cybersecurity certification scheme, which provides a limited degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted cybersecurity qualities of an ICT product or service, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to decrease the risk of cybersecurity incidents;deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 300 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) assurance level substantial shall refer to a certificate issued in the context of a European cybersecurity certification scheme, which provides a substantial degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted cybersecurity qualities of an ICT product or service, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to decrease substantially the risk of cybersecurity incidents;deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 304 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) assurance level high shall refer to a certificate issued in the context of a European cybersecurity certification scheme, which provides a higher degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted cybersecurity qualities of an ICT product or service than certificates with the assurance level substantial, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to prevent cybersecurity incidents.deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. AThe following elements shall be considered when preparing a European cybersecurity certification scheme shall include the following elements:
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 326 #

2017/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) relevance of promoting “security by design”;
2018/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Connected devices and machines increasingly communicate with each other by using electronic communications networks (Internet of Things). The transmission of machine-to-machine communications involves the conveyance of signals over a network and, hence, usually constitutes an electronic communications service. In order to ensure full protection of the rights to privacy and confidentiality of communications, and to promote a trusted and secure Internet of Things in the digital single market, it is necessary to clarify that this Regulation should apply to the transmission of machine-to-machine communications. Therefore, the principle of confidentiality enshrined in this Regulation should also apply to the transmission of machine-to- machine communications. Specific safeguards could also be adopted under sectorial legislation, as for instance Directive 2014/53/EU. Regulation shall not apply to machine-to-machine communications which are not provided as a service targeting the general public. Moreover, the provision of machine-to- machine platforms shall not be considered to be an electronic communications service solely by the inclusion of service other than the mere conveyance of communication data (such as collecting and making machine-to-machine data available to end-users via (i) the platform, (ii) offering functions to analyse the machine-to-machine data via the platform or (iii) transfer signals to operate and control the machines via the platform).
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The prohibition of storage of communications is not intended to prohibit any automatic, intermediate and transient storage of this information insofar as this takes place for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission in the electronic communications network. ItThe processing of anonymous data by providers, and making data anonymous, should be incentivised as the act of anonymization dramatically reduces the risk from a privacy and security perspective associated with processing of data related to transmission. This Regulation also should not prohibit either the processing of electronic communications data to ensure the security, confidentiality, integrity, availability, authenticity and continuity of the electronic communications services and networks, including checking security threats such as the presence of malware or the processing of metadata to ensure the necessary quality of service requirements, such as latency, jitter etc.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) Regulation 2016/679 explicitly recognises the need to provide additional protection to children, given that they may be less aware of the risks and consequences associated with the processing of their personal data. This Regulation should also grant special attention to the protection of children's privacy. They are among the most active internet users and their exposure to profiling and behaviourally targeted advertising techniques should be prohibited.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Exceptions to the obligation to obtain consent to make use of the processing and storage capabilities of terminal equipment or to access information stored in terminal equipment should be limited to situations that involve no, or only very limited, intrusion of privacy. For instance, consent should not be requested for authorizing the technical storage or access which is strictly necessary and proportionate for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the end-user. This may include the storing of cookies for the duration of a single established session on a website to keep track of the end-user’s input when filling in online forms over several pages. Consent should also not be necessary if the information processed or stored is necessary to protect privacy, security or safety of the end-user, or to protect confidentiality, integrity, availability and authenticity of the terminal equipment. Cookies can also be a legitimate and useful tool, for example, in measuring web traffic to a website. Information society providers that engage in configuration checking to provide the service in compliance with the end-user's settings and the mere logging of the fact that the end-user’s device is unable to receive content requested by the end- user should not constitute access to such a device or use of the device processing capabilities. As an exemption from obtaining end-user´s consent, the processing of information and data that are or are rendered pseudonymous or anonymous should be allowed or for purposes other than those for which they were initially collected in cases where the processing is compatible and is subject to specific safeguards, especially pseudonymisation as set forth in point (4) of Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) The methods used for providing information and obtaining end-user's consent should be as user-friendly as possible. Given the ubiquitous use of tracking cookies and other tracking techniques, end-users are increasingly requested to provide consent to store such tracking cookies in their terminal equipment. As a result, end-users are overloaded with requests to provide consent. The use of technical means to provide consent, for example, through transparent and user-friendly settings, may address this problem. Therefore, this Regulation should provide for the possibility to express consent by using the appropriate settings of a browser or other application. The choices made by end- users when establishing its general privacy settings of a browser or other application should be binding on, and enforceable against, any third parties, provided that there is no separate specific consent given by the end-user. Web browsers are a type of software application that permits the retrieval and presentation of information on the internet. Other types of applications, such as the ones that permit calling and messaging or provide route guidance, have also the same capabilities. Web browsers mediate much of what occurs between the end-user and the website. From this perspective, they are in a privileged position to play an active role to help the end-user to control the flow of information to and from the terminal equipment. More particularly web browsers may be used as gatekeepers, thus helping end-users to prevent information from their terminal equipment (for example smart phone, tablet or computer) from being accessed or stored.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The principles of data protection by design and by default were codified under Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Currently, the default settings for cookies are set in most current browsers to 'accept all cookies'. Therefore providers of software enabling the retrieval and presentation of information on the internet should have an obligation to configure the software so that it offers the optioninform the end-user about the possibility to express his or her consent using appropriate technical settings. The end-user should be offered multiple options to choose from, including to prevent third parties from storing information on the terminal equipment; this is often presented as ‘reject third party cookies’. End-users should be offered a set of privacy setting options, ranging from, higher (for example, ‘never accept cookies’) to lower (for example, ‘always accept cookies’) and intermediate (for example, ‘reject third party cookies’ or ‘only accept first party cookies’)rejecting tracking that is not necessary for the functionality of the website or other software to, for example, accepting tracking necessary for the functionality of the website or other software as well as for other purposes or, for example, accepting tracking necessary for the functionality of the website or other software and tracking for other purposes by parties that demonstrate the compliance with the EU data protection and privacy legislation, for instance in line with Article 40 and 42 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Such privacy settings should be presented in a an easily visible and intelligible manner.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Accessing electronic communications networks requires the regular emission of certain data packets in order to discover or maintain a connection with the network or other devices on the network. Furthermore, devices must have a unique address assigned in order to be identifiable on that network. Wireless and cellular telephone standards similarly involve the emission of active signals containing unique identifiers such as a MAC address, the IMEI (International Mobile Station Equipment Identity), the IMSI etc. A single wireless base station (i.e. a transmitter and receiver), such as a wireless access point, has a specific range within which such information may be captured. Service providers have emerged who offer tracking services based on the scanning of equipment related information with diverse functionalities, including people counting, providing data on the number of people waiting in line, ascertaining the number of people in a specific area, etc. This information may be used for more intrusive purposes, such as to send commercial messages to end-users, for example when they enter stores, with personalized offers. While some of these functionalities do not entail high privacy risks, others do, for example, those involving the tracking of individuals over time, including repeated visits to specified locations. Providers engaged in such practices should ask for the end-user´s consent or should carry out data protection impact assessment and in this case the data collected is or is rendered pseudonymous or anonymous. Where a data protection impact assessment indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the controller to mitigate the risk, prior consultation with the supervisory authority, as prescribed in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, should be carried out. Providers should display prominent notices located on the edge of the area of coverage informing end-users prior to entering the defined area that the technology is in operation within a given perimeter, the purpose of the tracking, the person responsible for it and the existence of any measure the end-user of the terminal equipment can take to minimize or stop the collection. Additional information should be provided where personal data are collected pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Publicly available directories of end-users of electronic communications services are widely distributed. Publicly available directories means any directory or service containing end-users information such as phone numbers (including mobile phone numbers), email address contact details and includes inquiry services. The right to privacy and to protection of the personal data of a natural person requires that end-users that are natural persons are asked for consent before their personal data are included in a directory. The legitimate interest of legal entities requires that end- users that are legal entities have the right to object to the data related to them being included in a directory. The consent should be collected by the electronic communications service provider at the moment of signing the contract for such service.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) In order to strengthen the enforcement of the rules of this Regulation, each supervisory authority should have the power to impose penalties including administrative fines for any infringement of this Regulation, in addition to, or instead of any other appropriate measures pursuant to this Regulation. This Regulation should indicate infringements and the upper limit and criteria for setting the related administrative fines, which should be determined by the competent supervisory authority in each individual case, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the specific situation, with due regard in particular to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences and the measures taken to ensure compliance with the obligations under this Regulation and to prevent or mitigate the consequences of the infringement. For the purpose of setting a fine under this Regulation, an undertaking should be understood to be an undertaking in accordance with Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty. Double penalties resulting from the infringement of both this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should be avoided.
2017/07/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation ensures free movement of electronic communications data and electronic communications services within the Union, which shall be neither restricted nor prohibited for reasons related to the respect for the private life and communications of natural and legal persons and the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data.
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 261 #

2017/0003(COD)

(a a) the data is anonymous or made anonymous before any other processing; or
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 271 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Electronic communications data that is generated in the context of an electronic communications service designed particularly for children or directly targeted at children shall not be used for profiling or behaviourally targeted advertising purposes.
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 323 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the information is or is rendered pseudonymous or anonymous; or
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 347 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) it is necessary to protect privacy, security or safety of the end-user, or to protect confidentiality, integrity, availability, authenticity of the terminal equipment; or
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 354 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(d b) it is necessary to measure the effectiveness, reach and quality of an information society service delivered to the end-user or about terminal equipment functionality, and it has no or little impact on the privacy of the end-user concerned.
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 425 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Upon installation, the software shall inform the end-user about the privacy settings options and, to continue with the installation, require the end-user to consent to a setting, except when the software already has built-in solution that prevents third parties from storing information on the terminal equipment.
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 428 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. In the case of software which has already been installed on 25 May 2018, the requirements under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be complied with at the time of the first update of the software, but no later than 25 August 2018.deleted
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 436 #

2017/0003(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Union or Member State law may restrict by way of a legislative measure the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in Articles 5 to 8 where such a restriction respects the essence of the fundamental rights and freedoms and is a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure in a democratic society to safeguard one or more of the general public interests referred to in Article 23(1)(a) to (e) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or a monitoring, inspection or regulatory function connected to the exercise of official authority for such interestsnational security (i.e. state security), defence, public security, and the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences..
2017/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2016/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the liability rules for online platforms should allow the tackling of issues related to illegal goods and illegal and harmful content in an efficient manner, for instance by respectapplying thdue duty of cariligence, while maintaining a balanced and business- friendly approach;
2017/03/27
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 252 #

2016/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses the need for online platforms to prevent illegal goods and illegal and inappropriate content and unfair practices through regulatory, measures complemented by effective self- regulatory or hybrid measures; stresses the importance of online platforms playing a proactive role in tackling illegal goods and illegal and inappropriate content and taking immediate action to remove illegal or inappropriate content if such contenthem if they slips through preventive monitoring;
2017/03/27
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 269 #

2016/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that online platforms should develop more effective voluntary measures and technical means of identifying and eliminating access to illegal goods and harmful content;
2017/03/27
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 5 #

2016/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas this requires a renewed focus across Europe, including the timely completion and implementation of different single market strategies, especially Digital Single Market strategy;
2016/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2016/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that the single market is one of the foundations of the EU and is the backbone of Member States’ economies and of the European project as a whole; notes that the single market remains fragmented and insufficiently implemented and the great potential for growth, innovation and jobs largely untapped; stresses that for the EU to successfully strengthen its recovery and foster convergence, the single market plays an essential role;
2016/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 13 #

2016/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its call for the creation of a real single market pillar within the European Semester with all dimensions of the single market - on goods, services, capital, energy transport, and in the digital sector, with a system of regular monitoring, identification of the country- specific barriers to the single market and evaluation of single market integration and competitiveness; insists that the evaluation of the state of single market integration should become an integral part of the economic governance framework;
2016/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2016/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the Single Market pillar within the European Semester should serve to identify the key areas with all dimensions of the single market for the promotion and facilitation of growth and jobs; stresses, furthermore, that it should also serve as a benchmark for commitment to structural reform in Member States;
2016/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2016/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Believes that with regard to national measures or implementation early intervention may be more effective and better results achieved than through infringements procedures; stresses, nevertheless, that if the early intervention proceeding do not give results, the Commission must use all available measures, including infringement procedures, to ensure full implementation of legislation on the single market;
2016/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2016/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to carry out systematic monitoring of implementation and enforcement of the single market rules through the country-specific recommendations (CSRs), in particular where those rules make a contribution to structural reforms; believes that the ownership of the CSRs by national parliaments needs to be strengthened; encourages the Member States to provide the possibility for the Commission to present the CSRs in the national parliaments; calls, furthermore, on the Member States to implement the CSRs and to rigorously transpose the EU targets into national targets; reiterates, furthermore, its request that the Commission report to the competent committee of Parliament on the measures taken to ensure progress in the implementation of the CSRs and the progress achieved thus far;
2016/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1032 #

2016/2114(REG)

Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 116 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Parliament shall establish a register of Parliament documents. Legislative documents and certain other categories of documents shall, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, be made directly accessible through the register, in an open and accessible format to allow for the reuse of content. References to other Parliament documents shall as far as possible be included in the register.
2016/09/27
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 6 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates the importance of a well- functioning and integrated Single Market to the recovery of the European economy after the financial crisis; supports the inclusion of Country-Specific Recommendations (CSRs) which go beyond narrow fiscal and macroeconomic targets and allow for a more balanced policy mix with the potential to help sustain a socially balanced recovery; welcomes this repositioning, as well as the streamlined structure of CSRs; stresses that fragmentation of the single market is one of the major impediments to higher structural economic growth;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the large number of CSRs that support a well-functioning and integrated Single Market, including financing and investment opportunities which support businesses and help create jobs, e-government, public procurement and mutual recognition including mutual recognition of qualifications; stresses that enforcement is key if the impact from these policy areas is to be felt;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of ensuring consistency between ongoing and future Commission Single Market initiatives and the European Semester process, in particular those involving the Single Market and Digital Single Market Strategies; Calls on the Member States to fully cooperate in implementing the Digital Single Market and Single Market Strategies; urges the Commission and Member States to support the further development of the collaborative economy;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to do all they can to foster a healthy business environment through innovation, R&D and digitalisation, in order to create jobs, particularly through micro-businesses, startups and SMEs;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Condemns the barriers which still exist that hinder a well-functioning and integrated Single Market, in particular the partial transposition and implementation of the Services Directive by many Member States, and calls on the Commission to enforce more effectively what Member States have signed up to in European law; recalls the Commission's promise to - if necessary - use infringement procedures to ensure full implementation of legislation on the single market of goods, services and in the digital sphere and to ensure structural reforms in product, services and labour markets in Member States;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that further action is required to better implement mutual recognition principle including mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and welcomes the exercise of mapping regulated qualifications, which will create an interactive public database that can aid Member States’ National Action Plans;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Supports the Member States in their endeavours to modernise public services, in particular through e-government, and calls for better cross-border cooperation, de-bureaucratization and interoperability of public administrations to the benefit of all citizens;
2016/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that, having been fully operational for less than a year, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) has kicked off successfully, delivering some initial concrete results and acting as a positive instrument to overcome the lack of investment in Europe through coordinated action; stresses, however, that the pace needs to be accelerated and its initial results need to improve significantly in the near future, particularly in those Member States in which the financing provided by EFSI was particularly low, in order for the instrument to achieve its objectives fully;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that EFSI has started functioning successfully, already delivering concrete results in some Member States and therefore, acting as a positive instrument to overcome the lack of investment and to fight unemployment in Europe through coordinated action;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. UrgStresses that EFSI must ensure greater additionality for its projects in relation to normal EIB activities; underlines the fact that EFSI should support strategic investments related to projects that cannot obtain funding because of market failures, suboptimal investment situations or high levels of risk; recalls, furthermore, that when determining the criteria for use of the EU guarantee, EFSI should consider not only the profitability factor, but also the positive effects in terms of growth, job creation and cohesion;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 23 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that, while the SMEs window of the EFSI represented a goods an excellent opportunity for start-ups, SMEs and mid- caps, there is a lack of big investment; calls for the creation of further opportunities for SMEs to obtain financing for higher-risk projects, particularly in the digital sector, but also points out that major investment projects should not be forgotten; emphasises, therefore, the need to improve the financing of infrastructure and innovation projects;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 27 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to help SMEs and micro- enterprises to tap into funding more easily, so as to increase their capacity to implement projects and afford them better access to advisory services and technical support; calls on the Commission for the creation of further opportunities for SMEs to obtain financing for higher-risk projects, particularly in digital sector;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the strong interest and participation in EFSI projects by intermediary banks across the EU in order to provide finance to SMEs was extremely successful; encourages the Commission to work with the EFSI Steering Board to use all the existing possibilities under the EFSI Regulation to reinforce this access to finance for SMEs, in order to increase in the overall volume of actions for these instruments and allow the EIF to finance a significant extra volume of operations;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for better coordination between EFSI and other EU funds, in particular the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs), so as to promote stronger cohesion in Europe and ensure that EFSI has wide geographical coverage, particularly in those countries in which attempts to obtain EFSI financing have been low; urges the Commission to step up the EFSI communication campaign and to increase awareness of EFSI; suggests preparing information for SMEs to explain, in a simple and intelligible manner using specific examples, how they can obtain financing and the types of projects that are financed by EFSI; calls, also, for closer cooperation with national promotional banks, local and regional authorities and relevant stakeholders, including further encouragement to establish investment platforms to aggregate sectorial and geographical investment opportunities;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for better coordination between EFSI and other EU funds, in particular the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs), so as to promote stronger cohesion in Europe and ensure that EFSI has wide geographical coverage; calls, also, for closer cooperation with national promotional banks, local and regional authorities and relevant stakeholders, including further encouragement to establish investment platforms to aggregate sectorial and geographical investment opportunities; encourages the Advisory Hub to work more locally and to enhance its cooperation with National Promotional Banks;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the strong interest and participation in EFSI projects by intermediary banks across the EU in order to provide finance to SMEs was extremely successful;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission to work with the EFSI Steering Board to use all the existing possibilities to reinforce this access to finance for SMEs in order to increase in the overall volume of actions for these instruments;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to increase the transparency of EFSI operations and to improve information about projects and their quality to citizens and potential beneficiaries; believes that all contracts signed between EIB and its clients, either public or private ones, need to be disclosed on a systematic basis, in order to prove the additionally of EFSI projects and demonstrate to the public that it is including strong environmental, social, fraud and integrity clauses in the contracts signed; points to the need to enhance the European Investment Project Portal (EIPP) and the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) in order to establish a link with the real economy, give visibility to projects and provide high-quality technical assistance to potential promoters;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that EFSI is instrumental in completing and restructuring the Single Market; underlines, in this light, the importance of strengthening the third pillar of the ‘Investment Plan for Europe’, also in the context of the European Semester process, in order to make the EU regulatory environment more certain, homogeneous and favourable to investments by focusing especially on strategic objectives such as completion of the Single Market and the development of a well-functioning and innovation driven Digital Single Market, and on key actions that support these objectives;
2016/09/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to step up the EFSI communication campaign and to increase awareness of EFSI by preparing information for SMEs to explain, in a simple and intelligible manner using specific examples, how they can obtain financing and the types of projects that are financed by EFSI;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it disappointing that the Commission’s assessment of the EFSI has failed to record the number of jobs created to date under the Fund and where attempts to obtain EFSI financing have been low;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that consumers of less- connected cities, regions and countries have a significant competitive disadvantage compared to major hubs and thus calls on the Commission to take action on improving intra-EU connectivity;
2016/05/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Agrees with the Commission that the lack of cross-border financial services is a major concern and may harm the interests of consumers and businesses, as well as undermine the functioning of the single market; supports all efforts to find new ways to re-launch the single market for retail financial services in practice;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses, as outlined in the Green paper, that barriers preventing financial products from being sold across borders and the lack of cross-border sales are not primarily found in European law but either in barriers caused by national legislations or by the voluntary choice of financial institutions to segment the single market into national markets; asks the Commission to undertaken further analysis to understand this market segmentation and price discrimination and to recommend in a white paper, while respecting the freedom to contract, measures that could be introduced to encourage financial institutions to compete beyond national borders and to challenge current national pricing structures;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 14 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Underlines the continued lack of cross-border sales of individual third party liability vehicle insurance is especially concerning; notes this lack of competition has led to some EU citizens paying rates that are hundreds of times higher than others for the same vehicle model; while understanding that risk and costs are factors in prices, notes that these factors are not sufficient to explain such price fragmentation across Europe; asks the Commission to adopt an sector specific action plan on the European market for individual motor vehicle insurances, including recommendations as to EU wide rules on guarantee funds, guidelines on the use of 'bonus-malus' data when a EU citizen moves to another Member State and other possible actions needed to create a true single market for vehicle insurance;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 22 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. CWelcomes the benefits brought to consumers by the digital transformation of financial services and the raise of non- traditional fintech companies which have started to change the way retailers and consumers interact; calls on the Commission to ensure that digitalisation brings better market access for all businesses on an equal footing, especially for SMEs and fintechs, and greater consumer choice, bringing down price differences of financial services within the EU;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned that consumer trust in financial services remains low, and calls on the Commission to bring forwardensure that current measures towards improved consumer financial literacy and awareness are fully implemented, to increase the transparency of these products, and to remove consumer barriers to switching; underlines that the European Standardised Information Sheet (ESIS) and Standard European Consumer Credit Information forms should be systematically given to consumers before an agreement as part of a credit, loan or mortgage estimate;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to fully transpose and implement the MCD, PAD, IDD MiFID II directives as soon as possible, especially in relations to their consumer information requirements and protection measures;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses the roles played by the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) in ensuring the protection of the consumers of financial products; asks the Commission to ensure they have the independency and tools needed to carry out their missions and regrets the budget reductions which have led to the limiting of their working programmes;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that unjustified discrimination based on residence and price differences for common retail financial products between Member States requires urgent action; suggests that comparison tools play a role in bringing down price differences; believes that retail financial institutions should be within the scope of the Commission's proposal on Geo-blocking (2016/289/EU).
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the importance of availability of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and online dispute resolution (ODR), especially cross-border, as efficient redress is key to the single market and consumer trust; recommends that the Fin- NET programme be incorporated into the ADR and ODR structures in order to increase its efficiency and the work towards consolidating such services into 'one-stop-shops' for consumers;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 63 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Asks the Member States to ensure that digital communications and sales related to retail financial services are available in forms accessible to persons with disabilities, including via websites and downloadable file formats; supports the full inclusion of all retail financial services within the scope of the Directive on the accessibility requirements for products and services (the "European Accessibility Act");
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Asks the Commission to work with retailers, consumer organisations and other relevant stakeholders towards the creation of an independent pan-European comparison website for the most sold financial services products;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Asks the Commission to assess the impact of a proposal to ban all fees or charges related to the sending or receiving of SEPA or national wire- transfers and the potential benefits for European consumers;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Welcomes the work towards greater transparency in the pricing of rental car services, including the sale of ancillary insurances and other fees; stresses that all fees or charges, either required or optional, connected to the rental a vehicle should be visible to the consumer on the rental company or comparison website in a clear and highlighted manner; reminds the Commission of the need to enforce the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and welcomes the recent adoption of new implementing guidelines in light of technological change;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Underlines the need to remove all barriers to the provision of financial services across borders includes national requirements to establish a structure or register in the Member State of the consumer; reminds the Member States of the current legislative requirements and case law in this domain and believes that if barriers are not removed that the Commission should take additional measures;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Welcomes the increased use of e- signatures and e-identification within the framework of the eIDAS regulation; asks the Member States to work to ensure that e-signatures become the norm for financial service transactions and agreements; calls on the Commission to promote the use of e-IDs as a means of remote identification which meets current safety requirements while not hindering business at a distance;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 e (new)
9e. Recalls the work done relating to the credit rating agencies regulation; asks the Commission to review the impact of such legislation in relations to products sold to retail consumers;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2016/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 f (new)
9f. Supports the introduction of a fully transferable bank account number system to replace the current SEPA system which ties a consumer to a single institution via the linking of an IBAN with a fixed BIC/SWIFT code; calls on the Commission to introduce a proposal to allow the portability of bank account numbers and believes that, at a minimum, portability should be possible between institutions within a single Member State;
2016/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that the VC industry and the VC technology are innovative technologies and are being developed not on the basis of existing infrastructures;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 4 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises the potential benefits associated with VCs for consumers, businesses, charities and the economy at large, which include greaterenhanced speed and efficiency and reducedlow costs in making payments and transfers, in particular across borders, and potentially promoting financial inclusion;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that VCs are the only means of payment other than cash, which can facilitate real-time settlement (receiver gets 100% of funds at the time of payment);
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 8 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas VC technology differently from most technologies is being developed from zero, not on the top of existing infrastructures;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Highlights that VCs are pseudo- anonymous which allows customers to maintain their identity private, but makes transactions perfectly traceable and investigations easier for legal authorities, and thus making it superior to cash or existing payment infrastructures;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas Bitcoin and other VCs are created as a method of transfer, not as a store of value which is just a secondary use case;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. AcknowledgNotes that VCs could present risks in relation to criminal activities such as money laundering and tax fraud; notes, however that traceability of cash transactions tends to be much lower than VCs, highlights that there is little evidence that VCs have been widely used as a payment vehicle for criminal activity;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises that persons seeking wealth preservation may use independent currencies such as Bitcoin at times of depressed interest rates or as a safe harbour during times of economic instability;deleted
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 22 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recognises the potential of VC technologies well beyond the financial sector;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) more generally reducing the cost of access to finance even without a traditional bank account(VCs and VC technologies are all about eliminating counterparties as intermediaries), thereby potentially contributing to financial inclusion and the derailed G20 and G8 ‘5x5 objective’23 ; __________________ 23 http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTE RNAL/TOPICS/EXTFINANCIALSECTO R/0,,contentMDK:22383199~pagePK:210 058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:282885,00.h tml
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 26 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that it is difficult to predict how VCs might develop and to identify any potential specific longer-term policy responses while not stifling innovation; recommends the Commission to review the EU legislation on payments in the light of the new possibilities afforded by new technological developments including VCs;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 30 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) enabling systems that combine ease of use, low transaction costs and a high degree of privacy, but without full anonymity so that transactions can be traced backmaking transactions traceable in order to make investigations easier for legal authorities in case of malfeasance;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 32 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for the Commission to promote a higher involvement of independent researchers (universities, think tanks) together with private sector to innovate in VCs and VC technology area and allocate sufficient financing through the existing programmes such as Horizon2020;
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) using such systems to develop online micropayment systems that could conceivably replace some of the present data-hungry online and traditional business models which significantly challenge individual privacy;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 38 #

2016/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of consumer awareness when using VCs while noting the growing use of VC micropayments for online purchases of goods; calls on the VC industry, in cooperation with the CommissionMember States, in cooperation with the Commission, to engage in promoting and educating citizens about VC technology so that VC technologies could be implemented to improve or replace existing payment or financial market infrastructures to achieve higher market efficiency; calls on the VC industry and the Member States, to develop voluntary standards and to address the opportunities and challenges of VCs for consumers with the aim of enhancing the transparency of VC schemes in terms of how they are organised and operated and how they distinguish themselves from regulated and supervised payment systems, in terms of consumer protection, in order to allow existing and future VC users to make an informed choice.
2016/03/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the legal uncertainty and lack of EU approach surrounding new applications of DLT, which may in some instances be the subject of (sometimes ill- suited) existing legislation while in other instances appropriate regulation may still be lacking;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 79 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for a proportionate regulatory approach at EU level so as not to stifle innovation at an early stage, while taking seriously the regulatory challenges that the widespread use of VCs and DLT might pose;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for the Commission to promote a higher involvement of independent researchers (universities, think tanks) together with private sector to innovate in VCs and VC technology space and allocate sufficient financing through the existing programmes such as Horizon 2020;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #

2016/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls for Member States to engage in promoting and educating citizens about VC technology and its possible benefits for business so that VC technologies could be implemented to improve or replace existing payment or financial market infrastructures to achieve higher market efficiency;
2016/03/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
3 a. “professional qualification requirements” means requirements of professional qualifications as defined in point (b) of Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/36/EC;
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. A host Member State shall refrain from imposing on holders of a previously issued European services e-card requirements other than those referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 the compliance of which has been or is deemed to have been verified under Artnot impose any authorisation scheme or notification scheme on a holder of a European services e-card, once service provision in its territory has started, which duplicates equivalent or essentially comparable controls to which the provider was subject as part of the procedure for issuing the European servicles 11 to 13e-card.
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Within two weeks from receiving the application the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall examine it and inform the applicant and the coordinating authority of the home Member State of any requirements applicable to temporary cross-border provisions under the legislation of the host Member State with the exception of those referred to in Article 5(4). In line with the rights of Member States as referred to in Article 10, tThe application form shall include the information about abovementioned requirements. The coordinating authority of the host Member State may, alternatively and within the same time- limit, decide to object to the issue of the European services e-card by the coordinating authority of the home Member State where it demonstrates that in accordance withe application of a prior authorisation scheme, prior notification scheme or requirements to the applicant is justified for one of thosble Union law. In this case, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall specify the applicable legislation and why the decision is necessary and appropriate for the purpose of safeguarding the overriding reasons of publicgeneral interest set out in Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC or is admissibleinvoked and how the decision does not go beyond what is necessary to attain that purpose, in accordance with other acts of EUUnion law.
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The host Member State shall take due account in that assessment of the requirements that the applicant already meets in its home Member States. For the purpose of that assessment and within the above-mentioned time-limit, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall be allowed to request necessary clarifications or necessary additional information from the home Member State or the applicant which is not yet contained in the application. In that case, the time limit referred to in this paragraph is suspended until the requested necessary clarification or necessary additional information is supplied. If the host Member State finds that the requirements already met by the applicant in its home Member State sufficiently fulfil the purpose of the requirement imposed by the host Member State, the host Member State cannot object the European services e-card. The procedure for requesting clarifications or additional information will be laid down by way of the delegated acts referenced in paragraph 4.
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
If the host Member State does not object in accordance with paragraph 1, the coordinating authority of the home Member State shall issue the European services e-card without delay upon expiration of the extended time-limit resulting from the application of paragraph 2. In the absence of any objection under the second subparagraph of paragraph 1Member States shall ensure that, upon reception of the information mentioned in the first and second subparagraph of paragraph 1, the coordinating authority of the home Member State issues, without delay, the European Services Card. In the absence of any objection by the coordinating authority of the host Member State and failing a decision by the coordinating authority of the home Member State upon expiration of the extended time-limit resulting from the application of paragraph 2, the European services e-card shall be deemed to have been issued by the home Member State in the terms communicated to the host Member State in accordance with Article 11(2).
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Upon receipt of the observations of the applicant or, where no observations have been made, upon expiration of the time- limit to present those observations, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall decide, within one week, whether to issue the European services e- card or reject the application for the European services e-card. The declaration of intention of rejection of the application and the decision to reject the application, notified to the holder of the European services e-card through the electronic platform where the standard form for application is made available, shall be fully reasoned, detailing which of the conditions identified in accordance with paragraph 1 have been deemed not complied with by the applicant and the reasons therefore.
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Where the coordinating authority of the host Member State intends to reject the application in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall inform the applicant and the coordinating authority of the home Member State, and state its reasons. The applicant shall have two weeks to submit its observations.
2017/12/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means a service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons(s) initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); i. It is the nature of such a service that it is bidirectional. It does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication mereonly as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 321 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 32
(32) voice communications' means an electronic communications service made available to the public for originating and receiving, directly or indirectly, national or national and international calls through a number or numbers in a national or international telephone numbering plan;
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 459 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 2
2. Member StatesBEREC, in close cooperation with the European Commission, shall define the functional internet access service referred to in paragraph 1 with a view to adequately reflect services used by the majority of end-users in their territorwhich are indispensable to ensure social and economic participation in society. To that end, the functional internet access service shall be capable of supporting the minimum set of services set services set out by BEREC in close cooperation with the European Commission, taking into account in Annex Vnational specifics.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 527 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 92 a (new)
Article 92a 1. By [3 months after adoption of this directive], the European Commission jointly with BEREC shall initiate a review of the market of intra-Union communications services terminating in another Member State with a view to assessing measures necessary to eliminate market distortion that leads to abusive pricing. The Commission shall review, inter alia, the degree of competition in intra-Union fixed communications services markets, and in particular shall assess available tariffs for the consumer. This encompasses available tariffs in the scope of voice only contracts, voice services bundled into larger service contracts and available tariffs over the internet access services and OTT's. In assessing measures necessary to enable possible measures to protect consumers, the Commission and BEREC shall take into account the need to ensure that the providers of intra-EU calls are able to recover all costs of providing intra-EU calls, including joint and common costs. 2. By [6 months after start of the assessment], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the findings of the review referred to in paragraph 1. If decided to be necessary, that report shall be accompanied by an appropriate legislative proposal preceded by a public consultation, to address the intra-EU call tariffs or to provide for another solution to address the issues identified.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 555 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) as part of the information on priceremuneration:
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 559 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) tariff information regarding any numbers or services subject to particular pricing conditions; with respect to individual categories of services, NRAs may require such information to be provided immediately prior to connecting the callIn case of remuneration other than money an information on the kind of remuneration, notwithstanding Regulation (EU) 2016/679 in case of personal data as remuneration,
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 592 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 96 – paragraph 1
1. National regulatory authorities shall ensure that the information referred to in Annex VIIIrticle 95 is published in a clear, comprehensive and easily accessible form by the undertakings providing publicly available electronic communications services other than number-independentinternet access services and interpersonal communications services, or by the national regulatory authority itself. National regulatory authorities may specify additional requirements regarding the form in which such information is to be published.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 613 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 97 – paragraph 1
1. National regulatory authorities may require providers of internet access services and of publicly available number- based interpersonal communications services to publish comprehensive, comparable, reliable, user-friendly and up- to-date information for end-users on the quality of their services and on measures taken to ensure equivalence in access for disabled end-users. That information shall, on request, be supplied to the national regulatory authority in advance of its publication. Measures of providers of publicly available interpersonal communications services to ensure quality of service shall respect net neutrality and shall be taken on a best effort basis.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 660 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 100 – paragraph 2
2. Any subscription to additional services or goods provided or distributed by the same provider of publicly available electronic communications services other than number-independent interpersonal communications services shall not re-start the contract period of the initial contract period unless the additional services or goods are offered at a special promotional price available only on the condition that the existing contract period is re-startedconsumer and provider have explicitly and legally agreed to it.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 669 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 102 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that all end-users of the service referred to in paragraph 2, including users of public pay telephones, are able to access the emergency services and of private electronic communication networks, are able to access the emergency services, or, where applicable, the internal emergency services, through emergency communications free of charge and without having to use any means of payment, by using the single European emergency number '112' and any national emergency number specified by Member States.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 675 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 102 – paragraph 2
2. Member States, in consultation with national regulatory authorities and, emergency services and providers of electronic communications services, shall ensure that undertakings providing end- users with number-based interpersonal communications service for originating communications to a number in a national telephone numbering plan provide access to emergency services through emergency communications to the most appropriate PSAP. In case of an appreciable threat to effective access to emergency services the oblig to the extent such emergency communications can reasonably be provided using location infor undertakings may be extended to all interpersonal communications services in accordance with the conditions and procedure set out in Article 59 (1) (c)mation that is available to number- based interpersonal communications service providers and in a manner that is consistent with the Member State's existing emergency calling infrastructure.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 702 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 102 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that caller location information is available to the PSAP without delay after the emergency communication is set up. This shall include both network-based location information and if available, handset- derived caller location information. Member States shall ensure that the establishment and the transmission of the caller location information are free of charge for the end-user and to the authority handling the emergency communication with regard to all emergency communications to the single European emergency number '112'. Member States may extend that obligation to cover emergency communications to national emergency numbers. Competent regulatory authorities shall lay down criteria for the accuracy and reliability of the caller location information provided.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 719 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 102 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The Commission shall maintain a database of E.164 numbers of European emergency services to ensure that they are able to contact each other from one Member State to another.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 723 #

2016/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 102 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Member States shall ensure, through the use of electronic communications networks, the establishment of an efficient 'Reverse- 112' communication system for warning and alerting citizens, in case of imminent or developing natural and/or man-made major emergencies and disasters, taking into account existing national and regional systems and without hindering privacy.
2017/05/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders and create a framework wherein the exploitation of works and other protected subject-matter can take place. This harmonised legal framework contributes to the good functioning of the truly integrated internal market; it stimulates innovation, creativity, investment and production of new content, also in the digital environment. The protection provided by this legal framework also contributes to the Union's objective of respecting and promoting cultural diversity while at the same time bringing the European common cultural heritage to the fore. Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires the Union to take cultural aspects into account in its action.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 79 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) In the fields of research, innovation, education and preservation of cultural heritage, digital technologies permit new types of uses that are not clearly covered by the current Union rules on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the optional nature of exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively impacts the functioning of the internal market. This is particularly relevant as regards cross- border uses, which are becoming increasingly important in the digital environment. Therefore, the existing exceptions and limitations in Union law that are relevant for scientific research, innovation, teaching and preservation of cultural heritage should be reassessed in the light of those new uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for uses of text and data mining technologies in the field of scientific research and innovation, illustration for teaching in the digital environment and for preservation of cultural heritage should be introduced. For uses not covered by the exceptions or the limitation provided for in this Directive, the exceptions and limitations existing in Union law should continue to apply. Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be adapted.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 79 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders and create a framework wherein the exploitation of works and other protected subject-matter can take place. This harmonised legal framework contributes to the good functioning of the truly integrated internal market; it stimulates innovation, creativity, investment and production of new content, also in the digital environment. The protection provided by this legal framework also contributes to the Union's objective of respecting and promoting cultural diversity while at the same time bringing the European common cultural heritage to the fore. Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires the Union to take cultural aspects into account in its action.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 92 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large amounts of digitally stored information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. In certain instances, text and data mining may involve acts protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database right, notably the reproduction of works or other subject- matter and/or the extraction of contents from a database. Where there is no exception or limitation which applies, an authorisation to undertake such acts would be required from rightholders. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) In the fields of research, innovation, education and preservation of cultural heritage, digital technologies permit new types of uses that are not clearly covered by the current Union rules on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the optional nature of exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively impacts the functioning of the internal market. This is particularly relevant as regards cross- border uses, which are becoming increasingly important in the digital environment. Therefore, the existing exceptions and limitations in Union law that are relevant for scientific research, teaching and preservation of cultural heritage should be reassessed in the light of those new uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for uses of text and data mining technologies in the field of scientific research and innovation, illustration for teaching in the digital environment and for preservation of cultural heritage should be introduced. For uses not covered by the exceptions or the limitation provided for in this Directive, the exceptions and limitations existing in Union law should continue to apply. Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be adapted.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 102 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships. The new exceptions should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large amounts of digitally stored information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst tText and data mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, and there is a widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit not only the research community but also start ups and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. In certain instances, text and data mining may involve acts protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database right, notably the reproduction of works or other subject- matter and/or the extraction of contents from a database. This is where research organisations such as universities and research institutes as well as businesses that use text and data mining as their main tool are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. Where there is no exception or limitation which applies, an authorisation to undertake such acts would be required from rightholders. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 124 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where researchers havethere is lawful access to content, for example through subscriptions to publications or open access licences, the terms of the licences may exclude text and data mining. As research is increasingly carried out with the assistance of digital technology, there is a risk that the Union's competitive position as a research area will suffer unless steps are taken to address the legal uncertainty for text and data mining. In terms of digital economy and its growth, it is important to recognise the positive impact that text and mining has on innovation and how it can foster further development of digital economy in the Union by providing for an exception for reproductions and extractions of information to be submitted to text and data mining when there is acquired lawful access.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 127 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) While distance learning and cross- border education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in primary, secondary, vocational and higher education, also including libraries which provide non- formal learning activities for a wide range of citizens across the Union every year to the extent when they pursue their educational activity for a non-commercial purpose. The organisational structure and the means of funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non-commercial nature of the activity.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) The exception or limitation should cover digitall uses of works and other subject- matter, digital or otherwise, such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use of the works or other subject- matter under the exception or limitation should be only in the context of teaching and learning activities carried out under the responsibility of educational establishments, libraries that provide non- formal learning activities, including during examinations, and be limited to what is necessary for the purpose of such activities. The exception or limitation should cover both uses through digital means in the classroom or learning area and online uses through the educational establishment's secure electronic network, the access to which should be protected, notably by authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 143 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) An act of preservation may require a reproduction of a work or other subject- matter in the collection of a cultural heritage institution and consequently the authorisation of the relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage institutions are engaged in the preservation of their collections for future generations. Digital technologies offer new ways to preserve the heritage contained in those collections but they also may create new challenges. In view of thespossible new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the current legal framework by providing a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction in order to allow those acts of preservation.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions and educational establishments to reproduce works and other subject-matter, digitally or otherwise, permanently in their collections for preservation purposes, for example to address technological obsolescence or the degradation of original supports. Such an exception should allow for the making of copies in any format by the appropriate preservation tool, means or technology, in the required number and at any point in the life of a work or other subject-matter to the extent required in order to produce a copy for preservation purposes only.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships. The new exception should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 150 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) For the purposes of this Directive, works and other subject-matter should be considered to be permanently in the collection of a cultural heritage institution or educational establishment when copies are owned or permanently held by the cultural heritage institution, for example as a result of a transfer of ownership or licence agreements.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit from a clear framework for the digitisation and dissemination, including across borders, of out-of-commerce works or other subject-matter. However, the particular characteristics of the collections of out-of-commerce works mean that obtaining the prior consent of the individual rightholders may be very difficult. This can be due, for example, to the age of the works or other subject- matter, their limited commercial value or the fact that they were never intended for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to provide for measures to facilitate the licensing of rights inonline availability of out-of-commerce works that are in the collections of cultural heritage institutions and thereby to allow the conclusion of agreements with cross- border effect in the internal market.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 182 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) While distance learning and cross- border education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in primary, secondary, vocational and higher education, also including libraries which provide non- formal learning activities for a wide range of citizens across the Union every year to the extent they pursue their educational activity for a non-commercial purpose. The organisational structure and the means of funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non-commercial nature of the activity.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 192 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the publica computation referencing or indexing system such as hyperlinking.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) The exception or limitation should cover digitall uses of works and other subject- matter, digital or otherwise, such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use of the works or other subject- matter under the exception or limitation should be only in the context of teaching and learning activities carried out under the responsibility of educational establishments as well as libraries that provide non-formal learning activities, including during examinations, and be limited to what is necessary for the purpose of such activities. The exception or limitation should cover both uses through digital means in the classroom or learning area and online uses through the educational establishment's secure electronic network, the access to which should be protected, notably by authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 198 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) An act of preservation may require a reproduction of a work or other subject- matter in the collection of a cultural heritage institution and consequently the authorisation of the relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage institutions are engaged in the preservation of their collections for future generations. Digital technologies offer new ways to preserve the heritage contained in those collections but they could also create new challenges. In view of thespossible new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the current legal framework by providing a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction in order to allow those acts of preservation.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 215 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) OEspecially over the last years, the functioning of the online content marketplace has gained in complexity. Oonline services providing access to copyright protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders have flourished and have become mainimportant sources of easy access to content online. This affects rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their work and other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it, but also causing challenges when copyright protected content is uploaded without prior authorization from right holders.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 224 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions and educational establishments to reproduce works and other subject-matter, digitally or otherwise, permanently in their collections for preservation purposes, for example to address technological obsolescence or the degradation of original supports. Such an exception should allow for the making of copies in any format by the appropriate preservation tool, means or technology, in the required number and at any point in the life of a work or other subject-matter to the extent required in order to produce a copy for preservation purposes only.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 243 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 1
Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged toy should conclude licensing agreements with rightholders in order to ensure fair remuneration, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . _________________ 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 247 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 2
In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 249 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit from a clear framework for the digitisation and dissemination, including across borders, of out-of-commerce works or other subject-matter. However, the particular characteristics of the collections of out-of-commerce works mean that obtaining the prior consent of the individual rightholders may be very difficult. This can be due, for example, to the age of the works or other subject- matter, their limited commercial value or the fact that they were never intended for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to provide for measures to facilitate the licensing of rights inonline availability out-of-commerce works that are in the collections of cultural heritage institutions and thereby to allow the conclusion of agreements with cross- border effect in the internal market.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 260 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 3
In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users should take appropriatreasonable and approportionriate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject-matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 265 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 a (new)
(38 a) For the implementation of such measures, rightholders should provide service providers with accurately identified works or subject matter over which they consider to have rights in copyright. Rightholders retain responsibility for claims made by third parties over the use of works which they would have identified as being their own in the implementation of any agreement reached with the service provider.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 274 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the funcimplementationing of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such casesreasonable and appropriate measures. Therefore, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content to which they have rights in copyright and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholdersand provide them with information on the type of technologimeasures used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 285 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the economic value of their rights which are harmonised under Union law. This is especially the case where such rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. As authors and performers tend to bare in a weaker contractual position when they grant licences or transfer their rights, they need information to assess the continued economic value of their rights, compared to the remuneration received for their licence or transfer, but they often face a lack of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of adequate information by their contractual counterparts or their successors in title is important for the transparency and balance in the system that governs the remuneration of authors and performers.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 295 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
(42) CertainMost contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long durationfor the entire duration of copyright, offering fewno possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there should be a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the relevant revenues and the benefits derived from the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the performance, including in light of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The assessment of the situation should take account of the specific circumstances of each case as well as of the specificities and practices of the different content sectorsCollective bargaining should be considered as an option to reach an agreement. Where the parties do not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, the author or performer should be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent authority.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 300 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Authors and performers are often reluctantunable to enforce their rights against their contractual partners before a court or tribunal. Member States should therefore provide for an alternative dispute resolution procedure that addresses claims related to obligations of transparency and the contract adjustment mechanism. The dispute settlement resolution can also be agreed upon in collective agreements.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the publica computation referencing or indexing system such as hyperlinking.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 326 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have acquired lawful access for the purposes of scientific research.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 329 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 348 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research, to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 352 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or a cultural heritage institution or through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or, students and teaching staff, teaching staff or registered members of the cultural heritage institution who are enrolled into the non- formal education activities provided by a cultural heritage institution;
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 365 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States availing themselves of the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments and cultural heritage institutions.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) OEspecially over the last years, the functioning of the online content marketplace has gained in complexity. Online services providing access to copyright protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders have flourished and have become mainimportant sources of easy access to content online. This affects rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their work and other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it, also causing challenges when copyright protected content is uploaded without prior authorization from rightholders.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 371 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States mayshall provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 395 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 1
Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged toy should conclude licensing agreements with rightholders in order to ensure fair remuneration, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . _________________ 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 403 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 2
In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 421 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 3
In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject-matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 428 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 – paragraph 3 a (new)
For the implementation of such measures, rightholders should provide service providers with accurately identified works or subject matter over which they consider to have rights in copyright. Rigtholders retain responsibility for claims made by third parties over the use of works which they would have identified as being their own in the implementation of any agreement reached with the service provider.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 430 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/ECa presumption of representation of authors of literary works contained in publications and the legal possibility to sue in their own name when defending the rights of such author for the digital use of their press publications.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 437 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 439 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 443 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the funcimplementationing of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such casesreasonable and appropriate measures. Therefore, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content to which they have rights in copyright and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreemand provide them with information on the measures, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 463 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the economic value of their rights which are harmonised under Union law. This is especially the case where such rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. As authors and performers tend to bare in a weaker contractual position when they grant licences or transfer their rights, they need information to assess the continued economic value of their rights, compared to the remuneration received for their licence or transfer, but they often face a lack of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of adequate information by their contractual counterparts or their successors in title is important for the transparency and balance in the system that governs the remuneration of authors and performers.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 468 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Information society service providers that store and provide access to the public access to large amounts ofto copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take reasonable and appropriate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant,. Those measures may take into account various available technological developments that would be appropriate for the nature of services of information society service provider. The service providers shall cooperate with rightholders and provide them with adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 479 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
(42) CertainMost contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long durationfor the entire duration of copyright, offering fewno possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there should be a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the relevant revenues and the benefits derived from the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the performance, including in light of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The assessment of the situation should take account of the specific circumstances of each cCollective bargaining should be considered ase as well as of the specificities and practices of the different content sectorsn option to reach an agreement. Where the parties do not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, the author or performer should be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent authority.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 481 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Authors and performers are often reluctantunable to enforce their rights against their contractual partners before a court or tribunal. Member States should therefore provide for an alternative dispute resolution procedure that addresses claims related to obligations of transparency and the contract adjustment mechanism. The dispute settlement resolution could also be agreed upon in collective agreements.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 485 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. For this purpose, rightholders shall provide service providers with accurately identified works or subject matter over which they enjoy right.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 491 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure and provide measures that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 502 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropri of measures thate andre proportionate content recognition technologiesand effective to ensure the protection of rightholders' works and or other subject-matter, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 523 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate, accurate and sufficient information on the exploitation of their works and performances from those to whom they have licensed or transferred their rights on a revenue share basis, notably as regards modes of exploitation, modes of promotion, revenues generated and remuneration due.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 529 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an appropriate levelensure a high degree of transparency in every sector. However, in those cases where the administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States mayshall adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, under the condition that the level of disproportionality is duly justified, provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 536 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may decide that tThe obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance or when reporting obligations have been agreed by parties, for instance through collective bargaining agreements which are reflected in terms of the contract or performed or which are otherwise applicable.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 539 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraph 1 shall not be applicable to entities subject to the transparency obligations established by Directive 2014/26/EU.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 542 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they havea lawful access is acquired for the sole purposes of scientific researchtext and data mining.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 551 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is widely disproportionately low compared to the unanticipated subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 555 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance, or when a revenue or profit share has been agreed by the parties.
2017/04/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 579 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research, to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 587 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or a cultural heritage institution through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff or registered members of a cultural heritage institution who are enrolled into the non-formal education activities provided by a cultural heritage institution;
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 618 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States availing themselves of the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments and cultural heritage institutions.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 632 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States mayshall provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 749 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/ECa presumption of representation of authors of literary works contained in publications and the legal possibility to sue in their own name when defending the rights of such author for the digital use of their press publications.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 771 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 778 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 822 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Information society service providers that store and provide access to the public access to large amounts ofto copyright-protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take reasonable and appropriate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant,. Those measures may take into account various available technological developments that would be appropriate for the nature of services of the information society provider. The service providers shall cooperate with rightholders and provide them with adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 834 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. For this purpose, rightholders shall provide service providers with accurately identified works or subject matter over which they enjoy rights.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 844 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure and provide measures that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 861 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologiesof measures that are proportionate and effective to ensure the protection of rightholders' works or other subject matter, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 884 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and no less than once a year and taking into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate, accurate and sufficient information on the exploitation of their works and performances from those to whom they have licensed or transferred their rights or their successors in title, notably as regards modes of exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 906 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an appropriate levelensure a high degree of transparency in every sector. However, in those cases where the administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States may adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, under the condition that the level of disproportionality is duly justified, provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 915 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may decide that tThe obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance or when reporting obligations have been agreed by parties, for instance through collective bargaining agreements which are reflected in terms of the contract.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 934 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional,an appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of theor the exploitation of their works or performances.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 950 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers or their representative organisations are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when originally agreed remuneration is disproportionately low in comparison to the unexpected success and therefore net revenues derived from the exploitation of their works or performances.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 970 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Proceedings in respect of a dispute may be also brought on behalf of authors and performers by their representative organisations.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 24 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In order to realise the objective of ensuring good functioning of the internal market, as an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of inter alia goods and services is ensured, it is not sufficient to abolish, as between Member States, only State barriers. Such abolition can be undermined by private parties putting in place obstacles inconsistent with internal market freedoms. That occurs where traders operating in one Member State block or limit the access to their online interfaces, such as websites and apps, of custoonsumers from other Member States wishing to engage in cross-border commercial transactions (a practice known as geo-blocking). It also occurs through other actions by certain traders involving the application of different general conditions of access to their goods and services with respect to such custoonsumers from other Member States, both online and offline. Whereas there may sometimes be objective justifications for such differential treatment, in other cases traders deny consumers wishing to engage in cross- border commercial transactions access to goods or services, or apply different conditions in this regard, for purely commercial reasons. This practice undermines the core purpose of the internal market, lowers consumers options and the level of competition.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 29 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In this manner certain traders artificially segment the internal market along internal frontiers and hamper the free movement of goods and services, thus restricting the rights of custoonsumers and preventing them from benefitting from a wider choice and optimal conditions. Such discriminatory practices are an important factor contributing to the relatively low level of cross-border commercial transactions within the Union, including in the sector of electronic commerce, which prevents the full growth potential of the internal market from being realiseda truly integrated internal market and its fostering. Clarifying in which situations there can be no justification for differential treatment of this kind should bring clarity and legal certainty for all participants in cross-border transactions and should ensure that rules on non-discrimination can be effectively applied and enforced across the internal market.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 31 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Pursuant to Article 20 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council17 , Member States are to ensure that service providers established in the Union do not treat recipients of services differently on the basis of their nationality or place of residence. However, that provision has not been fully effective in combatting discrimination and it has not sufficiently reduced legal uncertainty, particularly because of the possibility to justify the differences in treatment for which it allows and the corresponding difficulties in enforcing it in practice. Moreover, geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment can also arise as a consequence of actions by traders established in third countries, which fall outside the scope of that Directive, but which need to be tackled. _________________ 17 Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 42 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation aims at preventing discrimination based on custoonsumers' nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment, including geo-blocking, in cross-border commercial transactions between traders and custoonsumers relating to the sales of goods and the provision of services within the Union. It seeks to address direct as well as indirect discrimination, thus also covering unjustified differences of treatment on the basis of other distinguishing criteria which lead to the same result as the application of criteria directly based on custoonsumers' nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment. Such other criteria can be applied, in particular, on the basis of information indicating the physical location of custoonsumers, such as the IP address used when accessing an online interface, the address submitted for the delivery of goods, the choice language made or the Member State where the custoonsumer's payment instrument has been issued.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 49 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Considering that some regulatory and administrative barriers for traders have been removed across the Union in certain services sectors as a result of the implementation of Directive 2006/123/EC, in terms of material scope, consistency should be ensured between this Regulation and Directive 2006/123/EC. As a consequence, the provisions of this Regulation should apply inter alia to non- audio-visual copyright-protected works when a copyrighted content is blocked for reasons that are not copyright and electronically supplied services, the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, subject however to the specific exclusion provided for in Article 4 and the subsequent evaluation of that exclusion as provided for in Article 9. Audio-visual services, including services the main feature of which is the provision of access to broadcasts of sports events and which are provided on the basis of exclusive territorial licenses, are excluded from the scope of this Regulation. Access to retail financial services, including payment services, should therefore also be excluded. However, the Commission should nevertheless review possibilities to include them in the scope of the Regulation, notwithstanding the provisions of this Regulation regarding non-discrimination in payments.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 53 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Discrimination can also occurs in relation to services in the field of transport, in particular with respect to the sales of tickets for the transport of passengers. However, in that regard R, even though regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 , Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 and Regulation (EU) No 181/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council20 already contain broad prohibitions of discriminations covering all discriminatory practices that the present Regulation seeks to address. Furthermore, it is intended that Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council21 will be amended to that effect in near future. Therefore, and in order to ensure consistency with the scope of application of Directive 2006/123/EC, services in the field of transport should remain outside the scope of this Regulationservices in the field of transport should either, after review of this Regulation, be included in the scope of this Regulation, or prohibition of discriminations covering all discriminatory practices should be effectively enforced through specific Union legislation in that area. _________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3). 19 Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 concerning the rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 1). 20 Regulation (EU) No 181/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the rights of passengers in bus and coach transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 1). 21 Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 14).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 56 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) This Regulation should also cover the sale of bundled services. However, a trader should be under no obligation to sell the bundled services if he or she doesn't have a legal right to provide part of one or several services that are included in that bundle.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 60 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) PursuantThis Regulation should be without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 , the choice of law applicable to contracts between a consumer and a professional who pursues his or her commercial or professional activities in the. In cases where a trader actively directs or declares his or her activities to a country or to several countryies where the consumer has his or her habitual residence or, by any means, directs such activities to that, the choice of law applicable to country or to several countries including that country,acts between a consumer and a trader may not have the result of depriving the consumer of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement by virtue of the law of the country where the consumer has his or her habitual residence. Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 , in matters related to a contract between a consumer and a professional who pursues commercial or professional activities in the Member State of the consumer's domicile or, by any means, directs such activities to that Member State or to several States including that Member State, a consumer may bring proceedings against the other party in the courts of the Member State where he is domiciled and proceedings may be brought against the consumer only in those courts. _________________ 22 Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6). 23 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 63 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) This Regulation should not affect acts ofbe without prejudice to Union law concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters, notably the provisions on the law applicable to contractual obligations and on jurisdiction set out in Regulations (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , including the application of those acts and provisions in individual cases. In particular, the mere fact that a trader actprovides access to his or her online interface for consumers from other Member States in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation should not be construed as implying that he directs his activities to the consumer's Member State for the purpose of such application. _________________ 24 Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6). 25 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The discriminatory practices that this Regulation seeks to address typically take place through general terms, conditions and other information set and applied by or on behalf of the trader concerned, as a precondition for obtaining access to the goods or services in question, and that are made available to the public at large. Such general conditions of access include inter alia prices, payment conditions and delivery conditions. They can be made available to the public at large by or on behalf of the trader through various means, such as information published in advertisements, on websites or pre-contractual or contractual documentation. Such conditions apply in the absence of an individually negotiated agreement to the contrary entered into directly between the trader and the custoonsumer. Terms and conditions that are individually negotiated between the trader and the custoonsumers should not be considered general conditions of access for the purposes of this Regulation.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 73 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Both consumers and undertakings should be safeguarded from discrimination for reasons related to their nationality, place of residence or place of establishment when acting as customers for the purposes of this Regulation. However, that protection should not extend to customers purchasing a good or a service for resale, because it would affect widely used distribution schemes between undertakings in a business to business context, such as selective and exclusive distribution, which generally allow for manufacturers to select their retailers, subject to compliance with the rules on competition.deleted
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 79 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The effects for custoonsumers and on the internal market of discriminatory treatment in connection to commercial transactions relating to the sales of goods or the provision of services within the Union are the same, regardless of whether a trader is established in a Member State or in a third country. Therefore, and with a view to ensuring that competing traders are subject to the same requirements in this regard, the measures set out in this Regulation should apply equally to all traders operating within the Union.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 80 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) In order to increase the possibility for custoonsumers to access information related to the sales of goods and the provision of services on the internal market and to increase transparency, including with respect to prices, traders should not, through the use of technological measures or otherwise, prevent custoonsumers from having full and equal access to online interfaces on the basis of their nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment. Such technological measure. Access to online interfaces in the form of a mobile application should not be blocked in any possible way for consumers if they prefer to access their chosen online interface through such means and a trader offers such an option in a Member State. Technological measures that prevent such access can encompass, in particular, any technologies used to determine the physical location of the custoonsumer, including the tracking of that by means of IP address, coordinates obtained through a global navigation satellite system or data related to a payment transaction. However, that prohibition of discrimination with respect to access to online interfaces should not be understood as creating an obligation for the trader to engage in commercial transactions with custoonsumers.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 85 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In order to realise the objective of ensuring good functioning of the internal market, as an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of inter alia goods and services is ensured, it is not sufficient to abolish, as between Member States, only State barriers. Such abolition can be undermined by private parties putting in place obstacles inconsistent with internal market freedoms. That occurs where traders operating in one Member State block or limit the access to their online interfaces, such as websites and apps, of custoonsumers from other Member States wishing to engage in cross-border commercial transactions (a practice known as geo-blocking). It also occurs through other actions by certain traders involving the application of different general conditions of access to their goods and services with respect to such custoonsumers from other Member States, both online and offline. Whereas there may sometimes be objective justifications for such differential treatment, in other cases traders deny consumers wishing to engage in cross- border commercial transactions access to goods or services, or apply different conditions in this regard, for purely commercial reasons. This practice undermines the core purpose of the internal market, lowers consumers' options and the level of competition.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Certain traders operate different versions of their online interfaces, targeting custoonsumers from different Member States. While this should remain possible, redirecting a custoonsumer from one version of the online interface to another version without his or her explicit consent should be prohibited. All versions of the online interface should remain easily accessible to the custoonsumer at all times.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 87 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In certain cases, blocking, limiting of access or redirection without the custoonsumer's consent to an alternative version of an online interface for reasons related to the custoonsumer's nationality, or place or residence or place of establishment might becould be justified only if it is necessary in order to ensure compliance with a legal requirement in Union law or in the laws of a Member States in accordance with Union law. Such laws canmight limit custoonsumers' access to certain goods or services, for instance by prohibiting the display of specific content in a certain Member States. Traders should not be prevented from complying with such requirements and thus should be able to block, or limit the access or redirect certain custoonsumers or custoonsumers in certain territories to an online interface, insofar as that ismay be necessary for that reason. In this regard, a consumer should be notified on an online interface about the purpose of blocking, limiting or redirection to an alternative version of an online interface.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 91 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In this manner certain traders artificially segment the internal market along internal frontiers and hamper the free movement of goods and services, thus restricting the rights of custoonsumers and preventing them from benefitting from a wider choice and optimal conditions. Such discriminatory practices are an important factor contributing to the relatively low level of cross-border commercial transactions within the Union, including in the sector of electronic commerce, which prevents the full growth potential of the internal market from being realiseda truly integrated internal market and its fostering. Clarifying in which situations there can be no justification for differential treatment of this kind should bring clarity and legal certainty for all participants in cross-border transactions and should ensure that rules on non-discrimination can be effectively applied and enforced across the internal market.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In a number of specific situations, any differences in the treatment of custoonsumers through the application of general conditions of access, including outright refusals to sell goods, accept certain financial transactions that are officially stated by a trader or to provide services, for reasons related to the custoonsumers' nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment cannot be objectively justified. In those situations, all such discrimination should be prohibited and custoonsumers should consequently be entitled, under the specific conditions laid down in this Regulation, to engage in commercial transactions under the same conditions as a local custoonsumer and have full and equal access to any of the different goods or services offered irrespective of their nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment. Where necessary, traders should therefore take measures to ensure compliance with that prohibition of discrimination if otherwise the custoonsumers concerned would be precluded from having such full and equal access. However, the prohibition applicable in those situations should not be understood as precluding traders from directing their activities at different Member States or certain groups of customers with targeted offers and differing terms and conditions, including through the setting-up of country-specific online interfaces.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 95 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Pursuant to Article 20 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council17 , Member States are to ensure that service providers established in the Union do not treat recipients of services differently on the basis of their nationality or place of residence. However, that provision has not been fully effective in combatting discrimination and it has not sufficiently reduced legal uncertainty, particularly because of the possibility to justify the differences in treatment for which it allows and the corresponding difficulties in enforcing it in practice. Moreover, geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment can also arise as a consequence of actions by traders established in third countries, which fall outside the scope of that Directive. that are necessary to tackle. __________________ 17 Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The first of those situations is where the trader sells goods and there is no cross-border delivery of those goods by or on behalf of the trader to the Member State where the custoonsumer resides. In that situation the custoonsumer should be able to purchase goods, under exactly the same conditions, including price and conditions relating to the delivery of the goods, as similar custoonsumers who are residents of the Member State of the trader. That may mean that a foreign custoonsumer will have to pick up the good in that Member State, or in a different Member State to which the trader delivers. In this situation, the trader has no obligation to cover any additional costs of the cross- border delivery. Furthermore, there is no need to register for value added tax ("VAT") in the Member State of the custoonsumer, nor arrange for the cross-border delivery of goods.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation aims at preventing discrimination based on custoonsumers' nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment, including geo-blocking, in cross-border commercial transactions between traders and customers relating to the sales of goods and the provision of services within the Union. It seeks to address direct as well as indirect discrimination, thus also covering unjustified differences of treatment on the basis of other distinguishing criteria which lead to the same result as the application of criteria directly based on custoonsumers' nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment. Such other criteria can be applied, in particular, on the basis of information indicating the physical location of custoonsumers, such as the IP address used when accessing an online interface, the address submitted for the delivery of goods, the choice language made or the Member State where the custoonsumer's payment instrument has been issued.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Finally, in the situation where the trader provides services and those services are received by the custoonsumer in the premises of or at a location chosen by the trader and different from the Member State of which the custoonsumer is a national or in which the custoonsumer has his or her place of residence or place of establishment, the application of different general conditions of access for reasons related to such criteria should not be justified either. Those situations concern, as the case may be, the provision of services such as hotel accommodation, sport events, car rental, and entry tickets to music festivals or leisure parks. In those situations, the trader does not have to register for VAT in another Member State nor arrange for cross-border delivery of goods.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 106 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In all those situations, by virtue of the provisions on the law applicable to contractual obligations and on jurisdiction set out in Regulations (EC) No 593/2008 and (EU) 1215/2012, where a trader does not pursue his activities in the Member State of the consumer or does not direct his activities there, or where the customer is not a consumer, compliance with this Regulation does not imply any additional costs for the trader associated with jurisdiction or differences in applicable law. Where, in contrast, a trader does pursue his activities in the consumer's Member State or does direct his activities there, the trader has manifested its intention to establish commercial relations with consumers from that Member State and thus been able to take account of any such costs.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 108 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Traders falling under the special scheme provided in Chapter 1 of Title XII of Council Directive 2006/112/EC27 are not required to pay VAT. For those traders, when providing electronically supplied services, the prohibition of applying different general conditions of access for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer would imply a requirement to register in order to account for VAT of other Member States and might entail additional costs, which would be a disproportionate burden, considering the size and characteristics of the traders concerned. Therefore, those traders should be exempted from that prohibition for such time as such a scheme is applicable. _________________ 27 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1–118)
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 112 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In all those situations, traders may in some cases be prevented from selling goods or providing services to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, as a consequence of a specific prohibition or a requirement laid down in Union law or in the laws of Member States in accordance with Union law. Laws of Member States may also require, in accordance with Union law, traders to respect certain rules on the pricing of books. Traders should not be prevented from complying with such laws in as far as necessary.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 113 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Under Union law, traders are in principle free to decide which means of payment they wish to accept, including payment brands. However, once this choice . In accordance with the rules of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 and Directive (EU) 2015/2366, retailers accepting a card-based payment instrument of a specific brand and category are not under an obligation to accept card-based payment instruments of the same category but of a different brand. Likewise retailers accepting a debit card of a given brand are under no obligation to accept credit card of thast been made, in view of the existing legal framrand, or when accepting consumer credit cards of a given brand also to accept commercial credit card of the same brand. Equally, a trader accepting credit transfers or direct debits is under no obligation to accept the payment, if this requires entering into a new ork for payment services modified contract with a payment service provider. However, once this choice has been made, there are no reasons for traders to discriminate custoonsumers within the Union by refusing certain commercial transactions, or by otherwise applying certain different conditions of payment in respect of those transactions, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the customer. In this particular context, such unjustified unequal treatment for reasons related to the location of the payment account, the place of establishment of the payment service provider or the place of issue of the payment instrument within the Union should be expressly prohibited as well. It should be further recalled that Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 already prohibits all payees, including traders, from requiring bank accounts to be located in a certain Member State for a payment in euro to be accepted. The trader should remain free to request charges for the use of a payment instrument. However, this right is subject to the restrictions introduced by Article 62(5) of the Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 115 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Considering that some regulatory and administrative barriers for traders have been removed across the Union in certain services sectors as a result of the implementation of Directive 2006/123/EC, in terms of material scope, consistency should be ensured between this Regulation and Directive 2006/123/EC. As a consequence, the provisions of this Regulation should apply inter alia to non- audio-visual copyright-protected works when a copyrighted content is blocked for reasons that are not copyright and electronically supplied services, the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, subject however to the specific exclusion provided for in Article 4 and the subsequent evaluation of that exclusion as provided for in Article 9. Audio-visual services, including services the main feature of which is the provision of access to broadcasts of sports events and which are provided on the basis of exclusive territorial licenses, are excluded from the scope of this Regulation. Access to retail financial services, including payment services, should therefore also be excluded, nevertheless the Commission should review possibilities to include it in the scope of the Regulation, notwithstanding the provisions of this Regulation regarding non-discrimination in payments.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Directive 2015/2366/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council28 introduced strict security requirements for the initiation and processing of electronic payments, which reduced the risk of fraud for all new and more traditional means of payment, especially online payments. Payment service providers are obliged to apply so-called strong custoonsumer authentication, an authentication process that validates the identity of the user of a payment service or of the payment transaction. For remote transactions, such as online payments, the security requirements go even further, requiring a dynamic link to the amount of the transaction and the account of the payee, to further protect the user by minimising the risks in case of mistakes or fraudulent attacks. As a result of these provisions, the risk of payment fraud in national and cross- border purchases is brought to an equal level and should not be used as an argument to refuse or discriminate any commercial transactions within the Union. _________________ 28 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35– 127).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 119 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) This Regulation should not affect the application of the rules on competition, and in particular Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. Agreements imposing on traders obligations not to engage in passive sales within the meaning of Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/201029 to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories are generally considered restrictive of competition and cannot normally be exempted from the prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) TFEU. Even when they are not caught by Article 101 TFEU, in the context of the application of this Regulation, they disrupt the proper functioning of the internal market and they may be used to circumvent the provisions of this Regulation. The relevant provisions of such agreements and of other agreements in respect of passive sales requiring the trader to act in violation of this Regulation should therefore be automatically void. However, this Regulation, and in particular its provisions on access to goods or services, should not affect agreements restricting active sales within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 330/2010. _________________ 29 Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ L 102, 23.4.2010, p. 1).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 121 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Member States should designate one or more bodies responsible forresponsible bodies with necessary powers to takinge effective action to monitor and to secensure compliance with the provision of this Regulation. Member States should also ensure that effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties can be imposed on traders in the event of any breach of this Regulation.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 124 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Discrimination can also occurs in relation to services in the field of transport, in particular with respect to the sales of tickets for the transport of passengers. However, in that regard, despite the fact that Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 , Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 and Regulation (EU) No 181/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council20 already contain broad prohibitions of discriminations covering all discriminatory practices that the present Regulation seeks to address. Furthermore, it is intended that Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council21 will be amended to that effect in near future. Therefore, and in order to ensure consistency with the scope of application of Directive 2006/123/EC, services in the field of transport should remain outside the scope of this Regulationservices in the field of transport should either after review of this Regulation be included in the scope of this Regulation or prohibition of discriminations covering all discriminatory practices should be effectively enforced through the specific Union legislation in that area. __________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3). 19 Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 concerning the rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 1). 20 Regulation (EU) No 181/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the rights of passengers in bus and coach transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 1). 21 Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 14).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Consumers should be in the position to receive assistance from responsible authoritbodies facilitating the resolution of conflicts with traders, arising from the application of this Regulation, including by way of a uniform complaint form.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 125 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) This Regulation should also cover the sale of a bundle of services. However, a trader should be under no obligation to sell the bundle of services if he or she does not have the legal right to provide a part of one or several services that are included in that bundle.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) PursuantThis Regulation should be without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 , the choice of law applicable to contracts between a consumer and a professional who pursues his or her commercial or professional activities in the. In cases where a trader actively directs or declares his or her activities to a country or to several countryies, where the consumer has his or her habitual residence or, by any means, directs such activities to that, the choice of law applicable to country or to several countries including that country,acts between a consumer and a trader may not have the result of depriving the consumer of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement by virtue of the law of the country where the consumer has his or her habitual residence. Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 , in matters related to a contract between a consumer and a professional who pursues commercial or professional activities in the Member State of the consumer's domicile or, by any means, directs such activities to that Member State or to several States including that Member State, a consumer may bring proceedings against the other party in the courts of the Member State where he is domiciled and proceedings may be brought against the consumer only in those courts. __________________ 22 Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6). 23 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) This Regulation should be regularly evaluated, with a view to proposing amendments where necessary. The first evaluation should concentrate, in particular, on the possible extension of the prohibition of Article 4(1)(b) to electronically supplied services, the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, provided that the trader has the requisite rights for the relevant territoriscope of this Regulation to other sectors such as audio-visual services, financial or electronic communication services, transport services or healthcare services.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 133 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) This Regulation should not affect acts ofbe without prejudice to Union law concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters, notably the provisions on the law applicable to contractual obligations and on jurisdiction set out in Regulations (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , including the application of those acts and provisions in individual cases. In particular, the mere fact that a trader provides access to his or her online interface for consumers from other Member States acts in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation should not be construed as implying that he directs his activities to the consumer's Member State for the purpose of such application. __________________ 24 Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6). 25 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) With a view to facilitating the effective enforcement of the rules laid down in this Regulation, the mechanisms to ensure cross-border cooperation among competent authorities provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 should also be available in relation to those rules. However, as Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 only applies with respect to laws that protect consumers' interests, those measures should be available only when the customer is a consumer. Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly. _________________ 30 Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) (OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, p. 1).
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 139 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Traders, public authorities and other interested parties should have sufficient time to adapt to, and ensure compliance with, the provisions of this Regulation. In light of the particular characteristics of electronically supplied services, other than services the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, it is appropriate to apply the prohibition of Article 4(1)(b) only from a later date with respect to the provision of those services.deleted
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The discriminatory practices that this Regulation seeks to address typically take place through general terms, conditions and other information set and applied by or on behalf of the trader concerned, as a precondition for obtaining access to the goods or services in question, and that are made available to the public at large. Such general conditions of access include inter alia prices, payment conditions and delivery conditions. They can be made available to the public at large by or on behalf of the trader through various means, such as information published in advertisements, on websites or pre-contractual or contractual documentation. Such conditions apply in the absence of an individually negotiated agreement to the contrary entered into directly between the trader and the custoonsumer. Terms and conditions that are individually negotiated between the trader and the custoonsumers should not be considered general conditions of access for the purposes of this Regulation.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) In order to achieve the objective of effectively addressing direct and indirect discrimination based on the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of custof consumers, it is appropriate to adopt a Regulation, which directly applies in all Member States. This is necessary in order to guarantee the uniform application of the non- discrimination rules across the Union and their entering into force at the same time. Only a Regulation ensures the degree of clarity, uniformity and legal certainty which is necessary in order to enable custoonsumers to fully benefit from those rules.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 143 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the prevention of direct and indirect discrimination based on nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of custof consumers, including geo- blocking, in commercial transactions with traders within the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States, due to the cross-border nature of the problem and the insufficient clarity of the existing legal framework, but can rather, by reason of its scale and potential effect on trade in the internal market be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 146 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Both consumers and undertakings should be safeguarded from discrimination for reasons related to their nationality, place of residence or place of establishment when acting as customers for the purposes of this Regulation. However, that protection should not extend to customers purchasing a good or a service for resale, because it would affect widely used distribution schemes between undertakings in a business to business context, such as selective and exclusive distribution, which generally allow for manufacturers to select their retailers, subject to compliance with the rules on competition.deleted
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The purpose of this Regulation seekis to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market and achieve a high level of consumer protection by preventing discrimination based, directly or indirectly, on the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of custof consumers.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 154 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where the trader sells goods, provides services, or seeks to do so, in a Member State other than the Member State in which the custoonsumer has the place of residence or the place of establishment;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 155 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) where the trader sells goods, provides services, or seeks to do so, in the same Member State as the one in which the custoonsumer has the place of residence or place of establishment, but the custoonsumer is a national of another Member State;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 156 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The effects for custoonsumers and on the internal market of discriminatory treatment in connection to commercial transactions relating to the sales of goods or the provision of services within the Union are the same, regardless of whether a trader is established in a Member State or in a third country. Therefore, and with a view to ensuring that competing traders are subject to the same requirements in this regard, the measures set out in this Regulation should apply equally to all traders operating within the Union.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) where the trader sells goods or provides services, or seeks to do so, in a Member State in which the custoonsumer is temporarily located without residing in that Member State or having the place of establishment in that Member State.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 157 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) In order to increase the possibility for custoonsumers to access information related to the sales of goods and the provision of services on the internal market and to increase transparency, including with respect to prices, traders should not, through the use of technological measures or otherwise, prevent custoonsumers from having full and equal access to online interfaces on the basis of their nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment. Such technological measure. Access to online interfaces in the form of a mobile application should not be blocked in any possible way to consumers if they prefer to access their chosen online interface through such means and a trader offers such an option in a Member State. Technological measures that prevent such access can encompass, in particular, any technologies used to determine the physical location of the custoonsumer, including the tracking of that by means of IP address, coordinates obtained through a global navigation satellite system or data related to a payment transaction. However, that prohibition of discrimination with respect to access to online interfaces should not be understood as creating an obligation for the trader to engage in commercial transactions with custoonsumers.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. This Regulation shall not affectbe without prejudice to acts of Union law concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters. Compliance with this Regulation shall not be construed as implying that a trader directs his or her activities to the Member State where the consumer has the habitual residence or domicile within the meaning of point (b) of Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 and point (c) of Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012. When a trader is acting in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 5 of this Regulation, it shall not be considered on these grounds alone that he or she is actively directing his or her activities to another Member State where the consumer has a place of residence.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 166 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Certain traders operate different versions of their online interfaces, targeting custoonsumers from different Member States. While this should remain possible, redirecting a custoonsumer from one version of the online interface to another version without his or her explicit consent should be prohibited. All versions of the online interface should remain easily accessible to the custoonsumer at all times.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) 'customer' means a consumer who, or an undertaking which, is a national of a Member State or has his or her place of residence or place of establishment in a Member State, and intends to purchase or purchases a good or a service within the Union, other than for resale;deleted
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 167 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) 'general conditions of access' means all terms, conditions and other information, including sale prices, regulating the access of custoonsumers to goods or services offered for sale by a trader, which are set, applied and made available to the public at large by or on behalf of the trader and which apply in the absence of an individually negotiated agreement between the trader and the custoonsumer;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 168 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) 'goods' means any tangible movable item, with the exception of items sold by way of execution or otherwise by authority of law; water, gas and electricity shall be considered as goods within the meaning of this Regulation where they are put up for sale in a limited volume or a set quantity;.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 170 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In certain cases, blocking, limiting of access or redirection without the custoonsumer's consent to an alternative version of an online interface for reasons related to the custoonsumer's nationality, or place or residence or place of establishment might becould be justified only if it is necessary in order to ensure compliance with a legal requirement in Union law or in the laws of a Member States in accordance with Union law. Such laws canmight limit custoonsumers' access to certain goods or services, for instance by prohibiting the display of specific content in certain Member States. Traders should not be prevented from complying with such requirements and thus should be able to block, limit the access or redirect certain custoonsumers or custoonsumers in certain territories to an online interface, insofar as that ismay be necessary for that reason. In this regard, a consumer should be notified on an online interface about the purpose of blocking, limiting or redirection to an alternative version of an online interface.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 170 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) 'online interface' means any software, including a website and applications, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which serves to give custoonsumers access to the trader's goods or services with a view to engaging in a commercial transaction with respect to those goods or services;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 174 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Traders shall not, through the use of technological measures or otherwise, block or limit custoonsumers' access to their online interface for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 175 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In a number of specific situations, any differences in the treatment of custoonsumers through the application of general conditions of access, including outright refusals to sell goods, accept certain financial transactions that are officially stated by a trader or to provide services, for reasons related to the custoonsumers' nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment cannot be objectively justified. In those situations, all such discrimination should be prohibited and custoonsumers should consequently be entitled, under the specific conditions laid down in this Regulation, to engage in commercial transactions under the same conditions as a local custoonsumer and have full and equal access to any of the different goods or services offered irrespective of their nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment. Where necessary, traders should therefore take measures to ensure compliance with that prohibition of discrimination if otherwise the custoonsumers concerned would be precluded from having such full and equal access. However, the prohibition applicable in those situations should not be understood as precluding traders from directing their activities at different Member States or certain groups of customers with targeted offers and differing terms and conditions, including through the setting-up of country-specific online interfaces.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Traders shall not, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, redirect custoonsumers to a version of their online interface that is different from the online interface which the custoonsumer originally sought to access, by virtue of its layout, use of language or other characteristics that make it specific to custoonsumers with a particular nationality, or place of residence or place establishment, unless the customer gives his or her explicit consent prior to such redirection.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 178 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the event of such redirection with the custoonsumer's explicit consent, the original version of the online interface which the consumer initially sought to access, shall remain easily accessible for that custoonsumer.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 181 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The prohibitions set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply where the blocking, limitation of access or redirection with respect to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories is necessary in order to ensure compliance with a legal requirement in Union law or in the laws of Member States in accordance with Union law.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 182 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Where a trader blocks or limits access of custoonsumers to an online interface or redirects customers to a different version of the online interface in compliance with paragraph 43, the trader shall provide a clear justification and explanation to the consumer. That justification shall be given in the language of the online interface that the customer originally sought to access.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 183 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The first of those situations is where the trader sells goods and there is no cross-border delivery of those goods by or on behalf of the trader to the Member State where the custoonsumer resides. In that situation the custoonsumer should be able to purchase goods, under exactly the same conditions, including price and conditions relating to the delivery of the goods, as similar custoonsumers who are residents of the Member State of the trader. That may mean that a foreign custoonsumer will have to pick up the good in that Member State, or in a different Member State to which the trader delivers. In this situation, the trader has no obligation to cover any additional costs of the cross-border delivery. Furthermore, there is no need to register for value added tax ("VAT") in the Member State of the custoonsumer, nor arrange for the cross-border delivery of goods.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Traders shall not apply different general conditions of access to their goods or services, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, in the following situationswhere:
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 187 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where the trader sells goods and those goods are not delivered cross-border to the Member State of the custoonsumer by the trader or on his or her behalf, but are collected at a location agreed between the trader and the consumer in which the trader operates;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 191 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where the trader provides electronically supplied services, other than services the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 193 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) where the trader provides services, other than those covered by point (b), and those services are supplied to the custoonsumer in the premises of the trader or in a physical location where the trader operates, in a Member State other than that of which the custoonsumer is a national or in which the custoonsumer has the place of residence or the place of establishment.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 194 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Finally, in the situation where the trader provides services and those services are received by the custoonsumer in the premises of or at a location chosen by the trader and different from the Member State of which the custoonsumer is a national or in which the custoonsumer has his or her place of residence or place of establishment, the application of different general conditions of access for reasons related to such criteria should not be justified either. Those situations concern, as the case may be, the provision of services such as hotel accommodation, sport events, car rental, and entry tickets to music festivals or leisure parks. In those situations, the trader does not have to register for VAT in another Member State nor arrange for cross-border delivery of goods.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) the consumer seeks to receive electronically supplied services the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter in respect of which the trader has the requisite rights for the territory from which the consumer seeks to receive such services;
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 200 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In all those situations, by virtue of the provisions on the law applicable to contractual obligations and on jurisdiction set out in Regulations (EC) No 593/2008 and (EU) 1215/2012, where a trader does not pursue his activities in the Member State of the consumer or does not direct his activities there, or where the customer is not a consumer, compliance with this Regulation does not imply any additional costs for the trader associated with jurisdiction or differences in applicable law. Where, in contrast, a trader does pursue his activities in the consumer's Member State or does direct his activities there, the trader has manifested its intention to establish commercial relations with consumers from that Member State and thus been able to take account of any such costs.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The prohibition set out in paragraph 1 shall not apply in so far as a specific provision laid down in Union law or in the laws of Member States in accordance with Union law by preventsing the trader from selling the goods or providing the services to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 201 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
With respect to sales of books, tThe prohibition set out in paragraph 1 shall not preclude traders from applyoffering different prices to customers in certain territories in so far as they are required to do so under the laws of Member States in accordance with Union lawgeneral conditions of access, including different prices to consumers in certain territories.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 205 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Traders falling under the special scheme provided in Chapter 1 of Title XII of Council Directive 2006/112/EC27 are not required to pay VAT. For those traders, when providing electronically supplied services, the prohibition of applying different general conditions of access for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer would imply a requirement to register in order to account for VAT of other Member States and might entail additional costs, which would be a disproportionate burden, considering the size and characteristics of the traders concerned. Therefore, those traders should be exempted from that prohibition for such time as such a scheme is applicable. __________________ 27 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1–118)
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 210 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Traders shall not, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, the location of the payment account, the place of establishment of the payment service provider or the place of issue of the payment instrument within the Union, apply different conditions of payment for any sales of goods or provision of services, where:
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 212 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In all those situations, traders may in some cases be prevented from selling goods or providing services to certain customers or to custoonsumers in certain territories, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, as a consequence of a specific prohibition or a requirement laid down in Union law or in the laws of Member States in accordance with Union law. Laws of Member States may also require, in accordance with Union law, traders to respect certain rules on the pricing of books. Traders should not be prevented from complying with such laws in as far as necessary.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate a body or bodies responsible for the enforcement of this Regulation. Member States shall ensure that adequate and effective means exist with the body or bodies designated in order to enforce compliance withbodies for the effective enforcement of this Regulation.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 214 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Under Union law, traders are in principle free to decide which means of payment they wish to accept, including payment brands. However, once this choice . In accordance with the rules of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 and Directive (EU) 2015/2366, retailers accepting a card- based payment instrument of a specific brand and category are not under an obligation to accept card-based payment instruments of the same category but of a different brand. Likewise retailers accepting a debit card of a given brand are under no obligation to accept credit card of thast been made, in view of the existing legal framrand, or when accepting consumer credit cards of a given brand also to accept commercial credit card of the same brand. Equally, a trader accepting credit transfers or direct debits is under no obligation to accept the payment, if this requires entering into a new ork for payment services modified contract with a payment service provider. However, once this choice has been made, there are no reasons for traders to discriminate custoonsumers within the Union by refusing certain commercial transactions, or by otherwise applying certain different conditions of payment in respect of those transactions, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the customer. In this particular context, such unjustified unequal treatment for reasons related to the location of the payment account, the place of establishment of the payment service provider or the place of issue of the payment instrument within the Union should be expressly prohibited as well. It should be further recalled that Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 already prohibits all payees, including traders, from requiring bank accounts to be located in a certain Member State for a payment in euro to be accepted. The trader should remain free to request charges for the use of a payment instrument. However, this right is subject to the restrictions introduced by Article 62(5) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall lay down the rules on the penaltiesanctions applicable for infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary measures to ensure that they are implemented. The penaltiesanctions provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 220 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall confedesignate a body or responsibilityle bodies for providing practical assistance to consumers to a body or bodies in cases of a dispute between a consumer and a trader arising from the application of this Regulation. Each Member State shall designate a body or bodies responsible for that task.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 222 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Directive 2015/2366/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council28 introduced strict security requirements for the initiation and processing of electronic payments, which reduced the risk of fraud for all new and more traditional means of payment, especially online payments. Payment service providers are obliged to apply so-called strong custoonsumer authentication, an authentication process that validates the identity of the user of a payment service or of the payment transaction. For remote transactions, such as online payments, the security requirements go even further, requiring a dynamic link to the amount of the transaction and the account of the payee, to further protect the user by minimising the risks in case of mistakes or fraudulent attacks. As a result of these provisions, the risk of payment fraud in national and cross- border purchases is brought to an equal level and should not be used as an argument to refuse or discriminate any commercial transactions within the Union. __________________ 28 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35– 127).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 224 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) This Regulation should not affect the application of the rules on competition, and in particular Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. Agreements imposing on traders obligations not to engage in passive sales within the meaning of Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/201029 to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories are generally considered restrictive of competition and cannot normally be exempted from the prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) TFEU. Even when they are not caught by Article 101 TFEU, in the context of the application of this Regulation, they disrupt the proper functioning of the internal market and they may be used to circumvent the provisions of this Regulation. The relevant provisions of such agreements and of other agreements in respect of passive sales requiring the trader to act in violation of this Regulation should therefore be automatically void. However, this Regulation, and in particular its provisions on access to goods or services, should not affect agreements restricting active sales within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 330/2010. __________________ 29 Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ L 102, 23.4.2010, p. 1).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 227 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Member States should designate one or more bodies responsible forresponsible bodies with necessary powers to takinge effective action to monitor and to secensure compliance with the provision of this Regulation. Member States should also ensure that effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties can be imposed on traders in the event of any breach of this Regulation.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 228 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Consumers should be in the position to receive assistance from responsible authoritbodies facilitating the resolution of conflicts with traders, arising from the application of this Regulation, including by way of a uniform complaint form.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 228 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The first evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out, in particular, with a view to assessing whether the prohibition of Article 4(1)(b) should also apply to electronically supplied services, the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, provided that the trader has the requisite rights for the relevant territoriscope of this Regulation should be extended to cover additional sectors such as audio-visual, financial, transport, electronic communication and healthcare services.
2017/02/10
Committee: JURI
Amendment 231 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) This Regulation should be regularly evaluated, with a view to proposing amendments where necessary. The first evaluation should concentrate, in particular, on the possible extension of the prohibition of Article 4(1)(b) to electronically supplied services, the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, provided that the trader has the requisite rights for the relevant territoriscope of this Regulation to other sectors such as audio-visual services, financial or electronic communication services, transport services or healthcare services.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 238 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) With a view to facilitating the effective enforcement of the rules laid down in this Regulation, the mechanisms to ensure cross-border cooperation among competent authorities provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 should also be available in relation to those rules. However, as Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 only applies with respect to laws that protect consumers' interests, those measures should be available only when the customer is a consumer. Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly. __________________ 30 Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) (OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, p. 1).
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Traders, public authorities and other interested parties should have sufficient time to adapt to, and ensure compliance with, the provisions of this Regulation. In light of the particular characteristics of electronically supplied services, other than services the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, it is appropriate to apply the prohibition of Article 4(1)(b) only from a later date with respect to the provision of those services.deleted
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 242 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) In order to achieve the objective of effectively addressing direct and indirect discrimination based on the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of custof consumers, it is appropriate to adopt a Regulation, which directly applies in all Member States. This is necessary in order to guarantee the uniform application of the non- discrimination rules across the Union and their entering into force at the same time. Only a Regulation ensures the degree of clarity, uniformity and legal certainty which is necessary in order to enable custoonsumers to fully benefit from those rules.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the prevention of direct and indirect discrimination based on nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of custof consumers, including geo- blocking, in commercial transactions with traders within the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States, due to the cross-border nature of the problem and the insufficient clarity of the existing legal framework, but can rather, by reason of its scale and potential effect on trade in the internal market be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The purpose of this Regulation seekis to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market and to achieve a high level of consumer's protection by preventing discrimination based, directly or indirectly, on the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of custof consumers.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 264 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where the trader sells goods, provides services, or seeks to do so, in a Member State other than the Member State in which the custoonsumer has the place of residence or the place of establishment;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 269 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) where the trader sells goods, provides services, or seeks to do so, in the same Member State as the one in which the custoonsumer has the place of residence or place of establishment, but the custoonsumer is a national of another Member State;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) where the trader sells goods or provides services, or seeks to do so, in a Member State in which the custoonsumer is temporarily located without residing in that Member State or having the place of establishment in that Member State.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 288 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. This Regulation shall not affectbe without prejudice to acts of Union law concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters. Compliance with this Regulation shall not be construed as implying that a trader directs his or her activities to the Member State where the consumer has the habitual residence or domicile within the meaning of point (b) of Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 and point (c) of Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012. When a trader is acting in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 5 of this Regulation, it shall not be considered on these grounds alone that he or she is actively directing his or her activities to another Member State where the consumer has a place of residence.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 301 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) 'customer' means a consumer who, or an undertaking which, is a national of a Member State or has his or her place of residence or place of establishment in a Member State, and intends to purchase or purchases a good or a service within the Union, other than for resale;deleted
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 305 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) 'general conditions of access' means all terms, conditions and other information, including sale prices, regulating the access of custoonsumers to goods or services offered for sale by a trader, which are set, applied and made available to the public at large by or on behalf of the trader and which apply in the absence of an individually negotiated agreement between the trader and the custoonsumer;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 308 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) 'goods' means any tangible movable item, with the exception of items sold by way of execution or otherwise by authority of law; water, gas and electricity shall be considered as goods within the meaning of this Regulation where they are put up for sale in a limited volume or a set quantity;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) 'online interface' means any software, including a website and applications, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which serves to give custoonsumers access to the trader's goods or services with a view to engaging in a commercial transaction with respect to those goods or services;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Traders shall not, through the use of technological measures or otherwise, block or limit custoonsumers' access to their online interface for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Traders shall not, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custof the consumer, redirect custoonsumers to a version of their online interface that is different from the online interface which the customer originally sought to access, by virtue of its layout, use of language or other characteristics that make it specific to customers with a particular nationality, or place of residence or place establishment, unless the custoonsumer gives his or her explicit consent prior to such redirection.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 328 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the event of such redirection with the customer's explicit consent, the original version of the online interface shall remain easily accessible for that custoonsumer.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 333 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The prohibitions set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply where the blocking, limitation of access or redirection with respect to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories is necessary in order to ensure compliance with a legal requirement in Union law or in the laws of Member States in accordance with Union law.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 338 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Where a trader blocks or limits access of custoonsumers to an online interface or redirects customers to a different version of the online interface in compliance with paragraph 43, the trader shall provide a clear justification and explanation to the consumer. That justification shall be given in the language of the online interface that the customer originally sought to access.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 346 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Traders shall not apply different general conditions of access to their goods or services, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, in the following situationswhere:
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 355 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where the trader sells goods and those goods are not delivered cross-border to the Member State of the custoonsumer by the trader or on his or her behalf, but are collected at location agreed between the trader and the consumer in which the trader operates;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 360 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where the trader provides electronically supplied services, other than services the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 361 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the consumer seeks to receive electronically supplied services the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter in respect of which the trader has the requisite rights for the territory from which the consumer seeks to receive such services;
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 368 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) where the trader provides services, other than those covered by point (b), and those services are supplied to the custoonsumer in the premises of the trader or in a physical location where the trader operates, in a Member State other than that of which the custoonsumer is a national or in which the custoonsumer has the place of residence or the place of establishment.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 377 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The prohibition set out in paragraph 1 shall not apply in so far as a specific provision laid down in Union law or in the laws of Member States in accordance with Union law by preventsing the trader from selling the goods or providing the services to certain custoonsumers or to custoonsumers in certain territories.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 379 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
With respect to sales of books, tThe prohibition set out in paragraph 1 shall not preclude traders from applyoffering different prices to customers in certain territories in so far as they are required to do so under the laws of Member States in accordance with Union lawgeneral conditions of access, including different prices to consumers in certain territories.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Traders shall not, for reasons related to the nationality, or place of residence or place of establishment of the custoonsumer, the location of the payment account, the place of establishment of the payment service provider or the place of issue of the payment instrument within the Union, apply different conditions of payment for any sales of goods or provision of services, where:
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 414 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate a body or bodies responsible for the enforcement of this Regulation. Member States shall ensure that adequate and effective means exist with the body or bodies designated in order to enforce compliance withbodies for the effective enforcement of this Regulation.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 415 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall lay down the rules on the penaltiesanctions applicable for infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary measures to ensure that they are implemented. The penaltiesanctions provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 418 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall confedesignate a body or responsibilityle bodies for providing practical assistance to consumers to a body or bodies in cases of a dispute between a consumer and a trader arising from the application of this Regulation. Each Member State shall designate a body or bodies responsible for that task.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 428 #

2016/0152(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The first evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out, in particular, with a view to assessing whether the prohibition of Article 4(1)(b) should also apply to electronically supplied services, the main feature of which is the provision of access to and use of copyright protected works or other protected subject matter, provided that the trader has the requisite rights for the relevant territoriscope of this Regulation should be extended to cover additional sectors such as audio-visual, financial, transport, electronic communication and healthcare services.
2017/02/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 3 a (new)
Having regard to the reasoned opinions issued by national parliaments from 11 Member States objecting the Commission proposal on the grounds of subsidiarity,
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 25 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The freedom to provide services includes the right of undertakings to provide services in another Member State, to which they may post their own workers temporarily in order to provide those services there. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in Article 56 provides that restrictions on the freedom to provide services are prohibited.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whetherensure that the Posting of Workers Directive still strikes the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) IEspecially in view of the long duration of certain posting assignments, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in which the work isclosely check and assess whether a posted worker temporarily carrieds out. In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of his or her work in the host Member States therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months and from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regul. Article 2 of this Directive defines the nature of posting as having a temporary character therefore temporary character is an indispensable feature of genuine posting. Article 4 paragraph 3 of the Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU provides a clear list of elements of temporary nature of posting. In addition, the case law provides explanation of the notion of temporary nature of the provision of services, which is to be determined by its duration, regularity, periodicity and continuity. Therefore the temporary character, being the indispensable feature of posting, should be closely monitored and assessed, especially in the case of postings of long duration, in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I Regulaorder to avoid abuse and circumvention.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC provides a number of provisions to make sure that rules on posting of workers are enforced and are respected by all service providers. Article 4 of the enforcement directive provides a list of elements that should be assessed in order to identify the genuine posting and prevent abuse and circumvention.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Because of the highly mobile nature of work in international road transport, the implementation of the posting of workers directive raises particular legal questions and difficulties (especially where the link with the concerned Member State is insufficient). It would be most suitTherefore transport services such as transit, international transport and linked cabotage are excluded forom these challenges to scope of this Directive and should be addressed through sector-specific legislation together with other EU initiatives aimed at improving the functioning of the internal road transport market.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) It is within Member States' competence to set rules on remunerationminimum rates of pay in accordance with their law and practice. However, these national rules on remunerationminimum rates of pay applied to posted workers must be proportionate, non- discriminatory and justified by the need to protect posted workers and must not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remunerationinformation on minimum rates of pay under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear, up to date and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneris information on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive. In order to provide more transparency and clarity generally applicable collective agreements should be also accompanied by clear information on applicable minimum rates of pay. Social partners are also obliged to make public all collective agreements, which are applicable according to this Directive. Similarly, foreign subcontractors should be informed in writing about terms and conditions of employment that they should apply towards posted workers.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remunerationMember States have the freedom to establish on their territory appropriate measures applicable to local and foreign service providers in order to ensure compliance with the applicable rules concerning posting in case of subcontracting chains. In the case of the construction sector Member States are obliged, by the Directive 2014/67/EU, to introduce appropriate liability measures in order to ensure fair competition and workers rights. WThere such rules on remuneration exist at national level, thefore laws, regulations, administrative provisions or universally applicable collective agreements applicable in Member States may apply them in a non- discriminatory mannensure that subcontracting does not confer ton undertakings posting workers to the possibilitsy territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border proviso avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of servicesemployment.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 137 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(-1) in Article 1, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: “2. This Directive shall not apply to merchant navy undertakings as regards seagoing personnel.” (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996L0071:en:HTML) as well as transport services such as transit, international transport and linked cabotage.” Or. en
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2 a
(1) The following Article 2a is added: Article 2a Posting exceeding twenty-four months 1. When the anticipated or the effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried out. 2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workers performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.deleted
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a
(1) The following Article 2a is added: Posting exceeding twenty-four months 1. effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried out. 2. case of replacement of posted workers performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.deleted Article 2a When the anticipated or the For the purpose of paragraph 1, in
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point c
(c) remuneration, including overtime rates; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes;minimum rates of pay
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 208 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1a
1a. If undertakings established in the territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration,, the Member State may, on a non– discriminatory and proportionate basis, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory.deleted
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas, the single market makes a significant contribution to European economies and, according to Parliament’s own research, the anticipated gain from completing the single market stands at a trillion euros;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas fragmentation of the single market is one of the major impediments to higher structural economic growth;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 44 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the completion of the single market in the product and services and the removal of barriers is a top priority which requires fast-track approach from Member States and the EU institutions;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas barriers in the single market lead to less choice and more expensive products and services for consumers;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Supports the overall objectives of the Commission’s Single Market Strategy for goods and services, and welcomes its vision for howactions in key areas in order to unleash the full potential of the single market;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 63 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the fact that the strategy is complementary toordinated with efforts made in other areas, especially in the Digital Single Market Strategy; believes that, by building on the initiatives already being taken, the strategy has good potential to help ensure economic prosperity and make Europe more attractive for investments;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that it is crucial for all Single Market Strategy initiatives to be based on better regulation principles and on most efficient tools such as harmonisation and mutual recognition;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Underlines that proposals should be evidence-based and reduce regulatory and administrative burden on businesses, in particular, SMEs;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the strategy’s focus on aspects aimed at helping businesses, in particular SMEs, micro-enterprises and start-ups, to scale up their activities, grow and stay in the single market, thus facilitating their innovation and job creation; considerunderlines that all initiatives for SMEs and start-ups require immediate actions and should be treated as a priority;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that it is necessary to consider adoption of adopt a common definition of ‘innovative’ start- ups and SMEs, or objective criteria, that can be used as a point of reference for the adoption of related measures; calls on the Commission to propose such a definition;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. WHighlights the need for reduced compliance costs caused by VAT requirements; welcomes the Commission’s determination to address the difficulties faced by SMEs as a result of the complexity of differing national VAT regulations; extends its full support to the Commission in respect of the VAT reform; calls on the Commission to assess the feasibility of further coordination and, in particular, to assess the possibility of a single tax in the e-commerce sector;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 133 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to implement the Capital Markets Union and more particularly the framework for simple transparent standardised securitisation (STS), and swift adoption of the Prospectus Directive as fast as possible, as those measures will help SMEs to access finances;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the legislative initiative on business insolvency, including early restructuring and second chances, which will ensure that Member States provide a regulatory environment that is able to accommodate failure without discouraging entrepreneurs from trying new ideas; calls on the Commission to ensure that this initiative will align insolvency proceedings across the EU and reduce the length and costs of proceedings;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the Commission’s Digital Single Market Strategy, and in particular the announced Single Digital Gateway; calls on the Commission to explore all ways of making the best use of the Single Digital Gateway to help European start- ups to scale up across Europensure that the Single Digital Gateway is the single entry point for businesses to all single market related information, assistance, problem solving and to national and EU-wide procedures, needed to operate cross- border in the EU;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. EWelcomes new sharing economy business models and recognises their enormous potential for innovation; emphasises that the collaborative (or sharing) economy is growing fast and changing the way that many services and assets are provided and consumed; underlines, furthermore, the strong link between these new business models and the performance of the single market;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Commission’s announced initiative on the European agenda for the collaborative economy, and its intention to look at that economy in order to assess what needs to be done to accompany its growth and its major contribution to the economic system; calls on the Commission to ensure the best possible conditions for the collaborative economy to develop and thrive;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Draws attention to the important role of standards for innovation and progress in the single market; calls on the Commission to support and reinforce European standards and make the framework for standardization more efficient and fit for purpose, including by exploiting the opportunities offered by the ongoing negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP);
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. PCalls on the Commission to deepen its work on enforcements; points out that many measures have already been adopted but are not yet applied; points out, furthermore, that according to data provided by the Commission in mid-2015, around 1 090 infringement proceedings were pending in the area of the single market; calls on the Commission, therefore, to ensure that enforcement is prioritised at all levels; believes that with regard to national measures or implementation early intervention may be more effective and better results achieved than through infringements procedures; stresses, nevertheless, that if the early intervention proceeding do not give results, the Commission must use all available measures, including infringement procedures, to ensure full implementation of legislation on the single market;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to further support the Member States in developing a strong culture of compliance and enforcement, including by developing implementation plans for new major legislation and organising compliance dialogues with Member States; calls on Member States to fully commit to implement and enforce EU legislation and apply mutual recognition principle; stresses that correct enforcement and better regulation are essential and should cover all business sectors and apply to existing and future legislation;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 258 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Recalls the importance of strengthening and streamlining existing single market tools for SMEs in order to simplify their cross-border expansion; urges the Commission and Member States to place greater emphasis on streamlining and improving Product Contact Points and Single Points of Contacts;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 268 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises that it is necessary to reinforce the Solvit network and to improve awareness of the network and its role in solving interpretation problems relating to the single market; calls on Member States to appropriately equip and adequately position their national SOLVIT centres in order for them to fulfil their role;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 280 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes note of the Commission proposal, as part of strengthening the single market for goods, to improve mutual recognition through action to increase awareness as well as ensuring better application and enforcement of the mutual recognition principle and through the revision of the Mutual Recognition Regulation;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 283 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Reiterates its call for the rapid adoptionHighlights the need for a new of the Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package by the Council; underlines the importance of the indication of country of origin, which is crucial to protect consumers and to strengthen the fight against counterfeitinglegislation at the European level;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 300 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that regulatory differences between Member States regarding differing labelling requirements create unnecessary obstacles to the activities of suppliers of goods; calls on the Commission to consider introducing a mandatory scheme for the provision of key information for furniture, established at EU levelreview all labelling requirements, present a plan to reduce the number of EU and national labelling requirements, create a framework to assess which ones are essential to consume the product; highlights that all other information could be provided by digital means and not necessarily on the product; stresses that new requirements create additional costs for businesses, lead to confusion among consumers and diverging national requirements fragment the single market; considers that such an initiative would be beneficial for consumers, industries and trade operators, ensuring transparency, adequate recognition of European products and harmonised rules for operators in the single market;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 330 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. SEmphasises the need to ensure consistent proportionality assessment of regulatory requirements and restrictions applicable to services; supports the Commission proposal to introduce a services passport to help service providers demonstrate that they satisfy the requirements applicable to them in the Member State where they wish to provide their service on a temporary basis; considers that this initiative should be aimed at reducing administrative burden for service providers and simplifying the procedures applicable to cross-border service provision;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 340 #

2015/2354(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Underlines the need for a fully electronic public procurement system; highlights the need for fast and comprehensive implementation of the Public Procurement Directive in its whole; highlights the wider use of the e- procurement to open the markets for SMEs;
2016/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the monitoring of barriers and costs is piecemeal and unsystematic, quantification and clear identification of barriers and costs is lacking, which makes prioritisation of policy actions difficult;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas businesses and individuals are facing major obstacles in cross border activities within the single market due to lack of availability and quality of information, assistance services and online procedures, leading to high administrative burden and significant compliance costs;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Realises that despite the removal of tariff barriers since 1 July 1968, the free movement of goods and services has continued to be hampered by non-tariff barriers (NTBs) such as national technical rules and requirements governing products and service providers; highlights that strengthening of the single market requires urgent actions at Union and Member States levels to address such NTBs;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 44 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Reiterates that the Digital Single Market Strategy and Single Market Strategy for Europe compose initiatives that should be implemented swiftly and ambitiously in order to reduce single market NTBs; highlights that it is crucial for these initiatives to be based on better regulation principles and on the most efficient tools, such as harmonisation and mutual recognition;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that where such NTBs can be justified as proportionate, information on differing national regulatory requirements should be easily accessible; considers that the present system built around a diverse range of contact points, including Product Contact Points and Single Points of Contact, is deeply unsatisfactory; recalls the importance of strengthening and streamlining existing single market tools for SMEs in order to simplify their cross- border expansion; urges the Commission and the Member States to place greater emphasis on streamlining and improving these systems, in particular the need for rapid improvement of the Points of Single Contact and calls the Commission to report to the European Parliament on the progress and next steps by the end of 2016; highlights that understanding that by being more open and accessible as regards regulatory requirements their Member State becomes more attractive for inward investment;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the Single Digital Gateway initiative and urges the Commission to create a single entry point for businesses and consumers to all single market related information, assistance, problem solving and to national and EU-wide procedures needed to operate cross-border in the EU;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that for many companies, in particular SMEs, seeking to trade in another Member State, such an expansion will still from their perspective constitute ‘international trade’; highlights that SMEs, start-ups and innovative businesses, in particular sharing economy businesses, should be fully enabled to grow through cross-border trade;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the elimination of NTBs does not entail the limitation of workers' rights, where these are not discriminatory, disproportionate or fail to be founded upon a legitimate public policy objective;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the objective of the Union should be the eventualCalls for abolition of NTBs where they cannot be justified;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights that compliance costs with VAT requirements is one of the biggest non-tariff barriers; calls for practical VAT simplification proposals;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. BelieveHighlights that differences in the speed of transposition and the exact implementation at national level of existing directives create legal uncertainty for businesses;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2015/2346(INI)

8. Considers that where the Commission has repealed unnecessary EU legislation, Member States should act swiftly to repeal corresponding domestic provisionsUrges Member States to swiftly repeal outdated domestic provisions where the Commission has repealed unnecessary EU legislation;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 88 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. BelieveHighlights that inconsistent enforcement of existing correctly transposed rules causes the same harm as slow transposition; considers that compliance and enforcement are made more challenging when commonly used definitions are given different meanings in different pieces of legislation; calls for better regulation principles to be respected in the legislation drafting process;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that unequal application of the same rules in different Member States has the potential to create new NTBs; considers that transposition workshops should be held in orderalls on the Commission to take every effort to minimisze divergences at anthe earlyiest stage;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes the persistence of national-level differences in product market regulation with which businesses operating across borders still have to contend both in terms of level of restriction and differences between Member States; considers that this unnecessarily forces businesses to adapt their products and services to comply with multiple standards or repeated testing, thus limiting intra-EU trade, reducing growth and hampering job creation;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Draws attention to the low levels of cross-border public procurement, with less than 20only 3,5 % of all public procurement in the Union publicised on pan-European platforms being awarded to companies from other Member States; underlines the need for fully electronic public procurement system; highlights the need for fast and comprehensive implementation of the Public Procurement Directive in its whole; calls for wider use of e-procurement to open the markets for SMEs;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that many national administrative practices also give rise to NTBs, including requirements for formalising of documents by national bodies or offices; considers thaturges Members States should concentrate on e-governance as a way to reduce barriers, building on examples such as those in Estonia and Denmark, where a transition to digital services has simplified administration for businesses and citizeto use e-governance solutions and modernise their public administrations, building on examples such as those in Estonia and Denmark, by providing more and better accessible, digital services for citizens and businesses, and to facilitate cross border cooperation and interoperability of public administrations;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights that many businesses are not aware of mutual recognition and believe that they have to comply with national requirements in the Member State of destination when trading in the single market; calls for Member States to ensure that mutual recognition principle is applied by their competent authorities;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Draws attention to the problems for service providers, especially in business services, the transport sector and construction, stemming from multiple and diverse authorisations, registration or prior notification requirements;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Draws attention also to the restrictions in Member States as regards the legal form of service providers and their shareholding or management structure, and as regards restrictions on the joint exercise of the profession; considerstresses that these restrictions are serious obstacles to cross-border service provision; emphasizes the need to ensure consistent proportionality assessment of regulatory requirements and restrictions applicable to services;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 150 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Emphasises that the notification obligation contained in the Services Directive could have been effective in reducing or eliminating NTBs, but has been neglected by Member States and the Commission; welcomes, therefore, the renewed focus on the notification procedure in the Single Market Strategy, as through early engagement as regards proposed regulatory measures, disproportionate national measures can be revised to resolve issues before they occur; welcomes the introduction of a services passport; highlights that it should not lead to additional administrative burdens, but tackle non-tariff barriers and advance mutual recognition;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to address theset out reform priorities of Member Statesand address them accordingly in the area of professional services in the context of the European Semester and country-specific recommendations on deregulating certain professions in the Member States;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to deepen its work on enforcement and the principles which underpin the single market; believes that early intervention with regard to national measures or implementation procedures which constitute NTBs may be effective and results more readily achieved than through infringement proceedings; underlines, nevertheless, that for serious or persistent failures or misapplication of Union law, particularly in areas of single market and economic interest, the Commission may prioritise infringement actionust use all available measures, including infringement procedures, to ensure full implementation of legislation on the Single Market and to ensure structural reforms in Member States;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 206 #

2015/2346(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Stresses that accessible, affordable, efficient and high-quality parcel delivery is an essential prerequisite for a thriving cross-border e-commerce for the benefit of SMEs and consumers in particular;
2016/01/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses however that lowering labour costs by reducing workers’ protection is not a correct means of achieving lower unemployment, and that, in addition, reducing workers’ rights induces higher skills outflows, exposing SMEs to shortages of skilled workersand the flexibility of legislation on labour relations are a correct means of achieving lower unemployment;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned with the growing phenomenon of bogus self-employment across the EU, which cannot be considered in positive terms as contributing to the ‘growing number of micro-enterprises’, but, rather, undermines the image of entrepreneurshipTakes the view that increasing self-employment across the EU is a means to tackle unemployment problems;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that the artificial requirement to have a university degree set for certain professions is counterproductive in dealing with the shortage of skills experienced by SMEs; Takes the viewBelieves that vocational training and, in, particular,ly in the context of the internal Digital Single Market, and dual vocational training systems managed in cooperation with SMEs should receive greater public support;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the importance of advancing the SM to achieve structural economic growth in order to attract investment; Urges the Commission for systematic monitoring of implementation and enforcement of the Single Market rules through the CSRs, in particular where those rules provide a significant contribution to the structural reforms;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates a call for inclusion of the Single Market pillar in the European Semester, with a system for regular monitoring and evaluation of SM integration and competitiveness focused on a set of priorities where action would generate the most impact in growth and jobs; considers that the system should comprise a robust information database, a set of quantitative and qualitative indicators aims at measuring inter alia the economic effects of application of the Single Marker rules, benchmarking, peer review and exchange of best practices;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the proposal by the Commission to launch a legislative initiative introducing a services passport as a helpful tool to reduce barriers faced by service providersand administrative burden going cross-border;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Highlights the need for fast and comprehensive implementation of the Public Procurement Directive in its whole; highlights the potential of eProcurement to tackle remaining inefficiencies by simplifying the whole value-chain of public procurement and making cross-border business opportunities much easier to find; calls on the Commission to develop incentives to encourage SME participation in public procurement;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights that national regulations and practices, coupled with inadequate implementation of the mutual recognition principle, continue to create unnecessary barriers and burdens for businesses; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure proper application and for better enforcement of the principle and cost-efficient instruments for dispute settlement;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Invites the Commission to consult stakeholders in order to identify sectors and markets where the application of mutual recognition principle is insufficient or problematic;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Urges Member States to properly and timely implement and enforce the rules of the Single Market; highlights the importance of implementation of CSRs - including reforms of national products and services markets - to unlock Member States' growth potential;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Believes that Member States have to step up their efforts to modernise their public administrations by providing more, and better accessible, digital services for citizens and businesses, and to facilitate cross border cooperation and interoperability of public administrations;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 143 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes new business models emerging under the collaborative economy, creating a clear opportunity for growth, jobs and a wider choice for consumers and entrepreneurs; Highlights the importance of ensuring the best possible conditions for the collaborative economy to develop and thrive;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Stresses that accessible, affordable, efficient and high-quality parcel delivery is an essential prerequisite for a thriving cross-border e-commerce for the benefit of SMEs and consumers in particular
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Commission to take a strategic approach to enforcement and use all available evidence and instruments at its disposal, including rigorous notification of Member State legislation (ex-ante and ex- post), the ‘single market test’, proportionality, in particular in the area of regulated professions, benchmarking, best practices, peer pressure, alternative arbitration systems, existing Court of Justice of the European Union rulings and infringement procedures;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Calls upon the Commission to use all available measures, including infringement procedures, when necessary, to ensure full implementation of legislation on the single market of goods, services and in the digital sphere and to ensure structural reforms in product, services and labour markets in Member States;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Remains concerned about the length of infringement procedures and the number of outstanding cases; suggests that the Commission prioritises and focuses infringement action on areas with the most dissuasive impact; recognises the need for a fast-track extra-judicial arbitration procedure as a fast, alternative remedy instrument;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Notes the benefits of SOLVIT; requests that SOLVIT be strengthened and better connected to Commission services, and well integrated with existing projects and databases such as CHAP and EU Pilot in order to create information synergies and share best practices; requests that the Commission follow up consistently on unresolved cases; Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure the necessary support and expertise for SOLVIT to deal efficiently with the cases received;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Urges national market surveillance authorities to cooperate more closely and to exchange information and best practices to effectively tackle the high number of illegal and non-compliant products incurring high costs for complying businesses; calls for the immediate adoption of the Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package by the Council of the European Union; believes that the Commission has to take responsibility for not doing enough to in this area;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2015/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Welcomes the Commission initiative to create a Single Digital Gateway as an accessible umbrella portal that will streamline and simplify access to information and promote existing dedicated users’ platforms; stresses the role of national and regional governments in promoting such platforms, making them accessible and educating their users; calls the Commission further strengthen and streamline online Single Market tools;
2015/12/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point -i a (new)
- ia. to ensure that the main outcome of the negotiations be an ambitious and comprehensive agreement that goes beyond the current GATS agreement, bringing a significant market opening for EU companies, including SMEs, while ensuring that the agreement is in line with WTO rules;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point -i b (new)
- ib. to have high ambitions for TiSA, especially regarding telecommunications, e-commerce, professional qualifications and movement of natural persons; to ensure it is a tool for growth and jobs and lowering unemployment;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 4 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point -i c (new)
- ic. to use TiSA negotiations as a tool to move forward the current Doha Round of multilateral trade talks in services and as a negotiating position for opening of service markets between the Union and global trade partners, including in developing countries;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point -i d (new)
-id. to accept the request by China to join the negotiations which could mean the agreement allows for the further opening of services in China to EU businesses;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 8 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point i
i. to ensure the highest level of transparency in the negotiations, in particularcluding by allowing access to documents and by organising athat do not undermine the EU's or other Parties' negotiating positions, as well as continuing organising the consultation wiof the Parliament and civil society;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 15 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point ii
ii. to ensure that before considering the removal of barriers, the agreement seeks to create a level playing field in the services sector, and has as its main objective to highlight and maintain the high level of protection of consumers, workers and the environment enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)further liberalise global access to services and in particular, to open new markets to EU service providers;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 25 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point a - point iii
iii. to ensure thatwhile the TiSA provides reciprocal market access, notwithstanding the right of countries to adopt regulations whicha lack of reciprocity should not be used as a grounds for closing alre duly justified on public policy groundsady open service markets in Europe;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point b - point i
i. to ensure that the negotiations maintain and strengthen the fundamental role played by public services and services of general interest in the European Union, which proviinsist, while supporting the continued exclusion of public services from negotiations, that EU service providers should have full market access to liberalised services in TiSA countries; to ensure that the final agreement includes an essential safety net for citizens and contribute to social cohesion, growth and employment clause guaranteeing the non- discriminatory treatment of European service providers;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point c - point i
i. to ensure that a positive list of services ready to be placed on the market is presented by the Union in order to protect those services not explicitly referred to from being opened up to competition; increase market access for services according to a "hybrid list approach", using for market access "positive lists", whereby services that are to be opened up to foreign companies are explicitly mentioned and new services are excluded and using "negative list approach" for national treatment;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point c - point ii
ii. to ensure that the negotiations comply with thEuropean goods, services and economic operators, including SMEs, are newot directives on public procurement and concessions, in particular as regards the definition of public-public cooperation, exclusions and SME accesscriminated against in all TiSA public procurement markets for services, at any level of government, and to ensure transparent access at a level equal to that applying to TiSA companies have today in Europe under the new EU public procurement and concessions rules;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point c - point iii
iii. to ensure reciprocity of mutual recognition of professional qualifications, including through the creation of a legal framework and promopromote mobility of professionals including through ambitious provisions on movement on natural persons (Mode 4) in relation to trade in services as well as encouraging cooperation ofn mobility by facilitating the visa for professionals in the sectors covered by the Agreementutual recognition of professional qualifications;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point c - point iv a (new)
iva. to seek an ambition chapter ensuring the free flow of data - without compromising data protection - in order to support growth in the Digital Single Market;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point d - point i
i. to ensure that certain regulated professions are excluded from the agreecommitments;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 94 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 - point d - point ii
ii. to maintain the exclusioncontinue to refrain from issuing any commitments ofn audio- visual and cultural services as it is already the Union policy in regards to the GATS agreement;
2015/10/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 18 #

2015/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Is worried about the impact that the proposal for a directive on single-member private limited liability companies could have on workers’ rights, in particular workers’ representation;deleted
2016/03/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 23 #

2015/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that labour law, workers participation in the management or supervisory bodies of the companies, the right to information and consultation, taxation accounting and insolvency proceedings are all outside the scope of the Commission proposal for a directive on single-member private limited liability companies;
2016/03/18
Committee: JURI
Amendment 7 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the single market remains fragmented and insufficiently implemented and the great potential for growth, innovation and jobs largely untapped; calls on the Commission and the Member States to honour their commitments and to safeguard the revival of the single market as one of the Union’s main priorities;
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its call on the Commission to put forward proposals for classifying the single market as a specific pillar of the European Semester, including dedicated guidelines; calls on the Commission to integrate the completion of all dimensions of the single market - on goods, services, capital, labour, energy, transport, and in the digital sector - as part of the European Semester and country- specific recommendations (CSRs) thereon; , even when they might be also covered by other policy processes;
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 15 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls the Commission's promise to - if necessary - use infringement procedures to ensure full implementation of legislation on the single market of goods, services and in the digital sphere and to ensure structural reforms in product, services and labour markets in Member States;
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the Commission to take additional measures to improve access to finance for SMEs and to ensure an improved business environment, simplify procedures and reduce administrative burdens in the single market; stresses the importance of competitive and highly integrated markets with sound business regulation for the success of the European Fund for Strategic Investments;
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that the European Semester is a grean evident opportunity to urge Member States to step uppush for more progress in their efforts towards the digital single market (DSM); welcomes, in this context, the Commission’s communication on the roadmap for completing the DSM; considers it essential to remedy the current fragmentation of national rules on digital services and to build a more innovative and transparent DSM based on sound competition and providing a high level of accessibility and consumer protection;
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the Member States have to step up their efforts to modernise their public administrations by providing more, and better accessible, digital services for citizens and businesses, and to facilitate cross border cooperation and interoperability of public administrations;
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2015/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Believes that the ownership of the CSR by national parliaments needs to be strengthened; encourages the Member States to provide the possibility for the Commission to present the CSRs in the national parliaments; calls, furthermore, on the Member States to implement the CSRs and to rigorously transpose the EU targets into national targets; reiterates, furthermore, its request that the Commission report to the competent committee of Parliament on the measures taken to ensure progress in the implementation of the CSRs and the progress achieved thus far.
2015/09/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that whilst it is impossible to hold back the digital revolution, it is possible to shapedigital technologies bring tremendous opportunities; acknowledges the importance of the digital revolution as a fuel for entrepreneurship, digital transformation of industry, development of new business models, ideas and innovative start-ups and its course; a driver for growth and jobs creation;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that stimulating growth, innovation, consumer choice and competitiveness is of the utmost importance and digital technologies bring tremendous opportunities; believes that the dDigital sSingle mMarket Strategy is key to achieving this objective by removing barriers to tradetargeting the most significant remaining barriers to trade with a particular focus on SMEs, streamlining processes for online businesses and supporting creators, investors and consumers; calls in this regard for future-proof regulation and the competitiveness tests on all new proposals;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 22 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that particular attention will be paid to issues that prevent consumers and businesses from benefiting from full range of products and services, whether digital or those offered through digital channels in the EU, and prevent businesses from starting and scaling up, operating across borders and innovating;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 23 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 45 a (new)
- having regard to the 28 September 2015 agreement on 5G partnership between China and the European Union and related agreements,
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 44 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for targeted, evidence-based reforms to enhance cross-border access to legally available online content but stresses the importance of not mandating pan- European licences; calls instead; calls for reforms to remove the remaining barriers to the free circulation of goods and services sold on-line and tackle unjustified discrimination on the grounds of geographic location; calls for reforms to enable the enhanced portability of legally acquired content to be prioritised; and facilitate cross- border access to copyright content while ensuring a level playing field for intellectual property rights holders and consumers;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 52 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to undertake a thorough assessment of the impact which digitalisation will have onin co-operation with the nuMember and types of jobs available and to gather information on new forms of employment, such as crowdsourcing and crowdworkingStates, business and other relevant stakeholders to identify on new forms of employment and required skills sets in digitally-driven economies and to develop recommendations leading to required changes in the Member States' education systems;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls Member States to take necessary actions and to reform training systems in order to improve their efficiency in raising the skills and competences needed in the digital economy to help unemployed people to better anticipate and meet the changing needs of labour markets;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas all Union policies and legislation in the area of the Digital Single Market should allow new opportunities for users and businesses to emerge, especially within today’s service society, while taking a holistic approach that considers their social dimension as they inevitably involve structural changes;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 70 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that as job and skito embrace the fulls profiles become more complex, new demands are being placed on training and further educationotential of digital technology there is a need for information and communications technology (ICT) skills in the labour market as these skills are essential to operate and function in fully digitised information society; emphasises the importance of social dialogue in efforts to bring specific ICT training courses content up to date and develop skills strategies that are needed for unemployed people, young people in particular, to find a job;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the digitalisation-driven trend towards more flexible working practices may also give rise to precariousnew forms of employment to which current standards as regards social security, working time, working location, worker participation and employment protection no longer apply; calls for self-employed persons with quasi-employee status to be placed on an equal footing with employment rules do not correspond, calls for assessment of how to modernise employment regulations while ensuring employment flexibility as well as maintaining protection for workers including self-employed persons under employment law;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s aim to withdraw the proposal on a Common European Sales Law and the intention to propose rules for digital content; notes the proposal to introduce the ‘home option’ in order to bring down barriers to cross- border trade; insists on the need for comprehensive evidence and consultation with stakeholders before this approach is pursued, in particular as regards the impact it would have on the current protection provided to consumers under national law, especially in terms of remedies for failure to comply with the terms of contracts for online sales. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the proposed legislation is made fit for the age of digital and addresses all possible ways in which digital solutions can reduce burdens for consumers and businesses with an emphasis on making it easier for SMEs to do business online.
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 169 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the need to develop employeeat the Digital Single Market and EU privacy and data regulations should provide a coherent and stable framework to facilitate innovation, trade and entrepreneurship while ensuring adequate implementation of data protection rules for employees including data protection measures which cover new forms of data collection (relainteractions between humans and robotInternet of Things devices);
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Underlines that the primary objective of the Strategy must be the creation of a true digital single market free of barriers and not an occasion to create new ones through new regulation whose absolute necessity would have not been proven;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 246 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the urgent need for the Commission and Member States to promote a more dynamic economy for innovation to flourish and for companies to scale up, through the development of e- government, a modernised regulatory framework fit for the emergence and scale- up of innovative businesses, improved access to finance for start-ups and SMEs, and a long term investment strategy in infrastructure, skills, research and innovation;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 286 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, to further develop initiatives to boost entrepreneurship that range from changing the mind-set on how success is defined to promoting an entrepreneurial and innovation culture, including business model innovation; believes, in addition, that the diversity and specific attributes of the different national innovation hubs could be turned into a real competitive advantage for the EU if they are effectively interconnected;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 399 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the importance for consumers to be better informed of the use of their data, in particular in the case of free services;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 456 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is sceptical about the legal nature of model contracts regarding online sales of tangible goods in the absence of statutory regulation;deleted
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 494 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for an ambitious enforcement framework for the Services Directive; encourages the Commission to make use of all means at its disposal to ensure the full and correct implementation of existing rules, including developing enforcement guidelines to ensure, in particular ,uniform application of the mutual recognition principle in the field of services and fast-track infringement procedures whenever incorrect or insufficient implementation of the directive is identified;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 566 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that ambitious actions are needed to improve access to legal digital content,goods and services sold online by in particular by ending geo- blocking practices and unfair price discrimination based on geographical location; calls on the Commission to investigate the practice of price discrimination and market segmentation and for the Commission to act against unethical, unfair or illegal business practices including on price discrimination where location, language, or nationality are used as factures;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 581 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 d (new)
16d. Underlines that the end of geo- blocking should go hand in hand with an increase of cross border parcel shipping options at a better price in order to allow effective competition within the single market; stresses, therefore, the need for measures to improve price transparency and enhanced regulatory oversight of parcel delivery;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 585 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Stresses the need for all consumers within the Union to be treated equally by online merchants selling in one or more Member States, including in access to discounts or other promotions;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 593 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Stresses the need for portability of legally brought digital content, including subscription services, across borders in either downloaded or streaming formats;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 672 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Reminds the commitment of Member states to at least reach by 2020 the broadband targets of full deployment of superfast speeds (30 Mbps); calls on the Commission to evaluate if the current broadband targets meet the conditions to the development of a data-driven economy and if investments in Member States are part of a long term and future-proof investment strategy;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 687 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Stresses the importance of a successful implementation of EFSI in targeting projects with higher-risk profiles to maximise investments in digital infrastructure and better attract private investments for innovative companies; a particular focus should be given to information and support of innovative entrepreneurs, at the different funding stages of development of the company;
2015/10/21
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 723 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that since the development of over-the-top services has increased demand and competition among services to the benefit of consumers, modernisation of the telecommunication framework should not lead to more regulatory burdens, but should drive innovation and fair competition and ensure fair access to the networks;
2015/10/22
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 770 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses that the uniform enforcement of the Connected Continent package, including the end of roaming surcharges and the net neutrality principle, requires the establishment of a single European telecommunications regulatornet neutrality principle and the end of roaming surcharges, is essential to the functioning of the single market ;
2015/10/22
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 791 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission, in order to deepen the internal market for telecommunications, to establish a single European telecommunications regulator through a strengthening of the role and decisions of BEREC, in particular in enforcement of EU telecommunication rules, oversight of the single market and crossborder disputes ;
2015/10/22
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 858 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Appreciates the Commission’s initiative to analyse the role of platforms in the Digital Economy as part of the upcoming Internal Market StrategyDigital Single Market Strategy that should aim at identifying specific and defined problems within specific business areas; Stresses that taking a "one size fits all" approach in light of the diversity of platforms, and the growth potential in particular of B2B platforms, could seriously impede innovation;
2015/10/22
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 926 #

2015/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Considers, in order to ensure trust in digital services, that increased resources from the public and private sector are required to strengthen the security of IT systems and online networks and the encryption of communication, to improve cyber-attack prevention and to increase knowledge of basic security processes among users of digital services; in addition, requirements should be set for companies to have basic levels of security such as encrypting data and updating software;
2015/10/22
Committee: ITREIMCO
Amendment 6 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Regards a transparent and competitive single market as a key factor for growth and for an effective recovery, and takes the view, therefore, that competition policy has a vital role to play in safeguarding the rights of consumers, citizens, businesses and workers in the broader context of a social market economycompetition to the benefit of consumers, citizens, and businesses;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that the overhauleffective enforcement of competition policy is needed partly in order to meet the challenges posed by the digital single market, a sector which is changing rapidly, hence the importance ofrequires strong market knowledge and fast reactivity, and also in order to overcominge the current fragmentation along national lines and doingto do away with barriers to access to the market;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Regards it as essential to guarantee fair terms of competition on the digital market and to combat the abuse of dominant positions; considers it important, in particular, to make the on-line research, e-commerce, and advertising market more open and transparent, and regards it as vital to guarantee an open and neutral netthe principle of net neutrality, namely fair, open and non-discriminatory internet access, as a prerequisite for fair competition and market cohesion to the benefit of consumers and businesses;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regards it as essential that Directive 2014/104/EU on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions should be implemented quickly and correctly; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take additional measures, if necessary, to facilitate collective actions of this kind;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the new EU public procurement rules are implemented in a timely manner, in particular the deployment of e- procurement and the new provisions encouraging the division of contracts into lots, which is essential to foster innovation and competition and to support SMEs in procurement markets;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the strong interplay between competition enforcement and the digital single market strategy, in particular in actions related to geoblocking practices and licensing agreements, to complete the digital single market; considers that a similar interplay is vital in the internal energy market to remove barriers to the free flow of energy across borders and to build the Energy Union;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Takes the view that the main condition towards the completion of the European Energy Union is a well-functioning internal energy market that is dependent on the effective and persistent enforcement of EU competition rules; emphasises that implementing the competition rules contributes to sustainability, competitiveness and security of supply;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Considers that competition in the telecommunications sector is essential not only to drive innovation and investment in networks, but also for affordable prices and choice in services for consumers; calls, therefore, on the Commission to safeguard competition in this sector, including in the allocation of spectrum;
2015/09/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) This Directive should not affect national laws to the extent that the topics concerned are not regulated by this Directive, such as national rules providing for obligations of the consumer towards the supplier of digital content or regulating the qualification, formation and validity of contracts or the legality of the content. Member States should also remain free to provide rules for the detailed conditions for the exercise of rights, such as the right to damages to the extent not covered by the Directive, or rules which provide for the consequences of termination of the contract which apply in addition to restitution rules regulated by this Directive.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 33 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) The Directive should address problems across different categories of digital content and its supply. In order to cater for fast technological developments and to maintain the future-proof nature of the notion of digital content, this notion as used in this Directive should be broader than in Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.30 In particular it should cover services which allow the creation, processing or storage of data. While there are numerous ways for digital content to be supplied, such as transmission on a durable medium, downloading by consumers on their devices, web-streaming, allowing access to storage capabilities of digital content or access to the use of social media, this Directive should apply to all digital content independently of the medium used for its transmission. Differentiating between different categories in this technologically fast changing market is not desirable because it would hardly be possible to avoid discriminations between suppliers. A level-playing field between suppliers of different categories of digital content should be ensured. However this Directive should not apply to digital content which is embedded in goods in such a way that it operates as an integral part of the goods and its functions are subordinate to the main functionalities of the goods. _________________ 30_________________ 30 OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p.64. OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p.64.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 36 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) In order to meet the expectations of consumers and ensure a clear-cut and simple legal framework for suppliers of digital content offered on a durable medium, in relation to conformity requirements and remedies available to consumers for non-conformity, this Directive should apply to goods such as DVDs and CDs, incorporating digital content in such a way that the goods function only as a carrier of the digital content. The Directive should apply to the digital content supplied on a durable medium, independently whether it is sold at a distance or in face-to-face situations, so as to avoid fragmentation between the different distribution channels. The Directive 2011/83 should continue to apply to those goods, including to obligations related to the delivery of goods, remedies in case of the failure to deliver and the nature of the contract under which those goods are suppliedThe Directive should apply to the digital content supplied on a durable medium, independently whether it is sold at a distance or in face-to-face situations, so as to avoid fragmentation between the different distribution channels. The Directive is also without prejudice to the distribution right applicable to these goods under copyright law.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 40 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In the digital economy, information about individuals is often and increasingly seen by market participants as having a value comparable to money. Digital content is often supplied not in exchange for a price but against counter-performance other than money i.e. by giving access to personal data or other data. Those specific business models apply in different forms in a considerable part of the market. Introducing a differentiation depending on the nature of the counter-performance would discriminate between different business models; it would provide an unjustified incentive for businesses to move towards offering digital content against data. A level playing field should be ensured. In addition, defects of the performance features of the digital content supplied against counter-performance other than money may have an impact on the economic interests of consumers. Therefore the applicability of the rules of this Directive should not depend on whether a price is paid for the specific digital content in question.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 46 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) As regards digital content supplied not in exchange for a price but against counter-performance other than money, this Directive should apply only to contracts where the supplier requests and the consumer actively provides personal data, such as name and e-mail address or photos, directly or indirectly to the supplier for example through individual registration or on the basis of a contract which allows access to consumers' photos. This Directive should not apply to situations where the supplier collects data necessary for the digital content to function in conformity with the contract, for example geographical location where necessary for a mobile application to function properly, or for the sole purpose of meeting legal requirements, for instance where the registration of the consumer is required for security and identification purposes by applicable laws. This Directive should also not apply to situations where the supplier collects information, including personal data, such as the IP address, or other automatically generated information such as information collected and transmitted by a cookie, without the consumer actively supplying it, even if the consumer accepts the cookie. It should also not apply to situations where the consumer is exposed to advertisements exclusively in order to gain access to digital content.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 55 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) There are various ways for digital content to reach consumers. It is opportune to set simple and clear rules as to the modalities and the time for performing the supplier's main contractual obligation to supply digital content to the consumer. Considering that the supplier is not in principle responsible for acts or omissions of an internet provider or an electronic platform which the consumer selected for receiving the digital content, it should be sufficient for the supplier to supply the digital content to this third party. With regard to the time of supply, in line with market practices and technical possibilities, the digital content should be supplied immediatwithout undue delay, unless the parties decide to agree otherwise in order to cater for other supply models.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 76 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) In order to ensure that the consumer benefits from effective protection in relation to the right to terminate the contract, the supplier should allow the consumer to retrieve all data uploaded by the consumer, produced by the consumer with the use of the digital content or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content. This obligation should extend to data which the supplier is obliged to retain under the contract for the supply of the digital content as well as to data which the supplier has effectively retained in relation to the contract.deleted
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 78 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) Where, following the termination of the contract because of a lack of conformity with the contract, the supplier provides the consumer with the technical means to retrieve the data, the consumer should be entitled to retrieve the data free of any costs, for example the cost of employing a commonly used data format with the exception of costs generated by the consumer's own digital environment including the costs of a network connection as they are not specifically linked with the retrieval of the data.deleted
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 81 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
(44) The principle of the supplier's liability for damages is an essential element of the contracts for supply of digital content. In order to increase consumers' trust in digital content this principle should thus be regulated at Union level to ensure that consumers doConsumers should not suffer a detriment if their hardware or software is damaged by digital content which is not in conformity with the contract. Therefore, consumers should be entitled to a compensation for damages caused to the consumer's digital environment by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital content. However, it should be for Member States to lay down the detailed conditions for the exercise of the right to damages while taking into account that discounts on prices for future supplies of the digital content, especially when offered by suppliers as an exclusive compensation for losses, do not necessarily put the consumer as nearly as possible into the position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied and been in conformity with the contract.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 85 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
(46) Competition is an important element for a well-functioning digital single market. In order to stimulate such a competition, consumers should be enabled to respond to competitive offers and to switch between suppliers. In order to make this work in practice, they should be able to do so without being hindered by legal, technical or practical obstacles, including contractual conditions or lack of means for retrieving all data uploaded by the consumer, produced by the consumer with the use of the digital content or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content. However, it is also important to protect existing investments and the trust in concluded contracts. Therefore consumers should be given the right to terminate long- term contracts under certain balanced conditions. This does not preclude that consumer contracts may be concluded for longer contractual periods. However, the consumer should be entitled to terminate any contractual relation that altogether lasts for a period longer than 12 months. In order to prevent any circumvention of this right it should cover any contract which results in the consumer being bound by the contract for more than 12 months, irrespective of whether the contract is of indeterminate duration or is extended automatically or following a subsequent agreement by the parties.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 87 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) For the achievement of a genuine digital single market, the harmonisation of certain aspects concerning contracts for supply of digital content, taking as a base a high level of consumer protection, is necessary, as well as legal certainty for digital content suppliers.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 89 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
5. 'damages' means a sum of money to which consumers may be entitled as compensation for economic damage to their digital environmentharm caused ;
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 90 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
6. 'price' means money that is due in exchange for digital content supplideleted;
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 91 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
6. 'price' means money or any other type of representation of value that is due in exchange for digital content supplied;
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 93 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. 'interoperability' means the ability of digital content to perform all its functionalities in interaction with a concrete digitalstandard hardware and software environment;
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 95 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
11 a. 'personal data' means personal data as defined by Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 100 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall apply to any contract where the supplier supplies digital content to the consumer or undertakes to do so and, in exchange, a price is to be paid or the consumer actively provides counter- performance other than money in the form of personal data or any other data.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 102 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. This Directive shall not apply to digital content provided against counter- performance other than money to the extent the supplier requests the consumer to provide personal data the processing of which is strictly necessary for the performance of the contract or for meeting legal requirements and the supplier does not further process them in a way incompatible with this purpose. It shall equally not apply to any other data the supplier requests the consumer to provide for the purpose of ensuring that the digital content is in conformity with the contract or of meeting legal requirements, and the supplier does not use that data for commercial purposes.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 107 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 8
8. This Directive is without prejudice to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data.deleted
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 114 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a third party chosen by the consumer, which operates a physical or virtual facility making the digital content available to the consumer or allowing the consumer to access it and which has been chosen by the consumer for receiving the digital content.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 116 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The supplier shall supply the digital content immediatwithout undue delay after the conclusion of the contract, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. The supply shall be deemed to take place when the digital content is supplied to the consumer or, where point (b) of paragraph 1 applies, to the third party chosen by the consumer, whichever is the earlier.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 140 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) This Directive should fully harmonise a set of key rules that are so far not regulated at Union level. It should include therefore rules on conformity of the digital content, remedies available to consumers in cases of lack of such conformity ofr a failure to supply digital content with the contract and certain modalities for the exercise of those remedies. This Directive should also harmonise certain aspects concerning the right to terminate a long term contract, as well as certain aspects concerning the modification of the digital content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 143 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the supplier shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain from the use of the counter-performance other than money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digital content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumer with the exception of the content which has been generated jointly by the consumer and others who continue to make use of the contentIn respect of personal data and data other than personal data of the consumer, the supplier shall comply with the obligations applicable under Regulation 2016/679;
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 147 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content to the extent that data has been retained by the supplier. The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content free of charge, without significant inconvenience, in reasonable time and in a commonly used data format;deleted
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 151 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Upon termination, the supplier may prevent any further use of the digital content by the consumer, in particular by making the digital content not accessible to the consumer or disabling the user account of the consumer, without prejudice to point (c) of paragraph 2.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 152 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. Where the consumer terminates a part of the contract in accordance with paragraph 5, paragraph 2 shall apply, with the exception of point (b) in regards to the period during which the digital content was in conformity with the contract. The supplier shall reimburse to the consumer the part of the price paid corresponding to the period of time when the digital content was not in conformity with the contract.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 153 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The supplier shall be liable to the consumer for any economic damage to the digital environment of the consumerdamage caused by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital content. Damages shall put the consumer as nearly as possible into the position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied and been in conformity with the contract.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 161 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) The Directive should address problems across different categories of digital content and its supply. In order to cater for fast technological developments and to maintain the future-proof nature of the notion of digital content, this notion as used in this Directive should be broader than in Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.30 In particular it should cover services which allow the creation, processing or storage of data. While there are numerous ways for digital content to be supplied, such as transmission on a durable medium, downloading by consumers on their devices, web-streaming, allowing access to storage capabilities of digital content or access to the use of social media, this Directive should apply to all digital content independently of the medium used for its transmission. Differentiating between different categories in this technologically fast changing market is not desirable because it would hardly be possible to avoid discriminations between suppliers. A level-playing field between suppliers of different categories of digital content should be ensured. However this Directive should not apply to digital content which is embedded in goods in such a way that it operates as an integral part of the goods and its functions are subordinate to the main functionalities of the goods. _________________ 30 OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p.64.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 164 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) In order to meet the expectations of consumers and ensure a clear-cut and simple legal framework for suppliers of digital content offered on a durable medium, in relation to conformity requirements and remedies available to consumers for non-conformity, this Directive should apply to goods such as DVDs and CDs, incorporating digital content in such a way that the goods function only as a carrier of the digital content. The Directive should apply to the digital content supplied on a durable medium, independently whether it is sold at a distance or in face-to-face situations, so as to avoid fragmentation between the different distribution channels. The Directive 2011/83 should continue to apply to those goods, including to obligations related to the delivery of goods, remedies in case of the failure to deliver and the nature of the contract under which those goods are suppliedThe Directive should apply to the digital content supplied on a durable medium, independently whether it is sold at a distance or in face-to-face situations, so as to avoid fragmentation between the different distribution channels. The Directive is also without prejudice to the distribution right applicable to these goods under copyright law.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 165 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the supplier shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain from the use of other counter-performance than money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digitIn respect of personal data and data other than personal data, the supplier shall content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumermply with the obligations applicable under Regulation 2016/678;
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 167 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all any content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content to the extent this data has been retained by the supplier. The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content without significant inconvenience, in reasonable time and in a commonly used data format; andeleted
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 176 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, not later than on [the date of fivthree years after entry into force] review the application of this Directive and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council. The report shall examine, inter alia, the case for harmonisation of rules applicable to contracts for the supply of digital content against counter-performance other than money that covered by this Directive, in particular supplied against advertisement or indirect collection of data.
2016/09/01
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 177 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In the digital economy, information about individuals is often and increasingly seen by market participants as having a value comparable to money. Digital content is often supplied not in exchange for a price but against counter-performance other than money i.e. by giving access to personal data or other data. Those specific business models apply in different forms in a considerable part of the market. Introducing a differentiation depending on the nature of the counter-performance would discriminate between different business models; it would provide an unjustified incentive for businesses to move towards offering digital content against data. A level playing field should be ensured. In addition, defects of the performance features of the digital content supplied against counter-performance other than money may have an impact on the economic interests of consumers. Therefore the applicability of the rules of this Directive should not depend on whether a price is paid for the specific digital content in question.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 191 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) As regards digital content supplied not in exchange for a price but against counter-performance other than money, this Directive should apply only to contracts where the supplier requests and the consumer actively provides personal data, such as name and e-mail address or photos, directly or indirectly to the supplier for example through individual registration or on the basis of a contract which allows access to consumers' photos. This Directive should not apply to situations where the supplier collects data necessary for the digital content to function in conformity with the contract, for example geographical location where necessary for a mobile application to function properly, or for the sole purpose of meeting legal requirements, for instance where the registration of the consumer is required for security and identification purposes by applicable laws. This Directive should also not apply to situations where the supplier collects information, including personal data, such as the IP address, or other automatically generated information such as information collected and transmitted by a cookie, without the consumer actively supplying it, even if the consumer accepts the cookie. It should also not apply to situations where the consumer is exposed to advertisements exclusively in order to gain access to digital content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 201 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) CDigital content generated by consumers should be treated on the same basis as any other digital content that the consumer provides or stores throughout the period of duration of the contract such as music and video files, pictures, games or applications. CDigital content generated by consumers comprises a wide range of examples including digital images, video and audio files, blogs, discussion forums, text-based collaboration formats, posts, chats, tweets, logs, podcasting, content created on mobile devices, content created in the context of online virtual environments, ratings and collections of links referring to online content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 214 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) This Directive should apply only to those services whose main subject matter is providing digital content. Therefore, the Directive should not apply to services, which are performed personally by the supplier and where the digital means are only used for access or delivery purposes, such as a translation offered by a person or other professional advice services where only the output of the service is delivered to the consumer by digital means and the supplier does not further process them.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 231 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) There are various ways for digital content to reach consumers. It is opportune to set simple and clear rules as to the modalities and the time for performing the supplier's main contractual obligation to supply digital content to the consumer. Considering that the supplier is not in principle responsible for acts or omissions of an internet provider or an electronic platform which the consumer selected for receiving the digital content, it should be sufficient for the supplier to supply the digital content to this third party. With regard to the time of supply, in line with market practices and technical possibilities, the digital content should be supplied immediatwithout undue delay, unless the parties decide to agree otherwise in order to cater for other supply models.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 253 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) In order to work properly, digital content needs to be correctly integrated into the consumer's hardware and software of digital environment. Where a lack of conformity with the contract of the digital content results from an incorrect integration, it should be regarded as a lack of conformity with the contract of the digital content itself, where it was integrated by the supplier or under its control, or by the consumer following supplier's instructions for integration and the incorrect integration was due to shortcomings in the required integration instructions. In such scenarios the origin of the lack of conformity stems from the sphere of the supplier.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 267 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Without prejudice to the fundamental rights to the protection of private life, including confidentiality of communications, and the protection of personal data of the consumer, the consumer should cooperate with the supplier in order to allow the supplier to ascertain the consumer's digital environment with the use of the least intrusive means which are at the disposal of both parties in the circumstances for determining whether the lack of conformity existed at the time of the supply of digital content. This may often be done for instance by providing the supplier with automatically generated incident reports or details of the consumer's internet connection. Only in exceptional and duly justified circumstances where with the best use of all other means there is no other way possible, this may also be done by allowing virtual access to the consumer's digital environment. However, where the consumer does not cooperate with the supplier, it should be for the consumer to prove that the digital content is not in conformity with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 309 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) In order to ensure that the consumer benefits from effective protection in relation to the right to terminate the contract, the supplier should allow the consumer to retrieve all data uploaded by the consumer, produced by the consumer with the use of the digital content or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content. This obligation should extend to data which the supplier is obliged to retain under the contract for the supply of the digital content as well as to data which the supplier has effectively retained in relation to the contract.deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 340 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
(44) The principle of the supplier's liability for damages is an essential element of the contracts for supply of digital content. In order to increase consumers' trust in digital content this principle should thus be regulated at Union level to ensure that consumers doConsumers should not suffer a detriment if their hardware or software is damaged by digital content which is not in conformity with the contract. Therefore, consumers should be entitled to a compensation for damages caused to the consumer's digital environment by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital content. However, it should be for Member States to lay down the detailed conditions for the exercise of the right to damages while taking into account that discounts on prices for future supplies of the digital content, especially when offered by suppliers as an exclusive compensation for losses, do not necessarily put the consumer as nearly as possible into the position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied and been in conformity with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 342 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
(44) The principle of the supplier's liability for damages is an essential element of the contracts for supply of digital content. In order to increase consumers' trust in digital content this principle should thus be regulated at Union level to ensure that consumers do not suffer a detriment if their hardware or software is damaged by digital content which is not in conformity with the contract. Therefore, consumers should be entitled to a compensation for damages caused to the consumer's digital environment by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital content. However, it should be for Member States to lay down the detailed conditions for the exercise of the right to damages while taking into account that discounts on prices for future supplies of the digital content, especially when offered by suppliers as an exclusive compensation for losses, do not necessarily put the consumer as nearly as possible into the position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied and been in conformity with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 367 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive lays down certain requirements concerning contracte purpose of this Directive is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market and achieve a high level of consumer protection by laying down common requirements concerning certain rules for the contracts between suppliers and consumers for the supply of digital content to consumers, in particularand/or digital services, rules on conformity of digital content with the contract, remedies in case of the lack of such conformity or a failure to supply and the modalities for the exercise of those remedies as well as on modification and termination of such contracts.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 375 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) data which is produced and supplied in digital form, for example video, audio, applications, digital games and any other software,;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 382 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) adigital service allowing the creation, processing or storage of data in digital form, where such data is provided by the consumer, and
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 387 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
(c) adigital service allowing sharing of and any other interaction with data in digital form provided by other users of the service;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 396 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. 'integration' means linking and incorporating together different components of a digital environment to act as a coordinated whole in conformity with its intended purposedigital content components with the components of digital environment to use digital content in accordance with the contract;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 401 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. 'supplier' means any natural or legal person, irrespective of whether privately or publicly owned, who is acting, including through any other person acting in his name or on his behalf, for purposes relating to that person’his trade, business, craft, or profession in relation to contracts covered by this Directive;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 404 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
4. 'consumer' means any natural person who in relation to contracts covered by this Directive, is acting for purposes which are outside that person's trade, business, craft, or profession;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 408 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
5. 'damages' means a sum of money to which consumers may be entitled as compensation for economic damage to their digital environmentthe harm caused;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 413 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
6. 'price' means money or any other type of representation of value that is due in exchange for digital content supplied;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 418 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
6 a. 'personal data' means personal data as defined by Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 422 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
8. 'digital environment' means hardware, digital contentsoftware and any network connection to the extent that they are within the control of the usused by the consumer;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 431 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. 'interoperability' means the ability of digital content to perform all its functionalities in interaction with a concrete digitalstandard hardware and software environment;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 454 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall apply to any contract where the supplier supplies digital content to the consumer or undertakes to do so and, in exchange, a price is to be paid or the consumer actively provides counter- performance other than money in the form of personal data or any other data.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 465 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. With the exception of Articles 5 and 11, this Directive shall apply to any durable medium incorporating digital content where the durable medium has been used exclusively as carrier of digital contentThis Directive shall apply to goods in which digital content is embedded unless the supplier proves that the lack of conformity lies in the hardware of the good.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 472 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. This Directive shall not apply to digital content provided against counter- performance other than money to the extent the supplier requests the consumer to provide personal data the processing of which is strictly necessary for the performance of the contract or for meeting legal requirements and the supplier does not further process them in a way incompatible with this purpose. It shall equally not apply to any other data the supplier requests the consumer to provide for the purpose of ensuring that the digital content is in conformity with the contract or of meeting legal requirements, and the supplier does not use that data for commercial purposes.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 485 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) services performed with a predominant element of human intervention by the supplier where the digital format is used mainly as a carrier or for making such service available;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 496 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. Where a contract includes elementfor the supply of digital content includes additional contractual obligations in addition to the supply of digital content, this Directive shall only apply to the obligations and remedies of the parties as supplier and consumer of the digital content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 501 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 7
7. If any provision of this Directive conflicts with a provision of another Union act governing a specific sector or subject matter, the provision of that other Union act shall take precedence over this Directiveprevail.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 506 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 8
8. This Directive is without prejudice to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal datapersonal data as provided for by Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 537 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The supplier shall supply the digital content immediatwithout undue delay after the conclusion of the contract, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. The supply shall be deemed to take place when the digital content is supplied to the consumer or, where point (b) of paragraph 1 applies, to the third party chosen by the consumer, whichever is the earlier.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 551 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In order to conform with the contract, the digital content shall, where relevantapplicable:
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 573 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. To the extent that the contract does not stipulate, where relevant, in a clear and comprehensive manner, the requirements for the digital content under paragraph 1, the digital content shall be fit for the purposes that consumers could reasonably expect or for which digital content of the same description would normally be used including its functionality, interoperability and other performance features such as accessibility, continuity and security, taking into account:
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 576 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) whether the digital content is supplied in exchange for a price or other counter-performance than money;deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 645 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The burden of proof with respect to the conformity with the contract at the time indicated inwhether the digital content was supplied in accordance with Article 105 shall be on the supplier.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 658 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The consumer shall cooperate with the supplier to the extent possible and necessary to determine the consumer'sallow the supplier to ascertain the consumer's digital environment to the extent possible for determining whether the lack of conformity existed at the time of the supply of digital envirconmtent. The obligation to cooperate shall be limited to the technically availableIn particular, the consumer shall tolerate the use of the least intrusive technical means, which are the least intrusive for the consumerat the disposal of both parties. Where the consumer fails to cooperate, the burden of proof with respect to the non-conformity with the contract shall be on the consumer.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 665 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) any failure to supply the digital content in accordance with Article 5;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 680 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 1 (new)
1) The rights of the consumer laid down in Article 12 shall be subject to a prescription period of 2 years. The prescription period shall begin to run from the time when the consumer has become , or could be expected to have become, aware of the lack of conformity.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 691 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Where the supplier has failed to supply the digital content in accordance with Article 5 the consumer shall be entitled to terminate the contract immediately under Article 13, unless the supplier, upon the request of the consumer, supplies the digital content without undue delay.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 778 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The consumer shall exercise the right to terminate the contract by notice to the supplier given by any meansmaking any unequivocal notice setting out his decision to terminate the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 787 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the supplier shall reimburse to the consumer the price paid without undue delay and in any event not later than 14 days from receipt of the noticeusing the same means of payments, unless agreed otherwise, as the consumer used to pay for the digital content in any event not later than 14 days from receipt of the notice. The supplier shall not impose any fee on the consumer in respect of the refund;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 792 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the supplier shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain from the use of the counter-performance other than money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digital content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumer with the exception of the content which has been generated jointly by the consumer and others who continue to make use of the contentIn respect of personal data and data other than personal data of the consumer, the supplier shall comply with the obligations applicable under Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 800 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content to the extent that data has been retained by the supplier. The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content free of charge, without significant inconvenience, in reasonable time and in a commonly used data format;deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 828 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Upon termination, the supplier may prevent any further use of the digital content by the consumer, in particular by making the digital content not accessible to the consumer or disabling the user account of the consumer, without prejudice to point (c) of paragraph 2.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 842 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. Where the consumer terminates a part of the contract in accordance with paragraph 5, paragraph 2 shall apply, with the exception of point (b) in regards to the period during which the digital content was in conformity with the contract. The supplier shall reimburse to the consumer the part of the price paid corresponding to the period of time when the digital content was not in conformity with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 861 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The supplier shall be liable to the consumer for any economic damage to the digital environment of the consumerdamage caused by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital content. Damages shall put the consumer as nearly as possible into the position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied and been in conformity with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 884 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the consumer is notified reasonably in advance of the modification by an explicit noticeinformed of the modification and his right to terminate the contract free of charge, reasonably in advance in a clear and comprehensible manner on a durable medium;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 890 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the consumer is allowed to terminate the contract free of any charges within no less than 30 days from the receipt of the noticeday on which the consumer is informed of the modification; and
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 899 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the supplier shall refrain from the use of the counter-performance other than money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digital content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumer.deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 925 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The consumer shall exercise the right to terminate the contract by notice to the supplier given by any meansin accordance with Article 13. The termination shall become effective 14 days after the receipt of the notice.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 931 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Where the consumer terminates the contract in accordance with this Article: (a) the supplier shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain from the use of other counter- performance than money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digital content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumer; (b) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all any content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content to the extent this data has been retained by the supplier. The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content without significant inconvenience, in reasonable time and in a commonly used data format; and (c) where applicable, the consumer shall delete any usable copy of the digital content, render it unintelligible or otherwise refrain from using it including by making it available to a third party.deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 934 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the supplier shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain from the use of other counter-performance than money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digital content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumer;deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 942 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all any content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content to the extent this data has been retained by the supplier. The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content without significant inconvenience, in reasonable time and in a commonly used data format; andeleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 952 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) where applicable, the consumer shall delete any usable copy of the digital content, render it unintelligible or otherwise refrain from using it including by making it available to a third party.deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 956 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Where the consumer terminates the contract in accordance with this Article, Article 13 shall apply accordingly.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 962 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Upon termination, the supplier may prevent any further use of the digital content by the consumer, in particular by making the digital content not accessible to the consumer or disabling the user account of the consumer, without prejudice to paragraph (4) point (b)Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 986 #

2015/0287(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, not later than on [the date of five years after entry into force] review the application of this Directive and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council. The report shall examine, inter alia, the interaction and compliance with the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and the the case for harmonisation of rules applicable to contracts for the supply of digital content against counter-performance other than that covered by this Directive, in particular supplied against advertisement or indirect collection of data.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 117 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The definition of the term "firearm" should be clarified and the control of essential components enhanced by including in the definition any device which shares an essential component with a firearm. An essential component contained in any such device should be considered capable of being used in a firearm when the essential component can be transferred from that device to the firearm without substantial modification.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) The definition of the term "firearm" under Directive 91/477/EEC should continue to exclude objects which expel a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of a non-combustible propellant, for example through the operation of compressed air or another gas, including so-called airsoft devices and airgun devices, as well as objects which merely have the appearance of a firearm (replicas, imitations), provided in both cases that such objects cannot be converted to a firearm or do not contain an essential component which is capable of being used in a firearm. Member States should be able to regulate such objects under their national law.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 c (new)
(3c) Essential components should be defined as those components which are necessary for the operation of a firearm and are constructed to withstand high pressure of firing. Accessories, such as devices designed or adapted to diminish the sound caused by firing a firearm, should not fall within the definition of an essential component, as the firearm can still be operated without them.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 d (new)
(3d) It should be specified that the activities of a dealer include not only the manufacturing but also the modification or conversion a firearm, such as the shortening of a complete firearm, and in addition the modification or conversion of parts of firearms and of ammunition, provided that it affects the category of such a firearm or ammunition, and that, therefore, only authorised dealers should be permitted to engage in those activities. This will not prevent, where allowed by national law, private persons from preparing ammunition or from modifying non-essential components of firearms for personal use.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 e (new)
(3e) Member States should lay down particularly high requirements for secure storage with respect to firearms or ammunition classified in category A. Such requirements could include, where appropriate, measures ensuring real-time monitoring, as well as requirements to maintain essential components and ammunition in safe storage separate from the firearms in which they can be used.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Since collectors have been identified as a possible source of traffic of firearms, they should be covered by this Directive.deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Taking into consideration the high risk of reactivating badly deactivated weapons and in order to enhance security across the Union, dDeactivated firearms should not be covered by this Directive. Additionally, for the most dangerous firearms stricter rules should be introduced in order to ensure that those firearms are not allowed to be owned or traded. Those rules should also apply to fire if they have been deactivated in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 or in accordance with prior national standarmds of that category even after they have been deactivated. Where those rules are not respected, Member States should take appropriate measures including the destruction of thoseand procedures recognised as resulting in the firearms being rendered permanently unfit for use, inoperable and incapable of being converted into functioning firearms.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 197 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The acquisition and possession of firearms should only be permitted if, inter alia, there is good cause. It should be possible for Member States, whilst not being under any obligation in that regard, to find that the acquisition and possession of firearms for the purpose of, for example, hunting, target shooting, various scientific, technical or testing activities, or self-defence and re-enactment of historical events, filmmaking or historical study can constitute good cause.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 205 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In order to ensurincrease the traceability of deactivated firearms, they should be registered in national registriesfirearms and essential components and to facilitate their free movement, the provisions of Directive 91/477/EEC should be clarified to ensure that both an assembled firearm and all essential components, whether included in an assembled firearm or not, are marked irremovably, without delay, at the time of their being manufactured or imported, unless the firearm has been deactivated in accordance with that Directive.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Some semi-automatic firearms can be easily converted to automatic firearms, thus posing a threat to security. Even in There is a risk that any firearms converted to firing blanks, irritants, other absective substances of conversion to category "A", certain semi-automatic firearms may be very dangerous whenr pyrotechnic ammunition can be converted back in such a way as to make theirm capacity regarding the number of rounds is high. Such semi-automatic weapons should therefore be banned for civilian useble of firing live ammunition. Such firearms should therefore remain in the categories in which they were classified prior to their conversion.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 287 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Objects, that have the physical appearance of a firearm ("replica"), but are manufactured in such a way that they cannot be converted to firing a shot or expelling a bullet or projectile by the action of a combusted propellant, should not be covered by this Directive.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 304 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point -a a (new)
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 1a
(-a) Article 1(1a) is deleted.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 1b
1b. For the purposes of this Directive, "essential component" shall mean the barrel, chamber, body, frame, or receiver, slide or cylinder, bolt or breaech block and any device designed or adapted to diminish the sound caused by firingor other locking and cartridge-head supporting mechanism for containing the pressure of discharge at the rear of the chamber of a firearm which, being separate objects, are included in the category of the firearms on which they are or are intended to be mounted.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 1e
1e. For the purposes of this Directive, "broker" shall mean any natural or legal person, other than a dealer, his agents and representatives, whose trade or business consists wholly or partly in buying, selling or arranging the transfer within a Member State, from one Member State to another Member State or exporting to a third country fully assembled firearms, their parts and ammunition.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 360 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1– paragraph 1h
1h. For the purposes of this Directive, "replica firearms" shall mean objects that have the physical appearance of a firearm, but are manufactured in such a way that they cannot be converted to firing a shot or expelling a bullet or projectile by the action of a combustible propellant.deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point d
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point ii
(ii) the manufacture, including modification or conversion, trade, exchange, hiring out, or repair or conversion of parts of firearmf essential components;
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 408 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive shall not apply to the acquisition or possession of weapons and ammunition, in accordance with national law, by the armed forcesnational defence forces, encompassing all units and persons under their command or in their reserves, including the military, the police, or other public authorities. Nor shall it apply to commercial transfers of weapons and ammunition of war.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 423 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that any assembled firearm or part placed on the market has been markedessential component, when manufactured or imported, has been marked without delay with an irremovable mark and registered in compliance with this Directive, or that it has been deactivated in accordance with the provisions implementing Article 10b and registered in compliance with this Directive.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 447 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
For the purposes of identifying and tracing each assembled firearm and each essential component, Member States shall, at the time of manufacture of each firearm or at the time of import and each essential component, or at the time of its being manufactured or imported into the Union, require a unique marking including the name of the manufacturer, the country or place of manufacture, the serial number and the year of manufacture, if not already part of the serial number. This shall be without prejudice to the affixing of the manufacturer's trademark.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The marking shall be affixed to the frame or receiver of the firearm.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 470 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purposes referred to in the first subparagraph, Member States may choose to apply the provisions of the United Nations Convention for the Reciprocal Recognition of Proof Marks on Small Arms of 1 July 1969.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 476 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Furthermore, Member States shall ensure, at the time of transfer of a firearm from government stocks to permanent civilian use, the unique marking permitting identification of the transferring government. Firearms classified in category A must first have been deactivated in accordance with the provisions implementing Article 10b or converted to semi-automatic firearms, save in the case of transfers in accordance with authorisations granted pursuant to the first or the second subparagraph of Article 6.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 510 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Article 3, Member States shall authorise the acquisition and possession of firearms only by persons who have good cause and who:deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 540 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1a (new)
1a. Member States shall establish rules on appropriate storage of firearms, their essential components and ammunition, including when under transport, ensuring a level of security proportionate to the risk of unauthorised access and to the nature and category of the firearms concerned.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 581 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 2(2), Member States shall take all appropriate steps to prohibit the acquisition and the possession of the firearms and ammunition classified in category A and to destroy or deactivate those firearms and ammunition held in violation of this provision and seized. A competent authority of a Member State may under strict conditions grant authorisation for such firearms and ammunition provided that there is a legitimate purpose and provided that such authorisation is not contrary to public security, public order or national defence.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 604 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Member States may authorise bodies concerned with the cultural and historical aspects of weapons and recognised as such by the Member State in whose territory they are established to keep in their possession firearms classified in category A acquired beforchoose to grant authorisations to legal or natural persons dedicated to the gathering, study and conservation of firearms and associated artefacts for historical, cultural, scientific, technical, educational, aesthetic or heritage purposes and recognised as such by the Member State in whose territory they are for firearms and ammunition classified in category A, provided that such persons demonstrate [the date of entry into force of this Directive] provided they have been deactivated in accordance with the provisions that implement Article 10(b)at measures are in place to address any risks to public security or public order and that the firearm or firearms concerned are stored with a level of security proportionate to the risks associated with unauthorised access to such firearms.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 675 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7 a (new)
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 10
(7a) Article 10 is replaced by the following: "The arrangements for the acquisition and possession of ammunition shall be the same as those for the possession of the firearms for which the ammunition is intended. The acquisition and possession of ammunition shall be permitted only for persons who are allowed to possess a firearm of a respective category."
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 706 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. TFor the purposes of the efficient application of this Directive, the competent authorities of the Member States shall exchange information on theby electronic means via a data-exchange platform or interoperable data-exchange platforms to be operational by ... [insert date], including information on authorisations granted for the transfers of firearms to another Member State as well as information with regard to refusals to grant authorisations as defined in Article 7. The Member States shall, upon request by another Member State, exchange information relevant to an assessment of the criminal history, if any, of persons who apply for or who have been granted exceptions pursuant to Article 6 or authorisations pursuant to Article 7. That information shall include the entire text of the corresponding judicial decision or decision of a relevant public authority.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 717 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 13a concerning the modalities of exchange of information on authorisations granted and on refusalsor refused for the transfer of firearms to another Member State. The Commission shall adopt the first such delegated act by ... [insert date].
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 749 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 6
6. Automatic firearms which have been converted into semi-automatic firearms and which can be reconverted into automatic firearms using conventional tools or simply by the modification or replacement of parts other than essential components, provided that the technical conversion procedure was not previously authorised by a relevant authority of a Member State and provided that the converted firearm in question was inspected and marked;
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 774 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 7
7. Semi-automatic firearms for civilian use which resemble weapons withwhich have been converted into automatic mechanisfirearms;
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 783 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 8
8. FAny firearms under points 1 to 3 and 6 to 7 after having been deactivatedconverted to firing blanks, irritants, other active substances or pyrotechnical ammunition.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 791 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point ii
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category B – point 7
(ii) in category B, point 7 is deleted.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 804 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point ii a (new)
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category B – point 7 a (new)
(iia) in Category B, the following point is added: "7a. Any firearm previously classified under points 1 to 7 after having been converted to firing blanks, irritants, other active substances or pyrotechnic ammunition."
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 814 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point iii
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category C – point 5
5. Alny firearm aund signal weapons, salute and acoustic weapons as well as replicaser points 1 to 4 after having been converted to firing blanks, irritants, other active substances or pyrotechnic ammunition;
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 820 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point iii
Directive 91/447/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category C – point 6
6. Firearms under category B and points 1 to 5 of category C, after having been deactivadeleted.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 828 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point iii a (new)Directive 91/477/EEC

Annex I – part II – point A – category D
"Single-shot long firearms with smooth- bore barrels(iiia) in category D, the wording under the heading is replaced by the following: "Single-shot long firearms with smooth- bore barrels, including those which have been converted to firing blanks, irritants, other active substances or pyrotechnic ammunition."
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 834 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 14 – point a
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part III – point a
(a) point (a) is deleted; replaced by the following: "(a) have been rendered permanently unfit for use by deactivation, ensuring that all essential parts of the firearm have been rendered permanently inoperable and incapable of removal, replacement or modification in a way that would permit the firearm to be reactivated in any way, provided that such deactivation has been done: (i) in accordance with the provisions implementing Article 10b(1); or (ii) pursuant to prior national standards and procedures for deactivation recognised under Article 10b(2); or (iii) prior to 8 April 2016 such that a slot has been cut through the chamber wall of a minimum of 4mm width and into the barrel along at least 50% of the barrel length and the barrel has been securely pinned or welded to the receiver/frame, and conversion to expel a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of a combustible propellant is not possible; or (iv) prior to 8 April 2016 and the deactivated object is not transferred to another Member State or placed on the market by a dealer or broker";
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 836 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 14 – point b
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part III – point b
are designed for alarm, signalling, life- saving, animal slaughter or harpoon fishing or, for industrial or technical purposes provided that they can be used for the stated purpose only, or to only be capable of expelling a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of compressed air or other gas not generated by the action of a combusted propellant, or are designed as airsoft devices or airgun devices of any description from which only a small missile with limited energy can be discharged, provided that they can be used for the stated purpose only and are not capable of being converted in such a way as to render them capable of expelling a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of a combusted propellant;
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 844 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive [312 months after publication toin the OJ]. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Harmonisation of the information contained in the prospectus should provide equivalent investor protection at Union level. In order to enable investors to make an informed investment decision, that information should be sufficient and objective including with regard to the financial circumstances of the issuer and the rights attaching to the securities, and should be provided in an easily analysable, succinct and comprehensible form. Those requirements should apply to all types of prospectuses drawn up in accordance with this Regulation, including those following the minimumsimplified disclosure requirements for secondary issuances and for SMEs. A prospectus should not contain information which is not material or specific to the issuer and the securities concerned, as this could obscure the information relevant to the investment decision and thus undermine investor protection.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) One of the core objectives of the Capital Markets Union is to facilitate access to financing on capital markets for SMEs which are the main driver of the EU economy in the Union. As such companies usually need to raise relatively lower amounts than other issuers, the cost of drawing up a prospectus can be disproportionately high and complicated administrative procedures may deter them from offering their securities to the public. At the same time, because of their size and shorter track record, SMEs might carry a higher investment risk than larger issuers and should disclose sufficient information for investors to take their investment decision. A proper balance should therefore be struck between the cost- efficient access to financial markets and investor protection when calibrating the content of a prospectus applying to SMEs and a specific disclosure regime should therefore be developed for SMEs to achieve that objective.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) The minimumreduced information required to be disclosed by SMEs under the specific disclosure regime should be calibrated in a way that focuses on information that is material and relevant for companies of such size and their investors, and. It should aim at ensuring proportionality between the size of the company and its fundraising needs, on the one hand, and the cost of producing a prospectus, on the other hand. In order to ensure SMEs can draw up prospectuses without incurring costs that are not proportionate to their size, and thus the size of their fundraising, the specific disclosure regime for SMEs should be more flexible than that applying to companies on regulated markets to the extent compatible with ensuring that the key information necessary to the investors is disclosed.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) Favourable treatments granted to issuances of non-equity securities with a denomination per unit in excess of EUR 100 000 may distort the structure of debt markets, create impediments to proper diversification of portfolios and to the development of electronic trading platforms, thus undermining liquidity on the secondary market, and may reduce investment choice for retail investors by depriving them of the opportunity to acquire investment-grade corporate bonds. It is therefore appropriate to remove the prospectus exemption for offers of non-equity securities whose denomination per unit amounts to at least EUR 100 000 and the lower standard of disclosure granted to prospectuses concerning such non-equity securities, featured originally in Directive 2003/71/EC. In particular, it is appropriate to unify the minimum information requirements for non-equity prospectuses, thereby replacing the dual standard of disclosure between issuances targeting qualified investors only and issuances targeting non-qualified investors.deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 38 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) Not all issuers have access to adequate information and guidance about the scrutiny and approval process and the necessary steps to follow to get a prospectus approved, as different approaches by competent authorities exist in Member States. This Regulation should eliminate those differences by harmonising the rules applying to the scrutiny and approval process in order to ensure that all competent authorities take a convergent approach when scrutinising the completeness, consistency and comprehensibility of the information contained in a prospectus. Guidance on how to seek approval of a prospectus should be publicly available of the websites of the competent authorities. ESMA should play a key role in fostering supervisory convergence in this field by using its powers under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council13 . In particular, ESMA should conduct peer reviews covering activities of the competent authorities under this Regulation within an appropriate time-frame before the review of this Regulation and in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. ESMA should create an online platform in order to simplify the prospectus process, its procedures, and make the information easily accessible through the monitoring and approval stages. __________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC, (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84)
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) an offer of securities addressed to fewer than 1500 natural or legal persons per Member State, other than qualified investors;
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the total consideration of the offer is less than a monetary amount calculated over a period of 12 months, which shall not exceed EUR 120 000 000. in the Union, and
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The Commission shall harmonise the rules based on which this consideration shall be drafted.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
The Commission shall supervise and prevent that by such actions Member States do not hamper the fragmentation of the single market.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The prospectus shall include a summary providing the key information that investors need in order to understand the nature and the risks of the issuer, the guarantor and the securities that are being offered or admitted to trading on a regulated market, and that, when read together with the other parts of the prospectus, shall aids investors when considering whether to invest in such securities.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) an introduction containing warnings that include a possible loss of their investment if this would occur;
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. ESMA shall develop guidelines on the assessment by competent authorities of the specificity and materiality of risk factors and on theits allocation of risk factors across categories.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
In order to ensure consistent harmonisation in relation to this Article, ESMA mayshall develop draft regulatory technical standards to update the list mentioned in paragraph 1 by including additional types of documents required under Union law to be filed with or approved by a public authority.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) it shall inform the issuer, the offeror or the person asking for admission to trading on a regulated market within 10 working days of the submission of the draft prospectus and/or supplementary information, and state the reasons for the decision therefor, and
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 11
11. ESMA shall use its powers under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 to promote supervisory convergence with regard to the scrutiny and approval processes of competent authorities when assessing the completeness, consistency and comprehensibility of the information contained in a prospectus. In particular, ESMA shall foster convergence regarding the efficiency, methods and timing of the scrutiny by the competent authorities of the information given in a prospectus. ESMA shall create an online platform in order to simplify the prospectus process, its procedures, and make the information easily accessible through the monitoring and approval stages.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 12
12. Without prejudice to Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall also organise and conduct at least one peer review of the scrutiny and approval procedures of competent authorities, including notifications of approval between competent authorities. The peer review shall also assess the impact of different approaches with regard to scrutiny and approval by competent authorities on issuers' ability to raise capital in the European Union. The report on this peer review shall be published no later thatn three years after the date of application of this Regulation and be accessible online format too. In the context of this peer review, ESMA shall, where appropriate, request opinions or advice from the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group referred to in Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For the purpose of Article 27, and, where deemed necessary, for the purpose of Article 26, the competent authorities of Member States shall conclude supervisory cooperation arrangements with supervisorythe competent authorities of third countries concerning the exchange of information with supervisory authorities in third countries and the enforcement of obligations arising under this Regulation in third countries. Those supervisory cooperation arrangements shall ensure at least an efficient exchange of information that allows the competent authorities to carry out their duties under this Regulation.
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. It shall apply from [enter date 124 months after entry into force of this Regulation].
2016/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 15 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Throughout the economic and financial crisis, the Union has made efforts to promote growth, in particular through initiatives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy that put in place an approach for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, through the European Semester for economic policy coordination. The European Investment Bank ('EIB') has also strengthened its role in instigating and promoting investment within the Union, partly by way of an increase in capital in January 2013. Further action is required to ensure that the investment needs of the Union are addressed and that the liquidity available on the market is used efficiently and channelled towards the funding of viable investment projects.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 16 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) On 15 July 2014, the then President- elect of the European Commission presented a set of Political Guidelines for the European Commission to the European Parliament. These Political Guidelines called for an Energy Union, a connected Digital Single Market, and the mobilisation of ‘up to EUR 300 billion in additional public and private investment in the real economy over the next three years’ to stimulate investment for the purpose of job creation.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The investment environment within the Union should be improved by removing barriers to investment, reinforcing the Single Market and by enhancing regulatory predictability, in particular in energy, digital, and capital markets, by enhancing regulatory predictability and promoting a mentality shift towards a risk-taking culture. The work of the EFSI, and investments across Europe generally, should benefit from this accompanying work.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The EFSI should support strategic investments with high economic and social value added contributing to achieving Union policy objectives. The EFSI should improve access to finance and the competitiveness of enterprises, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Recommendation 2003/361/EC, and invest in projects which aim to strengthen the Single Market. The EFSI should be complementary to existing EU programmes. In this context, the projects financed by the EFSI should have a higher risk than projects financed by other EU programmes or by other EIB operations.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Many small and medium enterprises, as well as mid-cap companies, across the Union require assistance to attract market financing, especially as regards investments that carry a greater degree of risk. The EFSI should help these businesses to overcome capital shortages by allowing the EIB and the European Investment Fund ('EIF') to provide direct and indirect equity injections, as well as to provide guarantees for high-quality securitisation of loans, and other products that are granted in pursuit of the aims of the EFSI. The EFSI should also ensure that the specificity of funding at different stages that innovative businesses, such as start-ups, need is taken into account.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The EFSI should target projects delivering high societal and economic value. In particular, the EFSI should target projects that promote job creation, long- term growth and competitiveness, including through the development of innovation. The EFSI should support a wide range of financial products, including equity, debt or guarantees, to best accommodate the needs of the individual project. This wide range of products should allow the EFSI to adapt to market needs whilst encouraging private investment in the projects. The EFSI should not be a substitute for private market finance but should instead catalyse private finance by addressing market failures so as to ensure the most effective and strategic use of public money. The requirement for consistency with State aid principles should contribute to such effective and strategic use.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Decisions on the use of the EFSI support for infrastructure and large mid- cap projects should be made by an Investment Committee. The Investment Committee should be composed of independent experts who are knowledgeable and experienced in the areas of investment projectsproject structuring and project financing, and investment projects, and in different sectors, such as research and development, energy, transport and ICT. The Investment Committee should be accountable to a Steering Board of the EFSI, who should supervise the fulfilment of the EFSI's objectives. To effectively benefit from the experience of the EIF, the EFSI should support funding to the EIF to allow the EIF to undertake individual projects in the areas of small and medium enterprises and small mid-cap companies.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 30 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) For the purposes of the transparency, accountability and independence of the Steering Board and the Investment Committee, a system for the prevention of conflicts of interest should be adopted and implemented.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Infrastructure and project investments supported under EFSI should be consistentcomply with State aid rules. To that end, the Commission has announced that it will formulate a set of core principles, for the purpose of State aid assessments, which a project will have to meet to be eligible for support under the EFSI. If a project meets these criteria and receives support from the EFSI, the Commission has announced that any national complementary support, will be assessed under a simplified and accelerated State aid assessment whereby the only additional issue to be verified by the Commission will be the proportionality of public support (absence of overcompensation). The Commission has also announced that it will provide further guidance on the set of core principles with a view to ensuring an efficient use of public funds.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) To partially finance the contribution from the Union budget, the available envelopes of the Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020, provided by Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council2, and the Connecting Europe Facility, provided by Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council3, should be reduced. Those programmes serve purposes that are not replicated by the EFSI. However, the reduction of both programmes to finance the guarantee fund is expected toshould ensure a greater investment in certain areas of their respective mandates than is possible through the existing programmes, including energy interconnections, the synchronisation of energy systems and digital highways. The EFSI should be able to leverage the EU guarantee to multiply the financial effect within those areas of research, development and innovation and transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructure compared to if the resources had been spent via grants within the planned Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility programmes. It is, therefore, appropriate to redirect part of the funding presently envisaged for those programmes to the benefit of EFSI. __________________ 2 Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 104). 3 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 129).
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) To ensure accountability to European citizens, the EIB should regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council on the progress and impact of the EFSI and its complementarity with other instruments and programmes.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall concludebe empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20a concerning an agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) on the establishment of a European Fund for Strategic Investments ('EFSI').
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 44 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments that create growth and jobs in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, and innovative enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
For as long as the only contributors to the EFSI are the Union and the EIB, the number of members and votes within the Steering Board shall be allocated based on the respective size of contributions in the form of cash or guarantees.deleted
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
When other parties accede to the EFSI Agreement in accordance with Article 1(2), the number of members and votes within the Steering Board shall be allocated based on the respective size of contributions from contributors in the form of cash or guarantees. The number of members and votes of the Commission and the EIB, according to paragraph 2, shall be recalculated accordingly.deleted
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance andstructuring and project financing. The Investment Committee shall have expertise in different sectors, with a particular focus on research and development, energy, ICT and transport. It shall be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of three years.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The Investment Committee shall be accountable to the Steering Board of the EFSI, which shall supervise the achievement of the EFSI's objectives, but when implementing the guidelines adopted by the Steering Board, the Investment Committee shall not take instructions from the EIB, the Member States, other EU institutions or any other body.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The EU guarantee shall be granted for EIB financing and investment operations approved by the Investment Committee referred to in Article 3(5) or funding to the EIF in order to conduct EIB financing and investment operations in accordance with Article 7(2). The investment operations concerned shall be complementary to existing EU programmes, bring EU added value, be consistent with Union policies and support any of the following general objectives:
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The EU guarantee shall be granted for EIB financing and investment operations approved by the Investment Committee referred to in Article 3(5) or funding to the EIF in order to conduct EIB financing and investment operations in accordance with Article 7(2). The EFSI shall target projects with a higher risk profile than existing EIB and Union instruments or programmes so as to ensure additionality over existing operations. The operations concerned shall be consistent with Union policies and support any of the following general objectives:
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) development of infrastructure, including in the areas of transport, particularly in industrial centres; energy, in particular energy interconnections and the synchronisation of energy systems; and digital infrastructure;
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) providing financial support for the companies referred to in Article 1(1), including working capital risk financing, as appropriate in relation to the different stages of development of those companies.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The EIB shall notify OLAF promptly and provide it with the necessary information when, at any stage of the preparation, implementation or closure of operations subject to the EU guarantee, it has grounds to suspect that there is a potential case of conflict of interests, fraud, corruption, money laundering or other illegal activity that may affect the financial interests of the Union.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 1(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 1(1) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 1(1) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
2015/03/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The EIB should regularly evaluate activities supported by the EFSI with a view to assessing their relevance, performance and impact, notably as regards their social and economic impact, paying particular attention to job creation, and to identifying aspects that could improve future activities. Such evaluations should contribute to accountability and analysis of sustainability.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
No decision of the Steering Board shall be adopted if the Commission or the EIB votes against it. When this occurs, the reasons for the vote against shall be stated before the members of the Board.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the appoincommitment of twohe Commissioners who will work on further developing the EU digital agenda and, including copyright issues in the course of the new Commission mandate; welcomes the Commission Work Programme for 2015 insofar as it promises to deliver a Digital Single Market Package which includes the objective of modernising copyright rules;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the appointment of two Commissioners who will work on further developing the EU digital agenda and copyright issues in the course of the new Commission mandate; welcomes the Commission Work Programme for 2015 insofar as it promises to deliver a Digital Single Market Package which includes the objective of modernising copyright rules to make them fit for the digital age;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Directive 2001/29/EC (Infosoc Directive) was adopted in 2001 and that the digital use of material subject to copyright has changed and dramatically increased since then; highlights the need for the Commission to respond to technological developments and adapt current laws to economic realities;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights the fact that legislative differences in Member States cause legal uncertainties hindering the creation of Digital Single Market and cross-border accessibility of copyright content;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 14 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Recognises the need for more harmonisation at the European Union level in order to improve free movement of services and products based on creative content;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that copyright and related rights play an important role, as they protect and stimulate both the development and marketing of new products and services and the creation and exploitation of their creative content, thereby contributing to improved competitiveness, employment and innovation across several industry sectors in the EU, therefore any harmonisation of copyright must be taken at a high level of protection;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that copyright and related rights can play an important role, if they acknowledge the changes of behaviours of users, as they protect and stimulate both the development and marketing of new products and services and the creation and exploitation of their creative content, thereby contributing to improved competitiveness, employment and innovation across several industry sectors in the EU;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the need to ensure appropriate remuneration and to protect the rights of all categories of right holders in a better way; recalls that while the cultural and creative industries (CCI) employ more than seven million people and contribute 4.5% of EU GDP annually,are a significant source of employment, and according to the European Parliament's Cost of Non-Europe study 223 000 jobs will be created by the digital single market by 2020 and that even though the services, technologies and options permitting the general public to access creative works grow every day, the earnings of right holders in the CCI sector keep decreasing;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 25 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the need to ensure appropriate remuneration and to protect the rights of all categories of right holders in a better way; recalls that while the cultural and creative industries (CCI) employ more than seven million people and contribute 4.5% of EU GDP annually, and that even though the services, technologies and options permitting the general public to access creative works grow every day, the earnings of right holders in the CCI sector keep decreasing; notes that effective system for the protection of copyright is necessary to ensure the return of the investment required to produce copyright works;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fact that Member States’ provisions on copyright and related rights vary considerably, and that the exclusivity which copyright grants its owner is, in principle, limited to the territorial boundaries of the Member State where the right has been granted, which leads to market fragmentation and major divergences in enforcement across the EU;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that territorial fragmentation may require users aspiring to offer content- related services across the EU to secure multiple licenses; emphasises the fact that differences in limitations and exceptions create additional legal costs and legal uncertainty; recalls that consumers may be denied access to certain content services on geographical grounds; therefore urges the Commission to propose adequate solutions for the better cross-border accessibility to copyright content for consumers;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes, therefore, the adoption of Directive 2014/26/EU on collective rights management and multi-territorial licensing of rights, and believes that implementation of this directive will lead to a clearer set of EU-wide standards resulting in a faster and more flexible licensing infrastructure; notes however that fragmentation still remains and further legislative action is required, including harmonisation of exceptions, which are necessary for the completion of the digital single market;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 65 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Commission to promote a flexible and balancpose an harmonised framework for exceptions and limitations that does not cause any harm to right holders and, that conforms with consumer expectations, that fosters both creativity and innovation, and adapts to the technology advances in the digital environment; emphasises the important role that exceptions and limitations agreed on for public-interest reasons, for the purpose of education and teaching, play in providing access to knowledge as well as in encouraging cultural and societal participation; urges the Commission and the Member States to consider e-books as part of public lending schemes, provided that all necessary agreements with the relevant right holders have been reached beforehand;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2014/2256(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the structured stakeholder dialogue 'Licenses for Europe', launched by the Commission in 2013; believes that relevant stakeholder engagement and sharing of best practices is essential if a more homogenous implementation of copyright laws across the EU is to be reached; calls the Commission to monitor and report on the implementation of the Licenses for Europe' pledges;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2014/2241(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Member States and the Commission to simplify administrative procedures and taxation systems, taking into account specific challenges to SMEs in the tourism sector, to facilitate compliance in light of the rise of the sharing economy, and to ensure that the regulatory framework fosters innovation;
2015/06/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2014/2241(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need to have a more coordinated approach among Member States and more regional cooperation in tourism-related policy areas, such as innovation, transport, taxation, service quality and the visa regime, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity; highlights, in particular, the potential of regional cooperation to simultaneously create added value for multiple Member States;
2015/06/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2014/2241(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the providers of tourism services should provide consumers with accurate information andensure that the information given to consumers regarding such services is accurate and comprehensible, and that consumers are not mislead or misinform them.ed;
2015/06/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2014/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that IPRs are not just copyrights, but trademarks and patents, among others, and each of these is vital to the values of Europe's goods and services;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2014/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need for Commission's actions on IPR enforcement to be adapted to the growth of the Digital Single Market and to address both digital and physical IPR infringement equally; notes that increasingly counterfeit and IPR infringing physical goods are traded and sold via online marketplaces, where Member States authorities have limited abilities to control sales; stresses the need to enrol marketplace platform owners in all efforts to enforce IPRs, including efforts towards the removal of counterfeit goods and the banning of sellers from their sites;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #

2014/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes any potential actions on due diligence throughout the supply chain which leads to fewer IP infringing goods; stresses that such actions must be targeted in nature, without creating additional administrative burdens on the average trader, and flexible as IP infringers move from one product to another to avoid controls;
2015/02/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to use the opportunity presented by the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the revision of the Integrated Guidelines to strengthen the role of the Single Market, in cluding the ever growing importance of the digital agenda, in growth, innovation and jobs;
2014/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the shift in the 2014 country- specific recommendations to strengthening growth and employment, but calls for more determined efforts to guide and coordinate national and EU policies so as to complete the Single Market and reap its potential to boost growth and create jobs, especially unleashing opportunities of the digital economy;
2014/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that a strong injection of EU funding is fundamental in orderefficient use of EU funding is important to stimulate the real economy and to foster recovery in all Member States; supports the Commission’s recommendation to give priority to public investment in infrastructure, research, innovation and human capital;
2014/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Shares the Commission’s concerns about the increasing number of multinational companies that are using corporate tax strategies to reduce or evade their global tax burden by taking advantage of mismatches between tax systems; stresses that better and stronger tax coordination is needed in order to ensure a level playing field and to avoid unfair competition and detrimental distortions within the Single Market;
2014/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Emphasises that the European Semester is a great opportunity to urge Member States to step up their efforts towards the Digital Single Market which not only means more growth and jobs, especially in the SMEs sector and among young people, but also a future-oriented modern EU;
2014/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that Member States have to step up their efforts to modernise their public administrations, by providing more and better digital services for citizens and businesses, reducing costs and enhancing efficiency, and facilitating cross border cooperation and interoperability of public administrations; highlights that the proper and quick implementation of EU public procurement and concessions legislation would provide a great opportunity to modernise public administration, at both government and local levels, by enhancing the quality and effectiveness of public spending and investment.
2014/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) Interoperability has been a key factor to success in the area of Customs, Taxation and excise duties, in operating trans- European ICT systems spanning all Member States supporting interoperable business services funded by the Fiscalis 2013 and Customs 2013 programmes, implemented and operated by the Commission and national administrations. Assets created under Fiscalis 2013 and Customs 2013 programmes are available for sharing and re-use from other policy areas. In addition, Member States have committed themselves, in the Council Conclusions on the Governance forum of the Customs Union, to develop a strategy of jointly managed and operated IT systems in all customs-related areas.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
(18) At political level, the Council has repeatedly called for even greater interoperability in Europe and for continued efforts to modernise European public administrations. In particular, on 24 and 25 October 2013, the European Council adopted conclusions stressing that the modernisation of public administrations should continue through the swift implementation of services such as e- government, e-health, e-invoicing and e- procurement, which rely on interoperability. The commitment of Member States is essential to ensure the rapid deployment of an interoperable e- society in Europe and the involvement of public administrations in encouraging the use of online procedures.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 23
(23) Solutions established or operated under the present ISA2 Programme should, as far as possible, form part of a consistent environment of services facilitating interaction between European public administrations, enterprises and citizens, and ensuring, facilitating and enabling cross-border or cross-sector interoperability. To facilitate this interaction, Member States should continue to modernise their administrations by improving business processes and ICT infrastructures.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) For the ISA2 Programme to have a real added value at European level, the "once only" principle, for the registration of relevant data, and the "digital by default" and "open data" principles, should be key pillars of the implementation of the Programme, as part of a comprehensive strategy to build the digital environment for the delivery of public services in Europe.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 24
(24) Citizens and enterprises should also benefit from common, re-usable and interoperable front-office services resulting from better integration of processes and exchange of data through the European public administrations’ back-offices. The "once only" principle, for supplying data only once to public administrations, should be promoted to reduce the administrative burden on citizens and businesses. In addition, in order for citizens to have trust in e-services, solutions to provide secure communication through, in particular, e- authentication and encryption should be promoted.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 25
(25) The ISA2 Programme should bis one of the many instruments for the encouragement of public-sector modernisation in the Union.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 26
(26) The lack of interoperability often undermines the implementation of digital end-to-end services and the development of one-stop shops for businesses and citizens. Interoperability is directly connected with, and dependent on the use of, open standards and common specifications. The ISA2 Programme should promote and, where appropriate, support the partial or full standardisation of existing interoperability solutions. This should be achieved in cooperation with other standardisation activities at Union level, European standardisation organisations and other international standardisation organisations.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 30
(30) National, regional and local administrations can be supported in their endeavours through specific instruments under the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). Close cooperation under the ISA2 Programme should maximise the benefits expected from such instruments by ensuring that funded projects are aligned with the Union- wide interoperability frameworks and specifications such as the EIF.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The ISA2 Programme shall develop interoperability solutions autonomously or complement and support other Union initiatives by pilosuggesting interoperability solutions as a solution incubatoto the ISA2 Committee, either for by ensuring their sustainability asdeveloping new solutions or to help implement a solution bridge.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The ISA2 programme succeeds the Union programme on interoperability solutions for public administrations established by Decision No 922/2009/EC (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ISA programme’) and shall consolidate, promote and expand its activities, where such solutions have been identified as being useful, cost-efficient and in demand.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘interoperability’ means the ability of disparate and diversefferent organisations to interact towards mutually beneficial and agreed common goals, involving the sharing of information and knowledge between the organisations, through the business processes they support, by means of the exchange of data between their respective information and communication technology (ICT) systems;
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) acting as a ‘solution incubator’ means the development of, or support for, interoperability solutions during their pilot phase, before they become operational under other Union programmes or initiatives;deleted
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) acting as a ’solution bridge’ means the further development of, and support for, fully operational interoperability solutions before their delivery under other Union programmes or initiatives;deleted
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12a) 'European public administrations' means public administrations at EU, national, regional and local levels.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the identification of legislation gaps that hamper cross-border and cross-sector interoperability between European public administrations;
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 2
In addition, the ISA2 Programme may act as a ‘solution incubator’, piloting new interoperability solutions, and as a ’solution bridge’, operating existing interoperability solutions.deleted
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2
user-centricitya focus on the user;
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) be extensible and applicable to other business or policy areas; and, in particular through implementation of open data principles;
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
AWhere appropriate, actions in the form of projects shall, where appropriate, consist of the followingmay consist of multiple phases:
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The phases of specific projects shallmay be defined and specified at the time when the action is included in the rolling work programme. It should be possible to terminate a project at any point, should it no longer be needed or considered effective.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. In the implementation of the ISA2 Programme, due considerasolutions shall be given toonly be developed if they are fully in line with the European Interoperability Strategy, the European Interoperability Framework and their future updates.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. In the implementation of the ISA2 Programme, due consideration shall be given to the European Interoperability Strategy, the European Interoperability Framework and their future updates. The implementation of the ISA2 Programme shall also contribute to the implementation of the digital single market strategy of the Commission.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Involvement of the largest possible number of Member States in a project shall be encouraged. Member States shall be able, and encouraged, to join a project at any stage. If no Member States are involved in a project, that project shall be terminated.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6a Selection Criteria Actions to be funded under the ISA2 Programme shall fall into one of the following three categories: a) the development, establishment and improvement of common frameworks and generic tools; b) the development, establishment and improvement of common services; c) interoperability solutions taken over by the ISA2 Programme for developing new solutions or to help implement a solution. The action shall be in accordance with at least one of the Programme's objectives, as laid down in Article 1. Interoperability solutions shall be in accordance with existing or new European standards or publicly available specifications for information exchange and service integration. Interoperability solutions shall be in accordance with the guidance set by the e- Government Expert Group, the European Interoperability Strategy, the European Interoperability Framework, and the European Statistics Code of Practice, and their future updates, as well as with other groups, as agreed by the ISA2 Committee.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 b (new)
Article 6b Prioritisation For an action to be initiated under the ISA2 Programme, a specific user need or area of the market not already being explored must have been identified. There must also have been a clear demonstration of how the action will meet that need, in accordance with the activities laid down in Article 3. The rolling working programme shall take into account the extent to which the general principles laid down in Article 4 are being met.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The rolling work programme shall identify, prioritise, document, select, design, implement and evaluatecover the actions referred to in Article 5, as well as promote their results.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The inclusion of actions in the rolling work programme shall be subject to compliance with a set of rules and admission criteriaselection criteria, as set out in Article 6a, before being included in the rolling work programme. The actions of the rolling work programme shall be prioritised in accordance with Article 6b. Those rules and criteria and any amendments thereof shall be an integral part of the rolling work programme.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 121 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Interoperability solutions taken over by the ISA2 Programme as ‘solution incubator’ or as ’solution bridge’either for developing new solutions or to help implement a solution shall be funded by the Programme until they are taken over by other programmes or initiatives.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2014/0185(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The evaluations shall also examine the benefits of the actions to the Union for the advancement of common policies, identify areas for potential improvement and verify synergies with other Union initiatives in the area of cross-border or cross-sector interoperability and the modernisation, simplification and efficiency of European public administrations.
2015/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 7 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Part I of this Directive takes over the provisions of Directive 2009/102/EC as regards all single-member limited liability companies. It requires that in case all shares come to be held by a single shareholder, its identity should be disclosed to the public by the entry in the register. This Directive also provides that decisions taken by the single shareholder exercising the power of the general meeting as well as the contracts between the shareholder and the company should be recorded in writing and kept in digital format, unless they relate to contracts concluded under market conditions in the ordinary course of business.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Establishing single-member limited liability companies as subsidiaries in other Member States entails costs due to the diverse legal and administrative requirements which must be met in the Member States concerned. Such divergent requirements continue to exist among Member States and create barriers for companies, in particular SMEs, to establish and operate cross-border.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to facilitate the cross-border activities of SMEs and the establishment of single-member companies as subsidiaries in other Member States, the costs and administrative burdens involved in setting- up these companies should be reduced. The Commission should actively promote entrepreneurship by creating schemes for financing the set-up of the new single- member companies with at least 1000 EUR.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The availability of a harmonised legal framework governing the formation of single-member companies, including the establishment of a uniform online template for the articles of association should contribute to the progressive abolition of restrictions on freedom of establishment as regards the conditions for setting up subsidiaries in the territories of Member States and lead to a reduction in costs.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to make it easier and less costly to establish subsidiaries in other Member States, the online registration of SUPs should be ensured. In such case, the payment of the consideration in cash should be required. The founders of SUPs should not be obliged to be physically present before any Member State’s registration body. The register should be accessible from any Member State and a company founder should be able to make use of existing points of single contact created under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council19 as a gateway to national on-line registration points. It should, therefore, be possible to establish SUPs from distance and fully by electronic means. __________________ 19 Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In line with the recommendations set out in the European Commission’s 2011 Review of the Small Business Act21 to reduce the start-up time for new enterprises, SUPs should receive the certificate of registration in the relevant register of a Member StaMember States should ensure that the registration process is completed within three working days. This facility should only be available to the newly created companies and not to existing entities that wish to convert to SUPs as the registration of such entities by their very nature, may take more time. __________________ 21 COM(2011) 78 final, 23.2.2011. COM(2011) 78 final, 23.2.2011.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The coordination measures provided for inPart 1 of this Directive shall apply to the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to:
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘single-member company’ means a company with limited liability whose shares are held by a single person;
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Decisions taken by the single-member exercising powers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be recorded in writing and kept in a digital format. Records of decisions taken shall be kept for at least five years.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Contracts between the single-member and the company shall be recorded in writing and kept in a digital format. Records of such contracts shall be kept for at least five years.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Part I of this Directive takes over the provisions of Directive 2009/102/EC as regards all single-member limited liability companies. It requires that in case all shares come to be held by a single shareholder, its identity should be disclosed to the public by the entry in the register. This Directive also provides that decisions taken by the single shareholder exercising the power of the general meeting as well as the contracts between the shareholder and the company should be recorded in writing and kept in digital format, unless they relate to contracts concluded under market conditions in the ordinary course of business.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide that the single-member shall not be liable for any amount exceeding the subscribed share capital, without prejudice to other provisions on liability laid down in national law.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Establishing single-member limited liability companies as subsidiaries in other Member States entails costs due to the diverse legal and administrative requirements which must be met in the Member States concerned. Such divergent requirements continue to exist among Member States and create barriers for companies, in particular SMEs, to establish and operate cross-border.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 121 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The SUP, and its articles of association, shall be governed by the national law of the Member State where the SUP is registered (hereinafter ‘applicable national law’) in order to comply with this Directive.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) In line with the Europe 2020 strategy, the Review of the Small Business Act for Europe18 advocated further progress in making smart regulation a reality, enhancing market access and promoting entrepreneurship, innovation, job creation and inclusive growth. __________________ 18 COM(2011) 78 final, 23.2.2011.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to foster more entrepreneurship in Europe and to facilitate the cross-border activities of SMEs and the establishment of single- member companies as subsidiaries in other Member States, the costs and administrative burdens involved in setting- up these companies should be reduced and the rules for businesses on the internal market of the Union should be simplified.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to facilitate the cross-border activities of SMEs and the establishment of single-member companies as subsidiaries in other Member States, the costs and administrative burdens involved in setting- up these companies should be reduced. The Commission should actively promote entrepreneurship by creating funding schemes, offering new SMEs a grant of 1000 EUR to help with the setting up costs, with the cost of these grants being offset by reductions in other areas of the Union budget.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The availability of a harmonised legal framework governing the formation of single-member companies, including the establishment of a uniform online template for the articles of association should contribute to the progressive abolition of restrictions on freedom of establishment as regards the conditions for setting up subsidiaries in the territories of Member States and lead to a reduction in costs.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Single-member private limited liability companies formed and operating in compliance with Part 2 of this Directive should add to their names a common, easily identifiable abbreviation – SUP (Societas Unius Personae).
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 137 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to make it easier and less costly to establish subsidiaries in other Member States, the online registration of SUPs should be ensured. In such case, the payment of the consideration in cash should be required. The founders of SUPs should not be obliged to be physically present before any Member State's registration body. The register should be accessible from any Member State and a company founder should be able to make use of existing points of single contact created under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council19 as a gateway to national on-line registration points. It should, therefore, be possible to establish SUPs from distance and fully by electronic means. __________________ 19 Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In line with the recommendations set out in the European Commission's 2011 Review of the Small Business Act21 to reduce the start-up time for new enterprises, SUPs should receive the certificate of registration in the relevant register of a Member StaMember States should ensure that the registration process is completed within three working days. This facility should only be available to the newly created companies and not to existing entities that wish to convert to SUPs as the registration of such entities by their very nature, may take more time. __________________ 21 COM(2011) 78 final, 23.2.2011. COM(2011) 78 final, 23.2.2011.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that an SUP may be formed by the conversion of the types of companies listed in Annex I subject to compliance with the applicable national law.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that a company shall not become an SUP unless: (a) a resolution of its shareholders is passed or a decision of its single-member is taken authorising the conversion of the company into an SUP; (b) its articles of association comply with the applicable national law; and (c) its net assets are at least equivalent to the amount of its subscribed share capital plus those reserves which may not be distributed according to its articles of association.deleted
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The coordination measures provided for inPart 1 of this Directive shall apply to the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to:
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 1
(1) ‘single-member company’ means a company with limited liability whose shares are held by a single person;
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Decisions taken by the single-member exercising powers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be recorded in writing and kept in a digital format. Records of decisions taken shall be kept for at least five years.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Contracts between the single-member and the company shall be recorded in writing and kept in a digital format. Records of such contracts shall be kept for at least five years.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide that the single-member shall not be liable for any amount exceeding the subscribed share capital, without prejudice to other provisions on liability laid down in national law.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall require that the articles of association of the SUP shall cover at least the subject matters provided for in paragraph 2. Member States shall ensure online registration of an SUP with the uniform template of articles referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3).
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The uniform template of articles of association shall cover the questions of formation, shares, share capital, organisation, representation towards third parties, accounts and the dissolution of an SUP.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The SUP, and its articles of association, shall be governed by the national law of the Member State where the SUP is registered (hereinafter ‘applicable national law’) in order to comply with this Directive.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that an SUP may be formed by the conversion of the types of companies listed in Annex I subject to compliance with the applicable national law.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that a company shall not become an SUP unless: (a) a resolution of its shareholders is passed or a decision of its single-member is taken authorising the conversion of the company into an SUP; (b) its articles of association comply with the applicable national law; and (c) its net assets are at least equivalent to the amount of its subscribed share capital plus those reserves which may not be distributed according to its articles of association.deleted
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In addition to the information contained in the articles of association, Member States may only require for the registration of an SUP the following information or documentation:
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall require that the articles of association of the SUP shall cover at least the subject matters provided for in paragraph 2.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall ensure online registration of an SUP with the uniform template of articles referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the articles of association of the SUP;deleted
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The uniform template of articles of association shall cover the questions of formation, shares, share capital, organisation, representation towards third parties, accounts and the dissolution of an SUP.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
National on-line registration web-sites shall include links to the registration web- sites in other Member States. Member States shall ensure that the following templates are used for on-line registrationonline registration with the following templates:
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In addition to the information contained in the articles of association, Member States may only require for the registration of an SUP the following information or documentation:
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 187 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the articles of association of the SUP;deleted
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 188 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall issue a certificate of registration confirming that the registration procedure has been completed. The certificate of registration shall be issued no later thaensure that the registration procedure is completed within three working days from the receipt of all the necessary documentation by the competent authority.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the registration procedure for newly incorporated SUPs may be completed electronically in its entirety without it being necessary for the founding member to appearequiring the need of a physical presence of the founder before any authority in the Member State of registration (on-line registration).
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 201 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
4. National on-line registration web-sites shall include links to the registration web- sites in other Member States. Member States shall ensure that the following templates are used for on-line registrationonline registration with the following templates:
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 203 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall issue a certificate of registration confirming that the registration procedure has been completed. The certificate of registration shall be issued no later thaensure that the registration procedure is completed within three working days from the receipt of all the necessary documentation by the competent authority.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall not make the registration of an SUP conditional on obtaining any licence or authorisation. The registratis is without prejudice to provisions of the SUP, all documents provided during the process of registration and subsequent changes to them,national law that make carrying out certain activities after registration conditional on obtaining license or authorisations. These activities shall be dlisclosted in the relevant register of companies immediately afternational on-line registration websites.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall not make the registration of an SUP conditional on obtaining any licence or authorisation. The registratis is without prejudice to provisions of the SUP, all documents provided during the process of registration and subsequent changes to them,national law that make carrying out certain activities after registration conditional on obtaining a licence or authorisation. These activities shall be dlisclosted in the relevant register of companies immediately afternational on-line registration websites.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The registration of the SUP, all documents provided during the process of registration and subsequent changes to them, shall be disclosed in the relevant register of companies immediately after registration.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 221 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall require letter and order forms whether in paper form or in any other medium, to state the capital subscribed and paid up. If the company has a website, that information shall also be made available on it.deleted
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall require letter and order forms whether in paper form or in any other medium, to state the capital subscribed and paid up. If the company has a website, that information shall also be made available on it.deleted
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 225 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. AMember States shall ensure that an SUP may, on the basis of a recommendation from the management body, make a distribution to the single- member provided that it complies with paragraphs 2 and 3.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. AMember States shall ensure that an SUP may, on the basis of a recommendation from the management body, make a distribution to the single- member provided that it complies with paragraphs 2 and 3.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that any distributions paid out contrary to Article 18(2) or (3) are refunded to the SUP, where it is established thatand all damages resulting from such distribution shall be compensated to the interested parties that were effected, by the single- member that knew, or, in view of the circumstances, ought to have known that the distribution would be contrary to Article 18(2) or (3).
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 230 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19
Member States shall ensure that any distributions paid out contrary to Article 18(2) or (3) are refunded to the SUP, where it is established thatand all damages resulting from such distribution shall be compensated to the interested parties that were effected, by the single- member that knew, or, in view of the circumstances, ought to have known that the distribution would be contrary to Article 18(2) or (3).
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – title
PenaltieSanctions
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Member States shall provide for penaltiesanctions applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted to implement this Directive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penaltiesanctions are enforced. The penaltiesanctions provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – title
PenaltieSanctions
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 243 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Member States shall provide for penaltiesanctions applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted to implement this Directive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penaltiesanctions are enforced. The penaltiesanctions provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 244 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 a (new)
Article 30a Review By [2 years after the date of transposition of this Directive], the Commission shall review the operation of this Directive, in particular, in the light of the development of the Digital Single Market, as regards options to extend the scope to companies with more than one shareholder, and present a legislative proposal if appropriate.
2015/03/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 15 October 2014 on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities,
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that the ownership of the CSR by national parliaments needs to be strengthened; calls on the Commission to provide the possibility to present the CSRs in the national parliaments before their adoption by the Council;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Reiterates its request that the Commission reports on a quarterly basis in Parliament's competent committee on the measures takes to ensure progress on the implementation of the CSRs and on the progress achieved thus far; invites Member States to explain the reasons for non-compliance with the CSRs in Parliament's competent committee;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is greatly concerned by the persistent uncertaintyfall of private investorsments in Europe, their lack of confidence of private investors and their reluctance to invest, in particular as a consequence of productivity standards witha lack of structural reforms, of a pro-growth EU strategy as well as persisting Single Market fragmentation;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Takes the view that completing the Digital Single Market is crucial to stimulating growth and, creating employment in the European economy and keeping the European digital sector competitive in world markets;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Regrets the fact that the lack of national and European investment in broadband networks is impeding the achievement of the priority goals and objectives in the key area of the digital market;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the completion of the Digital Single Market could generate additional GDP growth of 4.0 % over the period up to 2020 and supports new; believes that investment in broadband infrastructure and the deployment of new technologies, such as 4G is crucial for the development of digital solutions as they rely on fast and effective connections; considers the adoption of the EU’s general data protection framework and the Network and Information Security Directive as essential for the completion of the Digital Single Market by 2015;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that there is a clear need to update EU Single Market rules for the digital era, establishing ato complete the single area for online payments, develop e-solutions Europe-wide, such as e-invoicing, protectingreform of intellectual property rights and clarifying VAT requirements, in order to generate trust in e-commerce and affordguarantee adequate protection to EU consumers online;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 88 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that there is a clear need to update EU Single Market rules for the digital era, establishing a single area for online payments, digital signature, e- invoicing, protecting intellectual property rights and clarifying VAT requirements, in order to generate trust in e-commerce and afford adequate protection to EU consumers online;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that Member States have to step up their efforts to modernise their public administrations providing more and better accessible digital services for citizens and businesses, reducing costs and enhancing efficiency, facilitating cross-border cooperation and implementing interoperability frameworks for public administrations;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Takes into account the Digital Agenda Scoreboard as an important tool to evaluate the progress made by Member States in this field; believes that the composite index to measure the Single Market gap should incorporate the Digital Agenda Scoreboard;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2014/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. UNotes that proper implementation and enforcement of EU legislation is crucial for the completion of the Single Market; therefore calls on the Commission to make determined use of all its powers to reach this goal and urges the Member States and the Commission to step up their efforts to enforce Single Market legislation and to monitor this enforcement, inter alia through regular EU inspection sweeps;
2014/11/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) ‘trade secret’ means undisclosed know- how and business information which meets all of the following requirements:
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The acquisition of a trade secret without the consent of the trade secret holder shall be considered unlawful whenever carried out intentionally or with gross negligence by:
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The use or disclosure of a trade secret shall be considered unlawful whenever carried out, without the consent of the trade secret holder, intentionally or with gross negligence, by a person who is found to meet any of the following conditions:
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) is in breach of a confidentiality agreement or any other duty to maintain secrecylimit the use or disclosure of the trade secret;
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) is in breach of a contractual or any other duty to limit the use or disclosure of the trade secret.
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. The conscious and deliberate production, offering or placing on the market of infringing goods, or import, export or storage of infringing goods for those purposes, shall be considered an unlawful use of a trade secret, when the person carrying out such activities knew, or should, under the circumstances, have known that the trade secret was used unlawfully.
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for the purpose of revealing an applicant’s misconduct, wrongdoing or illegal activity, provided that the alleged acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret was necessary for such revelation and that the respondent acted in the public interest;
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2013/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) for the purpose of fulfilling a non- contractual obligation;deleted
2015/02/06
Committee: IMCO