Activities of Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary speeches (1301)
Debate with the Prime Minister of Sweden, Stefan Löfven, on the Future of Europe (debate)
Minimum loss coverage for non-performing exposures (debate)
EU-Afghanistan Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development - EU-Afghanistan Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development (resolution) (debate)
EU-Vietnam Voluntary Partnership Agreement on forest law enforcement, governance and trade - EU-Vietnam Voluntary Partnership Agreement on forest law enforcement, governance and trade (resolution) (debate)
The future of the INF Treaty and the impact on the EU (debate)
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Romanian Presidency (debate) RO
Egypt, notably the situation of human rights defenders
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on Terrorism (debate)
Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania (debate) RO
2018 Report on Albania (debate)
Care services in the EU for improved gender equality (debate)
Implementation of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement - Implementation of the EU-Moldova Association Agreement (debate) RO
Empowering competition authorities and ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market (debate)
Debate with the President of Romania, Klaus Iohannis, on the Future of Europe (debate) RO
Need for a comprehensive Democracy, Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights mechanism (debate) RO
The rule of law in Romania (debate) RO
The EU's input on a UN binding instrument on transnational corporations with respect to human rights (debate) FR
Harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the VAT system - Rates of value added tax (debate) FR
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts (debate) FR
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (debate)
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (debate) RO
Uganda, arrest of parliamentarians from the opposition
Myanmar, notably the case of journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo
A European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy - Options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation (debate)
The political crisis in Moldova following the invalidation of the mayoral elections in Chisinau (debate) RO
Burundi (debate)
European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) - European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS): Europol tasks (debate)
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Austrian Presidency (debate)
Russia, notably the case of Ukrainian political prisoner Oleg Sentsov FR
Negotiations for a new EU-ACP Partnership Agreement (debate) FR
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 28 and 29 June 2018 (debate)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 28 and 29 June 2018 (debate) FR
Clearing obligation, reporting requirements, risk-mitigation techniques and trade repositories (debate) FR
Modernisation of education in the EU (debate)
Responding to petitions on tackling precariousness and the abusive use of fixed-term contracts (debate) FR
Debate with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Xavier Bettel, on the Future of Europe (debate) FR
Gender equality and women's empowerment: transforming the lives of girls and women through EU external relations 2016-2020 (debate) FR
Situation in Gaza Strip and the status of Jerusalem (debate)
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy (debate) FR
Commission decision adopted on the third Mobility Package (debate)
Debate with the Prime Minister of Belgium, Charles Michel, on the Future of Europe (debate) RO
Discharge 2016 (debate)
Annual Report on Competition Policy (debate)
Debate with the President of the French Republic, Emmanuel Macron, on the Future of Europe (debate) FR
Situation in Russia (debate)
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework - Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (debate)
Implementation of the Development Cooperation Instrument, the Humanitarian Aid Instrument and the European Development Fund (debate) FR
Enhancing developing countries' debt sustainability (short presentation) FR
Implementation of the conflict minerals regulation - Conflict minerals accompanying measures (debate)
The arrest of human rights defenders in Sudan, notably the case of Sakharov Prize laureate Salih Mahmoud Osman
Mercy killings in Uganda
US decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminium (debate)
Protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová (debate) FR
Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base - Common Corporate Tax Base (debate)
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (debate)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 22 and 23 March 2018 (debate)
Guidelines for the 2019 budget - Section III (debate)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (debate)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (debate)
Cutting the sources of income for Jihadists - targeting the financing of terrorism (debate)
EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate)
EU priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2018 (debate)
Definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks and protection of geographical indications thereof (debate)
Composition of the European Parliament (debate)
Composition of the European Parliament (debate)
Reform of the electoral law of the European Union (debate)
Threats to the rule of law by the Romanian justice system reform (debate)
Guarantee Fund for external actions - EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union (debate)
Guarantee Fund for external actions - EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union (debate)
Guarantee Fund for external actions - EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union (debate)
Debate with the Prime Minister of Croatia, Andrej Plenković, on the Future of Europe (debate)
Decision adopted on the EU Enlargement Strategy - Western Balkans (debate)
Manipulation of scientific research by multinationals in the wake of the emission tests on monkeys and humans by the German car industry (debate)
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (debate) FR
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (debate)
Decision on the Strategy on Plastics (debate)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 14 and 15 December 2017 (debate) RO
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 14 and 15 December 2017 (debate)
Situation in Iran (debate)
Situation in Kenya (debate)
International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (short presentation)
Agenda 2030 and Eurostat report on "monitoring progress towards Sustainable Development Goals in the EU" (debate)
Situation in Afghanistan (debate)
EU Citizenship Report 2017: Strengthening Citizens' Rights in a Union of Democratic Change (debate)
Ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy (debate)
Statement by the President RO
Order of business
2018 budgetary procedure (debate)
2018 budgetary procedure (debate)
Decision adopted on the State of Energy Union 2017 (debate)
Madagascar
Winter plan for asylum seekers (debate)
Legacy of the 1917 totalitarian Bolshevik revolution (topical debate)
Cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (debate)
Eastern Partnership: November 2017 Summit (debate)
The EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development (debate)
Economic policies of the euro area (debate)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19 and 20 October 2017 and presentation of the Leaders’ Agenda (Building our future together) (debate)
Criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking - Information exchange on, and an early warning system and risk assessment procedure for, new psychoactive substances I (debate)
The cases of Crimean Tatar leaders Akhtem Chiygoz, Ilmi Umerov and the journalist Mykola Semena
Presentation of the Court of Auditors' annual report - 2016 (debate)
Situation in Moldova RO
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the ICCAT Convention area (debate)
Women’s economic empowerment in the private and public sectors in the EU (short presentation) FR
Addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries (short presentation)
Accessibility requirements for products and services (debate)
Extension of the European statistical programme to 2020 (debate)
European venture capital funds and European social entrepreneurship funds (debate)
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (debate)
Fipronil scandal: how to improve the EU rapid alert system for food and feed (debate)
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (debate)
Recent developments in migration (debate)
Eritrea, notably the cases of Abune Antonios and Dawit Isaak
European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and establishing the EFSD Guarantee and the EFSD Guarantee Fund (debate)
European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and establishing the EFSD Guarantee and the EFSD Guarantee Fund (debate)
Review of the Maltese Presidency (debate)
Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (debate)
Building an ambitious EU industrial strategy as a strategic priority for growth, employment and innovation in Europe (debate)
Pakistan, notably the situation of human rights defenders and the death penalty
Panama Papers follow-up and the rule of law in Malta (debate)
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (debate)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (debate)
Assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation (debate)
Decision adopted on Mobility package (debate)
The new European Consensus on Development - our world, our dignity, our future (debate)
Resilience as a strategic priority of the EU external action (debate)
Implementation of Regulation (EU) 2017/458 regarding the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders (debate)
Road transport in the European Union (debate)
Making relocation happen (debate)
Harnessing globalisation by 2025 (debate)
Implementation of the Council's LGBTI Guidelines, particularly in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in Chechnya, Russia (debate)
Situation in Moldova (debate) RO
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2015 - Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (debate)
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2015 (A8-0161/2017 - Nedzhmi Ali)
Structural Reform Support Programme for 2017-2020 (A8-0374/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl)
European Year of Cultural Heritage (A8-0340/2016 - Mircea Diaconu)
Russia, the arrest of Alexei Navalny and other protestors RO
Wholesale roaming markets (A8-0372/2016 - Miapetra Kumpula-Natri)
Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (RC-B8-0237/2017, B8-0237/2017, B8-0241/2017, B8-0242/2017, B8-0243/2017)
Money market funds (A8-0041/2015 - Neena Gill)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate)
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (debate) RO
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (debate)
European Solidarity Corps (debate)
Ukrainian political prisoners in Russia and situation in Crimea
EU priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2017 (RC-B8-0183/2017, B8-0183/2017, B8-0184/2017, B8-0185/2017, B8-0186/2017, B8-0187/2017, B8-0188/2017, B8-0189/2017)
Supply chain due diligence by importers of minerals and metals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler)
Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector (A8-0150/2016 - Marco Affronte)
Constitutional, legal and institutional implications of a Common Security and Defence Policy: possibilities offered by the Lisbon Treaty (debate) FR
Global Gag Rule (debate)
Severe malnutrition and looming famine in Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan and Yemen (debate)
Mercury (debate)
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (debate)
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme (debate)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 9 and 10 March 2017 (debate)
Tackling the disappearance of migrant children in Europe (debate)
Gender pay gap (debate)
EU law enforcement information exchange and the replacement of pre-Lisbon instruments (debate)
Possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union - Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty - Budgetary capacity for the Eurozone (debate)
2016 Report on Albania (debate)
Biological low risk pesticides (debate)
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (debate)
Democracy and justice in Romania (debate) RO
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (debate)
Cross-border aspects of adoptions (debate) FR
A European Pillar of Social Rights (debate) RO
Indonesia, notably the cases of Hosea Yeimo, Ismael Alua and the Governor of Jakarta
Activities of the Committee on Petitions 2015 (debate)
The situation of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: revision of the suspension mechanism (A8-0235/2016 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (B8-1334/2016)
Support for Thalidomide victims (B8-1341/2016, B8-1343/2016)
Paediatric medicines (B8-1340/2016)
Activities of the Committee on Petitions 2015 (A8-0366/2016 - Ángela Vallina)
International aviation agreements (B8-1337/2016, B8-1338/2016, B8-1339/2016)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 15 December 2016 (debate)
Insolvency proceedings and insolvency practitioners (A8-0324/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
EC-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement and bilateral trade in textiles (A8-0332/2016 - Maria Arena)
EC-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement and bilateral trade in textiles (resolution) (A8-0330/2016 - Maria Arena)
EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Ecuador) (A8-0362/2016 - Helmut Scholz)
EU-Norway Agreement on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak (A8-0321/2016 - Jørn Dohrmann)
EU-Norway Agreement on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak (resolution) (A8-0320/2016 - Jørn Dohrmann)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/004 ES/Comunidad Valenciana automotive (A8-0379/2016 - Esteban González Pons)
Normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings (A8-0368/2016 - Merja Kyllönen)
Domestic passenger transport services by rail (A8-0373/2016 - Wim van de Camp)
Single European railway area (A8-0371/2016 - David-Maria Sassoli)
Market access to port services and financial transparency of ports (A8-0023/2016 - Knut Fleckenstein)
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors - Juhan Parts (A8-0375/2016 - Bart Staes)
Annual Report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter 2015 (A8-0355/2016 - Josef Weidenholzer)
Implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (Article 36 TEU) (A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok)
CAP tools to reduce price volatility in agricultural markets (A8-0339/2016 - Angélique Delahaye)
Labour market reforms and labour relations in Greece (debate)
Europol data breach on terrorism investigation files (debate)
Obligations in the field of visa reciprocity (debate)
"Clean Energy for All" package (debate)
EU-Algeria Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Algeria in Union programmes (A8-0367/2016 - Pier Antonio Panzeri)
North-East Atlantic: deep-sea stocks and fishing in international waters (A8-0369/2016 - Isabelle Thomas)
General revision of Parliament's Rules of Procedure (A8-0344/2016 - Richard Corbett)
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2015 (A8-0345/2016 - József Nagy)
A coherent EU policy for cultural and creative industries (A8-0357/2016 - Christian Ehler, Luigi Morgano)
Rights of women in the Eastern Partnership States (A8-0365/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
Normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings - Domestic passenger transport services by rail - Single European railway area (debate)
Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties on the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (B8-1304/2016, B8-1305/2016)
Formal sitting - Tunisia
US-EU Agreement on the protection of personal information relating to criminal offenses (A8-0354/2016 - Jan Philipp Albrecht)
EU-Ghana Stepping Stone Economic Partnership Agreement (A8-0328/2016 - Christofer Fjellner)
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2016 (A8-0347/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Draft amending budget No 4/2016: Update of appropriations to reflect the latest developments on migration and security issues, reduction of payment and commitment appropriations (A8-0350/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Draft amending budget No 5/2016: Implementation of the Own Resources Decision (A8-0348/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Germany (A8-0352/2016 - Monika Hohlmeier)
Draft amending budget No 6/2016 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Germany (A8-0349/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2017 (A8-0346/2016 - Jens Geier)
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to finance immediate budgetary measures to address the ongoing migration, refugee and security crisis (A8-0351/2016 - Jens Geier)
Union Customs Code, as regards goods that have temporarily left the customs territory of the Union by sea or air (A8-0329/2016 - Maria Grapini)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide for payment of advances in the 2017 budget (A8-0323/2016 - Patricija Šulin)
2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand)
Situation in Italy after the earthquakes (B8-1284/2016, B8-1285/2016, B8-1285/2016, B8-1286/2016, B8-1288/2016, B8-1289/2016, B8-1291/2016, B8-1294/2016, B8-1296/2016)
Commissioners' declarations of interests - Guidelines (A8-0315/2016 - Pascal Durand)
Liability, compensation and financial security for offshore oil and gas operations (A8-0308/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (RC-B8-1310/2016, B8-1310/2016, B8-1313/2016, B8-1315/2016, B8-1316/2016, B8-1319/2016, B8-1320/2016, B8-1324/2016)
Application of the European Order for Payment Procedure (A8-0299/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products as regards the date of its application (A8-0356/2016 - Pervenche Berès)
EU-Kiribati Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0334/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Solomon Islands Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0336/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Micronesia Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0337/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Tuvalu Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0333/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Marshall Islands Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0335/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
The European Union Solidarity Fund: an assessment (A8-0341/2016 - Salvatore Cicu)
2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
Macro-financial assistance to Jordan (A8-0296/2016 - Emmanuel Maurel)
Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (A8-0011/2016 - Brian Hayes)
Situation in Syria (B8-1123/2016, RC-B8-1249/2016, B8-1249/2016, B8-1250/2016, B8-1251/2016, B8-1252/2016, B8-1253/2016, B8-1254/2016, B8-1255/2016)
EU-Turkey relations (RC-B8-1276/2016, B8-1276/2016, B8-1277/2016, B8-1278/2016, B8-1279/2016, B8-1280/2016, B8-1281/2016, B8-1282/2016, B8-1283/2016) RO
EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women (B8-1229/2016, B8-1235/2016)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2015 (A8-0331/2016 - Notis Marias)
Towards a definitive VAT system and fighting VAT fraud (A8-0307/2016 - Werner Langen)
EU action plan against wildlife trafficking (A8-0303/2016 - Catherine Bearder)
New opportunities for small transport businesses (A8-0304/2016 - Dominique Riquet)
Situation in Belarus (RC-B8-1232/2016, B8-1232/2016, B8-1233/2016, B8-1234/2016, B8-1237/2016, B8-1238/2016, B8-1239/2016, B8-1240/2016)
Parliament's calendar of part-sessions – 2018
Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement between Canada and the European Union on a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (B8-1220/2016) RO
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (A8-0249/2015 - Julie Girling)
Finalisation of Basel III (B8-1226/2016)
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0317/2016 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)
EU strategic communication to counteract anti-EU propaganda by third parties (A8-0290/2016 - Anna Elżbieta Fotyga)
Sign language and professional sign language interpreters (B8-1230/2016, B8-1241/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106 : Renewing the approval of the active substance bentazone (B8-1228/2016)
Towards a definitive VAT system and fighting VAT fraud (debate) FR
Access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities (debate)
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Ukraine and Europol (A8-0342/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-François Jalkh (A8-0318/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-François Jalkh (A8-0319/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0325/2016 - Diane Dodds)
Access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities (A8-0326/2016 - Emmanuel Maurel)
European Central Bank annual report for 2015 (A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells)
Green Paper on Retail Financial Services (A8-0294/2016 - Olle Ludvigsson)
European Defence Union (A8-0316/2016 - Urmas Paet)
Unleashing the potential of waterborne passenger transport (A8-0306/2016 - Keith Taylor)
Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation (A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda)
EU-Turkey relations (debate)
Situation in the West Bank, including settlements (debate)
European Voluntary Service (debate)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0271/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2014: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0264/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0276/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A8-0275/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Situation in Northern Iraq/Mosul (RC-B8-1159/2016, B8-1159/2016, B8-1160/2016, B8-1161/2016, B8-1164/2016, B8-1165/2016, B8-1166/2016, B8-1169/2016)
Situation of journalists in Turkey (B8-1158/2016, RC-B8-1162/2016, B8-1162/2016, B8-1163/2016, B8-1167/2016, B8-1168/2016, B8-1170/2016, B8-1171/2016, B8-1172/2016)
Nuclear security and non-proliferation (B8-1120/2016, RC-B8-1122/2016, B8-1122/2016, B8-1125/2016, B8-1129/2016, B8-1130/2016, B8-1131/2016, B8-1132/2016)
European Voluntary Service (B8-1126/2016, B8-1126/2016, B8-1127/2016, B8-1128/2016, B8-1133/2016, B8-1134/2016, B8-1135/2016)
EU Youth Strategy 2013-2015 (A8-0250/2016 - Andrea Bocskor)
How the CAP can improve job creation in rural areas (A8-0285/2016 - Eric Andrieu)
Draft general budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections
General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand)
The MFF mid-term revision (B8-1173/2016)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/003 EE/petroleum and chemicals (A8-0314/2016 - Victor Negrescu)
Accessibility of websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies (A8-0269/2016 - Dita Charanzová)
Protective measures against pests of plants (A8-0293/2016 - Anthea McIntyre)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2016 priorities (A8-0309/2016 - Alfred Sant)
Trans fats (B8-1115/2016)
EU policies and actions to protect children in the context of migration (debate)
Nuclear security and non-proliferation (debate) FR
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Denmark (A8-0289/2016 - Claude Moraes)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Denmark (A8-0288/2016 - Claude Moraes)
EU-China Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports (A8-0281/2016 - Bodil Valero)
Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (A8-0292/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen (A8-0301/2016 - Evelyn Regner)
Request for the defence of the privileges and immunities of Jane Collins (A8-0297/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
Request for the defence of the privileges and immunities of Mario Borghezio (A8-0312/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
Rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents (A8-0300/2016 - Michael Cramer)
Statistics of goods transport by inland waterways (delegated and implementing powers) (A8-0298/2016 - Bas Eickhout)
Union legal framework for customs infringements and sanctions (A8-0239/2016 - Kaja Kallas)
Draft amending budget No 3/2016: Security of the Institutions (A8-0295/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement (A8-0286/2016 - Richard Howitt)
Fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM resolution (A8-0284/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
Human rights and migration in third countries (A8-0245/2016 - Marie-Christine Vergiat)
Corporate liability for serious human rights abuses in third countries (A8-0243/2016 - Ignazio Corrao)
EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage (A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk)
How to make fisheries controls in Europe uniform (A8-0234/2016 - Isabelle Thomas)
Improving connection and accessibility of transport infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe (A8-0282/2016 - Tomasz Piotr Poręba)
EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (A8-0283/2016 - Sophia in 't Veld)
General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate)
Situation in Syria (B8-1089/2016, B8-1090/2016)
Accession of Peru to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0267/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
Accession of Kazakhstan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0268/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
Accession of Korea to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0266/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
Global goals and EU commitments on nutrition and food security in the world (B8-1042/2016)
European Public Prosecutor's office and Eurojust (B8-1054/2016)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (debate) FR
Conclusion on behalf of the EU of the Paris Agreement adopted under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Giovanni La Via (A8-0280/2016))
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece following the earthquake that affected the Ionian Islands in November 2015 (A8-0270/2016 - Georgios Kyrtsos)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/001 FI/Microsoft (A8-0273/2016 - Petri Sarvamaa)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/002 SE/Ericsson (A8-0272/2016 - Esteban González Pons)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Giorgos Grammatikakis (A8-0279/2016 - António Marinho e Pinto)
Legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings (A8-0165/2015 - Dennis de Jong)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake)
Europol-China Agreement on Strategic Cooperation (A8-0265/2016 - Claude Moraes)
The future of ACP-EU relations beyond 2020 (A8-0263/2016 - Norbert Neuser)
Macroeconomic situation in Greece, structural reforms and their impact, as well as prospects for future negotiations within the Programme (debate)
The future of ACP-EU relations beyond 2020 (debate)
Access to education for Syrian children in Lebanon (debate)
Global goals and EU commitments on nutrition and food security in the world (debate)
Travel document for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals (A8-0201/2016 - Jussi Halla-aho)
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (A8-0238/2016 - Petr Ježek)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (A8-0236/2016 - Ska Keller)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0247/2016 - Laura Agea)
Key objectives for the CITES CoP17 meeting in Johannesburg (B8-0987/2016)
Application of the Postal Services Directive (A8-0254/2016 - Markus Ferber)
Access to finance for SMEs and increasing the diversity of SME funding in a Capital Markets Union (A8-0222/2016 - Othmar Karas)
How best to harness the job creation potential of SMEs? (A8-0248/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
Application of the Employment Equality Directive (A8-0225/2016 - Renate Weber)
Activities, impact and added value of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund between 2007 and 2014 (A8-0227/2016 - Marian Harkin)
Protocol to the EU-Switzerland Agreement on the free movement of persons (accession of Croatia) (A8-0216/2016 - Danuta Jazłowiecka)
Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment (A8-0252/2016 - Csaba Sógor)
Technical requirements for inland waterway vessels (A8-0256/2016 - Ivo Belet)
Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and the SADC EPA States (A8-0242/2016 - Alexander Graf Lambsdorff)
Sporazum o provedbi Konvencije o radu u ribolovu (B8-0976/2016)
Recent developments in Poland and their impact on fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (B8-0865/2016, B8-0977/2016, B8-0978/2016)
EU relations with Tunisia in the current regional context (A8-0249/2016 - Fabio Massimo Castaldo)
Social dumping in the EU (A8-0255/2016 - Guillaume Balas)
Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) (B8-0974/2016)
Need for a European reindustrialisation policy in light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases (debate)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (debate)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate)
Cohesion Policy and Research and Innovation Strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) (A8-0159/2016 - Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso)
European territorial cooperation - best practices and innovative measures (A8-0202/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (A8-0246/2016 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of István Ujhelyi (A8-0229/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
EU-China Agreement relating to the accession of Croatia (A8-0231/2016 - Iuliu Winkler)
EU-Uruguay Agreement relating to the accession of Croatia (A8-0241/2016 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors - Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou (A8-0258/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors - João Figueiredo (A8-0259/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors - Leo Brincat (A8-0257/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries (delegated and implementing powers) (A8-0240/2016 - Bernd Lange)
Towards a new energy market design (A8-0214/2016 - Werner Langen)
EU strategy on heating and cooling (A8-0232/2016 - Adam Gierek)
Enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs (A8-0162/2016 - Rosa D'Amato)
EU strategy for the Alpine region (A8-0226/2016 - Mercedes Bresso)
EU Trust Fund for Africa: implications for development and humanitarian aid (A8-0221/2016 - Ignazio Corrao)
Creating labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance (A8-0253/2016 - Tatjana Ždanoka, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė)
71st session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0146/2016 - Andrey Kovatchev)
Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (A8-0203/2016 - Helga Stevens)
Application of minimum wage law in the transport sector (debate)
Participation of Azerbaijan in Union programmes (A8-0210/2016 - Norica Nicolai)
Draft amending budget No 2/2016: Surplus from 2015 (A8-0212/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes)
High common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (A8-0211/2016 - Andreas Schwab)
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano)
European Border and Coast Guard (A8-0200/2016 - Artis Pabriks)
European Maritime Safety Agency (A8-0215/2016 - Michael Cramer)
Community Fisheries Control Agency (A8-0068/2016 - Alain Cadec)
Secretariat of the OLAF Supervisory Committee (A8-0188/2016 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
Preparation of the post-electoral revision of the MFF 2014-2020: Parliament's input ahead of the Commission's proposal (A8-0224/2016 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (TAXE 2) (A8-0223/2016 - Jeppe Kofod, Michael Theurer)
Synergies between structural funds and Horizon 2020 (RC-B8-0851/2016, B8-0851/2016, B8-0852/2016, B8-0857/2016, B8-0858/2016, B8-0860/2016, B8-0861/2016)
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme 2017 (RC-B8-0885/2016, B8-0885/2016, B8-0886/2016, B8-0892/2016, B8-0893/2016, B8-0894/2016, B8-0895/2016, B8-0896/2016)
Japan's decision to resume whaling in the 2015-2016 season (B8-0853/2016, B8-0853/2016, B8-0855/2016, B8-0862/2016, B8-0863/2016)
Objection pursuant to rule 105(4): EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses as regards Belarus (B8-0869/2016, B8-0870/2016)
Objection pursuant to rule 105(4): Setting the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (B8-0868/2016)
A global strategy for the EU's Foreign and Security Policy (debate)
EU-Peru Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0197/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
Emission limits for non-road mobile machinery (A8-0276/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini)
Refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market (A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei)
Social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility (A8-0217/2016 - Eleonora Forenza)
A forward-looking and innovative future strategy for trade and investment (A8-0220/2016 - Tiziana Beghin)
The fight against trafficking in human beings in the EU's external relations (A8-0205/2016 - Barbara Lochbihler)
Preparation of the post-electoral revision of the MFF 2014-2020: Parliament's input ahead of the Commission's proposal (debate)
Renewable energy progress report - Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (continuation of debate)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon (Framework Agreement) (A8-0193/2016 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
EU-Monaco agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0206/2016 - Andreas Schwab)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon (2004 enlargement) (A8-0194/2016 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/012 BE/Hainaut Machinery (A8-0207/2016 - Victor Negrescu)
Appointments to the Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon (accession of Bulgaria and Romania) (A8-0195/2016 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
Multiannual recovery plan for Bluefin tuna (A8-0367/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
Multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks
Jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (A8-0209/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
Jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships (A8-0208/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
Massacres in eastern Congo (RC-B8-0801/2016, B8-0801/2016, B8-0802/2016, B8-0804/2016, B8-0805/2016, B8-0807/2016, B8-0808/2016, B8-0809/2016)
Follow-up of the Strategic Framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET2020) (A8-0176/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
Renewable energy progress report (A8-0196/2016 - Paloma López Bermejo)
Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (A8-0199/2016 - Markus Pieper)
Massacres in eastern Congo (debate)
US sanctions impacting EU business in Iran (debate)
Tajikistan: situation of prisoners of conscience
Promoting free movement by simplifying the acceptance of certain public documents (A8-0156/2016 - Mady Delvaux)
Transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in EU civil service cases (A8-0167/2016 - Mady Delvaux)
A regulation for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (B8-0685/2016)
Competitiveness of the European rail supply industry (B8-0677/2016)
Mid-term review of the Investment Plan (debate)
EU-Palau Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0177/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Tonga Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0179/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Colombia Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0178/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
Expansion of trade in Information Technology Products (ITA) (A8-0186/2016 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl)
Subjecting α-PVP to control measures (A8-0175/2016 - Michał Boni)
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with the exception of aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0191/2016 - Pavel Svoboda)
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with regard to aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0190/2016-Pavel Svoboda)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (accession of Croatia) (A8-0148/2016 - Elmar Brok)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (consent) (A8-0149/2016 - Elmar Brok)
EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (resolution) (A8-0143/2016 - Elmar Brok)
Macro-financial assistance to Tunisia (A8-0187/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
Rules against certain tax avoidance practices (A8-0189/2016 - Hugues Bayet)
Follow-up to the resolution of Parliament of 11 February 2015 on the US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0580/2016, B8-0584/2016)
Space capabilities for European security and defence (A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski)
Space market uptake (B8-0739/2016)
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0700/2016, B8-0700/2016, B8-0723/2016, B8-0724/2016, B8-0725/2016, B8-0726/2016, B8-0728/2016, B8-0729/2016)
Endocrine disruptors: state of play following the Court judgment of 16 December 2015 (RC-B8-0733/2016, B8-0733/2016, B8-0734/2016, B8-0735/2016, B8-0736/2016, B8-0737/2016, B8-0738/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of GMO maize Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x GA21 (B8-0732/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: placing on the market of a genetically modified carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line SHD-27531-4) (B8-0731/2016)
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (A8-0154/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld)
Uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles: UNECE agreement (A8-0185/2016 - Bernd Lange)
EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0155/2016 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)
Eliminating illicit trade in tobacco products: protocol to the WHO Framework Convention (judicial cooperation in criminal matters) (A8-0198/2016 - Martina Anderson)
Markets in financial instruments (A8-0126/2016 - Markus Ferber)
Markets in financial instruments, market abuse and securities settlement (A8-0125/2016 - Markus Ferber)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Rimantas Šadžius (A8-0183/2016 - Bart Staes)
2015 Report on policy coherence for development (A8-0165/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda)
The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (A8-0169/2016 - Maria Heubuch)
Peace Support Operations - EU engagement with the UN and the African Union (A8-0158/2016 - Geoffrey Van Orden)
Unfair trading practices in the food supply chain (A8-0173/2016 - Edward Czesak)
Technological solutions for sustainable agriculture (A8-0174/2016 - Anthea McIntyre)
Enhancing innovation and economic development in future European farm management (A8-0163/2016 - Jan Huitema)
State of play of the external aspects of the European migration agenda: towards a new 'Migration Compact' (debate)
Space capabilities for European security and defence - Space market uptake - European space industrial policy (debate)
Measures to address the crisis in the dairy sector (debate) FR
The Single Market strategy (debate)
Virtual currencies (A8-0168/2016 - Jakob von Weizsäcker)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/010 FR/MoryGlobal (A8-0182/2016 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/011 GR/Supermarket Larissa (A8-0181/2016 - Liadh Ní Riada)
Request for waiver of immunity of Gianluca Buonanno (A8-0180/2016 - Evelyn Regner)
Transatlantic data flows (B8-0622/2016, RC-B8-0623/2016, B8-0623/2016, B8-0633/2016, B8-0639/2016, B8-0642/2016, B8-0643/2016, B8-0644/2016)
Delivering a new deal for energy consumers (A8-0161/2016 - Theresa Griffin)
Poverty: a gender perspective (A8-0153/2016 - Maria Arena)
Non-tariff barriers in the Single Market (A8-0160/2016 - Daniel Dalton)
The Single Market strategy (A8-0171/2016 - Lara Comi)
Preparation of the G7 Summit (debate)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0157/2016 - Dariusz Rosati)
Traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restaurants and retail (B8-0581/2016)
China's market economy status (B8-0604/2016, B8-0605/2016, RC-B8-0607/2016, B8-0607/2016, B8-0608/2016, B8-0609/2016, B8-0610/2016, B8-0611/2016, B8-0612/2016)
Follow-up and state of play of the Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (B8-0583/2016, B8-0587/2016)
Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for certain foods (B8-0545/2016)
Framework Agreement on parental leave (A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena)
Preventing and combating trafficking in human beings (A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder)
Exemptions for commodity dealers (A8-0064/2016 - Sander Loones)
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (A8-0164/2016 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
Entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, volunteering, pupil exchange and au pairing (A8-0166/2016 - Cecilia Wikström)
Acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy (B8-0562/2016)
Protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0257/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0256/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
EU-Liberia sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (A8-0142/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
EU-Mauritania fisheries partnership agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0147/2016 - Gabriel Mato)
New territorial development tools in cohesion policy 2014-2020 (A8-0032/2016 - Ruža Tomašić)
Statistics concerning balance of payments, international trade in services and foreign direct investment (A8-0227/2015 - Sven Giegold)
Cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU (A8-0074/2016 - Iliana Iotova)
Ongoing negotiations on the first review of the economic adjustment programme for Greece (debate)
Preparation of the World Humanitarian Summit (debate)
Follow-up and state of play of the Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (debate)
Legal aspects, democratic control and implementation of the EU-Turkey agreement (debate) FR
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0136/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0109/2016 - Monica Macovei)
Discharge 2014: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0080/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0087/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC Office) (A8-0093/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0084/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0082/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Police College (CEPOL) (A8-0088/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0095/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0133/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0090/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0103/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0118/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0100/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0104/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0086/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0085/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0091/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0117/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0114/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0105/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0102/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0098/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0106/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0096/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0134/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) (A8-0110/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0120/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: The European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) (A8-0099/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0122/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0108/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (A8-0115/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0112/2016 - Derek Vaughan)
Discharge 2014: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0092/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking (A8-0094/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (A8-0119/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0113/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (A8-0083/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0081/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A8-0097/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Discharge 2014: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0089/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
European Investment Bank annual report 2014 (A8-0050/2016 - Georgi Pirinski)
Attacks on hospitals and schools as violations of international humanitarian law (B8-0488/2016, B8-0488/2016, B8-0489/2016, B8-0490/2016, B8-0491/2016, B8-0492/2016, B8-0493/2016)
Public access to documents for the years 2014-2015 (A8-0141/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
Women domestic workers and carers in the EU (A8-0053/2016 - Kostadinka Kuneva)
Gender equality and empowering women in the digital age (A8-0048/2016 - Terry Reintke)
EU-Georgia Common Aviation Area Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0128/2016 - Francisco Assis)
EU-Israel Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0129/2016 - Francisco Assis)
Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations (accession of Croatia) (A8-0054/2016 - Liisa Jaakonsaari)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Bolesław G. Piecha (A8-0152/2016 - Gilles Lebreton)
Safeguarding the best interest of the child across the EU on the basis of petitions addressed to the European Parliament (B8-0487/2016)
EU Agency for Railways (A8-0073/2016 - Roberts Zīle)
Interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (A8-0071/2016 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
Railway safety (A8-0056/2016 - Michael Cramer)
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (A8-0131/2015 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Commission and Executive Agencies (A8-0140/2016 - Martina Dlabajová)
Discharge 2014: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2014 Commission discharge (A8-0127/2016 - Martina Dlabajová)
Discharge 2014: 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0137/2016 - Claudia Schmidt)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0135/2016 - Markus Pieper)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0123/2016 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Court of Auditors (A8-0107/2016 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0111/2016 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen)
Discharge 2014: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0132/2016 - Monica Macovei)
European Investment Bank annual report 2014 (debate)
Discharge 2014 (debate)
Pakistan, in particular the attack in Lahore
Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data (A8-0139/2016 - Jan Philipp Albrecht)
Processing of personal data for the purposes of crime prevention (A8-0138/2016 - Marju Lauristin)
Use of Passenger Name Record data (EU PNR) (A8-0248/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope)
Protection of trade secrets against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (A8-0199/2015 - Constance Le Grip)
Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2017 (A8-0131/2016 - Indrek Tarand)
2015 Report on Turkey (B8-0442/2016)
2015 Report on Albania (B8-0440/2016)
2015 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (B8-0441/2016)
Meeting the antipoverty target in the light of increasing household costs (A8-0040/2016 - Tamás Meszerics)
Private sector and development (A8-0043/2016 - Nirj Deva)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 March 2016 and outcome of the EU-Turkey summit (debate)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/009 SE/Volvo Trucks (A8-0077/2016 - Victor Negrescu)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: EGF/2016/000 TA 2016/Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0078/2016 - Andrey Novakov)
Draft Amending Budget No 1/ 2016 : New instrument to provide emergency support within the Union (A8-0130/2016 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Samo Jereb (A8-0060/2016 - Bart Staes)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Mihails Kozlovs (A8-0059/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Jan Gregor (A8-0057/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Ladislav Balko (A8-0055/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - Janusz Wojciechowski (A8-0061/2016 - Igor Šoltes)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate (B8-0439/2016)
The EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world (A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete)
Implementation and review of the EU-Central Asia Strategy (A8-0051/2016 - Tamás Meszerics)
Zika virus outbreak (B8-0449/2016)
Situation in Poland (B8-0461/2016, B8-0463/2016, B8-0464/2016, B8-0465/2016)
2015 Report on Albania (debate)
Products originating in certain ACP states (A8-0010/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Denmark and Greenland: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0067/2016 - Marco Affronte)
EU-Macao Agreement on certain aspects of air services (A8-0072/2016 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch)
Minimum standard rate of VAT (A8-0063/2016 - Peter Simon)
Agreement on strategic cooperation between Brazil and Europol (A8-0070/2016 - Claude Moraes)
Request for waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Hermann Winkler (A8-0062/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: fisheries aspects (A8-0042/2016 - Norica Nicolai)
Breeding animals and their germinal products (A8-0288/2015 - Michel Dantin)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (A8-0066/2016 - Roberta Metsola, Kashetu Kyenge)
Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0301/2015 - Sajjad Karim)
Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (A8-0208/2015 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)
Towards improved single market regulation (A8-0278/2015 - Anneleen Van Bossuyt)
Learning EU at school (A8-0021/2016 - Damian Drăghici)
Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in vocational education and training (A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall)
The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (A8-0027/2016 - Sylvie Goulard)
Small-scale coastal fishing in regions dependent on fishing (A8-0044/2016 - Ruža Tomašić)
External dimension of the CFP, including fisheries agreements (A8-0052/2016 - Linnéa Engström)
Counterterrorism following the recent terrorist attacks (debate)
Freedom of expression in Kazakhstan
Veterinary medicinal products (A8-0046/2016 - Françoise Grossetête)
Authorisation and supervision of veterinary medicinal products (A8-0035/2016 - Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu)
Towards a thriving data-driven economy (B8-0308/2016)
Situation in Eritrea (B8-0318/2016, B8-0319/2016, B8-0320/2016, B8-0321/2016, B8-0322/2016, B8-0323/2016, B8-0324/2016)
2015 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (B8-0310/2016)
2015 Report on Montenegro (B8-0309/2016)
Banking Union - Annual report 2015 (A8-0033/2016 - Roberto Gualtieri)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 March 2016 and outcome of the EU-Turkey summit (debate)
Reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (A8-0037/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
Trade diversion into the European Union of certain key medicines (A8-0038/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
EU-Andorra agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0047/2016 - Miguel Viegas)
Appointment of a new Executive Director of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0045/2016 - Roberto Gualtieri)
Procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings (A8-0020/2015 - Caterina Chinnici)
Guidelines for the 2017 Budget - Section III (A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier)
Interinstitutional agreement on Better law-making (A8-0039/2016 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
Tobacco agreement (PMI agreement) (B8-0311/2016, B8-0312/2016, B8-0312/2016, B8-0313/2016, B8-0313/2016, B8-0314/2016, B8-0315/2016, B8-0316/2016, B8-0317/2016)
Situation in Eritrea (debate)
2015 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (debate)
2015 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (debate)
The situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU (debate)
Animal health (A8-0041/2016 - Jasenko Selimovic)
Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments (A8-0006/2016 - Marc Tarabella)
Market access to port services and financial transparency of ports (A8-0023/2016 - Knut Fleckenstein)
Harmonised indices of consumer prices (A8-0313/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
Annual report 2014 on the Protection of the EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0026/2016 - Benedek Jávor)
Gender mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament (A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar)
The situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU (A8-0024/2016 - Mary Honeyball)
Situation in Syria (debate)
Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments (debate)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2014 (debate)
Tobacco agreement (PMI agreement) (debate)
Authorisation for Austria to sign and ratify, and Malta to accede to, the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 (A8-0018/2016 - Viktor Uspaskich)
EU-San Marino agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (C8-0370/2015)
Accession of Croatia to the Convention on the protection of the financial interests of the Union (A8-0019/2016 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
European network of Employment Services, workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets (A8-0224/2015 - Heinz K. Becker)
Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for Tunisia (A8-0013/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/007 BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass (A8-0029/2016 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0030/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 (A8-0031/2016 - Sofia Ribeiro)
Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (A8-0017/2016 - Catherine Stihler)
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Tunisia Free Trade Agreement (B8-0255/2016)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2014 (A8-0020/2016 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
Opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand (B8-0250/2016)
Introduction of compatible systems for the registration of pet animals across Member States (RC-B8-0251/2016, B8-0251/2016, B8-0252/2016, B8-0253/2016, B8-0254/2016, B8-0256/2016)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (B8-0147/2016, RC-B8-0151/2016, B8-0151/2016, B8-0152/2016, B8-0153/2016, B8-0155/2016, B8-0158/2016, B8-0160/2016)
2015 progress report on Serbia (B8-0166/2016)
European integration process of Kosovo (B8-0167/2016)
Situation in Libya (RC-B8-0146/2016, B8-0146/2016, B8-0169/2016, B8-0170/2016, B8-0177/2016, B8-0178/2016, B8-0179/2016, B8-0180/2016, B8-0181/2016)
Insularity condition (B8-0165/2016)
The role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) (B8-0171/2016)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (B8-0147/2016, RC-B8-0151/2016, B8-0151/2016, B8-0152/2016, B8-0153/2016, B8-0155/2016, B8-0158/2016, B8-0160/2016)
Systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS (RC-B8-0149/2016, B8-0149/2016, B8-0154/2016, B8-0156/2016, B8-0157/2016, B8-0159/2016, B8-0161/2016, B8-0162/2016)
Railways and public services in the Danube and Adriatic macro-regions (debate)
Railways and public services in the Danube and Adriatic macro-regions (debate)
Introduction of compatible systems for the registration of pet animals across Member States (debate)
EU-Moldova Association Agreement: safeguard clause and the anti-circumvention mechanism (A8-0364/2015 Helmut Scholz)
EU-Georgia Association Agreement: anti-circumvention mechanism (A8-0365/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis)
Ratification of the Marrakesh Treaty, based on petitions received, notably Petition 924/2011 (B8-0168/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean FG72 (B8-0133/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 (B8-0134/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Authorisation of genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 89788 (B8-0135/2016)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106 on emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (B8-0040/2016)
Negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) (A8-0009/2016 - Viviane Reding)
New Strategy for gender equality and women's rights post-2015 (B8-0148/2016, B8-0150/2016, B8-0163/2016, B8-0164/2016)
2015 progress report on Serbia (debate)
Rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (A8-0359/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on heavy metals (A8-0002/2016 - Giovanni La Via)
Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants (A8-0001/2016 - Giovanni La Via)
Eurojust and Ukraine Cooperation Agreement (A8-0007/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)
Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement (A8-0008/2016 - Nathalie Griesbeck)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Robert Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (A8-0015/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Robert Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (A8-0016/2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Florian Philippot (A8-0014/2016 - Laura Ferrara)
Establishment of a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (A8-0172/2015 - Georgi Pirinski)
Mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy (A8-0003/2016 - Mark Demesmaeker)
Refugee emergency, external borders control and future of Schengen - Respect for the international principle of non-refoulement - Financing refugee facility for Turkey - Increased racist hatred and violence against refugees and migrants across Europe (debate)
Appointment of the members of the Committee of Inquiry on emission measurements in the automotive sector
Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine (RC-B8-0068/2016, B8-0068/2016, B8-0069/2016, B8-0077/2016, B8-0078/2016, B8-0079/2016, B8-0080/2016) RO
Mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) (RC-B8-0043/2016, B8-0043/2016, B8-0045/2016, B8-0051/2016, B8-0057/2016, B8-0058/2016, B8-0059/2016, B8-0060/2016)
EU priorities for the UNHRC sessions in 2016 (RC-B8-0050/2016, B8-0050/2016, B8-0052/2016, B8-0056/2016, B8-0063/2016, B8-0064/2016, B8-0065/2016, B8-0066/2016)
Activities of the Committee on Petitions 2014 (A8-0361/2015 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
EU citizens under detention in India, notably Italian, Estonian and UK citizens
North Korea
Programme of activities of the Dutch Presidency (debate)
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data (VRD) in Latvia (A8-0370/2015 - Claude Moraes)
Presumption of innocence and right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings (A8-0133/2015 - Nathalie Griesbeck)
Personal protective equipment (A8-0148/2015 - Vicky Ford)
Appliances burning gaseous fuels (A8-0147/2015 - Catherine Stihler)
Cableway installations (A8-0063/2015 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
Colombian peace process (RC-B8-0041/2016, B8-0041/2016, B8-0042/2016, B8-0053/2016, B8-0054/2016, B8-0055/2016, B8-0061/2016, B8-0062/2016)
Situation in the South East of Turkey (debate)
Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine (debate) RO
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (debate)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Czesław Adam Siekierski (A8-0004/2016 - Heidi Hautala)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Czesław Adam Siekierski (A8-0005/2016 - Heidi Hautala)
Multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (A8-0367/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
Annual report on EU Competition Policy (A8-0368/2015 - Werner Langen)
The role of intercultural dialogue, cultural diversity and education in promoting EU fundamental values (A8-0373/2015 - Julie Ward)
Stocktaking and challenges of the EU Financial Services Regulation (A8-0360/2015 - Burkhard Balz)
External factors that represent hurdles to European female entrepreneurship (A8-0369/2015 - Barbara Matera)
Skills policies for fighting youth unemployment (A8-0366/2015 - Marek Plura)
Towards a Digital Single Market Act (A8-0371/2015 - Kaja Kallas, Evelyne Gebhardt)
Situation in the Maldives
Setting up a Committee of Inquiry on emission measurements in the automotive sector, its powers, numerical strength and term of office (B8-1424/2015)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0340/2015 - Sandra Kalniete)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (consent) (A8-0339/2015 - Barbara Lochbihler)
EU-Vietnam Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation (resolution) (A8-0342/2015 - Barbara Lochbihler)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0344/2015 - Cristian Dan Preda)
20th anniversary of the Dayton Peace agreement (B8-1350/2015, RC-B8-1362/2015, B8-1362/2015, B8-1363/2015, B8-1364/2015, B8-1396/2015, B8-1397/2015, B8-1398/2015, B8-1401/2015)
Arms export: implementation of the Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0338/2015 - Bodil Valero)
Patents and plant breeders rights (RC-B8-1394/2015, B8-1394/2015, B8-1395/2015, B8-1399/2015, B8-1400/2015)
Situation in Burundi (RC-B8-1348/2015, B8-1348/2015, B8-1352/2015, B8-1353/2015, B8-1354/2015, B8-1355/2015, B8-1356/2015, B8-1357/2015)
Protection of Virunga national park in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (B8-1346/2015)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 December 2015 (debate) FR
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0347/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0348/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
Extension of the term of office of the Chairperson of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0346/2015 - Roberto Gualtieri)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application from Ireland - EGF/2015/006 IE/PWA International (A8-0363/2015 - Victor Negrescu)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: list of invasive alien species
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603xT25
Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies (A8-0349/2015 - Anneliese Dodds, Luděk Niedermayer)
EU-China relations (A8-0350/2015 - Bas Belder)
Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: Challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance (A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom)
Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals (A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin)
Situation in Hungary: follow-up to the European Parliament Resolution of 10 June 2015 (B8-1349/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1351/2015, B8-1358/2015, B8-1359/2015, B8-1360/2015, B8-1361/2015)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter (debate)
20th anniversary of the Dayton Peace agreement (debate)
Arms export: implementation of the Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (debate)
Euro area recommendation - Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (debate)
Arrangement with the Swiss Confederation on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office (A8-0345/2015 - Roberta Metsola)
EU-Dominica agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0322/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Vanuatu agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0329/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Trinidad and Tobago agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0323/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Samoa agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0320/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Grenada agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0326/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Timor-Leste agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0327/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Saint Lucia agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0321/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-Saint Vincent and the Grenadines agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0325/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
EU-United Arab Emirates agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0324/2015 - Mariya Gabriel)
Memorandum of Understanding between the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and Eurojust (A8-0353/2015 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Methods and procedure for making available the traditional, VAT and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements (A8-0357/2015 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos (A8-0358/2015 - Evelyn Regner)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Stelios Kouloglou (A8-0356/2015 - Pavel Svoboda)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application from Finland - EGF/2015/005 FI/Computer Programming (A8-0362/2015 - Marco Zanni)
EU trade mark (A8-0354/2015 - Cecilia Wikström)
Laws of Member States relating to trade marks (A8-0355/2015 - Cecilia Wikström)
Scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the North-East Atlantic fisheries (A8-0294/2015 - Ole Christensen)
Suspension of exceptional trade measures with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0060/2015 - Goffredo Maria Bettini)
Strategic cooperation in the fight against serious crime and terrorism between the United Arab Emirates and Europol (A8-0351/2015 - Alessandra Mussolini)
Towards a European Energy Union (A8-0341/2015 - Marek Józef Gróbarczyk)
Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (A8-0330/2015 - Peter Eriksson)
Implementation of the European Progress Microfinance Facility (A8-0331/2015 - Sven Schulze)
A new CFP: structure for technical measures and multiannual plans (A8-0328/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
Outcome of the COP 21 (debate) FR
EU-Turkey summit (debate)
Setting up a special committee on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect, its powers, numerical strength and term of office (B8-1335/2015)
Appointments to special committee on tax rulings
EU-Liechtenstein agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0334/2015 - Sander Loones)
Special report of the European Ombudsman in own-initiative inquiry concerning Frontex (A8-0343/2015 - Roberta Metsola, Ska Keller)
Sustainable urban mobility (A8-0319/2015 - Karima Delli)
The state of play of the Doha Development Agenda in view of the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-1230/2015)
Accession of Ecuador to the EU-Peru and Colombia trade agreement (B8-1241/2015)
A new animal welfare strategy for 2016-2020 (B8-1278/2015, B8-1278/2015, B8-1279/2015, B8-1280/2015, B8-1281/2015, B8-1282/2015, B8-1283/2015)
Education for children in emergency situations and protracted crises (B8-1240/2015)
Towards simplification and performance orientation in cohesion policy for 2014-2020 (B8-1231/2015)
Recent terrorist attacks in Paris (debate) FR
Draft amending budget No 8/2015: Own resources and European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0337/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for immediate budgetary measures to address the refugee crisis (A8-0336/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide for payment of advances in the 2016 budget (A8-0335/2015 - Lefteris Christoforou)
2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: granting an authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexhyl) phthalate (DEHP) (B8-1228/2015)
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (A8-0317/2015 - Elisa Ferreira, Michael Theurer)
Prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (A8-0316/2015 - Rachida Dati)
EU Strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020 (A8-0312/2015 - Ole Christensen)
Situation in Moldova (debate)
Education for children in emergency situations and protracted crises (debate)
State of the Energy Union (debate)
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis (A8-0250/2015 - Claude Moraes)
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0251/2015 - Claude Moraes)
Repealing certain acts in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0252/2015 - Claude Moraes)
Accession to the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (A8-0318/2015 - Carlos Iturgaiz)
Insurance mediation (A8-0315/2015 - Werner Langen)
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on child poverty (A8-0310/2015 - Inês Cristina Zuber)
Cohesion policy and marginalised communities (A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke)
The role of the EU within the UN (A8-0308/2015 - Paavo Väyrynen)
Human rights in EU-Vietnam trade negotiations (debate)
Human rights in EU-Vietnam trade negotiations (debate)
Human rights in EU-Vietnam trade negotiations (debate)
European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate)
European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate)
Future aviation package (debate)
Financing of two new EU trust funds for Syria and Africa and Member States' contributions to these funds (debate)
Objectives of the previous Daphne programmes in the context of the new Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Interoperability solutions as a means for modernising the public sector (A8-0225/2015 - Carlos Zorrinho)
Reform of the electoral law of the EU (A8-0286/2015 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Jo Leinen)
Future aviation package (B8-1146/2015, B8-1147/2015, B8-1148/2015, B8-1149/2015, B8-1150/2015, B8-1151/2015, B8-1152/2015)
Hearing on summer-time changes in Europe (debate) FR
Safe use of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in the field of civil aviation (debate)
New challenges and concepts for the promotion of tourism in Europe (debate)
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) (A8-0048/2015 - Kinga Gál)
Transparency of securities financing transactions (A8-0120/2015 - Renato Soru)
Follow-up to the European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2014 on the electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens (B8-1092/2015)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities (A8-0307/2015 - Dariusz Rosati)
Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market (B8-1093/2015)
Safe use of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in the field of civil aviation (A8-0261/2015 - Jacqueline Foster)
New challenges and concepts for the promotion of tourism in Europe (A8-0258/2015 - Isabella De Monte)
Development of a satellite-based technology to enable global flight tracking systems (B8-1094/2015)
Use of genetically modified food and feed (debate)
EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region (A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić)
Cohesion policy and review of the Europe 2020 strategy (A8-0277/2015 - Fernando Ruas)
European Structural and Investment Funds and sound economic governance (A8-0268/2015 - José Blanco López)
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) (debate)
Follow-up to the European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2014 on the electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens (debate)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities - Steps towards completing the Economic and Monetary Union (debate)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities - Steps towards completing the Economic and Monetary Union (debate)
Draft general budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections
General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
Court of Justice of the European Union: number of judges at the General Court (A8-0296/2015 - António Marinho e Pinto)
Provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area (A8-0295/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
Use of genetically modified food and feed (A8-0305/2015 - Giovanni La Via)
Novel foods (A8-0046/2014 - James Nicholson)
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (A8-0249/2015 - Julie Girling)
European Citizens' Initiative (A8-0284/2015 - György Schöpflin)
Common Agricultural Policy: repealing obsolete acts (A8-0255/2015 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
EU-Switzerland agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information (A8-0271/2015 - Jeppe Kofod)
Taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments: repealing the Savings Directive (A8-0299/2015 - Molly Scott Cato)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Sweden (A8-0304/2015 - Monika Flašíková Beňová)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Belgium (A8-0303/2015 - Monika Flašíková Beňová)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Poland (A8-0302/2015 - Monika Flašíková Beňová)
Package travel and linked travel arrangements (A8-0297/2015 - Birgit Collin-Langen)
European single market for electronic communications (A8-0300/2015 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0306/2015 - Markus Ferber)
Discharge 2013: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0283/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0282/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0285/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0269/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Ebola crisis: long-term lessons (A8-0281/2015 - Charles Goerens)
Emission measurements in the automotive sector (B8-1075/2015, B8-1075/2015, B8-1076/2015, B8-1077/2015, B8-1078/2015, B8-1079/2015, B8-1080/2015)
General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate)
Situation in Israel and Palestine (debate)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation - EU-Switzerland agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information - Taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments: repealing the Savings Directive (debate)
Package travel and linked travel arrangements (debate)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by Member States and Europol for the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences (A8-0287/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope)
Draft amending budget No 6/2015: Own resources, Union trust funds for external action, Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (A8-0280/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration (A8-0290/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Draft amending budget No 7/2015: Managing the refugee crisis: immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration (A8-0289/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Béla Kovács (A8-0291/2015 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
Appointment of Deputy Managing Director of EFSI (A8-0293/2015 - Jean Arthuis, Roberto Gualtieri)
Appointment of Managing Director of EFSI (A8-0292/2015 - Jean Arthuis, Roberto Gualtieri)
Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (A8-0275/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux)
Central African Republic
Situation in Thailand
The mass displacement of children in Nigeria as a result of Boko Haram attacks
Payment services in the internal market (A8-0266/2015 - Antonio Tajani)
Mortgage legislation and risky financial instruments in the EU: the case of Spain (B8-0987/2015)
The death penalty (B8-0998/2015, B8-0998/2015, B8-0999/2015, B8-1001/2015, B8-1005/2015, B8-1006/2015, B8-1007/2015, B8-1008/2015)
Lessons learned from the red mud disaster five years after the accident in Hungary (B8-0989/2015)
Renewal of the EU Plan of action on Gender equality and Women's empowerment in development (B8-0988/2015)
Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (A8-0213/2015 - Anna Záborská)
Situation in Syria (debate) FR
Situation in Turkey (debate) FR
Parliament's calendar of part-sessions – 2017
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Tunisia in Union programmes (A8-0254/2015 - Pier Antonio Panzeri)
European small claims procedure and European order for payment procedure (A8-0140/2015 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air (A8-0160/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb)
Caseins and caseinates intended for human consumption (A8-0042/2015 - Giovanni La Via)
Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (A8-0049/2015 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
Decision adopted on the Capital Markets Union package (debate)
Lessons learned from the red mud disaster five years after the accident in Hungary (debate)
Doubling the capacity of the North Stream pipeline and impact on the energy union and the security of supply (debate)
Renewal of the EU Plan of action on Gender equality and Women's empowerment in development (debate)
ILO Forced Labour Convention: judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0226/2015 - Helga Stevens)
Subjecting 4-methylamphetamine to control measures (A8-0265/2015 - Michał Boni)
Subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures (A8-0263/2015 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
Subjecting 25I-NBOMe, AH-7921, MDPV and methoxetamine to control measures (A8-0264/2015 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
Subjecting 4,4'-DMAR and MT-45 to control measures (A8-0262/2015 - Michał Boni)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: disasters in Bulgaria and Greece in 2015 (A8-0253/2015 - Andrey Novakov)
Possible extension of geographical indication protection of the EU to non-agricultural products (A8-0259/2015 - Virginie Rozière)
Common provisions on European Structural and Investment Funds: specific measures for Greece (A8-0260/2015 - Iskra Mihaylova)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/002 DE/Adam Opel (A8-0273/2015 - Jens Geier)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/003 BE/Ford Genk (A8-0272/2015 - Paul Rübig)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/004 IT/Alitalia (A8-0274/2015 - Monika Vana)
Role of local authorities in developing countries in development cooperation (A8-0232/2015 - Eleni Theocharous)
Emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate)
Situation in Libya (debate)
The death penalty (debate)
Common provisions on European Structural and Investment Funds: specific measures for Greece (debate)
Role of local authorities in developing countries in development cooperation (debate)
Mortgage legislation and risky financial instruments in the EU: the case of Spain (debate)
Export controls in respect of dual-use items after the Hacking Team revelations (debate)
The gender dimension of trafficking in human beings (debate)
Russia, in particular the cases of Eston Kohver, Oleg Sentsov and Olexandr Kolchenko
Investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0173/2015 - Tamás Deutsch)
Assessment of the 2012 European Year for active ageing and solidarity between generations (A8-0241/2015 - Eduard Kukan)
Implementation of the 2011 White paper on transport (A8-0246/2015 - Wim van de Camp)
Women's careers in science and university (A8-0235/2015 - Elissavet Vozemberg)
Empowering girls through education in the EU (A8-0206/2015 - Liliana Rodrigues)
EEA-Switzerland: Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market (A8-0244/2015 - Andreas Schwab)
Migration and refugees in Europe (RC-B8-0832/2015, B8-0832/2015, B8-0833/2015, B8-0834/2015, B8-0835/2015, B8-0837/2015, B8-0838/2015, B8-0842/2015)
The EU's role in the Middle East peace process (RC-B8-0836/2015, B8-0836/2015, B8-0839/2015, B8-0840/2015, B8-0841/2015, B8-0843/2015, B8-0844/2015)
Situation in Belarus (RC-B8-0866/2015, B8-0866/2015, B8-0872/2015, B8-0874/2015, B8-0876/2015, B8-0878/2015, B8-0879/2015, B8-0880/2015)
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combatting unemployment (A8-0247/2015 - Verónica Lope Fontagné)
30th and 31st annual reports on monitoring the application of EU law (2012-2013) (A8-0242/2015 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century (A8-0222/2015 - Martina Dlabajová)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Guinea-Bissau: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (recommendation) (A8-0233/2015 - João Ferreira)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Guinea-Bissau: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (report) (A8-0236/2015 - João Ferreira)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Cape Verde: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (recommendation) (A8-0201/2015 - Peter van Dalen)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Cape Verde: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (report) (A8-0200/2015 - Peter van Dalen)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Madagascar: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0196/2015 - Ricardo Serrão Santos)
Protocol amending the Marrakesh agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (A8-0237/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
Protocol amending the Marrakesh agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (Trade facilitation agreement) (A8-0238/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
Authorisation for Austria, Belgium and Poland to ratify, or to accede to, the Convention on the contract for the carriage of goods by inland waterways (CMNI) (A8-0231/2015 - Pavel Svoboda)
Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece (A8-0245/2015 - Ska Keller)
Urban dimension of EU policies (A8-0218/2015 - Kerstin Westphal)
The EU's role in the Middle East peace process (debate)
Situation in Belarus (debate)
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combating unemployment - Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century - Precarious employment (debate)
Sustainability of healthcare systems in Europe: future challenges (debate)
ILO Forced Labour Convention: social policy (A8-0243/2015 - Patrick Le Hyaric)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Janusz Korwin-Mikke (A8-0229/2015 - Evelyn Regner)
Correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters (A8-0234/2015 - Liisa Jaakonsaari)
Trade in seal products (A8-0186/2015 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
Cloning of animals kept and reproduced for farming purposes (A8-0216/2015 - Giulia Moi, Renate Sommer)
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU (2013-2014) (A8-0230/2015 - Laura Ferrara)
Commissioner hearings: lessons to be taken from the 2014 process (A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett)
Human rights and technology in third countries (A8-0178/2015 - Marietje Schaake)
Protecting the EU's financial interests: towards performance-based controls of the CAP (A8-0240/2015 - Petri Sarvamaa)
Family businesses in Europe (A8-0223/2015 - Angelika Niebler)
Research and innovation in the blue economy to create jobs and growth (A8-0214/2015 - João Ferreira)
Promoting youth entrepreneurship through education and training (A8-0239/2015 - Michaela Šojdrová)
Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe (A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu)
Follow up to the European citizens' initiative Right2Water (A8-0228/2015 - Lynn Boylan)
Trade in seal products (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Srebrenica commemoration (debate)
Maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination following a nuclear accident (debate)
Maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination following a nuclear accident (A8-0176/2015 - Esther Herranz García)
Building a Capital markets union (B8-0655/2015)
European Agenda on Security (B8-0676/2015, B8-0679/2015)
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0680/2015, B8-0680/2015, B8-0681/2015, B8-0682/2015, B8-0683/2015, B8-0686/2015, B8-0687/2015, B8-0688/2015)
Security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa and prospects for political stability (A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon)
Review of the European neighbourhood policy (A8-0194/2015 - Eduard Kukan)
Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights (A8-0209/2015 - Julia Reda)
Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) (A8-0177/2015 - Andrzej Grzyb)
Situation in Burundi (RC-B8-0657/2015, B8-0657/2015, B8-0658/2015, B8-0665/2015, B8-0666/2015, B8-0667/2015, B8-0668/2015, B8-0669/2015)
Srebrenica commemoration (RC-B8-0716/2015, B8-0716/2015, B8-0717/2015, B8-0718/2015, B8-0719/2015, B8-0720/2015, B8-0721/2015, B8-0722/2015)
Cambodia's draft laws on NGOs and trade unions
Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) (short presentation)
Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (A8-0175/2015 - Bernd Lange)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0188/2015 - Ivo Vajgl)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Serbia (protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0189/2015 - David McAllister)
Scientific and technological cooperation with India: renewal of the agreement (A8-0179/2015 - Jerzy Buzek)
Scientific and technological cooperation with the Faroe Islands: Horizon 2020 (A8-0180/2015 - Jerzy Buzek)
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (A8-0158/2015 - Sergio Gaetano Cofferati)
Market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme (A8-0029/2015 - Ivo Belet)
Seafarers (A8-0127/2015 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier)
Scientific and technological cooperation with Switzerland: Horizon 2020 and ITER activities (A8-0181/2015 - Jerzy Buzek)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0205/2015 - Laura Agea)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/001 FI/Broadcom (A8-0210/2015 - Petri Sarvamaa)
2016 Budget - Mandate for the trilogue (A8-0217/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Green employment initiative (A8-0204/2015 - Jean Lambert)
Tax avoidance and tax evasion as challenges in developing countries (A8-0184/2015 - Elly Schlein)
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (A8-0215/2015 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
Recent terrorist attacks (debate)
Future EU-Cuba relations (debate)
Situation in Yemen (debate)
Review of the Latvian Presidency (debate)
Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (debate)
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors - Bettina Michelle Jakobsen (A8-0198/2015 - Igor Šoltes)
Exercise of the Union’s rights under international trade rules (A8-0203/2015 - Jiří Maštálka)
Protection against injurious pricing of vessels (A8-0202/2015 - Jiří Maštálka)
Fishing opportunities in EU waters for fishing vessels flying the flag of Venezuela off the coast of French Guiana (A8-0195/2015 - João Ferreira)
Draft amending budget No 3/2015: surplus from 2014 (A8-0219/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Draft amending budget No 4/2015: mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for Romania, Bulgaria and Italy (A8-0220/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Delivering multimodal integrated ticketing in Europe (A8-0183/2015 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch)
Extension of the term of office of the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect
Draft amending budget No 1/2015: European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) (A8-0221/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Draft amending budget No 5/2015 - Responding to migratory pressures (A8-0212/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Review of the implementation of the Dairy package (A8-0187/2015 - James Nicholson)
External impact of EU trade and investment policy on public-private initiatives (A8-0182/2015 - Jan Zahradil)
The fruit and vegetables sector since the 2007 reform (A8-0170/2015 - Nuno Melo)
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (debate)
Market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme (debate)
European Agenda on Security (debate) FR
Building a Capital markets union (debate)
Building a Capital markets union (debate)
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (debate)
Review of the implementation of the Dairy package (debate)
External impact of EU trade and investment policy on public-private initiatives (short presentation)
The fruit and vegetables sector since the 2007 reform (short presentation)
Delivering multimodal integrated ticketing in Europe (short presentation)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate)
Syria: situation in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish
Paraguay: the legal aspects related to the child pregnancy
Situation in Nepal after the earthquakes
Strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia (A8-0171/2015 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)
Recent revelations of high-level corruption cases in FIFA (RC-B8-0548/2015, B8-0548/2015, B8-0549/2015, B8-0550/2015, B8-0571/2015, B8-0572/2015, B8-0573/2015, B8-0574/2015)
Conclusion of the Doha amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0167/2015 - Elisabetta Gardini)
EU-Iceland agreement on Iceland participation in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (A8-0166/2015 - Giovanni La Via)
Accession of Croatia to the Convention on mutual assistance in criminal matters (A8-0156/2015 - Birgit Sippel)
Accession of Croatia to the Convention on the fight against corruption involving EC officials or officials of Member States (A8-0157/2015 - Filiz Hyusmenova)
State of EU-Russia relations (A8-0162/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis)
European energy security strategy (A8-0164/2015 - Algirdas Saudargas)
OLAF Supervisory Committee's annual report 2014 (B8-0539/2015, B8-0539/2015, B8-0540/2015, B8-0541/2015, B8-0542/2015)
Situation in Hungary (RC-B8-0532/2015, B8-0532/2015, B8-0533/2015, B8-0534/2015, B8-0535/2015, B8-0536/2015, B8-0537/2015)
2014 Progress Report on Turkey (B8-0455/2015)
Strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia (debate)
Strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia (debate)
Situation in Burundi (continuation of debate)
Recent revelations of high-level corruption cases in FIFA (debate)
State of EU-Russia relations (debate)
Adjustment rate for direct payments in respect of 2015 (A8-0174/2015 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015 (A8-0163/2015 - Maria Noichl)
Intellectual property rights in third countries (A8-0161/2015 - Alessia Maria Mosca)
Intellectual property rights: an EU action plan (A8-0169/2015 - Pavel Svoboda)
Conclusion of the Doha amendment to the Kyoto Protocol - EU-Iceland agreement on Iceland participation in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (debate)
European energy security strategy (debate)
Smart borders package (debate)
Adjustment rate for direct payments in respect of 2015 (debate)
EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015 (debate)
EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015 (debate)
Intellectual property rights in third countries (short presentation)
Preparation of the G7 Summit (7-8 June) (debate)
EU development aid to Eritrea in the light of documented human rights abuses (debate)
Cyber-attacks against the media - new level of threat to cybersecurity (debate)
Ending the practice of early, forced marriage of girls (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments - 2014/0014(COD) (B8-0362/2015)
Growth rates in EU and spring 2015 economic forecast (debate)
ACER - Human resources for monitoring wholesale energy markets (debate)
ACER - Human resources for monitoring wholesale energy markets (debate)
Zimbabwe, the case of human rights defender Itai Dzamara
Zimbabwe, the case of human rights defender Itai Dzamara
The plight of Rohingya refugees, including mass graves in Thailand
Swaziland, the case of human rights activists Thulani Maseko and Bheki Makhubu
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0054/2015 - Arnaud Danjean)
Financing the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0136/2015 - Eduard Kukan, Indrek Tarand)
Security and defence capabilities in Europe (A8-0159/2015 - Ana Gomes)
European Agenda on Migration (debate)
Parliament's calendar of part-sessions – 2016
Trade, development and cooperation agreement with South Africa (Protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) (A8-0146/2015 - Davor Ivo Stier)
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0153/2015 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini)
Information accompanying transfers of funds (A8-0154/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope, Peter Simon)
Insolvency proceedings (A8-0155/2015 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
Self-certification of importers of minerals and metals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (A8-0141/2015 - Iuliu Winkler)
Commission Delegated Directive ../…/EU amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, Annex III to Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards an exemption for cadmium in illumination and display lighting applications" (B8-0464/2015)
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No …/.. amending Regulation (EC) No 376/2008 as regards the obligation to present a licence for imports of ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin (B8-0440/2015)
Maternity leave (B8-0453/2015)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (B8-0460/2015)
Outbreak of Xylella fastidiosa affecting olive trees (B8-0450/2015, B8-0451/2015, B8-0451/2015, B8-0452/2015, B8-0456/2015, B8-0457/2015, B8-0458/2015)
2014 Progress Report on Turkey (debate)
2014 Progress Report on Turkey (debate)
Situation in Ethiopia (debate)
Eastern Partnership summit (21-22 May) (debate)
EU - CELAC summit (10-11 June) (debate)
Japanese whaling activities in the Antarctic (debate)
Decision adopted on the Digital Single Market (debate)
Safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement with the Swiss Confederation (A8-0145/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
European Convention on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access (A8-0071/2015 - Pavel Svoboda)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Viktor Uspaskich (A8-0149/2015 - Laura Ferrara)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Jérôme Lavrilleux (A8-0152/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Janusz Korwin-Mikke (A8-0150/2015 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Theodoros Zagorakis (A8-0151/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
Request for consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty’
Request for consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee on "Possible evolutions and adjustments of the current institutional set up of the European Union"
Request for consultation of the Committee of the Regions on "Improving the Functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty"
Request for consultation of the Committee of the Regions on "Possible evolutions and adjustments of the current institutional set up of the European Union"
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (A8-0131/2015 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen)
Financing for development (A8-0143/2015 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
Safer healthcare in Europe (A8-0142/2015 - Piernicola Pedicini)
Green growth opportunities for SMEs (A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer)
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - Financing the Common Security and Defence Policy - Security and defence capabilities in Europe (debate)
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing - Information accompanying transfers of funds (debate)
Insolvency proceedings - Review and extension of the Commission recommendation of 12 March 2014 on a new approach to business failure and insolvency, with regard to family insolvency and second chances for individuals and households (debate)
Maternity leave (debate)
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (debate)
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (debate)
Financing for development (debate)
Financing for development (debate)
Tobacco agreements (debate) FR
Tobacco agreements (debate)
Rules on VAT and VAT mini one-stop shop (MOSS) for digital services, books and papers in the EU (debate)
European Investment Bank annual report 2013 (debate)
Expo Milano 2015: Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life (debate)
Alcohol strategy (B8-0357/2015)
Second anniversary of the Rana Plaza building collapse and the state of play of the Sustainability Compact (RC-B8-0363/2015, B8-0363/2015, B8-0364/2015, B8-0365/2015, B8-0366/2015, B8-0368/2015, B8-0372/2015, B8-0376/2015)
Report of the extraordinary European Council meeting (23 April 2015) - The latest tragedies in the Mediterranean and EU migration and asylum policies (RC-B8-0367/2015, B8-0367/2015, B8-0377/2015, B8-0378/2015, B8-0379/2015, B8-0380/2015, B8-0381/2015, B8-0384/2015)
Suspension of exceptional trade measures with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0060/2015 - Goffredo Maria Bettini)
Persecution of the Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabaab (B8-0369/2015, RC-B8-0382/2015, B8-0382/2015, B8-0383/2015, B8-0385/2015, B8-0386/2015, B8-0387/2015, B8-0388/2015)
Situation in the Maldives (RC-B8-0392/2015, B8-0392/2015, B8-0395/2015, B8-0397/2015, B8-0399/2015, B8-0401/2015, B8-0402/2015, B8-0404/2015)
2014 Progress Report on Albania (B8-0358/2015)
2014 Progress Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (B8-0359/2015)
European Investment Bank annual report 2013 (A8-0057/2015 - Ernest Urtasun)
Expo Milano 2015: Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life (B8-0360/2015)
Situation in Nigeria (B8-0128/2015, B8-0129/2015, RC-B8-0370/2015, B8-0370/2015, B8-0371/2015, B8-0374/2015, B8-0394/2015, B8-0396/2015, B8-0398/2015, B8-0400/2015)
The case of Nadiya Savchenko
Discharge 2013: European GNSS Agency (GNSS) (A8-0095/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0103/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking (A8-0107/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0104/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (A8-0112/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Money market funds (A8-0041/2015 - Neena Gill)
Imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by specific Union import rules (A8-0016/2015 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0055/2015 - Monica Macovei)
Persecution of the Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabaab (debate)
Situation in the Maldives (debate)
2014 Progress Report on Albania (debate)
2014 Progress Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (debate)
Report of the extraordinary European Council meeting (23 April 2015) - The latest tragedies in the Mediterranean and EU migration and asylum policies (debate)
Suspension of exceptional trade measures with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina (debate)
EU Member States' commitments on Official Development Assistance (ODA) (debate)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0116/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Commission and executive agencies (A8-0101/2015 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
Pre-financing of operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative (A8-0134/2015 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier)
Safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement with Norway (A8-0046/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Albania (A8-0047/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters with Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0017/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0132/2015 - Andrzej Duda)
Application of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU to certain categories of horizontal state aid (A8-0029/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Rules for the application of Article 108 TFEU (A8-0047/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Court of Auditors special reports in the context of the 2013 Commission discharge (A8-0067/2015 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - 8th, 9th and 10th EDFs (A8-0102/2015 - Martina Dlabajová)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0109/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0111/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Court of Auditors (A8-0113/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Economic and Social Committee (A8-0114/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0105/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0115/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0118/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
2013 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0070/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0117/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0081/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CDT) (A8-0084/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (A8-0079/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Police College (CEPOL) (A8-0086/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0074/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0085/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0072/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0069/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0073/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0083/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0097/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0098/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0096/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0077/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0075/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0068/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0088/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0089/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0078/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0087/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0090/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013 : European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (EU-LISA) (A8-0099/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0076/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: Euratom Supply Agency (EURATOM) (A8-0119/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) (A8-0092/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: The European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) (A8-0091/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Police Office (EUROPOL) (A8-0080/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) (A8-0093/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2013: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (FRONTEX) (A8-0094/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (debate) RO
Reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (debate)
Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport (debate)
International Convention on standards for fishing vessel personnel (A8-0064/2015 - Sofia Ribeiro)
Draft amending budget No 2/2015: Revision of the MFF for 2014-2020 (A8-0138/2015 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system (A8-0053/2015 - Olga Sehnalová)
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (A8-0025/2015 - Nils Torvalds)
Reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (A8-0130/2015 - Margrete Auken)
Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport (A8-0122/2015 - José Inácio Faria)
Multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0128/2015 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
Landing obligation (A8-0060/2014 - Alain Cadec)
Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Russia to take account of the accession of Croatia to the EU (A8-0129/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis)
Implementation of the Bologna process (A8-0121/2015 - Krystyna Łybacka)
European film in the digital era (A8-0123/2015 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta)
A new EU Forest Strategy (A8-0126/2015 - Elisabeth Köstinger)
Decision adopted on the European Agenda on Security (debate)
Money market funds (debate)
Alcohol strategy (debate)
Second anniversary of the Rana Plaza building collapse and the state of play of the Sustainability Compact (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance RO
Amendment of the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (debate)
Armenian genocide 100th anniversary (debate)
Employment quotas for people with disabilities in the EU institutions (debate)
Envisaged EU-Mexico PNR agreement (debate)
One-minute speeches (Rule 163)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/017 FR/Mory-Ducros (A8-0124/2015 - Jean-Paul Denanot)
Decision establishing the Social Protection Committee (A8-0066/2015 - Marita Ulvskog)
Decision establishing the Employment Committee (A8-0065/2015 - Marita Ulvskog)
Amendment of the MFF 2014-2020 (A8-0125/2015 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
Armenian genocide 100th anniversary (RC-B8-0342/2015, B8-0342/2015, B8-0343/2015, B8-0344/2015, B8-0346/2015, B8-0347/2015, B8-0348/2015, B8-0349/2015)
International Roma Day – anti-Gypsyism in Europe and EU recognition of the memorial day of the Roma genocide during WW II (B8-0326/2015) RO
Annual Tax report - Decision adopted on the Tax Transparency policy (debate)
28th session of the UNHRC (debate)
Recent attacks and abductions by Daesh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians
Tanzania, notably the issue of land grabbing FR
Murder of the Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and the state of democracy in Russia (RC-B8-0239/2015, B8-0239/2015, B8-0247/2015, B8-0248/2015, B8-0250/2015, B8-0251/2015, B8-0252/2015)
Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament (A8-0039/2015 - Elmar Brok)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0023/2015 - Pier Antonio Panzeri)
Relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism (RC-B8-0215/2008, B8-0215/2015, B8-0216/2015, B8-0221/2015, B8-0222/2015, B8-0223/2015, B8-0224/2015, B8-0225/2015)
28th session of the UNHRC (RC-B8-0228/2015, B8-0228/2015, B8-0229/2015, B8-0230/2015, B8-0231/2015, B8-0232/2015, B8-0233/2015, B8-0234/2015)
Preparations for the European Council meeting (19-20 March 2015) (debate)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2015 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2015 - Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (debate)
Import into the Union of agricultural products originating in Turkey (A8-0048/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (A8-0038/2015 - Gabriel Mato)
Common rules for imports from certain third countries (A8-0014/2015 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Montenegro (A8-0051/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Union tariff quotas for high-quality beef, and for pigmeat, poultrymeat, wheat and meslin, and brans, sharps and other residues (A8-0052/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Suspending certain concessions relating to the import into the Union of agricultural products originating in Turkey (A8-0050/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
2014 Progress report on Montenegro (B8-0211/2015)
2014 Progress report on Serbia (B8-0213/2015)
The European integration process of Kosovo (B8-0214/2015)
Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (A8-0018/2015 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2015 (A8-0043/2015 - Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2015 (A8-0037/2015 - Dariusz Rosati)
Fight against child sexual abuse on the Internet (RC-B8-0217/2015, B8-0217/2015, B8-0218/2015, B8-0219/2015, B8-0220/2015, B8-0226/2015, B8-0227/2015)
Murder of the Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and the state of democracy in Russia (debate)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2013 and the EU policy on the matter (debate)
Mali peace agreement (debate)
Relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism (debate)
Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (debate)
European long-term investment funds (continuation of debate)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/007 BE/Hainaut Steel (Duferco-NLMK) (A8-0031/2015 - Andrej Plenković)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/014 DE/Aleo Solar (A8-0030/2015 - Iris Hoffmann)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/009 PL/Zachem (A8-0036/2015 - Jan Olbrycht)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/012 BE/ArcelorMittal (A8-0035/2015 - Victor Negrescu)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/011 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0033/2015 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki)
Dimensions and weights of road vehicles circulating within the Community (A8-0032/2015 - Jörg Leichtfried)
European long-term investment funds (A8-0021/2015 - Alain Lamassoure)
Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions (A8-0022/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/011 BE/Saint-Gobain Sekurit (A8-0034/2015 - Liadh Ní Riada)
Annual report on EU competition policy (A8-0019/2015 - Morten Messerschmidt)
European Central Bank annual report for 2013 (A8-0011/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
Guidelines for the 2016 budget - Section III (debate)
Global High-Level Conference on Ebola of 3 March 2015 (debate) FR
Global High-Level Conference on Ebola of 3 March 2015 (debate)
2014 Progress report on Montenegro (debate)
2014 Progress report on Montenegro (debate)
2014 Progress report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (debate)
2014 Progress report on Serbia (debate)
The European integration process of Kosovo (debate)
Progress on equality between women and men in the EU in 2013 (debate)
Annual report on EU competition policy (debate)
Annual report on EU competition policy (debate)
Situation in Venezuela (debate)
Saudi Arabia: the case of Raif Badawi
Humanitarian crisis in Iraq and Syria, in particular in the IS context (RC-B8-0136/2015, B8-0136/2015, B8-0137/2015, B8-0138/2015, B8-0139/2015, B8-0140/2015, B8-0141/2015, B8-0142/2015)
Common rules for imports (A8-0040/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement with Iceland (A8-0031/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Measures concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (A8-0033/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Combined effect of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures (A8-0032/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Common rules for exports (A8-0035/2014 - Andrzej Duda)
Accession of Gabon to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0007/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of Andorra to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0004/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of the Seychelles to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0006/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of Russia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0008/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of Albania to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0002/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of Singapore to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0003/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of Morocco to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0005/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Accession of Armenia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0009/2015 - Heidi Hautala)
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and Senegal (A8-0010/2015 - Norica Nicolai)
US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0098/2015, RC-B8-0123/2015, B8-0123/2015, B8-0133/2015)
Anti-terrorism measures (B8-0100/2015, RC-B8-0122/2015, B8-0122/2015, B8-0124/2015, B8-0125/2015, B8-0126/2015, B8-0127/2015, B8-0132/2015)
The work of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (A8-0012/2015 - Charles Goerens)
Humanitarian crisis in Iraq and Syria, in particular in the IS context (debate)
Humanitarian crisis in Iraq and Syria, in particular in the IS context (debate)
Situation in Yemen (debate)
Way forward for Frontex and the European Asylum Support Office FR
Way forward for Frontex and the European Asylum Support Office
European Youth Initiative (modification of the ESF regulation) (debate)
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (debate)
Situation in Ukraine (debate)
Situation in Ukraine (debate)
2015 Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (debate)
The work of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (debate)
The work of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (debate) FR
One-minute speeches (Rule 163) FR
Anti-terrorism measures (debate) FR
Roadmap towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (debate) (debate)
Situation in Libya (RC-B8-0011/2015, B8-0011/2015, B8-0013/2015, B8-0014/2015, B8-0030/2015, B8-0031/2015, B8-0032/2015, B8-0033/2015)
Situation in Ukraine (RC-B8-0008/2015, B8-0008/2015, B8-0018/2015, B8-0020/2015, B8-0021/2015, B8-0025/2015, B8-0027/2015, B8-0029/2015)
Situation in Ukraine (debate) (debate)
Launch of the European Year for Development (debate)
Review of the Italian Presidency (debate)
Situation in Libya (debate)
Khartoum Process and the forthcoming "EU-Horn of Africa Migration Route Initiative" (debate)
Khartoum Process and the forthcoming "EU-Horn of Africa Migration Route Initiative" (debate)
Khartoum Process and the forthcoming "EU-Horn of Africa Migration Route Initiative" (debate)
Participation of Croatia in the European Economic Area (A8-0026/2014 - Alexander Graf Lambsdorff)
Shortage of funding for the World Food Programme aid scheme to Syrian refugees (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance RO
Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank (A8-0027/2014 - Roberto Gualtieri)
The powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (A8-0028/2014 - Kay Swinburne)
The EU and the global development framework after 2015 (A8-0037/2014 - Davor Ivo Stier)
The EU and the global development framework after 2015 (debate)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/009 EL/Sprider Stores (A8-0023/2014 - Victor Negrescu)
Association agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova (A8-0020/2014 - Petras Auštrevičius)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Closing down of Memorial (Sakharov Prize 2009) in Russia
Presentation by the Commission President-elect of the College of Commissioners and their programme (debate)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities (A8-0019/2014 - Philippe De Backer)
European IS fighters (debate)
Reports (2)
REPORT on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation PDF (203 KB) DOC (82 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and establishing the EFSD Guarantee and the EFSD Guarantee Fund PDF (1006 KB) DOC (137 KB)
Shadow reports (13)
REPORT on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, with the support of the Commission, to the Council for a Council Decision establishing a European Peace Facility PDF (196 KB) DOC (69 KB)
REPORT containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, of the other part PDF (245 KB) DOC (90 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, of the other part PDF (167 KB) DOC (56 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods (recast) PDF (186 KB) DOC (59 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council Decision on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union, including relations between the European Union, on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark, on the other (‘Overseas Association Decision’) PDF (287 KB) DOC (122 KB)
REPORT on enhancing developing countries’ debt sustainability PDF (444 KB) DOC (57 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union PDF (441 KB) DOC (48 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax PDF (468 KB) DOC (83 KB)
REPORT on addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries PDF (432 KB) DOC (74 KB)
REPORT on private security companies PDF (453 KB) DOC (66 KB)
REPORT on the EU 2015 Report on Policy Coherence for Development PDF (336 KB) DOC (135 KB)
REPORT on space capabilities for European security and defence PDF (359 KB) DOC (147 KB)
REPORT on financing the Common Security and Defence Policy PDF (178 KB) DOC (94 KB)
Opinions (13)
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2017
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2017
OPINION on differentiated integration
OPINION on Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section III - Commission and executive agencies
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2016
OPINION on the functioning of franchising in the retail sector
OPINION on Discharge 2014: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2014, Section III - Commission and executive agencies
OPINION on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2014 and the European Union’s policy on the matter
OPINION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
OPINION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
Shadow opinions (23)
OPINION on the implementation of the GSP Regulation (EU) No 978/2012
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, the instrument for financial support for border management and visa
OPINION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, of the other part
OPINION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, of the other part
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination
OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
OPINION on the draft Council decision on the accession of Samoa to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part
OPINION on the WTO: the way forward
OPINION on A Space Strategy for Europe
OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 466/2014/EU granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2015
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2015
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2015
OPINION on Annual Report on the Financial Activities of the European Investment Bank
OPINION on EU options for improving access to medicines
OPINION on the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments
OPINION on monitoring the application of Union law: 2014 Annual Report
OPINION on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world
OPINION on recommendations to the European Commission on the negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA)
OPINION on the implementation of the 2010 recommendations of Parliament on social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility
Institutional motions (189)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of the Larung Gar Tibetan Buddhist Academy and Ilham Tohti PDF (163 KB) DOC (52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar PDF (157 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass graves in Iraq PDF (158 KB) DOC (57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar PDF (303 KB) DOC (55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass graves in Iraq PDF (272 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of the Larung Gar Tibetan Buddhist Academy and Ilham Tohti PDF (355 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (276 KB) DOC (50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (262 KB) DOC (48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ildar Dadin, prisoner of conscience in Russia PDF (154 KB) DOC (48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Guarani-Kaiowá in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso Do Sul PDF (149 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Syria PDF (167 KB) DOC (54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-Turkey relations PDF (260 KB) DOC (61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus PDF (289 KB) DOC (83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Guarani-Kaiowa in the Brazilian State of Mato Grosso Do Sul PDF (274 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ildar Dadin, prisoner of consience in Russia PDF (326 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Syria PDF (275 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women PDF (167 KB) DOC (86 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus PDF (266 KB) DOC (64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Northern Iraq/Mosul PDF (161 KB) DOC (87 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists in Turkey PDF (152 KB) DOC (81 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on nuclear security and non-proliferation PDF (159 KB) DOC (88 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists in Turkey PDF (277 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Northern Iraq/Mosul PDF (275 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on nuclear security and non-proliferation PDF (279 KB) DOC (77 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Thailand, notably the situation of Andy Hall PDF (153 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan PDF (167 KB) DOC (89 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Victoire Ingabire PDF (291 KB) DOC (83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Thailand, notably the case of Andy Hall PDF (270 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On Sudan PDF (371 KB) DOC (53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda: the case of Victoire Ingabire PDF (301 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe PDF (289 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Philippines PDF (289 KB) DOC (84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (295 KB) DOC (91 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe PDF (273 KB) DOC (51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Philippines PDF (280 KB) DOC (49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (299 KB) DOC (53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, in particular the situation of the Rohingya PDF (164 KB) DOC (86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain PDF (157 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of people with albinism in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (162 KB) DOC (86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Japan’s decision to resume whaling in the 2015-2016 season PDF (275 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain PDF (355 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of albinos in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (276 KB) DOC (72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the massacres in eastern Congo PDF (279 KB) DOC (82 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Djibouti PDF (176 KB) DOC (93 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The Gambia PDF (163 KB) DOC (88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Crimean Tatars PDF (158 KB) DOC (83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Djibouti PDF (313 KB) DOC (82 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On the Gambia PDF (296 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Crimean Tatars PDF (333 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the follow-up to and review of the 2030 Agenda PDF (285 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on attacks on hospitals and schools as violations of international humanitarian law PDF (295 KB) DOC (87 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria PDF (167 KB) DOC (91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Honduras: situation of human rights defenders PDF (162 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the attack in Lahore PDF (159 KB) DOC (85 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria PDF (372 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Honduras: situation of Human rights defenders PDF (335 KB) DOC (84 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the attack in Lahore PDF (276 KB) DOC (74 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (164 KB) DOC (88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt, notably the case of Giulio Regeni PDF (168 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Kazakhstan PDF (168 KB) DOC (88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Eritrea PDF (163 KB) DOC (91 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of Congo PDF (285 KB) DOC (77 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt, notably the case of Giulio Regeni PDF (291 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Freedom of expression in Kazakhstan PDF (306 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Eritrea PDF (273 KB) DOC (70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of the missing book publishers in Hong Kong PDF (157 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain: the case of Mohammed Ramadan PDF (149 KB) DOC (82 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars PDF (155 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Yemen PDF (159 KB) DOC (84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic mass murder of religious minorities by the so-called ‘ISIS/Daesh’ PDF (168 KB) DOC (94 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (162 KB) DOC (88 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain: the case of Mohammed Ramadan PDF (271 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of the missing book publishers in Hong Kong PDF (275 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars PDF (223 KB) DOC (69 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (288 KB) DOC (78 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS PDF (275 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Yemen PDF (283 KB) DOC (75 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Estonian and UK seamen under detention in India PDF (148 KB) DOC (72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on North Korea PDF (159 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ethiopia PDF (166 KB) DOC (91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine PDF (166 KB) DOC (94 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s priorities for the UNHRC sessions in 2016 PDF (186 KB) DOC (124 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) PDF (150 KB) DOC (76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION in support of the peace process in Colombia PDF (277 KB) DOC (78 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ethiopia PDF (291 KB) DOC (84 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU citizens under detention in India, notably Italian, Estonian and UK citizens PDF (273 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on North Korea PDF (277 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Implementation of the Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine PDF (276 KB) DOC (80 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2016 PDF (320 KB) DOC (103 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (285 KB) DOC (84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ibrahim Halawa, potentially facing the death penalty PDF (287 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the 20th anniversary of the Dayton Peace Agreement PDF (271 KB) DOC (71 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (303 KB) DOC (93 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Malaysia PDF (278 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (281 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ibrahim Halawa potentially facing the death penalty PDF (277 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the 20th anniversary of the Dayton Peace Agreement PDF (272 KB) DOC (66 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (272 KB) DOC (76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Cambodia PDF (281 KB) DOC (78 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, in particular the killings in the province of Zabul PDF (286 KB) DOC (79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression in Bangladesh PDF (292 KB) DOC (85 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Cambodia PDF (147 KB) DOC (72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan, in particular the killings in the province of Zabul PDF (147 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the freedom of expression in Bangladesh PDF (149 KB) DOC (71 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass displacement of children in Nigeria as a result of Boko Haram attacks PDF (158 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Thailand PDF (166 KB) DOC (84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Central African Republic PDF (170 KB) DOC (97 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty PDF (155 KB) DOC (81 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ali Mohammed al-Nimr PDF (159 KB) DOC (80 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Mr. Ali Mohammed Baqir al-Nimr, Saudi Arabia PDF (145 KB) DOC (69 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass displacement of children in Nigeria as a result of Boko Haram attacks PDF (161 KB) DOC (84 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Thailand, democracy and the case of Andy Hall PDF (148 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Central African Republic PDF (149 KB) DOC (77 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty PDF (279 KB) DOC (77 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Azerbaijan PDF (155 KB) DOC (85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Angola PDF (154 KB) DOC (84 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus PDF (271 KB) DOC (71 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Azerbaijan PDF (147 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Angola PDF (157 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia in particular the case of Eston Kohver, Oleg Sentzov, and Alexander Kolchenko PDF (145 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s role in the Middle East peace process PDF (296 KB) DOC (90 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Srebrenica Commemoration PDF (174 KB) DOC (79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of two Christian pastors in Sudan PDF (146 KB) DOC (76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain, in particular the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (155 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in particular the case of the two detained human rights activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma PDF (159 KB) DOC (89 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia’s draft laws on NGOs and trade unions PDF (153 KB) DOC (79 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (155 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (162 KB) DOC (86 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Srebrenica commemoration PDF (262 KB) DOC (67 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Situation of two Christian pastors in Sudan PDF (146 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bahrain, in particular the case of Nabeel Rajab PDF (148 KB) DOC (75 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), in particular the case of two detained human rights activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma PDF (148 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia's draft laws on NGOs and trade unions PDF (150 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (281 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (270 KB) DOC (76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nepal following the earthquakes PDF (178 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Syria: situation in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish PDF (191 KB) DOC (87 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Paraguay: legal aspects related to child pregnancy PDF (157 KB) DOC (82 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nepal after the earthquakes PDF (151 KB) DOC (77 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Paraguay: the legal aspects related to the child pregnancy PDF (149 KB) DOC (74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation Syria, in particular in Palmyra and the case of Mazen Darwish PDF (146 KB) DOC (72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Hungary PDF (273 KB) DOC (72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Swaziland, the case of human rights activists Thulani Maseko and Bheki Makhubu PDF (145 KB) DOC (72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the plight of Rohingya refugees, including the mass graves in Thailand PDF (138 KB) DOC (68 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe, the case of human rights defender Itai Dzamara PDF (140 KB) DOC (68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Swaziland, the case of human rights activists Thulani Maseko and Bheki Makhubu PDF (137 KB) DOC (64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the plight of Rohingya refugees, including mass graves in Thailand PDF (140 KB) DOC (59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe, the case of human rights defender Itai Dzamara PDF (133 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the imprisonment of workers and human rights activists in Algeria PDF (144 KB) DOC (70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Nadiya Savchenko PDF (136 KB) DOC (64 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (139 KB) DOC (67 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Yarmouk refugee camp in Syria PDF (145 KB) DOC (70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nigeria PDF (154 KB) DOC (80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the persecution of Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabaab PDF (135 KB) DOC (63 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the destruction of cultural sites perpetrated by ISIS/Da’esh PDF (152 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Imprisonment of Workers and Human Rights Activists in Algeria PDF (148 KB) DOC (66 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Yarmouk refugee camp in Syria PDF (131 KB) DOC (57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Nadiya Savchenko PDF (132 KB) DOC (56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Maldives PDF (225 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the persecution of Christians in the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group al-Shabaab PDF (234 KB) DOC (59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the latest tragedies in the Mediterranean and EU migration and asylum policies PDF (250 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nigeria PDF (237 KB) DOC (63 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (151 KB) DOC (76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the murder of the Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and the state of democracy in Russia PDF (150 KB) DOC (72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism PDF (142 KB) DOC (67 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (144 KB) DOC (70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent attacks and abductions by Daesh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians PDF (131 KB) DOC (57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the murder of the Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and the state of democracy in Russia PDF (231 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass graves of the missing persons of Ashia in Ornithi village in the occupied part of Cyprus PDF (135 KB) DOC (70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi: the case of Bob Rugurika PDF (138 KB) DOC (74 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Mr Raif Badawi, Saudi Arabia PDF (141 KB) DOC (70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian crisis in Iraq and Syria, in particular in the IS context PDF (151 KB) DOC (83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum PDF (240 KB) DOC (64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi: the case of Bob Rugurika PDF (140 KB) DOC (62 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Mass graves of the Missing Persons of Ashia at Ornithi village in the occupied part of Cyprus PDF (137 KB) DOC (52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Mr Raif Badawi, Saudi Arabia, PDF (135 KB) DOC (58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan: the case of Dr Amin Mekki Medani PDF (144 KB) DOC (73 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Mauritania, in particular the case of Biram Dah Abeid PDF (144 KB) DOC (69 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the persecution of the democratic opposition in Venezuela PDF (142 KB) DOC (72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan, the case of Dr. Amin Mekki Medani PDF (142 KB) DOC (60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Mauritania, in particular the case of Biram Dah Arbeid PDF (137 KB) DOC (63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Persecution of the democratic opposition in Venezuela PDF (130 KB) DOC (57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Serbia: the case of accused war criminal Šešelj PDF (136 KB) DOC (63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iraq: kidnapping and mistreatment of women PDF (129 KB) DOC (54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Serbia: Case of accused war criminal Vojislav Šešelj PDF (127 KB) DOC (54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in South Sudan PDF (148 KB) DOC (73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in South Sudan PDF (134 KB) DOC (68 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the closing-down of the NGO ‘Memorial’ (winner of the 2009 Sakharov Prize) in Russia PDF (146 KB) DOC (76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on closing down of Memorial (Sakharov Prize 2009) in Russia PDF (130 KB) DOC (57 KB)
Oral questions (13)
Guardianship for people with intellectual disabilities PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Guardianship for people with intellectual disabilities PDF (198 KB) DOC (20 KB)
Major Interpellation - Fires in the European Union this summer PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
The EU Youth Guarantee Programme PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Clearing the Danube of sunken ships PDF (97 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Major interpellation - Differences in declarations, composition and taste of products in central/eastern and western markets of the EU PDF (193 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Health risks related to consumption of vegetable oils, in particular palm oils PDF (196 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Health risks related to consumption of vegetable oil, in particular palm oil PDF (196 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Health risks related to the consumption of vegetable oils, and in particular palm oils PDF (197 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Disturbance of the free movement of goods by Greece PDF (99 KB) DOC (27 KB)
Reasonable grounds for suspicion of irregularities on the part of the Norwegian child protection authority ('Barnevernet') PDF (100 KB) DOC (28 KB)
EU agricultural innovation systems PDF DOC
European Tourist Board PDF DOC
Written explanations (956)
Listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, as regards the UK's withdrawal from the EU (A8-0047/2019 - Sergei Stanishev)
I welcome the Commission proposal for a regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose citizens are exempt from that requirement, as regards the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union. The proposal is part of the legislative measures to adjust Union law to Brexit. It aims to clarify the situation of UK nationals when Union law ceases to apply to them as regards visa policy. The report recommends inserting the United Kingdom as regards British citizens into Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 (i.e. in the list of third countries whose nationals are exempt from the visa requirement).
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0177/2019 - Miroslavs Mitrofanovs)
. ‒ The purpose of the report is to adopt guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States. The instructions were first taken together in 2010, underpinning the Europe 2020 strategy. In 2018, they were aligned with the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, to drive reforms at national level and to serve as a compass for a renewed process of convergence across Europe. I voted against the report while the validity of the broad economic policy guidelines is not limited to any specific period. The employment guidelines need to be drawn up each year. The Commission considers that the employment guidelines adopted in 2018 should remain stable to ensure a focus on their implementation.
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)
The current evaluation of the social legislation in road transport in the EU has shown shortcomings in the current legal framework and problems regarding enforcement. Furthermore, several discrepancies exist between the Member States in interpretation, application, and implementation of the rules. This creates legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of drivers and operators, which is detrimental to the working, social and competition conditions in the sector. The Commission aims to amend the existing rules unsuccessfully to make the road transport sector fair, efficient and socially accountable, while at the same time to mitigate the excessive regulatory burdens on operators and preventing distortions of competition. Therefore I strongly oppose it since we need fair, equal conditions for all European drivers.
Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (A8-0205/2018 - Wim van de Camp)
The Commission’s aim is to adapt and clarify the social rules in the Union in road transport to improve business and working conditions in the sector. I voted against the report since I strongly believe that it will lead to a significant reduction of international road freight transport with negative consequences for the Eastern European economy.The most recent study by the European Commission highlights an acute shortage of secure parking places for trucks at the European level. It is clear evidence that negotiations on the mobility package are heading in the wrong direction, as the proposed rules on driving times and rest periods, and the banning of regular weekly rest in the cabin, will be impossible to observe.
Adapting to development in the road transport sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
I am not supporting the Commission’s proposal, which is part of the Mobility Package, and so I voted against it. I believe it will lead to a significant reduction of international road freight transport, with negative consequences for the Eastern European economy. The report restricts Eastern carriers’ access to the EU transport market and seriously affects the fundamental freedoms of movement within the EU single market. Restricting cabotage is an EU departure from the road to the free market, and the provision on the obligation to return home is unacceptable as it affects the fundamental freedom of movement in the EU with a negative impact on transport efficiency and the environment, which is contrary to the EU’s objectives of reducing CO2 emissions from transport. The report restricts the liberalisation of the road haulage market and introduces more restrictive conditions for carriers and a ‘waiting period’ in the country of origin before moving to another. Cabotage is a concern and will have a significant adverse economic impact on the Eastern transport market.
Common rules for the internal market for natural gas (A8-0143/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)
. ‒ I welcome the Commission proposal, which aims to extend common rules for the internal market in natural gas to gas pipelines from third countries. An integrated gas market is the cornerstone of the Energy Union and a key Commission priority. Directive 2009/73/EC (the Gas Directive) has made a significant contribution towards the creation of the internal market in natural gas. However, it does not explicitly set out a legal framework for gas pipelines to and from third countries. I voted in favour of the provisional agreement.
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (A8-0176/2019 - Gabriel Mato)
. ‒ The proposal establishes the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund for the period 2021-2027 and ensures that the Union budget will continue to support fisheries and maritime affairs policies.Europe’s maritime sector employs more than 5 million people, generating almost EUR 500 billion a year, with the potential to create many more jobs. The output of the global ocean economy is estimated at EUR 1.3 trillion, and that figure could more than double by 2030. Fisheries are vital to the livelihood of many coastal communities in the EU and are an essential part of their cultural heritage. Along with aquaculture, the fisheries sector also contributes to food security and nutrition. Therefore I voted in favour of the report.
Multiannual plan for the fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea (A8-0005/2019 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)
. ‒ I welcome the Commission proposal, for which I voted, since its purpose is to establish a multiannual plan for fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the Western Mediterranean Sea. The Western Mediterranean is one of the most developed sub-regions in terms of fishing in the Mediterranean. It accounts for around 31% of its total landing (EUR 1.35 billion out of a total of EUR 4.76 billion) and about 19% of the officially reported Mediterranean fishing fleet. Demersal fisheries are highly sought after by fishermen due to their high commercial value. They are complex and involve many species of fish and crustaceans. The main demersal species caught in the Western Mediterranean are hake, red mullet, giant red shrimp, deep-water rose shrimp, blue and red shrimp and Norway lobster.
Strengthening the security of identity cards and of residence documents issued to Union citizens (A8-0436/2018 - Gérard Deprez)
I welcome the Commission proposal for which I voted in favour of the provisional agreement. The purpose of the report targets strengthening the security standards applicable to identity cards and residence documents issued by the Member States to European Union citizens and their family members respectively. Identity card ownership is compulsory in 15 Member States from twenty-six EU Member States.In line with Directive 2004/38/EC, mobile citizens and their family members, who are not nationals of a Member State, also receive documents proving their residence in their host Member State. While these residence documents are not travel documents, residence cards for those family members of mobile EU citizens, who themselves are not nationals of a Member State, used together with a passport grant the holders the right to enter the EU without a visa when they accompany or join an EU citizen.
Work-life balance for parents and carers (A8-0270/2018 - David Casa)
I welcome the report for which I voted in favour of the provisional agreement. The report establishes a renewed framework to strengthen equality between men and women to labour market opportunities and treatment at work across the Union and to repeal Directive 2010/18/EC. This proposal for a Directive is part of a package of measures to deliver on the Commission’s commitment. It aims at addressing women’s under-representation in employment and support their career progression through improved conditions to reconcile their working and private duties. The current legal framework at the Union and Member States’ level provides limited provisions for men to assume an equal share of caring responsibilities with women. Reducing the gap is crucial to achieving greater gender equality.
Computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods (A8-0010/2019 - Kay Swinburne)
The purpose of the proposal is to provide a base for the governance of further automation of processes defined by Union excise legislation. Decision No 1152/2003/EC is the founding decision for the computerised system (Excise Movement and Control System – EMCS). At the moment, it covers only movements of excise goods under excise duty suspension.In order to allow the automation of the procedure for the movement of excise goods which have been released for consumption in the territory of one Member State and moved to the area of another Member State to be delivered for commercial purposes in that other Member State, Decision No 1152/2003/EC has to be modified. Since most provisions of the Decision are affected by that modification, the Decision should be recast in the interests of clarity. Given the objectives of the proposal, which I fully support, I voted in favour.
Re-use of public sector information (A8-0438/2018 - Neoklis Sylikiotis)
The public sector information (PSI), e.g., meteorological data, digital maps, statistics, and legal information is a valuable resource for the digital economy. Therefore, the EU has been promoting the re-use of public sector information for several years. Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information (‘PSI Directive’) aims to facilitate the re-use of PSI throughout the Union by harmonizing the basic conditions for reuse and removing major barriers to re-use in the internal market. I voted in favour of the report which aims overall to contribute to the strengthening of the EU’s data-economy by increasing the amount of public sector data available for re-use, ensuring fair competition and easy access to markets based on public sector information, and enhancing cross-border innovation based on data.
Multiannual recovery plan for Mediterranean swordfish (A8-0389/2018 - Marco Affronte)
During the 2016 ICCAT Annual Meeting held in Vilamoura (Portugal), the contracting parties and cooperating non-contracting parties, entities or fishing entities to the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) took a decisive step to address the alarming situation of Mediterranean swordfish (Xiphias gladius) by adopting a 15-year recovery plan in the ICCAT Recommendation 16-05. The proposal for a Regulation lays down rules for the conservation, management, and control of the Mediterranean stock of swordfish as to achieve a biomass corresponding to a maximum sustainable yield by 2031 with at least 60% probability of achieving that objective, therefore, I voted in favour of the report.
Minimum level of training of seafarers (A8-0007/2019 - Dominique Riquet)
I strongly support the Commission proposal that aims to maintain a high level of maritime safety and pollution prevention at sea, and it is essential to improve the level of knowledge and skills of the Union’s seafarers by developing marine training and certification in line with international rules.The training and certification of seafarers were regulated at the international level by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers 1978 (‘STCW Convention’), which was revised in 2010. Further amendments to the STCW Convention were adopted in 2015 and 2016. An evaluation was carried out and concluded that the Directives are fit for purpose and, to a great extent, met the initial objectives and expectations. However, it also identified elements that have hindered the effectiveness and efficiency of the legislative framework.
Tax treatment of pension products, including the pan-European Personal Pension Product (A8-0481/2018 - Sophia in 't Veld)
I voted in favour of the own-initiative report on the tax treatment of pension products, including the pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP). The internal market for individual retirement savings products remains highly fragmented, particularly concerning tax reliefs. However, a study on the feasibility of a European Personal Pension Framework of June 2017 demonstrated that fiscal incentives are critical to the uptake of the PEPP.The report calls on the Council to elaborate proposals regarding incentives for PEPP savers to enhance the uptake of the PEPP.
Mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context (A8-0414/2018 - Matthijs van Miltenburg)
. ‒ The proposal to have an EU cross-border mechanism was first put forward by the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council in 2015, leading to the creation of an informal working group of Member States to develop this tool. Following an EU-wide cross-border review in 2015-2017, the Commission published a Communication on Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions on 20 September 2017, setting out a 10 point action plan, with the Commission stating it would consider the options to take this new instrument forward.It is necessary to find a balanced approach and reduce legal burdens in order to boost and promote cross-border projects, make them easier for citizens and private and public authorities. Therefore, in favour of the report, I share the opinion that the latter foresees for the EU to reduce bureaucracy and legal obstacles for cross-border regions with the aim to create jobs and puts forward projects for citizens, leading to further social, territorial and economic cohesion.
Draft Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Georgia (A8-0065/2019 - Sylvia-Yvone Kaufmann)
The Eurojust-Georgia Cooperation Agreement follows the model of similar agreements concluded by Eurojust in the past (for example, Eurojust-FYROM, Eurojust-US, Eurojust-Norway, Eurojust-Switzerland, and most recently Eurojust-Albania). The purpose of such agreements is to foster cooperation as regards combating serious crime, especially organised crime and terrorism.In favour of the report, I support the approval by the European Parliament of the Council’s draft implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and Georgia.
Health technology assessment (A8-0289/2018 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
In favour of the report, the proposed Regulation will define a support framework and procedures for cooperation on clinical assessment of health technologies at Union level and common methodologies for the clinical assessment of health technologies. However, pricing and reimbursement of medicines will fall within the exclusive national competence of the Member States.I share the opinion that HTA shall be used to promote innovations that produce the best results for patients and society in general. It should enable health professionals, patients and health institutions to know whether or not a new health technology represents an improvement of existing health technologies in terms of benefits and risks.A coordination group composed of representatives from Member States’ health technology assessment authorities and bodies should be established with responsibility and proven expertise for overseeing the carrying out of joint clinical assessments and other joint work within the scope of this regulation. In order to ensure the high quality of work, members of the Coordination Group will be drawn from national or regional health technology assessment agencies or bodies responsible for that field.
Framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union (A8-0198/2018 - Franck Proust)
There is currently no comprehensive framework at Union level for the screening of foreign direct investments on the grounds of security or public order, while the major trading partners of the Union have already developed such frameworks.In favour of the report, the proposed regulation establishes a framework for the screening by Member States of foreign direct investments into the Union on the grounds of security or public order, for a cooperation mechanism between Member States, and between Member States and the Commission, with regard to foreign direct investments likely to affect security or public order. It also includes the possibility for the Commission to issue opinions on such investments.The Regulation is without prejudice to each Member State having sole responsibility for its national security and to the right of each Member State to protect its essential security interests. Nothing in this Regulation shall limit the right of each Member State to decide whether or not to screen a particular foreign direct investment within the framework of this Regulation.
European Fisheries Control Agency (A8-0037/2019 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
. ‒ I support the Commission proposal to establish a European Fisheries Control Agency (codification of Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005) and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy. The new Regulation will succeed the acts incorporated and preserve the content of the acts meaning to bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself.Moreover, organising operational coordination of fisheries control and inspection activities by the Member States and to assist the Member States to cooperate so as to comply with the rules of the common fisheries policy in order to ensure its effective and uniform application.
Computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods (A8-0010/2019 - Kay Swinburne)
. ‒ I welcome the Commission’s proposal, which aims to allow the automation of the procedure for the movement of excise goods. The proposal extends the Excise Movement and Control System to intra—EU movements of excise goods that are released for consumption. Moreover, it needs to simplify the procedure for proper monitoring and to provide a better base for the governance of further automation, where such automation is considered beneficial.The funding will be covered by the Fiscalis budget within the appropriations already foreseen in the official financial programming. No additional resources will be required from the EU budget. Moreover, this initiative does not intend to prejudge the Commission’s proposal on the next multiannual financial framework. The estimation of costs for administrations and economic operators are included in the impact assessment prepared for the recast of Directive 2008/118/EC.
Law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims (A8-0261/2018 - Pavel Svoboda)
. ‒ The Proposal for a regulation points to the law of cross-border transactions involving claims or securities. Moreover, it concerns situations involving a conflict of laws, to the third-party effects of assignments of claims in civil and commercial matters other than third-party effects to the debtor of the claim assigned. The conflict-of-laws rules laid down in this regulation should govern the effects of assignments of claims in respect of third parties, for example, a creditor of the assignor, excluding the debtor. By laying down common conflict-of-laws rules, the regulation will increase cross-border claims transactions, to encourage cross-border investment in the Union and facilitate access to finance for firms – including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – and consumers, therefore, I voted in favour of the regulation.
Exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (Pericles IV programme) (A8-0069/2019 - Dennis de Jong)
. ‒ It is essential to increase the security and competitiveness of the Union’s economy and to ensure stronger protection of the euro against counterfeiting. The Commission’s proposal will help to prevent and combat counterfeiting and related fraud, thus preserving the integrity of euro banknotes and coins and strengthening the confidence of citizens and businesses in their authenticity and thereby enhancing the trust in the Union’s economy. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme shall be set at EUR 7 700 000 (at current prices) for the period 2021-2027. Therefore, I welcome the legislative resolution on the proposal to establish an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro and I voted in favour.
EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (A8-0053/2019 - David Martin)
Singapore is a privileged gateway for EU businesses to the Southeast Asia region, and as a whole is a USD 3 trillion economy and a market of over 650 million consumers. The EU- Singapore agreement will eliminate virtually tariffs on all qualifying goods over a five-year transition period from the date of entry into force. It will address non-tariff barriers to trade such as double testing for cars and car parts. Singapore and the EU commit to developing and promoting international trade and their trade and economic relationship to contribute to sustainable development. Both recognised as inappropriate encouraging trade or investment by weakening or reducing domestic labour and environmental protection provisions. They aim to respect, promote and effectively implement the principles concerning the fundamental rights at work as well as will make continued and sustained efforts towards ratifying and effectively implementing the fundamental ILO conventions. The agreement encourages firms to operate responsibly and accountable, therefore I voted in favour of the agreement.
EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (resolution) (A8-0048/2019 - David Martin)
I welcome Singapore and the EU commitment to developing and promoting international trade and their trade and economic relationship to contribute to sustainable development. Therefore, the Parliament recommends stronger language on environmental and social standards, also in connection to awarding public procurement and in the TSD chapter and to engage with the ILO to ultimately ratify the missing convention within a reasonable time frame. The Commission needs to allocate sufficient funds to support the participation of the civil society with the respect of EU standards including the precautionary principle.In addition, the Government of Singapore shall start to work immediately on the registration procedure on GIs and to ensure that the highest number of GIs are protected.
EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement (A8-0054/2019 - David Martin)
The agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment. It is important to highlight that this agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore. Such treaties are based on outdated investment protection provisions and feature the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). However, regrettably, the agreement still misses provisions on investors’ obligations, which should be strengthened according to Members.
EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement (resolution) (A8-0049/2019 - David Martin)
The agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment. It is important to highlight that this agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore. Such treaties are based on outdated investment protection provisions and feature the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). However, regrettably, the agreement still misses provisions on investors’ obligations, which should be strengthened according to Members.
EU-Singapore Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (A8-0020/2019 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
The partnership and cooperation agreement with Singapore constitutes another stepping-stone towards enhanced political and economic involvement of the EU in South-East Asia, a fact that I welcome. The PCA provides the basis for more effective bilateral engagement by the EU and its Member States with Singapore. It covers the EU’s standard political clauses on human rights, International Criminal Court (ICC), Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD), Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) and counter-terrorism. In addition, it encompasses cooperation in areas such as health, environment, climate change, energy, tax, education and culture, labour, employment and social affairs, science and technology, and transport. The agreement further addresses legal cooperation, money laundering and terrorist financing, organised crime and corruption and contains provisions on cooperation in the tax area.
EU-Singapore Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) (A8-0023/2019 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
I support the strengthening of EU-Singapore political relations through the PCA, which will offer a platform for enhanced dialogue in areas such as human rights, environment, climate change and tax matters. In particular, the EU should prioritise dialogue on the death penalty with a view to its eventual abolition, on LGBTI rights in order to ensure that the rights of the LGBTI community are fully protected in Singapore and on labour rights and ratification of the outstanding core ILO conventions. The agreement further addresses legal cooperation, money laundering and terrorist financing, organised crime and corruption and contains provisions on cooperation in the tax area.
Treaty establishing the Transport Community (A8-0022/2019 - Karima Delli)
The Treaty aims to create a Transport Community in the field of road, rail, inland waterway and maritime transport and to develop the transport network between the European Union and the Western Balkans. The Transport Community shall work towards the progressive integration of transport markets of the South-Western Balkans into the European Union, based on the relevant acquis , including in the areas of technical standards, interoperability, safety, security, traffic management, social policy, public procurement and environment, for all modes of transport excluding air transport. Strengthening regional cooperation within the Western Balkans is a key element for political stability, security, economic prosperity and social development in the region. The TCT will also be a key instrument for fostering the reform process in the context of the Western Balkan Six initiative as well as the implementation of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) as extended to the Western Balkans. It will replace the existing cooperation framework, the South East European Transport Observatory (SEETO), which has been in place since 2004. I voted in favour of the report.
2018 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0467/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I welcome the own-initiative report on the Commission report, from 2018, on Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). The report renews its call for the adoption of a countrywide strategy on human rights and calls for additional steps to be taken to reinforce the protection of minority rights. In this respect, it stressed the need for the establishment of a national preventive mechanism for the prevention of torture and ill-treatment, a state law on the rights of civilians tortured during the war. In addition, more efforts are needed to bring the conditions in prisons and police holding facilities into line with international standards and non-discriminatory access to justice throughout the country through a harmonized and sustainable system of free legal aid. More effective implementation of the legal provisions regarding equality between men and women, reducing pay gaps between men and women and enhancing access to the labour market for women, and for the combating of gender stereotypes in society. Finally, strong measures must be taken to further improve education, employment rates, health, housing and living conditions for Roma people and other minorities.
Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those (A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov, Constanze Krehl)
I welcome the Commission proposal for a common provision regulation, which establishes common measures for the structural funds. The overall budget for cohesion policy (CP) in the 2021-2027 period is EUR 373 billion. The bulk of European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund (CF) investments will go towards innovation, promoting competitiveness, digital transformation and industrial adaptation, as well as towards a low-carbon, circular economy and the fight against climate change. CP will still be used to invest in all regions, as many of them – including in ‘richer’ Member States – struggle to achieve industrial transition, fight unemployment and hold their own in a globalised economy.I voted in favour, as the common rules will be more closely related to the overall objectives of EU policy, such as a greener, low-carbon, more connected, competitive and smarter Europe, a more social and inclusive Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights, and a Europe closer to its citizens.
Justice programme (A8-0068/2019 - Josef Weidenholzer, Heidi Hautala)
The Union is a community of law, and its values constitute the very basis of its existence. To promote common European values and rights, the EU has combined several instruments in a policy mix of legislation and funding. The proposed regulation – presented for a Union of 27 Member States – seeks to establish the justice programme. It lays down the objectives of the programme, the budget for the period 2021—2027, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding. The programme has the general objective of contributing to the further development of a European area of justice based on the rule of law and mutual recognition and mutual trust between justice professionals in cross-border proceedings. In concrete terms, the programme seeks to enhance the effectiveness of legislation by increasing knowledge, awareness and capacity of citizens, professionals and stakeholders. In order to achieve all these goals, this report increases the budget from EUR 305 million, as initially proposed by the Commission for the period 2021-2027, to EUR 316 million.
The state of the debate on the Future of Europe (A8-0427/2018 - Ramón Jáuregui Atondo)
The European Union is an example of supranational integration without equal. However, over the past few years, the Union has faced multiple crises, which have tested its resilience and capacity to act in a decisive and united manner. The heads of state or government who addressed Parliament in plenary during the debates on the future of Europe all acknowledged that there is a need to face the challenges of the future. In view of the multiple challenges facing the Union, Parliament called on the EU to promote a renewed spirit of cooperation and solidarity among its Members. The report, among other features, proposes major reforms on the way that the Commission, Parliament and the Council operate as institutions, with a view to increasing transparency and making EU functioning more effective and accountable, therefore I strongly support the report.
Cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (A8-0477/2018 - Emil Radev)
I voted in favour of the regulation, due to the objectives of improving the efficacy and speed of judicial proceedings by simplifying and streamlining the mechanisms for cooperation in the taking of evidence in cross-border proceedings, while at the same time helping to reduce delays and costs for individuals and businesses. In addition, greater legal certainty, coupled with simpler, streamlined and digitalised procedures can encourage individuals and businesses to engage in cross-border transactions.
Service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (A8-0001/2019 - Sergio Gaetano Cofferati)
I welcome the regulation, which seeks to improve the effectiveness and speed of judicial procedures by simplifying and streamlining procedures for the notification or communication of judicial and extrajudicial documents at Union level. At the same time, it helps to reduce delays and costs for individuals and businesses and encourages individuals and businesses to engage in cross-border transactions. The fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the right to the protection of personal data and privacy, shall be fully observed and respected.
Common rules ensuring basic road freight connectivity with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union (A8-0063/2019 - Isabella De Monte)
The proposal provides for temporary measures to regulate the transport of goods by road between the Union and the United Kingdom in the absence of an agreement on the latter’s withdrawal. It aims to allow UK operators to temporarily transport goods to the EU for nine months (until 31 December 2019), provided that the United Kingdom grants equivalent rights to the EU. The temporary measures should allow road hauliers licensed in the United Kingdom to carry goods between the territory of the United Kingdom and the remaining 27 Member States or from the territory of the United Kingdom to the territory of the United Kingdom with transit through one or more Member States. The Commission could suspend the application of the regulation when equivalent rights are not granted to the EU or when the rights granted are minimal, or to establish limits to the allowable capacity available to UK road haulage operators or to adopt other appropriate measures, such as financial duties or operational restrictions.
Common rules ensuring basic air connectivity with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union (A8-0062/2019 - Pavel Telička)
I voted in favour of the report, which aims to establish interim measures to govern air transport between the Union and the United Kingdom after the United Kingdom withdraws from the Union, in the absence of an agreement. The proposed act would complement Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council so that basic connectivity is ensured, despite the fact that the regulation will no longer apply to the transport operations in question.
Aviation safety with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland from the Union (A8-0061/2019 - Kosma Złotowski)
I voted in favour of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of aviation safety with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union. The report sets rules and obligations concerning certificates governed by the regulation under discussion that shall apply to both holders and issuers of certificates.The competent authorities of the Member States or the Agency, as the case may be, shall take into account the examinations taken in training organisations, subject to oversight by the competent authority of the United Kingdom but which have not yet led to the issuance of the licence prior to the date of application referred to in this regulation, as if they had been taken with a training organisation subject to the oversight of the competent authority of a Member State.
GATS: necessary compensatory adjustments resulting from the accession of Czechia, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden to the EU (A8-0067/2019 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)
I support the Parliament consent to the conclusion of the agreement. The Commission proposal aims at formally concluding the compensatory agreements reached between the European Union and several WTO Members in order to obtain a consolidated GATS schedule of specific commitments covering all the Member States that were members of the European Union in 2006. The terms and conditions under which WTO Members commit access to their market to the services and service suppliers of other WTO Members are specified in their GATS schedules of specific commitments. The agreed compensatory adjustments constituted a satisfactory and balanced outcome of the negotiations and should therefore be approved on behalf of the European Union.
Insurance of motor vehicles (A8-0035/2019 - Dita Charanzová)
I welcome the Commission’s purpose to strengthen EU rules on motor insurance to better protect victims of motor vehicle accidents. The proposal clarifies the scope of the Directive in the light of recent judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The Court of Justice of the European Union has clarified that motor vehicles are intended normally to serve as means of transport, irrespective of such vehicle’s characteristics. In addition, it has clarified that the use of such vehicles covers any use of a vehicle consistent with its normal function as a means of transport, irrespective of the terrain on which the motor vehicle is used and of whether it is stationary or in motion.In order to ensure the same minimum level of protection at EU level for victims of motor vehicle accidents, the proposal harmonises at EU level the minimum levels of compulsory cover for personal injury and material damage, without prejudice to any higher amounts of cover prescribed by the Member States.
Experiencing backlash in women’s rights and gender equality in the EU (B8-0096/2019, B8-0099/2019)
According to statistics, the present decade is witnessing a visible and organised offensive at global and European level against gender equality and women’s rights, including in the EU and particularly manifested in a number of Member States. The main targets of this backlash appear to be common across countries and include gender mainstreaming, social and labour protection, education, sexual and reproductive health and rights, combating violence against women, LGBTI+ rights, the presence of women in political decision-making positions, and adequate funding for women’s organisations.The Gender Equality Index shows persistent inequalities with only marginal progress from 2005 to 2015, and stated that significant improvements are still needed in all Member States. Therefore, I welcome the resolution for which I voted in favour of strengthening public awareness and benefits of safeguarding women’s rights and gender equality and eliminating gender stereotypes for society, and to further support the development and dissemination of evidence-based research and information in the area of women’s rights.
Policy challenges and strategies against women's cancers and related comorbidities (B8-0097/2019)
One in three Europeans develops cancer during his or her lifetime, and every year around 1.3 million people die of cancer in the EU. Breast cancer is the most common fatal cancer among women in the EU (16%), followed by lung, colorectal and pancreatic cancers, while prostate and lung cancers remain the most common among men. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report, where the Parliament invites the Commission and Member States to put in place a comprehensive EU strategy and evidence-based, cost-effective policies against cancer and related comorbidities. Stressing that, while responsibility for organising healthcare systems rests with the individual Member States, cooperation at European level, together with the efficient use of EU funds, can contribute to the development of an effective EU strategy against cancer and related comorbidities.Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission and Member States to fully implement the existing legal framework on the use of high-risk medical devices and their effect on women’s health, and further develop measures to guarantee the safety of breast implants, stating that an in-depth assessment of the risks associated with such implants is urgently required.
Use of cannabis for medicinal purposes (B8-0071/2019)
I voted in favour of the resolution, which notes that several cannabinoids, which make up the cannabis plant, can help to reduce certain symptoms affecting patients – such as chronic pain, inflammation or bacterial infections – and can stimulate bone growth.There is evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids may be effective in alleviating symptoms of mental disorders, such as psychosis or Tourette’s syndrome, and in alleviating symptoms of epilepsy, as well as Alzheimer’s, arthritis, asthma, cancer, and Crohn’s disease. EU Member States differ widely in their approach to legislation on cannabis for medical purposes, fact that can lead to difficulties for countries applying a more prudent approach.Whilst the policy landscape for medical cannabis is evolving in the EU and worldwide, misunderstandings still exist even among national administrations regarding the different uses of cannabis, with the legalisation of cannabis for recreational use often being confused with the need to provide legal access to cannabis for medical purposes to all patients in need.
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions 2018 (A8-0024/2019 - Cecilia Wikström)
The right of petition should be a key element for a participatory democracy in which the right of every citizen to play a direct part in the democratic life of the Union is effectively protected. This right should enhance the responsiveness of the European Parliament towards the citizens and residents of the European Union. I am in favour of the own initiative report which calls on the EU institutions and Member States to promote the citizens’ right to petition and to raise public awareness of the EU competences and possible remedies that the European Parliament can provide while processing petitions.Moreover, it stresses the need for a continuous public debate about the Union’s fields of activity, its limits and its future in order to ensure that citizens are well informed about the levels at which decisions are taken and to prevent the ‘blame Brussels’ phenomenon used by some irresponsible Member States.
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between Côte d’Ivoire and the EU (2018-2024) (A8-0030/2019 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the report accompanying the consent procedure for the Protocol between the EU and Côte d’Ivoire. The Protocol’s aim is to enable the Union and Côte d'Ivoire to work together more closely on promoting a sustainable fisheries policy, sound exploitation of fishery resources in Ivorian waters, and Côte d'Ivoireʼs efforts to develop a blue economy.
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between Côte d’Ivoire and the EU (2018-2024) (resolution) (A8-0034/2019 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the report, as it shows that the Protocol to the 2013-2018 SFPA was effective, efficient, appropriate to the interests involved, and consistent with the Ivorian sectoral policy and a high degree of acceptability to stakeholders, thus lending support to the option of concluding a new protocol. I share the opinion that the new protocol would help strengthen monitoring, control and surveillance and contribute to improved governance of the fisheries in the region. In addition, through the financial contribution provided by the protocol, Côte d’Ivoire could sustainably strengthen its national fisheries industry, encouraging demand for local investment and industrial projects and creating local jobs.
EU-Morocco Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (A8-0027/2019 - Alain Cadec)
The European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco have negotiated a new sustainable fisheries partnership agreement. More broadly, the fisheries partnership agreement is part of a relationship under the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, which entered into force in 2000. While the current agreement will remain in force for an indefinite period, the protocol will apply for four years from the date of its entry into force or, as the case may be, its provisional application. I am in favour of the new protocol, as I share the opinion that it would enable the EU and Morocco to work together more closely on promoting a sustainable fisheries policy, while also supporting Morocco’s efforts to develop the fisheries sector and a blue economy.
Agreement to prevent unregulated high seas fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (A8-0016/2019 - Norica Nicolai)
I welcome the agreement to prevent unregulated high seas fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean, as it demonstrates a precautionary approach to fisheries management in line with the CFP. It is part of the EU’s overall efforts to foster international ocean governance, including the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. The agreement marks the first time that nations have worked together in such a proactive way to protect an ocean environment before commercial fisheries can occur. Ensuring that a science and management regime is in place before the start of commercial fisheries is of great importance for the ecosystem and the environment. The parties to the agreement are Canada, the Peopleʼs Republic of China, the Kingdom of Denmark in respect of the Faroe Islands and Greenland, Iceland, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Kingdom of Norway, the Russian Federation, the United States of America, and the European Union. They will meet at least every two years to review the implementation of the agreement and all scientific information.
Protocol to the EU-Mexico Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0066/2019 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
I voted in favour of the Third Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take into account Croatia’s accession to the European Union. This is in accordance with Article 6(2) of the Act of Accession of Croatia, according to which the accession of Croatia to the Global Agreement is to be agreed by means of a protocol to the Global Agreement concluded between the Council, acting unanimously on behalf of the Member States, and Mexico. On 14 September 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with Mexico with a view to concluding the Third Additional Protocol to the Global Agreement to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union. The negotiations were successfully concluded and the Protocol was signed.
EU Anti-Fraud Programme (A8-0064/2019 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)
. ‒ I welcome the report on the establishment of the EU anti-fraud programme affecting the EU budget (2021-2027). Fraud and irregularities are affecting the EU’s financial interests, impacting all EU Member States. The implementation of the past Union multi-annual budgets has been accompanied by a set of measures to support the Member States and the Union as a whole in preventing and fighting fraud affecting the Union’s financial interests, and supporting mutual administrative assistance and cooperation in customs and agriculture matters. The proposal for the new programme aims at streamlining the financial support for these tools, for the duration of the next multi-annual financial framework 2021-2027.
Multiannual plan for stocks fished in the Western Waters and adjacent waters, and for fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0310/2018 - Alain Cadec)
. ‒ This is the third multiannual management plan adopted under the reformed CFP, after the Baltic Sea and the North Sea. Under the CFP, multiannual plans aim to ensure that stocks are exploited sustainably. They also contain measures to implement the landing obligation, technical measures, as well as safeguards for remedial action where needed. The Western Waters plan covers fisheries for demersal species from the north and west of Scotland over the Gulf of Cadiz down to Madeira in the South (North East Atlantic). Around 4 000 demersal vessels and 13 000 EU fishers are active in the area (2015 data). I welcome the plan, as it aims to restore and maintain demersal stocks in the Western Waters at sustainable levels, based on the most up-to-date scientific advice, while ensuring social and economic viability for the fishers operating in the region. Finally, I share the opinion that the latter is another crucial step towards the implementation of the 2013 CFP reform.
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A8-0180/2018 - Elisabetta Gardini)
. ‒ I welcome the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism, as the latter supports, complements and facilitates coordination of Member States’ action at cross-border level, increasing the availability and use of scientific knowledge on disasters, including in the outermost regions and OCTs and mitigating the immediate consequences that catastrophes may have on human lives and on cultural and natural heritage. I share the opinion that European civil protection capabilities should be accompanied by an increased commitment on the part of Member States in the field of prevention. The regional and local authorities shall be appropriately involved in any coordination and deployment activities carried out under this Decision. Moreover, I support the call on the Commission to coordinate the harmonisation of information and guidance on alert systems, including on a cross-border level, in order to carry out preventive actions.
Minimum requirements for water reuse (A8-0044/2019 - Simona Bonafè)
. ‒ I welcome the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum requirements for water reuse since it lays down minimum requirements for reclaimed water quality and monitoring, and the obligation to carry out specified key risk management tasks, for the safe reuse of treated urban wastewater in the context of integrated water management. In favour of the report, the latter aims to guarantee that reclaimed water is safe for its intended use, thereby ensuring a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment. I share the opinion that Member States shall ensure that water resources used for drinking water purposes are not contaminated with reclaimed water.
Approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (A8-0318/2018 - Nicola Danti)
An accurate definition of the different features of agricultural tractors based on the analysis of their technical characteristics is of utmost importance for the correct and complete implementation of this Regulation and of the delegated and implementing acts adopted under it. The proposal aims to upgrade to technical progress Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 by updating certain requirements and correcting certain editorial errors following feedback received by stakeholders and Member States in the first implementation period.With a view to correcting these certain terms, I voted in favor of the proposed amended text. The latter also foresees that the Regulation shall not apply to interchangeable equipment that is fully raised from the ground or that cannot articulate around a vertical axis when the vehicle to which it is attached is in use on a road.
Programme for single market, competitiveness of enterprises and European statistics (A8-0052/2019 - Nicola Danti)
In favour of the report, the latter establishes the single market programme in the framework of the multiannual financial framework from 2021 to 2027, bringing together six programmes and numerous actions, previously separate, under one coherent framework. I welcome the new programme’s focus on the single market, consumer protection and competitiveness, especially for SMEs, food safety, statistics and standards, since I believe it is important to introduce specific actions that aim at strengthening consumer protection, empowering consumers and promoting their interests, with a particular focus on new opportunities and challenges brought by digitalisation.Finally, I share the opinion that the single market programme will empower and protect consumers, and enable Europe’s many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to take full advantage of a well-functioning single market.
VAT: Definitive system for the taxation of trade between Member States (A8-0028/2019 - Fulvio Martusciello)
I voted in favour of the report, which aims to implement the definitive VAT system to improve the operation of VAT arrangements for cross-border B2B trade on goods within the Union. This proposal is part of a package of measures aimed at radically changing VAT rules by ending 25 years of a ‘transitional’ VAT system in the single market. It contains detailed arrangements to put the cornerstones for a simpler and fraud-proof definitive VAT system for intra-Union trade in place for intra-Union B2B supplies of goods. This definitive system could reduce cross-border VAT fraud by up to EUR 41 billion per annum.
Roma integration strategies (B8-0098/2019)
This joint resolution is the follow up of the Report on the fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism. In this report, the Commission was called for a series of actions to be implemented and assessed like for example EU programmes and funding opportunities, reform the European Structural and Investment Fund to provide financial support for the fight against anti-Gypsyism in a more proactive way. Member States for their side were called to end statelessness, ensure access to all the essential basic services, including healthcare, housing and education for example.I am in favour of the resolution, as I share the opinion that more efforts are needed in all area to ensure Roma inclusion. I support the call within to act and propose a Strategic EU Framework on National Roma Inclusion Strategies for the post-2020 period with a wider set of priorities, clear targets, timelines and indicators for monitoring.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions related to EU Citizenship (A8-0041/2019 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)
On the eve of the European elections, it is crucial to underline the key role played by European citizenship in the construction of Europe. Even though the principle of European citizenship is enshrined in the Treaties, its real implementation is still not reaching a full potential and it is therefore essential to reaffirm this priority. I voted in favour of the report, as I share the opinion that that European citizenship has not yet fully reached its potential, and therefore it is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the principles of citizenship enshrined in the Treaties with a view to the improvement of their implementation.The report has the goal of reflecting on the institutional and political consequences of the Treaty provisions (in particular art. 9 TEU and 20 TFEU) on European citizenship, based on the principle that ‘every person who holds the nationality of a Member State is a citizen of the Union’. Moreover, the report underlines that the European citizenship is additional to the national one, and – with its combination of rights and duties – is a construction with no equivalent anywhere in the world.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning enhanced cooperation (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
According to the Treaties, at least nine Member States can initiate enhanced cooperation. The procedure is depicted in Article 329 TFEU and requires the agreement of the Council, by QMV, on a proposal by the Commission and after having obtained the consent of the Parliament.Only four cases of enhanced cooperation have been adopted: the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, divorce law, property regime rules, the European Unitary Patent. Of these four cases, only one has started with implementation (divorce law). Additionally, it is worthwhile mentioning the other existing forms of differentiated integration in the Union: the Schengen Agreement, the single currency, opt-outs from the area of freedom, security and justice (UK, Ireland, Denmark) and CSDP (Denmark’s constructive abstention).Finally, I share the opinion that enhanced cooperation should be under the direct jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. However, this should not bring prejudice to the possibility to establish an arbitration procedure or a dispute settlement court of first instance that could be required for the functioning of a particular case of enhanced cooperation, unless the Treaty provides otherwise, and which should be specified in the legal act establishing the enhanced cooperation.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions on Parliament’s power of political control over the Commission (A8-0033/2019 - Mercedes Bresso)
. ‒ The European Union needs more checks and balances vis-à-vis the work of the Commission, including greater scrutiny of how it makes senior appointments. Parliament is the direct link with European citizens and it is essential that the proposals put forward here become legislation. I support the Spitzenkandidaten process whereby all European citizens have a direct say in choosing the Commission President.In favour of the report, it aims to reassess Parliament’s scrutiny role over the Commission and bring it up to date with the new institutional developments. Parliamentary oversight is a precondition for democratic legitimacy. Recent changes in the law-making process and the increased legislative role of the executive have created a need to reinforce parliamentary scrutiny procedures. I share the opinion that Parliament’s instruments need to be improved and better adjusted to the challenges specific to the EU institutional structure.
Implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the EU institutional framework (A8-0051/2019 - Barbara Spinelli)
. ‒ The Lisbon Treaty confers the status of primary law on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union within the EU legal framework, giving it the same legal value as the Treaties. There is a general tendency to focus on avoiding its violation rather than on maximising its potential. I support the own-initiative report and the resolution whereby Members recognise the important steps made by the EU institutions to integrate the Charter into the EU legislative and decision-making processes and stress that all proposals for Union legislation must respect the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter.I agree that the Commission needs to strengthen its awareness-raising activities concerning the Charter, with the full involvement of civil society organisations, and to equip the Member States with practical guidelines, supporting them in the implementation of the Charter at national level.
Regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (Statute of the European Ombudsman) (A8-0050/2019 - Paulo Rangel)
. ‒ The European Parliament appoints the Ombudsman at the beginning of the parliamentary term, for the duration thereof, from among persons who are Union citizens and who offer every requisite guarantee of independence and competence.I am in favour of the draft regulation. It aims to establish conditions under which a complaint may be referred to the Ombudsman on the principle of full, free and easy access. It allows the Ombudsman to handle complaints and to conduct own-initiative inquiries with a view to identifying repeated instances of maladministration and promoting best administrative practices within the Union. Furthermore, it enables the Ombudsman, on his/her initiative or following a complaint, to conduct inquiries following up previous surveys to ascertain whether and to what extent the institution, body, office or agency concerned has complied with the recommendations put forward. It also provides that the latter are obliged to supply the Ombudsman with any requested information. Access to classified information or documents should be subject to compliance with the rules on the processing of confidential information by the institution or agency concerned, and the Ombudsman and his/her staff are obliged to treat in confidence any information they have acquired in the course of their duties.
A comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics (A8-0019/2019 - Ashley Fox)
. ‒ I support the own-initiative report since it underlines the need for investment in AI (artificial intelligence) in respect of social, ethical and liability aspects, and the fact that any AI model deployed should include ethics by design.AI is evolving rapidly and has been a part of everyday life for many years, leading to new business models and playing a key role in many sectors, such as industry, healthcare, construction and transport. The report highlights the need to address some undesired effects of malicious uses of AI, including against human rights, as in its use for surveillance and social control programmes in China, and the need for the EU to have its own value-based approach versus other models developed in Russia, China, etc. It also points out the dangers of using AI to influence elections.I also welcome the Commission’s proposal for the Digital Europe Programme and the budget of EUR 2.5 billion pledged for AI, as well as the increase in funding under the Horizon 2020 programme.
Sustainable use of pesticides (A8-0045/2019 - Jytte Guteland)
The INI report deplores the poor implementation of the Directive stressing, in particular, the very little progress made in promoting the uptake of alternative techniques in the majority of Member States. Moreover, it points out the inconsistency of the National Action Plans and the lack of quantitative objectives, targets, measurements, and timetables. Special attention is remanded to monitoring environmental and health damages caused by pesticides, improving water quality, fostering and maintaining biodiversity and prioritising Integrated Pest Management (IPM). At the same time, increasing the availability of alternatives products, such as low-risk plan protection products, would contribute to sustainable agriculture and to expanding the farmer’s toolbox by increasing plant protection options. The report urges the Commission and Members States to ensure better coherence of the directive and its implementation with related EU legislation and policies, in particular the new common agriculture policy (CAP), by integrating the Directive’s objectives and requirements into the Statutory Management Requirements under CAP switch to practices and products with the lowest risk to human health and the environment among those available for the same pest problem.
Implementation of the cross-border Healthcare Directive (A8-0046/2019 - Ivo Belet)
. ‒ I support the own-initiative report, which points out the effects of the Directive, and clarifies the rules on cross-border healthcare, ensures access to safe and high-quality cross-border healthcare in the Union as well as for achieving patient mobility following the case law of the Court of Justice. However, many Member States have not effectively implemented the requirements for guaranteeing patients’ rights. Therefore, Member States and border regions must deepen cross-border healthcare cooperation, in a more efficient and financially sustainable manner, including by providing accessible, sufficient and understandable information, to secure the best possible care for patients. Finally, the report calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest further in the development and promotion of accessible and visible National Contact Points (NCPs) and eHealth platforms for patients, which should provide user-friendly, digitally accessible and barrier-free information for patients and health professionals in multiple languages.
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure (A8-0462/2018 - Richard Corbett)
I welcome the report, which proposes changes that touch rules governing the transparency of its Members’ financial interests in the form of a Code of Conduct. Among the proposes changes, members should adopt a systematic practice of only meeting representatives/lobbyists that have registered in the Transparency Register established by means of the Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the transparency register and they should publish online all scheduled meetings with them. The report defines also the conditions according to which a group of at least 50 citizens can request that the European Parliament asks the Authority for European political parties and Foundations to verify whether a given European political party or foundation fulfils these requirements.Furthermore, the report proposes that the amendments shall enter into force on the first day of the next part-session. Exception are making the amendments to the Code of behaviour as well as the amendments to Rules 196 (setting-up of standing committees) and 204 (Committee bureaux), which shall enter into force at the opening of the first part-session following the next elections to the European Parliament due to be held in 2019.
Union Customs Code: inclusion of the municipality of Campione d'Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union (A8-0368/2018 - Jasenko Selimovic)
I voted in favour of the legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC, as the latter aims at addressing a request from Italy to include the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the EU customs territory. The proposal brings a formal amendment of the VAT Directive, moving the two territories from Article 6(2) (territories not forming part of the EU customs territory excluded from the territorial application of the VAT Directive) to Article 6(1) (territories forming part of the EU customs territory excluded from the territorial application of the VAT Directive).
Rules on direct payments and support for rural development in respect of the years 2019 and 2020 (A8-0018/2019 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
In order to ensure the continuity of support to European farmers in the years 2019 and 2020, I share the opinion that it is necessary to make certain amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013. In relation to direct payments, some of the provisions in Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 (Direct Payment Regulation) do not cover calendar year 2020 since expenditure relating to calendar year 2020 is made in financial year 2021, which is the first year of the new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2021-2027. Those Member States would be faced with important changes in their direct payments and rural development envelopes with considerable effects on the payments to farmers under both pillars.Therefore, I am in favour of the report and I welcome the proposal to ensure flexibility between pillars in the year 2020 and the transfer of the product of reduction of direct payments to rural development: flexibility between pillars is an optional transfer of funds between direct payments and rural development. Member States should have the possibility to transfer funds between pillars in the calendar year 2020 (corresponding to financial year 2021).
Accession of the Dominican Republic to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0451/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ This proposal is linked to the general objective enshrined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union to protect the rights of the child. The Commission proposes that the Council adopt a decision authorising Austria, Cyprus, Croatia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania and the United Kingdom to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of the Dominican Republic to the 1980 Hague Convention. Its purpose is to restore the status quo by means of the prompt return of wrongfully removed or retained children through a system of cooperation among central authorities appointed by its contracting parties.As prevention of child abduction is an essential part of the EU policy to promote the rights of the child, the EU is active at international level to improve the application of the 1980 Convention and encourages third states to accede it.As regards parental abduction, the 1980 Convention is the international counterpart to Council Regulation No 2201/2003 (Brussels IIa Regulation), one of whose main objectives is to discourage parents from abducting their children to another Member State, by establishing procedures which ensure the child’s immediate return to the Member State of his or her habitual residence.
Accession of Ecuador and Ukraine to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0452/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ This proposal is linked to the general objective enshrined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union to protect the rights of the child. The Commission proposes that the Council adopt a decision to authorise Austria to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of Ecuador and Ukraine to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the 1980 Convention). Its purpose is to restore the status quo by means of the prompt return of wrongfully removed or retained children through a system of cooperation among central authorities appointed by its contracting parties.As prevention of child abduction is an essential part of the EU policy to promote the rights of the child, the EU is active at international level in improving application of the 1980 Convention and encourages third states to accede to it.As regards parental abduction, the 1980 Convention is the international counterpart to Council Regulation No 2201/2003 (Brussels IIa Regulation), one of whose main objectives is to discourage parents from abducting their children to another Member State, by establishing procedures which ensure the child’s immediate return to the Member State of his or her habitual residence.
Accession of Honduras to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0457/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ This proposal is linked to the general objective enshrined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union to protect the rights of the child. The Commission proposes that the Council adopt a decision authorising Austria and Romania to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of Honduras to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Its purpose is to restore the status quo by means of the prompt return of wrongfully removed or retained children through a system of cooperation among central authorities appointed by its contracting parties.As prevention of child abduction is an essential part of the EU policy to promote the rights of the child, the EU is active at international level in improving application of the 1980 Convention and encourages third states to accede it.As regards parental abduction, the 1980 Convention is the international counterpart to Council Regulation No 2201/2003 (Brussels IIa Regulation), one of whose main objectives is to discourage parents from abducting their children to another Member State, by establishing procedures which ensure the child’s immediate return to the Member State of his or her habitual residence.
Accession of Belarus and Uzbekistan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0458/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ This proposal is linked to the general objective enshrined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union to protect the rights of the child. The Commission proposes that the Council adopt a decision authorising Austria, Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of Belarus and Uzbekistan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Its purpose is to restore the status quo by means of the prompt return of wrongfully removed or retained children through a system of cooperation among central authorities appointed by its contracting parties.As prevention of child abduction is an essential part of the EU policy to promote the rights of the child, the EU is active at international level in improving application of the 1980 Convention and encourages third states to accede it.As regards parental abduction, the 1980 Convention is the international counterpart to Council Regulation No 2201/2003 (Brussels IIa Regulation), one of whose main objectives is to discourage parents from abducting their children to another Member State, by establishing procedures which ensure the child’s immediate return to the Member State of his or her habitual residence.
Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the EU, Greenland and Denmark (A8-0480/2018 - Maurice Ponga)
The Commission proposal aims to establish rules and procedures governing the EU’s association with the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs), including Greenland (Overseas Association Decision) for the period 2021-2027. These 25 islands are not sovereign countries, but depend on four EU Member States and are not part of the Union’s customs territory. In this context, the main source of funding is the 11th EDF, except Greenland, which is the subject of a specific decision financed from the EU budget (the Greenland Decision). Under the next multiannual financial framework of the Union for the period 2021-2027, it is proposed to regroup a number of external financing instruments into a comprehensive instrument called the neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument (NDICI) and to integrate the EDF into the EU budget. The association is the framework for policy dialogue and cooperation on issues of mutual interest. It shall continue to be based on the three key pillars of enhancing competitiveness, strengthening resilience and reducing vulnerability, and promoting cooperation and integration between the OCTs and other partners and neighbouring regions. Actions under this programme are expected to contribute 20% of the overall financial envelope of the programme to climate objectives, therefore, I voted in favour of the report.
Annual report 2017 on the protection of the European Union’s financial interests- fight against fraud (A8-0003/2019 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
More than half of the EU Member States have not yet adopted national anti-fraud strategies (NAFS) and do not have specific laws against organised crime either, while the latter’s involvement in cross-border activities and sectors, affecting the EU’s financial interests, such as smuggling or currency counterfeiting, is constantly growing. Only a few Member States are using new technologies for all the major steps of the procurement process (e-notification, e-access to tender documents, e-submission, e-evaluation, e-award, e-ordering, e-invoicing, e-payment). I voted in favour as I share the opinion that all Member States should apply all forms of the public procurement process, as well as publicly accessible contract registers, available in online machine-readable format. Therefore, I welcome the creation of the EU’s anti-fraud programme, which will be implemented by OLAF under direct management. It is also important to ensure protection of whistleblowers, who play an important role in preventing, detecting and reporting fraud. Finally, I consider that OLAF should enjoy equal investigative powers in every Member State, including access to bank account information, and that evidence collected by OLAF should be admissible as criminal evidence by the judiciaries of all Member States.
Implementation and functioning of the .eu top level domain name (A8-0394/2018 - Fredrick Federley)
. ‒ I am in favour of the report on the proposal for the.eu Top Level Domain (.eu TLD), which aims to repeal existing legislation (Regulation (EC) No 733/2002 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004). I believe that it is important to ensure that the.eu TLD continues to function properly and to adapt its legal framework to the changing online environment and market. Managed by an non-profit organisation, the .eu TLD is the eighth largest country code Top Level Domain (ccTLD) and had over 3.8 million registrations in 2017.Moreover, I share the opinion that the proposed regulation aims to support the digital single market, building an online European identity and encouraging online cross-border activities, by promoting the competitiveness of the .eu TLD name. Through good management, the .eu TLD enhances the Union identity and promotes Union values, such as multilingualism, respect for users’ privacy and security and respect for human rights, as well as online priorities.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified oilseed rapes Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 × Rf3 (B8-0073/2019)
I share the opinion that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. GM oilseed rapes Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 × Rf3 has been made tolerant to glufosinate, which is no longer permitted in the EU as it has been classified toxic.I support the call on the Commission not to authorise the import, for food or feed, of any GM plant which has been made tolerant to a herbicide not authorised for use in the Union, in this case glufosinate. Moreover, use of any herbicide-tolerant GM plants should not be authorised without a full assessment of the residues from spraying with complementary herbicides, metabolites and commercial formulations as applied in the countries of cultivation. Any implementing decision regarding applications for authorisation of GMOs should be suspended until the authorisation procedure has been revised in such a way as to address the shortcomings of the current procedure, which has proven inadequate.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize MON 87403 (MON-874Ø3-1) (B8-0075/2019)
The application covers the placing on the market of products containing or consisting of genetically modified maize MON 87403 for uses other than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation. Maize MON 87403 is genetically modified to increase the biomass through insertion of a truncated gene sequence derived from other plant species. This leads to the expression of a protein (AtHB17Δ113) which is intended to act in competition with a similar natural protein that controls gene regulation and growth of the plants. Despite EFSA giving the green light as regards the safety of GM maize MON 87403, I share the opinion that without a comprehensive understanding of the genetic modification it is not possible to fully evaluate the associated risks. The potential risks posed by this GM maize to human and animal health and the environment have not been adequately examined by the EFSA GMO Panel.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 (B8-0076/2019)
Application of the complementary herbicides, such as glyphosate and glufosinate, is part of regular agricultural practices in the cultivation of herbicide-resistant plants and it can therefore be expected that they will be exposed to both higher and repeated doses, which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest, and therefore in the imported product, but may also influence the composition of the GM plant and its agronomic characteristics.I share the opinion that it should not be authorised the import, for food or feed uses, of any genetically modified plant which has been made tolerant to a herbicide that is not authorised for use in the Union, as is the case of glufosinate. At the same time, I support the call on the Commission not to authorise either any herbicide-tolerant GM plants without full assessment of the residues from spraying with complementary herbicides, metabolites and commercial formulations as applied in the countries of cultivation. Any implementing decision regarding applications for authorisation of GMOs should be suspended until the authorisation procedure has been revised in such a way as to address the shortcomings of the current procedure, which has proven inadequate.
Situation in Venezuela (B8-0082/2019, B8-0083/2019, B8-0084/2019, B8-0085/2019, B8-0086/2019, B8-0087/2019)
The Venezuelan population is facing an unprecedented social, economic and democratic crisis, with more than 3 million people having migrated and the inflation rate exceeding. International and regional partners, including the EU, have committed to help to create conditions for a peaceful, credible and inclusive political process among all relevant Venezuelan actors. Supporting the call for the restoration of democracy through a credible political process, I welcome the call by the UN for an independent and full investigation to be carried out into the perpetrated killings, in line with its previously adopted resolutions.
Annual report on competition policy (A8-0474/2018 - Michel Reimon)
I voted in favour since I consider important to ensure the proper functioning of the Union’s collective redress mechanisms, designed to secure adequate compensation for consumers affected by anticompetitive practices. I believe that it is necessary to take more ambitious steps to eliminate illegitimate obstacles to online competition in order to ensure barrier-free intra-EU online shopping, to monitor price caps in sectors such as online platforms for accommodation and tourism, and to ensure that consumers have cross-border access to a broad range of online goods and services at competitive prices.Competition rules should be seen in the light of wider European values underpinning Union legislation regarding social affairs, social market economy, environmental standards, climate policy and consumer protection. Finally, I share the opinion that when combating unfair trading practices through competition policy, it is necessary also to ensure a global level playing field that benefits workers, consumers and businesses, as one of the priorities of the EU’s commercial strategy.
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania (A8-0413/2018 - Rebecca Harms)
The Ignalina nuclear power plant consists of two High Power Channel Type Reactors (RBMK-1500 reactors), the same type as in Chernobyl. Since the decommissioning of this plant contributes towards increased nuclear safety in the region and in the EU as a whole, the Ignalina programme has as its general objective to assist Lithuania in managing the radiological safety challenges of the decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant.As an act of solidarity, and acknowledging the long-term nature of the decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant and the exceptional related financial burden, the EU committed itself, through Protocol No 4 of Lithuania’s Accession Treaty, to provide adequate financial assistance.Finally, I share the opinion that it should be an ethical obligation for each Member State to avoid any undue burden on future generations in respect of spent fuel and radioactive waste, including any radioactive waste expected from decommissioning of existing nuclear installations. National policies have to be based on the ‘polluter pays’ principle.
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2017 (A8-0479/2018 - Georgi Pirinski)
The report underlines the concerns and shortcomings related to the proper implementation of the EIB’s mission and some governance practices. I voted in favour, as the latter stresses the need to achieve full implementation of best banking practices, by improving administrative capacity and internal procedures and ensuring clear separation of responsibilities in the management board.I share the opinion that it is very important to ensure transparency and disclosure of information on contracting and subcontracting systems concerning intermediaries and final recipients in relation to prevention of tax avoidance, fraud and corruption.
Cross-border restitution claims of works of art and cultural goods looted in armed conflicts and wars (A8-0465/2018 - Pavel Svoboda)
In recent years a string of crimes against world cultural heritage have been perpetrated by warring factions and terrorist entities all over the world. Valuable artworks, sculptures and archaeological artefacts are being sold and imported into the EU from certain non-EU countries, with the profits potentially being used to finance terrorist activities.I voted in favour of the report, as the latter adequately addresses cross-border restitution claims of art and cultural goods looted in armed conflicts and wars. I share the opinion that insufficient attention has been paid at EU level to the restitution of works of art and cultural goods looted, stolen or illegally obtained, inter alia in armed conflicts, in particular in the fields of private law, private international law and civil procedure.
Cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions (A8-0002/2019 - Evelyn Regner)
The rules on cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions represent a significant milestone in improving the functioning of the Single Market, both for companies and firms to exercise the freedom of establishment on one hand and provide adequate protection for stakeholders, such as workers, creditors and minority shareholders, on the other. The proposal should allow companies to carry out a cross-border conversion by converting the legal form they have in one Member State into a similar legal form in another Member State. The proposal also harmonises rules for the protection of creditors and shareholders and simplifies the procedure allowing any capital company to carry out a cross- border division.Therefore, I voted in favour as I share the opinion that it is of great importance to facilitate conversions, mergers, and divisions within the Single Market.
Establishing a multi-annual plan for the fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea (A8-0005/2019 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)
The western Mediterranean is one of the most developed sub-regions in terms of fisheries in the Mediterranean. It accounts for around 31% of its total landing and around 19% of the officially reported Mediterranean fishing fleet.I voted in favour of the proposal for a regulation, as it aims to address the high levels of overfishing and the ineffective regulatory framework by introducing for the first time a multi-annual plan at EU level. I also share the opinion that the latter will play an important role in achieving the objectives of the CFP Regulation in western Mediterranean demersal fisheries, namely with regards to ensure that fishing activities are environmentally sustainable in the long term and managed in a way that secures economic, social and employment benefits.
Establishing the Fiscalis programme for cooperation in the field of taxation (A8-0421/2018 - Sven Giegold)
The interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of irregularities and fraud, the recovery of lost funds, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative sanctions. The Fiscalis Programme should enable Member States’ capacity to combat tax fraud, corruption, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning to be strengthened, including by means of technical assistance for human resources training and the development of administrative structures. Such assistance should be provided in a transparent manner.In this line, I voted in favour of the report on Fiscalis as it strengthens the cooperation of tax administration by means of collaboration and information exchange, while also taking up priorities of fighting against tax evasion, tax avoidance and money laundering.And last but not least, I further share the opinion that in order for this to better protect the financial and economic interests of the Union and of its Member States, Fiscalis should also support Member States in their joint tax audit activities and in the setting-up of quality registers of beneficial ownerships.
European Instrument for Nuclear Safety complementing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (A8-0448/2018 - Vladimir Urutchev)
Nuclear safety is an important part of the EU’s external action. I voted in favour, as I welcome the objective of the proposed instrument to promote a high level of nuclear safety standards and radiation protection, building on the experience of nuclear safety activities within the Euratom Community. In particular, the proposed instrument promotes an effective nuclear safety culture.Moreover, I support the call to ensure the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, while also reducing the overall radiological risk to the public and the environment through the decommissioning and remediation of former nuclear sites and installations.
Combating late payment in commercial transactions (A8-0456/2018 - Lara Comi)
I voted in favour, as I consider it important to facilitate the functioning of the internal market by streamlining payment practices across the EU. It is essential to develop a legal and business environment supportive of timely payments between companies and public administrations. In line with this, I welcome the call within the report for a combination of legal and voluntary measures involving the Commission, Member States and business associations with a view to improving payment practices.Moreover, as SMEs unfortunately often lack the capacity to invest in training, I also share the opinion that it is necessary to provide SMEs with specific tools, advice and training in credit management, as well as guidelines for overdue payment recovery in cross-border transactions.
Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU (A8-0420/2018 - Jo Leinen, Yana Toom)
Fully democratic and highly transparent decision-making at the European level is indispensable to increase citizens’ trust in the European project and in the EU institutions, especially in the run-up to the European elections in May 2019. After a public consultation, in its report of February 2018, the Ombudsman found that the Council’s lack of transparency regarding public access to its legislative documents and to its decision-making process – specifically during the preparatory stage at Coreper and at working group level – constitutes an act of maladministration.I voted in favour, as I believe that it is crucial to enhance the democratic accountability of all EU institutions, starting with the Council, whose lack of transparency is a manifest case. A high level of transparency also acts as a safeguard against the spread of speculation, fake news and conspiracy theories, as it provides a factual basis for publicly refuting such claims.Finally, I share the opinion that the Council should take all measures to implement as swiftly as possible the recommendations of the Ombudsman.
EU-Morocco Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0478/2018 - Marietje Schaake)
. ‒ The European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco enjoy historical relations and maintain close cooperation developed through a broad partnership that covers political, economic and social aspects and is strengthened by the advanced status and the willingness of both parties to develop it further. The agreement does not imply any form of recognition of Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara, presently listed by the United Nations as a non-self-governing territory.In addition, the agreement leads to the promotion of social and sustainable development, which make a key contribution to current economic, social and environmental development and to the potential creation of both low-skilled and high-skilled local employment opportunities. I voted in favour of the report, keeping in mind the fact that the Commission is called on to promote equivalency of measures and controls between Morocco and the European Union in the areas of sanitary, phytosanitary, traceability and environmental standards, as well as labelling of origin rules, in order to guarantee fair competition between the two markets.
EU-Morocco Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (A8-0471/2018 - Marietje Schaake)
. ‒ The European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco enjoy historical relations and maintain close cooperation developed through a broad partnership that covers political, economic and social aspects and is strengthened by the advanced status and the willingness of both parties to develop it further. The agreement does not imply any form of recognition of Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara, presently listed by the United Nations as a non-self-governing territory.In addition, the agreement leads to the promotion of social and sustainable development, which make a key contribution to current economic, social and environmental development and to the potential creation of both low-skilled and high-skilled local employment opportunities. I voted in favour of the report, keeping in mind the fact that the Commission is called on to promote equivalency of measures and controls between Morocco and the European Union in the areas of sanitary, phytosanitary, traceability and environmental standards, as well as labelling of origin rules, in order to guarantee fair competition between the two markets.
EU-China Agreement in connection with the WTO dispute settlement proceedings DS492 - Measures affecting tariff concessions on certain poultry meat products (A8-0472/2018 - Iuliu Winkler)
. ‒ I welcome the proposal, which implements the World Trade Organisation panel report of 19 April 2017 – ‘Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products’. In dialogue with China the panel found that, when allocating quantities within tariff rate quotas (TRQs) to supplying countries under WTO rules, the EU should have taken into account as a ‘special factor’ China’s increased ability to export poultry products to the EU following the relaxation of sanitary measures in July 2008.In particular, the agreement grants China TRQs for two tariff lines setting an in-quota duty rate of 10.9% and an erga omnes TRQ for another tariff line with 8% in-quota duty rate.The EU needs to conclude this agreement in order to comply with the WTO panel report and to confirm, once again, through specific action its firm and unwavering commitment to multilateralism through the WTO and, in particular, to the WTO’s most efficient mechanism – its dispute settlement system.
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) (A8-0445/2018 - Maria Arena)
. ‒ The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) is a concrete expression of EU solidarity with European workers who have lost their jobs. The Fund provides support to workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns caused by globalisation. I welcome the Commission proposal, which aims to align the Fund’s co-financing rate, which currently stands at 60%, with the highest ESF+ co-financing rates for a given Member State. In addition, the standard period for the implementation of EGF measures shall remain at 24 months. However, the proposal stipulates that the 24-month period shall be counted from the time the decision to mobilise the EGF is adopted and not from the date of application for EGF support. The EGF is not included in the budgetary ceilings of the multiannual financial framework. The maximum amount that can be used by the EGF for the period 2021-2027 is estimated at EUR 1.57 billion (in current prices), or an average of EUR 225 million per year.
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (A8-0461/2018 - Verónica Lope Fontagné)
. ‒ The Commission’s proposal tackles unemployment and persistently high rates of poverty, which remain a priority throughout the EU. The Commission proposes to allocate a total budget of EUR 101 billion (in current prices) to the ESF+ for the period 2021-2027. The financial envelope for the direct management strands of the ESF+ would amount to EUR 1 174 million in current prices, of which EUR 761 million for employment and social innovation and EUR 413 million for health.Moreover, Member States will allocate at least 25% of their ESF+ resources to the social inclusion policy area and at least 2% of their ESF+ resources to the specific objective of addressing material deprivation. Member States with a rate above the Union average of young people aged 15-29 not in employment, education or training (NEETs) shall devote 10% of their ESF+ to targeted actions and structural reforms to support young people. In the case of the outermost regions with a NEET rate above this threshold, this percentage shall be increased to 15%. Social and employment issues are a primary concern of European citizens, therefore I support the Commission’s proposal.
Specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) (A8-0470/2018 - Pascal Arimont)
. ‒ I support the purpose of the proposal, which lays down the specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and external financing instruments for the period 2021-2017. As part of a major simplification effort, the Commission now proposes to adopt specific provisions in relation to the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) where one or more Member States cooperate across borders with regard to effective programming. Taking into account the special features of Interreg the specific objectives are to concentrate on better Interreg governance and a safer and more secure Europe. The proposed regulation also sets out specific percentages for thematic concentration.This proposal has no budgetary implications. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR 8.43 billion of the global resources available for budgetary commitment from the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund for the 2021-2027 programming period.
Apportionment of tariff rate quotas included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the UK's withdrawal from the EU (A8-0361/2018 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl)
. ‒ The file is part of the Commission’s Brexit preparedness policy. In the context of the UK’s withdrawal from the Union, the EU is already negotiating with third countries to modify the EU’s WTO schedule where it contains tariff rate quota (TRQ) volumes. It is not certain whether these negotiations would be concluded before the UK will no longer be covered under the EU’s WTO schedule. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that, also in the absence of such agreements, the EU can proceed with the apportionment of TRQs.The Commission’s proposal lists how TRQs in the EU’s WTO schedule will be apportioned between the EU and the UK and gives the Commission the power to modify this apportionment later by delegated act, if necessary.
Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides (A8-0475/2018 - Norbert Lins, Bart Staes)
The special committee on pesticides aims to provide recommendations necessary for achieving a high level of protection of both human health and the environment. The Committee was set in light of the concerns raised over the assessment and consequent re-approval of glyphosate.This included one of only four registered Citizens’ Initiatives, thus far, entitled: Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides (1 070 865 signatories). The major point is the call for an immediate review of the approval of glyphosate in light of lack of transparency in the requirements for the renewal of the substance’s approval. The Commission holds that there are neither scientific nor legal grounds to justify a ban of glyphosate, and will not make a legislative proposal to that effect.
Establishing a dedicated financial programme for decommissioning of nuclear facilities and management of radioactive waste (A8-0441/2018 - Peter Kouroumbashev)
I welcome the proposed Regulation that seeks to establish a dedicated financial programme for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and management of radioactive waste, with the focus on needs identified on a current basis. For the period of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027, it will support Bulgaria and Slovakia to safely decommission their nuclear reactors that have been prematurely shut down, and the implementation of the decommissioning process and management of radioactive waste of the Commission’s own nuclear installations at the Joint Research Centre (JRC) sites, while ensuring the protection of workers, in particular as regards health impacts, the general public and the environment, therefore I voted in favour.
Implementation report on the trade pillar of the Association Agreement with Central America (A8-0459/2018 - Reimer Böge)
The own-initiative report on the implementation of the Trade Pillar of the Association Agreement with Central America was the first region-to-region association agreement concluded by the EU. It is based on three complementary pillars, namely political dialogue, cooperation, and trade. The political dialogue and cooperation pillars have still not been applied as not all Member States have ratified the Agreement. The non-application of these two pillars creates an imbalance between trade-related issues and political issues, namely the EU’s core values, such as promotion of democracy and human rights.However, the INI report aims to fully implement all the provisions of the trade pillar, to identify and develop joint strategies towards the necessary modernisation of the WTO, to monitor the implementation of internationally agreed standards for the fight against money laundering and to strengthen labour inspections and enhancing social dialogue, inter alia.
Establishing the InvestEU Programme (A8-0482/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes, Roberto Gualtieri)
I welcome the Commission`s proposal, which targets to establish the InvestEU Fund as a single investment support instrument for Union policies for the period 2021-2027. With 1.8% of EU GDP, down from 2.2% in 2009, infrastructure investment activities in the EU in 2016 were about 20% below investment rates before the global financial crisis. While investment conditions in Europe have improved thanks to structural reforms by Member States, a more favourable economic situation and public interventions, notably under the European Strategic Investment Fund (EFSI), investment gaps remain considerable in Europe.I fully support the new InvestEU programme that shall have the capacity to shape an EU strategy to address the investment gaps in sectors such: new mobility models, renewable energies, energy efficiency, research and innovation, digitisation, education and skills, social economy and infrastructure, circular economy, natural capital, climate action or small and medium-sized businesses creation and growth. The Commission proposes to allocate EUR 15.2 billion to the InvestEU Fund. The EU budget could thus provide a guarantee of EUR 38 billion to support projects of strategic importance across the EU.
EU Emergency Travel Document (A8-0433/2018 - Kinga Gál)
I welcome the proposed directive, which lays down rules on the conditions and procedure for unrepresented citizens in third countries to obtain an EU emergency travel document (EU ETD) and establishes a uniform format for such documents. Moreover, the directive aims to establish the measures needed to facilitate consular protection for the most frequent type of consular assistance provided to unrepresented citizens, namely the issuance of emergency travel documents. This objective is to be achieved by establishing a standardised procedure of cooperation between the Member States for the issuance of emergency travel documents (ETD) in a uniform format based on improved security features. This will allow citizens to exercise their right to consular protection effectively and in a more secure environment, therefore I fully support the Commission’s proposal.
Euratom Research and Training programme 2021- 2025 (A8-0406/2018 - Miapetra Kumpula-Natri)
One of the aims of the European Atomic Energy Community is to contribute to raising the standard of living in the Member States, including by promoting and facilitating nuclear research in the Member States and complementing it by carrying out a Community research and training programme. The Commission proposes a new five-year programme. It will pursue the current Euratom programme’s key research activities and expand research into non-power applications of ionising radiation, and make improvements in the areas of education, training and access to research infrastructure.The specific objectives are as follows: improve the safe and secure use of nuclear energy, foster the development of fusion energy, support the policy of the Community on nuclear safety, safeguards and security. The programme shall also support the mobility of researchers in the nuclear field in the framework of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme shall be EUR 1.67 billion in current prices for the period 2021-2025.
European Central Bank Annual report 2017 (A8-0424/2018 - Gabriel Mato)
I support the annual own-initiative report on the control of the financial activities of the EIB (European Investment Bank). It underlines the main policy goals’ achievements in 2017, together with concerns and shortcomings related to the proper implementation of the EIB’s mission and some governance practices. The report reiterates the call by Parliament on the EIB to report on the state of play and the status of Parliament’s recommendations from its previous resolutions with regard to the impact of the EIB lending activities and results achieved. Moreover, it stresses the need to prevent conflicts of interests of the members of the EFSI Investment Committee and the provision of more stringent rules on conflicts of interest in the relevant Codes of Conduct of the Management Board and Board of Directors. Furthermore, the report underlines the support for greater transparency and disclosure of information on contracting and subcontracting systems concerning intermediaries and final recipients in relation to the prevention of tax avoidance, fraud and corruption.
Banking Union - Annual report 2018 (A8-0419/2018 - Nils Torvalds)
The own-initiative report underlines the importance of commitment to the process of completing the Banking Union and the need to ensure openness and equal treatment of all Member States participating in the Banking Union. In it, Parliament recalls that the completion of the Banking Union, including a European Deposit Insurance Scheme and a fiscal backstop for the Single Resolution Fund, must continue, as must measures to achieve risk reduction, which contributes to further increasing financial stability and growth prospects. It stresses the importance of the commitment to the process of completing the Capital Markets Union and reminds that the Banking Union is open to all Member States that wish to join.It notes the establishment of EDIS (European Deposit Insurance Scheme) and ensures proper balance between risk-reduction and risk-sharing measures and tackles the problem of the high level of NPLs (non-performing loans) and level II and level III instruments. I voted in favour of the INI since it also points that we need a more unified approach towards prudential and anti-money laundering supervision and welcomes the Commission proposal to strengthen the role of the European Banking Authority in the fight against money laundering in the financial sector.
Implementation of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)
The report emphasises that the strategic values of the Agreement extend beyond the sphere of trade as it provides a solid foundation for a deeper relationship, with a long-term commitment to human rights, social rights, the rights of indigenous peoples and peasant farmers, and of the environment. I welcome the fact that the agreement opens markets for, inter alia, goods, services, government procurement and investment, which when built upon the principles of sustainable development can create opportunities for formal and quality employment, and improved working conditions and living standards by liberalising and expanding trade and investment. Indeed the Agreement has led to a significant increase in EU agricultural exports to both countries, however the Commission is invited to closely monitor the effects of the agreement on food production for the local market and to keep the European Parliament informed on this matter.
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017 (A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras)
I welcome the own-initiative report, which stresses importance of the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary system, the principles of equality before the law, the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair and public hearing. The report rejects any confusion made between immigration and terrorism, as well as any use of counter-terrorism measures for the purpose of controlling certain migratory movements. It condemns the abuses and human rights violations suffered by migrants and refugees, in particular with regard to access to territory, reception conditions, asylum procedures, immigration detention and the protection of vulnerable persons. The report calls upon to consider six main areas of intervention as empowering equality bodies to deal with issues that affect women’s rights, improving online safety, promoting gender equality in education and lifelong learning more effectively, improving data collection and the dissemination of knowledge on all forms of discrimination and violence against women and girls.
Establishing, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, the instrument for financial support for customs control equipment (A8-0460/2018 - Jiří Pospíšil)
I welcome the regulation, for which I voted in favour, since it establishes the instrument for financial support for customs control equipment, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, to provide financial support for the purchase, maintenance and upgrading of customs control equipment. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Instrument for the period 2021-2027 will be EUR 1 149 000 000 at current prices.The instrument has the specific objective of contributing to adequate and equivalent customs controls through the fully transparent purchase, maintenance and upgrading of relevant, state-of-the-art, secure, cyber-resilient, safe, environment-friendly and reliable customs control equipment. An additional objective is to improve the quality of customs controls throughout Member States to avoid the diversion of goods towards weaker points in the Union. Furthermore, the instrument will contribute to the implementation of European integrated border management by supporting interagency cooperation and the sharing and interoperability of new equipment acquired through the instrument.
Conclusion of the EU-Albania status agreement on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Albania (A8-0463/2018 - Bodil Valero)
The aim of the proposed Council decision is to approve the Status Agreement between the European Union and Albania on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Albania as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 on the European Border and Coast Guard. The idea of a status agreement is to provide a legally binding framework for operations of the Agency in which team members with executive powers would be deployed to the territory of a third country. The agreement should cover all aspects necessary for carrying out the actions of the Agency in third countries.Furthermore, it should set out the scope of the operation, civil and criminal liability and the tasks and powers of the team members deployed. Status agreements must also guarantee full respect for fundamental rights and the establishment of dedicated complaints mechanisms to be used if fundamental rights were to be violated during the operations. That is why I am in favour of the report.
Autonomous driving in European transport (A8-0425/2018 - Wim van de Camp)
. ‒ The INI report lays out an approach to make EU the world’s leader in the deployment of safe systems for automated mobility, increasing road safety and efficiency, combating congestion, reducing energy consumption and emissions from transport, and gradually phasing out fossil fuels. I believe that there is a need to intervene effectively for the development of autonomous vehicles that are accessible for persons with disabilities and reduced mobility (PRMS) and to clarify who should bear the liability in the event of accidents caused by fully autonomous vehicles. In addition, the legislator must resolve those ethical aspects of self-driving vehicles before these vehicles can be fully accepted and made available in traffic situations. I support the report as it encourages the Member States and industry to further implement cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS), and calls on the Commission to support the Member States and industry in deploying C-ITS services, notably through the Connecting Europe Facility, the European Structural and Investment Funds and the InvestEU programme.
Use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road (A8-0193/2018 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
. ‒ The Commission proposal is part of the Mobility Package, and reviews Directive 2006/1/EC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road. The Directive allowed Member States to restrict the use of hired goods vehicles with a gross vehicle weight above six tonnes for own-account operations and restricted the use of a vehicle which has been hired in a Member State different from the one where the undertaking hiring the vehicle is established.The proposal removes these restrictions and establishes a uniform regulatory framework across the EU, where Member States would no longer have the possibility to restrict the use of hired vehicles for own-account operations. In addition, while Member States may still limit the use of a vehicle hired in a Member State different from the one where the undertaking hiring it is established, they would have to allow its use for at least four months. This period would give transport companies enough time to meet peak or seasonal demand and replace defective vehicles. I voted in favour of the report.
Temporary withdrawal of preferences in certain agreements concluded between the EU and certain third countries (A8-0330/2018 - Christofer Fjellner)
. ‒ I welcome the adoption of the horizontal safeguard clause, which will strengthen the safety net for our domestic industry in cases where trade agreements can lead to a disproportionate surge in the level of imports. The safeguard regulation provides a safety net for European producers in case a new trade agreement brings with it an unexpected and sudden increase in imports that causes serious damage to an EU industry. In these cases, the EU could suspend market liberalisation or withdraw lower custom tariffs. The regulation will cover future free trade agreements. With the safeguard regulation in place and applying horizontally, there will be no need to legislate safeguards clauses with each new trade agreement. The measures themselves are meant to provide a temporary breathing space for a sector or area to make necessary adjustments to withstand subsequent imports.
Establishing the 'Customs' programme for cooperation in the field of customs (A8-0464/2018 - Maria Grapini)
The proposal, which I am in favour of, establishes the customs programme in the framework of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) from 2012 to 2027. It is the successor of the Customs 2020 programme and dedicates an envelope of EUR 950 million to cooperation in the field of customs. The general objective of the proposed new programme is to support the customs union and customs authorities to protect the financial and economic interests of the Union and its Member States, to ensure security and safety within the Union and to protect the Union from unfair and illegal trade, while facilitating legitimate business activity. A major focus is also on the further development and maintenance of customs IT-infrastructure, as stipulated in the Union Customs Code, which entered into force in 2016.
Amendment of the European Investment Bank Statute (A8-0476/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
In accordance with Article 308 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the members of the European Investment Bank are the Member States, therefore the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU brings an end to the membership of the United Kingdom and its right to nominate members and alternate members of the board of directors. I voted in favour of the report. The function of the board of directors, since I believe we need a better e strengthening, allowing the nomination of additional alternates, and better use of alternate Board members and non-voting experts to enhance their support to the decision-making process of the board of directors, in particular regarding the analysis of financing proposals.
Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament (A8-0429/2018 - Angelika Mlinar)
Gender mainstreaming has a double dimension: it requires both integrating a gender perspective to the content of the different policies, and addressing the issue of representation of women and men in the given policy area. The report insists on the role of the EU, and in particular the EP, to promote gender mainstreaming. I support the objective of having an EU budget focused also on gender issues and calls to keep providing data in order to face reality.In addition, an enhanced cooperation and a stable relationship between the EP’s high—level group for gender equality and diversity and the rotating co-presidency of the Gender Mainstreaming Network. Since 2009, a network of Members responsible for gender mainstreaming in EP committees has been established as well as an additional network at staff level. The network meets regularly, information is exchanged on ongoing files of interest for the Members of the network, and best practices are shared. In the last legislature, the delegations have also appointed Members responsible for gender mainstreaming.
European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A8-0393/2018 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
I support the INI report, which calls on the Council to approve the Commission proposal while introducing some modifications regarding the Euratom contribution to the Joint Undertaking in both constant and current prices, and which will evaluate and eliminate overlapping responsibilities between the Administration and Management Committee and the Technical Advisory Panel with regard to project plans and work programmes.In addition, it will clarify the role and contribution of the United Kingdom in the light of its Euratom status and will include provisions regarding synergies and cooperation between ITER and the Euratom Research and Training Programme for the period 2021-2025. Finally, it considers cooperation with small and medium-sized private disruptive players, such as start-ups experimenting with new approaches and technologies, in the research programme and the network of organisations designated in the field of scientific and technological fusion research, for which I voted in favour.
Assessing how the EU budget is used for public sector reform (A8-0378/2018 - Brian Hayes)
This is an INI report which stresses that public sector reform is essential to help Member States adapt to changing circumstances, increase their resilience to prevent future crises, develop eGovernment and improve service delivery across the Union. Ensuring that the financing of eGovernment deployment measures should also be envisaged in future programming periods and implementing reforms within the Member States to apply the principle of good administration in practice with a view to improving the capacity of regions that are lagging behind to access to finance are among top objectives of the report.In addition, promoting coordination, complementarity and simplification will avoid overlaps between specific operational programmes and other EU funding. Thus, encouraging within public administrations innovative processes that promote connectivity, digital transition and the provision of quality digital services for citizens, businesses and public authorities, while taking into account the rapid development of new technologies in these areas, determined me to give my positive vote for the report.
EU guidelines and the mandate of the EU Special Envoy on the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU (A8-0449/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb)
I welcome the INI report that stresses that religion or belief is an important pillar of human identity and therefore requires proper recognition and addressing, while expressing its deep concern at the fact that recent years have seen a dramatic rise in violations of FoRB (freedom of religion or belief) worldwide. We urgently need to implement the EU Guidelines on FoRB to be increased in intensity and effectiveness. Furthermore, underlines the need for broader and more systematic training programmes, which would raise awareness of and increase the use of the EU Guidelines among the EU’s and Member States’ officials and diplomat. In addition, asks for churches and religious communities and associations to be involved in this training process and calls on the Commission and the Council to earmark resources for establishing such training programmes.
Gender equality and taxation policies in the EU (A8-0416/2018 - Marisa Matias, Ernest Urtasun)
This report looks at the impact of taxation policies on gender equality and gives recommendations to MS and the Commission on how to make taxation policies fairer and gender-sensitive. Taxation is considered in no way gender-neutral. Indirect taxation such as VAT exerts a gender bias, as women’s consumption patterns differ from those of men. The reports calls on MS and COM to carry out gender audits of fiscal policies in order to eliminate tax-related gender bias. Moreover, Member States are urged to introduce progressively individual taxation systems, while ensuring that all financial and other benefits linked to parenthood in current joint taxation systems are fully preserved. In addition, the report also condemns the outrageous situation that female hygiene products are still not considered as basic products in all Member States, and urges all EU countries to eliminate the so-called ‘care and tampon tax’ by applying a 0% VAT rate to these essential goods. Therefore I voted in favour of the report.
Expedited settlement of commercial disputes (A8-0396/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I support the proposal amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards minimum loss coverage for non-performing exposures. The proposal on capital requirements (CRR) provides for a statutory prudential backstop against any excessive future build-up of non-performing exposures (NPEs) without sufficient loss coverage on banks’ balance sheets. The establishment of a comprehensive strategy to address the issue of NPEs is an important goal for the Union in its attempt to make the financial system more resilient. The ‘exposure’ shall include a debt instrument, a loan commitment given, a financial guarantee given or any other commitment given. The exposure value of a debt instrument that was purchased at a price lower than the amount owed by the debtor shall include the difference between the purchase price and the amount owed by the debtor. In order to allow institutions and Member States to improve the efficiency of proceedings and to recognise secured NPEs guaranteed by an eligible provider retaining their value for a longer period of time after the loan turned non-performing, it is appropriate to provide for a calendar of nine years. For other secured NPEs a calendar of seven years shall apply until full coverage has built up.
Establishing the space programme of the Union and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (A8-0405/2018 - Massimiliano Salini)
I voted in favour as the Space Programme provides high-quality and up-to-date secure space-related data, information and services without interruption and wherever possible at global level. I believe that this programme is very important as it enhance the security, including cybersecurity, of the Union and its Member States, and reinforces its strategic autonomy, in particular in industrial and technological terms. It is very important to strength the European industrial and scientific ecosystem in the field of space, by establishing a coherent framework that combines the excellence of European training and know-how, the development of high-level design, manufacturing capabilities and the strategic vision needed in an increasingly competitive sector.
Establishing the Digital Europe programme for the period 2021-2027 (A8-0408/2018 - Angelika Mlinar)
I support the new initiative aiming to reinforce the Union’s capacities in areas that will be key for Europe to ensure its competitiveness in global markets. It is important to reduce the digital divide inside the European Union, to increase cohesion between different territories and to put more attention in areas and regions lagging behind. I also support the need for applications and actions financed under this fund to comply with ethical standards and a proper ethical assessment and respect the European digital identity. It is essential to invest in technologies if we want to remain competitive in the global scene and we need to shape these policies to our European values and ethical standards.
US-EU Agreement on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety (A8-0432/2018 - Theresa Griffin)
The idea of the agreement is to create a single market for air transport in which European and US airlines to be able to provide air services without any restriction and which would include the domestic markets of both parties. The ratification and consent process of the Protocol is still on going. The Protocol provides for advances additional investment and market access opportunities, as well as strengthening the framework of cooperation in regulatory areas, such as safety, security as well as environment. It included also (Article 21) a mutual responsibility towards ‘further expansion opportunities’ that covers, among others, future progress relating to foreign ownership rules. It is important to strengthen EU-US regulatory cooperation, in civil aviation safety, to promote global safety standards, and to enhance the production of civil aeronautical products by taking into account the interests of all concerned actors: pilots, aircraft manufacturers, airport platforms, and airlines. The aviation industry consistently advocated closer cooperation, recognition and harmonisation between the two largest markets the US and EU), in order to reduce unnecessary transaction costs that add little or no safety value and in turn diminish the industry’s overall competitiveness.
Common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services (A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang)
I voted in favour as this proposal aims to protect the integrity of the Single Market and to ensure its proper functioning. It is important to make sure that the public finances within the Union are sustainable and that the national tax bases are not eroded. It is essential to fight against aggressive tax planning and to close the gaps that currently exist in the international rules, which makes it possible for some digital companies to escape taxation in countries where they operate and create value. This tax is one of the numerous steps we need to reduce income inequality and promote tax justice. Inequality is the challenge of our times and it must be urgently addressed to restore trust in politics and in the EU. It is crucial to have a common tax base for corporate taxation and a minimum effective taxation of companies across the EU.
Corporate taxation of a significant digital presence (A8-0426/2018 - Dariusz Rosati)
I welcome the proposal, which opens the road for a deep, international reform of corporate tax systems, in order to ensure that multinational companies are taxed. The EU cannot wait for an international compromise at OECD level, which under the current political circumstances, could take many years to come. In the digital era, the data has become a new economic resource in addition to labour. Too many multinational companies that heavily rely upon digital activities make tax arrangements allowing them to avoid or evade taxes, a new method needs to be developed in order to have an equitable and sustainable system of digital taxation, which will ensure digital companies to pay their taxes where their real economic activity occurs. It is also important the inclusion of sale of goods or services which is facilitated by using the internet or an electronic network as digital service within the scope of the Directive (e-commerce platforms).
Blockchain: a forward-looking trade policy (A8-0407/2018 - Emma McClarkin)
Blockchain technology offers the potential to improve trust and confidence in the current trade system by providing an immutable record of transactions. There are at least 202 government blockchain initiatives in 45 countries around the world and economies in the regions of the Asia-Pacific, the Americas and the Middle East, in particular. Blockchain may enhance and improve EU trade policies, enable customs authorities to automatically obtain information and reduce bureaucracy. Furthermore, it monitors the origin of goods and their manufacturing conditions, reduces the costs of transactions, insurance and logistics, removes intermediaries, increases trust between transacting parties, and combats contraband and the entry of illegal goods. Moreover it improves transparency and traceability throughout the supply chain, reduces the cost of supply-chain management, improves the application of correct duty and VAT payments and revenue collection within trade policy, and reduces the total time goods are in transit by automating tasks that are typically accomplished manually.
Adequacy of the protection of personal data afforded by Japan (B8-0561/2018)
I voted in favour as transfers of personal data between the EU and Japan for commercial purposes are an important element of EU-Japan relations in light of the ever-increasing digitisation of the global economy. Such transfers should be carried out on a basis of full respect of the right to the protection of personal data and the right to privacy, as one of the basic objectives of the EU is the protection of fundamental rights, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It is important to take into consideration that Japan has recently modernised and strengthened its data protection legislation to align it with international standards, in particular with the safeguards and individual rights provided by the new European data protection legislative framework.
Conflict of interest and the protection of the EU budget in the Czech Republic (RC-B8-0582/2018, B8-0582/2018, B8-0583/2018, B8-0584/2018, B8-0585/2018)
I consider that it is important for all national authorities and government officials to proactively apply the new Financial Regulation, in particular Article 61 on conflicts of interest, in order to prevent harmful situations for the European Union, its Member States, democracy and the EU’s financial interests, and to serve as an example of working for the public good rather than personal gain. The obligation of national authorities is to ensure that the Union’s legislation on conflicts of interest is applied in all cases and to all people.
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2017 (A8-0411/2018 - Eleonora Evi)
I welcome the Annual Report on the Activities of the Ombudsman in 2017, supporting the recommendations made by the Ombudsman on a number of issues such as transparency over the decision-making process. I support the call for setting up a transparency register in order to better monitor and regulate lobbying activities. In line with this idea, I also share the opinion that higher ethical standards and rules are necessary for elected members and officials. These should be swiftly applied throughout the EU institutions, agencies and bodies and must be based on a legislative act. There is also an urgent need for the existing Code of Good Administrative Behaviour to be upgraded effectively, by adopting a binding regulation on the matter. I welcome the Ombudsman’s five-year strategy, ‘Towards 2019’, which aims to forge stronger relationships with the EU institutions, agencies and organisations, for the greater benefit of citizens.
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions 2017 (A8-0404/2018 - Cecilia Wikström)
I welcome the report as it draws attention to the specific interactive nature of the petition process with citizens who, through their petitions, provide a useful source of information for detecting breaches, loopholes or inconsistencies in EU law.In return, citizens expect the EU institutions to bring added value in resolving their concerns. I am happy to see that improvements have also been made to the petitions web portal in order to facilitate the submission of petitions. Users of the web portal also have the possibility to support petitions. I voted in favour as I support the call on the Commission to improve the quality of its replies to the committee – including during committee meetings – in relation to petitions. There should also be enhanced cooperation with Member State authorities when it comes to responding to inquiries about the implementation of and compliance with EU law.
Draft amending budget No 6/2018: Reduction of payment and commitment appropriations (own resources) (A8-0399/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
In the framework of the annual budgetary procedure, Draft Amending Budget 6 represents a standard exercise aiming at updating the expenditure and revenue sides of the EU budget in line with the latest developments. I voted in favour of the report on the Council’s position on Draft amending budget No 6/2018 of the European Union for the financial year 2018: Reduction of payment and commitment appropriations in line with updated forecasts of expenditure and update of revenue (own resources). On the expenditure side, the financing of competitiveness for growth and jobs and the funding for sustainable growth are decreased respectively by EUR 48.7 million and EUR 44.7 million.As concerns the revenue side, this provision entails a revision of the forecast of traditional own resources, as well as VAT and GNI bases and the budgeting of the relevant UK corrections. The Union needs the necessary financial resources to meet the citizen`s expectations and to allow the Union to effectively tackle the numerous priorities and challenges in order to improve the day-to-day life of its citizens.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the EU general budget for 2019 (A8-0453/2018 - Lefteris Christoforou)
The purpose of the report is to mobilize the EU Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the general budget of the Union for 2019. In order to ensure the timely availability of sufficient budgetary resources in the general budget of the Union for 2019, the Commission proposes that the European Union Solidarity Fund be mobilized to the amount of EUR 50 million for the payment of advances. The decision should apply from the beginning of the 2019 financial year to limit the time taken to mobilize the Fund.The European Union Solidarity Fund aims to enable the Union to respond quickly, effectively and flexibly to emergencies and to show its solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters therefore, I expressed my positive vote for the report.
EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (resolution) (A8-0367/2018 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
I voted in favour as I consider this agreement to have significant bilateral and global strategic importance, while promoting high standards, namely in the field of the environment, food safety, consumer protection and labour rights and human rights. The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement is one of the most significant bilateral trade agreements concluded by the Union and it covers nearly a third of world GDP, almost 40% of world trade and over 600 million people. I believe that market access commitments in cross-border services, including e-commerce, maritime transport, postal services, energy and telecommunications, have the potential to give a significant boost to trade in services and will make it easier for EU firms to provide services on the Japanese market. From an economic point of view, it is very important to take into consideration that Japan is the world’s third largest consumer market, which means a positive effect in terms of GDP growth, income, trade, productivity and employment.
EU-Jordan Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0371/2018 - Keith Taylor)
I voted in favour for Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia. The purpose of the Protocol is to enable Croatia to become a party to the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Jordan, of the other part, and to define the linguistic adaptations to be made to the Agreement by reason of Croatia’s accession. The Protocol makes no substantial amendments to the Agreement between the European Union and Jordan.
Establishing Horizon Europe – laying down its rules for participation and dissemination (A8-0401/2018 - Dan Nica)
I voted in favour as I support the ambitious and properly funded framework programme to take up on future challenges. Through science, innovation, and ground-breaking research, Europe can become more competitive and stay at the forefront of global research and innovation, creating quality jobs. At least 35% of the total budget under this programme would be allocated to support EU’s climate objectives. The Union should invest in research and innovation through Horizon Europe - a Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2021-2027 to support the creation, diffusion and transfer of high-quality knowledge and technologies in the Union, to strengthen the impact of research and innovation in addressing global challenges including the Sustainable Development Goals and climate change, and in developing, supporting and implementing Union policies, to support the uptake of innovative and sustainable solutions in the Union’s industry and society to create jobs and boost economic growth and industrial competitiveness.
Programme implementing Horizon Europe (A8-0410/2018 - Christian Ehler)
I voted in favour as the priorities of Horizon Europe are very closely aligned with the Union’s general strategic priorities and its policies. The strategic planning are based on foresight activities, studies and other scientific evidence and take account of relevant existing initiatives at Union and national level. It incorporate inter-disciplinary and cross-sectoral perspectives and ensure that all activities under Horizon Europe are coordinated in an effective manner. Reflecting the important contribution, research and innovation should make to address challenges in food, agriculture, rural development and the bio-economy. The completion of the Digital Single Market and the growing opportunities from the convergence of digital and physical technologies requires a stepping up of investments. Horizon Europe will contribute to these efforts with a substantial increase of spending in main digital research and innovation activities compared to the Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020.
Single Market package (RC-B8-0557/2018, B8-0557/2018, B8-0558/2018, B8-0559/2018, B8-0560/2018)
The free movement of people, goods, services and capital have helped improve citizens’ prosperity and strengthen the EU’s competitiveness over the past 25 years. However, at the present, a deeper integration and greater efforts are required to strengthen the Single Market and overcome the persisting obstacles. The Single Market is a unique asset to preserve and boost Europe’s standing, values and influence worldwide. Today only 8% of SMEs offer goods and online services and only 15% of consumers make use of this possibility.The Single Market cannot be considered in purely economic terms, but must be seen as embedded in a wider legal framework granting specific rights for citizens, workers, consumers, entrepreneurs and businesses. I believe that we need a strategic and more holistic approach whereas the response to the challenges faced should be as much political as technical in nature.
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on Terrorism (A8-0374/2018 - Monika Hohlmeier, Helga Stevens)
Terrorism is a major security challenge for European societies and we have the obligation to protect our citizens’ right to life and safety.Looking back at what happened in the last few years, especially in Europe, I’d like to underline a few of the errors and failures in the European system to counter terrorism. These include weak security systems, sharing intelligence failures, problems with different judicial systems, failures and low results in fighting radicalisation and fundamentalism, insufficient resources and, in many cases, a lack of police, intelligence and security institutions, accountability and funding, a lack of properly monitoring and defending EU external borders and so forth. Welcoming the report, I would like to add that the latter addresses the shortcomings mentioned above and focuses on strengthening the mechanism of cooperation and information sharing between European agencies and Member States’ competent authorities. Preventing and fighting terrorism has to stay a priority of the European Union.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0392/2018 - David McAllister)
I voted in favour, as European security should be based on the ambition of common strategic autonomy. It is important to promote and protect universal values, such as peace, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, including minority rights. The EU’s security environment is now more volatile, unpredictable, complex and ambiguous than at any time since the end of the Cold War, confronted with interstate conflicts, natural disasters, terrorism, failed states, cyber-attacks and hybrid warfare.The current EU policies may no longer suffice to promote a stable and prosperous neighbourhood. The EU has a growing responsibility to safeguard its own security while defending its interests and values. At a time of increased international challenges, such as terrorism, instability in the Middle East, actions of external actors seeking to undermine the EU’s stability and security order, European citizens more than ever expect an effective common foreign and security policy from the EU and Member States, adequately backed up by financial resources.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0375/2018 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)
I voted in favour as the EU’s strategic security and defence objectives can only be achieved through the closest coordination of the needs and long-term capability-building requirements of both the armed forces and defence industries of the Member States. The need for cooperation has been increasingly recognised in recent years, and I welcome the advances that have been made in this direction, although concrete results still need to be duly evaluated.I consider that the EU should also strengthen dialogue and cooperation with third countries in its region and with regional and sub-regional organisations. I believe that it is important to develop the necessary civilian and military capabilities, including through pooling and sharing, to deal with the comprehensive security challenges in and around Europe and its periphery. Nevertheless, I very much support the latest progress achieved in the Security and Defence field by the Union and I believe that these achievements open up the perspective for important structural changes in the future.
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2017 and the European Union’s policy on the matter (A8-0373/2018 - Petras Auštrevičius)
I voted in favour, as it is essential to continue to strive to be the leading global actor in the universal promotion and protection of human rights. There is the need for increased coherence between the EU’s internal and external human rights policies, with gender mainstreaming in all its actions. The policies in support of human rights and democracy should be mainstreamed across all other EU policies with an external dimension, such as development, migration, security, counter-terrorism, women's rights and gender equality, enlargement and trade, in particular through the implementation of human rights conditionality.It is also important to increase coherence between the EU’s internal and external policies, as well as among the external policies themselves, as this is a fundamental requirement for a successful and effective EU human rights policy. I consider that a truly independent, pluralistic and dynamic civil society contributes to development and stability, ensures democratic consolidation, including separation of powers, social justice and respect for human rights, and promotes transparency, accountability and good governance, in particular through measures to combat corruption and extremism.
Establishing the European Defence Fund (A8-0412/2018 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
I voted in favour as the aim of the fund is ultimately to be able to be less dependent on external industrial military actors and it contributes to the EU’s strategic autonomy in protecting and defending itself. The lack of cooperation between Member States in the field of security and defence and a fragmented market is estimated to cost between EUR 25 billion and EUR 100 billion per year. Most of the defence procurement is run on a national basis leading to a costly duplication of military capabilities. I welcome this fund, which would contribute to the establishment of a strong, competitive and innovative defence industrial and technological base and which go hand—in—hand with the Union’s initiatives towards a more integrated European Defence Market. I believe that the European Defence Fund is important due to support actions pertaining to both new and the upgrade of existing products and technologies. When applying for the Union funding, legal entities should be required to provide the relevant information to establish the absence of restrictions. In the absence of such information, Union funding should not be possible.
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (A8-0409/2018 - Henna Virkkunen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Pavel Telička)
. ‒ I voted in favour, as the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is a key EU funding instrument to promote growth, jobs and competitiveness through targeted infrastructure investment at European level. It supports the development of high performing, sustainable and efficiently interconnected trans-European networks in the fields of transport, energy and digital services. The digitalisation of European industry and the modernisation of sectors like transport, energy, healthcare and public administration depend on universal access to reliable, affordable, high and very high capacity networks.Digital connectivity has become one of the decisive factors to close economic, social and territorial divides, supporting the modernisation of local economies, and underpinning the diversification of economic activities. I believe that the innovative infrastructure technologies, which help to transition to low emission energy and mobility systems and improve security of supply, seeking greater energy independence for the Union, are essential in view of the Union’s decarbonisation agenda.
EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (A8-0369/2018 - Michael Gahler)
I welcome the Ukraine’s economic stabilisation and the progress achieved in implementing the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), which is very much focused on trade flows and trade irritants. I also welcome the increase in trade volume between the EU and Ukraine and the diversification of Ukrainian exports to the EU. Ukraine has been making progress on the path towards European integration, registering important achievements, but more difficult tasks still need to be addressed. The public support for modernisation and reform is suffering on account of people’s disappointment at deteriorating social conditions, uncertainty about the future, dissatisfaction with the government’s reform policy, the continuing power of the oligarchs and the persistence of endemic corruption in state institutions. Ukraine deserves particular praise for reforms in the areas of energy, health, pensions, education, public administration, decentralisation, public procurement, defence and security, and the banking sector, and for securing macro-economic stabilisation, but significant challenges remain, particularly in areas such as the fight against corruption, privatisation and judicial reform.
Education in the digital era: challenges, opportunities and lessons for EU policy design (A8-0400/2018 - Yana Toom)
The report underlines that the acquisition of digital skills needs an approach more anchored in lifelong learning and closer to the needs of different age groups and the demands of society. The great lack of connectivity in schools across Member States comes at a cost. Therefore, all remaining schools need to connect and to make use of existing EU programmers for this purpose.The report suggests that teachers and trainers should be at the core of the digital transformation and they therefore require adequate preparation and training, but not as an extra task on top of their daily activities.Furthermore, it encourages the Member States to promote and finance regional and local initiatives that support the transformation of teaching practices, to enhance innovation and to take steps in collaboration with businesses, education and training centres and civil society to identify existing skills gaps, expand digital literacy, enhance media literacy and establish a high level of digital connectivity and inclusion.I believe, moreover, that the Digital Education Action Plan is the first step towards a developed EU strategy on digital education, which can provide a more coordinated policy framework and simultaneously be adaptable to changing realities.
Coordination of social security systems (A8-0386/2018 - Guillaume Balas)
The purpose of the report is to bring up to date the Unionʼs rules on the coordination of social security, since the right of EU citizens and their families to move freely and reside in any EU country is one of the four fundamental freedoms in the EU Treaties. This initiative is part of the European Commissionʼs 2016 labour mobility package and it focuses on four areas of coordination: inactive citizensʼ access to social benefits, long-term care benefits, unemployment benefits and family benefits.The proposal distinguishes between an economically inactive citizen and a job-seeker. Among its objectives, it establishes a coherent regime for long-term care benefits and sets out new arrangements for the coordination of unemployment benefits in cross-border cases, including a minimum period of three monthsʼ insurance in the Member State of the most recent activity, and extends to six months the minimum period for export of unemployment benefits.I fully support the objective of improving the opportunities for unemployed persons moving to another Member State to look for work and their prospects for reintegration into the labour market and of addressing skills mismatches across borders. I therefore voted in favour of the report.
Establishing a European Labour Authority (A8-0391/2018 - Jeroen Lenaers)
The report aims to clarify the authorityʼs objective by focusing only on a limited number of tasks so that the Authority can be used efficiently where it can provide the greatest benefit. Therefore, the authority is to assist the Member States and the Commission in matters relating to the application and enforcement of Union law in the area of labour mobility and freedom to provide services in the internal market. It will strengthen access to information, compliance and cooperation between Member States. I am in favour of the report, since it will also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work and in situations in which the proper functioning of the internal market is at risk because of, inter alia, letter-box companies, fraudulent companies or the phenomenon of bogus self-employment.In addition to a high-level representative from each Member State and two representatives of the Commission, the Management Board is to include six representatives of the social partners at Union level, equally representing employersʼ organisations and trade unions, as well as three independent experts appointed by the European Parliament after verifying that there is no conflict of interest.
Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund: Re-commitment of remaining amounts (A8-0370/2018 - Miriam Dalli)
. ‒ I welcome the proposal establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMFI) which allows Member States to re-commit or to transfer amounts within their national programmes, through revisions to these national programmes, in order to promote EU priorities in the areas of migration and asylum, including relocation. The proposal extends to six months the deadline for de-commitment of the remaining amounts so that Member States have sufficient time to review national programmes and make changes related to possible re-commitments or transfers of amounts. In practical terms, Member States shall re-commit 20% of those amounts to actions in national programmes for relocation. Priority is given to the relocation of unaccompanied minors, other vulnerable applicants and family members of beneficiaries of international protection. Member States shall receive, in addition to their allocation, an additional amount based for each applicant for international protection and beneficiary of international protection transferred from another Member State. Moreover, for the rest of this amount, where duly justified, it shall be possible to fund specific actions in line with the AMFI regulation.
Establishing a Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) (A8-0397/2018 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
. ‒ I fully support the LIFE programme, since is the only EU fund dedicated solely to environmental and climate objectives. It is targeted at a niche between EU programmes supporting research and innovation on the one hand and EU programmes financing large-scale deployment on the other hand. Moreover, the programme bridges the gap between the development of new knowledge and its implementation.The new proposal for LIFE 2021-2027 has a general objective to contribute to the shift towards a clean, circular, energy-efficient, low-carbon and climate-resilient economy, including through the transition to clean energy, to the protection and improvement of the quality of the environment and to halting and reversing biodiversity loss, thereby contributing to sustainable development.I voted in favour of the report, which aims to increase the role of merit criteria for the award of the funds, the flexibility of the co-financing rates for better adaptability, as well as measurable targets and performance indicators in particular for actions aimed at the protection of biodiversity. Furthermore, it promotes a greater awareness, better communication and good governance, and introduces elements more detailed inter alia to the award criteria and the multiannual work programmes.
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (A8-0142/2018 - Claude Rolin)
. ‒ I welcome the proposal as the latter aims to improve workers’ health protection by reducing occupational exposure to carcinogenic chemical agents, to provide more clarity and to contribute to a level playing field for economic operators. Cancer is the number one cause of work-related deaths in the EU. According to the Commission’s figures, seven to twelve people die of work-related cancer every hour in the European Union.The provisions of the Directive apply to any chemical agent that meets the criteria for carcinogen, apply to any substance, mixture or process and sets a number of general minimum requirements to eliminate or reduce exposure for all carcinogens and mutagens falling under its scope. In favour of the report concerning occupational limit setting exposure values that needs to be drawn for the inhalation route of exposure for particular carcinogens and mutagens, I voted in favour. In line with the proposal, employers must identify and assess risks to workers associated with exposure to specific carcinogens at the workplace, and must prevent exposure where risks occur. Substitution with none or less-hazardous process or chemical agent is required where this is technically possible.
Transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain (A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer)
I welcome the regulation of the General Food of Law, which aims to improve transparency, reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies used by EFSA in its risk assessment. Many stakeholders and citizens complain that the EFSA’s evaluations of authorisation applications are based on studies, data and information generated (and paid for) by the applicant for authorisation. I voted in favour of the proposal, which sets out which type of information can be considered confidential and the process to be followed for the processing of confidentiality claims. A Union register of commissioned studies on substances subject to a food law authorisation system is being set up, to be managed by EFSA. At the stage of submission of an authorisation application, when all studies are made public, according to the new transparency provisions, a consultation of third—parties will be launched with the aim of identifying whether other relevant scientific data or studies are available. A system of controls and audits by Commission inspectors in relation to studies is set up. There is a new possibility for the Commission to request EFSA to commission verification studies in exceptional circumstances.
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0273/2017 - Anne Sander)
I voted in favour of the Proposal for a Regulation, which aims to align certain provisions of the existing Regulation governing Cedefop with the Common Approach on Decentralised Agencies. Second, it aims to update its objectives and tasks, including technological developments linked to the increasing use of digital technologies. It also concerns new activities such as work on qualifications, in particular the European Qualifications Framework, on skills analysis and forecasting, and the validation of non-formal and informal learning, which should all be acknowledged. As the founding regulation of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational training (Cedefop), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) and the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) were revised at the same time; inter-institutional negotiations were conducted in parallel. Transparency of the selection procedure will improve, as Parliament will also have the right to invite a candidate for the executive director of each agency for an exchange of views. Parliament enforced the role of the Directors and managed to ensure a better balance between men and women among the staff of the agencies.
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0274/2017 - Czesław Hoc)
I share the proposal’s objective to revise the founding regulation of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). The revision will align certain provisions of the existing regulation governing EU-OSHA with the Common Approach on Decentralised Agencies. This revision will provide a clearer description of the role of EU-OSHA and it will update the mandate of EU-OSHA as a centre for the technical, scientific, legal and economic information and qualified expertise of use in the field of safety and health at work.Furthermore, the revision will provide for anti-fraud measures, conflict of interest policy, evaluation and review and the establishment of a headquarters agreement and will also harmonise the provisions on programming and reporting with the requirements set by the revised Framework Financial Regulation.I support the provisions of the report, according to which the Agency shall establish a strategy for relations with third countries and international organisations concerning matters for which the Agency is competent and establish a communications strategy which is coherent with and relevant to the strategies and activities of the Commission and those of the other institutions and agencies.
European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0275/2017 - Enrique Calvet Chambon)
. ‒ The purpose of the report is to replace and repeal the Regulation establishing the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, and to repeal Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75. The reasons for the revision are twofold: it will harmonise certain provisions of the existing regulation governing Eurofound; and it offers the opportunity to update the objectives and tasks of the foundation, which was established in 1975.I am confident that the new objectives and tasks will better reflect developments and Eurofound’s current contribution to the development of social and work-related policies though the provision of relevant and high-quality research output in the field of employment, industrial relations and working and living conditions.The major battles with Council and Commission concerned the number of independent experts to be nominated by Parliament to the Management Board.
Complementing EU type-approval legislation with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (A8-0359/2018 - Marlene Mizzi)
. ‒ The automotive industry is a key sector and the Union needs to ensure preparedness for all possible outcomes related to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU. This regulation will deliver an element of preparedness to deal with any possible adverse effects that the withdrawal of the UK from the Union may have on manufacturers of motor vehicles. I share the opinion that manufacturers should not be punished for having chosen a UK type-approval authority, while provisions for preparedness should fully respect the Union framework for type approval. I welcome the regulation.In order to ensure that the Union recognises type approvals issued previously by a UK authority, it will need to meet the demands of the industry by providing manufacturers with a legal framework within which they can apply to any EU27 type-approval authority. This regulation will ensure legal certainty for manufacturers in this situation, whilst maintaining liability for both type-approval authorities and manufacturers alike, and without otherwise altering or affecting in any way the current general framework of type-approval legislation.
Humanitarian Visas (A8-0423/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
. ‒ The current situation we face is that there is no provision in EU law as to how a refugee should actually arrive, and this has led to almost all arrivals occurring in an irregular manner. The persons fleeing have to engage in life-threatening trips, with the help of smugglers, for which they need to pay enormous fees and during which they are exposed to exploitation, ill-treatment and abuse.Member States are not required, under Union law, to grant a humanitarian visa to persons who wish to enter their territory with a view to applying for asylum, but they remain free to do so on the basis of their national law. The procedures for humanitarian visas should be similar to short-stay visas, with differences where necessary. Such visa applications should be decided on, after an interview, within 15 calendar days of the date of lodging the application and it should also be possible to apply by electronic means. It is recommended that humanitarian visas should be issued by means of a common sticker and should be recorded in the Visa Information System.
Visa Code (A8-0434/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
. ‒ I welcome the proposal of the Commission to reform the EU’s common visa policy and to adapt the rules to the evolving security concerns, challenges linked to migration and new opportunities offered by technological developments. The proposal is based on an impact assessment focusing on the three main issues: insufficient financial resources, repeated visa procedures for regular travellers and insufficient levels of return of irregular migrants to some countries of origin. The proposal extends to six months the deadline for an application and due to their specific working conditions, seafarers may lodge their application nine months before the intended trip. Minimum deadline for lodging an application has been set to allow Member States time for proper assessment of applications and organisation of work. The general provisions on the limited number of supporting documents will not apply to nationals of third countries not cooperating on readmission on the basis of objective and relevant criteria.
Common system of value added tax as regards the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of goods and services above a certain threshold (A8-0418/2018 - Gabriel Mato)
. ‒ The Commission proposes a temporary application of the generalised VAT reverse charge mechanism. In the EU, VAT is generally collected along the supply chain, with the last amount collected when the goods are sold to the final consumer. For a long time now it has been claimed that VAT fraud could be tackled better by only collecting VAT at the final sale – the reverse charge mechanism. The proposal will allow temporary derogation from normal VAT rules to prevent VAT fraud better. Member States will only be able to use the generalised reverse charge mechanism (GRCM) for domestic supplies of goods and services above a threshold of EUR 17 500 per transaction, only until 30 June 2022 and under very strict technical conditions, and 25% of their VAT gap must be due to carousel fraud. Member States applying the GRCM will have to submit an interim report to the Commission no later than one year after they start applying the GRCM, giving a detailed assessment of its effectiveness, and will also have to establish appropriate and effective electronic reporting obligations on all taxable persons, particularly those to which the mechanism would apply.
Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0365/2018 - Sergei Stanishev)
. ‒ Bulgaria and Romania met since 2011 all necessary conditions for the Schengen acquis. The maintenance of controls at the internal borders of Bulgaria and Romania has a negative impact on exports and imports to and from both Member States and on transport operations to and from some of the largest freight and passenger ports in southern Europe, resulting in financial losses and increased expenditure. I share the opinion of the rapporteur regarding the fear that the introduction of a two-step approach could have a negative impact on the future enlargement of the Schengen area. The division suggested by the Council decision to have two legal acts – one for the abolition of controls at air and sea borders and the other for land borders – would legally codify the current double standards in the Schengen area.I would like to reiterate that Bulgaria and Romania have all the obligations and responsibilities of fully-fledged Schengen members, but do not enjoy the benefit of free movement. The reintroduction of border controls could cost the European Union between EUR 50 million and EUR 20 billion in one-off costs and EUR 2 billion in annual operating costs. The Council needs to present as soon as (the text abbreviated according to Rule 183(1)) .
Military mobility (A8-0372/2018 - Tunne Kelam)
. ‒ The report concerns the EU Member States’ military mobility to pursue their security and defence interests, and calls for Member States to develop national plans for military mobility by the end of 2019. The report stresses that the ambitious timetable laid down in the Action Plan should ensure that current mobility gaps are filled as soon as possible. The Action Plan describes a number of tasks that need to be accomplished at Member State level, e.g. achieving harmonised rules for cross-border movement permissions, which are a major obstacle to rapid movements, where the EU can only supplement Member States’ efforts.I welcome the Commission’s proposal on use of the Connecting Europe Facility and the substantial funds envisaged for dual-use military mobility projects to ensure that infrastructure is adjusted to take into account military mobility needs and I think that these dual-use projects will also be of considerable benefit for civilian use. Finally, the report urges both the EU and NATO to intensify their cooperation and coordination and share information more broadly to ensure that synergies are achieved, including better sharing of classified information between the two bodies as soon as possible to enable this.
New European Agenda for Culture (A8-0388/2018 - Giorgos Grammatikakis)
The report aims to ensure the right balance between social, economic, external and digital aspects of cultural policies with the cultural dimension as a cross-cutting priority, and guarantees consistency between the new Agenda and other programmes such as Creative Europe and Europe for Citizens. There is a need for doubling the budget for the Creative Europe programme, developing synergies and interactions with other EU funded programmes in order to create a holistic approach to culture and ensuring that funding allocated to cultural and creative sectors across all funding programmes amounts to at least 1% of the next MFF.There is also a need for the European music sector, which is seriously underfinanced. I welcome the idea of introducing a European year of cultural personality to celebrate the achievements of Europeans who have contributed to the flourishing of culture across the continent. In order to create links and enhance intercultural dialogue and peaceful relations we need immediate implementation of the Strategy for External Cultural Relations. I voted in favour of the report since I consider culture as an essential part of the political dialogue with third countries and systematically integrating culture into external action projects and programmes.
Application of the Euro 5 step to the type-approval of two- or three- wheel vehicles and quadricycles (A8-0346/2018 - Daniel Dalton)
. ‒ I voted in favour since I support applying the newest Euro standards to vehicles as ambitiously as possible. I support the well functioning of the internal market for type-approval of all types of vehicles. While the particularities of the market concerning certain vehicles produced in limited numbers, such as enduro and trial motorcycles, should be acknowledged, all other vehicles should have Euro standards.
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel treatment or punishment (A8-0387/2018 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
. ‒ I voted in favour as I support and promote respect for human rights. It is necessary to impose controls on exports of certain goods that could be used not only for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, but also for legitimate purposes. These controls should apply to goods that are primarily used for law enforcement purposes and unless such controls prove disproportionate, to any other equipment or product that could be abused for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund: Re-commitment of remaining amounts (A8-0370/2018 - Miriam Dalli)
. ‒ I am in favour as it is very important for the Member States to continue showing solidarity when implementing transfer decisions in practice. I share the opinion that this proposal provides Member States with the possibility to use the funding for other actions defined in the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Regulation, in addition to relocation and resettlement, which will need to be revised.
Accession of Samoa to the EU-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement (A8-0376/2018 - David Martin)
. ‒ I welcome this development-oriented trade agreement, which facilitates Samoa’s exports into the EU and offers asymmetric market access to Samoa, allowing it to shield sensitive sectors from liberalisation, while providing a large number of safeguards and a clause for infant industry protection. I expect the parties to the agreement, through a decision of the EPA Trade Committee, to enter into negotiations as soon as possible and to include a fully-fledged trade and sustainable development chapter that foresees a proper civil society monitoring mechanism. Due to this agreement, Samoa will maintain the current duty-free and quota-free access to the EU on all products; although such exports may appear quite limited in value, they are very significant for the Samoan economy.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/003 EL/Attica publishing (A8-0377/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
. ‒ I voted in favour as funding will contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services with the aim of providing assistance for integrating the affected persons into the labour market. The steady decline is the consequence of the economic and financial crisis, which still affects the Greek economy (reduced household income, high unemployment). The European Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns or of the global financial and economic crisis, and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.
Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders (A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon)
. ‒ I support the report regarding the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for reasons apparently related to migration, terrorism or ‘exceptional’ cases with regard to the maximum duration of internal border control. I believe that the latter does not seek to encourage internal border controls by lengthening the period for which those are permitted, but to have a common response to situations that may seriously affect EU public policy or its internal security.
Common rules for the operation of air services (A8-0150/2018 - Claudia Țapardel)
. ‒ The European Union needs to facilitate growth, but also to uphold the highest standards in terms of social and working conditions and passenger rights. It is important to strike the right balance and to give the EU enough flexibility when negotiating international agreements and, at the same time, to uphold our essential EU rights and principles, in all cases. It could lead to opening the EU market to unrestricted wet-leasing of aircraft registered in third countries. In the long term, time limitations and seasonality might be dropped with wet-leasing becoming a permanent feature of the airlines’ business models.
The Cum Ex Scandal: financial crime and the loopholes in the current legal framework (B8-0518/2018, B8-0519/2018, B8-0520/2018, B8-0521/2018, B8-0525/2018, RC-B8-0551/2018, B8-0551/2018, B8-0552/2018)
. ‒ I welcome the call upon the European Supervisory Authorities to investigate breaches of EU law. It is important to urge all Member States to conduct investigations of all financial institutions involved, and intermediaries, and for those responsible to be brought to justice – it is time to end impunity of corporate crimes. Member States must also look into their national taxation systems to address any remaining loopholes. New measures are needed to prevent abuse of divided arbitrage, and to broaden the scope of information to be exchanged between tax administrations.
Role of the German Youth Welfare Office (Jugendamt) in cross-border family disputes (B8-0546/2018)
I consider that the principle of subsidiarity should be applied in all matters of substantive family law issues. This subject is very sensitive. The Member States should collect statistical data on the administrative and judicial proceedings concerning child custody and involving foreign parents, particularly on the outcome of the judgments, in order to develop a detailed analysis of existing trends over time and to provide benchmarks. It is very important to have a close cooperation and an efficient communication between the different national and local authorities involved in childcare proceedings, from the social services to the jurisdictional and central authorities.
WTO: the way forward (A8-0379/2018 - Bernd Lange, Paul Rübig)
. ‒ I voted in favour as WTO needs modernisation to address the challenges faced by the global trading system and to ensure that it remains vital, relevant and effective. This means revisiting both the rules and the processes of the WTO, to ensure that it addresses the challenges of 21st century trade realities. The system has to be flexible enough to accommodate different sets of ambition among its membership, rules have to be enforced effectively and efficiently and there should be checks and balances to ensure its Members pursue the objectives of market openness and non-discrimination.However, transparency is a key element in ensuring a stable and predictable trading and investment environment, but also to enforcing the rules. However, there is often poor compliance with notification requirements, while the monitoring work of the WTO regular committees is suboptimal.
2018 Report on Serbia (A8-0331/2018 - David McAllister)
I welcome the report on Serbia, as it puts emphasize on the continued commitment of Serbia’s path towards EU integration. Moreover, the latter draws also attention to problems, such as media freedom, deteriorating conditions for freedom of expression, lack of transparency in the funding of political parties and election campaigns.I support the calls on the authorities to fully address and implement the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR observation mission. I consider important for Serbia to make further efforts to improve the situation of the Roma and to ensure consistent implementation across the country of legislation on protection of minorities.Serbia has contributed to strengthening regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations, as well as peace and stability, and has remained committed to creating a functioning market economy and has continued to build a track record in implementing the obligations of the SAA.
2018 Report on Kosovo (A8-0332/2018 - Igor Šoltes)
It is important to urge Kosovo’s authorities to deal with previously identified electoral shortcomings, including a lack of transparency and accountability of funding for political parties and campaigns and allegations of widespread voter intimidation, particularly within many Kosovo Serb communities. Nevertheless, corruption and organised crime, including drug and human trafficking, and cybercrime, remain issues of concern that require concerted efforts. It is needed for the normalisation of relations between Kosovo and Serbia.
2018 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0341/2018 - Ivo Vajgl)
I welcome the report, which includes recent developments in the country and endorses the Commission’s recommendation and ensuing Council decision setting June 2019 as a date for opening accession negotiations in recognition of the encouraging reform efforts, and considers that the opening of negotiations would provide further incentives for democratisation and enhance scrutiny and accountability.Hungary needs to respect the independence of the Macedonian justice system and the rule of law in the country, re-evaluate the political asylum granted to Nikola Gruevski and proceed with his extradition to Skopje.
2018 Report on Albania (A8-0334/2018 - Knut Fleckenstein)
. ‒ I welcome the report as it recognises the progress achieved by Albania over the past year. In examining the state of EU-Albanian relations, I consider it essential to emphasise Albania’s solid commitment to the EU integration process and I thus support the opening of accession negotiations in 2019. The opening of negotiations gives a tangible incentive for further developments and a positive prospect for the Western Balkans region as a whole.I share the opinion that Albania needs to keep up the reform momentum and intensify its efforts to consolidate the reforms achieved and continue preparing for EU membership obligations across all chapters. Therefore, there is a particular need to strengthen further the administrative capacity of the institutions and bodies responsible for the implementation of accession-related reforms, for the transposition of EU legislation into national law and for preparing for the EU accession negotiations.
2018 Report on Montenegro (A8-0339/2018 - Charles Tannock)
I supports the European integration of Montenegro and the whole Western Balkans region. Montenegro is a frontrunner in the EU accession process, but still a lot needs to be done in the area of rule of law, media freedom and the fight against corruption, domestic handling of war crimes cases, integrity of the electoral process, the fight against corruption, organised crime and the informal economy. The implementation and application of reforms remain a key indicator of successful integration. Is very important for Montenegro to improve the planning, coordination and monitoring of the implementation of new legislation (ex: on public and political participation of women and minorities) and policies.
Defence of academic freedom in the EU's external action (A8-0403/2018 - Wajid Khan)
I voted in favour as the academic freedom contributes to creating the space in which any open and stable society is free to think, question and share ideas. This is why is needed to raise awareness of the importance of academic freedom and to create opportunities to improve the capacity for its advocacy and defence. It is very important to create new initiatives within existing programmes, such as Erasmus+ and new EU-funded programmes to support the placement of at-risk academics and students with international protection status at European higher education and research institutions.
The situation of women with disabilities (B8-0547/2018)
It is very important to develop positive actions targeting women with disabilities, aiming at promoting training, job placements, access to employment, job retention, equal career paths, adoption in the work place and work-life-balance. Women with disabilities must have full rights over their lives and bodies and be free from multiple discrimination. It is essential to include full bodily autonomy rights, such as legal gender recognition, and also public investment for high-quality education for children and adults with disabilities as part of mainstream education.
Transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union (A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon)
The proposed directive aims to replace the 1991 Written Statement Directive with a new instrument that ensures transparency about working conditions for all workers and defines new substantive rights to improve the predictability and security of working conditions, particularly for those in precarious employment. I am in favour of the purpose of the new directive to improve working conditions by promoting more secure and predictable employment while ensuring labour market adaptability. Since 2014, more than five million jobs have been created, of which almost 20% are in new forms of employment. The adaptability of new forms of employment to changes in the economic context has enabled new business models to develop.This initiative is one of the Commission’s key actions to follow up on the European Pillar of Social Rights, and it is expected that the combination of measures will show a substantial improvement of working and living conditions.In favour of the report, I welcome the plan, which extends towards forms of employment that are today often excluded, such as domestic work, casual workers (for instance those carrying out on-demand or intermittent work), short-term employees, domestic workers, platform workers or voucher-based workers.
Rail passengers' rights and obligations (A8-0340/2018 - Bogusław Liberadzki)
I welcome the regulation, as the latter aims at ensuring a high level of effective protection of passengers and encourage rail travel. Users’ rights to rail services include the receipt of information regarding those services and related matters both before and during and after the journey.Railway undertakings and ticket vendors shall provide this information, as soon as possible, in advance or at least at the start of the journey. That information shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities or persons with reduced mobility and shall be available publicly.Railway undertakings shall provide this information to ticket vendors and other railway undertakings selling their services.Furthermore, I support the increase in compensation, which means that a traveller who is delayed between the place of departure and the destination indicated on the ticket would be entitled to request compensation of: 50% of the ticket price for a delay of between 45 and 89 minutes; 75% of the ticket price for a delay of between 90 and 119 minutes; and 100% of the ticket price for a delay of 120 minutes or more.
Persistent organic pollutants (A8-0336/2018 - Julie Girling)
I welcome the Commission legislative proposal for a regulation on persistent organic pollutants (‘POPs’), which implements Union commitments under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. The term Persistent Organic Pollutants refers to a group of toxic chemical substances of global concern due to their potential for long-range transport, persistence in the environment, ability to bio-magnify and bio-accumulate in ecosystems, as well as their significant negative effects on human health and the environment. The proposal envisages to attribute some new tasks to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), providing the Commission with administrative, technical and scientific support in the context of the implementation of the Regulation. The Regulation aligns the original proposal foreseeing delegation for an unlimited period of time to the consolidated position of the Parliament, which provides for five years renewable under the control of Parliament and Council. DecaBDE is mainly used as a flame-retardant in plastics, electronics and textiles. I voted in favour since this could impact the plastics recycling from end-of-life vehicles and electrical and electronic equipment.
Care services in the EU for improved gender equality (A8-0352/2018 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
This report underlines the role of women at the care services within the context of the work-life balance proposal and emphasizes the importance of the availability of diverse, quality, accessible and affordable care infrastructure, and support for childcare and care for other dependants either at home or in home-like situations.Furthermore, the report analyses the types and the quality of services regardless of the differences between the users to which they cater (early childhood care and education, care services for the elderly to care for persons with disabilities, persons chronically ill, etc.), care services should be developed in a comprehensive fashion.In addition, I underline the need of investment of the public sector in care services as well as an awareness of the difficult situation of women working in this sector, having in mind the different familiar composition, which leads to needing care.I welcome this report since we need effective investments in public sector in care services as well as rising the awareness of the difficult situation of women working in this sector.
Interim report on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 – Parliament's position with a view to an agreement (A8-0358/2018 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas, Janusz Lewandowski, Gérard Deprez)
. ‒ The EU needs new own resources based on common European values and policies. Additional financial resources are need to tackle current challenges. I agree with a text that dedicates financial resources, even though limited, to the main EU challenges, including migration, climate change and unemployment.However, I unconditionally reject clauses included in the report that refer to the implementation of a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) on which to ground a new own resource, and/or the call for the extension of potential new own resources through the setting up of a financial transaction tax (FTT).Equally, I remain unreservedly opposed to the articles that declare or imply that the unanimity requirement for the adoption of the MFF Regulation represents an unacceptable impediment to the budgetary process. On the contrary, I believe that the unanimity principle remains essential in safeguarding the interests of all Member States. In such a delicate process as drafting a long-term budget, unanimity remains an essential tool to anchor the mutual all-round acceptance of a final MFF agreement.My vote in favour of the resolution should therefore be seen as conditioned by the three reservations listed.
State aid rules: new categories of State aid (A8-0315/2018 - Sander Loones)
Although the differences in the legal status of EU funds paid directly to final beneficiaries (which do not qualify as state aid) and EU funds indirectly paid through national authorities (i.e. from the state budget) are often well defined. The national or regional authorities do not take account of the fact that EU funds are not automatically excluded from the application of the state aid rules nor automatically qualify as state aid.Confusion is largely due to the fact that EU funds are caught by Article 107 (1) TFEU only if a public authority can exercise control over them. I voted in favour of this report because I believe that the Commission’s proposal to include two new categories in the enabling regulation (national funds combined with centrally managed EU funds and projects supported through the EU’s territorial cooperation programs), thereby modifying the GBER, will brings an administrative simplification.
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0335/2018 - Sabine Lösing)
According to the latest figures, arms exports from the EU-28 amounted to over 27% of the global total in 2013-2017, which would make the EU collectively the second largest arms supplier in the world after the US (34%), with Russia following at 22%.With the setting up in 1998 of an EU Code of Conduct for Arms Exports, replaced in 2008 by the EU Common Position on Arms Exports, Member States have committed themselves to achieving high common standards and convergence in their arms exports controls.Let’s not forget that the insufficiently controlled exports of cyber surveillance technologies by EU companies can have on the security of the EU’s digital infrastructure and on respect for human rights.I am in favour of improving the implementation of the Common Position and particularly its consistency and my vote express the need of improvement of the export licensing risk assessment methodology, for more information-sharing and pooling of resources between Member States.
Empowering competition authorities and ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market (A8-0057/2018 - Andreas Schwab)
The Commission proposal aims at strengthening national competition authorities (NCAs), granting them effective investigation, decision-making and sanctioning tools keeping in mind that some NCAs have not sufficient independence from political interference, as well as all the tools they needed to detect and tackle competition law infringements and only some NCAs were able to impose effective fines.In order to ensure that NCAs devote sufficient resources to the requests for mutual assistance and in order to incentivise such assistance, the requested authorities should be able to recover the related costs.I voted in favour of the report in order to have strong and effective enforcement of EU anti-trust rules, to ensure the protection of consumers and fair competition between companies in the internal market. This legislation also brings forward a stronger framework for the independence of national competition authorities, so that they can carry out their work without undue influence.
Humanitarian visas (A8-0328/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
The current paradoxical situation that we face is that there is no provision in EU law as to how a refugee should actually arrive, leading to a situation in which almost all arrivals take place in an irregular manner. Member States are not required, under Union law, to grant a humanitarian visa to persons who wish to enter their territory with a view to applying for asylum, but they remain free to do so on the basis of their national law.The persons fleeing need to engage in life-threatening trips with the help of smugglers, for which they need to pay enormous fees and where they are exposed to exploitation, ill treatment and abuse. At the same time, Member States are confronted with ever-stronger organised crime, which benefits from financial gain made by human smuggling.An estimated 90% of those granted international protection have reached the Union through irregular means. There are high costs, in human but also in social, economic and budgetary terms, associated with the status quo for the third-country nationals concerned
EU development assistance in the field of education (A8-0327/2018 - Vincent Peillon)
Education aid accounted for 8.3% of total development aid in 2009, whereas its share had fallen to 6.2% by 2015. For the Member States, the figure fell from 11% to 7.6% over the same period. Aid allocated to basic education by the Union and its Member States decreased by 33.9% between 2009 and 2015, more than education aid in general (15.2%).I welcome the report, which aims to place education at the centre of EU development policies, since it is essential for the achievement of the SDGs, for economic development and reducing inequalities, for gender equality and for the social inclusion of persons with disabilities.The report also calls on the EU and Member States to devote 10% of their official development assistance to education by 2024, and 15% by 2030. I believe that the creation of innovative funding instruments leverages, and aligns with, existing funding mechanisms and initiatives for providing services for all and to develop fair, accessible and non-discriminatory national education institutions.
Energy efficiency (A8-0391/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
. ‒ This Directive reinforces the minimum right of consumers to have accurate, reliable and clear information on their energy consumption in a timely manner, which I am in favour of.The energy savings obligation has an important role in the creation of local growth and jobs, and they ensure that the Union can achieve its energy and climate objectives by creating further opportunities and to break the link between energy consumption and growth.I support the Directive 2012/27/EU, which establishes a common framework of measures for the promotion of energy efficiency in the Union, in order to ensure that the Union’s main objectives of improving energy efficiency by 20% by 2020 and by at least 32.5% by 2030 will be achieved.At Member State level, there would be no binding targets set by 2020 and 2030, and they would remain free to set their national contributions on the basis of primary or final energy consumption, or primary or final energy savings, or energy intensity.
Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Jakop Dalunde)
. ‒ This report is a part of the Clean Energy Package with the aim to ensure the fulfilment of the EU 2030 energy and climate targets. It contributes to a greater regulatory certainty in the absence of national binding targets on renewable energy and the energy efficiency.I support this proposal that aims to integrate and simplify planning, reporting and monitoring obligations of Member states through National Energy and Climate action plans with a specific emphasis on the EU targets on renewable energy, energy efficiency and greenhouse gases reductions. It also introduces long-term low-emission strategies as a means to assess progress in meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.There is also an obligation for Member States with significant energy poverty to set policies and measures to address it and later to report on progress achieved and prepare strategies every 10 years starting in 2020 (and updating every 5 years) with at least a 30-year perspective.
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López)
EU has long been a worldwide leader in the development of renewable energy. The 2030 framework for climate and energy sets out an EU target of at least 27% for the share of renewable energy consumed in the EU in 2030. I believe that if no new policies are put in place, EU energy system projections indicate that current Member States and EU policies would only lead to approximately, 24.3% of renewable energy consumption in 2030.This level would be well below the minimum 27% EU—level binding renewable energy target and it would prevent the Union from collectively delivering on the commitments made in the 2015 Paris Agreement. Accordingly, the Commission indicates that reaching the EU—level target of at least 27% calls for a change in policies in the form of a Union—level framework leading to EU—, national— and regional—level measures.
Multiannual plan for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0337/2018 - Ruža Tomašić)
The multiannual plan for the small pelagic stocks of the Adriatic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Multiannual Plan for the Adriatic Sea’) is being established in accordance with the basic Regulation. Multiannual plans shall be adopted on a priority basis on the basis of scientific, technical and economic advice and shall contain conservation measures to restore and maintain fish stocks above levels that can ensure maximum sustainable yield. The Basic Regulation also provides that, before including measures in multi-annual plans, account must be taken of their economic and social impact. The Multiannual Plan for the Adriatic Sea is likely to have a major impact on fisheries management across the Mediterranean.I voted in favour of this report, considering that the ultimate goal is to achieve maximum sustainable production by 2020. In addition, the plan should provide measures to eliminate discards, to count fish below the minimum conservation reference size and to minimise, and where possible eliminate, the negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine environment.
Minimum standards for minorities in the EU (A8-0353/2018 - József Nagy)
. ‒ Approximately 8% of EU citizens belong to a national minority and approximately 10% speak a regional or minority language. I believe we need more effective tools in order to monitor and enforce respect for minority rights, as well as a wider protection system targeting minorities in the European Union, which needs to be accompanied by a robust monitoring mechanism. In order to protect the rights of minorities and to respect existing rights in the Member States, and to avoid double standards, we need a legislative proposal on minimum standards for the protection of minorities in the European Union.It is a statutory requirement that Member States have a legal system which guarantees non-discrimination for persons belonging to minorities. It is also necessary to adopt and apply targeted protection measures. Member States must take effective measures to ensure that minorities have access to healthcare regardless of nationality. We need measures to enable Member States to exchange good practices and apply solutions to tackle the problems facing minorities across the European Union, which is why I voted for this report.
Digitalisation for development: reducing poverty through technology (A8-0338/2018 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta)
. ‒ This is an own-initiative report and addresses the potential of digitalisation for advancing development and humanitarian assistance, tackling poverty through increased use of new technologies. I am in favour of the report since digitisation plays an important role in facilitating development in several areas, such as governance, education, health, gender equality, economic growth and agriculture.The EU has the mission to promote and facilitate better coordination of development policies at all levels. Member States must provide technology education for their citizens and give the digital divide a central role. At the same time, the principle of policy coherence for development must be fully respected. The involvement of all actors is the key to putting this into practice. With such an inclusive approach, we can ensure that the digitisation process does not exclude anyone.Funding sources will have to be found because public funding will not be enough for a real digitisation reform process. Given its specialised skills and technological and innovative know-how, the private sector can also play an essential role. In a fast moving era towards digitisation, we need to make sure that European citizens are prepared and will benefit from technology.
Import of cultural goods (A8-0308/2018 - Alessia Maria Mosca, Daniel Dalton)
In favour of the report, I believe that it is a very good example of a due diligence system. In the case of the import of cultural goods at risk of illicit trafficking, I welcome the inclusion of a full list of mandatory due diligence requirements that were lacking in the Commission’s proposal. The regulation needs to be in line with the legislation on the export of cultural goods to ensure a predictable environment and a level playing field among art operators who either export or import cultural goods into the EU customs code.We need to continue our work on fighting tax avoidance and tax evasion: we cannot afford to lose billions of euros due to the lack of proper implementation by Members States of the Union Customs Code. Therefore, I support the establishment of a more thorough procedure for the import of cultural goods by means of import and export certificates, which would shift the responsibility to prove licit ownership onto businesses with the least possible burden.
Protection of the EU’s financial interests - Recovery of money and assets from third-countries in fraud cases (A8-0298/2018 - Cătălin Sorin Ivan)
In favour of the report, I welcome the latter’s aim at initiating a reflection on means to better recover fraudulent assets perceived in the EU, which have been transferred to third countries.Most Member States have to rely on bilateral agreements to recover assets while there is no EU approach to this serious issue. As only a few EU on mutual legal assistance exist, I also share the opinion that we should conclude more of such agreements and that we should generalise the introduction of anti-fraud clauses to agreements signed by the EU.Moreover, I support the establishment of a standardised data collection method, which would be identical for all Member States, to enable detection of the transfer of fraudulent assets to third countries, with the aim of creating a central EU database as soon as possible, and as well advance with the application for membership of the Council of Europe Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) as rapidly as possible.
Unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain (A8-0309/2018 - Paolo De Castro)
I support the start of the interinstitutional negotiations with regard to the ‘Unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain’, as it aims at reducing the occurrence of UTPs (unfair trading practices) in the food supply chain by introducing a minimum common standard of protection across the EU that consists of a short list of specific prohibited UTPs. According to a 2013 survey of agricultural producers and agricultural cooperatives based on a wide definition of UTPs, the estimated damage from UTPs amounted to over EUR 10 billion per year. In an agricultural policy environment that has become distinctly more market oriented, the good governance of the food supply chain has become more important for operators, in particular for agricultural producers.Therefore, I support the harmonisation of UTP rules in the EU food supply chain while introducing a common minimum protection standard in the EU to help achieve the objective of reducing the occurrence of UTPs.
Authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use (A8-0035/2016 - Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu)
In favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency, I share the opinion that the final agreement foresees a number of improvements to the Commission’s proposal, concerning in particular the Agency’s revenue and sources of income.Moreover, I also support the call for matters relating to the structure and level of fees to be decided through the co-decision procedure, rather than through implementing acts.Finally, I believe that the present interinstitutional agreement facilitates the circulation of veterinary medicines throughout the European Union through better authorisation procedures and up-to-date retail regulations.
Veterinary medicinal products (A8-0046/2016 - Françoise Grossetête)
I welcome the regulation, as the latter aims at ensuring a high level of protection of both animal and human health while securing the protection of the environment. Member States may impose stricter conditions, justified on grounds of public health, animal health and environmental protection, for the use and retail of veterinary medicinal products on their territory, provided that these conditions are proportionate to the risk and do not unduly restrict the functioning of the internal marketFurthermore, I share the opinion that the Union should be active in advocating the creation of an international strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance, in line with the recent Global Action Plan adopted by the WHO.In parallel, I support the call on the Commission to adopt guidelines supporting the Member States in the development of a harmonised system of digital prescription across the Union, including measures for controlling cross-border veterinary prescriptions.The European Parliament adopted amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on veterinary medicinal products. The matter has been referred back to the committee while the vote on the legislative resolution has been postponed to a subsequent sitting.
Manufacture, placing on the market and use of medicated feed (A8-0075/2016 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)
In favour of the report, I welcome the legislation applicable to medicated animal feed, which is an important update and goes hand in hand with the Veterinary Medicinal Products legislation and the earlier Animal Health Law of 2016. I share the opinion that the three pieces of legislation ensure an up-to-date regime, take major steps in helping the EU address the issue of anti-microbial resistance, and have a sound and coherent approach for future animal production and welfare.
Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy)
In voted in favour of the report. I believe that the latter reinforces the Commission’s proposal. The Eurovignette has not been so far an incentive to reduce CO2 emissions from the road transport sector and to achieve the Transport White Paper’s objective to move towards the full application of ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles. From that perspective, the Commission’s proposal to review the Directive is a turning point for the EU road charging legislative framework. The Commission’s proposal contains many ambitious measures in line with the EU Transport White Paper’s objective. Full application of the ‘user/polluter pays’ principle in transport sector should be guaranteed.
Promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles (A8-0321/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb)
As part of the second Mobility package released last November, the Commission proposed a revision of the so-called Clean Vehicles Directive (Directive 2009/33/EU on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles). The principal aim of the Clean Vehicles Directive is to influence the market in, and incentivise the production of, clean and zero-emission vehicles by using the public authorities’ procurement power to stimulate demand while also contributing to the decarbonisation of EU road transport and help member states meet their local air pollution targets.I believe that this proposal will help deliver clean air for our cities by putting cleaner and zero-emission buses on our streets. However, public authorities should be at the forefront of the transition to zero-emission mobility, setting an example to the rest of the economy. Also, the European Commission and governments should ensure local and regional authorities get enough funding to accelerate this transition and build the necessary infrastructure.
Multiannual plan for fish stocks in the Western Waters and adjacent waters, and for fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0310/2018 - Alain Cadec)
This is the fifth proposal for a multiannual management plan under the reformed CFP, after the Baltic Sea, North Sea, Adriatic Sea and Western Mediterranean. Under the CFP, multiannual plans aim to ensure that stocks are exploited sustainably. They also contain measures to implement the landing obligation, technical measures, as well as safeguards for remedial action where needed. The Western Waters plan covers fisheries for demersal species from the north and west of Scotland over the Gulf of Cadiz down to Madeira in the South (North East Atlantic). Around 4 000 demersal vessels and 13 000 EU fishers are active in the area (2015 data).In favour of the report, I welcome the plan, which aims at restoring and maintaining demersal stocks in the Western Waters at sustainable levels, based on the most up-to-date scientific advice, while ensuring social and economic viability for the fishers operating in the region. The measures required to achieve those objectives must be in line with the CFP Regulation, thus contributing to meeting the challenges of managing fisheries at FMSY by 2020 and the full implementation of the landing obligation by 2019.
Location of the seat of the European Banking Authority (A8-0153/2018 - Othmar Karas, Pervenche Berès)
In the context of the United Kingdom’s notification on 29 March 2017 of its intention to withdraw from the Union pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the other 27 Member States, meeting on 20 November 2017 in the margins of the Council, selected Paris, France, as the new seat of the European Supervisory Authority. Having regard to Article 50(3) TEU, the Authority should take its new seat as of 30 March 2019. Therefore, the new premises should be ready and fit for the purpose of permanent relocation by 30 March 2019 and the headquarters agreement should reflect the responsibility of the French authorities to provide the most appropriate conditions in order to ensure the proper functioning of the Authority in the context of its relocation.Finally, I support the call for the Parliament to be systematically and on equal terms with the Commission and Council involved in defining and weighting the criteria for the location of all Union bodies and agencies and the call on the Commission and Council to launch a revision of the Joint Statement of 19 July 2012 on decentralised agencies with the aim of ensuring a strong involvement of Parliament whilst respecting in particular its co-decision power.
Relocation of the European Medicines Agency (A8-0063/2018 - Giovanni La Via)
In the context of the United Kingdom’s notification on 29 March 2017 of its intention to withdraw from the Union, pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’), the other 27 Member States, meeting on 20 November 2017 in the margins of the General Affairs Council in Article 50(4) format, selected Amsterdam, the Netherlands, as the new seat of the European Medicines Agency. Having regard to Article 50(3) TEU, the Agency should take its new seat as of 30 March 2019. To ensure the proper functioning of the Agency in its new seat, a headquarters agreement should be concluded between the Agency and the Netherlands before the Agency takes up its new seat.Finally, I support the call on the Commission to monitor the overall relocation process of the Agency to its new seat and assist the process within the limits of its competences.
Rise of neo-fascist violence in Europe (RC-B8-0481/2018, B8-0481/2018, B8-0482/2018, B8-0483/2018, B8-0486/2018, B8-0488/2018)
I welcome the adoption of the motion of resolution. Neo-fascist and neo-Nazi groups operate in impunity in several EU Member States and this is one of the main reasons why their violent actions are increasingly a security threat that is unfortunately often under-reported by the media. The EU and its Member States do have a legal instrument to act, notably the Council Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law, including the possibility for the Commission to launch infringement procedures against those Member States that have not complied with the provisions of the Council Framework Decision.Awareness of history is one of the preconditions for avoiding similar crimes in the future; downplaying Nazi crimes is a first step towards reawakening ideas from that era. If Europe is to become more integrated, this will necessitate not only a stronger European public sphere but also a common culture of remembrance.
Animal welfare, antimicrobial use and the environmental impact of industrial broiler farming (B8-0484/2018, B8-0484/2018, B8-0485/2018, B8-0487/2018, B8-0489/2018)
As imports of chicken meat from countries with lower environmental, social, food safety and animal welfare standards have increased, we need to ensure that imported chicken meat, meat products and preparations have been produced in line with the environmental, social, food safety and animal welfare standards of the Union. Therefore, I share the opinion that we need to encourage the uptake of alternative rearing systems for broiler chickens, with particular reference to those using traditional and/or broiler breeds that allow for higher welfare. Member States should better implement and enforce existing broiler chicken welfare rules.Finally, it is important to ensure transparency for consumers, by for example introducing, within an appropriate time-frame, mandatory labelling of chicken meat, meat products and preparations according to method of production (similar to the egg labelling system), country of origin, animal welfare, health effects and ecological footprint.
2018 UN Climate Change Conference in Katowice, Poland (COP24) (B8-0477/2018)
I share the opinion that, especially ahead of the upcoming EU 2050 zero-emissions strategy, we need to update our 2030 climate target, considering also the latest scientific findings and the need to provide for a comprehensive position regarding the main issues at hand at COP 24, as well as the EU’s overall climate ambition. The only way to address climate change is for every Member State and, of course, every sector to play their part. The EU should take a united and ambitious stance at COP24 in Katowice.
14th meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP14) (B8-0478/2018)
The 14th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 14) is due to take place in Sharm-el-Sheikh, Egypt, from 17 to 29 November 2018. Two major items for COP14 are the mainstreaming of biodiversity in mining, energy, infrastructure, industry and health, and the process preparing the follow-up to the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity. I support the call for more ambition in global efforts to preserve and protect biodiversity. Indeed, it is of utmost importance to step up the efforts on the implementation of the current Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and to increase ambition and functioning for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. In addition, we have to emphasize the importance of ensuring sufficient financing for biodiversity, of moving towards more sustainable agricultural and forestry practices, of innovation, research and development in order to achieve the objectives of the 2050 Vision, and of capacity-building, increasing public awareness and involving all actors.
Employment and social policies in the euro area (A8-0329/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)
I voted in favour of the report. The latter represents an own-initiative report drawn by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs on eurozone Member States’ employment and social policies. It brings forward recommendations on employment policies and on improving the balance between the economic and social dimensions of the Semester. Recommendations focus on reducing inequalities, promoting decent jobs and quality employment, encouraging sustainable growth and social investment. I strongly support the call on the eurozone Member States to incorporate the recommendations put forward by the European Parliament, and on the Commission to step up its efforts on implementing the social pillar and ensuring better coherence between social and economic recommendations in the Semester. Indeed, we need urgent and more decisive action and policy coordination to reduce inequalities, to promote equal opportunities and to ensure fair working conditions. More action from the eurozone Member States is also needed to ensure (access to) social protection and social inclusion. Steps must be taken to tackle unemployment and to fight poverty, especially in-work and child-poverty.
The use of Facebook users’ data by Cambridge Analytica and the impact on data protection (B8-0480/2018)
I share the opinion that the data breach in question shed light on the need to do more in order to restore trust and confidence in our democratic systems. Indeed, the abuse of algorithms, fake accounts and fake news for the manipulation of elections poses a serious threat to democracy and immediate action is needed from the companies that have built their business model on such algorithms. I welcome the resolution put forward, and I consider that the latter rightly puts the spotlight on the need of further action, such as competition rules to be upgraded with the view to reflect the digital reality, an audit to be carried out into the activities of the advertising industry on social media, as well as a thorough investigation into Facebook and its current practices so that the new consistency mechanism of the GDPR can be relied upon to establish an appropriate and efficient European enforcement response.
Promoting automatic mutual recognition of diplomas (B8-0492/2018)
Mutual recognition of diplomas and the outcomes of learning periods abroad allows Member States to intensify and accelerate their cooperation in education and training, while illustrating the concrete benefit of EU cooperation to citizens. Consequently, the motion of resolution asks for the improvement of recognition procedures for higher education and upper secondary education diplomas as well as for the outcomes of learning periods abroad. It calls on Member States to make a political commitment and put in place those mechanisms in line with the European Education Area. In parallel, the European Commission is invited to foster mutual learning and exchange of good practice such as the regular issuing of ‘statements of comparability’ of upper secondary school diplomas and the consistent use of the ECTS grading table. Furthermore, it puts the focus on new technologies in order to increase efficiency, reduce costs, improve transparency and build trust to that end.
Deployment of infrastructure for alternative fuels in the EU: time to act! (A8-0297/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
Transport is the only major economic sector in the EU where greenhouse gas emissions have increased since 1990. It is responsible for 23% of CO2 emissions, and this share is still growing. Road transport represents almost 75% of all energy used in transport and causes almost 73% of transport’s GHG emissions. In order to keep the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C while pursuing the 1.5°C target as signed up to in the Paris Agreement, road transport needs to be fully decarbonised with zero net emissions by 2050 at the latest. I voted in favour of the report as the latter puts forward concrete actions to be taken in order to decarbonise the transport sector by 2050, while underlining the opportunities for the industry, technology and employment presented by the deployment of alternative fuels and corresponding infrastructure.
Harnessing globalisation: trade aspects (A8-0319/2018 - Joachim Schuster)
The report represents an own initiative report based on the Commission’s reflection paper on Harnessing Globalisation (2017). While welcoming the Commission reflection paper on the issue and its focus on easing access to the positive effects of globalisation, it is of paramount importance to stress the need to counter the negative effects and to recognize the growing responsibility of the EU to contribute to answering these challenges in its global trade and external relations. A crucial objective of the report was to state that trade agreements must include strong and ambitious Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters, which should be binding and enforceable through the inclusion of a sanctions based mechanism. This was however removed from the report.
General budget of the European Union for 2019 - all sections (A8-0313/2018 - Daniele Viotti, Paul Rübig)
Ahead of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, the Union needs the necessary financial resources to respond to citizens’ expectations, to allow the Union to effectively tackle its priorities and the challenges it faces and to improve the day-to-day life of its citizens. I strongly share the opinion that cohesion policy plays a primary role in the development and growth of the Union and in the convergence between Member States and regions and that adequate appropriations for those programmes that represent a core policy of the Union have to be ensured. Furthermore, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030, in particular Goal 3 on health, Goal 4 on education, Goal 5 on gender equality and Goal 13 on climate action, require appropriate Union assistance and must be reflected in the Union budget for 2019, in line with the priority given to long-term efforts to eradicate poverty, as stipulated in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0300/2018 - Marco Valli)
. ‒ Since 2009, Parliament has not been granting discharge to the Council. This year once again, the Council did not provide Parliament with the information that had to be considered in order to grant discharge, and did not deem it necessary to reply favourably to the invitation from the Committee on Budgetary Control to its annual ‘other institutions’ discharge hearing. In April 2018, Parliament voted against granting discharge to the Council, thus automatically postponing the discharge decision to October. Against the backdrop of no significant improvement since April, Parliament maintains its position of refusing discharge.
Support to structural reforms in Member States (A8-0316/2018 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl)
. ‒ While the European Parliament did not originally support the concept of a performance reserve when the current cohesion package was adopted, I share the opinion that it is important for the funds in the performance reserve to be spent as originally planned, on cohesion projects, and not to be diverted to structural reforms. This does not mean that structural reforms are not important: in other contexts, the Committee on Regional Development has supported an increase in the budget for structural reforms. However, local authorities and stakeholders are, in most cases, relying on the 6% set aside in the performance reserve in order to fund projects already planned within the current programming period.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Ireland (A8-0344/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
. ‒ The exchange of data among law-enforcement authorities in order to fight terrorism and cross-border crime is of paramount importance. The draft Council implementing decision constitutes a technical decision, which aims to authorise Ireland to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of automated searching and comparison of dactyloscopic data under the Prüm Treaty. Ireland has run a successful pilot project and fulfilled all the data protection provisions – the Commission has evaluated the results and found Ireland ready to take part in the Prüm system.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Ireland (A8-0343/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
. ‒ The exchange of data among law enforcement authorities in order to fight against terrorism and cross-border crime is of paramount importance. The draft Council implementing decision is a technical decision, which aims to authorise Ireland to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of automated searching and comparison of DNA data under the Prüm Treaty. Ireland has run a successful pilot project and fulfilled all the data protection provisions – the Commission has evaluated the results and found Ireland ready to take part in Prüm.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Croatia (A8-0345/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
. ‒ I voted in favour. The draft Council implementing decision is a technical decision, which aims to authorise Croatia to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of automated searching of dactyloscopic data under the Prüm Treaty. Croatia has run a successful pilot project and fulfilled all the data protection provisions; the Commission has evaluated the results and found Croatia ready to take part in Prüm.
Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (A8-0317/2018 - Frédérique Ries)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as I strongly support the directive targeting the main sources of macro-plastics found in Europe’s seas and beaches, which account for 70% of marine litter. This includes 10 single-use plastic products, as well as lost and abandoned fishing gear. Plastic has become a plague for our planet, with eight million tonnes thrown into the oceans every year.On 28 May 2018, the Commission adopted a proposal for a new directive on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment, which is part of the wider approach announced in the plastics strategy and of the circular economy action plan. The proposal includes new EU-wide rules targeting the 10 single-use plastic products most often found on Europe’s beaches and seas, as well as lost and abandoned fishing gear.Establishing clear targets to reduce use of single-use plastics will lead to less littering, which most of the time ends up in our seas. Single-use plastics have a high environmental impact: they are not recyclable and are prone to littering, requiring intense clean-ups. Finally, consumers should be encouraged to choose reusable alternatives and the industry to create more sustainable products.
Establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System in the field of border checks (A8-0347/2017 - Carlos Coelho)
Following an evaluation of the functioning of the Schengen Information System (SIS), the Commission proposed, at the end of 2016, to revise the legal instruments governing the SIS.The three proposals dealt with three aspects of the SIS, namely, the police and judicial cooperation aspect, the border checks aspect and a new returns aspect. Although there were three separate proposals, the SIS remains one single information system which operates as such with a single network for communication between the Member States.I support the updated legal basis of the Schengen Information System as it is a valuable tool for border guards when carrying out border checks at the external borders. Efforts to improve the functioning of the system should not, however, come at the expense of the protection of individuals’ fundamental rights.
Establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0349/2017 - Carlos Coelho)
Following an evaluation of the functioning of the Schengen Information System (SIS), the Commission proposed, at the end of 2016, to revise the legal instruments governing the SIS.The three proposals dealt with three aspects of the SIS, namely, the police and judicial cooperation aspect, the border checks aspect and a new returns aspect. Although there were three separate proposals, the SIS remains one single information system which operates as such with a single network for communication between the Member States.I support the updated legal basis of the Schengen Information System as it is a valuable tool for border guards when carrying out border checks at the external borders. Efforts to improve the functioning of the system should not, however, come at the expense of the protection of individuals’ fundamental rights.
Use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals (A8-0348/2017 - Jeroen Lenaers)
Following an evaluation of the functioning of the Schengen Information System (SIS), the Commission proposed, at the end of 2016, to revise the legal instruments governing the SIS.The three proposals dealt with three aspects of the SIS, namely, the police and judicial cooperation aspect, the border checks aspect and a new returns aspect. Although there were three separate proposals, the SIS remains one single information system which operates as such with a single network for communication between the Member States.The proposed first-reading agreement provides that all return decisions should be entered into the SIS until such time as the return has actually been carried out, in order to allow for a consistent and coherent approach on return policy. The alerts added into SIS do not, in themselves, have any impact on the status of the third country national on the territory of Member States other than the Member State that issued the alert.I support the updated legal basis of the Schengen Information System. An effective returns policy should form part of the EU’s policy on migration and asylum but must not become the sole focus of policy in this area. A holistic approach must remain the aim.
Harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (A8-0307/2018 - Miguel Viegas)
Directive 92/83/EEC on the structures of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages sets out the common rules on the structures of excise duty applied to alcohol and alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine, defining and classifying the different types of alcohol and alcoholic beverages according to their characteristics and providing a legal framework for reduced rates, exemptions, and derogations in some sectors.It has been observed that the Directive has not kept pace with the challenges and opportunities offered by new technologies and developments within the alcohol industry. Some problems have been identified and inefficiencies persist, causing possible distortions of the internal market. The large variation in duty levels between Member States, which provides a strong incentive for tax evasion, and other weaknesses in the design of the tax necessitate the use of burdensome administrative procedures for both tax administrations and economic operators.I welcome the Commission’s proposal to update the excise duty system. The original Directive has not evolved with technological developments and tendencies, and in many instances, market operators have had to face undue bureaucracy, which burdens especially SMEs. Therefore, I support the Commission’s approach in addressing these issues and ensuring more clarity in the provisions of the Directive.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Renewing the authorisation for genetically modified maize NK603 × MON 810 (B8-0490/2018)
The Commission published a draft decision to authorise the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize NK603 × MON 810 (MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 × MON-ØØ81Ø-6). The planned authorisation concerns 20 different products, only a few of which have been tested for safety, and several of which have not even been created yet. I share the opinion that the Commission’s draft implementing decision exceeds its implementing powers and is not consistent with Union law in that it is not compatible with the aim of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, which is, in accordance with the general principles to provide the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests in relation to genetically modified food and feed, while ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market. Herbicide-resistant GMOs should not be authorised, because they could encourage the increase use of herbicides, and the wider health and environmental implications of this has not been taken into account.
Discharge 2016: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0299/2018 - Bart Staes)
. ‒ The European Asylum Support Office (EASO) has a key role in managing the challenges in the current migration situation. Therefore we need to make sure that its management is fully functional and efficient in order to be able to cope with the current and future challenges. It is the role of Parliament and the Committee on Budgetary Control to scrutinise budget implementation and point out problems. Those problems need to be tackled as soon as possible to improve the management of the EASO.
Electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (A8-0323/2018 - Pavel Svoboda)
I voted in favour of the recommendation. The European Parliament was asked to give its consent to the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) 216/2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. Pursuant to the Regulation which is being amended, the Official Journal of the European Union is published in electronic form. In order to guarantee the authenticity, integrity and inalterability of this electronic publication it has to bear an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate and created with a secure signature-creation device. At the same time, the current EU legislation provides for the possibility of authenticating a document with an electronic seal. The main difference between the electronic signature and the electronic seal is that, in the former case, the signatory is a natural person, whereas in the latter case, the signatory is a legal person. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to introduce, for the electronic publication of the Official Journal, the option of authenticating a document by an electronic seal.
EU-Mauritius Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0303/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the recommendation. The agreement crowns the deepening of relations between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of short-stay provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which gives a clearer interpretation of ʻshort-stayʼ. The amended visa waiver agreement will enable citizens not only to derive full benefit from the ACP-EU partnership, but also to continue to participate in it by travelling at a reduced, economical and practical cost under a clearer and more coherent legal framework.
EU-Seychelles Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0302/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of ‘short stay’ as is provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which provides a clearer interpretation of the term. The EU’s political dialogue with the various ACP countries and the Seychelles in particular is gradually increasing. This agreement may allow us to continue our partnership under a clear legal framework. The amending visa exemption will continue to send out a positive message in support of the country and the efforts it is making.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/002 PT/Norte – Centro – Lisboa wearing apparel (A8-0311/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, which gives green light for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in Portugal, in regions of Norte, Centro and Lisboa.The application relates to 1161 redundancies in 2 enterprises, operating in the economic sector (classified under the NACE Rev. 2 Division 14 Manufacture of wearing apparel), during the reference period from 1 May 2017 to 1 February 2018.The EGF funding of EUR 4 65 883 shall contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services, providing assistance for 730 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies in the 2 enterprises in the regions of Norte (PT11), Centro (PT16) and Lisboa (PT17), with the aim of providing assistance for integrating the affected persons into the labour market.
Quality of water intended for human consumption (A8-0288/2018 - Michel Dantin)
. ‒ Access to good quality drinking water constitutes a subject of paramount importance for EU citizens. The Drinking Water Directive (Directive 98/83/EC) is one of the pillars of EU legislation in the field of water and provides a quality water supply in more than 99% of cases within the Union. However, it has been in force for twenty years and has not undergone a major overhaul since that date. The purpose of the revision is therefore to align drinking water quality standards with the most up-to-date scientific data, to tackle the areas of improvement identified by the Commission in its REFIT review and to adapt the legislative framework to better respond to emerging challenges, such as climate change and the circular economy.
Resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal (A8-0282/2018 - Iskra Mihaylova)
. ‒ The proposal, which concerns funding for the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) in 2018, is a technical amendment to the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR). The YEI provides support to young people living in regions where youth unemployment was higher than 25% in 2016, helping Member States implement measures to ensure that young people up to age of 25 receive a quality offer of employment, continued education, an apprenticeship or a traineeship within 4 months of leaving school or being unemployed. The present proposal frontloads some of the 2020 appropriations for the YEI to 2018. An increase in the budgetary means (EUR 116.7 million) for the EYI in 2018 was agreed in the negotiations for 2018 EU Budget. This amendment to the CPR is nevertheless required because the YEI has a specific allocation which is specified in the text of regulation. The increase for 2018 cannot be implemented without this amendment and would otherwise be lost.
Alignment of reporting obligations in the field of environment policy (A8-0324/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
I voted in favour of the report. The objective of the Regulation is to streamline and align reporting obligations for environment-related legislation, updating specific provisions of 10 sectorial directives and regulations. The general aim is to increase transparency, provide an evidence base for future evaluations, and to simplify and reduce administrative burden for Member States and the Commission. Furthermore, by applying more widely the most efficient processes and by increasing the use of electronic tools, the proposal intends to better collect and process environmental data.
The role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed (A8-0293/2018 - Renate Weber)
I voted in favour of the report. I share the opinion that the Employee financial participation (EFP) in companies should be encouraged, provided that: EFP remains voluntary; workers are sufficiently informed of and knowledgeable on the risks involved; employees are aware of the risk of losing both their job and the capital they invested; the scheme does not shift entrepreneurial risk to workers; EFP is embedded in a system of workers’ involvement, for example in company decision-making; the scheme does not replace or diminish normal basic remuneration, is not a substitute for fair and decent pay, nor an alternative to public pensions or to collectively agreed pension schemes; and participation does not affect employees’ social security benefits or their right to take collective action.
Public procurement strategy package (A8-0229/2018 - Carlos Coelho)
. ‒ In favour of the report. I believe that the latter is very well balanced and thus, I welcome the call within for fair public procurement, which takes into account social criteria, workers’ rights, environmental criteria and SMEs, as well as those using publicly procured facilities.Moreover, I share the opinion that the Commission should swiftly finalise the Guidance on Public Procurement of Innovation and the Guide on Socially Responsible Public Procurement, in order to facilitate the implementation of the respective legal provisions in the Member States. Better and more clearly organised guides and other tools could help Member States with the implementation of the public procurement framework.
EU Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) (A8-0320/2017 - Axel Voss)
. ‒ In favour of the revision, the latter will ensure that the mandate of Eurojust complies with the Treaty of Lisbon and takes account of new developments in the area of criminal justice cooperation at EU level, most notably the decision to create a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). A strengthened Eurojust should help in ensuring better and more efficient judicial cooperation across the EU in the fight against serious crime, including terrorism.
Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders (A8-0001/2018 - Nathalie Griesbeck)
In favour of the report, I believe that the latter ensures effective freezing and confiscation of criminal assets across the EU, making the EU more secure by combating crime financing, including terrorist activities.As such, it will be easier for the authorities to freeze and confiscate illegally obtained assets across borders. The new rules will allow police to deprive criminals from the proceeds of crime, while confiscation can be used to compensate victims or boost law enforcement activities. The rules will bring in mutually recognised laws across the EU, thus making it easier for national authorities to tackle an issue that goes beyond national borders.Finally, it is essential to ensure that these new tools could only be used for their intended purpose, while protecting fundamental rights and strong procedural safeguards.
Free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (A8-0201/2018 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)
In favour of the report, I believe that the adoption of the latter represents a major step towards achieving a European Digital Single Market with increased competition for cloud services and more choice for consumers. The new rules will encourage more flexibility in the market for cloud services, ensuring that businesses are free to choose the most cost-effective locations for IT resources, to switch between service providers, and to be free to make full use of cloud services without endangering the protection of personal data.
The EU's input on a UN binding instrument on transnational corporations with respect to human rights (B8-0443/2018, B8-0472/2018, B8-0473/2018, B8-0474/2018) FR
L’internalisation croissante des activités commerciales et des chaînes d'approvisionnement renforcent le rôle joué par les entreprises quant au respect des droits de l'homme, tout en conduisant à une situation dans laquelle des règles ainsi que de la coopération internationale sont devenues nécessaires.Avec un soutien fort pour un traité international contraignant sur les entreprises et les droits de l’homme, j’insiste sur le fait qu’il faut continuer à inviter l’Union Européenne et les États membres à participer d’une manière constructive au processus d’élaboration du dernier et à garantir une position cohérente sur ce sujet «à tous les niveaux», dans toutes les politiques, relations et accords commerciaux, tout en incluant «des règles concernant la responsabilité des entreprises dans les violations des droits de l’homme» dans les accords de commerce et d’investissement.En effet, il faut continuer à appeler l’Union européenne à renforcer ses efforts pour rester un chef de file au sein des enceintes internationales sur le sujet des entreprises et des droits de l’homme, en s’assurant que chaque État membre développe un plan d’action national, et en veillant à s’impliquer dans les discussions en cours à l’échelle régionale et à l’échelle internationale.
Fighting customs fraud and protecting EU own resources (B8-0400/2018)
Traditional own resources, comprised mainly of duties on imports from outside the EU and sugar levies, account for around 12.8% of the EU’s own resources. However, the significant threat posed by customs fraud still persists across the EU, because of legal loopholes, lack of cooperation – among administrations and among Member States – and lack of harmonisation and standardisation.As there is an overall concern about how EU resources made available from Members States are scarce, I share the opinion that besides calling for new EU own resources, it is also important to ensure that there is no leakage of our traditional own resources.Especially, considering the increasing trade flows in the context of globalisation and new technologies (e.g. online commerce), we need to cooperate effectively in customs matters.
Harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the VAT system (A8-0280/2018 - Jeppe Kofod)
. ‒ The VAT gap, defined as the difference between the amount of VAT revenue actually collected and the theoretical amount that is expected to be collected, has been increasing, reaching the amount of EUR 151.5 billion in 2015 in the EU-28. This illustrates the need for an urgent and comprehensive reform of the VAT system towards a definitive VAT regime, in order to facilitate and to simplify cross-border intra-Union trade and to make the system more fraud-proof.I voted in favour as I support these measures as transitional, intended to harmonise and simplify certain arrangements for businesses. Finally, I emphasize on the importance to adopt and implement this proposal as soon as possible, in order to reduce administrative burden for European businesses and to reduce the VAT gap in the EU.
VAT: period of application of the reverse charge mechanism and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism (A8-0283/2018 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of this proposal is to prolong the possibility for Member States to apply the reverse charge mechanism to combat existing fraud in supplies of goods and services included in Article 199a of the VAT Directive and the possibility to use the Quick Reaction Mechanism (QRM) to combat fraud. The purpose of the measures foreseen in Articles 199a and 199b is to allow Member States to quickly tackle problems of the Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) fraud. The measures included in Articles 199a and 199b of the VAT Directive have been useful as temporary and targeted measures. Their expiration on 31 December 2018 would deprive Member States of an efficient tool to fight fraud.It is therefore proposed to prolong the measures included in Articles 199a and 199b until 30 June 2022, the date on which the definitive regime for intra-Union B2B supplies of goods should enter into force.
Administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register (A8-0285/2018 - Ivana Maletić)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register. The proposal concerns the automation of the supervision of movements of excise goods which have been released for consumption in one Member State and that are being moved to another Member State in order to be delivered for commercial purposes in that other Member State. The proposal amends the scope of Article 19 of the Regulation to include two new categories of economic operators: certified consignors, who are registered as consignors for excise goods that have already been released for consumption, and certified consignees, who are registered as consignees for excise goods that have already been released for consumption.
Health technology assessment (A8-0289/2018 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment (HTA) and amending Directive 2011/24/EU. The proposed regulation will define a support framework and procedures for cooperation on clinical assessment of health technologies at Union level and common methodologies for the clinical assessment of health technologies. HTA will be used to promote innovations that produce the best results for patients and society in general. I fully share the opinion that cooperation between HTA authorities has to be based on the principles of good governance, objectivity, independence and transparency, while taking into consideration that trust is a precondition for successful cooperation.
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli) FR
Je partage pleinement l’opinion que la création d'emplois, la protection de l'environnement et la lutte contre le changement climatique vont de pair. C'est pourquoi il faut continuer à plaider pour une proposition ambitieuse et à la fois réaliste, qui protège l'environnement et les emplois, tout en assurant une transition équitable pour les travailleurs et les régions touchées par les changements.Le renforcement des normes de performance en matière d’émissions pour les voitures particulières neuves et pour les véhicules utilitaires légers neufs est susceptible de réduire les émissions de CO2. Dans le même temps, les normes adéquates peuvent donner la possibilité aux consommateurs de réaliser des économies de carburant considérables. En outre, la transition sauvera des emplois en Europe, renforcera la compétitivité industrielle de l’UE, soutiendra l’innovation technologique et contribuera à la lutte contre le changement climatique, conformément aux engagements pris dans l’Accord de Paris.
Rates of value added tax (A8-0279/2018 - Tibor Szanyi) FR
Suite à la proposition de la Commission visant à modifier la directive TVA (directive 2006/112 / CE), dans le but de donner plus de flexibilité aux États membres pour établir les taux de TVA, je salue les modifications proposées dans le rapport, car elles soulignent que les taux réduits devraient bénéficier en premier lieu au consommateur final, tout en poursuivant des objectifs sociaux et environnementaux. Par conséquent, je partage l'avis que les taux réduits et les exemptions devraient s’appliquer seulement aux produits ayant un impact positif sur l'intérêt général, présentant des avantages culturels, sociaux ou environnementaux évidents, et ne devraient jamais être appliqués aux produits nocifs ou de luxe. En ce qui concerne les PME (petites et moyennes entreprises), je soutiens la proposition de la Commission visant à créer un portail d'information sur la TVA de l'Union, complet, multilingue et accessible au public, sur lequel les entreprises et les consommateurs peuvent rapidement et efficacement obtenir des informations précises sur les taux de TVA dans les différents États membres, y compris les biens concernés ou les services bénéficiant de taux réduits ou des exemptions.
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts (B8-0442/2018)
I welcome the resolution on the International Financial Reporting Standards 17, which comes in response to the potential contradictions of IFRS 17 with European legislation regarding insurance contracts, especially between the new norm and the EU prudential legislative corpus.On the one hand, I share the opinion that it is necessary to guarantee that IFRS 17 will not be a constraint for small and non-systemic companies (SMEs) while defending a high quality of disclosure and reporting and including sustainability and long-term objectives in line with the Paris Agreement. On the other, I believe that we need to ensure and support an IFRS 17 that is more conducive to the European public good, with more involvement of the EP on its implementation.IFRS 17 is supposed to provide consistent principles for all aspects of accounting for insurance contracts. While it is expected to take effect on 1 January 2021, if endorsed by the EU, it still raises serious concerns of compliance efforts by insurance companies and, as such, we certainly need to make the implementation process less complex and less bureaucratic.
Distributed ledger technologies and blockchains: building trust with disintermediation (B8-0397/2018)
Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) are computing technologies that reduce the number of intermediaries in a whole range of transactions as well as it allows full transparency and encryption of these. It replaces central registers and the costs of intermediation that are linked to them. By operating in a decentralised fashion and reducing the number of intermediaries who validate each transaction, significant costs reductions and velocity of operations can be achieved.In favour of the resolution, I welcome the emphasis that it puts on the number of potential gains for the economy, the need for the EU to lead this technology and ensure an open-minded, progressive and innovation-friendly regulation vis-à -vis DLT.Blockchain is a forward-looking technology that we expect to change the quality of our life, empower SMEs and improve business models in most industrial sectors.
EU Agenda for Rural, Mountainous and Remote Areas (B8-0399/2018)
Rural, mountainous and remote areas constitute 80% of EU territory, are home to 57% of its population and account for 46% of gross value added. The European economy, cities, industry (including tourism) and citizens largely depend on these areas for food, land use, energy, water, clean air and raw materials. In favour of the resolution, I support the call within for a better coordination of EU policies to ensure the development of rural territories.Moreover, I also share the opinion that the EU Agenda for Rural, Mountainous and Remote Areas should promote socioeconomic development, economic growth and diversification, social wellbeing, protection of nature, and cooperation and interconnection with urban areas in order to foster cohesion and prevent the risk of territorial fragmentation. Therefore, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) spending should continue to be linked with cohesion policy with a view to facilitating integrated and complementary funding in rural areas.
Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (A8-0290/2018 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
EU-Morocco Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: terms and conditions for the participation of Morocco in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0281/2018 - Aldo Patriciello)
The Mediterranean Research and Innovation Partnership (PRIMA) represents a public-public partnership that brings together the research capacities of the Union and the participating Mediterranean countries to facilitate the development and implementation of innovative and integrated solutions to make agri-food and water management and supply systems in the Mediterranean area more efficient, secure and sustainable. I voted in favour, as I share the opinion that cooperation with third countries in this area constitutes a fundamental tool for science diplomacy that could also help to address shared goals for both sides of the Mediterranean.
EU-Canada air transport agreement (A8-0254/2018 - Francisco Assis)
I voted in favour of the agreement. According to a study launched by the Commission, an open agreement with Canada would generate an additional half a million passengers in its first year and, within a few years, 3.5 million extra passengers might be expected to benefit from the opportunities provided by the Agreement. The Agreement could generate consumer benefits of at least EUR 72 million through lower fares and would also lead to the creation of new jobs. The agreement eliminates all restrictions on routes, prices, or the number of weekly flights between Canada and the EU. Airlines will be free to enter into commercial arrangements such as code-share agreements, and to establish their tariffs in line with competition law. The agreement encompasses provisions for the phased market opening (in four phases) linked to the granting of greater investment freedoms by both sides.
Inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union (A8-0284/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
I voted in favour. The Italian Government requested that the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano should be included in the EU customs territory and in the territory of the Union to which Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty (the ‘excise directive’) applies. However, Italy wishes to continue the exclusion of the two territories from the territorial application of Directive 2006/112/EC (VAT Directive) on the common system of value added tax, as Italy considers it to be essential to maintain an even playing field between economic actors in Campione d’Italia and Switzerland. This proposal only requires a formal amendment of the VAT Directive, moving the two territories from Article 6(2) (territories not forming part of the EU customs territory excluded from the territorial application of the VAT Directive) to Article 6(1) (territories forming part of the EU customs territory excluded from the territorial application of the VAT Directive).
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/001 NL/Financial service activities (A8-0294/2018 - Ivana Maletić)
The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund was created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. On 20 July 2018, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of the Netherlands to support the reintegration into the labour market of workers made redundant by twenty enterprises operating in the economic sector.The application was sent to the Commission on 23 February 2018 and supplemented by additional information by 4 May 2018. The Commission finalised its assessment on 20 July 2018 and has concluded, in accordance with all applicable provisions of the EGF Regulation, that the application meets the conditions for a financial contribution from the EGF, as referred to in Article 4(1) of the EGF Regulation. I voted in favour of the report.
Provision of audiovisual media services (A8-0192/2017 - Sabine Verheyen, Petra Kammerevert)
. – The current Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive established the main rules for TV and video-on-demand services. The Directive is currently being adapted in order to keep pace with the challenges of the digital age, and it puts forward rules for all kinds of videos, including those disseminated on social media or video platforms.The new Directive proposes an expansion of its scope to regulate all audiovisual media. I share the opinion that it is of particular importance that online services are subject to similar standards as traditional TV broadcasters, as well as to fight for ambitious regulations regarding barrier free access and media competencies and the online protection of minors. The reform ensures that minors will be protected against dangerous and non-age appropriate content that is freely accessible on the internet.
Eurojust and Albania Cooperation Agreement (A8-0275/2018 - Laura Ferrara)
I welcome the agreement between Eurojust and Albania as it is intended to increase cooperation in the fight against serious crime and provides, among other things, for liaison officers, contact points and information exchange.With Albania being an EU Candidate Country since 2014, and given the acknowledged areas of cross-border crime on which cooperation between the EU and Albania is needed (notably, on the illicit drug trade, money laundering and human trafficking), such a cooperation agreement is in the best interests of both the EU and Albania.
Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and free movement of such data (A8-0313/2017 - Cornelia Ernst)
In favour of the report, I welcome the spotlight put on the need to apply the regulation also to the Union agencies’ carrying out activities with regard to data protection regime.Therefore, I support the call for all EU institutions and bodies, including the Court of Justice, to be subject to independent supervision by the EDPS, which should be appointed by common accord for a period of five years. To this end, the EDPS and the national supervisory authorities shall cooperate in the framework of their responsibilities in order to ensure effective and coordinated control.At the same time, I underline the importance of aligning the regulation with General Data Protection Regulation, while ensuring that the Union is maintained at the same standards as the Member States regarding data protection, by respecting the principle relating to the processing of operational personal data and prohibition of treatment of particular categories of data.
Single Digital Gateway (A8-0054/2018 - Marlene Mizzi)
Accessing and understanding information about public administration and completing procedures with public authorities can be difficult and frustrating, especially in cross-border situations. I welcome the single digital gateway as I believe that it will significantly help citizens and companies to access information and administrative procedures online, for example, when applying for study loans or registering a car. It will pool together national and European-level information, procedures and assistance services into a single entry point on the ‘Your Europe’ portal, through which citizens can easily find and access what they need.The single digital gateway is also another important step in easing citizens’ interaction with public administration. It implements the ‘once only’ principle, which will enable citizens and businesses to submit information to a public administration only once, after which this information can, at the user’s consent, be re-used in other procedures, while making sure that this principle is implemented fully in line with the new data protection rules.
A European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy (A8-0262/2018 - Mark Demesmaeker)
The way plastics are produced, used and disposed of today has devastating environmental, climate and economic drawbacks and potential negative health impacts on both humans and animals.I very much welcome this report, which tackles successively the need to move from design for recycling to design for circularity, the creation of a genuine single market for recycled plastics, prevention of plastic waste generation, as well as innovation and global action. A stable internal market for secondary raw materials is indispensable for safeguarding the transition to a circular economy, therefore the obstacles this market confronts with have to be fully addressed, while laying the ground for a level playing field.Indeed, the EU Plastic Strategy constitutes a necessary step forward in the EU’s transition towards a circular economy and as well as a crucial tool towards attaining the Sustainable Development Goal to prevent and reduce marine litter. Preventing the generation of plastic waste upfront and boosting our plastics recycling performance are both essential.Moreover, I strongly share the opinion that the plastics strategy should also be used as a lever for encouraging new, smart and circular business, production and consumption models covering the entire value chain.
Options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation (B8-0363/2018)
I believe that truly circular economy products must be designed for upgradeability, durability, reparability, reusability and recyclability, and with minimal use of substances of concern. In line with the 7th EAP (Environment Action Programme) I support the development, without any further delay, for a Union strategy for a non-toxic environment.As such, implementation of chemicals, product and waste legislation may present a challenge, nevertheless it is imperative to identify and clarify the interlinkages, to ensure coherence and to exploit possible synergies.
A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (A8-0257/2018 - Karin Kadenbach)
Antibiotic resistance is a widespread problem; we can call it even one of the world’s most pressing public health problems. Bacteria that were once highly responsive to antibiotics have become more and more resistant, becoming a massive threat to human and animal health.Since the discovery of penicillin by Sir Alexander Fleming in 1928, antibiotics have transformed modern medicine and saved millions of lives. Many decades after the first patients were treated with antibiotics, bacterial infections have again become a threat.As such, I support the measurable and binding AMR objectives proposed within the report, regarding both the European One Health Action Plan and national action plans, in order to enable benchmarking. I share the opinion that it is necessary a clear commitment of the EU and its Member States to launching a cross-cutting global strategy to combat AMR, covering important policy areas such as international trade, development and agriculture. Lastly, I support the call on the Commission to implement collaborative research programmes with third countries to reduce the overuse of antibiotics.
Europe on the Move: an agenda for the future of mobility in the EU (A8-0241/2018 - István Ujhelyi)
The mobility sector plays a key role in the European economy and society. With the development of automated cars, digitalisation and the necessity to develop cleaner transport, the sector is undergoing profound changes which affect all aspects of our societies.In favour of the report, I support the call within the latter to manage and facilitate the transport transition in a way that makes the optimal use of the new opportunities from the point of view of all users of mobility sector. Safety and security of transport users remains of paramount importance.
Implementation of the Plant Protection Products Regulation (A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc) FR
Le rapport relève que les objectifs et les instruments du règlement, tout comme sa mise en œuvre, ne sont pas toujours suffisamment alignés sur les politiques européennes dans des domaines tels que l’agriculture, la santé, le bien-être animal, la sécurité alimentaire, la qualité de l’eau, le changement climatique, et l’utilisation durable des pesticides.Il est inacceptable que le principe de précaution ne soit manifestement pas appliqué dans le cadre général de l’analyse des risques relative aux pesticides et que les exigences relatives à l’approbation des phytoprotecteurs et des synergistes n’aient pas encore été appliquées.Par conséquent, je soutiens fortement l’appel adressé à la Commission lui demandant d’apporter des améliorations quant à la transparence du processus réglementaire, y compris l’accès aux données des études sur la sécurité soumises par les producteurs lors des demandes d’autorisation de mise sur le marché des produits phytopharmaceutiques au sein de l’Union.En effet, je partage l’avis qu’il est bien nécessaire de réviser la procédure actuelle afin d’améliorer les évaluations, de renforcer l’indépendance des autorités chargées de conduire les études, tout en évitant des conflits d’intérêts et en rendant la procédure plus transparente.
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová) FR
Des études démontrent qu’en dépit d’une appellation commerciale, d’un emballage et d’un aspect commercial apparemment identiques, certains produits circulant sur le marché unique font état de compositions clairement différentes à l’égard de leur recette, des matières premières de base utilisées ou de la proportion de ces dernières dans le produit. Par conséquent, je salue l’engagement pris par la Commission d’élaborer une méthode de test commune et de recueillir d’autres éléments de preuve fiables et comparables, ainsi que de mettre à jour la directive 2005/29/CE sur les pratiques commerciales déloyales. Tout type de discrimination existant entre les différents marchés des États membres est inacceptable. De plus, ce problème de double niveau de qualité met en jeu les principes de fonctionnement du marché unique européen ; c’est pourquoi, une solution à l’échelle de l’Union, se traduisant par des mesures exécutoires, est pleinement nécessaire.
Nominal quantities for placing on the Union market of single distilled shochu (A8-0255/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The Commission proposal aims at introducing a derogation from Union rules concerning bottle sizes, for single distilled shochu, a spirit drink produced by pot still and bottled in Japan that is traditionally sold in bottles of four go or one sho that correspond to nominal quantities of 720 ml (one go corresponds to 180 ml) and 1800 ml, respectively, and that are currently not among the nominal quantities permitted in the Union under Directive 2007/45/EC laying down rules on nominal quantities of prepacked products.This proposal is an amendment to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the definition, description, presentation and labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks. The EU has finalised negotiations for a trade agreement with Japan. An agreement in principle was reached on 7 July 2017 and negotiations were finalised on 8 December 2017. On 18 April 2018, the text of the agreement was presented by the Commission to the Council. Once approved by the Council, the agreement will be sent to Parliament, aiming for its entry into force before the end of the current Commission’s term of office in 2019.
Amendment to the US-EU Memorandum of Cooperation (deployment of air traffic management systems) (A8-0214/2018 - Rolandas Paksas)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Sharing the common goal to develop safer air transport, in 2011, the European Union and the United States of America signed the Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) between the United States of America and the European Union in civil aviation research and development. The cooperative activities conducted so far under the MoC address air traffic management (ATM) systems, in particular cooperation in the field of research and development (R&D) between the SESAR (Single European Sky ATM Research) project, the technological component of the Single European Sky (SES) initiative and NextGen, the programme managed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Cooperation under the MoC has now reached a high level of maturity. This led the two parties to explore the potential for extending the scope of cooperation to topics relating to the deployment of ATM systems. On this basis, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate with the FAA concerning an amendment to the MoC to extend its scope to cover deployment. The Amendment was negotiated between the Commission and the FAA and it is built on the same objectives and principles that underlie the existing MoC.
Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the EU (accession of Croatia) (A8-0256/2018 - Francisco Assis)
I voted in favour of the report. The purpose of the Protocol is to enable Croatia to become a Party to the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, and to provide for the necessary ensuing linguistic adaptations made to the Agreement due to Croatia’s accession. The Protocol makes no substantial amendments to the Agreement between the European Union and Canada.
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss)
The evolution of digital technologies has transformed the way protected subject-matter is created, produced, distributed and exploited. New uses have emerged together with new actors and new business models. In the digital environment, cross-border uses have also increased, while consumers benefit from new opportunities to access copyright-protected content.Performers and authors have to be fairly remunerated for their works. These new rules will make it easier for them to sell their content throughout the European Union by achieving harmonisation of rules across Member States.I welcome the efforts aiming to ensure that authors are entitled to fair remuneration for their creative endeavours and associated with the commercial success of their works. We have to ensure that authors are remunerated both for direct and indirect revenues coming through use of their work and ensure that trade unions and other representative organisations will be able to initiate dispute resolution mechanisms on their part.However, the area of copyright is highly complex, due to the presence of numerous stakeholders who have different interests but nevertheless need each other. Here we need a balance between the interest of right-holders on one hand and the fundamental rights of consumers on the other.
Controls on cash entering or leaving the Union (A8-0394/2017 - Mady Delvaux, Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I welcome the agreement as it is another important tool in the fight against money laundering, organised crime and terrorist financing. It focuses on tightening the rules on declaring cash when more than EUR 10 000 is taken out of or brought into the European Union.I share the opinion that the latter will improve the existing system of controls with respect to cash entering or leaving the EU, by ensuring that the latest developments in international standards on combating money-laundering and terrorism financing developed by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) are reflected in EU legislation.
Countering money laundering by criminal law (A8-0405/2017 - Ignazio Corrao)
The Report on Countering Money Laundering by Criminal Law is one part of three proposals agreed in the last year aimed at tackling terrorist financing. The main elements of the proposed directive are to establish minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of money laundering, as well as common provisions to improve the investigation of those offences and to ensure better cross-border cooperation in the fight against money laundering. In favour of the report, I consider important that the latter also ensures that tax crimes are included as ‘predicate’ offences, criminalising negligence and creating minimal sentences for aggravating circumstances.
Autonomous weapon systems (RC-B8-0308/2018, B8-0308/2018, B8-0309/2018, B8-0355/2018, B8-0359/2018, B8-0360/2018, B8-0361/2018, B8-0362/2018)
I share the opinion that providing machines with the discretion and power to end human life raises strong legal, ethical and moral issues and that machines and robots cannot make human-like decisions. There is a pressing need for an internationally agreed working definition of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS).Indeed, as underlined within the resolution, the Parliament has constantly advanced calls for the immediate development and adoption of a common position on autonomous weapon systems, for a ban on the development, production and use of fully autonomous weapons allowing strikes to be conducted without meaningful human involvement.In this regard, I support the calls on the HR/VP, the Member States and the European Council to put forward a common position on autonomous weapons system, that guarantees meaningful human control over the critical functions of weapons systems, including during deployment. Moreover, I strongly believe that multilateral efforts have to be enhanced so that normative and regulatory frameworks are not outpaced by technological developments and new methods of warfare.
State of EU-US relations (A8-0251/2018 - Elmar Brok)
The EU-US partnership has prospered for more than six decades, and has been the cornerstone of efforts to ensure peace and stability, including for the building up of the multilateral trade system, while being the fundamental guarantor for global stability.Constructed on a solid foundation of common values, the transatlantic partnership needs to continue its commitment to the rules-based multilateral international order. Both the EU and the US face common challenges and threats, and they should continue to play constructive roles by jointly addressing regional conflicts and global challenges based on the principles of international law.As such, further to recent unilateral decisions of the US, I welcome the call on strengthening the partnership, especially through fostering dialogue and enhancing cooperation on all elements of this partnership. The EU and the US are not only partners, they are allies and friends, and we have to remain committed to a strong transatlantic relationship, which should be given a new impetus with regard to our cooperation on bilateral, multilateral and global levels.
State of EU-China relations (A8-0252/2018 - Bas Belder)
I welcome the spotlight on the EU-China Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, being founded on a shared commitment to openness and working together as part of a rules-based international system. Most importantly, both the EU and China are committed to establishing a transparent, just and equitable system of global governance, sharing the responsibility for promoting peace, prosperity and sustainable development.China is one of our key partners in tackling climate change and global environmental challenges; consequently, I welcome the aims to work together to speed up the implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement.I support the call for a cooperative and constructive approach to effectively reach the potential of EU-China trade and, the call for the Commission to intensify cooperation and dialogue with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Finally, I would like to welcome the 2018 EU-China Tourism Year (ECTY) and its economic and cultural significance, especially as it coincides with the European Year of Cultural Heritage.
Equivalence of field inspections (A8-0253/2018 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
I voted in favour of the report. The Commission proposal relates to the import of seeds from non-EU countries. It puts forward the proposal to add Brazil and Moldova to the list of countries whose control systems are recognised with regard to certain species of seeds. For this purpose Council Decision 2003/17/EC on field inspections and equivalence of seeds in non-EU countries would be amended.
Common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises (A8-0260/2018 - Tom Vandenkendelaere)
I voted in favour of the report, as I welcome the new proposal on the VAT scheme for small enterprises. This should facilitate cross-border operations for small companies, while increasing VAT compliance. Moreover, the proposal is also in line with the proposed definitive regime for a single VAT area in Europe and the introduction of the mini one-stop shop, allowing companies operating cross-border to declare their VAT obligations at one single point of contact.
Implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0271/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
I voted in favour of the report, as I support the proposal to submit cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl to control measures across the Union, taking into account the dangerous nature of these substances. Indeed, the available evidence and information on the health and social risks that the substances pose, given also their similarities to fentanyl, provides sufficient grounds for subjecting cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl to control measures across the Union.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland (A8-0272/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)
I voted in favour of the report. Within the framework of the EU budgetary procedure for the financial year 2018, the European Union Solidarity Fund is to be mobilised to provide the amounts of EUR 2 258 225 to Bulgaria, EUR 2 535 796 to Greece, EUR 16 918 941 to Lithuania and EUR 12 279 244 to Poland, in both commitment and payment appropriations. The proposed mobilisation is intended to provide financial support in order to deal with the damage caused by floods in Bulgaria and Lithuania, earthquakes in Greece and storms in Poland.
Draft Amending Budget No 4/2018: mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland (A8-0273/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
Within the framework of the EU budgetary procedure for the financial year 2018, the draft Amending Budget No 4 intends to increase the budget line dedicated to the assistance to Member States in the event of major natural disasters by EUR 33 992 206, both in commitment and payment appropriations. The proposed increase is supportive and complementary to the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for providing financial assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland, following a series of related natural disasters. I voted in favour of the report.
The impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland (A8-0240/2018 - Derek Vaughan)
I voted in favour of the report as I welcome the outcome. I welcome the highlight on the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, especially in the context of its peace process, reflected also in the Commission’s commitment to future funding in the draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027. I share the opinion that the case of Northern Ireland is one of the concrete examples of the EU cohesion policy’s bridge-building capacity between communities. I believe that the success of this specific case should encourage the EU to further use cohesion policy as a means to tackle conflicts in the future, while overcoming mistrust.
Specific measures for Greece (A8-0244/2018 - Pascal Arimont)
The report puts an emphasis on the major role of cohesion policy and the ESI Funds as the most important source of direct investment in Greece. I welcome the measures’ impact on the consolidation of economic activity, the normalisation and consolidation of the turnover and working capital of a significant number of businesses, including the creation and preservation of jobs, and the completion of important production infrastructures. Recalling the importance of adequate structural reforms, I welcome Greece’s efforts while underlining the importance to further continue to make full use of the assistance offered under the Structural Reform Support Programme. Welcoming the outcome of the report, I voted in favour of the latter.
Pathways for the reintegration of workers recovering from injury and illness into quality employment (A8-0208/2018 - Jana Žitňanská)
I voted in favour of the report. The latter stresses that chronic mental and physical health problems, including disabilities and illnesses, need preventative reintegration and rehabilitation policies to maintain jobs, to keep pension and social security systems sustainable and to improve people's social psychological well-being. I strongly support the call to put in place functioning legislation with effective overview to ensure that employers make workplaces more inclusive for those suffering from chronic conditions and disabilities. Moreover, I share the opinion that forthcoming EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020 should further prioritise investments, through EU funds, aimed at prolonging and promoting healthier lives and working lives, and individualised working arrangements, and at supporting recruitment and well-adapted return to work, where desired and where medical conditions allow.
Relationships between the EU and third countries concerning financial services regulation and supervision (A8-0263/2018 - Brian Hayes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. Since the financial crisis, more than 40 new pieces of EU financial legislation have been adopted, of which 15 include ‘third-country provisions’ that give the Commission, on behalf of the EU, discretion to unilaterally decide whether regulatory rules in foreign jurisdictions can be considered equivalent. I welcome the increased regulatory and supervisory cooperation between the EU and third countries, and I share the opinion that this has contributed to improving global consistency in financial regulation, while making the EU more resilient to global financial shock. Finally, I welcome the emphasis put on the importance of the EU’s active role in global standard-setting as a means of working towards international consistency in financial regulation.
Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions (A8-0266/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)
. ‒ Internal border regions of the European Union represent as much as 40% of its territory and are home to 150 million of Europeans. They also generate a quarter of Europe’s GDP. However, the border regions are facing persistent obstacles, which impede their growth and development. I welcome the report as the latter underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes, and in particular cross-border cooperation programmes, in the economic and social development and cohesion of border region. In addition, I strongly support the promotion and development of social enterprises in border regions as a source of job creation, in particular for vulnerable groups such as young unemployed people and people with disabilities, and I welcome the emphasis put on measures aimed at combating all forms of discrimination in border regions and at breaking down barriers for vulnerable people in finding employment and becoming integrated into society.
European Solidarity Corps (A8-0060/2018 - Helga Trüpel)
. ‒ The main objective of the European Solidarity Corps (ESC) is to promote and increase the social and civic engagement of youth and their active and supportive citizenship, also through the acquisition of competences. I voted in favour of the report as I welcome the call on the Commission to provide the ESC with a clear and detailed legal framework, as well as with a precise definition of solidarity action at EU level. In addition, I strongly welcome the spotlight put on the need to guarantee that all EU citizens, including those with special needs or from disadvantaged backgrounds, have equal access to the European Solidarity Corps, and to ensure that gender equality is mainstreamed when implementing the initiative.
Structural Reform Support Programme: financial envelope and general objective (A8-0227/2018 - Ruža Tomašić) FR
Le programme d'appui à la réforme structurelle de l'UE vise à aider les États membres à développer et à mettre en œuvre des réformes institutionnelles, administratives et structurelles et à utiliser de manière plus efficiente les fonds de l'UE qui sont disponibles à cet effet. Celui-ci couvre la période 2017–2020 et est doté d'un budget de 142,8 millions €. Pourtant, il a été apprécié comme nécessaire de consolider la dotation financière allouée au programme afin que l’appui fourni par l’Union européenne puisse répondre aux besoins des États membres demandeurs et de permettre la mise en œuvre des réformes structurelles. J’accueille favorablement l’objectif général du programme. Cependant, il faut se munir de précaution à cet égard pour que la dotation financière n’ait pas d’incidence négative sur les autres priorités de la politique de cohésion. De plus, il faut assurer une communication efficace, au niveau de l’Union, ainsi qu’au niveau national et régional, afin de faire connaître les résultats des réformes implémentées.
Euratom Programme complementing the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (A8-0258/2018 - Rebecca Harms)
In favour of the report, I strongly believe that it is important to ensure sound financial management of the Euratom Programme and its implementation in the most effective and user-friendly manner possible, while also ensuring legal certainty and that potential beneficiaries are properly informed, in order to increase accessibility for all participants. I share the opinion that achieving the objectives of the Euratom Programme in relevant areas requires support for cross-cutting activities, both within the Euratom Programme and jointly with the activities of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme.
Measures to prevent and combat mobbing and sexual harassment at the workplace, in public spaces, and in political life in the EU (A8-0265/2018 - Pina Picierno)
I voted in favour of the report, which, stressing that sexual harassment is a violation of human rights, calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal for a directive to address all forms of violence against women and girls and gender-based violence. Women in the EU are not equally protected against gender-based violence and sexual and psychological harassment due to differing policies and legislation across the Member States. Against this background, I share the opinion that the draft directive should encompass common definitions of the different types of violence against women, including a comprehensive definition of harassment (be it sexual or otherwise) and mobbing, and common legal standards on criminalising this violence.
Language equality in the digital age (A8-0228/2018 - Jill Evans)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, which emphasises that multilingualism represents one of the greatest assets of cultural diversity in Europe and, at the same time, one of the most significant challenges for the creation of a truly integrated EU. Owing to a lack of adequate policies in Europe, there is currently a widening technology gap between well-resourced languages and less-resourced languages, and more than 20 European languages are in danger of digital language extinction.Therefore, I strongly support the call to develop a strong and coordinated strategy for the creation of an accessible multilingual Digital Single Market. Furthermore, I fully support the establishment of a large-scale, long-term, coordinated funding programme for research, development and innovation in the field of language technologies, and I share the opinion that it should be realised with the participation of research centres, academia, and enterprises (particularly SMEs and start-ups).
Transparent and accountable management of natural resources in developing countries: the case of forests (A8-0249/2018 - Heidi Hautala)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as I support the call to the Commission to honour the European Union’s international commitments, in particular those made at COP21 and in the UN Forum on Forests (UNFF), the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, the New York Declaration on Forests and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 15.2, which aims to promote sustainable management of all types of forests, halt deforestation, restore degraded forests and substantially increase afforestation and reforestation globally by 2020.In addition, I welcome the emphasis put on the need to encourage community-based forest management by reinforcing the involvement of civil society in the planning and implementation of forest management policies and projects, raising awareness and ensuring that local communities share the benefits of forest resources.
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss)
This Directive aims at modernising and further harmonising aspects of the EU copyright framework in order to take account of technological developments and new channels of distribution of protected content in the internal market. The focus is on the digital and cross-border uses of protected content, rules on exceptions and limitations, on the facilitation of licences and rules aiming at ensuring a well-functioning marketplace for the exploitation of works.My vote reflects the need to have further consideration on the report in order to allow for a proper debate to take place and as well as the opportunity for all MEPs to put forward their concerns on this very important subject while providing room for improvement.
European citizens’ initiative (A8-0226/2018 - György Schöpflin)
The European citizens’ initiative (ECI) is a right enshrined in the Treaty on European Union (TEU). Article 11, § 4 TEU provides that ‘Not less than one million citizens who are nationals of a significant number of Member States may take the initiative of inviting the European Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties’. This instrument aims to enhance citizens’ participation in the democratic life of the European Union (EU) by allowing them to request the Commission directly to submit a proposal for legal acts of the EU for the purpose of implementing the Treaties. The aim of this new proposal for a Regulation on the European citizen’s initiative is to improve how the ECI functions by addressing the shortcomings identified over the past years with the main policy objectives.In favour of the report, I believe that the latter reinforces citizenship of the EU and enhances further the democratic functioning of the Union by providing that every citizen has the right to participate in the democratic life of the EU. The report also improves the European citizens’ initiative as a Union instrument of participatory democracy.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Croatia (A8-0225/2018 - Jaromír Štětina)
In favour of the report. The draft Council implementing Decision aims to authorise Croatia to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of automated searching and comparison of DNA data under the Prüm Treaty. Croatia has run a successful pilot project and fulfilled all the data protection provisions. Further to the evaluation’s positive results, I share the opinion that Croatia is ready to take part in Prüm.
Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (A8-0211/2017 - Ingeborg Gräßle, Richard Ashworth)
In favour of the report. I believe that the latter ensures that the EU budget will be implemented in a simpler and more flexible manner in order to reduce bureaucracy, obtain financial savings, facilitate accessibility to funding for beneficiaries and allow the Union to promptly provide its financial support in unforeseen situations. The revised financial rules will contribute to the achievement of these objectives.
European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) (A8-0322/2017 - Kinga Gál)
The purpose of the proposal is to create a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (mimicking the ESTA system of the United States), in order to determine whether travellers from visa-free third countries would be allowed to come to the territory of the EU. The would-be traveller would need to be in possession of a valid ETIAS authorisation in order to be allowed into the Schengen area/ to board the aircraft.The applicant is vetted against multiple databases, as well as the information they need to provide in the application, to determine, via algorithms, whether they might pose an irregular migration risk, a threat to security or a high epidemic risk, before they arrive at the external border at a border crossing point/ airport. If there are no problems or hits at the checked databases, the applicant automatically receives their ETIAS authorisation. The final decision, where the are some irregularities or alerts attached to the applicant in some of the databases, will be taken by the authorities of the responsible Member State.
European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS): Europol tasks (A8-0323/2017 - Kinga Gál)
I welcome the outcome of the report, as the latter improves the proposal to create a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (mimicking the ESTA system of the United States), in order to determine whether travellers from Visa-free third countries would be allowed to come to the territory of the EU.While Europol does not belong to the Schengen acquis and whereas ETIAS will fully belong to the latter, I welcome the strengthening of Europol by extending its tasks, especially with the responsibility to develop and host the ETIAS watchlist (people suspected to have committed, or be likely to commit a criminal offence). I support the call for the Management Board, after consulting the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), to adopt guidelines further specifying the necessary procedures for the processing of information for the purpose of the ETIAS watch list.I also share the opinion that it is important to increase institutional cooperation by ensuring Europol’s information sharing with ETIAS as regards any terrorist offences, as well as, direct consultation through ETIAS National Unit of the responsible Member State in cases falling under Europol’s mandate.
European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (A8-0404/2017 - Monica Macovei)
The proposed agreement would provide a new mandate for the European Agency in charge of the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (normally known as ‘eu.LISA’). This Agency is still relatively new, having been established only in 2011, and having started operations only in December 2012.The new mandate seeks to improve the functioning of eu.LISA and strengthen its capacity to act, in particular, in the light of new EU databases being created in the area of Justice and Home Affairs for which eu.LISA will be responsible (a new Entry-Exit System, a revised Visa Information System, a revised EURODAC), and in the light of the proposed interoperability of those EU databases, a project for which eu.LISA will also be responsible (if it is agreed upon by the co-legislators).Finally, I voted in favour as I support a strong and independent agency to ensure data protection, data quality and data security for all EU databases in the area of Justice and Home Affairs.
2019 budget - Trilogue mandate (A8-0247/2018 - Daniele Viotti)
In favour of the report, the latter constitutes the first formal response of the EP to the draft Budget 2019 unveiled by the Commission on 23 May 2018. It serves as a mandate for the EP delegation for trilogue scheduled for 12 July with the Council and the Commission, ahead of Council’s reading on Draft Budget 2019.I share the opinion that the 2019 Draft Budget as proposed by the EC is not sufficient to comply with political commitments regarding climate change, migration management or the numerous new initiatives. The EU budget should support all political priorities, such as: sustainable growth, innovation, competitiveness, security, the fight against climate change, the transition to renewable energy, migration, and a particular focus on young people. It should target decent and quality jobs through further improvements in the financing of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), Horizon 2020 (R&D), the Connecting Europe Facility and Erasmus+ (to be doubled), especially to counterbalance the cuts operated to finance the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI), and adequate support for young farmers. Moreover, any new EU initiatives should be financed by additional funds and not be detrimental to existing programmes.
73rd Session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0230/2018 - Eugen Freund)
In favour of the annual recommendation to the Council on the 73rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly, I share the opinion that the EU and its Member States need to remain fully committed to multilateralism, global governance, the promotion of UN core values as an integral part of the EU’s external policy, and the three pillars of the UN system: (i) human rights, (ii) peace and security, (iii) development.The EU’s global strategy reflects the level of today’s global challenges, which require a strong and more efficient UN and a deepening of cooperation at Member State level both within the EU and the UN.EU Member States need to make every effort to coordinate their action in the organs and bodies of the UN system and speak with one voice based on international human rights law and the core values of the EU.
Guidelines for Member States to prevent humanitarian assistance being criminalised (B8-0314/2018)
In recent years, due to the migrant crisis, the distinction between persons who assist with irregular entry or irregular residence and those who are providing humanitarian aid or shelter is blurred, opening the way for abuse. Therefore, I consider that we need to define the existing legal framework and to decriminalise actions which are by their nature humanitarian assistance. Clear lines between different forms of assistance is necessary in order to distinguish between those who provide aid on a humanitarian basis and those who are involved in illegal activities. Furthermore, uniformity in the implementation of the acquis at Members State level is necessary in order to ensure a coherent European practice in this field.I consider that, together with the implementation of adequate measures for development, all these actions will lead to long-term stability and will shape the framework of humanitarian assistance in order to better address the issues of those in need.
Adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield (B8-0305/2018)
After the Court of the European Union annulled the so-called Safe Harbour Decision of the Commission, on the transfer of personal data from the EU to the United States of America, in October 2015, the Commission subsequently negotiated and adopted a new decision on such transfers of personal data, the so-called Privacy Shield, in July 2016.Taking into account the first annual report of the Commission on the functioning of the Privacy Shield, the opinions of the Article 29 Working Party and of the EDPS, the coming into force of the GDPR and the higher standard of protection it ensures, and also the reauthorisation by the US Congress of the Section 702 of the FISA act, the adoption of the Cloud Act and the current state of nominations for bodies essential for the functioning of the Privacy Shield arrangement, I share the opinion that the Privacy Shield in its current form does not provide the adequate level of protection required by the current EU data protection law and the EU charter.Therefore, I support the resolution and the call for the suspension of the decision until the required level of protection can be guaranteed, as defined in the law and Court jurisprudence.
The adverse effects of the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act on EU citizens (B8-0306/2018)
In favour of the resolution, I believe that the lives and livelihood of thousands of EU citizens and their families are being very seriously affected by FATCA on a daily basis. I support the call for the Council to mandate the Commission to open negotiations with the US on an EU-US FATCA agreement, with a view to ensuring the full reciprocal exchange of information, upholding the fundamental principles of EU law, as well as the Payment Accounts Directive, and allowing EU ‘accidental Americans’ to relinquish their unwanted US citizenship on a no-fees, no-filings, no-penalties basis.
Statute for social and solidarity-based enterprises (A8-0231/2018 - Jiří Maštálka)
In favour of the report, I believe that social and solidarity companies generally create better quality for our society and the communities they act within, as they are driven by social values, not by profit. A European label for social enterprises is a first step to create more coherence and to facilitate these companies operating cross-border and gaining access to the internal market. Currently, the social economy provides employment for more than 14 million people, representing around 6.5% of workers in the EU and 10% of EU undertakings.
Structural Reform Support Programme: financial envelope and general objective (A8-0227/2018 - Ruža Tomašić)
. ‒ I voted in favour as I share the opinion that the financial envelope of the Structural Reform Support Programme must be increased and its general objective must be adapted in order to meet the growing demand for support from Member States, and especially from those whose currency is not yet the euro. Furthermore, measures such as those intended to foster full employment, social policies, and fighting tax fraud or evasion should be at the top of our priorities.
Reform of the electoral law of the European Union (A8-0248/2018 - Jo Leinen, Danuta Maria Hübner)
. ‒ I welcome this report as I believe that it is necessary to reform our electoral procedure before the 2019 elections in order to enhance the democratic and transnational dimension of the upcoming elections, while strengthening the legitimacy of the EU decision-making process. Furthermore, gender equality must be ensured in the establishment of electoral lists, while promoting representative democracy and ensuring the direct representation of European Union citizens in the European Parliament.
Partnership Agreement between the EU and EAEC and Armenia (A8-0177/2018 - László Tőkés)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part. The new agreement sets a new legal basis to reinvigorate the political dialogue and broaden the scope of economic cooperation, as well as cooperation in sectors such as energy, transport, infrastructure and the environment. Parliament encouraged Armenia to implement mutually agreed reforms, regarding in particular the stability of the electoral system, the independence of the judiciary, and transparency in the governance of state institutions, whilst underlining the paramount importance of involving relevant civil society organisations during this implementation phase.
Partnership Agreement between the EU and EAEC and Armenia (resolution) (A8-0179/2018 - László Tőkés)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part. The new agreement sets a new legal basis to reinvigorate the political dialogue and broaden the scope of economic cooperation, as well as cooperation in sectors such as energy, transport, infrastructure and the environment. The latter constitutes a significant step forward in EU-Armenian relations and encompasses a commitment to a further deepening of political and economic relations.
EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (A8-0222/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other part. The draft EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement provides a legal framework covering issues from regular political dialogue to trade relations and regulatory cooperation, and development assistance. Its aim is to build a solid basis for strengthening ties between Iraq and the EU.
EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) (A8-0224/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other part. Iraq is faced with a magnitude of challenges and the country strives to make progress towards better governance, economic progress and national reconciliation. The EU has reaffirmed its commitment to building a strong partnership with Iraq, based on the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, and to supporting the Iraqi authorities throughout the transition to democracy and reconstruction process, while also tackling the root causes of the political, social and economic instability.
EU-New Zealand Agreement relating to the modification of concessions (accession of Croatia) (A8-0220/2018 - Daniel Caspary)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the recommendation. The Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand was negotiated following the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. With the accession of Croatia, the European Union enlarged its customs union. Therefore, in line with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, the EU has to enter into negotiations with WTO members having negotiating rights related to the tariff schedule of Croatia in order to eventually agree on a compensatory adjustment. Such adjustment is due if the adoption of the EU’s external tariff regime results in an increase in tariff beyond the level for which the acceding country has bound itself at the WTO. Negotiations with New Zealand resulted in a draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters that was signed on 13 March 2018.
Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank: clearing and payment systems (A8-0219/2018 - Gabriel Mato, Danuta Maria Hübner)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as, in the context of the review of the rules governing clearing (the EMIR Regulation), this amendment to the Statute of the European Central Bank will allow the latter to bring central clearing counterparties (CCPs) within the scope of its regulatory powers. I share the opinion that the text strikes the right balance between creating legal certainty and leaving flexibility to the ECB in order to be able to react to exceptional situations. The ECB has now clear legal competence in the area of central clearing also when it comes to third-country CCPs.
Vehicle taxation: charging of heavy good vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (A8-0200/2018 - Deirdre Clune)
I voted in favour of the report as distance-based road pricing can play a key role in incentivising cleaner, more efficient operations, and its coherent design is paramount to ensuring fair treatment of road users and sustainable infrastructure financing. An efficient transport system is essential for the smooth functioning of the internal market and is a key sector of the economy. In order to give Member States as much flexibility as possible, it is proposed to reduce the minimum rates of taxation in a single step, starting on 1 January 2024, instead of the gradual reduction of five steps as proposed by the Commission.
Draft amending budget No 2/2018: Entering the surplus of the financial year 2017 (A8-0209/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the report. The draft amending budget No 2/2018 aims to enter in the 2018 budget the surplus from the 2017 financial year, amounting to EUR 555.5 million. The main components of that surplus are: a positive outturn on income of EUR 338.6 million, an under-spending in expenditure of EUR 383.4 million, and a positive balance of exchange rate differences amounting to EUR 166.4 million.
Draft amending budget No 3/2018: Extension of the Facility for refugees in Turkey (A8-0246/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the report. Draft amending budget No 3 aims at mobilising EUR 500 million in order to finance the largest part of the 2018 budget dedicated to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey. Indeed, in order to allow for the continuation of the schooling of refugee children in Turkey, it is necessary to support the disbursement of this amount from the EU budget with the aim of financing the Facility for Refugees in Turkey for the year 2018.
EU guarantee to the EIB against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, as regards Iran (B8-0313/2018)
My vote reflects the opinion that a potential EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects in Iran would put at risk the EIB’s ability to raise capital on the international financial markets taking into account US sanctions against Iran and restrict EIB’s access to the US dollar payments system. I share the opinion that such a guarantee could lead to severe financial risks for the EIB.
Towards an EU external strategy against early and forced marriages (A8-0187/2018 - Charles Goerens)
I voted in favour of the report, which addresses the multiple causes of child, early and forced marriage, including harmful traditions, endemic poverty, conflicts, stereotypes, lack of regard for gender equality and women’s rights and lack of appropriate educational opportunities. I strongly support the call on the European Union, in the context of its foreign and development cooperation policies, to offer a strategic pact to its partners, and, to that end, to require that the latter prohibit child, early and forced marriages. Furthermore, in order to comprehensively tackle child, early and forced marriages, the European Union, as a major actor in global development and human rights, must play a leading role in cooperation with regional organisations and local communities.
The definition of SMEs (B8-0304/2018)
SMEs account for 99% of European enterprises, providing over 90 million jobs and generating EUR 3.9 trillion in value added. Indeed, SMEs are the backbone of the European economy and the biggest providers of jobs. Nevertheless, they remain disproportionately affected by administrative and regulatory burdens and must deal with challenging conditions including market failures. Therefore, a stringent SME definition constitutes a tool that can diminish market failures and problems inherent to competition between enterprises that differ in terms of size, volume of assets and business models.
Negotiations on the EU-Azerbaijan Comprehensive Agreement (A8-0185/2018 - Norica Nicolai)
I voted in favour of the report. The EU is Azerbaijan’s first trading partner and its biggest export and import market, representing 48.6% of Azerbaijan’s total trade and constituting its largest source of foreign direct investment. Azerbaijan is a strategic energy partner for the EU, allowing for a diversification of the EU’s energy sources. I share the opinion that it must be ensured that the deepening of relations between the EU and Azerbaijan is conditional on upholding and respecting the core values and principles of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Moreover, I support the provisions which call on the parties to communicate clearly regarding the aims and conditionality of the new agreement and the ongoing negotiation process in order to improve transparency and public awareness.
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)
The existing posting provisions and administrative requirements do not suit the highly mobile nature of the work of drivers. This leads to disproportionate regulatory burdens for operators and generates unjustified barriers to provision of cross-border services. I voted in favour of the report as I believe that the proposal to exclude international transport and transit operations from the scope of the Posting of Workers Directive represents the best solution at this moment. Indeed, I share the opinion that the Posting of Workers Directive was not conceived to take into account the mobile nature of the profession of driver.
Adapting to development in the road transport sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
The road transport sector is a very important sector and crucial to making our society function.On 31 May 2017, the Commission adopted a Mobility Package with the aim of ensuring fair competition, simplifying existing rules, preserving the EU internal market and ensuring the rights of workers in this sector. The Commission proposals introduce changes in four distinctive areas: letterbox companies, light commercial vehicles (LCVs), cabotage and enforcement. However, I share the opinion that, when it comes to cabotage, the provisions put forward could worsen the current situation that the Member States face. Therefore, I voted against the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector. Indeed, my vote reflects the need to have further consideration on the report in order to provide room for strengthening the proposal on several points.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Jordan Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0232/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report. Since the entry into force of Regulation 2016/794 (the Europol Regulation) on 1 May 2017, the Commission has been responsible, on behalf of the Union, for negotiating international agreements with third countries regarding the exchange of personal data with Europol. This recommendation specifically concerns negotiations with Jordan. The report underlines the requisite data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that the Commission ensures that fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future agreement, not just those concerning protection of personal data and privacy.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Turkey Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0233/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the recommendation by the Commission for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Turkey on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Turkish competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. I support the call for an appropriate impact assessment to be carried out with a view to defining the safeguards which need to be integrated in the agreement. In addition, I support the call on the Commission to ensure that fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Israel Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0235/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report. Since the entry into application of Regulation 2016/794 (the Europol Regulation) on 1 May 2017, the Commission has been responsible, on behalf of the Union, for negotiating international agreements with third countries for the exchange of personal data with Europol. This Recommendation specifically concerns negotiations with Israel. The report underlines the necessary data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that the Commission ensures that the fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future Agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy. Also, the report stresses that if such a level cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Tunisia Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0237/2018 - Claude Moraes)
Since the entry into application of Regulation 2016/794 (the Europol Regulation) on 1 May 2017, the Commission is responsible, on behalf of the Union, for negotiating international agreements with third countries for the exchange of personal data with Europol. This Recommendation specifically concerns negotiations with Tunisia. The report underlines the necessary data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that the Commission ensures that the fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future Agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy. Also, the report stresses that if such level cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Morocco Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0238/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Moroccan competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.The report emphasises the necessary data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that Commission ensures that fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future Agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy. The report underlines that if such a level cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Lebanon Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0234/2018 - Claude Moraes)
Since the entry into application of Regulation 2016/794 (the Europol Regulation) on 1 May 2017, the Commission has been responsible, on behalf of the Union, for negotiating international agreements with third countries for the exchange of personal data with Europol. This Recommendation specifically concerns negotiations with Lebanon.The report underlines the necessary data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that the Commission ensures that the fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future Agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy. Also, the report stresses that if such level cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Egypt Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0236/2018 - Claude Moraes)
Since the entry into application of Regulation 2016/794 (the Europol Regulation) on 1 May 2017, the Commission has been responsible, on behalf of the Union, for negotiating international agreements with third countries for the exchange of personal data with Europol. This Recommendation specifically concerns negotiations with Egypt.The report underlines the necessary data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that the Commission ensures that the fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future Agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy. Also, the report stresses that if such level cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Algeria Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0239/2018 - Claude Moraes)
Since the entry into application of Regulation 2016/794 (the Europol Regulation) on 1 May 2017, the Commission has been responsible, on behalf of the Union, for negotiating international agreements with third countries for the exchange of personal data with Europol.This Recommendation specifically concerns negotiations with Algeria. The report underlines the necessary data protection benchmarks that the European Parliament expects to see in the Agreement and requests that Commission ensures that fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter are respected by the future Agreement, not just those of protection of personal data and privacy. Also, the report stresses that if such level cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded.
Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (A8-0213/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)
Extension of the EU-US Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0212/2018 - Rolandas Paksas)
I am in favour because I believe that the strategic partnership between the European Union and the United States of America should be enhanced, taking also into consideration that the US is the main scientific and technological partner of the EU. The partnership, which entered into force 20 years ago, should continue to develop in the future, leading to significant job creation and improvement in the quality of life for citizens on both sides of the Atlantic.
European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (A8-0217/2018 - Zigmantas Balčytis)
I welcome this report, as I share the opinion that it will support the rapid establishment of a joint undertaking that will provide the basis for an independent EU high-performance computer infrastructure, enabling our scientists and industry to lead key areas of research and industrial innovation. These machines will give EU researchers access to complex massive calculation that can bring huge benefits to society, primarily for civilian uses such as health care, energy, smart cities, autonomous transport and space.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/009 FR/Air France (A8-0210/2018 - Alain Lamassoure)
My vote underlines the growing need to support, and provide additional assistance to, workers suffering the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. The EGF funding of EUR 9 894 483 is to contribute towards the cost of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services, providing assistance for 1 858 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies in Air France in the regions of Île-de-France (FR10) and Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (FE82), with the aim of providing assistance for integrating the persons affected into the labour market. I welcome France’s assurance that a financial contribution from the EGF will not replace actions that the enterprise concerned is required to take by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements.
Role of cities in the institutional framework of the Union (A8-0203/2018 - Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski)
Given that, in the European Union, more than 70% of the population live in urban areas, cities are valuable and irreplaceable economic, social and cultural assets and therefore should contribute to territorial cohesion. I am in favour of the report and share the view that cities and local public authorities play a central role in the preparation, design, financing and implementation of the major Union policies, such as the fight against climate change, while also having a high potential in EU external policies.
Three-dimensional printing: intellectual property rights and civil liability (A8-0223/2018 - Joëlle Bergeron)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as 3D printing is one of the most advanced technologies where EU can play a leading role. However, I share the view that this technology might raise some specific legal and ethical concerns regarding all areas of intellectual property law. Therefore, the adoption of new legislation and the tailoring of the existing laws to the cases of 3D technology are needed.
European Defence Industrial Development Programme (A8-0037/2018 - Françoise Grossetête)
. ‒ Competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the European defence policy must be fostered in order to move towards to the Union’s strategic autonomy. Defence products and technologies, together with improved agility of defence supply and value chains, should contribute to the development of the Programme after its research phase, in order to support the competitiveness of the European defence industry on the internal market and the global marketplace.
Integrated farm statistics (A8-0300/2017 - Maria Gabriela Zoană)
. ‒ I welcome this resolution as I share the view that we must establish a framework for the European statistics at the level of agricultural holdings and provide information of integration on this structure. These statistics should include production methods, rural development measures, agro-environmental aspects and other related information.
Measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in the field of value-added tax (A8-0215/2018 - Roberts Zīle)
. ‒ My vote is in favour of the report, and it reflects the opinion that the Member States should strengthen their administrative cooperation in order to develop exchange of information and to coordinate their actions in order to fight VAT fraud more efficiently. Furthermore, Member States’ tax administrators should intensify their cooperation in Eurofisc.
Violation of rights of indigenous peoples in the world (A8-0194/2018 - Francisco Assis)
. ‒ The total population of indigenous people exceeds 370 million in over 70 countries worldwide. Even though they live in different geographical and economic settings, they all face similar threats and challenges. Therefore, I support the adoption of adequate measures to ensure the full recognition, protection and promotion of the rights of indigenous people, as enshrined in human rights treaties and conventions.
Climate diplomacy (A8-0221/2018 - Arne Lietz, Jo Leinen) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport, tout en saluant son contenu qui souligne l’importance de la diplomatie climatique pour l’UE, une forme de politique étrangère ciblée, visant à engager les gouvernements des pays tiers et les acteurs non gouvernementaux partout dans le monde afin de soutenir la lutte contre le changement climatique. Dans cette démarche, coopérer sur des questions spécifiques liées au climat, nouer des partenariats stratégiques et renforcer les relations entre les acteurs étatiques et non étatiques constituent des éléments clés. Je partage pleinement l’opinion que les capacités diplomatiques de l’UE devraient être renforcées afin de promouvoir l’action climatique à l’échelle mondiale, d’appuyer la mise en œuvre de l’accord de Paris et de prévenir les conflits liés au changement climatique.
Structural and financial barriers in the access to culture (A8-0169/2018 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski)
I voted in favour of the report. Its objective is to carry out a cross-sectoral analysis of existing obstacles to cultural access and participation. I share the opinion that access to culture and cultural participation represents a cross-cutting issue, and therefore coordinating cultural policy with other policy areas such as education, social, economic, regional, foreign, digital and media policies is paramount. While I wish to stress the importance of an active and accessible cultural sector for the development of an inclusive society, along with the strengthening of a common core of universal values and active European citizenship, I strongly support the call put forward in the report to develop and implement the specific measures needed to guarantee access to and participation in cultural life.
Proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions (A8-0395/2017 - Andreas Schwab)
I voted in favour of the report. Regulating professions is of crucial importance when it comes to safeguarding public interest objectives, such as the protection of public health, the protection of consumers, recipients of services and workers, or the protection of the environment. Therefore, proper regulation of professions is essential for preserving the EU economic, social and cultural model. In the absence of EU—level harmonisation, it is a Member State competence to decide whether and how to regulate a profession within the limits of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality. The Directive aims to establish rules for proportionality assessments to be conducted by Member States before the introduction of new, or the amendment of existing, professional regulations, in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, while guaranteeing transparency and a high level of consumer protection.
Use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road (A8-0193/2018 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
As part of the 2017 road transport mobility package, the European Commission proposed the softening of the existing restrictions on using hired vehicles in international transport and that a uniform regulatory framework be established which would give transport operators across the EU equal access to the market for hired goods vehicles.Road transport is still the most common method for carrying goods over land. In 2015, three quarters (75.3%) of all inland freight transport activities in the EU were by road.While I agree with some measures, such as the need to prevent transport operators from moving their fleet to states with low taxes and hiring them back, I believe that the proposal to amend Directive 2006/1/EC still needs to be improved. I share the opinion that we need to have an assessment on the effects of the latter on road safety, the environment and tax revenue, which are not clearly reflected within.
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations: Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)
The current evaluation of the social legislation in road transport in the EU has shown shortcomings in the current legal framework and problems regarding enforcement. Furthermore, a number of discrepancies exist between Member States in interpretation, application and implementation of the rules. This creates legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of drivers and operators, which is detrimental to the working, social and competition conditions in the sector.In favour of the report, I share the opinion that the latter comprises sufficient elements to make significant improvements in order to create a more socially just EU internal market, improve drivers’ working conditions, promote road safety and prevent social dumping. The numerous proposals to reduce the amount of environmental damage caused by road transport are also important, in the case of both the first and the second mobility package.
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations: Amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (A8-0205/2018 - Wim van de Camp)
In favour of the proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation EC 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation EC 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs, I share the opinion that the latter aims to remedy shortcomings in the current law, such as lack of clarity, non-uniform implementation, insufficient enforcement and to facilitate strengthened cooperation between Member States and the relevant authorities. I believe that the measures foreseen within would improve road safety, drivers’ working conditions and increase the attractiveness of the sector.
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Amending Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
Against the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations, I share the opinion that we need to continue to fight to put a stop to the unfair competition between European employees on the basis of their nationality.I believe that the measures foreseen in the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector, adopted by the TRAN Committee, would considerably weaken the guarantees and social protections of the workers in the road sector.The mobility package must continue to liberalize the EU road haulage market and not introduce more restrictive conditions than the current cabotage provisions of Regulation 1072/2009.
Objection to Commission delegated regulation amending delegated regulation (EU) 2017/118 establishing fisheries conservation measures for the protection of the marine environment in the North Sea (B8-0299/2018)
I fully support regionalisation as introduced under the 2013 CFP Reform. However, Member States must fulfil their obligations and adopt measures in compliance with environmental legislation. The protection and preservation of the marine environment must not be compromised for short-term commercial interests. Therefore, supporting the objection to this delegated act, I consider the proposed measures within the latter insufficient because of the outdated information/data serving as a basis, the non-application of the review clause and reporting obligations, fairly unambitious protection measures with numerous derogations and the lengthy transitional period.
Georgian occupied territories ten years after the Russian invasion (RC-B8-0275/2018, B8-0275/2018, B8-0276/2018, B8-0277/2018, B8-0278/2018, B8-0279/2018, B8-0285/2018)
As we reiterate once again our full support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders, I believe our efforts should better reflect our solidarity with the people of the occupied territories by concentrating our efforts in allowing international monitoring and humanitarian aid.Sovereignty, independence and the peaceful settlement of disputes are key principles of the European security order and must be respected.
Negotiations for a new EU-ACP Partnership Agreement (B8-0274/2018) FR
Tout en saluant l’architecture générale pour la future coopération entre le groupe des pays ACP et l’Union européenne proposée par la Commission, je souligne que le programme de développement durable à l’horizon 2030, les objectifs de développement durable ainsi que le consensus européen pour le développement doivent constituer le noyau du futur partenariat. En outre, il est indispensable d’impliquer la société civile dans le dialogue politique et sa pleine participation devrait constituer un élément contraignant du partenariat. De même, il est important de renforcer la dimension parlementaire du futur accord en veillant à ce que la future APP (Assemblée parlementaire paritaire) assure un dialogue parlementaire ouvert, démocratique et global.
Monitoring the application of EU law 2016 (A8-0197/2018 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
Every year, the European Parliament produces an annual report on monitoring the application of the EU law based on the report submitted by the Commission and expresses its position on the state of the implementation of the EU law. The Commission’s 2016 Report shows that ensuring timely and correct application of EU legislation in the Member States remains a serious challenge and priority due to the high number of infringement procedures. The four fields in which the greatest number of transposition infringement proceedings were opened against Member States in 2016 were the environment, justice and consumers, taxation and the internal market.Therefore, in favour of the report, I also share the opinion that a clear approach on behalf of the Commission is needed, which should be based on the priority-setting by focusing its enforcement action where it can make a real difference. Furthermore, I support as well the increasing role of social partners and civil society in reporting shortcomings in the transposition and application of EU law.
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0207/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira)
My vote reflects the opinion that the distribution of seats in the European Parliament should first of all respect the principle of degressive proportionality, as stipulated in article 14 of the Treaty on European Union. The European Parliament has a fundamental democratic role and, to strengthen it, the number of MEPs from under-represented countries should be increased, ensuring at the same time that no Member State will lose a seat.
Insolvency proceedings: updated annexes to the Regulation (A8-0174/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council replacing Annex A to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings, as the aim of the latter is to ensure that the scope of the recast Regulation is adjusted to the actual legal framework of the Member States on insolvency by the time of its application. It therefore seeks to replace the list in Annex A to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on Croatia with a new list taking account of the information notified by that Member State. Also, changes to Annex A of the Regulation do not affect the substantive set of rules.
EU-Iceland Agreement on supplementary rules for external borders and visas for 2014-2020 (A8-0196/2018 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen)
I share the opinion that the Internal Security Found for Borders and Visas is an important element of the solidarity mechanism and that Iceland’s contribution to this budget will ensure a high level of security for this associated country, and also for the EU. Through this agreement, Iceland will apply the same rules as EU countries regarding the control of its external borders, enhancing the EU-Iceland cooperation in this field but also safeguarding the common security interest of the signatories.
EU-Switzerland Agreement on supplementary rules for external borders and visas for 2014-2020 (A8-0195/2018 - Claude Moraes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the conclusion of the agreement. The Internal Security Fund ‘borders and visas’ instrument establishes a solidarity mechanism, binding the participating states by the same European rules on the control of external borders in each other’s interests and on each other’s behalf. The purpose of the proposal – the draft agreement with Switzerland – is to enable the Commission to assume responsibility for the implementation of the budget of the instrument in this associated country and to determine Switzerland’s contribution to the Union budget in respect of it.
Implementation of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0192/2018 - Monica Macovei)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report. The draft Council Decision aims to lift the remaining restrictions on the use of SIS by Bulgaria and Romania. Eliminating all restrictions on the use of SIS will enable Romania and Bulgaria to ensure the same level of protection of the Union’s external borders as other Schengen Member States. Lifting the remaining restrictions will increase the level of security in the Schengen area, making the fight against serious crime and terrorism more effective.Full Schengen Member State status has to be granted to Romania and to Bulgaria as soon as possible. Both countries successfully fulfilled in 2011 all relevant criteria and prerequisites, as set by the Schengen evaluation procedures, so the requisite Council decision in this regard should be taken as soon as possible.
Cohesion policy and the circular economy (A8-0184/2018 - Davor Škrlec)
While highlighting that local and regional authorities are at the forefront of the transition to a circular economy, the report calls on the Commission to implement measures in favour of the circular economy, including monitoring measures, while reducing the administrative burden. Moreover, the report lays down an emphasis on the potential of regions and local communities to invest in recycling infrastructure and create new green jobs. In favour of the report, I particularly welcome the call put forward within the latter on regions and local authorities to ensure that the circular economy is suitably integrated into educational programmes and vocational training and re-training.
Further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0183/2018 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
I voted in favour of the report. The objective of the proposed macro-financial assistance is to help Ukraine cover part of its additional external financing needs in 2018-2019, reducing the economy’s short-term balance-of-payment and fiscal vulnerabilities. Furthermore, the macro-financial assistance shall contribute to values shared with the European Union, including sustainable and socially responsible development leading to employment creation and poverty reduction, and a commitment to a strong civil society. The Commission shall regularly inform the European Parliament and the Council of developments relating to the assistance.
Negotiations on the modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0158/2018 - Charles Tannock)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, as it is crucial to strengthen cooperation between Chile and the EU and to ensure that the modernised agreement with Chile is ambitious, comprehensive and balanced. Chile and the EU are united by shared values and close cultural, economic and political ties. They are close partners in tackling regional and global challenges, such as climate change, international security, sustainable development and global governance. From a more socioeconomic perspective, I share the opinion that particular attention has to be paid to the fight against poverty and the reduction of inequality, and to efforts to improve educational standards and programmes and to ensure that people with the lowest incomes have full access to higher education.
EU-NATO relations (A8-0188/2018 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)
. ‒ In favour of the report; I welcome the outcome of the latter, as it reiterates that purely national responses to terrorism and insecurity are inadequate to protect EU citizens from these threats and only close cooperation between the EU and NATO would allow Member States to be more complementary and more effective.I share the opinion that the EU has to do much more for its own deterrence and defence capability. However, I also believe that strategic autonomy at EU level needs to be achieved in the framework of a strengthened EU-NATO partnership and hence, developed in this spirit.While ensuring complementarity of PESCO, I agree that we need to further cooperate and explore synergies on strengthening and developing the technological and industrial bases for a swift and rapid movement of military personnel and assets within and beyond the EU.
Cyber defence (A8-0189/2018 - Urmas Paet)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as I strongly share the opinion that there is an urgent need to strengthen the EU’s capabilities in the field of cyber—defence. Cyber and hybrid challenges, threats and attacks constitute a major threat to the security, defence, stability and competitiveness of the EU, its Member States and its citizens. A common cyber—defence policy a should constitute core element in the development of the European Defence Union (EDU), while a coherent development of cyber—capacities across all EU institutions and bodies, as well as in the Member States, should be ensured. Moreover, while stressing the importance of increased cooperation between the EU and NATO as a means of preventing, detecting and deterring cyber—attacks, I support the call on the Council to consider ways of providing, at soon as possible, Union-level support for integrating the cyber—domain into Member States’ military doctrines, in a harmonised manner and in close cooperation with NATO.
State of play of recreational fisheries in the EU (A8-0191/2018 - Norica Nicolai)
I recognise the need for improved reporting and monitoring of catches in connection with recreational fisheries, in order to ensure the sustainability of these activities in the EU Member States, and I therefore voted in favour of the report. Furthermore, a clearer definition of recreational fishers, taking also into account the diversity of this sector, will significantly contribute to the accuracy of the data collected, which will lead to a proper assessment of activities and their impact on the economy and the environment.
Clearing obligation, reporting requirements and risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives and trade repositories (A8-0181/2018 - Werner Langen) FR
Je soutiens la proposition EMIR Refit (le règlement sur les infrastructures de marché européennes - programme pour une réglementation affûtée et performante), qui révise le règlement EMIR original du 2012, en simplifiant certaines règles pour les contreparties financières et non financières dans le marché des dérivés, les rendant plus proportionnelles ce qui répond au principe du «plus simple, plus léger, plus efficace et moins coûteux».
Common rules in the field of civil aviation and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (A8-0364/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) FR
Je soutiens la proposition de règlement concernant des règles communes dans le domaine de l’aviation civile et instituant une Agence de la sécurité aérienne de l'Union européenne, dont l'objectif principal serait d'établir, de maintenir et d'appliquer un niveau élevé et uniforme de sécurité de l'aviation civile dans l'Union.Je salue aussi l’introduction de la nouvelle disposition stipulant que les interdépendances entre la sécurité de l'aviation civile et les facteurs socioéconomiques (les conditions d’emploi par exemple) devraient être examinées, notamment dans les procédures réglementaires, et en vue d'identifier les mesures visant à prévenir les risques socio-économiques pour la sécurité aérienne.
CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0010/2018 - Damiano Zoffoli) FR
. – Il est regrettable que les émissions de CO2 et la consommation de carburant des véhicules utilitaires lourds neufs mis sur le marché de l’Union ne soient, à l’heure actuelle, soumises à aucune certification, ni à aucune exigence de surveillance ou de communication d’informations de manière objective et comparable. Ceci empêche d’avoir des données fiables concernant la configuration du parc de ces véhicules, son évolution dans le temps et son incidence potentielle sur les émissions de CO2. Par conséquent, je soutiens fortement la proposition visant à contrôler et à diffuser des données sur les émissions de CO2 et sur la consommation de carburant des véhicules utilitaires lourds nouvellement immatriculés dans l’Union sur la base d’une méthodologie convenue d’un commun accord.
Modernisation of education in the EU (A8-0173/2018 - Krystyna Łybacka)
I shared the opinion that European education should be focused on achieving common goals, including ensuring quality education for all. In order to accomplish this, I strongly believe that internal and external collaboration must be enhanced, and the rights of the most vulnerable groups must be promoted, including women’s and girls’ rights.In this regard, a notable increase in the founding of the ERASMUS + program is essential in order to provide the same opportunities also to students from disfavoured environments and to include more students and teachers, which will result in better inclusion and a more qualified workforce at the European level.
Towards a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector (A8-0186/2018 - Carlos Iturgaiz)
My vote underlines the growing need to support the aquaculture sector as it is one with a high potential for sustainable development, which may increase both employment and food security for EU citizens.As competition from third countries has been growing in this area over the last two decades and EU overall production has remained more or less constant, I welcome the EU’s initiative to increase its production in the aquaculture sector while meeting the same standards as for the rest of its economic activities.
Odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework (A8-0155/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
I voted in favour of this report, as I strongly believe that there is a need for a proper response at EU level as this phenomenon not only imposes an unfair additional cost to costumers, insurers, second—hand car dealers, leasing companies and manufactures, but also exerts severe negative impacts on roads safety. Furthermore, the environmental impact of those cars is worse than expected and pollutant emissions increase.Therefore, I strongly support the call on the Commission to submit a legislative framework that requires Member States to create legal, technical and operational barriers in order to make odometer manipulations impossible.
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A8-0180/2018 - Elisabetta Gardini)
Against the background of internal security concerns and in light of disaster trends, I welcome the proposals to strengthen the European civil protection system by improving coordination among Member States and by also developing new capabilities at the European level, complementary to Member State efforts.
Connecting Europe facility after 2020 (RC-B8-0242/2018, B8-0242/2018, B8-0243/2018, B8-0245/2018, B8-0246/2018, B8-0247/2018)
The transport sector plays a key role in the European economy, accounting for 10% of total EU employment and is vital for the efficient transport of people and goods. Securing the future transport network and modernising the transport sector to make it safer, more reliable, more efficient and more green is thus essential. The CEF (Connecting Europe facility) has already contributed to many high-quality projects in the EU and can be recognised as being one of the most important European funding programme, offering the opportunity to finance the deployment of sustainable transport projects, being complementary to Horizon 2020, the European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF) and to EFSI.
Situation in Nicaragua (RC-B8-0244/2018, B8-0244/2018, B8-0248/2018, B8-0249/2018, B8-0250/2018, B8-0251/2018, B8-0252/2018, B8-0253/2018)
I share the opinion that inclusive dialogue is the solution for the protests in Nicaragua, as democracy is also founded on the freedom of expression and on the freedom of peaceful assembly. While the public forces must protect the protesters against any form of abuse, they should also act with minimum restraint in order to help rebuild trust in relation with local authorities, contributing to the resolution of this situation.I welcome the EU’s initiative to support the much-needed broad and inclusive dialogue between all sectors of the society on one hand, and the Government on the other.
Gender equality and women's empowerment: transforming the lives of girls and women through EU external relations 2016-2020 (A8-0167/2018 - Linda McAvan, Dubravka Šuica) FR
J’ai voté en faveur du rapport qui fait le point sur plusieurs évolutions positives observées après la première année de fonctionnement du plan d’action II sur l’égalité des sexes, tout en mettant en lumière diverses pistes d’amélioration. Je partage l’opinion que le plan d’action prévoit un programme exhaustif qui vise à agir sur les principaux facteurs et causes de discrimination.Néanmoins, afin que le plan puisse fonctionner concrètement sur le terrain, il faut veiller à ce que celui-ci soit soutenu par un engagement à long terme et constant d’acteurs politiques, ainsi que par des ressources appropriées, tout comme par une capacité de l’Union à ajuster ses efforts selon les réalités locales dans les pays bénéficiaires.
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (A8-0162/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I welcome this report, as I strongly believe that the future EU Youth Strategy should have in the centre the young people in Europe and their needs, encourage their participation and involvement in the decision-making process, including also the most disadvantaged ones.In my view it is essential to ensure equal access to quality education and training for the young people in Europe as well as fair working conditions and remuneration.
Implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries)
Strongly believing that substances with the potential of damaging the environment should be restricted or at least limited at the product design phase, as 80% of environmental pollution and 90% of manufacturing costs are the result of decisions taken at that stage of the project, I voted in favour of this report. Furthermore, Member States must strengthen their market surveillance framework in order to ensure the effectiveness of the Ecodesign Directive.I share the view that the public should have access to more information regarding the specific legislation in this field and the benefits of ecodesign products. In particular, low-income households should be informed and encouraged to pass on more resource-efficient articles as they are the most vulnerable to the lack of access to modern energy services.
Responding to petitions on tackling precariousness and the abusive use of fixed-term contracts (B8-0238/2018) FR
J´ai voté en faveur de la résolution comme y souligné dans la résolution, il faut ajuster les politiques de lutte contre la précarité au caractère dynamique de la dernière, tout en avançant des mesures à tous les niveaux et intégrées qui soutiennent des normes inclusives et concrètes en matière de travail, accompagnées par des mesures efficaces visant le respect du principe d’égalité.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (A8-0175/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes)
. ‒ Further to the damages produced by forest fires in Portugal and Spain, hurricanes in France and earthquakes in Greece, I am in favour of mobilising the European Union Solidarity Fund by providing EUR 1 359 119 to Greece, EUR 3 228 675 to Spain, EUR 48 906 025 to France and EUR 50 673 132 to Portugal, both in commitment and payment appropriations.
Draft amending budget No 1/2018 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (C8-0181/2018)
Within the framework of the EU budgetary procedure for the financial year 2018, Draft Amending Budget No 1 increases the budget line dedicated to the assistance to Member States in the event of a major natural disasters by EUR 97 646 105, both in commitment and payment appropriations.In favour of the proposed increase, I believe that it is supportive and complementary to the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for providing financial assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal, following a series of related natural disasters.
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0182/2018 - Christofer Fjellner)
. ‒ Welcoming the report, I believe that the proposals within are a clear improvement of the actual regulation, as it brings modernising elements to the EU’s trade defence instruments that increase protection of European workers and industries from unfair trade practices.Effective trade defence instruments – including anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures – are essential tools for Europe’s industry to protect its companies against unfair trade practices. Any use of dumped product should be treated as an import and charged to duty accordingly, especially when causes injury to the Union industry.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/000 TA 2018 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0172/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
. ‒ I am in favour for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to provide technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission. The amount of the foreseen EGF contribution, EUR 345 000, is to be used for financing monitoring and data gathering, information activities, the creation of a knowledge base / application interface, administrative and technical support, as well as for networking seminars. The measures aim at simplifying the application procedure of the EGF and allowing for a faster processing of applications, and better reporting.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize GA21 (MON-ØØØ21-9) (D056125) (B8-0232/2018)
I support the resolution objecting to the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize GA21 (MONØØØ21-9) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed. I am in favour of the call for the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision and I believe that any implementing decisions regarding applications for authorisation of GMOs need to be suspended until the authorisation procedure has been revised to address the shortcomings of the current procedure.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize 1507 × 59122 × MON 810 × NK603, and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events 1507, 59122, MON 810 and NK603 (D056123) (B8-0233/2018)
I support the resolution objecting to the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507 × 59122 × MON 810 × NK603, and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events 1507, 59122, MON 810 and NK603, and repealing Decisions 2009/815/EC, 2010/428/EU and 2010/432/EU pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed.I am in favour of the call for the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision, and I believe that any implementing decisions regarding applications for authorisation of GMOs need to be suspended until the authorisation procedure has been revised to address the shortcomings of the current procedure.
Conformity of fisheries products with access criteria to the EU market (A8-0156/2018 - Linnéa Engström)
. ‒ I support the call for equal treatment of imported EU fishery and aquaculture products in an effort to create fairer competition, foster consumer protection and traceability as well as sustainability, and raise standards in third countries.I believe that controls on fishery and aquaculture products should be increased and improved, and efforts to ensure a more harmonised implementation of existing legislation should be intensified. I support the reinforcement of the role of the European Fisheries Control Agency, and the EU’s trade and fisheries policies should be closely coordinated, including during the negotiation of trade agreements with third countries involving fisheries matters.
The future of food and farming (A8-0178/2018 - Herbert Dorfmann)
. ‒ Welcoming the report, I strongly believe that measures must be taken in order to make the CAP a more efficient tool for both farmers and European citizens. The CAP is of the utmost importance for approximately 12 million agricultural holdings and 22 million farmers and agricultural workers in the European Union, and its contribution to food safety and sustainability is of vital importance to everyone living in the EU.Taking into account the need to safeguard sustainable management of natural resources and the need to contribute to the environmental and climate objectives of the EU, including the delivery of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, I fully support the guarantees that would maintain the CAP budget at least at its current level, in order to achieve its ambitious objectives.
Interpretation and implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making (A8-0170/2018 - Pavel Svoboda, Richard Corbett)
In favour of the report, I believe that the current inter-institutional agreement on better law-making offers a wide set of opportunities to improve the quality of EU legislation. The IIA needs to be monitored in order to fully assess its potential and to show that better law-making should not lead to deregulation.
2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and own resources (B8-0239/2018, B8-0240/2018, B8-0241/2018)
The decision on the MFF needs to provide the Union with the necessary financial means to meet important challenges and attain its political priorities over the next seven-year period. I believe that unfortunately, the Commission’s proposal weakens the main EU solidarity policies and leads directly to a reduction in the level of both the common agricultural policy (CAP) and cohesion policy, of 15% and 10% respectively. I support the need to maintain the financing of the CAP and cohesion policy for the EU-27 at least at the level of the 2014-2020 budget in real terms, while respecting the overall architecture of these policies.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative on Libya (A8-0159/2018 - Pier Antonio Panzeri) FR
Je partage l’opinion qu’il faut l’appui inconditionnel au plan d’action présenté en septembre 2017 par le représentant spécial des Nations unies, qui vise la stabilisation de la Libye, tout en considérant la crise libyenne à un échelon régional et panafricain, compte tenu du fait que la Libye possède un rôle important dans la stabilité de l’Afrique du Nord et du Sahel. De même, il faut rester déterminés à remédier aux causes profondes des migrations, en s’appuyant sur des solutions à long terme, efficaces et viables, ainsi que d’intensifier les efforts conjoints déployés par l'UE, l'UA (Union Africaine) et l'ONU afin d’améliorer la protection des migrants et des réfugiés en Libye, en accordant une attention particulière aux personnes vulnérables.
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (A8-0160/2018 - Carlos Coelho)
The area of free movement without internal borders is considered one of the greatest achievements of the European integration process, which is highly appreciated by European citizens.I believe that in order to have a coordinated and robust legal security framework, it is essential to apply the Schengen acquis in full in all Member States that have successfully fulfilled the Schengen evaluation process.
Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Angelika Mlinar)
I voted in favour, as I strongly believe that minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime in EU Member States must be established. The European Union has a mandate to ensure the protection of both its citizens and foreigners within its borders.As different interpretations exist at national level and provisions of national criminal law may differ, it is necessary to avoid possible gaps, which may hinder the implementation of the related provisions. I fully support the provisions enabling adequate instruments to protect the victims of crime in the EU Member States.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy (A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi) FR
. – J’ai voté en faveur du rapport qui souligne que le contexte international a profondément changé depuis la publication de la stratégie «Le commerce pour tous» en 2015 et que de nouveaux défis commerciaux devront maintenant être relevés. Il faut qu’on renforce notre soutien à un système commercial ouvert, juste, équilibré, durable, fondé sur des valeurs, qui offre des opportunités économiques aux citoyens de l'UE et à nos partenaires commerciaux. En outre, il est essentiel de rester déterminés à engager les pays partenaires dans un processus de coopération et que les accords commerciaux contiennent des dispositions complètes en ce qui concerne les normes sociales, de travail et environnementales.
Fishing mortality ranges and safeguard levels for certain herring stocks in the Baltic Sea (A8-0149/2018 - Alain Cadec)
I voted in favour of the report as the proposal aims to amend Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 to ensure that opportunities to fish Gulf of Bothnia herring stocks are determined in accordance with the updated conservation reference points following the scientific evaluation conducted by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).
Statistics of goods transport by inland waterways (codification) (A8-0154/2018 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
My vote is in favour, as the proposal put forwards common rules for the production of European statistics regarding inland waterways transport, which shall enable the Commission to have statistics concerning the transport of goods by inland waterways in order to monitor and develop the common transport policy, as well as the transport elements of policies on the regions and on trans-European networks.
EU-Switzerland Agreement on the cumulation of origin between the EU, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences (A8-0151/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)
I voted in favour of the legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the cumulation of origin between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of Norway and the Republic of Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences.
EU-Norway Agreement on the cumulation of origin between the EU, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences (A8-0152/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)
I voted in favour of the legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on the cumulation of origin between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of Norway and the Republic of Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences. The new system of cumulation entails that the EU, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey will allow GSP beneficiary countries to incorporate materials from any of the countries in the system (EU, Switzerland, Norway, Turkey) in their production processes, and export the final product to the EU, Switzerland, Norway or Turkey under the GSP preferential terms provided that the final product has been sufficiently worked or processed.
EU-Norway Agreement on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax (A8-0147/2018 - Miguel Viegas)
I voted in favour as increasing cooperation between tax administrations in the EU and with third countries is key to fight VAT fraud. In the context of the current legal framework, administrative cooperation with Norway is occasional and only possible on the basis of bilateral agreements between Norway and individual Member States, the Nordic convention or rare invitations to Norway to participate in the VAT observatory meetings as an observer. This bilateral agreement between the EU and Norway provides for a solid legal framework for a sound cooperation between Norway and Member States. This cooperation follows the same structure of the cooperation currently in force between EU Member States and will benefit from the same instruments such as electronic platforms and e-forms.
Optimisation of the value chain in the EU fishing sector (A8-0163/2018 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)
I voted in favour as I welcome this report, the main objective of which is to find out what can be enhanced so that processors and local fishermen can retain most of the value generated by their activities. The report identifies aspects to be improved and puts forward concrete measures in order to boost the value chain, with a view to unlocking the potential of a dynamic and sustainable economic activity that can revitalise local fishing communities, increase the attractiveness of the sector for young people and limit the population decline in these communities.
Implementation of CAP young farmers’ tools in the EU after the 2013 reform (A8-0157/2018 - Nicola Caputo)
Although measures had been taken to support young farmers to overcome the major barriers in entering agriculture, up to this day only around 6% of the people in charge of farms are under 35 years old. Therefore, I share the view that the existing scheme must be developed in order to facilitate their access into this sector, and to provide them long-term prospects in this field.In a Europe facing the rapid aging of its workforce in the agricultural sector, sustainability cannot be achieved in this field without efficient inclusion of new generations. They will play a vital role in guaranteeing long-term food security in Europe and we need enhanced cooperation at EU level as well as targeted ways to encourage them to join the farming sector.
Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust)
The multi-annual plan for North Sea demersal fisheries represents the second management plan (following the Baltic Sea plan) proposed by the European Commission since the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy agreed at the end of 2013. My vote reflects the importance of this plan, whose aim is to ensure the sustainable exploitation of stocks by making sure that they are exploited in line with the principles of maximum sustainable yield and of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Indeed, such multi-annual plans for the conservation of fish stocks and the management of fisheries exploiting these stocks constitute essential tools to ensuring sustainable use of marine biological resources and, in putting forward long-term approaches, they also enhance predictability for fishermen’s activities over time.
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (A8-0319/2017 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Agnes Jongerius) FR
. – Mon vote reflète l’importance de la révision des règles sur le détachement des travailleurs afin d’identifier le juste milieu entre le droit du travail et la libre prestation des services, tout en soulignant l’urgence d’agir pour une homogénéité dans l’application des règles et une véritable convergence sociale vers le haut. Les entreprises qui détachent des travailleurs doivent respecter un noyau commun de droits en matière d'emploi dans le pays d'accueil. De plus, afin de supprimer les abus dans les situations de sous-traitance, les États membres devraient garantir, conformément à la législation et aux pratiques nationales, que les travailleurs détachés perçoivent l’ensemble des droits qui leur sont dus.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström)
As the largest single market for fisheries products in the world, the EU plays an important role in promoting sustainable fisheries and better governance through a number of international organisations and regional fisheries management organisations such as the SPRFMO. My vote is in favour as I welcome the Regulation, which lays the ground for a swift transposition of SPRFMO measures into EU law.
Sustainable finance (A8-0164/2018 - Molly Scott Cato)
I voted in favour as I strongly believe that financial markets can and should play an essential role in enabling the transition to a sustainable economy in the EU which extends beyond climate transition and ecological issues. Sustainable finance can be a means to tackle societal challenges with a view to long-term inclusive growth and to promote citizens’ well-being.
The 2017 EU Justice Scoreboard (A8-0161/2018 - Jytte Guteland)
Protocol to the EU-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0104/2018 - Jozo Radoš)
Considering the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, I voted in favour for giving consent to the conclusion of the Protocol.
EU-Korea Framework Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0120/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)
The Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, was signed on 10 May 2010 and entered into force on 1 June 2014, and is the first agreement of its kind between the European Union and a country in Asia. The protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union has been negotiated between the Commission and the Korean authorities and was signed on 21 June 2017. Since I support closer cooperation in a number of areas such as peace and security, human rights and the rule of law, the environment, combating terrorism and organised crime, I voted in favour of granting consent to the conclusion of the Protocol.
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance ADB-CHMINACA to control measures (A8-0133/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)
ADB-CHMINACA is a synthetic cannabinoid with similar effects to those of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), but with additional life-threatening toxicity and can constitute a poisoning risk. ADB-CHMINACA has been detected in 17 Member States and 13 deaths associated with it. More than 630 seizures were reported within the Union. Thirteen Member States control ADB-CHMINACA under national drug control legislation and four under other legislation.Given the dangerous nature of the substance, I support the proposal to submit ADB-CHMINACA to control measures across the Union.
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance CUMYL-4CN-BINACA to control measures (A8-0134/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)
. ‒ CUMYL-4CN-BINACA is a synthetic cannabinoid with similar effects to those of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), but with additional life-threatening toxicity, and it can constitute a poisoning risk. CUMYL-4CN-BINACA has been detected in 11 Member States and 11 deaths have been associated with it. More than 270 seizures have been reported within the Union. There are nine Member States which control CUMYL-4CN-BINACA under national drug control legislation and five which use other legislation.Given the dangerous nature of the substance, I support the proposal to submit CUMYL-4CN-BINACA to control measures across the Union.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0148/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
On 18 December 2017, Belgium submitted an application for EGF funds, in respect of redundancies in Caterpillar Solar Gosselies and its five suppliers. The application relates to 2 287 redundancies in the enterprise Caterpillar Solar Gosselies, operating in the economic sector classified under NACE Rev. 2 Division 28 (Manufacture of machinery and equipment) during the reference period from 31 May 2017 to 30 September 2017.Considering that the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) is intended to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns owing to globalisation, as a result of a continuation of the global financial and economic crisis, or as a result of a new global financial and economic crisis, and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market, I am in favour of mobilising the EGF to provide a financial contribution of EUR 4 621 616, thus providing assistance to 2 287 targeted beneficiaries as well as 300 young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 30.
Annual report 2016 on the protection of EU’s financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0135/2018 - Gilles Pargneaux)
I voted in favour of the report, which puts forward recommendations on improving EU action in protecting its own resources, especially through the work of OLAF and its follow-up. Moreover, the report calls for a set of measures to be taken in order to ensure closer, more effective and more efficient cooperation between the Commission and the Member States in the area of fraud detection. Furthermore, expressing concern at the on-going differences between Member States regarding the reporting process, the report calls for establishing a uniform system for the collection of comparable data on irregularities and cases of fraud from the Member States in order to standardise the reporting process and ensure the quality and comparability of the data provided.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified sugar beet H7-1 (B8-0220/2018)
Commission Decision 2007/692/EC1 authorised the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed produced from genetically modified sugar beet H7-1. GM sugar beet H7-1 expresses the CP4 EPSPS protein which confers tolerance to glyphosate. Therefore, it has to be expected that GM sugar beet H7-1 plants will be exposed to higher and also repeated dosages of glyphosate which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest but may also influence the composition of the plants and their agronomic characteristics. My vote is in favour as I support the calls put forward to the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision and to suspend any implementing decision regarding applications for authorisation of GMOs until the authorisation procedure has been revised in such a way so as to tackle the shortcomings of the current procedure.
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2016 (A8-0139/2018 - Marco Valli)
I voted in favour of the report, which constitutes part of the discharge procedure and scrutinises the activities of the European Investment Bank in the year 2016. Moreover, the report recalls the Parliament’s concern with regard to framing a balanced strategy with a dynamic, fair and transparent geographical distribution of projects and investments among Member States, taking into consideration the special focus on the less developed countries and regions. 70% of the EIB’s total lending for 2016 (EUR 46.8 billion) is concentrated in six Member States, which shows that not all Member States or regions are able to benefit equally from investment opportunities.
Cohesion policy and thematic objective ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ (A8-0136/2018 - Andrey Novakov)
. ‒ My vote reflects the opinion that the EU’s cohesion policy stands as the single most visible instrument of European added value, which contributes to closing different divergence gaps within the EU and to building a strong single market for a competitive Europe. I also support the call to draw up a checklist of eligibility criteria which better expresses local and regional needs concerning transport, and removes bottlenecks in network infrastructures.
Protection of children in migration (B8-0218/2018)
The majority of the Member States still face systemic challenges in the implementation of the European Commission recommendations delivered one year ago. Regardless their status, refugee or migrant, all children are entitled to all the rights enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Therefore, I strongly support a holistic rights-based approach to be implemented at EU level in all child related policies. Member Stets should be, as well assisted to adopt and properly implement the Commission’s recommendations based on the principle of the best interest of the child.I voted in favour also because I believe that we should step up our efforts to jointly tackle the various forms of organised crime, including child trafficking, while increasing cross-border cooperation, information sharing and coordination to also ensure the adequate child protection systems.
A global ban on animal testing for cosmetics (B8-0217/2018)
I strongly share the opinion that we have to deploy our efforts towards a global ban on both animal testing in cosmetics and on the trade in cosmetic ingredients tested on animals, which requires using our diplomatic networks to create a coalition and to launch an international convention within the UN framework.Although the European Union stopped the testing of finished cosmetic products on animals in 2004, and ingredients in 2009, some cosmetics are tested on animals outside the EU before being re-tested in the EU using alternative methods and placed on the EU market. For these reasons, I support a global ban on animal testing in cosmetics.
Current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU (A8-0064/2018 - Esther Herranz García)
. ‒ I vote in favour, as I strongly believe that is necessary to maintain and strengthen the sheep and goat sectors, which are a vital part of our rural areas, especially in less favoured areas where their environmental contribution is generally positive and they provide employment opportunities. The sheep and goat sectors account for 3% of European milk and 9% of European cheese production, and together they employ 1.5 million people in the European Union.Getting newcomers in the sector, developing markets, promoting quality products, and safeguarding them against threats such as predators and disease, are the ways to strengthen this sphere. Therefore, I support the increase of the voluntary coupled aid for sheep and goat farming in the forthcoming reform of the common agricultural policy and further assistance for the young farmers through incentives for the setting up or taking over of sheep or goat farms.I also support the exploitation of the high potential of traditional sheep and goat farming practices through agri—tourism and the ease of the administrative requirements for opening small cheese-making ventures on sheep and goat farms, thereby enabling farmers to boost the added value of their farms.
Media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (A8-0144/2018 - Barbara Spinelli)
. ‒ The European Union must ensure, promote and defend media freedom and pluralism as they are essential for the existence of a healthy democracy, and a good balance for responsible and lawful free speech must be achieved. I believe that adequate measures must be taken to avoid abuses and crimes, as well as and deadly attacks, which are still being committed against journalists and media workers in the Member States because of their activities.Therefore, voting in favour of the report, I support a comprehensive framework for common European legislation to protect whistle-blowers and the creation of a mechanism for the annual assessment of the risks to media pluralism in the Member States.
Common system of value added tax, with regard to the obligation to respect a minimum standard rate (A8-0124/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
. ‒ As I welcome the proposal to prevent the 15% minimum level applicable to the standard rate of VAT from expiring on 1 January 2018 and to ensure that all Member States apply a standard rate of 15% as a minimum on a permanent basis, my vote reflects my support to set an agreed limit that ensures the proper functioning of the internal market whilst leaving flexibility for Member States in setting the standard VAT rate, instead of numerous last-minute prolongations of a temporary minimum rate.
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0056/2017 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini)
I welcome the proposal for a revision of the fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, an important part of our action plan against terrorist financing. The series of terror attacks striking Europe has underlined the need for additional action to control terrorist financing and money laundering.Looking back to what happened in past years, especially after the events of 11 September 2001, specifically in Europe, we can say that there have been multiple errors and failures in the European system to counter terrorism. For this reason, I believe that enhanced access to the beneficial ownership registers of companies and trusts, and interconnection of the registers between Member States while improving checks on risky third countries and, as well, cooperation between Member States’ financial intelligence units are among the necessary steps to tackle these errors and failures.This is why, I consider it crucial to achieve our action plan’s objective, to enhance Member States’ collaboration in a fully coordinated manner, especially in their counterterrorism programmes, establishing new and innovative approaches to address the many aspects of the dynamic threat posed by terrorism.
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton)
. ‒ My vote reflects the opinion that we have to tighten up the approval and surveillance of new cars in order to better protect consumers and the environment. Through this agreement, the Member States will have clear minimum targets to fulfil, the Commission will have obligations and powers for real European oversight, thus the whole system will be more transparent, allowing independent market surveillance by interested parties such as consumer organisations.
Organic production and labelling of organic products (A8-0311/2015 - Martin Häusling)
. ‒ I welcome this important report on labelling of organic products, which extends the scope of the regulation regarding new products like traditional herbal preparations, all essential oils, beeswax, cork, mate, wool, cotton, salt, etc. I believe that if these products are produced organically, they should be covered by the organic label in future.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0140/2018 - Miroslavs Mitrofanovs)
. ‒ The employment guidelines define common priorities and targets for Member States’ employment policies. Together with the broad economic policy guidelines, they form the basis of the European Semester and the country-specific recommendations. I support the revision of the employment guidelines, introducing the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, with a special focus on equal opportunities, fair working conditions as well as social protection and inclusion for all citizens. Moreover, I share the opinion that child poverty has to be tackled by providing access to health care, education and childcare that are free of charge, as well as to decent housing and proper nutrition.
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2019 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0146/2018 - Paul Rübig)
. ‒ I am in favour as I share the opinion that the report envisages a reasonable budget that is estimated to finance the extra needs for the last year of the mandate (Members leaving Parliament and new Members arriving, institutional electoral campaign) and adjust Parliament’s needs to the situation regarding UK Members after Brexit. Also, I believe that the budget will allow parliamentary work to be undertaken under good conditions, and is fair for all types of staff.
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on European business statistics, amending Regulation (EC) no 184/2005 and repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (A8-0094/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)
The draft regulation on European business statistics, amending Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 and repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (FRIBS) is part of the Commission’s REFIT Programme. This programme seeks to simplify EU law and reduce unnecessary regulatory costs. It identified business statistics as one of its priority area. However, I believe that the current system for producing European business statistics is fragmented into separate domain-specific regulations, which leads to inconsistencies in the data collected and inefficiencies in their production.
Protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová (B8-0186/2018)
In favour of the resolution, I strongly condemn the murder of Slovak investigative journalist Ján Kuciak and his partner Martina Kušnírová. While it is the second fatal attack on a journalist in the EU in the past six months, after journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was assassinated in Malta on 16 October 2017, I believe that it is of vital importance to guarantee that the common European values listed in Article 2 TEU are upheld in full and that fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights are guaranteed. Therefore, I support the call for a regular process of monitoring and dialogue involving all Member States in order to safeguard the EU’s basic values of democracy, fundamental rights and the rule of law.
A European values instrument to support civil society organisations which promote democracy, rule of law and fundamental values within the European Union (B8-0189/2018)
I voted in favour as I support the call to set up a new funding instrument that should focus on the promotion and protection of EU values within the EU borders such as democracy, freedom, rule of law and fundamental rights, as enshrined in Article 2 of the TEU.I share the opinion that the new dedicated funding instrument, entitled European Values Instrument, should be foreseen within the EU budget of the next MFF (Multiannual Financial Framework) and should complement the already existing European funds through targeted financial support.
The violation of human rights and the rule of law in the case of two Greek soldiers arrested and detained in Turkey (B8-0194/2018, B8-0196/2018)
Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national Parliaments (A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel)
I voted in favour as I support the need for inter-parliamentary cooperation which can be achieved progressively through the exchange of best practices between NPs (National Parliaments), regular debates between the respective ministers and specialised committees in NPs, before and after Council and European Council meetings and regular meetings between members of NPs, Commissioners and MEPs.
Annual Report on Competition Policy (A8-0049/2018 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells)
I voted in favour as I support this important report regarding competition policy, which includes the attention given to the national competition authorities, given the role these administrations play in fighting trusts. It is a good thing that the report encourages the ECN+ (European Competition Network+) proposal, so we can progress towards a stronger capacity, more resources, autonomy and transparency.I am glad to see that the report encourages the CCCTB (Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base) negotiations, pointing out that it would solve Europe’s problem of unfair tax competition.
Vaccine hesitancy and drop in vaccination rates in Europe (B8-0188/2018, B8-0195/2018)
I support a fully comprehensive EU Action Plan raising the social problem of vaccine hesitancy as well as the measures proposed within to tackle the spread of unreliable, misleading and unscientific information on vaccination. I share the opinion that concrete action has to be taken to facilitate a more harmonised schedule for vaccinations across the EU, which currently are very fragmented.
Implementation of the European Protection Order Directive (A8-0065/2018 - Soraya Post, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
In am in favour of the report as I consider that the EPO has the potential to be an effective instrument to protect victims in a world characterised by high mobility. The report also gives recommendations to improve the state of implementation and the functioning of the EPO. A well-used EPO and EU accession to the Istanbul Convention are an integral part of a coherent EU legal framework for the protection of victims.
Implementation of the Bologna Process – state of play and follow-up (B8-0190/2018)
. ‒ In view of the upcoming Bologna Ministerial Conference in Paris on 23-25 May 2018, I welcome the motion for a resolution, mainly because of its focus on important matters such as increasing political engagement alongside mutual cooperation in the implementation of commonly agreed goals throughout the EHEA (European Higher Education Area).I believe that the participating countries need to foster more inclusive mobility for students, teachers, researchers and administrative staff by providing adequate public funding, in particular for those from disadvantaged backgrounds. All key stakeholders should work consistently and together to ensure better implementation of the Bologna Process, as it contributes to the personal and professional development of students, teachers, researchers and administrative staff and to the quality of learning, teaching, research and administration.
Fixing the period for the ninth election of representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (A8-0145/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
The Council, acting unanimously and after consulting the European Parliament, can determine, at least one year before the end of the legislature, a different electoral period which shall not be more than two months before or one month after the normal slot. The Council has reached an agreement to hold the elections from 23 to 26 May 2019. The same period was suggested by the EP Conference of Presidents in January this year. The decision on the new dates needs to be adopted quickly in order to give sufficient time to Member States to organise the elections.
EU-Australia Framework Agreement (A8-0110/2018 - Francisco José Millán Mon) FR
J’ai voté en faveur comme j’ai salué ce rapport qui souligne que l'UE, en tant qu'acteur mondial, devrait renforcer sa présence dans la vaste et dynamique région Asie-Pacifique, où l'Australie est un partenaire naturel de l'UE et un acteur important.Je salue particulièrement les mesures y avancées qui visent un renforcement de la coopération antiterroriste entre les équipes d'intervention d'urgence des États membres et les agences de l'UE telles qu'Europol et son Centre européen de lutte contre le terrorisme (ECTC) et le système australien de sécurité nationale. En effet, il est très important de mettre les bases d’une coopération bilatérale de plus en plus étroite pour l'échange d'informations sur les combattants étrangers et leur retour.
EU-Australia Framework Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0119/2018 - Francisco José Millán Mon)
. ‒ In 2016, the EU was Australia’s second largest trading partner – its second source of imports (19.3%) and third destination for exports (10.3%). The EU and Australia celebrated 55 years of cooperation and diplomatic relations in 2017, and on 7 August 2017 they concluded a Framework Agreement. My vote was in favour as I welcome the agreement, which will provide a legally binding instrument to upgrade and strengthen EU-Australia bilateral relations and to increase cooperation in areas such as foreign policy and security.
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (A8-0131/2018 - Helga Stevens)
. ‒ The report refers to the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No 196). Convention No 196 introduces criminal offences related to terrorism, for which the Union has competence based on Article 83(1) TFEU. Action against terrorism needs to be reinforced, not only at national level but also at pan-European level and beyond. The cross-border nature of terrorism calls for strong international cooperation. A common understanding of terrorist and terrorism-related offences, accompanied by provisions to facilitate cooperation between national authorities, as laid down in Convention No 196, contributes to further enhancing the effectiveness of the criminal justice instruments and of cooperation at Union and international level.
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (Additional Protocol) (A8-0132/2018 - Helga Stevens)
. ‒ The Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism aims to supplement the Convention in certain respects, with the aim of further strengthening efforts to prevent and suppress terrorism in all its forms, both in Europe and globally, while respecting human rights and the rule of law.
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
My vote reflects the opinion that quantitative prevention and qualitative improvement of packaging should be the primary objective of a revision of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive in line with the principles on which the circular economy is based. Prevention of packaging waste is key, therefore removing incentives for the excessive use of packaging, setting higher reuse and recycling targets, and marketing more reusable, resource—efficient and environmentally friendly packaging are all central to proper waste management.
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0013/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
This proposal is important because it is designed to simplify Member State reporting obligations and align them with the provisions in the Waste Framework Directive, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive and the Landfill Directive, as well as aligning the comitology provisions of the Lisbon Treaty.In order to be able to monitor the state of implementation of the waste legislation in the various waste streams, reporting systems on statistical data must be streamlined, robust and well functioning.
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
Integrity policy of the Commission, in particular the appointment of the Secretary-General of the European Commission (B8-0214/2018)
My voice reflects the opinion that trust in the European project and in the European Union will only be maintained if the European Union institutions act as role models in the fields of the rule of law, transparency and good administration, and are seen to have sufficient internal checks and balances to react adequately whenever these fundamental principles are threatened.
Progress on UN Global compacts for safe, orderly and regular migration and on refugees (B8-0184/2018)
I voted in favour, as the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration should be people-centred and human rights-based, and should offer long-term, sustainable and comprehensive actions, for the benefit of all parties involved, building on the principle of partnership and strengthened cooperation among countries of origin, transit and destination.
Implementation of the EU external financing instruments: mid-term review 2017 and the future post-2020 architecture (A8-0112/2018 - Marietje Schaake)
I voted in favor as I fully welcome the implementation of the EU external financing instruments. It is essential that the multi-annual financial framework express ambition and that the external action adoptions be increased, in line with modern challenges and Europe’s new priorities. These changes should directly contribute to more efficiency, flexibility and transparency of EU external relations, with the aim of strengthening EU values and interests worldwide.The EU must show leadership and motivation by deploying an overarching policy for mainstreaming its sustenance to democracy in all its external relations.
Annual reports 2015-2016 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0141/2018 - Mady Delvaux)
The principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are fundamental principles which ensure an efficient European legislative process while respecting national sovereignty. My vote is in favour as I welcome the report on subsidiarity and proportionality, which aims to analyse the application of these principles by the European institutions and their partners with a view to meeting the expectations of citizens and their national institutions.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Commission and executive agencies (A8-0137/2018 - Joachim Zeller)
I voted in favour to the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, and also to grant discharge to the Directors of the Education, Audio-visual and Culture Executive Agency, the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency, the European Research Council Executive Agency and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency in respect of the implementation of their respective Agencies’ budgets for the financial year 2016.I share the opinion that the Union’s budget must be results-based. In the light of the post-2020 MFF, the Union budget should be a true European added value budget, aimed at achieving common Union objectives of promoting sustainable economic and social development of the whole Union.
Discharge 2016: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2016 Commission discharge (A8-0130/2018 - Joachim Zeller)
My vote reflects the importance of the special reports of the Court of Auditors, that are a very important source for evaluating/controlling the implementation of the EU budget. The observations on the special reports of the Court of Auditors form an integral part of Parliament’s decision on the general discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section III – Commission.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0105/2018 - Derek Vaughan)
I voted in favour as the discharge exercise constitutes an important task for the European Parliament which must be implemented with the greatest political responsibility and objectiveness, having in mind and defending EU taxpayers and citizens’ interests.I share the opinion that the Commission should better define the development outcomes to be achieved in each case and above all to enhance control mechanisms concerning recipient states’ conduct in the fields of corruption, respect of human rights, rule of law and democracy.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0116/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I am in favour to postpone the Parliament’s decision to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council with respect to the implementation of the Council’s budget for the 2016 financial year.In 2016, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 545 054 000 (compared to EUR 541 791 500 in 2015), with an implementation rate on average of 93.5%, this is an increase of EUR 3.3 million (equivalent to 0.6%) in the 2016 budget of the European Council and the Council.I believe that the situation should be resolved as rapidly as possible in the interest of the citizens of the Union. The procedure of giving discharge separately to the individual Union institutions and bodies is a long-standing practice accepted by all the other institutions except the Council. This procedure has been developed to guarantee transparency and democratic accountability towards Union citizens.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0122/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of granting the discharge as, in its 2016 annual report, the Court of Auditors observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect of the audited topics relating to human resources and procurement for the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Moreover, the Court of Auditors concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2016 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Court of Auditors (A8-0089/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
In the context of the discharge procedure, it is of particular importance of further strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the Union institutions by improving transparency and accountability, implementing the concept of performance-based budgeting (PBB) and good governance of human resources. My vote is in favour of granting the discharge, and I welcome the Union’s added value approach of the Court in its reports, while supporting the calls for further work with the other institutions of the Union to develop the performance indicators and priorities for a good financial governance.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0097/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee in respect of the implementation of the committee’s budget for the 2016 financial year. I welcome the conclusion of the Court of Auditors, according to which the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2016 for administrative and other expenditure of the committee were free from material error. No significant weaknesses were identified in respect of the audited topics relating to human resources and procurement.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0117/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour to grant discharge to the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the EU’s general budget for the 2016 financial year, Section VII – Committee of the Regions.I welcome the fact that the Court of Auditors observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect of the audited topics relating to human resources and procurement for the Committee. The Court concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2016 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0128/2018 - Marco Valli)
I voted in favour to grant discharge to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European External Action Service (EEAS) for the 2016 financial year.The EEAS has continued to implement its administrative budget without being affected by major errors and that the overall level of error in the spending related to the ‘Administration’ budget has been estimated by the Court of Auditors at 0.2%. I welcome the establishment of the mission support platform to provide centralised administrative support to Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions. It is very important to address the financing of the platform, with a clear and transparent framework.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0100/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of granting the discharge, taking into consideration the overall prudent and sound financial management of the Ombudsman in the 2016 budget period. In its 2016 annual report, the Court of Auditors observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified with respect to the audited topics related to human resources and procurement for the European Ombudsman. Furthermore, on the basis of its audit work, the Court concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2016 for administrative expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0099/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.I welcome the conclusion of the Court of Auditors, according to which the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2016 for administrative and other expenditure of the European Data Protection Supervisor were free from material error and that the examined supervisory and control systems for administrative and other expenditure were effective
Discharge 2016: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0074/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour, taking into consideration the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2016 and the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2016.
Discharge 2016: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0090/2018 - Bart Staes)
In the context of the discharge procedure, it is of particular importance of further strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the Union institutions by improving transparency and accountability, implementing the concept of performance-based budgeting (PBB) and good governance of human resources. I voted in favour of granting the discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Discharge 2016: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0109/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of granting the discharge, taking into consideration the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Police Office for the financial year 2016, as well as the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2016.
EU-Lebanon Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0352/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as the new Partnership on Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) constitutes, so far, the most ambitious Euro-Mediterranean research and innovation initiative in this field. Moreover, the latter also contributes to resolve the issue of forced displacement of Mediterranean residents and thus tackle some of the root causes of migration. PRIMA was launched on 1 January 2018 for a period of ten years with the objective of framing innovative and integrated solutions for the sustainable management of water provision and agro-food systems in the Mediterranean area.
EU-Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0053/2018 - Norica Nicolai)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as the ex-post evaluation of the previous Protocol shows that both parties have benefited from the framework, with the Mauritian government utilising the EU funds for sectorial support, a better Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) protection and considerable progress in implementing its environmental policy and promoting sustainability. At the same time, the EU fleet has benefited from a more stable, predictable and clear framework. Moreover, Mauritius has a continuously growing economy, with the fishing sector bringing approximately 1.4% of the GDP of the country. The country’s development plan of 2015 encompasses fishery and ocean economy as one of the main sectors, with due respect for long-term management and sustainable exploitation of the marine environment.
EU-Norway Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0126/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)
. ‒ I voted in favour, as the agreement constitutes a step towards engaging on liberalising agricultural trade between the EU and Norway further, in particular trade in processed agricultural products which is hampered by high customs tariffs in Norway and towards resuming negotiations on geographical indications. The proposed agreement will provide new trade opportunities for EU exporters and strengthen trade relations between the EU and Norway. It seeks to increase the degree of liberalisation further, enlarging the current tariff rate quotas, opening new tariff rate quotas for additional agricultural products and addressing certain pending trade irritants.
A European strategy for the promotion of protein crops (A8-0121/2018 - Jean-Paul Denanot)
. ‒ My vote underlines the need to frame a strategic European vegetable protein production and supply plan based on the sustainable development of all the crops grown throughout the EU. The European Union is suffering from a major deficit in vegetable proteins due to the needs of its livestock sector which is dependent on feed imports from third countries. It is necessary to diminish the Union’s significant dependency on imports of protein crops, which are mainly used for animal feed. In addition to the environmental impact in soya producing regions, the current situation implies significant risks especially for the EU livestock sector, as price volatility on international markets has considerably increased.
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins)
. ‒ I voted in favour as I support the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework. Forest management has an essential role to play in combating climate change. The forest mitigation should be measured using a scientifically objective approach, and not allowing countries to hide the impacts of policies that increase emissions.
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
. ‒ The proposed Regulation aims to set the Union on track to a low-carbon economy through the establishment of a predictable long-term pathway to reducing by 2050 the greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by 80 to 95% compared to 1990 levels. Therefore, my vote reflects the high importance of the latter, which intendeds to implement the Paris Agreement and whose objective consists in strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Energy performance of buildings (A8-0314/2017 - Bendt Bendtsen)
My vote reflects the need for an ambitious and future-proof directive on the energy performance of buildings with a view to securing a highly energy-efficient and decarbonised European building stock. The Union’s building stock consumes a substantial part of Europe’s final energy demand, in particular for fossil fuels. A better performing building stock offers major potential for improved energy security and reduced energy imports to Europe, while leading to lower energy bills for European energy consumers and ensuring healthier living conditions as well as increased growth and jobs, in particular in SMEs.
Implementation of the 7th Environment Action Programme (A8-0059/2018 - Daciana Octavia Sârbu)
The seventh environment action programme (‘7th EAP’) puts forward legally binding targets in the areas of environment and climate change to be achieved by 2020, while setting a long-term vision for 2050. The latter provides important strategic guidance for both the EU and Member States, while driving an agenda that has a positive effect on citizens and the environment. However, there are several key areas in which poor implementation of the EAP is contributing to environmental degradation and posing direct health threats to citizens. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report, which highlights that there remains great room for improvement and calls on the Commission and the competent authorities in the Member States to show increased political will at the highest level in order to implement the 7th EAP.
Gender equality in the media sector in the EU (A8-0031/2018 - Michaela Šojdrová)
The report points out that women constituted 68% of journalism and information graduates in the EU-28 in 2015, while employment data for the EU-28 for the years 2008 to 2015 show that the percentage of women employed in the media sector, on average, is continuing to languish at around 40%. Moreover, the proportion of women in decision-making in the media in the EU-28 in 2015 was still below the gender balance zone (40%-60%) at just 32%, while the proportion of women board chairs was 22%. My vote highlights the pressing need to support and develop incentive measures for the equal representation of women and men in decision-making posts, and for the effective monitoring of such efforts to be given greater prominence in the organisations concerned.
Empowering women and girls through the digital sector (B8-0183/2018)
My vote underlines the growing need to support female digital entrepreneurship, as the digital sector represents one of the fastest growing and prospering sectors in the economy, offering numerous opportunities for innovation and growth, while women constitute only 19% of entrepreneurs in this field. Digitalisation represents an opportunity to increase labour market participation and pay levels, by also improving work-life balance and boosting female entrepreneurship. Moreover, the entry of more women into the ICT sector would boost a market in which labour shortages are predicted, and in which the equal participation of women would lead to a gain of around EUR 9 billion in EU GDP each year.
Implementation of the Development Cooperation Instrument, the Humanitarian Aid Instrument and the European Development Fund (A8-0118/2018 - Enrique Guerrero Salom) FR
J’ai voté en faveur de ce texte et j’ai salué cet important rapport dont le but est de contribuer à la révision du Fonds européen de développement et de l’instrument de coopération au développement, tout en analysant leur pertinence et celle de l’instrument d’aide humanitaire par rapport aux objectifs des politiques de coopération au développement et d’aide humanitaire de l’Union. Je partage l’opinion que, si l’Union souhaite garder sa position de leader en la matière, tant par ses apports financiers à la coopération au développement et à l’aide humanitaire que par le bien-fondé de ses actions dans ce domaine, le nouveau cadre financier pluriannuel post-2020 devrait pouvoir répondre aux défis mondiaux auxquels elle est confrontée et comprendre des dotations financières à la hauteur de ces défis.
Enhancing developing countries' debt sustainability (A8-0129/2018 - Charles Goerens) FR
Je soutiens fortement cet rapport. L’UE doit donner une inflexion nouvelle à l’aide publique au développement en cherchant particulièrement à mieux encadrer l’octroi de prêts aux pays en développement, tout en jouant un rôle important en matière de responsabilisation des parties impliquées dans les opérations d’emprunts souverains.
Strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0138/2018 - Marc Joulaud)
The European Commission’s 7th Cohesion Report shows how much regions and their needs differ within the EU. I voted in favour of the report, as I consider that cohesion policy in the new programming period should continue to adequately cover all European regions and remain the European Union’s main public investment instrument based on long-term strategy and perspectives, with a budget commensurate with existing and new challenges, and ensuring the fulfilment of the basic goals of the policy. Moreover, the cohesion policy should in future not only diminish disparities but also foster resilience and prevent vulnerable areas from falling behind, by taking greater account of trends and dynamics.
EU-Comoros fisheries partnership agreement: denunciation (A8-0058/2018 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour as I think it is of great importance to fight against IUU fishing and it is regrettable that the Comoros failed to meet its obligations in this regard, resulting in the denunciation of the EU-Comoros Fisheries Partnership Agreement. As a Small Island Developing State and Least Developed Country, it is essential for the Comoros to continue cooperation with the EU, notably in terms of development policy.
EU-Comoros fisheries partnership agreement: denunciation (resolution) (A8-0055/2018 - João Ferreira)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution as I support the call on the Commission to pursue the dialogue with the Comoros and provide assistance to enable it to improve its fisheries management in order to effectively combat IUU fishing in all its forms. Notably in terms of development policy, it is essential for the Comoros to continue cooperation with the EU. The EU should take all possible steps to ensure that sustainable fisheries agreements with third countries bring mutual benefits to the EU and the third countries concerned, including their local populations and their fisheries sectors.
Europass: framework for skills and qualifications (A8-0244/2017 - Thomas Mann, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov)
I support the promotion and updating of Europass, the European tool, through the creation of an online platform in order to take into account technological advances. With this single portal, end users will have easy access to available information that will be useful for their recruitment processes, their choice of education, training or their career paths.
Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) (A8-0369/2017 - Silvia Costa)
My vote reflects the importance of the European Union Youth Orchestra’s role in offering young musicians regular training and opportunities for international performances. I share the opinion that EUYO contributes to promoting intercultural dialogue, mutual respect and understanding, knowledge of the rich European musical heritage across borders and the mobility of young European talent.
Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (A8-0063/2018 - Giovanni La Via)
I share the opinion that the Commission and the Dutch authorities should take all the necessary measures to ensure that the agency can move to its temporary location no later than 1 January 2019 and to its permanent location no later than 16 November 2019. I support the call for the Commission and the competent authorities of the Netherlands to submit a written report to the European Parliament and the Council on the progress of the adjustments to the temporary premises and on the construction of the permanent building three months after the entry into force of the regulation, and every three months thereafter, until the agency has moved into its permanent headquarters.
Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (A8-0051/2018 - Alain Lamassoure)
I voted in favour as I support the merger of both Directives on Corporate Tax by also aligning the entry into force of the base and the consolidation on 1 January 2020. I would like to welcome, at the same time, the introduction of a new concept of digital permanent establishment to capture the profits made by digital companies.
Common Corporate Tax Base (A8-0050/2018 - Paul Tang)
Guidelines for the 2019 budget - Section III (A8-0062/2018 - Daniele Viotti)
I welcome the report on the guidelines for the next year’s budget, as it sets out the main political priorities of the European Parliament, and provides a rather comprehensive overview. I support a strong and progressive EU budget for 2019 and I am in favour of mobilising all means available to tackle the European and global challenges in order to reach the sustainable development goals.
Situation in Syria (RC-B8-0139/2018, B8-0139/2018, B8-0141/2018, B8-0142/2018, B8-0143/2018, B8-0144/2018, B8-0146/2018, B8-0150/2018)
I support the EU’s continuing efforts towards full implementation of the UN Security Council resolution and respect of international law in Syria. On our side, I underline the importance of having an inclusive political process and transition, up to the task of shaping Syria’s future unity and reconciliation.
US attack on EU farm support under the CAP (in the context of Spanish olives) (B8-0137/2018, B8-0137/2018, B8-0138/2018, B8-0145/2018, B8-0147/2018, B8-0148/2018, B8-0149/2018, B8-0151/2018)
My vote reflects the belief that the decision taken by the US Department of Commerce to impose a tariff on Spanish olives calls into question, in an unfair and arbitrary manner, all the EU’s farming support programmes and could negatively impact all recipients of payments under the CAP. I strongly support the call on the Commission to defend our system of CAP support, which is regarded by the WTO as non-trade-distorting and which has been approved under the WTO green box procedure.
Corporate social responsibility (B8-0140/2018, B8-0152/2018, B8-0153/2018, B8-0154/2018, B8-0155/2018, B8-0156/2018, B8-0157/2018, B8-0158/2018)
My vote reflects the importance of corporate social responsibility, which constitutes an essential element of the European social and economic model. I support the proposal for the Commission to present, before the end of 2018, a new action plan on corporate social responsibility, which should provide for a more ambitious approach to CSR, encompassing legal requirements and both stronger reporting obligations and more effective control mechanisms.
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (B8-0134/2018, B8-0135/2018)
I voted in favour as I share the opinion that any future EU-UK relationship has to involve an appropriate balance of rights and obligations and it needs to safeguard a number of fundamental principles, such as preserving the EU’s decision-making autonomy, the integrity of the single market and financial stability.I welcome the provisions put forward within the Resolution that provide an input for the Council guidelines, and according to which an association agreement negotiated between the EU and the UK following the latter’s withdrawal, could provide an appropriate framework for the future relationship. In this view, it is crucial to build a consistent governance framework, which should rely on a robust dispute resolution mechanism.
Rail transport statistics (A8-0038/2018 - Karima Delli)
I voted in favour, as I support the common rules proposed within the Regulation on the production of rail statistics at EU level. Statistical data on goods, passenger transport and accidents covering all EU railways are necessary with a view to monitoring and developing the common transport policy and transport safety. I underline the importance of Member States to be responsible for the quality of the statistical data provided, which shall be assessed by Eurostat, the statistical office of the EU.
Further macro-financial assistance to Georgia (A8-0028/2018 - Hannu Takkula)
I voted in favour, as the MFA is provided as an integral part of the international support for the economic stabilisation of Georgia. The EU’s macro-financial assistance is an exceptional emergency instrument aimed at addressing severe balance-of-payment difficulties in third countries. The MFA is very important, as together with the economic adjustment and reform programme will help alleviate Georgia’s short- term financing needs while supporting policy measures aimed at strengthening medium-term balance of payments and fiscal sustainability and raising sustainable growth, thus complementing the programme agreed with the IMF.
Objection to Commission delegated regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 as regards the Union list of projects of common interest (B8-0136/2018)
I consider that the European Commission needs to significantly strengthen cooperation with the European Parliament when drafting the list of Projects of Common Interest. I also believe that the list includes positive projects relevant to our constituencies. It is also well recognised that support for gas will still be necessary in a transition phase, in particular in Central and Eastern Europe.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/008 DE/Goodyear (A8-0061/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 (A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
I voted in favour as I consider that the next MFF is an opportunity to prepare the ground for a stronger and more sustainable Europe through one of its most tangible instruments, the European Union budget. I strongly believe that the next MFF should be embedded in a broader strategy and narrative for the future of Europe.From my point of view the next MFF should be built on the European Union’s well-established policies and priorities, which aim at promoting peace, democracy, the rule of law, human rights and gender equality, long-term and sustainable economic growth, and research and innovation, providing quality employment leading to decent jobs, fighting climate change, and fostering economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski)
I welcome the proposed reform and encourage the own resources system, as the EU needs to be able to stand up to its political commitments and as well as to increase its degree of independence in the decision-making process at international level. I believe that this can be achieved through a reform of its own resources system.
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0047/2018 - Hugues Bayet)
I voted in favour, as I consider that an increase of wages combined with a boost to public investment to foster convergence and enhance the environmental sustainability are key priorities for 2018. This report is important as it fights against inequalities and calls to develop a comprehensive strategy to support investment that enhances environmental sustainability, and to ensure a proper link between the Sustainable Development Goals and the European Semester.
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0052/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)
Social justice is declining and inequalities must be corrected through political action at the European and national level, and the European Semester should focus on this objective.I believe that we need urgent and more decisive action and policy coordination to reduce inequalities and promote equal opportunities, to fight poverty – especially child-poverty – and to tackle unemployment. A decisive change and transformation in political will, direction and policy are urgent. Europe must have a heart that looks after its workers, its children, its youth, its elderly, the most vulnerable ones and all those who lack opportunities in life.
Implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A8-0034/2018 - Jean Arthuis)
I voted in favour, as I share the opinion that the overcapacity in the steel industry should be approached in an inclusive way and I support the call to monitor the market’s fluctuations and its effects on the European industry in order to prevent any disruption through the development of social funds.
EU-New Zealand agreement on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (A8-0029/2018 - Daniel Caspary)
In favour of the agreement, I believe it helps the two parts to share administrative best practices and enhance cooperation in order to facilitate legitimate trade and fight fraud. The EU and New Zealand are close partners – a partnership that is going to be fostered through the agreement by providing practical arrangements between the administrations which will secure global supply chains and facilitate the fight against customs fraud.
A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (A8-0036/2018 - István Ujhelyi)
I am in favour of the report as I support the focuses on four important areas: privacy and data protection, cybersecurity, communication technologies and interoperability of systems. I encourage industrial sectors to join forces – telecommunications, car manufacturing and energy operators – so that the results of digital advances can be properly put in place and applied. Intelligent cars will also contribute to reducing deaths on the roads and increase safety.
Cross-border parcel delivery services (A8-0315/2017 - Lucy Anderson)
My vote reflects the importance of the new measures, which constitute a significant element of the Commission’s Digital Single Market strategy in boosting e-commerce growth. The rules put forward will pave the way towards greater transparency of tariffs and employment practices and a better deal for consumers and small businesses ordering and sending cross-border parcels. By making it easier for consumers and businesses to check which cross-border parcel delivery companies offer the best rates, consumers will be encouraged to buy more online, and retailers, especially small businesses, which do not possess the bargaining power to negotiate better rates, will be provided with new possibilities.
Initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles and driving licences (A8-0321/2017 - Peter Lundgren)
. ‒ My vote reflects the importance of this report, which is built on the Commission’s proposal to update and to tackle a few shortcomings in the Directive on the initial qualification and periodic training requirements for professional drives of truck and buses. The efficiency and safety of the road transport business greatly depend both on the quality of vehicles used and on the skills of the human capital. In view of this, the qualification and periodic training of drivers, and the ability to carry out assessments of those skills and enforce the legislation that regulates them across the EU are crucial and must be regularly updated in order to stay in line with the changes within the industry.
Establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry (A8-0037/2018 - Françoise Grossetête)
. ‒ My vote is in favour as I support the Commission’s proposal to establish a European Defence Industrial Development Programme, and I share the opinion that it is very important to implement it successfully from January 2019 in order to secure the prospects for the European defence industry in the period after 2020. The objective of the Programme is to foster the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the defence industry throughout the Union, which contributes to the EU’s strategic autonomy, support and leverage cooperation between Member States. I particularly welcome the proposal to ensure that at least 10% of the overall Programme budget is allocated to actions promoting cross-border participation of SMEs.
Gender equality in EU trade agreements (A8-0023/2018 - Eleonora Forenza, Malin Björk)
Trade and investment agreements are not gender neutral, meaning that they have different impact on women and men due to structural inequalities; therefore it is of paramount importance to address them the gender equality angle. My vote is in favour of the report as the latter puts forward concrete recommendations on what the EU could do in order to guarantee that its trade policies are in line with its gender equality objectives, recalling at the same time that binding and enforceable provisions in EU trade agreements are necessary to safeguard respect for human rights standards, including gender equality.
Lagging regions in the EU (A8-0046/2018 - Michela Giuffrida)
I voted in favour of the report as the latter calls for tailor-made strategies, programmes and actions for different lagging regions, depending on their specificities and using smart specialisation to accelerate their convergence and secure the best solutions for job creation, economic growth and sustainable development. I particularly welcome the emphasis on the cohesion policy, which plays a key role in ensuring and promoting public and private investment in all EU regions, both directly and by contributing to the creation of a favourable environment for investment. Also, I share the opinion that unemployment constitutes of the most pressing problems in the vast majority of lagging regions and that secondary and higher education, of professional, on-the-job training and of knowledge transfer, play an essential role in combating the levels of youth unemployment and the large numbers of young people departing these regions.
The role of EU regions and cities in implementing the COP 21 Paris Agreement on climate change (A8-0045/2018 - Ángela Vallina)
I welcome this report as I strongly share the opinion that cities need to play a decisive role in tackling climate change, in coordinated interdependence with national authorities and their surrounding regions. More than 70% of Europeans and 73% of jobs are based in urban areas: cities bear great responsibility for global warming, and at the same time they offer a great deal of potential in terms of solutions. I particularly welcome the emphasis put on the need to increase the post-2020 cohesion policy budget and on the need for the latter to pay particular attention to urban investment in air quality, the circular economy, climate adaptation, green infrastructure development solutions, as well as the energy and digital transition.
Insurance distribution: date of application of Member States' transposition measures (A8-0024/2018 - Werner Langen)
. ‒ I voted in favour as the Directive in question aims to extend the deadline for transposition to 1 October 2018 ( instead of 23 February 2018) to give insurance undertakings and insurance distributors more time to implement the Directive and to comply with the Delegated Regulations which were adopted by the Commission in September 2017.
EU-USA Bilateral Agreement on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (A8-0008/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
I welcome this bilateral agreement and encourage new measures regarding insurance and reinsurance and the aims of eliminating some key trade barriers between European Union and USA.I voted in favour because this agreement is important for both site of the Atlantic: for EU companies, elimination of the collateral requirement will remove a key barrier to cross-border expansion and on the US side, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and US state regulators expressing reservations with respect to the supervision provision.
Definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks and protection of geographical indications thereof (A8-0021/2018 - Pilar Ayuso)
I voted in favour as I support proper labelling. I welcome any action that would lead to an increased consumer protection and a stronger protection of consumer interest. It is of great importance that consumers, when buying anything labelled as vodka, whisky or rum in the EU market have the confidence that they will received exactly what they expect.
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel)
I voted in favour as I support the Commission proposal to improve and strengthen administrative cooperation between the Member States’ tax administrations and I consider important for the Member States to strengthen the financial and human resources of the tax administration.It is important to have strong and corresponding sanctions, which should be financial, as well as a granted access to the central depository, which could also strengthen the EU competition policy.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/006 ES/Galicia apparel (A8-0033/2018 - Esteban González Pons)
I voted in favor as the EGF funding of EUR 720 000 shall contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalized services, providing assistance for 303 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies in the NUTS level 2 region of Galicia, with the aim of providing assistance for integrating the affected persons into the labour market.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/007 SE/Ericsson (A8-0032/2018 - Urmas Paet)
I voted in favor as the report gives the green light for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in Sweden. I welcome the EGF funding of EUR 2 130 400, which will contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services, providing assistance for 900 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies in the NUTS level 2 regions of Stockholm with the aim of providing assistance for integrating those affected into the labour market.
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (A8-0025/2018 - Frank Engel)
I voted in favour as I welcome this very important report that focuses on the rule of law, immigration and integration, as well as discrimination – key interlinked issues, which have lost nothing of their relevance or topicality. It is essential to continue fighting for the principles of equality and justice across the EU and tear down any form of discrimination against any of our citizens or threats to the rule of law.
Prospects and challenges for the EU apiculture sector (A8-0014/2018 - Norbert Erdős)
I voted in favour as I welcome this very important report, which provides support for the EU apiculture sector, as beekeeping represents a very important economic agricultural sector in many Member States, with a significant contribution in increasing and diversifying the incomes of many rural households. This is why it is important to recognise pesticides as the first cause of bee mortality and the ban of those neonicotinoids that are harmful to bees.
Banking Union - Annual Report 2017 (A8-0019/2018 - Sander Loones)
I voted in favour because I consider the banking union as a fundamental objective to guarantee the financial stability of the euro area and an indispensable foundation of an open economic and monetary union that should be reinforced. I believe that a quick completion of the banking union is needed, through deposit protection, which is a common concern of all EU citizens.
Cutting the sources of income for Jihadists - targeting the financing of terrorism (A8-0035/2018 - Javier Nart)
I voted in favour because I welcome the report for its focus on cutting terrorist funding through its balanced approach to the source regions and I fully support the blocking the financial means available to the terrorist organisation.As I strongly believe that the security of EU citizens has to become the first priority of EU specialised institutions, I consider that cutting the sources of terrorist funding is a key area for successfully addressing this threat.
EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0022/2018 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Ángela Vallina)
I voted in favour as I welcome the recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women and the provisions provided within.I strongly share the opinion that we have to put the spotlight on the empowerment of rural women as they are often the primary care providers in their families and communities. I recall that we have a duty to work towards the achievement of full gender equality in the Union, and to promote this goal in all external relations.
Establishing a centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third country nationals and stateless persons (TCN) to supplement and support the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS-TCN system) (A8-0018/2018 - Daniel Dalton)
ECRIS—TCN Regulation establishes the creation and management of a centralised system, the responsibilities of the data controllers and the access rights to this centralised database. My votes is in favour as the ECRIS-TCN constitutes a tool to facilitate cooperation and information sharing between Member States. I share the opinion that is important to distinguish between the ECRIS system and the centralised system, referred to as the ECRIS-TCN system. The ECRIS-TCN system only allows a competent authority to establish where criminal records information is held, and not what that information is. In order to obtain the details of what the criminal conviction actually is, the competent authority will have to use the traditional ECRIS system to make a request to the relevant Member State.
Guarantee Fund for external actions (A8-0132/2017 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
My vote reflects the importance of this report, which constitutes a progressive tool for promoting sustainable development and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as objectives. The Guarantee Fund for External Action is part of the External Investment Plan (EIP), as well as the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD). The EIP establishes a coherent and integrated framework to foster investment in Africa and the European neighbourhood, with the aim of promoting decent job creation and inclusive and sustainable development, and addressing root causes of migration.
EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union (A8-0135/2017 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
My vote reflects the importance of supporting investments and the private sector through innovative financing that shall foster sustainable and inclusive economic and social progress, address root causes of the migration crisis and support resilience of the partner countries in Africa and the Neighbourhood, including in Least Developed Countries, with a specific focus on growth, creation of decent jobs, youth and women, socio economic sectors and SMEs.
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0013/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I voted in favor as I agree that the prolongation of EFSI should enable EIB to overcome problems identified in the current scheme related to sustainability, climate action support and geographic balance. I share the opinion that the European Investment Bank supports social upward convergence and fights the root causes of migration.
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0007/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira)
Voting in favour, I welcome the report as it represents an important step forward for European democracy through the nature of the compromise we managed to reach upon this issue. I believe that the proposals better reflect the EU as a whole, by also increasing the number of MEPs from under—represented countries.
Revision of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (A8-0006/2018 - Esteban González Pons)
I voted in favour of the report as the revised Framework Agreement constitutes an important step forward in enhancing the political dimension of the European Commission, by putting an emphasis on the Spitzenkandidat principle and establishing clear standards of transparency for commissioners willing to participate in the next European elections.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (A8-0017/2018 - Ignazio Corrao)
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (FGM), as we must step our efforts to put an end to FGM. UNICEF’s 2016 statistical report indicates that at least 200 million girls and women worldwide have undergone FGM, but the exact figure remains unknown. I welcome the calls on the Commission and Member States, put forward in the resolution, to mainstream the prevention of FGM into all sectors, especially health, including sexual and reproductive health, social work, asylum, education, including sex education, law enforcement, justice, child protection, and media and communication.
EU-Brazil Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0004/2018 - Angelo Ciocca)
I voted in favour as I welcome the renewal of this agreement which has been beneficial for both the EU and Brazil, thanks to research and development partner in fields of interest to the Union like agriculture, second generation biofuels and diseases. Brazil’s potential as a research and innovation partner continues to grow, strengthening its strategic role for the EU in Latin America.
Geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment (A8-0172/2017 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)
I voted in favour as I fully welcome the long-awaited agreement reached on new rules preventing geo-blocking, a landmark agreement which will provide EU citizens with access to a wider range of goods and services and tear down another barrier to a truly digital European Union. Putting an end to artificial segmentation of the market by traders and comprehensively fighting discrimination based on nationality, place of residence or establishment represents a significant step in further achieving the full potential of the digital single market.I believe this regulation constitutes the much needed improvement of the legal framework, and I strongly believe that it will pave the way towards an increased trust in the Single Market, by ensuring that EU retailers give consumers access to goods and services on the same terms all over the EU.
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017 - Julie Girling)
I voted in favour as the ETS (Emissions Trading System) constitutes a landmark piece of legislation on which we heavily rely in order to meet our commitments for the climate and the Paris Agreement, as well as for our industrial policy and the possibilities to guarantee that we have a competitive and modern production in Europe.I would like to stress on the importance for the Member States to also tackle the social aspects of decarbonising their economies and use proceeds from the EU ETS to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy.
European Central Bank Annual Report for 2016 (A8-0383/2017 - Jonás Fernández)
Accelerating clean energy innovation (A8-0005/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)
I voted in favour as the report puts forward the need to create incentives, so as to ensure investor certainty and enhance investment in clean energy innovation, R&D and deployment. I share the opinion that energy-related research and innovation should continue to remain a priority under FP9 (Framework Programme 9), while supporting the call to increase by at least 50% the proportion of clean energy-related financing under FP9.I consider that more efforts should be devoted towards promoting innovations to tackle energy poverty and assist regions that have social impacts as a result of phasing out of coal and lignite.
Marrakesh Treaty: facilitating the access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired, or otherwise print disabled (A8-0400/2017 - Max Andersson)
I voted in favour of the report as I strongly support the conclusion of the Marrakesh Treaty. The Marrakesh Treaty is embedded within a clear humanitarian and social development dimension and its main objective is to improve the availability and the cross-border exchange of certain works and other protected subject-matter in accessible format for persons who are blind, visually impaired, or otherwise print disabled.
Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, and international child abduction (A8-0388/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the report as the new rules put forward will speed up the procedure and ensure legal clarity, as well as diminish costs associated with proceedings and legal assistance. In order to protect the best interest of the child, I strongly support these much needed changes and that the hearing of the child becomes an obligatory component of the proceedings. I particularly welcome the provisions according to which, cases relating to children and child abduction should now be handled much faster and that national central authorities will be better coordinated.
Implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative in the Member States (A8-0406/2017 - Romana Tomc)
My vote reflects the importance of The Youth Employment initiative, which provides financial support for measures, which address youth unemployment via fostering the integration of young people who are not in education, employment or training into the labour market. It is necessary to continue fighting for the sustainability of offers that not only match the candidate’s qualification level and profile but also ensure their development of skills, social protection, decent working conditions and adequate remuneration.
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (A8-0401/2017 - Nicola Danti)
Regulated professions, which represent up to 22% of the labour force in the EU and cover many crucial sectors, constitute a significant element in the economy of the Member States. Rules on regulated professions are usually imposed to ensure the protection of general interest objectives. I voted in favour as I welcome this very important report, which highlights that high-quality professional services and an effective regulatory environment are of utmost importance for preserving the EU economic, social and cultural model and for boosting the competitiveness of the EU.
Control of exports, transfer, brokering, technical assistance and transit of dual-use items (A8-0390/2017 - Klaus Buchner)
. ‒ Considering current international security threats, the export control of dual-use goods and technologies is a critical aspect of the security policies of countries that trade technology. Dual-use goods are those items that can be used for both military and civilian purposes. For human rights reasons, and in order to avoid serious abuses, I supported the report, which reflects awareness of the need for stricter control of exports of these goods.
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report as I fully support the necessary infrastructure for using renewable energy sources. The use of fossil fuels has been, and still is, devastating to the environment through greenhouse gas emissions and consequent global warming. Aiming towards clean energy, we will not only make progress towards a decarbonised economy but will also reinforce our energy security and our economy, and we will create highly qualified jobs.
Energy efficiency (A8-0391/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
The low-carbon energy transition is a global challenge and an universal ambition to reduce CO2 emissions and energy consumption across the EU, which is necessary to fulfil in order to meet the terms of the Paris commitments, to fight climate change and to lead the energy transition. My vote reflects the importance of energy efficiency, which is the main target of the Energy Union strategy, leading to economic development reinforcement, consumer protection, research and competitiveness - all vital to address the climate challenge and to accelerate the EU energy transition.
Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Claude Turmes)
A robust governance system for the Energy Union is necessary in order to fulfil the EU 2030 climate and energy targets and to coordinate efforts, while framing long-term strategies for decarbonisation. I voted in favour as I welcome the proposal on the Governance of the Energy Union, which contributes to a greater regulatory certainty and whose objective is to simplify the process of monitoring progress and tackling weaknesses in implementing the goals of Energy Union, in particular the 2030 EU targets on renewables, energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström)
I support a swift and comprehensive transposition into EU law of the conservation, control and enforcement measures adopted by the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO), to which the EU is a contracting party and which covers a wide range of matters such as common control measures, measures applicable to jack mackerel and measures aimed at reducing seabird mortality and exploratory fishing.I welcome the provisions put forward in the report, which aim to ensure fair allocation of fishing opportunities, prohibit the use of large-scale pelagic driftnets and deep-water gillnets throughout the SPRFMO Convention area, and spotlight both the need to promote coastal fishing activities and the use of fishing gear and techniques which are selective and have a reduced environmental impact.
Implementation of EU macro-regional strategies (A8-0389/2017 - Andrea Cozzolino)
I support the report, which evaluates the implementation of macro-regional strategies and underlines the conclusions for the future.Macro-regional strategies play an important role in promoting European territorial cooperation and bring together regions from Member States and third countries confronted with a common set of challenges. Each macro-regional strategy varies on the basis of the countries involved or the scope of their policies, but they all have the same goal, which is to address these challenges mentioned before.
Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures (A8-0381/2017 - Gabriel Mato)
The report regards the implementation of the landing obligation and ensures a reduced impact of fishing activities on the ecosystem. I express my confidence that the Technical Measures Regulation can restore the confidence in the fishing sector through greater stakeholder participation, clear/less complex rules and reduced administrative burden. I believe that the Regulation provides incentives for a more sustainable fishing which would lead to reduced environmental impact, more abundant stocks, and to a more attractive fishing sector with more and better paid jobs.
International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (A8-0399/2017 - José Inácio Faria)
I support this important report, which constitutes an ambitious response to the Joint Communication and puts forward key guidelines for efficient and effective ocean governance at international level in order to deliver on the commitments of the Paris Agreement and achieve the 2030 Agenda.While recalling the crucial part that oceans, along with coastal and marine resources, play in supporting life on earth and in social and economic development worldwide, I would like to also emphasise that they represent in fact our strongest allies against climate change, with a vital role in the global climate system. However, as widely acknowledged, the environmental health of the oceans is in great peril, which calls for strongly coordinated efforts.
Women, gender equality and climate justice (A8-0403/2017 - Linnéa Engström)
I support the report, as gender equality and full participation of women in overall climate action are important topics for which awareness needs to be improved and firmly included in climate—change policy at all levels. As traditional models in the community, women have now become more and more representatives of change. Considering their decisive effect on the success of sustainable development and on the mitigation of climate change, I believe Member States should increase awareness about gender equality also in regard to climate aspects.
Enforcement of the Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market, laying down a notification procedure for authorisation schemes and requirements related to services, and amending Directive 2006/123/EC and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (A8-0396/2017 - Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, which builds on the Commission’s proposal on enforcement of Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market, laying down a notification procedure for authorisation schemes and requirements related to services. The proposal constitutes part of a range of actions by the Commission aiming to improve the functioning of the single market in services. I share the opinion that the proposal will pave the way for better compliance with the notification obligation under the Services Directive, and will increase transparency while enhancing dialogue among the Member States and the Commission.
Situation in Afghanistan (RC-B8-0678/2017, B8-0678/2017, B8-0679/2017, B8-0680/2017, B8-0681/2017, B8-0682/2017, B8-0683/2017, B8-0684/2017)
My vote validates the importance of the Joint Communication on the EU-Afghanistan Strategy, which is strengthening the shared purposes for achieving peace, stability, security and sustainable development in Afghanistan. Nonetheless, I welcome and support the political commitment of the EU and the Afghan government for the continuation of the progress in all the areas mentioned above.
Situation of the Rohingya people (RC-B8-0668/2017, B8-0668/2017, B8-0669/2017, B8-0670/2017, B8-0671/2017, B8-0672/2017, B8-0673/2017, B8-0674/2017)
Implementation of the directive on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography (A8-0368/2017 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)
Child sexual abuse online and off line is a growing tragedy and constitutes a cross-border crime that requires cross-border cooperation. Directive 2011/93/EU (the Directive) represents a comprehensive legal instrument, which puts forward provisions on substantive criminal law and criminal procedure, administrative measures and policy measures. The Commission implementation reports drew the conclusions that there is still considerable scope for the Directive to reach its full potential. I voted in favour of the report, which identifies the areas where Member States should do more and clarifies certain provisions in the Directive to facilitate the correct and full implementation by the Member States.
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions 2016 (A8-0387/2017 - Notis Marias)
I voted in favour of the report, and I fully support the latter, especially the call on the Commission to identify ways of enhancing cooperation with Member States Authorities as regarding the inquiries about the implementation of and compliance with EU law. Petitions to the European Parliament are valuable means for citizens to obtain a formal hearing by the EU institutions, establishing a direct link between them and their elected representatives. I believe that by promoting citizens’ participation and engagement, we strengthen democracy, increase transparency and ensure information flows.
A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility (A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout)
I voted in favour of the report, as the transport sector, which is responsible for almost a quarter of Europe’s greenhouse gas emissions, has to make the irreversible shift to a low-emission mobility. I particularly welcome the call on the Commission to put forward an ambitious action plan fostering the market uptake of electric vehicles and to issue Member States with guiding recommendations to encourage them to implement fiscal incentives for zero- and low-emission vehicles.
State of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (B8-0676/2017, B8-0677/2017)
I voted in favour of resolution B8-0677/2017, and I consider it appropriate to move to the second phase of negotiations. I am content that we have reached an agreement on all three main important separation issues. The most important on which I am keen is that the rights of all EU and United Kingdom citizens are going to be protected, with close monitoring of their implementation and applications. Moreover, the UK Government has agreed to honour its financial obligations.
Objection to an implementing act: use of phosphoric acid – phosphates – di – tri – and polyphosphates (E 338-452) in frozen vertical meat spits (B8-0666/2017)
My vote is in favour of the resolution as the latter calls on the Commission to reassess current authorisations and, where necessary, table proposals for their discontinuation or revision, in cases where the re-evaluation of phosphates for use as food additives by EFSA cannot exclude any health risks resulting from the use of phosphates as food additives.
Draft recommendation following the inquiry on money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion (B8-0660/2017)
My vote is in favour as tax avoidance, tax evasion and money laundering continue to be global phenomena and therefore call for a comprehensive, clear and coherent responses relying on mutual support and increased cooperation at EU and global level. Fighting against tax evasion and money laundering must be a top priority and for this we need to be united and determined to close down definitively every single tax heaven, to stop any collaboration with the jurisdictions that allow tax evasion, tax avoidance and money laundering.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0351/2017 - Michael Gahler)
I voted in favour as I fully support the report and the proposal within in to develop the permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) in the EU framework, while benefiting from effective Union support, in full respect of Member States’ competences in defence. The world is changing rapidly around us and we have to tackle new challenges every day. To deliver better, Europe and the European Union must focus on today’s main challenges – ensuring the security of our citizens, confronted with both growing external and internal threats.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister)
I voted in favour of the report, which addresses the main institutional, thematic and geographical aspects of EU common foreign and security policy. At a time of increased international challenges, European citizens more than ever expect an effective common foreign and security policy from the EU and Member States, adequately backed by financial resources. As emphasised in the report, a common EU action constitutes the most effective way to preserve Europe’s interests, support its values, engage in a wider world as a united and influential global actor and protect its citizens and Member States from increased threats to their security.
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2016 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0365/2017 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl)
I voted in favour of the report, which recalls that the EU and its Member States must actively pursue the principle of mainstreaming human rights and democracy, as mutually reinforcing fundamental principles lies at the core of the EU, in all EU policies, including those with an external dimension. I particularly welcome the emphasis placed on the importance of enhanced cooperation between the Commission, the Council, the European External Action Service (EEAS), Parliament and the EU delegations to promote and guarantee a consistent and united voice in defence of human rights and democratic principles.
Hong Kong, 20 years after handover (A8-0382/2017 - Alyn Smith)
While sharing the opinion that the report could have been more balanced, my vote reflects the belief that the latter arrives timely and reflects some of our concerns. I particularly welcome the recommendation to highlight the EU’s commitment to strengthening democracy, including the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, fundamental freedoms and rights, transparency, and freedom of information and expression in Hong Kong.
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0374/2017 - Linnéa Engström)
My vote for the report expresses my support for the system of issuing and managing fishing authorisations. It is important to increase the surveillance and transparency of the EU external fishing fleet and to guarantee its sustainability management in accordance with the objectives of the CFP reform.
Amendments to various Regulations in the field of agriculture and rural development (A8-0380/2017 - Albert Deß)
I voted in favour as I believe that the European agriculture needs a more social and inventive approach in our agricultural policy, while developing a more resilient agriculture as a vital necessity for sustainability and public health. Moreover, I welcome the new rural development policy for 2014-20, designed to improve quality of life in rural communities and to harness the full potential of rural areas.
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling)
Greenhouse gas emissions from aviation activities are significant and, if we do not step up our efforts, emissions from the international aviation will reach worrying levels by 2050, undermining EU and global efforts to live up to the Paris climate commitments and effectively address climate change. My vote is in favour of this report, and, as emphasised in the latter, the Commission should regularly submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the advancements in the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation) negotiations, while examining the overall environmental integrity of the measure, including, among others, its general ambition with respect to the targets under the Paris Agreement.
Extension of the duration of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0198/2017 - Udo Bullmann, José Manuel Fernandes)
My vote reflects the belief that the extension, as agreed, would allow to strengthen the impact of the EFSI to fill in the investment gap in the EU not only by increasing the investment target from 315 bn. to 500 bn. but also by improving the quality of the projects supported by EFSI through better criteria and more transparency in the selection procedure process of the projects.
Rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes (A8-0378/2017 - Tiemo Wölken)
The initial objective of the regulation was to lay the ground for legal certainty and to foster paid and legal cross-border access in the digital age, but following the vote in the JURI Committee, I share the opinion that the outcome would further complicate the access of European citizens to European content and would pave the way towards a higher level of geo-blocking. Therefore, my vote reflects to abovementioned opinion.
EU-USA Air Transport Agreement (A8-0376/2017 - Theresa Griffin)
My vote reflects the European Parliament’s consent regarding the conclusion of the agreement. The Air Transport Agreement (first stage agreement) was signed on 25 and 30 April 2007 and has been provisionally applied from 30 March 2008. In October 2015, the Commission put forward an amended proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the agreement, in order to take into consideration the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and the fact that Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania had joined the EU in the meantime. In order to conclude the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States and the United States of America, the Council needs the consent of the European Parliament as required by Article 218 TFEU.
EU-Switzerland agreement on the linking of their greenhouse gas emissions trading systems (A8-0386/2017 - Christofer Fjellner)
After several years of negotiations, the European Commission has concluded negotiations on linking the EU ETS with the ETS of Switzerland. The Agreement establishes the institutional framework as well as the key objectives and principles for linking the two systems. I voted in favour of the agreement as the latter will hopefully lead to the creation of a solid international carbon market. However, more transparency in future similar agreements is a prerequisite for ensuring environmental integrity and public acceptance.
EU-Kazakhstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Consent) (A8-0325/2017 - Liisa Jaakonsaari)
I voted in favour as I welcome the new EU-Kazakhstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, whose goal is to support Kazakhstan – a key trade and strategic partner for the EU and its efforts to commit to international human rights standards and dialogue. However, Kazakhstan still raises concerns regarding the rule of law, democracy and human rights. This is why permanent efforts have to be made by Kazakhstan in order to achieve high compatibility with EU laws and to have a fruitful dialogue on human rights and civil society.
EU-Kazakhstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0335/2017 - Liisa Jaakonsaari)
I voted in favour, as I welcome the new EU-Kazakhstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. Kazakhstan is the first Central Asian partner to have concluded an enhanced partnership and cooperation agreement with the EU and a leading partner in relations with the EU. Finally, taking into consideration the worrying human rights situation in Kazakhstan, I support the call on the EU to consistently prioritise, in its political dialogue with Kazakhstan, the issues of the rule of law and democracy, fundamental freedoms and human rights.
EU Citizenship Report 2017: Strengthening Citizens' Rights in a Union of Democratic Change (A8-0385/2017 - Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea)
My vote is in favour as I welcome the report, which identifies areas where more work remains to be done. Following last year’s Brexit referendum, the right to petition and the right to free movement of persons, in particular, have raised the interest of EU citizens. This is why I believe that now, more than ever, it is time for the EU to gain credibility by overcoming any obstacle and any discrimination against EU citizens.
Towards a digital trade strategy (A8-0384/2017 - Marietje Schaake)
I voted in favour of the report, which does not provide a ‘carte blanche’ to enshrine free flow of data language in FTAs. Rather, it highlights the conditions and methodology that Parliament wants to see adhered to and used when putting forward rules on the transfer of data within a trade context. I particularly welcome the emphasis laid on the fact that a digital trade strategy requires social flanking measures that bridge the digital divide so that everyone can share the benefits.
Mobilisation of the Contingency margin in 2017 (A8-0372/2017 - Jens Geier)
The new proposal puts forward an adjustment of the offsetting of the Contingency Margin mobilised in 2017 with the aim of decreasing from EUR 570 million to EUR 318 million the amount offset under Heading 5 in 2018 and introducing a corresponding offset of EUR 252 million under the same heading in 2020. My vote is in favour as I support the provisions put forward, while agreeing with the expressed concern over the consequent reduction in the margin of Heading 5 that this manoeuvre will bring in 2020.
Draft amending Budget No 6/2017: Reduction of payment and commitment appropriations in line with updated forecasts of expenditure and update of revenue (own resources and fines) (A8-0379/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour as the objective of the Draft amending Budget No 6/2017 is to update both the expenditure and the revenue side of the 2017 EU budget in order to take the latest developments into consideration. I support the call put forward for those Member States with a very high level of under-implementation to take the necessary measures in order to properly implement the jointly agreed Union programmes, with the assistance of the Commission.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the general budget 2018 (A8-0371/2017 - Inese Vaidere)
I voted in favour of the report as I support the objective put forward by the latter, which aims at entering into the general budget of the Union for 2018 the amount of EUR 50 million in commitment and payment appropriations for the payment of advances in a timely and efficient way in the event of a disaster occurring next year.
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to finance immediate budgetary measures to address the on-going challenges of migration, refugee inflows and security threats (A8-0370/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/003 GR/Attica retail (A8-0367/2017 - Marie-Pierre Vieu)
Following the application put forward by Greece for a financial contribution from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) based on 725 redundancies in nine enterprises operating in the retail-trade sector in the region of Attica and 10 other regions, it was concluded that the conditions set out in the EGF Regulation are met and that Greece is entitled to the respective financial contribution. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/005 FI/Retail (A8-0366/2017 - Răzvan Popa)
Following the application put forward by Finland for a financial contribution from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) based on 1 660 redundancies in three enterprises operating in the economic sector, it was concluded that the conditions set out in the EGF Regulation are met and that Finland is entitled to the respective financial contribution. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report.
2018 budgetary procedure (A8-0359/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth)
With regard to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018, my vote reflects the fact that there is room for improvement in order for the budget to be capable of addressing the wide range of challenges in Europe, while fully taking into consideration the citizens’ concerns.
Changes to the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and to the resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal and for the European territorial cooperation goal (A8-0358/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
EU-Egypt Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Egypt in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0353/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
The report welcomes the membership of Egypt in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area and I support the international cooperation with third countries in Research, Development and Innovation, for the crucial role that it plays in science diplomacy and in forced displacement of Mediterranean residents.
EU-Algeria Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Algeria in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0354/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
The report welcomes the membership of Algeria in the international Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) and I fully support the report for the reason that it focuses on developing solutions for a more sustainable management of water and agro-food systems in the Mediterranean.
EU-Jordan Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Jordan in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0355/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
I support the first ever Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area signed for scientific and technological cooperation between EU-Jordan, whose aim is to help address the forced displacement of Mediterranean residents, and therefore counter fight some of the root causes of migration. I would also remind that the report reflects how important is cooperation with third countries in Research, Development and Innovation - a fundamental tool for science diplomacy.
Accession of Chile, Iceland and Bahamas to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0364/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I support the ratification of this report by as many states as possible in order to have a better international cooperation. The report welcomes the accession of Chile, Iceland and Bahamas to the 1980 Hague Convention and the international cooperation that helps to secure custody of children whose parents are living in two different countries.
Accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0362/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
The report welcomes the accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention and I fully support the international cooperation between the states that help to secure custody of children whose parents are living in two different countries. Therefore, I welcome as many states as possible to ratify the Hague Convention to safeguard the rights of children in legal uncertainty.
Accession of San Marino to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0360/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I completely support the report and its objective to stop any situation that could favour child abduction and that seldom finds stimulus in the lack of cooperation between states. The report clarifies another important issue regarding legal custody, as being the only one that offers legal certainty to children with separated parents that are living in different states. I am in favour of the ratification of this report by as many states as possible in order to have a better international cooperation.
Accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0361/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I fully support the report, which welcomes the accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention while seeking to protect children against abduction, guarantee the return of abducted children, and organise and secure children’s rights. Protection of children is of crucial importance, and therefore we need to strengthen cooperation between states and invite other countries to sign up to the Convention.
Transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 (A8-0255/2017 - Peter Simon)
. ‒ I welcome the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as I believe that the accounting standards changes should ensure transparency and accountability. The accounting changes introduced by the IFRS 9 (International Financial Reporting Standard) and their capital impact, are significant in terms of both the IFRS 9 effective date and, on an ongoing basis, in relation to capital forecasting.
Instrument contributing to stability and peace (A8-0261/2017 - Arnaud Danjean)
. ‒ One cannot have security without development, as one cannot have development without security. I agree that security is a pre-requisite for sustainable development but, nevertheless, we have to investigate the most appropriate way to fund military capacity building in third countries and find an efficient and operational solution in this matter. At the same time, I believe in the need for substantial widening and more efficient implementation of European development cooperation.The re-labelling of funds for development purposes to security and defence funding must be avoided.
Ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy (A8-0302/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark)
. ‒ I welcome the proposed amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU as they reflect much-needed efforts to implement the TLAC (Total Absorption Loss Capacity) standard, which was adopted by the G20. I share the opinion that, in order to avoid legal uncertainty, the TLAC standard requires that liabilities be eligible for TLAC only if they are subordinated to other liabilities.
Value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods (A8-0307/2017 - Cătălin Sorin Ivan)
I share the opinion that the Commission’s proposal is only a building block for closing the VAT gap and that further measures are needed to effectively combat VAT fraud in the Union. In conformance, I support the proposal according to which the online platforms should also be held liable for the collection of VAT when they act as intermediaries in supplies of goods imported from third countries. The Commission should allow businesses to register to the new one-stop-shop by 31 December 2021, and adapt their own IT systems to connect it to the new one-stop shop until 1 April 2021.
Administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (A8-0306/2017 - Luděk Niedermayer)
When considering VAT reform, the Commission’s proposal is one of the important steps in taking note of the fast-moving developments in the digital services. Part of the EU legislation package that aims to modernise the VAT regime for cross-border B2C e-commerce, I believe that it provides the basis for the underlying IT infrastructure and the necessary cooperation by Member States to ensure the success of the Mini-One-Stop-Shop (MOSS)extension. Key aspects are related to the exchange of information between competent authorities of Member States, control of transactions and taxable persons, and as well Member States’ information granting to the Commission.
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0649/2017, B8-0649/2017, B8-0650/2017, B8-0651/2017, B8-0652/2017, B8-0653/2017, B8-0654/2017, B8-0655/2017, B8-0656/2017)
The war in Yemen is having devastating consequences. Highlighting the increased suffering of the Yemeni people, I fully support an immediate end to hostilities and genuine talks on inclusive political transition. I am also in favour of halting arms sales, while supporting UN and European External Action Service (EEAS) efforts in this regard.
Implementation of the European Disability Strategy (A8-0339/2017 - Helga Stevens)
I support the call for a comprehensive strategy for people with disabilities by 2030 with the aim of ensuring full implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in all areas of EU policy. I particularly welcome the spotlight shone on the adoption of the European accessibility act without delay. There are 80 million people with disabilities in the European Union and they all have equal rights in all fields of life and are entitled to inalienable dignity, equal treatment, independent living, autonomy and full participation in society.
Establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast) (A8-0345/2017 - Cecilia Wikström)
. ‒ I voted in favour as I welcome the Commission proposal to recast and replace Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person. Indeed, the refugee crisis put the spotlight on the need for a fundamental reform of the Dublin Regulation in order to enable the structured reception of asylum seekers in Europe, and allow Member States to manage their borders effectively.
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Consent) (A8-0327/2017 - Charles Tannock)
. ‒ I voted in favour because I strongly support the EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement. New Zeeland is one of the EU’s closest friends and allies, with which several EU Member States have strong and historic bilateral relationships, and this agreement is positive at a time of mainly rigid international competition and populist vision.
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0333/2017 - Charles Tannock)
. ‒ I voted in favour because I strongly support the EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement. New Zeeland is one of the EU’s closest friends and allies, with which several EU Member States have strong and historic bilateral relationships. This agreement is positive at a time of mainly rigid international competition and populist vision.
The EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development (A8-0334/2017 - Maurice Ponga)
I voted in favour as I welcome the outcome of this very important report, which comes at a time when a sound political and economic partnership between Europe and Africa is gaining momentum, and when the need to provide the latter with a new vision is becoming more and more pronounced. While acknowledging resilience as a core concept for the new EU-Africa strategy, I share the opinion that future cooperation, for which an intensified political dialogue acts as a precondition, should focus on key areas such as economic development, good governance, human development, migration, environment as well as security and the fight against terrorism.
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2016 (A8-0328/2017 - Marlene Mizzi)
I voted in favour as I welcome the annual report of the European Ombudsman, which addresses key issues and concentrates on providing detailed information about the activities and work deployed by the Ombudsman in 2016. Moreover, I particular welcome the Ombudsman’s initiative with respect to the call for nominations for Award for Good Administration, in order to identify best practices in the EU administration and bring them to greater public attention.
Environmental Implementation Review (EIR) (B8-0590/2017)
My vote recognises the great potential of the Environmental Implementation Review (EIR). The findings of the first edition of the Environmental Implementation Review (EIR) reveal very concerning implementation gaps and send a strong signal that we have to come forward with a boosted commitment and lay the ground for a structured implementation dialogue. I strongly believe that the Environmental Implementation Review constitutes a pivotal tool with a great potential in serving as an early warning mechanism, but we have to devote more commitment towards this instrument and ensure that its role in improving the implementation of EU environmental law and policy is fully accomplished.
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (A8-0340/2017 - Javi López)
Period for adopting delegated acts (A8-0332/2017 - Gesine Meissner)
My vote was in favour of the report regarding the period for adopting delegated acts, as the power to adopt acts should be delegated to the Commission for an additional period of five years starting from 27 August 2017. However, the Commission shall notify, as soon as a delegated act is adopted, Parliament and the Council.
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0236/2017 - Salvatore Cicu)
Welcoming as I do the outcome of the report, and in line with my support for a strong TDI (trade defence instruments) system and protection of our industries against unfair competition, I voted in favour. I fully agree that the regulation should be without prejudice to establishing whether any WTO (World Trade Organisation) member is a market economy or to the terms and conditions set out in protocols and other instruments whereby countries have acceded to the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO. In applying its rules, it is essential for the Union to coordinate and exchange information with its major trading partners.
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-0593/2017)
Eastern Partnership: November 2017 Summit (A8-0308/2017 - Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Knut Fleckenstein)
Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (B8-0589/2017)
My vote is in favour as I welcome the Action Plan for nature, people and the economy, and I share the opinion that the latter constitutes a step in the right direction with respect to attaining the objectives of the Nature Directives. I welcome the four priority areas identified in the Action Plan and the emphasis put on the need for the active involvement of all relevant actors at national, regional and local level, in order to effectively address the shortcomings in the implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives.
The situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (B8-0594/2017, B8-0595/2017)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/004 IT/Almaviva (A8-0346/2017 - Daniele Viotti)
Saving lives: boosting car safety in the EU (A8-0330/2017 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch)
I voted in favour of the report as I support the calls on active and passive measures at all three levels on which the road safety depends: the vehicle, the infrastructure and the driver. Moreover, in light of the fact that around 25% of the overall annual fatalities in the European Union are caused by alcohol consumption, I particularly welcome the harmonisation of the EU blood alcohol concentration limit at 0.0% for new drivers in their first two years and for professional ones.
Territorial typologies (A8-0231/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
I sustain the report as I believe is essential to have a clear determination of urban, rural, costal and/or other areas and regions in the EU, considering that currently these typologies are not legally defined in conformity with the Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003. Also, it is essential to establish a legal recognition of territorial typologies, including a definition of cities, for the purpose of European statistics. Not at least, I sustain this report which aims to establish the key definitions and statistical criteria for the territorial typologies, ensuring their transparent application and their use at EU level and in Members States.
Recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation (A8-0338/2016 - Gesine Meissner)
I voted in favour of the report as I fully support the proposal to set up a common system of qualifications for workers in inland navigation, and I strongly believe that the latter brings forward new avenues for progress in this specific sector. Establishing an automatic mutual recognition based on a common set of minimum requirements will diminish the barriers for entering to professions in inland navigation and will improve career prospects, while making jobs in the sector more attractive and enhancing the labour mobility across the Union.
Cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (A8-0077/2017 - Olga Sehnalová)
I voted in favour of the report as I strongly support the outcome of this highly important report, which builds on the proposal of reforming a pivotal piece of legislation, the so-called Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Regulation. Welcoming the reform proposal, I share the opinion that the European Commission has rightly put the spotlight on the powers needed by the enforcement authorities in all Member States, which will certainly underpin a proper cross-border cooperation.
Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change (A8-0329/2017 - Iratxe García Pérez)
Demographic change constitutes one of the major challenges that European regions have to face now and in the near future. Over the period 2008-2030, one region in three – mostly located in central Europe, eastern Germany, southern Italy and northern Spain –may experience population decline. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report, as it emphasises the importance of cohesion policy measures, which are often the main provisions for tackling demographic challenges at regional and local levels and often complement national and regional strategies.
Action plan on retail financial services (A8-0326/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson)
I voted in favour of the resolution, as I strongly support the ambitious agenda for the retail financial services in the upcoming years, which promotes innovation and sustainable investment. I insist, nevertheless on the condition that the Action Plan maintains a high level consumer protection and transparency, which are crucial to the progress of a single market in retail financial services.
Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive (A8-0297/2017 - Laura Ferrara)
I voted in favour of the report as it ascertains the strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) implementation, the objective of the latter being to establish a common framework for the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, at a reasonable cost to society. Moreover, I share the opinion that we need to shape a definition of environmental damage, which should be effective, uniform and consistent with the evolution of pollutants from industrial activities. Therefore, I strongly support the extension of the directive’s scope so that damages to the air are included as well.
Framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation (A8-0387/2016 - Paul Tang)
I voted in favour of the report as I welcome the elements put forward in the final package, which have the potential of paving the way towards a more European, more stable, more transparent, more environment-friendly and more prudential securitisation market. I particularly support a macro-prudential framework created at the European level that should be able to efficiently oversee the market through ESRB (European systemic risk board) and through EBA (European Banking Authority). Indeed, securitisation can widen business access to financing, but we need clear European prudential rules, transparency and supervision.
Prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (A8-0388/2016 - Othmar Karas)
I voted in favour as the regulation revises the prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms, being interlinked with the proposal that paves the way towards a European label for Simple, transparent and standardised securitisation (STS). Moreover, the two regulations in question constitute one of the main pillars of the Capital Markets Union, which aims at creating further means for financing the real economy.
Respect for private life and the protection of personal data in electronic communications and repealing Directive 2002/58/EC (Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications) (A8-0324/2017 - Marju Lauristin)
The report needs a better alignment with the General Data Protection Regulation to allow publishers to offer their services on open sites, as they need uniformity with GDPR, transparent information, selections and adequate safety measures to diminish risks. It is required to foresee a long-term and constructive approach that would be compatible with the empowerment of the consumer in relation to his data.
Combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU (RC-B8-0576/2017, B8-0576/2017, B8-0577/2017, B8-0578/2017, B8-0579/2017, B8-0580/2017, B8-0581/2017, B8-0582/2017)
I voted in favour as I welcome the calls and the elements introduced by the resolution such as the call on the Commission to submit a legal act supporting Member States in the prevention and suppression of all forms of violence against women and girls and of gender-based violence, as well as the emphasis put on the urgent need for Member States, employers’ organisations and trade unions to promote awareness of sexual harassment and encourage women to report incidents immediately.
Economic policies of the euro area (A8-0310/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark)
I voted in favour of the report, which is expressly dedicated to the Eurozone. Following the Commission’s first proposal for Eurozone fiscal stance, I support a positive fiscal stance that will allow Member States to invest more and that directly contributes to the increase of growth and employment. In order to build a stronger Europe, we need to create a more social Europe, to lay the ground for social growth, based on a general approach, but also on country specific. Therefore, we need to ensure that the fiscal policies are led with the necessary flexibility at EU level.
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with Australia (A8-0311/2017 - Daniel Caspary)
Australia is one of the EU’s oldest and closest partners, based on common values and the commitment towards promoting prosperity and security within a global rules-based system. I voted in favour as I support the calls on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a trade and investment agreement with Australia. However, the negotiations have to be conducted as transparently as possible while not undermining the Union’s negotiating position.
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with New Zealand (A8-0312/2017 - Daniel Caspary)
The EU and New Zealand already work together in addressing common challenges across a wide-ranging spectrum of issues, and New Zealand ranks among the EU’s oldest and closest partners, due to common values and the commitment towards promoting prosperity and security within a global rules-based system.I voted in favour as I support the calls on the Council to authorise the Commission to start the negotiations. However, we have to ensure that the negotiations are carried out with the utmost transparency, including through constant dialogue with social partners and civil society, while not undermining the European Union’s negotiating position. Moreover, robust, ambitious and enforceable sustainable development chapters have to be developed.
Monitoring the application of EU law 2015 (A8-0265/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
The high number of infringement proceedings found in the Commission’s 2015 annual report monitoring the application of EU law shows the difficulty and challenges Member States have in applying EU legislation correctly and timely. I voted in favour of the report as I particularly share the opinion on the need to come forward with a comprehensive legislative proposal on a European law of administrative procedure, by also setting up a single gateway that would provide citizens with user-friendly information on infringement procedures.
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (A8-0299/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth)
I voted in favour as the outcome of the report reflects per ensemble our commitment to Europe’s growth. I welcome the reinforcements to support growth, competitiveness and employment (Europe 2020), in particular: increase in Erasmus+ budget by +EUR 32 million, increase in EURES (European Employment Services) budget by +EUR 5.6 million, and an increase in the Youth Employment Initiative by EUR 366 million to combat youth unemployment.I strongly believe that the Commission’s proposal to make use of the flexibility instrument for EUR 817 million is still not sufficient to tackle the migration and refugee challenges, thus I share the opinion on further use of the special instruments under the MFF (multiannual financial framework) Regulation. Finally, I fully support granting additional financial assistance for the Development Cooperation Instrument.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0291/2017 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section II – European Council and Council. The lack of transparency and budgetary accountability coming from the Council is not acceptable for EU citizens; we need to maintain our democratic accountability towards the Union’s taxpayers. I believe that greater goodwill on both sides is needed with a view to improving cooperation in the future.
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens (A8-0064/2017 - Marita Ulvskog)
I voted in favour of the report as it sets limits for 13 substances that can cause cancer, while reaching even tougher limit values for hexavalent chromium and hardwood dust than initially proposed by the Commission. Indeed, a precise legislative framework in the EU will contribute to a better prevention of work-related cancers and other serious illnesses and will save at least 100 000 more lives.
Establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data of third country nationals crossing the EU external borders (A8-0057/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the report as I welcome the objectives underpinning the proposal of setting up a European Entry/Exit System (EES): to facilitate border crossings, help combating irregular migration and support the fight against organised crime and terrorism. Indeed, the growing traveller flows at the EU’s external borders in recent years sent a strong signal with respect to the inefficiency of the current border control systems. However, we must always ensure that the functioning of the European Entry/Exit System (EES) fully respect the principles of necessity and proportionality and that the appropriate safeguards for rights and data protection are entirely met.
Amendment of the Schengen Borders Code as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System (A8-0059/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
The report complements the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the EU. I voted in favour as I share the opinion that different legislative texts need to be technically aligned in order to make the rules governing the Schengen area more coherent and avoid legal contradictions. Moreover, I support the development of national facilitation programmes, based on common legislation, in order to facilitate border crossings and to meet the general objectives of the EES.
Fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism (A8-0294/2017 - Soraya Post)
I voted in favour of the report as the latter puts forward many positive elements such as the call on the Commission and the Member States to develop strategies encompassing both proactive and reactive measures on the basis of real, systematic consultations with Roma representatives and NGOs, as well as the call on the Commission to place the anti-Gypsyism fight in the focus of the post-2020 EU Framework in addition to social inclusion, and to introduce anti-discrimination indicators in the fields of education, employment, housing and health.
EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (A8-0303/2017 - Dominique Riquet)
Authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion (A8-0304/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
My vote is in favour because I support the practice of France for a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion. Moreover, these special excise duty arrangements have been extended with EU approval since the creation of the internal market and the harmonisation of excise duty in Europe.
Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking: financial contributions (A8-0293/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
My vote is in favour because the bio-based industry can generate a bioeconomy with growth and added value and it surely creates secure jobs; it also contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, thus improving public health, and, finally, I believe in the public-private partnership for the bio-based industries as a joint technology initiative.
Control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes cost-effectiveness (A8-0296/2017 - Derek Vaughan)
Youth unemployment continues to be a serious problem in many Member States. The Youth Guarantee (YG) and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) have played a significant part in reducing the youth unemployment rate in the EU by boosting education and the labour market’s demand for young people, and supporting job creation measures. While much has been achieved, we have to do more. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report as I share the opinion that more funding at national and EU level, as well as better monitoring and sharing of best practices, have to be put in place to combat youth unemployment.
Criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking (A8-0317/2017 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
My vote is in favour of the recommendation, as it aims to improve at EU level the currently applicable system for addressing the threats posed by new psychoactive substances. We are aware that there is a terrible intensification of narcotic drugs use and, consequently, of higher health risk; not least, there is a resilient ability of the criminal networks’ ‘modus operandi’ to adapt and diverge, which I am confident we will succeed in combating.
CE marked fertilising products (A8-0270/2017 - Mihai Ţurcanu)
I voted against the report as I do not agree with the proposal to introduce a gradual reduction of cadmium (Cd), respectively from 60 mg Cd/kg P2O5 to 40 mg Cd/kg after three years, and to 20 mg Cd/kg after 12 years. Lowering the cadmium level is not justified on grounds of scientific evaluation and is likely to bring a negative impact on the industry.
Information exchange on, and an early warning system and risk assessment procedure for, new psychoactive substances (A8-0359/2016 - Michał Boni)
Common Fisheries Policy: implementation of the landing obligation (A8-0285/2017 - Alain Cadec)
Renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0567/2017)
The objection calls on the Commission to adopt necessary measures to eliminate the active substance glyphosate in the European Union by 15 December 2020, ensuring that no use of glyphosate is authorised after that date. I voted against the objection as, according to the findings of the EFSA’s review of glyphosate, the latter is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans, the evaluation being based on a large body of evidence, including a number of studies not assessed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Moreover, the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency concluded in its opinion that no hazard classification for carcinogenicity is justified for glyphosate.
Authorisation of genetically modified maize 1507 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0568/2017)
I voted in favour of the objection regarding the authorisation of genetically modified maize 1507, as herbicide-resistant genetically modified organisms (GMOs) should not be authorised. Indeed, they could lead towards an increase use of herbicides, and the wider health and environmental implications of this have not been taken into consideration.
Authorisation of genetically modified soybean 305423 x 40-3-2 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0570/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution as I support the call on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean 305423 x 40-3-2, taking into consideration that it is not possible to give a favourable verdict, from the perspective of human or animal nutrition, on the safety profile of the products in question.
Authorisation of genetically modified oilseed rapes MON 88302 x Ms8 x Rf3 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0569/2017)
Draft amending budget No 5/2017: financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development and increasing the Emergency Aid Reserve (A8-0301/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour as I welcome the purpose of the Draft amending budget No 5 to provide the financing from the general budget 2017 for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and to reflect in the general budget 2017 the outcome of the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) regulation with respect to the increase of the annual amount of the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) from EUR 280 million to EUR 300 million.
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to provide the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (A8-0298/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the report as I welcome the decision to use the Flexibility Instrument to provide the amount of EUR 275 million in commitment appropriations and payment appropriations under Heading 4 of the MFF (Global Europe). This amount would be mobilised to provide the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD).
Reflection paper on the future of EU finances (B8-0565/2017)
I voted in favour as the motion for resolution puts forward real budgetary ambition for the future of the EU. I share the opinion that the structure of the next MFF should render the EU budget more readable and understandable to EU citizens and allow for a clearer presentation of all areas of EU expenditure. Finally, I particularly welcome the inclusion of sustainable development as one of the main pillars for future EU spending.
Legitimate measures to protect whistle-blowers acting in the public interest (A8-0295/2017 - Virginie Rozière)
I voted in favour of the report as it puts forward rules to protect whistle-blowers and their right to directly inform citizens. Indeed, whistle-blowers play a pivotal role in reporting unlawful or improper conduct which undermines the general interest and functioning of society. Nevertheless, the protection of whistle-blowers is fragmented in Europe. Therefore, I fully support the call on the Commission to present a horizontal legislative proposal creating a comprehensive common regulatory framework to protect whistle-blowers in the EU.
Minimum income policies as a tool for fighting poverty (A8-0292/2017 - Laura Agea)
Enhanced cooperation: European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0290/2017 - Barbara Matera)
Prison systems and conditions (A8-0251/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron)
Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation (A8-0279/2017 - Javier Couso Permuy)
I voted in favour because the European Union – Latin America and Caribbean Foundation (EU-LAC Foundation), a tool of the EU-CELAC partnership, focuses on strengthening the bi-regional partnership between the EU and the EU Member States and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States and supports, among other things, that region’s efforts to reduce poverty and inequality and pursue sustainable development.
Schengen acquis provisions relating to the Visa Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0286/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
Since 2011 the Council has concluded that Romania and Bulgaria are ready to join the Schengen border check-free area, given that all the Schengen acquis conditions on air borders, land borders, police cooperation, data protection, the Schengen Information System, sea borders, and visas have been met. Obviously, therefore, I voted in favour, as the two countries are technically ready for Schengen.
Safety rules and standards for passenger ships (A8-0167/2017 - Daniela Aiuto)
Registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships operating to or from ports of the Member States (A8-0168/2017 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
My vote was in favour of the legislative draft because it aims at simplifying rules and reducing administrative costs, while at the same time it brings improvements for safe travel at sea through a digitalisation system which records the responsibilities for search and rescue services and which allows immediate access to information on passengers on board.
System of inspections for the safe operation of ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft in regular service (A8-0165/2017 - Dominique Riquet)
My vote supports the creation of a clear and robust framework for the inspections, which eliminates overlaps and closes regulatory gaps resulting from the application by Member States of different inspection regimes. I am glad to see that the proposal will diminish the administrative burden for shipowners and rationalise the inspection efforts of Member States’ authorities, with a high common level of safety being ensured.
Objection to an implementing measure: scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties (B8-0542/2017)
I voted against the Objection because I support the Commission proposal for an implementing act on the scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties in pesticides. I mention that the chemicals with endocrine disrupting properties are found in many of the daily products we use, and are harmful for human beings’ hormone system, therefore I strongly sustain the Commission’s implementation to establish criteria that regulates what is or is not an endocrine disruptor for the purposes of plant protection products and biocidal products.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean FG72 x A5547-127 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed (B8-0540/2017)
I voted in favour of the objection because I call the Commission to carry out an extensive analysis of the health risks and toxicology on human being health, as well as post-market monitoring, that target the whole food, before any authorisation of the placement on the market of the products containing genetically modified soybean.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean DAS-44406-6, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed (B8-0541/2017)
Ending child marriage (B8-0535/2017)
My vote is in favour, because child marriage cannot be legal as there is no available consensus for a marriage on behalf of the minors, and also because this practice diminishes the child’s chance to education and to a healthy life. I believe child marriage represents a much higher risk for psychological and emotional abuses and, not least, physical.
2017 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany (COP23) (B8-0534/2017)
My vote recognises climate change as one of the most important challenges for mankind, to which all states and players worldwide have to fully commit in order to address the problems. Moreover, efforts in tackling climate change should not be considered as an obstacle to economic growth, but on the contrary they should be seen as a stimulus in generating new and sustainable economic growth and employment.
State of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (B8-0538/2017, B8-0539/2017)
I vote in favour because I believe in the close cooperation between the EU and the UK in areas of common interest such as security, defence and foreign policy; the cooperation goes beyond security and criminal matters and aims to eradicate extreme poverty and to build stability and resilience in developing countries.
Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0205/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the ICCAT Convention area (A8-0173/2017 - Gabriel Mato)
Welcoming the 28 recommendations for conservation, management and control of fisheries, as they have not yet been covered by EU rules, I voted in favour of the report. Even though they are binding, the decisions adopted by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) must be transposed as soon as possible into EU law.
Women’s economic empowerment in the private and public sectors in the EU (A8-0271/2017 - Anna Hedh)
Addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries (A8-0283/2017 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
I voted in favour of the report as it puts the spotlight on the central role that civil society plays in ensuring democratic consolidation, social justice and respect for human rights as well as in promoting accountability and good governance. Whereas clamping down on civil society organisations is getting more difficult to address, we need to step up efforts and provide guidance to beneficiary countries on strategies for creating adequate legal, administrative and political environment allowing to these key actors to work efficiently. Civil society actors including human rights defenders and development NGOs must always possess the space to operate free from intimidation, harassment, violence and undue bureaucratic burdens.
The fight against cybercrime (A8-0272/2017 - Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi)
I voted in favour of the report as it highlights the need for rapid information exchange on identification and mitigation of cyber threats between Union, state and private actors. As the revised EU Cyber Strategy proposes to strengthen the EU Cybersecurity Agency ENISA, by becoming more operationally involved in European critical information infrastructure protection, in cyber information sharing and in the enforcement of European cybersecurity legislation, I support the call within the report for ENISA to continuously evaluate the threat level in order to strengthen capacity-building at European level.
EU political relations with ASEAN (A8-0243/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer)
I voted in favour of the report as I support the recommendation on upgrading the relations between the EU and the ASEAN to a strategic partnership. I particularly welcome the initiative of taking a deeper look into the opportunities for cooperation in implementing the sustainable development goals, as well as the initiative of establishing a new-dedicated EU-ASEAN Dialogue on Sustainable Development, especially that the ASEAN regions represent one of the most vulnerable to climate change.
Accessibility requirements for products and services (A8-0188/2017 - Morten Løkkegaard)
. ‒ My vote was in favour of the report because ‘universal accessibility’, ‘design for all’ and ‘gender perspective’ should be ensured in products, tools, devices and services in order for them to be commonly used by persons with disabilities. I believe in equal rights for all citizens, including those with disabilities.
EU-Chile Agreement on trade in organic products (A8-0257/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
Protocol to the EU-Chile Association Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0277/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
. ‒ My vote is in favour of the protocol because it incorporates Croatia as a contracting party to the agreement. After adoption, the protocol will be applied retroactively, from 1 July 2013, the date of Croatia’s EU accession. I believe the protocol offers a good opportunity for Croatia to formalise and strengthen the existing relationship with the European Union.
Modernisation of the trade pillar of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0267/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
European venture capital funds and European social entrepreneurship funds (A8-0120/2017 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust)
I voted in favour because multiannual plans represent an essential instrument of the reformed common fisheries policy and play a pivotal role in ensuring the long-term sustainable exploitation of biological marine resources, while covering the characteristics of different fisheries and enhancing the predictability of catch authorisations. Also, taking into account the need to build a robust working basis with third countries for future management purposes and in view of Brexit, I share the opinion that the multiannual plan is crucial and its early entry into force is highly desirable.
Establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace (A8-0261/2017 - Arnaud Danjean)
Transparency, accountability and integrity in the EU institutions (A8-0133/2017 - Sven Giegold)
My vote is in favour because I believe that more transparency, accountability and integrity will increase public trust and democratic legitimacy and will strengthen the European Union. Moreover, the citizens trust EU institutions and it is fundamental to raise the level of transparency, to promote greater integrity and to reduce accountability gaps within the EU.
The future of the Erasmus+ programme (B8-0495/2017)
My vote recognised the importance of the Erasmus+ programme, which contributed to the development of so many people by providing enriching opportunities in the areas of education, training, youth and sport. A particular focus has to be orientated towards people from disadvantaged backgrounds and those with special needs whose mobility is rendered difficult in the absence of coordination and portability of rights among EU social systems.
A new skills agenda for Europe (A8-0276/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Momchil Nekov)
I voted in favour because the report puts the spotlight on both needs: the need to develop employability skills that make it possible to keep pace with labour market advancements and the need to boost those transversal skills, the so-called ‘skills for life’, which benefit young people’s personal and professional development, while positively impacting society. Indeed, when shaping our measures, we must be fully aware that skills have to suit not only the needs of the labour market, but also societal and personal needs.
Multilateral Agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (A8-0260/2017 - Roberts Zīle)
Subjecting acryloylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0284/2017 - Brice Hortefeux)
I voted in favour because I believe the control measures across the Union would avoid obstacles in cross-border law enforcement and judicial cooperation, and definitively it contributes to protect from the health and social risks, as the acryloylfentanyl is a psychoactive substance, a synthetic opioid, available in the EU and detected in six Member States.
EU political relations with India (A8-0242/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0280/2017 - Giovanni La Via)
My vote is in favour of mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy because the application meets the conditions for providing a financial contribution from the Fund, (as stated in the Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002) and the funds will cover the costs of emergency services, temporary accommodations and clean-up operation in Italy.
Draft amending budget No 4/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0281/2017 - Jens Geier)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/002 FI Microsoft 2 (A8-0278/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa)
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling)
I voted in favour because the report puts forward a timeline regarding the derogation for extra-EEA (European Economic Area) flights, brings more details with respect to the Commission’s review report on CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation) and calls for increased transparency of ICAO’s (International Civil Aviation Organisation) advancements on the global offsetting scheme.
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins)
Uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals (A8-0065/2017 - Jussi Halla-aho)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean DAS- 68416-4 (B8-0498/2017)
I voted in favour of the objection because I believe the EU has to ensure for its citizens a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, the environment and consumer interests in relation to genetically modified food and feed, ensuring at the same time the functioning of the internal market.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing Regulation amending Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/6 as regards feed and food subjected to special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station (B8-0502/2017)
My vote is in favour of the objection because it is necessary that all food and feed imported from Japan into the Union, including the categories listed in Annex I, be controlled and checked as there are sufficient reasons to believe that this proposal could lead to an increase in exposure to radioactively—contaminated food with a corresponding impact on human health.
Draft amending budget No 3/2017: budgetary resources of the Youth Employment Initiative; establishment plans of ACER and SESAR2 (A8-0282/2017 - Jens Geier)
My vote is in favour of the draft amending budget number 3 from this year because I strongly believe that there is an urgent need to increase the Union’s financial commitment in the fight against youth unemployment through additional funding for the Youth Employment Initiative, and also that it is necessary to increase the annual budget for the YEI.
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0264/2017 - Bodil Valero)
My vote is in favour because I believe that as a values-based global actor, for the EU’s credibility, every Member State has the responsibility to ensure that such exports do not contribute to human rights violations and prolongation of conflicts in third countries and that the security of the Union and its citizens is not at risk.
EU political relations with Latin America (A8-0268/2017 - Javi López)
I voted in favour because I strongly consider that strengthening the partnership and the political dialogue between the EU and the LAC (Latin America and the Caribbean region) would boost both parties’ efforts in tackling common challenges and help deliver stronger economic growth through sustainable socio-economic development policies. Finally, I highly believe that achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) must represent the prevailing objective of this cooperation.
Corruption and human rights in third countries (A8-0246/2017 - Petras Auštrevičius)
My vote is in favour because I am calling on respect for human rights in third countries, and all Member States have always played an important role in the field of further developing partnerships and cooperation with the third countries. Also, I urge for promoting democracy and the rule of law in third countries.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Marie-Christine Boutonnet (A8-0259/2017 - Heidi Hautala)
Nominal composition of the special committee on terrorism
My vote was of approval in this matter, because the names of the members of the special committee on terrorism were previously accepted by the Conference of Presidents and the committee is specialised on matters such as EU anti-terror laws, on fundamental rights or external border management measures etc.
EU-Iceland Agreement on the protection of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs (A8-0254/2017 - David Borrelli)
EU-Iceland Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0256/2017 - David Borrelli)
Implementation of the Mediation Directive (A8-0238/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
The functioning of franchising in the retail sector (A8-0199/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
A Space Strategy for Europe (A8-0250/2017 - Constanze Krehl)
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (A8-0181/2017 - Carlos Zorrinho)
I voted in favour because I believe that, today, the internet has become an extremely valuable service. Accessing the internet can improve services, increase the choices we have and help in finding or creating employment. Europe needs a Digital Union, and together we can build one through promoting internet connectivity.
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (A8-0310/2016 - Jerzy Buzek)
I voted in favour because safeguarding the security of gas supply demands more cooperation, more coordination and more transparency. I welcome the introduction of the solidarity principle and I strongly believe that the latter paves the way towards the achievement of a genuine Energy Union by making one of its cornerstones, energy security, more effective.
EU accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (A8-0266/2017 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)
My vote was in favour because I strongly call for the immediate ratification and implementation by all EU Member States of the Istanbul Convention, which places the rights of the victim at the centre and provides for measures such as the prevention of violence, the fight against discrimination, and victim protection and support. We can eradicate violence against women and combat domestic violence.
Impact of international trade and EU’s trade policies on global value chains (A8-0269/2017 - Maria Arena)
My vote was in favour of the report because I call on the EU Member States for stronger legislation on corporate accountability and due diligence to enhance standards. Not least, I believe it is crucial to include sustainable development chapters and provisions in free trade agreements to fight money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance.
2016 Report on Turkey (A8-0234/2017 - Kati Piri)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report, which calls for the suspension of the accession negotiations with Turkey, as parts of the constitutional-reform package seem to have been implemented already – unchanged and at odds with the Copenhagen criteria.I support the deepening of EU-Turkey relations in key areas of joint interest, such as counter-terrorism, migration, energy, the economy and trade. I would also emphasise that dialogue and cooperation with Turkey should be preserved and encouraged.
Setting up a special committee on terrorism, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B8-0477/2017)
. ‒ My vote is in favour because I consider that, unfortunately, the terrorist threat has grown and evolved in recent years, so we have to reinforce the safeguards as much as possible. I believe we need to implement relevant international standards and obligations and address the evolving terrorist threat, so I support the special committee on terrorism.
European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and establishing the EFSD Guarantee and the EFSD Guarantee Fund (A8-0170/2017 - Eduard Kukan, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
The fund is crucial to support investments and the involvement of the private sector through innovative financing so we can foster sustainable and inclusive economic and social development. This can help us address the root causes of the migration crisis and promote the resilience of partner countries in Africa and the neighbourhood, particularly in the least developed countries. These are my considerations for voting in favour of the report.
Permitted uses of certain works and other protected subject-matter for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled (A8-0097/2017 - Max Andersson)
Unfortunately, currently, there are still people that continue to face many barriers in accessing culture, education and entertainment. Books and other print materials are not accessible for everyone.I am voting in favour of the report, because these measures need to be adopted in order to increase the availability of these works in accessible formats and to improve their circulation in the internal market.
Cross-border exchange of accessible format copies of certain works and other protected subject-matter for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled (A8-0102/2017 - Max Andersson)
It is sad that not every individual has access to books, journals, newspapers, music and that persons with disabilities are excluded from having the right to a proper education, research or innovation work.I voted in favour of the report because I believe it is necessary to make accessible audiovisual works. In this way the needs of disabled people would be attended to and also the authors would reach new audiences through European works being accessible to all European citizens.
Double taxation dispute resolution mechanisms in the EU (A8-0225/2017 - Michael Theurer)
I am in favour of the dispute resolution mechanism, which stands as a welcome proposal from the Commission aimed at easing the resolution of disputes between Member States on how to eliminate double taxation of income from business and the rights of taxpayers in this context. I underline the importance of a fair and effective corporate taxation system in encouraging businesses to reap the full benefits of the Single Market.In addition, I also agree that there is considerable room for improvement in the performance of competent authorities, and thus I support the need to accelerate the different procedural stages, to which Member States should dedicate the necessary [resources].
EU action for sustainability (A8-0239/2017 - Seb Dance)
My vote is in favour of the report on EU action for sustainability because I consider it essential in terms of the needs of present generations, whose future we need to ensure. Sustainability impacts every aspect of the EU’s work and we need the effective participation of society in order to set society on the path to sustainability, and this can be achieved through education and participation. I consider that my vote reflects my belief in the importance for us to move towards green, high-quality and sustainable employment.
Promoting cohesion and development in the outermost regions of the EU (A8-0226/2017 - Younous Omarjee)
My vote is in favour of the report because I consider the following aspects: the outermost regions challenge the population living there through their high costs and limited market competition. In these regions, high rates of unemployment and social exclusion are registered, as well as strong population growth on an insular, small size surface. My vote reflects my acknowledgment of the outermost regions’ issues, which stresses the need for the EU to adopt a differentiated approach for them in all European policies.
Agreement to amend the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, adopted in Kigali (A8-0237/2017 - Kateřina Konečná)
I am in favour of the Agreement to amend the Montreal Protocol, as the amendment adds hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) to the list of substances regulated by the Protocol and amends the applicable articles in the Protocol accordingly. HFCs are active greenhouse gases whose global warming potential can be one thousand times greater than that of carbon dioxide. Their use must therefore be reduced as soon as possible. I agree that most economically developed countries should cut down the production and use of HFCs between 2019 and 2023. Most developing countries should freeze their consumption and production of HFCs between 2024 and 2028. The rest should freeze their consumption and production between 2028 and 2031. I believe that the EU’s adoption of the Kigali Amendment shows its commitment to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, by also meeting the targets set in the Paris Agreement.
Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution to abate acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone (A8-0241/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
The 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) is the main international framework for cooperation and measures to limit and gradually reduce and prevent air pollution. Fifty-one countries have joined the Convention, including the EU Member States, Canada, the United States and various Central Asian countries. I support the changes aimed at incrementing the efforts to reach the objectives regarding the long-term protection of the environment and human health. Therefore, I am in favour of the amendment that introduces new national binding objectives for GHGs emissions from 2020 onwards. It concerns atmospheric pollutants like sulphur (principally sulphur dioxide), nitrogen oxides, ammonia, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulates.
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Consent) (A8-0232/2017 - Elena Valenciano)
This Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement is a highly necessary and appropriate instrument which will provide a framework for the relations that the EU and its Member States already maintain with the Republic of Cuba. Being in favour of the agreement, I believe it sends a strong message of political presence to other global actors who are competing in the Caribbean and across the Latin American continent.Through this agreement, the EU is pledging to accompany Cuba in its evolution while fully respecting its autonomy, sovereignty and independence. Cuba for its part is demonstrating its interest in having the EU as a reference, within a framework of full mutual respect. Moreover, the agreement will make it possible further to develop cooperation and Cuba’s participation in the EU’s specific programmes.
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0233/2017 - Elena Valenciano)
This Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement is a highly necessary and appropriate instrument which will provide a framework for the relations that the EU and its Member States already maintain with the Republic of Cuba. Being in favour of the agreement, I believe it sends a strong message of political presence to other global actors who are competing in the Caribbean and across the Latin American continent. Through this agreement, the EU is pledging to accompany Cuba in its evolution while fully respecting its autonomy, sovereignty and independence. Cuba for its part is demonstrating its interest in having the EU as a reference, within a framework of full mutual respect.Moreover, the agreement will make it possible further to develop cooperation and Cuba’s participation in the EU’s specific programmes.
Memorandum of Understanding between the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and Eurojust (A8-0215/2017 - Claude Moraes)
I am in favour of allowing Eurojust to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems (eu-LISA). The MoU will enable the two agencies to cooperate on the exchange of information, on ICT (Information and Communications Technology) related matters, on the right of Eurojust to access SIS II and on Strategic and Administrative measures, and as well on other areas of mutual importance. I believe that the main driver of the MoU is the implementation of the right of Eurojust to access SIS II.
Fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (A8-0230/2017 - Ingeborg Gräßle, Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I believe it is very important to enhance the fight against fraud and corruption, harmonising offences and sanctions at European level and ensuring – among other things – that cross-border VAT fraud can be tackled more rigorously and that the financial interests of the Union will be better protected. Moreover, the adoption of this Directive also paves the way for the creation of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office.
Union legal framework for customs infringements and sanctions (A8-0239/2016 - Kaja Kallas)
The fight against violations of customs legislation of the Union has become increasingly important with the growth of international trade. In the EU, despite the fact that customs legislation is fully harmonised (for almost 45 years now), its enforcement and the lawful imposition of sanctions lie within the ambit of Member States’ national law.The main objectives of the proposal are to bridge the gap between different legal regimes through a common platform of rules and to enhance the level playing field between economic operators in the Customs Union. To this end, it includes a common list of infringements and establishes a common scale of administrative sanctions. I believe it is very important to address the divergent sanctions that pose problems to economic operators and to international trade relations, problems that also create uneven compliance costs and an administrative burden that could make some Member States more ‘attractive’.
HIV, TB and HCV epidemics in Europe on the rise (B8-0436/2017)
These are significant health threats in the EU and often affect vulnerable and overlapping populations. The EU Action Plan on HIV/AIDS expired at the end of 2016 as many of us know and yet there have been no proposals for a renewal or replacement. Therefore my vote reflects the fact that I call for a new integrated EU strategy on HIV/AIDS, TB and viral hepatitis, including prevention and which gives patients access to better treatment.
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme for 2018 (RC-B8-0434/2017, B8-0434/2017, B8-0435/2017, B8-0450/2017, B8-0451/2017, B8-0454/2017, B8-0455/2017, B8-0456/2017)
I believe that we should see the future of Europe with a progressive vision focused on achieving tangible results on priorities people care about. Therefore, we need to come forward with a strong set of proposals for effective European solutions and with a vision of Europe doing much better together on priorities people care about, based on European integration that reconciles the North, South, East and West – a progressive path for Europe where nobody is left behind.Therefore, I really think that the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights can be turned into reality through adequate legislation, policy coordination and financial instruments. Moreover, the Single Market can be strengthened with the European Pillar of Social Rights and a European investment strategy for sustainable development, covering all key sectors. As well, the Banking Union should be completed and a fiscal capacity for the Eurozone should be established, with strong democratic accountability, to help weaker regions catch up and to cushion economic shocks. The EU budget should be modernised to address tomorrow’s shared challenges. It can be increased and provided with own resources so that the EU can act effectively and meet all needs.
2018 Budget - Mandate for the trilogue (A8-0249/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I support the development of new projects or new political commitments financed by additional resources without prejudice to existing programmes and without having recourse to flexibility instruments. The Commission proposal falls short of complying with this principle, notably for priorities expressed by Parliament and the Council such as growth and quality jobs or migration. I believe that the long-term EU budget must be flexible to react to new contexts and to launch new initiatives. Any new EU initiatives including those in the field of defence should be financed by additional funds and not be detrimental to existing programmes. Also, the EU budget should support the advance of stability, development, democracy, rule of law and human rights within the partner third countries.
Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations (A8-0220/2017 - Elmar Brok, Silvia Costa)
My vote is in favour of the report because it stresses the importance of cultural diplomacy, education and cultural exchanges for promoting a global peace and order, which can contribute to intercultural dialogue and conflict prevention. International cultural relations are also a key element for economic benefits and for sustainable development because the creative sector can promote reconciliation, growth and freedom of expression on which other fundamental freedoms can be built.
Recommendation to the Council on the 72nd session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0216/2017 - Andrey Kovatchev)
During the last years, the cooperation between the United Nations and the European Union has increased greatly. The European Union is very committed to deepening its cooperation with the United Nations on a broad range of areas. I believe we have to continue the enhanced cooperation and we also express confidence that several issues, such as: no tolerance for the death penalty, human-rights based approach to migration, special attention to women and children, and stopping gun proliferation, will be of major concern for the UN agenda.My vote therefore is in favour of the report as it insists on notable aspects such as peace and security, development, human rights, and refugees/migrants.
Building an ambitious EU industrial strategy as a strategic priority for growth, employment and innovation in Europe (RC-B8-0440/2017, B8-0439/2017, B8-0440/2017, B8-0445/2017, B8-0446/2017, B8-0447/2017, B8-0448/2017, B8-0449/2017)
My vote reflects the following considerations: I believe we have to ensure effective protection for workers affected by insecurity and precariousness, giving special priority to female workers, young workers, older workers, workers in the informal economy, migrant workers and workers with disabilities. I emphasise the importance of building an ambitious EU as a strategic priority for growth and innovation in Europe. Not at least, EU policy needs to enable European industry to preserve its competitiveness and capacity to invest in Europe and to address social and environmental challenges.
EU-Kosovo Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Kosovo in Union programmes (A8-0207/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek)
I support the EU-Kosovo Framework Agreement as I believe that it is going to facilitate Kosovo’s integration into EU policies. Therefore, the Agreement plays an important role in Kosovo’s path towards EU membership. The participation of Kosovo in European Union programmes is going to strengthen the European perspective of the country and, also, deepen its bilateral relations.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/001 ES/Castilla y León mining (A8-0248/2017 - Monika Vana)
I am in favour of EGF mobilisation in Spain, mainly in the region of Castilla y León. The EGF funding of EUR 1 002 264 is intended to contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services, providing assistance for 339 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies in the NUTS level 2 region of Castilla y León (ES41) in Spain, the aim being to help integrate those affected into the labour market. The redundancies were caused by major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation. The European coal industry is increasingly suffering because of competition from cheaper coal from non-European countries.
European standards for the 21st century (A8-0213/2017 - Marlene Mizzi)
My vote was in favour of the report because I consider that the European standards contribute to single market integration and thus to ensuring job creation, overall growth of the EU economy, increased competitiveness, innovation and industrial leadership. Standards promote innovation, raise the quality and safety of products and services, enable jobs and growth in Europe, and not least, support global value chains by opening markets beyond the EU. I also consider that voting in favour of the report was important because in the end the best quality standards are developed in a fair environment and in a transparent, open and inclusive manner so that I needed to ensure that the various interests and stakeholders are properly represented in standardisation.
Towards a pan-European covered bonds framework (A8-0235/2017 - Bernd Lucke)
Even though covered bonds represent an important part of the EU capital markets, they still remain fragmented along national lines. If the capital markets union is to become reality, covered bonds need to be brought under a common framework at EU level. Covered bonds are debt securities created from public sector loans or mortgage loans backed by a pool of assets that covers the bond if the originator becomes insolvent. Their good performance during the financial crisis ensured that they remained a key investment vehicle in many EU countries. Due to the divergences in the national system, I believe it is important to ensure through EU legislation that all covered bonds in the EU are of high quality and sustainable in the long run.
The role of fisheries-related tourism in the diversification of fisheries (A8-0221/2017 - Renata Briano)
My vote was in favour of the report because I consider that fisheries-related tourism offers the potential to contribute to job creation, promote social inclusion and revitalise communities that depend on fishing and it could benefit greatly from an ambitious policy framework.In order to unlock these benefits, we need to create harmonised rules regarding taxation regimes, licensing procedures, qualification requirements, and safety and hygiene regulations, as these differ from one Member State to another.I would like also to emphasise that it is necessary, therefore, to set up a European tourism fishing network and a European network for tourist services related to sport/recreational fishing.
Limitation periods for traffic accidents (A8-0206/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)
My vote is in favour of the report regarding limitation periods for traffic accidents. My believe in this case is that the time limits applicable for instituting a claim differ very much, as they are established according to each national laws on limitation and prescription periods. Therefore, limitation periods for tort claims can lead to situations where victims of cross-border road traffic accidents lose their right to compensation and are unaware of their legal rights.Thus, my support for the report is driven by the necessity for a greater legal certainty at EU level and for simplification and clarification of existing national regimes.
Common minimum standards of civil procedure (A8-0210/2017 - Emil Radev)
My vote is in favour of the report, because I consider that common minimum standards are needed definitively in order to ensure access to justice and to raise awareness. This step might be the beginning towards a European Code of Civil Procedure, which can only increase common awareness of EU procedural rules and mechanisms already existing and also the confidence of the EU citizens in the procedural systems of other states.
Macro-financial assistance to Moldova (A8-0185/2017 - Sorin Moisă)
I sustain the granting of the macro-financial assistance, which stands for a strong political signal for commitment to support the European path and to implement the structural reforms, considering the following aspects.The economy of the Republic of Moldova was affected during the past years by many challenges: political instability, banking fraud scandals, weak economic activity and imposed import bans. I believe that the macro financial assistance represents an important economic and political instrument of EU to promote structural reforms aimed at supporting sustainable and inclusive growth in Moldova. However, the granting is linked to a very clear conditionality which Moldova must fulfil.Furthermore, we should not ignore Moldova’s growing military contribution and civilian operations to strengthening the EU’s role as a global security provider. For all these considerations, I sustain the macro financial assistance to Moldova in the form of a medium-term loan.
Disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches (A8-0227/2017 - Hugues Bayet, Evelyn Regner)
The Panama Papers scandal is a clear example of how tax evasion and tax avoidance have a negative effect on the world’s economy and social cohesion. Only with a strong commitment to fair taxation and through coherence between European policies will it be possible to effectively fight poverty and inequalities in Europe and worldwide.I strongly believe that the multinationals must pay their taxes where they make their revenues. Whether they are based within the EU or not, their profits have to be made public. Transparency is the key to fight tax evasion and profit shifting. It is also a matter of fairness to all the taxpayers, who should know how taxes are paid by the companies and where they are paid.
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
I support the report on the introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine supplementing the trade concessions available under the Association Agreement. In other words, I support the access for Ukraine to the EU market for some industrial and agricultural products. Ukraine is facing a difficult economic situation and I believe the efforts undertaken by Ukraine on the economic reform are considerable. Nevertheless, I insist Ukraine should respect democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principle of the rule of law.
Draft amending budget n° 2 to the General budget 2017 entering the surplus of the financial year 2016 (A8-0229/2017 - Jens Geier)
I am in favour of the Draft amending budget No 2 of 2017 (DAB2/2017), which aims at entering in the 2017 budget the surplus from the 2016 financial year. The 2016 surplus amounts to EUR 6.4 billion, notably due to a major EUR 4.9 billion under-implementation in payment appropriations (especially in cohesion policy) and to a relatively high amount of fines, which are counted in the 2016 surplus.
A longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies (A8-0214/2017 - Pascal Durand)
I vote in favour of the report on a longer lifetime for products, emphasising the importance of the Member States exploring appropriate incentives, promoting durable, high-quality and repairable products, stimulating repairs and second-hand sales, and developing repairs training.I would also like to stress the idea that the time has arrived to move towards more sustainable production and consumption of goods; we also need to start working in order to improve product durability information.
Addressing human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide (A8-0222/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
There is no need to emphasise that the perpetration of violent war crimes and crimes against humanity has been widely reported. In my view, the preparation of an Action Plan on the Fight against Impunity within Europe for crimes falling under international law, with clear targets for the EU institutions and the Member States, is necessary. This will definitely strengthen the respect of human rights and the investigations and prosecutions for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Furthermore, I underline as well the importance of the Cooperation and Assistance Agreement between the EU and the ICC. Lastly, I strongly argue for the compensation right of the victim and for the accountability of the perpetrators of the war crime, such as: state actors, non-state actors and individuals, because justice, the rule of law and the fight against impunity are required to achieve peace and conflict resolution. For all the above considerations, my vote is in favour.
Private security companies (A8-0191/2017 - Hilde Vautmans)
I voted in favour as I believe it is very important to have an overview, a detailed and comprehensive assessment of the present situation of the PSCs established in the EU, working on the EU’s territory or on the territory of third countries, providing services for European or non-European entities. In the present security environment, proper and effective control and the implementation of clear and strict rules for PSCs should be a priority, both at EU level as well as at global level.Therefore, I support the need to develop a European regulatory model that should, among others, also ensure reporting of PSCs’ irregularities and illegalities and offer a framework to hold PSCs accountable for violations. The non-homogenous national legislations and self-regulation adopted by some PSCs provide a weak deterrent to prevent abuses and have a major impact on how PSCs operate in multilateral interventions and conflict regions. Of course, the cost-effectiveness principle should not become the main criterion in dealing with security issues.
Working conditions and precarious employment (A8-0224/2017 - Neoklis Sylikiotis)
My vote is in favour of the report, because I definitely condemn the habitual employment of migrants without securing their full rights and benefits. I strongly support the directive on decent working conditions and I believe we have to ensure effective protection for workers affected by insecurity and precariousness.
Implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0200/2017 - José Manuel Fernandes, Udo Bullmann)
The European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) is one of the key achievements to boost investments in the EU and it was set up to help fill the European investment gap, which is one of the top priorities in fostering sustainable growth and quality employment in Europe. We need to continue to work to make it a success by increasing its efficiency and coverage.Consequently, Europe needs a more robust investment plan in order to relaunch the European economy allowing public investment both at national and European level to play the role of catalyser.Accordingly, I support the implementation report by way of addressing in a clear and straightforward manner the main shortcomings and insufficiencies on the quality of projects supported by EFSI. For instance, deficiencies created by the lack of clear proof of additionality, the geographical concentration, under-coverage of certain sectors (as you know, EFSI’s activities are overly condensed on the most highly developed regions of our Union), and the lack of transparency in the selection of projects.
European agenda for the collaborative economy (A8-0195/2017 - Nicola Danti)
The success of collaborative platforms are very challenging for existing market operators and practices. Also, they promote new employment opportunities, flexible working arrangements and new sources of income. This is the reason why I call for workers’ rights to be preserved also in the collaborative economy, including for self-employed workers. Therefore, my vote is in favour.
Online platforms and the Digital Single Market (A8-0204/2017 - Henna Virkkunen, Philippe Juvin)
I welcome the fact that in the Report on Online platforms and the Digital Single Market we introduced elements in the final report on the social dimension and the challenges raised by the redefined contractual relations between workers and businesses.It is fundamental to ensure compliance with labour and social rights and the adequate enforcement of existing legislation in order to foster the social security schemes and the quality of employment in the digital era. It is also important to underline digital skills development in order to form a highly skilled workforce, to ensure a high level of employment under fair conditions throughout the EU, while terminating digital illiteracy. Moreover, this finally underlined the importance of preventing possible gaps that can be produced by the lack of digital skills or unequal access to technology.Online platforms should be distinguished and defined in the relevant sector, and coherence between rules that apply online and offline in equivalent situations must be ensured.
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0407/2017, B8-0407/2017, B8-0408/2017, B8-0409/2017, B8-0410/2017, B8-0411/2017, B8-0412/2017, B8-0413/2017)
. ‒ The situation in Yemen is extremely worrying. Yemen has been plagued by years of instability, poor governance, absence of the rule of law, under-development, environmental decline and widespread poverty. Millions of people are in acute need, and urgently require immediate, life-saving assistance. Moreover, there are serious allegations of violations of international humanitarian law and human-rights law being committed by all sides.The humanitarian situation is likely to deteriorate further in 2017. Without urgent action – including full funding for the Humanitarian Response Plan, steps by the parties to end the war and to facilitate the resumption of commercial imports of food and other goods, and full access to all the people in need – the crisis will worsen. It is absolutely essential that the parties to the conflict respect international humanitarian law, allow the importation of food, medical supplies and other necessary goods into Yemen, and guarantee unhindered movement of humanitarian workers so as to reach those in need of assistance.
Statute and funding of European political parties and foundations (B8-0405/2017, B8-0406/2017)
. ‒ Regarding the funding of European political parties and foundations: firstly, I believe it should be transparent and not open to abuse; and secondly, I consider that the European political parties and foundations play a key role in European democracy and help bring the EU closer to citizens. I supported the motion for a resolution for these reasons.
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
. ‒ I welcome the fact that we succeeded in pushing forward a very balanced report aiming for a reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions in the transport, agriculture and buildings sectors by 30% by 2030 compared to 2005 levels. We fought to include in the report an emissions-reduction trajectory which is closer to real emissions, so as to ensure that we do not dis-incentivise early action.It is essential to press for more regular compliance checks, every two years instead of every five years as the Commission proposed. Equally important is to keep the so-called ‘flexibilities’ under control to ensure that we do not create loopholes and that action is taken in every sector, including agriculture and forestry.After US President Trump’s decision to leave the Paris climate agreement, it more important than ever that the EU leads by example in the fight against climate change.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Mylène Troszczynski (Rule 150)
My vote is in favour of waiving the immunity concerned, considering the request forwarded by the Minister of Justice of the French Republic in connection with a judicial investigation on serious grounds: public defamation and incitement to hatred or violence in respect of a person or group of persons on account of their origin or membership or non-membership of a particular ethnic group, nation, race or religion.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen (Rule 150)
My vote is based upon the consideration that an application for waiver of the immunity was forwarded by the General Procurator at the Paris Court of Appeal relating to allegations made against Jean- Marie Le Pen of having made a statement during a radio broadcast amounting to incitement to discrimination, hatred or racial violence, which is a criminal offence, firstly, under the French Criminal Code.
The need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap (A8-0197/2017 - Constance Le Grip)
Today’s gender pension gap (GPG) which is at nearly 40% (EU average) is an unacceptable manifestation of gender inequality and the reason for high female poverty in older age. The Commission and the Member States must tackle the underlying causes for the GPG which are the gender pay gap (still at 16%), labour market segregation, part-time-work, stereotypes, lack of facilities for a better work-life -balance and discrimination.It is fundamental to deal with the issues of informal care work; to develop a strategy for equality between women and men for 2016-2020; and to deliver country specific recommendations and gender.Finally, I support applying sanctions if principle of equal pay for equal work is not applied; abolition of incentives counter-productive to gender equality available under the taxation and pension systems is needed.
2016 Report on Serbia (A8-0063/2017 - David McAllister)
After several postponements, we can finally decide on the adoption of the 2016 report on Serbia.It comes at an important moment for Serbia: when the new president – the outgoing prime minister Aleksandar Vučić – is taking up new duties and I am impatiently waiting for the new government to be formed. I are very worried about recent protests following Vučić’s victory and inauguration, continuous undermining of media freedom and the fundamental pillars of democracy, and an ever more fearful and frustrated civil society. I strongly believe that the report should give an objective, yet critical if necessary, broad picture of the progress Serbia has made on its EU journey. I sincerely hope this will be the case.
2016 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0055/2017 - Ivo Vajgl)
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (RC-B8-0397/2017, B8-0397/2017, B8-0398/2017, B8-0399/2017, B8-0400/2017, B8-0401/2017, B8-0402/2017)
I am gravely concerned about the growing violence and political instability in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and call for the de-escalation of tensions in the country. The Congolese authorities must work to address the current security and humanitarian crisis, ensuring political stability and full respect for human rights and the Congolese constitution. A peaceful, transparent, smooth and timely conduct of the next presidential and legislative elections are vital for the security of the Great Lakes region. We must recall the commitments made by the DRC under the Cotonou Agreement to respect democracy, the rule of law and human rights.I strongly believe that respect for democracy, peace and the peaceful transfer of power must now be a priority for all political forces in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
State of play of the implementation of the Sustainability Compact in Bangladesh (B8-0396/2017)
Increasing engagement of partners and visibility in the performance of European Structural and Investment Funds (A8-0201/2017 - Daniel Buda)
I voted in favour because cohesion policy is the most important investment vehicle of growth of the Union with a budget of EUR 351.8 billion, having an impact on all EU regions and citizens. I considered also the fact that, since its establishment, cohesion policy has been a key tool for reducing development gaps between the different European regions and sustaining the economy through investments at the micro level, in particular where national investment is lacking or insufficient.
Cost effectiveness of the 7th Research Programme (A8-0194/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Inés Ayala Sender)
I welcome this report, which looks into the question of whether the 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7) was implemented in a cost-effective way. It is fundamental to look to the future with regard to lessons learnt for Horizon 2020 as well as the post-2020 period, and it also briefly reflects on the impact of Brexit on EU research policy.I believe the overall report is now more balanced in terms of identifying weaknesses for constructive improvement regarding both FP7 and Horizon 2020.EU research funding is very important, and it is vital that it is spent in a cost-effective manner. This report concludes that, overall, research money has been spent cost-effectively, but there are several important improvements that should be made.
Statelessness in South and South East Asia (A8-0182/2017 - Amjad Bashir)
The right to nationality is a fundamental human right enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Globally, an estimated 10 million people are unfortunately affected by statelessness. I strongly advise the international community to address the gaps in data collection for measuring statelessness in developing countries. Therefore, I voted in favour of the resolution as it stands.
Participation of the Union in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0112/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
I voted in favour to allow the financial participation of the European Union in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area. This public-public partnership would support collaborative research and innovation projects on agrifood systems and water management between institutions of the EU and of third countries around the Mediterranean shore which is important.
Specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters (A8-0070/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
Europe needs to be able to quickly provide additional effective support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to Member States and regions hit by major or regional natural disasters, complementing the means available under the European Union Solidarity Fund. I believe in actively promoting solidarity in the event of natural disasters as well as the smooth running of important cohesion policy projects. Therefore, I voted in favour.
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano)
New energy-efficiency labels will enable consumers to buy low-energy household products and allow them to save electricity and hundreds of euros in energy bills. The overwhelming number of products in the highest efficiency classes no longer reflect the technological advances made in recent years. Furthermore, current labels with different scales from A+++ to G are confusing for consumers. New rules are set to replace these outdated labels with a unified and clearer A to G scale for most household products. Old labels should be replaced faster, despite resistance from those who want to protect inefficient industries.I welcome the fact that a public database will give consumers a better tool to compare the energy efficiency of products while a database will strengthen market surveillance authorities in the Member States. If the new rules will be adopted they will apply in all Member States as of this summer and most household products will have new labels by the end of 2019.
European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (A8-0061/2017 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)
My vote is in favour, considering the fact that the cities from EFTA/EEA countries and from candidate countries as well as potential candidates for EU membership participating in the Creative Europe Programme or in the subsequent Union programmes supporting culture have the right to apply for the title of European Capitals of Culture.
Assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation (A8-0209/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
Research, development and innovations are key to the future of European society, and money spent in these areas should be seen as investment into the future, not as a cost.I welcome the fact that we have managed to get a solid majority for EUR 120 billion for the future FP9; to include a strong focus on SSH, to assert the Open Data principle, to balance fundamental research and innovation, to better involve SMEs in collaborative projects and innovation.Moreover, I am satisfied by the fact that we highlighted the need for FP9 to strengthen societal progress and create growth and jobs. I support the call for the policies to remove barriers such as lower salaries in order to avoid a brain drain. Finally, we must put a very strong focus on the need for better synergies between FP and other EU funds (EFSI and ESIF).
Building blocks for a post-2020 EU cohesion policy (A8-0202/2017 - Kerstin Westphal)
My vote is in favour of the motion of the resolution, because I believe the cohesion policy post-2020 should cover all EU regions and start right from the outset, involving local, regional and national stakeholders. Also, in order to promote its development the Union should strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion, which shall be pursued with the EU Cohesion policy, the main EU-wide investment policy for jobs and growth.
Status of fish stocks and socio-economic situation of the fishing sector in the Mediterranean (A8-0179/2017 - Marco Affronte)
More than 90% of Mediterranean fish stocks are overexploited. Continued unsustainable exploitation of shared resources as well as other impacts, such as climate change and pollution, will provoke the widespread collapse of fish stocks, along with the fishermen and communities that depend on them, marine ecosystems, and cultural traditions. The cost is particularly high for the small-scale sector, which represents 83% of the Mediterranean fishing fleet.I strongly support the call for an urgent, coordinated and inclusive approach to fisheries management in the Mediterranean, implementing an ecosystem-based approach in line with the CFP and achieving a balance between fair competition, consumer needs, sustainability of the fishing sector and the preservation of jobs. I welcome the ‘MedFish4Ever’ campaign launched by the European Commission, drawing attention to the critical situation in the Mediterranean Sea.
Protection of vulnerable adults (A8-0152/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron)
I welcome this report which raises awareness on the importance of developing instruments at European level aimed at solving difficulties related to cross border situations for vulnerable adults, and also to ensure that moving from one Member State to another can be done efficiently, while ensuring that protection measures are fully respected.I believe the Commission should focus more on the situation of people that find themselves in a vulnerable situation, whether due to their age or disabilities. There are already several European instruments, for different situations and categories of people, that help determine jurisdiction, facilitate cross-border recognition and enforcement of administrative and judicial acts and measures. A regulation giving legal clarity and offering an EU wide system of judicial cooperation in the benefit of vulnerable adults would very much improve their lives and encourage freedom of movement.
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
The market access concessions given to Ukraine under the Association Agreement and its Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) were negotiated in an entirely different context. This was before the annexation of Crimea, conflict in Donbass and the trade war initiated against Ukraine by Russia. The result has been immense economic difficulties for Ukraine which have made it even more difficult to progress on the path of political reform and alignment with EU standards. Ukraine is deserving of support. But this must not be a blank cheque. We must continue to urge progress on reforms and the fight against corruption.Above all, we must make sure that the right people in Ukraine profit from the trade with the EU. SMEs and ordinary citizens must benefit, not well-established oligarchs.
Uniform format for visas (A8-0028/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)
I welcome the regulation to lay down a uniform format for visas and I suggest that the Commission proposal be adopted. It was necessary to develop a new security concept and design for a future more secure visa. The current security concept for a uniform format for visas dates back to 1995, when it was initially developed under the intergovernmental Schengen cooperation. Over the past few years forged visa stickers have arisen in several Member States. The present sticker is, however, not secure any longer.I therefore strongly support this new model with more security features in order to make the visa sticker more secure and prevent forgery. I strongly believe this new format will help to fight visa sticker fraud, which has significantly increased over the last few years.
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (A8-0177/2017 - Angelika Mlinar)
It is important to insist on the need to improve the working procedures for the governance and the functioning of the Agency and to clarify that the Agency’s competence include also the ‘ex-third pillar’ matters (‘police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters’).Including the area of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Multiannual Framework would not only reflect the needs on the ground, but also would allow the Agency to provide comprehensive analysis on its own initiative in areas that are of obvious relevance to fundamental rights, especially given the recent and ongoing legislative developments at EU level in this field.We must continue to care about fundamental rights aspects of police and judicial cooperation, including in criminal matters, something that is wished for, and expected by both citizens and the human rights community.
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (B8-0384/2017)
It is important to insist on the need to improve the working procedures for the governance and the functioning of the Agency and to clarify that the Agency’s competence include also ‘ex-third pillar’ matters (‘police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters’).Including the area of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Multiannual Framework would not only reflect the needs on the ground, but also would allow the Agency to provide comprehensive analysis on its own initiative in areas that are of obvious relevance to fundamental rights, especially given the recent and ongoing legislative developments at EU level in this field.We must continue to care about fundamental rights aspects of police and judicial cooperation, including in criminal matters, something that is wished for, and expected, by both citizens and the human rights community.
The new European Consensus on Development - our world, our dignity, our future (B8-0387/2017, B8-0390/2017)
We must ensure that poverty eradication and fighting inequality remains at the heart of the EU development policy including in the new Consensus. The EU and MS must put all their efforts for the successful implementation of the Agenda 2020 and the Sustainable Development Goals.I welcome the fact that commitments on agriculture are more detailed than the previous Consensus and include support for small-holder farmers and pastoralists and recognise the role they play in combatting hunger and malnutrition.Finally, I would like to congratulate the negotiators for including commitments to promote decent work, corporate social responsibility and the importance of social and environmental standards for European investments in developing countries.
Resilience as a strategic priority of the EU external action (B8-0381/2017)
Building resilience means creating a more responsive Union and is key to forging strong partnerships.We must reiterate our call on the Commission and the Council to incorporate in their new initiative existing EU policies on the matter and ensure their continuity. In addition, the new initiative should promote alignment with international commitments, comply with the development effectiveness principles, promote a coherent EU approach to resilience and the complementarity of its development, humanitarian, foreign and security policies, with a particular focus on the needs of the most vulnerable populations while highlighting the role of local actors and civil society.It is fundamental to strengthen the resilience of states and societies by supporting good governance, accountable institutions and working closely with civil society.
High-level UN Conference to support the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14 (UN Ocean Conference) (B8-0382/2017)
Oceans, along with coastal and marine resources, are extremely vulnerable to environmental degradation, overfishing, climate change and pollution. The sustainable use and preservation of marine and coastal ecosystems and their biological diversity is essential to achieving the 2030 Agenda, in particular for small island developing states. I join the call for urgent global action to implement Sustainable Development Goal 14; the EU needs to take the lead to promote stronger ocean governance around the globe.
Agreement between the EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021 (A8-0072/2017 - David Borrelli)
Considering that Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland participate in the single market under the EEA agreement, and that in accordance with the agreement the three countries also contribute financially to the alleviation of economic and social disparities in Europe, I support the report as the new agreements detail the updated future financial contributions.
The right funding mix for Europe’s regions: balancing financial instruments and grants in EU cohesion policy (A8-0139/2017 - Andrey Novakov)
. ‒ Considering that major projects and policy areas such as education, social affairs and help for job seekers have to rely on grants from the EU cohesion budget, and only bigger projects with clearly defined settings and circumstances should become involved with financial instruments such as loans, guarantees, equity and other risk-bearing mechanisms, it remains clear to me that grants must continue to be an indispensable tool for the realisation of cohesion policy projects.
Future perspectives for technical assistance in cohesion policy (A8-0180/2017 - Ruža Tomašić)
. ‒ Technical assistance in the framework of EU cohesion policy is an important instrument that has been used since 1988. With regard to the technical assistance offered at the initiative of Member States, it has come to light that this kind of technical assistance was never offered to regional and local authorities. Therefore I support the report’s call for information to be disseminated on the possibilities for regional and local authorities’ participation, as well as greater involvement of these authorities in training.Furthermore, I welcome the fact that the report underlines the right of cities to have recourse to technical assistance, especially in the context of integrated sustainable urban development.Regions and local authorities, together with their partners such as NGOs, should be able to profit from technical assistance, but unfortunately that has not always been the case.
Cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market (A8-0378/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
The Portability Regulation is an easy-to-use legal instrument meant to facilitate access to their online subscriptions for people that travel through the EU, or that have periods of work or study in other Member States.I welcome the fact that we managed to secure having no specific time limitations to portability; taking out the formulation ‘regularly returns’ from the definition of temporary presence; keeping IP checking as a means of verification in a very restrictive way, that does not allow storing or sharing or use for any other purpose than to check the Member State of residence in a binary format.It is a small step towards better access across the digital internal market, but it will immediately be felt by users of online subscriptions of movies, programmes, or other online content that will no longer be geo-blocked when they travel outside their Member State of residence.
Implementation of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement (A8-0123/2017 - Adam Szejnfeld)
. ‒ I believe the most critical aspect of the implementation process of the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Korea is the failure on the Korean side to implement the provisions on trade and sustainable development, specifically with regard to labour rights. In recent times, there have been severe crackdowns by the Korean police on trade-union leaders. Some of them have been sentenced to up to five years in prison. Such a situation is not acceptable as it runs counter to our principles and values.I welcome our implementation report, which reminds the Korean side of its commitment to international labour standards and asks the Commission to press the Korean Government for rapid implementation of the labour provisions.
Achieving the two-state solution in the Middle East (RC-B8-0345/2017, B8-0345/2017, B8-0346/2017, B8-0347/2017, B8-0348/2017, B8-0352/2017, B8-0354/2017)
. ‒ We must continue strongly to support the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – with the state of Israel within secure and recognised borders, a sovereign, contiguous and viable state of Palestine living side-by-side in peace and security, and mutual recognition of the 1967 borders, with mutually agreed land swaps, and Jerusalem as capital of both states – as the only way of achieving a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Protecting and preserving the viability of this two-state solution must be the immediate priority in European Union policies and action with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Middle East peace process.
EU Strategy on Syria (RC-B8-0331/2017, B8-0331/2017, B8-0333/2017, B8-0335/2017, B8-0337/2017, B8-0338/2017, B8-0341/2017, B8-0342/2017)
. ‒ The need to protect civilians and ensure unfettered humanitarian access to affected populations remains a paramount concern. The EU and High Representative Mogherini must explore all diplomatic and economic levers to influence the parties to the conflict and their sponsors – including Russia, Turkey and Iran – to ensure full humanitarian access to the hard-to-reach and besieged areas of Syria and, in light of the Raqqa offensive, to populations fleeing the ongoing coalition-supported offensive to expel ISIS.As stakeholders which prioritise the primacy of international humanitarian law, the EU and Member States must provide annual financial support and political backing to the UN General Assembly International Impartial and Independent Mechanism system so it can fulfil its remit.Lastly, I support the Compacts agreed by the EU with Jordan and Lebanon in Brussels as a follow-up to commitments made at the London conference in February 2016, as I believe they provide a new and potentially game-changing financing model.
Road transport in the European Union (B8-0290/2017)
. ‒ I welcome the fact that, at the end of March, the Commission will present the so-called ‘Mobility Package’, which includes legislation on working and rest times for truck drivers, access to the haulage market and enforcement of social legislation. For us it is important to guarantee a high level of social rights and strengthen the enforcement of the legislation.I strongly support trade-union requests to make better enforcement of social rights a priority in the forthcoming road mobility package and to avoid the current situation of social dumping. The aim is to find a balanced approach to ensure free market access while ensuring that worker’s rights are not bypassed and transport workers are not exploited through illegal practices.
Dadaab refugee camp (RC-B8-0300/2017, B8-0300/2017, B8-0332/2017, B8-0334/2017, B8-0336/2017, B8-0339/2017)
Kambioos camp, the smallest of the five refugee camps in Dadaab, has now been closed. Kenya continues to promote repatriation and has unfortunately not renounced its decision to ‘close Dadaab’ by the end of May. Since December 2014, when UNHCR started supporting the voluntary return of Somali refugees in Kenya, 62 383 Somali refugees have been repatriated from Kenya to Somalia. In 2017 alone, over 22 000 Somalis were repatriated. UNHCR reports that another 20 944 Somali refugees are registered for voluntary repatriation. The situation is extremely worrying.However, the High Court in Nairobi blocked the decision in the meantime, and this ruling affirmed Kenya’s legal obligation to protect people who seek safety from harm and persecution. Today is a historic day for more than a quarter of a million refugees who were at risk of being forcefully returned to Somalia, where they would have been at serious risk of human rights abuses.
Making relocation happen (B8-0340/2017, B8-0343/2017, B8-0344/2017)
I strongly support the [Commission’s] call upon Member States to increase their efforts to meet the set relocation targets and [that it] stands ready to assist Member States in making progress towards meeting their legal obligations. These measures have the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility at their core, a principle that is binding for each Member State and fundamental for the future of the European Union.Further intensified and coordinated efforts from all Member States, in particular those who have not relocated at all, as well as solid cooperation between all actors involved is still required to relocate all those eligible from Italy and Greece by September 2017.I welcome the fact that the 11th report includes targeted recommendations for specific Member States aimed at removing those bottlenecks that affect the common efforts to facilitate and accelerate relocations.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems (A8-0196/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa)
Considering that the redundancies were caused by major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, I will vote on the report giving the green light for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), which contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services, providing assistance for 821 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies, providing assistance for integrating the affected persons into the labour market.
Annual report 2014 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0114/2017 - Sajjad Karim)
I welcome the fact, in the report, that there is no mention of a red card, a possible introduction of a green card only for a constructive use, meaning national Parliaments could ‘suggest to the Commission a legislative initiative for its examination’, but no reopening of agreed legislation.Moreover, there will not be a general extension of the eight ‒ week period in which national parliaments can issue a reasoned opinion under Article 6 of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality ‒ consideration of extension only on grounds of time constraints on the basis of justified objective reasons.Finally, I am satisfied with the fact that environmental, social and economic impacts are mentioned on an equal footing when it comes to proportionality assessments.
FinTech: the influence of technology on the future of the financial sector (A8-0176/2017 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen)
Technological developments may have an important influence on the future of the financial sector, especially the technology companies, the so-called FinTech, that develop software solutions and applications to be used in financial services.FinTech can have significant benefits for the financial sector, as they can bring cost reductions, efficiency gains and more transparency, by opening up high-level services to those who could not afford them before. This may lead to financial inclusion. Moreover, I believe that FinTech can enable cross-border financial flows through alternative investment channels.Nevertheless, I support the need to ensure a high level of supervision and to develop regulation to make sure that these technologies are inclusive, durable and sustainable.As an addition to the need of supervision, the European Supervisory Authorities should regularly review the existing operational standards covering ICT (Information and Communication Technology) risks of financial institutions. At this stage, exchange of information and best practices between supervisors is very important, as well as between regulators and governments at their respective levels.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Croatia (A8-0171/2017 - Claude Moraes)
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0294/2017)
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: GMO cotton GHB119 (B8-0293/2017)
Genetically modified maize DAS-40278-9 (B8-0292/2017)
Considering that he outbreak of Xyllela fastidiosa in Italy and the introduction of invasive alien species in Europe show that we need to ensure that all imports of plants or plants products are free of pests and that one infected plant can destroy a whole sector or the economy of a whole region, I support the objection.
Situation in Hungary (B8-0295/2017, B8-0296/2017)
The Hungarian Government’s recent moves to stigmatise and obstruct the work of civil society organisations and to threaten the Central European University must be condemned. These developments are bound to have negative implications for Hungarian society and for the respect of human rights and the rule of law in Hungary. These actions are contrary to the EU’s founding principles as enshrined in Article 2 TEU. The European Union is a community based on the rule of law, and on fundamental values that are non-negotiable.
European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (B8-0298/2017)
The EQF is a common European reference system, which will link different countries’ national qualifications systems and frameworks together. In practice, it will function as a translation device making qualifications more readable. This will help learners and workers wishing to move between countries or change jobs or move between educational institutions at home.I encourage Member States to relate their national qualifications systems to the European Qualifications Framework by 2010; to adopt measures, as appropriate, so that, by 2012, all new qualification certificates, diplomas and ‘Europass’ documents issued by the competent authorities contain a clear reference, by way of national qualifications systems, to the appropriate European Qualifications Framework level.
Protocol to the EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (accession of Croatia) (A8-0074/2017 - Helmut Scholz)
EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0169/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
The Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) provides for the technical adjustment of the trade provisions in the SAA to take into account the accession of Croatia to the EU and prevent disruption of bilateral trade. Although this is standard practice after every new EU enlargement, an agreement on the adaptation of the SAA was only reached in August 2016, putting an end to a difficult dispute with Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and allowing further progress in BiH’s European aspirations.The protocol was signed in July 2016 and started to be provisionally applied as of 1 February 2017, pending ratification by the two parties. I provided my consent to the ratification of the protocol.
EU-Norway Agreement on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa (A8-0174/2017 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
This report proposes to give Parliament’s consent to certain rules under which Norway may participate in and benefit from the Internal Security Fund (External Borders and Visa), a fund established in 2014 to replace the former External Borders Fund. The Internal Security Fund (ISF) Borders and Visa is intended to ensure a high level of security in the Union while facilitating legitimate travel, through a uniform and high level of control of the external border and the effective processing of Schengen Visas. As the ISF (Borders and Visa) represented a development of the development of the Schengen Acquis and affects the legal framework of the agreement between the EU and Norway on Norway’s participation in Schengen, it is necessary to lay down rules for Norway’s financial contribution to and participation in the fund. On 14 October of last year, the Commission proposed a Council Decision to sign an agreement with Norway laying down such supplementary rules for the ISF with regard to Norway.I supported the Parliament’s report, which provides consent for the Council to proceed.
EU accession to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) (A8-0187/2017 - Fernando Ruas)
The work of Parliament on this file started with a working document in 2012, followed by a resolution of 14 March 2013 on sustainability in the global cotton value chain. The Committee on International Trade has hence conducted a scrutiny of cotton production and trade, including child and forced labour aspects, and put forward recommendations concerning EU’s membership in the ICAC.The ICAC brings together cotton producing, consuming and trading countries. It assists governments in promoting a sound world cotton economy by raising awareness, gathering statistics on the cotton market, serving as a clearing house for technical information on cotton and textiles and fostering international cooperation.I voted in favour as I believe we should be committed to improving workers’ rights in third countries through initiatives such as the ICAC, traceability and mandatory due diligence.
EU eGovernment action plan 2016-2020 (A8-0178/2017 - Sabine Verheyen)
Open, accessible, inclusive, trustworthy and safe eGovernment services can improve public administration for all: citizens, businesses, and the public sector itself. We need to ensure that everyone has the skills and the means to participate in digital government. The development of eGovernment services is a key element of the digital single market and we need to ensure EU-wide interoperability of digital services for the benefit of our citizens.
Annual report 2015 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0159/2017 - Julia Pitera)
I support this report, which focuses mainly on the losses due to the VAT (value added tax) gap and intra-Community VAT fraud, and welcome the advances on the PIF Directive (protection of the Union’s financial interests). The Commission needs to have more access to the exchange of information between Member States with a view to preventing and combating intra-Community fraud. We are looking forward to the Commission’s mid-term assessment in 2018, as this will help establish whether the new regulatory architecture for cohesion policy can prevent and reduce the risk of all sorts of irregularities and fraud.I believe that the text takes a more constructive approach than in previous years, with less naming and shaming by the Member States, but our Group might still table some amendments to put greater emphasis on the need for a solution-based orientation.
Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety (A8-0175/2017 - Biljana Borzan)
I strongly welcome the call for a legally binding definition of food waste and a common methodology for measuring food loss and for an EU reduction target of 30% by 2025 and 50% by 2030 compared with the 2014 baseline.The Commission and the MS must take practical and political measures to tackle food waste at every stage in the food chain, including a definition and methodology for measuring food waste, setting specific reduction targets, and providing financial and fiscal incentives to facilitate food donation, engage in awareness-raising campaigns and provide targeted education programmes.The EU, as one of the most prosperous communities in the world, has a moral and political obligation to reduce the huge quantities of food wasted every year.
Evaluation of external aspects of customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade (A8-0162/2017 - Tiziana Beghin)
There is a clear need for better EU cooperation with Member States to ensure a coordinated and uniform approach to implementation of the UCC (Union Customs Code). It is fundamental to secure availability of fund and IT resources. I support functional, modernised and harmonised approaches to customs procedures and controls throughout the EU. There is a need to improve cooperation between customs authorities, international organisations, third countries, other governmental authorities, including Union and national market surveillance authorities, as well as economic operators and organisations representing economic operators. I support an early transition towards an EU Information System for customs, where we could proceed from a paper to a paper-free customs environment. Finally, I support the call for a set of common key performance indicators (KPIs) in order be able to assess the performance of customs administration at home and abroad.
Request for waiver of the immunity of António Marinho e Pinto (A8-0163/2017 - Gilles Lebreton)
These facts relate rather to activities of a purely national nature, given that his remarks were made on a TV programme in Portugal on a specifically Portuguese subject relating to the management of an association incorporated under national law. I therefore supported the request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity.
EU trade mark (A8-0054/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I welcome this file which takes existing directives and puts them in one. Thanks to this codification the new act on an EU trade mark passes through the full legislative process and replaces the acts being codified. It will make it easier and more user friendly for citizens and companies to use European legislation on aspects related to EU trade marks. The advantages of codification are that users need consult only one single authentic text, and the volume of the ‘acquis communautaire’ is reduced.
Minamata Convention on Mercury (A8-0067/2017 - Stefan Eck)
The Minamata Convention on Mercury is an international treaty designed to protect human health and the environment from anthropogenic emissions and releases of mercury and mercury compounds. After three years negotiations 140 countries signed the Convention on 19 January 2013 in Geneva. The Convention is named after the Japanese city Minamata, following the devastating cases of mercury poisoning there.The Convention contains measures that cover the entire life cycle of mercury. It addresses the direct mining of mercury, its export and import, its safe storage and its disposal.I therefore voted in favour of global action against the devastating health and environmental effects of mercury.
Hybrid mismatches with third countries (A8-0134/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson)
This Commission proposal extends both the scope and operation of hybrid mismatch rules to cover intra-EU and third country hybrid and branch mismatches as well as imported mismatches, hybrid transfers and dual resident companies.Our main achievements at committee level was to include a number of hybrid mismatch situations that were not originally covered by the proposal such as permanent establishment mismatches, disregarded permanent establishment (e.g. Mc Donald’s case), diverted hybrid mismatches, tax residency mismatches (Apple case), etc., to ensure that no loopholes leading to mismatches can be exploited anymore.This report is another step in the right direction, towards tax justice to ensure that profits are taxed where the economic value is created and to prevent profit shifting to tax havens.
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Denmark and Europol (A8-0164/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
This is the second phase of the procedure to establish a cooperation relationship between Denmark and Europol after the new Europol regulation comes into force on May 1, otherwise forcing Denmark out of Europol, after Denmark rejected the full JHA cooperation in a referendum in 2015.The first phase was concluded in February this year, somewhat controversially, assigning Denmark as a third country. In this second phase the Commission and Council are using the pre-Lisbon third-pillar procedure of making association agreements between Europol and third countries in order to conclude an operational and strategic cooperation agreement with Denmark as a third country.I voted in favour of the proposal.
Union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing (A8-0291/2016 - Theodor Dumitru Stolojan)
This financial program aims to prolong the programme adopted in 2014. I support accounting standards that ensure financial stability and sustainable growth, and a deep reform of the process of elaboration and endorsement of Accounting standards to ensure transparency and accountability. This revised financial programme for the Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation), the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) and the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB) will contribute to these ends.
Union programme to enhance the involvement of consumers in financial services policy making (A8-0008/2017 - Philippe Lamberts)
I support the establishment of the Programme for the period from 1 May 2017 to 31 December 2020 and it shall co-finance the following activities: engaging with consumers and other financial services end-users; raising awareness, dissemination, financial education and training; activities reinforcing the interactions between the members of the beneficiary organisations as well as advocacy and policy advice activities. Regarding the implementation of the Programme, the maximum rate of direct co-financing should be 60% of eligible costs and the maximum rate of cumulative non-direct Union funding should be limited to 70% of the total eligible costs of the beneficiary.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Commission and executive agencies (A8-0150/2017 - Joachim Zeller)
I welcome the report on the Commission discharge, which tackles the different problems caused by the different durations of the political and financial programming periods, and a rolling budgeting procedure with a medium-term planning horizon and rolling evaluation programme and a certain flexibility.
Discharge 2015: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2015 Commission discharge (A8-0160/2017 - Joachim Zeller)
The findings of the European Court of Auditors special reports carry a lot of political weight. I support amendments specifically on the problematic of ‘EU nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Lithuania, Bulgaria and Slovakia: some progress made since 2011 but critical challenges ahead’, where we called for clearer rules and incentives for decommissioning after 2020, if any EU funding will be made available.I would like to highlight the importance of the findings regarding better targeting of the EU budget for Roma, improved monitoring of the budget for European Union external migration spending in southern Mediterranean and eastern neighbourhood countries and the assessment of the financial instruments – Lessons to be learnt from the 2007-2013 programme.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0125/2017 - Younous Omarjee)
I welcome the EDF 2015 achievements and grant the discharge. The report is quite balanced and constructively oriented. There are still this year some concerns concerning effectiveness that involve not only Commission headquarters and European Union delegations in beneficiary countries, but also other actors such as the national authorising officers designated by ACP countries, where frequently weaknesses in checks have been detected.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0153/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
We worked hard to keep this report strictly within the scope of the Budgetary Control Committee’s competence, examining how Parliament has managed its own budget. We pursued a balanced approach, recognising achievements and improvements made, whilst also constructively highlighting weaknesses of Parliament’s administration that should be addressed.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0131/2017 - Bart Staes)
Discharge was postponed. Parliament and the Council continue holding different legal views of the discharge procedure. The Council does not recognise the authority of Parliament but sees itself on the same level as the two arms of the EU budgetary authority. Parliament’s interpretation of Article 319 of the TFEU clearly sees a distinction in the two institutions’ role – Parliament being the authority which gives the discharge, while Council is the institution which gives a recommendation as to whether to grant discharge.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Justice (A8-0136/2017 - Benedek Jávor)
I voted in favour of the discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice, considering that in its annual report, there is no significant weaknesses identified in respect of the audited topics relating to human resources and procurement for the Court of Justice of the European Union (the 'Court of Justice') and the productivity of the judicial activity of the Court.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Auditors (A8-0151/2017 - Benedek Jávor)
Discharge was postponed, as there are different legal views of the discharge procedure being sustained by Parliament and the Council. The Council does not recognise the authority of Parliament but sees itself on the same level as the two arms of the EU budgetary authority. Parliament’s interpretation of Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union clearly sees a distinction in the two institutions’ role – Parliament being the authority which gives the discharge.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0140/2017 - Bart Staes)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. The Agency’s activities is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0149/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0147/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Our group supports the Agencies in their many areas of work as this is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0145/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Considering the importance of the CEDEFOP role to help develop and implement EU vocational training policies, always ensured that Erasmus+ plays an important role in promoting social inclusion and intercultural dialogue, and fighting youth unemployment, for these reasons I am voting in favour of the discharge.
Discharge 2015: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0087/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I consider important the reinforcement of the protection of Europe’s external borders, including European cooperation on coastguard function, and as well the cooperation with the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the European Fisheries Control Agency, and I voted in favour of the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0093/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0086/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the discharge for EFCA as I strongly believe it is important to strengthen co-operation and co-ordination of the three European agencies to support the national authorities carrying out coastguard functions (pooling their operational capacities; by sharing and analysing information; providing surveillance and communication services; capacity building by elaborating guidelines, recommendations and best practices as well as by providing training and exchange of staff).
Discharge 2015: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0106/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
In the current political atmosphere in Europe, I take a firm stance to make gender equality – a declared objective and principle of the EU enshrined in its Treaties – a priority, in order not only to demonstrate commitment to our values but also to use the potential of both women and men to increase the economic potential of the EU.
Discharge 2015: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0084/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Considering the importance for a better protection clinical trial for the participants and that the medicines that are intended for the EU should not harm clinical trial participants in low-income countries, whereas the transparency of EMA is necessary as it offers insight in its activities regarding ethical clinical trials, I am voting in favour of the discharge.
Discharge 2015: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0099/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Considering the health risks of high-potency products, the continued emergence of new substances, and changing patterns of drug use, which are among the issues highlighted in the European Drug Report 2016, and in view of the concern over rises in overdose deaths in some countries and the threats posed by internet drug markets, I chose to vote in favour for the discharge.
Discharge 2015: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0130/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Following the vote in the Committee on Transport and Tourism (TRAN) of the report on the European Maritime Safety Agency, all amendments were voted down, and the text as modified rejected.The Committee did not adopt the EMSA text as amended with 19 votes in favour, 25 against and 3 abstentions. No text report was adopted by TRAN.
Discharge 2015: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) (A8-0115/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. Our group supports the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0128/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. Our group supports the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0118/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (A8-0105/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0116/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) (A8-0126/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0111/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0146/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (A8-0137/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The Agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the Agencies in their many areas of work e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean or our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0148/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
The agencies of the European Union have vital importance in terms of delivering the goals and results of EU policies. There is now good progress being made in terms of the agencies sharing best practice and, where feasible, support services. Their network is strong and they are working with the Commission to implement the Roadmap on Decentralised Agencies. I support the agencies in their many areas of work – e.g. to keep our food safe, our environment clean and our planes and flights safer and more secure. This is of clear benefit to EU citizens and their performance is improving year on year.
Discharge 2015: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0103/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies. Domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion. I voted in favour of granting the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (A8-0094/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public-private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies. Domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion. I voted in favour of granting the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (A8-0113/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public-private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies. Domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion. I voted in favour of granting the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH) (A8-0109/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public-private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies. Domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion. I voted in favour of granting the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0083/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public-private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies. Domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion. I voted in favour of granting the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: ITER Joint Undertaking (A8-0108/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public-private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies. Domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion. I voted in favour of granting the Discharge.
Discharge 2015: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0096/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
I consider the fact that the Joint Undertakings bring together industry and research bodies in public private partnerships to support research, new technology and demonstration activities and to accelerate the market introduction of specific technologies, and that domains covered include air traffic control, carbon-clean energy, nanotechnology, computing technology, cleaner aviation technologies and nuclear fusion.
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions (A8-0138/2017 - Ulrike Rodust)
. ‒ These regions are very poor and the economic situation is catastrophic, especially for fisheries. They lack the capacity to have an autonomous economy. Replacing an old boat by a new boat does not come without cost and, as you know, banks are not willing to invest in many sectors in the current context. Today men and women are risking their lives on board frail 40-year-old craft in order to go on with their traditional activity, and casualties are occurring every month.In these areas with peak unemployment rates, fishing remains an active sector and a part of the insular way of life, most importantly offering the inhabitants of these regions a livelihood. But for how long? The EU has already started to sell fishing opportunities in Guyana to Venezuela, for instance.These areas feel abandoned by the EU, as proven by the recent anti-European results from outermost regions in the French elections. Let us not abandon them.
State of play of farmland concentration in the EU: how to facilitate the access to land for farmers (A8-0119/2017 - Maria Noichl)
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0270/2017, B8-0270/2017, B8-0271/2017, B8-0272/2017, B8-0274/2017, B8-0275/2017, B8-0276/2017, B8-0277/2017)
There will be no viable, peaceful and stable solution for Venezuela without national dialogue and calls on all parties to engage in a constructive, solution-driven process. In consequence, the objective of this dialogue must be to reach a national agreement that foresees a democratic and peaceful conflict resolution. The HR/VP shall also support any regional or international efforts that might lead to a mediation process.However, in light of the current circumstances and in order to move forward, I support the call on the Venezuelan Government to immediately free political prisoners; call for elections and avoid sidelining opposition candidates; put an end to the repression of demonstrations; and investigate the murders and allow humanitarian aid into the country.
Objection to a delegated act: Scheme of generalised tariff preferences (B8-0273/2017)
Since 2010 Sri Lanka has made significant progress. I consider that Sri Lanka meets the GSP+ entry criteria set out in the EU regulation. I welcome the fact that the new government of Sri Lanka established a path of major reforms aiming for national reconciliation, respect of human rights, the rule of law and good governance principles, as well as sustainable economic development.Moreover, I consider that the government made important efforts to achieve progress in order to fulfil the commitments and agree granting the GSP+ tariff concession to Sri Lanka.
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Ukraine (A8-0274/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
Visa liberalisation is one aspect of an increasingly close partnership between Ukraine and the European Union. Ukraine is a key partner country for the EU within the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership. The Association Agreement signed in June 2014 and its simultaneous ratification by the Verkhovna Rada and the European Parliament in September 2015 sent a strong signal and provided clear proof of the EU’s and Ukraine’s shared aspiration to achieve a substantive rapprochement on the basis of the principles of political association and economic integration. Waiving the visa obligation for Ukrainian citizens who hold biometric passports will represent a concrete achievement stemming from this shared aspiration and from the commitment shown by the Ukrainian people to peace, stability and a European and reformist direction for their country.
European Solidarity Corps (B8-0238/2017)
The launch of the Commission's registration platform for potential young volunteers has spurred a tremendous amount of interest among young Europeans. Yet, this initiative could quickly turn into general frustration, if the Commission doesn't present a convincing and sustainable approach soon. In view of the high number of registrations, the Commission needs to make sure that sufficient funding is dedicated to the initiative and that all stakeholders are sufficiently involved in the development and implementation of the European Solidarity Corps. We cannot reallocate funds from priority programs, such as ERASMUS+, often lacking sufficient resources, to finance new policy initiatives. We need fresh money. And we cannot create a new initiative which goes against well-established and well-functioning programmes.
Adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US privacy Shield (B8-0235/2017, B8-0244/2017)
The long-term viability of the Privacy Shield (PS) as an instrument capable of effectively safeguarding privacy rights according to EU standards has still to be confirmed. As to the commercial aspects, the Privacy Shield allows data processing for very broad and generic purposes, contrary to the purpose limitation principle as enshrined in EU law. Actually, the text of the PS requires firms to inform individuals of ‘the purposes for which it collects and uses personal information about them’; it is, however, unsure how detailed such a purpose must be, the PS does not require the firms to specify the actual use for which the information is intended. Moreover, the PS would be based on an ‘op out’ system (notice and choice), requiring users actively object to their data being processed by a company (if they are aware of such processing), and contrary to the EU ‘opt in’ system that requires companies to obtain prior user consent.
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with regard to aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0078/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)
Through the current report Parliament gives its consent to the ratification and accession by Member States, in the interest of the European Union, to the Protocol of 2010 to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, with regard to aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters.Swift ratification of Protocol 10 by all Member States in order to enable the implementation of the Convention as soon as possible.
Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Croatia (A8-0073/2017 - Nuno Melo)
This consultation procedure relates to a proposed Council Decision to allow for certain provisions relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) to be applied to Croatia. The application of those provisions will essentially allow for SIS data to be transferred to Croatia. This, in turn, will allow the European Commission to verify that Croatia meets the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the Schengen Acquis in the SIS area. In essence, it is a further step on the way to Croatia becoming a full member of the Schengen Area without internal borders. Verification of Croatia’s compliance with the Schengen Acquis in the area of the Schengen Information System (SIS) should be carried out as soon as possible.
Medical devices (A8-0068/2017 - Glenis Willmott)
Medical devices are an important and innovative industry in Europe, but we must ensure that devices are safe and that patients are protected. I welcome the new law which introduces much stricter requirements for manufacturers of medical devices and for the notified bodies that have responsibility for authorising devices. It is also important to tighten up the system of post-market surveillance: manufacturers will have to develop and maintain a post-market surveillance system for every device, including producing a Periodic Safety Update Report, to ensure that devices are constantly monitored and action can be taken quickly if things do go wrong. Crucially, we achieved a key demand to have additional pre-market scrutiny for certain high-risk devices. The new legislation will mean that patients can have more confidence in the safety of medical devices, without stifling the innovation that is key to this industry.
In vitro diagnostic medical devices (A8-0069/2017 - Peter Liese)
I support better regulation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices to ensure that tests such as pregnancy tests and blood tests are accurate and reliable. The new law will require high-risk devices to undergo additional, pre-market assessment, while stricter rules on post-market surveillance will ensure a faster response if there is a problem with a device.
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (A8-0238/2016 - Petr Ježek)
The regulation, as it is now negotiated, reduces fragmentation of practices across Member States towards a deeper integration of the capital markets in the EU and unlocks liquidity from institutional investors who are currently facing a low interest rate environment and sitting on capital. Moreover, it reduces legal costs and red tape.The CMU is not only a European issue; therefore, I encourage the possibility of the issuers based in third counties to access the EU capital market. I fully support the use in the EU of the prospectus approved in third countries by fulfilling equivalence requirements. I also, approve and support the increasing role of ESM in developing guidelines on supervision and enforcement, as the scrutiny and approval practices of national competent authorities should be enhanced by them.The achievement of the SME Growth Prospectus allows SMEs to raise funds across EU.
Multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 (A8-0110/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
A revision was necessary to restore Europe’s capacity to take action. I welcome the fact that we were united in putting pressure on the Commission and the Council, and obtained a substantial revision, gaining up to EUR 3 billion euros more for flexibility by 2020 and the release of around EUR 3 billion for 2017-2020. In this battle, a notable victory was securing EUR 1.2 billion to fight youth unemployment. We can congratulate ourselves for this historic precedent. Nevertheless, this review remains insufficient to address the many issues we face. I hope we will remain steadfast and determined in the future negotiations on the annual budgets – as they already have shown this year on the negotiations for the 2018 budget – in order to give Europe a sufficiently ambitious budget. We will also be pushing for an ambitious budgetary programme following 2020.
Multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 (Resolution) (A8-0117/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
A revision was necessary to restore Europe’s capacity to take action. I welcome the fact that we were united in putting pressure on the Commission and the Council, and obtained a substantial revision, gaining up to EUR 3 billion more for flexibility by 2020 and the release of around EUR 3 billion for 2017-2020. In this battle, a notable victory was securing EUR 1.2 billion to fight youth unemployment. We can congratulate ourselves for this historic precedent. Nevertheless, this review remains insufficient to address the many issues we face. I hope we will remain steadfast and determined in the future negotiations on the annual budgets – as they already have shown this year on the negotiations for the 2018 budget – in order to give Europe a sufficiently ambitious budget. We will also be pushing for an ambitious budgetary programme following 2020.
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin (A8-0104/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
The decision on the Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin is part of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) revision package voted in Plenary the same day.It confirms European Parliament’s long standing position that payment appropriations for special instruments are counted over and above the MFF ceilings.
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2018 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0156/2017 - Richard Ashworth)
I support this report which reflects the position of the Committee on Budgets on the administrative and financial needs for the European Parliament. The report will allow the increase in the European Parliament budget for 2018 to be limited to 2.3% compared to the 2017 budget (which is a compromise between an increase of 3.6% proposed by the Secretary-General and the Bureau and an increase limited to a maximum of 1.9% requested by the Committee on Budgets). That means a decrease of the preliminary draft estimates by EUR 18.4 million.Moreover, it will set the overall level of the estimates for the year 2018 to EUR 1 953 483 373 corresponding to an increase by EUR 43.89 million compared to the 2017 budget.
Draft Amending Budget No 1/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal (A8-0155/2017 - Jens Geier)
I support the draft Amending Budget No 1/2017 to the general budget 2017 which is linked to the Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund.It provides assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal relates to floods in the United Kingdom, drought and fires in Cyprus and fires on the Portuguese island of Madeira (EUR 71 524 810 in commitment and payment appropriations).
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/000 TA 2017 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0157/2017 - Victor Negrescu)
The Plenary voted on a report giving the green light for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to provide technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission.The amount of the foreseen EGF contribution, EUR 310 000, is to be used for financing preparation, monitoring, data gathering and the creation of a knowledge base, administrative and technical support, information and communication activities as well as audit, control and evaluation activities. The measures aim at simplifying the application procedure of the EGF as well as at encouraging a general awareness about the EGF and its visibility.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal (A8-0154/2017 - José Manuel Fernandes)
I support draft Amending Budget No. 1/2017 to the general budget 2017 which is linked to the Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund.It provides assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal relates to floods in the United Kingdom, drought and fires in Cyprus and fires on the Portuguese island of Madeira (EUR 71 524 810 in commitment and payment appropriations).
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Latvia (A8-0089/2017 - Claude Moraes)
The aim of the draft Council implementing Decision is to authorise Latvia to continue to receive and supply of personal data for the purpose of automated searching of dactyloscopic (digital fingerprints) data under the Prüm Treaty.Latvia has implemented the required data protection provisions into national law and the Commission has evaluated the pilot run and found Latvia ready to take part in Prüm.
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium (A8-0091/2017 - Judith Sargentini)
The aim of the draft Council implementing Decision is to authorise Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium to continue to be entitled to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison of DNA data under the Prüm Treaty.The Member States above have implemented the required data protection provisions into national law and the Commission has verified the pilot run and found said Member States compliant to continue to be entitled to be part of the Prüm Treaty.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland (A8-0092/2017 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
The aim of the draft Council implementing Decision is to authorise Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland to continue to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching of dactyloscopic (digital fingerprints) data under the Prüm Treaty.The Member States above have implemented the required data protection provisions into national law and the Commission has verified the pilot run and found said Member States compliant to continue to be entitled to be part of the Prüm Treaty.
Automatic exchange of data concerning vehicles registered in Finland, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Hungary (A8-0095/2017 - Filiz Hyusmenova)
The aim of the draft Council implementing Decision is to authorise Finland, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Hungary to continue to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching of vehicle registration data (VRD) under the Prüm Treaty.The Member States above have implemented the required data protection provisions into national law and the Commission has verified the pilot run and found said Member States compliant to continue to be entitled to be part of the Prüm Treaty.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Malta, Cyprus and Estonia (A8-0090/2017 - Maria Grapini)
The aim of the draft Council implementing Decision is to authorise Malta, Cyprus and Estonia to continue to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching of vehicle registration data (VRD) under the Prüm Treaty.The Member States above have implemented the required data protection provisions into national law and the Commission has verified the pilot run and found said Member States compliant to continue to be entitled to be part of the Prüm Treaty.
Genetically modified maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 (B8-0236/2017)
The Commission published a draft decision to authorise the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21, and twenty sub-combinations thereof. Requirements for labelling and monitoring for environmental effects are introduced, as well as conditions or restrictions on the placing on the market, use or handling of the products.The objectors oppose the draft measure on the grounds that the Commission has exceeded the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. The planned authorisation concerns 20 different products, only a few of which have been tested for safety, and several of which have not even been created yet. The objectors also point out that the EFSA scientific opinion includes a minority opinion, which state that no specific data regarding any of those 20 sub-combinations was provided by the applicant, who also did not give a satisfactory rationale explaining the reasons why that data was missing and/or why they would consider that this data is not necessary for the risk assessment.Herbicide-resistant GMOs should not be authorised, because they could encourage the increase use of herbicides, and the wider health and environmental implications of this has not been taken into account.
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (A8-0045/2017 - Elena Valenciano, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
For a too long time, the external dimension has been missing in the definition of the EU response to migration movements although it is fundamental to address the root causes of this phenomenon. I support the call for the full respect of migrants and refugees’ rights and dignity, no matter their legal status; I reject any conditionality on EU aid upon collaboration of third countries on migration issues; I urge for the establishment of safe and legal channels to reach the EU for asylum seekers and potential migrants, which would be the best way to break the business of human traffickers and organised crime; and I believe the Parliament has be fully involved in all current initiatives and their budgetary consequences.
Characteristics for fishing vessels (A8-0376/2016 - Werner Kuhn)
The common fisheries policy (CFP) manages and establishes ceilings of total capacity of Member States’ fishing fleets, in terms of engine power and vessel tonnage, notably with a view to capping fishing means in consideration of the fisheries resources available. A significant number of EU rules under the CFP also refer, and apply, to fishing vessels based on their power, tonnage as well as some other technical characteristics, such as length, breadth and date of entry into service. Identical definitions of these characteristics and common rules for their determination have been set since 1986 (Council Regulation No 2930/1986, amended in 1994). On 23 May 2016, the Commission tabled a legislative proposal to replace this 1986 regulation with a new one. I welcome the new rules which repeal and recast the Council Regulation in line with the European Union’s commitment to simplify and clarify EU law in order to make it clearer and easier to understand. The new Regulation should enter into force by mid 2017.
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton)
I believe this report contains improvements, but we have to be more ambitious and equip the EU with a strong independent watchdog able to act independently to prevent future crises. We have to think of a future-proof solution, given the challenges posed by the IoT connected cars. A clear chain of liabilities must be defined and the missing piece is a strong technical body, as budget neutral as possible for EU citizens, capable to identify and report risks and failures.Second, we should be committed to a real consumer empowerment in contractual relations with any trader. This regulation is a piece of the puzzle. I support the call for the highest level of consumer protection when it comes to remedies and producer liability under consumer contracts proposals, and a strong role to be played by the national competent authorities and the EU in launching actions against fraudulent traders who cheat on EU consumers.
Palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (A8-0066/2017 - Kateřina Konečná)
Palm oil is extensively used in food, cosmetics and biofuels, however the unsustainable production of the cheap vegetable oil leads to deforestation, loss of nature habitats and greenhouse gas emissions.I strongly support the draft report makes reference to the environmental impacts of the palm oil industry while encouraging the sustainable production of palm oil. It is fundamental to call for a single mandatory certification scheme to ensure that palm oil products are only allowed to enter the EU market if they meet minimum sustainability criteria.Palm oil is not worth the devastation it causes. Over the past 20 years, intensive palm oil cultivation has led not only to massive deforestation of some of the world’s most precious ecosystems while pushing many species to the brink of extinction but it has also exploited millions of plantation workers, including children and violated rights of local and indigenous communities.EU shares global responsibility in achieving sustainable palm oil production.
Women and their roles in rural areas (A8-0058/2017 - Marijana Petir, Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez)
This report on women in rural areas highlights a domain in which the rights of women still lag behind and in which the issue of gender equality can be promoted significantly to improve women’s lives. Women in rural areas are not a homogeneous group, and bear an unequal share of the consequences of poor services or infrastructure, and find it harder to get secure and safe employment, or the resources needed to start their own businesses than do their male counterparts. Investment in women, and the services they need, in rural areas, will do much to ensure that living communities remain there and local economies thrive and build on agricultural and other businesses.
Draft recommendation following the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (B8-0177/2017)
Member states failed to monitor cars for illegal emissions and turned a blind eye to cheating by Volkswagen and other manufacturers on tests. Meanwhile, the Commission didn't enforce its own legislation, eroding consumer trust in the car industry and putting public health at risk. After Dieselgate, business as usual is simply not an option. We want to see stronger oversight in form of an independent EU agency for vehicle surveillance put in place to ensure that cars are not only clean in the lab but also on the road. Those countries who continue to block independent and transparent system for type-approval of European vehicles and the strengthening of the market surveillance at the EU level must stop putting the interests of their own car industry above those of consumers and citizens.
Constitutional, legal and institutional implications of a Common Security and Defence Policy: possibilities offered by the Lisbon Treaty (A8-0042/2017 - Esteban González Pons, Michael Gahler)
The report explores the possibilities offered by the Lisbon Treaty to further develop the Common Security and Defence Policy. It underlines the importance of the operationalisation of the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the adoption of an EU White Book on Security and Defence, and calls for stronger EU-NATO cooperation and enhanced civil-military cooperation. It also asks for increased investment in defence expenditure (NATO goal), welcomes the activation of the defence clause (Art. 42(7) TEU), demands the revision of the Athena mechanism and welcomes the preparatory action for defence research as well as the European Defence Action Plan. I supported this balanced text, fully reflecting the possibilities that the Lisbon Treaty offers for further realistic progress in the field of CSDP.
An integrated EU policy for the Arctic (A8-0032/2017 - Urmas Paet, Sirpa Pietikäinen)
. ‒ As the geopolitical importance of the Arctic region is growing, with climate change effects and competition for natural resources bringing new environmental and security risks for the region and for the world, the EU should speak with one voice, protect the fragile ecosystems and push to keep the Arctic an area of cooperation.The Arctic has long been, and should remain, a low-tension area of constructive international cooperation. There is a strong need to avoid its militarisation and to respect international law there. I would like to stress the important role of the Arctic Council for maintaining constructive cooperation, low tension, peace and stability in the region.It should also be emphasised that the EU needs further to assert its interests vis-à-vis Russia through the use of selective engagement and to seek progress on issues of common concern where there is ground for global solutions to common challenges and threats.
2016 Report on Montenegro (A8-0050/2017 - Charles Tannock) FR
. – J'ai voté pour le rapport. Néanmoins, je déplore la clôture temporaire des plateformes de communication en ligne qui a dû être imposée le jour des élections ainsi que le piratage du site internet du Centre pour la transition démocratique (CTD) quelques jours avant les élections, qui a également freiné les travaux menés par les organisations de la société civile afin de surveiller les élections. Nous demandons aux autorités compétentes de remédier aux dysfonctionnements et d’enquêter sur les irrégularités de procédure présumées, y compris sur les allégations d’utilisation abusive de fonds publics et d’abus de pouvoir, ainsi que sur tout autre problème signalé, de manière efficace et transparente, et conformément aux recommandations de l’OSCE/BIDDH.
e-Democracy in the EU: potential and challenges (A8-0041/2017 - Ramón Jáuregui Atondo) FR
. – J'ai voté en faveur de cet excellent texte. L’application et le développement des nouvelles TIC entraînent de profonds changements dans les sociétés modernes. Cette révolution technologique majeure est principalement régie par l’internet et les différents réseaux de communication et d’interaction sociale qui y sont associés. Le champ politique, et plus particulièrement la participation citoyenne, n’échappe pas à leur influence.L’essor des nouveaux outils de communication numérique et des plateformes ouvertes et collaboratives a donné naissance à un nouveau mode de communication, de débat et de participation sociale aux affaires publiques, mettant fin au monopole exercé par les médias traditionnels en tant que relais entre citoyens et monde politique.
EU-Brazil Agreement: modification of concessions in the schedule of Croatia in the course of its accession (A8-0052/2017 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)
I have always supported an effective multilateral rules-based system such as the WTO. On the other hand, we have to acknowledge that European agriculture is facing today many challenges in terms of competition. For this reason, we need to strike a right balance and to take even more into account the concerns of all relevant actors when negotiating international agreements that could have a significant impact on specific sectors.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Denmark (A8-0051/2017 - Maria Grapini) FR
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece (A8-0053/2017 - Claude Moraes) FR
Food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products (A8-0022/2017 - Karin Kadenbach)
In the light of food-related scandals, ensuring that EU citizens consume safe and high-quality food products is of paramount importance. Scrupulous safety checks along the food production chain are necessary to effectively combat fraudulent practices and to restore the consumer's trust in the integrity of the food chain.I welcome the fact that our concerns were taken on board in the final agreement with the Council, such as the wider scope, the strengthening the provisions on transparency all along the process, meat inspections, important progress in the area of animal welfare through fleshing out provisions on dedicated reference centres, and finally better enforcement, especially against fraudulent or deceptive practices. I believe the new Regulation will fulfil its initial aim of a comprehensive scope encompassing the whole agri-food chain and will guarantee that the food which consumers buy and eat in Europe is safe and wholesome, thus improving consumer health and preventing food crises.
Use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union (A8-0327/2016 - Patrizia Toia) FR
L’internet des objets, l’informatique en nuage, les services de communications mobiles, la numérisation des secteurs industriels ("Industrie 4.0") et l’amélioration de l’efficacité des services publics (l’administration électronique) ne sont que quelques exemples des services de connectivité qui connaissent une expansion rapide dans le monde et qui nécessitent des connexions rapides ainsi que des réseaux de communications capables de véhiculer de gros volumes de données, non seulement dans les régions à forte densité de population, mais aussi dans les régions périphériques. L’achèvement de l’Union numérique dépendra également des nouvelles technologies de transmission et de réception des données, et donc des plages du spectre disponibles pour les communications sans fil.J'ai voté en faveur de ce texte à la lumière des explications efficaces données par le responsable S&D sur le dossier.
Obstacles to EU citizens’ freedom to move and work in the Internal Market (B8-0179/2017)
It is important to raise concerns about the consequences of the economic crisis on the freedom of movement of workers and to call on Member States to remove any discriminatory practices and unnecessary barriers under their rules to EU citizens and their family members who are non-EU nationals benefiting from the right to entry and residence in their territory, as well as from their social rights, while rendering their administration more efficient in order to facilitate labour mobility in the EU.EU citizens still complain about obstacles encountered to exercising their freedom of movement. Member States should fully fulfil the current EU legislation and fundamental principles of labour law in order to protect EU workers.
Commission's approval of Germany's revised plan to introduce a road toll (B8-0180/2017)
The de-facto exemption from a road toll introduced by the German Government results in German-registered vehicles receiving a rebate clearly needs further clarifications.I believe it is important to question the Commission on the discussions they held with the German Government, how an agreement was reached and under what assessment the Commission no longer considers the road toll exemption to be discriminatory to non-German EU drivers and therefore in violation of EU law.Discrimination within the internal market is not permissible, and I therefore strongly believe that the Commission must give a public explanation of why it halted infringement proceedings and what discussions took place with the Government of Germany.
Guidelines for the 2018 budget - Section III (A8-0060/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I support in particular the need to fight corporate tax fraud and tax avoidance and their huge losses of tax income for Member States, and the special focus on the EU budget as a tool of external solidarity and the fight for poverty eradication and sustainable development.We must continue to push for a strong and progressive next year’s EU budget and we are in favour of mobilising all means available to tackle the European and global challenges.
Responsible ownership and care of equidae (A8-0014/2017 - Julie Girling)
I support the holistic view of the equid sector in this report, focusing particularly on the economic and employment role which equestrian farms play in rural areas, and the need for them to be treated fairly and equitably in the VAT regime. Food safety concerns are also well integrated with calls for consumer protection vis—à—vis imported horse meat, which should be subject to the same standards of inspection, traceability, safety and quality as meat produced inside the EU. Good welfare for horses and donkeys throughout their lives, in transport and at the time of slaughter are also promoted in the report.
Mercury (A8-0313/2016 - Stefan Eck)
After the signing the Minamata Convention under the UNEP, aiming to control the use of mercury, this ban on mercury fillings for children and pregnant women is a natural next step. However, in my opinion Member States must go further and prohibit all dental amalgam.I welcome the inclusion in the report of the mention that national plans on phasing out amalgam use should be made available publicly and to the Commission by 1 July 2019. Moreover, new products and processes containing/needing mercury will only be authorised when an assessment of the risks and the benefits demonstrates a significant environmental and health benefit. Finally, we get a ban on the use of amalgam in vulnerable populations. Limitations on certain exports and industrial processes were also achievements.
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (A8-0158/2015 - Sergio Gaetano Cofferati)
I welcome the revision of the Shareholders’ Rights Directive, as I believe it will contribute to improve stability, increase corporate transparency and boost long-term investment, as opposed to the short-term risk taking behaviour identified as a key driver of the economic crisis and the high turnover of shares.For the first time in the history of European company law stakeholders of companies other than shareholders are mentioned. The report underlines the need for stronger transparency requirements with regard to share-based remuneration and to the ratio between fixed and variable remuneration of directors.Finally, I welcome the fact that we managed to push the Commission to present a proposal on Public Country by Country reporting and I believe we must continue to push for more tax transparency.
Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (A8-0251/2016 - Vicky Ford)
I welcome the revised directive on the acquisition and possession of firearms in the EU, as I believe it will ensure that public security is strengthened – inter alia – via a better exchange of information among authorities, more stringent rules on deactivation and the use of the most dangerous semi-automatic firearms and monitoring systems for checking the medical conditions of users. The rights of legal owners and users is preserved.In particular, I welcome the improved conditions for authorisation requirements and safe storage: Member States will have to guarantee that an assessment of the conditions of license-holders is in place but can choose if carrying it on a continuous or periodical basis. Member States will establish rules on proper storage in a way which is proportional to the risk associated with the respective firearm.
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0013/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
In order to be able to monitor the state of implementation of the waste legislation in the various waste streams, reporting systems on statistical data must be stream-lined, robust and well-functioning.It is important to establish a common methodology for the collection and processing of statistical data as regards recycling and recovery targets contained in the three directives; moreover, I support the review clauses, which states that the Commission to examine the directives in the context of the Circular Economy Action Plan and, if appropriate, propose comprehensive reviews of the legislation.I welcome reporting obligations for statistical data and the obligation for Member States to set up minimum quality standards for the treatment of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment that has been collected.
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
Around 600 million tonnes of waste are thrown away in Europe when they could be reinvested in the economy. It is only by setting ambitious targets and goals and giving MS the instruments and tools to change attitudes and practices, that there will be any serious shift towards a more sustainable, resource efficient circular economy. Food waste in the EU is estimated to be at around 180 kg per capita per year. The Member States have to adopt a food waste hierarchy which will contribute towards our goal of reducing food waste by 50% by 2030.I welcome the inclusion, in the report, of higher recycling targets for municipal waste by 2025 and 2030, a single calculation method for calculating recycling targets, separate waste collection systems for different kinds of waste, the removal of exemptions on technical and environmental grounds, compulsory extended producer responsibility schemes for all products, a food waste hierarchy and a reduction in food and marine waste targets.
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I welcome this report, which aims at the aim of making better use of resources and reducing risks to human health of landfill sites. I believe these objectives have been broadly achieved in the report with the adoption of a stricter reduction target limiting the annual landfilling of municipal waste to 5% of the total generated by 2030, as opposed to the 10% target proposed by the Commission, with exemptions for Member States no longer automatic, but subject to specific conditions.In particular, I support definitions and economic instruments/measures to assist Member States in applying the waste hierarchy to be aligned with the Waste Framework Directive.A progressive reduction in landfilling is necessary to prevent detrimental impacts on human health and the environment, and to ensure that economically valuable waste materials are gradually and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy.
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
We must continue to be committed to leading a transition towards an economic model that reduces waste and promotes re-use, efficiency, durability and recycling. We cannot continue with the existing paradigm. Around 600 million tonnes of waste are just thrown away in Europe, when they could be reinvested in the economy. It is a matter of sustainability, efficiency and ethics.The circular economy package provide the appropriate measures that can help a change in attitude by making sure that very little goes to waste whilst protecting our environment, reduce resource loss and providing new economic opportunities whilst creating new jobs.I believe that the report has broadly achieved its objectives of preventing packaging waste and channelling it back into the production process by raising recycling targets and simplifying the calculation method for measuring these targets, removing incentives for the excessive use of packaging, promoting the design of packaging which can be recycled or re-used more easily and making producers more responsible for their packaging product.
Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 (A8-0046/2017 - Ernest Urtasun)
In the current political atmosphere in Europe, we must take a firm stance to make gender equality – a declared objective and principle of the EU enshrined in its Treaties – a priority, in order not only to demonstrate commitment to our values but also to use the potential of both women and men to increase the economic potential of the EU.I therefore strongly support this report, which calls for equal pay for equal work and work of equal value, including salary- and wage-mapping, delivers a package of legislative and non-legislative measures regarding work-life-balance for 2017 Work Programme, includes gender mainstreaming in the Europe 2020 strategy and in the framework of the European Semester and establishes a EU Child Guarantee.
Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz)
EU legislation guarantees the equal treatment between women and men in the access to and supply of goods and services but the application of this principle must be further improved on national level; further awareness raising among services and goods providers as well as users about provisions of the Directive is needed, national equality bodies must be financially and administratively enabled to fulfil their tasks, best practices should be further exchanged. I welcome the fact that services provided within the collaborative economy are covered by the Directive, as well. I strongly support the call for extending the application of this Directive to the advertisement and media sector.Finally, I hope to see national regulations that go further than required by the Directive covering also discrimination between men and women in media, advertisement and education.
EU funds for gender equality (A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody)
Gender equality is a fundamental principle and political objective of the EU enshrined in its Treaties, which should be translated into policies and spending. In certain policy areas this principle is already well applied, EU funding being in some cases the only support that is specifically aimed at women. The importance of this report is to recognize the value that this funding brings to many people’s live; however, it also identifies where and how we can do better, calling for applying gender mainstreaming and gender budgeting in all EU budget titles and in all phases of EU projects.I welcome our main achievements, in particular highlighting the EU’s high level commitment to gender equality and intended gender mainstreaming, however deploring that this has not yet been fully reflected in the budget allocations and spending decisions in all EU policy areas, and pointing out ESIF as most important financial support for gender equality in the EU.
Fundamental rights implications of big data (A8-0044/2017 - Ana Gomes)
With the report on the impact of Big Data on Fundamental Rights, we want to stress that the opportunities of big data can only be fully enjoyed by citizens and institutions if there is public trust in these technologies and the way they collect and process data about our lives. Big data analytics pose specific challenges for fundamental rights and raise concerns over discrimination and security. We need to address these risks with specific guidelines, more transparency and algorithmic accountability. We have a strong data protection framework in the EU, but tackling these issues in will require cooperation between the private and public sectors, law enforcement authorities and independent supervisory authorities. This is certainly an issue that I will continue to look at.
Minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits (A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck)
I believe that farmers should ensure a high degree of animal welfare for rabbits, as they do for other animals, and that more investment in housing conditions is necessary. This investment should be accompanied by an increase in the research and development of new solutions and more studies on the health and well—being of rabbits which are farmed.
EU-Lebanon Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0027/2017 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
This is a technical file, which updates the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Lebanon by taking into account the accession of Croatia to the EU.Lebanon is a key partner of the EU in the Middle East. The EU invests in the country’s stability and resilience in the face of multiple challenges, such as the terrorist threat, the fall-out from the civil war in Syria and a great number of refugees from Syria (1.5 million in a country of 4 million).
EU-Liechtenstein Agreement on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa (A8-0025/2017 - Josef Weidenholzer)
This report proposes to give Parliament’s consent to certain rules under which Liechtenstein may participate in and benefit from the Internal Security Fund (External Borders and Visa), a fund established in 2014 to replace the former External Borders Fund.The Internal Security Fund (ISF) Borders and Visa is intended to ensure a high level of security in the European Union while facilitating legitimate travel, through a uniform and high level of control of the external border and the effective processing of Schengen visas. As the ISF (Borders and Visa) represented a development of the Schengen acquis and affects the legal framework of the agreement between the EU and Liechtenstein on Liechtenstein’s participation in Schengen, it is necessary to lay down rules for Liechtenstein’s financial contribution to and participation in the fund.On 12 August of last year, the Commission proposed a Council Decision to sign an agreement with Liechtenstein laying down such supplementary rules for the ISF with regard to Liechtenstein. I supported Parliament’s consent for the Council to proceed.
Information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments in the field of energy (A8-0305/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
This concerns requiring Member States to notify the Commission of intergovernmental energy agreements which they intend to sign with third countries in order to allow for an ex-ante assessment by the Commission to see if the agreements are compatible with EU legislation, notably the internal energy market and competition rules. I supported the agreement as I believe Member States should not undermine the internal energy market by signing up to agreements with third countries which go against its core principles.
Obligations in the field of visa reciprocity (B8-0173/2017)
Citizens of five Member States (Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Croatia and Cyprus) are still required to obtain a visa if they want to travel to the USA.Because this situation has not been resolved by the deadline set by the regulation (12th April 2016) the Commission is obliged to adopt a delegated act suspending for 12 months the visa waiver for nationals of these countries. However, due to the sensitivity of the matter and consequences of such decision the Commission has not adopted this delegated act so far. The LIBE Committee debated this issue in September in the presence of Commissioner Avramopoulous. The debate during plenary session of December and the answers we got from the Commission were not satisfactory either.In the meantime Canada committed already to lift the visa requirements for Romanian and Bulgarian citizens by December 2017.Because of the persistence of the US Government in still imposing visas on those European nationals I voted in favour of this resolution calling on the Commission to adopt a delegated act on the basis of Article 265 TFEU within two months from the day of adoption of the present resolution at the latest.
Options for improving access to medicines (A8-0040/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
. ‒ Improving access to medicines is a political priority, especially in the context of the financial crisis and struggling public health systems. Cases of huge and prohibitive prices for life-saving medicines – for hepatitis C and HIV, for example – have drawn more attention to this problem.Recognising the urgency of the problem, I support the task force and the development of a set of recommendations to improve access to medicines, as well as the own-initiative report on the subject in the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme (A8-0030/2017 - Silvia Costa)
I welcome the success of the programme in the objectives of promoting European cultural diversity and strengthening the potential of the cultural and creative sector, although it is important to strongly call for an increase in the Creative Europe budget, which is seriously underfinanced, in order to bring it into line with the expectations. I believe we must continue to strongly support the cultural, creative and audiovisual sector, asking for an increased budget for the Creative Europe Programme to meet the expectations and avoid frustration, together with better management of the existing programme, with more transparency and simplified procedures. The creation of three new strands on innovation crossovers, social inclusion and Creative Europe Mundus to include third countries will reflect our objectives and priorities.
Implementation of the Europe for Citizens programme (A8-0017/2017 - María Teresa Giménez Barbat)
. ‒ The Europe for Citizens programme is a key tool for strengthening a sense of European citizenship and belonging, enhancing solidarity, mutual tolerance and respect, promoting a better understanding of the EU, its origin and development, its values, its institutions and competences, and fostering active dialogue between EU citizens.Given the current rise of euroscepticism, the Europe for Citizens programme is extremely important. I therefore support the suggestion that consideration be given to a total financial envelope of approximately EUR 500 million for the programme under the next MFF, as it represents only EUR 1 per citizen. Such a programme has to focus on citizens and allow EU institutions to engage directly with civil society on the ground, in order to exchange views on current challenges for Europe such as migration, refugees, radicalisation, social inclusion and intercultural dialogue.
Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives (A8-0012/2017 - Emma McClarkin)
Trade policy can play a crucial role in the fight against wildlife trafficking.I support the adoption by the EU of legislation akin to the United States Lacey Act which prohibits the import of wildlife that has been illegally harvested in third countries even if it does not fall under the protection of international instruments such as CITES.Moreover, I believe Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters in trade agreements should be enforceable. Policy coherence for development and poverty reduction are key to ensure people are not forced into poaching activities.In particular, I welcome references to the broad interpretation of the ‘public morals’ exception in trade law by the WTO Appellate Body extending also to the prevention of cruelty against animals.I strongly support the call for a European ban of trade of elephant ivory, including ‘pre-Convention’ ivory in a manner compliant with WTO law.
Combating terrorism (A8-0228/2016 - Monika Hohlmeier)
I welcome this proposal, which replaces Framework Decision 2002/475 and seeks to put in place updated EU-level legislation establishing minimum rules on the definition of terrorist offences, offences related to a terrorist group or terrorist activities, and penalties in this area. It also provides specific measures on protection, support and assistance to the victims of terrorism. Victims of terrorism need special attention, support and protection due to the particular nature of the crime that has been committed against them, as they can be under significant public scrutiny. We should therefore take particular account of their needs, and should seek to protect their dignity and security.It is important to reinforce the safeguards as much as possible, especially on controversial issues such as the rather broad definition of certain offences and the criminalisation of certain preparatory acts with a minimal or no direct link to a violent act of terrorism.
Reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders (A8-0218/2016 - Monica Macovei)
. ‒ I fully support increased security at the external borders of the Union, and, as a consequence, within the Schengen zone, but we must be aware of introducing ill-thought-through measures which will cause unnecessary hardship to all those lawfully seeking to enter or leave the Union. We must not create havoc at the external borders by introducing additional checks with no additional security benefits.Nevertheless, against the current political backdrop, it is unthinkable not to support the overall intention of increasing security at external borders. The provisions on the extended derogation for airports, the additional clarity regarding the databases which will be searched against, and the Commission’s review after two years of the effectiveness of the checks give me sufficient reason to back the first-reading agreement.
Possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union (A8-0390/2016 - Guy Verhofstadt)
European citizens expect more efficient solutions for challenges like growth, jobs, security or migration. I ask to equip the European Union with the necessary competences and instruments to be more successful. The S&D priority for a sustainable and clean European energy policy is largely reflected in the AFCO final text. S&D amendments on fundamental values control have been completely incorporated in the report. I therefore voted in favour.
Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty (A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso, Elmar Brok)
Civil Law Rules on Robotics (A8-0005/2017 - Mady Delvaux)
I believe both the European economy as well as European citizens and consumers would benefit from a coherent EU regulation on robotics. I welcome this legislative report which comprehensively deals with general principles as well as research and innovation, ethical principles, a possible European Agency, Intellectual Property Rights and the flow of data, standardisation, safety and security, various categories of robots, education and employment and liability.This revolution can bring huge benefits to our societies – new jobs in research and innovation, robots performing dangerous tasks currently done by humans, lower risk of car accidents by excluding human error, and smarter energy consumption. However, we need to ensure that the robotic revolution does not bring about unemployment, destabilise our tax and social system and widen the gap between the rich and poor in our societies.
European Cloud Initiative (A8-0006/2017 - Jerzy Buzek)
It is crucially important to recognise the importance of making the European Union a centre for global research, gaining critical mass and creating clusters of excellence and I welcome the Open Science approach and the role it plays in building a European knowledge economy, and in further stimulating the quality of research and its development in the European Union. A specific focus should be given to SMEs in this context, creating the necessary legislative and administrative framework to allow them to prosper.I recommend the Commission to ensure that the EOSC benefits all regions of the Union, exploring the use of regional development funds for widening the initiative; I urge the Commission to present targeted steps which could genuinely enhance the involvement of all EU funds, in particular EFSI, in DSM—related projects, including data-sharing initiatives, digital accessibility, infrastructure and Union-wide digital connectivity.
Investing in jobs and growth - maximising the contribution of European Structural and Investment Funds (A8-0385/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij)
With a budget of EUR 454 bn for 2014-2020, the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs) are the EU’s main investment policy tool. During the financial and economic crisis, as well as thereafter, ESIFs are often the main /only public investment tool in the Member States. Maximising the impact of this investment tool therefore is essential.
Aviation Strategy for Europe (A8-0021/2017 - Pavel Telička)
This report covers important social issues, including measures to tackle precarious work, protecting the right to strike, health and safety, training and lifelong learning, preventing circumvention of social legislation, institutionalised social dialogue and the importance of all workers being aware of their rights throughout such a mobile sector.Aviation is a key industrial sector and economic driver in the European Union, making a major contribution to research and development, manufacturing and connectivity. I therefore welcome measures to keep the EU sector globally competitive while contributing to cross-border mobility in the internal market. It is crucial that future development of the sector takes place with environmental concerns, passenger rights, multimodality and strong social protection at its core.In particular, I support measures for improving market access and investment opportunities in growth economies through the conclusion of comprehensive air agreements with third countries, measures for improving connectivity, efficiency, capacity and a reduction in congestion, and for maintaining high EU standards.
Delayed implementation of ESI Funds operational programmes - impact on cohesion policy and the way forward (B8-0149/2017)
The ESI Funds investments are meant to contribute to reducing the economic, social and territorial disparities in the EU while helping to achieve EU2020 goals. As they are often the main/only investment source of public investments, the delay may negatively impact the achievement of the goals of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and job creation in the Member States. Such a delay is not only bad from the point of view of the objectives of the EU Cohesion policy as such but also for the ‘support’ of these programmes locally and regionally.
EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (A8-0009/2017 - Artis Pabriks)
I have consistently supported the conclusion and provisional application of CETA in order to ensure non-discriminatory access for all Europeans, including for Romanians, in the economic benefits of the agreement.CETA is an agreement progressive setting new standards in free trade agreements which will allow, in addition to the elimination of 98% of customs duties, to create economic opportunities and investments in Romania, while preserving public services and the right to regulate in the public interest.A key aspect is that CETA is the abolition of visas for all Romanian citizens, thanks to the commitment made by the Canadian authorities. Therefore, CETA adoption by the European Parliament is of particular importance in terms of positive implications for Romanian citizens.
Conclusion of the EU-Canada CETA (B8-0141/2017, B8-0142/2017, B8-0143/2017, B8-0144/2017, B8-0145/2017, B8-0146/2017)
I have consistently supported the conclusion and provisional application of CETA in order to ensure non-discriminatory access for all Europeans, including for Romanians, in the economic benefits of the agreement.CETA is an agreement progressive setting new standards in free trade agreements which will allow, in addition to the elimination of 98% of customs duties, to create economic opportunities and investments in Romania, while preserving public services and the right to regulate in the public interest.A key aspect is that CETA is the abolition of visas for all Romanian citizens, thanks to the commitment made by the Canadian authorities. Therefore, CETA adoption by the European Parliament is of particular importance in terms of positive implications for Romanian citizens.
EU-Canada Strategic Partnership Agreement (A8-0028/2017 - Charles Tannock)
Canada is a trusted friend and ally with whom we share our fundamental values, references, freedoms, and action for good across the world.The Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) aims to intensify this bilateral cooperation in areas such as foreign and security policy, counter-terrorism, the fight against organised crime, sustainable development, research and culture. This agreement will allow EU-Canadian relations to become even stronger, aid closer cooperation and increase people-to-people contacts for the shared benefit of citizens on both sides of the Atlantic.
EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0383/2016 - Helmut Scholz)
Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (Product Coverage Annex) (A8-0007/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
Signed by 32 parties and entered into force in 1980, the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (ATCA) eliminates import duties on all aircraft, other than military aircraft, as well as on all other products covered by the agreement - civil aircraft, all components and sub-assemblies of civil aircraft, and flight simulators. I am in favour of approving the proposed Protocol amending the Product Coverage Annex of the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017)
Considering the enormous danger that climate change is posing to our existence, and the fact that there are islands which are sinking while we are talking, I believe is our immediate responsibility to do whatever it takes to combat climate change.The ETS (emission trading scheme) is indeed a fundamental tool in our hands. I welcome the fact that in the DEVE Committee we have been called to give an opinion, as this ETS has important consequences on developing countries and communities. It is important to give a voice to the most impacted countries that are, at the same time, the least responsible for it.
2016 Report on Albania (A8-0023/2017 - Knut Fleckenstein)
I believe Albania has made good progress on its accession related reforms. It has notably embarked on a comprehensive judiciary reform process which has been a major demand by Albanian citizens. Albania should now ensure that the judicial and other key reforms are being implemented. The judiciary reform will allow Albania to move forward on other key priorities as well, such as the fight against corruption and organised crime. Accession negotiations should be opened as soon as there is credible progress on the implementation of the judicial reform. I welcome the inclusion, in the report, of the need to reinforce the legislative framework for protection of human and minority rights.Albania is on the right track, all political forces now need to assume their responsibilities, ensuring implementation of the reforms and offering a European future for the country.
2016 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0026/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I welcome this balanced report, as I support the start of consideration of Bosnia and Herzegovina's (BiH) EU membership application and the call for internal cooperation in order to have coherent replies to the Commission's questionnaire. Moreover, I fully support the European perspective of BiH, as it will lead to a common, peaceful future for all its inhabitants within the EU. We must continue to insist on the importance of the social dimension, on equal rights for all citizens and on the need to promote reconciliation and socially sensitive reforms. It is essential that reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina are promoted in a balanced manner, through transparency and dialogue with social partners, in a way that will lead to positive changes in the daily life of all citizens, by providing new jobs and by protecting effectively disadvantaged people in society.
Biological low risk pesticides (B8-0140/2017)
The use of conventional plant protection products is increasingly contentious, on account of the risks that they pose for human health and the environment. Biological low-risk pesticides may constitute a viable alternative to conventional plant protection products, for both conventional and organic farmers, and contribute to more sustainable agriculture.The health of EU citizens is of paramount importance and any pesticide that can directly or indirectly cause harm to human beings and the environment should not be allowed to be placed on the Union market. At the same time, European agriculture has to remain competitive and food security in Europe has to be maintained. European farmers are increasingly looking for alternatives to conventional pesticides, which are nevertheless not available on the market. That is why we need measures that help farmers to switch to more sustainable practices to minimise the risks for human health and the environment.
EU-Cook Islands sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (A8-0010/2017 - João Ferreira)
The agreement will have positive consequences on the conservation of resources, responsible and sustainable fishing, combating of IUU fishing, and upholding of human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law.This agreement does not present any problematic aspect, and the financial contribution will be used to promote sustainable fishing practices and to safeguard long-term productivity for Cook Islands local fisheries.
EU-Cook Islands sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (Resolution) (A8-0015/2017 - João Ferreira)
The agreement will have positive consequences on the conservation of resources, responsible and sustainable fishing, on combating of IUU fishing and upholding of human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law.This agreement does not present any problematic aspects, and the financial contribution will be used to promote sustainable fishing practices and to safeguard long-term productivity for Cook Islands local fisheries.
Control of the Register and composition of the Commission's expert groups (A8-0002/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
Expert groups play an important role in ensuring the smooth functioning of EU policies, but they must be properly monitored to ensure transparency and balanced composition. I welcome the manner in which the Commission engaged constructively with Parliament in drawing up its new rules for expert groups, and I hope that the messages from this report can be taken into account when implementing the reforms.
The role of whistleblowers in the protection of EU´s financial interests (A8-0004/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
List of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements (A8-0035/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
The association agreement would not give Denmark a full membership in Europol, but would allow certain types of cooperation and the exchange of information and personal data. The future association agreement with Denmark is only of a transitional nature and valid for only five years, during which time a legally sound way of association or membership must be found. I voted in favour of the proposal.
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance methyl 2-[[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-CHMICA) to control measures (A8-0024/2017 - Lorenzo Fontana)
Currently, 16 Member States control α-PVP under national legislation complying with the obligations of the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances, and five Member States use other legislative measures to control it. Subjecting this substance to control measures across the Union would help avoid the emergence of obstacles in cross-border law enforcement and judicial cooperation, and would help protect against the risks that its availability and use can pose.Taking into account the above, the new proposed approach will include expanding the proposed Directive based on Article 83 TFEU with the provisions on information exchange and the introduction of two categories of risk that the substance can pose (‘risk’ allowing to take further action at EU level and ‘no risk’ stopping further actions at EU level). In the event that the substance will be assessed harmful (‘risk’), the substance will be subject to the permanent control measure in the form of an EU-wide obligation to declare the substance illegal on the national level.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/005 NL/Drenthe Overijssel Retail (A8-0036/2017 - Nedzhmi Ali)
The application relates to 1 096 redundancies at several retail companies in the regions Drenthe and Overijssel in the Netherlands, operating in the economic sector classified under NACE Rev. 2 Division 47 (Retail trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles) during the reference period from 1 August 2015 to 1 May 2016.The EGF funding of EUR 1 818 750 shall contribute to the costs of a coordinated package of eligible personalised services, providing assistance for 800 targeted beneficiaries following redundancies in the NUTS level 2 regions of Drenthe (NL13) and Overijssel (NL21) with the aim of providing assistance for integrating the affected persons into the labour market. The redundancies were caused by major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation.
Revision of the European Consensus on Development (A8-0020/2017 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Norbert Neuser)
Against the backdrop of the new global challenges the world has to digest such as climate change, migration and security, the Committee on Development of the European Parliament today gave its green light on its priorities for the revision of the European Consensus on development.The Revision of the European Consensus on Development comes at a good moment to pave the way for guidelines that will serve as a framework for European Development policies for many years to come. The European Parliament’s resolution will serve as a basis for the negotiations with the EU institutions.We must ensure that poverty eradication and fighting inequality remains at the heart of the EU development policy including in the new Consensus. The EU and Member States should put their efforts towards the successful implementation of the Agenda 2020 and the Sustainable Development Goals.
Promoting gender equality in mental health and clinical research (A8-0380/2016 - Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea)
I believe we all agree on the fact that we must stand strong in fighting discrimination and promoting gender equality in all areas.Women have particular health concerns and needs, and are more vulnerable, especially in developing countries. Women’s different biological and physiological make-up requires proper information about the effects on drug on their bodies and I welcome the fact that many of my colleagues agree with me on this point. If health services are to meet the needs of both women and men, then sex differences need to be taken seriously in the planning and delivery of care.We must question and investigate the causes of inequalities in health status, health-related behaviour, access to health and treatment and offer effective answers. It seems that, especially in Least Developed Countries, the exclusion of women from biomedical research is often caused by lack of information and awareness campaign, their fulfilment of their role as mothers and caregivers and their lack of decision-making in the household.
Priorities for the 61th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0018/2017 - Constance Le Grip, Maria Arena)
By sending this strong message to the Council we will make sure that key priorities for reaching economic empowerment of women in the world are taken into account by the EU Council preparing the EU position of the UN Conference in NY. These are: gender equality and women’s rights as fundamental human rights; enhancing women’s economic empowerment by overcoming barriers on the labour market; women’s equal share in all levels of decision making; the involvement of the social partners and women’s organisations in decision making and to address the needs of the most marginalised women.These commitments must be translated into expenditure and become more visible.
Cross-border aspects of adoptions (A8-0370/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
Drawing up common minimum standards at European level is a means to ensure better cooperation between the authorities of Member States, as well as for facilitating adoption procedures. I welcome this proposal that sets non-legislative guidelines for best practices and the fact that the report stresses the need to focus mostly on the interest of the child, as evaluated on a case-by-case basis.I believe we have seen a good implementation of the Convention so far and I believe it is important to provide automatic recognition in all signatory states (which include all Member States of the European Union). However, I deplore the lengthy and costly procedures. Intensifying cooperation between national authorities is of the utmost importance. I believe we must set up an effective European network of judges and specialised authorities in order to facilitate coordination.
Bilateral safeguard clause and stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (A8-0277/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
I welcome the recommendation and I believe we must lay down as clearly as possible the procedures to guarantee the effective application of the bilateral safeguard clause and for applying the stabilisation mechanism for bananas as foreseen in the agreement in respect of Ecuador. We must be focused on calling on the Commission to provide a report assessing the EU banana market to be presented no later than one year before the expiry of the stabilisation mechanism, in cases where trigger volumes have been met. Moreover, I believe we must use a stronger language on adopting implementing acts that suspend preferential customs duty, and on receiving information regarding the development of banana imports to the EU well in advance. We must ensure the possibility of resorting to the extension of the applicability of the stabilisation mechanism or compensatory measures in cases where risks are identified.
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0377/2016 - Linnéa Engström)
. ‒ Human slavery and repeated IUU (illegal, unreported and unregulated) fishing still represent major problems in the fishing industry. This legislation is therefore extremely important because it revises the system of issuing and managing fishing authorisations. It is intended to improve monitoring and transparency in the EU external fishing fleet and to ensure its sustainable management. It applies to all EU vessels fishing outside EU waters, and to third-country vessels fishing in EU waters.Clearly we must ensure that a flag Member State may issue an authorisation for fishing activities outside Union waters only if the master of the fishing vessel concerned has not been subject to a sanction for a serious infringement during the 12 months prior to the application. Otherwise, we will not be able to guarantee the sustainability of our fishing vessels.
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (A8-0260/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
Georgia is a strategic partner for the EU in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy and in particular of the Eastern Partnership. The Association Agreement between the EU and Georgia signed in 2014 has brought relations to a new level by enhancing the cooperation in wide range of fields. The Association Agreement constitutes an integral part of the EU policy of a sequenced engagement with Georgia and its commitment to a close relationship that encompasses political association and economic integration. The visa liberalisation will contribute to the deepening of people-to-people contacts and will boost the economic and cultural relations among the EU and Georgia by intensifying political dialogue on various issues, including human rights and fundamental freedoms.With the adoption of this proposal of the Commission, we confirm the principle that every country after the successful fulfilment of all benchmarks can benefit from the visa liberalisation of the visa regime and recalls that the criteria which lead to this liberalisation must be continuously respected in the future after the entry into force of the decision.
Rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in Gabon (RC-B8-0120/2017, B8-0120/2017, B8-0121/2017, B8-0122/2017, B8-0123/2017, B8-0124/2017, B8-0125/2017, B8-0126/2017)
I strongly believe we must continue to play a leading role in the field of further developing partnership and cooperation with the African continent, and further promote democracy and the rule of law. Delegations from the European Parliament have been on several visits to Africa and specifically to the Democratic Republic of Congo in order to ensure better understanding of key developments issues at grass roots level.I welcome the measures taken by the EU Council, such as imposing targeted sanctions against some key authorities responsible for the violent crackdown and for undermining the democratic process in the DRC, and considering extending restrictive measures in the event of further violence.
Implementation of Erasmus + (A8-0389/2016 - Milan Zver)
. ‒ This year, Erasmus+ is celebrating its 30th anniversary. The first two-and-a-half years of programme implementation were difficult and improvements have been made in the meantime. However, many challenges must be addressed: visibility and awareness, bureaucratic obstacles across the project cycle, IT tools, evaluation of applications, the contacts between the Commission, national agencies, programme beneficiaries, representatives of civil society organisations and the EACEA.We must continue to ensure that Erasmus+ plays an important role in promoting social inclusion and intercultural dialogue, and fighting youth unemployment.I support the call not only for the current budget level to be secured for the next programme generation under the new Multiannual Financial Framework, but also for a budget increase in order to safeguard the programme’s success and enable those who currently cannot participate because of financial constraints to do so.
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement: procedures for its application (A8-0361/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld)
The EU-Kosovo stabilisation and association agreement paves the way for the future European path of Kosovo. In this context it is important that the agreement’s provisions are implemented in practice and that concrete steps are taken to develop Kosovo’s economy sustainably, particularly on integration into European value chains.The EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement entered into force on 1 April 2016 and it is now necessary to lay down rules for the implementation of certain provisions. This proposal for a regulation confers implementing powers on the Commission.The INTA report endorsed the proposal, while adopting some technical amendments. Our modifications have been accepted by the Council, which is why we can conclude the procedure at first reading.
Imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by specific Union import rules (A8-0311/2016 - Hannu Takkula)
The regulation to be amended establishes quotas for the level of textile imports from Belarus to the EU. The only other country covered by these rules is North Korea. In light of recent, though very modest, improvements in the human rights situation in the country, it is proposed to abolish the autonomous quotas for Belarus as symbolic encouragement for further political reform.This measure is economically insignificant, both for the EU and for Belarus because in the past textile imports have not reached the threshold. A rise in imports is not to be expected. Nevertheless, surveillance and safeguard measures will be maintained. The human rights situation in Belarus remains very bad, but isolating the country has not made any positive difference. The recent parliamentary elections saw modest improvements. Therefore, it is appropriate to consider abolishing the quotas as a purely symbolic gesture to encourage Belarus on its path to increasingly opening its society and political system.
Conclusion of the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Center (A8-0363/2016 - Elmar Brok)
The ISTC Continuation Agreement will ensure that ongoing and new projects continue with a changed membership, a broader geographical scope possibly including the Middle East region, and a set of updated objectives more specifically targeting dual-use knowledge. I gave my consent as I fully support measures aimed at preventing proliferation of know-how, technology and materials, as well as their means of delivery in this respect, in accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolutions, and G8 commitments, aimed at States and non-State actors attempting to acquire or use them.
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0001/2017)
The European Union has to remain in the forefront of the fight against money laundering, terrorism and corruption. Therefore, when the EU has decided to go ahead and issue a list of identified high risk third countries with strategic deficiencies regarding their legal framework for anti-money laundering/combating the financing of terrorism and criminal activities, then this list should reflect reality, and not be a political compromise as negotiated by the FATF.
Logistics in the EU and multimodal transport in the new TEN-T corridors (A8-0384/2016 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I strongly support this report, which highlights the need for a renewed EU strategy on freight logistics in order to tackle competiveness, sustainability and employment challenges in this key sector of the economy. I believe it is important to call on the Commission and Member States to make full use of the multimodal TEN-T infrastructure, and better coordinate its development. Particular action to be taken should also aim at further reducing regulatory, operational and technical barriers, ensure optimal use of resources, and facilitate the uptake of new technologies, including digital solutions, automated vehicles and drones in freight transport logistics. In addition, we must call for measures to help increase the sector’s attractiveness for new professionals, and to improve statistical information on intermodal transport and logistics performance.
A European Pillar of Social Rights (A8-0391/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues)
I strongly believe we have to make strong efforts in order to adapt our social security systems to the living and working conditions will Europeans have in the 21st century, ensuring that everyone has the necessary education and skills and providing a decent living wage, maternity leave, sick leave, pensions and childcare for all.The Single Market needs rules on decent working conditions in all forms of employment, so that all working people have basic rights regardless of the type of their contract. Decent national wage floors must be ensured in all EU countries. Secondary education should be compulsory and a Skills Guarantee should ensure that everyone has the skills needed in tomorrow’s economy. A Child Guarantee should ensure that every child at risk of poverty has free healthcare, childcare, education, adequate nutrition and decent housing. Public budgets must include enough public investment in people, such as in education and childcare.
Tackling the challenges of the EU Customs Code (UCC) implementation (B8-0024/2017)
A well-functioning Customs Union guarantees better access for consumers to safe goods and maximises trade opportunities for economic operators. I voted in favour of this report, as all S&D amendments are included, including the request to have an interim report by May 2017, achievable/deliverable targets which take account of the implementation calendar, the call to help via co-financing the establishment of a coherent electronic system based on an identical data model and common movement system. This resolution is part of a broader political dialogue at committee level. The Commissioner attended in 2016 a meeting dedicated to the Union Customs Code and on that occasion renewed its commitment and availability to continue this dialogue.
Major interpellations (3)
VP/HR - Recent state-terror activities by Iran in the EU PDF (53 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Fires in the European Union this summer PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Differences in declarations, composition and taste of products in central/eastern and western markets of the EU PDF (193 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Written questions (363)
Tackling the effects of illegal fishing PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Persistent human rights violations in Egypt PDF (42 KB) DOC (19 KB)
The use of digital technology to shorten food supply chains PDF (89 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Slow progress in tackling gender disparities PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Tackling lung cancer in Europe PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Sustainable recycling in the EU PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Conservation of the mako shark PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Higher level of protection from pesticides PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Students with disabilities PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Humanitarian innovation PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Humanitarian aid in Mali PDF (89 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Regulations on the protection of minors PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
E-invoicing in the European Union PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Cultural awareness in education PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Improving the inclusion of persons with disabilities in labour markets PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Food waste education and awareness-raising PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Food safety in the EU PDF (187 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Data access in the agriculture sector PDF (87 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Girls' education during humanitarian crises PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Human rights abuses PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
The Prüm Decision PDF (88 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Combating the grey economy PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Floods and landslides in Japan PDF (90 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Iceberg in Greenland PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Access to transport for persons with disabilities PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Water quality in the European Union PDF (186 KB) DOC (17 KB)
European Labour Authority PDF (88 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Ebola outbreak PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Equal opportunities through Erasmus+ PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Situation in Guatemala PDF (182 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Improving the safety of products sold online PDF (88 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Specific legislation for textiles PDF (183 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Situation in Derna PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Situation of human rights defenders in Brazil PDF (91 KB) DOC (16 KB)
EU school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme PDF (182 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Vaccination across the EU PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
eCall emergency call technology PDF (88 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Road toll should be used to finance the cost of trans-European transport infrastructure PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
New forms of work require efforts from all stakeholders PDF (88 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Additional measures to tackle unemployment PDF (185 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Ukraine not respecting human rights PDF (89 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Urban agriculture PDF (87 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Situation of human rights defenders in Honduras PDF (89 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Arbitrary detention in Sudan PDF (90 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Unaccompanied child migrants in the EU missing PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Health and care in the Digital Single Market PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
EU intelligence system PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Saving European biofuels PDF (89 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Migrant workers in Nepal PDF (91 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Roma children in the EU PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Slave auction in Libya PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Cyber insurance industry PDF (181 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Water reuse PDF (87 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Undocumented migrant women PDF (180 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Precision agriculture PDF (87 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Dynamic Currency Conversion across EU PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Collective redress for compensation to EU consumers PDF (87 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Increasing funding for organic farming PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Organic agriculture PDF (183 KB) DOC (18 KB)
TV news - the need for intervention PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Tackling child hunger in schools PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Promoting reading programmes in schools PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
The role of digitalisation in spurring economic growth and jobs PDF (87 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Children and young people facing abuse along Mediterranean migration routes PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Water contamination threatening the health of indigenous people in Peru PDF (90 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Unlawful detentions in Rwanda PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Refugee academics PDF (181 KB) DOC (18 KB)
EV pre-equipment provisions PDF (184 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Humanitarian assistance in Nepal PDF (87 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Statelessness PDF (181 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Enforced disappearances PDF (186 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Flooding in South Asia - the impact on education PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Cholera in Yemen - scaling up humanitarian funding PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Education for refugee children PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Volunteer tutors for unaccompanied refugee children PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Violence in Myanmar PDF (87 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Flood-hit Sri Lanka PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Energy poverty in the EU PDF (181 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Improving family care practices PDF (182 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Discrimination of Hindu minority in Pakistan PDF (186 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Cholera epidemic in Yemen PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Malnutrition and starvation in India PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Poverty of the Caribbean population PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
European Reference Networks PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Promoting cyberculture PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Water protection PDF (185 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Food waste PDF (185 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Myanmar/Burma PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Freedom of religion or belief: agenda for implementation PDF (183 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Poverty and social exclusion PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Mauritania PDF (186 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Mexico PDF (189 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Chad PDF (186 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Shark fin trade PDF (182 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Rural poverty PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) PDF (182 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Intensification of farming PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Motorcycle ban in Mali PDF (185 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Challenges of accessing the ESIF PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Protection of human rights in Thailand PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Harassment of a journalist in Azerbaijan PDF (90 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Detention of journalists in Uzbekistan PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
The Dinka-Nuer conflict and the ensuing humanitarian crisis in South Sudan PDF (98 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) PDF (99 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Kazakhstan PDF (187 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Recycling PDF (87 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Yemen PDF (89 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Myanmar/Burma PDF (89 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - India PDF (182 KB) DOC (15 KB)
The Gambia PDF (185 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Somalia PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Ethiopia PDF (89 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Refugees in Serbia PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - The death penalty in the Philippines PDF (184 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Libya PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
The severe drought in Somalia PDF (182 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Recovery plan for sharks PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Venezuela's humanitarian crisis PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
European Fund for Sustainable Development PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Amazon forest PDF (90 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Yemen PDF (187 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Mediterranean border PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Nigerians in urgent need of humanitarian aid PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
New transport technologies PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Review of dual-use export control PDF (184 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Paraguay PDF (187 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Kyrgyzstan PDF (187 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Congo PDF (186 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Displaced persons in Babille and Kubi districts (Ethiopia) PDF (185 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Vietnam PDF (187 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Humanitarian tragedy in Aleppo PDF (90 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Rohingya PDF (90 KB) DOC (15 KB)
EU reconstruction aid for Haiti in the wake of Hurricane Matthew PDF (195 KB) DOC (17 KB)
EU reconstruction aid to Haiti in the wake of Hurricane Matthew PDF (195 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR -Malawi PDF (185 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Malaysia PDF (187 KB) DOC (15 KB)
EU Emergency Support Instrument PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Protests against the mandatory liability insurance rates PDF (184 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Urgent need for food aid in Chiredzi PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Refugee children PDF (181 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Farmers in India PDF (182 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Encrypted communications across the EU PDF (179 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Oil glut and an oversupplied oil market PDF (87 KB) DOC (16 KB)
VP/HR - Drug trafficking in Indonesia PDF (186 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Influence of traffic-light food labelling on consumers' choices PDF (197 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Zimbabwe PDF (185 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Malawi PDF (183 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Brazil PDF (91 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Renewable energy PDF (89 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Poliomyelitis PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Kenya PDF (183 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Central African Republic PDF (91 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Humanitarian crisis in Lainya County, South Sudan PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Humanitarian crisis in Chad PDF (182 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights in Ethiopia PDF (188 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Child labour in Indonesia tobacco fields PDF (90 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights in Côte d'Ivoire PDF (188 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Air pollution - a major contributor to stroke PDF (88 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Resettlement plans in Israel PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Unaccompanied children claiming asylum PDF (87 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Increasing displacement in Iraq PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Idomeni camp PDF (88 KB) DOC (15 KB)
Humanitarian catastrophe in Deir ez-Zor PDF (88 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Colombia PDF (186 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Seabirds PDF (90 KB) DOC (16 KB)
Children affected by humanitarian crises PDF (184 KB) DOC (15 KB)
EU-US free trade deal PDF (183 KB) DOC (15 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights defenders in Honduras PDF (89 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Children poisoned in Nigeria PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Nahua indigenous tribe at risk of mercury poisoning PDF (91 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Escalation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict PDF (187 KB) DOC (18 KB)
VP/HR - Crisis in Côte d'Ivoire PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Security situation in Pakistan PDF (90 KB) DOC (17 KB)
VP/HR - Protection of minorities in Indonesia PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights situation in Crimea PDF (184 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Food insecurity in the Cameroon's far north region PDF (181 KB) DOC (25 KB)
VP/HR - Humanitarian situation in Sur District of Diyarbakir PDF (89 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Radicalisation in South Asia PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights in Ethiopia PDF (186 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Security at the Virunga National Park PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Sustainable textile supply chain PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Free Trade Agreement with Vietnam PDF (183 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Humanitarian crisis in Syria PDF (182 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Humanitarian crisis in Zimbabwe PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Humanitarian crisis in Pakistan PDF (183 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Humanitarian crisis in Haiti PDF (88 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Steel industry workers' protest PDF (182 KB) DOC (24 KB)
South Sudan PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Educational attainments PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Households at risk of poverty or social exclusion PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Access to the labour market for asylum-seekers and refugees PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Attacks by Boko Haram in Cameroon PDF (187 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Disappearances in Thailand PDF (188 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights in Kuwait PDF (186 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Focal points for democracy and human rights-related matters in EU Delegations PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Denmark and refugees possessions PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
United Kingdom in the EU PDF (180 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Mali PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Jordan PDF (183 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Access to Commission evaluation of the potential impact on jobs and investment in Romania and other Member States of changes made to the Renewable Energy Directive PDF (184 KB) DOC (26 KB)
VP/HR - Central African Republic PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Iraq PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
South Kivu PDF (186 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Incidence of premature deaths and the other health and social costs arising from traffic pollution PDF (186 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Consequences of attacks PDF (187 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Smart Borders Package PDF (88 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Financing of terrorist groups PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Somalia PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Burundi PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Myanmar PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Kenya PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Yemen PDF (88 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Support for victims of earthquakes in Afghanistan PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Protection of Sahrawi refugees PDF (88 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Accession of Turkey to the EU PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
WHO study on red meat consumption PDF (183 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Protection of indigenous communities in Mato Grosso, Brazil PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Russian military hardware in Syria PDF (186 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Demographic and ethnic impact of the wave of immigrants on the EU Member States PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Flood of immigrants from the Middle East in Romania and Bulgaria PDF (180 KB) DOC (22 KB)
Hosting in Romania of refugees from Africa and the Middle East PDF (87 KB) DOC (22 KB)
Measures to support farmers affected by drought in Romania PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Full implementation of Directive 2011/24/EU PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Links between prescribers and producers PDF (186 KB) DOC (25 KB)
The situation of micro hydro plants in Romania PDF (186 KB) DOC (26 KB)
Impact of the OLAF report on the management of European funds PDF (181 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Campaign to protect girls from being abducted by ISIS PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Family farm sustainability in Romania PDF (183 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Illegal logging of Romanian forests PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Copyright rights for orphan work PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Establishment of a framework for recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Security situation in Afghanistan PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Foreign investors in Europe PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The results of the Turkish elections PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Sanctions against Russia PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Russia's blacklist of European Union politicians PDF (183 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Nepal's long-term recovery plan PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Moratorium on the death penalty in Pakistan PDF (88 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Measures taken against Ukraine PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Statements by the Gambian President regarding rescues in the Mediterranean PDF (183 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Finnish budget for development cooperation PDF (89 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Freedom of journalism in Tajikistan PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
EU relations with The Gambia PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Bilateral trade and investment measures with regard to Brazil PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Security situation in Sudan PDF (91 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - North Korean workers in Mongolia PDF (91 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Hungary's discriminatory actions PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Integration of immigrants PDF (180 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Visa-free travel for Ukrainian citizens PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Integration of migrants from conflict zones PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The conflict with ISIS PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The eastern borders of the European Union PDF (86 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Financing for development PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Islamic State in Palmyra PDF (184 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Rohingya immigrants in Gambia PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The reintroduction of capital punishment in Hungary PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Turkey's accession to the EU PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Nepal earthquake PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Hungarian law against migration PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
100 days of Alexis Tsipras' government PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Fight against deforestation PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Targeted killings in Pakistan PDF (186 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Closing down of Dabaab refugee camp in Kenya PDF (183 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Disorder in Burundi PDF (90 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Abduction of girls in Nigeria PDF (91 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Measures to combat discrimination of migrants PDF (89 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Measures to deal with the migration crisis in the MediterraneanOn 20 April, the Commission announced fresh proposals to deal with the migration crisis in the Mediterranean. What specific measures does the Commission PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Official development assistanceThe EU Member States have pledged to increase official development assistance (ODA) to 0.7 % of their gross national income (GNI) by 2015. PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights violations in Pakistan PDF (185 KB) DOC (25 KB)
VP/HR - Abduction of Itai Dzamara in Zimbabwe PDF (185 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Daesh recruitment rings in Turkey PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Organ trafficking PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Lack of democracy in the Maldives PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Extremely polluting power plants in Kosovo PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Alternatives to the use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Human rights abuses in Côte d'Ivoire PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Withdrawal of the dossier on waste and recycling PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Adequate rules on rest time for commercial pilots PDF (185 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Acts of violence in Bangladesh PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The conclusions on EU support for sustainable changes in transition societies PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Joint action plan between Greece and Russia PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Follow-up to urgency resolution on human rights in Uzbekistan PDF (189 KB) DOC (25 KB)
VP/HR - Prosecution of war crimes in Syria PDF (99 KB) DOC (26 KB)
VP/HR - Political detainments in Congo PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Psychological checks on aeroplane pilots PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Financing of terrorism PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Daesh's crimes against humanity PDF (86 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Economic support for Tunisia PDF (86 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Tax for the use of German roads PDF (184 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Daesh terrorist attack PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Anti-terrorism legislation in Turkey PDF (183 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Gas attack in Syria PDF (90 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Situation in Vanuatu PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Torture in Russia PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Executions in Pakistan PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Security situation in Nigeria PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Macro-financial assistance for Ukraine PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Illegal logging PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Repressive legislation in Kenya PDF (185 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Iceland's suspension of EU accession talks PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
EU visa facilitation agreements with Ukraine and Russia PDF (178 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Human rights violations in Afghanistan PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The Lima Climate Change Conference PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The Lima Climate Change Conference PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Poverty risks in Member States PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Deployment of financial resources for humanitarian assistance in Africa PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Recycling in Member States PDF (89 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Diversification of European energy sources PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Sale of crowd-control and anti-riot equipment to third countries PDF (178 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Impact assessment on the expansion of the Suez Canal PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Recruitment of children by armed groups in Yemen PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Elections in Burkina Faso PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Elections in the Central African Republic PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Universal primary education PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Shale gas extraction in Europe PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Deployment of EU Battlegroups PDF (90 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Violence against students protesting in Burma PDF (183 KB) DOC (24 KB)
VP/HR - Disruption to EU-funded building by Israel PDF (179 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Discrimination of minorities in Iraq PDF (180 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Gender equality in access to education PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Human rights violations in Venezuela PDF (182 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Conflict in Ukraine PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Childcare facilities in Member States PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Child labour in Burkina Faso PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Democracy and human rights in Afghanistan PDF (90 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Rescue of migrants in the Mediterranean Sea PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Evictions in Tanzania PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Human rights situation in Sri Lanka PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Humanitarian assistance in South Sudan PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Destruction of wildlife habitat in Cameroon PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Roaming charges in the EU PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Contaminated water in Peru PDF (187 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Child marriages in Malawi PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Episodes of racism against Romanians in Italy PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Illegal ivory trade PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Climate Cooperation with the Government of India PDF (182 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Ebola PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Role of the Kurds in the fight against Islamic State/Daesh PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Climate Cooperation with the Chinese Government PDF (180 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty PDF (87 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Sustainable development in the Arctic PDF (181 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Eviction of families in Angola PDF (90 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - Migrant workers' human rights violations on Saadiyat Island PDF (186 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Situation of migrants from Yemen PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
VP/HR - World Cup in Qatar PDF (90 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Fight against tax Fraud PDF (182 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Humanitarian aid in Syria PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Proposal for a regulation on conflict minerals PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The promotion of Islamic State in the media PDF (88 KB) DOC (24 KB)
The regulation of the Swiss franc issue in Romania PDF (88 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The absence of indications of the country of origin of products imported from third countries PDF (186 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Measures for the protection of children left alone by their parents who work abroad PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Failure to comply with working conditions for Romanians in the region of Ragusa, Italy PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
The rule of law PDF (89 KB) DOC (25 KB)
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) PDF (197 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Stage reached in proceedings for approval of projects submitted by Romania to the Commission PDF (87 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Romania in the Schengen area PDF (177 KB) DOC (23 KB)
European border of the Black Sea with the Russian Federation PDF (86 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Flexibility in the Stability and Growth Pact - investment clause PDF (195 KB) DOC (26 KB)
VP/HR - Situation of Rohingya minority in Myanmar/Burma PDF (190 KB) DOC (25 KB)
VP/HR - Anti-terrorism intelligence agency PDF (91 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Romania's accession to the Schengen area PDF (184 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Individual motions (2)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on fighting discrimination based on race, religion and nationality PDF (254 KB) DOC (48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on food waste PDF (234 KB) DOC (46 KB)
Written declarations (23)
Amendments (1525)
Amendment 79 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Recital G
G. whereas corporations are one of the major players in economic globalisation, financial services and international trade and are required to comply with all applicable laws and international treaties in force, and to respect human rights; whereas these business enterprises may at times cause, or contribute to human rights violations, and affect the rights of vulnerable groups such as minorities, indigenous people, women and children or contribute to environmental problems; and whereas they may also have an important role to play in offering positive incentives in terms of promoting human rights, democracy, environmental standards and corporate social responsibility;
Amendment 110 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that globalisation and increasing internationalisation of business activities and supply chains make the role that corporations play in ensuring respect for human rights more important and create a situation in which international norms and rules, rules and cooperation are crucial to avoid human rights violations in third countries;
Amendment 115 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the NAP development process, if well designed and adjusted to the local context, can contribute not only to ensuring an efficient implementation of the UNGPs but also to the strengthening of national human rights protection mechanisms;
Amendment 117 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Reiterates the call for the UNGPs and other international corporate responsibility standards to be consistently raised by EU representatives in human rights dialogues with third countries;
Amendment 121 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Paragraph 3
3. Strongly supports the full implementation of the UNGPs within and outside the EU, and calls on the EU and Member States to elaborate and adopt an EU, respectively national action plans for the swift, effective and comprehensive implementation of the said Principles;
Amendment 152 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Paragraph 7
7. Warmly welcomes in this context the work initiated in the United Nations through the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) to create a binding UN instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights and considers this to be a necessary step forward in the promotion and protection of human rights;
Amendment 159 #
2018/2656(RSP)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls the need to adopt a gender- sensitive approach throughout the process and pay special attention to vulnerable groups such as indigenous people and children;
Amendment 1 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
Amendment 2 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
Citation 11
Amendment 3 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
Citation 14
— having regard to the 1972 EU- Switzerland Free Trade Agreement, which has been expandadapted and updated over the years3 , _________________ 33 OJ L 300, 31.12.1972, p. 189. OJ L 300, 31.12.1972, p. 189.
Amendment 4 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17
Citation 17
— having regard to the negotiations on an EU-Swiss Confederation electricity agreement, which began in November 2007on food safety and on public health,
Amendment 5 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19
Citation 19
— having regard to its resolutions on Switzerland, in particular of 7 Octo9 September 20105 on EEA-Switzerland: obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market6 , and to the draft motion for a resolution of its Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection on the same topic of 24 April 2018, _________________ 6 OJ C 308 E, 20.10.2011, p.18. OJ C 316, 22.09.2017, p.192.
Amendment 11 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas Switzerland has expressed its wish to leave binding material provisions on State aid for a future market access agreement and have access to the single market for electricity; whereas the Swiss Federal Council has announced a stakeholder consultation on the basis of the text agreed between the negotiators;
Amendment 12 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas on 28 September 2018 the Federal Council approved the second Swiss contribution to a number of EU member states of CHF 1.3 billion over ten years and is now awaiting a positive decision of the Federal Assembly;
Amendment 13 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas Switzerland is member of the European Environment Agency;
Amendment 14 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas Switzerland ratified participation in the European satellite navigation programmes Galileo and EGNOS;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas Switzerland participates in the EU MEDIA programme, which encourages the development of European film industry, vocational training and distribution of European films;
Amendment 16 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D e (new)
Recital D e (new)
De. whereas Switzerland’s participation in the EU’s Horizon 2020 research framework programme and its predecessor Framework Programme 7 (FP7) has been valuable to all parties involved due to the high quality of proposals;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas Switzerland and the EU signed a newn additional protocol to the Taxation and Savings Income Agreement on 27 May 2015, which requires that both parties automatically exchange information (AEI) on the financial accounts of each other’s residents from September 2018; whereas the EU listed Switzerland as ‘non- cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes’ in December 2017;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Switzerland cooperates in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and has participated in the civil and military peace missions of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), notably in Ukraine and Mali; whereas the EDA-Switzerland Framework for Cooperation signed in March 2012 enables exchange of information and foresees joint activities in research and technology and armament projects and programmes;
Amendment 20 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Amendment 21 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas based on the Dublin association agreement, Switzerland is associated to parts of the EU asylum acquis; whereas Switzerland has contributed financially and operationally to Frontex since 20109;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas in 2017, the Swiss population of 8.48 million included 2.13 million foreign nationals, 1.4 million of whom came from Member States of the EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA); whereas 320 000 EU citizens commute to Switzerland every day,; while 4ereas 750 000 Swiss nationals live abroad, of which 450 000 live in the EU;
Amendment 23 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas in 2009, Switzerland agreed to continue the 1999 bilateral EU- Switzerland Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP),which confers upon the Swiss and the EU member states’ citizens alike the right to freely choose their place of employment and residence within the national territories of the contracting parties;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas Switzerland introduced ‘flanking measures’ in 2002 with the stated aim of protecting Swiss wages, working conditions and social standards, which the EU considers to be disproportionate and discriminating against EU operators;
Amendment 26 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas Switzerland wishes to exclude takeover obligthe implementations of the EU’s cCitizenship and coordination of social security systems from the provisions of the institutional framework agreement Directive and EU citizens rights for social welfare benefits and rights of establishment have caused concerns in Switzerland;
Amendment 31 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) is based in Geneva;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O b (new)
Recital O b (new)
Ob. whereas Switzerland hosts 25 major international organizations and conferences as their worldwide headquarters, most of them in Geneva;
Amendment 33 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O c (new)
Recital O c (new)
Oc. whereas hundreds of international non-governmental organizations are based in Switzerland providing advice to the UN and other non-governmental organizations;
Amendment 34 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O d (new)
Recital O d (new)
Od. whereas Switzerland plans to hold Federal elections on 20 October 2019;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
b) stresses that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU, is a close-minded partner and shares European regional and global challenges with the EU; welcomes the Swiss statement that it is in its interest, and in the interest of the EU, to renew and consolidate the bilateral approach and to forge an ever- closer relationship;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
c) urges that the EU’s relations with its close partner, Switzerland, be elevated through the timely conclusion ofe conclusion of the bilateral Institutional framework agreement as soon as possible; welcomes the agreement by the negotiationors on the bilateral institutional framework agreement and highlights the potential to further intensify the relations that are already in placefinal text for the agreement; calls on the Swiss Federal Council to take a decision to conclude the agreement, as soon as the consultation of stakeholders has been positively concluded in this respect;
Amendment 44 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
d) stresses, alongside the Council, that the free movement of persons is a fundamental pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible; expresses regret at the disproportionate one-sided ‘flanking measures’ of Switzerland that have been in force since 20024; and invites Switzerland and the EU to come to a mutually acceptable agreement on the issueto seek a solution which is fully compatible with relevant EU instruments;
Amendment 49 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
e) underlines the fact that Switzerland should continue making a significant financial contribution in an effort to reduce economic and social disparities in the EU and welcomes the positive results of the contribution in the receiving Member States; recalls that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the Single Market; stresses that future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably along the practice set by EEA/Norway grants;
Amendment 53 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
f) suggestswelcomes the ongoing intense internal debate on cooperation with EU inside Switzerland; suggests, however, that Switzerland even better tries to explain to its citizens the tangible benefits they reap from having access to the internal market and a closer cooperation with the EU;
Amendment 55 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
g) urges that once concluded, the institutional agreement be submitted without delay to the European Parliament, the Member States, and the Swiss Parliament for approval, and a referendum by the Swiss electorate, in accordance with the Swiss constitution;
Amendment 57 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
h) notes that Switzerland has welcomed well over a million immigrants from1.4 million EU citizens live in Switzerland; whereas over 450 000 Swiss nationals live in the EU;
Amendment 60 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
j) acknowledges the contribution thato the close EU-Swiss partnership brings to the bilateral sectoral agreementsthat the bilateral sectorial agreements on Free movement of persons, pensions, MEDIA, environment, statistics, judicial and police cooperation, Schengen area, asylum (Dublin), the CFDP, satellite navigation, research, civil aviation, overland transport, reciprocal market access for agreed goods and services, processed agricultural goods, legal harmonization, mutual recognition, fight against fraud, and taxation and savings bring; urges, however, that it is time to elevate the partnership and take a much more comprehensive and substantial step in bilateral relations by concluding the framework agreement;
Amendment 67 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
m) acknowledges the Swiss contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration flows to the Schengen area and in the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration; regrets the decision ofthat Switzerland has not to signed up to the Global Migration Compact and expects it to sign the Compact following the debate in the Swiss Parliament;
Amendment 70 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
Paragraph 1 – point n
n) suggestcalls ion the context of the flanking measures, that the EU directive on the posting of workers could leave enough room for Switzerland to keepSwitzerland to take over relevant EU directives to maintain its current level of social protection and level of wages, when it comes to the cross-border offering of services;
Amendment 72 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
na) welcomes Switzerland joining the Europol joint cybercrime action taskforce (J-CAT) in April 2018, in the fight against international cybercrime threats in a proactive manner;
Amendment 74 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
Paragraph 1 – point p
p) urges the conclusion of negotiations on SwisSwitzerland to engage in negotiating its participation in the Erasmus+ programme;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2262(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
pa) welcomes progress in the construction of the transalpine rail link (NEAT);
Amendment 1 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Disarmament Agenda (‘Securing our Common Future’)4a, _________________ 4a https://front.un- arm.org/documents/SG+disarmament+ag enda_1.pdf
Amendment 2 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
Citation 1 b (new)
- having regard to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular SDGs 1, 16 and 17, aiming at the promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development4b, _________________ 4b https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
Amendment 6 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
Citation 12
— having regard to the Council conclusions of 13 November 2017 and, 25 June 2018 and 19 November 2018 on security and defence in the context of the EU Global Strategy,
Amendment 8 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas the EU ambitions to be a global actor for peace, striving for the maintenance of international peace and security and respect for international humanitarian and human rights law;
Amendment 11 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the challenging security environment surrounding the EU necessitates the provisions of instruments which enhance the EU’s ability to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security; whereas it is acknowledged that secured and peaceful societies are a pre-requisite for lasting development;
Amendment 16 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital 20 b (new)
Recital 20 b (new)
20b. whereas the EU is the world biggest provider of development and humanitarian aid, strengthening its security and development nexus towards achieving sustainable peace;
Amendment 20 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU has found it challenging in the past to finance operations with defence implications; whereas Parliament has repeatedly emphasised the need for funding that is more flexible and efficient and expresses solidarity; whereas additional instruments are necessary to ensure that the EU can play its role as a global actor; whereas any such instruments need to be subject to proper parliamentary control;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas internal and external security are increasingly intertwined; whereas the EU has taken significant steps to increase the cooperation between its Member States in the defence area; whereas the EU has always prided itself on its soft power and will keep doing so; whereas an evolving reality, however, requires the EU not to remain an exclusively ‘civilian power’, but to extend its hard power, since soft and hard power go hand in hand; whereas development in third countries is not possible without security and peace; whereas the military plays a key role in this, especially in countries where civilian authorities are unable to fulfil their tasks in the light of the security situation; whereas the European Peace Facility (EPF or the Facility) will lead to a stronger engagement of the EU towards partner countries and will increase the effectiveness of EU external action, allowing the EU to become in the future a global stability and security provider;
Amendment 39 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas operations carried out under the Facility shall comply with the principles and values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and respect for international humanitarian and Human Rights law; whereas operations which are not defined as ethically acceptable from the point of view of human safety, health and security, freedom, privacy, integrity and dignity, shall be thoroughly assessed and reconsidered;
Amendment 42 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the proposed average annual envelope for the EPF is EUR 1 500 000 000, while the combined spending under the Athena mechanism and the APF has fluctuated between EUR 250 000 000 and EUR 500 000 000 annually; whereas the potential purposes of the additional EUR 1 000 000 000 per year are notshall be adequately specified in the proposal; and shall seek to improve global peace, stability and security;
Amendment 44 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas as an off-budget mechanism financed through yearly contributions by Member States, based on a GNI distribution key, the EPF is expected to allow the EU to fund a higher proportion of the common costs (35-45 %) of military missions and operations, as is currently the case with the Athena mechanism; whereas the EPF is also expected to ensure that EU funding is available on a permanent basis, ensuring adequate programming for crisis preparedness and making rapid deployment easier and improving flexibility in case of rapid response; whereas the ambitious inclusion and expansion of the Athena mechanism for the common funding of CSDP missions and operations has been a long-standing demand of Parliament; whereas, however, the proposed Council Decision does not have the same binding character as the internal agreement of the APF, which means that Member States may opt out from funding EPF actions;
Amendment 48 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas all military tasks under the Facility, such as joint disarmament operations, humanitarian and rescue tasks, military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peacekeeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peacemaking and post-conflict stabilisation, the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories, with full respect of human rights, fall within the remit of the CSDP; whereas the exception of Article 41(2) TEU applies to the operating expenditure arising from those military missions only; whereas all other operating expenditure arising from the CSDP, including expenditure arising from any other action referred to in Article 42 TEU, should be charged to the Union budget; whereas the administrative expenditure of the EPF should be charged to the Union budget;
Amendment 53 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas military and civilian missions outside the Union need to be kept separate from each other in order to ensure that the civilian missions are further developed and funded from the Union budget only;
Amendment 56 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
Recital P
P. whereas the European Court of Auditors has published a special report on the African Peace and Security Architecture funded via the APF, which is proposed to be included and expanded in the EPF; whereas the Court finds that this support was poorly prioritised and had limited effect, which raises serious questions abereas the recommendations from the ECA shall be duly taken into account the proposed radicallyin view of the ambitious increased funding for the new Facility;
Amendment 57 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas the new Facility shall primary focus on capacity building;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Recital Q
Q. whereas the Commission did not submit a financial impact assessment regarding the administrative expenditure to accompany its proposal shall be submitted; whereas the administrative expenditure for the EPF has substantial implications for the EU budget; whereas no extra staff should be hired by or delegated to the EPF beyond the staff currently working on the instruments being replaced; whereas the synergies arising from bringing together the current distinct instruments in one administrative structure should facilitate managing the larger geographical scope of the EPF; whereas additional staff should only be recruited if and when the revenue for a mission or measure has been effectively collected from all participating Member States; whereas the time-limited character of the revenue calls for the contracts of staff recruited by the Facility or the secondments to the Facility for a particular mission or measure to have corresponding time limits; whereas no staff should be recruited by or seconded to the Facility from a Member State where it has made a formal declaration under Article 31(1) TEU for a particular mission or measure;
Amendment 60 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q a (new)
Recital Q a (new)
Qa. whereas adequate staff should be hired by or delegated to the EPF beyond the staff currently working on the instruments being replaced; whereas the synergies arising from bringing together the current distinct instruments in one administrative structure should facilitate managing the larger geographical scope of the EPF; whereas additional staff should only be recruited if and when the revenue for a mission or measure has been effectively collected from all participating Member States; whereas the time-limited character of the revenue calls for the contracts of staff recruited by the Facility or the secondments to the Facility for a particular mission or measure to have corresponding time limits; whereas no staff should be recruited by or seconded to the Facility from a Member State where it has made a formal declaration under Article 31(1) TEU for a particular mission or measure;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
R. whereas the VP/HR should regularly consult Parliament on all main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP and CSDP and their subsequent evolution; whereas Parliament should be consulted and informed in a timely manner to allow it to present its views and ask questions, to the VP/HR and the Council before decisions are made or decisive action is taken; whereas the VP/HR should consider Parliament’s views and incorporate them into his or her proposals, should reconsider decisions or parts of decisions that Parliament opposes, or withdraw such proposals, notwithstanding the possibility of a Member State advancing the initiative in such a case, and should propose Council decisions relating to the CSDP where invited by Parliament to do so; whereas the Parliament should have a yearly debate with the VP/HR on operations funded by the Facility;
Amendment 69 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to includelay down in the decision reference to Parliament’s role as discharge authoritythe powers of Parliament in terms of discharge according to Article 319 TEU, as is currently the case with the European Development Fund (EDF) and therefore for the APF, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the financial regulations applicable to the EDF, with a view to preserving the consistency of the EU’s external action in line with Article 18 (TEU);
Amendment 71 #
2018/2237(INI)
(c) to provide Parliament with access to all information, including original documents, regarding the EPF annual budget, amending budgets, transfers, action programmes (including during the preparatory phase), implementation of assistance measures (including ad hoc measures), agreements with implementing actors, and reports on the implementation of revenue and expenditure, as well as the annual accounts, the financial statement, the evaluation report and the annual report by the Court of Auditors;
Amendment 87 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 5
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 5
- to add a new subparagraph at the end of Article 26 as follows: ‘All civilian aspects, assets or missions under the CFSP and in particular under the CSDP, or parts thereof, shall be exclusively funded from the Union budget.’;
Amendment 92 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 8
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 8
- to amend Article 7 as follows: ‘Any Member State, the High Representative or the High Representative with the support of the Commission may submit proposals for Union actions under Title V TEU to be financed by the Facility. The High Representative shall inform the European Parliament immediatelyn a timely manner any such proposal.’;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10
- to add a new point 2a to Article 11: ‘2a. The facility shall have a liaison officer to the European Parliament. The liaison officer shall appear before the relevant parliamentary body before taking up his or her post, and subsequentlHead of the FPI shall have annual exchange of views with the relevant parliamentary body in order to provide regular briefings. on the Facility’;
Amendment 99 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 a (new)
- to amend Article 12.1 as follows: ‘A Facility Committee (hereafter “ the Committee”) composed of one representative of each participating Member State is established. Representatives of the European External Action Service (EEAS) and of the Commission shall be invited to attend the meetings of the Committee without taking part in its votes. Representatives of the European Defence Agency (EDA) may be invited to attend Committee meetings for items under discussion that relate to the EDA’s area of activity, without taking part in or being present at its votes. Representatives of the European Parliament may be invited to attend the Committee meetings without taking part in or being present at its votes.’; ;
Amendment 101 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 b (new)
- to amend paragraph 4 of Article 12 as follows: ‘The Committee shall approve the annual accounts and close them’;
Amendment 102 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 c (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 c (new)
- to amend paragraph 1 of Article 13 as follows: ‘The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, after informing the Committee, and after an exchange of views with the European Parliament relevant body, shall appoint an administrator for a period of three years.’;
Amendment 103 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 d (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 d (new)
- to amend paragraph 7 of Article 13 as follows: ‘The administrator shall coordinate work on financial questions relating to operations, assistance measures and other operational actions. He or she shall be the contact point with national administrations and, as appropriate, with the European Parliament and international organisations on these matters.’;
Amendment 104 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 11
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 11
- to add a new point 8a. to Article 13 as follows: ‘8a. The administrator shall be involved in briefinghave yearly exchange of views with the European Parliament relevant body.’;
Amendment 107 #
2018/2237(INI)
- to add a new point 8a. to Article 16 as follows: ‘8a. The operation commanders shall be involved in briefing the European Parliamenthave exchange of views with the European Parliament relevant body in a timely manner.’;
Amendment 108 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 a (new)
- to amend Article 34.1 as follows: ‘The administrator shall propose to the Committee the appointment of an internal auditor of the Facility, and at least one deputy internal auditor, for a period of four years, renewable up to a total period not exceeding 8 years. Internal auditors must have the necessary professional qualifications and offer sufficient guarantees of security, objectivity and independence. The internal auditor may not be either the authorising officer or accounting officer; he or she may not take part in the preparation of financial statements.’;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 b (new)
- to add a new paragraph 7a. to Article 47 as follows: ‘7a. Sale or transfer to the host country or a third party shall be in full compliance with the EU Common Position 944/2008/CFSP.’;
Amendment 112 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 c (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 c (new)
- to add a new paragraph 7b. to Article 47 as follows: ‘7b. Sale or transfer to the host country or a third party shall have been subject to adequate end-use checks and risk management evaluation.’;
Amendment 113 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 d (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 d (new)
- to amend paragraph 1 of Article 49 as follows: ‘Action Programmes shall be approved by the Council on a proposal from the High Representative. The European Parliament shall be informed of the approved Action Programmes once adopted by the Council.’;
Amendment 118 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 a (new)
- to amend paragraph 3 of Article 50 as follows: ‘Where a request falls outside the existing Action Programmes, the Council may approve an ad hoc assistance measure on a proposal from the High Representative. The European Parliament shall be informed of the approved ad hoc assistance measures once adopted by the Council;’
Amendment 120 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 b (new)
- to add a new point fa) to Article 52, paragraph 2 as follows: ‘fa) A detailed list of equipment funded under the Facility shall be made available;’
Amendment 122 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 14
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 14
- to amend point a1 of Article 54 as follows: ‘Any implementing actor entrusted with the implementation of expenditure financed through the Facility shall respect the principles of sound financial management and transparency and, shall have due regard forundertaken the necessary risk assessments and end-use checks, and shall ensure EU fundamental values and, international law, notably concerning human rights.’;
Amendment 132 #
2018/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point e
Paragraph 2 – point e
(e) to ensure, in line with Article 18 TEU, the complementary with existing EU funds, programmes and instruments, the consistency of the EPF with all other aspects of the EU’s external action, notably as regards the Capacity Building for Security and Development initiative (CBSD), which should in all cases be implemented in the framework of the wider security sector reform programme;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2204(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court’s recommendations;
Amendment 10 #
2018/2204(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, ESMA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2204(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Draws attention to the fact that the Authority’s budget is financed partly27% from European Union funds and partly42% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and supervised entities 29% from fees received from supervised entities (Credit Rating Agencies and Trade Repositories) and 2% from others sources, and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding.
Amendment 2 #
2018/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
Amendment 4 #
2018/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines the central role of the Authority in contributing to a high quality common regulatory and supervisory standards and practices, to the consistent application of legally binding Union acts, to stimulate and facilitate the delegation of tasks and responsibilities among competent authorities, to monitor and access market developments within the scope of its competence and to foster the protection of policy holders, pension scheme members and beneficiaries.
Amendment 5 #
2018/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Emphasises the need of a closer supervision in certain Member States with the view of addressing vulnerabilities in the insurance markets of those Member States and protecting consumers from unfair practices of multinational insurance companies, such as selling in some parts of Europe, namely in Central- Eastern Europe, insurance products of lower quality than in other MS.
Amendment 9 #
2018/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should carefully adhere to the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court’s recommendations;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EIOPA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Draws attention to the fact that the Authority’s budget is financed partly40% from European Union funds and partly60% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding. , as only sufficient financial resources would allow the Authority to fulfil its mandate consistently, independently and efficiently, with a view to making the financial markets more secure and protecting European consumers more effectively;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Banking Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
Amendment 5 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines the central role of the Authority in ensuring better oversight of the Union financial system to ensure financial stability, the necessary transparency, a better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union, in particular by coordinating an enhanced supervision over national supervisory authorities
Amendment 12 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EBA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well; expects the Authority to publish the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups more swiftly.
Amendment 18 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need to allocate more resources to anti-money laundering tasks to fulfil the Authority’s oversight functions and inquiries into national institutions; urges the Authority to ensure that competent authorities and credit and financial institutions apply the European Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation effectively and consistently; asks the Authority to develop common guidance in exchange with ESMA and EIOPA on how to integrate AML/CFT risks in prudential supervision;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasizes that the Authority’s budget is financed partly40% from European Union funds and partly60% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding., that would allow the Authority to fulfil its mandate consistently, independently and efficiently;.
Amendment 25 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights that the Authority will leave the United Kingdom in 2019, and draws attention to its budgetary implications; notes that its accounts and notes have been drawn up using the information available at the time of signing the accounts and draws the attention to its budgetary implications; mentions that on 20 November2017, the General Affairs Council of the European Union agreed to move the seat of the Authority to Paris, France and acknowledges that removal is planned for the beginning of 2019 and the Authority’s accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to 6,7 million euros and disclose 11,2 million euros remaining future contractual payments as scheduled for the Office in London.
Amendment 28 #
2018/2202(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes that, the Court observed some weaknesses in public procurement, mostly relating to services that lack of adequate balance between price and quality aspects; highlights that such procedures indicate that the Authority puts an over-emphasis on quality criteria and do not allow the identification of the most economically advantageous solutions, which should show a fair balance between quality and price.
Amendment 89 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights that close to 40 % of MNEs’ profits are shifted to tax havens globally each year25 ; _________________with some European Union countries appearing to be the prime losers of profit shifting, because 35% of shifted profits come from EU countries, followed by developing countries (30%)1a; deplores that Ireland is the number one shifting destination, followed by Singapore, the Netherlands, Caribbean tax havens and Switzerland1b; deplores furthermore that about 80% of the profits shifted within the EU are shifted to the EU tax havens, primarily Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands1c; [3] _________________ 1a Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 1b Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 1c Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘Themissing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 25 Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018.
Amendment 170 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Stresses that between 1985 and 2018, the global average statutory corporate tax rate has fallen from 49% to 24%1a ; notes that nominal corporate tax rates have decreased by 46% since 2000 at EU level –from an average of 32% in 2000 to 21,9% in 20181b; is concerned about a growing race to the bottom on nominal corporate tax rates at both international and EU levels; regrets that international tax reform such as G20/OECD led BEPS project did not touch upon this unfair tax competition; calls for a second set of international tax reforms aiming at tackling tax competition among countries and ensuring a fair allocation of taxing rights; underlines it is necessary to give a greater role to the UN Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters in the next reform of international tax rules; _________________ 1a Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘Themissing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 1b Taxation trend in the EU, Table 3:Top statutory corporate income tax rates (including surcharges), 1995- 2018,European Commission 2018
Amendment 214 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the provisions on Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) included in ATAD I to ensure that profits made by related companies parked in low or no-tax countries are effectively taxed; acknowledges that they prevent the absence or diversity of national CFC rules within the Union from distorting the functioning of the internal market beyond situations of wholly artificial arrangements as called for repeatedly by Parliament; deplores the coexistence of two approaches to implement CFC rules in ATAD I and calls on Member States to implement only the simpler and most efficient CFC rules as in ATAD I Article 7(2)(a); asks the European Commission to make a legislative proposal reinforcing CFC rules, including a criteria on an actual corporate tax paid on profits lower than 18%;
Amendment 218 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the general anti-abuse rule for the purposes of calculating corporate tax liability included in ATAD I, allowing Member States to ignore arrangements that are not genuine and having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances aimed at obtaining a tax advantage; reiterates its repeated call for the adoption of a general and common anti- abuse rule, namely in existing legislation and in particular in the parent-subsidiary directive, the merger directive and the interest and royalties directive; calls on Member States to consider a general anti- abuse rule including a minimum effective tax rate of 18%;
Amendment 244 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Recognises that the new flow of information to tax authorities following the adoption of ATAD I and DAC4 creates the need for adequate resources to ensure the most efficient use of such information and to effectively reduce the current tax gap; calls on all Member States to evaluate if the tools of the authorities are sufficient and adequate to use this information; points out the importance of combining different sets of information in order to identify patterns which indicate suspicious activity and can thereby help to discover financial crimes, tax evasion or tax avoidance;
Amendment 271 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32 a. Calls on the Council, assisted by the European Commission, to define a comprehensive and exhaustive list of potential harmful tax practices within the EU, to be updated every year; demands that criteria aiming at identifying harmful tax practices include, notably, schemes allowing for a large deduction of corporate income tax without benefiting the real local economy;
Amendment 284 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Welcomes the re-launch of the CCCTB project in a two-step approach, with the Commission’s adoption of interconnected proposals on CCTB and CCCTB; calls on the Council to swiftly adopt them,stresses that once implemented fully, the CCCTB will make it possible to attribute income to where the value is created and will eliminate loopholes between national tax systems, in particular transfer pricing; calls on the Council to swiftly adopt and implement the two proposals side by side taking into consideration Parliament’s opinion that already includes the concept of virtual permanent establishment that would close the remaining loopholes allowing tax avoidance to take place and level the playing field in light of digitalisation;
Amendment 300 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that the phenomenon of digitalisation has created a new situation in the market, whereby digital and digitalised companies are able to take advantage of local markets without having a physical, and therefore taxable, presence in that market, creating a non-level playing field and putting traditional companies at a disadvantage; notes that digital businesses models in the EU face a lower effective average tax burden than traditional business models31 ; deplores that digital businesses pay almost no taxes in some Member States despite their significant digital presence and large revenues in those Member States; reminds that, when it comes to the digitalisation of the whole economy, the location of the value creation should take into account the input from users as well as information collected on consumers' behaviour online; _________________ 31 As evidenced in the impact assessment of 21 March 2018 accompanying the digital tax package (SWD(2018)0081), according to which on average, digitalised businesses face an effective tax rate of only 9.5 %, compared to 23.2 % for traditional business models.
Amendment 339 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 b (new)
Paragraph 36 b (new)
36b. Calls on Member States to ensure that the ‘Digital Services Tax’ remains a temporary measure by including a ‘sunset clause’ to the proposal for a Council Directive on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services and by speeding up the discussion on a Significant Digital Presence1a ; _________________ 1a Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence COM(2018) 147 final
Amendment 407 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to create a mandatory standardised public European Business Register in order to gain up-to-date and trustworthy information on companies and to achieve transparency via cross- border access to comparable and reliable information of companies in the EU;
Amendment 425 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49 a (new)
Paragraph 49 a (new)
49a. Deplores the fact that companies can make agreements with governments to pay almost no tax in a given country despite conducting substantial activity; points in this light to a tax ruling between the Dutch tax revenue authority and Royal Dutch Shell plc that seems to be in violation of Dutch tax law on the sole ground that the head office would be located in the Netherlands after the unification of the two former parent companies, which results in an exemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax, while at the same time recent investigations seem to show that the company pays no profit tax in The Netherlands either; reiterates its call on the Commission to investigate this case of potential illegal state aid;
Amendment 444 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
Paragraph 52
52. Notes that there is no single definition of letterbox companieHighlights that companies create cross-border operations and corporate constructions including artificial arrangements in order to avoid or circumvent national tax law; stresses that company mobility should not lead to forum shopping; notes that there is no single definition of letterbox companies; reiterates its call for a clear definition; stresses that the requirement of genuine economic activity in the destination Member States can prevent the creation of a letterbox company through a cross- border operation, as proposed in the draft report for the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 as regards cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions;
Amendment 519 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 65 a (new)
Paragraph 65 a (new)
65a. Welcomes that a VAT Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS) on telecommunications, broadcasting and electronic services was introduced in 2015 as a voluntary system for registration, declaration and payment of VAT; welcomes the extension of the MOSS to other supplies of goods and services to final consumers as of 1 January 2021;
Amendment 555 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75
Paragraph 75
75. Points, however, to the need for better cooperation between the administrative, judicial and law- enforcement authorities within the EU, as highlighted by experts during the hearing held on 28 June 2018 and in a study commissioned by the TAX3 Committee; calls on the EPPO, OLAF, Eurofisc, Europol and Eurojust to closely cooperate with a view to coordinating their efforts against VAT fraud and to identifying and adapting to new fraudulent practices;
Amendment 708 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 102
Paragraph 102
102. Calls on the Commission to table a legislative proposal to ensure the automatic exchange of information between the relevant authorities, including tax and customs authorities, on beneficial ownership and relevant transactions for taxation purposes taking place in free ports, customs warehouses or SEZs;
Amendment 747 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 110 a (new)
Paragraph 110 a (new)
110 a. Welcomes the Action Plan adopted by the Council on the 4th of December 2018, including several non-legislative measures to better tackle money laundering and terrorist financing in the EU; requests the Commission to regularly update the Parliament on the progress of the implementation of the Action Plan;
Amendment 748 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 110 b (new)
Paragraph 110 b (new)
110 b. Is concerned by the absence of concrete procedures to assess and review the probity of members of the governing council of the European Central Bank, in particular when they are formally accused of criminal activity; calls for mechanisms to monitor and review the conduct and propriety of the members of the governing council of the European Central Bank and to protect them in case of abuse of power by the authority that has the appointment power;
Amendment 759 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 a (new)
Paragraph 112 a (new)
112 a. Notes the positive results of the UK law establishing the Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) in tracking proceeds of criminal activities; highlights that a UWO is a court order that requires a person who is reasonably suspected of involvement in, or of being connected to a person involved in, serious crime to explain the nature and extent of their interest in particular property, and to explain how the property was obtained, where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the respondent’s known lawfully obtained income would be insufficient to allow the respondent to obtain the property; calls on the Commission to assess the feasibility of proposing a similar measure through EU legislation and report back to Parliament;
Amendment 762 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 b (new)
Paragraph 112 b (new)
112 b. Welcomes the decision in some Member States to ban the issuing of bearer shares and to convert the current ones into nominal securities; reiterates its call on the Commission to propose EU- wide legislation to the same effect;
Amendment 763 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 c (new)
Paragraph 112 c (new)
112 c. Stresses the urgent need to create a more efficient system for communication and information exchange among judicial authorities within the EU, replacing the traditional instruments of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, which provide lengthy and burdensome procedures harming investigations of money laundering and other serious crimes; reiterates its call on the Commission to assess the need for legislative action in this field;
Amendment 764 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 d (new)
Paragraph 112 d (new)
112 d. Calls on the Commission to assess and report to Parliament about the role and particular risks presented by legal arrangements such as Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) and Non Charitable Purpose Trusts (NCPTs) in money laundering, particularly in the UK, and Crown Dependencies and Overseas territories;
Amendment 806 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 121 a (new)
Paragraph 121 a (new)
121 a. Notes that the recent scandals affecting banks in Malta, Latvia, Estonia, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark reveal the failure of supervision by national anti-money laundering authorities; highlights, at the same time, that ESAs have limited abilities to take a more substantial role in the anti-money laundering field due to tight resources coupled with a lack of appropriate powers;
Amendment 825 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 125 a (new)
Paragraph 125 a (new)
125 a. Notes the concerns expressed by the EBA with regards to the implementation of the Directive 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms1a; welcomes the suggestions made by the EBA to tackle the deficiencies caused by the current Union legal framework; _________________ 1a https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/101 80/2101654/Letter+to+Tiina+Astola+on+t he+request+to+investigate+a+possible+B UL+under+Article+17+of+Regulation+% 28EU%29%20No+10932010+- +24092018.pdf
Amendment 827 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5.2
Subheading 5.2
Cooperation between financial intelligence units (FIUs) and law enforcement
Amendment 833 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 126 a (new)
Paragraph 126 a (new)
126 a. Highlights that the fight against money laundering and tax evasion also requires good cooperation between FIUs and customs authorities;
Amendment 858 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 129 a (new)
Paragraph 129 a (new)
129 a. Notes the Commission’s assessment of the framework for FIUs’ cooperation with third countries and obstacles and opportunities to enhance cooperation between FIUs in the Union including the possibility of establishing an EU level coordination and support mechanism; recalls that according to the AMLD5 this assessment should be ready by 1 June 2019; asks the Commission to consider this opportunity to make a legislative proposal for a EU Financial Intelligence Unit, creating a hub for joint investigative work and coordination, with its own remit of autonomy and investigatory competences on cross border financial criminality, and an early warning mechanism;
Amendment 863 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 129 b (new)
Paragraph 129 b (new)
129 b. Calls on the Commission to draw up a report assessing the necessity of uniformisation or harmonisation of the organisational status conferred to FIUs in Member States, to ensure better cooperation and exchange of information, without interfering with their independence;
Amendment 864 #
2018/2121(INI)
129 c. Calls on the Commission to propose legislation for the creation of a European Financial Police within the framework of Europol, with its own autonomous investigatory competence, based on the European legal framework to tackle cross-border tax fraud, money laundering, financing of terrorism and predicate offences;
Amendment 870 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 131 a (new)
Paragraph 131 a (new)
131 a. Takes note of the repeated calls from obliged entities, namely financial institutions, for proper channels of enhanced dialogue, communication and exchange of information between private bodies and public authorities, on one hand, and among obliged entities themselves, on the other, to provide less fragmented information to FIUs; calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines in accordance with the AMLD5, for Member States to implement at national level in this regard, namely using the mechanisms provided in the General Data Protection Regulation for secure and lawful exchange of data;
Amendment 881 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 133 a (new)
Paragraph 133 a (new)
133 a. Calls on Member States to ensure that registers of beneficial owners contain verification mechanisms to ensure the accuracy of the data; calls on the Commission to make assessment of verification mechanisms and reliability of the data in its reviews;
Amendment 920 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 140 a (new)
Paragraph 140 a (new)
140 a. Urges the Commission to lead on creating a global framework regulating virtual currencies which takes into consideration the risks of these new technologies; recalls the dangers posed to consumers by Initial Coin Offerings (ICO’s) and urges the Commission to enact a proposal for their regulation as financial operations; notes in particular that cryptocurrencies' opacity can be used to facilitate money laundering and tax evasion; calls on the Commission to draft legislative proposals to ban certain anonymity measures on specific cryptocurrencies, on a case-by-case basis;
Amendment 949 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 148
Paragraph 148
148. Recognises the effort made by some third countries to act decisively against BEPS; stresses, however, that such reforms should remain in line with existing WTO rules; considers the information gathered during the committee visit to Washington DC about the US tax reforms and their possible impact on international cooperation to be of particular importance; finds that some of the provisions of the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 would be incompatible with existing WTO rules according to some experts regrets certain provisions of the US tax reform seek, unilaterally and without any reciprocity, to revitalise transnational benefits attributable to US territory (presuming that these are generated, at least 50%, in US territory); welcomes the fact that the Commission is currently in the process of assessing the potential regulatory and commercial implications of, in particular, the BEAT, GILTI and FDII78 provisions of the new US tax reform; asks the Commission to inform Parliament of the results of the assessment; _________________ 78 Respectively ‘Base Erosion and Anti- Abuse Tax’ (BEAT), ‘Global Intangible Low Tax Income’ (GILTI) and ‘Foreign- Derived Intangible Income’ (FDII).
Amendment 1000 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 154 c (new)
Paragraph 154 c (new)
154 c. Notes that developing countries might not possess the resources to implement newly agreed international or European tax standards and /or might have more urgent tax gap issues to tackle to ensure they generate sufficient revenues to provide for essential public services; subsequently calls on the Council to exclude counter measures such as cuts in development aid;
Amendment 1005 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 154 g (new)
Paragraph 154 g (new)
154 g. Notes the current negotiations between the EU and Switzerland towards a Framework Agreement; stresses its view that the EU should renegotiate its trade, economic and other relevant bilateral agreements with Switzerland to bring them into line with EU anti-tax fraud policy and anti-money laundering legislation, so as to eliminate serious flaws in the Swiss supervisory system which enable a policy of internal banking secrecy to continue, as well as the creation of offshore structures worldwide, tax fraud and tax evasion not constituting a criminal offence, weak supervision, the inadequate self-regulation of obliged entities, and aggressive prosecution and harassment of whistle-blowers;
Amendment 1021 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158
Paragraph 158
158. Reiterates its call for the EU to have a leading role in the global fight against tax evasion, aggressive tax planning and money laundering, in particular through Commission initiatives in all related international forums; calls on the EU as a member of the G20 to aim for that forum to undertake a strong action against tax competition;
Amendment 1041 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 160 a (new)
Paragraph 160 a (new)
160 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to push for a second set of international tax reform gathering all countries interested on an equal footing and aiming at tackling the growing corporate tax race to the bottom and the allocation of taxing rights;
Amendment 1097 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 b (new)
Paragraph 170 b (new)
170 b. Notes that some tax treaties allow the development of potential harmful tax schemes, such as the ‘SingleMalt’ 1awhich directs profits to countries with which Ireland has a double taxation agreement but that do not have any corporation tax; asks the European Commission to investigate such schemes and assess if they constitute an abuse of tax treaties; _________________ 1a Christian Aid, ‘Impossible’ structures: tax outcomes overlooked by the 2015 tax Spillover analysis, Part Two, 2017 https://www.christianaid.ie/sites/default/fil es/2018-02/impossible-structures-tax- report.pdf
Amendment 1102 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 171 a (new)
Paragraph 171 a (new)
171 a. Asks Member States to renegotiate their bilateral tax treaties with third countries with the aim of introducing anti-abuse clauses, preventing ‘treaty shopping’ and a race to the bottom among developing countries;
Amendment 1103 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 171 b (new)
Paragraph 171 b (new)
171 b. Reiterates its call on the European Union and its Member States to ensure that, when negotiating tax and investment treaties with developing countries, income or profits resulting from cross-border activities be taxed in the source country, where value is extracted or created; stresses, in this regard, that the UN Model Tax Convention ensures a fairer distribution of taxing rights between source and residence countries; stresses than when negotiating tax treaties, the European Union and its Member States should comply with the principle of policy coherence for development established in Article 208 TFEU;
Amendment 1132 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 177
Paragraph 177
177. Welcomes the broad definition of both ‘intermediary’ and ‘reportable cross- border arrangement’ in the recently adopted DAC683 ; _________________ 83stresses that the relevant information in relation to potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements should also be accessible to the general public; _________________ 83 OJ L 139, 5.6.2018, p. 1. OJ L 139, 5.6.2018, p. 1.
Amendment 1149 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 a (new)
Paragraph 178 a (new)
178 a. Calls for a rotation of auditors every 7 years to prevent conflicts of interests and the limitation of the provision of non-audit services to a minimum;
Amendment 1152 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 b (new)
Paragraph 178 b (new)
178 b. Reiterates that intermediaries play a crucial role in facilitating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and should beheld accountable for these actions;
Amendment 1158 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 179 a (new)
Paragraph 179 a (new)
179 a. Points out that professional secrecy cannot be used for the purposes of protection, the covering up of illegal practices or violating the spirit of the law; urges that the client/attorney privilege principle should not impede adequate STRs or the reporting of other potentially illegal activities without prejudice to the rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the general principles of criminal law; calls on the Commission to issue guidance on the interpretation and application of the legal privilege principle for professionals and to introduce a clear demarcation line between traditional judicial advice and lawyers acting as financial operators, in line with case-law of European courts;
Amendment 1159 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 179 b (new)
Paragraph 179 b (new)
179 b. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibilities of blacklisting financial and non-financial intermediaries based in the EU which operate branches in countries blacklisted as non-cooperative jurisdictions or which are listed as high risk third countries by the Commission; Suggests further that intermediaries should be restricted from operating in the single market if convicted of financial crimes or of facilitating tax evasion;
Amendment 1167 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 180 a (new)
Paragraph 180 a (new)
180 a. Calls for a general EU fund to be set up to give appropriate financial support to whistle-blowers whose livelihood is put at risk as a result of disclosures of criminal activity or facts with clear public interest;
Amendment 1174 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 181 a (new)
Paragraph 181 a (new)
181 a. Is concerned by the impact of non- disclosure agreements in employment contracts and dismissal agreements, particularly in the financial sector; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of proposing legislation banning abusive non-disclosure agreements and declared void agreements which limit the employee’s ability and right to report unlawful activity;
Amendment 1207 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 188 a (new)
Paragraph 188 a (new)
188 a. Highlights that trade unions should have a greater role in the negotiation of whistleblowing policies and channels in the workplace; calls on Member States to allow, in national law, for whistle-blowers to report wrongdoing to a union representative if they feel they cannot report it internally;
Amendment 1224 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 194 a (new)
Paragraph 194 a (new)
194 a. Notes that no EU Member States were included on the EU list of non- cooperative jurisdictions as EU Member States were not assessed; welcomes the declaration from the Chair of the Code of Conduct Group indicating that Member States could be assessed in the future1a; demands that such assessment is conducted without any further delay; _________________ 1a “The fact of screening the EU Member States with the same criteria is exactly what is under discussion in the context of the revision of the mandate of the Code Group that currently the Austrian Presidency of the Council is taking forward.” Exchange of views with Fabrizia Lapecorella, Chair of the Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation, European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/1 55396/TAX3%20Verbatim%2010%20Oct ober%202018_OR.pdfOct 2018
Amendment 1233 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 199 a (new)
Paragraph 199 a (new)
199 a. Reiterates its call for the creation of an EU Tax Policy Coherence and Coordination Centre (EUTPCCC) within the structure of the Commission1a,which would ensure effective and expeditious cooperation between Member States’ and facilitate early warning in cases like the Cum Ex scandal; urges Member States to support this call and for the Commission to present a legislative proposal for such a mechanism; _________________ 1a European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2016 on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (2016/2038(INI))
Amendment 1280 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 207
Paragraph 207
207. Takes the view that the work of the TAXE, TAX2, PANA and TAX3 committees should be continued, in the forthcoming parliamentary term, in a permanent structure within Parliament such as a subcommittee to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON), including Members from a diverse range of committees; considers that the Commissioner for Taxation, the Chair of the CoC Group and the Finance minister holding the rotating EU presidency should appear at least twice a year before the heretofore mentioned permanent structure;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s Mid- Term Evaluation of the EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP); welcomes the fact that the new regulation has seen an increase in exports from beneficiaries of the Everything But Arms (EBA) and GSP+ arrangements, which is an important stepcontribution towards poverty eradication; notes that the focus on fewer beneficiaries under the 2012 regulation should further contribute to this aim;
Amendment 4 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasize that EU’s trade policy must be built on the principles of EU external policy (effectiveness, transparency and values); whereas Article 208 of the TFEU establishes the principle of policy coherence for development and sets the eradication of poverty as the main objective;
Amendment 8 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines that the GSP+ is a key to the EU trade policy instrument which provides better market access and is accompanied by astringent monitoring mechanism to promote human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance in vulnerable developing countries;
Amendment 10 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with satisWelcomes the faction that the preference utilisation rate for EBA beneficiaries is high, meaning the potential benefit for the world’s poorest countries is also high; stresses; recalls that market- access alone is not enough to reduce poverty and inequalities; stresses therefore that EBA should be complemented with development aid as well as trade-related assistance and capacity-building if it is to become more usefuleffective; notes in particular that greater effort is needed to tackle issues such as land grabbing and environmental degradation in the context of EBA;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the fact that GSP has contributed to social development and human rights, in particular employment of women, implementation of good governance practices and ratification of core ILO conventions; urges the Commission to intensity dialogue with partner countries on these issues in order to ensure continuous progress; stresses the importance of continued engagement and monitoring, together with thegreater participation of civil society in these processes;
Amendment 20 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Expects the GSP mid-term review to encourage more the EU’s trade partners to adopt higher social, labour and environmental standards, which could be achieved through incentives such as additional tariff preferences for sustainably produced products;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Recalls that GSP is an incentive- based regime which must be used consistently in order to effective; regrets that investigations into alleged non- compliance with the requirements on human rights and labour standards have not been launched in a coherent or timely manner; urges the Commission to take more decisive and swift action into alleged violations of human or labour rights under the requirements of the GSP regime; calls for the establishment of a mechanism that can be invoked by individuals or groups who have been negatively affected by the implementation of the GSP regime;
Amendment 23 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for greater support to be given to GSP+ beneficiary countries to reverse the trend of decreasing product diversification; Is of the opinion that the more intensified GSP+ monitoring system, alongside the findings of UN and ILO monitoring bodies and information provided by third parties, has contributed to the fact that all GSP+ beneficiaries are making progress in implementing the 27 conventions; notes however that greater transparency in GSP+ monitoring is needed;
Amendment 28 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for greater participation in the monitoring process from Member State embassiescivil society and development agencies.
Amendment 95 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Praises the work done by the EU’s Special Representative for Human Rights (EUSR), Stavros Lambrinidis, in increasing the effectiveness, cohesion and visibility of human rights in EU foreign policy and recalls its request for his mandate to be made permanent; welcomes the recent approach on the EU’s Good Human Rights Stories initiative, which focuses on the best practices employed by various countries to counter attacks on the universality of human rights;
Amendment 222 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the support the EU provides for electoral processes and democracy around the world – its electoral missions and subsequent follow-up, its electoral assistance and, in particular, the active role played by Parliament in this regard – is of the utmost importance; stresses the importance of electoral observation in the context of peaceful democratic transitions, of strengthening the rule of law, of political pluralism and increasing the participation of women in electoral processes, and of transparency and respect for human rights; recalls that involving civil society organisations in the implementation of the election missions' recommendations is essential for their adoption at local level;
Amendment 237 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 242 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Recalls the release in August 2017 of the first annual implementation report for the year 2016 of the Gender Action Plan II 2016-2020 (GAP II), which notes a number of positive trends in transforming the lives of girls and women through ensuring girls' and women's physical and psychological integrity, promoting the economic and social rights and strengthening girls' and women's voice and participation; underlines however that one year on from the adoption of GAP II it is too early to deliver a full assessment of its impact; emphasises the need to ensure coherence and complementarity among all existing EU external instruments and policies with respect to gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 260 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Notes with appreciation the adoption of the revised EU Guidelines for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of the Child and highlights the need of ensuring that all children are reached, including the most marginalised and those in vulnerable situations; underlines the fact that children are often exposed to specific abuses, such as child marriage, genital mutilation and child labour, especially in humanitarian crises and armed conflicts, and therefore require enhanced protection; stresses the need to step up the EU’s engagement when it comes to addressing the protection of children, including unaccompanied minors, and to devote particular attention to education and psycho-social support;
Amendment 304 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Denounces and explicitly rejects trafficking in human beings; underlines the fact that trafficking in human beings is a modern kind of slavery, and a serious crime which constitutes one of the worst forms of human rights violations; emphasises, in this respect,reiterates that human trafficking constitutes a regional and global problem which cannot always be addressed exclusively at national level; emphasises the importance of a consistent approach to the internal and external dimensions of the EU’s policies for combating trafficking in human beings; calls for the EU and the Member States to increase cooperation with third countries in order to investigate all stages of trafficking in human beings;
Amendment 314 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Encourages all countries, including the Member States, and the EU to engage in the negotiations to adopt a legally binding international human rights instrument for transnational corporations and other companies with respect to human rights, through active participation in the UN-established open-ended intergovernmental working group; welcomes the adoption of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and calls for their universal application; recognises the major importance of the UN Global Compact and the National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights; encouragesmphasises the importance of supporting states’ efforts to develop their National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights by creating a database of best practices and case studies, particularly on access to remedy; calls on companies to exercise due diligence; calls on all countries to swiftly implement the UNGPs and guarantee that businesses in their jurisdictions abide by human rights and social labour standards; encourages all countries to tackle companies which use raw materials or other commodities originating from conflict zones; reiterates its call to include the rules of corporate liability for human rights violations into trade and investment agreements; emphasises that the victims of business- related human rights abuses should be guaranteed appropriate and effective access to remedies;
Amendment 325 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers GSP+ trade schemes to be one of the main EU trade policy instruments for promoting human rights, sustainable development, good governance and environmental standards with third countries; calls on the Commission to review and better monitor GSP+ schemes in order to ensure that human rights standards are upheld by beneficiary countries;
Amendment 339 #
2018/2098(INI)
29. Strongly condemns all forms of discrimination, including that carried out on the grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability or any other status; is alarmed by the many manifestations of racism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance and a lack of political representation for the most vulnerable groups, such as ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities, people with disabilities, the LGBTI community, women and children; calls for the EU to enhance its efforts to eradicate, without distinction, all forms of discrimination and to promote awareness, a culture of tolerance and inclusion, and special protection for the most vulnerable groups by means of human rights and political dialogues, the work of EU delegations and public diplomacy; stresses the importance of developing education strategies in schools in order to raise awareness among children and provide them with the tools they need to identify all forms of discrimination; calls on all countries to ensure that their respective institutions provide effective legal protection within their jurisdictions;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that trade liberalisation is notcan play a positive, per s role, in terms of reducing poverty and inequalities, and that it can even have negative effects on sustainable development if it is not properly regulated; underlines, in this context,in advancing sustainable development if it is accompanied by appropriate policies and institutions that maximise and distribute better the benefits of trade and economic growth; reiterates the importance of promoting policy reforms in the multilateral trading system which support development-related objectives; underlines the potential of the WTO as an efficient rules-based multilateral negotiating forum which provides a platform for open discussion on global trade-related issues; insists that the EU should continue to promote the democratisation of the WTO;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for a trade agenda based on fair trade for the benefit of all, which puts development and social, environmental and human rights at the centre of the process and has a special focus on the needs of low-income developing countries and least-developed countries; highlights in this regard the need of promoting comprehensive, binding and enforceable provisions on social, labour and environmental standards in trade agreements;
Amendment 28 #
2018/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines the importance for WTO members who are developing countries to decide on their own pace and sequencing of trade liberalisation according to their level of development;
Amendment 29 #
2018/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Amendment 32 #
2018/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Regrets that the WTO 11th Ministerial Conference did not secure progress on issues of key importance to developing countries; welcomes however enhanced preferential treatment previously secured at the WTO for LDCs including preferential Rules of Origin and treatment for service providers and emphasises the need to undertake capacity building measures that would allow suppliers from LDCs to benefit from the LDC Services Waiver;
Amendment 62 #
2018/2084(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to continue to make the case for increasing the importance of the parliamentary dimension of the WTO; calls on WTO members to ensure democratic legitimacy and transparency by strengthening the parliamentary dimension of the WTO; stresses, in this connection, the need to ensure that parliamentarians have better access to trade negotiations and are involved in the formulation and implementation of WTO decisions and that trade policies are properly scrutinised in the interests of their citizens.
Amendment 2 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
Citation 19 a (new)
– having regard to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol (A/RES/61/106),
Amendment 17 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas humanitarian innovation must be consistent with the humanitarian principles (humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence) and the dignity principle;
Amendment 19 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Recital K b (new)
Kb. whereas humanitarian innovation must be conducted with the aim of promoting the rights, dignity and capabilities of the recipient population, and it should be possible for all members of a crisis-affected community to benefit from innovation without discriminatory barriers to use;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K c (new)
Recital K c (new)
Kc. whereas under no circumstances should humanitarian digitalisation and innovation lead to intentional harm;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K d (new)
Recital K d (new)
Kd. whereas risk analysis and mitigation must be used to prevent unintentional harm, including those relating to privacy and data security and impacts on local economies;
Amendment 23 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K e (new)
Recital K e (new)
Ke. whereas experimentation, piloting and trials must be undertaken in conformity with internationally recognised ethical standards;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K f (new)
Recital K f (new)
Kf. whereas the work started at the World Humanitarian Summit for the creation of a global network aimed at addressing critical gaps in capacity and relationships must continue in order to generate a more supportive and enabling environment for innovation efforts that help comply with the humanitarian objectives;
Amendment 36 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the imperative that any digital trade strategy must be fully in line with the principle of Policy Coherence for Development (PCD); underlines that access to internet connectivity and digital payment methods are pivotal to enabling digital trade, sustainable development and inclusive growth; notes in this regard the potential of the Trade Facilitation Agreement to supporting digital initiatives in developing countries to facilitate cross- border trade;
Amendment 39 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the development of an action plan in technical innovation for humanitarian assistance to ensure compliance with the legal and ethical principles laid down in documents such as the New European Consensus on Development - 'Our world, our dignity, our future' and ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Underlines that all aspects of humanitarian innovation should be subject to evaluation and monitoring, including an assessment of primary and secondary impacts of the innovation process; notes that ethical review and risk analysis should be undertaken prior embarking on humanitarian innovation and digitalisation projects, and should incorporate external or third party experts where appropriate;
Amendment 41 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls for the implementation in EU external action of the principles embodied in The Digital Single Market for Europe (DSM) strategy through the support to EU partners’ regulatory frameworks;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for digitalisation to be incorporated into the national strategies for development of EU Member States;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for a more concerted and holistic cross-sectoral effort from the international community, including non- state actors such as representatives of civil society, the third sector, private companies and academia, to ensure that the shift towards a more digital economy leaves no one behind;
Amendment 54 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for the improvement of political articulation between the EU, the EU Member States and other relevant actors, with a view to enhancing their coordination, complementary and the creation of synergies;
Amendment 69 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Deplores the persistent digital divides across gender, geography, age, and income, ethnicity, and health condition or disability, among other factors of discrimination, within each country; insists, therefore, that international development cooperation should use digital technologies for greater inclusion of disadvantaged groups;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for increased efforts to address the challenges of digital exclusion through education and training on essential digital skills and initiatives to facilitate the use of ICTs; stresses the importance of e- learning and distant learning to reach remote areas and people of all ages;
Amendment 81 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for the introduction of digital literacy in school curricula at all levels of education, from primary school to university, in developing countries, with a view to the acquisition of the skills needed to improve access to information;
Amendment 106 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls that MSMEs in developing countries make up the majority of businesses and employ the majority of manufacturing and service sector workers; reiterates that facilitating cross-border e- commerce will have a direct impact on improving livelihoods, fostering higher living standards and boosting economic development; reaffirms the contribution that such endeavours could make to gender equality, since a great number of these companies are owned and run by women; stresses the need to reduce legal, administrative and social barriers to women’s entrepreneurship;
Amendment 117 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Points out that ICT tools can be used for information dissemination during both natural and technological disasters and emergencies, as well as in fragile and conflict affected contexts; highlights that digital technologies can enable low-income communities and other vulnerable communities to have access to quality basic services such as health, education, water and electricity, as well as to humanitarian relief and other public and private services;
Amendment 119 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines that technological innovation in humanitarian assistance is a priority, most especially in the context of forced displacements, for contributing to sustainable solutions that bring stability and dignity to people’s lives and may facilitate the humanitarian development nexus; welcomes global initiatives to facilitate humanitarian innovation, such as the Global Alliance for Humanitarian Innovation (GAHI), the Humanitarian Innovation Fund (HIF) and UN Global Pulse, and calls for the EU to promote open data and strongly support the global communities of software developers and designers who are building practical open technology with a view to solving international development and humanitarian problems;
Amendment 125 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses that e-government applications contribute to making public services faster and cheaper to access, improve consistency and citizen satisfaction, facilitate the articulation and activities of civil society, and increase transparency, thus contributing significantly to promoting democratisation and fighting corruption; stresses the vital role of technology and digitalisation for effective fiscal policy and administration, enabling an effective increase in domestic resource mobilisation; insists that it is imperative to create secure digital identities, as this could help determine the numbers of those in need of certain basic services;
Amendment 132 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Acknowledges the central role of digital technology in access to health services and in training for health workers andmanagement of health services, emergency response to epidemics, dissemination of public health campaigns, public access to health services and in training for health workers, support and promotion of basic research, and development of health and e-health information services; calls, therefore, on policymakers to introduce the appropriate policy and regulatory frameworks to scale up e-health projects; asks the Commission to provide the necessary financial resources in this regard;
Amendment 136 #
2018/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Highlights the importance of digital technologies in the fight against climate change, the improvement of the environment, and the development of renewable energies and agroecology; underlines the need to reduce the ecological impact linked to digitalisation;
Amendment 7 #
2018/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas education prevents the transmission of poverty between generations;
Amendment 8 #
2018/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas education plays a pivotal role in achieving gender equality and women’s empowerment;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines the importance of supporting countries affected by fragility and conflict to strengthen the resilience of their education systems during and after a crisis in order for children to be able to continue with their education;
Amendment 88 #
2018/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Reiterates the importance of reinforcing policies and measures promoting education for girls and recalls that girls and young women are particularly vulnerable and that special focus is needed to guarantee their access to all levels of education;
Amendment 102 #
2018/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Reiterates that only an enabling environment makes quality education possible, including nutritional aspects, health and safety, and access to electricity and water, water and adequate sanitation, in order to enable pupils to genuinely benefit from school and to increase completion rates, especially in primary education;
Amendment 108 #
2018/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Considers it vital to improve coordination of donors in local groups for education in order to avoid duplication and even conflict of aid efforts; calls on Member States to make more systematic use of joint programming and delegation; recalls that development aid must not be subordinated to a strategy designed to wield influence;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the SDGs 2030, in particular Goal 3 on health, Goal 4 on education, Goal 5 on gender equality and Goal 13 on climate action require appropriate Union assistance and must be reflected in the budget for 2019, while focusing on long-term efforts to eradicate poverty, as stipulated in Article 208 TFEU;
Amendment 12 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the Union and its Member States must honour their collective commitment, confirmed in 2015, to raise their ODA to 0,7 % of their GNI by 2030; calls on the Commission and the Member States to present binding timelines for progressive increases towards this level; calls the Member States to exclude the in donor costs out of the ODA calculation; reiterates the commitment made by the Commission to dedicate at least 20% of its total ODA to human development and social inclusion; calls for an increased allocation of its 2019 ODA to health, education and social protection, in order to reach its commitment by the end of the current MFF; stresses in particular the need to promote and protect sexual and reproductive health and rights, thereby countering the Global Gag Rule which was reinstated by the United States government;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Given the dramatic situation in the field of humanitarian aid, insists to mobilise more funds from the emergency aid reservehat the current global humanitarian needs are reflected with a significant funding increase for humanitarian aid budget lines; reiterates that education plays a key role in preventing man-made humanitarian crises by avoiding conflicts and welcomes that already a significant amount of humanitarian aid is spent on education in emergencies; calls, however, for a steady increase of this share and for more support to the Erasmus+ DCI budget line;
Amendment 29 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes the exhaustion of margins and flexibility mechanisms within the Union budget and in the Union’s external action, which are often used to mobilise additional funds to respond unforeseen needs, including humanitarian crises; in relation to this, opposes the Commission’s proposal for the funding of the second tranche of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT) that has not left sufficient margins under the Heading IV and MFF special instruments for unforeseen humanitarian crisis, due to the unfulfilled commitment by the Members States to contribute with EUR 2 billion by means of bilateral to the FRT; is concerned by the continued mobilisation of the European Development Fund (EDF) reserve to top- up contributions to the Union Trust Fund for Africa, most recently by EUR 500 million; stresses that this transfer of founds not only diverts money away from the EDF objectives of eradicating poverty and promoting sustainable development and towards migration management, but also severely limits the possibility to mobilise additional funds for future humanitarian crises in the ACP region in the coming years; calls again on Member States to increase their contributions to the FRT and the EU Trust Fund for Africa, for which pledged contributions currently amount to EUR 3 billion (before the additional EUR 500 million) from the Union budget and European Development Fund, and only EUR 430 million from EU Member States and other donors;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Recalls the importance to support expenditure directly linked to the achievement of the objectives of the humanitarian aid policy, inter alia, expenditure on technical and administrative assistance;
Amendment 33 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Emphasises the importance of maintaining payment appropriations in the humanitarian aid chapter at least on the same level as commitment appropriations, in order to avoid severe and constant lack of funds for payments, complicated urgent interventions and led to the accumulation of unpaid bills, with negative effects also on implementing partners;
Amendment 38 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4f. Reiterates the importance of focusing on main humanitarian crises, including forgotten humanitarian crises; calls to guarantee humanitarian funding for the following crises: Yemen (22 million people in need of humanitarian aid), Syria crisis including neighbouring countries (more than 13 million people in need of humanitarian assistance inside Syria), as well as for forgotten humanitarian crises such as Sahel (1,6 million children at risk of suffering from severe acute malnutrition and 6.8 million people food insecure) and DRC (13 million people in need and more than 2 million children suffering from severe acute malnutrition);
Amendment 39 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 g (new)
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4g. Highlights the need to guarantee humanitarian and development aid for the Sahel; stresses that chronic poverty, climate change, intensification of conflicts and a nearly lean season this year have resulted in 6.8 million people in need of humanitarian aid in a region with structural fragilities restricting access to basic social services; therefore calls to increase humanitarian and development funding for the region to cover both life- saving interventions and longer term efforts to tackle the root causes of vulnerability to food and nutrition insecurity and to strengthen basic social services;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 h (new)
Paragraph 4 h (new)
4h. Stresses that the need to implement the humanitarian/development nexus should be reflected in the budget 2019, in focusing on key sectors such as nutrition; calls therefore on the Commission, and in particular ECHO and DEVCO to close the humanitarian and development gap by dedicating both humanitarian and longer term funding to nutrition in the budget 2019, hence enabling children with severe acute malnutrition to access the treatment in all contexts, emergency and development alike;
Amendment 45 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the effects of climate change have a tangible impact on several aspects of human life and are increasingly being felt in the development countries; calls for an increased allocation in climate action, which better reflects the strong commitment to and increased engagement in climate diplomacy in order to tackle climate change; stresses, that the allocation shall come from other funds than development funding.
Amendment 49 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underscores the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions; asks for continued support for on-going and new pilot projects and preparatory actions;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA,
Amendment 5 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 b (new)
Citation 3 b (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 5 October 2017 on prison systems and conditions (2015/2062(INI)),
Amendment 6 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 c (new)
Citation 3 c (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 3 May 2018 on media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (2017/2209(INI)),
Amendment 7 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 d (new)
Citation 3 d (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 1 March 2018 on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (2017/2125(INI)),
Amendment 8 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 e (new)
Citation 3 e (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 30 May 2018 on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime(2016/2328(INI)),
Amendment 9 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 f (new)
Citation 3 f (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2015 on the prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (2015/2063(INI)),
Amendment 10 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 g (new)
Citation 3 g (new)
- having regard to the Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions – Combatting radicalisation and violent extremism: prevention mechanisms at local and regional level,
Amendment 11 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 h (new)
Citation 3 h (new)
- having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism,
Amendment 12 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 i (new)
Citation 3 i (new)
- having regard to the Council of Europe handbook for prison and probation services regarding radicalisation and violent extremism,
Amendment 13 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 j (new)
Citation 3 j (new)
- having regard to the European Court of Auditors Special report Tackling radicalisation that leads to terrorism: the Commission addressed the needs of Member States, but with some shortfalls in coordination and evaluation,
Amendment 14 #
Amendment 15 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas counter-terrorism measures and the protection of freedoms are not conflicting goals, but complementary and mutually reinforcing;
Amendment 16 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A a (new)
Recital -A a (new)
-A a. whereas the Union is founded on the values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as on the principles of democracy and the rule of law; whereas acts of terrorism constitute one of the most serious violations of these universal values and principles;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A b (new)
Recital -A b (new)
-A b. whereas the EU should do the utmost possible to guarantee the wellbeing of its citizens who are endangered by terrorists; whereas Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights enshrines both the right to liberty and the right to security, which complement each other; so that wherever measures are taken to combat terrorism, the right to liberty must be safeguarded in all cases; whereas Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights ensures the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A c (new)
Recital -A c (new)
-A c whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights prohibits discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation; and recognises the right of people with disabilities to benefit from measures to ensure their independence, social and occupational integration, and participation in the life of the community; whereas the rights of persons with disabilities in the EU are also protected by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the security of one Member State is the security of all in the Union; whereas in the last two years the EU and the Member States have made progress in countering the threats posed by terrorism which require a holistic approach, articulating internal and external security and national and European coordination;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the national security and intelligence agencies of EU Member States and of some third countries cooperate very effectively through the Counter Terrorism Group (CTG), an informal body outside the EU, and on a bilateral and multilateral basis; whereas the EU has an established complex of structures dealing wholly or in part with terrorism, notably through Europol’s European Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC)through EU Intelligence and Situation Centre (INTCEN), as the gateway for strategic intelligence from the intelligence and security services to the EU, and Europol’s European Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC), as the central hub for law enforcement information exchange and cooperation in the field of counter terrorism at the EU level;
Amendment 38 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the diverse landscape of regional, national, EU and international actors in the field of terrorism with overlappingspecific competences and insufficiently delineateddifferent mandates, the multitude of formal and informal fora for cooperation and exchange of information, as well as the division of competences between the different regional and national agencies, between law enforcement services and intelligence services and between the EU and the Member States, give rise to difficulties with regard to the coordinationrequire consistent efforts in order to provide efficiency and coherence of the response to the terrorist threat;
Amendment 50 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the Commissioner for Security Union is a valued actor in joining up the Commission’'s policy development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; whereas the establishment of the position of Commissioner for Security Union signals the EU’'s commitment to encouragingsupport cooperation between Member States on issues of EU internal security while fully respecting the status of these matters as national competencies as laid down in the Treaties;
Amendment 81 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas in recent years the EU Member States have suffered major terrorist attacks, perpetrated or inspired by jihadist groups such as Daesh, Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda; whereas far right, far left and ethno- nationalist separatist extremism are also matters of concern;
Amendment 97 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the cross-border aspects of the terrorist threat call for a coordinated EU approach by offering cooperation and assistance in the form of capacity-building in third-countries;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas Daesh and Al-Qaeda arim to be financially self-reliant and whereas illicit trade in goods, firearms, oil, drugs, cigarettes and cultural objects, among other items, as well as trafficking in human beings, slavery, child exploitation, racketeering and extortion, have become means for terrorist groups to obtain funding; whereas the possible links between organised crime and terrorist groups could constitutes a growing noteworthy security threat; whereas these sources could enable the continued funding of future criminal activities by Al-Qaeda, as well as by Daesh following its territorial collapse in Syria and Iraq;
Amendment 158 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital S
Recital S
S. whereas the flow of illegal migrants and refugees poses challenges to the integration process, which have already been exploited by extremists and could be further exploited in the future;
Amendment 196 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital X
Recital X
X. whereas experts highlight the positive experience offered by a multi- agency approach, focusing on creating infrastructures that ensure the provision of early-stage support to those vulnerable to radicalisation and their families from different authorities and organisations across multiple levels and emphasising the supportive role of the police, thus strengthening the relationship;
Amendment 199 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Y b (new)
Recital Y b (new)
Y b. whereas the promotion of social inclusion and active promotion of democratic values contribute to mitigate the risk of radicalisation through practical measures to address violent extremist ideologies, poverty, discrimination and marginalisation, including the prevention of early school leaving and school exclusion, enhancing equality, social cohesion and encouraging active citizenship;
Amendment 225 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AC
Recital AC
AC. whereas there is a prevalence of Wahhabi and Salafist literature available in certain bookshops and online in Europe, leaving little moderate alternative interpretation available to Muslim communities;
Amendment 254 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AG a (new)
Recital AG a (new)
AG a. whereas several recent investigations have shown that the internet and namely social media can play a role as a driver of radicalisation leading to violent extremism as well as a tool for xenophobic groups to disseminate hate speech and illicit content especially among young people;
Amendment 259 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AH a (new)
Recital AH a (new)
AH a. whereas combating radicalisation and violent extremism requires close and coordinated collaboration between all concerned actors, at all levels of governance (local, regional and national) as well as with civil society and the private sector;
Amendment 268 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AI
Recital AI
AI. whereas although majorsome progress has been made with regard to removal of online terrorist content, there is a need to scale up the companies’' engagement; whereas the removals are often not complete nor timely or permanent, removing the content from one website but leaving it on another belonging to the same company; whereas effective and comprehensive and transparent reporting by companies has to be improved;
Amendment 284 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AJ
Recital AJ
AJ. whereas, in response to larger companies removing more content and doing so at a greater pace, Daesh is increasingly using new and/or smaller platforms which are less suited to fast removal of terrorist material; whereas this diversification to smaller platforms makes additional technical support and the sharing of best practices essential to enable, for example, the introduction of platform-agnostic automated tools, such as the database of hashes which can identify online terrorist content with a high degree of accuracy;
Amendment 289 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AK
Recital AK
AK. whereas prisons have become hothouses of extremism, incubatmagnify and accelerate the threat of radicalisation of offenders, incubating and enabling terroristsm; whereas many of those serving prison sentences will soon be released back into their communities and there are few resources to monitor their activities; whereas prison conditions can play a significant role in heightening or lessening risks of radicalisationwith particular reintegration needs and high risk of re- offending; whereas there are few resources to monitor their activities and achieve re- entry into society; whereas prison regimes and risk management can play a significant role to mitigate these threats;
Amendment 308 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AL
Recital AL
AL. whereas retention of data is an essential part of the investigative process; whereas police and judicialthe national competent authorities usually rely heavily on communications data to successfully proceed with their casework; whereas in order for interoperability of information systems to reach its full potential, harmonised data retention regimes across the EU are vital; whereas the necessity of an appropriate data retention regime when it comes to the fight against terrorism was consistently raised during the work of the TERR Committee;
Amendment 317 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AM
Recital AM
AM. whereas the use of encryption by terrorists to protect their communications or stored data represents a considerable challenge for law enforcement,the national competent authorities denying access to essential intelligence and evidence; whereas encryption becomes particularly critical when even the responsible online service providers are unwilling or unable to decrypt the communication;
Amendment 357 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AY
Recital AY
AY. whereas a variety of factors can lead to difficulties in cooperation between the different national, regional and local services within the Member States, such as: overlapping competences and insufficiently delineated mandates; hesitancy to share information as this might result in loss of responsibility or loss of important information flows; legal obstacles when it comes to sharing information between different servicauthorities or the possibility of using intelligence in court cases; servicauthorities being obliged to compete with each other for resources; and technical barriers to information exchange;
Amendment 367 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AZ
Recital AZ
AZ. whereas adjusting thethe different legal standards applying to information exchange between intelligence and, respectively, the law enforcement authorities isare one of the main challenges that need to be addressed, especially, since intelligence often concerns information on people who are not yet suspects in criminal investigations but belong to terrorist networks or are returning FTFs;
Amendment 372 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital BA
Recital BA
BA. whereas a possible solution could also be offered by the creation of counter- terrorism centres or units within the national territory; whereas such centres allow representatives of the different servicnational competent authorities to communicate with each other on a regular basis and discuss how best to cooperate and exchange information; whereas this helps build trust between the servicnational competent authorities and fosters a better understanding of their respective working methods and challenges;
Amendment 379 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital BB
Recital BB
BB. whereas security services tend to cooperate and exchange information bilaterally or multilaterally - notably through the Counter Terrorism Group (CTG) and with the EU bodies via EU INTCEN, by sharing strategic intelligence; whereas it is necessary to find a practical solution to fill the existing gaps between the parallel tracks of the law enforcement community and the intelligence community, as well as between Europol’'s ECTC and the CTG, in order to allow a more systematic interaction between both communities and an enhanced operationalmore efficient cooperation, while still keeping them separate;
Amendment 393 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital BD
Recital BD
BD. whereas efficient and systematic cooperation between the Member States and the EU aAgencies, according to their legal mandates, as well as among the agencies in the counter-terrorism field is imperative, especially cooperation between Europol and Eurojust in order to effectively support the efforts to detect, prevent, and investigate and prosecute the perpetrators of a terrorist attack;
Amendment 402 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital BG
Recital BG
BG. whereas several EU instruments such as Decision 2005/671/JHA, the CT Directive and the Europol regulation require Member States to share information on terrorism with the relevant agencies; whereas increased information sharing with Europol and Eurojust on a regular basis and in a timely and systematic manner, including contextual information, according to their legal mandates, facilitates their work in detecting links between cases and providing an overview of challenges and best practice related to investigations, prosecutions and convictions for terrorist offences;
Amendment 479 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital BV
Recital BV
BV. whereas social media fundraising, non-profit organisations and small wire transfers arecould be used as funding methods for Daesh and other terrorist organisations; whereas micro lending platforms are used to facilitate all three of these typologies;
Amendment 497 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CA
Recital CA
CA. whereas cyber-attacks on electronic services or through interconnected systems are a key compontent of hybrid threatsial tool for cyber terrorism;
Amendment 498 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CB
Recital CB
CB. whereas the Commission Comprehensive Assessment of EU Security Policy and the evaluation study of Directive 2008/114/EC in need of revision and updating indicate that: the threat to critical infrastructures is likely to continue to rise, that there is a need to enhance preparation and response capabilities and to revise Directive 2008/114/EC, and that there is an interest in targeting transport infrastructures; whereas a better framework is needed to improve rail security and to address the issue of protection of public areas of transport infrastructures, such as airports and railway stations and also energy production facilities, with particular attention to nuclear power plants;
Amendment 505 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CE
Recital CE
CE. whereas the private sector should be involved in the protection and insurance of critical infrastructure and soft targets;
Amendment 511 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CG
Recital CG
CG. whereas the Commission, in its communication on the new Multiannual Financial Framework, proposes to significantly increase EU funding for security and defence, including EU internal security;
Amendment 530 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CR
Recital CR
CR. whereas the potential crime-terror nexus could also facilitates the access of terrorists to firearms;
Amendment 536 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CT
Recital CT
CT. whereas the key regions in the EU’s 's neighbourhood, and more specifically the Balkans, the Caucasus and North Africa, are facing important challenges such as those relating to foreign fighters and returnees management, as well as to home- grown radical cells;
Amendment 575 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital DA
Recital DA
DA. whereas deaththe aftermath of terrorist attacks destroys families and leaves a legacy of irrevocable sadness, and many of the injured survivors of terrorist attacks suffer disfiguring and life- changing loss of senses and limbs and their plight impacts heavily on close family and community, while too often once the media spotlight has passed, the long-term needs of the victims are neglected;
Amendment 593 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital DE a (new)
Recital DE a (new)
DE a. whereas businesses, including SMEs, can also suffer damage from terrorism such as property damage and business interruption;
Amendment 597 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital DF
Recital DF
Amendment 604 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital DG
Recital DG
Amendment 610 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital DH
Recital DH
Amendment 634 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that while Member States remain first in line to respond to and prevent threats, a clear need exists to fully recognisrther clarify and consolidate the Security Union’'s role in supporting them, providing common solutions and adding value;
Amendment 641 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that, at this stage, the EU and the Member States should improve cooperation through existing European agencies and Member States’ security' competent authorities and justice institutions;
Amendment 670 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to work with the Member States towards more transparency and a common understanding of threat levels; calls on the Member States to swiftly transmit to the appropriate EU bodies information on the change of the threat level and the rationale behind it;
Amendment 682 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to monitor all identified foreign terrorist fighters; calls for an effective and appropriate follow-up of the threat posed by returnees, and for this purpose invites Member States to share contextual information about returnees via Europol; calls on the Commission to assist Member States in the establishment of aligned classification systems in order to distinguish between high, medium and low-risk returnees;
Amendment 746 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for the creation of an EU ‘Centre of Excellence for Preventing Radicalisation (CoE PR)’, to be embedded in the Commission with adequate financial and human resources; believes its tasks should include coordination, including of funding, and facilitation of cooperation among Member States, policymakers, practitioners (by involving former RAN and ESCN structures), technologists, experts and researchers in the area of preventing and countering radicalisation, exchange of best practices, lighthouse projects and training, also by partnering with key strategic third countries; considers that this centre should also establish methodologies to evaluate and measure the effectiveness of programmes and projects;
Amendment 876 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States to establish binding procedures for schools for tackling the challenge of radicalised pupils, and to offer training for teachers with regard to this; stresses the need for involvement of law enforcement and justice bodcompetent authorities in the process of addressing radicalisation;
Amendment 889 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the need to achieve automatic, fast and full removal of terrorist content and the need to achieve prevention of upload or streaming of terrorist content; requests the Commission to present a legislative proposal obliging companies to remove terrorist content fully within one hour from upload and to introduce clear and transparent reporting obligations on the incidence of terrorist content and removal rates, as well as sanctions for non-compliance;
Amendment 911 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for the creation of an online European platform that citizens can use in order to flag terrorist and extremist content online, increasing companies’ capabilities to respond to flagged content;
Amendment 939 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on Member States to ensure secure, safe and orderlyjust prison conditions and to create specific procedures for radicalised inmates, in order to prevent radicalisation of others, as well as to ensure targeted monitoring and targeted disengagement measures, and to train prison staff accordingly;
Amendment 975 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Urges Member States to ensure that they havefind the adequate means for ensuring the necessary technical equipment (for example mobile devices allowing the police to check the biometrics of a person during on-the-spot checks), software, security systems and qualified staff to make full use of the existing information systems and cooperation mechanisms;
Amendment 989 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Urges Member States to adopt the approach of ‘'information sharing by default’' when it comes to sharing CT- related information, among national competent authorities thus exchanging such information as a rule, and refraining from such exchange only in specific cases where circumstances require that it be withheld;
Amendment 1032 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on Member States to ensure access to VIS for law enforcement authorities involved in CT operationtheir CT competent authorities and for a simplified procedure for such access;
Amendment 1048 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Calls on the Member States to interconnect their PIUs in order to facilitate the exchange of PNR, data and calls on the Commission to propose technological solutions to make the exchange of PNR data less time-consuming and demanding in terms of human resources by automating the processing of requests from one PIU to another; encourages, therefore, projects such as the ISF project led by the Netherlands to develop PIU.net based upon the established FIU.net; asks the Commission, together with Europol, to support the development of joint targeting rules and risk assessments to be applied by the Member States, in order to enable Europol to searchsearches into the national PNR data with central algorithms;
Amendment 1084 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
Paragraph 53
53. Calls on the Member States that have not yet done so to create national counter-terrorism ‘'fusion centres’'/coordination units, as well as coordinated databases, in order to centralisein order to facilitate the search, identification and exchange of terrorism-related information and intelligence from all relevant national stakeholders;
Amendment 1101 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
Paragraph 55
55. Recommends that Member States provide guidance or a legal framework in national law as to when it is permissible to exchange information between services, and believes that aligning national standards on this issue iwith other MS' competent authorities and EU agencies as a precondition for an EU-wide solution to the issue of when such information can be used and shared;
Amendment 1109 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
Paragraph 56
56. Calls on the Member States to examinesupport the examination of the possibility of better coordination and cooperation between intelligence and law enforcement services at EU level, e.g. by increasingly sending intelligence experts in addition to law enforcement staff to the meetings of the Counter-Terrorism Joint Liaison Team (CTJLT) at Europol, which could serve as a blueprint for further cooperation between law enforcement and intelligence; calls on the Commission to support the CTJLT, including special funding;
Amendment 1118 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
Paragraph 57
57. Calls on Member States and European stakeholders to continue existing operational capabilities and enhance maximum effective cooperation in the fields of counter-terrorism and EU internal security;
Amendment 1125 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
Paragraph 58
58. Calls on Member States to further support the sharing of intelligence through EU INTCEN and calls for Europol to become a veritable hub for law enforcement information exchange and cooperation in the field of counter- terrorism in the EU, if necessary with a stronger mandate;
Amendment 1279 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88
Paragraph 88
88. Calls for the mandate of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia to be extended and its territorial scope enlarged with a view to better responding to changing migration patterns such as ghost landings from Tunisia, and for the fight against terrorism to be specifically includedassessing the possibility to include the fight against terrorism in its mandate;
Amendment 1323 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 97
Paragraph 97
97. Calls on the Commission to develop, together with Member States and international partners, ways of better monitoring financial flows and identifying users of virtual currencies, electronic wallets and prepaid cards, crowdfunding platforms and online and mobile payment systems in relevant investigations;
Amendment 1344 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 a (new)
Paragraph 99 a (new)
99 a. Calls on Member States to ensure that cryptocurrency companies fully apply Anti-Money Laundering regulations when users convert cryptocurrencies to real currency;
Amendment 1347 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 b (new)
Paragraph 99 b (new)
99 b. Stresses the importance of enhancing interaction and exchange of information between investigative authorities and the private sector, namely obliged entities under the EU AML/CFT Directive, to overcome the shortcomings of segregated and incomplete information submitted by suspicious transaction reports; calls on the Commission and Member States to develop dedicated fora for sharing financial information, including on use of virtual currency, including the private sector, under safe channels and EU data protection standards; notes the important role that Europol could play in this regard;
Amendment 1348 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 c (new)
Paragraph 99 c (new)
99 c. Calls on the Commission to examine the EU regulation virtual currency platforms, and namely exchanges between different virtual currencies, since some Member States have already spearheaded national systems to become global hubs for virtual currency platforms; calls on the Commission to form an expert working group to explore next steps in the EU- wide regulation of virtual currencies; calls on the Commission and Member States to act as global advocates for a coherent and coordinated international regulatory framework around virtual currencies;
Amendment 1349 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 d (new)
Paragraph 99 d (new)
99 d. Calls on Commission and Member States to mandate and support formal, strategic and sustained operational law enforcement training to enhance capacity in Member States for investigating illicit activity involving virtual currencies; stresses that these efforts should ensure a standard level of law enforcement competency across the EU, so that certain Member States do not fall behind; emphasises the importance of conducting the EU-wide risk assessments of virtual currency activities and of coordinating investigative initiatives to use findings from those assessments to develop strategies for regulatory and law enforcement approaches over the short, medium and long-term;
Amendment 1350 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 e (new)
Paragraph 99 e (new)
99 e. Calls on Member States to encourage cryptocurrency companies to use analysis tools to assess potential criminal activity associated with the destination and recipient addresses;
Amendment 1351 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 f (new)
Paragraph 99 f (new)
99 f. Encourages the Commission to carry out an in-depth assessment to evaluate whether features designed to make cryptocurrency users untraceable should be banned;
Amendment 1352 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 100
Paragraph 100
100. Calls on the Member States which have not yet done so to establish national CIP programmes addressing the issues identified by the Commission, especially in relation to the potential vulnerabilities of critical infrastructures, in its 2006 communication on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection which should be revised and updated;
Amendment 1361 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106
Paragraph 106
106. Calls for Directive 2008/114 to be revised, in order to: provide similar rules and procedures for ‘operators of essential services’ as in the NIS Directive; ensure that designation of ECIs be done on the basis of an analysis of the systems supporting vital and cross-border services, rather than a sector-by-sector approach, taking due account of the importance of cybersecurity; allow the Commission to designate assets of pan-European services as ECIs; take due account of existing interdependencies; create an obligation to report incidents, conduct stress tests, provide appropriate training at the designated contact points and establish quality requirements as regards business and operational continuity plans in the case of an incident or attack;
Amendment 1364 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 107
Paragraph 107
107. Recommends that the private sector be involved when devising programmes for the protection of critical infrastructure and soft targets, and highlights the need to develop public-private dialogues to this effect and to develop national and local resilience;
Amendment 1445 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 126
Paragraph 126
126. Calls on the Commission to establish an EU Coordination Centre for victims of terrorism (CCVT), which should provide timely and adequate crisis support in cases of mass attacks in one or several Member States; considers that the role of the CCVT would be to ensure the provision of expertise at EU level by promoting exchange of knowledge and best practices; stresses however the need to extend support and protection measures to indirect victims, like victim’s relatives, eyewitnesses and first responders;
Amendment 1472 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 132
Paragraph 132
132. Calls on the Member States to ensure that the assistance provided to victims of terrorism also encompasses measures such as first aid, psychological support, protection from secondary victimisation, effective access to justice, cash advances to help cover immediate expenses, certified childcare and home support, tax relief schemes or other forms of social benefits and help with transport;
Amendment 1517 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 139
Paragraph 139
139. Calls on the Member States to ensure that the necessary data protection safeguards are in place, including appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect the security and confidentiality of personal data; urges the Member States to provide clear rules as to who can access and who consults which data in the systems, to maintain records of consultation and disclosure, and to provide for rights of access, rectification, erasure and restriction, as well as rights to compensation and judicial redress;
Amendment 1519 #
2018/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 139 a (new)
Paragraph 139 a (new)
139 a. Encourages the Commission to regularly submit reports to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the added value of the anti-terrorism legislation; asks that such reports shall also focus on fundamental rights and freedoms, including on non- discrimination, on the rule of law, and on the level of protection and assistance provided to victims of terrorism;
Amendment 6 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the New European Consensus on Development in which the EU and its Member States reaffirm their commitment to Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) across all policies and all areas covered by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;
Amendment 10 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the EU’s and its Member States’ commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and underlines that coherence of the CAP with the SDGs is crucial; recalls in particular SDG 2 and its associated targets, which aim at ending hunger and malnutrition by 2030,notably by increasing productivity of small-holders and achieving sustainable and climate resilient agriculture and food systems;
Amendment 20 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for another chapter in the CAP post-2020 legislation regarding its responsibility in development policy issues and stresses on the need to systematically measure the CAP’s impact on developing countries;
Amendment 34 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Member States to put an end to the goal of an ever more intensified European agriculture and to cease overproduction in the livestock sector through the obligatory introduction of an area-based livestock farming system; consequently urges them to reduce, and ultimately to put an end to, their imports of protein crops from third countries such as Argentina and Brazil, since increased soybean production has led to negative social and environmental impacts, such as biodiversity loss, forced displacement of small farmers and indigenous people, loss of employment and higher level of food insecurity;
Amendment 62 #
2018/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. SRecalls the need to improve the contribution of finance to sustainable and inclusive growth and to accelerate the shift to a low-carbon and resource efficient economy; stresses the potential of a faster green transition as an opportunity for orienting capital markets towards long- term, innovative and efficient investments; notes that environmental, social and governance (ESG) benefits and risks are not reflected in prices and that this provides a market advantage to unsustainable and short-termist geared finance; stresses that a political and regulatory framework to govern sustainable finance is overdue;
Amendment 77 #
2018/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines that the financial sector has a critical role to play in the process of accelerating the transition towards a low-carbon, more resource- efficient and sustainable economy;
Amendment 82 #
2018/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the financial sector as a whole and its core function of allocating capital to benefit society should be governed by the values of equity and sustainability; taking into account environmental, social and governance considerations; emphasises in that respect the instrumental role of economic, fiscal and monetary policy in fostering sustainable finance by facilitating capital allocation, by re-orienting investments towards more sustainable technologies and businesses, to decarbonised and resource- efficient economic activities which are able to reduce the current need for future resources and thereby capable of meeting EU sustainability goals; insists that a substantial price for greenhouse gas emissions is a key component of a functioning and efficient environmental and social market economy;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that ODA alone is not sufficient to meet development needs and that the private sector plays an essential role in the realisation of inclusive and sustainable development and the implementation of the 2030 Agendait is necessary to ensure that trade becomes an effective vehicle to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); calls on the EU to increase its financial commitment to Aid for Trade initiatives that are essential for developing countries, in particular Least Developed Countries (LDCs);
Amendment 7 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that when acting in development, the private sector should abide by shared principles and common values, and that development objectives and effeConsiders that the private sector should meet its responsibility in contributing to the realization of the 2030 Agenda; stresses that development objectives and effectiveness principles should prevail and recalls the obligations that the private sector is required to fulfill under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises in terms of transparency and respect of human rights; calls on the Commission to draw up a legislative proposal on binding due diligence obligations for supply chains and to engage in constructive ness should prevailgotiations on the UN binding instrument on business & human rights;
Amendment 12 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU to ensure that its activities with developing countries, both in the field of development and trade, promoteare based on a fair and balanced framework among equal partners and are aimed at the promotion and respect of human rights;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that trade is not an end in itself, but that an inclusive, rules-based, free and fair trade policy if aligned with the SDGs can contribute to poverty eradication; recalls, reducing inequalities and creation of decent jobs; recalls the need to strengthen the principle of policy coherence for development, requiring that the objectives of development cooperation be taken into account in policies that are likely to affect developing countries; calls on the EU to systematically evaluate the impact of its trade and fiscal policies on developing countries;
Amendment 33 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates the importance of the multilateral rules-based order as the most effective way to achieve an inclusive global trading system; emphasises the importance of comprehensive provisions on social, labour and environmental standards in trade agreements; and welcomes the Commission’s commitment to include abinding and enforceable chapters on Trade and Sustainable Development in all trade agreement; calls for accompanying measures, including financial support, to be implemented in trade agreements concluded with developing countries in order to support their efforts in respecting and implementing internationally agreed social and environmental standards; reiterates its call for more transparency in the trade in natural resources;
Amendment 39 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recalls that Africa is still marginalized in the global context, calls on the EU to support its ambitions of creating a genuine intra-African market and avoid taking steps which might hinder these ambitions; underlines in this regard the need to maximise the development and the positive impact of migration and mobility;
Amendment 42 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the EU to take into account the different level of development and capabilities of developing countries and to support African countries in strengthening its productive and transformation capacities in order to become less dependent on raw materials and simple processed products, enhancing their competitiveness and participation in global markets, and to help create quality jobs particularly strengthening the role of women in the formal and informal economy; stresses the need for any trade agreement with developing countries to provide for sufficiently asymmetrical liberalisation schedules, protection for infant industries, development-supportive rules of origin and effective safeguard clauses;
Amendment 45 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) are an important instrum, if accompanied by appropriate structural measures and duly monitored, have the potential to be an important tool to promote regional integration and the inclusion of the African continent into promote sustainable development through trade, if accompanied by appropriate structural measureworld trade; stresses the importance of engagement with partner countries to create ownership at government and civil society levels, and strongly condemns the use of coercion as an instrument to secure approval for EPAs;
Amendment 50 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Deplores the facts that, each year, a sum exceeding total annual ODA is drained out of Africa in the form of illicit financial flows; reiterates its call to create effective tools to combat tax dodging globally and to enhance cooperation on tax matters with developing countries, including domestic resource mobilisation; recalls the need to establish a UN intergovernmental body to engage on an equal footing with developing countries in the reform of global tax rules;
Amendment 56 #
2018/2005(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls for transparency in trade agreements and for the full involvement of civil societies of the partner countries concerned in the negotiations and implementations of future trade agreements, including the inclusion of structured and well-financed civil society monitoring process;
Amendment 1 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the Treaties on the Functioning of the EU and the Treaty of Lisbon Art. 208,
Amendment 6 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 28 a (new)
Citation 28 a (new)
– having regard to the most recent Planetary Boundaries report,
Amendment 49 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas SDG goal 15 explicitly mentions the need for good forestry management, while forests can play a role helping achieve many of the other SDGs;
Amendment 50 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas a European Commission study in 2013 found that EU27 was the largest global net importer of embodied deforestation(between 1990 and 2008), concluding that during that time 9 million hectares of tropical forest had been cleared to provide products such as beef, soya and palm oil to the European market;
Amendment 81 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges that forest crime, such as illegal logging, has been estimated to represent a value of 50-152 billion USD globally in 2016, up from 30- 100 billion in 2014 and ranks number one in revenues among environmental crimes. Notes that illegal logging plays a substantial role in financing organized crime and thus significantly impoverishes governments, nations and local communities owing to uncollected revenues 2a. _________________ 2a UNEP, 2017: The Rise of Environmental Crime report
Amendment 128 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses that recognition of tenure rights of peoples e.g. via constitution are not necessarily applied in practice and therefore calls for tenure rights to be respected and that their recognition be a necessary component of the EU’s screening process for the purpose of Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPA) and for individual cases of EU development funding; 11a _________________ 11aFor example a recent case (WaTER project financed by DG DEVCO) of violation of tenure rights of Kenyan indigenous peoples Ogiekand Sengwer despite the recognition of their rights to land in the Kenyan Constitution, particularly Article 63(2)(d)) and in the 2016 Community Land Act
Amendment 142 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point e a (new)
Paragraph 14 – point e a (new)
(ea) expand the scope of the EU Timber Regulation to cover all products that are or may be made of wood, and that contain or may contain wood;
Amendment 156 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that it is well established and uncontested that the conversion of tropical forest to agriculture, plantations and other land uses causes a significant loss of species, and particularly of forest- specialist species;
Amendment 160 #
2018/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Recalls that sustainable development can only be successful if supply chains are made to be sustainable, and through the use of good management of the lived environment;
Amendment 3 #
2018/0291(NLE)
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Declines to giveGives its consent to the proposal for a Council decision;
Amendment 1 #
2018/0272M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly supports the FLEGT process with Vietnam since about 45% of Vietnam's land area is forested, and the country has a key role in processing in the timber sector in Southeast Asia; welcomes Vietnam’s commitment to this process and the progress made so far, including the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA);
Amendment 6 #
2018/0272M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Draws attention to the crucial importance of full stakeholder involvement and of the major role that civil society must be able to play; encoplay as a fully-fledged actor including the implementation and monitoring of the Agreement; urages the Vietnamese Government to further develop the working methods in relation toto ensure transparency and the timely sharing of documents;
Amendment 11 #
2018/0272M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Recalls that the implementation of the Agreement must complement EU commitments to environmental protection and ensure coherence with commitments to prevent mass deforestation.
Amendment 14 #
2018/0272M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to continue its FLEGT-related support to Vietnam and to ensure the integrity of the FLEGT process, in particular through the stamping outeradication of illegal timber and the full involvement of civil society in the preparation of measures and monitoring of results; recalls that in order to ensure effective monitoring the Agreement, and its impact on development, the Commission should continue to regularly report-back to Parliament on the implementation.
Amendment 4 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 77(2) and 79(2)(d) and 80 thereof
Amendment 6 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Pursuant to Article 80 TFEU, these policies and their implementation should be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between theall Member States of the European Union.
Amendment 10 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Financial support from the Union budget is indispensable to the implementation of European integrated border management to support Member States to achieve the objectives of the program, which are largely in their responsibility ,in managing the crossing of the external borders efficiently and in addressing migratory challenges and potential future threats at those borders, thereby contributing to addressing serious crime with a cross-border dimension while acting in full respect of fundamental rights.
Amendment 13 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) To promote the implementation of the European integrated border management defined by its components in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1624: border control, search and rescue during border surveillance, risk analysis, cooperation between Member States (supported and coordinated by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency), inter-agency cooperation (including the regular exchange of information), cooperation with third countries, technical and operational measures within the Schengen area related to border control and designed to address illegal immigration and to counter cross- border crime better, use of state-of-the-art technology, quality control and solidarity mechanisms, and to ensure that it becomes an operational reality, Member States should be provided with real, adequate and substantial Union financial support in line with their own needs.
Amendment 15 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) As customs authorities of the Member States have been taking up an increasing number of responsibilities which often extend to the field of security and take place at the external border, ensuring uniformity in carrying out border control and customs control at the external borders needs to be addressed by providing real, adequate and substantial Union financial support to the Member States. This will not only strengthen customs controls but also facilitate legitimate trade, contributing to a secure and efficient customs union.
Amendment 17 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The instrument should be implemented in full compliance with the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with the Union’s international obligations as regards fundamental rights and the principle of non-refoulement.
Amendment 92 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 13
Article 12 – paragraph 13
13. Training in the field of border management carried out with the support of this instrument shall be based on the relevant harmonised and quality-assured European education and common training standards for border and coast guarding as well as for fundamental and human rights respect and protection.
Amendment 117 #
2018/0249(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) any action concerning third countries, the respect of fundamental and human rights, the complementarity between the actions supported by the instrument and support provided by other Union Funds, in particular those in or in relation to third countries;
Amendment 26 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Fund should comply with the UN Agenda 2030 and the commitments at the international level in relation to migration and asylum, notably the Global Compact on Refugees and the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.
Amendment 54 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) An efficient return policy is an integral part of the comprehensive migration approach the Union and its Member States pursue. The Fund should support and encourage efforts by the Member States with a view to the effective implementation and further development of common standards on return, in particular as set out in Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 , and of an integrated and coordinated approach to return management. For sustainable return policies, tThe Fund should equally support related measures in third countries, such as the reintegration of returnees to facilitate and guarantee safe and dignified return and readmission as well as sustainable reintegration. _________________ 15 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 98).
Amendment 75 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Measures in and in relation to third countries supported through the Fund should complement other actions outside the Union supported through the Union’s external financing instruments. In particular, in implementing such actions,taken under the Fund in relation with Third countries should be fully coherence should be sought with the principles and general objectives of the Union’s external action and foreign policy in respect of the country or region in question and the Union international commitments. In relation to the external dimension, the Fund should target support to enhance cooperation with third countries and to reinforce key aspects of migration management in areas of interest to the Union's migration policyCooperation with Third countries should not be intended to support actions that are directly oriented towards development and should not undermine the principle of policy coherence for development, as set out in Article 208 of the TFEU.
Amendment 104 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that actions in relation with third countries are taken in coherence with other actions implemented through Union instruments, respect the principle of policy coherence for development and focus on non- development-oriented measures.
Amendment 127 #
2018/0248(COD)
8. Whenever a Member State decides to implement projects with or in a third country with the support of the Fund, the Member State concerned shall consultrequest the approval of the Commission prior to the start of the project.
Amendment 138 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) heavy migratory pressure in third countries, including where persons in need of protection may be stranded due to political developments or conflicts, notably where it might have an impact on migration flows towards the EU.
Amendment 96 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) The Union and the OCTs recognise the special importance of education and vocational training as a lever for the OCTs’ sustainable development, especially on territories where the population’s general level of education is rather low.
Amendment 98 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Trade and trade-related cooperation between the Union and the OCTs should contribute to the objective of sustainable economic development, social development and environmental protection along with the lines of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Amendment 99 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) This Decision should provide for more flexible rules of origin, including new possibilities of cumulation of origin. Cumulation should be possible not only with OCTs and Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) countries, but under certain conditions also for products originating in countries with which the Union is applying a free trade agreement as well as for products entering the Union duty-free and quota-free under the Union’s General System of Preferences, also subject to conditions. These conditions are necessary for a trade union more robust and capable to prevent trade circumvention and ensure the proper functioning of the cumulation arrangements.
Amendment 100 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Cooperation in the area of financial services between the Union and OCTs should tackle tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance in order to contribute to building a safer, sounder, more transparent financial system that is essential to enhance global financial stability and to underpin sustainable growth. Efforts in that area should focus on convergence with internationally agreed standards and approximation of OCTs' legislation with Union acquis on financial services. Adequate attention should be paid to strengthening administrative capacity of OCTs' authorities, including in the area of supervision.
Amendment 103 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. The general objective of this Decision is to promote the economic and social development of the OCTs and to establish close economic relations between them and the Union as a whole. The association shall pursue this general objective by the enhancing the OCTs’ competitiveness, improving social standards, strengthening the OCTs’ resilience, reducing their economic and environmental vulnerability and the promoting of cooperation between them and other partners.
Amendment 104 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 6
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. In pursuing those objectives, the association shall respect the fundamental principles of liberty, democracy, gender equality, human rights and fundamental freedoms, the rule of law, good governance and sustainable development, all of which are common to the OCTs and the Member States to which they are linked.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) the promotion of a high quality social model;
Amendment 107 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. To this end, the Union and the OCTs may exchange information and best practices or establish any other form of close cooperation and coordination with other partners in the context of the OCTs’ participation in regional and international organisations, where appropriate by means of international agreements, in order to contribute to the smooth integration of the OCTs to their respective geographical environments.
Amendment 108 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) OCT organisations, such as the Overseas Countries and Territories Association (OCTA);
Amendment 109 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 13 – paragraph 5
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. The dialogue with Greenland shall, in particular, strengthen the Union's strategy in each region concerned and provide the basis for broad cooperation and dialogue in areas concerning, inter alia, energy, climate change and environment, disaster risk reduction, biodiversity, sustainable management of natural resources, including raw materials and fish stocks, maritime transport, research and innovation, as well as the Arctic dimension of those issuessocial issues, good governance in the tax area and the fight against organised crime.
Amendment 113 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an OCTs-EU forum for dialogue (the ‘OCT-EU Forum’), shall meet annually to bring together OCTs' authorities, representatives of the Member States and the Commission. Members of the European Parliament, representatives of the EIB, and representatives of the outermost regions and neighbouring ACP and non-ACP States shall, where appropriate, be associated with the OCTs- EU Forum;
Amendment 114 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the promotion of sustainable resource use and resource efficiency, and encouragement to the decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradationtowards the achievement of a low carbon economy based on just transition strategies; and;
Amendment 115 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) addressing issues linked to land degradation, including rising sea-levels and soil contamination,
Amendment 116 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
In the context of the association, cooperation in the field of sustainable forest management may concern the promotion of the conservation and sustainable management of forests, including their role in the conservation of the environment from erosion and desertification control, afforestation and management of timber exports and fighting illegal logging.
Amendment 117 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) conciliation of economic and social activities such as fisheries and aquaculture, tourism, maritime transports and sustainable agriculture with the potential of marine and coastal zones in terms of renewable energy, raw materials, whilst taking into account impacts of climate change and human activities.
Amendment 118 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the development and strengthening of human rights, social end environmental protection;
Amendment 119 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) contributing to partners countries' efforts to pursue their commitments on climate change in line with the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 120 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the support to the OCTs in defining and implementing education and vocational training policies. and
Amendment 121 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the support of the participation and access of the OCTs to the Erasmus+ program, by fostering and increasing the mobility of its potential beneficiaries, from and to, the OCTs;
Amendment 122 #
Amendment 123 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the context of the association, cooperation in the field of performing fine and digital arts may concern:
Amendment 124 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 42 a (new)
Article 42 a (new)
Article 42 a Negotiation of trade agreements with third countries Where a trade negotiation with third countries cause or threaten to cause serious injuries to sensitive sectors of OCTs, the Commission shall carry out an impact assessment, taking into consideration the cumulative impact of trade agreements on OCTs economies. When completed, the Commission shall forward the results of this assessment to the European Parliament, the Council and the governmental and local authorities of the OCTs before the conclusion of the international agreements in question.
Amendment 125 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 53 – paragraph 2
Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. Trade-related cooperation shall aim to support the ultimate objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and, the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. It may also extend to cooperation on other trade related multilateral environmental agreements, such as the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species.
Amendment 126 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) Urges for the inclusion of sustainable development chapters (TSD) in the trade agreements between the Union and the OCTs , with binding and enforceable provisions and sanctions- based mechanisms.
Amendment 127 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 70 – paragraph 1
Article 70 – paragraph 1
The Union and the OCTs shall make their best endeavours to ensure that internationally agreed standards for regulation and supervision in the financial services sector and for the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance are implemented and applied in their territory. Such internationally agreed standards are, inter alia, the Basel Committee’s ‘Core Principle for Effective Banking Supervision’, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors’ ‘Insurance Core Principles’, the International Organisation of Securities Commissions’ ‘Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation’, the OECD’s ‘Agreement on exchange of information on tax matters’, the G20 ‘Statement on Transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes’, the Financial Stability Board’s ‘Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions.
Amendment 128 #
2018/0244(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Article 75 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 75 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) be implemented with due regard to the OCTs respective demographic, geographical, social and cultural characteristics, as well as their specific potential;
Amendment 399 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The general objective of the Programme "Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument" (the ‘Instrument’) should be to promote sustainable development, contribute to the eradication of poverty, fight inequality in all its forms uphold and promote the Union’s values and interests worldwide in order to pursue the objectives and principles of the Union’s external action, as laid down in Article 3(5), Articles 8 and 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 406 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In accordance with Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union, the Union shall develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to eliminate inequalities, the gender equality gap and to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, founded on the values of the Union and characterised by close and peaceful relations based on cooperation. This Regulation should contribute to such objective.
Amendment 408 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The primary objective of Union’s development cooperation policy, as laid down in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty and should complement and reinforce the Members States' development cooperation policies . The Union’s development cooperation policy also contributes to the objectives of the Union’s external action, in particular to foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary aim of eradicating poverty, as set out in Article 21(2)(d) of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 439 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In line with the international commitments of the Union on development effectiveness as adopted in Busan in 2011 and renewed at the Nairobi High Level Forum in 2016 and recalled in the Consensus, the Union’s development cooperation should apply the development effectiveness principles, namely ownership of development priorities by developing countries, a focus on results, alignment, harmonisation, inclusive development partnerships as well as transparency and accountability.
Amendment 451 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Children and youth are essential agents of change and contributors to the realisation of Agenda 2030, as recognised in the European Consensus on Development and Art. 3 of the Treaty on European Union. The Union's external action under this regulation will give particular attention to their rights and empowerment and will contribute to the realisation of their potential as key agents of change by investing in human development and social inclusion.
Amendment 457 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 b (new)
Recital 13 b (new)
(13b) In line with existing commitments in EU Gender Action Plan II, at least 85% of ODA-funded programmes should have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. In addition, 20% of all Official Development Assistance under this regulation should have gender equality as a principal objective. These commitments will be reflected through specific objectives under all pillars of the instrument.
Amendment 460 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 c (new)
Recital 13 c (new)
(13c) Under this regulation, we will give particular attention to the rights and empowerment of children and youth, in particular girls and young women, and will contribute to the realisation of their potential as key agents of change by investing in human development and social inclusion.
Amendment 511 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change, protecting the environment and fight nature loss, in line with the Union commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Regulation should contribute to mainstream climate and environmental action in the Union policies and to the achievement of an overall target of 250 % of the Union budget expenditures supporting climate and environment objectives. Actions under this Regulation are expected to contribute 250% of its overall financial envelope to climate objectiveand environment related objectives and support actions with clear and identifiable co-benefits across sectors. Relevant actions will be identified during the implementation of this Regulation, and the overall contribution from this Regulation should be part of relevant evaluations and review processes. As a general principle, all Union action and expenditure should be consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement and not contribute to environmental degradation. Special emphasis should be put on support for adaptation to climate change in poor, highly vulnerable countries. Financing of climate action through this regulation will contribute to the honouring of the developed countries’ commitment to mobilise USD 100 billion per year from 2020 to address the needs of developing countries.
Amendment 530 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) This Regulation should enable the Union to respond to challenges, needs and opportunities related to migration, in complementarity with Union migration policy. To contribute to that end, and without prejudice to unforeseen circumstances, 10% of its financial envelope is expected to be dedicated to addressing the root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement and to supporting migration management, to contribute to helping host communities provide concrete support for displaced persons, notably the provision of access to basic services and livelihoods opportunities and to supporting strengthened engagement to facilitate safe, orderly, regular and responsible migration and the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies and governance including the protection of refugees and migrants' rights within the objectives of this Regulation.
Amendment 535 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Capacity building in support of development and security for development should be used in exceptional cases only, where the objectives of the Regulation cannot be met by other development cooperation activities. Giving support to security sector actors in third countries, excluding the military, in a conflict prevention, crisis management or stabilisation context is essential to ensure appropriate conditions for poverty eradication and development. Good governance, effective democratic control and civilian oversight of the security system, as well as compliance with human rights and the rule of law principles are essential attributes of a well-functioning State in any context, and should be promoted through a wider security sector reform support to third countries.
Amendment 590 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to pursue the eradication of poverty, especially in Least Developed Countries (LDCs);
Amendment 721 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Programmes and actions under this Regulation shall mainstream conflict prevention and peace-building, climate change, environmental protection and, gender equality and women’s empowerment, and shall address interlinkages between Sustainable Development Goals, to promote integrated actions that can create co-benefits and meet multiple objectives in a coherent way. These programmes and actions shall be based on an analysis of risks and vulnerabilities, integrate a resilience approach and be conflict sensitive. They shall be guided by the principle of leaving no one behind.
Amendment 728 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. The Commission shall ensure that actions adopted under this Regulation in relation to security, stability and peace, in particular with regard to capacity building of security actors in support of development and security for development, fight against terrorism and organised crime, and cyber-security, are applied in accordance with international law, including international human rights and humanitarian law. The Commission shall carefully monitor and report on the application of such actions pursuant to Article 31 in order to ensure compliance with human rights obligations. For such actions, the Commission shall pursue a conflict sensitive approach, including conflict analysis, in addition to the provisions on risk management under Article 8(8)b. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 34 supplementing this Regulation by establishing an operational framework to ensure that human rights are taken into consideration in the design and application of the measures referred to in this Article, in particular as regards the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and respect for due process, including the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial and rights of defence.
Amendment 738 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 41(2) of the Treaty on European Union, Union funding under this Regulation shall not be used to finance the procurement of arms or ammunition, or operations having military or defence implications. Any equipment supplied under this Regulation shall be subject to strict transfer controls as set out in the EU Common Position on Arms Exports.
Amendment 743 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Assistance pursuant to this Article may cover in particulashall be conflict sensitive and may cover in particular actions providing support and training to civil society actors, including women, men, girls and boys from diverse segments of society, to develop their capacity to monitor the actions of military forces. It may also cover the provision of capacity building programmes in support of development and security for development, including training, mentoring and advice, as well as the provision of equipment, infrastructure improvements and services directly related to that assistance.
Amendment 757 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) where a consensus exists between the partner country concerned and the Union that militarsecurity actors are key for preserving, establishing or re-establishing the conditions essential for sustainable development and that those security actors are not implicated in human rights violations or pose a threat to the functioning of state institutions, including in crises and fragile or destabilised contexts and situations.
Amendment 765 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) recurrent military expenditure;
Amendment 773 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 7
Article 9 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall establish appropriateundertake rigorous and systematic ex ante conflict analysis which fully integrates gender analysis, risk assessment, monitoring and evaluation procedures for measures pursuant to this Article.
Amendment 776 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9 a Scope of the thematic programmes 1. Thematic programmes shall cover the following areas of intervention: (a) Human Rights, Fundamental Freedoms and Democracy: - protecting and promoting human rights and human rights defenders in countries and urgency situations where human rights and fundamental freedoms are most at risk, including through addressing urgent protection needs of human rights defenders in a flexible and comprehensive manner. - upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, contributing to forging societies in which participation, non-discrimination, equality, social justice and accountability prevails. - consolidating and supporting democracy addressing all aspects of democratic governance, and supporting credible, inclusive and transparent electoral processes, in particular by means of EU Election Observation Missions (EU EOMs). - promoting effective multilateralism and strategic partnerships contributing to reinforcing capacities of international, regional and national frameworks and empowering local actors in promoting and protecting human rights, democracy and the rule of law. - fostering new cross-regional synergies and networking among local civil societies and between civil society and other relevant human rights bodies and mechanisms so as to maximise the sharing of best practices on human rights and democracy, and create positive dynamics. (b) Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities: - supporting inclusive, participatory, empowered and independent civil society in partner countries; - promoting dialogue with and between civil society organisations; - supporting capacity building of local authorities and mobilising their expertise to promote a territorial approach to development; - increasing awareness, knowledge and engagement of Union citizens about objectives specified in Article 3 of this Regulation; - supporting civil society to participate in public policy advocacy and dialogue with governments and international institutions; - supporting civil society to sensitize consumers and citizens and raise their awareness about environmental friendly and fair trade production and consumption, to encourage them to adopt more sustainable behaviour; (c) Stability and Peace - assistance for conflict prevention, peace- building and crisis preparedness; - assistance in addressing global and trans-regional threats and emerging threats; (d) global challenges - health, - education, - women, - children and youth, - migration and forced displacement, - decent work, social protection and inequality, - culture, - ensuring a healthy environment and tackling climate change, - sustainable energy, - sustainable and inclusive growth, decent jobs and private sector engagement, - food and nutrition, - access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene - promoting inclusive societies, good economic governance, and transparent public finance management. (e) Foreign Policy Needs and Priorities: - providing support for the Union's bilateral, regional and inter-regional cooperation strategies, promoting policy dialogue and developing collective approaches and responses to challenges of global concern; - providing support for Union trade policy; - contributing to the implementation of the international dimension of internal Union policies and promoting the widespread understanding and visibility of the Union and of its role on the world scene; 2. Further details of the areas of cooperation referred to in paragraph 3 are set out in Annex III.
Amendment 784 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. CAll cooperation and interventions under this Regulation shall be programmed, except for rapid response actions referred to in Article 4 (4) shall be conflict- and gender sensitive.
Amendment 851 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to address new needs or emerging challenges, such as those at the Union’s or its neighbours’ borders linked to crisis and post-crisis situations or migratory pressure;
Amendment 868 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) commitment to and progress in building deep and sustainable peace and democracy;
Amendment 882 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Indicatively 10 % of the financial envelope set out in Article 4(2)(a) to supplement the country financial allocations referred to in Article 12 shall be allocated to partner countries listed in Annex I in order to implement the performance-based approach. The performance-based allocations shall be decided on the basis of their progress towards democracy, human rights, rule of law, cooperation on migration, economic governance and reforms. The progress of partner countries shall be assessed annually.
Amendment 920 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Appropriate environmental screening, including for climate change and biodiversity impacts, shall be undertaken at the level of actions, in accordance with the applicable legislative acts of the Union, including Directive 2011/92/EU82 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 85/337/EEC83 , comprising, where applicable, an environmental impact assessment for environmentally sensitive actions, in particular for major new infrastructure; where exceptional assistance measures concern conflict related crises and threats to peace, conflict analysis and risk assessments shall be conducted in order to ensure positive impact and effectiveness of that assistance. _________________ 82 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification) (OJ L 26 28.1.2012. p.1). 83 Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 05.07.1985. p. 0040 – 0048).
Amendment 921 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Appropriate environmental screening, including for climate change and biodiversity impacts, shall be undertaken at the level of actions, in accordance with the applicable legislative acts of the Union, including Directive 2011/92/EU82 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 85/337/EEC83 , comprising, where applicable, an environmental impact assessment for environmentally sensitive actions, in particular for major new infrastructure. as well as a human rights due diligence and an assessment of externalities (beyond the environmental but also social and economic aspect). _________________ 82 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification) (OJ L 26 28.1.2012. p.1). 83 Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 05.07.1985. p. 0040 – 0048).
Amendment 927 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – point c
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – point c
(c) contributions to the necessary costs of setting up and administering a public- private partnership;, including support of broad participation by setting up independent 3rd party CSO body to assess and monitor PPP set-ups.
Amendment 941 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Budget support as referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1, including through sector reform performance contracts, shall be based on country ownership, mutual accountability and shared commitments to universal values, democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and aims at strengthening partnerships between the Union and partner countries. It shall include reinforced policy dialogue, capacity development, and improved governance, complementing partners' efforts to collect more and spend better in order to support sustainable and inclusive economic growth and decent jobs and poverty eradication.
Amendment 959 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 12
Article 24 – paragraph 12
12. Under the Democracy and Human Rights programme, Civil Society Organisations, Peace-building, Conflict Prevention and Stability, Global Challenges thematic programmes as well as for rapid response actions, any entity not covered under the definition of legal entity in Article 2(6) shall be eligible when this is necessary to pursue the areas of intervention of this programme.
Amendment 988 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Objectives for the EFSD+ 1. The EFSD+ operations eligible for support through the External Action Guarantee shall contribute to the following priority areas: (a) providing finance and support to private and cooperative sector development to contribute to sustainable development and, where appropriate, the European Neighbourhood Policy and the objectives set out in Article 3 of the of Regulation EU.../... [IPA III]; (b) addressing bottlenecks to private investments; (c) leveraging private sector financing, with a particular focus on micro, small and medium-sized enterprises; (d) strengthening socio-economic sectors and areas and related public and private infrastructure and sustainable connectivity and sustainable production, with the objective of promoting an inclusive and sustainable socio-economic development that respects human rights and the environment; (e) contributing to climate action and environmental protection and management; (f) contributing, by promoting sustainable development, to addressing specific root causes of migration, including irregular migration, and contribute to safe, orderly and regular migration and mobility. 2. The External Action Guarantee shall not be used to privatize or undermine the provision of essential public services, which remains a government responsibility.
Amendment 1039 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the financing and investment operations covered by the External Action Guarantee, and the functioning of the EFSD+, its management and its effective contribution to its objectives.That report shall be made public and be accompanied by an opinion of the Court of Auditors.It shall include the following elements: (a) an assessment of the results contributing to the purpose and objectives of the EFSD+ as set out in Article 26(1); (b) an assessment of current financing and investment operations and covered by the External Action Guarantee at sector, country and regional levels and their compliance with this Regulation, including the risk measures and their impact on the financial and economic stability of the partners; (c) an assessment of the additionality and added value, the mobilisation of private sector resources, the estimated and actual outputs and the outcomes and impact of the financing and investment operations covered by the External Action Guarantee on an aggregated basis, including the impact on decent job creation and ability to provide a living wage, the eradication of poverty and the reduction of inequality, are addressed;that assessment shall include a gender analysis of the operations covered based on evidence and data broken down by gender, where possible, and an analysis of the type of private sector supported including cooperatives and social enterprises; (d) an assessment of the compliance with the requirements concerning the use of the External Action Guarantee and of the achievement of key performance indicators established for each proposal submitted; (e) an assessment of the leverage effect achieved by the operations covered by the External Action Guarantee; (f) the financial amount transferred to beneficiaries and an assessment of financing and investment operations by each eligible counterpart on an aggregated basis; (g) an assessment of the additionality and added value of financing and investment operations of the eligible counterparts, and of the aggregate risk associated with those operations; (h) detailed information on calls on the External Action Guarantee, losses, returns, amounts recovered and any other payments received, as well as overall risk exposure; (i) the financial reports on financing and investment operations of the eligible counterparts covered by this Regulation, audited by an independent external auditor; (j) an assessment of the synergies and complementarity between operations covered by the External Action Guarantee and the second and third pillars of the EIP based on relevant existing reports, with particular regard to progress made on good governance, including in the fight against corruption and illicit financial flows, respect for human rights, the rule of law and gender-responsive policies, as well as the boosting of local entrepreneurship and local financial markets; (k) an assessment of the compliance of External Action Guarantee operations with the internationally agreed development effectiveness principles; (l) an assessment of the remuneration of the guarantees and of the application of the provisions related to excluded activities and non-cooperative jurisdictions.
Amendment 1082 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part A – point 1 – point j
Annex II – part A – point 1 – point j
(j) Increasing transparency and accountability of public institutions, strengthening public procurement, including the development of sustainable criteria (environmental, social and economic) and targets and public finance management, developing eGovernment and strengthening service delivery;
Amendment 92 #
2018/0225(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 8
Annex I – paragraph 8
In the implementation of Horizon Europe, particular attention will be paid to ensuring a balanced and broad approach to research and innovation, which is not only limited to the development of new products processes and services on the basis of scientific and technological knowledge and breakthroughs, but also incorporates the use of existing technologies in novel applications and continuous improvement and non-technological and social innovation. A systemic, cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral and cross-policy approach to research innovation will ensure that challenges can be tackled while also giving rise to new competitive businesses and industries, fostering competition, stimulating private investments and preserving the level playing field in the internal market. In line with Union commitments to the reduction and eradication of poverty, particular attention will be paid to innovation for the benefit of international development and humanitarian assistance.
Amendment 101 #
2018/0225(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 18
Annex I – paragraph 18
The Commission will systematically identify and record the results of the research and innovation activities under the Programme and transfer or disseminate these results and knowledge produced in a non-discriminatory fashion to industry and enterprises of all sizes, public administrations, academia, civil society organisations and policy-makers within and outside the EU, in order to maximise the European added value of the Programme.
Amendment 105 #
2018/0225(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 19
Annex I – paragraph 19
Greater impact will be obtained through aligning actions with other nations and regions of the world within an international cooperation effort of unprecedented scale. Based on mutual benefit, partners from across the world will be invited to join EU efforts as an integral part of initiatives in support of EU action for poverty- eradication, sustainability, reinforced research and innovation excellence, and competitiveness.
Amendment 109 #
2018/0225(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 20
Annex I – paragraph 20
International joint action, particularly focused on addressing market failures, will ensure effective tackling of global societal challenges and neglected areas of research, achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, access to the world’s best talents, expertise and resources, and enhanced supply and demand of innovative solutions.
Amendment 119 #
2018/0225(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 3
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 3
Health research and innovation research and innovation have played a significant part in this achievement but also in improving productivity and quality in the health and care industry. However, the EU continues to face novel, newly emerging or persisting challenges that are threatening its citizens and public health, the sustainability of its health care and social protection systems, as well as the competitiveness of its health and care industry. Major health challenges in the EU include: the lack of effective health promotion and disease prevention; the rise of non-communicable diseases; the spread of antimicrobial drug resistance and the emergence of infectious epidemics; increased environmental pollution; the persistence of health inequalities among and within countries affecting disproportionally people that are disadvantaged or in vulnerable stages of life; the detection, understanding, control, prevention and mitigation of health risks in a rapidly changing social, urban and natural environment; the increasing costs for European health care systems and the progressive introduction of personalised medicine approaches and digitalisation in health and care; and the increasing pressure on the European health and care industry to remain competitive in and by developing health innovation vis-a-vis new and emerging global players. Globally, deaths from preventable diseases remain unacceptably high, particularly for children. Access to essential medicines remains out of reach for many in the developing world, due to prohibitively high costs, or because insufficient investment has been made into tackling neglected diseases. Health research under Horizon Europe must be driven by the principles of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health to increase research into neglected diseases, ensure global access to essential medicines, recognise the right to healthcare as a human right, and stimulate new funding mechanisms to encourage greater collaborative efforts to tackle global health challenges in Europe and the developing world.
Amendment 146 #
2018/0225(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.4 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.4 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– The capacities of society to increase resilience and better manage and reduce disaster risk, including through nature-based solutions, by enhancing prevention, preparedness and response to existing and new risks
Amendment 60 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) To deliver scientific, economic and societal impact in pursuit of this general objective, the Union should invest in research and innovation through Horizon Europe - a Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2021-2027 (the ‘Programme’) to support the creation and diffusion of high-quality knowledge and technologies within and outside the EU, to strengthen the impact of research and innovation in developing, supporting and implementing Union policies, to support the uptake of innovative solutions in industry and society to address global challenges, meet the Sustainable Development Goals and promote industrial competitiveness; to foster all forms of innovation, including breakthrough innovation, and strengthen market deployment of innovative solutions; and optimise the delivery of such investment for increased impact within a strengthened European Research Area.
Amendment 87 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) The Programme should promote and integrate cooperation with third countries and international organisations and initiatives based on common interest, mutual benefit and global commitments to implement the UN SDGs. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union's research and innovation excellence, attractiveness and economic and industrial competitiveness, to tackle global challenges, as embodied in the UN SDGs, and to support the Union's external policies, notably the reduction and long- term eradication of poverty. An approach of general opening for international participation and targeted international cooperation actions should be followed, including through appropriate eligibility for funding of entities established in low to middle income countries. At the same time, association of third countries to the Programme should be promoted.
Amendment 93 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) In line with the objectives of international cooperation as set out in Articles 180 and 186 TFEU, the participation of legal entities established in third countries and of international organisations should be promoted. In support of the participation of entities established in third countries, training and information activities shall be provided to the national contact points (NCPs) and to all relevant stakeholders from research organisations to private sector, civil society, as well as local and national authorities. The implementation of the Programme should be in conformity with the measures adopted in accordance with Articles 75 and 215 TFEU and should be in compliance with international law. For actions related to Union strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security, the participation to specific actions of the Programme may be limited to entities established in Member States only, or to entities established in specified associated or other third countries in addition to Member States.
Amendment 99 #
2018/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme’s general objective is to deliver scientific, economic and societal impact from the Union’s investments in research and innovation so as to strengthen the scientific and technological bases of the Union and foster its competitiveness, including in its industry, deliver on the Union strategic priorities, and contribute to tackling global challenges, including measures to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals inside and outside the Union.
Amendment 27 #
2018/0217(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled 'The Future of Food and Farming' of 29 November 2017 concludes that the Common Agricultural Policy (hereinafter ‘CAP’) should continue to step up its response to future challenges and, opportunities, by boosting employment, growth and investment and to adjust farmers' position in the value chain by boosting employment, growth and investments to facilitate business development in rural areas, promoting social inclusion, reduce development gaps between areas, fighting and adapting to climate change, technological change and bringing research and innovation out of the laboratories and onto fields and markets. The CAP should furthermore address citizens' concerns regarding sustainable agriculture production., food security an to foster sustainable development and efficient management of natural resources such as water, soil and air
Amendment 32 #
2018/0217(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) Moreover to upgrade the response of EU agriculture to societal demands on food and health, including safe, nutritious and sustainable food, as well as animal welfare to provide to the protection of biodiversity and preserve habitats and landscapes.
Amendment 34 #
2018/0217(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The CAP's compliance-driven delivery model should be adjusted to ensure a greater focus on results and performance. Accordingly the Union should set the basic policy objectives, types of intervention and basic Union requirements while greater responsibility and accountability for meeting those objectives should be borne by the Member States. As a consequence, there is a need to ensure greater subsidiarity in order to take better account of the local conditions and needs. Accordingly, under the new delivery model, Member States should be responsible for tailoring their CAP interventions in line with their specific needs and basic Union requirements in order to maximize their contribution to Union CAP objectives and to establish and design the compliance and control framework for beneficiaries.
Amendment 36 #
2018/0217(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The CAP encompasses various interventions and measures, many of which are covered by the CAP Strategic Plans referred to in Title III of Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council10 [the CAP Strategic Plan Regulation]. Others still follow the traditional compliance logic. It is important to provide financing for all interventions and measures in order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CAP such as ensuring a viable support farm income and resilience across the EU territory to enhance food security, increase competitiveness,improve farmers' position, contribute to climate change ,foster sustainable development ,promote employment, growth, social inclusion and local development in rural areas. Those interventions and measures have certain elements in common, therefore their financing should be dealt with in the same set of provisions. However, where necessary those provisions should allow for different treatment. Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council11 governed two European agricultural Funds, namely the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (‘EAGF’) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (‘EAFRD’) (hereinafter the "Funds"). Those Funds should be maintained in this Regulation. In view of the scope of the reform, it is appropriate to replace Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. _________________ 10 Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of […][…] (OJ L […], […], p. […]). 11 Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549).
Amendment 49 #
2018/0217(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Competent national authorities should make the CAP payments provided for by Union law to the beneficiaries in full in order to a lead towards a more sustainable agriculture, to support farmers' income and viability and to ensure that agriculture plays its full role in relation to the general objectives of the Union.
Amendment 53 #
2018/0217(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) The existing main elements of the integrated system and, in particular, the provisions concerning a system for identifying agricultural parcels, a geo- spatial and an animal-based application system, a system for identifying and registering payment entitlements, a system for recording the identity of beneficiaries and a control and penalties system should be maintained. Member States should continue to use data or information products provided by the Copernicus programme, in addition to information technologies such as GALILEO and EGNOS in order to ensure that comprehensive and comparable data is available throughout the Union for the purposes of monitoring agri-environment- climate policy and for the purposes of boosting the use of full, free and open data and information captured by Copernicus Sentinels satellites and services. Moreover satellite technology will significantly reduce the number of field inspections, removing the climate of fear, and will contribute in reducing the costs of administering controls and checks. To this end, the integrated system should include also an area monitoring system.
Amendment 75 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets out the challenges, objectives and orientations for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. These objectives include, inter alia, the need for the CAP to be more result-driven, to boost modernisation and sustainability, reducing development gaps between different areas including the economic, social, environmental and climate sustainability of the agricultural, forestry and rural areas, and to help reducing the Union legislation- related administrative burden for beneficiaries.
Amendment 82 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In view of further improving the performance of the CAP, income support should be targeted to genuine farmers. In order to ensure a common approach at Union level for such a targeting of support, a framework definition for ‘genuine farmer’ displaying the essentialcommon elements should be set out. On the basis of this framework, Member States should define in their CAP Strategic Plans which farmers are not considered genuine farmers based on conditions such as income tests, labour inputs on the farm, company object and inclusion in registers. It should also not result in precluding support to pluri-active farmers, who are actively farming but who are also engaged in non-agricultural activities outside their farm, as their multiple activities often strengthen the socio-economic fabric of rural areas and help to preserve the model of family farming that already exists in UE.
Amendment 84 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In order to ensure consistency between the direct payments types of interventions and rural development types of interventions when addressing the objective of generational renewal, a framework definition for ‘young farmer’ with the essential elements should be set out at Union levelcommon elements and practicing a credible agricultural activity should be set out at Union level for a balanced and fair rural economy.
Amendment 88 #
2018/0216(COD)
(12) A smarter, modernised and more sustainable CAP needs to embrace research and innovation, in order to serve the multi- functionality of Union agriculture, forestry and food systems, reduce poverty, technological changes, investing in technological development and digitalisation, as well as improving the access to impartial, sound, relevant and new knowledge; The existing gender gaps, including digital gender gap, a gender- perspective must be incorporated and Member States should develop sub- programmes in the Strategic Plan for supporting women farmers to utilise financial instruments and to upgrade their knowledge and skills.
Amendment 95 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 – introductory part
Recital 16 – introductory part
(16) Bolstering environmental care and climate action and contributing to the achievement of Union environmental- and climate-related objectives is a very high priority in the future of Union agriculture and forestry. The architecture of the CAP should therefore reflect greater ambition and must be speeded up to meet with respect to these objectives and by making farming a strong pylon in the battle against climate change . By virtue of the delivery model, action taken to tackle environmental degradation and climate change should be result-driven and Article 11 TFEU should, for this purpose, be considered as an obligation of result.
Amendment 99 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The CAP should keep ensuring food security, which should be understood as meaning access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food at all times. Moreover, it should help improving the response of Union agriculture to new societal demands on food and health, including sustainable agricultural production, healthier nutrition, food waste and animal welfare. The CAP should continue to promote production with specific and valuable characteristics, while at the same time helping farmers to proactively adjust their production according to market signals and consumers’ demands also thought access to land at reasonable prices, encourage young farmers to setup in business and by promoting short supply chains and local purchasing.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Member States should set farm advisory services for the purpose of improving the sustainable management and overall performance of agricultural holdings and rural businesses, covering economic, environmental and social dimensions, and to identify the necessary improvements as regards all measures at farm level provided for in the CAP Strategic Plans. These farm advisory services should help farmers and other beneficiaries of CAP support to become more aware of the relationship between farm management and land management on the one hand, and certain standards, requirements and information, including environmental and climate ones, on the other hand. The list of the latter includes standards applying to or necessary for farmers and other CAP beneficiaries and set in the CAP Strategic Plan, as well as those stemming from the legislation on water, on the sustainable use of pesticides, as well as the initiatives to combat antimicrobial resistance and the management of risks, and to promote the sustainable management of nutrients. In order to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the advice, Member States should integrate advisors within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), in order to be able to deliver up-to-date technological and scientific information developed by research and innovation.
Amendment 109 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The CAP should ensure that Member States increase the environmental delivery by respecting local needs and farmers' actual circumstances. Member States should under direct payments in the CAP Strategic Plan set up Eco-schemes voluntary for farmers, which should be fully coordinated with the other relevant interventions. They should be defined by the Member States as a payment granted either for incentivising and remunerating the provision of public goods by agricultural practices beneficial to the environment and climate or as a compensation for the introduction of these practices. In both cases they should aim at enhancing the environmental and climate performance of the CAP and should consequently be conceived to go beyond the mandatory requirements already prescribed by the system of conditionality. Member States may decide to set up eco- schemes forto promote production models that are beneficial for the environment and to promote all kind of agricultural practices such as, among other measures, the enhanced management of permanent pastures and landscape features, and organic farming. These schemes may also include ‘entry-level schemes’ which may be a condition for taking up more ambitious rural development commitments.
Amendment 112 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Member States should be allowed to use part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments for coupled income support in order to improve competitiveness, sustainability, and/or quality in certain sectors and productions that are particularly important for social, economic or environmental reasons and undergo certain difficulties and where other tools are not sufficient enough or don´t exist, Member States should be free to identify the sectors that should benefit from this. Furthermore, Member States should also be allowed to use an additional part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments to grant coupled income support specifically for the support of protein crop production in order to reduce the Union's deficit in this regard.
Amendment 113 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) Taking into account the on-going development of digitalisation in agricultural sector, Member States may develop sub-programme to upgrade digital skills in rural areas and may take further measures to minimize the digital gender gap by facilitating women’s access to life- long learning, vocational and professional training in rural areas.
Amendment 130 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 80
Recital 80
(80) Farmers are increasingly facing risks of income volatility, partly because of market exposure and catastrophic or systemic risks , partly because of extreme weather events and frequent sanitary and phytosanitary crises affecting the Union livestock and agronomic assets. To develop strategies and to alleviate the effects of income volatility by encouraging farmers to make savings in good years to cope with bad years, national tax measures whereby the income tax base applied to farmers is calculated on the basis of a multiannual period should be exempted from the application of the State aid rules.
Amendment 133 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to foster a long-lasting, smart, resilient, sustainable and diversified agricultural sector ensuring food security;
Amendment 137 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) promote employment, growth, gender equality, social inclusion and local development in rural areas, including bio- economy and sustainable forestry;
Amendment 1 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Recalls TFEU art 208 in which the Union policy in the field of development cooperation shall be conducted within the framework of the principles and objectives of the Union's external action, which primary objective is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty; stresses that the Union's development cooperation policy and that of the Member States complement and reinforce each other; recalls article 21(2) TEU sets out that the development cooperation policy contributes to the objectives of EU external action; Calls for full respect of the TFEU and the TUE legal commitments and for a development oriented external instrument in the next MFF 2021-2027;
Amendment 5 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the proposal for a Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) reflects a new approach to foreign and development policy; recalls thatunderlines that poverty eradication, sustainable human and economic development, good governance and peace and security are essential for achieving the goal of eradicating povertytackling inequality, injustice and exclusion, good governance and peace and security must be the EU´s external financial instruments primary objectives in the next MFF, as well as achieving its Sustainable Development Goals commitments honouring the TFUE art.208.2;
Amendment 13 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the next MFF must ensure that the external instruments are policy driven, serving the most effective way possible to the pursuit of the objectives of the relevant policies, as laid down in the Treaty ; recalls that EU domestic interest should not drive its neighbourhood, development, humanitarian and international cooperation agenda; underlines its opposition to the instrumentalisation of aid;
Amendment 18 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the new financing needs resulting from the deterioration of security conditions in the European Union's neighbourhood and the increase in migration flows to the Union are reflected in the mobilisation of new funds; notes that thmust be supported by Member States and Union's freseh new challenges must be added to existing sustainable development goalsfunds in the next MFF;
Amendment 22 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that country aid allocations within the EUs international cooperation programs should complemented foreign policy, while ensuring that development funding is used only for development related objectives and purposes and not to cover expenses related to the achievement of different objectives, such as border control or anti-migration policies;
Amendment 23 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that the design of the cooperation instrument should leave sufficient flexibility for tailoring programmes to the specific needs of third countries; reiterates that a substantial share of EU aid should be allocated to Least Developed Countries, as primary target of ODA; stresses that ensuring efficiency, effectiveness, visibility and policy coherence for development in the implementation; ensuring the participation of CSOs and implementing the rights-based approach to development cooperation, as well as introducing a benchmarking of 20% of funds for basic social services, are key development features to be maintained and improve in the next MFF cycle;
Amendment 24 #
2018/0166R(APP)
2c. Stresses that gender equality and women’s and girls’ rights and empowerment must be a significant objective, across all programmes, geographic and thematic; considers that the EU budget should be gender-and conflict-sensitive;
Amendment 27 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the NDICI appears to not substantially contain thcore elements for a more pragmatic implementation of the Union's development cooperation policy and reiterates its position that a single instrument for this policy is necessary and will allow for better cooperation with partner countries and stakeholders; notes with concern the lack of explicit reference in the objectives to eradication of poverty , sustainable development, the Sustainable Development Goals and combating inequality; underlines that these priorities must be reflected explicitly in the objectives of the proposed instrument;
Amendment 36 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Draws attention to the European Union's international commitments to increase its official development assistance to 0.7% of GNI and to contribute at least0.2% of GNI towards Least Developed Countries by 2030 and to provide new and additional funding for climate action in developing countries; asserts that these commitments must be properly reflected in MFF 2021-2027;
Amendment 49 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Acknowledges the significant efforts made by the EC to increase the allocation given to humanitarian aid budget line in the next MFF. However, notes that this increase does not respond yet to the level of needs, which have more than doubled since 2011;
Amendment 52 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the extension scope and allocation increase of the Emergency Aid Reserve to respond also to internal crises. Reminds that priority should be guarantee to sudden onset humanitarian crises outside the EU;
Amendment 53 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Stresses the need to seize the opportunity y of the next MFF to financially support Linking Relief , Rehabilitation and Development operations; underlines that implementing the humanitarian-development nexus requires ensuring complementarity of development and humanitarian activities, and a culture shift from the EU as a donor, towards more operational flexibility and risk taking to support LRRD, people and their communities resilience, early recovery and reconstruction; call for more multi-year planning and funding in EU humanitarian activities, and the systematic introduction of crisis modifiers in EU development activities in order enable EU´s partners to effectively contribute to the nexus implementation;
Amendment 54 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Underlines that the MFF 2021- 2027 must preserve and improve the EP oversight and scrutiny over the use of funds, with a clear mechanism and decision making process for the disbursement of unallocated funds, ensuring the EP impact in the programming and implementation phase of the external financial instruments; reiterates that any proposal for increased flexibility must be balanced by an improvement of transparency and accountability;
Amendment 42 #
2017/2594(RSP)
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that building resilience in partner countries is a long-term process and that this therefore needs to be integrated into development programmes; stresses that the new Joint Communication should recognise this and support the promotion of resilience as essential element of the sustainable development strategies of partner countries, particularly in fragile states; notes that these strategies need to be context-specific and in line with the principles of effective development including countrylocal ownership and shared accountability to European citizens and those from partner countries; underlines in this regard the important monitoring and scrutiny role of the European Parliament and of national parliaments;
Amendment 43 #
2017/2594(RSP)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses the importance of providing technical assistance to LDCs and fragile states in particular on sustainable land management, conservation of the ecosystems and water supply, being these, fundamental issues in order to achieve benefits for both the environment and the people who depend on it;
Amendment 66 #
2017/2594(RSP)
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the concept of resilience in the external action of the EU should maintain a global geographic scope; notes that fostering resilience should be an objective of the promotion of sustainable development in partner countries and not be limited to geographic areas facing security crises with an immediate impact on the EU; promoting resilience should in any case prioritise and pay particular attention to LDCs and fragile states;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2586(RSP)
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the clear recognition by the new Consensus that the primary objective of EU development policy is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty in line with the Article 208 of the TFEU; reiterates that this should be done fully in line with the principles of effective development cooperation: ownership of development priorities by developing countries, focus on results, inclusive partnerships and transparency and accountability; underlines the need to prioritize action on fragile states and global public goods, including climate change.
Amendment 4 #
2017/2586(RSP)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Strongly welcomes the objective to pursue an end to hunger, universal health coverage, universal access to quality education and training, adequate and sustainable social protection and decent work for all, within a healthy environment;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2586(RSP)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Welcomes the commitment to implement a rights-based approach to development cooperation and the promotion of the protection and fulfilment of women's and girls' rights;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2280(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the EU’s external financing instruments (EFIs) are a complex set of tools for the EU to support and enhance its action on the international scene, and that their complexity is coordinated by the Common Implementing Rules Regulation, which ensures a smooth and complementaryharmonised approach to the implementation of all instruments;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),
Amendment 53 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the effects of climate change have a tangible impact on several aspects of human life, on peace and security as well as on business models and trade relations, and that these effects are increasingly being felt in the lives of EU citizens, as well as challenging the international community; underlines the increasing urgency of climate action and that addressing climate change requires a joint effort at international level,; urges the Commission and EU Member States to continuously facilitate the multilateral discourse as it constitutes a collective responsibility towards the entire planet, for the current and future generations; notes that the fight against climate change is necessary for the protection of Human Rights;
Amendment 66 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms the EU’s commitment to the Paris Agreement and to the UN Agenda 2030, including the SDGs, and stresses the need to implement the Paris Agreement, in particular its objectives of mitigation, adaptation and redirecting finance flows, among others, and the SDGs both in the EU and globally to develop a more sustainable economy and society; reaffirms the need for an ambitious EU climate policy and its readiness to improve the existing EU National Determined Contribution (NDC) for 2030 as well the necessity of developing a long-term strategy for 2050 in a timely manner;
Amendment 70 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Strongly welcomes the European Council’s demand towards the Commission to present by the first quarter of 2019 the proposal for a Strategy for long-term EU greenhouse gas emissions reduction in accordance with the Paris Agreement, laid down in the Council Conclusions from 23 March 2018;
Amendment 71 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Urges the Commission to develop an ambitious proposal for a new EU long- term mid-century low-emission strategy that lays down concrete greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2050 for all sectors and a clear path how to reach these targets, and how to enhance removals by sinks in pursuit of the temperature goals and the Paris Agreement, so as to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions within the EU by 2050, and go into negative emissions soon thereafter; calls for this strategy to represent a fair distribution of efforts between sectors, to be consistent with a fair EU-share of the remaining global carbon budget, to include a mechanism to incorporate the results of the five yearly global stocktake, to build on national plans, to take into account the findings of the upcoming IPCC Special Report, the recommendations and positions by the European Parliament, as well as the views of non-state actors like local and regional authorities, the civil society and private sector;
Amendment 73 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Underlines the importance of an ambitious EU climate policy in order for the EU to act as a credible and reliable partner vis-à-vis third states and calls on the Commission and the Member States to take an active and constructive role during the 2018 Talanoa Dialogue and COP24 as 2018 will be a crucial year for the implementation of the Paris Agreement; urges the Commission and the Member States to raise the ambition of the EU’s NDC before 2020 taking into account the outcome of the Talanoa Dialogue; believes that the stocktaking mechanisms every five years should inform the possible raising of ambition of EU climate commitments; calls on the EU to show commitment beyond its NDC through substantial contributions of finances and capacities like technology and knowledge, by seeking and announcing alliances and cooperation on climate finance instruments, phasing out fossil fuel subsidies and shifting to an economy that is less harmful to the climate; stresses that a strong internal climate policy will help the EU to advocate for strong mitigation commitments of other countries and to find partners at the UNFCCC Conference of Parties;
Amendment 74 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 d (new)
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Welcomes the Commission’s Action Plan on sustainable finance, adopted on 8th March 2018, and the recommendations put forward by the High Level Expert Group On Sustainable Finance; believes that the financial system needs to contribute to the targets of the Paris Agreement as well as the SDGs; considers it necessary that investments and financial products are in line with climate policy and that they support the development towards a sustainable economy; is convinced that a true reform of the EU financial system to contribute to climate mitigation and incentivising investments in clean technologies and sustainable solutions will be a role model for other countries and help them to implement similar systems; underlines that a transformation towards a financial system in line with the Paris Agreement and the SDGs will reduce risks on the global financial system stemming from stranded fossil fuel assets;
Amendment 81 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the US President’s announcement of the country’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement gives the EU the opportunity and reinforces its obligation to assume a leading role in climate action and to step up its climate diplomacy efforts and to form a strong alliance of countries and actors that will continue to support and contribute to the objectives of limiting global warming to well below 2°C while pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C;
Amendment 86 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that mitigating climate change and moving towards a low- emission economy will contribute to enhanced peace and human security both within and outside of the EU as climate change often exacerbates existing instabilities and conflicts as well as deepening existing or creating new inequalities, even leading to increased - mainly internal - migration flows due to the scarcity of resources and lack of economic opportunities, a fragile governance structure, insufficient supply of water and food as well as a deterioration in living conditions;
Amendment 96 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reiterates that consequent and rapid climate action contributes essentially to the prevention of social, economic, but also security risks, the prevention of conflicts and instabilities and ultimately to the prevention of major political, social and economic costs;
Amendment 106 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Underlines that due to melting polar caps and rising sea levels people living on the coast line or on small island states are in particular danger; urges the Commission and the Member States to protect and preserve these living spaces through facilitating ambitious climate change mitigation goals as well as multilateral coastal protection measures;
Amendment 108 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Notes that the EU and its Member States are the largest provider of public climate finance; urges the Commission and the Member States to scale up their financial contributions to the collective goal to jointly mobilise USD 100 billion per year by 2020 through to 2025 for mitigation and adaptation purposes and to actively support the mobilisation of international climate finance through public sources by other countries as well as private sources; welcomes the announcements made at the ONE Planet Summit on 12 December 2017 that put an important focus on the need for financial support and the role of new instruments to trigger sustainable investments; recognises the Commission’s announcement of its new Action Plan for the Planet in this regard;
Amendment 120 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to raise international awareness for climate change through coordinated communication strategies and activities to increase public and political support; calls to especially create an international understanding of the interconnection of climate change and social injustice, migration, famine and poverty and that global climate action can largely contribute to the solution of these issues;
Amendment 127 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Commits itself to formulate an own position and recommendations for a new EU long-term mid-century strategy that shall be taken into account by the Commission and the Council before submitting the strategy to the UNFCCC;
Amendment 131 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Commits itself to making better use of its international role and its membership of international parliamentary networks, to stepping up its climate activities within its work in its delegations as well as through delegation visits, especially of ENVI and AFET Committees, and during European and international interparliamentary meetings as well as in dialogue platforms with national parliaments and subnational actors/non-state actors and civil society; encourages the inclusion of members of the AFET Committee into the parliamentary delegations to the annual COP; intends to set off an exchange on NDC implementation and to address EU’s financial contributions and efforts in projects in the respective countries to trigger an exchange on successes and shortcomings of existing cooperation;
Amendment 144 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Urges the Commission to provide, in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), for a bigger budget line dedicated to supporting climate change activities in existing programmes and future calls that reflects the increased importance and urgency of climate action and that translates into a higher target for climate related spending than the current 20% target, meaning at least a 30% target, in order to enable further climate diplomacy actions; calls for a better use of other EU funds to ensure resource efficiency, optimised outcomes and enhanced impact of EU actions and initiatives;
Amendment 155 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the EU must be an active player in international organisations and forums (such as the UN, UNFCCC, the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HPFL), NATO, the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the G7 and G20) and closely cooperate with regional organisations (such as the African Union (AU), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and MERCOSUR) to foster global partnerships and ensure the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the SDGs, while defending, strengthening, and further developing multilateral cooperation regimes; notes that climate can be an entry point for diplomatic relations with partners with whom other agenda items are highly contested, thereby offering an opportunity to enhance stability and peace;
Amendment 161 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the EU to mediate between disagreeing parties and facilitate consensus in order to ensure an effective and successful summitry, thereby injecting strong political momentum into the global discourse on climate action; calls on the EU and the Member States to stronger place climate action on the agenda of G20 summits and meetings as well as on the agenda of bilateral meetings of G20 members; calls on the Member States to enhance their engagement in the framework of the Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe (OSCE) in line with the targets of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 172 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to integrate the climate change dimension into international trade and investment agreements and to make compliance with the provisions of the Paris Agreement a condition for future trade agreements; calls on the Commission to streamline financial instruments and programmes to ensure coherence and increase the effectiveness of EU climate action; recommends the development and systematic inclusion of a fundamental climate change clause in international agreements with partners who have signed the Paris Agreement, supporting thereby the European and international decarbonisation process;
Amendment 187 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Supports sustained and active EU engagement within the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) and with its member countries to give visibility to their determination to achieve meaningful implementation of the Paris Agreement, the conclusion of its rule book in 2018 and a successful Talanoa Dialogue at COP24 that is aimed at motivating further States to join in with these efforts and to establish a group of climate leaders in the next few years that are ready to ramp up their climate targets in line with the Paris Agreement goals, in order to establish shared leadership;
Amendment 190 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the responsibility incumbent on the EU and other developedaffluent countries to show greater solidarity towards the vulnerable states and developing countries, many of them in the Global South, that are most affected by the impact of climate change and to ensure continuous support to help them recover from damage related to climate change, to improve adaptation measures and resilience through financial support and by means of capacity building; notes that vulnerable states are crucial partners for pushing for ambitious climate action internationally, due to the existential threat posed to them by climate change; calls on the Member States to support the efforts of developingless affluent countries to decrease dependence on fossil fuels and increase access to affordable renewable energy as well as to become low-carbon societies, especially by cooperating within NDC partnerships; highlights the opportunities offered by the EU External Investment Plan in stimulating climate-smart investments and supporting sustainable development;
Amendment 204 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recommends that the EU deepens its strategic cooperation on state- and non- state levels through zero-carbon development dialogues and partnerships with emerging economies and other countries which have a major impact on global warming, but which are also decisive in terms of global climate action; notes against this backdrop that climate can be an entry point for diplomatic relations with partners with whom other agenda items are highly contested, thereby offering an opportunity to enhance stability and peace; calls on the EU to create dedicated panels to debate climate and sustainability policies during high-level ministerial meetings; calls on the EU to build up and support partnerships for carbon markets and other carbon pricing instruments beyond Europe;
Amendment 215 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the EU to be at the forefront of developing international and regional partnerships on carbon markets as set out by Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and by using its understanding in setting up, adjusting and operating the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) and its experience in linking the ETS with the Swiss carbon market; calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the development of carbon pricing mechanisms in third states and regions and to foster international cooperation with the aim to make them compatible to a large extent in the medium-term and to create an international carbon market in the long- term; emphasizes, in this regard, the successful cooperation of the past years between the EU and China enabling the launch of the nationwide emission trading system in China in December 2017 and urges the EU to continuously support China’s carbon trading ambition and enhance the future cooperation;
Amendment 233 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers it important that the EU keep up its efforts to re-engage the US in multilateral cooperation andwithout jeopardizing the Paris Agreement’s level of ambition; points out that the Brexit negotiations and the future relationship with the UK must reflect the need for continued cooperation on climate diplomacy;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the EU to further intensify its relations with local and regional authorities in third countries to enhance thematic cooperation between cities and regions both within and outside of the EUNotes that regions and cities play an increasingly important role for a sustainable development as they are affected by climate change directly, as their growth has direct impact on the climate and as they are becoming more active in the mitigation of and adaptation to climate change, sometimes in the light of opposing policies of their national governments; therefore, calls on the EU to further intensify its relations with local and regional authorities in third countries to enhance thematic cooperation between cities and regions both within and outside of the EU to develop adaptation and resilience initiatives and emission reduction plans in key sectors such as energy, industry, technology, agriculture and transport in both urban and rural areas, e.g. through twinning programmes, through the International Urban Cooperation programme, through support of platforms like the Covenant of Mayors and by building new fora for exchanging best practice; calls on the EU and the Member States to support efforts by regional and local actors to introduce regionally and locally determined contributions (similar to NDCs) where climate ambition can be increased through this process; notes the role EU delegations in third countries can play in this regard;
Amendment 245 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Notes that increasing urbanisation visible in many parts of the world aggravates existing challenges caused by climate change due to a higher demand for resources like energy, land and water and contributes to further deterioration of environmental problems in many conurbations in and outside the EU, like air pollution and increased volumes of waste; notes that further consequences of climate change, like extreme weather events, droughts and land degradation are often felt in rural areas particularly; believes that local and regional authorities need to receive special attention and support to address these challenges, to establish better resilience and to contribute to mitigation efforts by developing new energy supply as well as transport concepts;
Amendment 247 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Believes that the increased importance and influence of elected local and regional authorities and this form of bottom-up government should be better reflected within the UNFCCC regulatory and structural framework and its processes including the Talanoa Dialogue and the five yearly Global Stocktake by recognising their role in a formalised manner; believes that the EU should support the possibility for cities and regions to submit local and regional determined contributions that could help to increase ambition towards full implementation of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 249 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the EU and its Member States to strengthen their ties with civil societyand support for civil society around the globe as agents for climate action, and to form alliances and build up synergies with the scientific community, non-governmental organisations, and non- traditional actors and the private sector; encourages the EU and its Member States to engage with the private sector, to enhance cooperation on how to reap the opportunities from the transition towards a zero-carbon economy, to develop export strategies for climate technologies for countries globally and to encourage technology transfer to and capacity- building in third countries;
Amendment 256 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Underlines the importance of scientific research for climate political decision making; notes that transboundary scientific exchange is a fundamental component of international cooperation; urges the Commission and the Member States to continuously support scientific organisations that work on climate risk assessment and that aim on estimating the implications of climate change and that offer possible adaption measures for political authorities; urges the EU to use their own research capacities in order to contribute to global climate action;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2266(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points outIs aware that IUU fishing is a major economic and environmental problem worldwide, in both marine and freshwater fisheries, threatening the sustainability of fish stocks and food security, and the biodiversity of the world’s oceans; stresses that IUU fishing also undermines fisheries management efforts and constitutes unfair competition for fishers, in particular from artisanal fleets, and others who operate in accordance with the law, with serious social and economic, economic and environmental repercussions; notes that high levels of IUU fishing tend to be more frequent in countries with weak governance;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2266(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that developing countries are particularly vulnerable to IUU fishing due to their limited capacity for control and surveillance of their waters, which further destabilises the management of their fisheries; highlights that IUU fishing deprives developing countries of revenue and food, particularly when these activities take place in the same fishing grounds where small-scale local fishers operate;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2266(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is convinced that the fight against IUU fishing requires a multilateral approach and greatly depends on a coherent response at international level, including from flag states, coastal states, port states and market states; takes the view that this response should be based on the uniform application of international law and regulations on IUU fishing and on an extensive and accurate exchange of information; calls on the international community to take similar measures to those adopted by the EU to close markets to IUU-caught fish.;
Amendment 53 #
2017/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that in their first years of implementation, the DCI and the EDF have enabled the EU to respond to new crises and needs thanks to the broad nature of the instruments’ objectives; notes, however, that a multiplication of crises and the emergence of new political priorities have put financial pressure on the DCI, the EDF and the HAI, have stretched these instruments to their limits and have required the setting-up of new ad hoc mechanisms such as trust funds; recalls the recently adopted European Fund for Sustainable Development, which has been created to provide further leverage capacity;
Amendment 73 #
2017/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is satisfied with the simplification, harmonisation and broader implementation modalities introduced in Regulation 236/2014 on common rules for the implementation of the EFIs, which has brought about more effectiveness in the DCI; notes, however, that the implementation procedures, some of them originating from the Financial Regulation, are still perceived as lengthy and burdensome; stresses that the DCI Regulation does not provide details on a monitoring and evaluation system for measuring the instrument's performance;
Amendment 86 #
2017/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines that more efforts have to be taken in order to ensure greater coherence between geographic and thematic programmes;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the EDF has played an important role in addressing poverty eradication and the attainment of the SDGs; notes, however, that evidence of progress is weaker at regional level and that the EDF has not consistently established solid synergies and coherence across its national, regional and intra-ACP cooperation programmes;
Amendment 147 #
2017/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Is of the view that in a context of multiple crises and uncertainty the EFIs need to have sufficient flexibility to be able to adjust swiftly to changing priorities and unforeseen events, and to deliver rapidly on the ground; recommends, to this end, a smart use of the EFIs reserve or the unused funds, more flexibility in the multiannual programming, an appropriate combination of funding modalities and greater simplification at implementation level; also, points out that the balance between long-term commitments to uphold reforms in partner countries and short-term actions should be reviewed;
Amendment 167 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 a (new)
Subheading 3 a (new)
Amendment 94 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights, however, the persistent structural problem of insufficient growth of potential output and productivity, flanked by too low a level of investments and wages, leading to persistent social inequalities; underlines the importance of socially-balanced structural reforms in order to achieve social justice, diminish income inequalities and foster convergence towards better outcomes;
Amendment 120 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of a responsible wage increase at European level in order to boost private consumption as the main support for growth; points out the need to focus on the interaction between monetary, fiscal and incomes (including wage and profit development) policies rather than only fiscal issues;
Amendment 160 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the importance of public investment for accelerating the pace of reforms and for boosting and leveraging investment in the EU; considers that the policy mix proposed in the AGS 2018 should be further developed to remedy the current decrease in public investment in the EU; highlights that this decrease also affects local and regional authorities, threatening their ability to deliver quality public services;
Amendment 183 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. URecalls the Commission’s efforts to reinforce the role and visibility of social indicators encompassed in the European Semester and calls, when formulating country-specific recommendations and the euro-area recommendation, to take into consideration the existing scoreboard of key employment and social indicators; underlines that the European Semester and the Country-Specific Recommendations should achieve the objectives set out in the Pillar of Social Rights;
Amendment 206 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Insists on the need to develop within the European semester a comprehensive and an ambitious strategy to support investment that enhances environmental sustainability; calls on the Commission, in this respect, to demonstrate how its statement that ‘the SDGs are now fully integrated in the Semester’ (Commission communication of 22 May 2017, COM(2017)0500) is reflected in Annual Growth Survey 2018 and will be reflected in the subsequent Semester process;
Amendment 217 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the AGS 2018 acknowledges the need for efficient and fair tax systems to ensure sustainable finance and reverse the current fall in capital income taxation; recalls that fair and growth-friendly tax systems can diminish inequalities and poverty and boost employment; supports the Commission’s initiatives to achieve increased transparency, a reformed VAT system and a common consolidated corporate tax base;
Amendment 257 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls that the role of the Member States is to guarantee equal opportunity and access to quality education and training; underlines that this requires to invest in both initial and continuing education and training and to upgrade vocational training and strengthen work- based learning, including through quality apprenticeships;
Amendment 302 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that a fiscal capacity – on top of existing capacities, and not through redeployments that would undermine the vital role currently played by structural funds and cohesion policy – represents a necessary tool for increasing incentives for convergence and to counter asymmetric or symmetric economic shocks; stresses that the fiscal capacity should be complementary and additional to other existing instruments of the EU budget;
Amendment 310 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Is concerned that gaps and discrimination on the labour market remain high throughout the European Union, contributing to differences in remuneration, retirement, participation in decision- making and wealth between men and women and considers that more efforts have to be made in order to improve the participation of women in the labour market, to eliminate gender pay gaps and to promote a better work-life balance for men and women; stresses the importance of preserving high standards in relation to the quality of the proposed employment;
Amendment 367 #
2017/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines that any further step towards a deepening of the EMU must go hand in hand with stronger democratic ownership, legitimacy, accountability and controls; insists that, to this end, the role of the European Parliament and national parliaments must be strengthened; asks to include trade unions in the negotiation process at both national and European level; urges the launch of the long-awaited negotiation of an interinstitutional agreement (IIA) on the Semester;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2206(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the allegations that ODA projects have negatively affected the rights of indigenous peoples; regrets that the REDD+ programme has failed to secure tenure rights for local forest communities; urges the EU to support the inclusion of human rights obligations in all domestic and international mitigation and adaptation instruments; calls on the EU Delegations to reinforce the dialogue with indigenous peoples on the ground further in order to identify and prevent human rights violations;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2206(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that particular attention should be given to empowering indigenous women, in particular by strengthening their equal access to productive resources and agricultural inputs;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2086(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to make climate financethe financing of both adaptation to climate change and mitigation of its effects gender-responsive; encourages the private sector and other climate finance mechanisms at national and global level to engage in gender mainstreaming during all phases of the project cycle, namely design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation;
Amendment 32 #
2017/2086(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to address the gender-differentiated investment risks to sustainable agriculture; calls for the EU to help developing countries reform laws and eliminate practices that restrict women’s ownership of and access to productive resources, advisory or financial services;
Amendment 53 #
2017/2086(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recalls the climate change impact on the energy sector and highlights that, within the latter, women and men have different gender-defined roles; emphasizes the need to incorporate gender mainstreaming into energy policies and programmes to improve its effectiveness and efficiency;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes this new communication, which aims to impart fresh impetus to the Africa-EU partnership in order to broaden and intensify it, gearing it to prosperity and stability on the two continents, in accordance with the commitments given in subscribing to the SDGs, the new European consensus for development, which serves as guideline for European development policy, the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy and Agenda 2063;
Amendment 115 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines the need for a stronger political partnership with shared responsibilities between the EU and Africa, that will give greater African ownership on programs and goals based on shared values and interest;
Amendment 170 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines within the EU/African partnership the necessity to create decent jobs and ensure decent payment and to link investment to it; calls to comply with ILO standards, including those related to a safe and healthy working environment; stresses the importance to respect and strengthen the role of social partners amongst others in involving them in monitoring, consultation processes, policy making and implementation notably of social, trade and economic policies and to support the organisation and carrying into effect of social dialogue and collective bargaining;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Recognises the fundamental role of small-scale producers to attain food security; calls for support to notably small-holder farmers and pastoralists through building up and investing in infrastructure that facilitates the regional food supply and diversity of food production and that are in line with the Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems of the CFS, in granting them access to land and water, in preserving healthy water and soil ecosystems and respecting non- documented traditional use thereof, in guaranteeing access to open source seeds in great variety that also contribute to biodiversity, in facilitating participatory land use planning and rangeland management of small-scale producers, and in supporting the establishment of cooperatives;
Amendment 194 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Recognises that the increasing population in Africa is both a challenge and an opportunity for the continent and therefore calls on the EU to be committed in promoting appropriate public policies and investments in health, education, and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) to ensure young people are equipped to make informed decisions about their SRH, without which social, economic and environmental resilience cannot be reached;
Amendment 207 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the EU to support Africa to build the capacity of its administrative structure by opening channels for more young Africans participation in the Erasmus+ programme: mobility of staff and students and academic cooperation by providing trainings for teachers in a few key disciplines in order to improve students' skills and education quality and relevance;
Amendment 212 #
2017/2083(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Considers it important to support African countries in establishing effective health systems; in this context, the importance of investing in science, technology and innovation (STI) to tackle the still huge burden of poverty-related and neglected diseases (PRNDs) that disproportionately affect the most marginalised African populations, and thereby addressing the critical need to achieve the SDGs;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2070(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the importance of the multilateral system as the most effective way to achieve an inclusive global trading system; which works in the interest of developing countries; regrets in this regard the failure of the WTO 11th Ministerial Conference to make progress on issues of key importance to developing countries; welcomes however enhanced preferential treatment previously secured at the WTO for LDCs including preferential Rules of Origin and treatment for service providers; further welcomes the extension of the WTO waiver for pharmaceutical products for LDCs until 2033; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to ensure that trade provisions do not hinder access to medicine, and TRIPS+ provisions such as data exclusivity are not included in trade agreements with developing countries;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2070(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of comprehensive provisions on social, labour and environmental standards in trade agreements; urges the Commission to include a sanctions-based, binding and enforceable chapter on Trade and Sustainable Development in all trade agreements; insists strong provisions to tackle tax evasion and avoidance are included in EU FTAs and preferential trade regimes;
Amendment 18 #
2017/2070(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the conclusion of the Regulation on Conflict Minerals1 and calls for its speedy implementation including the accompanying measures; encourages the Commission to introduce greater transparency and accountability in global supply chains, including binding due diligence obligations for supply chains in the garment sector; _________________ 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, OJ L 130, 19.5.2017, p. 1.
Amendment 32 #
2017/2070(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that EU trade and development policy must contribute towards regional integration and the incorporation of developing countries into global value chains; calls on the Commission to continue to support the development of the Continental Free Trade Area in Africa through political and technical assistance;
Amendment 35 #
2017/2070(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the progress on the conclusion and implementation of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and calls on the Commission to advance dialogue in a spirit of genuine partnership; calls in order to address outstanding issues; recalls EPAs are asymmetrical agreements with equal importance given to development and trade aspects; calls in this regard for the timely implementation of accompanying measures including the disbursement of EDF resources;
Amendment 41 #
2017/2070(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the importance of robust monitoring mechanisms in trade agreements with developing countries, including; recalls that monitoring and enforcement of sustainable development provisions require sustained and comprehensive engagement with civil society organisations including local partners; welcomes the fact that EU monitoring missions are being sent to all GSP+ countries and urges the Commission to carry out a critical assessment of progress reports in order to evaluate the ability of trade preferences to deliver development outcomes;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2055(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that intensified activities in coastal and marine waters increasingly require the implementation of Maritime Spatial Planning; calls on the Commission to work towards international guidelines on Maritime Spatial Planning and help expand Marine Protected Areas worldwide with funding under Horizon 2020 and LIFE programmes;
Amendment 40 #
2017/2055(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Commends the EU's international leadership in achieving concrete progress in the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU) and its strong commitment in implementing effective measures against IUU fishing; recalls the EU's efforts to reinforce its international actions against IUU fishing at bilateral, regional and multilateral level, including by continuing bilateral dialogues with third partners, using vessel tracking instruments and securing greater role for key international agencies such as Interpol; calls on the Member States' authorities to actively support the Commission's work in establishing an electronic tool for management of catch certificates;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2055(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Looks forward to the Commission's proposals on coordinating EU research and observation activities with international partners, and exploring ways to improve research quality inter alia through extending the existing EU research and observation tools and activities, including the European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet) in order to put in place a shared database, the European Earth Observation Programme (Copernicus), the European Global Ocean Observing System (EuroGOOS) and the Joint Programming Initiative 'Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans' (JPI Oceans), all with the aim of creating an international marine and maritime data network;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the EU’s commitment to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) worldwide must guide the preparation of the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and that the EU’s support for such implementation , focusing on long-term objectives such as eradication of poverty, tackling inequality and exclusion, promoting developing countries must increasemocratic governance and human rights, and enhancing sustainable and inclusive development;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that EU Development Cooperation has as its primary objective the eradication of poverty as enshrined in article 208 TFEU; calls for the next MFF to maintain the integrity of development and humanitarian aid, which should support the capacity and interests of developing countries in line with internationally agreed development effectiveness principles;
Amendment 22 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines, in this context, the need to focus on the health, food, education, water and sanitation, energy, industry, innovation and infrastructure and governance SDGincrease the level of resources allocated to development cooperation in order to implement Agenda 2030 in an integrated and holistic way; emphasises the need to fulfil EU commitments to allocate 20% of its ODA to social inclusion and human development with a focus on education and health; recalls EU commitment to gender mainstreaming in the next MFF and the need to invest in powerful enablers to sustainable human development such as sexual and reproductive health and rights;
Amendment 30 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines, in this context, the need to focus on the health, security, food, education, employment, water and sanitation, energy, industry, innovation and infrastructure and governance SDGs;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the crucial role of official development assistance (ODA) in least developed countries and fragile states; notes its potential to facilitate the mobilisation of financing for development from other sources, private and public, domestic and international; supports the EU’s new efforts at stimulating private investment through blending grants and loans and providing guarantees, also in countries where the needs are great, but and recalls EU commitment under the Addis Ababa Action Agenda to reach 0,20% of ODA/GNI to least developed countries, abiding by the prisks are high; notes that important funding needs will arise as a resultnciple of leaving no one behind;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the next MFF also to reflect the unprecedented needs for humanitarian aid, caused by natural and man-made disasters driven, inter alia, by climate change and human insecurity, conflicts and forced displacement; calls in particular for maintaining a separate instrument for humanitarian aid with its own legal basis, budget and long term funding strategy, as well as a substantial humanitarian aid reserve;
Amendment 67 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the next MFF also to reflect the unprecedented needs for humanitarian aid, caused by natural and man-made disasters driven, inter alia, by climate change and to consider earmarking more resources to the civil protection instrument and equip their use with more flexibility;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the next MFF should enable the Union to provide solutions and emerge strengthened from the crises of the decade: the economic and financial downturn, the phenomenon of migration and refugees, climate change and natural disasters, terrorism and instability, persistent poverty, increasing inequality, to name but a few; underlines that these global, cross-border challenges with domestic implications reveal the interdependency of our economies and societies, and point to the need for joint actions; stresses in this context the obligation to align the EU’s budgetary framework with the Sustainable Development Goals which provide a global roadmap for more sustainable, equitable and prosperous societies within planetary boundaries; recalls that all EU member states and the European Commission itself had signed up the SDG Declaration in November 2015
Amendment 76 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out the need to reinforce the essential role of the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights in promoting European values worldwide and consolidating human rights and democracy in EU external action;
Amendment 80 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for the next MFF to adequately resource the EEAS and EU Delegations, in order to allow them to meet their objectives and obligations in the field of development cooperation and humanitarian aid;
Amendment 81 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Calls for the next MFF to be consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, underlines the need of scaling up financing for climate action in developing countries, supporting climate mitigation and adaptation and the protection of biodiversity; calls for effective mainstreaming of climate change and environment issues in EU external financing instruments;
Amendment 83 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that losses of fUnderlines that the United Kingdom’s contribution amoundts forto 15 % of the EU’s development cooperation caused by Brexit must be compensated for; supports the integration of the European Development Fund (EDF) into the EU budget in the context of an overall increase the total of EU-managed ODA; aid budget, calls for a review of existing tools and instruments that can allow for a future UK collaboration in EU development policy; emphasises that eventual losses of funds for EU development cooperation caused by Brexit must be compensated for;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that losses of funds for EU development cooperation caused by Brexit must be compensated for; supports the integration of the European Development Fund (EDF) into the EU budget in the context of an overall increase the total of EU-managed ODA; is encouraged by the advantages that budgetisation may bring such as stronger democratic legitimacy of the EDF together with increased efficiency and effectiveness of EU development aid;
Amendment 91 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates its position that the European Development Fund (EDF) should be integrated into the Union budget; stresses, however, that such integration should be conditional to a geographical allocation of funds based on countries’ needs and an ambitious upward revision of the ceilings to avoid a reduction of the current EDF resources;
Amendment 96 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Draws attention to the ODA commitments entered into by thCalls for the next MFF to enforce EU’s and itsthe Member States international commitments, including that of increasing their ODA to 0.7 % of GNI by 2030 in a timely manner; recalls that EU-managed ODA contributes towards the honouring of Member States’ commitments and can significantly increase the development effectiveness of ODA expenditure, including through reduced fragmentation and the facilitation of an incentive-based approach with partner countries.;
Amendment 100 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Draws attention to the ODA commitments entered into by the EU and its Member States, including that of increasing their ODA to 0.7 % of GNI by 2030 and points out that the next MFF should take this into account; recalls that EU-managed ODA contributes towards the honouring of Member States’ commitments and can significantly increase the development effectiveness of ODA expenditure, including through reduced fragmentation and the facilitation of an incentive-based approach with partner countries.
Amendment 105 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that a genuine simplification of EU external financing instruments could enhance coherence and facilitate democratic control and scrutiny; stresses however that such simplification should respect European Parliament’s right of scrutiny and development effectiveness principles, and that EU development funding should retain its fundamental objective of poverty eradication, focusing in particular on LDCs and fragile contexts;
Amendment 109 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Recalls that the EU budget dedicated to EU external action has constantly been fully mobilised and reinforced, exhausting all available margins to tackle the multiplication of humanitarian and other emergencies around Europe; underlines the need for flexibility to allow funding to be deployed more rapidly in reaction to unforeseen developments and crises; stresses however that greater flexibility should not come at the expense of aid effectiveness principles and aid predictability, in detriment of those instruments designed to serve long- term development goals, or short-cutting parliamentary scrutiny and consultations with partner countries and civil society;
Amendment 112 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Believes that the promotion of peace, security and justice in developing countries is crucial and recognises the need for security-related expenditure to deliver on SDG 16;reiterates that the creation of a specific and separate instrument in support of capacity building for security and development should avoid the securitization of development instruments and funding;
Amendment 116 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Strongly believes that Trust Funds benefitting of development funds, such as the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa, should serve genuine long-term development objectives and respond to partner countries’ development needs; considers that the mobilisation of the EU budget to respond to the migration challenge should be accompanied by a common policy on this field and that actions taken in this area should not come at the expense of EU's development policies;
Amendment 117 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6f. Notes that development assistance can play an important role in the area of migration in tackling the causes of forced displacement and enhancing the benefits of migration and mobility for development; considers however that ODA should not be used to cover in-donor refugee costs, the externalisation of migration policies outside EU borders or the costs of returns and readmission to countries of origin; rejects the idea of conditionality of aid based on border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements as the basis of partnership and cooperation with third countries;
Amendment 118 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6g. Notes the potential role of ODA to facilitate the mobilisation of financing for development from other sources, private and public, domestic and international; supports the EU’s effort at stimulating private investment through blending grants and loans and providing guarantees; stresses, however, that private sector engagement shall abide by strong transparency and accountability standards, bringing in measurable and additional development impact with solid social, environmental and human rights safeguards in place;
Amendment 118 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Union to assume its role in twohree emerging policy areas with internal and external dimensions, which have appeared in the course of the current MFF: on the one hand, by develop– by developing and funding a comprehensive asylum, migration and integration policy and addressing the root causes of migration and displacement in third countries and on the other hand, by providing security to European citizens and promoting stability abroad, notably by pooling research efforts and capabilities in the area of defence; on the other hand, promoting stability and safeguarding human rights abroad notably by building capacity in conflict prevention and mediation; – by promoting stability and safeguarding human rights abroad notably by building capacity in conflict prevention and mediation, and development of the adequate infrastructures and logistic capacities which guarantee the needed mobility – by pooling research efforts and capabilities in the area of defence, stresses that actions taken in this areas should not come at the expense of EU’s development policies, preventing diversion of ODA from its main objective of poverty eradication
Amendment 119 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 h (new)
Paragraph 6 h (new)
6h. Reiterates its unequivocal call for continued and increased EU support and funding for CSOs as development actors in their own right, and for their full and free involvement in political dialogue as well as in programming and implementation across EU cooperation instruments;
Amendment 284 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
54. Considers also that, when a certain share of off-budget operations is deemed necessary to achieve certain specific objectives, for example through the use of financial instruments or trust funds, these should be kept at a limited level and duration, be fully transparent, and backed by strong decision- making and accountability provisions;
Amendment 348 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
Paragraph 69
69. Calls, therefore, for a substantial increase in the overall budget earmarked for the FP9 programme in the next MFF that should be set at a level of at least EUR 120 billion; considers this level to be appropriate for securing Europe’s global competitiveness, scientific and industrial leadership, for responding to societal challenges, and for helping to achieve the EU’s climate goals and the Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 613 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88 b (new)
Paragraph 88 b (new)
88b. Recalls that the EU budget dedicated to EU external action has been constantly mobilised and reinforced, exhausting all available margins to tackle the multiplication of humanitarian and other emergencies around Europe; underlines the need for more flexible procedure to allow funding to be deployed more rapidly in reaction to unforeseen developments and crises; stresses however that greater flexibility should not come at the expense of aid effectiveness and aid predictability, or short-cutting parliamentary scrutiny and consultations with partner countries and civil society;
Amendment 618 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89
Paragraph 89
89. Emphasises that substantial additional funding is necessary for the Union to play its role in the framework of its global strategy and of its neighbourhood, development and enlargement policies; draws attention to the commitment by the EU and its Member States to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and to increase their official development assistance (ODA) to 0.7 % of GDP by 2030; expects the next MFF to reflect the unprecedented needs of neighbourhood countries struggling with conflicts and the consequences of the challenges presented by migration and refugees, as well as the needs for humanitarian aid as a result of natural and manmade disasters;
Amendment 621 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89 b (new)
Paragraph 89 b (new)
89b. Recalls that EU Development Cooperation has as its primary objective the eradication of poverty as enshrined in article 208TFEU; calls for the next MFF to maintain the integrity of dedicated instruments for development and humanitarian aid in order to serve the interests of developing countries in line with internationally agreed development effectiveness principles; recalls EU commitments to allocate 20% of its ODA to social inclusion and human development, including sexual and reproductive health and rights, to reach 0,20 % of ODA to Least Developed Countries, to gender mainstreaming and to ensure that Policy Coherence for Development is respected throughout all EU policies;
Amendment 622 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89 c (new)
Paragraph 89 c (new)
89c. Calls for the next MFF to reflect the unprecedented needs for humanitarian aid, caused by natural and man-made disasters driven, inter alia, by climate change, through an increased allocation; underlines that humanitarian aid must be delivered according to the humanitarian principles enshrined in the Treaty and the European Consensus, and in a predictable, timely and flexible manner; calls for a separate instrument and an own budget line for humanitarian aid; draws the attention to the need to avoid any gap between commitment and payment appropriations for humanitarian aid;
Amendment 624 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90
Paragraph 90
90. Is ready to consider a streamlined architecture of the external financing instruments, as long as the Commission and the High Representative clearly demonstrate the expected advantages of such changes such as enhanced coherence and democratic scrutiny, and provided that the specificities autonomy and objectives of the underlying Union policies, in particular EU Development Cooperation and Humanitarian aid are respected; notes that such architecture should include a budgetised EDF, a more transparent incorporation of trust funds and facilities guided by the key principles of democratic ownership and development effectiveness, as well as a possible continuation of the External Investment Plan based on its evaluation demonstrating its development additionality and human rights, social and environmental impact; could consider, as part of an overall increase in the external financing instruments, a larger unallocated reserve aimed at increasing in-built flexibility, but stresses that this should not be achieved at the expense of long-term geographic and thematic priorities; in addition, considers that the streamlined architecture calls for proper check and balances and transparency, including an enhanced strategic policy input and scrutiny of implementation by the EP.
Amendment 627 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 a (new)
Paragraph 90 a (new)
90a. Notes that development assistance can play an important role in the area of migration tackling the causes of forced displacement and enhancing the benefits of migration and mobility for development; considers, however, that ODA should not be used to cover in-donor refugee costs, the externalisation of migration policies outside EU borders or the costs of returns and readmission to countries of origin; rejects the idea of conditionality of aid based on border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements as the basis of cooperation with third countries;
Amendment 634 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 b (new)
Paragraph 90 b (new)
90b. Notes the potential role of ODA to facilitate the mobilisation of financing for development from other sources, private and public, domestic and international; supports the EU’s effort at stimulating private investment through blending grants and loans and providing guarantees; stresses, however, that private sector engagement shall abide by strong transparency and accountability standards, bringing in measurable and additional development impact with solid social, environmental and human rights safeguards in place;
Amendment 635 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 c (new)
Paragraph 90 c (new)
90c. Reiterates its unequivocal call for continued and increased EU support and funding for CSOs as development actors in their own right, and for their full and free involvement in political dialogue as well as in programming and implementation across EU cooperation instruments;[
Amendment 35 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Commends the role of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in bridging the investment gap across the EU and supports its extension until 2020; underlines its position in the on-going legislative negotiations that no further cuts should be incurred on existing EU programmes in order to finance this extension; points to persistent differences in the eligibility criteria, regulations, timeframe for reporting and the application of state aid rules, which hinder combined usage of EFSI and ESI Fund and hopes the revision of the Financial Regulation will be performed in a timely manner so as to simplify the combination of financing and avoid competition and overlaps;
Amendment 159 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to fund the continuation of the Youth Employment Initiative and notes the proposed mobilisation of EUR 233.3 million from the global margin for commitments; calls on the Commission and the Member States to follow the indications of the recent report of the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in order to carry out an impact assessment specifying expected costs and benefits; recalls that any increase in the dedicated allocation for YEI should be matched with the corresponding amounts from the European Social Fund (ESF);
Amendment 219 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Notes the overall increase in draft budget 2018 for decentralised agencies by +3.1 % (not taking into account assigned revenues) and +146 posts but highlights wide differences between ‘cruising speed’ agencies (-11.2 %) and ‘new tasks’ agencies (+10.5%); assumes that these figures properly reflect the fact that since 2013 most agencies have completed or even exceeded the 5 % staff cuts (some are to complete them in 2018), while staff increases in the same period were confined to agencies dealing with migration and security (+183 posts), financial supervisory agencies (+28 posts) and some agencies entrusted with new tasks (ERA, EASA, GSA) (+18 posts); notes with concern that staff cuts are also applied regardless of increases in some agencies' core tasks, in particular when these are financed by applicant's fees; reiterates its call, as expressed in the 2015 discharge report, to safeguard and where necessary provide additional resources to ensure the proper functioning of the agencies, including the Agencies Network’s Permanent Secretariat (now called Shared Support Office);
Amendment 225 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 a (new)
Paragraph 46 a (new)
46 a. Notes EU agencies currently located in the UK will be facing an additional workload and budgetary needs in 2018 as a consequence of the decision of the UK to withdraw from the Union; calls on the Commission to make available additional staff and budget resources in 2018, to ensure that these agencies can both continue to carry out their tasks effectively and launch all required activities in preparation of their relocation in 2019 including significant IT and infrastructure investments; proposes in addition that the agencies, in the spirit of sound financial management, be authorised to maintain a budgetary reserve to respond to unforeseen costs and unfavourable exchange rate fluctuations that may be incurred in 2018 or beyond;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to the UN human rights conventions and the optional protocols thereto,
Amendment 2 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Security Council Resolutions 1325, 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106, 2122 and 2242 on Women Peace and Security,
Amendment 3 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 b (new)
Citation 3 b (new)
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution from the 16th of March 2017 on the EU Priorities for the UN Human Rights Council session in 2017,
Amendment 4 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 c (new)
Citation 3 c (new)
– having regard to the EU Annual Report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union´s policy on the matter 2015,
Amendment 5 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 d (new)
Citation 3 d (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 28 April 2016 on attacks on hospitals and schools as violations of international humanitarian law,
Amendment 14 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
– having regard to the revised EU Guidelines on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of the Child - Leave No Child Behind, adopted 6 March 2017,
Amendment 32 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the EU and its Member States were instrumental in shaping the global UN 2030 Agenda, EU remains committed to be a front-runner in mobilizing all means of implementation and a strong follow-up and review mechanism to ensure progress and accountability; that this is reflected in the EU external action and other policies across EU financial instruments;
Amendment 40 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU’s security environment is increasingly unstable and volatile owing to a large number of longstanding or newly emerging challenges, including violent conflicts, terrorism, organised crime, unprecedented waves of migrationmigratory pressures and climate change, which are impossible to address at national level and require regional and global responses;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 a (new)
Subheading 1 a (new)
to support the strengthening of the coherence, synergies and complementarities of the UN peacebuilding architecture and of UN Security Council Resolutions on Women, Peace and Security; to support the implementation of the UN Security Council's resolution 2242 on women, peace and security, which makes women the central component in all efforts to address global challenges, including rising violent extremism, climate change, migration, sustainable development, peace and security;
Amendment 45 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)
Subheading 1 b (new)
stresses the importance of women's equal and full participation as active agents and the incorporation of a gender analysis in all areas concerning prevention and resolution of conflicts, notably peacekeeping operations, humanitarian operations, post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation processes in line with landmark UNSC resolutions 1325, 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106, 2122 and 2242 on women, peace and security; calls for the development of indicators to measure progress on the participation of women in peace and security building;
Amendment 46 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 c (new)
Subheading 1 c (new)
to remind of the impact of sexual violence in conflict on the maintenance of peace and security and recalls that sexual violence such as rape is used as a tactic of war and constitutes a war crime, in this context to ensure that safe medical attendance to female war rape victims are provided in line with the Commission's review of its humanitarian aid policy;
Amendment 57 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph b
Paragraph b
(b) to push for stronger multilateral commitments to find sustainable political solutions to current conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa, particularly in Syria, Yemen and Libya; to continue to support UN special envoys’' work, actions and initiatives aimed at solving these conflicts; to call for continued humanitarian, financial and political assistance from the international community in order to address the humanitarian situation and to work towards the immediate cessation of violence; of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law, including the direct targeting of civil infrastructure and civilian populations; to support efforts deployed by the UN to find a sustainable resolution to the conflict in Syria and to continue to back the EU’'s role in the humanitarian field and the EU’'s regional initiative; to call on all States Parties to the UN Refugee Convention to recognize the Syrian community's right to safety and protection and the obligation of State Parties to offer sanctuary; to support the UN peace plan initiative in Yemen and to tackle the ongoing humanitarian crisis as a matter of urgency; to call for stronger support for the UN-backed government in Libya;
Amendment 72 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph c
Paragraph c
(c) to call for a stronger empowerment of Iraqi institutions and for the need to work towards a more inclusive society and the reintegration of all the ethnic and religious minorities that have been displaced; while engaging the most vulnerable people (i.e. children, youth, women, people with disabilities) at all levels of decision-making;
Amendment 85 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph h
Paragraph h
(h) to further encourage the UN’'s efforts to bring about peace in Afghanistan and to overcome the fragile security environment in the country; to strengthen support for local actors by empowering the most vulnerable (especially children, youth, women) to act as agents of change and create the spaces to engage them in all phases of humanitarian and peacebuilding work;
Amendment 90 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph i
Paragraph i
(i) to strongly condemn the actions of the North Korean leadership that threaten peace and security in the Korean peninsula and beyond; to draw up and implement a strongresilient response, supported by a broad and sufficiently robust international consensus, in order to deter the North Korean regime from further developing hostile nuclear capabilities and carrying out extra- territorial assassinations, attacks and kidnappings;
Amendment 96 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph j
Paragraph j
(j) to significantly increase Member State support for UN peacekeeping and peacebuilding operations, in particular by contributing personnel and equipment, and to enhance the EU’'s role as a facilitator in this respect; to ensure better visibility for this support and contribution; to further develop procedures for the use of EU Common Security and Defence Policy in support of UN operations; to support the UNSC reform of its use of veto power when evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity occur;
Amendment 109 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph k
Paragraph k
(k) to continue to support the efforts to further operationalise R2P and to support the UN in continuing to play a critical role in assisting countries in the implementation of R2P and the role of women in peace- building;
Amendment 113 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph k a (new)
Paragraph k a (new)
(ka) to promote a broad definition of the human security concept and the Responsibility to Protect principle, bringing it more closely together with human rights, gender equality and human development;
Amendment 121 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph m
Paragraph m
(m) to support the UN in making counter-terrorism a key element of its prevention agenda in line with the EU’'s engagement in preventive measures to combat terrorism and counter violent extremism; to strengthen joint EU-UN efforts in combating the root causes of terrorism, particularly by supporting resilient societies in countering hybrid threats and developing research and capacity-building in cyber defence; to rely on the existing peacebuilding initiatives set up by local partnersactors (including young peacebuilders in line with the UN Security Council Resolution 2250) to devise, implement, and develop approaches to counter radicalisation and terrorist recruitment;
Amendment 130 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph n a (new)
Paragraph n a (new)
(na) to recall that the promotion and protection for human rights and respect for the rule of law are key elements in counter-terrorism policies;
Amendment 140 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph r
Paragraph r
(r) to work towards more effective action against the diversion of and illicit trade in weapons and ammunitions, including small arms and light weapons, in particular by developing a weapons tracking system; to request the UN Members to actively take steps towards global disarmament;
Amendment 141 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph r a (new)
Paragraph r a (new)
(ra) to pay special attention to the technological progress in the field of weaponisation of robotics and in particular, on the armed robots and drones and their conformity with the international law; to establish legal framework on drones and armed robots in line with the existing international humanitarian law to prevent this technology to be misused on illegal activities by state and non-state actors;
Amendment 147 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph s
Paragraph s
(s) to call for a strengthening of the global response to migrationory pressures, by building on the successful UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting to Address Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants of 19 September 2016 and addressing the challenges and security concerns that arise, such as illegalrregular migration and human trafficking;
Amendment 158 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph t a (new)
Paragraph t a (new)
(ta) to call on all countries to adopt a human rights-based approach to migration, which safeguards the rights of migrants and refugees in migration policies and management, paying particular attention to the situation of marginalised and disadvantaged groups of migrants and refugees, such as women and children; to call on all states to address gender-related violence against women and girls, and stresses the importance of designing migration policy from a gender perspective in order to respond to their particular needs;
Amendment 160 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph u
Paragraph u
(u) to demand that greater efforts be made to prevent irregular migration and to fight people smuggling and human trafficking, in particular by introducing safe and legal routes for migrants and refugees and by combating criminal networks through timely and effective exchange of relevant intelligence; to improve methods to identify and protect victims and to reinforce cooperation with third countries with a view to tracking, seizing and recovering the proceeds of criminal activities in this sector; to insist at UN level on the importance of the ratification and full implementation of the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and the Protocols thereto against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air and to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children;
Amendment 164 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph u a (new)
Paragraph u a (new)
(ua) to requests the EU to refrain from the externalisation of the refugee crisis management and to remain coherent with our internal and external policies in order to maintain our credibility;
Amendment 169 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v a (new)
Paragraph v a (new)
(va) to promote, strengthen and mainstream activities supporting equality between women and men; to support measures strengthening leadership and participation of women at all levels of decision-making; to call on states to secure equal representation for women in public institutions and public life, including special attention to the inclusion of minority women;
Amendment 174 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v e (new)
Paragraph v e (new)
(ve) supports the EU's efforts to promote children's rights, in particular by contributing to ensuring children's access to water, sanitation, healthcare and education, by ensuring the rehabilitation and reintegration of children enlisted in armed groups, by eliminating child labour, torture, child witchcraft, trafficking, child marriage and sexual exploitation, and by assisting children in armed conflicts and ensuring their access to education in conflict zones and refugee camps;
Amendment 175 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5 a (new)
Subheading 5 a (new)
reiterates that indigenous peoples today are among the most disadvantaged and vulnerable groups of people in the world; calls on the international community to recognize and dedicate the means necessary for the special measures required to protect the rights of indigenous peoples and maintain their distinct cultures and way of life; to recognise and protect the exceptional vulnerable situation indigenous human rights defenders have due to climate change and exploitation of their lands;
Amendment 176 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v f (new)
Paragraph v f (new)
(vf) to call for the UN member states, including the EU Member States, to implement the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;
Amendment 177 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5 b (new)
Subheading 5 b (new)
reiterates that the Roma people are among the most discriminated against minorities in the world and that the discrimination is getting worse in several countries; reminds that the Roma issue is a global issue as they live on all continents; calls on the UN to install a special rapporteur on Roma issues to raise awareness and to safeguard that the UN programs will also reach the Roma;
Amendment 180 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph w
Paragraph w
(w) to continue to advocate freedom of religion or belief; to call for greater efforts to protect the rights of religious and other minorities; to call for greater protection of religious minorities against persecution and violence; to call for the repeal of laws criminalising blasphemy or apostasy, which serve as a pretext for the persecution of religious minorities and non-believers; to support the work of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; to actively work for UN recognition of the genocide of religious, ethnic and other minorities committed by ISIL/Daesh, and for referral to the International Criminal Court (ICC) of cases of suspected crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide;
Amendment 188 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph y
Paragraph y
(y) to strengthen the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the international criminal justice system in order to promote accountability and to end impunity; to ensure its independence and provide the Court with strong diplomatic, political and financial support, including in the UN; to encourage dialogue and cooperation between the ICC, the UN, the UNSC and the UN´s agencies;
Amendment 192 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph z
Paragraph z
(z) to maintain strong engagement in promoting an end to the death penalty worldwide; torecalls the EU's position on zero tolerance for the death penalty and reiterates its long-standing opposition to the death penalty, torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment in all cases and under all circumstances; underlines the importance of the EU continueing to advocate zero tolerance for the death penalty; to call for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty and to further work towards its universal abolition; ance the moratorium on the death penalty and emphasises once again that the abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity;
Amendment 200 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph aa
Paragraph aa
(aa) to underline the leading role of the EU in the process that led to the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Agenda 2030) and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the General Assembly in September 2015; to take concrete steps to ensure the efficient implementation of Agenda 2030 and the 17 SDGs as important instruments for prevention and development; as well as a priority for all external and internal action, especially when it comes to development cooperation financing; to recognize the significant role civil society organizations plays to successfully implement Agenda 2030 and to achieve the SDGs; to recognize the instrumental role and impact of the SDG's for international peace and security;
Amendment 208 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph aa a (new)
Paragraph aa a (new)
(aaa) To increase EU's leading role in leaving no-one behind while ensuring the most vulnerable, especially children, young people, women, people with disabilities, are consulted and engaged in the implementation and monitoring of Agenda 2030; to emphasise the role local actors play in ensuring resilient and peaceful communities as well as a long- term sustaining peace and development;
Amendment 214 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph aa b (new)
Paragraph aa b (new)
(aab) to urge the EU to seek for cross- national initiatives in promotion and protection of women´s rights; calls for the full implementation of Beijing Platform for Action and the ICPD Programme of Action;
Amendment 223 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph ab – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph ab – subparagraph 1 (new)
to participate actively in the debate on the term 'climate refugee', including its recognition of a legal definition in international law or in any legally binding international agreements;
Amendment 226 #
Amendment 227 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7 b (new)
Subheading 7 b (new)
to further support the work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on improving accountability and access to remedy for victims of business- related human rights abuse in order to contribute to a fair and more effective system of domestic law remedies, in particular in cases of gross human rights abuses in the business sector; to call on all governments to fulfil their duties in securing respect for human rights, access to justice for victims who face both practical and legal challenges to access remedies at national and international levels, with regard to human rights violations linked to business;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph ad
Paragraph ad
(ad) to support actively a comprehensive reform of the United Nations Security Council on the basis of a broad consensus in order to better reflect the new world reality and to re-launch the question of the necessity for the EU single seat; to promote the revitalisation of the work of the General Assembly, and improved coordination and coherence of the action of all UN institutions, which should enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, legitimacy, transparency, accountability, capacity and representativeness of the system;
Amendment 243 #
2017/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph ad – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph ad – subparagraph 1 (new)
reminds of the importance of gender and human rights mainstreaming in all UN activates; calls for the dedication of sufficient means to make the UN an example for gender and human rights mainstreamed organisation;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2036(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that development policy based on law, respect for democratic values and individual rights, freedom of expression and good governance is one of the pillars of the EU’s external action, and this should be clearly reflected in the application of the agreement;
Amendment 22 #
2017/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Parliament emphasised that progress in the negotiation of the EPCA must be linked to progress of political reform, democracy, the rule of law and real progress on respect for human rights, where implementation of the Venice Commission recommendations could play a beneficial role;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expects that the EPCA will promote a strengthened rule of law and a more diverse political landscape, a better functioning, independent and impartial judiciary, increased transparency and accountability of the government, improvement in labour laws in line with ILO requirements and the sustainable development of environment, taking into consideration the water resource management;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Supports Kazakhstan in its efforts to save the Aral Sea in the framework of the action programme of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2035(INI)
22. Is concerned that some of the provisions of the recently reformed Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedural Code restrict the freedom of expression; encourages Kazakhstan to revisit those in particular with regard to the criminalisation of defamation and corruption of the judiciary, which also need to tackle the right to a fair trial and defence rights;
Amendment 103 #
2017/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Regrets that Kazakhstan has so far refused an independent international investigation into the Zhanaozen events of 2011 despite calls by the UNHCR, regarding their causes and their repercussion, despite calls by the UNHCR; and urges for the release of the persons convicted on political grounds on the basis of the vague “inciting social discord” criminal charge;
Amendment 104 #
2017/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Regrets that Kazakhstan is not a party nor a signatory state and calls to sign and accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;
Amendment 111 #
2017/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Notes with concern that adoption of recent anti-terrorism laws, including a bill proposing withdrawal of citizenship for terrorist suspects could lead to the suppression of peaceful and legitimate political opposition; urges the Kazakh authorities to avoid abusing this legislation with the aim of restricting freedom of speech, the independence of the judiciary or banning opposition activity and the activity of independent candidates; also urges that citizens’ electoral rights to be respected;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas corruption appears to be a complex phenomenon which can be defined as the abuse of entrusted power for individual or collective, direct or indirect personal gain, and which poses a serious threat to social, political and economic stability and security by undermining the institutions and values of democracy, ethics and justice;
Amendment 54 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the economic consequences of corruption are extremely negative, especially in terms of its impact on increasing poverty and inequality among the population, the quality of public services, mistrust in public institutions, access to infrastructures, economic opportunities and loss of investment;
Amendment 26 #
2017/2027(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to step up efforts to combat corruption and impunity, to ensure the separation of powers and equal access to an impartial judicial system, to address institutional weaknesses, to enhance social cohesion and to strengthen administration;
Amendment 34 #
2017/2027(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. BRecalls that one of the main challenges in LAC countries is the high level of youth violence and social conflicts; believes public policies opening up opportunities for the nearly 30 million young people not in employment, education or training to be fundamental;
Amendment 53 #
2017/2027(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that economic growth and trade alone are not sufficient to reduce poverty and inequality; calls for policies that contribute to achieving diversified, sustainable and inclusive growth, with a strong emphasis on social issues; recalls the necessity to respect the rights of vulnerable indigenous populations of LAC countries whose needs shall be taken into consideration when negotiating EU- LAC agreements;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2027(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for development programmes in LAC to guarantee women’s fundamental freedoms and ensure their access to job opportunities;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the original Gender Action Plan I (2010- 2015) brought some progress, it also contained a number of gaps : narrow scope, a missing gender responsive budgeting, a weak understanding of the gender equality framework by the EU delegations, a lack of commitment among the EU leadership and a lack of institutional architecture and incentives to motivate and adequately support staff;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the GAP II provides a comprehensive agenda that spans across the entire EU foreign policy agenda and welcomes in this regard the choice of fourthree thematic pillars, including theand an horizontal one on shifting the Commission services’ and the EEAS institutional culture;
Amendment 72 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the expansion of the gender action plan to all EU external services and to the member states and notes the important progress in shifting EU institutional culture at headquarters and delegation levels; reiterates however the need for strengthened leadership and for continued improvements in coherence and coordination among EU institutions and member states while using the existing structures and budget;
Amendment 75 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Welcomes the compulsory requirement introduced by GAP II for all EU actors to submit an annual reporting on the progress delivered in at least one thematic area and on shifting institutional culture, which is key to strengthening effectiveness of EU initiatives and their impact on gender equality and key to improving accountability of EU initiatives to EU institutions and citizens, and finally to beneficiaries;
Amendment 76 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that the Commission services and EEAS as well as 81% of EU delegations and 22 member states submitted gender reports for 2016; while there might be justified circumstances for delegations not reporting, the European Parliament expects to see continued progress year on year towards all reports by EU delegations and member states being submitted; recalls that full compliance in GAP reporting and implementation will be key in attaining the GAP II target to mainstream gender actions across 85% of all new initiatives by 2020;
Amendment 125 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the link between trade and gender is not sufficiently addressed in the GAP II; recalls in this respect that negotiation of trade agreements could be used as an effective tool for advancing equality between women and men and calls for all EU trade agreements to include references to women’s rights and gender equality; recalls the need to monitor the impact of trade agreements on women’s empowerment and gender equality during their implementation;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has a transformational potential and sets out universal, ambitious, comprehensive, indivisible and interlinked goals requiring immediate action with a view to full and effective implementation;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the EU has not yet established a comprehensive strategy to implement Agenda 2030 and taken up a general coordination role for the actions taken at the national level; whereas an effective implementation strategy, monitoring and review mechanism are essential to achieve the SDGs;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas the financing of the SDGs poses an enormous challenge which demands a strong and global partnership and the use of all forms of financing (domestic, international, public, private and innovative sources) and non- financial means; whereas private financing can complement, but not substitute public funding;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
A c. whereas effective mobilisation of domestic resources is an indispensable factor in achieving the objectives of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and developing countries are particularly affected by corporate tax evasion and tax avoidance;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A d (new)
Recital A d (new)
A d. whereas international trade can be a powerful driver of development and economic growth and a large part of EU imports comes from developing countries, whereas the Agenda 2030 acknowledges trade as means of implementation to achieve the SDGs;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A e (new)
Recital A e (new)
A e. whereas Member States and EU policies have both intended and unintended effects on developing countries, and the SDGs constitute a unique opportunity to achieve more coherence and fairer policies towards developing countries;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A f (new)
Recital A f (new)
A f. whereas Agenda 2030 emphasises the role of migration as potential driver of development, and art. 208 of TFEU establishes that eradication of poverty is the primary objective of EU development policies;
Amendment 15 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to draw up an ambitious overarching strategy bringing together existing initiatives, setting new priorities based on identified gapsinformed by a broad gap analysis of existing policies and their implementation, as well as synergies and incoherencies between them, and providing guidance for both the EU institutions and the Member States in their implementation, monitoring and review of the 2030 Agenda, ensuring that both EU internal and external policies are in line with the agenda;
Amendment 16 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to draw up an ambitious overarching strategy bringing together existing initiatives, identifying areas where further action or implementation is needed, setting new priorities based on identified gaps and providing guidance for both the EU institutions and the Member States in their implementation, monitoring and review of the 2030 Agenda, ensuring that both EU internal and external policies are in line with the agenda;
Amendment 21 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to define a clear and detailed EU-wide Sustainable Development Goal (SGD)2030 Agenda implementation plan with specific targets, deadlines, and methodology for coordination between the EU and its Member States, underpinned by a transparent and robust monitoring, accountability and review framework with the close involvement of Parliamentthe European Parliament and civil society, on the basis of a comprehensive set of quantitative and qualitative indicators covering social, economic and environmental factors;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to define a clear, concrete, ambitious and detailed EU-wide Sustainable Development Goal (SGD) implementation plan with specific targets, deadlines, and methodology for coordination between the EU and its Member States, underpinned by a transparent and robust monitoring, accountability and review framework with the close involvement of Parliament, on the basis of a comprehensive set of indicators covering social, economic and environmental factors;
Amendment 27 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls the importance of the underlining principle of the Agenda 2030 of 'leaving no one behind', asks the Commission and the Member States to take strong action in addressing inequalities within and between countries and to promote research and data disaggregation in their policies to ensure inclusiveness and prioritisation of the most vulnerable and marginalised;
Amendment 29 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the next Multiannual Financial Frameworks (MFFs) should be designed in a way that enables the implementation of the EU’s strategy and SDGthe 2030 Agenda implementation plan and ensures a substantial EU contribution to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda worldwide, mainstreaming sustainable development priorities throughout the EU budget;
Amendment 32 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of Official Development Assistance (ODA) as a key instrument for eradicating poverty; calls on the EU and its Member States to recomminfirm their commitment without delay to the 0.7 % of the gross national income target and to submit a timeline for gradually increasing ODA in order to reach this target; recalls the EU commitment to allocate at least 20% of its ODA to human development in the period until 2020 and calls on the Commission to reconfirm this commitment; calls to protect ODA from diversion by retaining its fundamental objective of poverty eradication, focusing in particular on LDCs and fragile contexts;
Amendment 46 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to reaffirm their commitment to Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) as an important contribution towards achieving broader Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (PCSD) in its actions for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and; stresses the need to enhance mechanisms for PCD and PCSD within all EU institutions and policy-making and to ensure that the principle is respected adequately in regular ex ante impact assessments and by introducing adequate mechanisms for accountability, mitigation and redress;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Believes that supporting peace, security and justice in developing countries is crucial; emphasises that the funding for security-related expenditure, which does not constitute ODA, must come from other instruments than the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) or the European Development Fund (EDF) or any other mechanisms that benefit from these instruments;
Amendment 57 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls for EU action to be coordinated also with external partners bilaterally and at global level, especially to achieve further progress in developing countries;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes note of the role of the private sector in implementing the 2030 Agenda, in particular its responsibility for transitioning towards sustainable consumption and production patterns in Europe and globally; calls on the Commission to establish binding obligations for corporate accountability and transparency to ensure that the private sector adheres to clear environmental, social and human rights standards, and that its contribution is fully in line with the 2030 Agenda;
Amendment 65 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that ensuring tax justice, and transparency, fighting tax dodging, eradicating tax havens and increasing Domestic Resources Mobilisation is crucial for financing the 2030 Agenda; reiterates its call to investigate the spill over impact on developing countries of all national and EU tax policies and to uphold the principle of Policy Coherence of Development when legislating in this field;
Amendment 66 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that ensuring tax justice, transparency and increasing Domestic Resources Mobilisation is crucial for financing the 2030 Agenda; supports increased efforts and funding for targeted education programmes and public campaigns, such as a European Year for Sustainable Development, to increase public awareness and action for the SDGs;
Amendment 74 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the importance of fair and properly regulated trade for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, and urges the EU to frame its trade policy strategy in line with the SDGand urges the EU to frame its trade policy strategy in line with the 2030 Agenda in order to promote regional integration, high social and environmental standards, sustainable consumption and production patterns, contributing to sustainable growth and combating poverty and global inequalities;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls on the Commission to promote sustainable global value chains with the introduction of due diligence systems for companies with regard their full supply chain, encouraging businesses to invest more responsibly and stimulating more effective implementation of sustainability chapters in free trade agreements, including anticorruption, transparency, anti-tax avoidance and responsible business conduct;
Amendment 79 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to re-adjust their approach to migration with a view to developing a migration policy in line with the SDG 10 and a positive, evidence-based narrative on migrants and asylum-seekers; reiterates its concerns that the new policies and financial instruments to address the root causes of migration may be implemented to the detriment of development objectives, and asks for a stronger scrutiny role of the European Parliament in this regard to ensure that the new funding tools are compatible with EU legal basis, principles and commitments, especially with the 2030 Agenda;
Amendment 85 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Strongly rejects the idea of conditionality of aid based on border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements as the basis of partnership and development cooperation with third countries; calls on the EEAS and the Member States to ensure that cooperation with partner countries on migration is human rights compliant;
Amendment 88 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to establish an EU Multi- Stakeholder Platform, and with a role in the follow-up and exchange of best practices on SDG implementation across sectors, allowing a real engagement of stakeholders in the planning and monitoring of the implementation of the SDGs; stresses the need to include civil society as an active partner in the entire planning, implementation, monitoring and review process.
Amendment 89 #
2017/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to establish an EU Multi- Stakeholder Platform, and stresses the need to include civil society as an active partner in the entire planning, implementation, monitoring and review process; invites the Commission and the Member States to invest in raising awareness on sustainable development among citizens.
Amendment 317 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) To ensure a high level of convergence in the area of supervision and approval of internal modeland to remedy potential inconsistencies, EIOPA should be able to iassue opinions to remedy potential inconsistencieess and, where necessary, review the decisions made by the competent authorities in the area of supervision and approval of internal models and assist competent authorities in reaching agreement related to the approval of internal models. Competent authorities should take theirIn cases where EIOPA deems that a decisions in conformity with these opinions, or alternatively explain why there are notthe area of supervision and approval of internal models should be amended or withdrawn, competent authorities should conforming to the opinionfinal provisions laid down by the Authority.
Amendment 352 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a c (new)
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point f
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) enhancing customer protection. ac) In paragraph 5, point (f) is replaced by the following: "(f) enhancing the protection of customers and other users of financial services." (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.) Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/ET/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010R1093&qid=1532334130461&from=EN)
Amendment 354 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a d (new)
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point fa (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point fa (new)
(ad) In paragraph 5, the following point (fa) is added: "(fa) ensuring supervisory convergence of conduct of business across the internal market."; (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
Amendment 355 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a e (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a e (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point fb (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point fb (new)
(ae) In paragraph 5, subparagraph 1, the following point (fb) is added: “(fb) contributing, in all areas of its work, to preventing the use of the financial system for money laundering or terrorist financing purposes." (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
Amendment 378 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point iii
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to organise and conduct reviews of competent authorities and, in that context, to issue guidelines and recommendations and to identify best practic, with the support/contribution of national competent authorities, of competent authorities and, in that context, to issue recommendations addressed to those competent authorities and to identify best practices and, in that context, to issue guidelines, with a view to strengthening consistency in supervisory outcomes; (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
Amendment 464 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 466 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
In cases specified in the Union acts referred to in Article 1(2) as well as in all cases of disagreement between two or more national competent authorities concerning the application of those acts and without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 17, the Authority may assist the competent authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraphs 2 to 4 in either of the following circumstances: (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
Amendment 595 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point -a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point -a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 33 – paragraph 1
Article 33 – paragraph 1
(-a a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Without prejudice to the respective competences of the Member States and the Union institutions, the Authority may develop contacts and enter into administrative arrangements with regulatory, supervisory and resolution authorities, international organisations and the administrations of third countries. Those arrangements shall not create legal obligations in respect of the Union and its Member States nor shall they prevent Member States and their competent authorities from concluding bilateral or multilateral arrangements with those third countries. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02010R1093-20160112)By way of derogation from this paragraph, where a third country is included in the list of jurisdictions which are considered to have national anti- money laundering policies and policies countering the financing of terrorism regimes with strategic deficiencies that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union, as referred to in a delegated act in force adopted by the Commission pursuant to Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Authority shall not conclude administrative arrangements with regulatory, supervisory and resolution authorities of that third country. " (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.) Or. en
Amendment 905 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010
Article 21 a – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 21 a – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Iassue opinions toess and, where necessary review, the decisions made by the supervisory authorities concerned oin the application to use or change an internal model. To this end, EIOPA may request all the information necessary from the supervisory authorities concerned; andrea of supervision and approval of internal models. To this end, the Authority shall: (i) follow a risk-based approach, taking into account level playing field aspects and closely examining cross- border cases; (ii) have access to all the information necessary, notably all data and material concerning the model application; (iii) participate in all relevant meetings and on-site inspections; The Authority may involve staff from the supervisory authorities concerned in order to ensure the relevant skills and experience for its assessment. Following their assessment by the Authority, the decisions made by the supervisory authorities concerned may be amended or withdrawn by the Executive Board in accordance with Article 45a. The supervisory authorities concerned shall conform to the final provisions as laid down by the Authority.
Amendment 907 #
2017/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010
Article 21 a – paragraph 2
Article 21 a – paragraph 2
2. In the circumstances set out under Article 231(6a) of Directive 2009/138/EC, undertakings may request EIOPAthe Authority to assist the competent authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 19.
Amendment 212 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
Amendment 233 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The portability of personal pension products is a concern for people moving to another EU country while trying to maintain the same product and provider. PEPP providers should have access to the whole Union market with one single product authorisation issued by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”), on the basis of a single set of rules.
Amendment 1 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Citation 2
— having regard to Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides2 , and in particular Article 124 thereof; _________________ 2 OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p.71.
Amendment 29 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Recital D
D. whereas biological low-risk pesticides may constitute a viable alternative to conventional plant protection products, both for conventional and for organic farmers, and contribute to a more sustainable agriculture, especially if it is based on the implementation of good agronomic practices; whereas some biological pesticides possess new modes of action, which is beneficial with a view to evolving resistance to conventional pesticides and limits the impact on non- target organisms; whereas biological low- risk pesticides should be the preferred option for non-professional users and home gardening;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Recital K
K. whereas Article 12 of Directive 2009/128/EC provides that the use of low- risk plant protection products shall be prioritised in specific areas, such as areas used by the general public and protected areas; whereas some Member States have, for a long time now, prohibited the use of pesticides in these specific areas;
Amendment 113 #
2016/2903(RSP)
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the need to revise Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in order to foster the development, authorisation and placing on the EU market of biological low-risk pesticides; is concerned that the current authorisation process for placing plant protection products on the market is sub-optimal for biological low-risk pesticides; points out that the current registration process for low-risk basic substances sometimes, in practice, acts as a kind of patent, making it difficult to use a product based on the same substance which is not registered in another Member State;
Amendment 15 #
2016/2325(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes pre-existing bilateral relationships between European countries and the United States should be utilised where appropriate in order to strengthen shared security and defence interests, and to enhance vital capabilities to detect, deter, and respond to, emerging threats in space and to deal with security situations such as disaster response, border and maritime surveillance, arms control and terrorist attacks;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2325(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges enhanced cooperation between the European Space Agency, NATO, the United States, and countries such as India, in order to improve space policy, including in areas of infrastructure resilience, launch capabilities and security; cooperation would enable Europe's space sector to respond to the changing landscape global competition, in terms of changing markets, actors and technologies;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2325(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises the increasing synergies between the civil and defence aspects of developing space technology, and encourages the development of dual-use systems consistent with the space security objectives of EU Member States; notes, furthermore, that some Member States already operate dual-use satellite systems supporting civil as well as government/military operations; encourages cooperation with EEAS, EDA, EUSatCen and Member States to explore duals-use synergies in space programmes.
Amendment 13 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights,
Amendment 20 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas civil society represents the third sector of society, along with governments and businessethe public and private sectors; whereas it comprises non-governmental and non- profit organisations that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU is the largest donor to local civil society organisations in developing countries and has been a leading actor in the protection of civil society actors and human rights defenders through the use and implementation of a range of instruments and policies, including the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the European Endowment for Democracy, the DCI thematic programme for Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities (CSOs-LAs), the Civil Society Roadmaps implemented in 105 countries and country strategy papers;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas an increasing number of governments in developing countries are clamping down in legal or administrative terms on civil society organisations, including by imposing restrictive laws, limits on funding, strict licensing procedures and punitive taxes;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas civil society’s ability to act relies on the exercise of three fundamental freedoms, namelyincluding the right to freedom of association, freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that a genuinely independent, pluralistic and vibrant civil society is pivotal to a country’s development and stability, to ensuring democracytic consolidation and respect for human rights, and to building inclusive societies; further recalls that civil society is a key actor in achieving the SDGs;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the central role played by civil society in developing countries in promoting transparency, accountability and good governance, in particular in the fight against corruption, and its potential implicationsdirect impact on country’s economic and human development;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned that the closing down of civil society space in developing countries is being carried out inand in particular at the increasingly subtcomplex and sophisticated waycomprehensive means, which are harder to tackle and range from legislation, administrative, reporting and banking requirements, to the criminalisation and stigmatisation of CSO representatives, defamation, administrative harassment, online repression, censorship, arbitrary detention, torture and assassination;
Amendment 89 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EU to continue to work towards greater autonomy of the civic space not only by tackling thethrough EU development and human rights policies, but by integrating all other EU internal and external policies, including justice, home affairs, trade and security policies, in accordance with the principle of policy coherence for development;
Amendment 101 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that tackling shrinking civil society space requires a unified and consistent approach in the EU’s relationship with developing countries, and calls for the EU and Member States to proactively address the root causes of shrinking civil society space, in particular by mainstreaming the promotion of civil society organisations and their participation in bilateral and multilateral cooperation at all stages, including in political dialogues at the highest level, taking into account their different sizes, capacities and expertise;
Amendment 103 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. ENotes the importance of the EU and Members States working with CSOs, the private sector, opposition political parties, governments and local authorities to maintain an open environment for civil society; encourages the EU to become an active facilitator and to promote institutional mechanisms for reinforced dialogues and partnerships amongin developing countries governments, CSOs, local authorities and the private sector on an enabling civil society environment; calls on the Commission to strengthen the role of civil society actors in trade agreement institutions including Domestic Advisory Groups and EPA Consultative Committees;
Amendment 110 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls equally that the private sector is a key partner in achieving the SDGs, and has an important role to play in fostering civic space; responsibilities in fostering civic space including Corporate Social Responsibility reporting, transparency in supply chain due diligence and full recognition and engagement with trade unions;
Amendment 123 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls the importance of regional cooperation to strengthen enabling environments for civil society; encourages developing countries to promote dialogue and best practice of protection of and engagement with civil society;
Amendment 125 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the EU to strengthen its support for the full participation of minorities including indigenous people and other vulnerable groups in cultural, social, economic and political processes;
Amendment 131 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the critical role played by women in social progress; calls on the EU to insist on the need for supporting the creation of a safe and enabling environment for women’s CSOs and women’s rights defenders, particularlyCSOs defending and promoting women’s rights, and in conflict- affected regions;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2324(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the EU to take steps to maximise engagement with and support the CSOs through its funding modalities and mechanisms beyond those which currently have on-going contracts;
Amendment 81 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the respect for fundamental freedoms shown at the elections of 11 December 2016; urges all political parties to accept its results in the interest of domestic stability and underlines their responsibility to ensure that there is no backsliding into political crisis; calls for a swift formation of a new, stable and accountable government in order to make use of the mandate to carry on with necessary reforms; considers cross- party cooperationand inter-ethnic cooperation, as well as a strong reformist consensus, to be essential for addressing pressing domestic and EU- related challenges;
Amendment 254 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Is extremely concerned about the significant shortcomings in the field of the environment, in particular in the area of air and water pollution; calls for a comprehensive policy and strategy on climate action to be developed that is in line with the EU 2030 framework;
Amendment 275 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Commends the country for constructive cooperation in addressing the migration crisis; recommends further actions to ensure capacities to combat human trafficking and migrant smuggling; recommends the European Council to open negotiations with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in order to allow deployments of the European Boarder and Coast Guard and make the Agency fully operational as soon as possible;
Amendment 36 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the continued steady progress in the accession negotiations, noting that so far 26 chapters have been opened for negotiations and 2 chapters have been provisionally closed; encourages Montenegro to work on meeting all benchmarks and to continue focusing on the fundamentals of the accession process; recalls that it is essential to deliver concrete results with a strong implementation record; believes that a credible enlargement process is necessary to generate transformation and to consolidate stability in all of South-East Europe;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the attempts by Russia to influence developments in Montenegro; is concerned about the serious incidents that occurred on 16 October 2016, and calls on the Vice-President of the European Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR), and on the Commission, to follow closely ongoing investigations by the competent authorities; encourages the Prime Minister to enter a dialogue with the opposition and to clarify remaining open questions; considers it important that relevant services of the Member States share information pertaining to these incidents among themselves and with the VP/HR and the Commission;
Amendment 97 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. NotWelcomes the adoption of an action plan for fighting money laundering and terrorism financing, and the signing of the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe’s Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism; stresses the need to continue to develop the track record in organised crime cases, especially as regards trafficking in human beings and money laundering, to ensure stronger inter-agency cooperation and to further intensify regional and international cooperation in the fight against organised crime;
Amendment 105 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the new strategy to combat violent extremism in 2016-2018, which complements the national strategy for preventing and combating terrorism, money laundering and the financing of terrorism; notes the setting up of a new intelligence unit tasked with identifying and monitoring potential members of violent extremist groups; considers it importantfundamental to identify people in the early stages of radicalisation in order to prevent them from being recruited by violent extremist groups;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. While acknowledging CSOs’ involvement in the accession preparations, calls on the competent authorities to further improve CSOs’ access to EU-related information and to ensure that consultations with CSOs are held in a meaningful way, where possible; is deeply concerned that smear campaigns and intimidation attempts have continued against certain CSO activists; calls on the authorities to investigate and clarify the cause of these attempts and to strengthen efforts in order to protect CSO activists;
Amendment 2 #
2016/2306(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the European Semester debate is of particular importance in view of the need to find a new development model for structural reforms and selective investments, investing in strategic areas; stresses that the European Semester is one of the means of mainstreaming and integrating environmental concerns into other relevant policies, in line with the approach defined by Article 11 TFEU; reiterates, therefore, that the environmental dimension should play a full role, together with the economic and social dimensions, in the European Semester process to ensure that Member States return to higher growth levels while continuing their path towards the development of sustainable societies;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2306(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to use the European Semester as an instrument to fulfil EU commitments emanating from the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and in particular to include in the process policies and effective measures addressing climate change, sustainable production and consumption, food security and biodiversity;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2306(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that ensuring sustainable growth, climate protection and job creation in the EU means using our resources in a smarter and more sustainable way and reducing dependence on imports of raw materials; considers that the focus should be on waste prevention, greater recycling and re-use of products; stresses that if the reform of waste legislation and the action plan on the circular economy are to advance the transition of the European economy into a circular model, it is essential to integrate recommendations to this effect into the European Semester process to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth; notes that it is estimated that the circular economy could provide EU companies with savings of about EUR 600 billion per year; reiterates therefore its call for the principles of the circular economy to be incorporated into the European Semester;
Amendment 21 #
2016/2306(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the efficient use of resources, reducing foreign energy dependence and the induction of production patterns and more sustainable consumption patterns involves promoting entrepreneurship and job creation and effectively implementing international targets and objectives and diversifying revenue sources, in a context of fiscal responsibility and economic competitiveness; considers that the European Semester should also incorporate reporting on renewable energy, energy efficiency and interconnectivity on the basis of targets set at EU level;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2306(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that effective investment in health is an essential condition for economic prosperity and growth promotion, producing results in terms of productivity, labour supply, human capital and public spending.; stresses the importance of the sustainability of the healthcare sector, which plays an important role in the overall economy as it accounts for 8 % of the total European workforce and 10 % of GDP in the EU, and of being able to provide equal access to healthcare services for all citizens, as health is an essential factor for stability, sustainability and further development of Member States and their economies;
Amendment 34 #
2016/2301(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. recalls the 2030 SDG agenda and calls on the Commission to transparently communicate the reference to each SDG concerned in the reporting; calls on the Commission and the Member States to use trade to promote sustainable development and good governance according to the principles of policy coherence for development;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2301(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. underlines the importance of inclusive and sustainable approaches as agreed in the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development, notably those on sustainable production, sustainable consumption and decent work;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2301(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. encourages the Commission and Member States to include specific measures in Free Trade Agreements with developing countries in order to support their social and environmental standards; calls on the Commission to introduce tariff preferences for proven sustainably- produced goods in the forthcoming reform of the GSP / GSP+ rules;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2301(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Warmly welcomes the drafting of a binding UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights and reiterates its calls for the Member States and the EU itself to promote and participate in this process; calls on the Commission to introduce a legislative proposal on binding due diligence obligations for supply chains aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and several sector-specific OECD guidelines and set up comprehensive labelling measures in order to guarantee enhanced consumer information on the content and origin of the final products sold in the EU market throughout their supply chain;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2301(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. encourages the International Labour Organization, enterprises and other stakeholders to work towards a binding legal convention, regulating Global Value Chains, which will include adequate remedy mechanisms for workers when their rights are violated, establish legal accountability for the actions of the corporations and their subcontractors, and include mandatory due-diligence and transparency obligations;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas it is both economically and environmentally necessary to preserve raw materials and limit the production of waste;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the Commission’s Ecodesign Work Plan 2016-2019; welcomes especially the inclusion of product durability and recyclability as a possible environmental standard of its own;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the UN General Assembly Resolution 'Towards the establishment of a multilateral legal framework for sovereign debt restructurings' of 9 September 2014,
Amendment 3 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital –A (new)
Recital –A (new)
-A. whereas addressing the sovereign debt problems of developing countries is an important element in international cooperation and can contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in developing countries;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the composition of developing country debt has evolved in line with the growing importance of private creditors and trading conditions and increased exposure to financial market volatility, which has an impact on the sustainability of debt; whereas, while debt denominated in the national currency effectively eliminates exchange-rate risks, such an option may prove to be unfavourable or untenable where backed by insufficient domestic capital reserves;
Amendment 20 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas, while the UNCTAD principles for responsible sovereign lending and borrowing and the G20 operational guidelines for sustainable financing are undeniably useful for the formulation of regulatory framework provisions, priority must be given to ending irresponsible practices through the introduction of suitable and binding deterrents and penalties;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the debt sustainability analysis should not focus solely on economic considerations, such as the prospects for future economic growth of the debtor State and its ability to service its debts, but must take into consideration the impact of the debt burden on the country’s capacity to respect all human rights;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas odious debts contracted by regimes parties to facilitate corrupt practices or transactions known by creditors to be illicit are resulting in a substantial burden for the poorer classeseople, particularly those who are most vulnerable;
Amendment 51 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that borrowing is an important way of supporting investment, which is vital in order to achieve sustainable development, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
Amendment 58 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned at the substantial increase in both private and public debt in many developing countries and the harmful effect thereof on their ability to finance investment expenditure for health, education, the economy and, infrastructure and combating climate change;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that structural adjustment plans that were developed in the 1990s for over-indebted countries have seriously compromised the development of basic social services and undermined the ability of those countries’ ability to assume their essential responsibilities they have as sovereign nations, in combating insecurity and terrorism for example to maintain security;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that debt relief measures must not be liable to impede the provision of basic services and impair respect for all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, and development in the recipient State;
Amendment 70 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the EU and its Member States to actively combat tax havens, tax avoidance and illicit financial flows, which merely increase the debt burden of developing countries, to cooperate with developing countries to combat aggressive tax avoidance, and to seek ways to help developing countries withstand pressures to engage in tax competition, which would damage the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development;
Amendment 73 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for legislation to be drawn up to prevent the repayment of loans to creditors that have been complicit in granting loans to manifestly corrupt governments;
Amendment 74 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Advocates the drafting of a code of conduct on credit management that is binding on institutional, political and private stakeholders;
Amendment 97 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to draw up, in the form of a white paper, a genuine strategy designed to save developing countries from excessive debt by adopting a multilateral approach, specifying the rights, duties and responsibilities of all concerned and considering the institutional provisions best suited to to ensuring an equitable and sustainable approach to the problem of debt;
Amendment 98 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Endorses the principles set out by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development for responsible credit policy, which highlight in particular the shared responsibility of creditors and borrowers (UNCTAD Principles on Promoting Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing), as well as the need for parliamentary control, which is an essential component of public funding operations, and calls on the European Union to support the implementation of the UNCTAD Principles; stresses the importance of introducing monitoring and accountability mechanisms in order to ensure full compliance with the principles adopted;
Amendment 112 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point a
Paragraph 14 – point a
(a) create a permanent crisis management mechanism for the developing countries, which can be activated promptly and over the long term;
Amendment 115 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point b
Paragraph 14 – point b
(b) allow the establishment of a multilateral legal framework for the orderly and predictable restructuring of sovereign debt in order to prevent it becoming unsustainable and to achieve greater predictability for investors;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point b a (new)
Paragraph 14 – point b a (new)
(ba) Underlines that, in order to ensure sustainability, sovereign debt restructuring negotiations should be completed without delay and efficiently and should lead to a stabilisation of the debtor State’s debt, while safeguarding its sustainable development;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2238(INI)
G. whereas the outsourcing of military activities, formerly an integral part of the activities of armed forces, is taking place, among other things, to provide services in a more cost-efficient manner, but also to compensate for a shortfall in capabilities in shrinking armed forces in the context of an increasing number of multilateral missions abroad; whereas PSCs can also , provide capabilities that are entirely lacking in national armed forces, often at short notice; whereas PSCs could also be used for reasons of political convenience to avoid limitations on the use of troops; whereas the use of PSCs as a foreign policy tool raises a number of concerns;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas PSCs have been involved in incidents resulting in loss of life; whereas thisviolations of human rights and in loss of life; whereas the opacity in their behaviour and their lack of transparency has had repercussions on the efforts of the international community in the countries in question and has revealed considerable gaps in accountability structures, such as, among others, the creation of numerous layers of subsidiaries or subcontracts in diverse countries;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas, due to the lack of specific international regulation of PSCs and PMCs, the non-homogenous national legislations and self-regulation adopted by some PSCs provide a weak deterrent to prevent abuses and has a major impact on how PSCs operate in multilateral interventions and conflict regions;
Amendment 69 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas, for states to benefit from the advantages offered by PSCs, and to ensure that they can be held accountable, a legal framework should be put in placewith binding regulatory and monitoring mechanisms should be put in place at the international level to facilitate their use; whereas PSCs are part of an industry, which is highly transnational in nature and is intertwined with governmental and intergovernmental actors and as such requires a global approach to regulation;
Amendment 75 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas there is a lack of agreed definitions of PSCs, PMCs and of their services; whereas, as suggested by the definition included in the draft convention prepared by the UN Working Group on Mercenaries, a PSC can be defined as a corporate entity which provides on a compensatory basis military and/or security services by physical persons and/or legal entities; whereas military services in this context can be defined as specialised services related to military actions including strategic planning, intelligence, investigation, land, sea or air reconnaissance, flight operations of any type, manned or unmanned, satellite surveillance and intelligence, any kind of knowledge transfer with military applications, material and technical support to armed forces and other related activities; whereas security services can be defined as armed guarding or protection of buildings, installations, property and people, any kind of knowledge transfer with security and policing applications, development and implementation of informational security measures and other related activities;
Amendment 79 #
2016/2238(INI)
M. whereas the EU and 23 Member States have joined the Montreux document and whereas the EU is a Member of the Working Group on the International Code of Conduct Association; whereas the EU contributes in the context of the Human Rights Council to the possible development of an international regulatory framework; whereas the EU plays a critical role in promoting national and regional control over the provision and export of various military and security services;
Amendment 122 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that the cost-effective principle of PSCs employment offers mainly benefits in the short-term, especially if a number of socioeconomic variables are not taken into consideration, and should therefore not become the main criteria when dealing with security issues; recalls that accountability and oversight mechanisms are crucial in order to ensure that the legitimacy and potential benefits of PMSCs are fully obtained;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that the employment of PSCs in third countries leads primarily to aspects of social and moral trust, both in relation with the beneficiaries (employers) and with those whom they have to interact with, i.e. the population and authorities of the third countries;
Amendment 139 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises, however, that, particularly in conflict-prone environments, employing a PSC for certain duties can have negative side effects for the EU, especially for its legitimacy, by accidentally associating it with armed actors in a conflict area, with negative repercussions in the case of armed incidents, or by possibly compromising Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) and Security Sector Reform (SSR) efforts through the inadvertent strengthening of local actors; notes in particular the risks posed by uncontrolled sub-contracting;
Amendment 165 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Draws attention on the fact that PSCs, besides offering security services, are conducting intelligence activities, as well, that, due to their potentially implications, require efficient regulation and control;
Amendment 177 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that the European Commission draw up a Green Paper with the objective of involving all stakeholders from the public and private security sectors in a broad consultation and discussion of processes to identify opportunities for direct collaboration more efficiently and to establish a basic set of rules of engagement and good practices; recommends the creation of sector-specific EU quality standards; recommends, therefore, a clarification of the definition of PSCs before setting up an effective regulation of their activities, as the lack of it can create legislative loopholes;
Amendment 195 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – indent 4 a (new)
Paragraph 12 – indent 4 a (new)
– ensure reporting of eventual private military and security companies' irregularities and illegalities;
Amendment 206 #
2016/2238(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes, however, that the evaluation of the performance of PSCs is hampered by the lack of consistent reporting about their use by both EU institutions and Member States’' governments; encourages Member States and EU institutions to provide this information more consistently to allow for a proper assessment of the use of PSCs by their respective budgetary authorities; recommends non-state actors should be actively engaged in the necessary evaluation processes that are crucial for the regulation and oversight of this industry;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2230(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that the EU-Cook Islands FPA should effectively promote sustainable fisheries in the Cook Islands waters through adequate EU sectoral support, and pursue two equally important goals: 1) to provide fishing opportunities to EU vessels in the Cook Islands fishing zone, on the basis of the best available scientific advice and respecting the conservation and management measures of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) within the limits of the available surplus; and 2) to promote cooperation between the European Union and the Cook Islands with a view to a sustainable fisheries policy and sound exploitation of fisheries resources in the Cook Islands fishing zone, and to contribute to the sustainable development of the Cook Islands fishing sector, through economic, financial, technical and scientific cooperation while respecting that country’s sovereign options regarding this development;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2230(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the EU-Cook Islands FPA and the relevant protocol should allow bilateral cooperation on the fight against illegal fishing to be strengthened and provide the Cook Islands with the means to finance surveillance programmes, and believes that measures to prevent IUU fishing in the exclusive economic zone of the Cook Islands should be reinforced, including by improved monitoring, control and surveillance through the use of the satellite-based vessel monitoring system, logbooks, inspectors and the implementation of decisions by regional fisheries organisations;
Amendment 9 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Reminds the Commission of its Communication "Addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss" emphasising a holistic approach to tropical deforestation, taking into account of all deforestation drivers, including palm oil production; reminds the Commission of its objective in the UNFCCC negotiations to halt global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest and to reduce gross tropical deforestation by at least 50% by 2020 compared to current levels;
Amendment 21 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas palm oil is increasingly being used in processed food, with some 50 % of packaged goods now containing palm oil, and as a biofuel;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the EU is a major importer of products resulting from illegal deforestation; calls for the immediate termination of EU subsidies for biofuels produced from food crops and for a phase- out of such fuels; stresses the inadequacy of voluntary certification schemes, such as the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), in addressing land grabs and human rights violations; calls for binding regulations on agricultural commodity importers’ supply chains; Expresses its deep concerns that multiple investigations reveal widepsread abuse of basic human rights at a time of establishment and running of palm oil plantations in many countries, including forced evictions, armed violence, child labour, debt bondage or discrimination of indigenous communities;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that palm oil can be cultivated responsibly and can make a real contribution to the economic development of a country, offering viable economic opportunities to farmers, provided that no deforestation occurs, that no plantations are established on peat lands, that plantations are managed using modern agroecological techniques to minimise adverse environmental and social outcomes and that land rights, the rights of indigenous communities as well as human rights and workers' rights are respected;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas precious tropical ecosystems, which cover a mere 7% of the Earth’s surface, are under increasing pressure from deforestation and the establishment of palm oil plantations, which are resulting in, for example, massive forest fires, the drying up of rivers, soil erosion, loss of groundwater, loss of biodiversity, pollution of waterways and destruction of rare natural habitats, and even causing ecosystems to stop providing basic ecosystem services, which is having a major impact on the global climate;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Notes that latest research proves that agroforestry polycropping applied to palm oil plantations can offer combined benefits in terms of biodiveristy, productivity and positive social outcomes;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission to support the development of new binding regulations for deforestation-free and conflict-free palm oil, backed by appropriate and mandatory due diligence framework and traceability mechanisms throughout the supply chain. These would be imposed on supply chain operators for forest-risk and conflict-risk palm oil commodities and should be aligned with globally adopted best standards and practices.
Amendment 67 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Commission to require all palm oil imports arriving in the EU to be certified according to the established sustainability criteria;
Amendment 68 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. calls on the European Commission to completely phase out the use of biofuels made from food crops after 2020 by making these ineligible to meet all EU 2030 climate and energy targets, in particular of biodiesel that has created an unsustainable demand for palm oil;
Amendment 96 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission, the Member States, and the industry to support the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach, which makes it possible to determine areas suitable for planting with oil palms, that is to say, degraded lands of little value in terms of carbon storage and their natural environment, thereby promoting sustainable palm oil that can be produced without converting forests or interfering with ecosystems with a high conservation value;
Amendment 111 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to include a ‘no deforestation’ guarantee in trade agreements with palm oil-producing countries;
Amendment 119 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for companies that cultivate palm oil to useadopt the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach, when developing their plantationsich makes it possible to determine areas suitable for plantation with oil palms, which is to say degraded lands of little carbon storage or natural value, thereby promoting sustainable palm oil production without converting forests or interfering with ecosystems of high conservation value; draws attention to the need to create a comprehensive land- use plan that will take into account the land used by local communities for the cultivation of food, peatlands and high conservation value (HCV) land, and will respect the right of communities to use the land on the basis of ‘free prior and informed consent’ (FPIC);
Amendment 158 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the non-profit sector, to launch information campaigns and to provide consumers with comprehensive information on the consequences of the reckless cultivation of palm oil; calls on the Commission to ensure that information confirming that a product is not linked to deforestation is provided to consumerinform consumers on the sustainability of products by means of a special indication to be affixed ton the product;
Amendment 168 #
2016/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to draw up an action plan to combat deforestation and trade in agricultural commodities, in particular palm oil, obtained by that means;
Amendment 196 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to strengthen environmental measures in its trade agreements with a view to preventing palm oil-related deforestation, including, in particular, an anti-deforestation guarantee in trade agreements with palm oil producing countries;
Amendment 211 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a regulatory framework of strong and enforceable measures to guarantee that none of those forming part of the supply chain, including EU financial institutions and the investments and loans they provide, are involved in deforestation;
Amendment 224 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to develop technologies and, strategies and a plan of action to reduce the impact of European consumption on deforestation in third countries;
Amendment 236 #
2016/2222(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. calls for the clear and transparent labelling of palm oil in processed goods;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2220(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises the connections between statelessness and social and economic vulnerability; urges governments in developing countries to prevent denial, loss or deprivation of nationality on discriminatory grounds, to adopt equitable nationality laws and to implement accessible, affordable and non- discriminatory nationality documentation procedures;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2220(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Invites the European Commission to launch exchanges of good practices among Member States, encourages the active coordination of national statelessness contact points, and welcomes the IBelong Campaign;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2220(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Invites Member States to grant protection status to stateless migrants and facilitate their naturalization;
Amendment 25 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Strongly believes that the private sector has a role in ensuring respect of human rights when taking activity in a country and believes that this role can be maximised by the conclusion of more public-private partnerships;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Warns against the increase of populism and extremism that legitimise breaches of human rights as well as the constitutional abuse of some elected officials to remain in power;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Insists that all international agreements negotiated by the EU must include binding and non-negotiable human rights clauses and regrets that the Economic Partnership Agreements negotiated until now fail to meet this standard; notably insists that the future agreement between the ACP and the EU must reinforce the existing dialogue on human rights and enable a system of sanction when failure to respect human rights is demonstrated;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the creation of new EU instruments to address the root causes of migration but urges for human rights to be at the centre of the programmes that are financed by these instruments; recalls that human rights of migrants must be fully respected in origin, transit and destination countries;
Amendment 140 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points to the importance of a viable, dynamic rural context in which there is demographic diversity; points also to the importance of creating the opportunities necessary to support young women;
Amendment 163 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to help set up an accurate database on the economic and social situation of women and their involvement in business in rural areas and to use available data more effectively in order to better tailor policy measures;
Amendment 238 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for support for women's business and other initiatives, in particular through the promotion of female ownership, businesswomen's networks and easier access to financing for businesswomen in rural areas, including self-employed women, for women in part-time low-paid jobs and for younger women, with a view to placing them in a stronger position on the market;
Amendment 280 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that, in rural as well as urban areas, it is essential to improve the quality and accessibility of infrastructures, facilities and services meeting daily needs, so as to facilitate work-life balance and preserve rural communities; notes that this would necessitate the inclusion of rural childcare infrastructures (such as ' agroasilo' kindergarten and other pre- school facilities), healthcare services, educational (including lifelong learning) facilities, care homes for elderly and dependent people, sickness and maternity replacement services and local outlets for everyday items and cultural services; calls, therefore, for the provision of such services under the CAP, thereby offering women fresh prospects and opportunities for paid employment and greatly helping to reconcile family and working life;
Amendment 296 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission to recognize the importance of extending its digital agenda to rural areas, ensuring that no citizens, especially women, are excluded or isolated and that the digital opportunities are available to all;
Amendment 298 #
2016/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Urges the Member States to use the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund to remedy the lack of good transport infrastructure in rural areas and implement policies to actively improve access to transport for all, given that transport problems continue to constitute a factor of social exclusion and inequality, primarily for women;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that ESMA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while ensuring that all assignments are carried out in full, ESMA should carefully adhere to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect, that, where possible, ESMA needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionalityonly sufficient financial resources would allow ESMA to fulfil its mandate independently and efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 21 #
2016/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Concludes that ESMA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of modifying the current financing arrangement by introducing additional appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly replacing in partensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of nthe National cCompetent aAuthorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, ESMA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2187(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that EIOPA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2187(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full, EIOPA should carefully stick to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect that, where possible, EIOPA needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionalityonly sufficient financial resources would allow EIOPA to fulfil its mandate independently and efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2187(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 21 #
2016/2187(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Concludes that EIOPA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility to modify the current financing arrangement by introducing appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly partly replacingensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of nthe National cCompetent aAuthorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
Amendment 25 #
2016/2187(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EIOPA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2187(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Underlines that EIOPA should supervise more and intervene more, when National Financial Supervisory Authorities do not function properly and even create problems to the markets, as for example the Romanian Financial Supervisory Authority did with the Romanian insurance market;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2186(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that EBA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
Amendment 8 #
2016/2186(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the initial budget cuts should not have been implemented by postponing the publication of standardonly sufficient financial resources would allow EBA to fulfil its mand guidelines or by cutting attendance in BCBS working groups, but bate independently eanding financing of non-core related activities; stresses, therefore, that any potential increases in EBA's means must be accompanied by adequate rationalisation meas efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
Amendment 22 #
2016/2186(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Concludes that EBA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of modifying the current financing arrangement by introducing appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly partly replacingensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of the National Competent Authorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
Amendment 25 #
2016/2186(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EBA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
Amendment 15 #
2016/2182(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recognises that the Agency's declarations of interest are transparent, and calls on it to constantly review its internal procedures and to further improve its policies to guarantee independence and transparency in all its fields of activity as regards both outside staff and temporary staff;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2182(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes the discussion platform between the Agency and nongovernmental organisations, as a useful forum for discussing the main issues of interest to civil society;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2175(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that with regard to its procurement procedures, the Centre has put specific focus on ensuring consistency in all tender documents; emphasises that the Centre’s revised Committee on Procurement, Contracts and Grants is providing an additional quality control mechanism; calls on the Centre in particular to carry out careful checks on conflicts of interest in relation to tenders, procurement, recruitment and contracts in order to strengthen transparency;
Amendment 8 #
2016/2175(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Asks the Centre to apply strictly the measures pertaining to discretion and exclusion in public procurement, with proper background checks being carried out in every instance, and to apply the exclusion criteria so as to debar companies in the event of any conflict of interest, this being essential to protect the financial interests of the Union;
Amendment 4 #
2016/2166(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for the Agency to implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union by publishing information about senior officials who have left the service and a list of conflicts of interest on an annual basis;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2166(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Encourages the Agency further to raise awareness of the conflict-of-interest policy among its staff, alongside ongoing awareness-raising activities and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance reviews;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2151(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is satisfied with the overall implementation of the LIFE+ operational budget, which amounted to 99,95 % in 2015 for commitment appropriations and 98,93% for payment appropriations; stresses that LIFE+ has helped to increase public awareness and participation in legislation and the implementation of EU environment policy, in addition to improving governance in this sector; notes that in 2015 EUR 225,9 million were committed for action grants, EUR 40 million were used for financial instruments managed by the European Investment Bank and EUR 59,2 million were used for measures intended to support the Commission's role of initiating and monitoring policy and legislation development; notes that EUR 10,2 million were used for administrative support to LIFE and for support to the Executive Agency for Small and Medium- sized Enterprises (EASME);
Amendment 3 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
Citation 6 b (new)
- having regard to the programmes funded by the UN Trust Fund to End Violence against Women focused on addressing harassment and violence against women in the garment industry6b _________________ 6bhttp://www.unwomen.org/en/trust- funds/un-trust-fund-to-end-violence- against-women
Amendment 4 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child6a _________________ 6a https://www.unicef.org/crc/
Amendment 7 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
Citation 18 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part, amending the Agreement in order to extend the provisions of the Agreement to bilateral trade in textiles, taking account of the expiry of the bilateral textiles Agreement18a , _________________ 18a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0490.
Amendment 10 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 c (new)
Citation 6 c (new)
Amendment 11 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 d (new)
Citation 20 d (new)
- having regard to the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact20d _________________ 20d http://www.ilo.org/global/docs/WCMS_40 8025/lang--en/index.htm
Amendment 13 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 c (new)
Citation 20 c (new)
- having regard to the Bangladesh Accord20c _________________ 20c http://bangladeshaccord.org/
Amendment 16 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to the EU's GSP+ scheme9a , _________________ 9a http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015 /august/tradoc_153732.pdf
Amendment 17 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
Citation 9 b (new)
- having regard to the Public Procurement Directive of 26 February 20149b _________________ 9bhttp://eur- lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/oj
Amendment 19 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles20a , _________________ 20a https://www.textilbuendnis.com/en/
Amendment 20 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 b (new)
Citation 20 b (new)
- having regard to the Dutch Agreement of the Sustainable Garment and Textile20b , _________________ 20b https://www.ser.nl/en/publications/publica tions/2016/agreement-sustainable- garment-textile.aspx
Amendment 27 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas victims of the three most deadly incidents in the garment sectors (Rana Plaza, Tazreen and Ali Enterprises) have or are in the process to receive compensation for the loss of income; whereas this is in line with ILO Convention 121 and is the result of unprecedented cooperation between brand, trade unions, civil society, governments and the ILO; whereas given the widespread violation of key human rights, actual remedy remains rare;
Amendment 28 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas victims of human rights abuses involving European companies face multiple obstacles to access judicial remedies; including procedural obstacles on admissibility and disclosure of evidence, often prohibitive litigation costs, absence of clear liability standards for corporate involvement in human rights abuses, and lack of clarity on the application of EU rules of private international law in transnational civil litigation;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) requiredemands the EU’'s policies, including trade,trade policy to be baseduilt on the principles and objectives of the EU’s external actionEU's external policies and objectives a, concretely those of development cooperation stated in Article 208 TFEU; whereas Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) reaffirms that the EU’'s external actions will be guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and compliance with the UN Charter and international law;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas most human rights violations in the garment sector are labour- rights related and include the denial of workers fundamental right to join or form a union of their choosing and bargain collectively in good faith; whereas this has led to widespread labour rights violations ranging from poverty wages, child labour, forced labour, arbitrary dismissals, wage theft, unsafe workplaces, violence against women and sexual harassment, to precarious work conditions;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas initiatives led by the private sector on a voluntary basis, such as codes of conduct, labels, self-assessments and social audits, have to be further enhanced and have not proven to be at all effectiveenough over the last 20 years in terms of increasing workers’ rights, consumer awareness and environmental safety in the garment supply chain;
Amendment 51 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas multistakeholder initiatives like the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles or the Dutch Agreement on Sustainable Garment and Textile are bringing stakeholders like the industry, the trade unions, the government and the NGOs at one table; whereas the standards elaborated by the initiatives also reach out to environmental issues; whereas those initiatives have not yet entered the implementation phase, so concrete results are still outstanding; whereas such national initiatives are necessary due to a lack of an EU legislative initiative; whereas there is still a majority of Member States that don't have any initiative;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas the trend of the garment industry is still going towards fast fashion, which poses an enormous threat and pressure on garment workers in the producing countries;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
E c. whereas the German Ministry for Development Cooperation has set the goal, that by 2020 Germany will import 50% of its textiles only according to ecological and social criteria;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the specific characteristics of the garment sector value chains, such as geographically dispersed stages of the production process, low prices,different types of garment workers, low prices, high volumes short lead times, subcontracting and short-term buyer-supplier relationships are conducive to reducing visibility, traceability, and transparency over an enterprise’'s supply chain and to increasing the risks of human rights and labour abuses and of environmental damage; whereas transparency and traceability are is a prerequisites for a company’'s accountability and responsible consumption; whereas the consumer has the right to know where a piece of clothing was produced, and in which social and environmental conditions;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the specific characteristics of the garment sector value chains, such as geographically dispersed stages of the production process, low prices, short lead times, subcontracting and short-term buyer-supplier relationships are conducive to reducing visibility and transparency over an enterprise’s supply chain and to increasing the risks of human rights and labour abuses and of environmental damage already in the raw-material production; whereas transparency is a prerequisite for a company’s accountability and responsible consumption; whereas the consumer has the right to know where a piece of clothing was produced, and in which social and environmental conditions;
Amendment 64 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas women’'s rights are a constitutive part of human rights; whereas gender equality falls within the scope of the chapters of trade agreements on sTrade and Sustainable dDevelopment (TSD); whereas the specific impact of trade and investment agreements affects women and men differently owing to structural gender inequalities, and whereas sustainable and inclusive development, growth and trade agreements must include human rights, including from a gender perspective;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas in December 2016 many trade union activists have been arrested in Bangladesh followed by a protest for a living wage and better working conditions, whereas several hundreds of garment workers have been fired following the protests; whereas the right of association is still not respected in the producing countries;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the garment sector is the sector which has the most sustainability initiatives in progress; whereas few existing initiatives reach the scale needed and need further actions to make a significant impact;
Amendment 81 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas in October 2015 the Commission released its new trade strategy ‘'Trade for All’', in which it sets out its aim to use trade agreements and preference programmes as levers to promote around the world, sustainable development, human rights, fair and ethical trade and improve the responsibility of the supply chains as a means of strengthening sustainable development, human rights and good governance in third countries;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the clothing and textile sector in Europe provides for 1.7 million workplaces and generates an output of EUR 166 million; whereas the EU imports about the world's total clothing production; whereas the manufacturing countries are mostly emerging economies;
Amendment 87 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Recital K b (new)
K b. whereas the garment industry in Eastern Europe, for example Poland, the Czech republic, Slovakia and Croatia, does not comply with ILO standards like a living wage or decent working conditions;
Amendment 89 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that EU trade and investment policies are interlinked with social protection, gender equality, tax avoidance, SMEs, development, human rights and environmental policies; reiterates its call on the Commission and the Member States to guarantee policy coherence for development on business and human rights at all levels, in particular in relation to the Union’'s trade and investment policy;
Amendment 101 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the increasing attention given to promoting gooddecent working conditions through global supply chains following the Rana Plaza factory collapse, the introduction of the draft French law on mandatory due diligence, the UK anti- slavery bill, the Dutch Agreement on Sustainable Textile and Garment, the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles, and the statement made by President Juncker at the G7 Summit in favour of ‘'urgent action’' to improve responsibility in global supply chains; acknowledges the Commission’'s commitment towards responsible management of supply chains, including in the garment sector, as outlined in the Communication entitled ‘'Trade for All’'; welcomes the green card initiative in which eight Member States have called for a duty of care by EU-based companies towards individuals and communities whose human rights and local environment are affected by the companies’' activities;
Amendment 102 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Supports the Commission's examination of a possible EU-wide initiative on the garment sector; notes, in addition, that the current multiplication of existing initiatives could result in an unpredictable environment for companies; believes that the proposal should address human rights related issues, promote the traceability and the transparency of value chains, enhance conscious consumption, focus on labour rights and gender equality;
Amendment 103 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Believes that the EU consumers have the right to be informed on conformity of garment industry products with sustainability and respect for human rights and environment; believes that EU legislative effort and initiative to this regard on garments should be made visible in the final product;
Amendment 108 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on binding due diligence obligations for supply chains in the garment sector as soon as possible, aligned with the new OECD guidelines and internationally agreed standards on human rights and social and environmental standards; this proposal should focus on the core problems garment workers facon due diligence in the garment and foot- wear sector, the OECD guidelines for multinational companies, that are importing into the European Union, the ILO resolution on decent work in supply chains and internationally agreed standards on human rights and social and environmental standards; emphasises, that the new OECD guidelines should be the leading principle in the legislative proposal; stresses, that this legislative proposal should include core standards like (occupational health and safety, a living wage, freedom of association, and freedom of collective bargaining, prevention of sexual harassment and violence) and shouldt the workplace, eliminating forced and child labour; calls on the commission to further address the following matters: key criteria for sustainable production, transparency and traceability, including collection and transparent of data and tools for consumer information, due diligence checks and auditing, access to remedy;, gender equality, supply-chain due diligence reporting; awareness raising; notes, however, with concern that a lot more needs to be done and urges the Commission to take further actions which have a direct impact on workers’ lives in the European Union; encourages the Commission to acknowledge other national legislative proposals and initiatives with the same goal as the legislation, once they have been audited and have met the requirements of the European legislation;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls the Commission to introduce tariff preferences for proven sustainably produced textiles in the forthcoming reform of the GSP / GSP + rules; notes, that the goods would have to undergo a certification on their voluntary basis with regard to their sustainable production method, and corresponding proofs should be submitted during the import into the EU; encourages the Commission to support the efforts of the private sector to bring sustainability into the textile value chain in this way; urges the Commission to recognise established sustainability criteria and minimum requirements for the detection and certification systems on the basis of international conventions, such as the core labor standards of the International Labor Organization or the protection of biodiversity; calls on the Commission to promote the production of Fair Trade products through this instrument of tariff preferences;
Amendment 122 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its call on the Commission to extend corporate social responsibility and binding due diligence initiatives beyond existing frameworks for the garment sector so as to ensure that the EU and its trading partners and operators live up to the obligation to respect both human rights and the highest social and environmental standards; urges the Commission to pay attention on remuneration and the working conditions in the garment sector in the Eastern Member States of the EU; urges the Eastern Member States to implement the ILO standards in the garment sector;
Amendment 140 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to deliver on its objective to foster improvements in the ready-made garment sector, including through a strong gender focus; calls on the Commission to make gender equality a central focus of its flagship legislative initiative; calls for gender aspect to be mainstreamed in the EU garment initiative; therefore believes that the proposal should promote women empowerment, non-discrimination, gender equality and address the issue of harassments in workplaces as already envisaged by European and international commitments;
Amendment 141 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to promote actively the use of ecological and sustainably managed raw materials like cotton and to promote enthusiastically the re-use and recycling of garments and textiles within the European Union through specific provisions in its flagship legislative initiative;
Amendment 143 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Urges the commission to invest in Research and Development (R&D) aiming at building a sustainable alternative sourcing of raw materials for the EU garment sector and the recycling process within the European Union; calls on the Commission to put in place additional resources in institutions in order to follow up on the flagship initiative;
Amendment 154 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to put in place specific measures for small and medium-sized European enterprises to have access to toolsfinancial and policy tools with particular regard to their capacity to deliver on traceability and transparency, to invest in the sustainability and fairness of their supply chains by, inter-alia, supporting match- making business platforms to connect them with fair trade and ethical fashion importers and suppliers in the EU and in its partner countries;
Amendment 161 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that it is crucial to ensure increased access to information on the conduct of enterprises; considers it fundamental to introduce a mandatory reporting system and due diligence for EU companies that outsource their production to third countriesgarment products entering the EU market ; believes that responsibility should extend throughout the entire supply chain, including sub- contractors in the formal and informal economy, and commends existing efforts to this effect; believes, however, that the EU is best placed to develop a common framework through legislation on mandatory transnational due diligence and supply chain transparency and traceability;
Amendment 166 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need for collecting and publishing comprehensive data on corporate sustainability performance; in this context, the elaboration of common definitions and standards for the collection, comparison and assessment of statistical data notably on imports, and welcomes the holistic approach of the Higg Index in measuring enterprises’ environmental, social and labour impacts;
Amendment 172 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Commission to develop a wide variety of monitoring systems in the EU garment sector using Key performance indicators – encompassing data collection using surveys, audits and data analysis techniques that can effectively measure performance and address their impacts on development, labour rights and human rights in the entire garment supply chain;
Amendment 173 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Urges the Commission to export the model of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact into other producing countries like India or Pakistan;
Amendment 176 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to present a comprehensive strategy on how development, aid for trade and public procurement policies can support a fairer and more sustainable garment supply chain, by promoting best practices and giving incentives to private sector actors that invest in the sustainability and fairness of their supply chains, from the fibre farmer to the final consumer; urges the Commission and the European Institutions to be a role model when it comes to public procurement of textile used in the institutions; calls on the Commission to create guidance for local authorities on social criteria in purchasing textiles following the 2014 Directive on Public Procurement and motivate them accordingly; encourages the Commission to propose a plan so that the majority of public procurement of garments in the EU by 2030 comes from sustainable sources;
Amendment 181 #
2016/2140(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. encourages the Commission to use the legislation to further implement and promote the SDGs;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas South-South cooperation continued to grow despite the slowing down of the emerging economies and dropping commodity prices;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability, mobilising the private sector and its responsibility for sustainable development, policy coherence, multi- stakeholder partnerships, south-south and triangular cooperation;
Amendment 73 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Underlines that a monitoring framework anchored on the principles of horizontal development cooperation, i.e. solidarity, mutuality, respect for sovereignty, human rights, inclusiveness, non-conditionality, is crucial towards enhanced accountability and impact of SSDC, particularly in the country level;
Amendment 76 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Urges the EU to honour its longstanding commitments on development effectiveness by supporting sustained global efforts to monitor the implementation of the Busan principles and commitments;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the importance to promote equal partnerships and shared responsibility for development results, including support for implementation of the Istanbul Principles and other voluntary mechanisms;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Underlines the importance to enable CSOs to exercise their roles as independent development actors, with a particular focus on an enabling environment, consistent with agreed international rights, that maximizes the contributions of CSOs to development;
Amendment 96 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Urges the Commission to submit reports on EU´s and Member States´ effort and action plans to comprehensively implement the Busan principles on regular basis, at least every 24 months;
Amendment 113 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines the significance of SDG 16 for development effectiveness overall, and warns that development aid cannot effectively fulfil its purpose where there is a lack of respect for human rights and the rule of law, sufficientinternationally-recognized social, environmental and labour standards and safeguards for the integrity of public institutions and office-holders, and transparency and accountability;
Amendment 115 #
2016/2139(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Notes the increasing role of private sector in development cooperation and asks business sector actors to commit to development effectiveness commitments, become increasingly transparent and responsive to all sectors of society, including workers, legislators, regulators, consumers and shareholders, and adhere to existing international human rights commitments such as ILO labour standards, UN Principles on Business and Human rights and the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises; furthermore asks the private sector to align their efforts to national development plans and with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and to set up reporting and accountability systems on environmental, economic and social impacts of their efforts, in particular on the generation of full and productive employment and decent work for all;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17.06.2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU,
Amendment 11 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
Citation 8 b (new)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20.1.2004 on the control of company amalgamations,
Amendment 12 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 c (new)
Citation 8 c (new)
– having regard to the White Paper 'Towards more effective EU merger control' of 9.7.2014,
Amendment 13 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 d (new)
Citation 8 d (new)
– having regard to the European Commission's E-000344/2016, E- 002666/2016 and E-002112/2016 answers to written parliamentary questions,
Amendment 92 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises that corruption in public procurement has serious market distorting effects on European competitiveness; reiterates that public procurement is one of the government activities most vulnerable to corruption; highlights that in certain Member States, EU funded procurement carries higher corruption risks than nationally funded procurement; reminds that tailor-made tender invitations are widely used to limit market competition; calls on the Commission to continue its effort to prevent the misuse of EU funds and stimulate accountability in public procurement; urges the establishment of the European Public Prosecutors' Office with the necessary rights in order to better investigate alleged crimes against EU money;
Amendment 94 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recognises the actions of the Commission against international companies distorting fair competition on the European Single Market; reminds that unfair competition is still one of the main challenges identified by European SMEs; highlights that illegal tax benefits granted by Member State governments to multinational companies generate a highly anti-competitive environment and further degrade the capacity of SMEs for job creation; calls on the Member States to forthwith cease such activities and asks the Commission to actively support the improvement of SMEs' access to markets, the reduction of administrative burdens on SMEs and the promotion of entrepreneurship and skills within the EU;
Amendment 98 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Calls on the Member States and the EU institutions to prioritise the strengthening of the post-Brexit Single Market by ensuring full compliance with European competition laws and by further increasing cooperation between Member States on tax issues;
Amendment 100 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 e (new)
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Stresses the need for single market rules to be enforced also at the Member States level and for infringements to be dealt to tackle fragmentation of the single market;
Amendment 147 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the Commission's commitment towards a European digital single market and its proposal on geo- blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality and place of residence; notes that the proposal only covers online purchases of goods and services therefore calls on the Commission to also address the geo-blocking of audiovisual services;
Amendment 152 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Underlines that collaborative economy platforms have brought into play the idea of challenging existing incumbent, dominant players to create a more competitive environment for consumers and businesses alike;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Highlights, the increasing presence of new digitally enabled businesses, in particular internet and mobile phone applications, alongside existing operators has opened up new channels for consumers to find, compare, and select goods and services across the single market. This results in an empowered consumer who seeks to make informed choices based on their personal needs and goals;
Amendment 168 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. There is clearly a need for further deregulation of the taxi and private hire vehicle market in Europe. The present rigid regulation of the number of taxis and private hire vehicles results in poor competition, detrimental to consumers and businesses alike. Therefore the present system should be reformed as quickly as possible across Europe;
Amendment 171 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. For decades, national authorities have conferred special rights to taxi operators by granting them exclusive rights, resulting in artificial and unnecessary barriers to competition in the provision of services. Conversely, Member State measures have prevented other sector participants, such as Private Hire Vehicle (PHV) drivers, from operating under equivalent conditions as taxi operators. They have created a dramatic imbalance between supply and demand as evidenced by the difficulties that consumers often face when trying to find an available taxi or PHV. These entry barriers have a negative economical and societal impacts as consumers are facing reduced choice and availability of taxis and PHVs, higher prices, lower quality of service, and longer waiting periods;
Amendment 343 #
2016/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls on the Commission to propose changes in the Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 to ensure the same protection for air travellers on flights from third country, regardless the fact that the carrier is EU or non-EU carrier;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Welcomes the EIB's development mandates in the ACP region when operating Under its External Lending Mandate; underlines that the focus of EIB's activities should be to have a positive impact on the achievements of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
Amendment 2 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Stresses that the EIB should continue to pay strong attention to the Human Rights impacts of its operations and to reinforce its due diligence at project level in this regard; calls on the EIB to act in strict compliance with the EU treaty obligations, including Article 21 TEU on principles of EU external action, and to ensure its policies and operations are in line with the EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan for Human Rights and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 10 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights the need for the EIB to ensure that, together with its clients, sound public consultations take place at project level, including via the application of the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC); urges the EIB to consider extending the FPIC to all affected communities in land and natural resource-based investments;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Welcomes the adoption of the EIB External Lending Mandate Climate Strategy in December 2015 and the commitment to increase the share of climate-related projects to 35% of its investments in developing countries by 2020; calls on the EIB to ensure this is supported by robust eligibility criteria for climate action and that climate considerations are also mainstreamed into all EIB operations outside of Europe;
Amendment 21 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the fact that the European Commission's 2016 External Strategy for Effective Taxation reminds that European legislation prohibits EU funds from being invested in entities in third countries which do not comply with international tax transparency standards and asks the EIB to transpose good governance requirements in their contracts with all selected financial intermediaries; supports the Commission's claim that the EIB needs to go further than the current transparency requirements to ensure fair tax competition; calls therefore on the EIB to establish a responsible taxation policy in 2017, starting from the review of its policy on non-cooperative jurisdictions (NCJ policy) in cooperation with the European Commission;
Amendment 22 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses the need for increased visibility of the bank's involvement in project financing to various projects stakeholders, in particular outside the European Union, which is crucial for local citizens to be aware of their right to appeal and lodge complaints at the Complaints Mechanism Office and the European Ombudsman;
Amendment 31 #
2016/2099(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need for the Resilience Initiative of the EIB to reach a high level of transparency in its operation and to focus on high quality projects with enhanced development impact and genuine additionality.
Amendment 5 #
2016/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that gender discrimination and inequalities occur in health and social care research in developing countries, thereby affecting the development of appropriate and targeted treatments; recalls that women's different biological and physiological make-up requires proper information about the effect of drugs on their bodies;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on governments of developing countries to mainstream gender in mental health policy, and to develop policies and programmes that address both the specific needs of women for mental health treatment and the social origins of psychological distress; notes with concern that, especially in Least Developed Countries, the exclusion of women from biomedical research is often caused by lack of information and awareness campaign, their fulfilment of their role as mothers and caregivers and their lack of decision-making freedom in their household; strongly believes that better balance in gender roles and obligations, income security, access to education, the development of social safety nets and poverty reduction would further redress gender disparities in mental health;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the European Commission to address the root causes of the failure to include and retain adequate numbers of women in clinical trials and to yield meaningful information about treatment and burden of disease, and to allocate resources for more research, prevention, treatment and support services for women;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes with concern that the increase in offshoring medicine testing to Africa may result in serious ethical violations; points out that not having access to affordable healthcare or health insurance, as well as access to affordable medicine, gives vulnerable people, particularly women, no other choice than to participate in clinical trials in order to receive medical treatment;
Amendment 11 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas wildlife protection can, however, have a considerable price for local communities, as some species are dangerous to humans or can destroy plantations and other property or kill livestock; whereas confronting armed poachers can be utterly risky;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. recognises the intrinsic value of biological diversity and its various contributions to sustainable development and human well-being as enriched in Goal 15 of Agenda 2030;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. is concerned about the increasing scale of poaching and illegal trade in wildlife and wildlife products and its adverse economic, social and environmental impacts; believes that the fight against poaching requires a EU coordinated response and assistance to countries with limited capacity to protect wildlife; considers the EU can play an extended role in protecting and maintaining wildlife reserves projects in developing countries;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. SRecognises that illicit trafficking in wildlife contributes to damage to ecosystems and rural livelihood, including those based on ecotourism, undermines good governance and the rule of law and, in some cases, threatens national stability; stresses the need to responsibly manage the risks associated with combating poaching, which is often perpetrated by heavily armed and well- organised criminal groups;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for actions that enable local actors to directly benefit from engaging in wildlife protection, reduce the costs of living with wildlife, and, in parallel with measures to discourage illicit wildlife- related activities, improve possibilities of earning a living without such involvement;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2076(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a step change in intelligence-gathering, lawmaking and law enforcement, fighting corruption, in relation to wildlife trafficking in EU Member States and other destination and transit countries.
Amendment 3 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that Sustainable Development Goal 3, with nine quantitative and four qualitative targets, clearly states that by 2030 everyone should have access to good mental and physical health throughout their lives, which cannot be achieved without efficient and effective investment in new improved prevention, treatment and diagnostic tools; underlines that, each year, 100 million people fall into poverty because of health costs which are disproportionate to their incomes, and that, according to the WHO, over one third of the world’s population, with over 50 % in Africa, does not have access to medicines;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance of developing a comprehensive access to medicines policy that ensures that all EU policies (global public health, development, research and trade) are consistent with, and beneficial for, access to affordable medicines for citizens in the EU and low-and middle-income countries alike;
Amendment 28 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 36 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the option for voluntary licensing that allows to produce generic drugs with allowance and adapted remuneration of the originator at reduced prices; reminds that in case of national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency TRIPS allows compulsory licensing as enables developing countries to produce generics without consent of the originator; stresses that originators usually grant waivers to LDCs and low income countries that exempts them from TRIPS provisions;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Supports competition in generic medicines within the negotiated rules, which allows broad access to medicines in LMICs; calls, in particular, for the EU to support actively governments that use the available legal measures, including TRIPS safeguards and flexibilities, to protect and promote public health; calls also for the EU to immediately stop targeting countries such as India that have implemented progressive TRIPS-compliant IP policies which promote access to medicines, through its watch-list of ‘priority countries’ in case of emergency;
Amendment 50 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that in LMICs limited accessibility of health medical tools is - next to affordability - also linked to issues such as weak distribution systems and insufficient regulatory capacities, and that for most poverty-related and neglected tropical diseases, acceptable, safe and effective vaccines, drugs and diagnostics are still lacking; calls on the Commission and Member States to step up efforts to address this persisting research gap, and to support LMICs in building respective capacities;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, without basic transparency of research and development costs to originator companies and information on the actual prices paid for medicines across the EU, any discussion on fair medicine prices remains impossiblfair pricing is difficult to determine; recalls the Commission’s commitment to greater transparency of EU positions, specific legal proposals, and negotiating texts in the TTIP negotiations;
Amendment 66 #
2016/2057(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges to take advantage of the ongoing review process of the EU Tiered Pricing Regulation to repeal it unless it can be amended, in close collaboration with the Commission’s Directorates- General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO) and for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTÉ), in order to support all measures that countries have at their disposal to ensureopen a broader and transparent discussion on pricing regulation and strategies that improve access to affordable access to medicines.;
Amendment 14 #
2016/0371(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) Communication between the Commission and Member States should be adequate and effective, with a view to attaining the objectives of this Regulation in a timely manner.
Amendment 74 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 83b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 83b
(83b) 'resolution group' means: (a) a resolution entity and its subsidiaries that are not: (i) resolution entities themselves and that are not subsidiaries of another; (ii) subsidiaries of other resolution entities; or (iii) entities established in a third country that are not included in the resolution group in accordance with the resolution plan and their subsidiaries; (b) credit institutions affiliated to a central body, the central body and any institution under the control of the central body when at least one of those entities is a resolution entity;.
Amendment 109 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 13
Article 1 – paragraph 13
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where a substantive impediment to resolvability is due to a situation referred to in Article 141a(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU the institution shall, within two weeks of the date of receipt of a notification made in accordance with paragraph 1, propose to the resolution authority possible measures to ensure that the institution complies with Articles 45f or 45g and the requirement referred to in Article 128(6) of Directive 2013/36/EU. The two week deadline may be extended by the resolution authority, in consultation with the competent authority, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case.
Amendment 120 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 17
Article 1 – paragraph 17
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where those impediments are due to a situation referred to in Article 141a(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU, the Union parent undertaking shall, within two weeks of the date of receipt of a notification made in accordance with paragraph 2, propose to the group-level resolution authority possible measures to address or remove those impediments. The two week deadline may be extended by the resolution authority, in consultation with the competent authority, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case.
Amendment 125 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 18
Article 1 – paragraph 18
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point i
Amendment 138 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 19
Article 1 – paragraph 19
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 29a
Article 29a
Amendment 182 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 22 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 22 a (new)
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 44 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 44 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new)
22 a. In Article 44(2), the following point (ga) is added: “(ga) deposits by public authorities.”
Amendment 203 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45b – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 45b – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, liabilities issued before ... [the date of entry into force of this amending Directive] which do not meet the conditions set out in points (d) and (g) to (o) of Article 72b(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 may be included in the amount of own funds and eligible liabilities of resolution entities.
Amendment 220 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 45b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Resolution authorities may decide that the requirement referred to in Article 45f is fully or partially met by resolution entities with instruments that meet all conditions referred to in Article 72a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 with a view to ensure that the resolution entity can be resolved in a manner suitable to meet the resolution objectives. For each resolution entity the level of required instruments that meet all conditions referred to in Article 72 a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall not exceed the level of the requirement specified in Article 92a(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 taking into account the transitional provisions specified in Article 494 of that Regulation.
Amendment 238 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 45c – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The requirement referred to in Article 45(1) of each entity shall be determined by the resolution authority, after having consultedin cooperation with the competent authority, on the basis of the following criteria:
Amendment 251 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 45c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The resolution authority shall ensure that the level of the requirement referred to in Article 45(1) is proportionate to the specificities of the business and funding models of the resolution entity, taking into account: (i) the prevalence of deposits in the funding structure; (ii) the lack of experience in issuing debt instruments due to the limited access to cross-border and wholesale capital markets; (iii) the fact that the institution will rely primarily on CET1 and capital instruments to meet the requirement referred to in Article 45(l).
Amendment 263 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment 274 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the requirements referred to in Article 92(1)(a),(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU of the resolution entity at sub- consolidated resolution group level,
Amendment 279 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the resolution group resulting from resolution to restore compliance with its total capital ratio requirement referred in Article 92(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and its requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU at consolidated resolution group sub- consolidated levellevel after the implementation of the preferred resolution action;
Amendment 285 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the resolution entity's leverage ratio requirement referred to in theArticle 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 at consolidated resolution group sub- consolidated level; and
Amendment 288 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the resolution group resulting from resolution to restore compliance with the leverage ratio requirement referred to in Article 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 at consolidated resolution group sub-consolidated levellevel after the implementation of the preferred resolution action.
Amendment 296 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
When determining the recapitalisation amounts referred to in the previous subparagraphs, the resolution authority shall: (a) use the values for the relevant total risk exposure amount or leverage ratio exposure amount as adjusted for any changes resulting from resolution actions foreseen in the resolution plan; (b) after consulting the competent authority, adjust downwards the requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU currently applicable to the resolution entity, to determine the requirement that will be applicable to the resolution entity after the implementation of the resolution actions foreseen in the resolution plan.
Amendment 298 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 310 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
4. Without prejudice to the last subparagraph, fFor entities that are not themselves resolution entities, the amount referred to in paragraph 2 shall not exceed the greater of any of the following:
Amendment 318 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the requirements referred to in Article 92(1)(a),(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU of the entity, and
Amendment 320 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the entity to restore compliance with its total capital ratio requirement referred in Article 92(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and its requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU after the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59;
Amendment 325 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the entity's leverage ratio requirement referred to in the Article 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, and
Amendment 327 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the entity to restore compliance with its leverage ratio requirement referred to in the Article 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 after the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59;
Amendment 334 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
When determining the recapitalisation amounts referred to in the previous subparagraphs, the resolution authority shall: (a) use the values for the relevant total risk exposure amount or leverage ratio exposure amount as adjusted for any changes resulting from actions foreseen in the resolution plan; (b) after consulting the competent authority, adjust downwards the requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU currently applicable to the relevant entity, to determine the requirement that will be applicable to the entity after the implementation of the actions foreseen in the resolution plan.
Amendment 335 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 363 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 1
Article 45d – paragraph 1
Amendment 369 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 2
Article 45d – paragraph 2
Amendment 378 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 45d – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where more than one G-SII entity belonging to the same EU G-SII are resolution entities, the relevant resolution authorities shall calculate the amourequirement referred to in paragraph 2Article 92a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013,
Amendment 380 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 4
Article 45d – paragraph 4
Amendment 389 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 45e – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The resolution authority may give guidance to an entity to have own funds and eligible liabilities that fulfil the conditions of Article 45b(1) or 45g(3) in excess of the levels set out in Article 45c and Article 45d that provides for additional amounts for the following purposes:
Amendment 393 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 45e – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) to ensure that, in the event of resolutionfollowing resolution or the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59, a sufficient market confidence in the entity is sustained through capital instruments in addition to the requirement in point (b) of Article 45c(2) ('market confidence buffer').
Amendment 396 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 45e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 1 may be set only where the competent authority has already set its own guidance in accordance with Article 104b of Directive 2013/36/EU and the resolution authority determines that the requirement referred to in point (a) of Article 45c(2) would not be sufficient to absorb all the losses in resolution taking into account the entity’s business model, funding model and risk profile or to reduce or remove an impediment to resolvability or absorb losses on holdings of MREL instruments issued by other entities included in the same resolution group. The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 1 shall not exceed the level of that guidance.
Amendment 399 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 45e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 1 shall not exceed the amount of the combined buffermay be set when the resolution authority determines that the requirement referred to in point (6b) of Article 128 of Directive 2013/36/EU, except for the requirement referred to in point (a) of that provision, unless a higher level is necessary to ensure that, following the event of resolution, the entity continues to meet the conditions for its authorisation for an appropriate period of 45c(2) would not be sufficient to sustain market confidence and ensure both the continued provision of critical economic functions by the entity and the access to funding without recourse to extraordinary financial support other than contributions from resolution financing arrangements. The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 1 shall not exceed the amount of the combined buffer requirement referred to in point (6) of Article 128 of Directimve that is not longer than one year2013/36/EU, except for the requirement referred to in point (a) of that provision.
Amendment 407 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 3
Article 45e – paragraph 3
Amendment 438 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45g – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 45g – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. By way of derogation from point (a)(ii) of paragraph 3, liabilities issued before ... [date of entry into force of this amending Directive] which do not meet the conditions set out in points (b)and (g) to (o) of Article 72b(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 may be included in the amount of own funds and eligible liabilities.
Amendment 462 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45g – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 45g – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) both the subsidiary and the resolution entity are subject to authorisation and supervision by the same Member State;
Amendment 476 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45g – paragrapgh 5 – point g
Article 45g – paragrapgh 5 – point g
(g) the competent authority of the subsidiary has fully waived the application of individual capital requirements to the subsidiary under Article 7(1) or Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Amendment 494 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive2014/59/EU
Article 45i – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 45i – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The requirement referred to in the first subparagraph shall not apply to the guidance for the minimum requirement of own funds and eligible liabilities referred to in Article 45e.
Amendment 502 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45k – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 45k – paragraph 1 a (new)
Any breach of the guidance referred to in Article 45e shall be addressed by the relevant authorities on the basis of at least one of the powers referred to in point (a), (b) and (d) of paragraph 1.
Amendment 523 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) that the liabilities or instruments referred to in the first subparagraph can be subject to write down and conversion powers by the resolution authority of a Member State pursuant to the law of the third country or to a binding agreement concluded with that third country; or
Amendment 532 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The liabilities referred to in points (b) and (c) shall not include unsecured bonds or similar debt instruments which are unsecured liabilities, Additional Tier 1 instruments, and Tier 2 instruments. Moreover, they shall be senior to the liabilities which count towards the minimum requirement for own funds and permissible liabilities.
Amendment 535 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The liabilities which fail to include the contractual term as required by paragraph 1 or for which, in accordance with points (b) and (c), do not include the contractual term referred to in paragraph 1 is not required, shall not be counted towards the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities.
Amendment 540 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 4
Article 55 – paragraph 4
4. Where an institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) fails todoes not include in the contractual provisions governing a relevant liability a contractual term as required in accordance with paragraph 1, that failure shall not prevent the resolution authority from exercising the write down and conversion powers in relation to that liability.
Amendment 558 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 26
Article 1 – paragraph 26
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 63 – paragraph 1a
Article 63 – paragraph 1a
1a. The period of the suspension pursuant to paragraph 1(n) shall not exceed the minimum period of time that the resolution authority considers necessary for the effective application of one or more resolution tools or for the purposes of the valuation pursuant to Article 36 and in any event shall not exceed 52 working days.
Amendment 583 #
2016/0362(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall apply Article 45i(2) from 1 January 2028.
Amendment 77 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Union's ambitious External Investment Plan (EIP) is needed to support investments starting in Africa and the Union's Neighbourhood as a means to promote the sustainable development goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ('the 2030 Agenda'), in particular poverty eradication, as well as the commitments under the recently revised European Neighbourhood Policy thus addressing root causes of migrationmigratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change. It should also contribute to the implementation of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change (COP 21).
Amendment 92 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The EFSD should contribute to the implementation of the UN's Agenda 2030 which recognizes international migration as a multi-dimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, and requiring coherent and comprehensive responses while underlining the potential for migrants contributing to inclusive growth and sustainable development.
Amendment 100 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD), as part of the EIP, should provide an integrated financial package to finance and attract investments starting in regions of Africa for countries that are signatories to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its member Statesfostering sustainable and inclusive economic and social development and promoting the socio- economic resilience of partner countries, while maximising additionality, addressing market failures and sub- optimal investment situations, and crowding-in private sector funds. The EFSD's operations should be clearly distinct from, and complementary to, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 200022 and the Neighbourhood countries, thereby creating growth and er support, in particular the external lending mandate operations of the European Investment Bank (EIB), the Economic Resilience Initiative, and the ACP-IF Facility. EFSD guarantee operations should also be comployement opportunities, maximary to the existing additionality, delivering innovative products, and crowding-in private sector funds. __________________ 22OJ L 317, 15.12.2000 as last amended by OJ L 287, 4.11.2010ctivities of other eligible financial institutions and cover blind spots in investment that they are currently not able to meet.
Amendment 112 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) In order to fulfil the political commitments of the Union on renewable energy and climate change, including resource efficiency, a minimum share of 35 % of the funding allocated under the EFSD should be devoted to financing and investment operations relevant for those sectors, thus contributing to the implementation of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
Amendment 132 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Moreover, the Strategic Board should support the Commission in setting strategic guidance and overall investment goals. The Strategic Board should also support coordination and coherence between the regional platforms. This should ensure complementarity of the various instruments in external action. The Strategic BThe strategic board should be co- chaired by the Commission and the High Representative of the Unioin for Foreign Affairs and Security Policyder to ensure consistency and coherence with Union external policy objectives, and partnership frameworks with third countrieswith the Union's other efforts addressing the root causes of migration, as well as Policy Coherence for Development.
Amendment 136 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) European Union Delegations in partner countries should promote access to, and actively provide information on the EFSD, and enhance coherence between the use of the guarantee, use of blended finance under the regional platforms, the provision of enhanced targeted technical assistance, and policy dialogues in their respective country.
Amendment 144 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The EFSD guarantee should be managed so as to provide a level playing field for eligible counterparts, avoid conflicts of interest and be efficient with due regard to the objective of crowding in private sector for financing investments and maximising additionality.
Amendment 152 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) As the funds of the EDF are to be used for the countries eligible under the 11th European Development Fund (EDF)25, it requires the allocation of a minimum of EUR 400 000 000 of EFSD Guarantee coverage for investments throughout the implementation period of the EFSD Guarantee. The EFSD Guarantee should only become available when a contribution of EUR 400 000 000 of 11th EDF funds have been allocated to the EFSD Guarantee Fund has been confirmed. __________________ 25 Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union applies (OJ L 210, 6.8.2013, p. 1).
Amendment 159 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The Commission should report annually to the European Parliament and the Council and the Joint Parliamentary Assembly ACP-EU on the financing and investment operations covered by the EFSD Guarantee with a view to ensuring accountability to the European citizens and partner countries. The report should be made public in order to allow relevant stakeholders, including civil society, to express their views. The Commission should also report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the management of the EFSD Guarantee Fund so that accountability and transparency are ensured.
Amendment 163 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) In order to ensure the monitoring and accountability of the EFSD and of the External Investment Plan, the European Parliament may organise regular and structured exchanges of views as part of an investment dialogue with the Commission, the High Representative, the EIB and other eligible financial institutions as well as private sector and civil society organisations.
Amendment 171 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) In order to reflect political developments and needs for Union action in the world, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the Annex of this Regulation listing the regions eligible for support through EFSD Guarantee. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making 1a. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 1a OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1
Amendment 188 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSD shall contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda with a particular focus on sustainabland be guided by the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 208 TFEU and the internationally agreed development effectiveness principles, thus contributing to the Union's development and Neighbourhood policies, with a particular focus on poverty eradication, long-term sustainable and inclusive growth, job creation, socio-economic sectors and on the support to micro, small and medium sized enterprises, thus addressing. In so doing, the EFSD shall, inter alia, contribute to addressing the specific socio-economic root causes of migration and contributing tofoster sustainable reintegration of returned migrants inmigrants returning to their countries of origin while maximising additionalor transity, delivering innovative products and crowding in private sector fundas well as strengthen resilience of host communities.
Amendment 197 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a In the regions and countries where it operates, the EFSD shall contribute to the objectives set out in the basic acts of the relevant Union external financing instruments and shall be consistent with the priorities contained in the national or regional programmes, where available.
Amendment 201 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The management of the EFSD shall be ensured by the Commission. The Commission shall work in close cooperation with the EIB and with the other eligible counterparts as regards the operational management of the EFSD Guarantee. To that end, a technical working group shall be put in place. An agreement shall be concluded with the EIB specifying the conditions of their cooperation in the management of the EFSD, in consultation with other eligible counterparts.
Amendment 207 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 209 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. As soon as possible in the implementation phase of the EFSD, the Strategic Board shall adopt and publish guidelines setting out in detail how conformity of EFSD operations with the objectives and eligibility criteria laid down in Art. 8 is to be ensured.
Amendment 219 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The strategic board shall be composed of representatives of the Commission and of the High Representative, of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (High Representative), of thecontributing Member States and of the EIB. The Commission may invite other contributors to become members of the strategic board having regard where appropriate to the view of the board. Partner CThe European Parliament shall have observer status. Observers designated by the European Parliament shall have the right to contribute to the deliberations without the right to vote. Partner countries and relevant regional organisations, and the eligible counterparts and the European Parliament may be given observer status, where appropriate. The strategic board shall be co-chaired by the Commission and the High Representative.
Amendment 224 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Technical assistance and advisory support The Commission and the High Representative, through a central secretariat as well the Union delegations, shall act as a single point of entry for authorities, and project promoters. It shall proactively provide advisory support in the identification, preparation, development and promotion of investment projects, on the use of technical assistance for project structuring, and on the use of innovative financial instruments and public-private partnerships as well as on identifying opportunities for promoting gender equality. In doing so, it shall seek to use the expertise of the EIB and other eligible counterparts. The Commission shall maintain a public investment pipeline containing current projects and attracting future ones under the EFSD. It shall establish a dedicated project web-portal. In the context of the annual budgetary procedure, the budgetary authority may decide to reinforce the relevant programmes with a view to increase the amount for technical assistance. Technical assistance may also be used to achieve the objectives set out in Art. 5 c on policy dialogue.
Amendment 225 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 b (new)
Article 5 b (new)
Article 5b Policy dialogue In the context of the Union's existing political relations with partner countries, the Commission and the High Representative shall maintain policy dialogues aimed at improving the investment climate and overall policy environment and developing legal frameworks, policies and institutions that are more effective and promote economic stability, sustainable investment and inclusive growth. The policy dialogues shall include, among other issues, the fight against corruption and organised crime, illicit financial flows, sustainable energy and climate action, respect of human rights and the rule of law as well as gender-responsive policies with a focus on addressing the policy and regulatory restrictions, which contribute to gender gaps in access to finance and entrepreneurship. In implementing the EFSD, its governing bodies and the Commission shall look more favourably to financing and investment operations in partner countries that undertake measures aimed at facilitating the success of investments backed by the EFSD and at contributing further to achieving the objectives set out in this Regulation.
Amendment 228 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The EFSD Guarantee shall support financing and investment operations in partner countries in the regions included in the Annex to this Regulation. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20a concerning amendments to the Annex.
Amendment 231 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The maximum period allowed for eligible counterparts to conclude agreements with co-financing private sector partners, financial intermediaries or final beneficiaries shall be four years after the conclusion of the relevant guarantee agreement.
Amendment 234 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The financing and investment operations eligible for support through the EFSD Guarantee shall be in line with the purpose of the EFSD, as described in Article 3, and in full respect of the list of excluded activities listed in Article 20. They shall be consistent and aligned with Union policies, in particular development and neighbourhood policies of the Union, as well as the partner countries' strategies and policies and aim at supporting the following general objectives:
Amendment 251 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) targetstrengthen socio-economic sectors, in particular infrastructure including renewable and sustainable energy, water and waste, transport, information and communications technologies, environment, sustainable use of natural resources and blue growth, social infrastructure, human capital, in order to improve the socio-economic environment;
Amendment 254 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) provide finance in favour ofsupport private sector development with a particular focus on local companies and micro-, small- and medium- sized enterprises with a particular focus on private sector developmentespecially those operating in fragile states and LDCs;
Amendment 265 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) provide financial instruments aimed at addressing the bottlenecks to private investaddress bottlenecks to private investments by providing financial instruments, including first loss guarantees to portfolios guarantees to private sector projects such as loan guarantees for small and medium-sized enterprises and guarantees for specific risks for infrastructure projects and other risk capital; financial instruments provided may include be denominated in local currencies of partner countries;
Amendment 271 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) contribute to climate action, environmental protection and management, thus producing climate co- benefits allocating at least 35 % of the financing to investments with components that contribute to climate action, renewable energy and resource efficiency.
Amendment 294 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The EFSD shall not be used to replace government responsibility for public services.
Amendment 299 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission mashall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20 a to supplement this Regulation by defineing investment windows for specific regions or partner countries or for both, for specific sectors, for specific projects or for specific categories of final beneficiaries or for both to be funded by instruments referred to in Article 9 to be covered by the EFSD Guarantee up to a fixed amount. All requests for financial support within investment windows shall be made to the Commission.
Amendment 302 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20a to supplement this Regulation by establishing and publishing a scoreboard of indicators to be used to ensure an independent and transparent assessment of the potential and actual operations backed by the EFSD Guarantee.
Amendment 310 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall ensure a level-playing field for eligible counterparts and promote cooperation between them. It shall ensure an absence of conflicts of interest throughout the stages of implementation of the EFSD. In order to ensure complementarity, the eligible counterparts shall provide any relevant information about their non- EFSD operations.
Amendment 321 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
At the request of the Member States and subject to approval by the Strategic Board, the contributions made by them may be earmarked for the initiation of projects in specific regions, countries, sectors or or existing investment windows.
Amendment 327 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) the objectives and purpose of this Regulation, a needs assessment and an indication of the expected results taking into account the promotion of corporate social responsibility, including in particular through adherence to all internationally agreed by the EU guidelines, principles and legal instruments, in particular those listed in Annex a.
Amendment 329 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the amount of own resources as well as private sector co-financing that the counterpart is ready to mobilise for the investment window.
Amendment 361 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 December 202019, the Commission shall evaluate the functioning of the EFSD, its management and its effective contribution to the purpose and objectives of this regulation. The Commission shall submit its evaluation report to the European Parliament and the Council, containing an independent evaluation of the application of this Regulation. This report shall be submitted without delay by the Commission in the event that accompanied by a reasoned proposal with a view to reviewing or amending this Regulation, as appropriate, in particular withe approved financing and view to extending the initial investment operations absorb in full the amount of the EFSD Guarantee available before 30 June 2020iod referred to in Article 7(2). That evaluation report shall be accompanied by an opinion of the Court of Auditors.
Amendment 365 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. by 30 June 2018, the Commission, in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS) shall establish a framework and methodology for assessing the compliance with Article 21 TEU.
Amendment 368 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
In accordance with its transparency policies and general Union principrules on access to documents and information, the eligible counterparts shall proactively and systematically make publicly available on their websites information relating to all financing and investment operations covered by the EFSD Guarantee under this Regulation, relating in particular to the manner in which those operations contribute to the requirements of this Regulation. Where possible, such information shall be broken down at project level and include information on the ultimate beneficiaries, taking into account the protection of confidential and commercially sensitive information.
Amendment 381 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 385 #
2016/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6 shall be conferred on the Commission from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2020. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 6 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 386 #
2016/0281(COD)
ANNEX a LIST OF INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES, PRINCIPLES AND ILO CONVENTIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 12 (3) and 20 (3) (a) International Guidelines and Principles – United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment – United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights – OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises – FAO (Committee on World Food Security) Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems (b) International Labour Organization Conventions – ILO Convention 87 on Freedom of Association and the Protection of the Right to Organise; – ILO Convention 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining; – ILO Convention 29 on Forced Labour; – ILO Convention 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labour; – ILO Convention 138 on Minimum Age; – ILO Convention 111 on Discrimination (Employment and Occupation); – ILO Convention 100 on Equal Remuneration; – ILO Convention 182 on Worst Forms of Child Labour;
Amendment 26 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The international community faces an unprecedented refugee crisis which requires solidarity, efficient mobilisation of financial resources and the need to confront and surmount the existing challenges in a concerted manner. All actors need to work together to apply sustained, medium and long-term policies and an efficient use of existing processes and programmes in order to support initiatives which contribute to addressing root causes of migrationory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change.
Amendment 35 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to allow the ELM to respond to potential upcoming challenges and Union priorities, as well as to provide a strategic response addressing root causes of migrationory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change, the maximum ceiling for the EIB financing operations under the EU guarantee should be increased to EUR 32 300 000 000 by releasing the optional additional amount of EUR 3 008 470 000 000. Under the general mandate, the amount of EUR 1 400 000 000 should be earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communities in crisis affected areas.
Amendment 44 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Addressing root causes of migration should be added as a new objective of the mandateory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change should be added as a new objective of the mandate; every project financed under the new objective should fulfil the criteria for Official Development Assistance (ODA) established by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD and be in compliance with Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and UN´s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Amendment 53 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The EIB should develop and implement a set of indicators in its Results Measurement framework for projects in the public sector and in the private sector directed to refugees and host communitiincluding indicators that can, in an effective way, measure and assess the project´s contribution to Sustainable Development Goals, the involvement of local civil society, the alignment with Union external and Union budget priorities and other indicators agreed at international level by the Union and its Member States. Therefore, an assessment of the contribution of EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migrationthose mentioned factors should be included in the Commission's annual reporting to the European Parliament and to the Council on EIB financing operations.
Amendment 56 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Only where it concerns the need to address urgencies and crisis situations that could arise within the mandate period and which are recognised as Union external policy priorities, the ceiling for reallocation between the regions by the EIB in the course of the mandate should be increased from 10 % to 20 %. The EIB should notify the European Parliament any reallocation decision by providing a justification report and an impact assessment. The private sector mandate of EUR 2 300 000 000 and the amount of EUR 1 400 000 000 dedicated to public sector projects cannot be reallocated because its purpose is to address root causes of migration.
Amendment 59 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
The maximum ceiling of the EIB financing operations under EU guarantee throughout the period 2014-20 shall not exceed EUR 32 308 470 000 000. Amounts initially earmarked for financing operations but subsequently cancelled shall not count against the ceiling.
Amendment 60 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) a maximum amount of EUR 30 006 170 000 000 under a general mandate, of which an amount of up to EUR 1 400 000 000 is earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communitiesaddress the root causes of migratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change;
Amendment 66 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
(d) strategic response to addressing root causes of migration.migratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change;
Amendment 68 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
To ensure that private sector investments have the greatest development impact, the EIB shall endeavour to strengthen as a priority the local private sector in beneficiary countries through support to local investment as provided for in point (a) of paragraph 1. EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in paragraph 1 shall endeavour to also enhance its support to investment projects run by SMEs from the Union. In order to effectively monitor and evaluate the use of funds for the benefit of the SMEs concerned, the EIB shall establish and maintain adequate contractual provisions imposing standard reporting obligations on both the financial intermediaries and the beneficiaries;
Amendment 73 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Over the period covered by this decision, the EIB should endeavour to sustain the current high level of climate-relevant operations, while the minimum volume of those operations shall represent at least 25 % of the total EIB financing operations, gradually increasing that target to at least 35% by 2020.
Amendment 76 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in point (d) of paragraph 1 shall back investment projects that address root causes of the migrationmigratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change and contribute to long-term economic resilience and safeguard sustainable development in beneficiary countries while ensuring compliance with the SDGs. EIB financing operations shall, in particular, address increased needs for infrastructure and related services to cater for the migrants influx, and boost employment opportunities for host and refugee communities to foster economic integration and enable refugees to become self-reliant.strengthen humanitarian action and support for decent job creation, while ensuring the full respect of human, labour and social rights, fundamental freedoms and gender mainstreaming by implementing a rights- based approach (RBA) encompassing all human and social rights in line with transparency, participation, non- discrimination and accountability. EIB financing operations shall recognise that gender equality is a cross cutting issue to achieving sustainable development. A gender perspective shall be applied to all financing operations. The EIB shall ensure that it develops a Gender Action Plan by 31 December 2017 and that all EIB operations under this mandate comply with the principles of its Gender Strategy approved in December 2016
Amendment 85 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Indicators for projects providing strategic response addressing root causes of migration shall be developed by the EIB; in consultation and in cooperation with stakeholders and the civil society;
Amendment 89 #
2016/0275(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) An assessment of the contribution of EIB financing operations in providing strategic response addressing root causes of migration. migratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change;
Amendment 4 #
2016/0274(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migrationmigratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change.
Amendment 10 #
2016/0274(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.
Amendment 18 #
2016/0274(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
By 31 March of each year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors, in the context of the financial statements of the Commission, all the required information on the situation of the Guarantee Fund.
Amendment 19 #
2016/0274(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
In addition, it shall, by 31 May of each year, submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors an annual report on the management of the Guarantee Fund in the previous calendar year. The annual report shall contain the presentation of the financial position of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year, the financial flows during the previous calendar year as well as the significant transactions and any relevant information on the financial accounts. The report shall also include information about the financial management and performance and the risk of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year. Finally, it shall include an assessment of the adequacy of the 9% target and of the 10% threshold/ceiling, and of the asset management of the Guarantee Fund performed by the Commission.
Amendment 34 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
Recital 20 a (new)
(20 a) This regulation should be implemented within the scope of the Paris Agreement, in particular by observing the importance of ensuring the integrity of all ecosystems and respect for the livelihoods and resilience of communities living in forested areas.
Amendment 35 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 b (new)
Recital 20 b (new)
(20 b) Climate change has a profound effect on the development of communities around the world. The Union has made commitments to the UNFCCC whereby, when taking action to address climate change, it will respect, promote and consider its obligations with regard to human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations. In addition, it will respect, promote and consider its obligations with regard to the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and intergenerational equity.
Amendment 36 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 c (new)
Recital 20 c (new)
(20 c) A holistic approach to tropical deforestation should be ensured, taking into account all deforestation drivers, as well as the objective declared by the Commission in the UNFCCC negotiations to halt global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest and to reduce gross tropical deforestation by at least 50 percent by 2020 compared to current levels.
Amendment 37 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 d (new)
Recital 20 d (new)
(20 d) The Union has made commitments to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, which can be met only with proper forest management and a commitment to stall and reverse deforestation and drive forward reforestation.
Amendment 38 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 e (new)
Recital 20 e (new)
(20 e) This regulation, in accordance with the UNFCCC agreement, should follow a country-driven, gender- responsive, participatory and fully transparent approach, taking into consideration vulnerable groups, communities and ecosystems. Furthermore, it should be based on and guided by the best available science and, as appropriate, traditional knowledge, knowledge of indigenous peoples and local knowledge systems, with a view to integrating adaptation into relevant socioeconomic and environmental policies and actions.
Amendment 39 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 f (new)
Recital 20 f (new)
(20 f) Forestry and forests should be managed responsibly and should make a real contribution to the economic development of a country, offering viable economic opportunities to farmers, provided that no deforestation of sensitive ecosystems occurs, that no plantations are established on peat lands, that plantations are managed using modern agroecological techniques to minimise adverse environmental and social outcomes and that land rights, the rights of indigenous communities as well as human rights and workers' rights are respected.
Amendment 19 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted in September 2015, underoutlines the importance of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies both as a Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 16) and in order to achieve other development policy outcomSustainable Development Goals (SDGs), first of which is the eradication of poverty (SDG 1). SDG 16 underlines the importance of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies. SDG 16.a specifically requests to “strengthen relevant national institutions, including through international cooperation, for building capacities at all levels, in particular in developing countries, for preventing violence and combatting terrorism and crime”.17 __________________ 17 United Nations, A/RES/70/1, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015
Amendment 26 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Supporting security sector actors, including the military under exceptional circumstances, in third countries in a conflict prevention, crisis management or stabilisation context is essential to ensure appropriate conditions for poverty eradication and development, including good governance for an effective use of development cooperation, whose main goal is poverty eradication. Those actions are particularly necessary to ensure the protection of civilian populations in the areas affected by conflict, crises or fragility. Good governance and effective democratic control and civilian oversight of the security system, including the military, as well as compliance with human rights and the rule of law principles are essential attributes of a well-functioning State in any context, and should be promoted through a wider security sector reform support to third countries.
Amendment 32 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The Council conclusions on Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) of 18 May 2015 called to explore options to enhance coherence and coordination between EU security and development actions, as well as to improve the delivery of capacity building in support of security and development, notably in terms of financing instruments.19 They also invited to develop an EU-wide strategic framework for Security Sector Reform, bringing together CSDP and all other relevant Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) tools as well as development cooperation instruments and freedom, security and justice actors. __________________ 19 Foreign Affairs Council (Defence formation) conclusions on CSDP, document 8971/15 of 18 May 2015
Amendment 37 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The primary objective of ODA is not to finance security-related instruments.
Amendment 53 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. Assistance may cover in particular the provision ofshall be eligible to cover capacity building programmes in support of security and development, including training, mentoring and advice, as well as the provision of equipment, infrastructure improvements and provision of other services.
Amendment 54 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 230/2014
Article 3a – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The services whose provision is eligible for financial assistance under this instrument shall be listed in the Annex. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article ... concerning amendments to the list contained in the Annex.
Amendment 55 #
2016/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 230/2014
Article 3a – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 3a – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The funding for the instrument established by this Regulation shall come from instruments other than the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) or the European Development Fund (EDF) or any other mechanisms that benefit from those instruments.
Amendment 42 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Certain widely recognised nutritional guidelines exist at national and international level, such as the WHO Regional Office for Europe's nutrient profile model, in order to differentiate foods on the basis of their nutritional composition in the context of foods television advertising to children. Member States should be encouraged to ensure that self-and co- regulatory codes of conduct are used to effectively reduce the exposure of children and minors to audiovisual commercial communications regarding foods and beverages that are high in salt, sugars or fat or that otherwise do not fit these national or international nutritional guidelines.
Amendment 43 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In addition, Member States should ensure that self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct aim to effectively reduce the exposure of children and minors to audiovisual commercial communications relating to the promotion of gambling. Certain co-regulatory or self-regulatory systems exist at Union and national level in order to promote gambling responsibly, including in audiovisual commercial communications. Those systems should be further encouraged, in particular those aiming at ensuring that responsible gambling messages accompany audiovisual promotional communications for gambling.
Amendment 48 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Similarly, Member States should be encouraged to ensure that self-and co- regulatory codes of conduct are used to effectively limit the exposure of children and minors to audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages. Certain co- regulatory or self-regulatory systems exist at Union and national level in order to market responsibly alcoholic beverages, including in audiovisual commercial communications. Those systems should be further encouraged, in particular those aiming at ensuring that responsible drinking messages accompany audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages.
Amendment 62 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Product placement should not be admissiblebe prohibited in news and current affairs programmes, consumer affairs programmes, religious programmes and programmes with a significant children’s audience. In particular, evidence shows that product placement and embedded advertisements can affect children’s behaviour as children are often not able to recognise the commercial content. There is thus a need to continue to prohibit product placement in programmes with a significant children’s audience. Consumer affairs programmes are programmes offering advice to viewers, or including reviews on the purchase of products and services. Allowing product placement in such programmes would blur the distinction between advertising and editorial content for viewers who may expect a genuine and honest review of products or services in such programmes.
Amendment 81 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) An important share of the content stored on video-sharing platforms is not under the editorial responsibility of the video-sharing platform provider. However, those providers typically determine the organisation of the content, namely programmes or user-generated videos, including by automatic means or algorithms. Therefore, those providers should bare required to take appropriateffective measures to protect minors from content that may impair their physical, mental or moral development and protect all citizens from incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to sex, race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin.
Amendment 119 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States and the Commission shall encouragsure the development of self- and co- regulatory codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications, accompanying or included in programmes with a significant children’s audience, of foods and beverages containing nutrients and substances with a nutritional or physiological effect, excessive intakes of which in the overall diet are not recommended, in particular fat, trans-fatty acids, salt or sodium and sugars.
Amendment 124 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The Commission and ERGA shall encouragsure the exchange of best practices on self- and co-regulatory systems across the Union. Where appropriate, the Commission shall facilitate the development of Union codes of conduct.";
Amendment 138 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and the Commission shall encouragsure the development of self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages. Those codes should be used to effectively limit the exposure of minors to audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages.
Amendment 139 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) Member States and the Commission shall ensure the development of self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications for gambling. Those codes shall be used to effectively limit the exposure of minors to audiovisual commercial communications for gambling.
Amendment 140 #
2016/0151(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission and ERGA shall encouragsure the exchange of best practices on self- and co-regulatory systems across the Union. If considered appropriate, the Commission shall facilitate the development of Union codes of conduct."”;
Amendment 58 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 8
Annex 8
Amendment 75 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whether important to ensure that the Posting of Workers Directive stillcontinues to strikes the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers. The complete transposition of the Directive 2014/67/EU is essential to the protection of the rights of the posted workers.
Amendment 87 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 95 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The Rome I Regulation generally permits employers and employees to choose the law applicable to the employment contract. However, the employee must not be deprived of the protection of the mandatory rules of the law of the country in which or, failing that, from which the employee habitually carries out his work. In the absence of choice, the contract is governed by the law of the country in which or, failing that, from which the employee habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract.
Amendment 116 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 13
Annex 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remunerationa minimum wage on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive 96/71/EC.
Amendment 117 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In view of the long duration of certain posting assignmecase of posting assignments lasting for periods longer than 24 months, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in whichthe host Member State becomes the country in which the work is carried out, with the possibility to extend this period based on a prior request submitted to the competent authority in the Member State whose legislation the person concerned wishes to apply to him/her, and based on an agreement between the twork is carried out Member States (host and sending). In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of the host Member Sates therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months and from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regulation in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I Regulation.
Amendment 138 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(-1) Article 1(2) is amended as follows: ‘2. This Directive shall not apply to merchant navy undertakings as regards seagoing personnel or to road or rail transport.’
Amendment 144 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2 a
Article 2 a
Amendment 174 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In a competitive internal market, service providers compete not only on the basis of a labour costs but also on factors such as cost, productivity and efficiency, or the quality and innovation of their goods and services.
Amendment 195 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, ‘remuneration’ means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, inthe concept of 'minimum wage’ shall be defined by the national law and/or practice of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
Amendment 197 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) It is within Member States' competence to set rules on remunerationates of pay in accordance with their law and practice. However, national rules on remunerationates of pay applied to posted workers must be justified by the need to protect posted workers and must not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services by enabling unfair competition.
Amendment 205 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Directive 96/71
Article 3 – paragraph -1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph -1 a (new)
(aa) the following paragraph is added: ‘-1a. Service providers are exempted from the obligation to settle the fine for paying less than the minimum wage as set by the law of the host Member State where there is evidence that the host Member State has not met the obligation to publish on the national official single website provided for in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration, as per letter (c), or the information is not provided in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner. Subparagraph 2 of paragraph 7 in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC is deleted.’
Amendment 207 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remunerationates of pay under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remunerationand should therefore be mandatory for them to publish the constituent elements of rates of pay including all the bonuses and allowances in accordance with point (c), on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive.
Amendment 213 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a a (new)
Amendment 217 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1b a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is added: ‘1ba. The undertaking user shall inform in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner the temporary work agency of the regulation applied as regards working conditions and wages.’
Amendment 239 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remunerationates of pay. Where such rules on remunerationates of pay exist at national level, the Member State may apply them in a non-discriminatory manner to undertakings posting workers to its territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services.
Amendment 253 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents6, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments. With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified, _________________ 6 OJ C 369, 17.12.2011, p. 14.
Amendment 290 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1
Article 2a – paragraph 1
1. When the anticipated or the effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried out. When it can be foreseen (or becomes clear after the posting period has already commenced) that the activity will take more than 24 months, the employer or the person concerned can submit, without delay, a request to the competent authority in the Member State whose legislation will continue to be applied to the posted worker. Based on an agreement reached between the posting State and State/s of employment, the duration of the posting can be extended. The undertakings shall include in the request for extension of the posting, reasoned grounds justifying that the nature of the service provided still remains temporary after the lapse of the initial 24 months, as well as specify the time frame to which these reasoned grounds apply.
Amendment 363 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point b
Amendment 369 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point c
(c) remunerationates of pay, including overtime rates, minimum paid annual leave, bonuses for dirty, heavy or dangerous work, board and lodging allowances; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes;
Amendment 393 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitates of pay are defined by the national law and/or praction awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, ince of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
Amendment 426 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shallmust publish without delay in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration in accordance with point (c)ates of pay, including all the bonuses and allowances in accordance with point (c), as established by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph.
Amendment 472 #
2016/0070(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is added: 1ba. The undertakings must inform the temporary employment agency, in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner, on the working conditions, rates of pay, including various allowances and bonuses, which they apply.
Amendment 67 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas humanitarian aid base on needs and the respect of the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence, as well on the respect on international humanitarian law and the human rights provided by the Geneva Conventions and the additional protocols thereto, must be at the core of all EU external actions; whereas aid independence, i.e. aid that is free from any political, economic or security considerations or any type of discrimination, must prevail;
Amendment 90 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the increase in human mobility, if managed in a safe, orderly, regular and responsible manner, can provide significant benefits, as recognised by the 2030 Agenda, but these are often largely underestimated; whereas the ageing of the European population requires, among other measures, relying on foreign workers in order to guarantee an adequate balance between activepersons in remunerative work and retired people;
Amendment 96 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the EU has a responsibility to supports its implementing partners to carry out rapid, effective, quality assistance and protection and be accountable to affected-population; in that regard the EU's partners require timely and predictable funding, decisions on allocations of funding for changing or new priorities should give them sufficient time for planning and mitigation measures;
Amendment 111 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that we are witnessing in today’´s world an unprecedented level of human mobility, and stresses that one of the most urgent actions the international community must urgently undertake is the strengthening of a common response to address the challenges and opportunities that this phenomenon represents; stresses that this response must be guided by the full protection of the rights and dignity of everyone forced by any circumstance to flee their homes in search of a better and safer life, ; underlines that, though their treatment is governed by separate legal frameworks, refugees and migrants (including migrants in an irregular situation) have the same universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, which need to be safeguarded regardless of their legal status; recalls that the EU must abide by its values and principles in all common policies and promote them in its external relations, recognises that the effects of externalisation of EU migration and asylum policies and the lack of legal avenues to the EU are worrying, and translate in significant abuses at all stages of the migratory and refugee movement; recalls that the external dimension of the EU asylum and migration agenda should be rooted in solidarity and in the principle of protection of the fundamental rights;
Amendment 156 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises that the humanitarian aid system is dangerously overstretched and that it will never be sufficient to respond to forced displacement crises, in particularnotably given the protracted nature of a majority of them; welcomes therefore the new policy framework outlined in the Commission communication on ‘"Forced Displacement and Development’" of April 2016 and calls on the EEAS and the European Commission to implement its content within the new Partnership Framework with third countries; notes the importance of promoting closer humanitarian-development links, and the need to engage with different partners – governments, local authorities, civil society, including refugees themselves, and the private sector – to develop targeted evidence-based strategies to tackle this challenge while respecting that humanitarian aid is not a crisis management tool as stated in the EU Consensus for Humanitarian Aid;
Amendment 209 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 386 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Expresses concerns regarding the list of identified partners in the foreseen migration compacts include governments with poor human rights records; considers that cooperation with these countries, and making significant payments to such regimes is setting worrying precedents, and risk reinforcing some of the root causes that force people to migrate.
Amendment 400 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses concerns regarding the quantitative approach in the new Partnership Framework and the related ‘migration compacts’, which see the ‘measurable increases in the number and rate of returns’ as one of the EU’s main goals, as the number of returns clearly depends on the nature of migration flows and on the situations in the countries of origin; stresses that the short-term objectives of the compacts should focus on how best to address the challenges faced by third countries, including by developing legal migration channels such as family reunification, resettlement or humanitarian visas, as a result of which the levels of irregular migration and death tolls in the Mediterranean will decrease;
Amendment 407 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Underlines that partnership agreements such as mobility partnerships, should ensure that migrants can be received in countries of transit and origin safely, in a manner entirely consistent with their fundamental rights. Stresses that the European Parliament has a clear say in EU readmission and mobility agreements as state in the Lisbon Treaty (Article 79(3) TFEU) and specifically states that the EP must give its consent prior to the conclusion of association and similar agreements (Article 218(6)(v) TFEU) and that shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure (Article 218(10) TFEU;
Amendment 429 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines that EU cooperation assistance is tailored to achieve poverty reduction, the empowerment of individuals and the promotion of the rule of law; recalls that both donors and the governments of aid-receiving countries must work to improve the effectiveness of aid, especially by tackling root cause for migration and strengthening democratic ownership, increasing civil society participation, and improving accountability for the use and distribution of aid; underlines that development assistance should not be made conditional to the willingness and/or capacities of States to engage in migration management activities, including through return and readmission clauses or border controls;
Amendment 432 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Stresses that in order to avoid duplication of effort, maximize the impact and effectiveness of global aid and ensure that the main focus is on development, and not on border control and security to the detriment of migrants, calls therefore on the Commission, to maintain a strong dialogue with local and international NGO, Civil society and local governments in partner countries as well as the UN for design, implementation and evaluation of the migration, displacement and refugee policies;
Amendment 509 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Call for the trust funds to follow the same rules and regulations applying to EU traditional funding instruments in relation to transparency, equal treatment of partners and capacity to provide predictable and timely funding to partners;
Amendment 529 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the use of common security and defence policy (CSDP) missions such as EUCAP Sahel Niger and EUNAVFOR MED, cooperation with NATO, and EU initiatives such as Europol’s Joint Operational Team (JOT) Mare to gather intelligence and fight smugglers, while underlining that global mobility should not be considered a threat but an opportunity; recommends the use of CSDP tools for early warning (forecasting), mediation and conflict resolution, while stressing the importance of starting to plan for durable solutions as early as possible in conflict situations;
Amendment 542 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the EU to carefully and systematically evaluate the impact of the actions funded on migration, displacement and refugees base on the quality delivery of humanitarian aid and development aid;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the Bekou Trust Fund established in 2014
Amendment 11 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the Bekou Trust Fund has shown positive results in the Central African Republic;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Africa continues to experience very high rates of population growth and a slow decline of fertility rates, leading in the near future to a sharp rise of the young working-age populations and great potential social and economic benefits; whereas equipping young people with the education and skills they need to realise their potential and the creation of employment opportunities are essential to foster stability, sustainable economic growth, social cohesion and development in the region;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EUTF is intended to be a development tool that pools resources from different donors in order to enable a quick, flexible, transparent and collective response by the EU to the different dimensions of an emergency situation;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the EUTF has been conceived in order to assist a band of countries across three African regions (the Horn of Africa; the Sahel and Lake Chad basin; North Africa) that contain some of the most fragile African countries, are affected by migration as countries of origin, transit or destination if not all three, and will draw the greatest benefit from this form of EU financial assistance; whereas the eligible countries’ African neighbours may also benefit, on a case-by-case basis, from Trust Fund projects having a regional dimension with a view to addressing regional migration flows and related cross-border challenges;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the EU’s financial allocation for the EUTF for Africa comes mainly from the 11th EDF; stresses that the EUTF was established because the EU budget lacks the resources and the flexibility needed to address crises such as those in question promptly and comprehensively; calls for the EU to agree a more holistic solution in the framework of next year’s revision of the 2014-2020 MFF and the revision of the Financial Instruments in 2016, with a view to increasing the effectiveness and reactivity of humanitarian and development assistance available under the EU budget;
Amendment 37 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need for contributions by Member States and other different sources; notes that the contributions from the Member States are still too low and do not match up the contribution from the European Commission;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly underlines that funds from EDF and ODA sources must be devoted exclusively to development ends; recalls that all other expenses related to security, counter-terrorism and border controls, migration management, etc have to be funded from different sources that are pooled in the Trust Fund; stresses the need for contributions by Member States and other different sources, and recalls that leveraging is one of the foremost reasons for the creation of this instrument devoted to such different and heterogeneous ends; condemns any use of ODA sources, even a small percentage, for any purposes different from development;
Amendment 49 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Insists that national authorities must be consulted and that they must be full partners as long as there is full guarantee of efficiency and good governance in accordance with the principles of aid effectiveness;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the EU Trust Fund for Africa should contribute to the strengthening and improving of local services (health, education, nutrition) and of governance, mainly through community-based projects, and that civil society, non- governmental organisations (NGOs) and international NGOs should play a pivotal role in addressing the root causes of migration and improving local services;
Amendment 59 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets the limited engagement of civil society in the discussions, conceptualisation and programming of the Trust Fund; recalls that the issue of creating ownership and a close partnership with a wide range of civil society actors are essential to the implementation of the EUTF;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that regional and local authorities, civil society and NGOs are natural partners for an effective development policy; stresses the need for a stronger cooperation with local authorities and NGOs in states demonstrating unsufficient guarantees of good governance and transparency; calls for respect for the principle of subsidiarity also in this field of action; stresses that NGOs and civil society should be strongly involved in the implementation phase of the EUTF;
Amendment 71 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Strongly believes that the Trust Fund should focus not only on macroeconomic issues but also on grassroots projects with the specific aim of improving quality and equity of services, particularly in education and the health sector, which is key to increasing inclusiveness and enhancing the wellbeing of local populations, as it can respond to the needs of vulnerable communities, including minorities, while also being able to provide better and more equitable and sustainable services to the general population;
Amendment 91 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Asks the Commission to enhance the transparency of the Fund and underlines that monitoring and evaluation of the projects and programmes financed will be essential, to make sure the Fund serve its purposes helping directly those in need and not financing governments responsible for human rights violations;
Amendment 110 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that the rules and criteria that govern development aid for projects financed by the Trust Fund must respect Europe’s fundamental values; in this respect, underlines that EU policy regarding cooperation on security, border controls and organised crime with governments that do not respect human rights or the rights of people on the move should include specific provisions aimed at enhancing respect for human rights and the rule of law, with particular attention to women’s rights, sexual and reproductive health and rights, children’s rights, and the rights of minorities and other particularly affected groups;
Amendment 116 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need to carefully and systematically check how the funds from the EU Trust Fund for Africa are employed and what the EU is actually financing through the Trust Fund, given the extraordinary lack of clarity in its objectives, the lack of solidarity and consensus among Member States, and the clear desire to achieve security goals by means of an instrument theoretically conceived to pursue development ends; in particular, calls on the Council and the Commission to inform Parliament in detail on the specific actions undertaken by both the EU and the African states when employing these funds;
Amendment 120 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Recalls the need for a better communication between the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament in programming and implementing actions of the Trust Fund in general for further planning of potential further Trust Funds
Amendment 121 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. underlines that the Trust Fund should function only as a complementary flexible and rapid instrument and should not undermine the long-term development cooperation of the European Union;
Amendment 123 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines that the lack of involvement of Parliament thus far in the establishment of the Trust Fund should at least give rise to detailed and regular reporting by the Commission on how the African Trust Fund is been implemented, enabling Parliament to play its role of watchdogscrutiny;
Amendment 125 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that, given the extraordinary flexibility and rapidity proper to a Trust Fund, periodical reporting to Parliament should be undertaken at least once every six months; strongly underlines the need for transparent performance monitoring, evaluation and auditing;
Amendment 130 #
2015/2341(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Underlines the need for a thorough monitoring of the implementation of the provisions on the creation of ‘hotspots’, redistribution, replacement in countries of origin, and Member States’ financial commitments, paying particular attention to human rights;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the effectiveness of EU law is systematically undermined by its unsatisfactory application by Member Stfundamental in achieving an "ever closer" Union as enshrined in the TEU; recognizes the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of same legal value as the Treaties; n. Notes that thise lack of enforcement is at the root of a number of European crisesof EU law weakens the EU itself;
Amendment 17 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that 11 directives in the area of banking and finance legislation are being infringed by one or more Member States, with Germany being the only country to comply with all existing legislation in this field, and Austria the only other Member State with fewer than three infringements1 ; __________________ 1 Particularly worrying are the cases of Poland (10 infringements), Luxembourg (9) and Slovenia, Spain and Estonia (8 each).;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the Late Payments Directive is still not implemented well in 11 Member States, and that the situation is worst in Italy, Cyprus, Spain, Portugal and Greeceis also correlated to the state of public finances affected by the economic crisis; notes as well that the delay in B2B payments is well above average; points out that also the directive on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, wthere the delay in B2B2 payments is well above average3 directive on requirements for budgetary framework of the Member States and the directive on consumer rights have not yet been transposed; __________________ 2 Business-to-business. 3 See ‘Transposition and implementation of the Directive on Late Payments in Commercial Transactions’, European Parliamentary Research Service.
Amendment 25 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that non-compliance with the Maastricht criteria, and the lenient enforcement of the Stability and Growth Pact rules by the Commission and the Council before 2010, contribufollowing the global financial crisis which led to a European debt crisis, the EU has further strengthened its economic coordination and banking supervision; stresses the importance of completing the Banking Union, deepening the EMU and creating a CMU that finances the real economy and growth in Europe; invites all Member Stateds to the emergence of the European debt crisis that followed the global financial crisismake full use of flexibility within the existing rules of the Stability and Growth Pact as per Commission's Communication COM (0215)12;
Amendment 36 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that in 2014 only 10 of the 157 main recommendations made to Member States in the framework of the European Semester were fully implemented or showed substantial progress4 ; ; and believes that, in order to improve implementation, there is a need to better identify clearly articulated priorities at European level as well as to increase genuine public debate, political willingness and commitment at national level, leading to greater relevance and national ownership; welcomes the recommendation on the economic policy of the euro area, proposed by the Commission six months before country- specific recommendations, as a step to deepen policy coordination in the follow- up to the Five Presidents' Report and relevant resolutions of the European Parliament; __________________ 4 Success rate of around 6.5%: Zsolt Darvas and Alvaro Leandro, ‘The Limitations of Policy Coordination in the Euro Area under the European Semester’, Bruegel, November 2015.
Amendment 45 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is very concerned by the fact that the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive (DGSD) has still not been implemented by 10 Member States6 , which undermines the efforts to build a, and calls on the Commission to ensure that it is implemented; welcomes the Commission proposal on European Deposit GuaInsurantece Scheme, that would complete the Banking Union; __________________ 6Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden; Commission press release, 10 December 2015.e third and final pillar of the Banking Union, needed to safeguard deposits throughout Europe;
Amendment 48 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the European Commission's first proposals in the area of the Capital Markets Union and stresses the importance of encouraging more investments in the real economy;
Amendment 53 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 65 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Is of the opinion that financial penalties for non-compliance with EU law should include a multiplier for those Member States for which several procedures are openbe effective, proportionate and dissuasive;
Amendment 70 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Considers that the number of formal infringement procedures decreased also due to the effectiveness of the structured dialogue with Member States via EU Pilot;
Amendment 71 #
2015/2326(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Welcomes the Commission's efforts to improve access to information on the application of the Union Law. Encourages further efforts to enhance transparency;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Regrets that, although PCD was endorsed in the UN Millennium Declaration4 , the Lisbon Treaty and the Busan Forum on Aid Effectiveness5 , little progress has been made as to its concrete implementation; believes that, especially considering the framework of the 2030 Agenda, more prominence must be given to PCD, which has to be mainstreamed and implemented at an international, national and local level; __________________ 4 http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ ares552e.htm 5 http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiv eness/49650173.pdf
Amendment 14 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for an EU-wide debate on PCD in the framework of the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, so as to understand better how the concept might fit with the more universal concept of PCSD; recalls that PCD requires policy changes both in internal and external policies;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for the inclusion of PCSD as a core issue in the coming debates on EU policies, particularly on the Global strategy, and the mid-term review of the Multi-annual Financial Framework;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that PCD must be made a clear priority for the EEAS and the Delegations by further strengthening the EU's policy dialogue with CSOs, local parliaments and other stakeholders, by asking them to gather evidence on lack of either inconsistency or incoherence, by improving PCD references in programming documents and making them operational, and by developing a training programme for all new EEAS staff to ensure that they are able to understand and apply PCD; believes that adequate resources for this task must be allocated;
Amendment 24 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Proposes that in preparation for that summit, the Commission and the EEAS should address a paper to the EU heads of state and government with concrete recommendations on how to implement PCD and how to define more clearly the responsibilities of each EU institution in achieving PCD commitments; believes that such a process should be as inclusive, involving as possible, involving local and regional governments, civil society organisations and think-tanks;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the mechanisms used by EU delegations to provide feedback to the Commission’s 2015 PCD Report should be extended to all EU delegations, and that this should become a yearly exercise; considers furtheralls on EU delegations to ensure that PCD ishould be on the agenda of the respective bilateral meetings and joint assembly meetings, such as the yearly meeting of EU Heads of Delegations in Brussels;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets the fact that although impact assessments represent a significant tool for achieving PCD, assessments of development impacts remain few in number; hopes that the Better Regulation Package and its guidelines will improve this situation; believes that impact assessment have to be made public before the policy proposal, in order to open up opportunities for external stakeholders, including CSOs and developing country stakeholders, to comment and put forward evidence-based material that should be taken into account; considers the need to establish more systematic ex-post assessment of the impact of EU policies on developing countries during policy implementation;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for more participatory impact assessments, to allow relevant stakeholders, including developing countries, civil society and NGOs to participate effectively in the IA process and give their views;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the proposal for an independent system within the Union for receiving complaints by people or communities affected by the Union's policies;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to produce a regular analysis of the cost of incoherencies and toblacklist of incoherencies and a regular analysis of their cost by developing adequate monitoring and progress-tracking mechanisms on PCD;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises that the EU needs greater harmonisation of migration and asylum policies, both within the Union itself and with its international partners; suggests that a truly efficient and holistic migration policy has to fully integrate EU internal and external policies, including particular within EU working structures;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for an inclusive approach to tackle the root causes of migration, including local stakeholders in the first instance; emphasises the need to ensure that development and tackling root causes of migration will be the main approaches leading to a sustainable settlement of the current migration crisis;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Insists that EU policies which seek to manage migration should be compatible with those that seek to reduce poverty in developing countries and to tackle the root causes of migration; considers that development aid programmes and budgets should not be used for migration control purposes;
Amendment 65 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines that the EU and its Member States remain the most important Aid for Trade donor in the world (EUR 11.7 billion in 2013 - SWD(2015)0128); welcomes the Commission’s aims to make trade agreements development-friendly, while recognising that Official Development Assistance (ODA) is a key source of financing for sustainable development, if mobilised efficiently; recalls the commitment by Member States to make concrete efforts towards the target of 0.7 percent of gross national product (GNP) as ODA to developing countries;
Amendment 82 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Strongly believes that EU trade policy must take into account the realities and development situation of developing countries in order to achieve PCD objectives; recalls the right of development countries to establish their own development strategies without being exposed to unfair competition;
Amendment 87 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Supports an efficient, fair and transparent tax system in line with good governance principles; welcomes the package of tax transparency measures presented by the Commission on 18 March 2015 and the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package presented on 28 January 2016, including its Communication on an external strategy to promote tax good governance internationally; considers that international cooperation is vital for tackling illicit financial flows and tax evasion;
Amendment 94 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recalls that EU tax policies can have negative impacts on developing countries, and reiterates its call to conduct a spill- over analysis of all national and EU tax policies, in order to assess the impact on developing countries and remove policies and practices which negatively affect them;
Amendment 96 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls for an evaluation of the impact of price subsidies for exports, tariffs and trade barriers on developing countries;
Amendment 100 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recalls that efforts to secure access to raw materials from developing countries must not undermine local development and poverty eradication but support developing countries in translating their mineral wealth into real development;
Amendment 101 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Calls on the Member States properly to ensure a fair treatment of developing countries when negotiating tax treaties, taking into account their particular situation and ensuring a fair distribution of taxing rights between source and residence countries; calls Member States, in this regard, to adhere to the UN model tax convention rather than the OECD model, to conduct comprehensive impact assessments ensuring that negative impacts are avoided, to desist from reducing withholding tax rates and to ensure transparency around treaty negotiations;
Amendment 111 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the EU to evaluate systematically the impact of, among others, EU agricultural, trade and energy policies – such as biofuel policy – on food security in the developing world; urges the Commission to continue to concentrate on small- and medium-scale farming, and to promote sustainable and agro-ecological practices; recalls the need to ensure that the deployment of CAP measures do not jeopardise the food production capacity and long-term food security of developing countries; stresses that substantive issues of policy coherence and impact need to be addressed in the ongoing monitoring of the EU’s Food Security Policy Framework (COM(2010)0127);
Amendment 113 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls for a consideration of the impact of fisheries agreements on the food security of developing countries;
Amendment 117 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for determined action from the EU in implementing the Paris Agreement6 ; stresses that the EU and the other developed countries must continue to support climate action to reduce emissions and build resilience to climate change impacts in developing countries; recalls the crucial importance of the provision of adequate climate finance in this context; supports the process of EU energy transition and the shift towards renewable energy in this regard; welcomes the proposal to mainstream environmental concerns into development cooperation programmes; __________________ 6 https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop2 1/eng/l09r01.pdf
Amendment 118 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for determined action from the EU and governments at all levels in implementing the Paris Agreement6 ; stresses that the EU and the other developed countries must continue to support climate action to reduce emissions and build resilience to climate change impacts in developing countries; recalls the crucial importance of the provision of adequate climate finance in this context; __________________ 6 https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop2 1/eng/l09r01.pdf
Amendment 133 #
2015/2317(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the EU to strengthen its capacities for crisis prevention and to reinforce the synergies between the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and development instruments, finding a balance between short-term responses to crises and longer-term development strategies; suggests that creating a new instrument dedicated to the development-security nexus might limit incoherencies and increase the efficiency of PCD; calls for the inclusion of governmental and civil society actors' concerns, priorities and policies of the regions and countries concerned into the elaboration of EU strategies for security and development;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that migration is a human right enshrined in Article 13 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights; urges the Commission and, the EU Member States and the international community to respect this article and all otherthe relevant international obligations concerning refugees and migrants, and to recognise the contribution that refugees and migrants make to our societies; considers that forced migration has root causes (notably economic, political and social reasons) that must be tackled; underlines the need for urgent action to address all human rights violations faced by migrants, which are most acute in situations of pressure due to security challenges and natural disasters; stresses that the EU and its Member States must lead by example in the promotion and the protection of the human rights of migrants, notably within its own borders, in order to be credible when discussing migration and human rights in third countries;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the integration of migration into the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely in SDG 10, which sets the framework for global development policy until 2030; recalls that the States committed to cooperate internationally to ‘ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons’; notes that forced displacement is not only a humanitarian issue but also a development challenge, therefore there should be a better coordination between humanitarian and developmental actors; considers that the implementation of the SDGs is an opportunity to reinforce a rights-based approach in the asylum and migration policies and to mainstream migration into development strategies; calls on the international community to adopt measurable indicators of the SDGs on migration, as well as to collect and publish disaggregated data on migrants access to decent work, healthcare and education, especially in developing destination countries, in order to improve migration governance;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 16 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU and its Member States to assume their responsibilities with respect to forced migration and human rights viRecognises the complexity of the ‘development-migration nexus’, without denying that development can help mitigate forced migration by increasing development cooperation, improving capacity-building, supporting conflict resolautions and promoting third countries, and to address the root causes both of human rights violations in third countries and of forced migration from third countries to Europee respect of human rights; considers that development aid should address effectively the root causes of migration, either economic, political, social or environmental; stresses that development assistance programmes should not be used for purely migration and border management purposes; notes that EU development policy main objective should be the eradication of poverty;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recognises the positive contribution of refugees and migrants to our societies, benefiting destination countries, transit countries, countries of origin - amongst which developing countries; calls on the EU and the international community to identify specific actions that governments can take to amplify the potential of legal migration as a development enabler; stresses that political leadership and strong advocacy are required, especially in destination countries, to combat xenophobia and to facilitate the social integration of migrants;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recalls that the majority of the world’s refugees and migrants are being hosted by developing countries; recognises the efforts carried out by third countries in the reception of migrants and refugees; stresses that the support systems of these countries face critical challenges which may cause severe threats to the protection of a growing displaced population; calls on the EU to pursue policy coherence and to use various policy instruments in its relations with developing countries in order to promote human rights and the rights of migrants, especially of women and children who are particularly vulnerable to violence, trafficking and abuse; in this regard, calls on the EU and its Member States to systematically incorporate migration issues as a component of development programmes and in the political dialogue with third countries, as well as to provide technical assistance to improve national and local-level migrant integration policies, always ensuring the proper involvement of NGOs and civil society;
Amendment 25 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Urges the EU to integrate the migration dimension in the post-Cotonou framework which will define the future relations between the EU and ACP countries; notes that a greater involvement of third countries in the design and negotiation of GAMM instruments would enhance the ‘partnership’ nature of these instruments, improving their local ownership and their efficiency;
Amendment 26 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Asks the Commission to enhance the transparency and flexibility of the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa and calls on EU Member States to contribute, at least at the same level as the Commission, to this Fund; underlines that it is essential to make sure, through proper monitoring and evaluation of the programmes, that the Trust Fund serves its purpose, namely helping those in need, fighting bad governance, corruption and promoting the rule of law in African countries;
Amendment 28 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 32 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 37 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 38 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 40 #
2015/2316(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the cancellation of the exInsists that sustainable debt solutions, including standards for responsible lending and borrowing, must be facilitated through a multilaternal debt of impoverished countries, as such debt makes it impossible for their governments to develop public policies that guarantee respect for human rights. legal framework for sovereign debt restructuring processes, with a view to alleviating the debt burden and avoiding unsustainable debt in order to create the conditions for the protection of human rights in the long term;
Amendment 14 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by terrorist attackshe most serious security challenges since the end of the Cold War ranging from conventional military threats to hybrid warfare and mass murderymmetric threats which no Member State can cope with alone, calls for the strengthening of the EU’s security and defence policy to make it a more effective policy instrument and a real guarantee of the safety of EU citizens and the promotion of European interests and values;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against terrorismsecurity challenges at home and abroad, including by supporting third countries in combating therrorism; whereas the Union needs to make its external borders more secure;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas space capabilities for European security and defence are appropriate for a range of situations, ranging from day-to- day peacetime use to crisis management and even full-scale warfaremore acute security challenges ; whereas the development of such capabilities is a long- term venture; whereas the development of future capabilities needs to be programmed when current capabilities are being deployed;
Amendment 45 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas in the area of defence and security the Union acts among others through such institutions as the European Defence Agency and the EU Satellite Centre;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role, among other areas, in the context of European security and defence; is convinced that current and future space- based capabilities and services will provide Member States and the Union with improved operational capacity for the implementation of the common security and defence policy and of other EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport;
Amendment 66 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the Union should improve space-based communication, situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; underlines the commitment for non-militarisation of the space;
Amendment 76 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that the Union’s space policy promotes scientific and technical progress, industrial competitiveness and the implementation of all EU policies, including security and defence policy; invites the Council, the VP/HR and the Commission to ensure that European space programmes develop space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence;
Amendment 83 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities for the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, bearing in mind the need to develop EU civil space programmes that can be used for both civil and militarysecurity and defence purposes;
Amendment 91 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services; takes the view that the Union, namely the VP/HR, should coordinate, facilitate and support such cooperation in the area of security and defence; express its conviction that the European Space Agency should play a significant role in the implementation of security and defence policy;
Amendment 94 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 112 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is convinced that the EU-USNATO relationship in the field of security and defence policy should be further developed; considers that EU-UStransatlantic cooperation on future space-based capabilities and services for security and defence purposes would be mutually beneficial; notes the work undertaken towards the third US Offset Strategy; calls for increased cooperation with the Japan Space Agency; urges the Union to take this development into account when preparing its own Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, and to include space-based capabilities for security and defence within the remit of that strategy; invites the VP/HR to discuss with defence ministers the strategic approach to be taken, and to inform Parliament as that debate unfolds;
Amendment 122 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls the need for stronger cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of security and defence; is convincedExpresses its conviction that EU-NATO cooperation should cover the building of resilience by the two bodies and in conjunction with our neighbours, as well as defence investment; considers that cooperation on space-based capabilities and services offers prospects for improving compatibility and synergy between the two frameworks; is convinced that this would also strengthen NATO’'s role in security and defence policy and in collective defence;
Amendment 141 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the EU programmes in the space domain that provide capabilities and services relevant to the Union’'s security and defence policy, including the next stages of evolution of the Copernicus and Galileo systems, need to takeshould take the eventual security- and defence- related requirements into account from their inception; considers that space situational awareness, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning are areas in need of EU-level cooperation in the public and private sectors, continuous investment by, and support for, agencies in the space, security and defence fields, such as the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Agency;
Amendment 157 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Remains cautiouExpresses its deep concerns about the risks associated with privatisation of the space sector;
Amendment 170 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Expresses its concerns about the increased cost of the Copernicus and Galileo programmes far beyond the initial budgetary allocations; express its support for the further development of the EU space capabilities while asking for an adequate management of the financial resources;
Amendment 180 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space- based capabilities and servidual use technologies with relevances for security and defence, and should promote the development of innovative applications and new business ideas in this area, with a particular focus on small and medium- sized companies and on developing entrepreneurship in this sector; calls for a plan for the use of dual-use space technologies in the space sector, aimed at contributing to the development of the European militarydefence industry and to greater competition;
Amendment 188 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Is convinced that EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities; welcomes, therefore, the European Council conclusions of June 2015; urges the Council, the VP/HR and the Commission to develop the necessary framework for EU-level funding;deleted
Amendment 195 #
2015/2276(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Takes the view that an EU-level ‘'white book’' on security and defence would be the appropriate means of structuring future EU engagement and investment in space-based security and defence capabilities; takes the view that this would also allow coherent development across all capability domains in relation to peace-keeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, and the progressive framing of a common EU defence policy;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2275(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that sexual violence is used as a weapon of war in many conflict areas; stresses that women and girls are especially vulnerable during conflicts; underlines their need for protection, supported by trained armed forces, who are respecting human rights.
Amendment 4 #
2015/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the aim of the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy to be comprehensive, enhance coherence between internal and external policies and improve coordination between institutions and with Member States; recalls in this context the Treaty obligation to consider Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) and minimiseto avoid contradictions between development and non-development policies that have an impact on developing countries; calls on the Member States therefore to establish and consolidate systems of coordination between respective Ministries and to further involve national Parliaments in the PCD agenda, and calls on the EU to reinforce a coordination mechanism for identifying the potential implications of policies on development objectives, integrating development aspects into policy initiatives from the outset and introducing a more systematic measurement of impacts and progress as regards PCD;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the realisation of the Sustainable development cooperation goals – in particular those of promoting good governance, human rights and gender equality, democracy and justice, combating poverty, reducing inequalities and social exclusion, tackling unemployment and barriers to economic growth, and improving health and education – all contributes to addressing the root causes of recent security and migration challenges; stresses in this context that in order to address the security-development nexus properly, dedicated mechanisms with flexibleharmonized financing must be developedshould be envisaged without jeopardizing and decreasing financing for development in favour of security;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the idea of redefining the EU relationship with Africa by upgrading the principle of good governance as annd human rights as essential elements of the post- Cotonou agreement and by building stronger links between EU development, trade, security and migration policies for mutual reinforcement; reiterates its call for budgetisation of the European Development Fund; calls for a fair and ambitious post-2020 EU-ACP partnership that better focuses on common challenges and interests and that is better adapted to make a real change to the security and prosperity of both parties.
Amendment 23 #
2015/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes it is important to enhance the role of developing countries in international fora, such as the UN, in order to ensure a fairer representation of interest.
Amendment 1 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that around 15 % of the world’s population, or an estimated 1 billion people, live with disabilities and 80% of these people live in low-income countries; underlines that 50 % of disabilities are preventable and directly linked to poverty and also that an estimated 98 % of children with disabilities in the developing world do not attend school;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines the fact that poverty is both a cause and a consequence of disability and that poverty is a barrier to accessing basic social services, such as nutrition, health, water and sanitation, and this can lead to disability;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the increasingly volatilechallenging security environment calls for a strengthening of the CSDP to make it a more effective policy instrument, a real guarantee for the safety of EU citizens and for the promotion of European interests and values;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Underlines the fact that persons with disabilities may face additional disability- related costs, higher rates of unemployment and lower incomes, which can put them and their families at higher risk of financial hardship;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Underlines the fact that exclusion from education may lead to lower employment and earning potential among people with disabilities, making these individuals and their families more vulnerable to poverty and limiting national economic growth;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1 d. Underlines the fact that inability to access and receive appropriate timely health care may result in continuously poor or worsening levels of functioning among people with disabilities, including the development of additional disabling conditions that lead to higher personal and societal medical and productivity costs in the long term;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1 f. Underlines the fact that on-going conflicts and natural disasters are also contributing factors to the growing numbers of persons with disabilities;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the European Council of December 2013 decided to examine the financial aspects of EU missions and operations, including the review of the Athena mechanism, in order to ensure that procedures and rules enable the Union to be faster, more flexible and efficient in the deployment of EU civilian missions and military operations;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that significant progress has been achieved by the EU regarding the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) but that, as stated by the CRPD Committee, there is still a lot to do in terms of inequality, unemployment and education; also expresses concern regarding sexual violence and other forms of abuse of womens against people with disabilities, in particular women and childrens;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses the fact that any actions of information, awareness and training represent a fundamental element in order to implement the CRPD Convention;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls the EU to take the lead on the promotion of the rights of persons with disabilities in the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with its partner countries, regional organisations and at the global level;
Amendment 28 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that despite a combined yearly defence budget of some EUR 190 billion, the Member States are still unable to meet the 1999 Helsinki Headline Goals; recalls the ambitious civilian headline goals set by the EU; calls for the EU to be strengthened as an real actor in defence, and regrets the lack of a clear military doctrine which operationalises the tasks listed in Article 43 TEU (the expanded ‘Petersberg tasks’); strongly advocates closer security and defence coordination and cooperation between Member States and at EU level, in particular pooling and sharing of resources, capabilities and assets;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Recommends the fact that the EU take the lead on disability-inclusive implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and establish a work plan and a mid-term review of the work plan in order to guarantee a monitoring and evaluation mechanism and ensure EU accountability;
Amendment 30 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Stresses the fact that EU should ensure that all EU funded programmes and projects promote, protect and uphold the rights of persons with disabilities and are compliant with the articles of the UN CRPD;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5 e. Underlines the necessity to establish mechanisms to collect and monitor disaggregated data by disability, sex, age and other characteristics and that the EU should implement such mechanisms in all EU funded projects and setup a clear timetable for producing disaggregated data across all its programmes;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5 f. Stresses the importance that persons with disabilities and their representative organisations should be regularly consulted and participate in decision- making with EU institutions;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 g (new)
Paragraph 5 g (new)
5 g. Underlines the importance to give a special support to the persons with disabilities in post emergency situations;
Amendment 39 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the concrete measures and pragmatic solutions introduced recently by the Commission within the existing framework of financial rules in order to shorten financial procedures; deplores, however, the still significant delays in procuring essential equipment and services to the missions under the CSDP, partially due to the often slow process of adopting decisions by the Council, to a very bureaucratic system of procurement, but also to a certain lack of flexibility of the financial rules, and the resulting negative effect on the missions’ functioning; recalls that the Court of Auditors already criticised this in its 2012 Special Report on the EU assistance to Kosovo related to the rule of law;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to mitigate these shortfalls, and to propose the necessary adaptations to financial rules for civilian CSDP missions, in order to facilitate the rapid and, flexible and more efficient conduct of missions, while guaranteeing sound financial management of the EU resources and an adequate protection of the Union’s financial interests; takes the view that the budget implementation powers should be delegated to the Civilian Operation Commander, in the same way that has been done for Heads of EU Delegations;
Amendment 54 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the chronic constraints of the EEAS/Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability’s administrative budget should be fast alleviated, as the yearly budget allocation remains too small to cater for all planning, conduct and support tasks, notably when more missions are launched almost simultaneously;
Amendment 56 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Takes the view that the permanent CSDP Warehouse, which currently only serves new CSDP civilian missions, should quickly be upgraded by enlarging its scope to include existing missions and by improving the availability of stored equipment, and enlarge, as well, the diversity of the necessary equipment, and that it should be managed by the future SSC;
Amendment 67 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for better military-civilian synergies where appropriate, notably in the areas of planning and coordination, logistics, transport and the security of missions, while respecting the different chains of command and the different nature of civilian and military missions;
Amendment 73 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the review of Crisis Management Procedures (CMP) agreed in 2013, as it led to improvements in the planning and launching of CSDP missions; stresses, however, that much more needs to be done to overcome the persistent ‘silos’ separating different parts of the EU foreign policy machinery;
Amendment 87 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Acknowledges that military operations are financed by the Member States outside the EU budget and that their common costs are covered by the Athena mechanism; underlines that Athena is crucial to the fast deployment of those operations and is an instrument of solidarity between Member States, as well as a major incentive, notably for those lacking financial resources, to contribute to CSDP operations; regrets, however, that the proportion of the common costs remains very low (estimated at around 10-15 % of all costs) and that the ‘costs lie where they fall’ outdated principle further deters Member States from taking an active part and leads to delays or even complete blockages in decision-making; finds that the long-term, better financing of military missions should be ensured;
Amendment 107 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls that the Lisbon Treaty provides the EU with new CSDP provisions which are yet untapped; encourages the Council to make use of Article 44 TEU, enabling a group of willing Member States to go ahead with the implementation of a CSDP task; considers the urgent need for a faster decision making process; takes the view that the ad hoc funding mechanisms for a military operation should cover more than the traditional common costs reimbursed by Athena;
Amendment 113 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Council to initiate as soon as possible the setting-up of the start-up fund (foreseen by Article 41(3) TEU) for the urgent and rapid financing of the initial phases of military operations, which could also serve as a strong tool for capacity development; notes that, while civilian missions benefit from a dedicated budget for preparatory measures, the deployment and efficiency of military missions will remain structurally hindered as long as this possibility is not used; strongly encourages Member States to engage in the permanent structured cooperation provided for by Article 46 TEU, which would also considerably strengthen the EU rapid reaction capability;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that the next European Council on defence should not waste an opportunity to have a deep discussion and produce concrete proposals on reforming the financial arrangements for CSDP missions and operations; in order to make them more efficient, more successful urges the Member States to deliver on the commitments undertaken at the European Council of December 2013;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that EU trade and investment policies are interlinked with EU development policies and have an impact on developing countries; calls for the Commission to respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development in all trade negotiations; stresses the need to focus on the effective implementation and monitoring of the sustainable development chapters in trade agreements, in line with the Sustainable Development Goalat TiSA should incorporate the principles of Aid for Trade strategy; emphasises that the economic prosperity of the EU cannot be detrimental to that of other countries, particularly to the social and economic condition of developing countries;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. UrgesWelcomes the present efforts of the EU to increase transparency of its trade agreements; urges, however, the Commission to increase transparency and democratic accountability on the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) negotiation process, and on all trade policies, by duly taking into account concerns expressed by trade unions and civil society organisations, including the CSOs of developing countries;
Amendment 26 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Rejects TiSA and other macro-trade agreements on the basis that they are a tool to bypass multilateral and democratic fora in which developing countries are properly represented in order to set global standards; recalls that TiSA, contrary to the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), does not currently have special and differential treatment provisions; urges the Commission to immediately propose such a clause based on GATS Article IV; reiterates the need for a strengthened multilateral approach to global trade that is to be achieved by means of an intensified cooperation between the EU and international bodies such as UNCTAD, G20, WTO and the World Bank;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RecCalls TiSA’s risks of increasing asymmetric international trade relations between countrieson the Commission to take into account the impact of TiSA on countries that are not part of the agreement, especially developing countries; stresses that to mitigate any potentially negative effects, the EU should intensify its actions to include developing countries into global value chains in services, and to consider a more flexible approach for developing countries when subscribing to the level of ambition of the agreement;
Amendment 44 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Rejects TiSA and other macro-trade deals, taking the view that they are a tool for the privatisation of public services and liberalisation of public procurement, such public services and public procurement being key elements for sustainable development and for ensuring respect fCalls on the Commission to explicitly exclude public services from TiSA, regardless of how the services are funded, organised or opeople’s dignity; askrated; invites the Commission to respect the policy space of developing countries’ governments and parliaments to take decisions in order to ensure internationally agreed standards on labour, the environment and human rightsupport and monitor the capacity-building of developing countries in providing sustainable and efficient public services;
Amendment 54 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls the Commission to mainstream gender equality and women’s empowerment in its trade policy and to consider the negative impact that TiSA and other trade agreements may have in this respect in developing countries, in light of existing concerns, closely monitor the impact of EU trade agreements on gender equality;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 66 #
2015/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls Uruguay’s decision to withdrawInvites the Commission to reflect on the recent withdrawal of Uruguay from the TiSA negotiations on the basis of concerns that TiSA could threaten the country’s policand to draw the necessary conclusions by space on strategic sectors and services; urges the Commission to take this withdrawal into serious considerationying more attention to the needs of developing countries which are subscribing to TiSA.
Amendment 24 #
2015/2229(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages the Member States and the EU to really implement a HRBA approach in their development policies and aid, for example by emphasising the importance of human rights, good governance and democracy in budget and sector support dialogues and to ensure democratic ownership, participation of civil society and transparency and accountability of development aid; underlines that, particularly in countries which have poor records both in development and respect for human rights, development aid should be maintained and even strengthened, but should preferably be channelled through civil society organisations and non- governmental local partners, and be systematically monitored, along with governmental commitments to improve the human rights situation on the ground;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2229(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU and its delegations to increase their political dialogue with governments in breach of human rights, democracy and the rule of the law, and insists that the political dialogue on human rights between the EU and third countries must cover a more inclusive and comprehensive definition of non- discrimination, inter alia on the basis of religion or belief, sex, racial or ethnic origin, age, disability, sexual orientation and gender identity.; encourages the EU to consolidate its basic value of solidarity and full respect for human rights, both home and abroad;
Amendment 50 #
2015/2229(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that human rights are genuinely protected in the remit of any trade and investment agreements concluded or revised, through binding and non-negotiable human rights clauses; insists that the Commission conducts systematic human rights impact assessments of trade and investment agreements to help ensure effective enforcement of human rights;
Amendment 54 #
2015/2229(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses the need to link security, development and human rights, as illustrated by the chaotic situations faced by many regions in EU's neighbourhood or vicinity, such as Middle-east, Horn of Africa, North Africa, Sahel, Western and Central Africa;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2229(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Encourages the EU Annual Report on Human Rights to dedicate more importance to the role of development cooperation;
Amendment 17 #
2015/2203(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines the importance of continuously improving the impact assessment of development cooperation and humanitarian aid projects funded through EU external financial instruments; emphasises the need for an in-depth, accurate and global analysis of the different monitoring and reporting arrangements to avoid any mismanagement, lack of transparency and misappropriation of EU funds;
Amendment 26 #
2015/2189(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Concludes that EIOPA’s mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, burdensome and a potential threat to its independence, especially when 60% of its budget is financed by the competent national supervisory authorities; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider the financing arrangement in favour of an independent budget line from the budget of the Union and the introduction of fees by market participants.
Amendment 5 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the 2014 EIB Annualctivity Report and the increase by 6.92% to EUR 80.3 billion in the EIB Group’s lending; is very concerned at the increasingbout still very high unemployment, inequality and poverty levels, as well as weak investment in Europe and the continuous uncertainty in the financial markets, also in view of a worsening global economic outlook;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that overall EU investment in 2013 decreased by 13% compared with the pre- crisis period with investment in some countries decreasing 25% and even by as much as 60% in others, creating a dangerous investment imbalance in the EU; is of the opinion that this constitutes a major challenge for the EIB Group and will require extraordinary efforts from its side for the years to come, as part of an overall EU effort to implement a renewed long-term strategy for sustainable, convergent and inclusive growth;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes the urgent need for an increase in EIB lending activityGroup investment activity, including innovative financial instruments with greater additional risk-bearing capacity, and for the improvement of its activity in line with Protocol (No 28) on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the EIB Group to re-examine its strategic planning programme, given the high degree of concentration of funding for the four biggest economies in the EU accounting for more than 45%, and the disproportionate rise in unemployment levels and investment gaps in some other countries which remains at alarming levels, and which could hamper economic convergence in the EU and further damage growth prospects and social cohesion in specific countries and regions in the EU;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Takes note ofWelcomes the establishment of the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI) and emphasises the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, transparent and fair way, to honour fully the requirement of additionality, and to take into account that priority should be given to projects in strategic sectors, countries in adjustment programmewhere investment gaps have widened most during the economic crisis and regions which have difficulties in attracting funding because of their high risk environment; their geographical or historical disadvantage translates into a higher high risk profile in an economic environment marked by uncertainty; Regrets the selection procedure used to appoint the Managing Director and the Deputy Managing Director and stresses the need to finalise as soon as possible the inter-institutional agreement between the EIB and the Parliament on reporting and on the selection procedure for both positions;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the EIB Group to develop an increased focus on economic and labour market resilience in the context of technological changes, environmental constraints, globalisation and demographic trends; calls on it to prioritise investment operations with high potential in terms of job creation and environmental sustainability, particularly in areas of greatest need, and to expand its cooperation with other development banks in this direction;
Amendment 70 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the EIB Group to consider strengthening non-financial criteria in its project assessment models, giving greater weight to projects' contribution to sustainable and inclusive development and cohesion in line with Protocol (No 28) on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, while aiming at maximum transparency;
Amendment 87 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EIB to refrain from cooperating with financial partners with a negative track record and to enforce prevention measures against tax havens, fraud and evasion as well as aggressive tax avoidance; calls for these prevention measures to include ensuring that no EIB funding can go to ultimate beneficiaries or financial intermediaries which make use of tax havens or harmful tax practices;
Amendment 88 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EIB Group to refrain from cooperating with financial partners with a negative track record, particularly in the field of corporate taxation, and to enforce prevention measures against tax havens, tax fraud and tax evasion as well as aggressive tax avoidance; requests a list of outstanding EIB Group transactions involving counterparts established in jurisdictions featuring on the Commission's list of "top 30" tax havens around the world;
Amendment 91 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the EIB to adopt an effective and up-to-date Responsible Taxation Policy, to be overseen by a Tax Unit and detailed within an Annual Tax Report; calls for this policy to include regular country tax assessments in order to identify problematic jurisdictions; calls for this policy to involve the EIB actively using its relocation clause and systematically publishing the domicile of funds which benefit from EIB support, as well as the domicile of the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds if they are supported by financial intermediaries;
Amendment 112 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EIB Group to further enhance transparency and access to information both internafor the Parliament and other EU institutions as welly ands for the public, especially regarding the selection, monitoring and evaluation of activities and programmes;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Requests the EIB to increase its reporting to Parliament regarding its decisions, progress achieved and the impact of its lending activities within and outside the EU; requests that this include regular reports to the European Parliament and other stakeholders on the implementation of its Non-Compliant Jurisdiction Policy, including the number of applications which have been turned down for failing to comply with this policy, as well as the number of relocations which have been requested and implemented.
Amendment 128 #
2015/2127(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Requests the EIB Group to increase its reporting to Parliament regarding its decisions, progress achieved and the impact of its lending activities within and outside the EU; calls on the EIB Group to engage in deeper dialogue with the Parliament on all its activities within the same scheme for reporting and accountability as set out in the EFSI regulation and to fully comply with the spirit and letter of the EFSI regulation, notably concerning inter-institutional cooperation with the Parliament.
Amendment 6 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that climate change poses a major threat to poor and least developed countries (LDCs); stresses that failure to limit global warming to 2°C maywill undermine development gains;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that climate change poses a major threat to poor and least developed countries (LDCs); stresses that failure to limit global warming to 2°C may undermine development gains; and acknowledges that whereas the Paris agreement aims to put the world on a course for not more than a 2°C warming scenario; a 2°C warming scenario will still bring significant loss and damage to environment and communities and more than this will bring catastrophic effects;
Amendment 9 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Draws attention to the recent Adaptation Gap report produced by UNEP which estimates that the cost of adapting to climate change in Africa alone, even assuming international efforts keep global warming below 2°C this century, will rise to US$50 billion per year by 2050. Considers that even if all cost- effective adaptation is realised, there will be further ‘residual’ damages where adaptation is no longer possible. Recognises that these residual damages will double the adaptation costs in the period 2030-2050;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that in order to reduce GHG emissions in developing countries, it is necessary to put in place mechanisms that would increase the use of efficient, alternative energy sources and industrial capacities with zero or low carbon footprint;
Amendment 50 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Expects the European Commission to assume a pro-active role in negotiations; calls on it to make it clear that the climate challenge is the top strategic priority to this Commission and to organise itself in a way which reflects this, at all levels and across all policy areas.
Amendment 52 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Calls for a commitment for an allocation of climate finance towards supporting development goals that are at risk of being undermined by climate change, with particular reference to the food security objectives as laid out in the Millennium Development Goals and reiterated in the Post 2015 development Agenda.
Amendment 53 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Calls on major developed economies to harness their existing advanced infrastructure to promote, enhance and develop sustainable growth and to commit to support developing countries to build their own capacity to help ensure future economic growth in all parts of the world is achieved at no further cost to the environment.
Amendment 54 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 e (new)
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Calls on the EU and its Member States to clearly define the role of private finance in the context of additional leverage of funding, while recognising that this cannot replace the need for public finance, in particular for adaptation, to emphasise the need for transparent reporting and accountability of such finance and to ensure the implementation of relevant social and environmental safeguards;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 f (new)
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Calls on the EU to help settle ongoing discussions around additionality of climate finance to development aid and to stop the diversion of existing aid to climate finance by providing guarantees to developing countries that climate finance that qualifies as ODA will be part of an overall ODA budget that is rising at least at the same rate. Calls for a robust monitoring and accountability framework for effective follow-up of the implementation of climate finance commitments and objectives to help provide clarity on these issues;
Amendment 56 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 g (new)
Paragraph 7 g (new)
7g. Stresses the importance of the role that the Development Community, OECD and OECD DAC should play in working closely with stakeholders and relevant organisation to assess and mitigate the worst human impacts of climate change, which are expected to be challenging even below a 2°C warming level.
Amendment 57 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 h (new)
Paragraph 7 h (new)
7h. Recalls the principle of EU Policy Coherence in this, the European Year for Development, which seeks to take account of development objectives in all policies that are likely to affect developing countries and therefore calls on negotiators to aim with their COP strategy to minimise contradictions and ensure synergy between the EU negotiating position and different EU policies to benefit developing countries and increase the effectiveness of development cooperation.
Amendment 58 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 i (new)
Paragraph 7 i (new)
7i. Highlights the importance of policy scrutiny to ensure that policies aimed at mitigating climate change do not inadvertently undermine communities rights to land, water and food; such as in the case of biofuels.
Amendment 59 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 j (new)
Paragraph 7 j (new)
7j. Recognises and proposes action on the implications of high carbon food sources and related agricultural emissions, such as methane and nitrous oxide; Also calls for action on deforestation arising from change of land use for feed and pasture with an aim to avoid emissions associated with food source markets. Calls for action to be taken to raise awareness of the climate impacts of high impact food production methods and to help businesses and people change behaviour. Demands that side measures, including action on curbing food waste should be part of national mitigation plans, especially in those countries with higher than average levels of consumption;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 k (new)
Paragraph 7 k (new)
7k. Recalls the importance of monitoring, reporting and reducing maritime and air transport GHG emission reductions, and the need for swift progress and ambition in reaching satisfactory and timely outcomes before 2016, on the part of both the International Maritime Organisation and the International Civil Aviation Organisation, in line with the scale and urgency of the climate challenge; calls for dedicating revenues derived from these to post-2020 international climate finance and the Green Climate Fund;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 l (new)
Paragraph 7 l (new)
7l. Considers that while Less Developed Countries and Small Island Developing States have contributed the least to climate change, they are disproportionately affected by the adverse consequences and are often in a lesser position to mitigate and adapt to these changing conditions. Calls therefore for a strong focus in the Paris agreement for supporting adaptation and mitigation measures for Less Developed Countries through technology transfer and finance.
Amendment 4 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that organised crime has a transnational dimension and encompasses a various range of criminal activities including drug trafficking, smuggling of migrants, money-laundering, trafficking in counterfeit goods, firearms, wildlife and cultural property; highlights the need for a joint action based on accessible information and increased cooperation between the police and the judicial authorities of various Member States and developing countries, which should be assisted by ad hoc joint coordination bodies;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the costs of corruption cannot only be calculated in economic terms, and that these costs are very high, especially in developing countries, which undermines public trust in public authorities and democratic institutions, increases inequalities that disproportionately affect the poorest and most vulnerable, and reduces the effectiveness of development aid;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that illicit financial flows, estimated at $1 trillion a year, are major obstacles to the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development, and drain resources that should be invested in developing countries;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recalls that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development recognises the need to fight corruption in all its forms, calling on States to reduce illicit financial flows, bribery and corruption and to build effective, accountable and transparent institutions;
Amendment 11 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy for corruption risk management in developing countries and to implement fully the anti-fraud strategy issued in 2013, especially when implementing EU aid in all its modalities, including the EDF and trust funds, and when delegating development projects to third parties;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Calls on the EU to support the establishment of strong national systems and institutions to address corruption in developing countries, including central and local government systems, tax authorities, law enforcement agencies, but also NGOs, media and parliaments; stresses that budget support to developing countries should be accompanied by a clear strategy to minimise corruption risks;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that whistleblowing is an essential anti-corruption tool, and that a proper system to protect whistleblowers should be established both inside and outside the EU; stresses in particular a direct reporting mechanisms is needed for citizens in EU aid recipient countries who bring attention to irregularities in EU- funded aid programmes;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that open trade ismust be an engine for growth, development and wealth creation and sustainable development; recalls that the countries most integrated into the world economy are also among the richest;
Amendment 14 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the importance of the potential contribution of trade policy to sustainable development was recently reaffirmed in the Addis Ababa outcome document and in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; recalls that the Sustainable Development Goals include several trade-related targets across a number of policy areas;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes that the communication "Trade for All" reaffirms the principle of policy coherence for development and aims at 'a more responsible' trade and investment policy, namely by contributing to the SDGs and the inclusive growth in developing countries; welcomes also the commitment to undertake in-depth analysis of the potential effects of new FTAs on LDCs; urges the Commission to put its words into action and to make all EU trade-related instruments consistent with the SDGs;
Amendment 25 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the advances made at the World Trade Organisation’'s Ministerial Conference in Nairobi, in particular in the area of agriculture (e.g. the elimination of trade-distorting agriculture export subsidies, and progress on market access for the least developed countries (LDCs)); calls on the Commission to support developing and LDCs in the implementation of the Agreement on Trade Facilitation and welcomes, in this regard, EU's initiative of targeting EUR 400 million in funding over five years for supporting trade facilitation reforms and projects such as improving the customs systems of developing and LDCs;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to enforce supply chain due diligence; calls on the Commission to support developing countries to increase their domestic value added in order to upgrade along the global value chains;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the crucial role of Aid for Trade (AfT) in trade-related capacity-building, technical assistance, business support policies for SMEs and regional integration; notes, however, that without serious efforts by the countries directly concerned and significant improvements in governance, trade cannot – in isolation – help countries to overcome development constraints; calls the EU and its Member States to commit to increase Aid for Trade (AfT) support for developing countries, LDCs, while addressing fair and ethical trade in the upcoming revision of its Aid for Trade strategy, as announced in the communication "Trade for All";
Amendment 44 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) arcan be a key development instrument for helping to alleviate poverty in the long run; stresses, however, that their scope is still mainly limited to goods, and that expanding them to services and investment would considerably increase potential for growth and promote human rights; calls on the EU to establish specific monitoring structure in the EPAs dedicated to sustainable development and that ensure the proper involvement of civil society organisations and trade unions as well as to include stronger human rights clauses with coherent means of implementation;
Amendment 49 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that the communication "Trade for All" does not make any reference to the Cotonou Agreement, which expires in 2020; calls on the EU to engage in a broad consultation and dialogue process, including with our ACP countries, about the post-Cotonou framework;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the Commission to include strong and comprehensive sustainable development chapters, which are effectively implemented and enforced, in EU's trade and investment agreements; calls in particular for provisions that ensure human rights, labour rights, environmental and social protection as well as gender equality;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the cooperation of the EU and the UNDPnited Nations in promoting shared values and supporting governments, civil society and populations in over 100 countries in important policy areas such as capacity development, institutional development, the fight against corruption, equality between men and women, electoral assistance, crisis prevention and recovery, disaster risk reduction and climate changeto save and improve the lives of millions of people in developing countries and fragile States;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls forInvites the fEurther deepening and strengthening of the Strategic Partnership between the EU and the UNDP and of its goals of combating poverty and promoting peace, development and human rightsopean Commission and United Nations specialized agencies, funds and programmes to establish a high-level dialogue on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, with a view to coordinate the policies, programmes and operations of the EU and UN; underlines the importance of disaggregated and accessible data to monitor progress and evaluate the results of the EU-UN partnership;
Amendment 10 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of EU-UNDP cooperation on aid effectiveness; underlines the commitment of both to the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation and to encouraginges all states as well as private- sector actors also to commit to it;
Amendment 14 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for further EU-UN cooperation in the areas of health, HIV/AIDS, education, food and nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene, child protection, gender equality, social inclusion, climate action, humanitarian aid, migration, human rights, non-discrimination on all grounds, good governance and democracy-building, notably in order to fight corruption, tax evasion and illicit financial flows and support conflict prevention measures;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the importance of the EU- UN partnership to improve the lives of future generations and stresses the special vulnerability of children, as well as their pivotal role in achieving sustainable and equitable development for all; acknowledges the longstanding cooperation between the EU and UNICEF as crucial to protect children in emergencies and achieve all child-related Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reiterates the fact that the EU must be in the lead of the fight against climate change and further cooperate with UN on this area, taking into account the particular situation of developing countries, notably ahead of the adoption of the SDGs and the agreement in Paris of COP21;
Amendment 20 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Welcomes the EU's support of the Women, Peace and Security agenda at the United Nations, and its commitment to gender equality in external action; considers that the EU should proactively align its approach to conflict with that of the Women, Peace and Security agenda, and specifically its commitment to international humanitarian law;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2104(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points to the importance of EU-UN partnership in addressing the root causes and consequences of global refugee crises and humanitarian emergencies; reiterates the fundamental importance of coordinated action by all international actors at the same time as providing technical assistance and mobilising adequate resources;, in order to protect the most vulnerable population, including children; and calls, therefore, for further cooperation and dialogue in the preparation of the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit.
Amendment 9 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the migration crisis can be addressed only within the context of a European approach and not by bilateral meetings among Members States; calls for a newwelcomes the European agenda on migration under the leadership of the Commission and the European Council, underpinned by solidarity among the Member States. This agenda mighust include the replacement of the Dublin regulation with a centralised European asylum system;
Amendment 30 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the complexity of the development-migration nexus, diverging from the common view of development as a means to reduce, if not eliminate, migration, without denying that development can help mitigate some of thesignificantly contribute to address the root causes of forced migration, such as conflicts or state fragilityresponding to political and economic instability, human rights violations, conflicts, global inequalities, poverty, unemployment and climate change; recalls that emigration rises with economic development until countries reach an upper-middle-income country status (around USD 7000-8000 per capita), at which point it begins to decrease;
Amendment 64 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers the issues and problems faced by women migrants in the migration process and its impact on women’s empowerment and human rights to be of major importance; stresses that an explicit gender perspective in migration policies is vital; calls in particular for gender discrimination to be removed in the legal aspects of migration; insists on the need to respect the human and individual rights of the weakest among the migrants, namelyin particular women and children (including the need for education for migrating and refugee children), and on the need to include these rights in the post-2015 development agenda;
Amendment 71 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Takes note of the creation of an ‘Emergency Trust Fund for stability and addressing root causes of illegal immigration in Africa’ and strongly encourages the Member States to contribute to the Fund in order to effectively help to foster stability and to address the root causes of migration; asks the Commission to enhance the transparency of the Fund and underlines that monitoring and evaluation of the projects and programmes financed will be essential, to make sure the Fund serve its purposes helping directly those in need and not financing governments responsible for human rights violations;
Amendment 76 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the EU to fully respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development (Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) in its migration and Mediterranean policies, and in particular in the implementation of its European Agenda on Migration; underlines the need for a more systematic incorporation of the development dimension in migration policies;
Amendment 80 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recommends an incorporation of migration issues in the dialogue with partner countries and regions, ensuring that cooperation with third countries does not lead to trap migrants in abusive situations or preventing them from accessing fair asylum procedures;
Amendment 83 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Welcomes the November Summit in La Valletta as a real opportunity to discuss solutions to the migration crisis with developing countries; recalls the need for the summit to address not only the fight against human trafficking and the need to secure access to protection and asylum, but also the root causes of migration and the need of stabilisation and development of the African countries concerned;
Amendment 86 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls for the development of policies and mechanisms to maximize the development impact of remittances, continuing efforts to decrease their costs;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2067(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Is convinced that the Agreement is a development opportunity that by helping to create a more favourable business environment enhances export competitiveness and brings expanded trade opportunities, in particular to small and medium-sized enterprises and land- locked developing countries, and can attract more private sector investment;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2067(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Acknowledges that the implementation of the Agreement will improve the conditions for the deepening of regional economic integration, enhance the efficiency of cross-border trade flows and thus increase regional trade exchanges, notably in Africa; notes that regional initiatives should be pursued in line with the WTO Agreement;
Amendment 11 #
2015/2067(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recognises that private sector expertise can play a central role in promoting trade facilitation measures and in providing assistance and support for TFA implementation in developing countries; takes note of a planned USAID initiative for a public-private alliance towards this end; calls on the Commission to encourage private sector involvement and to explore possibilities for partnerships with European industries in support of implementing the TFA;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2067(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Acknowledges that the implementation of trade facilitation reforms has broader development benefits; notes in this context the key role that customs can play in facilitating the expeditious movement of consignments of disaster relief items; stresses that emergency humanitarian assistance should benefit from simplified customs clearance procedures to speed up aid deliveries, and, moreover, be exempt from duties and taxes.
Amendment 6 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas illicit financial flows (IFFs), i.e. all unrecorded private financial outflows involving capital that is illegally earned, transferred or utilised, typically originate from tax evasion activities, trade misinvoicing and abusive transfer pricing, against the principle that taxes should be paid where profits have been generated, and tax evasion and avoidance have been identified as major obstacles to the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development by all major international texts and conferences on financing for development;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the need for an increase of domestic revenues has become more pressing due to the financial and economic crisis;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas the amount of resources raised by developing countries through domestic revenue mobilisation has been increasing steadily, and important progress has been done in this field with the aid of international donors;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas developing countries still rely heavily on taxes from trade, which exposes national budgets to volatile commodity price, and are having difficulties in compensating for the decline in trade taxes resulting from the current global context of trade liberalisation, and in shifting to other types of domestic resources;
Amendment 44 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas corporate tax revenues constitute a significant share of developing countries' national income, and in the past years developing countries have continually lowered corporate tax rates;
Amendment 47 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas, comparatively speaking, developing countries raise substantially less revenue than advanced economies (with-a-tax to GDP ratio ranging between 10 to 20%, as opposed to 30 to 40% of OECD economies) and are characterised by extremely narrow tax bases, and there is considerable potential for increasing the tax-to-GDP ratio, especially in the least industrialised countries (LICs);
Amendment 52 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas developing countries have been offering various tax incentives and exemptions, which are not transparent and guided by proper cost-benefit analyses and often fail to attract real and sustainable investments, putting developing economies against each other, competing to offer the most favourable tax treatments, and leading to harmful tax competition and a ‘race to the bottom’ that brings greater benefit to multinational corporations (MNCs) than to developing countries;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions that allow banking or financial information to be kept private, combined with 'zero-tax' regimes to attract capital and revenues that should have been taxed in other countries generate harmful tax competition and particularly affect developing countries, with a loss of an estimated $189 billion of tax revenue annually;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas the fiscal treatment of mining investments varies across countries, and arrangements between developing countries' governments and extracting companies are usually ad hoc and negotiated without transparency and clear guidelines, with the risk of hampering tax collection;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas the existence of large informal sectors in developing countries' economies makes broad-based taxation next to impossible, and in countries where a large proportion of the population lives in poverty a considerable share of GDP is not taxable;
Amendment 68 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the amount of aid in support of domestic resource mobilisation is still low, accounting for less than one percent of total ODA in 2011;
Amendment 70 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
Amendment 72 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters is a subsidiary body of the Economic and Social Council which pays special attention to developing countries and countries with economies in transition;
Amendment 72 #
2015/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the urgent need for a study on the impact of international tax treaties and for a strengthened international cooperation in the field of taxation;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the European Investment Bank supports private companies in developing countries directly by providing loans, or indirectly by supporting financial intermediaries such as commercial banks and private equity funds, which then on-lend or invest in enterprises;
Amendment 80 #
2015/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for a code of conduct to be established for governments of the countries concerned in order to ensure tax systems are managed efficiently and that harmful tax practices are avoided;
Amendment 84 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that effective mobilisation of domestic resources and a strengthening of tax systems will be an indispensable factor in achieving the post-2015 framework that will replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which represents a viable strategy to overcome foreign aid dependency in the long term, and that efficient and fair tax systems are crucial for poverty reduction, fighting inequalities, good governance and state- building;
Amendment 89 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that tax avoidance and tax evasion represent a considerable financial loss for developing countries, and that taking appropriate measures at national, European and international level against these practices should be a top priority for the EU, taking into account the needs and constraints that developing countries face in gaining access to their tax revenues; considers that the EU should be taking a leading role in driving international efforts to combat tax havens, tax fraud and evasion, leading by example; and that it should cooperate with developing countries in counteracting aggressive tax avoidance practices by certain transnational companies, as well as in seeking ways to help them withstand pressures to engage in tax competition;
Amendment 94 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission to support developing countries and regional tax administration frameworks, such as the African Tax Administration Forum and the Inter-American Centre of Tax Administrations, in the fight against tax dodging, in developing fairer tax policies, in promoting administrative reforms and in order to increase the share, in terms of aid and development, of financial and technical assistance to the national tax administrations of developing countries;
Amendment 102 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to give good governance in tax matters and fair tax collection a high place on the agenda in its policy dialogue (political, development and trade) and in all development cooperation agreements with partner countries, enhancing ownership and domestic accountability by fostering an environment where national parliaments are enabled to meaningfully contribute to the formulation and oversight of national budgets, including on domestic revenues and tax matters, and supporting the role of civil society in ensuring public scrutiny of tax governance and monitoring of cases of tax fraud, inter alia by setting up effective systems for protecting whistleblowers and journalistic sources;
Amendment 108 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges that information on beneficial ownership of companies, trusts and other institutions be made publicly available in open-data formats, in order to prevent anonymous shell companies and similar legal structures from being used to launder money, finance illegal activities or terrorist activities, conceal the identity of corrupt and criminal individuals, hide the theft of public funds and profits from illegal traffic and illegal tax evasion;
Amendment 115 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EU and the Member States to enforce the principle that multinational companies, and especially those companies extracting natural resources, must adopt country-by-country reporting (CBCR) as standard, requiring them to publish as part of their annual report on a country-by-country basis for each territory in which they operate the names of all subsidiaries, their financial performance, relevant tax information, assets and number of employees, and to ensure that this information is publicly available; calls on the OECD to recommend that its proposed CBCR template should be made public by all MNCs, to ensure that all tax authorities in all countries are able to access thorough information so they can assess transfer pricing risks and determine the most effective way to deploy audit resources;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the adoption of an Automatic Exchange of Information mechanism, a fundamental tool for enhancing global transparency and cooperation in the fight against tax avoidance and tax evasion; acknowledges, however, that support and time is needed for developing countries to build the required capacity to send and process information; therefore stresses the importance of ensuring that the new OECD Global Standard on Automatic Exchange of Information include a transition period for developing countries, recognising that by making this standard reciprocal, those countries that do not have the resources and capacity to set up the necessary infrastructure to collect, manage and share the required information might effectively be excluded; moreover, considers that a single standard on confidentiality should be envisaged;
Amendment 142 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. UStrongly supports the range of existing international initiatives to reform the global system, with a focus on the increased participation of developing countries in the structures and procedures of international tax cooperation; urges the EU and the Member States to ensure that the UN taxation committee is transformed into a genuine intergovernmental body equipped with additional resources, ensuring that developing countries can participate equally in the global reform of existing international tax rules;
Amendment 148 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that gender analysis should be made central to tax justice, recognising that while tax evasion has an impact on the welfare of individuals across the world, it is especially damaging to poor and lower- income households, in many of which women are disproportionately represented;
Amendment 154 #
2015/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the EIB to ensure that companies that receive EIB support do not participate in tax evasion and avoidance via offshore centres and tax havens, and to increase its transparency policy by, for example, making publicly available all of its reports and investigations;
Amendment 171 #
2015/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the decisive importance of good governance, the rule of law, separation of powers, institutional framework and regulatory instruments; especially supports the respect and the promotion of human and citizens’ rights and liberties, as well as investment in capacity-building, education, health, public services, social protection and the fight against poverty and inequality, including in terms of gender; recognises the need for infrastructures and selective public investments, as well as the sustainable use of natural resources, including by the extractive industries;
Amendment 203 #
2015/2044(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the importance of favourable conditions for private enterprise in developing countries, especially for SMEs; calls for alignment of the private sector with the sustainable development goals through appropriate partnerships, financial instruments, incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR);
Amendment 3 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stress that EU trade and investment policies are interlink with social protection, development, human rights and environment policies; Calls on the Commission to respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development in all external policies and specifically to include it in all treaties and develop legally binding mechanisms to ensure it;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the 1986 UN Declaration on the Right to Development, which confirms the right to development as an inalienable human right; calls on the EU to respect the sovereignty of developing countries in setting policies aimed at responding to the demands of their populations, for human rights and dignityensuring people dignity and obligations and duties of all investors in order to guarantee internationally agreed social, environmental and human rights standards;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the 1986 UN Declaration on the Right to Development, which confirms the right to development as an inalienable human right; calls on the EU to respect the sovereignty of developing countries in setting policies aimed at responding to the demands of their populations for human rights and dignity;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the European Union and its Member States to promote binding measures to ensure that multinational corporations pay taxes in the countries in which their profits are generated and to promote compulsory country-by-country reporting by the private sector, thus enhancing domestic resource mobilisation capacities of countries;
Amendment 11 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the EU to recognise the common but differentiated responsibility of developing countries, while ensuring equity when addressing the post-2015 Development Agenda; recalls the EU’s direct and historical responsibility in its dealings with partner countries, particularly as regards tax, trade and investment;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Finds regrettable the significant lack of adequate information and transparency as regards the actions of corporations and their impact on social and environmental standards and human rights; calls for an effective increase in the transparency of corporations and for independent ex-ante impact analysis prior to the signing of any trade agreement; calls for a new monitoring and enforcement mechanism to ensure corporations comply with social, environmental and human rights standards;
Amendment 20 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Finds regrettable the significant lack of adequate information and transparency as regards the actions of corporations and their impact on social and environmental standards and human rights; calls for an effective increase in the transparency of corporations and for independent ex-ante impact analysis prior to the signing of any tradeinternational agreement;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it regrettable that a regulatory framework on the way corporations comply with human rights and obligations with respect to social and environmental standards is still lacking, which allow certain States and companies to circumvent them with impunity; finds it regrettable that current human rights clauses in free trade agreements and other economic partnership agreements are ineffective and are usually not respected; urges the Commission to further promote binding initiatives for responsible mining, logging and sourcing of commodities so as toand private sustainability-bound schemes throughout supply chains and to step-up environmental and social product and process life cycle analysis so as to improve consumers information and to effectively ensure the accountability of companies;
Amendment 28 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it regrettable that a regulatory framework on the way corporations comply with human rights and obligations with respect to social and environmental standards is still lacking; finds it regrettable that current human rights clauses in free trade agreements and other economic partnership agreements are ineffective and are usually not respectedreiterates its call for the European Commission to be more committed to promoting binding and non- negotiable human rights and social and environmental clauses in negotiations of international agreements; urges the Commission to further promote initiatives for responsible mining, logging and sourcing of commodities so as to ensure the accountability of companies;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls for the EU to follow UNCTAD´s Comprehensive Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development recommendations to ensure responsible transparent and accountable investments to not undermine social and environmental standards, human rights, development and people´s dignity, while guarantee respect of human rights, gender equality, decent work, union rights, environmental protection, social protection, universal access to quality goods and public services (paying particular attention to public and universal health coverage), social protection, universal access to medicines, and food and product safety;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to engage actively in the work of the UN’s Human Rights Council on aand of the UNEP on international treatyies to hold transnational corporations accountable for human rights abuses and violations of environmental standards.
Amendment 32 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU and Member States to engage actively in the work of the UN’s Human Rights Council on an international treaty to hold transnational corporations accountable for human rights abuses.
Amendment 31 #
2015/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is gravely concerned over the surge in armed conflict, hybrid war, instability and widespread human rights violations in the EU’s immediate neighbourhood and the threat of terrorism inside and outside the EU; believes that the current security threats are common to the EU as a whole and should be addressed in a united and coordinated fashion, pooling and sharing civilian and military resources; strongly believes, in this regard, that it is imperative not to waste resources and that it is essential to better use tax payers’ money and make progress on the establishment of a European defence equipment market and to develop a European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB);
Amendment 46 #
2015/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Warns of worrying developments in the European defence market that are increasing external dependencies in the European defence sector at a time of an increasingly complex and challenging security environment; warns, in particular, of the combination of Member States’ declining defence budgets, persisting market fragmentation despite new internal market rules, the growing dependence of the defence industry on extra-EU exports and increased foreign investment in Europe’s defence sector, yielding control of strategic national and European defence industries, assets and technologies;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the European Council to draw the necessary lessons and take concrete measures towards overcoming the defragmentation of the European defence market in order to guarantee, an issue that hampers innovation and leads to a duplication of defence and programmes and resources, in order to guarantee its transparency and competitivity as well as the availability of the defence capabilities needed to ensure European security and fulfil the objectives of the CSDP;
Amendment 98 #
2015/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that EU export control policies should be substantially revamped with a view to developing a more integrated, coherent and comprehensive EU regime and a level playing field, making sure that overarching foreign and security policy objectives have priority over short-term financial, economic and commercial interests; notes that the Council has failed to ensure the uniform application of the common position on the control of exports of military equipment; is disconcerted that even in cases of flagrant non-compliance by a buyer country with several of the eight criteria, including those on the preservation of regional peace, security and stability, and on the behaviour of the buyer country with regard to the international community and its respect for international law, the common position is almost entirely absent from the political decision-making sphere and public discourse;
Amendment 130 #
2015/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Considers mutual assurances of SoS between the Member States to be a fundamental element in the construction of an integrated European defence market; welcomes the EDA’s updated framework arrangement on SoS as an instrument which strengthens mutual confidence and solidarity, but notes that it does not create any legal obligations; takes the view that the EU- wide SoS regime needs to be based on legislation, and in particular on the full implementation of the directive on intra- EU transfers in order to remove barriers to the movement of defence products inside the EU;
Amendment 1 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that Afghanistan is one of the world’s largest recipients of development aid and that EU institutions committed EUR 3.6 billion in aid to the country between 2002 and 2016; regrets the fact that, despite international assistance,at the proportion of Afghans living in poverty has risen from 38 % (2012) to 55 % (2017) and highlights that the country has registered slow growth since 2014 with the draw- down of international security forces, accompanying reductions in international grants as well as a worsening security situation;
Amendment 3 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recalls the EU commitment to support poverty reduction by focusing its efforts in areas in which it adds most value and by respecting the principles of aid efficiency and effectiveness, in line with “Policy Coherence for Development” (PCD);
Amendment 5 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that this recent reversal in development progress is largely due to the intensification of long-lasting violence and conflict, and that internal displacement, the arrival of returnees from the surrounding region and climatic factors, such as drought, have all led to a deterioration of the humanitarian situation; urges therefore the EU and its Member States to enhance all their efforts to address key humanitarian challenges and human needs and to pay particular attention to vulnerable people, including people located in hard to reach areas;
Amendment 9 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights that an estimated 10 million people have limited or no access to essential health services; emphasizes in this regard the need to remain committed to supporting the government to strengthen basic health provisions, with a focus on ensuring health care to vulnerable people including women, girls and children, as well as addressing disability and mental health care;
Amendment 10 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the CAPD will also enable the EU and Afghanistan to jointly address global challenges, such as nuclear security, non-proliferation and climate change;
Amendment 13 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes that rural economies and agriculture constitute the current main source of employment generation and calls on the EU to scale up its interventions in this area in order to improve food and nutrition security, rural livelihoods and employment, including the sustainable management of natural resources; underlines that particular attention should be given to the impact of natural hazards and climate change on small subsistence farmers;
Amendment 18 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. SRecalls that 8.7 million people have chronic needs which require longer- term systemic actions; stresses the need to comprehensively address humanitarian, development and security challenges and to better operationalise the nexuses between them; insists that pacifying the country and normalising the functioning of the state and its institutions are indispensable prerequisites for development in Afghanistan;
Amendment 25 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 28 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasizes the importance of ensuring that civil society organisations (CSOs) will continue to play an essential role in exercising social control necessary to verify the good provision of public services;
Amendment 29 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the EU to further promote equality between women and men and women’s empowerment though its development efforts, bearing in mind that changing societal attitudes towards women's socio-economic role calls for accompanying measures in awareness raising, education and reform of the regulatory framework;
Amendment 30 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Regrets the lack of parliamentary oversight and democratic control on the conclusion of the Joint Way Forward informal readmission agreement between the EU and Afghanistan and stresses the importance of conducting continuous dialogue with the relevant actors in order to find a sustainable solution on the issue of Afghan refugees in its regional dimension; emphasizes that the EU development assistance to Afghanistan should not be seen through the prism of purely migration and border management purposes and considers that development aid should address effectively the root causes of migration, in line with its primary objective of poverty eradication;
Amendment 55 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Agreement provides the basis for developing a mutually beneficial relationship in an increasing range of areas such as the rule of law, health, rural development, education, science and technology, as well as actions to combat corruption, money laundering, the financing of terrorism, organised crime and narcotics;
Amendment 81 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises that support and positive co-operation from neighbouring countries and regional powers, in particular China, Iran, India, Russia and Pakistan, areis vital for peace and essential to thefor stabilisation and development of Afghanistan; regrets that a stable and successfulconsiders that closer relations with its neighbours are imperative for Afghanistan i's not always the end goal for these regional actorrmalization process to achieve stability; encourages them to cooperate constructively to promote a genuine and results-oriented negotiation process without preconditions;
Amendment 115 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises the EU’s continued support for the Afghan-led and Afghan- owned peace process; calls on the Taliban to denounce violence and join the peace process; recognises that a military presence will be required in the long termlong term assistance is need in order to assist the Afghan security forces in the suppression of violent extremists or terrorist groups that refuse to join the peace process;
Amendment 132 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines the need to increase and strengthen capabilities of the Afghan National Defence and Security Forces (ANDSF) and National Police Force, critical for Afghanistan’s security and reconstruction;
Amendment 143 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Government of Afghanistan to increase political inclusiveness, strengthen accountability and actively combat corruption;
Amendment 149 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Supports and endorses the Government of Afghanistan’s new counter- narcotics strategy, backed by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC); underscores the importance of a genuine internal reconciliation process; underlines that combating terrorism and its financing is a key ingredient of creating an environment conducive to security in Afghanistan;
Amendment 161 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines the necessity to support Afghanistan´s system of education in favour of increasing the number of children following school classes at all levels;
Amendment 164 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the fact that the EU- Afghanistan CAPD proposesreflects the principles and conditions for the EU-Afghanistan partnership with an emphasis on holding regular dialogues on human rightspolitical and economic issues, including thehuman rights of women and childrenand gender equality;
Amendment 166 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. The CAPD also foresees cooperation on migration and effectively reinforces EU assistance for Afghanistan in addressing migration and forced displacement challenges, in particular the reintegration of people on the move and returnees in Afghanistan;
Amendment 189 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recognises that the end goal of EU aid to Afghanistan is to help the country’s government and economy develop to a state of independence and growth with internal development and regional cooperation through external trade and investment, as opposed to a reliance on aid that supports the state over the peoplef the Afghan people have on state aid;
Amendment 196 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Following the country’s accession to the WTO in 2016, which increased Afghanistan’s ties to the global economy, the EU granted Afghanistan the duty free and quota free access to the EU market, but further concrete measures are needed in order to allow the private sector to take the advantage of this regime and as such increase its internal development;
Amendment 198 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Further efforts are need in order to increase the capacity of government institutions to formulate and implement trade strategies and policies, improve cross border movement of goods, and enhance the quality of products to meet international standards;
Amendment 210 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Reiterates the need for the international community to continue its engagement in Afghanistan and to contribute to rebuilding the country, developing the economy and resisting terrorism; encourages further financial engagement by the EU and the Member States;
Amendment 224 #
2015/0302M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the establishment of the joint cooperation bodies at executive level, with an emphasis on holding regular dialogues on political issues including human rights, in particular the rights of women and children and to address challenges and create opportunities for a stronger partnership, which are essential elements of this agreement;
Amendment 18 #
2015/0289(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The issue of the obligations and concomitant responsibilities and liabilities of the flag State and, where appropriate, the flag international organisation, for the conservation and management of the living resources of the high seas under UNCLOS has increasingly come into focus at international level. This has also been the case, under the heading of a due diligence obligation flowing from UNCLOS, for concurrent coastal State jurisdiction and flag State jurisdiction and, as appropriate, flag international organisation jurisdiction, to secure sound conservation of marine biological resources within sea areas under national jurisdiction. The Advisory Opinion of 2 April 2015 of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), rendered in response to questions raised by the West Africa Subregional Fisheries Commission, confirmed that the Union bears international responsibility before third countries and international organisations for the activities of its fishing vessels, and that such responsibility requires it to act with due diligence. A due diligence obligation is an obligation for a State to exercise best possible efforts and to do the utmost to prevent illegal fishing, which includes the obligation to adopt the necessary administrative and enforcement measures to ensure that fishing vessels flying its flag, its nationals, or fishing vessels engaged in its waters are not involved in activities which breach the applicable conservation and management measures. For these reasons, it is important to organise both the activities of Union fishing vessels outside Union waters as well as the governance system pertaining thereto in such a manner that the Union's international obligations can be efficiently and effectively discharged and that situations where the Union might be reproached for internationally wrongful acts are avoided.
Amendment 24 #
2015/0289(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The Union committed itself at the United Nations Summit on Sustainable Development on 25 September 2015 to implementing the resolution containing the outcome document entitled "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", including Sustainable Development Goal 14 "Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development", as well as Sustainable Development Goal 12 "Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns" and their targets.
Amendment 26 #
2015/0289(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 b (new)
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) All the members of the FAO, including the Union and its developing countries partners, unanimously adopted in 2014 the Voluntary Guidelines on Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the context of Food security and Poverty Eradication, including point 5.7 thereof, which highlights that small- scale fisheries should be given due consideration before agreements on resource access are entered into with third countries and third parties.
Amendment 33 #
2015/0289(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c – indent 4 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c – indent 4 a (new)
- available data on the global fishing effort in the fisheries concerned; and
Amendment 37 #
2015/0289(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Amendment 25 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The Union and its Member States, having signed the Paris Agreement, approved at the 21st conference of the parties (COP-21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the Paris Agreement), committed themselves to holding "the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1,5°Cˮ. They should bear this commitment in mind when working towards emissions reductions and low carbon investments.
Amendment 27 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 b (new)
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) The Paris Agreement represents a global accord to limit and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and seeks to achieve a 'just transition', from which developing nations must also benefit.
Amendment 29 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 c (new)
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) One of the best tools at the Union's disposal to meet the commitments laid down in the Paris Agreement is the EU ETS. It is recognised that in order to meet the challenges of global climate change, the EU ETS must function effectively and efficiently reduce emissions as well as support the transition to renewable energy, maximise energy efficiency and foster clean technology growth globally.
Amendment 32 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The zero-rating of emissions from biomass in the EU ETS constitutes a support scheme within the meaning of the Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Bioliquids, biofuels and solid and gaseous biomass should only receive support and count towards the national targets where they comply with sustainability criteria set out in the Directive 2009/28/EC or the Sustainable Bioenergy Policy. Consequently, the sustainability criteria must be applied for all sources of bioenergy that are consumed and zero- rated for greenhouse gas emissions within an installation or an aircraft operator's activities covered by the EU ETS. _________________________________ 1aDirective 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16).
Amendment 38 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a
(a) threfive new subparagraphs are added to paragraph 1: "From 2021 onwards, the share of allowances to be auctioned by Member States shall be 57at least 63%. 2% of the total quantity of allowances between 2021 and 2030 shall be auctioned to establish a fund to improve energy efficiency and modernise the energy systems of certain Member States as set out in Article 10d of this Directive (“the Modernisation Fund”). 2% of the total quantity of allowances between 2021 and 2030 shall be auctioned to establish the International Climate Action Fund to support climate action in vulnerable developing countries with low capacity, especially the Least Developed Countries, Small Island Development States and countries in Africa, in particular for adaptation to the impacts of climate change. Financial resources from the International Climate Action Fund will be used to replenish the United Nations Green Climate Fund on an annual basis, which has a goal to allocate 50% for adaptation, with half destined for highly vulnerable countries. 2% of the total quantity of allowances between 2021 and 2030 shall be auctioned to establish the Just Transition Fund to support local communities and workers in regions impacted most strongly by the ongoing transition to a decarbonised economy. The resources of that fund shall be used for investments aiming at creating jobs, financing job training and other employment and health services in alternative economic activities in regions where traditional carbon intensive sectors will lose a large number of jobs as a result of decarbonisation. A specific plan shall be developed by each Member State applying to utilise resources from this fund, in close partnership with the municipal and local authorities of the transformation regions as well as the social partners and civil society organisations. The total remaining quantity of allowances to be auctioned by Member States shall be distributed in accordance with paragraph 2.";
Amendment 64 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
(22a) In Article 27 paragraph 1is replaced by the following: "1. Following consultation with the operator, Member States may exclude from the Community scheme installations which have reported to the competent authority emissions of less than 25 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent and, where they carry out combustion activities, have a rated thermal input below 35 MW, excluding emissions from biomass, in each of the three years preceding the notification under point (a), and which are subject to measures that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions, if the Member State concerned complies with the following conditions: (a) it notifies the Commission of each such installation, specifying the equivalent measures applying to that installation that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions that are in place, before the list of installations pursuant to Article 11(1) has to be submitted and at the latest when this list is submitted to the Commission; (b) it confirms that monitoring arrangements are in place to assess whether any installation emits 25 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year. Member States may allow simplified monitoring, reporting and verification measures for installations with average annual verified emissions between 2008 and 2010 which are below 5 000 tonnes a year, in accordance with Article 14; (c) it confirms that if any installation emits 25 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year or the measures applying to that installation that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions are no longer in place, the installation will be reintroduced into the Community scheme; (d) it publishes the information referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) for public comment. Hospitals may also be excluded if they undertake equivalent measures. content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)" Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
Amendment 67 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I – paragraph 1
Annex I – paragraph 1
(22b) Paragraph 1 of Annex I is replaced by the following: "Installations or parts of installations used for research, development and testing of new products and processes and installations exclusively using biomass are not covered by this Directive. re not covered by this Directive." Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)
Amendment 68 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 c (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I – paragraph 3
Annex I – paragraph 3
(22c) Paragraph 3 of Annex I is replaced by the following: "When the total rated thermal input of an installation is calculated in order to decide upon its inclusion in the Community scheme, the rated thermal inputs of all technical units which are part of it, in which fuels are combusted within the installation, are added together. These units could include all types of boilers, burners, turbines, heaters, furnaces, incinerators, calciners, kilns, ovens, dryers, engines, fuel cells, chemical looping combustion units, flares, and thermal or catalytic post- combustion units. Units with a rated thermal input under 3 MW and units which use exclusively biomass shall not be taken into account for the purposes of this calculation. 'Units using exclusively biomass' includes units which use fossil fuels only during start- up or shut-down of the unit. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)
Amendment 69 #
2015/0148(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex IV – Part A
Annex IV – Part A
Amendment 42 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The possibility that the provision of information may be refused where it would lead to the disclosure of a commercial, industrial or professional secret or of a commercial process, or of information whose disclosure would be contrary to public policy should not apply to provisions of mandatory automatic exchange of information on advance cross- border rulings and advance pricing arrangements in order not to reduce the effectiveness of these exchanges. The limited nature of the information that is required to be shared with all Member States should ensure sufficient protection of those commercial interests.
Amendment 48 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In order to reap the benefits of the mandatory automatic exchange of advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements, the information should be communicated promptlyimmediately after and at the latest one month after the end of the quarter during which after they are issued and therefore regular intervals for the communication of the information should be established (at least twice a year).
Amendment 51 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The mandatory automatic exchange of advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements should in each case include communication of a defined set of basic information to all Member States. The Commission should adopt any measures necessary to standardise the communication of such information under the procedure laid down in Directive 2011/16/EC for establishing a standard form to be used for the exchange of information. That procedure should also be used in the adoption of any necessary measures and practical arrangements for the implementation of the information exchange.
Amendment 54 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Member States should exchange the basic information to be communicated also with the Commission. This would enable the Commission at any point in time to monitor and evaluate the effective application of the automatic exchange of information on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements. Such communication will not discharge a Member State from its obligations to notify any state aid to the Commission.
Amendment 64 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) A Member State should be able to rely on Article 5 of Directive 2011/16/EU as regards the exchange of information on request to obtain additional information, including the full text of advance cross- border rulings or advance pricing arrangements, from the Member State having issued such rulings or arrangements.
Amendment 65 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Member States should take all measures necessary to remove any obstacle that might hinder the effective and widest possible mandatory automatic exchange of information on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements.
Amendment 75 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The existing provisions regarding confidentiality should be amended to reflect the extension of mandatory automatic exchange of information to advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements.
Amendment 85 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 14 – introductory part
Article 3 – point 14 – introductory part
14. 'advance cross-border ruling' means any agreement, communication, or any other instrument or action with similar effects, including one issued in the context of a tax audit, which:
Amendment 87 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 14 – point c
Article 3 – point 14 – point c
(c) relates to a cross-border transaction or to the question of whether or not activities carried on by a legal person in the other Member State create a permanent establishment, and;
Amendment 88 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 14 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – point 14 – subparagraph 2
The cross-border transaction may involve, but is not restricted to, the making of investments, the provision of goods, services, finance or the use of tangible or intangible assets and does not have to directly involve the person receiving the advance cross-border ruling;
Amendment 89 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 15 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – point 15 – subparagraph 1
'advance pricing arrangement' means any agreement, communication or any other instrument or action with similar effects, including one issued in the context of a tax audit, given by, or on behalf of, the government or the tax authority of one or more Member States, including any territorial or administrative subdivision thereof, to any person that determines in advance of cross-border transactions between associated enterprises, an appropriate set of criteria for the determination of the transfer pricing for those transactions or determines the attribution of profits to a permanent establishment.
Amendment 104 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 1
Article 8a – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority of a Member State issuing or amending an advance cross-border ruling or an advance pricing arrangement after the date of entry into force of this Directive shall, by automatic exchange, communicate information thereon to the competent authorities of all other Member States as well as to the European Commission.
Amendment 110 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 2
Article 8a – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority of a Member State shall also communicate information to the competent authorities of all other Member States as well as to the European Commission on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements issued within a period beginning ten years before the entry into force but still valid on the date of entry into force of this Directive;
Amendment 120 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 3
Article 8a – paragraph 3
3. Paragraph 1 shall notalso apply in a case where an advance cross-border ruling exclusively concerns and involves the tax affairs of one where the request for an advance ruling relates to a legal structure without legal personality. In that instance, the competent authority of the Member State issuing the advance ruling shall forward the information it has to the competent authorities of all other Member States and shall arrange for the memorandum of incorporation to be transferred to the Member State or States where the incorporator more natural persons incorporators and the beneficiary or beneficiaries are resident.
Amendment 122 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) in respect of the information exchanged pursuant to paragraph 1: withinimmediately after and at the latest one month followingafter the end of the quarter during which the advance cross-border rulings or advance pricing arrangements have been issued or amended.
Amendment 124 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) in respect of the information exchanged pursuant to paragraph 2: before 31 December 2016within three months following the entry into force;
Amendment 127 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) the content of the advance cross-border ruling or advance pricing arrangement, including a description of the relevant business activities or transactions or series of transactions;
Amendment 129 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point d
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point d
(d) the identification of the other Member States likely to be directly or indirectly concerned by the advance cross-border ruling or advance pricing arrangement;
Amendment 130 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point e
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point e
(e) the identification of any person, other than a natural person, in the other Member States likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the advance cross-border ruling or advance pricing arrangement (indicating to which Member State the affected persons are linked).
Amendment 131 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point e a (new)
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point e a (new)
(ea) as soon as it is available, the European Tax identification Number (TIN) as outlined in the Commission's Action Plan on the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion of 2012.
Amendment 135 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 8a – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall require each issuer to annually publicly disclose, specifying by Member State and by third country in which it has a subsidiary, the following information on a consolidated basis for the financial year : (a) name(s), nature of activities and geographical location, (b) turnover, (c) number of employees on a full-time equivalent basis, (d) profit or loss before tax, (e) tax on profit or loss, (f) public subsidies received.
Amendment 136 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 6
Article 8a – paragraph 6
6. To facilitate the exchange the Commission shall adopt any measures and practical arrangements necessary for the implementation of this Article, including measures to standardise the communication of the information set out in paragraph 5 of this Article, as part of the procedure for establishing the standard form provided in Article 20(5). In Member States where decentralised territorial or administrative bodies are endowed with fiscal-related competences, the Commission shall assist member states to ensure that they meet their responsibility to provide training and support to these bodies.
Amendment 138 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 8
Article 8a – paragraph 8
8. Member States – or their territorial or administrative bodies including local authorities if applicable – may, in accordance with Article 5, request additional information, including the full text of an advance cross- border ruling or an advance pricing arrangement, from the Member State which issued it.
Amendment 139 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 8a – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. A minimum tax rate shall be established.
Amendment 157 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 20 – paragraph 5
Article 20 – paragraph 5
5. The automatic exchange of information on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements pursuant to Article 8a shall be carried out using a standard form once that form has been adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 161 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 21 – paragraph 5
Article 21 – paragraph 5
5. TOn 31 December 2016 at the latest, the Commission shall develop a secure central directory where information to be communicated in the framework of Article 8a of this Directive mayust be recorded in order to satisfy the automatic exchange provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 8a. The Commission shall have access to the information recorded in this directory. The necessary practical arrangements shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 173 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
The following Article is inserted: “Article 23b The Commission must examine all sanctions to be established in instances of refusal or omission of information exchange.”
Amendment 174 #
2015/0068(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 23 c (new)
Article 23 c (new)
The following Article is inserted: “Article 23c The Commission should accommodate and extend the working methods and the established criteria in the code of conduct in order to fight against the emergence of new forms of harmful fiscal practices within the present economic environment.”
Amendment 37 #
2014/2239(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly supports the inclusion of the goal of ensuring safe, public drinking water and adequate sanitation and hygiene for all by 2030 among the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be adopted in September 2015; stresses that realisation of all SDGs requires mobilisation from both developing and developed countries and deployment of much more financing for development than is currently provided, including from new sources;
Amendment 42 #
2014/2239(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that assistance for safe, public drinking water and sanitation should be given high priority in the allocation of funds and in assistance programming; favours open-mindedness in relation to different aid modalities, but strict adherence to development effectiveness principles and to an unwavering focus on poverty eradication and the maximisation of the development impact; in this regard, supports the involvement of local partners in the realisation of projects in developing countries, as well as the principle of community ownership;
Amendment 48 #
2014/2239(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises the importance of technology sharing for the design, construction and maintenance of programs; calls for effective monitoring of projects carried out through external aid;
Amendment 13 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 59 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Urges the Commission and the Member States to phase out all environmentally harmful subsidies;
Amendment 62 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6g. Maintains that public funding should be allocated with a view to spurring moves towards environment-friendly production methods;
Amendment 72 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Maintains that to ease the transition to a green economy, investment has to be channelled into education, training, and research and development;
Amendment 75 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 g (new)
Paragraph 7 g (new)
7g. Points out that SMEs are playing a key role in the transition to a green economy and hence in creating green jobs;
Amendment 77 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 i (new)
Paragraph 7 i (new)
7i. Points to the importance of, and the need for, financial instruments aimed at SMEs;
Amendment 115 #
2014/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 g (new)
Paragraph 11 g (new)
11g. Calls on the Member States to coordinate policies more closely where the green economy is concerned and to share their best practice regarding employment opportunities in the green economy.
Amendment 11 #
2014/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that private investments and finance are likely to be the key engine for growth, which is projected to be approximately 5 % in developing countries in the coming years; emphasises that the future public-private partnerships (PPPs) within the post-2015 development agenda must have a greater focus on poverty reduction, climate change mitigation, energy and resource efficiency;
Amendment 28 #
2014/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that properly structured and efficiently implemented PPPs can bring many benefits such as innovation, competitiveness and economic growth; outlines that PPPs in developing countries are so far concentrated mostly in the energy and telecommunications sectors, whereas private engagement in social infrastructure remains rare;
Amendment 44 #
2014/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for increased technical assistance toand technology sharing with the governments of the partner countries;
Amendment 52 #
2014/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned that certain safeguards to guarantee the purposeful use of public finance are not always in place; points out that a pro-poor development ex-ante impact assessment is needed for each PPP project that benefits from official development aid; stresses that measurable output indicators and monitoring as well as evaluation mechanisms need to be agreed upon during the preparatory phase of the projects and effectively implemented; highlights the fundamental importance of the prior formal consultative and scrutiny role for parliaments and civil society in order to ensure full transparency, legitimacy and accountability;
Amendment 68 #
2014/2233(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it indispensable to increasingly engage with both local and European SMEs and start-up companies in PPPs;
Amendment 61 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph E a (new)
Paragraph E a (new)
Ea. Asks the Commission to move towards a fairer approach in its negotiations of Economic Partnership Agreements and suggests the loss of value in preferences from the TTIP be recognised;
Amendment 77 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph F a (new)
Paragraph F a (new)
Fa. Asks the Commission to support developing countries in pursuing stronger regional integration in order to diminish possible negative effects of TTIP and enable them to become thriving trade partners of the EU and US;
Amendment 81 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph F b (new)
Paragraph F b (new)
Fb. Calls on the Commission to increase the transparency and democratic nature of negotiations by enhancing dialogue with civil society and other stakeholders.
Amendment 12 #
2014/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to address human rights in a holistic and indivisible fashion by emphasising and strongly committing to economic, social and, cultural and environmental rights, since without these rights there can be no development; stresses the need to tackle the root causes of poverty; highlights the obligation to respect international labour standards, in line with the fulfilment of the ILO Decent Work Agenda, and calls for the setting-up of a universal social protection floor; takes the view that social issues should have a more central place in the EU’s external relations; urges the EU to incorporate a social clause reflecting ILO core labour standards in all its external trade agreements;
Amendment 20 #
2014/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recognises the importance of actively engaging the NGOs in planning, implementing and evaluating human rights provisions so as to have the widest possible involvement of civil society in policy-making and in ensuring the effectiveness of human rights provisions;
Amendment 35 #
2014/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Takes the view that the EU, including its delegations, should identify early warning signals, such as repression of minorities and human rights violations, that point to potential conflicts and humanitarian catastrophes; calls on the EU to design best practices for promoting and protecting human rights in post-disaster and post- conflict situations, paying special attention to disabled people and other vulnerable groups and with a focus on human rights mainstreaming in relief, recovery and reconstruction efforts, while respecting the humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence and the needs-based approach to humanitarian assistance;
Amendment 3 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to its report of 19 May 2015 on Financing for Development and especially its call for the alignment of the private sector with the SDGs,
Amendment 8 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 b (new)
Citation 18 b (new)
- having regard to the UNIDO's Lima Declaration: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development (ISID)1, __________________ 1 http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/Lima_De claration.pdf
Amendment 19 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the private sector is a very broad term encompassing a wide range of actors and needs to be specified;
Amendment 26 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas industrialisation (especially through the development of local Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and Small and Medium Industries (SMIs)) is a driver for well-being and development: 1% of increase in Manufacturing Value Added (MVA) per capita decreases the poverty head count by almost 2%;1 __________________ 1 http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_med ia/Services/PSD/WP4_2014_Industrializat ion_and_social_well-being.pdf
Amendment 42 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Amendment 80 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas manufacturing with around 470 million jobs worldwide in 2009 and around half a billion jobs worldwide in 20131 , provides high potential for employment and wealth generation as well as for decent and highly qualified work; __________________ 1 https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_me dia/Research_and_Statistics/UNIDO_IDR _2013_main_report.pdf
Amendment 89 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's initiative to endorse the private sector in becoming, alongside other governmental and non- governmental development organisations, a truen important partner in achieving inclusive and sustainable development, poverty reduction and empowerment of the local economies;
Amendment 92 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls the Commission to recognise the diversity of the private sector and the challenges that are faced in alleviating the poverty of the most marginalized and the hardest to reach;
Amendment 97 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes that development cooperation is the primary responsibility of the State; notes that reducing poverty or inequality is not the primary objective of the private sector and therefore private sector involvement in development objectives must be carefully designed with special emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR);
Amendment 117 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the vast potential of the EU's value added in partnering with the private sector, in close coordination with its Member States, and relevant International Organisations;
Amendment 128 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls the Commission to prioritise investment in domestic small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), as they offer the greatest potential to drive equitable development in countries;
Amendment 168 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Highlights that the defence of human rights, gender equality, social cohesion and the fight against inequalities should remain at the core of development activities; recalls the need to comply with agreed international standards such as the International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; calls for binding international rules for firms on compliance with human rights, labour law and environmental standards and urges the European Commission to take the lead by developing a clearly defined framework agreement governing all partnership agreements with private sector in line with the Corporate Social Responsibility principles and standards;
Amendment 172 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Calls for European development efforts to play a significant role in implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, including working with European enterprises and investors to ensure full compliance with the guiding principles and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprise in their business activities and in their supply chains in developing countries;
Amendment 173 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises that the private sector and especially local SMEs must be part of the policy dialogue, including industrial policies, alongside all other development partners; recognises that the private sector includes actors such as social enterprises and Fairtrade organisations which have social and environmental principles built in to their work; calls on the Commission to recognise these efforts in its work on the role of the private sector in development;
Amendment 179 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the European Commission to champion the proposal from investors and other stakeholders to support binding rules on social, environmental and human rights reporting by business, consistent with the EU directive on non- financial reporting, which are encompassed as one of the new proposed UN Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 183 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Calls for greater transparency in finance to help combat corruption and illicit financial flows, including through the development of fair and effective tax systems;
Amendment 199 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the vast potential forrisks associated with PPPs in agriculture, including land grabbing, which must be prevented; stresses the importance of focusing assistance on small-scale farmers, in particular women; calls on the Commission to couple any PPPs in the agriculture, undal sector involving EU money with comprehensive measures to protect small-holder farmers, pastoralists and other vulnerable land users a clearly defined legislative framework for property rights, to prevent land grabbing; gainst the potential loss of access to land or water; emphasises that safeguards should include social and environmental risk assessment, mandatory consultation with legitimate representatives of the affected communities, with their free, prior and informed consent as a condition for the launch of the respective project and legal support for these communities when they so need; asks the Commission to accompany projects with monitoring procedures and to negotiate revision of contracts in cases that turned out to be harmful to the local population; recommends to replace G8 New Alliance projects with initiatives under the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP); stresses that financial and social compensations have to be binding commitments and that alternative development plans should always be taken into consideration;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recommends that the EU continues to engage PPPs in renewable and green energy projects in developing countries in a sustainable manner; welcomes the fact that one of the priorities of the EIB's IFE is the investment in energy, widely recognised as a key element in unlocking economic growth in Africa;
Amendment 211 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Urges the EU to develop a robust regulatory framework, based on development effectiveness criteria, within which the private sector must operate, including for the promotion of long term contractual PPPs; urges the EU to only promote PPPs if other less expensive and risky financing options are not available, on the basis of a cost-effective analysis; calls on the EU to implement effective safeguard policies for PPP projects to ensure human rights, including women's rights; insists that PPPs should be excluded for the provision of essential public services, such as health and education;
Amendment 213 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Calls on the EU to work on strengthening capacity building of partner countries to assess when it is appropriate to engage in PPP projects and how to manage them in the public interest, including in planning, contract negotiation, management, accounting and minimising contingent liabilities;
Amendment 216 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses, that support for local SMEs/SMIs can be enhanced not only through financing instruments, but also through technology transfer, capacity building, sustainable supplier development and business linkages;
Amendment 254 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the Commission to give the highest primacy to the full compliance with development effectiveness principles like ownership, accountability and transparency, before expanding the scope of blending operations; insists that the Commission clearly demonstrates the financial and development additionality of EU grants for blended projects, as recommended by the Court of Auditors; calls on the Commission to democratise the governance structure of the EU Blending Platform and the regional blending facilities, by properly engaging with all relevant stakeholders at the local level, including partner governments, national parliaments, private sector actors, trade unions and local communities;
Amendment 255 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 262 #
2014/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 259 #
2014/2158(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Reiterates that in shaping competition policy the Commission must be fully accountable and must follow up Parliament’s resolutions;
Amendment 275 #
2014/2158(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on the Commission to continue reporting to Parliament, on an annual basis, on developments and effects in the application of competition policy;
Amendment 13 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and goldfor natural resources originating in conflict-affected and high- risk areas
Amendment 16 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Natural mineral resources in conflict- affected or high risk areas − although holding great potential for development – can be a cause of dispute where their revenues are fuelling the outbreak or continuation of violent conflict, undermining national endeavours towards development, good governance and the rule of law. In these areas, breaking the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation of mineralnatural resources is critical to peace and stability.
Amendment 18 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Disputes over oil, gas, minerals, timber and other natural resources rank second as a source of conflicts worldwide; competition over resources, such as land and water, is on the rise, and exacerbates existing conflicts or triggers new ones; the mismanagement of land and natural resources is compounded by environmental degradation, population growth and climate change.
Amendment 20 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 b (new)
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) Human rights abuses are common within the extractive industry and include child labour, sexual violence, disappearance of people, violation of the right to a clean environment, loss of land and livelihoods without negotiation and without adequate compensation, forced resettlement and the destruction of ritually or culturally significant sites.
Amendment 25 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Union has been actively engaged in an Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD) initiative to advance the responsible sourcing of minerals from conflict regions, which has resulted in a government-backed multi-stakeholder process leading to the adoption of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Due Diligence Guidance5 ) including supplements on tin, tantalum and tungsten, and on gold. In May 2011, the OECD Ministerial Council recommended to actively promote the observance of this Guidance. __________________ 5 OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.
Amendment 26 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
Amendment 28 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) On 26 February 2014, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on promoting development through responsible business practices, including the role of extractive industries in developing countries, in which the European Commission is requested to bring forward binding legislation on conflict minerals;
Amendment 29 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Union citizens and civil society actors have raised awareness with respect to companies operating under the Union’s jurisdiction for not being held accountable for their potential connection to the illicit extraction and trade of mineralnatural resources from conflict regions. The consequence is that such mineralnatural resources, potentially present in consumer products, link consumers to conflicts outside the Union. To this end, citizens have requested, notably through petitions, that legislation be proposed to the European Parliament and the Council holding companies accountable under the Guidelines as established by the UN and OECD.
Amendment 32 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In the context of this Regulation, and in line with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, supply chain due diligence is an on-going, proactive and reactive process through which business operators monitor and administer their purchases and sales with a view to ensuring that they respect human rights and do not contribute to conflict and adverse impacts thereof.
Amendment 34 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) This Regulation reflects the need for due diligence along the entire supply chain from the sourcing site to the final product, by requiring all companies who first place covered resources—including products that contain those resources—on the European market to conduct and publicly report on their supply chain due diligence. In line with the nature of due diligence, the individual due diligence obligations contained in this Regulation reflect the progressive and flexible nature of due diligence processes, and the need for obligations that are appropriately tailored to enterprises’ individual circumstances. Obligations are tailored to a company’s size, leverage, and position in its supply chain. Certain companies are recognised to have great influence over the due diligence that is conducted along the supply chain in the sourcing countries, due to their position in the supply chain. These actors, commonly referred to as choke points, are subject to more extensive obligations than other enterprises. Due diligence obligations duly reflect this difference. Downstream companies are required to make reasonable and good faith efforts to identify the relevant choke points in their supply chains, and do their best to assess the due diligence of these companies, for instance on the basis of the audited reports of said actors.
Amendment 35 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 b (new)
Recital 9 b (new)
(9b) In accordance with OECD Due Diligence Guidance, companies should take reasonable steps and make good faith efforts to conduct due diligence to identify and prevent or mitigate any risks of adverse impacts associated with the conditions of access to natural resources and the relationship of suppliers operating in conflict-affected or high-risk areas.
Amendment 36 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
Amendment 37 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Union companies have expressed their interest through the public consultation in the responsible sourcing of minerals and reported on current industry schemes designed to pursue their corporate social responsibility objectives, customer requests, or the security of their supplies. However, Union companies have also reported countless difficulties in the exercise of supply chain due diligence because of lengthy and complex global supply chains involving a high number of operators that are often insufficiently awaIn accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance it is recognized that due diligence in conflict-affected and high-risk areas presents practical challenges and that flexibility is there for ethically unconcerned. The cost of responsible sourcing and their potential impact on competitiveness notably on SMEs should be monitored by the Commissione needed in the application thereof. The nature and extent of due diligence that is appropriate for an enterprises’ individual circumstances depend on a number of factors, including its size and position in the supply chain, fully taking account of the challenges faced by SMEs.
Amendment 39 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Smelters and refiners are an importantrecognised choke points in global mineral supply chains as they are typically the last stage in which due diligence can effectively be assured by collecting, disclosing and verifying information on the mineral’s origin and chain of custody. After this stage of transformation it is often considered unfeasible to trace back the origins of minerals. A Union list of responsible smelters and refiners could therefore provide transparency and certainty to downstream companies as regards supply chain due diligence practicestheir respective supply chains with substantial influence over the due diligence that is conducted along the supply chain in the sourcing countries. A Union list of responsible choke-point actors could therefore provide transparency and certainty to companies in the downstream with a view to carrying out supply chain due diligence practices. Consistently with OECD Due Diligence Guidance, choke-point actors should undergo independent third-party audit of their supply chain due diligence practices, also with a view to being included in the list of responsible actors. Choke point actors based outside the Union should also have a possibility for being included in the list to ensure its global scope.
Amendment 44 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Member State competent authorities are responsible to ensure the uniform compliance ofwith the self- certification of responsible importers by carrying out appropriate ex-post checks so as to verify whether the self-certified responsible importers of the minerals and/or metals within the scope of the Regulation comply with the supply chain due diligence obligationobligation of operators to carry out due diligence by carrying out appropriate ex-post checks. Records of such checks should be kept for at least 5 years. Member States are responsible to lay down the rules applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation.
Amendment 46 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) With a view to enhancing the effective implementation of this Regulation, and addressing development needs directly linked to the exploitation of natural resources originating in conflict- affected and high-risk areas, accompanying measures should be implemented. The Commission and the European External Action Service should apply and further develop an integrated Union approach to responsible sourcing as initiated in the Joint Communication of 5 March 2014 to the European Parliament and the Council ‘Responsible sourcing of minerals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Towards an integrated EU approach’1a. In particular, the promotion of responsible sourcing of natural resources originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and the establishment of national and international due diligence frameworks for responsible sourcing should be integrated into internal and external policies and in particular into political and policy dialogues with partner countries, local authorities and private stakeholders. Particular attention should be given to addressing the contribution and challenges of the artisanal and informal mining sector for local livelihoods and sustainable development. _______________ 1a JOIN(2014) 8 final.
Amendment 47 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) In order to ensure the proper implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. The implementing powers relating to the list of responsible smelters and refiners and the list of Member State competent authorities should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/201111 . __________________ 11 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13)amend Annex I and Annex II to this Regulation, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, following the provisions laid down in this Regulation.
Amendment 50 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The Commission should report regularly to the Council and the European Parliament on the effects of the scheme. No later than three years after entering into force and every six years thereafter, the Commission should review the functioning and the effectiveness of this Regulation, including as regards the promotion of responsible sourcing of the minerals within its scope from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The reports may be accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate legislative proposals, which may include mandatory measures,.
Amendment 55 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation sets up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self- certification in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces12 to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold. It is designed to provide transparency and certainty as regards the supply practices of importers, smelters and refiners sourcing from conflict-affected and high- risk areas. __________________ 12‘Armed groups and security forces’ as defined in Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.designed to:
Amendment 57 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) increase certainty and transparency as regards the supply practices of companies sourcing from conflict-affected and high- risk areas,
Amendment 58 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
(b) curtail opportunities for the sourcing, transport and trade of natural resources to fund conflict and/or fuel human rights violations or abuses,
Amendment 59 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)
(c) help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their activities and sourcing decisions.
Amendment 60 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Amendment 65 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a
Article 2 – point a
Amendment 66 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) ‘OECD Due Diligence Guidance’ means the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013))1a including all Council Recommendations, Annexes and Supplements, as may be amended or replaced periodically; _________________ 1a OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.
Amendment 67 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a b (new)
Article 2 – point a b (new)
(ab) ‘covered resources’ means all natural resources as set out in Annex I, as may be amended periodically in accordance with this Regulation;
Amendment 68 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a c (new)
Article 2 – point a c (new)
Amendment 69 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a d (new)
Article 2 – point a d (new)
(ad) ‘recycled resources’ means reclaimed end-user or post-consumer products, or scrap processed resources created during product manufacturing, including excess, obsolete, defective, and scrap materials which contain refined or processed resources that are appropriate to recycle in the production of any material. Minerals partially processed, unprocessed or a bi-product from another ore are not recycled resources;
Amendment 70 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a e (new)
Article 2 – point a e (new)
(ae) ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person that places any covered product on the market for the first time;
Amendment 71 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a f (new)
Article 2 – point a f (new)
(af) ‘placing on the market’ means the supply by any means, irrespective of the selling technique used, of products for the first time on the internal market for distribution or use in the course of commercial activity whether in return for payment or free of charge, including the supply by means of distance communication as defined in Directive 97/7/EC1a. ‘Placing on the market’ also includes the supply on the internal market of products derived from covered products already placed on the internal market. ________________ 1a Directive97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts (OJ L 144, 4.6.1997, p. 19).
Amendment 72 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point b
Article 2 – point b
Amendment 74 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point c
Article 2 – point c
(c) ‘mineralresources supply chain’ means the system of activities, organisations, actors, technology, information, resources and services involved in moving and processing the mineralresources from the extractionsourcing site to their incorporation in the final product;
Amendment 75 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point c a (new)
Article 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) ‘supply chain due diligence’ refers to the obligations of operators in relation to their management systems, risk management, third-party audits and disclosure of information with a view to identifying, addressing and publicly reporting on actual and potential risks linked to conflict-affected and high-risk areas to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts associated with their sourcing activities;
Amendment 77 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point c b (new)
Article 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) ‘model supply chain policy’ means the model supply chain policy in Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance;
Amendment 78 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point d
Article 2 – point d
(d) ‘chain of custody or supply chain traceability system’ means a system to identify and record of the sequence of entities which have custody of minerals and metalresources as they move through athe supply chain;
Amendment 79 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point d a (new)
Article 2 – point d a (new)
(da) ‘risk management plan’ means an operator’s written responses to the supply chain risks identified under Article 5 in accordance with its supply chain policy;
Amendment 81 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point e
Article 2 – point e
(e) ‘conflict-affected and high-risk areas’ means areas in a state of armed conflict, fragile post-conflict as well as areas witnessing weak or non-existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses; dentified by the presence of armed conflict, widespread violence or other risks of harm to people and, for these purposes, it is recognized that: (i) armed conflict may take a variety of forms, such as a conflict of international or non-international character, which may involve two or more states, or may consist of wars of liberation, or insurgencies, civil wars; and (ii) high--risk areas may include areas of political instability or repression, institutional weakness, insecurity, collapse of civil infrastructure and widespread violence, both of which areas are often characterized by widespread human rights abuses and violations of national or international law;
Amendment 83 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point f
Article 2 – point f
Amendment 86 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point g
Article 2 – point g
Amendment 88 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point h
Article 2 – point h
Amendment 90 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point i
Article 2 – point i
Amendment 92 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j
Article 2 – point j
(j) ‘grievance mechanism’ means an early- warning risk awareness mechanism allowing any interested party or whistle- blower to voice concerns regarding the circumstances of mineral extractionresource sourcing, trade, handling and export in respect of resources originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas;
Amendment 93 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j a (new)
Article 2 – point j a (new)
(ja) ‘Annex II operator’ refers to any operator of the type identified in Annex II;
Amendment 94 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j b (new)
Article 2 – point j b (new)
(jb) ‘Annex II actor’ refers to any natural or legal person of the type identified in Annex II;
Amendment 95 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j c (new)
Article 2 – point j c (new)
(jc) ‘responsible Annex II actor’ refers to any Annex II actor that complies with this Regulation or the OECD Due Diligence Guidance and has submitted audited reports as set out in Article 6 to a Member State authority in accordance with Article 7 (3) or 7 (7);
Amendment 96 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j d (new)
Article 2 – point j d (new)
(jd) ‘business confidentiality and other competitiveness concerns’ means price information and supplier relationships without prejudice to subsequent evolving interpretation.
Amendment 97 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point k
Article 2 – point k
Amendment 98 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point l
Article 2 – point l
Amendment 99 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point n
Article 2 – point n
Amendment 104 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – title
Article 3 – title
Amendment 107 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Any importer of minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation may self-certify as responsible importer by declaring to a Member State competent authority that it adheres to the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in this Regulation. The declaration shall contain documentation in which the importer confirms its adherence to the obligIn accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, operators shall take all reasonable steps and make good faith efforts to conduct their due diligence obligations pursuant to Article 4 and 5. Each operator shall ensure that they make progressive, measurable and timely improvement in complying with its obligations. The nature and extent of specific due diligence that is appropriate depends on individual circumstances and is affected by factors such as an operator’s position in the supply chain, the size of the operator, the location of the operator’s activities, the situations including results of the independent third-party audits carried out a particular country, the sector and nature of the products or services involved.
Amendment 109 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Amendment 113 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – introductory part
Article 4 – introductory part
Amendment 117 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point b
Article 4 – point b
(b) incorporate in its supply chain policy the standards against which supply chain due diligence is to be conducted consistent with the standards set forth in the model supply chain policy in Annex II to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance,
Amendment 118 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point c
Article 4 – point c
(c) structure its internal management systems to support supply chain due diligence, inter alia, by assigning responsibility to senior staff to oversee the supply chain due diligence process as well as maintain records for a minimum of 5 years,
Amendment 119 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point c a (new)
Article 4 – point c a (new)
(ca) establish a system of controls and transparency over the resources supply chain, including the identification of Annex II actors in the supply chain, which may be implemented through participation in industry-driven programmes,
Amendment 120 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point d
Article 4 – point d
(d) strengthen its engagement with suppliers, inter alia, by incorporating its supply chain policy into contracts and agreements with suppliers consistent with Annex II to the OECD Due Diligence Guidancethe model supply chain policy,
Amendment 121 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point e
Article 4 – point e
(e) establish a company-level, or industry- wide, grievance mechanism as an early- warning risk- awareness system or provide such mechanism through collaborative arrangements with other companies or organisations, or by facilitating recourse to an external expert or body (e.g. ombudsman),
Amendment 122 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point f
Article 4 – point f
Amendment 123 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point g
Article 4 – point g
Amendment 127 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In addition to the obligations set out in paragraph 1, Annex II type operators, shall operate a chain of custody or supply chain traceability system that provides, supported by documentation, the following information: (i) description of the resource including its trade name and type, (ii) name and address of the supplier to the Annex II actors, (iii) country of origin of the resource, (iv) quantities and dates of extraction, expressed in volume or weight, (v) when resources originate from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, additional information, such as extraction site; locations where resources are consolidated, traded and processed; and taxes, fees, royalties paid, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
Amendment 128 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Where an operator can reasonably conclude that covered products are derived only from recycled resources, it shall: (a) publicly disclose their determination; and (b) describe in reasonable detail the due diligence measures they exercised in making that determination.
Amendment 129 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The responsible importer of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation shallEach operator shall, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, identify and assess the risks in its resources supply chain in accordance with Article 4, and:
Amendment 130 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 132 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) reporting findings of the supply chain risk assessment to its designated senior management of the operator,
Amendment 133 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – introductory part
(ii) devising and adopting a risk management measures consistent with Annex II and the due diligence recommendations of the OECD Due Diligence Guidanceplan, considering its ability to influence, and where necessary take steps to put pressurbuild leverage on suppliers who can most effectively prevent or mitigate the identified risk, by making it possible either to:
Amendment 134 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 135 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. If a responsible importen Annex II operator pursues risk mitigation efforts while continuing trade or temporarily suspending trade, it shall, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, consult with suppliers and affected stakeholders, including local and central government authorities, international or civil society organisations and affected third parties, and agree on a strategy for measurable risk mitigation in the risk management plan.
Amendment 136 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. A responsible importeEach Annex II operator shall, in order to design conflict and high-risk sensitive strategies for mitigation in the risk management plan, relydraw on the measures and indicators under Annex III of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance and measure progressive improvement in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
Amendment 137 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. If an operator other than an Annex II operator pursues risk mitigation efforts while continuing trade or temporarily suspending trade it shall, as appropriate and in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, consult suppliers and affected stakeholders, including local and central government authorities, international or civil society organisations and affected third parties, and agree on a strategy for measurable risk mitigation in the risk management plan.
Amendment 138 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Amendment 139 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Amendment 140 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) include in the audit scope all of the responsible importeoperator’s activities, processes and systems used to implement supply chain due diligence regarding minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation, including the responsible importecovered resources, including the operator’s management system, risk management, and disclosure of information,
Amendment 141 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) determine as the objective of the audit the conformity of the responsible importeoperator’s supply chain due diligence practices with Articles 4, 5 and 7 of this Regulation,
Amendment 142 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) respect the audit principles of independence, competence and accountability and any applicable audit scope, criteria and activities, as set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
Amendment 143 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
All operators may cooperate through their industry organizations to ensure that the independent third-party audit is carried out in accordance with the second paragraph.
Amendment 144 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By 31 March of each year at the latest, the responsible importer of minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation all operators shall submit to the Member State competent authority the following documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period:
Amendment 145 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 146 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. By 31 March of each year at the latest, the responsible importer of minerals wioperators other thian the scope of this RegulationAnnex II operators shall also submit to the Member State competent authority the documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period as regards the proportion of minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas relative to the total amount of minerals purchased, as confirmed by independent third-party audits in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.management reports containing the following documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period:
Amendment 147 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
(a) the operator’s supply chain due diligence policy, including the operator’s management structure responsible for its due diligence and the person directly responsible,
Amendment 148 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)
(b) the operator’s system of control and transparency over the resources supply chain, including the steps taken to identify upstream actors in the supply chain and to assess their due diligence practices,
Amendment 149 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)
(c) name and address of each of the Annex II actors in its supply chain, as identified by the operator in accordance with Article 4 and 5,
Amendment 150 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)
(d) independent third-party audits regarding each of the Annex II actors in its supply chain carried out in accordance with the scope, objective and principles set out in Article 6 of the Regulation, as identified by the operator in accordance with Article 4 and 5,
Amendment 151 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)
(e) potential or actual risks identified by the operator and action taken by the operator to manage risks during the reporting period in accordance with Article 5,
Amendment 152 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)
(f) action taken by the operator to strengthen its due diligence efforts during the reporting period.
Amendment 153 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. By 31 March of each year at the latest, the responsible importer of metals within the scope of this RegulationAnnex II type operators shall also submit to the Member State competent authority the following documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period:
Amendment 154 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 156 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) independent third-party audits regarding each of the responsible smelters or refiners in its supply chain carried out in accordance with the scope, objective and principles set out incarried out in accordance with Article 6 of theis Regulation,; and
Amendment 158 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) information on the proportion of mineralcovered resources originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas relative to the total amount of minerals purchased by each of those smelters or refinerscovered resources purchased, as confirmed by the independent third-party audits in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.
Amendment 159 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The responsible importer of minerals or metals within the scope of this RegulationOperators shall make available to itstheir immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to its supply chain due diligence with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns, in accordance with the OECD Guidance.
Amendment 160 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The responsible importer of minerals or metalsOperators shall publicly disclose in accordance within the scope of this Regulation shall publicly reportOECD Due Diligence Guidance and as widely as possible, including on the internet and on an annual basis on its supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing. The report shall contain the steps taken by the responsible importeoperator to implement the obligations as regards its management system, risk management set out in Article 4 and 5 respectively, as well as a summary report of the third-party audits, including the name of the auditorny independent third-party audits of responsible Annex II actors in the operators’ supply chain, with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns.
Amendment 161 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Responsible Annex II actors outside the territory of the Union may, for the purpose of being included in a Member State competent authority’s reports under Article 15(1) and the list referred to in Article 8, submit to that authority: (a) documentation in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 3 above, and (b) a written declaration of conformity with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, also containing its name, address, full contact details and a description of its commercial activities.
Amendment 162 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – title
Article 8 – title
List of responsible smelters and refineAnnex II actors
Amendment 164 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. On the basis of the information provided by the Member States in their reports as referred to in Article 15, the Commission shall adopt and make publicly available a decision listing the names and addresses of responsible smelters and refiners of minerals within the scope of this RegulationAnnex II actors.
Amendment 167 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall identify on the list referred to in paragraph 1 those responsible smelters and refineAnnex II actors that source – at least partially – from conflict- affected and high-risk areas.
Amendment 169 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall adopt the list in accordance with the template in Annex II and the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 13(2)I. The OECD Secretariat shall be consulted.
Amendment 170 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall update the information included in the list in a timely manner but not less than every six months. The Commission shall remove from the list the names of the smelters and refineAnnex II actors that are no longer recognised as responsible importeAnnex II actors by Member States in accordance with Article 14(3), or the names of the smelters and refiners in the supply chain of the no longer recognised responsible importers.
Amendment 176 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall make a decision to publish, including on the internet, a list of competent authorities in accordance with the template in Annex III and the regulatory procedure referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 13V. The Commission shall update the list regularly.
Amendment 178 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
Article 10 – title
Ex-post checks on responsible importeoperators
Amendment 179 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities of the Member States shall carry out appropriate ex-post checks in order to ensure whether self-certified responsible importers of minerals and metalthat operators within scope of this Regulation comply with the obligations set out in Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Amendment 180 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The checks referred to in paragraph 1 shall be conducted by taking a risk-based approach. In addition, checks may be conducted when a competent authority is in possession of relevant information, including on the basis of substantiated concerns provided by third parties, concerning the compliance by a responsible importen operator with this Regulation.
Amendment 181 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) examination of the responsible importeoperator’s implementation of supply chain due diligence obligations including the management system, risk management, independent third-party audit and disclosure,
Amendment 182 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) examination of the reporting requirements in accordance with the scope, objective and principles set out in Article 7,
Amendment 183 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Responsible importeOperators shall offer all assistance necessary to facilitate the performance of the checks referred to in paragraph 1, notably as regards access to premises and the presentation of documentation and records.
Amendment 184 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The competent authorities of the Member States shall publish a report detailing the full findings of any ex-post checks, together with a reasonable explanation for making those findings and any documentation on which the competent authority based its findings.
Amendment 185 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Article 11 – title
Records of checks on responsible importeoperators
Amendment 187 #
Amendment 188 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
Amendment 189 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. WThere reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time-limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so request power to adopt delegated acts referred to in the relevant Articles shall be conferred to the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the date that this Regulation enters into force.
Amendment 190 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Amendment 191 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The delegation of powers referred to in the relevant Articles may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 192 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 193 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 c (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. A delegated act adopted pursuant to the relevant Articles shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by either the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
Amendment 194 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a Amending Annex I and Annex II 1. The Commission shall regularly review developments with regard to the contribution of global trade in natural resources to conflict and human rights abuses and violations in conflict-affected and high-risk areas, the development of international responsible sourcing standards and the experience gained in the implementation of this Regulation. In the course of the review, the Commission shall take into account, in particular, the information obtained by the Commission under and for the purposes of Article 15 and information provided by international or civil society organisations and affected third parties. 2. The Commission shall regularly review the scope of Annex I and II, in the light of the information obtained pursuant to paragraph 1 so as to achieve effectively the purpose of this Regulation, as stated in Article 1. Annex I shall be reviewed with a view to expanding the list of covered resources. Annex II shall be reviewed with a view to identifying additional choke points of transformation and traceability in covered resources supply chains with a view to strengthening supply chain due diligence with regard to all Annex I resources. Such a review shall take place not less than every 6 months. 3. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in order to expand the list of covered resources as stated in paragraph 2. 4. Delegated acts adopted under this Article shall enter into force without delay and shall apply as long as no objection is expressed in accordance with paragraph 5. The notification of a delegated act adopted under this Article to the European Parliament and to the Council shall state the reasons for the use of the urgency procedure. 5. Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act in accordance with the procedure referred to in this Article. In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act without delay following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or the Council.
Amendment 197 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. In case of an infringement of the provisions of this Regulation, the competent authorities of Member States shall issue a notice of remedial action to be taken by the responsible importeoperator.
Amendment 199 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. In case of inadequate remedial action by the responsible importeoperator, the competent authority shall issue to the importeoperator a notice of non-recognition of its responsible importer certificate as regards the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation compliance and inform the Commission.
Amendment 203 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall submit to the Commission by 30 June of each year at the latest, a report on the implementation of this Regulation during the previous calendar year, including any information on responsible importersAnnex II actors, as set out in Article 7(1) (a), 7.2 and 7.3 (a) and (c(3) (a)-(b) and 7(7) (a).
Amendment 206 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation and every six years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation, including on the promotion and cost of responsible sourcing of the mineralresources within its scope from conflict- affected and high-risk areas. The Commission shall submit a review report to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 209 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15 a Accompanying measures 1. In order to effectively break the link between the exploitation of natural resources and conflict and to ensure their responsible sourcing, the Commission and the External Action Service shall implement accompanying measures to this Regulation aimed at the enhancement of responsible sourcing, the effective establishment of national and international due diligence frameworks and related support systems, including reliable certification and traceability systems, and the addressing of development needs linked to (a) the exploitation and trade in natural resources originating from conflict- affected and high-risk areas and (b) the implementation of this Regulation, including: (i) support to companies to responsibly source from conflict-affected and high risk areas providing technical and other assistance and guidance to operators, taking into account the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises and their position in the supply chain, in order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of this Regulation. (ii) targeted, rights-based development cooperation, particularly addressing the challenges of implementing responsible sourcing in the local context of conflict- affected and high risk areas, including poverty reduction, good governance and the security sector; (iii) meaningful policy dialogues on responsible sourcing with third countries and other stakeholders; (iv) close cooperation with the Member States, in particular complementary initiatives in the area of consumer, investor and customer information and when providing technical and other assistance in accordance with point (i). 2. The European Commission and the European External Action Service shall, as appropriate, implement the objectives of accompanying measures through political and policy dialogues, programming, and relevant internal and external policies. Where appropriate, legislative proposals should be presented to the European Parliament and the Council. 3. The European Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council an annual report of the accompanying measures implemented pursuant to this Article and their impact and effectiveness.
Amendment 212 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I -- title
Annex I -- title
List of minerals and metalresources within the scope of the Regulation classified under the Combined Nomenclature
Amendment 213 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I -- table
Annex I -- table
Amendment 214 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex Ia (new)
Annex Ia (new)
Annex Ia List of choke points identified in the supply chains of covered resources -‘smelters’ -‘refiners’
Amendment 215 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II -- title
Annex II -- title
List of responsible smelters and refiners’ template referred to in Article 8Annex Ia actors
Amendment 216 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II
Annex II
Column A: Name of smelters or refinersAnnex Ia actor in alphabetical order Column B: Address of the smelter or refineAnnex Ia actor Column C: Annex Ia category of the actor Column CD: (*) indicator, if the smelter or refiner sources mineralAnnex Ia actor engages in responsible sourcing of resources originating from conflict- affected and high -risk areas
Amendment 217 #
Amendment 702 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – title
Article 21 – title
Amendment 705 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. At the request of a Member State, tThe Commission may grant a derogan exemption from the requirements of this Chapter to a credit institution taking deposits from individuals and SMEs that are, which in case of a group can be in relation to the group as a whole or specifically to a group entity located in one or more Member States, that is subject to national primary legislation adopted bein force at the date of entry into force 29 January 2014of this Regulation when the national legislation complies with the following requirements:
Amendment 719 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 724 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Once the Commission has all the information it considers necessary for appraisal of the request for derogaexemption, it shall within one month notify the requesting Member State or credit institution, as the case may be, that it is satisfied with the information.
Amendment 728 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Within five months of issuing the notification referred to in the second subparagraph, the Commission shall, after having consulted the EBA on the reasons underlying its envisaged decision and on the potential impact of such a decision on the financial stability of the Union and the functioning of the internal market, adopt an implementing decision declaring the national legislation not incompatible with this Chapter and granting the derogaexemption to the credit institutions specified in the request referred to in the first subparagraph 1. Where the Commission intends to declare the applicable national legislation incompatible and to not grant the derogaexemption it shall set out its objections in detail and provide the requesting credit institution and the Member State concerned with the opportunity to submit written comments within one month from the date of notification of the Commission objections. The Commission shall within three months from the end of the time limit for submission adopt an implementing decision granting or rejecting the derogationexemption, which it shall notify to the requesting credit institution and to the Member State whose national legislation is concerned.
Amendment 730 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Where, and as long as, national legislation not declared incompatible with this Chapter applies to a credit institution that has been granted an exemption from the requirements of this Chapter, the national supervisory authority of the Member State in question shall in relation to the entity subject to the exemption continue to exercise its powers as defined in the national legislation not declared incompatible, as in force at the time of the entry into force of this Regulation. In case of an exemption granted to a group entity, the exercise of these powers shall be without prejudice to the powers of the competent authority under this Regulation as regards the EU parent and the other group entities of the same group which were not granted an exemption.
Amendment 733 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Where the national legislation is amended, the Member State shall notify the amwhich the Commission has declared not incompatible is amended or no longer applies, the credit institution and the Member State concerned shall independments toly from each other notify the Commission. The Commission may, whether on the basis of such notification or on its own motion, review the implementing decision referred to in the third subparagraph. Where national legislation not declared incompatible with this Chapter no longer applies as in force at the date of entry into force of this Regulation to a credit institution that has been granted an exemption from the requirements of this Chapter, that exemption shall be withdrawn with regard to that credit institution.
Amendment 737 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Amendment 741 #
2014/0020(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
The Commission shall notify its decisions to the EBA. The EBA shall publish a list of the credit institutions that have been granted a derogan exemption in accordance with this Article. The list shall be continuously kept up-to-date.